Men's RightsTIME Magazine: It’s Time to End ‘Rape Culture’ Hysteria (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by 16 TRP VanguardTRPsubmitter


On college campuses, obsession with eliminating “rape culture” has led to censorship and hysteria. At Boston University, student activists launched a petition demanding the cancellation of a Robin Thicke concert, because the lyrics of his hit song “Blurred Lines” allegedly celebrate “systemic patriarchy and sexual oppression.” (The lyrics may not exactly be pleasant to many women, but song lyrics don’t turn men into rapists. Yet, ludicrously, the song has already been banned at more than 20 British universities.) Activists at Wellesley recently demanded that administrators remove a statue of a sleepwalking man: The image of a nearly naked male could “trigger” memories of sexual assault for victims. Meanwhile, a growing number of young men find themselves charged with rape, named publicly, and brought before campus judicial panels informed by rape culture theory. In such courts, due process is practically non-existent: Guilty because accused.

[–]likelybaked 298 points299 points  (72 children)

Back when I was a sophomore in college, I invited one of my plates who happened to be a cheerleader to one of my fraternity parties. She was a small chick obviously and couldn't handle a lot of alcohol. I remember having a good time and we were pretty drunk. We beer bonged a couple cups of gin bucket and pj at some point and I guess it put her over the edge.

Next thing I know she's "feeling sick" and threw up. I got a pledge to take her to a mutual friend's place to pass out and stayed at the party. She got his bed all muddy and maybe peed/puked in it, while he slept on the couch after the party.

Got a nasty text the next day and she was telling EVERYBODY that we roofied her. Yeah... we roofied you and took you to a safe place to sleep while you sobered up. You got me.

Basically the point of this story is that girls use the rape/roofie terms as cop outs when they embarrass themselves and don't want to own up to their decisions.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 96 points97 points  (11 children)

Saw this happen a million times in college. I always loved how they assumed that every was trying rape them . . . yet they were the ones choosing to get black-out drunk over and over and over again, 4 nights a week.

[–]RedPillScare 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Attention is a helluva drug.

-- Rick James

[–]Kharn0 16 points17 points  (9 children)

I feel the same way about women that are paranoid about being attacked(like middle of the night walk me 200 ft to my car paranoid) but don't so much as take kickboxing to help them defend themselves. Lack of agency(I think thats the right term)

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 34 points35 points  (2 children)

It's not entirely their fault. They've been propagandized since birth to think that there is a murderer or rapist lurking behind every bush.

[–]10J18R1A 16 points17 points  (1 child)

*behind every penis

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every time you point I see a penis!

[–]vaker 10 points11 points  (5 children)

Some shitty kickboxing class taken with a halfhearted attitude will only provide a false sense of security. I'd rather them be careful than think they can actually defend themselves against a determined attacker.

[–]Kharn0 -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

If they do it half-hearted and dont go to a better class, then they arent really taking responsibility, now are they?

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

and yet i offer discounted concealed carry NRA approved classes to women, advertised in every school building. i have had 2 takers, one was a tranny, and one ended up dating me. i think they'd rather get raped and wield the Rapehammer than actually avoid idiotic situations by being smart and careful. the Rapehammer is as powerful...or moreso....than the race card, on college campuses. It reverses the responsibility of sexually parasitic women with no questions asked. Must be nice!

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

heh, more proof that women would rather destroy than protect themselves. That victim blanket must be so incredibly confortable!! Whore yourself out and THEN find out the guy is poor or unpopular after a weekend of fucking? RAPE. Fuck his brains out and then your friends don't like his shoes? RAPE. After all, one tiny drink and your accountability goes out the window.

This is why I murder women after the first night. It's safer.

[–]Fundumpsters 205 points206 points  (16 children)

Sure would be nice if I could get black out drunk ( my choice ) and have sex with a lady ( my choice ) and then wake up and decide she's ugly ( my choice ) and then charge her with rape. ( my choice )

That power would be very tempting.

[–]LeonTrotskyTrout 96 points97 points  (15 children)

At my school we had to attend this seminar thing for new fraternity members, and part of it was on sexual assault. According to the instructors, it's "impossible to give consent with any amount of alcohol in your system." But what about if both parties are drunk? "The guy is guilty of sexual assault. That's the law." Fucking bullshit.

[–]Fundumpsters 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I know man.. it's ridiculous.. and even if the guy charged is found innocent.. he will never live a normal life unless he moves far away.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 55 points56 points  (6 children)

Men and women are exactly equal. There's nothing a man can do that a woman can't do just as well.

Unless we're talking about being under the influence, in which case men have full agency and women have none.

[–]Indianbro 14 points15 points  (2 children)

I mean, isn't that what women's rights is all about? lol, they're so caught up in wanting to have equal rights yet they are exempt from "being under the influence" just because they're girls? Fuck that

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Feminists only fight for Team Woman. Adding more responsibilities to women is not in the cards

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All the benefits with none of the responsibility and drawbacks of being male.

[–]chtrchtr_pussyeater 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Well, and you don't (almost) see a lot of female fire fighters. Because let's be honest, nature made women less physically strong. That's just how it is. There is just some things women and men can and can't do and we don't have to call it sexist, unless you're feminist of course.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say that is a factor but more than anything, if media is reporting fairly which seems likely in this case, its the frat like community within fire houses. There were numerous articles written in recent years regarding hazing and the like within fire houses and women being particularly targeted.

[–]psycho-logical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The laws exist because men are more likely to be predatory when pursuing sexual endeavors.

Basically the immorality of a few men put a ton of men at risk to the predation of women.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 34 points35 points  (2 children)

By that logic all contracts are invalid if anyone has consumed any alcohol. Therefore all business dinner agreements are invalid.

[–]JustThrewUp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you ate something they mouth raped you.

[–]MrStinky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very good point

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

According to the instructors, it's "impossible to give consent with any amount of alcohol in your system."

That's simply untrue as a matter of law and custom.

Thank God I graduated before this nonsense started.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The law basically is enforced in a way that says it's impossible for a woman to give sexual consent with any amount of alcohol in her.

All laws that apply to guys, apply to guys when drunk.

Now, if a woman got drunk and drove and killed someone, she would be accountable.

If she punched a police officer, she would go to jail.

If she lost her phone and wallet, she would have to deal with the consequences.

But if she decided to have sex with someone, it wasn't her fault. Someone took advantage of her.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The law basically is enforced in a way that says it's impossible for a woman to give sexual consent with any amount of alcohol in her.

Not true. The situation isn't nearly that grim. The standard is "too drunk to consent", not "any amount of alcohol", and prosecutors don't bring prosecutions they don't think will be successful. If both parties are drunk and it comes down to a he said-she said situation most times you won't see charges.

However, in terms of campus discipline the situation is very different. You don't have any of the normal protections you'd have in a real court, so if you sleep with a woman under any circumstances you just have to accept the fact that she can get you kicked out of school.

[–]boydeer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

at least they're giving you an accurate picture of the law. how else are you going to know?

[–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 62 points63 points  (4 children)

Women are ignorant regarding the effects of alcohol. They have no fucking clue when they're sick as dogs the next day, foggy as hell, and have intense symptoms of dehydration, that this is the alcohol, and just the alcohol, because that's what getting drunk and hungover fucking does to you.

Instead, they insist that they must have been drugged by whatever guys they were with.

[–]rj88631 30 points31 points  (3 children)

Wasn't there some study posted here a while ago showing like only 8% percent of people claiming were drugged actually were drugged?

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I would believe that number.

[–]OBJHamSandwich 6 points7 points  (1 child)

If you remember any details of it, I'd appreciate it if you could dig them up and link is to that study.

[–]brave_sir_fapsalot 18 points19 points  (0 children)


The whole article is interesting and relatively neutral/fact-based. Here's a relevant excerpt, although note that it just looks at alleged rape victims' toxicology reports, not whether the victims claimed to be drugged or not:

ElSohly & Salamone (1999) report that the substances found most frequently in urine samples of 1179 cases collected from alleged victims in 49 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia over a 26 month period were alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, benzodiazepines, amphetamine and GHB. Thirty-nine percent of the samples tested negative for all substances. Alcohol was found to be present in almost 40 percent of the samples; whereas benzodiazepines (including Rohypnol) and GHB -- the most frequently suspected "date-rape" drugs were each found in slightly less than four percent of the samples.

Some other facts: Rohypnol was brought to the US in the early 90s. It was made illegal to make or sell in 1996. As of the article's date (2004), "more than 2500 cases" of sexual assault cases "believed to involve the use of Rohypnol" have been reported to law enforcement country-wide. 2,500 doesn't seem like that much to me. By comparison, the average number of rapes (not sexual assault) reported annually in the US is 89,000. Source: http://www.statisticbrain.com/rape-statistics/

Reasonable conclusion: relatively, "date-rape drugs" are almost never used in the commission of a rape.

[–][deleted] 65 points65 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tulkes 28 points29 points  (3 children)

Because people like that have no concept of practicality when evaluating themselves in fields where women are inferior to their male counterparts. It's like demanding equal pay in certain labor fields where they can only produce half as much product.

Yet in porn where they get paid five times as much as the guy because women are the more valuable worker, they interestingly never complain about pay-gaps, only commenting on the "abuse of women" as that veteran pornstar makes a few thousand by grinningly gobbling 9 cocks attached to guys getting pennies for their first and only porn appearance. They push for "equality" when it benefits themselves only, and often there is a huge lack of grounding for any sense of equality, like in your example where a stick of a girl claimed to be able to drink with a jacked lineman-type male.

If they were talking gymnastics flips, she'd obviously be able to win, because women are fucking smaller and more flexible than their counterparts. And she'd rub it in, and be smug the whole time that she'd win because she's a girl. Sense of realism but entitlement where it helps, total lack of objective evaluation where it hurts them.

[–]dropit_reborn 5 points6 points  (2 children)

[–]CantankerousMind 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting article.

[–]Tulkes 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That article sums it up exactly: there is always a net loss of honor when participating in any competition with the slightest sense of legitimacy. Either the male is shamed for brutally destroying the obviously fragile female and lose any sense of honor at the lost chivarlry, he must bow out and be considered to not take women seriously as an "ignorant misogynist", or he will lose and be shunned for lacking manhood and prowess.

[–]boydeer 36 points37 points  (0 children)


[–]bigyellowtwinki 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Someone should educate her on alcohol poisoning...

She probably literally damaged her brain from all the dehydration. That's probably why women who binge drink are so stupid, they've done damage over time from blacking out so much.

Oh, and she could have died also, and I imagine that you and your friend would have been hit very hard by the law in that case. It isn't smart to just leave someone like that with her friend (another woman) who might freak out and make matters worse.

[–]foooow 16 points17 points  (2 children)

I don't know what it is about women that makes them think they can compete physically with men when there is a 3x1 size difference.

It's because that 3:1 size difference also applies to the brain

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not completly, a larger brain is required for moving more muscles. Take a look at elephants for example, giant brain, still not smarter than a human.

I would argue there's just completly different value systems in male/female brains.

[–]foooow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your elephant example is nice but I'd like you to apply it everywhere else.

pidgeons smarter than dogs? dogs smarter than dolphins? ants smarter than whales?

You are correct that a bigger brain does not necessarily mean that they will be smarter, but you can't tell me it doesn't help.

[–][deleted] 32 points32 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]grelknar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's "gin bucket"?

[–]captshady 48 points49 points  (3 children)

I've witnessed that roofie incident too many times to count. No rape, just roofied them, because the perpetrator likes watching women make fools of themselves before they piss/shit themselves.

[–]torchbearer101 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Why do I keep hearing stories of chicks shitting themselves? Who the hell shits themselves blackout?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Very first time I got very drunk when I was 16, shit myself in the hottub, kissed everyone at the party on the lips without consent( I claim to be straight), revealed a bunch of secrets, and barely remember the night other than a few blips. Never have gotten, or want to, get that drunk since.

But this is the type of drunk you get when you try to out-drink someone 3x your size.

[–]torchbearer101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol fair enough.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

As a bouncer in several bars. Including gay bars. I have seen girls claim the roofie card like once a month.

In a gay bar. Think about that.

[–]iamnotfromtexas90 14 points15 points  (0 children)

"I shit myself, must be the patriarchy!" I love it and can see it now all over Tumblr.

[–]absntmindedprofessor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This comment has been removed, as the user has moved on to greener pastures (baaaahh!), where they take free speech a little more seriously.

[–]Link_GR 5 points6 points  (3 children)

I read somewhere that 9/10 "roofie" reports are bogus and it's just alcohol. I gotta look that up. Pretty sure it was a TIL some time back.

[–]chillmonkey88 11 points12 points  (2 children)

It's 19/20...

Edit: my bad 24/25 odds.

[–]Sixaintnine 3 points4 points  (1 child)

If you find a source with numbers please post it. Meanwhile I found some daily mail articles on this. This one even claims that out of 75 tested none were roofied, 65% of women had 160mg of alcohol in their blood - twice the 80mg drink/drive limit - and a quarter were three times over the limit. The women also denied taking any drugs like cocaine and amphetamine but one fifth tested positive.

Also, does anyone here have any idea of GHB's or Rohypnol's stay time in the system? Because I feel like that might influence the statistics.

[–]chillmonkey88 1 point2 points  (0 children)


"Anywhere from .2% to 9% of reported date rape cases" the number I gave above us average of confirmed date rapes that were mixed with alcohol was 4%... 24/25 being falsified.

[–]Endorsed ContributorHarleyWalker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

girls use the rape/roofie terms as cop outs when they embarrass themselves and don't want to own up to their decisions.

Tell me about it. First year of uni during orientation week a girl from the same floor as me shits in another girls room (srs). She pulled her pants down, sat on the chair in the other girls room and took a shit. She claimed she was drugged but everyone (even all the other girls) were sure she just drank too much.

[–]pericardiyum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In my experience women aren't raised to hold value to equal responsibility and consequences, only "equal rights". If that's rape culture then this is irresponsibility culture.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 49 points50 points  (8 children)

Our glorious corporate overlords have decided that Rape Culture is no longer a suitable distraction from wage slavery, as it may negatively influence productivity.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 11 points12 points  (3 children)

Took them long enough. Is there some hotline we can call to expedite correction of these inefficiencies?

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 12 points13 points  (2 children)

The great ones have all ready chosen, the action of the sub-people is not necessary.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 5 points6 points  (1 child)

As it should be.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Never forget that Time is a mouthpiece for the corporate media and every article of substance serves an objective.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly! It isn't good for the prime directive.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 0 points1 point  (1 child)

As less and less men graduate from college (you know,the ones that do their job instead of playing lawsuit lottery or leaving the workforce after five years), the demotion of this feminist paradise was inevitable.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lawsuit lottery is not as viable as it was before because judgments are now capped via tort reform

[–][deleted] 122 points122 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]trpRX 118 points119 points  (11 children)

Its because the sons of single moms/feminists are getting charged...

don't think for a minute it has anything to do with what's right for men.

[–][deleted] 74 points75 points  (9 children)

Yeah, it's not so fun when the feminazis are coming after YOUR baby boy.

[–]trpRX 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Someone else posted in here saying that woman would rather have been "raped" then have had "regrettable sex".

I am sure the beta's that these woman have spawned are in the "regrettable sex" category, hence the backlash...

[–]Indredd13 86 points87 points  (7 children)

I've worked at college campuses for about 8 years. I get a LOT of crap because I speak out about this kind of stuff. Two anecdotes.

1.) I have debated a long time with liberal women about "regrettable sex" vs "rape". Its surprising how many would rather be declared a rape victim instead of having regrettable sex. (this stems from the fact that women after the fact can say they did not want the sex but were unable to say no verbally... since they did not say "yes" it can be deemed as rape)

2.) A women's student group brought this woman on campus to talk about this documentary of a women escaping an abusive relationship. I wanted to go but could not. A good buddy of mine went and told me about it. This woman escaping the relationship ends with her lighting her husband on fire while he slept. He died 3 days later from the burns. She was giving an award for bravery by the UK. This student group got a TON of women to rally against violence against women.... by lighting people on fire!

[–]grelknar 48 points49 points  (5 children)

Re #1 I've started seeing "yes doesn't always mean yes" around lately, whatever that means.

[–]12FAM0US 51 points52 points  (1 child)

it means "yes, but i reserve the right to change my mind if you dont stay with me and be my bitch"

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At the same time it also means "yes, but I reserve the right to change my mind if you do try to stay with me and are a little bitch."

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Hilarious because when we say "no, doesn't always mean no" (token resistance) they call us rapists. Oh irony, you are beautiful.

[–]wtfdizzy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The only validity that "yes doesn't always mean yes" is under terms of blackmail. If someone somehow blackmails another person into engaging in a sexual act, that is considered a form of sexual assault.

However, such an act is already illegal.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Imagine a society in which men were cheered for setting their wives on fire to get out of marriages. That would be a "patriarchy". I'm not saying that we live in a matriarchal society, but that's certainly what feminists are pushing for.

[–]untitled1 82 points83 points  (6 children)

Related: Feminist mother and lawyer decides that Title IX and Violence Against Women Act is a bad idea after her own son is the one who gets accused.


[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (3 children)

I'm actually excited to see the feminist fallout over the next 30 years as all of these young tumblr feminists hit the wall and have their sons' lives destroyed by their ideology.

[–]vaker 7 points8 points  (2 children)

You assume they'll have children. Considering males' plummeting willingness to get suckered into that, I'm not so sure.

[–]conscienceking 5 points5 points [recovered]

A fair point, but there are surely enough beta orbiters willing to provide their saved assets and sperm to post wall women

[–]vaker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My point is that there are less and less of those. See the growing popularity of MGTOW and TRP - both of which are against wasting assets on undeserving females. Marriage rates are falling. There's already loud whining about 'where are the good men'? By the time today's generation of tumblerinas hits the wall there will be even fewer. See The Misandry Bubble on the sidebar.

[–]IMissOsama 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It sounded like she was starting to understand some of TRP thoughts, but that last paragraph killed it. :(

[–]Idrinkjdbythegallon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Title 9 is a joke. A couple of my boys irrevocably fucked up their knees so some girl could get a free ride playing water polo

[–]Sinborn 20 points21 points  (8 children)

" Activists at Wellesley recently demanded that administrators remove a statue of a sleepwalking man: The image of a nearly naked male could “trigger” memories of sexual assault for victims."

yeah let's go smash the statue of David because he's naked

[–]1701ncc 11 points12 points  (4 children)

if that statue was in the USA that would happen

[–]thecajunone 4 points5 points  (3 children)

A sad possibility. Feminism, making men emasculated. Religion, stopping science and brainwashing people, modern government, illusion of freedom of choice. All these things keep us from revolting.

[–]vaker 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I assume you include nontheistic religions, like liberalism.

[–]xPURE_AcIDx 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Liberalism isnt a religion...its a set of ideology in governance. And you can make such a claim because non religion has no rules and no set guidelines. Its based on scientific method only.

Any comparison of religion to non religion is like comparing a stamp collector to a non stamp collector. Stamp collectors collect stamps...non stamp collectors do....well anything they want.

Point; non theism can't control people into doing different things because they dont have a "team" that society teaches us from birth to have and to be controlled by. Christianity is a team. Therefore followers well listen to those on there team without question. Non theists only have scientists. Which rely on scientific method. Christianity figures dont use the scientific method. This is dangerous.

[–]vaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which rely on scientific method.

Which liberal dogmas don't stand up to. But this is not PC to discuss.

Let's see, we're all convinced about evolution. To recap, evolution works by selecting those who fit their current environment better. Which means for evolution to work there need to be genetic differences among individuals. (there goes the dogma of individual 'equality') In fact groups of individuals living in the same area and breeding together for a period of time and adapting to their environment represent a cluster in the space of genetic possibilities. They adapt to their environment and develop commonalities. This is unspeakable, because it goes against the completely unfounded and unscientific dogma of 'races are equal'.

A religion is a group of people having a system based on beliefs, intent on converting others to that belief system. The belief system doesn't need a god, it can be nontheistic, like buddhism or liberalism. Liberals have their own unscientific belief system (see above for one example), they consider themselves better than others, and busy trying to convert others, like you did in your post above. It perfectly qualifies as a religion.

[–]SavantTrain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't that why they remove the junk of a bunch or art. Doomed to repeat history.

[–]RedPillFu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]RebootedMale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you were actually assaulted, part of healing is acknowledging and coming to terms with your memories. If seeing some dumb hipster statue of a goober in his underpants causes you anxiety, you've got far bigger problems that you've swept under the carpet and need to address.

[–][deleted] 120 points121 points  (20 children)

Activists at Wellesley recently demanded that administrators remove a statue of a sleepwalking man: The image of a nearly naked male could “trigger” memories of sexual assault for victim


[–]gprime312 34 points35 points  (1 child)

I'm gay. The sight of a naked female triggers me. I want all art to accommodate my unnecessary whims.

[–]1kick6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

seems legit

[–]CinnabonHotJizz 54 points55 points  (12 children)

True story, I grew up in the area and had a friend that attended Wellesley. Even went to a few mixers on campus. You will be hard pressed to find anyone there not on a mission to bag a Harvard trust fund baby or hapless MIT blue pill chode. The stories of the Wellesley "fuck bus" stories are true.

All under the pretense of enlightenment within a post cultural progressive atmosphere. Truly a red pill case study if there ever was one.

[–]zephyrprime 19 points20 points  (7 children)

Wellesley "fuck bus" What's that?

[–]1BadgerBurger 41 points42 points  (2 children)

The Fuck Truck is a shuttle that drops off Wellesley girls at the Harvard and MIT campuses on weekends. Wellesley is suburban and a dry town, so the bus gives them a ride to somewhere more lively. Of course it just so happens to drop off at those schools and not Bunker Hill or Suffolk.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Hypergamy in action.

[–]Aaron565 11 points12 points  (0 children)

lol right because they look good they are obviously good enough for genius men.

The second you realize how retarded that is is the second you start becoming much better with women in general.

[–]2RedPill4LYF 14 points15 points  (1 child)

I concur. This sounds worthy of a post with more context.

[–]Starrucca 12 points13 points  (1 child)

They probably use both terms, but I've heard it mostly called the "fuck truck"

It's a bus that connects Wellesley (a girls only school) to other colleges in the Boston area.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Its almost as if women's studies are something to occupy them until they find a husband. The sad thing is these women used to become something useful like nurses.

[–]vaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Except getting brainwashed with that stupid shit significantly lowers their chances for a decent husband.

[–]absntmindedprofessor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This comment has been removed, as the user has moved on to greener pastures (baaaahh!), where they take free speech a little more seriously.

[–]Adach 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful campus tho hahah

[–]Manuel_S 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Hearing a feminist screech forcibly brings to my mind the image of a gibbering rodent, thus forcing me to associate that with women, which is not only politically incorrect but, far more relevant, unfair (for the most part)

This is something I do not wish to experience, and find offensive.

Where do I register to make sure they are kept away from my vicinity?

[–]rockmasterflex 11 points12 points  (2 children)

but its wellesley so if you were looking for the farthest amount of insanity you could get in the femsphere, you'd find it there.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (1 child)

These women need to man the fuck up.

[–]bitchdantkillmyvibe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know, shit like this makes me sad for the human race. We were once so powerful, so proud, we are the fucking apex predators. And we have people going into a nervous breakdown over a statue...

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points  (1 child)

When Time says feminists have gone too far, it's probably time for them to go home in shame.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Politically, your enemies can never hurt you as much as your allies. They probably realized this shit is so far out of hand the entire left side of the political spectrum was taking splash damage.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (4 children)

There is a strong hunger in this country for a an anti-feminist backlash, but inertia is a heck of a thing. Most people would just prefer to ignore it or 'make women nod'.

[–]master_mo 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Feminists are actually pretty hated on a lot of other subreddits. I've seen people complain about them on askreddit.

[–]1Sergnb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The term feminazi is part of the common street vocabulary, at least as far as my country goes. Being a feminist is a ticket straight into "shut up, Claire" territory. Nobody wants to hear that shit over here. And that goes for both men and women.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Lower the activation energy

[–]nrjk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a strong hunger in this country for a an anti-feminist backlash

In my own personal experience, I've been noticing this lately among friends and even some media outlets. For me, I've been a lot more outspoken about a lot of the contradictions/problems within feminist theory (benevolent sexism, strength tests, patriarchy theory, etc).

Either I've stopped caring if someone calls me a sexist for disagreeing with them or the pot has finally boiled over and the ridiculousness of some of the theories have become more apparent to more people. Maybe a little of both.

[–][deleted] 40 points40 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]hermit087 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe the media will begin shifting in an effort to stay relevant? Only time will tell.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Click to see the reddit reaction.

[–]In_Liberty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That was quite a read.

[–]1kick6 12 points13 points  (3 children)

The radicals at the front of this charge believe that any penetrative sex act is rape.

He sober? She Sober? Rape...his fault

He drunk? She drunk? Rape...his fault

He drunk? She sober? Rape...his fault

Working from their absolutely fucking retarded definition of rape, we do have a rape culture....but that would be like me saying I eat healthy because pizza is a vegetable.

[–]cascadecombo 0 points1 point  (2 children)

It's funny because schools do, or did, count pizza as a vegetable in school lunches.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's actually not funny at all. It's really disturbing.

[–]cascadecombo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant funny as in sad/depressing/retarded

[–]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan 20 points21 points  (9 children)

Has one of us completed the obligatory "post this to /r/feminism and watch the hamsters go nuclear" yet?

[–][deleted] 32 points32 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (3 children)

That is fucking sickening. Yes so progressive to murder your new born and call it an after birth abortion.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's how hamstering works. Doesn't matter how sick, demented, or sadistic that thing you did was, the hamster in their brains finds a way to rationalize it.

[–]trias_e 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I don't think there is much moral difference between infanticide and abortion. The only reason one is accepted and the other isn't is arbitrary cultural convention. Most moral arguments that justify abortion would also justify infanticide.

[–]Tecumseh90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You speak the logical truth. Have an upvote.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

TRP is more hated than r/beatingwomen for some weird reason too. Probably because we're spreading hurtful truth.

[–]1Sergnb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's more hate then rbeatingwomen tho. There's just much more discussion about TRP than there is about the other subreddit.

I'm gonna guess it's mainly because there's actually people that are willing to defend TRP, whereas you would be hard pressed to find someone outside of /r/beatingwomen defending its legitimacy.

[–]16 TRP VanguardTRPsubmitter[S] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

This posted in subs like TBP or feminism will get predictable hamstering reactions.

My curiosity lies with the larger "neutral" subs like /r/news. The xfactor is that it seemingly "demands" discussion because it's TIME (even though it's an op-ed on their online site). If this was just some random blogspot/wordpress, people wouldn't bother or would dismiss it. After all, even RAINN came out and called 'rape culture' a load of shit.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If this was just some random blogspot/wordpress, people wouldn't bother or would dismiss it.

If it's a blog site, it will get less traffic, less traffic is less influence to sway opinion despite the relevance the content has.

The world of commercial publishing and personal blogs is worlds away. In terms of sheer volume, profit, audience etc.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This was a privilege to read.

[–]EndTheCause 7 points8 points  (1 child)

What's interesting about this whole "rise of rape culture" over the past couple of years is predicting its effects on the future. What we'll likely end up seeing is more and more women claiming they were raped, along with an even higher percentage of completely unaware, beta men resulting.

The article puts it plainly: rape is wrong, and just about everyone knows it. Having sex with a completely intoxicated, non-functioning person is obviously non-consensual sex. Holding a woman down and forcing your dick inside her is clearly rape. However, feminists and rape-culture activists are pushing harder and harder for rape education for men. Essentially, it's adding this huge dose of legality (almost like writing every scenario and line of consent into law) to what used to be a more casual act of two people hooking up and having a good time.

Before we know it, men will be too scared to even touch a woman because if he got in bed with a girl, that next morning she could go to the police and say, "Well I never said yes directly" and BAM!, that guy is now in jail. It'd become all too-easy for women to "cry rape" and put away an innocent man simply because they regretted last night, or because they want nothing to do with him anymore.

My biggest question is, why is there no push to educate women to practice safer, smarter sex? Like, "Don't go to a frat party with a bunch of horned up guys, drink more than you can physically consume and black out on the kitchen counter." I would think they could avoid the situation altogether.

[–]alcockell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can concur - this is what is being discussed in the whole MGTOW community. Factor in someone like me - who WAS sexually abused by girls when I was 13 (I'm autistic - so at the time I had a sociosexual development age of 8, the rest of me was in line with chrono age - I'm 43 now), the fear takes a long time to deal with - and means if anything I am even MORE scared.. as I was personally damaged and silenced by the fact that I would be seen as the perp. Basically the girls AND cultural messages at the time groomed me.

[–]1Jaereth 8 points9 points  (2 children)

It's going to be a shitty time to be a man going forward.

While I was in school, whenever i'd get a girl in bed i'd always kinda playfully stop kissing her or whatever, look her in the eyes and say "Do you want to have sex with me?" In a cocky kinda way.

They viewed it as just flirting. I always had an out!

[–]bam2_89 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I always try to get a text message acknowledging she had a good time. That way, I've got a paper trail.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either that, or go out for breakfast and record the conversation. It's not illegal to record/photograph in public place without consent.

It's kind of sick that we even have to be anxious about such a thing.

[–]deville05 18 points19 points  (7 children)

Its moments like these (and only these) that im glad i live in a third world country. Jeez, white bitches be crazy!

[–][deleted] 4 points4 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]deville05 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll never forgive what our ancestors did to our women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

We got all kinds over here in the west. Although I've heard those bitches from the eastern block can be hell on wheels.

[–]deville05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can be.. But they dont have these crazy groups and cults or wide spread support for them. But then again recently certain christian sects have denounced science and say they only believe in creationism

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There are crazy religions in a lot of the world. Feminism is just one of the crazy religions sweeping through the West.

[–]deville05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but at any given time every other religion has an opposing voice of reason that is loud enough to be heard. The whole society is not on its side

[–]jquest23 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Best thing I heard, was a dad telling his son to sext the girls he was interested in. And to make sure he asked for sex in a text, this way he had text proof of consent... Like going to a party, and texting we gonna have sex tonight? Etc. Great concept

[–]ThePugnax 6 points7 points  (0 children)

World is getting weirder if we have to start making documentation of the process leading up to sex.

"Sign here, and here. Great. Now lets hanky panky"

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In my experience, it's even harder to get a girl to admit she wants to have sex with you than it is for her to just have sex with you.

This rule is void for ongoing sex.

Talking about it seems to make them lose the whole "it just happened" magic.

[–]bama79rolltide 17 points18 points  (11 children)

"Since rape exists because our culture condones and normalizes it, activists say, we can end the epidemic of sexual violence only by teaching boys not to rape."

"No one would deny that we should teach boys to respect women."

I thought rape wasn't forced sexual urges at it is a power play. The fact is that what is considered rape on most college campuses occurs because the woman gets so obliterated that she forgets that she consented.

As far as the second sentence, what about women respecting men? It doesn't happen anymore, so we should focus on EQUAL terms, right feminists?

[–]Fundumpsters 7 points8 points  (5 children)

We should teach young children not to rape.... did you not know women are rapists as well?

A study done by the CDC found that 1 in 21 men (4.8%) reported that they had been forced to penetrate someone else, usually a woman; had been the victim of an attempt to force penetration; or had been made to receive oral sex.[20]

Two myths that men are not able to be raped by women include: Men always want sex, so women do not have to force themselves on men, and men must be aroused to have an erection.[25] However, much like female erectile response, male erectile response is involuntary,[26][27] meaning that a man need not be aroused for his penis to become erect and be placed in a woman's vagina; mechanical stimulation is all that is necessary. Arousal and stimulation are not the same thing. Stimulation is a physical response to a stimulus. For example, when a person steps on another person's toe, the stimulation felt is pain and there is nothing that can be done about this. Men can be physically stimulated without feeling aroused and thus causing an erection. Men can be scared and intimidated into one, especially if the person is older or an authority.[25]

Male victims of sexual abuse by females[28] often face social, political, and legal double standards.[29][30] Gender-neutral laws have combated the perception that rape rarely occurs to men,[31] and other laws have eliminated the term rape altogether.[32] In 1978 in the UK, Joyce McKinney was sentenced to 12 months in prison for forcing a man to have sex with her while chained up. With the prospect of male sexual victimization presenting itself in the media, the primary myths and facts about rape against can be accessible to the public. Many of the myths about male sexual victims are centered on cultural and sexual stereotypes that a proportion of society holds against victims. Some of the major myths about male sexual victims include the following: boys and men cannot be victims, most sexual abuse of boys is committed by gay males, boys are less traumatized than girls, and physical arousal by boys means that they were willingly participating in the encounter.[33] Each of these myths can be countered by sociological, psychological and scientific evidence.

Several widely publicized cases of female-on-male statutory rape in the United States involved school teachers raping their underage students. Federal law states that the age of consent in the United States is 18 nationally, but may range from 16-18 within differing states. Under federal law, any sexual encounters between adults and minors under the age of consent is considered sexual assault. (See, for example, Mary Kay Letourneau or Debra Lafave.)

Some cases in the United States have received increased attention and sparked awareness within the population. Sometimes referred to as "made to penetrate" cases, male rape victims are made to engage in penetration of the female without proper consent. Many times the male victims are under the influence of drugs or alcohol or being held in life threatening positions. The case of Cierra Ross[34] sexually assaulting a man in Chicago gained national headlines and Ross was convicted of aggravated criminal sexual abuse and armed robbery with a bail set at $75,000. Cases like this one are often described as "unusual" or "uncommon." In the case of a female being a victim of sexual assault, the male criminal could face up to a life sentence in prison, whereas the punishment for a female rapist is far less severe. A similar case includes James Landrith.[35]

Since most studies have found that people tend to blame the victim of rape for the incident, a study called Gender Differences in Attributions of Blame for Male Rape Victims in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence focused on where the blame lies in rape cases. In cases of female rape victims, a higher proportion of males than females tend to blame the victim for the sexual assault. In order to show whether males or female respondents blamed the rape victim at a higher rate, this study utilized a story of a man being raped to see if the blame was placed on the victim or the assaulter. After performing the experiment, researchers found that a statistically significant proportion of males tend to blame the victim, even when the rape victim is a male.[36]

This study implies that even in cases of male sexual victimization, the male victims are held responsible for the assault by the majority of the uninvolved population.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 14 points15 points  (4 children)

Please paragraph this, it's painful to read.

[–]Fundumpsters 0 points1 point  (2 children)


[–]rhettdu 4 points5 points  (1 child)

6 hours later and no change?

Or... you know you need to have a double pace to make a paragraph don't you?

Incidentally, if you're new to reddit and haven't already, check out Reddit Enhancement Suite It will make your browsing a lot more pleasant.

[–]Fundumpsters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I got that and tried.. lemme have another go...

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children)

No one would deny that we should teach boys to respect women.

Respect is something you earn. Of course we should teach boys to behave in a civilized manner, but we should also teach girls not to get blackout drunk and not to dress so immodestly the men around them can think about something besides sex.

[–]rhettdu 3 points4 points  (3 children)

so immodestly the men around them can think about something besides sex.

I don't like this because it implies that men are powerless to stop themselves raping. It's basically what both the fundamentalist religious and these rape-culture radical feminists say.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I don't like this because it implies that men are powerless to stop themselves raping.

I think it's more a recognition of reality. The vast majority of men aren't powerless to stop themselves, but there's no reason to tempt fate either.

[–]bam2_89 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It's a poor way of phrasing the idea to say that their clothing is "tempting". It's not going to provoke someone who ordinarily wouldn't rape someone. What it's going to do is indicate to someone who would rape you in a heartbeat that you're an easy target.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a poor way of phrasing the idea to say that their clothing is "tempting".

I didn't say their clothing was tempting.

It's not going to provoke someone who ordinarily wouldn't rape someone.

"Provoke" isn't the right word to use here.

I think there are a whole lot of guys who, having had too much to drink, would be more apt to take advantage of a drunk, scantily clad woman than a woman who was dressed more modestly. Whether that's rape or not really depends on the details.

When I went to school one of the women was knocked off her bike by a stranger with a lead pipe and then assaulted. If you're talking about that kind of rape then yeah, the clothes don't matter.

[–]Stopher 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I'm torn here. On the one hand I want to stop the hysteria but on the other hand how can I not be behind anyone who wants to ban Robin Thicke music?

[–]fullmealdeal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, cuz man, he got some cuts.

[–]FinalEquin0x 18 points19 points  (1 child)


The shitlords at Time Magazine are simply supporting the Patriarchy!


[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)


[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How long until the epic twitterstorm followed by an apology letter from Time, and maybe a huge donation to some Feminist institution?

[–]Kalepsis 7 points8 points  (2 children)

If it is illegal for a man to drink and then choose to drive,

It should be illegal for a woman to drink and cry rape.

The logic is exactly the same. Peoples' lives are destroyed. I support a law that makes it illegal for a woman to accuse a man of rape if she is over .08 BAC.

[–]alcockell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or even worse- for a woman to drink, then SEXUALLY ASSAULT a guy - THEN cry rape, therefore blaming the victim..

[–]RebootedMale 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are of course drunk people who are legitimately raped. We don't need to go to absurd extremes. All we have to do is require actual evidence of RAPE. Actual witnesses, for starters. Evidence of penetration, ejaculation, should all be considered irrelevant. Even bruises should be considered irrelevant, because some people like it rough.

[–]bh3244 5 points6 points  (2 children)

the best form of revenge is to live well.

live well and ignore these imbeciles.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 4 points5 points  (1 child)

That works on an individual level but not in larger social spheres.

[–]vaker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On a larger scale we're fuckt. Enjoy the decline.

[–]Lilcheeks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That was a breath of fresh air.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i am so glad i went to an engineering school and graduated before i even heard about any of this malarkey.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

rape culture /does/ exist. but not how we imagine it to be.

sure, end rape culture /hysteria/. but women do need to wake up. every women should carry pepper spray - and every man needs to wake up and call rape where women rape men, too.

this shit's too over blown and misunderstood - now they want to kill rape "hysteria" but rape goes unsettled as a general gender issue - not just a female issue.

what they are ending, to put it more accurately, is the femenazi hijacking of rape for their petty selfish purposes. and in turn, they are killing the whole issue - well here we are being properly served again by extremist western flavor of feminism (eastern viariants imo actually have a purpose). doing wrong by women, men and humanity in general.

[–]symko -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shoot! Oh well, I guess we have to throw out all the BSDM Dominatrix porn because we know men ain't watching that shit.

[–]Nieben -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

RAINN - Wincest.

[–][deleted] -2 points-2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]alcockell 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Reason why the numbers are so low is because Mary Koss deliberately discounted males who were "made to penetrate". Add rape by envelopment - the numbers are around 40% male victims of female perps.