1591
1592

CultureNikola Tesla explains why he never married. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by jacques_cousteau007

From an article in 1924

"I had always thought of woman as possessing those delicate qualities of mind and soul that made her in her respects far superior to man. I had put her on a lofty pedestal, figuratively speaking, and ranked her in certain important attributes considerably higher than man. I worshipped at the feet of the creature I had raised to this height, and, like every true worshiper, I felt myself unworthy of the object of my worship.

But all this was in the past. Now the soft voiced gentle woman of my reverent worship has all but vanished. In her place has come the woman who thinks that her chief success in life lies on making herself as much as possible like man - in dress, voice, and actions, in sports and achievements of every kind. The world has experience many tragedies, but to my mind the greatest tragedy of all is the present economic condition wherein women strive against men, and in many cases actually succeed in usurping their places in the professions and in industry. This growing tendency of women to overshadow the masculine is a sign of a deteriorating civilization.

Practically all the great achievements of man until now have been inspired by his love and devotion to woman. Man has aspired to great things because some woman believed in him, because he wished to command her admiration and respect. For these reasons he has fought for her and risked his life and his all for her time and time again.

Perhaps the male in society is useless. I am frank to admit that I don't know. If women are beginning to feel this way about it - and there is striking evidence at hand that they do - then we are entering upon the cruelest period of the world's history.

Our civilization will sink to a state like that which is found among the bees, ants, and other insects - a state wherein the male is ruthlessly killed off. In this matriarchal empire which will be established, the female rules. As the female predominates, the males are at her mercy. The male is considered important only as a factor in the general scheme of the continuity of life.

The tendency of women to push aside man, supplanting the old spirit of cooperation with him in all the affairs of life, is very disappointing to me."


[–]wiseprogressivethink 1190 points1191 points  (6 children)

Nikola Tesla was fired from Google for this post.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 62 points63 points  (4 children)

Could you imagine the cognitive dissonance if Elon Musk had penned that and they replaced him as CEO as the company began to flounder?

"Well yeah, they lost a couple billion dollars and had to lay off thousands of people, but it's about... fuck what are we doing?"

[–]SemiCurrentGuy 31 points32 points  (3 children)

That's basically what happened to Mozilla, right? They fired the guy who invented Javascript (yeah, I know) because of political correctness. Now they're out here changing the Firefox icon on the regular, using memes and whatnot. It's embarrassing.

[–]Endorsed Contributorsadomasochrist 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Well to be fair their competitors were Microsoft and Google.

[–]ledbed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They were crushing Microsoft (which in general sucks) for years and held their own against Google

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 203 points204 points  (37 children)

In this matriarchal empire which will be established

Which may seem dandy for them in plentiful times, but when the system is stressed, they very quickly collapse. They got away with it for the last hundred years because thirsty men still got sex. They got it by way of marriage and their spouses were shamed into keeping up their end of the deal. However, what do they think is going to happen when armies of men go celibate, unable to attract a mate with either their looks or resources? And what about the army of married men that have since found out that women have no need to keep up their end of the contract?

Men going their own way? No. These are armies of men that despise the system and have no interest in seeing it survive. At first they will just ride the decline, but at some point they will shift gears and conquer and forge a new empire. It is how we are and it is not how they are.

Have fun, ladies. It won't last forever.

[–][deleted] 65 points66 points  (16 children)

I don't know if I can relate to anything other than the idea that there are a lot of these mateless men. Just in Asia there are millions. I wonder how this will play out.

[–][deleted]  (13 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (2 children)

    There is so much money to make from that. Not just video games.

    [–]kyledontcare 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Not just video games. Very true. Pick a hobby or past time and start growing. Make a Top Ten list of places you want to travel to.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    What I meant is that there are ways to capitalize on the desires of beta males.

    [–]BendAndSnap- 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    Soon to be synths with a.i. that they will mate with.

    [–]Patriarchysaurus 8 points9 points  (5 children)

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]dissentforall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Obviously, why else would Netflix pay Amy shumer as much as Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock? /S

      [–]unlikel_remedy 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      It's terrifying to think that little nuggets of truth are sprinkled throughout TV shows like this.

      [–]Surf_Or_Die 12 points13 points  (0 children)

      What about aggressive high testosterone Middle Easterners and Africans who are pouring into Europe? They've actually changed the gender balance in places like Sweden - there are now more men than women in the 15-30 bracket. I'll bet my money on even more rapes and sexual assault.

      [–]marlybarrow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      There's also War, that always does the job in eradicating single, potentially threatening men.

      [–]BendAndSnap- 11 points12 points  (4 children)

      Not just any empire but a space faring, planet terraforming, a.i., robotics, and virtual reality fueled empire. Babies will be born from artificial wombs. Women will be perfect bodied synths with incredible a.i.. Real women will go extinct. Not joking.

      [–]thrillhouss3 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      This will end when the Third World War begins. Testosterone will take the forefront again.

      [–]1htbf 20 points21 points  (8 children)

      It won't happen. Women are not dumb and readily submit to real men. No woman wants to collaborate with other women in taking the lead.

      [–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 44 points45 points  (6 children)

      No woman wants to collaborate with other women in taking the lead.

      You're right. They don't. I see how miserable they are in corporate America. However, the same powerful force that made them (generally) virtuous before the sexual revolution is the same powerful force that drives them into these sorts of positions.

      Peer Shaming.

      And yes, women aren't dumb, but their social behaviors often cause them to make dumb decisions.

      [–]PowerVitamin 2 points3 points  (5 children)

      If you marry the government, 90% of your behavior is tied to following social norms set in place by the government. Women get wet for displays of power. Women won't submit to a real man, when Alpha-Dog government will do a full display of power in riot swat teams. Nothing makes a woman wetter.

      [–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 13 points14 points  (3 children)

      I get where you are going with this, but remember this. That serial killer drug addict with tattoos on his face and pending felony charges? He's getting pussy.

      [–]PowerVitamin 9 points10 points  (1 child)

      Good. I'm not going to be a serial killer to get pussy.

      [–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      I support your plan. I follow it myself.

      [–]-ATLAS-_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Except that porn has literally changed the behavior of billions of men who now think they're getting laid and their body's biology is treating it as such since it can't distinguish if you used your bodies resources to form a new existence or if it's just into a tissue. The body reacts the same, releases essentially sedatives of all sorts of stuff to chill you out and shut you down. Look at any country in the modern age that has a high population of single men, and then look at its porn usage and prepare not to be shocked.

      [–]V1SoR 287 points288 points  (42 children)

      Practically all the great achievements of man until now have been inspired by his love and devotion to woman. Man has aspired to great things because some woman believed in him, because he wished to command her admiration and respect. For these reasons he has fought for her and risked his life and his all for her time and time again.

      I would upvote this a thousand times if I could. When I was blue pill, I had far superior motivation in my career, to the point where I could live without any discipline at all simply because it was redundant and unnecessary.

      [–]wiredtobeweird 128 points129 points  (27 children)

      Jesus, same. I work in sales and for whatever reason when I was working to save up for a house so we could live together I never made less than 8k/month.

      Being single, now it's a personal achievement if I do. Fuck. I need to find a reason again... my reason...

      [–]LOST_TALE 46 points47 points  (11 children)

      Read gulag archipelago, realize some things. Then no amount of money will be enough.

      [–]sd4c 5 points6 points  (10 children)

      What does GA have to do with kids..?

      [–]LOST_TALE 11 points12 points  (9 children)

      It's another form of evolutionary investment;it synergises well with children.

      [–]ForeverMaverick 19 points20 points  (8 children)

      Do you actually need to read the whole book, can't you give us a TL;DR just for the purpose of your comment?

      [–]LOST_TALE 20 points21 points  (6 children)

      TLDR: Some make children for pleasure or conformity. My comment assumes you make children as a form of fight against evil (assuming you're naturally better than the average (fewer are) ), and making children, some care about the future world they live in, thus in both cases, you'd want to fight political danger for your children or for the same goal you made children in the first place (though you might of had other reasons like the relationship it provides).

      Vast swaths of the population is thrown in death labor camps, executed on sight and then starved of the economic freedom they'd need to feed themselves (and literally starve to death). Then degeneracy is subsidized. If you're part of the Degenerates TM then, I get it, doesn't mean I'd prefer you alive, either. Kill off all the productive well off and kulaks, and then your genes are all that's left, with some criminals and normies. I mean, nice. Sometimes to defeat the enemy, you must retard whole civilization.

      ''Man we defeated those more intelligent apes, but at-least we own the jungle now!'' - evolutionary dead end that gets burned by a red giant, never colonizes space and amounts to nothing more.

      Some people have children because they got nothing better to do, are bored and just follow their instinct to please it and themselves or they just want to conform and virtue signal their parental ''virtue'' (likely vice, statistically speaking).

      Then some people make children as part of a greater goal. I personally think pro-social institutions and culture are genetic based to a significant degree. I think by spreading my genes, the world will shift to how I want it to be in the long term. Sure you can also turn koreans in south korea and then also north korea.

      Regardless of how much X change in genetics can account for, it is a more permanent variable you can control and not as easily changed.

      As for the money. You can use the money to defend yourself, and others against political enemies (some of which are illustrated by gulag archipelago). I couldn't have enough money for my political desire of having a significant chunk of territory being capitalist, and not some micro nation or area under the jurisdiction of another shithole state. I consider myself (forget about SJW speech) an oppressed minority. Though I motivated by other things.

      Economic free-zone are bullshit. They can be easily re-fucked by the host nation. They might aswell being a pig being fed only to be eaten later. After all, free slaves are the most productive. For this reason and other reasons, there is no economic area on this planet that is reasonably resistant to aggression from its own establishment. There's always a population willing to vote for political violence against economic freedom, everywhere, even in the most pro social areas like Britain (for it's high IQ, high patience psycho-graphics).

      [–]ForeverMaverick 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      I agree with you on a lot of things. Thanks for taking the time to post, I really appreciate it.

      [–]TheSp4rk 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      You should turn this comment into a post of its own.

      [–]LOST_TALE 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      It's off topic per TRP's standards. Since it deals with values and morality. Sure I could present it/frame it in a way that is accepted (maybe). I feel like ''fuck off'' to the audience in this regard.

      Here's for you, if you found the part on pro-social institutions interesting: https://pseudoerasmus.com/2015/10/04/ce/

      The rest is easier to find. Mises.org for this branch of econ/politics if you're new (though I learned elsewhere).

      As for primarily amoral posts, I have a history of bad ratings on my posts here. I, three times, vanguard posted a topic that I thought was very relevant and an expansion of TRP's practical research. Yet it was staggeringly rejected. I was very disappointed.

      You're free to quote my stuff all you want and editorialize it. Sure could use some better syntax here and there.

      ''Man. We defeated those more intelligent apes, but at-least we own the jungle now!''

      added a comma or period.

      [–]parsnippityjim 81 points82 points  (11 children)

      Have a kid, 10x more motivating than a woman.

      [–]HobbesTheBrave 43 points44 points  (9 children)

      Funny you say that.

      Statistics say that men earn about 10 times more when they get a kid. Because now they have 3+ mouths to feed. And he eats much more than he did as a bachelor.

      [–]What_is_real_anymore 55 points56 points  (7 children)

      Cause when you're single, you're making minimum wage working part time. When you're a professional in the middle of your career, you're making substantially more. That's the only way 10X works out.

      I'd like to see those statistics.

      [–]get-process 6 points7 points  (6 children)

      I'm single and doing much better than that.

      [–]HobbesTheBrave 6 points7 points  (5 children)

      Those statistics imply a 'good wife', as in she isn't an useless mouth to feed. One who is cherished, one who does her job, one who only sleeps with her husband.

      Everyone who does math knows that cheaters are as useless as feminists.

      [–]1PantsonFire1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Hold on to that old world and look for a place in this world where you can make a change. I can attest from anons that serve in the military or in politics and say that nothings has been more motivating than to fight against this slavery. When I was plugged in I wasn't half as motivated as I am now to reach new heights.

      [–]WonderIfThisUsername 34 points35 points  (7 children)

      Tesla was a wise man. So ahead.

      Too bad about his sad life.

      [–]nofilmynofucky 47 points48 points  (6 children)

      He was inwardly red but outwardly blue - don't get me wrong, the man was a fucking genius but people walked all over him his entire life

      [–]WonderIfThisUsername 75 points76 points  (2 children)

      I think he was just a guy passionate about electricity, his toys and didnt give a fuck about people or people skills. It cost him. Edison was opposite in a way. Einstein too. They had flare and were machiavellistic.

      Tesla was on another level. You cant even compare him with other scientists or geniuses.

      He spoke interesting things about vibration and frequencies too. I suspect the guy will be celebrated even more in times to come.

      [–]nofilmynofucky 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      You make some excellent points, I was thinking about this in a far too simplistic manner. What can I say, not a genius myself.

      [–]aboynameddrama 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      From what I read of Edison, he was good at stealing other people's ideas and making money off them. Tesla was good at thinking things through and deriving formulas and shits so he could invent crazy ass things. He thought he could deliver free energy over the air and I think he died before he could build a tower capable of transmitting free energy. What a different world we could live in if he did it.

      [–]mummersfarce_is_done 70 points71 points  (5 children)

      Nihilism takes root when one previous idea is destroyed. If an idea can lose it's meaning, any idea can lose it's meaning. Sadly I don't know the answer to this problem as I suffer the same.

      [–]TheRationalMale.comRollo-Tomassi 257 points258 points  (24 children)

      And all any feminist (female or male) will reflexively think about this is that Tesla was "afraid / intimidated by women competing against him" and entirely miss the point.

      [–]widec 91 points92 points  (16 children)

      It's pure projection. They are intimidated to compete against strong men. They assume it's the same the other way around and refuse to look at different factors.

      [–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 42 points43 points  (15 children)

      All of the "Curvy/Thick" chicks on Tinder know they have a lifestyle problem, theyre just too intimidated by the challenge of charting a course to change.

      Thats really sad actually.

      [–]Patriarchysaurus 43 points44 points  (2 children)

      I recently had one chat me up on Bumble the other day with a "hey handsome." When I probed her about the IG username she listed in her bio (fatgirl something or other), she went ballistic on me for somehow insinuating fat girls aren't ALWAYS just as attractive as any other women & then said she was "going to go fuck one of her other 4000 thirsty dicks now bye."

      Talk about a loaded gun of insecurities.

      [–]ANGRY_ATHEIST 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      going to go fuck one of her other 4000 thirsty dicks now bye

      like that's something to brag about... more projection on her part.

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [removed]

        [–]kyledontcare 6 points7 points  (1 child)

        Frankly I find thin very attractive even if they have smaller boobs. If she's "curvy" she will need a face that's a 10/10 in terms of beauty but still not too big either. I have standards.

        [–]Surf_Or_Die 12 points13 points  (0 children)

        Meh. Different strokes for different blokes. I think we can all agree that fat chicks are disgusting though.

        [–]widec 23 points24 points  (6 children)

        That or they might just be slaves to their addictive tendencies

        [–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 21 points22 points  (5 children)

        Changing my diet showed me I was addicted to sugar for sure.

        [–]Surf_Or_Die 9 points10 points  (4 children)

        Same here. I've always been in good shape but I had a massive weak spot for sweets and soda. When I decided to entirely shift my diet away from all the cheeseburgers and fries to basically salads I actually had withdrawals. I would dream of soda cans and I'd even hear the sound of a cork opening sometimes when I was all by myself. Really fucking weird shit. I just got over it a couple of months ago, but it's like smoking, it never really goes away. I still get cravings every time I eat.

        [–]RPmatrix 4 points5 points  (3 children)

        I would dream of soda cans and I'd even hear the sound of a cork opening sometimes when I was all by myself. Really fucking weird shit

        I had exactly the same problem but when stopping cocaine -- I'd have dreams I'd just scored some fire and my grandma would come over to visit seconds before I could have it!

        and then I'd wake up, exhausted from the crazy dreams! It took about a year for them to stop! Coke's a hell of a drink drurg

        [–]Surf_Or_Die 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Haha so weird! Now that I think of it, I never got to actually drink the soda either. I'd always wake up a split second before that sweet sugar hit my lips. Really just goes to show that sugar is a drug.

        [–]nagynorbie 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        Man, it really is a hell of a drug. I had no idea what effects it had on my brain until I've quit for about a year. Now I see the chaos in my friends who are still abusing it. Scary.

        [–]bazingabrickfists 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        What was your take on the point?

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        Rollo, I think it is plausible that you are the reincarnation of Tesla

        [–]TheRationalMale.comRollo-Tomassi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I'd agree except I have the foresight and wherewithal to protect and own my ideas.

        [–]Glacierdust 70 points71 points  (3 children)

        Guys, please don't fall for his pessimism. Women can never rule like a Queen Bee/Queen Ant model. Remember: they understand the reality around them through their emotions. Men understand it through their rationality, their reason, their analytical and logical thinking. It is this rationality that has accompanied us every step of the way from the swamps to the stars. It is what gave us skyscrapers, advanced sanitation systems, fast and reliable transportation, superior medicine, effective weapons, cutting-edge software, a structured justice system, and even masterful works of art and literature that help us understand our humanity. What have women done since feminism? Twerk because they're so liberated? Get fat and inked up? Did you see feminist "art"? Looking at it impoverishes the soul. Women cannot survive without us and history is living proof (mythology, legends, and religion also echo that notion).

        And besides, all the women I know in my life feel absolutely worthless when they're single. They crave male attention. So relax. The only way we can be taken out is if we do it ourselves. We always do everything ourselves anyway.

        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        "Swamps to the stars", great Reagan line

        [–]ForeverMaverick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Great comment. Very insightful. Needs more upvotes.

        [–]0signal0 385 points386 points  (34 children)

        Tesla, being MGTOW before it was cool.

        [–]soulmysold 160 points161 points  (3 children)

        Tesla wasn't a virgin, Thomas Edison fucked him good. Tesla was a great man, glad he's finally getting some fame.

        [–]WolfofAnarchy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

        Holyy shit half the train is wondering why I just burst out laughing 😂

        [–]Red-Curious 28 points29 points  (0 children)

        The tendency of women to push aside man

        and

        Then [God] said to the woman ... "You will desire to control your husband" (Genesis 3:16)

        God totally called that one.

        [–]llmercll 45 points46 points  (5 children)

        MGTOW is not cool and will never be. There is too much instinctual drive in us to reproduce and raise families. It's a lazy solution to a complex problem.

        Also, red pill is not mainstream, and likely never will be. It's too ego shattering for many, and too risky for the unintelligent to properly implement.

        [–]BlackFire68 14 points15 points  (0 children)

        It doesn't need to be cool it seeks to be right. It certainly will not be mainstream, to the detriment of many.

        [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 6 points7 points  (1 child)

        You're so far off the target you didn't even land within the range. Pushing a blue pill narrative and trying to make it appear red.

        I'm amused by those who are in the rat race, rushing around, buying expensive useless shit, getting married over and over searching for the one who won't fuck him over. Unless you were born into a wealthy family, or stumble on something like Musk and Gates did (right place right time with something on the cutting edge) you're never going to be rich. You will not ever matter, you will be forgotten in three generations. Trying desperately to gain money, digits in a bank account, wasting your precious hours working for others doing meaningless bullshit.

        Rather egotistical to think you matter out of 7 billion people and your genetics will make a difference. Not very good at math and biology from the looks of it. I've never had the urge to raise a family, was trapped into it. After learning the nature of girls the hard way, I'll never let one set up camp in my life again. I'll fuck them, spend time with those who earn it, and have fun with them, but they'll always be at arm's length.

        As for checking out of society, why the fuck should I do anything to benefit you unless I benefit from it more than you? You don't mean fuck all to me, why should i share my inventions and knowledge beyond getting laid with you? I share my experience in how to get your dick wet because it's inexpensive to me. It's quite interesting watching people fail over and over then finally getting it and becoming something more than they thought possible. I have no need to sharemy other info with you, and there's plenty you could implement in your life. Why the fuck would you deserve it? You don't.

        That is the next step beyond Tesla, he wanted to advance humanity, I'm more like fuck them. All they've ever done is fuck me over, use me, and try to kill me. Zero incentive to help them, especially without a return. You can be generous, I'm done with that bullshit. Getting some pussy is not worth fucking up my entire life or changing my plans, altering my life, or giving shit away. Had a cunt try that shit this week, didn't work for her. They want the vengeful dick, but they also want to see if they can control me, when they pull bullshit like that, they never hear from me again.

        The losers who are "opting out" but have yet to do, know, learn, or achieve anything, they're the joke. That's throwing a tantrum, I'm taking my ball and going home. Nobody gives a fuck, they have other shit to play with. Until you're valuable, going your own way is an escape from reality, a excuse to not try. You can build your own life without the rat race, no need to keep up with the Jones's, but never have the delusion that you matter so much your genes need to continue... you don't fucking matter.

        [–]llmercll 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        Your post is too philosophical to even touch. Resentment and nihilism, with a healthy dose of epicurean hedonism tossed in. Endlessly debatable.

        Regardless, raising a family is not a blue pill narrative. You don't have to respect a women, love her, or give in to her shit in order to raise children with her. Men find tremendous meaning through raising their children.

        If you just want to fuck women all your life and never reproduce that's your prerogative, do what makes you happy.

        [–]etherael 15 points16 points  (0 children)

        "Cool". Christ. What a fucking retarded metric for picking a path in life Fonz.

        [–]porkmaster 41 points42 points  (3 children)

        Past that, he fell for a pigeon.

        [–]11-Eleven-11 10 points11 points  (1 child)

        That's just not true it all. He was actually very good with women. He even dated a celebrity for a while until he decided she was too distracting.

        [–]taylepathy 9 points10 points  (1 child)

        Sorry, I missed the memo. When was being MGTOW ever cool?

        [–]dRePe_Thill 78 points79 points  (31 children)

        He saw the writing on the wall almost 100 years ago..

        [–]falcon10474 55 points56 points  (16 children)

        Seriously, this bullshit's been going on since 1924?

        [–]tuyguy 35 points36 points  (0 children)

        Since the civilisation of man brother. Except men have become more and more disposable and useless since the industrial revolution.

        [–]digitaler_demenz 22 points23 points  (9 children)

        Read G. K. Chesterton's "What's Wrong With the World" from 1910, particularly the chapter entitled "The Emancipation of Domesticity".

        Here:

        http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1717?msg=welcome_stranger

        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

        Thank you. This is such a great read. It's very refreshing to have someone from 100 years ago explain my own thoughts about modern things better than I can.

        [–]nsquared5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Thanks for this. This is really great!

        [–]Omnibrad 12 points13 points  (0 children)

        Rockefeller was pushing this stuff back in the late 1800's.

        [–]vast_rightwing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Civilization tends to follow a 80-100 year cycle, essentially the length of the longest surviving people. The pattern holds for the largest conflicts (ww2, civil war, revolutionary war), even the great awakenings.

        Read into Strauss–Howe generational theory. It's not a hard science but pretty interesting. It lines up perfectly in this case with 1924 and today.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        The timeline actually makes sense because this is when the sexual liberation movement was occurring. Cultural Marxism took it's roots long ago.

        [–][deleted]  (13 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]circlhat 50 points51 points  (0 children)

          feminist version of history and reality are two very different things

          [–]parsnippityjim 27 points28 points  (7 children)

          At least in the US this was when women got the right to vote and women pretty much led the temperance movement that swept America and parts of Europe. Women were getting uppity back then, the men that encouraged them for their own selfish gains had no idea what they were unleashing.

          [–]ThrowMeABoneScott 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          Yes 1920 it became law so not shortly after. WW1 before then too

          [–]lopsidedlucky 7 points8 points  (5 children)

          Remember the temperance movement was the driving force behind Prohibition in the US. They made it a god damn amendment to the Constitution.

          Not only this but once women got the right to vote and the temperance movement went crazy WW1 started and we sent our most able bodied men over seas in droves to die. Who raised the children left behind? Women and the men who were to unfit to serve.

          That's were this shit took root imo.

          [–]parsnippityjim 5 points6 points  (3 children)

          Eh in the grand scheme of things we didn't lose many men in WWI, barely a blip. But I agree with your other points. WWII is where you had lots of good US men leaving widows and single mothers. Then the GI bill helped destroy universities by over expanding them, then the boomers were created, etc etc. 1950s America is idealized but it set us up to be open to cultural Marxism.

          We got off easy compared to the Europeans. Can you imagine? 25+ MILLION dead Russians, 10+ MILLION dead Germans (compared to 400k Americans), countless others from other places. The Russians soldiers raped every pussy from east Prussia to Berlin (I've read there were over 2M rape pregnancies). When we wonder why Europe seems to want to die we have to remember the best men already died, nobody left to keep it together.

          [–]lopsidedlucky 8 points9 points  (1 child)

          I agree with your WW II and other points. Losing that many fit able bodied men pushed this country far down this path.

          As for the 2M rape pregnancies, I'd question it. Read Tomassi's article on war brides and read up on the French women who openly slept with German soldiers after so many of their husbands were killed.

          Back to the point though, the trend has been accelerating since the 50's.

          [–]parsnippityjim 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          The situation on the eastern front was so different than the west it's almost like the two fronts were different epochs in history. The Russians and Germans fought a war of extermination that makes the western front look gentlemanly in comparison (compare casualty numbers).

          Stalin was so brutal when his own ally, the commander of Yugoslav forces, complained that the Soviet soldiers were raping Slavic women he basically told the dude "who cares as long as they're also killing Germans". The Russians were in full barbarian mode after years of getting straight up owned by the Wehrmacht, they wanted everybody dead and raped.

          [–]Tailback 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Don't forget the Napoleonic wars, the Franco Prussian wars, etc....

          It's amazing to me that there's enough alpha DNA in Europe to maintain basic society. Sewer, clean water, garbage service, food standards, police, and/or military.

          Those things aren't being maintained by a 75 IQ "refugee" from sub Saharan Africa.

          [–]BullshittingNonsense 10 points11 points  (1 child)

          Tesla's mind explodes if he teleports to today.

          [–]Ebrg 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          I wouldn't wish it upon him

          [–]hagolu 180 points181 points  (90 children)

          Fuck man the very thought of a woman leading the society like a queen ant with male soldier ants being practically her slave sickens me.

          And I see this mass feminization of men in all developed societies, where men are basically reprimanded for embracing their masculinity whereas females are prodded to embrace her "feelings" and "be an uncaged butterfly". Women will fucking destroy the world as we know it with their pettiness and indecisiveness.

          Hopefully, movements like TRP will educate more men to be self-reliant and assertive because that is what is best for us and the humanity as a whole.

          [–]fuzzcrompton 30 points31 points  (3 children)

          Actually in ants the soldiers are female too, the only males ever produced are drones whose only purpose is to leave the colony and try to bang some virgin queens.

          [–]hagolu 24 points25 points  (1 child)

          You are right. Most ant colonies need far more females than males for the basic reason that females do all the work.

          In humans, it is the opposite.

          [–]WonderIfThisUsername 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          Sounds like fun.

          One bee. One voyage of HIiIs Life.

          In the fields of flowers. He meets his destiny.

          Will he prevail? Or will he get snapped in half by a roided hornet?

          Find out on netflix this Fall.

          [–]grewapair 17 points18 points  (1 child)

          Fuck man the very thought of a woman leading the society like a queen ant with male soldier ants being practically her slave sickens me.

          Me too. Just make sure you lift, earn a ton of money, look a certain way, and do a million other things to get one who will divorce rape you. Then you'll realize we've already arrived at that point and you never even noticed it.

          And don't forget to pay your taxes. Those single mothers aren't going to feed themselves!

          [–]Patriarchysaurus 102 points103 points  (36 children)

          In a popular HBO television series, a queen gets fucked by the baddest alphas in the world and commands an army of eunuch soldiers who will do anything for her. She is a favourite character among female viewers. What's that tell you?

          [–]somenudedude 36 points37 points  (2 children)

          Yeah when HBO turned an edgy show that didn't pretend the audience was stupid into a lowest-common-denominator show that your mother would feel cool watching she became all about guuurl power.

          In the novels she's a 13 year old girl who gets silly crushes on swashbuckling mercenaries and crippling insecurities whose kingdom is ultimately managed by Barristan Selmy... whom HBO killed off.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 33 points34 points  (16 children)

          Technically they only follow the Mother of Dragons because she is also the Breaker of Chains but I suspect that subtlety is lost in the emotional garbage that fills this series.

          The Weiner's Song (in response to Butters complaining there are no Dragons in Game of Thrones, only floppy wieners) is the funniest thing...ever.

          [–]Whoareyou559 13 points14 points  (11 children)

          The Breaker of Chains kills anyone who questions her.... doesn't sound like freedom to me

          [–]BullshittingNonsense 25 points26 points  (8 children)

          Yes. This idea that Dany is this benevolent ruler is insane. She's like the rest of Westeros. Jon truly rose from nothing to be a ruler, which he doesn't even want to be.

          [–]prettyflamazing 7 points8 points  (7 children)

          Thank you, she loves to signal how she's soooo unlike her father yet following in his footsteps of tyranny.

          [–]WonderIfThisUsername 24 points25 points  (3 children)

          Sounds like female fantasy. Unlimited alpha cock and dragons. Which are Yungian cock symbol.

          So its cocks upon cocks while betas serve her ego.

          [–]PowerVitamin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          Damn the quality of this thread is really good. Hahah

          [–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

          I am still waiting for Tyrion to fuck her.

          [–]Nautica51o 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Why haven't more people seen this comment

          [–]hagolu 4 points5 points  (5 children)

          Well if you are the mother of dragons, you can be the queen but only in a fantasy world.

          [–]Patriarchysaurus 30 points31 points  (4 children)

          That's my point bro, its a woman's sexual fantasy. Wish-fulfilment. Be born a beautiful blonde princess and constantly have the world fall over itself backwards to give you the best of everything possible.

          [–]FREEDNA 20 points21 points  (1 child)

          And countless rich powerful sexy men lining up to court you!!! That's female sexual fantasy 101 Including her wedding night with Horse-Chad

          [–]RPmatrix 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          the problem is it's bluepill beta males writing the scripts and producing and directing the shows!

          for money

          these males are as much 'The Enemy' of commonsense and reality as was Disney et al and his 'fantasyland princesses' were/are still today! Add shit that becomes a 'go grrl genre' e.g the hunger games/all powerful but very female assasin type characters, which come straight from games and no wonder young girls/guys have no idea what's what!

          i think I'd hate to be a teenager in today's world

          [–]PowerVitamin 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          You're killing it, man. You should do a full write up on pop-culture Game of Thrones / Conor McGregor / Trump. Any of the three things everyone is tuned into at the moment.

          [–]FREEDNA 21 points22 points  (22 children)

          Game of Thrones.. have you noticed... it's all Queens now.

          [–]AncientScrolls 38 points39 points  (12 children)

          Its more like Game of Feminists. I stopped watching Game of Thrones as soon as they turned the show into a freakshow of weak men who do anything to please hot bitches.

          [–]tuyguy 17 points18 points  (5 children)

          About the time where GRRM's original medieval fantasy was replaced by the HBO pop culture narrative. About the same time I stopped watching.

          [–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 4 points5 points  (4 children)

          What season did it go down the shitter?

          [–]Patriarchysaurus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          People say it's as soon as D&D ran out of book canon, but I think it's when they decided to fuck it.

          http://www.returnofkings.com/38518/how-feminism-is-ruining-game-of-thrones

          [–]tuyguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Hard to say it's been so long. I'd say I stopped watching 2 years ago.

          [–]FREEDNA 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          Schlicking Feminist fantasy fuckaroo!

          [–]keepstay 3 points4 points  (1 child)

          you still can enjoy the story tho, not everything is about sex-war

          [–]FollowTheDodo 11 points12 points  (3 children)

          "Game of Thrones.. have you noticed... it's all Queens now." --because Hillary was supposed to be president according to (virtually all of) the networks. Sorry to bring this up but worth considering, given this noticeable & valid point (or just that creepy wtf feeling you get watching what's been 'Good TV' for so long. Game of Thrones, The Walking Dead -both still good/great but the moment Hill was supposed to shatter that glass ceiling... The shows were suddenly cucked (which were well into production or airing already). IMHO.

          [–]Casanova-Quinn 4 points5 points  (2 children)

          Interesting observation. Idk about the others shows, but that doesn't make sense for GoT. The show is based on books written well before the election.

          [–]BullshittingNonsense 26 points27 points  (4 children)

          And then Arya says "the world doesn't let girls choose what they want to be." I wanted to yell "bitch, it doesn't let men either. And if you actually fought a man, you would get destroyed. You have nowhere near the strength to fight."

          [–]Casanova-Quinn 13 points14 points  (1 child)

          What's funny is that a male lead character, John Snow, perfectly fits Arya's statement. He's King of the North but he's basically the only one that doesn't want to be a king.

          [–]BullshittingNonsense 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          And she says she wanted to be a knight. Sorry, it would have been child abuse to send her out to battle.

          [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

          The funny thing is biology won't change. There will always be alphas and betas, and women around the former while the latter group is totally ignored. The only difference is Internet and social media which got people to be aware of a massive amount of information by idiots for idiots.

          [–]FudgingEgo 8 points9 points  (11 children)

          What are your thoughts on a Queen running a country? Either in the modern age or throughout history....

          [–]Unnormally2 56 points57 points  (1 child)

          There is a spectrum of ability for both genders. A woman can be an excellent leader, but men on average will be better more often.

          [–]hagolu 10 points11 points  (0 children)

          If the lady leading is red-pilled herself, I really have no problem as long as whatever you want from a leader (direction, vision, ethics) are all right.

          But as far as the concept of a Queen bee leading through subservient men, crushing men's testicles to fuel her "equality" propaganda is concerned, fuck those feminist scum.

          TBH, there are only a handful of great queens in history and even they were standing on the legacy of their fathers.

          [–]satanicpriest13 38 points39 points  (0 children)

          I'd rather have a strong queen rather than a bunch of feminised politicians poisoning our youth. Nothing wrong with a good traditional woman leader who knows her stuff.

          [–]jm51 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          Victoria did ok. As did Elizabeth I.

          [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Thatcher wasn't bad, either. Though she did some disastrous things, like pushing the EU and the Global Warming scam.

          Even so, she was far less bad than Blair, Brown, Cameron and whatsername.

          [–]Frenetic_Zetetic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Women will fucking destroy the world as we know it with their pettiness and indecisiveness.

          This should be the tag line to the RP reddit header/banner.

          [–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (12 children)

          I think he's being fairly pessimistic. I doubt western civilization will be reduced to bee / ants / insect colonies where the females rule. Matriarchal human societies don't last. Either people will realize how fucked up everything is, or the civilization will be overtaken by another civilization.

          In the first scenario, the newer generations (in their 20s right now) will get fed up with all the political nonsense and will address the issues when they're in power (around 2040-2050 I suppose). I feel like most millennials are actually left-leaning, but I have noticed a huge spike in conservatism among them in the past 5-10 years. Alternatively, western civilization will be 'dethroned' by a patriarchal society. Probably more likely outcome.

          [–]lala_xyyz 52 points53 points  (7 children)

          It's already being dethroned. All Western societies are dying demographically. They have population growth only due to immigration and patriarchal minorities (mostly Muslim, but also various Christian denominations in the US) having lots of children. Feminism is fertility-negative and women supporting it will naturally go extinct. That's why supporting abortion is good in the long term - sluts having accidental pregnancies shouldn't have children anyway.

          [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children)

          Demographics is largely irrelevant at this point. As more and more work is automated away, we'll have no need of a large population. And we're 10-20 years away from being able to grow babies in a vat from eggs made from skin cells, with the time largely down to how quickly the Chinese push the tech when they realize they don't have enough women for all the men to have kids.

          Alternatively, feminism may lead to a complete social collapse before then, and we'll be in a Mad Max world where feminists won't matter any more.

          [–]lala_xyyz 5 points6 points  (3 children)

          Demographics is largely irrelevant at this point.

          Demographics is everything in a democracy. One person = one vote. The land and the political system belongs to the most populous group with a shared identity.

          As more and more work is automated away, we'll have no need of a large population.

          There was never a "need" for large population. Population just keeps growing naturally. Demographics on a downward spiral is an aberration, an unnatural trend brought about by unnatural tendencies in the society. Growing extinct is nature's ways of telling "Fuck you". Technological progress and sizable population growth are not in a mutual conflict - that's just a sorry lie sold to us by politicians and ((them)), while they import millions because capitalism based on debt needs perpetual growth to sustain itself. Population growth is a problem only when you seek to maintain the status quo. If anything, history shows that extreme population growth is synonymous with extreme economic growth. Today's millennials are the first generation in ages to be less wealthy than their parents, and they marry/reproduce the least. That's not a coincidence.

          And we're 10-20 years away from being able to grow babies in a vat from eggs made from skin cells, with the time largely down to how quickly the Chinese push the tech when they realize they don't have enough women for all the men to have kids.

          Making babies naturally or in a lab, it doesn't matter, when people don't do it. Every woman in the West could get pregnant today for almost minimal cost - some governments even subsidize impregnation from sperm banks. Yes 50%+ fertile women in the West don't have babies. Designer babies, degenerate natural babies, it doesn't matter when there are none, and in three generations you'll be a single digit minority.

          feminism may lead to a complete social collapse before then, and we'll be in a Mad Max world where feminists won't matter any more.

          Perhaps the word collapse is too strong. But a traditionalist reset will happen, naturally. Women lacking strong maternal instincts will eventually grow extinct, since they are redundant/inferior to men in sustaining civilization. The number one problem as I see is massive centralization of power and wealth transfer from productive men via taxes. Women need to be stripped of voting rights to correct that injustice.

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          sluts having accidental pregnancies shouldn't have children anyway

          now I can def say how I'm 100% pro abortion, and not only because that's what's correct in society. Natural selection - Thank you for that

          [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (2 children)

          Millennials are left-leaning, but the younger generation Z is overwhelmingly conservative. I find that comforting.

          [–]1PantsonFire1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          The comparison between insects who crawl in the dirt and humans who fly the skies is ludicrous. The reason why a matriarchaal society works for those small critters is because they are just that, critters. We are not. The male dominant society will always win and conquer the one that isn't.

          [–]extremelyonlineguy78 45 points46 points  (2 children)

          This is so on point with Sexual Selection theory that its scary.

          Sexual Selection theory says that all of world culture is a result of females sexually selection creative intelligence as an attractive trait. When he says all the things men do is for women, its 100 percent on the nose.

          [–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          When he says all the things men do is for women, its 100 percent on the nose.

          I too, learned far too many life lessons from Seinfeld intro rants

          [–]CaughtInTheNet 18 points19 points  (0 children)

          Is this verified? Which of his writings does it appear in?

          [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

          There was more to the article, I will post as it is also well worth reading. Here it is:

          I am considering this question not merely from the standpoint of a man, I am thinking of the woman's side of it.

          As we contemplate any change, we naturally take into consideration the results that may follow such an innovation. One of the results to my mind is quite a pathetic one. Woman, herself, is really the victim instead of, as she thinks, the victor. Contentment is absent from her life. She is ambitious, often far beyond her natural equipment, to attain the thing she wants. She too frequently forgets that all women cannot be prima donnas and motion picture stars.

          Woman's discontent makes the life of the present day still more overstressed. The high pitch given to existence by people who are restless and dissatisfied because they fail to achieve things wholly out of proportion to the health and talent with which Nature has endowed them is a bad thing for the world.

          It seems to me that women are not particularly happy in this newly found freedom, in this new competition which they are waging so persistently against men in business and the professions and even in sport. The question that naturally arises is, whether the women themselves are the gainers or the losers.

          Discontent makes for cranks and unnatural people. There seems to be an uncommon number of them about to-day. This is one of the reasons I remain apart from the crowds. The public, or semi-public, character is the target for all sorts of attacks and unpleasant communications.

          [–]11-Eleven-11 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          I'm a big fan of nikola tesla. I watched a documentary about him and apparently be was very good with women. There was this one celebrity girl who he spent a lot of time with. He decided it was best to stop seeing her because he was too focussed on her and not his work.

          [–]SpecOpsAlpha 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          Declining testosterone in western men is a big reason for a lot of this. Men stop being men and women fill the void.

          [–]Jailhouseredpilled93 13 points14 points  (5 children)

          Shopenhauer was red pill as shit: .

          A real man wants two things: danger and play. Therefore he wants woman as the most dangerous plaything. Man shall be educated for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly.

          [–]WhyIsYosarionNaked 1 point2 points  (2 children)

          That was Neitzche actually. It's a passage from Thus Spoke Zarathustra.

          [–]stpauley45 7 points8 points  (1 child)

          "You need to break'er ass and shake'er her ass!" - Tupac

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7fgNpTxqw0

          [–]Alpha_Jedi 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          90 years ahead of the game

          [–]Press2ForEnglish 23 points24 points  (14 children)

          Now the soft voiced gentle woman of my reverent worship has all but vanished. In her place has come the woman who thinks that her chief success in life lies on making herself as much as possible like man - in dress, voice, and actions, in sports and achievements of every kind.

          Damn this hits home. I just had an internet argument with a "woman" in my town who asked why she wasn't being hit on by guys in the area. I suggested that she was too masculine and this was her response:

          I can retile a bathroom, fix your toilet, install a ceiling fan, change my own oil and spark plugs and tires. Drive a stick. I can impress you with my knowledge of sports, science, current events, the latest buzz worthy fashion and food trends. I workout 3-5 times a week. Ski during the winter. Snorkel and SUP in the summer. I camp and hike.

          In order to demonstrate how much of a catch she is, she actually listed even more of her masculine credentials. Its a shame what American women have become.

          You can read more of that shitshow in my recent comment history.

          [–]cjroney2 27 points28 points  (5 children)

          Time for Elon Musk to Disavow Telsa, and remove the Tesla name from the company...

          [–]widec 23 points24 points  (3 children)

          Is there any statues we can tear down as well?

          [–]Myollinir 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          yes this is what happens after long periods of intelligence, peace, and prosperity. it will happen again and again, for all time. we cannot help it. all of written history it has reoccurred - when a prosperous society arises it brings forth its own downfall..

          [–]1PantsonFire1234 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Ants, bees etc are insects. Their survival is limited to the mudheap the live in. Women might want to bring back men to this muddy orgie of hedonism but next to this mud hill will stand a shining bastion of civilization. And this bastion will win every time.

          Everything in this universe is balanced and in this same way our species is. Women have it easy and are the valuable sex. But because of this men is propelled to higher heights. Exactly because or lives are disposable and replaceable- men is forced to ascend to super human levels in order to survive.

          This is why I've never seen a woman perform miracles like men do. Women get work done at the bare minimum. They won't go and explore space, they won't invent complex machinery, they won't become the best athletes in the world and they won't create the best civilizations. Far from it.

          Now lots of beta men will surrender to this reality of the female imperative. Throw down their hands and sigh as they look on, powerless. But the men who defy this notion will be the alpha men of tomorrow. When you stop being a passive spectator and take your destiny in your hands, good or bad. You are no longer at the whims of a woman.

          Just as nature intended.

          [–]CrimsonEllipse 20 points21 points  (8 children)

          Nikola Tesla never married. He also died a virgin. He is the perfect example of why MGTOW is a joke.

          Nikola did not forgo the pleasures of knowing women. He never even had the option. And his hamster was approaching light speed in its attempt to rationalize why.

          Nikola Tesla was a genius. He was also an absolute failure of a man and he did his entire species a disservice by removing his intellect from the gene pool.

          No one here should look up to him as a hero or example of the kind of RP success that is celebrated around here.

          [–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (1 child)

          Nikola Tesla died a virgin because he basically dedicated his life to his work. He was an autistic absolutist who came up with crazy ass technology then destroyed it because he didn't trust humanity to use it for good. Also, he was in love with a fucking pigeon. There are plenty of others reasons for his loneliness rather than just MGTOW.

          [–]apollosapien 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Definitely agree with this here. When nuance is applied, Tesla's life is a strangely taut balance of RP/BP foreclosures.

          He never got married, but a big reason is that he followed his mission of finding electricity to the very end. He died a virgin, but lived to know what top-tier women were like. Nexting a celebrity of his time to focus on your work is some serious, serious dedication.

          [–]jacques_cousteau007[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          Great point. Where history provides a lesson, fiction creates a alternate possibility.

          There's a reason that Marvel created the character of Iron Man - genius billionaire playboy who all little boys strive to be... in contrast to Tesla whose bloodline the world will never see, because the dude couldn't get out of his own head.

          Imagine a generation of boys studying STEM, sharpening their business/company ownership skills, and reading TRP....all while having 3-5 kids each.

          Little shits would change the entire world in one century.

          [–]ForeverMaverick 11 points12 points  (0 children)

          Natural selection taking its course. If you know anything about genetics you understand the importance of a diverse gene pool and that not only good genes produce good results. There's an aspect of randomness which can turn average or poor genes into quality offspring. Maybe his great aptitude for science was compensated by a lack of social skills (just the universe balancing itself out) and that would mean his offspring would also have a low chance of reproduction, which could inevitably keep lowering the population so, who knows, this could just be nature cutting its losses. Truth is we'll never know.

          [–]RPmatrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Nikola Tesla was a genius.

          show me anywhere he says "I am a virgin" or proof of your statement? I'd be impressed

          That said, he clearly wasn't foolish enough* or so insecure that he needed to get married or have kids "for posterity's sake" and he didn't need a female "muse" (like he says other men did) to provide his inspiration to create remakable inventions we use to this day!

          He was a classic Alpha Sigma in RP terms

          Nikola Tesla was a genius full stop.

          [–]Surf_Or_Die 4 points5 points  (6 children)

          Holy shit, he saw it coming way ahead of his time. With that said, a genius like him ought to have fathered children anyway. His genes are now forever lost, which is a loss for civilization as a whole.

          [–]sabbo_87 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          uhh he was also in love with a pigeon, so...

          [–]Mattcwu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          The Blue Pill people are going to FLIP when they see this women-hating post.

          [–]APSTNDPhy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Dude can see the future or something? Should have been a scientist.

          [–]segagaga 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          It was for Helen that the Greeks launched a thousand ships to sack the city of Troy.

          Had this saga occurred in today's world, King Menelaus would have said "She is not worth a single one of my men's lives."

          [–]tiklsh 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          I also think the human will stop evolving if men with minds like his don't have offspring

          [–]dissentforall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          There's actually an interesting paper published recently about how homosexuals no longer leading secret lives has the unintended effect of lowering intelligence due to gay men having higher IQs on average and not reproducing.

          [–]pmmedenver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Our culture has become "take take take what can you do for me". This has been man's lead and of course women are now following, tossing away all their feminine characteristics as a casualty. We as men need to start valuing, respecting and encouraging (and in some circumstances, yes, even embodying) the feminine characteristics and women will naturally follow our lead. As a "redpilled" man your natural response will likely be "but that's what betas do!". However, we tend to forget around here that true alphas embody both masculine and feminine characteristics. Elliot Hulse has a great video on this and he refers to it as 'tender aggression'. The difference is that a beta is unable to control when and how he displays these characteristics (and likely displays the wrong traits at the wrong time), but an alpha will display softer characteristics to women and children but a harder side when facing challenges. This leads rise to another rift between men and women. Because our work is so separated from women, and also because our work is largely more mental than ever before, it is much more difficult for women to observe our aggressive side in its natural state (which as we all know turns them on). Thus leading to men (and women) confused as to why a sexual component is lacking.

          [–]Painsanity666 6 points7 points  (1 child)

          That... And he may have been gay. According to his journals, the closest personal relationship he had was with his long time lab assistant. He was crushed when he left to pursue other work. It could have just been a close friendship, but there wasn't much else in his life that resembled romance.

          [–]mummersfarce_is_done 8 points9 points  (2 children)

          I'm afraid he still clings to the beta core where men were to do things to impress women. That is indeed true on a mass scale, as most of civilisation's men are beta looking to find another mommy to impress. But from the way he points it out makes me think he is still not over this need yet. Just that he understood that he will never find his unicorn, so he gave up on women alltogether. Whereas he didn't see that he could have given up on the idea of finding a unicorn, and had fun with women instead.

          [–]scamper_22 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          i dont know tesla but he was a really intelligent man who had very scientific interests. he might not find a lot of joy in playing with women. i know i dont. id much rather do martial arts, read, learn a new skill, work on a project... than have fun with women in that sense. ive had my flings and i get bored.

          its probably just a personality thing. do what you enjoy doing and excel ay what u do. but dont assume everyone has the same wants or needs

          [–]ForeverMaverick 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          It is the purpose of life. You're here to reproduce, otherwise your race goes extinct. To reproduce you need to find a willing female. For a female to be willing you need to be better than the other guy trying. Add in modern transportation (cars) and factor the competition by 100. Add in telecommunications and factor by 10. Add in social media and factor by 1000. Add in online dating and cheap flights and I've lost count.

          One can't fuck a woman simply because he wishes to. To deny this is to become Nihilistic.

          [–]bullseyed723 12 points13 points  (1 child)

          When will liberals tear down Tesla?

          [–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Theyll avoid looking at it because its easier to hamster it away as unimportant, a passing phase he went through, blah, blah, blaaaah

          Its mind blowing to me how women can A: rationalize anything that a high status man does/believes away because hes high status, and B: never clue into the fact that a very large number of men that they want to fuck dont agree with feminism and the rest of the pantheon of liberal beliefs to a lesser degree.

          [–]Kommanderdude 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Well maybe there is hope for us. We voted trump for president which is the polar opposite of the feminazi Hildabeast ( Hillary) that tried to become president.

          [–]circlhat 5 points6 points  (11 children)

          Perhaps the male in society is useless. I am frank to admit that I don't know. If women are beginning to feel this way about it - and there is striking evidence at hand that they do - then we are entering upon the cruelest period of the world's history.

          We have to remember he was book smart, I however find this line very interesting he seems purple pill as his philosophies dictate women can be reasoned with, he is coming to terms that the women he grew up with and the ideologies he had are completely different.

          He makes the mistake in thinking this is a new era of some kind and that women are making conscious decisions to not work with man, when in reality they never did want a partnership either they are dominate or you're dominate there is no 50/50 equality with a women.

          The male is considered important only as a factor in the general scheme of the continuity of life.

          The pill is so bitter here to swallow, I don't think he could come to terms, I mean you can really see his weakness in social issues, he is your nice guy (TM), most blue pillars and blue pillars that think they are red do this because they want A genuine good person not to have the negative annotation nice guys have.

          Tesla was Nice guy tm, be like Edison

          [–]tolerantman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Most women wouldn't mind if 80% of men dropped dead tbh. And yes I know society would collapse right after.

          [–]biggerbetterjobs 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          I wonder if he tipped his fedora upon writing that.. LOL

          [–]RighteousSouljah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Revelation 17 the queendom. They have built it

          [–]dingman58 1 point2 points  (7 children)

          He fell in love with a white dove (possibly hallucinated) so I'm not sure how much weight I'd put into his inklings on relationships

          load more comments (54 replies)