1614
1615

Men's RightsCalling your wife/girlfriend fat, now officially domestic abuse in the UK. Punishable by 5 years in prison. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by [deleted]

tl;dr: "Psychological abuse", another broadly defined term that you can go to prison over.

I'm not making too long a post about this, it's just a rant to get the word out asap. There's also a good post from a couple years back when the law was only being proposed.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-psychological-abuse-law-a6789271.html

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/dec/29/domestic-abuse-law-controlling-coercive-behaviour

Naturally the law is bullshit, that'll never be used against women, despite manipulation being their everything."Honey you don't make enough money." this kind of comment won't be considered and yet "Honey, you're getting too fat." Will be considered abuse, even though both comments could be said by either sex. You might thinking I'm crazy, but really, I was just watching women's TV, because I slept in late because of a cold, went and had my breakfast and lo and behold a DV "victim", complained about her husband of 8 years, literally it was him insulting her appearance and his general disapproval of her "Getting dressed up and going out with the girls", regardless of what he said, because honestly it sounds like something the feminist narrative write. Even then she just left, but now in hindsight it was DV.

Ultimately all this is down to feminism, money, globalism et cetera

I'm just gonna quit while I'm ahead and am not too angry.

On a positive note, here is Erin Pizzey, she created the first domestic violence shelter in the modern world, because she was concerned with DV itself, as opposed to man-hating feminism, it's a good video to watch and she's a genuinely lovely person.

Lessons learned: Brits need to think about expat, need to leave the west behind, if you're white go to a country that white worships, which is pretty much most of Asia.

EDIT: Here is the link to the video I watched this morning, 1:40 they ask her what was the pyschological abuse she suffered, that in her words was worse than the physical violence, the answer is he insulted her appearance, how she managed the children and the house, and going out with friends.

Here is a link to the official government document.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/482528/Controlling_or_coercive_behaviour_-_statutory_guidance.pdf

The cross-Government definition of domestic violence and abuse outlines controlling or coercive behaviour as follows:

Controlling behaviour is:a range of acts designed to make a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities for personal gain, depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance and escape and regulating their everyday behaviour.

Coercive behaviour is:a continuing act or a pattern of acts of assault, threats, humiliation and intimidation or other abuse that is used to harm, punish, or frighten their victim.”

The perpetrator and victim have to be personally connected when the incidents took place-meaning that at the time the incidents took place they were in an intimate personal relationship (whether they lived together or not)or they lived together and were family members, or they lived together and had previously been in an intimate personal relationship.It is not necessary for the perpetrator and victim to stillbe cohabiting or in a relationship when the offence is reported as long as the incidents took place when they were “personally connected”, and after the offence came into force.If they were not personally connected, or the incidents took place after a relationship/cohabitation,the stalking and harassment legislation may apply


[–][deleted]  (19 children)

[deleted]

[–]SubbaHubba 186 points187 points  (7 children)

What, we're outsourcing masculinity now?

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

    Yes, to a nation where the few and the proud can't tell their fat wives that they're fat without fear that the local municipal officials will incarcerate them while diddling their children.

    [–]michael9314 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    The UK has been for a while if this article is anything to go by.

    [–]putinbusch 30 points31 points  (4 children)

    I can do it in an aussie accent if you wish. Just press 666 on your keypad and your nearest aussie will be with you shortly, cunt

    [–]Tachyon9 5 points6 points  (1 child)

    To be fair, you guys have the absolute best accent for the word "cunt."

    [–]Lucifer_The_Unclean 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Holy shit. This is a great idea for an app.

    Call it Red Brothers. Males only allowed. You give a Brother a girl's number and he will put her in her place for you.

    [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 209 points210 points  (8 children)

    Fatacceptance codified into law. The movie, Wall-E, comes to mind.

    • #19842016

    [–]redolas 15 points16 points  (6 children)

    How about Shallow Hal? That's the top. Have an empty bucket next to you if you want to watch it. It doesn't even deserve a link.

    [–]1Ill_mumble_that 16 points17 points  (2 children)

    Hey, I liked Shallow Hal.

    It was one of the very first movies I saw pre-selection at work in. The actual-hot neighbor girl wasn't interested in him until she saw other women (even if they were fat) leaving his apartment.

    Would this actually work? Maybe. If you worked your way up from ugly girls to hotter and hotter girls.

    The rest of that movie was garbage though.

    [–]Harry_Teak 22 points23 points  (0 children)

    No, that doesn't work in the real world. When people see fat and ugly people together their sense of proportion is satisfied. Fuggies hooking up is the standard, we only really notice mismatched couples.

    The hot neighbor's interest would only be piqued if she saw a woman that she considered to be near her own SMV leaving Hal's apartment. If she saw him with the fat chick she'd be quite relieved that he's decided to box inside his own weight class and might leave her alone.

    [–]redolas 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Would this actually work?

    It would, yes. You would have a large assortment of overweight ladies to entertain at your leisure. Which you already have.

    And pre-selection you can observe in any movie out there. It's obvious if you know what to look for.

    [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    "If I can squeeze them, they're real to me"

    ~"Look at that nice rack yo" (only a b cup)

    [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 394 points395 points  (92 children)

    There are historical examples of what happens when men lose faith in the legal system and its not pretty.

    [–]WillyWonka321 59 points60 points  (70 children)

    Please give us examples.It would be most informative

    [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 187 points188 points  (47 children)

    Youtube the French Revolution

    [–]Squeezymypenisy 55 points56 points  (41 children)

    We aren't there yet, but were on the way. You need starvation first.

    [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 139 points140 points  (38 children)

    Men today are pathetic. They have to wait until they're starving before they can tell a woman no or just ignore them.

    [–]Squeezymypenisy 60 points61 points  (36 children)

    Yea I don't know why men act like this. I blame it on the single mother epidemic. It's amazing that men cannot stand up to women.

    [–]le_king_falcon 106 points107 points  (21 children)

    Eh it's more than that, we have entire generations of men brought up to believe that women are golden. Add to that the extreme demonization of any violence towards women and it makes sense.

    Just try raising your voice and shouting at a women in an argument (two things women do routinely) and measure the reaction you get, most women and bystanders will act like you've just pointed a gun at them. People have been so thoroughly conditioned that a man raising his voice is viewed as tantamount to actual physical violence. Funnily enough it turns out even Alpha men from solid homes don't like being labeled as violent and psychotic, so the cycle of meek men continues.

    [–]cadthrower 57 points58 points  (8 children)

    Yes which is why the millions of African and Arab men flooding into Europe are going to have a field day. European men are thoroughly cucked.

    Western European men honestly kind of disgust me with their cuckholdry. Its much more disgusting then women being children and acting like sluts because they are just following their biological instincts.

    West European males need to reclaim their masculinity or we will see a collapse of western civilization in the next 100 years.

    [–]ArchangelleFuckOff 40 points41 points  (5 children)

    It's not going to happen. This... cultural self-loathing is unique to modern Western culture. No other civilized culture in history has hated itself like ours does. And it's fatal. We are going to continue ceding ground to invaders, because we can't stomach putting our own values above theirs.

    We're living on borrowed time, so the only thing to do is to secure a place for you and yours, and hopefully ride it out and see what it takes to get along in the aftermath.

    [–]Squeezymypenisy 13 points14 points  (6 children)

    I though the rule of alpha was to never raise your voice since there was no need?

    [–]ThePacketSlinger 19 points20 points  (4 children)

    I think that's "never needlessly raise your voice". Realistically, if you're yelling all the time there's nothing to escalate to and people won't take you seriously.

    [–]Malachhamavet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Or think you are hard of hearing and routinely yell back

    [–]warjesus420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Truth. I'll spare you the details but when I wasn't at the point I am now I confronted my gf at the time about her clearly talking to this guy continually who obviously wanted to bang her. She kept saying how I had "nothing to worry about!"(she cheated on me with him eventually). I barely raised my voice. She told me later that after I left the table of girls next to us started applauding her after I left. "YEAH YOU BE A SLUT!!"

    [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (11 children)

    its the 'disney' syndrome, i like to call it

    people think women are princesses, animals can talk, stupid shit like that

    the same betas that will whiteknight a girl to no end will lecture you on how hunting is bad, or they'd never be able to actually kill an animal(other than fish, oddly) for themselves.

    it also shows the growing dependence on others to do things for you, including the govt, also shown by people needing to, for some reason, give money to the government so they can pay for their healthcare instead of just cutting out the middleman and paying for it themselves...

    weird times

    [–]stringerbell 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    The French didn't give a shit about the law - they cared about the fact that they were starving...

    [–]Gawernator 12 points13 points  (0 children)

    The fact that the United States of America exists now

    [–][deleted]  (17 children)

    [removed]

      [–]Bic13bic 38 points39 points  (16 children)

      Different circus, different monkeys. Gypsies are a scourge in Europe, have been for a long time. When they roll into town, you hide everything that can be carried.

      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (14 children)

      They're rare in the US but yeah after dealing with them once I don't see how Europe can tolerate them.

      [–]joh2141 13 points14 points  (13 children)

      What was it like dealing with gypsies? They pretend to entertain you while pickpocketing you?

      [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (10 children)

      Honestly that's not too far from the truth. And it sucks because they know where that line is and walk on the edge as long as they could so you can't take definitive action.

      Back in the day I worked fast food. Their entire clan came in. Ordered off the dollar menu probably 5 things, eat half then complain. At first you're like "i don't give a shit, this is a fast food gig, whatever" but they keep doing it and doing it. The management eventually says enough and just fixes the order instead of raplacing it. Escalated to some of their younger men trying to pick a fight with our younger guys. Manager says "In calling the cops" picks up the phone and I swear to god all 15 of them were in their van and gone in under a minute.

      Just talk to any older person that's worked retail a decent amount of time and they'll probably have stories. I've heard of mass shoplifting to having their entire clan get haircuts then running out the door without paying.

      [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (9 children)

      then complain.

      Arabs complain, complain, complain too.

      [–]prestidigibator 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Here is an example that happened a couple of years ago. It's a emotional con from an older woman with children and an enticement from a young girl. It's long but it is so amazing how far these people will go to scam for money.

      https://youtube.com/watch?v=dTRse4GXM5k

      [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      The Weimar republic and what came from it. The Russian revolution.

      [–]1nzgs 12 points13 points  (15 children)

      It's men passing these laws. It's not a men vs women thing.

      [–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (4 children)

      Plenty of men serve women's agendas.

      [–]Lucifer_The_Unclean 6 points7 points  (8 children)

      The men passing these laws aren't men, they're cucks, feminists, males, but don't call them Men.

      The term man should be reserved for males who have agency.

      [–]Gorech1ld 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      Yeah, societies that do shit like this don't continue being stable too long afterwards.

      [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 134 points135 points  (22 children)

      There is also financial abuse as part of this law - ie not giving her enough of your money.

      Some of the uses of this law will be reasonable and right. And the barrier on proof will gradually lower, and women (and their lawyers) will take advantage of the new legal situation to increase female entitlement. "Give me more money or I'll make up some stuff about financial abuse" will be the new threatpoint, as if the previous threats weren't enough.

      I'd be happier if the courts will be as willing to convict women of this so-called crime as they will men, because controlling-nagging behaviour is the purview of women. But we all know the courts will be thinking "we didn't you just leave?". Men will be blamed for their actions and inactions, women exonerated for theirs.

      This is why you should not marry (as if women themselves haven't put you off already) - the laws will continue to get more and more harsh on married men.

      [–]TheRedChemist 64 points65 points  (3 children)

      It occurred to me that a simple solution to all of the legal gender bias issues would be to simply require any reference to gender be strictly withheld from all court documents relating to divorce etc. The final documents to be sanitised down to "Applicant" and "Respondant" and expressly using gender-neutral pronouns. As a result, both parties are judged purely on the material facts and their recorded actions. Judges are forced to be more considerate and careful - even though in most cases gender could be inferred from the facts (one party stayed home to raise the kids = probably the woman), they could never know for certain, and so could never give too extreme a verdict intended to favour Team Woman lest they accidentally favour the Evil Males.

      A smart men's rights social justice warrior could surely make something of this under the banner of Equality. Which of course it actually is.

      [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 20 points21 points  (1 child)

      require any reference to gender be strictly withheld from all court documents relating to divorce

      Ah but... noone is motivated to do this. Society wants this bias.

      Even when society already does this, by removing gender pronouns, the biases still persist. As you say "stay at home parent" will get the preferential treatment as this would be deemed to be "most likely the mother".

      The Violence Against Women Act is gender neutral in all but its title. And of course... the bias is always towards the male as the main protagonist, and women are always believed.

      [–]TwoTonJoe 73 points74 points  (8 children)

      or I'll make up some stuff about financial abuse"

      My first wife tried this one on me during our divorce. I was 'financially abusive' because she chose not to work, and I wouldn't take her on the vacations or buy her the pretty things she thought she deserved.

      Thankfully, both lawyers had a good laugh over it. Country lawyers, country judge, in the south. Had we been living in a major city, I could see it having traction.

      [–]aang1818 44 points45 points  (3 children)

      Amazing. I live down south too and something similiar was used in court..... With the outcome being the ex husband paying lifetime alimony on a 30K salary. Even though the woman earns more than him.

      [–]joe579003 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      Well, sounds like the woman was able to afford a better lawyer on top of her bullshit advantage out of the gate in court.

      [–]RupsjeNooitgenoeg 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      You should know you're one lucky son of a bitch! May I ask how long ago this was?

      [–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 22 points23 points  (1 child)

      There is also financial abuse as part of this law - ie not giving her enough of your money.

      This has been in the works for awhile. Apparently, if you work and your wife doesn't, or if you make significantly more than your wife does, you need to give her a credit card, the checkbook, and unfettered access to all of your family's funds. If you try to restrict her to a reasonable grocery/shopping budget, you're exercising too much control -- practically slavery!

      And if you tell her to get a job so she doesn't have 16 hours a day to fill spending your money, that's belittling her, which is also abusive.

      [–]bobawet 6 points7 points  (4 children)

      Agreed and all this is going to do is eventually push men away from women. Especially once VR comes online. At some point the resolution and experience will be almost indistinguishable from the real thing and at that point most men with walk away from these fat cunts.

      [–]The__Tren__Train 11 points12 points  (2 children)

      Especially once VR comes online

      This is how the Elites will greatly reduce the world's population.

      Everyone believed it was going to come through a massive war, famine, or plague..

      but no, the Elites have been, and currently are, working to make marriage/any relationship with a woman so incredibly unpalatable, that no man will even consider it.

      then, they will create machines that men can fuck, and the vast majority of an entire generation will die off without reproducing itself.

      Brilliant.

      [–]unicorn-carousel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      It's amazing how far it's coming.

      https://www.eventbrite.com/e/virtual-reality-hackathon-tickets-20542075902

      I know a very smart person partiipating here. I'm building this shit, designing the next 3 years' of use cases on the daily. (disclaimer: I probably won't be there, hard to swing the time at the moment).

      [–]1aguy01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Can't wait for a guy to sue his girlfriend for making him pay for everything.

      [–]PM_ME_TYRANITARS 14 points15 points  (4 children)

      Lifehack: Don't wife fat bitches.

      [–]The__Tren__Train 16 points17 points  (1 child)

      -Implying that women don't pull the ripcord and inflate into a life raft after the documents are signed.

      [–]PM_ME_TYRANITARS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Man, that is why I like skinny skeleton chicks more than the cute chubby ones. Maybe subconsciously I know that they aren't gonna be a landwhale after childbirth

      [–]Throw59 6 points7 points  (1 child)

      [–]PM_ME_TYRANITARS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      It's all fun and games until she divorces you because you don't fuck her anymore

      [–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl 94 points95 points  (55 children)

      Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear....

      Welcome to the legalization of hypergamy... don't want your wife cheating on you? That's DV & 5 years in jail... now she can do it anyway... and you'll be forced to pay child support (if you have kids), which you can't cause you're in jail, and now you're stuck in an infinite loop of failure...

      [–]Lucifer_The_Unclean 24 points25 points  (3 children)

      You're joking but in college I roomed with this guy (not a student) who had two children he was paying child support for and never got to see them. He missed one of his payments so the cops came to our apartment and asked where he was I obviously said no idea, why do you want him? Turns out he was at work at his third job. They literally made him stop working and put him in jail. He lost all three work opportunities, got fined more for court fees and late payments. I honestly thought it was some kind of joke. It was on that day that I realized men are disposable to society.

      [–]TRP VanguardArchwinger 33 points34 points  (1 child)

      Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear....

      "Honey, I wrecked my car again. Can I take yours to my boyf...to buy groceries today?"

      "Uh...I kinda need my car to get to work."

      "You can take the bus, dear."

      "Why would I take the bus when it's my car and I pay all of the bills?"

      "You can't control me like this any more, asshole! It's the law!"

      [–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl 17 points18 points  (0 children)

      Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear....

      Where you going?

      On vacation...

      Where?

      Florida

      With who?

      To visit my friend...

      The one that's been cheating on her husband with a new guy every week for the past 2 years?

      Yea... what of it?

      What else you going to do...

      Lay on the beach, get hit on by guys, let them buy me drinks, take my picture, hang out with them, not tell you what I'm actually doing, and I'll start birth control again while I'm on vacation but I'm doing it all for you... (true story btw - but I only found out afterwards)

      Seriously? That's fucked up...

      No, what's fucked up is that's exactly what I'm going to do and you can't stop me you controlling, abusive asshole! Now go to jail!

      [–]marplaneit 42 points43 points  (33 children)

      You can easy quit out of that infinite loop of failure

      1)Save a few thousand dollars 2)Move the fuck away to another country

      People in 1st world country thinks Latin America, SE countries, and rich africa countries (South africa, bostwana etc) are dangerous as fuck, when in Fact most of these places though have poor infraestructure, people are super friendly, and the whole thing is just way more relaxed...

      [–]Endorsed Contributorsqerl 18 points19 points  (3 children)

      Move the fuck away to another country.

      That was my exact thought too. Always wanted to see the world.

      [–]Whiskersgrower 15 points16 points  (1 child)

      Im from the rest of the world. Lot of things to see over here m8.

      [–]Kalepsis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Has to be a country with no extradition agreement with the US, because the government can and most definitely will have you arrested and shipped back to the States for failure to pay child support.

      [–]Whiskersgrower 16 points17 points  (4 children)

      Latin american here.

      We will usually copy/paste US and EU laws cause we think they are right and well structured, but I have learned that your latest laws regarding social matters are pure bullshit.

      [–]xiko 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      Not in all places. I heard that in Brazil a law was passed that custody is 50% to each parent in case of divorce as default. Because the children needs the father as much as the mother.

      [–]sirmadam 8 points9 points  (9 children)

      I've been saving as much of my salary as possible recently, now up to £7,000 and thinking that's enough to move out to Thailand whilst I setup my online business. It might just be time.

      [–]DaphneDK 10 points11 points  (4 children)

      Check out digitalnomad subreddit.

      I'm in SE Asia now. You can usually live pretty good for around £700/month. A lot less if you want to save. You can have an appartment here in the centre of Phnom Penh for £70/month. Internet will cost you another £30. Living perhaps around £200/month if you eat out. I meet loads of British expats all over the world. Owning bars and restaurants and various local businesses. And loads of mainly US men, and a few US girls, who have checked out and live for nothing doing odd jobs.

      For some reason, this thing with travelling abroad seems predominately to be a Anglo-Saxon/Scandinavian thing. Loads of Brits, Americans, Canadians, Australians, Scandinavians. A lot fewer Germans/French/Italian/Spanish/etc. people.

      [–]marplaneit 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      I don't know how expensive is thailand, but in Argentina with that money you probably could survive around 8-10 months, including tickets of airplane.

      [–]sirmadam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I would do about that in Thailand too.

      [–]joh2141 2 points3 points  (5 children)

      I hear Maldives is a good place to go. To even live in if you're sick of the BS.

      [–]wastagaswe 45 points46 points  (4 children)

      Now it will be even easier for women to make false abuse accusations. Without a shadow of the doubt, the UK is the gutter.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]miserybollocks 27 points28 points  (2 children)

        This was the final nail in the coffin you would have to be fucking insane to marry in the UK now.

        [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

        Maybe holding a sign saying "Welcome refugees" isn't such a bad idea.

        [–]2Overkillengine 10 points11 points  (0 children)

        I don't blame UK men for not riding to the rescue when UK women get violently raped by immigrants.

        Less effort for the same lack of reward.

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 67 points68 points  (15 children)

        From second link:

        “This behaviour can be incredibly harmful in an abusive relationship where one person holds more power than the other, even if on the face of it, this behaviour might seem playful, innocuous or loving.

        Men love women, women love children, children love puppies.

        This power dynamic (which creates tingles) was just made into a crime.

        Masculinity (polarity) is now illegal in England.

        Masculinity is now defined as an "abusive relationship".

         

        [–]nuesuh 38 points39 points  (12 children)

        Being a man (not a cuck) is now officially criminal behaviour in England.

        God save the queen

        [–]verify_account 37 points38 points  (11 children)

        Can't own guns

        Can't carry a locking knife

        Can't use force to defend your own life

        Poor bongs....

        [–]nuesuh 24 points25 points  (0 children)

        They can watch porn tho, if they call their ISP and ask for permission to access pornograpic websites.

        edit: and swear on the Queen ONLY to watch cuck porn

        [–][deleted] 108 points109 points  (57 children)

        Holy shit. I'm not getting children. This world is getting more fucked up each year. I don't want them living in this shit world.

        [–]123123drink123123 124 points125 points  (11 children)

        Removing yourself from the gene pool won't matter. 5 blue pill white knights will gladly take your place. Each day we're closer and closer to the movie Idiocracy.

        [–]DodgedAFew 17 points18 points  (1 child)

        Yes, but you will not witness the suffering of your kids and will not suffer yourself. If you are after passing genes then just donate sperm.

        [–]123123drink123123 33 points34 points  (0 children)

        Life is about suffering and persevering. The best you can do is provide a strong platform for your kids to guarantee them a good future which means financially providing and mentoring your kids to avoid these problems. Quitting is for pussies and donating sperm just for the sake of genetics and for some independent mom to raise your kids means congratulations you just promoted another generation of blue pill kids.

        you know that anti-vegeterian saying "for every animal you don't eat I'll eat 3"? Well I'm going to do my part to offset the coming of Idiocracy. that's the mindset you need to apply, not removing yourself from the equation.

        [–]cynicalprick01 6 points7 points  (5 children)

        um, idiocracy was satire for how things are right now...

        [–]Whiskersgrower 21 points22 points  (3 children)

        Same was said about "Office Space" and look at what happened.

        Both movies (OS and Idiocarcy) were directed by Mike Judge.

        [–]Trpidation 8 points9 points  (2 children)

        That man is a fucking genius, smarter than he gets credit for.

        [–]MakeEmSayAyy 4 points5 points  (1 child)

        He actually understands every day life. King of the Hill was a masterpiece at making fun of pussy liberals and stupid conservatives. He is a brilliant, rational person who is really objective on all the bullshit.

        Both parties are scum.

        [–]bowie747 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        It's got electrolytes!

        They actually say that in ads now. It's just saltwater people!!!

        [–][deleted] 44 points45 points  (21 children)

        You're a testament to the success of their plans. How do you make people living in a safe society with a surplus of everything they need stop reproducing when you can't send them to the front lines or gas chambers anymore?

        [–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 50 points51 points  (19 children)

        Pretty much this.

        Not having kids is their fucking plan. That's the goal they want to reach.

        If you don't t raise kids and train them to conquer and stand strong in this world then the people who believe this garbage will be the ones doing it.

        [–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (17 children)

        I don't care about the world. When I'm gone it won't matter anyway. The women and the betas can run riot and turn things upside down for all I care.

        [–]cdtCPTret 9 points10 points  (3 children)

        Which is why I don't care too much for abusing the environment

        [–]michael_wilkins 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Because unless there's a genetic "Red Pill" gene for independent thought, anyone can be woken up and think independently.

        I know I didn't always think like this when I was a younger kid.

        [–]pinstrap 14 points15 points  (15 children)

        That's such a stupid way to think. Reddit in general likes to dramatize subjects like this but in all honesty now is the best time in human history to have a child. Less disease, war, better medical care than ever. Not all woman are like the ones in that article, it's just that the types like that make it on to this forum.

        [–]twatbutter 13 points14 points  (3 children)

        You say this now, but this is one of the many latest trends that we're seeing where social injustice gets translated into legal injustice. It might now be bad now, but it's a general trend that is alarming, to say the least.

        Granted, you also have the manginas who will play ball with these legal systems instead of standing up to them.

        Consider this, too- having a kid doesn't necessarily mean that you'll be able to raise it as you would a normal parent from, say, the 50's. You may be paying alimony, you may not have custody, you may not be able to teach your kid whatever you want without being socially chastised, etc.

        [–]1nzgs 5 points6 points  (2 children)

        It isn't social injustice though. "Social justice" is bullshit and you're only validating their demented beliefs by believing in the myth of social injustice.

        If a fat girls is called fat, it isn't an injustice, it's just an observation. If less blacks graduate highschool than whites it isn't social injustice, it's just differences in ethnic cultures and IQs.

        The only way for these left wing nutjobs to give themselves power and authority is to designate arbitrary groups of people as victims and appropriate power for themselves under the guise of correcting some injustice. THERE IS NO INJUSTICE.

        [–]twatbutter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        you're only validating their demented beliefs by believing in the myth of social injustice.

        Uhh no, I'm not-- within the context of what I'm saying, it translates to social injustices done towards men.

        I never claimed to endorse the stupid "social justice" that libertards tend to endorse (Fat-acceptance).

        To be clear, there are social injustices-- they just aren't what the left-wing nutjobs usually spout (namely, made up/over-exaggerated "offenses")

        [–]through_a_ways 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        but in all honesty now is the best time in human history to have a child.

        No it isn't. Inequality is higher now than it ever has been in human history. And it shows no signs of stopping.

        And as we all know, it's not just absolute wealth that matters (having enough calories to live, being able to thwart disease), but relative wealth.

        People had dismal lives following the advent of agriculture, and female selection was far more hypergamous than during paleolithic times (confirmed by DNA analysis).

        Right now we're just going through agriculture 2.0, new world order

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]Endorsed ContributorMeat-on-the-table 28 points29 points  (3 children)

          They're pushing and pushing...at some point, men are going to push back. Hopefully it'll be before the average weight is 280lbs.

          [–]becredible 11 points12 points  (1 child)

          I can't wait until the misandry bubble pops but at this point I don't know if it will ever happen.

          [–]ANGRY_ATHEIST 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          When men stop marrying, it will happen. At this point the family law industry seems to be self-destructing with laws like these, so I hope it won't be too much longer. It will be interesting to see the hampsters' response. The bachelor tax comes to mind, but I have a feeling that once male birth control becomes easy, the hampsters are going to get so ridiculous that they won't even take themselves seriously anymore. Sooner or later they'll snap out of it, like when you ignore a toddler throwing a fit.

          [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          a gun knowns not what pulls its trigger. A 5 year or a 800 pound fatass can fire a modern weapon. Hell a car is a weapon if you want it to be.

          If people are pushed too far I expect to see suicide trucks barrelling through crowded streets long before we see the gun fire.

          [–]1RXRob 33 points34 points  (5 children)

          British guy here.

          If I'm seeing a girl who starts to get fat, then I'll simply call things off in future. I don't want to get arrested for upsetting her.

          Secondly, why would I consider expatriating? Britain is awesome. I have free at point of treatment health care, a moderate climate, a world famous legal red light district next door, I make a great living on 40 hours a week minimum wage, I'm a 30 minute drive from the big city and a 30 minute drive from the middle of nowhere, nobody has to live without central heating and running hot and cold water, we have very right of centre politics despite what social media would have you believe. We're still in the 1% of the global population just by living on this island.

          [–]Nothing_Gazes_Back 15 points16 points  (0 children)

          You uh... Looking for a roommate?

          [–]2Sepean 21 points22 points  (3 children)

          This is one of the things made illegal:

          Repeatedly putting them down, such as telling them they are worthless

          If I wanted to make shit testing illegal I'd word it just like that.

          Ironically no woman will get prosecuted for this.

          [–]FortunateBum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          Exactly what I was thinking.

          Isolating a person from their friends and family

          Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear and when they sleep

          Repeatedly putting them down, such as telling them they are worthless

          Enforcing rules and activity which humiliate, degrade or dehumanise the victim

          Financial abuse

          Threats to reveal or publish private information

          All things women routinely do to the men they "love". Something I've long believed about domestic violence is that it's not the behavior, it's whether or not the woman does it to the man. Shit, there's a new video going around about how it's wrong for women to slap men. Oh really? We have to discuss that? It's not obvious?

          [–]mammothleafblower 14 points15 points  (0 children)

          .....And the Nanny State marches on.

          [–][deleted]  (26 children)

          [deleted]

          [–]Piroko 68 points69 points  (4 children)

          Said it before:

          This isn't rape culture, but what follows will be.

          [–]-TempestofChaos- 4 points5 points  (3 children)

          And these harlots are the ones WELCOMING in the Muslims. It's insane.

          [–]BradLightningRooster 13 points14 points  (20 children)

          If we can manage to keep Muhammad Bin Ghazi from lopping our heads off. The next global empire will very likely be Muslim and they will want to completely purge all that is Western and decadent.

          [–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (17 children)

          I disagree. I think middle eastern tribal self-centered lazy entitled culture is simply not productive enough to pull off something like that. There is no chance in hell they would be able to put up mass production of any sufficiently complex technology with that attitude. They don't stand a chance against both western or eastern work ethics.

          But I do think that there will be lots of unnecessary trouble on that part before it gets better.

          [–]BradLightningRooster 9 points10 points  (3 children)

          Our own work ethic is failing under the welfare state though. While hard work still pays off, the incentive is being reduced. Americans are fat and lazy these days. If we had to resort to the draft again most are unfit for service.

          We still have a strong military and in a stand up fiight could bomb them back to the stone age, but we hesitate to use it due to concerns of civilian casualties so we fight on their terms on the ground. Our police have less restrictive rules of engagement than our military when it comes to lethal force. (Another issue all its own)

          They may not entirely take over and dominate the way that the West has, but they will rise and we will fall. Europe invited them in and the US isn't telling them to stay out. Getting killed by one of these clowns will become a real concern in the future. Sheer numbers will see to that.

          [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

          Well, on a lighter note, I'm from Europe. If you think that american work ethic is failing because of the welfare state, then what we have here should be literally Somalia :D It's not OK, but it's not so bad. European welfare state does have long history and lots of benefits that make complete sense. But that's not our point of discussion.

          My point is also not that there won't be further problems and that current EU immigration policies are not harmful and destructive for both us and them (they are). I just think that AFAIKnow middle eastern culture, they're no threat in that regard (domination). Theocratic tribal system which only raises selfish lazy entitled fucks is simply too inferior. Just look at Israel, for example. They have problems with extremists, yes, but when it comes to war, they're simply in a different league. Palestinians can't do shit. Even more, the whole arab world was unable to do shit in the last 50 years.

          Even some of their own clerics admit that.

          So, problems, yes. Arabian world domination? Only in dreams, IMO.

          [–]joh2141 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I heard Greece is real bad with that too. Greece is basically an example of the worst case scenario if America was even lazier and had a failing central banking system.

          [–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (5 children)

          They have a strong family system which should help them outbreed the fuck out of places with weak families and low birth rates. I fully thank western women for bringing this upon us.

          [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (4 children)

          That may be true. But making the place where you live a complete shithole destroys your chances for creating "the next global empire". I still think that long-term a backwards entitled tribal culture like that has no future. Either they'll change or they'll lose.

          [–]joh2141 1 point2 points  (3 children)

          I agree I believe a Muslim dynasty is not going to exist because they are drawing the lines right now basically; trying to cause two factions. Non muslims and Muslims. Not that I have anything against Muslims but as Matakokoyama said they haven't been productive. Their religion of strong family system and high fertility count is only what kept them alive thus to this point.

          Also for some living in desolate mountains and sandstorm plains, you have to adopt a mentality like that just to survive. However, those values arent' translating well to the outside world. The most amazing thing about humans were not how SMART we were but how we were able to adapt.

          Muslims have not done so (or more accurately orthodox Muslims in Afghanistan or something). They have remained static. Muslims and Christians and Jews who have adapted to the modern world will continue but Muslims are not majority in 1st world. Perhaps in Europe it really will become like that.

          But the Muslims that most likely will survive will almost guaranteed be westernized. Muslims in America have been assimilating to western lifestyle well since way before the 90s.

          [–]cariboo_j 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          True we always forget about the Chinese.

          They're just staying on the sidelines watching Western nations tire themselves out fighting endless guerilla wars with the Muslim savages.

          The Chinese will probably be the ones who pick up the pieces if/when the West collapses.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorRS73 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          The UK is an absolute motherfucking insane asylum. Rotherham rapes of young white girls by Muslim turds = no problem, have at it. Say one word against those protected by PC = go to jail.

          They actually arrest people in the UK for shit they say on Twitter. Google it: https://www.google.com/#q=uk%20twitter%20arrests They'll arrest you and throw you in jail for some drunken shit you said half-seriously about a football player. Un-fucking-believable.

          The US is screwed in many ways and I'm happy to talk about that but the UK is on a whole different level of psychotic totalitarian political correctness and denial.

          The West is reaching a point where nothing less than a blood drenched French-style revolution can turn it around.

          [–]michael_wilkins 12 points13 points  (0 children)

          Erin Pizzey is a fucking Champ and I'd love to meet her before she kicks the bucket.

          You want to know what having a mission in life looks like? look at her.

          [–]LegendaryContent 23 points24 points  (2 children)

          Tell your gf or wife that she's putting on an unhealthy amount of weight? That's five years in jail buddy.

          Run a child sex slave ring with thousands of British children? They gud boys dey dindu nuffin yall racist

          [–]Rougepellet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          So don't get married and don't go into a long term relationship. Got it

          [–]Moobx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          what they really need to outlaw is divorce rape so that men don't feel trapped, become bitter or resentful, and start doing things like this. idk what they expect to happen when youre literally trapped in a horrible mariage

          [–]Beachbum74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Yesterday I asked my wife if she had been to the gym lately, she asked 'why, do I look fat'? I'd better be careful...

          [–]Nothing_Gazes_Back 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I have lost all faith in mankind.

          [–]RidleySmith 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          From the news article: "The College for Policing issued new guidance for police officers on how to prosecute without relying on the victim for evidence, which is backed by Women's Aid and SafeLives"

          Without evidence.

          [–]JihadDerp 24 points25 points  (8 children)

          Clicked both articles. Ctrl + f: "fat". Nothing. Nice hyperbole.

          [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

          The first link had the definition of what psychological abuse was, naturally there was not an exact definition, but the NHS definition was "Emotional abuse includes verbal abuse such as yelling, name-calling, blaming and shaming".

          Here is the link to the video I watched this morning, 1:40 they ask her what was the pyschological abuse, the answer is he insulted her appearance, how she managed the children and the house, and going out with friends.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]jm51 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            When I was a kid in the early 60s, there was some serious DV in my neighbourhood. Lots of women wearing sunglasses because they 'walked into a door'. Not one of those abused wives got to go out in the evening without her husband.

            [–]anonymousoutrage 6 points7 points  (0 children)

            Not long ago I was talking to a female friend of mine, and the abuse topic was brought up. She said there were a lot more cases where the male abuses the female than otherwise.

            She said she knew three friends of hers that had been abused (for once rightfully so, it was abuse and there was no denial about it). After I pronounced myself as a male victim of abuse when I was a child, she said "it's still three to just one man".

            I looked at her in complete disbelief and cracked a smile that had both measures sarcasm and an acknowledgement of the social denial the male typically receives, I merely said: "So you think that 25% of the abuse cases you know about is nothing.", and then just dropped the topic.

            edit: Might have gone offtopic, but it looked like the right place to mention this.

            [–]csehszlovakze 2 points3 points  (1 child)

            This was to be expected. I think it'll be soon expanded outside relationships, basically making bachelorhood and MGTOW illegal. "Damned if you do, damned if you don't."

            Run. Run until it's too late.

            [–]RebelliousCitizen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            You got it man. I feel lucky as shit that I have a headstart on this by being involved in such communities to save up, research, and gtfo while its still semi-sane, the borders are open etc etc.

            [–]1mr_nate_ 8 points9 points  (10 children)

            Still planning to move to Singapore.


            PROS:

            • skinny Asian girls

            • Asian girls love my white ass

            • everyone speaks English

            • not a disgusting Asian country, it's clean

            • strong market in my field of study

            • cheap vacations to nearby exotic-ish countries

            • cheap transportation

            • low crime rates

            CONS:

            • expensive rent

            • rains a lot


            That's what I call a good deal.

            [–]becredible 12 points13 points  (3 children)

            You had me at skinny Asian girls.

            [–]needsomehelp3211 12 points13 points  (1 child)

            He had me at "skinny girls". A rare resource in the West.

            [–]23456lol 6 points7 points  (1 child)

            Fuckoff, don't come, we fucking hate your Ang Mo Tiko type here. You will be relentlessly mocked by the locals if you expect white worship and behave like an arrogant dickbag.

            [–]1mr_nate_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            LOL, forgot my trigger warning for the weak of heart

            [–]Mysteriouspaul 4 points5 points  (0 children)

            I fucking love rain sign me up

            [–]OneInAZillion 2 points3 points  (2 children)

            Fun Fact: Erin Pizzey also wanted to create DV shelters for abused males, but was forced to abandon that idea after extreme hatred, criticism and backlash from feminists.

            [–]redzorp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            They went so far as to kill her dog and dump it on her doorstep! True story. Just goes to show just how evil and misandrist feminazis truly are.

            [–]ser0402 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            If criticizing your wife on her lack of ability to perform house hold duties is DV my dad should've been locked up 20 years ago.

            [–]VoyPerdiendo1 1 point2 points  (1 child)

            On a positive note, here is Erin Pizzey, she created the first domestic violence shelter in the modern world, because she was concerned with DV itself, as opposed to man-hating feminism, it's a good video to watch and she's a genuinely lovely person.

            That there is the biggest gem of your post. That video, so much insight. Such a compassionate human being. Do you know why we are here? Because of feminism. We needed to fight back, that is the reason we exist. This woman is wiser than any of us, she is the "middle ground".

            I cried.

            [–]ntnclvr 1 point2 points  (1 child)

            WTAF?

            Let me guess, degrading men about not making enough money or having a small penis will continue to be fine.

            If you call your wife fat, she should tell you fuck off and leave you. The world is full of fucking sensitive pussies.

            Fucking disgusting!

            Edited:for spelling.

            [–]zylo47 1 point2 points  (1 child)

            Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear and when they sleep

            Isn't this called proper parenting?

            [–]samurai96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Haha not if you're Muslim! You could beat the shit out of her and they won't do shit.

            [–]TheRedChemist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Hilarious that all of this stems from a reduction in adversity faced on a day to day basis. As creatures we're evolved to cope with a daily struggle for survival, and we developed social structures and sexual strategies to best enable that survival. Now, survival is taken for granted and there's no true struggle in daily life - so we end up seeing something where there isn't anything, just so that there's something to struggle against.

            It's like our entire species has PTSD. We've returned from the war and we're safe now, but we're still nervous about ambushes and IEDs and eventually we end up killing the neighbour's kid and drinking ourselves to death. You can't just delete thousands of years of learned experience. Without the control mechanism of a daily fight for survival, all the internal processes just snowball into total nonsensical madness.

            [–]TattedGuyser 5 points6 points  (5 children)

            I wonder if withholding sex and using it to control their partner (All women pretty much do this) would be considered Domestic Abuse?

            Obviously it'll never be used against women, but it certainly fits their list of criteria that they listed out. I'd love to see a precedent set, oh man that would be hilarious to watch the femtards flip shit.

            [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 3 points4 points  (4 children)

            It is at the University of Michigan

            http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/19448/

            [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

            are giving divorce papers considered abuse? Because it's a good option considering

            [–]brianbarett 3 points4 points  (0 children)

            What if she calls herself fat?

            [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

            So if a girl says im too small, i can now sue her for 'psychological abuse' ?

            [–]joseph_fuzzco_Jr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            England, you deserve this for being so dickless.

            [–]TWYW 4 points5 points  (40 children)

            There goes my idea of moving to the UK (I'm European)...

            [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (37 children)

            Jesus fuck don't move here.

            [–]2rp_valiant 5 points6 points  (16 children)

            I don't know how the fuck this managed to happen under the Conservatives. Labour or Greens I'd understand, but fucking hell.

            [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (6 children)

            Well, the conservatives are no longer conservative.

            If they actually were fox hunting would be back day 1 and the NHS budget would just literally be just cut in half. Oh you're suffering with obesity related illnesses? Sorry we're not making everyone else pay for that.

            They've only just managed to half house reform "benefits".

            Conservatives are no longer really fiscally or socially conservative. Hence why anything at all other than left is just labelled "far right". The tories are now too reliant on women's and dependents' votes.

            [–]2rp_valiant 5 points6 points  (4 children)

            yeah the Conservatives always had their sucky policies but at least we could rely on them not to go full socialist. Now it seems they've decided to take the worst of both worlds and have been fucking us in the ass ever since. And because the lib dems were in coalition with them no-one trusts them any more, the closest thing to a sane party we have.

            [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

            Other than drug laws, to which I fall distinctly on the libertarian side I find most of conservative policy (historically) to be the thing that actually holds society together.

            The endless circlejerk of big companies "not paying their fair share" etc is all a red herring, big companies aren't there to pay corporation tax, they never have and never will. They pay NI and employ people who then go off and stimulate the economy with their own money. As for fox hunting, I've never done it but I'm very very uninterested in how brutal an end a fox experiences when weighed against creating jobs for people and maintaining a cultural staple of Britishness. All the people upset about that shit are the first ones shopping in primark supporting slave labour etc.

            Labour has lost it's relevance, so have the tories and all we're left with is the rabid left parroting on about womens pay gaps and scrapping our nuclear arsenal and a one trick pony UKIP. Politics in the UK is in a dire state at the moment - there's no sensible leadership coming from anyone at the moment.

            I hope Trump gets POTUS if only to drag the overton window back to where it should be. I'd gladly swap Cameron for Putin. There's no leadership any more.

            [–]2rp_valiant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            I agree with pretty much everything you've said. My negativity on the Conservatives was for policies like, as you mentioned, privatising the NHS. Of course that depends on the approach they would take as I'd be more amenable to private hospitals being contracted by the state, but the last thing we'd want is the American system where you can go bankrupt because you got in a car accident.

            The UK is totally fucked right now, it's like our leadership have forgotten everything that once made this country great - striving for classical liberal ideals, being an industrial and economic powerhouse, and making big footprints on the world. Right now we're saddled up to faggy Sweden pretending that if we're super nice and bend over for everyone who wants something from us that we'll be better off for it. If we keep on this track it won't be long before you see the black flag of ISIS flying in more than just poor areas of London and Bradford.

            [–]jm51 2 points3 points  (1 child)

            The Law of Unintended Consequences:

            The ban on fox hunting, plus the increase in gas (gas not gasoline) prices led to the outbreak of mad cow disease.

            Sheep that died of disease used to be fed to the foxhounds. After the ban, those carcasses went to the rendering industry and got turned into fertiliser and cattle feed etc. They got rendered a 2nd time which, as it turned out, was enough to destroy any transmittable disease. Gas prices went up, 2nd rendering process got turned off as no longer economic. Disease in the food chain.

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [deleted]

              [–]LoveYourSelfish 1 point2 points  (6 children)

              Mr. Cameron is marginally more right wing than Jeremy Corben, but still atrociously left wing.

              [–]Riktenkay 1 point2 points  (1 child)

              Yeah, sure he is.

              I am utterly baffled any time anyone claims the political arena has shifted to the left. It's been heading steadily rightwards for years. Pretty much the only legitimately left wing option lately has been the Greens.

              Yes, with Corbyn Labour do now finally have someone who appears to be genuinely left wing. Though the way the media portray him as "extreme left", and the way people seem to be lapping it up, I'm sure he stands no chance ever becoming PM and after he's gone I'm sure it will be back to business as usual.

              [–]LoveYourSelfish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              I am lost by the media's agenda, and I am not well informed enough to really say what they are all about.
              Society is shifting towards the right, I believe you are correct there, but not because of spineless, corruptible politicians who cannot do the things they say they are going to do.

              [–]Bonesteel50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              They can issue orders that make you have to get a form signed before you get laid.

              Fuck everything about england. what a shithole.

              [–]twatbutter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

              I've always said it, but the moment that the law becomes unjust to a group of people, or fails to be upheld, vigilantism becomes warranted. Men will just see offing their wives, or better yet not marrying them, as a better alternative than going through legal loops.

              I expect to see domestic murder rates rise in correlation with such laws. I also expect manginas/feminists to say that this correlation was not caused by said laws.

              [–]alwaysultimate21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              So if she's actually fat, and you call her fat. You go to prison for telling the truth.

              [–]ABProsper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              This will be easily dealt with either with Sharia courts for some guys or for secular/non religious guys by not having a wife or girlfriend. Plenty of loose women out there and if not that porn. Hope the UK enjoys the population crash and tech regression since other the Arabs and Blacks who being in a few ways smarter than Western men can't be made to behave that stupidly (too many of them , too violent) no one who can sustain society is having many children. Poles have a lower birth rate that UK Whites and all of those societies are running out of migrants.

              Also some men may immediately divorce the woman without telling her why if she puts on weight before this law can be used against them as well though there are risks.

              More likely men won't marry, have cohabitation or any LTR's with any women, By by family formation and by by economy and social order. Hope the ladies like moggies.

              For the sex urge there are plenty of loose women out there as well and porn and eventually I suspect people will end up shifting very hard right

              Long term, women will fail the worlds largest shit test and end up without any rights I suspect.

              Whoever takes over, the philosophy/faith of Islam, Traditionalists if any still exist in the UK or rebels and/or warlords for that matter will simply not allow their women to cause so many problems.

              They won't be owning property, voting, serving in office, going to Uni if they are through, doing many different jobs and will be expected to marry and have children or live with the parents till they do,

              This is much less female freedom than Western cultures are accustomed to so it won't last terribly long and Islam won't stay around that long without conquest but the irony is that most women will complain but will be much happier since their be feminine and even the mealiest of men will be fairly masculine

              [–]dragonfangxl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              Oh no you don't understand, it's not bad at all. It's only when it happens "repeatedly" that it becomes illegal.

              So you have to call her fat twice at any two points. Perfectly logical! /s

              [–]thor_away92 4 points5 points  (23 children)

              The offence only applies if the victim suffers such treatment “repeatedly or continuously”, on an ongoing basis.

              TRP get all butt hurt before reading the fucking material?! It's like they're a subgroup of redditors or something!!

              I mean if you repeatedly call your woman a fat cow, yet you're still with her I'd deem that rather abusive too..

              So basically a lot of you blew this out of context with your anger phase. You're not going to prison because you tell your girlfriend she is getting fat.

              I see why we're called a cult now. Look at all the foul mouthed things you said when the entire topic of anger isn't even what this fucking law is about.

              Tl;dr you guys are fueling the decline.

              I wouldn't hear out people who are claiming to logically be above women, and then react just like a woman would to a simple article they didn't even read.

              /rant

              *cue the down votes because you cliff notes'd my post and I touched your precious little feels.

              [–][deleted]  (4 children)

              [removed]

                [–]wastagaswe 18 points19 points  (0 children)

                Since when do women have to prove anything. All she needs to do is cry.

                [–]Miheegz 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                First off, you clearly do not understand womens capacity to lie to achieve their goals. If verbal abuse can land you in jail what do you think the burden of proof will be? An audio recording? Yeah right, it will be more than enough that the woman say you have abused her for months or years and cry. You will then be in the position of trying to prove you did not verbally abuse her which is tough. This is what happened with rape claims. Men practically have the burden of proof on them to prove their innocence. That is why this law is fucking scary.

                [–]redzorp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                You don't get.

                Just look at how domestic violence and alimony laws have ALREADY been perverted and used unfairly against men for DECADES. Horror story after horror story after horror story - in turn giving birth to the manosphere.

                Now they come up with an even more vaguely written DV law that goes into the nebulous and murky area of "psychological abuse" being wielded by a feminist near-totalitarian state. How do you think that is going to work out for you? Rhetorical question. NOT WELL is the answer.

                [–]Rasalom72 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                “repeatedly or continuously” doesn't mean 24 hours a day 7 days a week. It can mean over the course of day/ weeks/ months.

                [–]Momo_dollar 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                More women are guilty of these things then men, but they do it in a more covert way. So if this law when put into practice really covers psychological abuse, and not just bullying, then I hope all the psychologically abused husbands and bf's who have been put down or whatever get the justice they deserve

                [–]gonorealover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                I hope all the psychologically abused husbands and bf's who have been put down or whatever get the justice they deserve

                They won't . The society we currently live in is not meant for that.

                We are living right now in a societal decline. Look around you . Everything is going to shit for men and everything is going perfect for women. This world will crumble soon .

                [–]flatox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Hahaha I just heard a brilliant joke, want to hear it?

                UK.

                load more comments (123 replies)