912
913

Men's Rights"Sexual Assault" is Why I'm Endorsing Donald Trump for President of the United States (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Modredpillschool

For the most part, we've stayed politics neutral here on TRP, limiting political discussion to how it applies to TRP (or how TRP applies to the political world), and what we can learn from it. This policy isn't changing any time soon; the last thing we need is for TRP to devolve into a political debate sub.

But discussion of red pill principles has always been on topic, and events that occur in the greater culture do affect us, as men, and are on topic.

This election season we're not going to be able to put up any walls between sexual strategy and politics, because the outcomes from these candidates are directly tied to the very cultural influences and trends we've been discussing here for the past few years. They're tied to sexual strategy.

To begin, I want to state with a disclaimer that TRP is not going to officially endorse one candidate or the other. If you lean liberal or conservative, or if you lean in any other direction, you're always welcome to discuss your viewpoint on TRP. This hasn't changed.

That said, I am posting this today to announce my endorsement of Donald Trump for president. And not in spite of his alleged sexual assault gaffes, but rather because of them.

Today's US presidential candidates do not represent Republican V Democrat. They're not representing a difference of economic or social opinion at all. I've had casual arguments with many people of different political leanings, and many have well-reasoned arguments for their disagreements on policy. The reason there's a political debate is because there is no hard answer to many of these questions. If economics was a solved field, we probably wouldn't even need elections today.

No, our presidential candidates are representing instead a system set up to increasingly damage the lives of men (and promote the choices, advantages, and positive outcomes for women), and those alienated by this system, respectively.

I'm sure you've heard the old adage that Democrats and Republicans are just two sides of the same coin. Our elections with a two-party system have been set up to offer us an illusion of choice, but no matter which party you end up with, the new boss is strikingly similar to the old boss.

Yes, the "liberal" media is against Trump, and democrats are crying louder than ever. But there should be no better tell that Trump is outside of this system than the fact that his own party is now turning against him.

It would seem that our entire culture is against Trump. If this didn't appear particularly damaging to his chances, I'd suggest Trump orchestrated this himself just to bolster his credibility with those disenfranchised by our system. But alas, this may not be good news for team Trump. Only time will tell.

This is a fascinating scenario on its own, but the point that interests me the most about it is on what pretext our culture saw fit to turn against Trump: An off-color remark about his legal, consensual sexual exploits.

Essentially, the establishment took a benign comment that uses coarse language, and made it into a sexual assault using their newspeak versions of consent and assault. They lied about what took place, but nobody is catching the lie because consent today means, well, whatever the hell works for the feminists' narrative.

Why is this election important?

The last eight years have been a great example of the left generating a society in which baseless attacks that involve certain keywords (such as "misogyny") will now be taken seriously in lieu of any actual proof or crime having been committed.

I hope that it's clear to any red pill veteran what the culmination of this past decade has achieved. The erosion and broadening of the term "consent" (among others) has played a pivotal role in the grand movement against men. By making the concept as nebulous as possible, it not only makes it impossible to play by the rules, but it retroactively makes any law abiding citizen that they point the social justice beam at into a guilty one.

There's no doubt in my mind that the past two terms have done more damage to our language and race/gender relations than anything I can point to in the past half century. Anybody who thought it was coincidental or unplanned should have another look at exactly how they weaponized these changes in language and relations to attempt to maim a presidential candidate. The worst part is, it might actually work.

Let's imagine the next four (or God help us, eight) years with Hillary at the helm. Is there any reason to believe that this war on language and men will subside? The very tools that put her into power will obviously be solidified, and built upon with Hillary in power. These tools are too effective to be used once and then tossed. They will be used and abused.

This is why I am officially endorsing Trump. I'm not here to get into the nitty-gritty details of foreign or economic policy, or discuss the best way to fix the healthcare situation in our country. I do have opinions on them, and coincidentally I believe Trump has pretty decent stances on a lot of them. But the reason I'm addressing this here on TRP and to this community is because what we stand to gain or lose is much larger than these items.

The war on men hasn't been abating as many here have suggested over the last few years. It's growing, and it's growing out of control.

The accusations of sexual assault are unfounded and convenient. People come out of the woodwork to accuse Trump of sexual assault years prior, but conveniently wait until right now to announce. The very accusation itself now holds as much weight as a guilty verdict, and our changing vocabulary ensures that any man, acting normally, would be considered guilty (both in the court of public opinion, and possibly in a court of law).

I know too well that these tactics and climate will affect more than just a presidential candidate. I know there are a number of men here today who have been on the receiving end of such false attacks. I know that these problems will only get worse for us as men, especially so if we endure more time under leadership that so willingly engages in (and takes advantage of) such nonsense.

When somebody accuses a powerful or famous figure like Trump of "sexual assault," I don't look the other way. I don't denounce them or their behavior. Instead I run towards them, because there is no truer signal which side somebody is on, than when they're given a bogus accusation by the establishment. This is our beacon to find allies in the war.

Do you ever wonder why, after an event like the Trump leak, reporters are quick to ask his endorsers: "But you don't condone sexual assault, do you?" Because the story they are trying to sell is that there is no question a sexual assault took place. They do this by distracting the viewership into thinking the only question left to ask is whether the bad people think it's okay.


[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (28 children)

For those who have yet to actually watch/listen to the clip in question that started the whole thing, here you go. You can see for yourself it was guys bullshitting each other and "talking shop" about women the way some guys do behind closed doors.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-recorded-having-extremely-lewd-conversation-about-women-in-2005/2016/10/07/3b9ce776-8cb4-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html

I can almost guarantee you the women complaining about any kissing or whatnot let it happen because it was innocent, and now they're blowing it out of proportion because it's the vogue thing to do.

Notice it isn't until now, YEARS later that they're saying anything, and it's always well after their looks have faded or begun to fade. Have you noticed that? This is a hit job, mixed with women's innate desire for validation and IMO is why he'll lose the election. Young HOT women LOVE The Donald, but it's the older jaded, washed up feminist types who seem to have a problem. Think about why that is for a moment and you'll see exactly why this is TRP related.


edit 10/27/2016:
Sheriff Clarke just gave a speech tonight that was reminiscent of another powerful speech, one I think everyone should see at least once in their lives.

https://youtu.be/NofNPqEIdUs

[–][deleted] 117 points118 points  (36 children)

I'd love to see statistics on what percentage of frequent TRP subs are also on /r/the_donald

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (4 children)

    Oh yeah!!! Ciswhitemaelstrom was the fucking boss over at the_donald. He had to step down as top mod because some tolerant liberals doxxed the fuck out of him or some bullshit like that. He was such an awesome mod, man.

    [–]navarroadonais 59 points60 points  (7 children)

    I'm part of that statistic.

    [–]DirtieHarry 26 points27 points  (5 children)

    Yupp. I think there is a lot of crossover.

    [–]Burea_Huwaito 23 points24 points  (4 children)

    Lurker here, can confirm.

    [–]Troll_Name 16 points17 points  (2 children)

    Anyone still doubting Trump at this point is clinging to an organized religion with no official name.

    [–]Party_Olive 12 points13 points  (0 children)

    I imagine that a majority of TRP subs prefer Trump, for the reasons OP stated.

    [–]ECoast_Man 22 points23 points  (4 children)

    I actually would argue that it is incompatible to adhere to TRP and support Hillary Clinton's bid for presidency. You can not support Trump but there is no way to be an HRC supporter.

    RPS is absolutely right to bring this up, we've been talking about this here for years.

    As an aside, I also suspect Hillary actually is a misandrist. She talks about men holding her down her whole life, her husband doesn't fuck her and publicly humiliated her, she got trounced by Obama when it was her time...

    [–]loganfire3 10 points11 points  (2 children)

    Well thats not true. I don't like the man but i agree with a fair share of what i read on here. Honestly, he comes off as weak to me. I dont respect the fact that he doesnt own up to the crap that he says all the time. I would respect him so much more if hen said " yeah i said it, so what?" Instead of the constant denials and redirection. Also, playing the victim is a huge red flag for me and honestly, i think this sub would also hate that trait.

    [–]ECoast_Man 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    What exactly makes you think HRC supporting is compatible with here? Forget Trump's perceived errors, talk about the Shill and her policies

    [–]SETXpinegoblin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    This is the problem with this election. Be full scale right wing your whole life and say, "Trump is a retarded douchebag" and the rest of the right will jump in and say "oh what, so you support Hillary?"

    A man can turn down a Pepsi and also dislike Coke.

    [–]2Overkillengine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Well, the DT hedonistic sector might support her, much like (covert) poachers would support a politician that defunds game wardens so that they have more latitude to get away with poaching.

    Being awake to reality is not a guarantee of sharing the same moral codes.

    That being said, a pragmatic hunter that wants there to be game to hunt 10 years from now would support rule of law.

    [–]blackedoutfast 31 points32 points  (0 children)

    grab this centipede a coat! 10 feet higher!

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I actually don't go there. Just see the occasional post in the front page.

    [–]QueenBee126 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    Also extends to RPW as well! :-)

    [–]PM-ME-YOUR-SEXTAPE 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Lets send the DON to the white house

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Let's do it bebe. T Minus 32 minutes

    [–]michael_wilkins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Quite a lot, many times I've been over there and discussing TRP stuff or talking about "that other sub"

    G_Petronius is an accomplished shitposter there as well. Also a mod I think.

    [–]lamentationsoftheir 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Yo.

    [–]Darkwoodz 89 points90 points  (36 children)

    Did anyone here ever consider that it might be better to have Betas running the world than dumbass corrupt business men.

    Y'all falling for the cult of personality. Dumb fucks.

    I really thought most people on here would be third party people. Those who can see through the two party bs system.

    This whole thread is just making me cringe. A bunch of losers complaining about needing an orange troll with zero understanding of policy to be president so that feminists will validate their masculinity. I've never been more embarrassed to be a subscriber here.

    Seriously, this post is cancer.

    [–]odenby 46 points47 points  (1 child)

    I feel like a bunch of guys on this sub are so extremely focused on gender relations that they will support any presidential candidate who satisfies them in that regard. Doesn't matter that he's authoritarian, not particularly knowledgeable, and supports torture, war crimes, and civil liberties violations like stop and frisk and government spying on Americans. He's on their side when it comes to gender relations/political correctness issues and that's all they care about. It annoys me because I think that it would be good to have higher standards than that.

    [–]Darkwoodz 26 points27 points  (0 children)

    I completely agree, and its really a shame that a group of people who pride themselves on seeing the world how it really is, are falling for such a fraud of presidential candidate.

    [–]supper_pt 19 points20 points  (1 child)

    This should be higher

    I'm not even american (European) and I don't give 2 fucks about your (highly undemocratic) election and whether you pick moron A instead of moron B. But the kind of arguments being used to justify a vote in this thread are (well undoubtbly something I expected from most beta americans) not the reason you should vote for the leader of your country. Just because he's an alfa is not a reason to vote for a candidate. I know a lot of betas that would make better presidents than most alfas.

    All this talk around the sexual assault accusations... Talking about how this culture is consequence of the Obama administration... I'm not even going to touch that with a stick.

    We came to the red pill to change our life for the better, be better men and discuss strategies with fellow alfas. This kind of post has no reason to be posted here and stickied to the top. We should work to convert our fellow beta men, not to present them with a post that reads "Sexual Assault is why I'm endorsing X moron" when they finally grow the balls to visit our subredit.

    For that kind of post I can go to the politics or the donald subredit

    [–]Modredpillschool[S] 16 points17 points  (10 children)

    There's a decision you make when you care about power. I'm going to clue you in because your comment reads like an angsty teen who thinks things like principles matter in the long run... They don't. You put your money on the guy who will help you the most (or hurt you the least) and you compromise on your values because a perfect ideology has gotten exactly zero people elected.

    Go ahead, vote third party and pretend you're playing with the adults.

    [–]Darkwoodz 43 points44 points  (8 children)

    No, what you're doing is being a single issue voter.... Just like many other brain dead Americans. You're rationalizing it as saying we need the save masculinity. Just like the dumbass feminists voting for Hillary because she has a vagina. " Isn't it time for a woman president? " = "We need a president with balls who isn't a cuck! "

    I agree with you to a certain extent, but if you think Trump will somehow fix our issues you've been duped by the snake oil salesman that is Donald Trump.

    [–]ThatHoeOverDere 8 points9 points  (2 children)

    Donald Trump wont fix our issues, but he will slow the decline for 4-8 years. That's the whole fucking point.

    [–]Darkwoodz 25 points26 points  (1 child)

    Maybe, in your fantasy reality where the president somehow magically has enough power to instantly effect social change. It's really sad how Trump supporters idealize this man and use him as a vessel to vent their frustrations with the world. Homophobes think he'll end gay marriage, the islamaphobes think he'll ban all muslims, racists think he'll kick out all the Mexicans and make them speak english. Some think he'll make people respect the police. Others believe..... Whatever else all these people want to believe. Just like a lot of people on this sub believe he'll teach the feminists to learn their place and blah blah. Cult of personality at its finest, suckers.

    [–]Lord_dokodo 108 points109 points  (46 children)

    I really did not get too into this election until just recently. Then I saw the Times articles repeatedly with more and more victims coming out against him. I saw the Times, HuPo, WaPo, CNN, CBS, NYPost, and all sorts of other media companies all citing one article in their report on the topic. It wasn't BuzzFeed, who surprisingly and laughably did the most journalism out of all of the media companies, but the New York Times, which WAS BASED OFF INFORMATION FROM THE BUZZFEED ARTICLE--getting your sources from BuzzFeed, hahahahahaha.

    Even BuzzFeed had the respect for journalism to include accounts of the other side--the other 11 Miss USA contestants who actually wanted to say something--say that there was a slim to zero possibility of Trump just casually walking past their chaperones (their own fucking parents), security detail, and others. I don't know what kind of parent just lets an old man into the dressing room that their daughter is currently standing naked in, but I doubt many people would sell away their children to receive the attention of some rich billionaire. No parent would give anyone the right to just barge into their home, even if it was Bill Gates, and just see their child naked.

    0, zilch, proof or even plausibility within these stories and they were all parroted by every media company. The scary part is that they all selectively omitted the details, in proxy, by basing their "findings" on the NYT article, which also conveniently left out the other side's story. The only articles I found that mentioned the other side was Slate and Fortune and Buzzfeed. Everyone else just conveniently left that out. Lo and behold, the comments then inundate with people calling for Trump to die and burn at a stake for his crude remarks and his sexual misconduct.

    The same people who denounce media companies as filthy biased lies will eat that shit up whenever it fits their narrative. No one truly ever thinks about it, they just put on a facade of intellectual capacity but succumb to ignorance whenever they truly have to do their own thinking. The very same liberals who abhorred Fox News would readily repost their shit all over Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram if it confirmed their narrative that we live in a rape culture society. And now that Republicans are pulling their support for Trump, Fox News is actually reporting on this as well, if o

    "Intellectuals", who parade themselves around as the future of our society and wellbeing, can't even tell that they've been blindfolded and spun around 3 times by the media and whoever has compelled them to act this way. People who despise secrecy cannot even fathom the idea that their own party is the height and pinnacle of deceit.

    We've developed networks capable of transferring data and information at light speed. We have more outlets of media than ever before. More channels of thought than the entirety of history up until this point. Yet people have never been so stupid and so misguided. Truly, truly, helpless. There isn't anything people can say that will change this, they have to learn from experience.

    No matter how hot you tell that baby the stovetop is, he won't know what searing heat is until he touches it for the first time.

    [–][deleted] 111 points112 points  (41 children)

    Lets say he did all that, still, why care?

    I have a security clearance. The shit that Hilary and the FBI has admitted she did would(and has) put people in prison. I could care if she ran against a clown. Trumps failings are personal, no worse than Bill, or Kennedy. Her failings are professional.

    Lets face it, few understand policy anyways, what they are voting for is a figurehead, and you have the choice between a classic loud mouthed new yorker, rich business man (the american dream) or the template for a Television show about sociopaths abusing power to achieve for their own ends, because it's time for women to be given the world.

    [–]Modredpillschool[S] 23 points24 points  (21 children)

    I have a security clearance.

    I hope you're taking appropriate precautions with your activity here!

    [–][deleted] 34 points35 points  (18 children)

    Nothing classified would be of any use to the manosphere anyways. All you have to do is keep your damed mouth shut about shit with a designation/classification.

    You'd think it was easy

    [–]Modredpillschool[S] 13 points14 points  (17 children)

    I'm more worried about those who granted you security seeing your browsing habits.

    [–]TRP VanguardWhisper 14 points15 points  (14 children)

    We're not followed anywhere near that closely.

    [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

    Someone using their personal politics as a legal cudgel is what put me here in the first place, funnily enough.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I looked into this recently and checked with one of my guys to get a legal opinion. We do not think that browsing on TRP would impact a security clearance investigation in any way. That is, being a Terp should not impact your ability to get a security clearance.

    Security Clearances are based primarily on your loyalty to the nation and (in the U.S.) your loyalty to the U.S. constitution. Obviously if your TRP posts advocate the violent overthrow of the government, or are overwrought and showing that you are a mental basket case who might be a risk to divulge national security secrets then the investigation might not go well for you but identifying gender dysfunctions, PUA, ranting about feminism etc all should be just fine.

    TLDR: TRP should not prevent anybody from getting a security clearance.

    [–]jackandjill22 20 points21 points  (1 child)

    Exactly. All the attacks leveled at Trump are ad hominem if you read the Wikileaks documents or the the Benghazi foreign policy disasters or the secret email server wipings. She's abandoned her base & demographic by mocking Bernie Sanders supporters. Hillary Clinton isn't even in office yet & has major governmental catastrophes/scandals. She's a stone-cold liar that gives Fuck-all about the wellbeing of the country.

    [–]darkrood 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Be careful next time your bench press when a stranger comes to "spot you".

    [–]Silver-Monk_Shu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    The problem is far worse than we can even begin to imagine.

    http://archive.is/veYJs
    http://archive.is/l79hy
    http://archive.is/154bQ (User analyzes 375 posts on politics right now: 327 of them are anti-Trump (87%). 0 are anti-Hillary. 0 are pro-Trump.)

    Even reddit mods have been bought out to support Hilary Clinton unfortunately.
    For example on the politics subreddit they have not covered many of the important wikileak email dumps and used vote manipulationt o manage the content that gets seen by others.

    Its been tailored to become anti-trump, and all the comments make it seem like 100% of the people do not support trump and all think he's a rapist.

    It's rigged as fuck right now. I don't know what I can trust anymore, I already KNEW I couldn't trust reddit but how can I not believe things are rigged like this on other news sites? They can just CHOOSE to not reveal information to me? How the fuck can I make an informed decision without information?

    How can I truly support anyone, if certain information about a candidate is withheld from me?

    I could think one person is good, and the other is evil but that's only because I don't have the full story. How can I make good decisions, how can I get actual facts when it comes to politics when I have to get my info through the media? They're controlling my decision whether I want them to or not, what the fuck do I do.

    [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 200 points201 points  (117 children)

    I'm heavily in favor of any intellectualy stimulating discussion taking place on TRP be it political or otherwise, because intellectual discussion is self improvement. Let me mansplain. Most of our userbase is stuck in an intellectualy stifling environment.

    Schools and Universities cater to women. Women aren't very keen on independent thought or the Socratic method so the education system has become a rote memorization extravaganza. In addition smart phones have nuked people's attention spans birthing a generation of ADHD zombies. Television and film are produced at a sixth grade level so that proles can understand them. Consequently most people now operate on a sixth grade level.

    Intellectualy stimulating environments are incredibly important for young men and TRP holds the unique distinction of forcing men to think like men instead of children.

    Furthermore an intellectual discussion of politics can only take place on the fringes of Reddit because every mainstream Sub is infested with CTR HillShills. TRP on the otherhand is HillShill proof because they don't want our misogy in their post history and are not going to waste time creating separate accounts for the task.

    [–]Programmer_Trainee 91 points92 points  (2 children)

    Let me mansplain.

    You smooth bastard.

    [–]1empatheticapathetic 12 points13 points  (0 children)

    I just burst out laughing at that point, after the sincerity before it.

    [–]1991Kira 37 points38 points  (88 children)

    Intellectually stimulating environments are incredibly important for young men

    And society in general. But sadly, there seems to be a profound shortage of these in the real world right now.

    I can count on the fingers of one hand (and still have fingers left) the number of times I've seen people use facts and logical arguments to denounce Trump instead of making blanket statements like "he's a misogynist" or "he's a buffoon and a phony". I'm glad the mods here are bold enough to encourage discussions on such topics. I look forward to seeing a lively debate on this thread, since whether Reddit and the mainstream media wish to acknowledge it or not, we've actually got some very intelligent people frequenting this sub.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 24 points25 points  (21 children)

    I have yet to hear anyone use a logical argument as to why they won't vote for Trump. It all amounts to nothing more than I don't like him, his business all fail, or he is racist/facist/misogynistic/not a snake headed alien. I'm not entirely sure I like the guy, but it's because he just might be exactly like the previous residents in the Oval Office. I'll take a wait and see approach, because I've seen lots of dog and pony show at the circus.

    However all I hear against Hillary is logical argument, evidence of wrongdoing, and shit leadership. Sure there is some made up fanciful bullshit, but jesus, I'd be in jail if I handled sensitive information like she did while I was in the military.

    [–]odenby 28 points29 points  (11 children)

    My logical anti-Trump argument is basically this: Trump would be bad for civil liberties. He supports torture, collective punishment, the PATRIOT Act, stop and frisk, NSA spying on Americans, and executing alleged traitors. Trump also seems to be a militarist, since he keeps talking about funding the military more even though the US already has a better-funded military than the next several countries put together.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    That's the point though, both are bad for liberty, but one tries to hide it with ad hominem and little more than shouting "I know you are but what am I?" the other is outspoken and says stupid shit.

    Both will lead us into war, the chances of the war being here in the states is higher with her, but rest assured, we will be at war in less than 4 years. I've done two already, I'm rather sick of it all.

    [–]RedMoonAscendant 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    I agree 100% and it's why I'm going to vote Trump grudgingly, because electing Trump is the only way to send a real message up the chain.

    [–]frequentlywrong 11 points12 points  (8 children)

    Trump also seems to be a militarist

    But he is also not a warmonger. He is for the military for defense. Hillary on the other hand is bloodthirsty, corrupt to the core and can not be believed on a single thing she says.

    All the things you listed Hillary is for also. He is just honest about his opinions.

    [–]FrakkenKrakken 14 points15 points  (2 children)

    Let me preface this by first saying I am no Clinton fan and firmly believe she will probably be one of the worst presidents we have ever had. However, Trump is of the same Narcissistic mold as LBJ who was has so far been our worst president. The problem with pathological narcissism is that people inflicted with it have no conscience, Tremendous Hubris, and little empathy. Their three main goals are Power, Attention and Thrills and will adhere to any set of behaviors and principles that will help them achieve their goals. LBJ put his name on everything (renamed his wife lady bird so she would have his initials) similarly Trump puts his name on everything he can. LBJ had "the Great society" Trump has "make America Great Again" both are an attempt to make themselves great, or to at least appear great. Clinton sucks donkey balls but Trump sucks the diseased dick of a dead dingo.

    [–]Rommel0502 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Agree 1000% with LBJ being the worst president in US history.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I won't disagree with you. Trump is "as yet to be seen" on my view. No telling what he might do, and the gop had been too full of batshit crazy for too long. That's how he was nominated.

    I'm pissed about this election, the whole thing is obviously rigged and serves only to divide us farther. How we got to this point is what infuriates me. Institutional weakness and ignorance, that's why we are here.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I remember the bush Election. It was all about the everyman, that you'd be willing to have a beer with. Obama was that same aspirational guy for the left. He's cool, I'd hang with him!

    Those were both lackluster at best...

    At this point, judging by what I read on his supporters, they don't care about his character, they don't like him (as a person) and that's not why they are voting for him. If he hadn't apologized for talking about women, this would have died already, because no one really cares, they like to pretend they do, but they don't.

    You're bang on with the Anti-hillary stuff though. I have a feeling that Trump isn't winning, so much as Hillary, and Jeb are losing this one.

    After all, it was supposed to be Clinton V bush 3.0 this cycle.

    [–]Hexthorne 16 points17 points  (65 children)

    I would find the entire election cycle hilarious if it weren't so damned sad and destructive.

    Clinton is absolutely qualified for the position, but has proven herself to be completely untrustworthy with any kind of power. Meanwhile Trump is completely unqualified but is at least talking about issues like corruption that are the root cause of a lot of political problems.

    I can count on the fingers of one hand (and still have fingers left) the number of times I've seen people use facts and logical arguments to denounce Trump instead of making blanket statements like "he's a misogynist" or "he's a buffoon and a phony".

    This is because most people vote based on emotion rather than logic, not because there aren't logical arguments in favor of or against both candidates.

    For example, Trump is not a good businessman despite his claims to be one. In the 80's his wealth was on par with Warren Buffet at the time, but Trump failed to grow his wealth in the past 30 years as compared to other rich bastards from the 80's. He's also certainly not worth $10 billion, especially when he self estimates his brand to be 1/3 of his net worth. He does manage to make it sound good though, so people believe him.

    Now with Clinton people won't even budge on their stance despite her terrible track record with security (she may have even potentially gotten US military personnel killed with her "carelessness") as well as the financial questions regarding the Clinton Foundation and how her private state department server was kept on the same fucking network as the Clinton Foundation server.

    Honestly I can't see how anyone can vote for either of them.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 23 points24 points  (5 children)

    Trump is not a good businessman despite his claims to be one.

    That is ridiculous. The Trump brand is known around the world. Known well enough to win him the Republican nomination and possibly get elected President.

    Trump wrote "The Art of the Deal" in the 1980's and it remains one of the best books on business and contracts ever written.

    He is mocked as a "reality TV show star" but the fact is he played himself- a top notch businessman on that reality TV show. Since you haven't seen the show, be advised that he was THE BOSS assigning groups of "Apprentices" various business assignments and then advising them, taking reports, and evaluating them. The Apprentices were Harvard and Yale MBA's and wall street bankers and other notables. He dressed down the failures and explained what they should have done. His trademark phrase was the boss telling the failed Apprentices "Your Fired."

    He maintained a Billion dollar real estate empire through the worst real estate crash in U.S. history without filing a personal bankruptcy.

    His bankruptcy / failure rate for startup companies is around 2% compared to the national average of about 40%.

    [–]Llanolinn 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    Not trying to get in any sort of argument one way or another but... Trump did not write Art of the Deal. Hell, the guy who did ghostwrite it had some pretty unflattering things to say about him.

    So probably don't use that in your defense next time. Its kind of a weak point. =/

    [–]_the_shape_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Now with Clinton people won't even budge on their stance despite her terrible track record with security

    Speaking of tracks, Wikileaks is dredging up some absolutely filthy ones each and every day.

    The options are: Vote Crooked, Vote Trump, vote third party, or don't vote all. If the conclusion is still "I don't care - voting for her" despite all of the dirt being uncovered (assuming they're aware of it too - media is doing an excellent job of looking in the other direction and not reporting it, or very lightly touching on it), then I don't know what say, other than maybe it's high time for the herd to be thinned out considerably.

    [–]1SexdictatorLucifer 32 points33 points  (14 children)

    This "I don't know how anyone could vote for either of them" stuff is an easy copout and really something a woman would say to rid herself of responsibility. You miss the point. This election is a cultural war. Experience, economics, and even the candidate representing either side is besides the point. Each one is fighting for one side of a global cultural war which is being battled in the west, especially the in US. Get over what you are told to think the "important issues" are and realize what this is all about.

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]thekingmaker88 20 points21 points  (8 children)

      Your use of hyperbole is almost as strong as my ex's.

      [–]pygar_mathmos 16 points17 points  (2 children)

      Let's see. Hillary and Kaine will amnesty the 20 million or so illegal immigrants currently here. They largely vote democratic. Presidential elections are determined by a couple of million votes. The Republicans will be shut out for the foreseeable future. Hillary will stack the Supreme Court with liberals who will gut the 1st and 2nd Amendments. Hate speech laws will be broadened to include anything critical of leftist ideas or the government, just like in Europe now where you can't criticize their insane immigration policies. They will also go after gun manufacturers by allowing them to be sued, driving them out of business They will also over regulate ammo and make it unaffordable. The public will become unable to resist a tyrannical government.

      The large number of Berniebots wanting free college gives you a glimpse of the socialist policies that will likely become laws. We will end up like Venezuela. In Europe and later the US and Canada, Islam will continue to expand until it reaches a critical mass. First local Sharia courts, then no-go zones, etc. With their birth rates 2-3x the native population they will become the majority in less the two generations. Sharia law will be enacted. Then the do-gooder-we-have-to-help-every-one feminists will finally realize their folly when they are forced to wear burkas and are beaten by their husbands.

      Trump is likely the last chance to stop this from happening, so yes, I don't think it is hyperbole to say that Western civilization is on the brink.

      Edited for clarity

      [–]pygar_mathmos 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      Last post too much red pill for you?

      [–]beginner_ 8 points9 points  (4 children)

      He sure has never been to Europe because in terms of bitchy women and feminism US is far worse of, Europe usually a decade behind.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Lvl10Bard 28 points29 points  (32 children)

        Clinton is absolutely qualified for the position,

        She's committed treason, bro. That's about a unqualified as it gets.

        Meanwhile Trump is completely unqualified but is at least talking about issues like corruption that are the root cause of a lot of political problems.

        'Member that time an actor ran for president?

        I 'member.

        Honestly I can't see how anyone can vote for either of them.

        I really, really want to see the economy go pre-chernobyl with a 15% tax rate.

        [–][deleted]  (14 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Lvl10Bard 25 points26 points  (7 children)

          This is exactly the same kind of shit-stupid hyperbole that gets employed against Trump.

          The definition of treason is as follows:

          This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.

          The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

          She knowingly did this. As per the Podesta emails, they knew that Saudi Arabia was funding ISIS. Despite this, the United States of America's State Department, under the control of Hillary Clinton, Sold Weapons to Saudi Arabia. By selling arms to the country that is actively giving covert aide to an enemy of our Country, who is therefor our enemy, Secretary Clinton has given aid to the enemy.

          It's not hyperbolic. You're just too wrapped in your hug box to admit that she's betrayed us.

          [–]PowerVitamin 17 points18 points  (3 children)

          Add the uranium deal with russia (1), the conspiring to down the intelligence of the electorate (2), approving arms to ISIS (3), wanting to increase islamic immigration (4), borderless world (5), making money though the Clinton foundation while in office (illegal, but not treason. Becomes treason when Saudi Arabia, responsible for 9/11 is doing the bribing) (6). These are all verifiable accounts of treason released by wikileaks in the last 2 weeks. Add the implications of a Scalia assassination (7) and a rigging of the democratic primaries against Bernie Sanders (8) and conspiring with the media against Donald Trump (9). And you have yourself an absolute portfolio of criminal activity, and deplorable behaviours all provable by wikileaks.

          The truth is, if you let this witch ascend any further, you are actively giving the free card to all women in the nation to be complete deplorable corrupt whores. Oh, you thought they already were? Think again dumbass. This is signing the fucking green card over to women. This monster cannot be allowed to have her tentacles anywhere near the oval office and you all know it. This is a cultural war that threatens the very fabric of masculinity, honor, and behaviour.

          You need to lift weights, and to get your buddies to lift weights. This is no joke. Without testosterone, the world will descend to nihilism. From nihilism they can absolutely end the world or take more of your freedoms and deny you sexual strategy. This is not just a casual battle for humanity. This is an absolute war.

          [–]Lvl10Bard 4 points5 points  (2 children)

          Your post is on point. Just one thing I want to point out:

          You need to lift weights, and to get your buddies to lift weights

          Or just do what I do, hunt your own food (Without a gun), chop your own fire wood, etc. Gym time is nice, but isn't always needed.

          [–]PowerVitamin 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          I should learn how to skin an animal. :D

          [–]xinihil 9 points10 points  (3 children)

          Feels real 1984 up in here.

          [–]LarParWar 7 points8 points  (2 children)

          Reagan's slogan: Let's make America great again.

          Trump's slogan: Make America great again.

          Call me cynical, but if Trump doesn't formally declare himself God-Emperor and proceed to fire 90% of Washington, absolutely nothing will change.

          [–]xinihil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          That would Make American TV Great Again

          [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

          You mentioned facts so here are some for you to digest.

          GLOBALISM

          Leaked private speech, Clinton: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmFjUFkd

          Clinton strategist: We need to “produce an unaware and compliant citizenry” to defeat Trump: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599#efmARKATm

          CHEATING

          Hillary’s huge debate prep book against Bernie Sanders (Prepared answers to anticipated debate questions): https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8009 (See attachment)

          CRIMINAL LIABILITY State Department tipping off Hillary’s staff about upcoming investigation details regarding her case: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6185#efmAH_AJdANKAPC

          Hillary campaign desperate to “get ahead of the narrative on this email issue”: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5344

          Hillary’s campaign manager, Robby Mook: “it’s a little troubling” that meeting of Clinton Foundation was held at Goldman Sachs HQ: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1381#efmAAwACA

          Do you support a candidate like this? Or a candidate who is fighting an uphill battle and winning against the clinton mainstream media machine.

          [–]LarParWar 13 points14 points  (0 children)

          The Clintons haven't committed treason if your definition of treason is betraying the government or the ruling class. They are the government and the ruling class, they'd hardly betray themselves.

          If your definition of treason is betraying your country, your nation, your civilization, meaning the land your forefathers conquered and their blood descendents, then the Clintons are some of slimiest, crookedest, double-crossing two-faced traitors ever in the history of the world, and deserve to be hanged to point of near-death, then resuscitated, then drawn and quartered and disemboweled, then burned still semi-alive, then shot by firing squad, then buried, then dug up, then whatever remains dumped in a filthy swamp somewhere to be eaten by alligators.

          Them, and hundreds of their co-conspirators.

          As entertainment. On live television broadcast round the globe.

          But only if that's your definition of treason.

          [–]Lvl10Bard 28 points29 points  (7 children)

          This may be the only time I break from my year-long lurking streak to post something, but I wholeheartedly agree. Specifically,

          Schools and Universities cater to women. Women aren't very keen on independent thought or the Socratic method so the education system has become a rote memorization extravaganza.

          This cannot be overstated. Ironically, the first and only time I ever heard this was from a marxist economics professor. 'Twas the only thing I've ever heard him say that wasn't fucking insane. Our current education system is batshit. We spend more time learning facts and figures and charts instead of learning why Genghis Khan got so buttmad that he fucked everyone in Eurasia, or why the Roman Empire fell, etc.

          I'm not the most intellectually- or philosophically-savvy individual, hence why I lurk, but even I can see it.

          Intellectualy stimulating environments are incredibly important for young men

          This can also not be said enough. Watching videos by guys like Molyneux, quite literally, woke me up. I went from thinking I knew everything to knowing that I knew so little, and had so much to learn. It's humbled me, and brought me to a form of understanding that I had never imagined. I've changed completely as a person after having an actual discussion about philosophy, not doing truth tables because some old, rich cunt that believes only statesmen should lead America says to to get a passing grade.

          Thanks for this eloquent response, dude. Really, I appreciate it.

          [–]LarParWar 10 points11 points  (5 children)

          The purpose of education is not to convey knowledge, but to inculcate the state religion. Our state religion is Progressivism, also variously referred to as multiculturalism, political correctness, liberalism, secularism, humanism, feminism, and others.

          As is probably obvious to you, this religion is based on bullshit, lies, and half-truths, so in order to successfully propagate itself it must warp students' ability to perceive reality, meaning real, true, authentic information must never be presented to students, so that authentic knowledge is never attained in sufficient quantity so as to prompt mass apostasy from the state religion.

          Yuri Bezmenov was quite right when he said that one whose perception has been warped in this way can be presented with authentic information and evidence and have their viewpoint completely unchanged, as unchanged as if you had tried to convince a Moslem that Allah doesn't exist, though he was wrong as to its mainspring of this reality-warping ideological force, which he thought was the KGB but was really Harvard.

          Orwell called it such things as crimethink, crimestop, and doublethink.

          So that's why school sucks. Not because America and Americans spend metric fucktons of their money on schools, but because the school system is designed to suck, exquisitely designed to warp your perception of reality, deprave your morality, make you a sucker for democracy and make you incapable of independent thought. School, the factory line of the perfect pacified populace. With military-grade precision, the schools are accomplishing exactly what they're supposed to.

          [–]Lvl10Bard 6 points7 points  (4 children)

          The purpose of education is not to convey knowledge, but to inculcate the state religion.

          Relevant video for anyone who doesn't get this.

          Yuri Bezmenov was quite right

          Full stop.

          I'm actually doing a 7 minute summary of his speech for a presentation. Can't wait to see how many people wake up.

          [–]LarParWar 4 points5 points  (3 children)

          If your objective is to wake people up, Bezmenov is not the place to start. Firstly, your objective should not be to wake just anyone up, your objective should be to wake up intelligent white men. They are the only ones who really matter. Stupid white men follow smart white men, women follow men, and nonwhites follow whites. So change the opinion of intelligent white men, and everything else organically adjusts downstream.

          By all means, include a few snippets of Bezmenov, but at 7 minutes your objective is not to present a dry analysis of him of his viewpoints, but to cut together a rapid-fire montage to form the most emotional impactful Matrix-piercing shiv possible. You want to overload your audience's senses and plant a seed of doubt to grow in the future. This is propaganda, it's done with anecdotes, images, and video clips, and the reason it is so wonderful is because it works whether you want it to or not, and even when you know it is propaganda. Crimestop works, but it is vulnerable to sensory overload, and so this is precisely what you want to do.

          Here is my suggestion, start with maybe half a minute of Bezmenov talking about authentic information, ask your audience if they feel that they keep "an open mind" to alternative points of view, if they update their worldview when presented with reality-based evidence or some such thing, making sure to use progressive talking point and disarm their defenses, and proceed to show a rapid fire succession of things that should really, truly piss of intelligent white men.

          Stuff like this:

          http://youtube.com/watch?v=keKcHoXzFTo

          http://youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio

          http://youtube.com/watch?v=RBqjZ0KZCa0

          I have so many videos like that.

          And maybe throw in an erudite reference to Unqualified Reservations or something.

          Anyway, just my take. Do as you will.

          [–]Lvl10Bard 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          If your objective is to wake people up, Bezmenov is not the place to start. Firstly, your objective should not be to wake just anyone up, your objective should be to wake up intelligent white men. They are the only ones who really matter. Stupid white men follow smart white men, women follow men, and nonwhites follow whites. So change the opinion of intelligent white men, and everything else organically adjusts downstream.

          I live in Hawaii, where whites are a minority of a minority. I gotta work with what I got.

          but to cut together a rapid-fire montage to form the most emotional impactful Matrix-piercing shiv possible.

          Way ahead of you, fam. I'll have to look into those videos later. But thanks for the advice. I'll try to use as much of it as possible.

          Here is my suggestion, start with maybe half a minute of Bezmenov talking about authentic information,

          Can't. It's for a speech class. Gotta be me talking the whole time.

          [–]Oz70NYC 13 points14 points  (0 children)

          6th grade level? That's being a mite generous there, sir.

          [–]awesomeusername999 8 points9 points  (3 children)

          TRP on the otherhand is HillShill proof because they don't want our misogy in their post history

          Absolutely false. CTR goes to /pol/ of all places, and you think they'd be afraid of us?

          [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Shill accounts are just that: disposable

          [–]odenby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          I'm heavily in favor of any intellectualy stimulating discussion taking place on TRP be it political or otherwise, because intellectual discussion is self improvement.

          I agree with that. I don't like or support Trump, but I do observe that in a lot of the more mainstream subs an attempt to have a meaningful discussion of Trump just gets flooded with idiotic and simplistic anti-Trump propaganda. And of course, on The_Donald a meaningful conversation about Trump is hard to have because they have a no-criticism policy over there.

          It is fucking good to be able to discuss stuff outside of the various bullshit bubbles, both pro- and anti- Trump. Like being able to breathe fresh air.

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          In addition smart phones have nuked people's attention spans birthing a generation of ADHD zombies. Television and film are produced at a sixth grade level so that proles can understand them. Consequently most people now operate on a sixth grade level.

          I haven't watched much TV in the last 10 or so years I haven't had cable, even then I didn't watch much cause I was more into dicking around on the computer during couch potato time. But the other day, I was hanging with some friends who were watching that cartoon China Illinois and holy shit.. ADHD all the way.

          I really believe that film and television entertainment is mainly subversive propaganda. In the film The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, the ending where the good guy is made to seem "mad" (even though he is correct) in his accusations toward the Doctor. Then the accuser is shown to be a madman with distorted perception in an insane asylum (conceptually similar to One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest)..

          This is because at that time, the powers that be did not want people questioning authority in depressed post WW1 Germany, so the film served a role to hammer this concept into peoples' heads and condition them. If you question authority and challenge, you will look like a made man and your reputation squashed like a giant stepping on a bug.

          Look at TV and movies today with the typical dimwit beta loser male role who's with a hot wife who keeps it all together. Super fast cuts in filming styles you see in action movies and as I mentioned- the cartoon China Illinois.

          We call them tv shows, our grandparents call them tv programs .

          [–]offthebeatmeoff 53 points54 points  (20 children)

          The media has him in such a deep trap, and it repulses me. Any guy with an ounce of testosterone and has slept with women to any degree, has said or thinks the exact same shit. Any girl who's gone backstage to see a rapper or any famous person doesn't think it's a completely innocent trip. Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows this, but it's such a social/political death sentence to admit it, that everyone and anyone who has something to lose has turned away from Trump. You'll see some weirdo on a forum talking about how he'd give up his testicle to suck a fart out of Scarlett Johanson or whatever the fuck her name is but then go out and say what Trump said IN PRIVATE is wrong and repulsive. It literally sickens me, and the worst part, is that it is working so well. The whole thing is socially engineered to perfection. Trump reaching with "octopus" like arms creates such a powerful creepy image.

          [–]jackandjill22 23 points24 points  (13 children)

          Dude, Martin Luther King slept with younger women. It's genetic it has nothing to do with your character.

          [–]offthebeatmeoff 8 points9 points  (10 children)

          Yeah of course, I don't think I referenced that in what I said. I'm just criticizing all this moral posturing that people are doing. Like everything else, I think all these people who have attempted to smear him will get schlonged.

          [–]jackandjill22 8 points9 points  (9 children)

          I'm not criticizing you I'm saying that Fucking attractive girls is literally a very poor indicator of moral character.

          It could be Trump or MLK.

          [–]offthebeatmeoff 8 points9 points  (7 children)

          Yeah any straight guy would want to. I'm referencing the lewd way he said it. I'm implying that most men think and talk this way (in private) and pretending like we don't is just moral posturing and I understand why some people have to do it. I just don't like it.

          [–]jackandjill22 10 points11 points  (6 children)

          Yea, there's this weird phenomena going on; we attack people in the public sphere for things that we all do in the private sphere. It's a form of hypocrisy that's becoming more & more normalized.

          [–]offthebeatmeoff 1 point2 points  (2 children)

          I don't want to meet the weirdo who is always a saint at all times. The guy would probably be a giant pussy and ironically unfit to lead people. Most leaders except Jesus, Buddha, Ghandi, and a few honorable mentions are creeps (I say that with affection).

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          Ghandi was a freak, he slept with his younger niece and he liked to do orgies. Jesus loved a whore, and bhudda would rather chill than fuck bitches.

          [–]offthebeatmeoff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Didn't know the Ghandi thing. Either way they are men that are idolized for being so "pure". Just further illustrates how you really need to be a creep (I say that with affection) to make it far in life. Just hide it well

          [–]OXHockey23 1 point2 points  (1 child)

          For sure. How people don't see the media as part of the feminist-conspiracy I do not know. He just seems like an standard alpha who knows how to get lays.

          [–]This1sMyWorkAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          I have thought his thoughts therefore I am Trump.

          [–]Olipyr 123 points124 points  (5 children)

          Quite frankly, this attack on Trump is yet another attack on masculinity. This time, the attack is focused on shaming men for being men in private.

          It's unsubstantiated.

          This election is much, much bigger than what we can imagine, and yes, I'll put my tin foil hat on.

          [–]oxykitten80mg 27 points28 points  (1 child)

          Exactly, this war on masculinity has gone on far too long and our only hope of stopping it right now is Trump. I just pray that all the blue-pill betas saying they hate Trump blah blah blah....is all just virtue signaling, and that when it comes down to brass tacks in the privacy of the voting booth they do the right thing and vote Trump. They can tell all the fem-nazis from their gender studies class that "I'm with her" but if they want to stay outta prison because some girl they fucked decides that she is not into them, two weeks post coitus, and cries rape. Now is the time to stop this war on men before its too late.

          Six years of hitlery and you will be getting called a sexist pig for signing your son up for baseball instead of ballet.

          [–]Troll_Name 13 points14 points  (0 children)

          Mark my words: in the last few days before the votes are cast, there will be "news" celebrities on TV echoing accusations of pedophilia.

          It's like asking in court, "how many times did you beat your wife." The answer to this question is irrelevant. It's a magic spell which causes damage just by being cast on someone.

          If Hillary takes the white house, magic accusations will be permanently cemented worldwide as an acceptable tactic. They've already caught on hard in Europe and Asia - that's why Julian Assange has been stuck in an embassy for entire years.

          [–]GetrichonIMP 66 points67 points  (7 children)

          Also, it can't hurt that we might avoid nuclear war with Russia.

          [–]CuckedByTRUMP 28 points29 points  (2 children)

          Their trying to start war to so he can justify not letting a new president step in.

          [–]stemgang 22 points23 points  (0 children)

          The nuclear brinksmanship by Hillary is so damn irresponsible! Syria has been a client state of the Russians for decades, and we presume to stomp in there and threaten to shoot down their planes? That is how you start a shooting war.

          [–]Auctoritate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          I thought Trump was the one being super gung ho on his warfare policies?

          [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorBlacklabellogics 66 points67 points  (16 children)

          The fact is that sexual assault is perfect: A) It's a crime that society perceives males as being the de facto committers of.

          B) It's a crime that is largely a case of word against word

          C) It caters to the view of "men as offenders, women as victims"

          D) Even if a man is found not guilty, his life is ruined.

          How is this not a perfect control mechanism to screw men over?

          [–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 37 points38 points  (10 children)

          It's a perfect tool that has been repeatedly used in the past when non-establishment men get too far. Hell, they even tried it on Trump earlier in the campaign (the cunt reporter disregarding protocol, invading Trump's space, and getting "manhandled" away from him). It would have probably done more damage except they had security camera footage of the incident.

          [–]1Original_Dankster 34 points35 points  (9 children)

          It's a perfect tool that has been repeatedly used in the past when non-establishment men get too far.

          What does the arrest warrant for Julian Assange read? It ain't espionage, he didn't spy on anybody. It ain't treason, he's done nothing against Australia.

          No - he's alleged (with no evidence whatsoever) to have not used a condom; and apparently that's sexual assault in Sweden.

          [–]Mckallidon 13 points14 points  (0 children)

          I'm never going to Sweden lol.

          [–]DirtieHarry 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Scary, isn't it?

          [–]jackandjill22 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          It's an assumed grey area Schopenhauer.

          [–]throwawayyourliberty 59 points60 points  (14 children)

          The elites did not expect that Trump comes out on top. Normally we have to choose between two controlled candidates. It was planned that Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton were "fighting" for president. Now Trump appeared and destroyed surprisingly the other republican candidates.

          Brainwashing is so effective that many people live in a different reality. The media is brought into one line and goes all out against Trump. Not only every news channel is attacking Trump, also Youtube stars are bought to secure Hillary Clintons victory.

          One great logical inconsistency many people still ignore is the Russia example. On the one hand Trump is meant to be friends with Putin and Russia, but on the other hand is he is a crazy lunatic, who will start WW III against...yes Russia.

          The average human being is bombarded with a false reality but many people are still able to notice that something is not alright. Trump is plain-talking. He doesn't hide between Orwellian newspeak and political correctness and addresses the reality, not an illusion.

          Donald J. Trump now fills stadiums, meanwhile Hillary cant even fill town halls. Do not believe the mass media. Do not believe the polls. They are rigged to demoralize you and your reality.

          We are on the edge in our western-society. Cultural marxism and feminism is deeply rooted in our society now, we are weak and we are defenseless. Hillary stands for the elites, but Trump stands for the people. Trump is not a globalist.

          This video breaks the media narrative and should be watched if you are not sure about Donald J. Trump. He is a genuine guy, who wants the best for the average american. You do not have to like Donald J. Trump, but as a man with logic and reason you are able to look behind the curtains and see what the elites want you to do. They want you to be enslaved - forever. Donald Trump wants an alternative. He wants to give the people their power back. You do not have to like him, but he is not a criminal and a liar, who tries to continue as usual for few elites. Hillary wants war. Decide what you want.

          [–]Modredpillschool[S] 10 points11 points  (10 children)

          Interesting perspective. Do you think Trump is doing better that the media is letting on, then?

          If the media/facebook/reddit is to be believed, Trump's campaign is already over.

          [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

          As an US outsider, the amount of Anti-Trump stuff that's getting ridiculous attention is staggering. The louder they scream anti-trump, the more of a threat he actually is is. And they're screaming really loud.

          [–]jackandjill22 11 points12 points  (1 child)

          They've been saying he's over since he first started running.

          [–]RealMcGonzo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          They've been saying he's over since he first started running.

          100%. Last January when he was leading the polls for the nomination, the MSM were still saying he'd drop out any day now -when he was winning! Before one GOP debate, so-called republican insiders implied that even if Trump beat the lottery-high odds to win the nomination, he'd be totally crushed in the general election and so would virtually every other GOP nominee.

          This continued through the debates. Trump will cancel the rest of them has long been the story. I'm sure we'll see stories about how Trump plans to walk out of this last one, if he even bothers to show up. And then he will be there and kick ass. This election cycle shows that not only is the MSM very biased, but they no longer even pretend to put on a show of objectivity. They just as bad as Pravda ever was.

          [–]TRP VanguardWhisper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          Increasingly panicked-sounding establishment types have been saying that since before he won the primaries.

          [–]throwawayyourliberty 13 points14 points  (0 children)

          I am surprised nobody upvoted my post, maybe i should hijack a top comment...

          Of course. It is a war on your mind. The average american is a sheep and follows the crowd. Donald Trumps early image was that he is a winner. They destroyed his image by rigging the polls and demoralize the whole Trump support. There is a constant oversampling of democratic voters in polls or the methodology is rigged to improve Hillary's figures. Proof is here (Politico), here (ABC), here (MSNBC) and here (CNN)

          The best joke is this video about a NYC Democratic Election Commissioner, who boasts about rigging the polls.

          Donald Trump will win. Brexit was the same.

          [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (21 children)

          Machiavelli would be spinning in his grave. Who endorses a man who is self-immolating? Trump is the lion, but he has no idea what a fox is, apparently, and you need to be both in order to be an effective leader.

          [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (4 children)

          There's a reason we call Pence: Silver Fox.

          He outfoxed Kaine quite easily.

          [–]XiLingChi 4 points5 points  (3 children)

          He really did make Kaine look like a buzzword vomiting dope from Whoville.

          That debate showed stronger than the Trump v Hillary ones that the questions are being giving to the Dems in advance. For the final VP question Kaine was giddy knowing it was over and even said something like "i'm glad we got to this question..."

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–]CuckedByTRUMP 9 points10 points  (13 children)

            I disagree emphatically. Trump follows the rule that rules all rules:

            • Law 6: Court Attention at all costs

            It states "at all costs" and it does mean this. Trump is fighting the media, he is fighting the government, he is fighting the fucking pope, he is fighting against feminism, he is fighting the left, he is fighting the right, he is fighting the elite, he is fighting facebook, google, twitter, etc. etc. etc.

            The only person he is not fighting is the unplugged American. He HAS to be controversial. If he does not get enough spotlight they will drown him out with all of their power and control of how people absorb media. Law 6 is the most important law in the laws of power and is the only law that states to sacrifice all others to accomplish it if needed. Yes you can go too far but at this point I would say he isn't even halfway near where he needs to be. Just wait thought. I believe Trump has the final act prepared and even the encore.

            I fully disagree with anyone that does not believe Trump is a master Machiavellian.

            [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

            Machiavelli wasn't aware of the "laws of power". He wrote the book on power and how to keep it. You don't throw your support behind a loser politics. Period.

            [–]graffix13 22 points23 points  (0 children)

            I just walked by the TV here at work (which is on CNN, of course) and the "BREAKING NEWS STORY: Trump Accused of Sexual Assault by yet Another Woman" or some other trite was on the screen. Seriously? Another one? They are coming out of the woodwork now like roaches. I guess a few months ago these women were too busy to speak up.

            The Blue Pill hive mind is so predictable.

            [–]LordThunderbolt 27 points28 points  (4 children)

            Time and time again I'm reminded that the average man is a fucking moron, and it might even include me even though I believe the opposite.

            Trump doesn't understand your concerns. He's not from the same level of thinking as the regular American. He stated that his father once made him a SMALL loan of million dollars. Explain to me in what world is one million a small loan? It shows you that this man doesn't understand what it's like to have bills that are bleeding your wallet, or stressing about making rent, or having money issues.

            That was point one. Point two is about you morons understanding that a president is not an emperor. Trump cannot build a wall on the Mexican border, because he doesn't have the power to do so. It's up to the US legislative branch to pass a statute ordering the construction of the wall to protect American interests. Trump won't change anything about language and micro aggressions because again he has no say in the matter.

            There are matters far more pressing and important to a president than Sjws.

            You guys have zero understanding of how country actually work and just shouldn't be allowed to vote, based on your reasons why you think ejecting that man for 4 years are.

            [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (12 children)

            As a non-American, I look at Trump's ideology, and I regret somewhat that he couldn't be a little more tactful. This election cycle demonstrates that a significant number of people are looking for a change - whether it be more of the fatherly, leftist figure in Bernie Sanders, or the maverick in Trump. My point is that Trump as an ideology is electable, but he has given the opposition a great deal of ammunition to throw at him by being too bombastic and allowing himself to be drawn into this image of being a bigoted moron. There has been evidence since the first debate that he has learned from these mistakes, but his recovery now is being met with all the propaganda that was inevitably going to be thrown at him as we hit the last leg of the election trail - the Democrats have had all this shit saved up and there will be more of it to come, be it in the form of truth or lies.

            However, if Donald Trump is not elected, we should take heart from his successful campaign and continue to petition for fairer electoral systems, instead of allowing the parties to close up and prevent anti-establishment candidates from running a serious campaign for President (like the Democrats did to Bernie). Trump's campaign shows that people are prepared to listen to different ideas, and that the liberal attitudes towards immigration, SJWs, etc., are beginning to turn. The tide is turning and the powers that be are trying to correct that by controlling the narrative. If Trump fails, all it requires is that somebody in his image comes along and demonstrates a little more savvy so as to prevail, if indeed Trump doesn't win this time around.

            [–]jackandjill22 5 points6 points  (2 children)

            This election has devolved into a literal shit-slinging contest

            [–]JohnnyHammerstickz 24 points25 points  (9 children)

            TRP itself is the farthest thing from apolitical/bipartisan. To say anything otherwise would be completely ignorant.

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [deleted]

              [–]bigcitytruth 5 points6 points  (3 children)

              Trickle down economics, capital gains taxes and insurance companies work exactly the same way, whether you eat a red or a blue pill.

              [–]sigma272 73 points74 points  (14 children)

              There will be so many feminist tears about this post that we may see a rise in sea levels.

              [–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (2 children)

              I wonder if it will top GLO's white meat asian pussy post. Archwingers 'shitty wives are rape victims' or that indian guys rant about racism is why he can't bag hot blondes?

              [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              indian guys rant about racism is why he can't bag hot blondes

              How dare you? The missus cannot be racist.

              [–]FriedHayek 8 points9 points  (0 children)

              'shitty wives are rape victims'

              I've read historical stories about men in catholic england, who felt really, really cheated when the women they married looked far, far hotter before the marriage night. Divorce wasn't an option then. Accidents happened on much more frequent basis way back when, however.

              indian guys rant about racism is why he can't bag hot blondes

              I remember that one. Still funny, however. Sad that he is unable to read sidebar. I thought indians were smart.

              [–]crx1 20 points21 points  (2 children)

              It has been said that at least 66% of those in the US mainstream media are registered democrats and quite possibly, liberal democrats. Despite this, I can't recall a single past election where the media has been so blatantly in the pocket for the democrat and so against the republican candidate. The current state of US journalism has become more akin to the former Soviet Union than to a free democracy.

              [–]hawtfabio 21 points22 points  (7 children)

              Are you guys fucking kidding me? This is a new low even for you. You think that a man who grabs women without consent is to be praised and is "fighting for your rights?" So you think sexually assaulting women is the "right" of a man? Do us all a favor and don't vote. You guys are delusional and sick.

              [–]Modredpillschool[S] 7 points8 points  (4 children)

              You're new here, aren't you?

              [–]Usecod 32 points33 points  (16 children)

              I endorsed Donald Trump for president on 26th June 2015.Thanks for coming to the team.

              [–]throwawayyourliberty 17 points18 points  (12 children)

              It is a war on your mind. The average american is a sheep and follows the crowd. Donald Trumps early image was that he is a winner. They destroyed his image by rigging the polls and demoralizing the whole Trump support. There is a constant oversampling of democratic voters in polls or the methodology is rigged to improve Hillary's figures. Proof is here (Politico), here (ABC), here (MSNBC) and here (CNN) and many more...

              The best joke is this video about a NYC Democratic Election Commissioner, who boasts about rigging the polls.

              Do not believe the media. Donald Trump will win. Brexit was the same.

              [–]Usecod 10 points11 points  (0 children)

              I know.Almost every poll was against Brexit and the result was opposite.I dont trust the polls especially from the MSM.

              [–]Modredpillschool[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

              I actually endorsed him in my offline life much sooner, but the sexual assault nonsense has made this race very relevant to TRP recently.

              [–]PedophilePriest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              that's the day supreme Court legalized gay marriage in all 50 states correct?

              [–]J_AsapGem 9 points10 points  (0 children)

              What's worst is the media is so good at manipulating the people and keeping them plugged in, i don't even live in america but the country is live in are completely under control by what the media feeds them and it's very sad, i really hope it doesn't have to come to this but the only way for people to learn is through pain, then again the left is growing largely by the day because of this manipulation of the media, all i know is if trump doesn't win that's pretty much it, america is screwed and what's worst hillary will have her hands on the most powerful ( allegedly ) nation in the world.

              [–]odenby 24 points25 points  (6 children)

              I'm a guy who's not going to vote for Clinton or for Trump, and here's my take: I like what Trump and his supporters have done to fight back against liberal dogma and bullshit and to open up the conversation about immigration, foreign alliances, the health of the economy, and various other issues. Unfortunately, I cannot support Trump. He is in favor of big government, freewheeling executive power, torture and collective punishment as military policies, and NSA spying on Americans.

              No thanks. Yes, I know that Clinton supports many of those things too. That's why I'm not going to vote for Clinton, either.

              Hitching the anti-SJW movement to Trump's train is a mistake. The phenomenon of Trump as a /pol hero, a Pepe the frog candidate, has always been somewhat unnatural at its root — since Trump supports the NSA and expanding police powers, he is ultimately neither a friend of freedom on the Internet nor a friend of freedom on the street. The memes are funny, but meme Trump is not the real Trump. While Trump's campaign has been valuable in pushing back against PC culture, he is not the great champion of liberty and fighter against censorship that some of his supporters like to see him as.

              He has also turned out to not be a very strong candidate. It's impressive how far he has come, and he was doing well for a while, but his performance in that first debate was terrible. He seemed completely unprepared and not even able to improvise his way forward, and his campaign has been slumping ever since. He has not been able to find a way to effectively fight back against the enormous assault on him waged by the mainstream media.

              There is a lot to be learned from Trump's campaign and from his initial successes, but going forward, we need better people than him, and more competent politicians as well. I hope that we will now start seeing more people in politics who are outspoken, authentic, and non-PC like Trump is but who have better policy ideas and are more competent.

              [–]ManCubEagle 7 points8 points  (4 children)

              He is in favor of big government, freewheeling executive power, torture and collective punishment as military policies, and NSA spying on Americans.

              I think you need to go read his actual policies on those (except for the torture, which he did say he would use - and honestly I have no real problem with as long as we're sure they have information that can save lives). He's most certainly not for big government; in fact many of his main topics are about how there is a ridiculous amount of regulation that stifles small business and is forcing larger corporations to leave the US.

              I'm also not sure where you got the idea that he's for "freewheeling executive power" or that he would abuse executive power if/when he was in office.

              I think it's also ignorant of you to say that you like how Trump and his followers began to push back against the third wave feminist SJW bullshit culture, but that he isn't effective because he hasn't found a way to fight back against the mainstream media. That's literally because of people like you and the attitude that you have. You believe the garbage that the media is feeding you about him slumping or falling behind in polls, when if you go actually look at the support he's receiving (he's up in major polls, and routinely gets crowds of 15+ thousand, when Hillary gets a few hundred), you can see that's not true. If you think he did a good job of pushing back against this culture that you say you hate, why do you think it's acceptable to not vote for him and potentially help Hillary get into office, where she will perpetuate that same culture?

              [–]odenby 7 points8 points  (3 children)

              1) big government - Trump wants to expand funding for the military, which is a completely unnecessary step given that the US already has more conventional military power than the next several nations combined. This is a total big government move. Trump also supports the NSA metadata collection programs, which is a big government move. Economically, he's for protectionism, which essentially means taxing international trade. Big government move.

              2) freewheeling executive power - I admit, I have no explicit proof that Trump wants freewheeling executive power. However, so many of his proposed solutions to problems involve applying executive/law enforcement/military power that I think there's good reason to believe that Trump would try to push the boundaries of the office if elected.

              3) torture - this you admit.

              4) collective punishment - Trump on Fox and Friends:

              We’re fighting a very politically correct war. And the other thing with the terrorists — you have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families! They care about their lives, don’t kid yourselves. They say they don’t care about their lives. But you have to take out their families.

              (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1eXRXL0nkk)

              5) NSA spying - Trump on Fox and Friends, talking about Snowden.

              Well first of all, he's a terrible guy, I said it right from the beginning, so many people are trying to defend him, "Look at what he's revealed... and isn't it wonderful what he's revealed?" And you have people marching in his favor. He's a terrible guy, he's really set our country back. China's now looking at us like, you know, we're taking it. We were hitting them hard on what they were doing in terms of what they were taking from us, and now they are really going at it, they're saying we're far worse than they ever were. He's really hurt us in terms of relationships. It really shows how weak our country's been and has become when you cannot get this guy back. I mean, you'd think you'd tell these countries, "Hey, folks, we're not making any deals with you until he's on a plane, and that includes Russia, that includes everybody. We really have become a very different nation than we were.
              ...
              You know, spies in the old days used to be executed. This guy is becoming a hero in some circles. I will say, with the passage of time, even people who were sort of liking him and trying to go on his side are maybe dropping out. But you know, when you look at where he goes, and now nobody knows where he is, but we've got to get him back and we've got to get him back fast. They're talking about, it could take years, it could take months or maybe years, that would be pathetic.
              ...
              And the other countries are definitely doing it and you know, we used to hit them pretty hard for doing it, and now they just look at us and smile because what he's revealed is incredible. I mean, he's revealing things that nobody thought possible. And I think he's probably got stuff that's far, that's maybe why he's staying in Russia. Russia's very smart, and they're probably getting every possible thing out of him, they said, "Hey waitaminute, let's not send him to Ecuador or wherever he's going, let's immediately, let's talk to him for a couple more days, this is pretty good stuff."
              ...
              Well you know, China has been on my mind for years, and you know it better than anybody because you know, I do your show every Monday. We have a little thing going on, China, and it just amazes me when I see what goes on and you know, for him to be ensconced in China and then, all of a sudden, he gets out because they say, "I'm sorry, you sent in the wrong document, we would have done it but you sent in the wrong document." And they got a lot of information out of this guy. This guy's a bad guy. And you know, there is still a thing called execution. You really have to, you have to take a strong, hey, you have thousands of people with access to material like this. We're not going to have a country any longer...
              (At this point, the host asks how Trump feels about the newspapers that printed what Snowden exposed. Trump continues.)
              Well I think it's disgraceful, I mean, that's what they do. I guess you can't really hold it... yeah, I mean, they have information. Wouldn't it be wonderful if you could say... hey folks, come on, give us a break. But how does he get this information? Here's a guy didn't even graduate from high school, he was high school dropout, how did he get the job in the first place? Where did he come from? And now he's traveling the world and everybody's protecting him, it really is a shame. Our country is in very sad shape. I mean look, we have to do something, you have thousands of Snowdens out there, I would imagine most of them at least have a high school education. But you have thousands of people with this kind of access. And who's gonna be the next Snowden? Unless the retribution is swift and really strong, you're gonna have other people coming out with more information than he's had.

              (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4DjrBC4K-Q)

              Now, for all I know, maybe Snowden really did spill the beans to the Russians and the Chinese. But the thing is, I don't give a fuck. Snowden having done that would be a tiny drop in the bucket compared to the magnitude of the fact that the government built, in secret, a giant surveillance apparatus that it then turned against domestic communications.

              Here's another Trump quote on the NSA:

              Well, I tend to err on the side of security, I must tell you," Trump replied, "and I’ve been there for longer than you would think. But, you know, when you have people that are beheading if you’re a Christian and frankly for lots of other reasons, when you have the world looking at us and would like to destroy us as quickly as possible, I err on the side of security, and so that’s the way it is, that’s the way I’ve been, and some people like that, frankly, and some people don’t like that.

              (http://truthinmedia.com/trump-supports-reauthorizing-patriot-act-nsa-metadata-collection)

              Trump wants big government national security efforts to address the threat of terrorism. Now I understand, perhaps as a New Yorker he was particularly affected by 9/11. But in my view, giving the government more powers so that the government can address the problem is a mistake. It trades in freedom for the promise of security. And if there's one thing that I think would actually make America great again, it's being willing to risk security in order to be free.

              I'll add a sixth point...

              6) Stop and frisk - Trump supports stop and frisk. But stop and frisk violates people's liberties. It's probably effective, but there are many powers we could give law enforcement that would make them more effective. Doesn't mean it's a good idea. It's possible to effectively address violent crime without violating liberties: Don't give each cop more power to pry into people's lives. Instead, put more cops on the streets so that violent criminals will understand that it would be very hard to get away with anything.

              Trump always seems to favor the quick, direct, authoritarian fix and doesn't consider what harmful effects the use of such methods might have on the country's liberty.

              That's literally because of people like you and the attitude that you have.

              I think it's more likely because the mainstream media backs Clinton.

              he's up in major polls

              And down in more polls, from what I understand.

              and routinely gets crowds of 15+ thousand

              So did Sanders. The elections are either rigged, which I suppose is possible but I doubt, or — more likely — there are just a lot people in this country who don't go to rallies but vote Clinton. I admit it's rather strange to think of, since I've hardly ever met any open Clinton voters, but then I've hardly ever met any open Trump supporters either, so I probably just do not intersect with those social circles much.

              If you think he did a good job of pushing back against this culture that you say you hate, why do you think it's acceptable to not vote for him and potentially help Hillary get into office, where she will perpetuate that same culture?

              The torture support is a dealbreaker for me. I mean, it seems likely to me that the CIA would send some people off to shady foreign regimes to get tortured under Clinton, too, but Trump openly supports it, so with Clinton I'm 80% certain people will get tortured and with Trump I'm 99% certain people will get tortured. It may not seem like a big difference, perhaps, but I am really against torture.

              [–]RedPillWintergreen 7 points8 points  (0 children)

              If I got one thing out of that clip it is that Donald Trump would be a fun guy to hang out and bullshit with.

              [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              I agree completely, and the analysts who support Trump did a good job of bringing this up tonight in their post-debate.

              Political correctness is the real star of the show, and it's used to deflect criticisms against any demographic except straight white males who aren't veterans or handicapped (SWMWAVOH). Hillary is an enabler to this line of poisonous thinking, and when she's elected things will only get worse.

              The one candidate who treats Americans equally is Trump. He slanders and praises blacks, whites, asians, and hispanics all the same. You get honesty. We at least know women don't want equal treatment, they want special treatment.

              Hillary elevates all of these demographics above SWMWAVOHs to a territory where they are no longer held accountable for their actions. This is exactly what radical feminism does for women. This is exactly what racism does for one's own race.

              People make the argument of civility being the sound reasoning for overdramatized political correctness. Use the same political correctness with Iran, Russia, and Syria and see how far that gets us. So far it looks like we're getting the shit end of the stick, failing to keep Iran down, not being able to enforce boundaries with Putin, while China leaves us in the dust. It's laughable.

              [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

              Technically, protection men from sexual assault is a Hillary position, isn't it?

              "I'm with her" because she will destroy the accusers

              [–]EdmondDaunts 8 points9 points  (2 children)

              Before Brexit there was another "shock" in a sense but was not as widely reported at the time but has changed since. This was Rodrigo Durerte, or Dugong, getting into power in the Philippines.

              Some of the stuff he told the press like if the reporters betrayed the Filipino people he would fucking kill them, was even more out there than Trump. Trump who is using his skills of influence rather than being an oaf.

              Duterte won by 13 million votes to 7 million of the next contender even allowing for vote fraud. And now he is more famous for taking on corruption and drug dealing as well as telling Obama to screw it.

              He was often called the Donald Trump of Asia.

              When people are sick of the shit they'll vote with someone who gets results. I watched the recent Florida speech in which Trump talked frankly about the allegations and wasn't afraid to call out the stinking shit of the media. It was brilliant.

              I hope he gets in.

              [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

              people want strong leaders that speak frankly. we see smooth talking obama and where did that get us exactly?

              [–]This1sMyWorkAccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              Here is a perfect website for the "what has Obama done or got us."

              Enjoy: http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/

              [–]1PantsonFire1234 10 points11 points  (0 children)

              Trump might be one of our last hopes to overthrow the current system and banish the lyers forever. More importantly he's the embodiment of everything masculine. Trump becoming president in the US means the West will eventually reflect him. We are taking our manhood back. No more slaves.

              Freedom for all.

              [–]J_AsapGem 14 points15 points  (15 children)

              The way you laid out everything actually has me scared for american, if hillary wins the current events will be magnified 10 folds, more people need to see this message.

              [–]logicalthinker1 27 points28 points  (4 children)

              The republicans are turning against him because he's an asshat who is going to get destroyed, give the GOP a horrible rep, and lose the House and Senate. They were backing him until he started blowing it like a fucking moron. He's incompetent.

              He's not a rp hero. He's an idiot, he's a sexual pervert, he has huge insecurities, and is as eloquent as a bag of dog shit. Oh, and he's known for being a deal maker his entire life. Lol he IS the system.

              Stop confusing being stupid with being alpha. Stop confusing rudeness with boldness. Stop confusing his lack of eloquence for straight talk. He whines about everything (sounds like a huge alpha to me lololol.), and is getting out smarted by an old, ugly, unlikeable lady. He's the slime ball con man that you think is really gonna help you make it big! You just need to give him your money.

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]logicalthinker1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                Which shows just how shallow their understanding is of what TRP is about. I guess some think you just call women pigs, act like a moron, whine about news organizations, and generally act petty.

                He's absolutely a middle finger to the political process. And that accomplishs about as much as a middle finger to your boss. Sure, emotionally it feels great doing it. Fuck him! Right?! Then he fires you, you lose your income, you can't get another job because that incident is on your professional record, and you work at McDonald's. Yay we did it America!!!

                [–]CuntyMcFagNuts69 7 points8 points  (2 children)

                I cuntymcfagnuts69 also endorse Donald J Trump.

                [–]Novembercriminal 10 points11 points  (1 child)

                That's what we needed. A gamechanger

                [–]Swifle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                "If economics was a solved field, we probably wouldn't even need elections today."

                That was the biggest laugh I had on reddit/imgur today, thank you for that.

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                How about:

                A vote not for Trump counts as a vote for Hillary

                And that ends the decision making process, ahah. Seriously, even if somebody thinks Trump is dirty, what are the odds he's dirtier than Clinton. Basically 0. I don't see this even needing to get ideological. There is a risky choice and a known terrible choice...

                [–]rock_or_something69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                I've repeatedly gotten into arguments with people, both men and women, that railed about trumps "actions". I'd correct them saying "you mean words right?" They had utterly internalized the Duluth wheel DV idea that words equate violence or an attack. The OP is absolutely right about the way our language has been manipulated to the point where we can't even think clearly anymore.

                [–]Endorsed ContributorMentORPHEUS 18 points19 points  (7 children)

                Biff Tannen for President! Yayy!

                I will be so glad when this election season is over.

                Trump is not Alpha.

                • Not sexually, his SMV is 1-2 with no money.
                • Not in leadership, he is a demagogue who panders to peoples' fears, without offering solutions.
                • Not in Frame, he takes no responsibility or agency for his words and decisions, instead lashing out and blaming everyone else for his failings.
                • Not economically, he takes credit for and puts his name on the accomplishments of others, then proceeds to screw his creditors and employees out of their money and pay.
                • Not in his masculinity, his comments about his daughter for example are creepy by any standard, and represent the words and thoughts of a thirsty man.

                People didn't have to be told to feel disgust at his "pussy" remarks by the media, these sentiments were cemented in the moment people heard him say this.

                Look again at the woman in the video, it is her job to appear glad to greet these high profile personalities, but I can see an undercurrent of disgust at both of their beta asses. If Trump wasn't rich, and Bush wasn't the show host or whatever, I could not see her willingly walking with them.

                Sexual assault is why I'm endorsing Donald Trump

                Considering "TRP is a bunch of rapey misogynists" is one of the sub's most common criticisms, you're really betting the farm on this, RPS.

                I'm old enough to remember Nixon. When the Watergate scandal first broke, lots of Republicans rallied behind him out of party loyalty and hatred for the hippie left at the time. Within one year, you'd be hard pressed to find ONE person willing to admit they had voted for Nixon. I predict the same will happen with Trump, whether he's ultimately elected or not. Edit:Format+link

                [–]Modredpillschool[S] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                I'm not really making an argument that he is alpha. In fact I agree with you. Let me sit on this for a while and come up with a response, you make good points.

                [–]ModeratorPaperStreetVilla 7 points8 points  (1 child)

                Yeah, illimitablemen calls his type the king. Self unaware and lashes out, but definite dark triad

                [–]Endorsed ContributorMentORPHEUS 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                I'll take Dark Triad, though that probably elevates him a bit much. Narcissist alone covers 80% of Trump.

                [–]creditoruim 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                I've always thought TRP was about being rational. Donald Trump doesn't believe in climate change, which just is not rational. At least Hillary knows that scientists know more than she does. They're smarter and the consensus is the planet's environmental stability is a big threat.

                edit: formatting

                [–]dinosauralienspirits 15 points16 points  (0 children)

                Donald Trump is fucking dumb dude. Any reason you are voting for him in that long ass post is overshadowed by how absolutely shit of a leader Donald trump is.

                [–]el_Technico 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                Donald Trump is very much a part of the system. Follow the money, he is a Rockefeller stooge. The only reason he is even running is to ensure the established get their president hillary Clinton. Anyone else half competent that ran against her would have won.

                [–]PaulAJK 10 points11 points  (1 child)

                Trump's lost frame too many times to win. I think it's a shame, but in truth the only person who could beat Trump was Trump, and he's done it.

                [–]Modredpillschool[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                I hope you're not right but it's true that this is Trump's game to lose.

                [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (6 children)

                Nice, but there's far greater reasons to vote for Trump than gender issues. The gender war they've launched against Trump is only meant as a distraction from reality.

                [–]Endorsed ContributorBluepillProfessor 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                Imagine the violent protests in 8 years with women and their mangina tools smashing windows and screaming: "Women lives matter." I believe that is her plan for America, to demolish gender relations in the same way as the last guy demolished race relations. She will take every opportunity to drive wedges between men and women no matter the good of the country. The only thing that will matter is her identity politics.

                sexual assault

                It's not. You can try to kiss a woman and it is not assault. They are trying to make it assault but it is not. There is no allegation that he restrained a woman against her will or used physical force or psychological coercion.

                They are trying to make it illegal for a man to approach a woman sexually if she decides RETROACTIVELY- even decades later(!!!)-that the advance was "unwanted." That is the master plan to fully solidify female power from dominance to complete mastery.

                Try to kiss a girl. She turns away....YOU ARE GUILTY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.

                Put your hand on a girls hip. She pulls away...YOU ARE GUILTY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.

                RPS is exactly right. They are trying to make what Trump said/did into "sexual assault." If they succeed then no man will be safe anywhere, anytime. There will be paralyzing fear in all men at the mere thought of approaching a woman. Only true "Alphas" will have the confidence to approach women and it won't matter. They can be brought down decades later if they were to forward or if they talked trash on a blog.

                That is the plan anyway. If Trump is elected they will be defeated and then they will cloister in the schools and journalism, waiting for the next opportunity to seize total power.

                Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

                [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (28 children)

                Preposterous. You don't endorse Donald Trump. You endorse anti-SJWism in spite of Trump.

                I'm not voting for Trump because of reasons that are extraneous to his intelligence and his character. I'm not going to take shit-slinging, which is 100% normal in our Presidential elections, and justify voting for someone who isn't a good choice.

                Look beyond the moment. Donald Trump has no idea what he is doing. He does not understand geopolitics, the government, or the economy. He was one of the loudest birthers. He keeps harping on about manufacturing jobs that will be made obsolete in a few decades and globalization that is here to stay whether we like it or not. Electing a populist moron will only serve as fodder for the SJWs in the next round. Trump is NOT the answer.

                I'm voting for Hilary Rodham Clinton. I have little reason to believe her comments about women are more than pandering. If they do manifest further, well, society isn't going to collapse. We will have the next election, hopefully with two better candidates.

                [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

                Technically the OG birther was on Clintons staff.

                I do enjoy how you give Hillar the benefit of pandering, but offer no such leeway to Trump. Most are treating this election as an emotional vote on old school masculinity, and I'm not seeing any difference

                [–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 3 points4 points  (12 children)

                Look beyond the moment. Donald Trump has no idea what he is doing. He does not understand geopolitics, the government, or the economy.

                Yes, because our government that has gotten into quagmire after quagmire understands? Do you even realize that the U.S. created ISIS? We have U.S. State Department paid and supplied militias in Syria battling Pentagon paid and supplied militias in Syria. Obama, Clinton, and the American deep state made this the status quo. Our foreign policy is an insane, psychotic, wasteful, irrational, evil joke right now, and Hillary Clinton will continue this.

                DJT doesn't understand the economy? He's worth 5-10 Billion. He understands something. Google lottery winners and see how many people who win 10 million dollars end up broke in 5 years. Whatever DJT started out with, he has made it grow a thousand fold. And not by giving private speeches to Goldman Sachs.

                HRC wants to strip Americans of their 2nd amendment right. When this happens say goodbye to the rest of our rights and any chance of stopping the tyranny that will instantly replace the shitty republic we already suffer from.

                [–]OmegaMan2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Notice how anyone who threatens the power of the Cathedral is slandered with the most vile of accusations that is an offense of a sexual nature. Look at what happened to Bill Cosby for suggesting that blacks take some responsibility for the situation they find themselves in. Likewise Clarence Thomas was almost done in in the same way.

                And for Bill Clinton it's like water off a duck's back.

                [–]Profdiddy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                A word of caution. Any group that makes one wedge issue their core engages in identity politics. This kind of politics allows you to be led and abused like sheep. I am much more worried about geopolitical relationships and economic development than gender issues. I vote my wallet. Enjoy the decline.

                [–]weezy_adams 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                It doesnt matter who you vote for. The trajectory of the country is wholly out of your control. That this is even posted here indicates a huge problem with motherfuckers failing to understand that you focus only on what you can control, and everything else be damned. Huge red pill fail. The only option is to refuse to vote and hit the gym. Is that not clear enough?

                [–]Big_Daddy_PDX 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                Sadly Trump has lost his own plot by continuing to fan the flames of his comments/accusers. He isn't passing shit tests at the moment. He's in DEER mode and needs to be in NEXT mode. instead of controlling the narrative or direction, he's wallowing in.
                Here we are in another scenario where a timeline prevents us from addressing the women's complaints fully. I think those complaints need to be addressed, but the brisk of what Hillary could do with the SCOTUS is, in my view, a greater risk.

                [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                Trump said: "They let us grab them by the pussy".

                Let us. That means there was consent. How much of a dense cunt do you have to be to think this is in any way sexual assault???

                [–]cuntevasion 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                The accusations of sexual assault are unfounded and convenient. People come out of the woodwork to accuse Trump of sexual assault years prior, but conveniently wait until right now to announce.

                The argument that waiting to go public with these assaults somehow reduces the probability of the reports being true makes no sense. Assuming someone wants to get revenge on a person who assaulted them, it is obviously entirely logical to wait until a time when going public will do the most damage.

                I walked in on a guy being raped (by a gay guy). Not hearsay or he-said/she-said, like I witnessed the rape and pulled the dude off (and out of) the victim while he was blacked out on a floor. The rapist is highly politically involved, and probably wants a career in elected office. His victim did not report the rape to police, because the victim didn't want to deal with the hassle of a police investigation etc etc for uncertain gain.

                He also has every intention of going public with the story if the rapist ever becomes politically successful, because at that point the damage he could inflict would be worth the potential hassle of going public.

                That is all completely sensible. If you want to get revenge on someone who raped you, you either report immediately to police while there's evidence, or you wait until the report will do maximum PR damage. Either way, the timing of the report has little to no relevance to how likely the story is to be true.

                [–]Satou4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                I mean, there's a moderate possibility that whoever becomes president will be impeached within the first year. This election season is really terrible.

                [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                [deleted]

                [–]Wilreadit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                You should have grabbed her by the pussy and then squirted hot DNA into her ass.

                [–]A_favorite_rug 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                By economic policy, what exactly do you mean by that?

                [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                It's nuts to think accusations can effect your life. For instance even if your completely acquitted of a rape or sexual assault charge your name is tarnished forever.

                [–]Totsean 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                I don't post much, I just see what's current on TRP and see if it applies to me. This however does not apply to me so I will lay it out truthfully.

                Both candidates are shit, worst of the worst when it comes to running for President. You may disagree with me but you know it.

                I am astonished at the Election, you have one guy that can't keep his mouth shut, FOR FAKE SAKES MAN, can't you keep your temper in check, why do you have to act out, why can't you control yourself!!!!

                It's like having mini tantrums. All he has to do is, be sensible, be rational and not listen to shitheads that have conspiracy theories pulled out of their ass and HE CAN EASILY WIN THIS SHIT!

                But nope...

                And then you have the evilest fucking bitch in the whole town, someone that has her pockets full and has ties to god knows how many organizations. She is a feminist to boot and not that good kind either.

                She is going to keep on being a puppet and to make things worse will support the damn SJW narrative.

                All in all it's a complete loss. If Trump wins, we may get to see something different, irrational, out of control, it might be for good or bad.

                If Hillary wins, the same shit we see plus with more added power to the people that supported her.

                They're both disasters, I wouldn't bet on them.

                But if I have to vote.... if I really have to vote.

                I like to live on the wild side, like to see the world burn, like to see how things fuck up. So, yeah Trump for sure, but only because it just might fuck USA enough that they will finally wake up and fix their shit.

                I am in Philippines and we have DU30 here, that just cut ties from USA, and went to China. You know how crazy insane that move is, like freaking fuck me insane... yep that's Trump for you.

                So, good luck guys. Win or Loss, it's going to be an interesting 4 years..

                [–]Ounumen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                New women just came out yesterday. She realized she wasn't alone and the others gave her strength. Now gentleman we must white knight this women and believe every word she says. She has a vagina and that is the rule

                [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

                Trump has glimmers of things I would like in a candidate, but I don't think he's a good choice for president. You do you, though.

                [–]bigcitytruth 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                This election is a sham. It should've been Kasich versus Sanders. At least that would have been straight up legit debate on policy. Neither Trump or Clinton is fit for office.

                I'm not here to get into the nitty-gritty details of foreign or economic policy, or discuss the best way to fix the healthcare situation in our country.

                See, those little things that aren't a big deal to you are things I know a lot about. We pick presidents based on policy, not sexual strategy. Presidents sign or veto laws created by the legislature. They don't wave a wand to make the population alphas or betas. I respect the time you took to make this post, but it's reaching a bit far and distracts from the real conversation, as everyone's personal political views will validate everything from Trump's hair to Hillary's pantsuits. An endorsement on this sub will gain us absolutely nothing.

                Still, I have to say Trump himself is an excellent character study. He has flaws (which I have noted before), but he has many traits of a natural alpha. THAT'S what we should be talking about. This was true EVEN BEFORE HE RAN. In fact, a very old book by Mystery (or Matador, can't remember) back in the old PUA days mentions Trump and how he behaves.

                [–]blackjackANDplates 3 points4 points  (2 children)

                I want you to shout so loud, so that everyone who disregarded you, everyone who let you down, everybody who betrayed your family ... everybody who ignored your worries and pleas.. I want you to shout so loud that it quivers the conference tables in Washington, D.C.*

                It's time our voices bring fear into their empty hearts.

                MAKE MEN GREAT AGAIN

                [–]al032184 14 points15 points  (26 children)

                I think you're wrong on him. He's an awful person, not some kind of messiah or representative of "real men" or the US or anti-establishment, as has been the claim of others. He's just a downright scumbag who has been scraping up the vote of spiteful people in this country who, despite having legitimate gripes, are making a huge mistake with this prick.

                [–]Modredpillschool[S] 19 points20 points  (18 children)

                By all means, make a reasoned argument.

                load more comments (244 replies)