924
925

Men's Rights#1 on the front page: The elephant in the room has been mentioned. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Endorsed ContributorScholarInRed

The top post on Reddit's front page right now is a picture of an 'anti-rape' poster. It explicitly paints a double standard for what counts as rape when it's done by men and women, and also when alcohol is involved.

I don't need to point out how fucked up the poster is, I'm here to draw attention to the tone of the comments. Men are waking up. Most will probably nod off again, back into their slumbers of toil and cuckoldry, but perhaps a few will manage to get the pill down their throats, before the delirium sets in again, and find us.

#1 Upvoted - 4221, gilded - 1

Men can be raped to, Jake couldn't consent, Josie should be charged with rape as well.

Makes sense in the real world, but not according to law;

#2 Upvoted - 224

I think a lot of people are missing that rape laws often explicitly require penetration. (I do not condone this, I am simply reporting the laws.) For example: FBI Definition: Previously, offense data for forcible rape was collected under the legacy UCR definition: the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Beginning with the 2013 data year, the term “forcible” was removed from the offense title, and the definition was changed. The revised UCR definition of rape is: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. UK Definition: A person commits rape if they intentionally penetrate the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with their penis without consent. Canada removed "rape" from the legal code, and changed the laws to have degrees of sexual assault that account for a gender-blind definition for sexual activity without consent. One might argue that this is very progressive, but opponents of the change (anti-rape activists, primarily) argued it was regressive. So, in the legal definitions in the US, the only way the female could possibly be guilty of rape is if she used an object to penetrate the male via the anus or the mouth. In the UK, she cannot rape him no matter what she does.

Someone sheds more light into the nature of our times;

#3 Upvoted - 540

No silly, men can't get raped! Its a hilarious concept. Its literally impossible for a woman to abuse men Also all men are constantly eye raping every woman

All are links going to anti-feminist media. The comments below it are almost unanimous in their contempt and disdain for the regime of the feminine imperative.

#4 Upvoted - 2586

So according to this ad men can still think clearly enough to be charged with a crime when drunk but women are plainly too stupid to know better

It's almost like the modern feminist agenda is disingenuous, isn't it? Another few thousand upvotes for comments continuing in this absurd vein directly below.

#5 Upvoted - 1316

So that's how it's gonna be, eh, ladies? Fine. We'll just start fucking each other. Supreme Court says it's legal. Let's get weird fellas.

1300+ votes for MGTOW, fairly high up on the most popular current post on the front page of the Internet. MGTOW is no longer the strange periphery inhabited by the occasional loner neckbeard.

#6 Upvoted - 218

Don't equate this with feminism. This isn't feminism; just ignorance.

It was only a matter of time before the White Knights arrived. However, it is interesting to observe how widespread the failings of modern feminism are - a collective with their intentions ought best to hide them, but they get more transparent by the day. We're lucky they're so fucking insane that they can't understand other people well enough to fool them this much.

The decline is happening, and men are waking up. The exodus continues. Feminism hamsters onward.


[–]BallisticTherapy 387 points388 points  (101 children)

So lemme see if I got this right... Josie could not consent because she was drunk, so she's not held responsible for her actions she engaged in while drunk. Being drunk absolves her of responsibility for her actions. Only her, though - not Jake.

Suppose she then gets behind the wheel of a car and decides to drive back home after a drunk hook up. Suddenly this dynamic is turned completely on its head and now she's held accountable for the consequences of her actions regardless of the same level of intoxication that absolved her of responsibility in the sex acts she just participated in.

This example right here shows why this whole dynamic is COMPLETE BULLSHIT. Either they both get charged for rape, or she is not held accountable for what happens when she gets behind the wheel of a car whilst intoxicated.

[–]dw0r 150 points151 points  (6 children)

she is not held accountable for what happens when she gets behind the wheel of a car whilst intoxicated.

They'll be lobbying for that next week.

[–]Squeezymypenisy 17 points18 points  (1 child)

I doubt it because then you are going up against madd. And they are a pretty strong group.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Mothers Against Drunk Driving.... unless it's a mother who is drunk who is driving away from one of those horrible man things. That's just self defense.

[–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 144 points145 points  (46 children)

You guys are missing the larger point and it's one that I posted in the topic and post here often:

The law, the government, and women themselves are telling you, repeatedly, over and over, women are children, you are responsible for them.

Why do you think women say things like "I'm not going to have sex with you"? It's so that when you do have sex she can say it was YOU who made her do it.

They are openly admitting to women's submissive, malleable nature.

[–]ThatsSoOddDoug 13 points14 points  (3 children)

I've been lurking for quite a while now and feel I have a decent grasp of RP concepts. This is the first time my mind's been blown due to one of them.

Ultimately, TRP is about responsibility. Society holds men responsible*. TRP shows you how to use that expectation of responsibility to your own benefit (with great responsibility comes great power?).

Maybe this is something basic I've just been oblivious to. The insight is so powerful that I'm kicking myself for not catching on to it sooner. Thank you for the epiphany, TheeRyanGrey.

*Not just for men's own actions, but for the shaping of society itself? I'm wary of taking the logic that far as of yet.

(Reposting, previous comment was removed due to a link)

[–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 5 points6 points  (2 children)

We talk about all the failings of women but lately we're garnered a victim complex and we stop discussing the failings of men.

We are, at this point, and most likely all future points, the most powerful creatures in the universe. Do you not believe great expectations and responsibility falls upon our shoulders?

It needs to be said that lately men seem unequipped or even worse, unwilling to take on that responsibility. They want all the power with 0 consequences or standards held their way.

This is, ironically, the same problems we complain about women

[–]TRPdis 7 points8 points  (1 child)

This is why I feel like the poster in the OP isn't that far off from the truth. In most sexual situations, I as the man am taking the lead. The girl usually is playing her usual "but I'm not that kind of girl" routine, and I'm pushing the boundaries and trying to take it past first and second base.

It sucks that women are able to turn around on some men and accuse them of rape after consenting the night before. I think it happens less than some MRA would have you believe, but its awful that it happens at all and the legal system shouldn't be so quick to throw men in jail for those kinds of cases. But, as a man, I do ultimately take responsibility for what a girl and I end up doing on most nights.

[–][deleted]  (30 children)

[deleted]

    [–]1sardinemanR 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    There are a lot of things women should not be doing.

    Look, our forefathers had the right idea. Women need to be at home and need to submit to first their fathers and then their husbands. It is patently absurd to pretend women are actually capable of making adult decisions and taking care of themselves.

    It is obvious even by their own actions and inability to ever take responsibility for anything that even they don't actually believe they are "equal" to men.

    The big mistake with society is socially engineering all the affirmative action, lowered standards and outright BS to let women "feel" that they are better than they are. It's a tremendous misallocation and waste of resources.

    And it's absolutely sad and pathetic that most men are so BP and such beta males they can't take their place above women, as the leader and dominant figure that women are seeking and craving. I know a lot of that is to blame on the Western governments that imposed the brainwashing on everyone from a young age, but at some point men need to shake that off and either swallow the red pill and use TRP tactics, or at the least just go MGTOW and opt out. But just puttering along as a beta male is inexcusable, IMO.

    [–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (6 children)

    No one will willingly take responsibility. I've had friends get mugged before, I got out of a robbing once, both times we were doing stupid things (bad area of town, late at night, alcohol involvement, etc)

    Yes it wasn't our "fault" but we realized that we made some dumb mistakes.

    Yet if you try to give women advice on not being raped it's victim blaming, sexist, etc etc. they don't want responsibility

    [–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (4 children)

    I've heard guys take responsibility for that shit all the time. I've heard a story and been like "and then that happened? shit!" and they're like "yeah but honestly it was my fault, I was doing some stupid shit and I deserved it."

    How many times have you heard women have that kind of accountability? If they EVER talk about mistakes they made or negative events it always paints them as the victim, completely blameless and all of this is just happening to them.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

    Ive seen men do it too, but usually it's a more feminine trait. I stopped blaming others when I realized that in doing so you are admitting you have no control over your life. That is wrong.

    It's one of the main reasons the average Reddit user disgusts me. Blame their parents generation, blame Bush, blame bad college advice, etc. none of them can sack up and take control of their lives.

    Red Pill is the exact opposite of that mentality. I dont agree with everything hear. But god damn do I love that thought.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    You want something to happen, you make it happen. That's true "empowerment" right there.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

    Being a victim is all they know, it's how they garner support and attention, it's how they win.

    Ironically, being a victim means you can never be equal. Modern women have been brainwashed just like modern men into being things they clearly do not want to be.

    [–]ioncloud9 53 points54 points  (24 children)

    Or maybe, just maybe, somebody can still consent when intoxicated. Neither of them should be charged with rape. If she was unconscious, then they would have a point. But just being drunk is silly. The whole line of reasoning is setup entirely to absolve women of responsibility for stupid decisions that they regret.

    [–]cariboo_j 77 points78 points  (9 children)

    One time in college, I got blackout drunk and woke up next to a chunker that lived in the building next door.

    She was enthralled and was like "omg that was amazing, I can't wait to do this again!"

    Being a man that takes accountability for my actions, my first thought was "holy shit... What am I doing with my life... I need to stop drinking so much... Also I need to figure out a way to let her down gently... We are definitely not doing that again."

    I actually felt pretty ashamed of myself for a few weeks after tbh. But the fact is I took responsibility for my actions and didn't blame anyone but myself.

    It's actually quite horrifying that colleges are teaching their female students to consider something like that rape. Like no bitch, stop getting so drunk that you go home with people you'll regret fucking. It's pretty simple.

    I'm sure chunker girl didn't have any malicious intent. She was just thrilled the fit guy next door wanted to fuck her.

    [–]the99percent1 21 points22 points  (0 children)

    yeh..that's never going to happen. The female psyche and ego is wayyy too fragile that any self-introspection or even a tinge of guilt will send her into a chaotic mess with small chance of suicide.

    Better to hamster the mistake as rape and deny any wrong doing on her part..

    [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (6 children)

    I've woken up next to some bad ones. Guess who's problem it was?

    [–]1rporion 7 points8 points  (5 children)

    Ach, come on, "bad ones" ?

    He made a big girl happy, that´s what he did.

    Now, waking up next to a psycho bitch...

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children)

    ...with no open condom wrappers in sight...

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I was in a similar situation once except it was during a time when I was on an official separation from my wife. I was so desperate to get it on with someone (anyone) else that I lowered my standards. I was so disgusted with myself afterwards and so apologetic to her (because I like you had no intention of doing anything beyond what we'd just done). Like you say she was really enthusiastic then let down.

    [–]Jack_Sophmore 17 points18 points  (3 children)

    Can you sign agreements while intoxicated? What if I get drunk and go and sign up for some porn websites in my drunken horny state of mind. Can I say that since I was intoxicated I wasn't in the proper state of mind to consent to the agreement of monthly charges?

    [–]The_Floating_Dick 17 points18 points  (2 children)

    Yeah and if alcohol is such a potent and harmful substance that it renders a person incapable of basic decisionmaking, shouldn't it be illegal?

    Also, how much is enough to lose the capability to consent? 50 g of alcohol? 100 g? Or maybe we should use some elaborated formula which accounts for bodyweight, age, height and bf%? How would you then track the amount of alcohol consumed if it was done in private? Good ol he said she said? Or just she said will suffice as it happens recently?

    Why then bother with all this pretend justice if we can simply allow a woman to point a finger at any man and convict him of rape on spot? That would definitely save some tax dollars, which then can be used to subsidize gender studies education, some reproductive health program or to the hell with it - it can be simply given directly to women. Such a shame my great granddad didn't live to see how glorious the country he was crippled for has become!

    [–]JollyO 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Colleges are held to a preponderance of evidence standard.

    As opposed to 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' as would be normal in a rape case since rape is a criminal offense.

    But on College Campuses due process (for men) is ignored and women are encouraged to file lunatic claims like 'nonconsensual kissing' 4 years after the fact (I can't find the story off hand about this) because there are no repercussions for filing a false report.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I know you were making a point with hyperbole, but the ability to point a finger at a man and convict him of rape on the spot isn't far off. Our current society and justice system has zero accountability for women.

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]JollyO 3 points4 points  (2 children)

      On college campuses there is no jury. The onus is on the defendant to prove that they (he) received consent. Thus why this is such a shit show.

      With no due process and only a preponderance of evidence required to accuse and convict men's lives can be ruined by any vindictive woman who wishes ill upon anyone whose ever laid eyes on her (it sounds hyperbolic but the wording of what 'sexual assault' is on many campuses is very vague and could include as much as knocking shoulders in passing in the hall.)

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]JollyO 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        no, he'll just be kicked out of college. lose all scholarships. have his reputation tarnished indefinitely, etc regardless of if the college disciplinary board finds him 'guilty' or not.

        A student from Amherst was wrongfully accused and within 6 weeks the plantiff held [he was] guilty of assault, expelled from the college, ejected from the campus and branded a sex offender,

        Paul, the guy who was victim of the mattress girl's false allegation and whom was acquitted thrice, is suing Columbia for abetting her in her crusade against him. Paul’s entire social and academic experience at Columbia has suffered tremendously as a result of her false accusation.

        another and another and another

        on and on. Those stories might help to illustrate what happens to these men.

        I am not clear why rape on a college campus doesn't receive a criminal trial though. It seems to dumb the issue down a bit, ya? It says, "We've let these people whom we've deemed rapists go free into society. Their only punishment is a Scarlet letter and an end to their higher education."

        It's all fucked man. I'd hate to be a man in college right now.

        [–]1ErasmusOrgasmus 2 points3 points  (5 children)

        I don't know where you're from but I'd recommend familiarising yourself with the Ched Evans case in the UK. He's a pro footballer who was accused of rape, convicted but still challenging his conviction.

        It was decided that his 'victim' was too drunk to consent - as you rightly said, one must be deemed too drunk - but on his webpage you can see the CCTV evidence of both parties entering the hotel just before the act. They walk in together but there's a point where she goes back outside to get a pizza box she left outside by accident. In so doing, she is seen walking, by herself, in high heels without incident. She looks perhaps a little unsteady, but doesn't fall over nor require assistance.

        How the ever-loving fuck could a jury reach the conclusion that a woman who was able to walk fine in 6 inch heels and who had the wits to remember she had left food outside was yet not fucking capable of consenting to sex?

        When I was studying this case at uni I was fucking incredulous. We discussed it in a seminar during which every girl in the class who offered an opinion said they agreed with the verdict. I sat there and looked in disbelief at girls whom I personally had seen five times as fucked up as this 'victim', vomiting their guts up then grinding on some strange dick 2 minutes later. Unable to consent my arse!

        TL;DR yes the law is that one must be deemed too drunk to consent and in theory it is not the case that any level of intoxication with suffice to render a woman's consent as irrelevant. But you can bet your arse that a bunch of 40-something drones who haven't experienced fun in 20 years don't have a damn clue how much alcohol a seasoned 20 year old veteran of the CC can take, nor do they care. All they care about is that you're probably a rapist because you're a young, strong, confident man who has sickening sex urges.

        [–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

        Josie also briefly forgot that she had taken several dozen pictures with Jake, which are now all over social media. This would be fine, but she also has a boyfriend that buys her things she wants. On top of that already highly uncomfortable fact, she's a good girl and doesn't do things like that. What would her friends, or worse, parents think?

        It's easier, no, morally better, to say she was raped; not just horny and wanting to fuck a guy.

        [–]Beltox2pointO 10 points11 points  (1 child)

        She'd be let off, as fleeing the scene of her "rape" while still intoxicated would probably strengthen her claim.

        "I know it's wrong to drink and drive but in my intoxicated state and fearing what had just happened I felt as though I had no other choice"

        Even if the accusation didn't stick, she'd still probably worm her way out of it.

        [–]Timmytanks40 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Haha for fucks sake this would completely work.

        [–]Harry_Teak 10 points11 points  (1 child)

        after a drunk hook up.

        Since the drunken sex was rape, Josie can claim PTSD for her decision to drive.

        [–]1xwm 16 points17 points  (3 children)

        Or you know, neither of them get charged because any reasonable judge should throw this case right out.

        [–]RedPillProphet 46 points47 points  (2 children)

        Except this will never make it to the real court after the guy gets expelled from his college.

        [–]1xwm 32 points33 points  (1 child)

        Or constantly harassed and reputationally ruined as it were.

        [–]DuncanMonroe 9 points10 points  (0 children)

        By a bitch with histrionic personality disorder who carried a mattress around and pretended it was "art"

        [–]GuitarHero07 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        It's never been about fairness or equality.

        Men are rapists in the event of consensual sex when two adults are intoxicated while women are victims.

        Women want to pursue jobs as firefighters, police and soldiers but insist on lower physical standards (they will still demand equal pay though). Is any major politician campaigning for women to be drafted?

        It is illegal for insurance companies to charge women higher premiums for health insurance even though they consume more healthcare resources. Yet, it's okay for insurance companies to charge men more for car insurance.

        A woman can hit a man and if the man hits back, he will be charged with assault.

        Women play fewer sets in tennis than men, but they get equal pay. Women are allowed to compete in WTA events but of course they don't because even Serena Williams wouldn't crack the top 100. At Wimbledon they are allowed to take 10 minute heat breaks but men and boys are denied this luxury.

        Title IX was passed in order to achieve "equality" for women in higher education. In 1972, females earned 44% of college degrees. Today, they earn 57%. Does any politician care about fixing this gender imbalance?

        I could go on.....

        [–]HeinousFu_kery 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        So what happens if Josie puts her finger or a sex-toy in Jake's no-no place. Isn't that mutual sexual penetration?

        [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Someone should tell Jake to file a false accusation.

        Turnabout is fair play.

        [–]Schindog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        But what if a man were to ask a drunk woman to drive him home? If she were to get pulled over and claims she didn't want to do it, but he made her drive, would he be charged with the DUI?

        Ninja edit: Beyond that, what if she, aware of her drunken state, offers an unaware male home then makes that claim?

        [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Well the difference between a penis and a car is that you can't phrase drink driving laws in a gender specific way.

        But with a penis, you can call it a penis and blame its owner. Err... regardless of gender.

        If men drove blue cars and women drove pink cars, before you know it there would be a law saying it's only illegal to drink drive if the car is blue.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Many states have moved away from the definition of rape requiring penetration, therefore the woman could also be the rapist in that situation. I could imagine a prosecutor ignoring that case, however I've never heard of it happening. I'm sure a quick Google could reveal a case or two.

        The law is slowly reflecting a gender neutral approach to rape. (See the Modern Penal Code). It's not really done to be gender neutral, I think it's done to be more inclusive of strange situatuons. There was a time when rape had to vaginal, that has changed obviously.

        [–]rockymountainoysters 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Modern Penal Code

        Penal Code, n. A system of laws prohibiting nearly all forms of penising.

        Did you penis? You did? So you admit it!

        [–]1ErasmusOrgasmus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I don't think the message behind rape laws is that the woman isn't responsible for her drunken actions because I think that would amount to an admission that her actions were voluntary at the time, under the circumstances, but they were vitiated by her drunkenness.

        I think the message is actually much simpler: when women drink they get vulnerable (in all cases, with no assessment of the facts necessary case by case), and when men drink they become predatory. Coupled with society's instinct for suspecting the worst of men and presuming the angelic innocence of women, the conclusion is that having sex with a woman when she is drunk is "taking advantage" of her vulnerable state, regardless of how eagerly consenting she actually was or indeed that she may have been the instigator.

        So although rape laws clearly DO allow women to avoid all responsibility when drunk, I think law makers' intentions were simply white Knight to the max: 'thou shalt not caress the fair maiden with your trouser snake, for she is innocent and defenceless!'

        [–]gg_s 158 points159 points  (90 children)

        #2 on the front page is a rudimentary sex bot (nsfw).

        A top comment:

        Technology has gotten so crazy, I can only imagine what shit like this will be like in 50 years. We're gonna end up fukin robots, actual females will be doomed! The age of men has come up upon us!!!! We must make ways to the hills.

        follow-up:

        This could be interesting, because instead of men courting women, it would have to be the other way around. Women would have to break the ice and convince the man why he should choose her over another woman or electronics.

        [–]scrantonic1ty 81 points82 points  (58 children)

        The sex bot will not only raise very interesting questions in the sexual marketplace, but the economic marketplace.

        If it ever becomes affordable, like the price of a laptop or game console, an infinite supply of pussy is given an actual dollar tag, and its relatively cheap (with no need to maintain SMV). Beyond that, and the cost of subsistence living, what incentive is there for the beta male to work hard? This has the potential to be disastrous, especially considering the hikikomori phenomenon in Japan which is growing throughout Western civilisation.

        Things like this and VR are not comparable to videogames. The potential for sensory stimulation goes way beyond the harmless way to kill time like it is for the vast majority of casual gamers. It will be life-consuming in a way we've never seen before.

        Think about what young people were like and how they socialised 30+ years ago compared to today. That change will be magnified many times over with a mass commercial explosion of VR.

        I wonder, will those in charge recognise this danger and artificially keep prices high? This is the only way I can see the West avoiding many millions of young men going hikikomori.

        [–]199639 25 points26 points  (0 children)

        Someone in the main thread mentioned that thing costs about $300 and the vr headset is about the same. Will be interesting to see how women attack it if they feel threatened. We already see the "strong sexy empowerment" of women owning dildos while males owning something like a flashlight is "creepy". Sex positive feminism is just as female focused as the rest of feminism. I see a lot of people saying things like "the pussy cartel must be enforced" as an explanation, but really I think it's much more basic. Women see men using a sex toy as an admission he can't get laid. Unlike men, women only pursue the opposite sex to be used as a social trophy, to show off to their friends. So a man admitting he can't get laid is damning proof that most women find him valueless and therefore worthless to her. Any man who is beneath a woman is automatically "creepy".

        [–]just_lift 12 points13 points  (9 children)

        A sex bot sounds interesting at first, but I don't think I'd ever buy one. The biggest reason I want to have sex with a women, besides the fact that it feels good, is that I want to be wanted. I want women to be crazy about me. Everybody can get a sex bot. But that's not the point. I could also get up right now and fuck a hooker within the hour because it's legal here and every town has a brothel. But I don't. It's either a women I seduced or jack off to porn.

        [–]ThunderSuit 7 points8 points  (7 children)

        I want women to be crazy about me.

        Which as TRP tells us, has a lot to do with SMV and the way we look.

        How about a world where anyone could modify their looks with ease? Nanotech that gets you buff in 12 weeks.

        What if these sex bots weren't just sex bots, what if they were woman bots? That perhaps didn't necessary show the same level of bonding with everyone, who tuned their sexual behaviours to that of their current 'hosts'.

        [–]franklyforthright 5 points6 points  (4 children)

        If the bot was 100% humanoid and was more charming and didn't shit test or leave you for an omega loser and didn't deny sex, dinner laundry... then well yes I'd get one for sure. This would force women to go full hardcore to change

        [–]Myrpl 7 points8 points  (3 children)

        Nah, they'll just increase their shaming tactics. Because complaining about something is much easier than making the effort to change.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        That's so true. Why raise yourself above the competition when you can just bring it down to your level and not have to change a thing?

        [–]Myrpl 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Funny that you worded like that, I had an argument with a fellow TRPer a few hours ago around whether I should help people get into programming or tell them to avoid it in order to keep the value of the degree high. And I ended up disengaging the discussion because I believe that line of thinking is against TRP.

        [–]Nohlium 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        [–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        yeah, that movie was interesting. One of the subtle themes seemed to be that the sexual market was inverted from what it is now, and that women were a lot more frustrated than men.

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        That's because you CAN have a woman who desire you. Let's imagine the poor beta who has been through a dry spell of 8 years. He won't give a shit. He will spend all his nights fucking his damn robot. Good for him

        [–]RPthrowaway123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        The number one feminist priority will be getting them banned, then. Something about how they encourage women being seen as objects probably.

        [–]Linrraba 8 points9 points  (38 children)

        How this would impact different than prostitution, which exists since always yet didn't change the men's desire to have a family?

        [–]scrantonic1ty 42 points43 points  (27 children)

        Prostitution is expensive, and illegal in many countries.

        Also, if it's a single payment then that makes a big difference. If you had to pay tens/hundreds of dollars every time you wanted to play a videogame or watch porn, would you bother?

        [–]ThunderSuit 9 points10 points  (12 children)

        if it's a single payment then that makes a big difference

        It will take a while before they get to single payments. (Referring to human-like sexbots with synthetic skin that can mimic human motion with 70%+ accuracy - look up 'Hanson Robotics' on youtube)

        I'm aware of a few of companies that should be testing similar concepts (not just for sex, but other physical activity, like elderly care) in the near future.

        The first couple of iterations will be stupidly expensive, and a bunch of enthusiasts will buy them, thus funding further research.

        When they get the costs down comparable to that of a Tesla Model S, they're officially ready for the mass market (unfortunately won't happen in the next decade).

        Due to the cost of such a unit (100-200K), companies that want to stay afloat (and push the growth of this emerging market; considering people aren't sure about sexbots yet at this point, they can't compare to the dynamics of the car ownership market) will likely push for an easier lease/subscription model, where you keep a bot with you for a month of so, after which they get shipped back to the company for maintenance/upgrades (with each bot having a mean lifetime of about 3 years).

        I don't believe sexbot ownership (LTRs) will catch on.

        [–]scrantonic1ty 23 points24 points  (1 child)

        If there's one thing in which I'll place my trust in humanity, it's the desire for easy and cheap access to sex.

        I'm not saying it'll be near future, but think about where computers and mobile phones were in the 80s compared to today. Even in the 90s they were expensive and not nearly powerful and user-friendly enough for the average man to perservere with and justify the cost. As soon as they became as ubiquitous as TVs in people's homes, porn and its demand has driven so much innovation in entertainment technology.

        [–]ThunderSuit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

        If there's one thing in which I'll place my trust in humanity, it's the desire for easy and cheap access to sex.

        As soon as they became as ubiquitous as TVs in people's homes, porn and its demand has driven so much innovation in entertainment technology.

        Couldn't agree more. Sex-related technology has been one of the key drivers of innovation.

        But if you didn't have to own a phone, if you could dump your smartphone in a vending machine every month and pick up a new one right away (since you would have all your data on the cloud anyway), wouldn't you prefer that to owning one?

        This has been the trend in the enterprise market (Eg. servers, software-as-a-service) for a while now. We're also seeing this trend in traditional ownership markets - housing, cars (zipcar, uber) where people shift to a subscription/shared economy.

        The emergent effect of all these market forces, I believe will negate the need for owning anything in the future. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.

        [–]swoleo_dicaprio 19 points20 points  (2 children)

        You can bet on the Uber model here. You order a sexbot, she shows up in all leather on an autonomous motorcycle, parks outside your house, fucks you, plugs into your 240 outlet for 60 seconds, and peaces out. Then you get a push receipt from Apple Pay.

        [–]fa53 11 points12 points  (1 child)

        Amazon drone brings her in with "Ride of the Valkyries" playing

        [–]swoleo_dicaprio 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        or Heavy Metal style like that south park

        [–]OKJaded 9 points10 points  (1 child)

        The thing is they don't need to actually build a car. They just need to make something that is like driving. VR Headsets are getting cheaper and cheaper (Google Cardboard). Someone will produce a bluetooth cock gobbler for sub $1000.

        If a guy can just lay on his bed, slip on his VR headset, his bluetooth cock gobbler, and have an augmented reality porn star transported on top of his dick... That's it. Game over. It might even be easier for the market to welcome a product like that versus a realdoll-esc situation.

        [–]ThunderSuit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        If a guy can just lay on his bed, slip on his VR headset, his bluetooth cock gobbler, and have an augmented reality porn star transported on top of his dick

        Good point. This will definitely happen sooner.

        It just won't have the tactile sensory response of an actual physical body to interact with, that responds back (unlike a realdoll). A sexbot that you can purchase real lingerie and perfume for, that perspires as you fuck away into the night, one that you can french kiss and her tongue feels real and wet.

        Heck, like I mentioned elsewhere, a lot of these physical bots are being built for alternative uses, like nursing and elderly care. So there's no reason why they can't help cook, clean up the house etc. They wouldn't just be 'sex' bots, with all that engineering built in.

        You're right, the VR will come first, then we'll likely just transplant the AI (of bots we're plating) into the bodies when they show up. Sexbot/bodies as just another interface like the headset.

        [–]IGoYouStayTwoAutumns 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        Just finished a major sci fi project (which required quite a bit of research), and yeah, gotta agree: the future isn't going to be "Give us half a million up front and now you're the proud new owner of a brand new sexbot...", more like "Here's your free, AD-SUPPORTED sexbot, and you can bring her back in and exchange her for a newer, better model after a 2 year minimum has passed..."

        Much like Google's coming auto-driving cars are likely to be free and ad-supported, sexbots will almost surely follow the same trend: this will, after all, be the ultimate panacea to the "How do we motivate the betas??" problem we're going to be looking at in the latter half of this century. I say don't worry about the betas--once these guys get their hands on their first free sexbot, and the sexbot says "Oh, I'd love to have sex with you, but only after you buy X merchandise from Y retailer, which you can do though me just by speaking to me right now...", all those men that had previously checked out of the economy (figuring: if there's no reason to impress women, then there's no reason to work hard) are suddenly going to be stampeding back onto the field, when they start having to impress their sexbots (by buying things) on a regular (nightly) basis... Sexbots will, in effect, be WOMEN DESIGNED BY MEN--and like a great video game, the more you put into the bot (re: money, energy, time, investment), the more you will get back out, the two will be directly proportional to each other (this in contrast to, say, women designed by mother nature, wherein, generally speaking, the harder you try, the more resources you commit, the worse you ultimately do)...

        Of course the nightmare scenario starts when you're 5 minutes into having sex with the bot and then suddenly she stops and says "You know, I'm just feeling it right now, but maybe if you bought me X from Y I might get more in the mood... MAYBE..." (Freemium gaming anyone? "You're in combat and wanna reload that gun?? That'll be 10 bucks my boy!!") Gonna be pretty funny if, at the end of the day, all the sexbots end up basically being modeled after Russian goldiggers--looks, personality and all... Who knows, maybe that really is the final evolution of woman--their "fitness peak", if you will...

        [–]ThunderSuit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        I'm just feeling it right now, but maybe if you bought me X from Y I might get more in the mood... MAYBE..." (Freemium gaming anyone?

        Haha, good one, can totally see that happening. Very Dickian; Wonder if you've read Ubik? There's a lot of the environment running on freemium in it.

        sexbots end up basically being modeled after Russian goldiggers

        Quite likely; Maybe free for basic sex and pay for some of the kinky stuff.

        Who knows, maybe that really is the final evolution of woman--their "fitness peak", if you will

        Couldn't agree more. Evolution was never meant to be limited to pure organics.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]KingMinish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Reality is more absurd than any fiction

          [–]rockinhard130 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          You should checkout that A&E show "Humans". Really goes into the subject of realistic human robots, including sexbots.

          [–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 5 points6 points  (7 children)

          Yes but the point is, even in countries where it's legal and cheap, men still date and marry.

          No robot will be anywhere near as good as a real woman. Not for many years yet. Therefore it stands to reason that whatever bots are available, they will have no more effect on the sexual marketplace than cheap and legal prostitution has had in countries where it exists.

          It will change the market a bit. But not as much as people imagine.

          [–]scrantonic1ty 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          I'd like to hear where prostitution is legal and cheap...with decent quality, clean women.

          I think you also underestimate the proclivity of young men these days to succumb to social withdrawal and dopamine cravings.

          [–]through_a_ways 2 points3 points  (2 children)

          No robot will be anywhere near as good as a real woman. Not for many years yet.

          I think VR takes care of that. Fixes the uncanny valley problem, drives down costs (much more software than hardware), and provides limitless potential, customizability and variability.

          [–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 1 point2 points  (1 child)

          I think VR takes care of that.

          Am I really that unusual in liking the way women smell? How about the texture of skin and subcutaneous fat?

          I don't doubt that VR will be better than plain video - just as video is better than printed porn, and photographs were better than drawings. I can imagine men in the era before photographs imaging what video porn would be like, and having the same unrealistic expectations that we seem to have about VR and robots.

          [–]Virtualization_Freak 2 points3 points  (4 children)

          tens/hundreds of dollars every time you wanted to play a videogame

          So... Arcades? I can't remember how many thousands of dollars my friends stuck into the tekken, soul caliber, capcom, darkstalkers, etc.. whatever the popular fighting game was of the minute.

          Edit: I don't know my fighting games. A bit of a tangent...

          [–]VeryEuropean 10 points11 points  (3 children)

          I know I sound like a nerdy asshole and you nor anybody else should really care about shit like this but Dark Souls is not a fighting game and sure as hell isn't playable in any arcads.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorTDCRedPill 3 points4 points  (2 children)

          Nerdy asshole #2: I think he meant DarkStalkers if he was keeping with the fighting arcade games.

          [–]Virtualization_Freak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Yes. DarkStalkers. The one with Felicia.

          [–]VeryEuropean 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Yea, Darkstalkers would make more sense.

          [–]ThunderSuit 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          Prostitution isn't legal in most countries. Also, the good kind comes at a steep price, which makes it more of a hobby for most.

          Sexbots (that you can't tell apart from real women - google the videos on robot skin; sure to freak you out), when available, would eventually be aimed at the masses, capitalism drives prices down, and they could easily replace prostitution and soon more.

          The question is, if prostitution were universally legal, if there was an unlimited supply and variety, if there wasn't a stigma associated, if there weren't STDs, would things be different?

          (Let's not forget that these sexbots will be programmed with reasonably sophisticated AI that mimics bonding, romance, desire, female emotions, and more.)

          Oh, and to answer the family part, eggs and sperm in a lab are the most efficient means of reproduction (IVF has proven that time and again). Artificial wombs are already being tested, so, we've got the family part easily covered.

          [–]waylandertheslayer 3 points4 points  (5 children)

          It would probably eventually be cheaper, and it's a one-time cost. It's kinda like the difference between arcade games and owning a games console in terms of how much you are able to use it, except with the added bonus that there will probably be a lot of homemade/pirated stuff to download for free (assuming it ends up being kinda like videogames).

          [–]Diarrhea_Van_Frank 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          Plus the assurance that nobody else's dick has been in it.

          [–]The_Floating_Dick 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          But she's been with only like 5-6 guys or something

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

          Futurama did an episode on this. Almoat a decade ago, if not longer. It seemed like such a strange and foreign idea. Now? Attainable in the next ten years.

          [–]Dark_Shroud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Even Blade Runner had sex bots, one of the "Replicants" was a working girl.

          It seems to be a long running theme in sci-fi in general. The more realistic authors realized men were going to build fuckable robots/androids.

          On the inverse in Star Trek TNG Data the male android even had a girl friend.

          [–]through_a_ways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Things like this and VR are not comparable to videogames.

          Even if they were, why would it make a difference? Video gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry which largely replaces more traditional recreational activities like sports and card/board games.

          Millions of men opt for video games, to the relative exclusion of traditional games, and traditional games aren't even that hard to play or find groups to play with.

          Now compare how hard it is to find a girlfriend with how hard it is to join a basketball/scrabble group.

          [–]SwissPablo 30 points31 points  (11 children)

          Sex bots would see the bottom fall out of the SMP for women, so you can bet your ass these things will be shamed at best, outlawed at worst. Sex bots and quality virtual sex would satisfy the "creepy" guys women routinely turn down for sex, but that wouldn't matter, if she feels it's not good it won't happen.

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

          They would be shamed but unless they make them pretty damn realistic I don't see any major changes. A large portion of men aren't getting sex anyways. This will just fill a need for the masturbation crowd that women already find ways to be repulsed by

          [–]SwissPablo 1 point2 points  (3 children)

          Right, but anything that threatens potential attention from the right men will be shamed. There's no accounting for feels.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

          It'd be essentially nothing but positive for men but women would hate it. All of the fluffy underpinnings of men that are "beneath her" would be gone because who wants the grief? That means the loss of having a buncha shit done and bought for them for free because for men they'd get a much more honest financial transaction from a robot. I buy you for 15k and you put out whenever I want. Deal? Deal. I'm sure they'd have a high price tag but the conclusion would be a sure thing instead of the current system, which is guys bend over backwards likely to get rejected anyhow in the end just to feel even worse about themselves.

          [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          Without "creepy" guys to put down as being beneath her, where's she going to get her self esteem boost? She'll actually have to admit she's competing with other women without having the bolster of "well I could always fuck X but haha not like I ever would, I'm better than that!"

          [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

          I can't wait til women realize sex bots are here to stay and say it's sexist how they don't get male sex bots.

          Of course the women would never want a male sex bot because of their ridiculous demands placed on men, a bot would never suffice.

          [–]through_a_ways 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          Women want an active man, while men are fine with a passive woman.

          This (ignoring all other factors) would make a male sexbot much harder to create.

          [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

          It's a little depressing how excited they are for sex bots.

          I imagine we're going to reach a point soon where porn will no longer cut it, so we're definitely going to need something more to satiate the unsexed masses.

          [–]mryddlin 2 points3 points  (7 children)

          on the front page, 2 post under this one.

          http://i.imgur.com/WwjmcDN.gifv

          it's basically a fleshlight with feedback controls to the game.

          This will 100% be a real thing and I suspect will push prostitution finally over the edge into legal territory.

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]mryddlin 4 points5 points  (4 children)

            "Why can Sony sell a fuck machine robot but I can't sell my ass"

            Robots are slaves, they would be opening the door to sex robots you can bet that people will protest and they would be right.

            It brings sex for money into the open in a whole new way that would chip away at that social norm.

            I'd like prostitution to be legal, makes it easier

            [–][deleted]  (3 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children)

              Sex bots would be disastrous, but for other reasons....

              If you could equally implement them across society in one fell swoop, then the impacts to the sexual market, reproduction rates, etc. would be equal.

              But that's not how it would/will work. They will be expensive at first, and only folks with the time and money to have them will. They will be the first to see a significant decline in their reproductive rates. Meanwhile, the less productive members of society will continue to breed like rabbits. Only now the proportion of kids coming into the world with parents who are barely eeking out an existence will be far greater. The upper/middle class will accelerate its decline, and the underclass, reliant upon them, will grow disproportionately until this whole sordid house of cards finally collapses.

              TL;DR: Sex bots = downfall of civilization.

              [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

              I don't know why this got downvoted. It was a decent tangent and a reasonably good sci-fi idea.

              [–]lucidsleeper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              It's not sci-fi if it's happening in real life.

              [–]Rathadin 52 points53 points  (3 children)

              Amazing.

              Clearly this means women should not be legally allowed to drink alcohol because their inferior brains can't handle it.

              4600 upvotes?? I know its comedy, but the fact its even said and is on the way to 5000 upvotes is amazing.

              [–]workdavework 5 points6 points  (0 children)

              [deleted]

              What is this?

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]fa53 19 points20 points  (0 children)

                It's genius because some people upvote the sarcasm and others upvote it as truth.

                [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c 71 points72 points  (1 child)

                This poster pretty much sums up feminism in a nutshell:

                All women are children. They have no agency and are not responsible for their actions.

                All men are rapists. They are inherently evil.

                That's a pretty fucked up worldview.

                [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                I swear, feminism instilled a deep hatred of anything masculine in women.

                [–]1REDPILLRECKONING 77 points78 points  (5 children)

                Holy shit, the reddit bluepill majority is starting to gain a little confidence. I think taking down Pao may have started a little bit of momentum, I really hope it continues.

                [–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (1 child)

                Feminists are fucking up their rhetoric. At first they were the only source of equality rhetoric. They've made people hypersensitive to equality and when feminists pull this shit, they notice. The problem is that most of them are gonna continue thinking that feminism is the solution. When feminists fuck up, you'll get angry comments, but nobody's going to the MRM for help.

                [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

                Their big mistake was shifting from things like "look at how tough it is being a woman" to talking points outright blaming men and their privilege.

                You think a sexless, frustrated redditor is going to be fine with constantly being told "you have it so easy?". No. No one likes that. It's how the feminist movement gained vocal enemies.

                [–]IronMeltsinmyHands 13 points14 points  (6 children)

                Shit happened to a good friend of mine in high school. The bitch told everyone she lied. If course she didn't go to the cops.

                She had almost every guy in our school kick his face in. Canada is a fucked up place.

                And to the people who say this isn't feminism, this is exactly why people hate feminists. You can do anything you like, and then add to the end "this isn't feminism." you're absolving yourself of all responsibility.

                This is the result of feminism. Grow up.

                [–]a_guy_from_braunau 2 points3 points  (2 children)

                Crazy people demonstrate on funerals - "This isn't christianity"

                Crazy people chop heads off - "This isn't islam"

                Crazy people think males are all rapists - "This isn't feminism"

                Well it is, of course it is christianity/islam/feminism. An axe doesn't stop being a tool just because some dude in a mask hunts college kids down. It's just another form of using a tool. It think it's just easier for people to say that these are not real **** so they don't feel the need to do anything about it themselves.

                [–]IronMeltsinmyHands 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                if you're going to add religion to the mix, you might as well add in democracy.

                [–]a_guy_from_braunau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                O think the list could go on forever if i tried to put in everything. Democracy didn't come to my mind, sorry.

                [–]through_a_ways 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                It's not the result of feminism, it's the result of innate sympathy for females.

                Feminism is also the result of innate sympathy for females.

                This sympathy exists because women look more neotenous, much like children. People also have innate sympathy for children.

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect

                I saw a video recently of a guy trying to break up a rape. This wasn't a human rape--it was a group of male ducks trying to fuck a female duck. The guy kept chasing down the male ducks, trying to get them to leave the female alone.

                This is the power of feminine-derived sympathy. The dude most likely eats duck, and would have no problem seeing a housecat violently hunt down a mouse or rabbit, but when he sees the oppression of female by male in nature, he personifies it and sympathizes with a duck.

                The duck itself doesn't look all that different from a male duck, but he takes the physical neoteny that human women have, along with the social conditioning propagated by it, and associates those things with the female-ness of the duck, and thus sympathizes with it.

                [–]IronMeltsinmyHands 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                ...there's a line and this... this is all just gone to hell.

                We need to curb this enthusiasm. This isn't healthy at all.

                [–]through_a_ways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Not sure what you're talking about.

                [–]kevinspaceyiskeyser 43 points44 points  (11 children)

                Setting back womens rights about 50 years

                The guy gets wrongly convicted for rape and they still think that their rights are being taken away,why?,because they don't see the double standards every one else is pointing out ,they only see someone saying that men can function while being drunk and women can't,how dare they say women are weaker than men right?(which by the way nobody is suggesting)

                Some people just disgust me.

                In truth we all know that women are rarely ever held accountable for their own actions

                [–]SilentForTooLong 30 points31 points  (5 children)

                To be fair, the people are recognizing that feminism itself is actually more sexist towards women than the phantom TRP monster...it's not a bad thing. Very sad, but it's like what GirlWritesWhat always says...no one listens to issues regarding men unless they can be spun as actually being damaging to women...

                I don't know why all of humanity doesn't disgust you personally. They all disgust me.

                [–]through_a_ways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                no one listens to issues regarding men unless they can be spun as actually being damaging to women...

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect

                This problem will never go away. Trying to get people to sympathize equally along gender lines is like trying to elicit the same emotional response across age lines.

                3 year olds are cuter than 30 year olds, and women are cuter than men. They've literally evolved to elicit powerful caretaker emotions in us.

                [–]kevinspaceyiskeyser 1 point2 points  (3 children)

                I totally agree that feminism is more sexist towards women,the best example is the metro here in my country.

                First coach is reserved for women,which is guess is fine but in all the other coaches too there are two seats each reserved for women,old and physically challenged.If they really cared about equality they would have protested against this as it is implying that they are as physically weak as old and PHC people but infact I have seen young women telling old men to get up from the seats reserved for women

                And I'm not saying that ALL old and PHC people are physically weak but there are assholes who don't offer seats to people who actually need and that's why government had put those rules so that people who need those seats can get them if they choose to

                [–]SilentForTooLong 12 points13 points  (1 child)

                Where the hell do you live??

                [–]a_guy_from_braunau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                In my country, some seats are marked for old people, physically challenged people and pregnant women/women with small children. What the hell are women seats for. I think i would lose my shit if some young woman wants an old man to stand up for a seat.

                [–]199639 12 points13 points  (1 child)

                I agree with your general post but the idea is actually pretty solid. They're recognizing that feminism today fights for increased freedom for women but reduced responsibility. The only people in our society with the legally mandated privilege of reduced responsibility are children. You just have to glance at the side bar to see how women are the oldest teenagers in the house.

                Look at our legal system, look at the corporate culture in the west, look in academia, in all of these places women have protection from severe repercussions for their actions no matter how heinous. Even women murderers spend less time in jail than male murderers, just like juveniles.

                That post is merely pointing out the hypocrisy of championing strength and equality of women while campaigning for child like protection on account of their fragile and immature minds.

                [–]kevinspaceyiskeyser 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                It's not only in the west its here in India too

                prime example:http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2015/02/19/rohtak-sisters-_n_6710858.html

                There was a viral video showing two women beating 2 men in a bus and they said they were molesting them and guess what?Everybody believed them.Both of them (guys)had applied in the army and as soon as this report cam out the army suspended their application.

                On the other had the girls were being glorified to the extent that they were called "bravehearts"

                But luckily ,passengers in the bus stepped up and told everyone the truth that the guys weren't being beaten up because they were molesters it was because of a seat.

                [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                The guy gets wrongly convicted for rape and they still think that their rights are being taken away,why?,because they don't see the double standards every one else is pointing out ,they only see someone saying that men can function while being drunk and women can't,how dare they say women are weaker than men right?(which by the way nobody is suggesting)

                It's called Feminism, not Equalism.

                [–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                Just stop listening to bitches. They complain when they don't get what they want, and they complain when they get what they want.

                Just make yourself happy. Women are supposed to be our equals, right? Let them take care of themselves.

                [–]Lithiumthium 39 points40 points  (6 children)

                IT'S GONE FROM FRONTPAGE, WTF, and the other top posts that were with that at the same time are still there.

                [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 31 points32 points  (3 children)

                Gotta silence reality, reason, and logic. We can't have those pesky things getting in the way of feminine supremacy.

                [–]mryddlin 4 points5 points  (1 child)

                that's odd, it's still the top post for me while logged in and the 2nd post when going incognito.

                [–]Myrpl 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                It's still there for me up top in both all and pics.

                [–]Lithiumthium 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                It was on all and pics, then it vanished from all, while still #1 on pics and getting upvoted.

                Now it came back for me also, but I'm sure it went gone for a good 30 minutes, they probably realized it was going to backfire ( since KIA loves a happening like that )

                [–]Endorsed ContributorLastRevision 14 points15 points  (0 children)

                Violent rape is assault; non-sexual assault is kind of like rape in that someone is exerting dominance over your body and physically harming you- the difference is the sexual nature of the crime.

                Anything else is weaponizing consent for the sake of female supremecy, and women are pushing hard enough now that even Blue Pill men are waking up to the nonsense nature of non-violent rape.

                There comes a point where it's just sex. So you had sex with someone you wouldn't normally have sex with because of reasons; get over it, learn from it, and don't repeat the mistake again.

                Women need their sexuality to have this aura of sacrament around it because they know it's the only bit of power they possess.

                [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 13 points14 points  (10 children)

                At its heart Feminism is a Marxist Critical Theory the purpose of which is to destroy the nuclear family so it can be replaced by the state. This is accomplished by making women fear men. By calling all men rapists. By telling women they are too good for men. And by encouraging women to be sluts instead of wives.

                If you analyze the poster via a classic Western perspective it makes no fucking sense. Two people are doing the same thing yet one of them is the victim and the other is a rapist. Equality under the law is a central tenant of western jurisprudence.

                However, if you look at the poster with the understanding that Feminism is a Marxist Critical Theory it makes perfect fucking sense.

                [–]noworriescc 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                I get frustrated when people want to criticize Feminism without understanding the ideological and political underpinnings of their agendas. The problems arising from Feminism are the same problems that arise from any other "progressive" Leftist agenda.

                edit: a word

                [–]Doctor_Mayhem 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                B-B-But TRP is supposed to be apolitical! There is no left-right divide and it's not a left-right thing! Tradcons (an autistic as fuck term if there ever was one) are just as bad as feminists!!

                [–]noworriescc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                It's a good goal, but it's a rare day when you have a leftist asking anyone to accept responsibility...unless he's what they deem "capable" ....each according to his need and each according to his ability..

                [–]donald_kingsley 1 point2 points  (5 children)

                Your term "marxist critical theory" is literally meaningless. Marxism is an economic critique, it can't be applied in the manner you suggest here.

                [–]Tarnsman4Life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Isint this actually doing the opposite though? It is getting to the point where betas especially are actually afraid to have sex with women, especially younger women, because they know if they don't commit , do everything the woman says and curl her toes then she is liable to cry rape. Moreover, the claim will be taken at face value and the betas life ruined.

                What is the purpose of that, exactly? Women have proven they cannot run society, including a state. By robbing yourself of compliant beta males, they actually weaken the power of the state. Without betas as good worker bees, then you can't build a sustainable state.

                [–]NickCiufi 15 points16 points  (0 children)

                Maybe once the Chairman resigned, the Reddit gestapo lost their authority.

                [–]neveragoodtime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                And I'm not sure any of this would have been upvoted without the recent regime change. Reddit was doing some serious censorship and once that's removed we're going to see some serious truth pour out.

                [–]Temuzjin 9 points10 points  (6 children)

                UK Definition: A person commits rape if they intentionally penetrate the vagina, anus or mouth of another person with their penis without consent.

                So a woman can't rape a woman either?

                [–]Endorsed ContributorScholarInRed[S] 16 points17 points  (5 children)

                Under UK law, women can't rape. End of.

                [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

                They can't even rape children?

                [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

                This right here is a very important question.

                [–]50-cal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                Nope, just charged with sexual abuse. From time to time stories pop up in the news with women raping their children and prostituting their kids to men. The men usually get charged with rape on top of child abuse charges while the mother gets a lighter charge or even just have the child taken away by social services.

                [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                If I read that definition correctly, if you ask a girl to stick her finger up your butt at some point during the drunk sex she could be charged too. Hmmmmm..... Back door solution (pun intended)

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                If men and women lived and abided by the same standards, men would outclass women 99.9% of the time. Inherently, we all know this. The only reason why women have leverage over us is because we (the people that represent us in government) keep allowing them to live by situational rules based on their gender.

                [–]__var 10 points11 points  (1 child)

                I like the Australian ad posted lower in the thread.

                [–]Jani1157 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                The poster itself is fucked up! Look at how Josie is smiling happily looking away at the guy enjoying herself, and Jake has the cup up to his mouth only showing his eyes looking straight into the camera. The effort to paint men as sinister is strong

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                So that's how it's gonna be, eh, ladies? Fine. We'll just start fucking each other. Supreme Court says it's legal. Let's get weird fellas.

                I may have just ruined my laptop. Spit water out all over it.

                [–]chadchadington 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                Women won't be gettin' "the feels" after signing a sex contract and consent to be filmed while in estrus.

                There are night vision-enabled alarm clock cameras on the market. Filming without consent carries with it a punishment; however, a rape charge on your record will be much worse.

                [–]Vigilo_Infinite 8 points9 points  (3 children)

                I don't think it's a secret that feminism is widely regarded as a bit of a joke.

                What people don't understand is that "equality" means "the same". This symbol: "=" means the same. Men and women will never be equal because we are not the same and will never be the same and that's a good thing.

                The sentence "equal but different" doesn't make any sense and is a contradiction.

                [–]Planner_Hammish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                I would disagree strongly that Femimism is widely regarded as a joke. IRL, pretty much all of my peers are Feminists, many are white knights, and if you disagree with the herd then you get shamed into changing your position (not that I have, I just self censor now when I am around those people because there is no upside to having my peers see me as some kind of misogynist/partiarch).

                I think the main reason is that many of my.peers are homosexual, and many of my peers are women who are professionals. Pretty much all are university educated, and so have been indoctrinated into their current worldview, which has benefitted them so the go with it.

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                It's really not regarded as a joke. It's the "cause" of our time. It has been since the 1980's. It really gained traction when most of the racial based causes had succeeded and when AIDS forced everyone to pay attention to sexual habits. The feminist message was unrelentingly played alongside the safe sex message and then even moreso because talking about sex in mainstream media was frowned upon by studios but talking about causes was a long established practice. Most men didn't speak up at first because those that did were shamed by the media and the others thought it was a fad that would blow over. More still didn't realize the juggernaut it would become.

                Now we live with 2 generations of women who have been born into a world where they're told from the moment they're born "you're right, you're special, men are trying to oppress you, the system is trying to oppress you, fight for yourself, your whims are your rights and no one is justified to take them from you". This of course makes rational discussion on the subject between a man and a woman almost impossible because much like arguing with someone who is very religious, almost all arguments end in a cliche feminist tagline response which both justifies a complete lack of integrity on her part and vilifies you for being born male.

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                But all people can still have equal opportunities, its just impossible and retarded to try have equal outcomes.

                For example: Giving all people access to state colleges at an affordable rate VS giving all people a cushy job regardless of their actual competence.

                [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                [deleted]

                [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Honestly I appreciate what you're trying to do here but I'm tired of people having to make arguments like yours that yes, argue against the typical feminist message but also coddle and pander to it at the same time. If the feminist crap is ever going to stop, it's certainly not going to be because women suddenly start saying "shit, I just realized that what we're doing is wrong".

                [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                [deleted]

                [–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 10 points11 points  (1 child)

                A sober woman isn't responsible for anything, either. Alcohol is just the contextual excuse for her chronic hypoagency.

                If she's looking for a job and can't find one, it's patriarchy.

                If she wants "equal pay" and "can't find it", it's the wage gap.

                If she wants to be left alone while walking down the street in a miniskirt and can't, it's male entitlement.

                If she wants to be cat-called while walking down the street in a miniskirt and isn't, it's male cowardice.

                Understand that, because women are children, they will always look for someone to blame. The sooner a man internalizes this idea, the less anxiety he will feel about his interactions with women, and the better his life will become.

                [–]Wubalubdubdub 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Imagine if all men agreed to not have sex with woman for about a month, what would happen?

                [–]QUIT_CREEPIN_HO 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                Taken from another thread:

                This isn't an accurate statement of the law, at least not in any jurisdiction I'm familiar with (I'm a military prosecutor by trade). However, this is consistent with what I've seen from many victim advocacy groups. Frankly misinformation like this does more harm than good from a prosecutor's standpoint, because any smart defense counsel will ask the victim if this is what she was taught. If so, they can then argue that she only "cried rape" because her miseducation about the subject caused her to believe she was sexually assaulted, when in reality, she made a decision that she now regrets. Just being "drunk" has no legal significance for either the victim or the accused. Voluntary intoxication is not a defense to sexual assault. Therefore a court can only view the accused's actions through the eyes of how a reasonable, sober person would act. The law states that a person who is "substantially incapacitated" cannot consent to sex and that the accused knew or should have known about that condition. Basically that means that a victim has to be so drunk that they lose the capacity to consent, i.e., really, really drunk, and the offender knew it. The choice of whether to charge this case in civilian jurisdictions belongs to the prosecutor and in military jurisdictions it belongs to the commander (who almost always follows the recommendations of his prosecutor). Hopefully the prosecutor takes all of the facts into account before charging someone in this type of case. TLDR - The system works as well as it reasonably can, but this poster is a misstatement of the law

                [–]1Watermelon_Salesman 4 points5 points  (3 children)

                1300+ votes for MGTOW

                So mig-tow is now another word for "gay"?

                [–]Endorsed ContributorScholarInRed[S] 22 points23 points  (2 children)

                MGTOW means men who cut women out of their lives where possible. It's a joke of an extreme example, but humour masks many ponderous intentions.

                [–]FlixFlix 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                I'm not sure why you'd say that the links in #3 "all go to modern feminist media". Did you mean anti-feminist, or did you not watch the videos?

                No silly, men can't get raped! It's a hilarious concept.

                It's literally impossible for a woman to abuse men

                Also all men are constantly eye raping every woman

                [–]Endorsed ContributorScholarInRed[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                I confess that I did not watch. Have now watched. I presumed that all were sarcastic links to sincere media. Have now corrected the post. May have made an ass out of umption and myself.

                [–]mananlak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                +1 For taking responsibility for your mistake like a man.

                [–]Lipophobicity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                "1300+ votes for MGTOW, fairly high up on the most popular current post on the front page of the Internet. MGTOW is no longer the strange periphery inhabited by the occasional loner neckbeard."

                I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Beyond a few concepts (AFBB especially), red pill will never be mainstream accepted (not a bad thing), but MGTOW is gaining massive traction all the time. If it is generally called MGTOW by most or just seen as a growing trend remains to be seen.

                While not really MGTOW myself (I'll never marry but like long term plates/FWB), it's becoming increasingly obvious that the game is rigged and for many simply not playing is the smartest way to go

                [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                Looks like a PSA from Coastal Carolina. This is what they are teaching our youth. This message is not so much a threat to young men as it a reminder to young girls to wield their pussy power over their male providers.

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

                The average commentors on reddit are white males, younger, usually pretty nerdy. They would never join feminism and never were their intended demographic. But they would tolerate it. At least, at first. They are slowly waking up to the bullshit that is 'male privilege'

                The more people we can get calling out feminism the better off we will be

                [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

                The average commentors on reddit are white males, younger, usually pretty nerdy. They would never join feminism

                I would respectfully disagree with this. Many of them are in college, which has a mandate on progressivism. I have very, very smart friends who are into "causes" like this without really knowing anything about them, other than parroting popular stats.

                [–]1CowardlyPetrov 0 points1 point  (1 child)

                Eh, angry nerds at their computers never changed anything. It only matters what the warrior caste does. I don't expect to see any "waking up". This society will still collapse on schedule.

                [–]dwus29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Replace "warrior caste" with "business and political castes," and I'll agree. Just look at the United States order of precedence and scroll down to the bottom. The U.S. military is a beta institution subordinate to the President, and has instituted homosexual, feminist, and SJW policies like affirmative action, double standards, and interminable "rape culture" seminars (See the work of Jackson Katz); not to mention female servicemembers getting pregnant to get out of deployment and the notorious trashiness, obesity, and cheating of military wives.

                [–]Transmigratory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

                Mother fucker... the moment they associate with any part of the manosphere, those upvotes would be taken down to the negative number line's area.

                load more comments (35 replies)