665
666

Red Pill TheoryFeminists calling for a ban on sex bots. Also: the future of dating/sex/relationships (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by 2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK

tl;dr: I talk about the first people pushing against sexbots. Expect a lot more over the next decades. Then I predict what will happen. Then I talk about how a lot of different technologies are al starting to arrive that will change dating, relationships, and having kids.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34118482

Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Kathleen Richardson.

"Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what roles they would play - are very disturbing indeed," she told the BBC.

The problem here is that they can be made to be not fat and wrinkly. This is going to set "unrealistic beauty standards that little girls cant live up to and damage their self esteem" - that will be the main argument for banning it.

Sexbots will be for the betas who are not in the top 20% and are not getting sex. Nobody cares about these people (not even themselves) so the feminists looking to legally ban sexbots will either win or make it social suicide for men to have one.

She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

That isnt even a reason to ban them. If women arent just sex objects, and they offer more than sex to men (emotional support? idk), then the sexbot wont be an issue as the man would still need all that other stuff from the woman. And the men that "are evil" and only want physical relationships will not bother women, as they get everything they want from the sexbots.

I also doubt this woman cares about relationships being more than physical. Does she actually care about hookup culture and women having pure physical relationships? Does she want to ban women from having dildos as it implies relationships with men can be purely physical? Or does she want to avoid losing power to control betas?

I think we can expect feminist regulation akin to Asimov's Three Laws of Sexbots

  1. A sexbot may not have sex with her owner without him doing the washing up and asking about how her day went, or through inaction, allow a human being to have sex with sexbot without him doing the washing up and asking about how her day went.

  2. A sexbot must reject orders that do not end in "please, honey, i'll make it up to you".

  3. A sexbot must be uglier and less slutty than any woman that shows an interest in its owner.


The second half of the article focuses on a guy who sells one of the first sexbots.

"We are not supplanting the wife or trying to replace a girlfriend. This is a solution for people who are between relationships or someone who has lost a spouse.

The more you think about it the better this answer is.

"The physical act of sex will only be a small part of the time you spend with a sex robot - the majority of time will be spent socialising and interacting," he said. Some experts are sceptical about the claims made for Roxxxy, given the huge complexity of creating intelligent machines but the first version - which will sell for $7,000 (£4,530) - has had thousands of pre-orders, according to Mr Hines.

It will be like talking to a chatbot (at first, give deep learning 10 more years. in fact you could simulate my last girlfriend by plugging an RSS feed of the Guardian website into it).

David Levy, author of the book Love and Sex with Robots, believes that there will be a huge market for dolls such as Roxxy and predicts that by 2050, intimate relationships between robots and humans will be commonplace. "There is an increasing number of people who find it difficult to form relationships and this will fill a void. It is not demeaning to women any more than vibrators are demeaning," he told the BBC.

His response isn't great. Implicitly that first sentence implies that they are to replace women, and women will pick up on this. It doesn't matter that its customers are socially undesirable. And the fact that "women are doing it already with vibrators" is not a good argument as that doesn't matter to them, this is emotional not logical. But this guy is only peddling a book, not a sexbot, so whatever.


What next?

Women basically have it all in 2015. It was only 50 years ago when casual sex was a life-altering risk (they didnt have The Pill). They now have a culture and apps that allow them to fuck a different alpha every day of the week, and settle down with a beta at 30. Then they are free to divorce him if they feel like it, and the state will help them support themselves. Men are either alpha and loving it, or mainly left in the dark and living on MGTOW forums.

A bunch of technology will disrupt sex/relationships/reproduction, and it will hit different places at different times and to different extents. There are going to be a huge range of dating strategies all popping up at once, as you can combine different tech to suit your desires. A few examples that spring to mind:

  • Surrogacy: you can get the egg of a 21 year old Ivy League athlete for $10k, have a Thai woman do the pregnancy for $10k, and have total legal rights over the child so that a divorce cant take them out of your life. Cristiano Ronaldo has a surrogate child - the top men start first and then it trickles down.

  • Sexbots are coming, sure. But also other needs from relationships are being replaced. It wasnt long ago that you needed a wife to settle your affairs at home. Cooking and cleaning were full time jobs. But now we have microwaves, washing machines, roombas... and you can hire a maid for $10/hr using your smartphone. Rather than having all of your needs met by one person we are starting to choose specialists for each. Women do this too by exploiting AF/BB.

  • In 2 years time you will be able to use your skin cells to make either sperm or eggs, by using stem cells. This will allow same-sex couples to have biological children. This means older women will find reproduction easier (they can use surrogates too). It also makes it easier for betas to have children with supermodels. Online markets for selling cells will start to appear (maybe somebody here should do it?).

Many on this forum talk about a need to return to traditional monogamy, and avoid hookup culture. Thats just not going to happen. And the dating market is going to go crazy with innovation. Different subcultures and countries/cities will have totally different cultures for sex. You will pick one depending on your own strengths (like you already do when you pick tinder or bars or clubs or libraries...). Some guys get prostitutes as "they pay them to go away", whereas some pay more for "the girlfriend experience"... different needs.

This is already happening. In New York the dating lifestyle is: text someone on tinder, meetup for drinks that day, have sex, have sex a few more times, and eventually she moves on after meeting a taller, richer guy. Its fantastic for both hypergamy and polygamy (at the cost of making the monogamy at the end total shit and doomed to fail). Whereas in rural communities they still have traditional relationships. Younger people pick up changes fast. Most 50 year olds have no idea that something like tinder exists. More extreme stuff is due to come, and the actual rate of change of innovation is always increasing. Im mid-20s and wtf is Yik Yak?

We will see more and more single parents, and the state will gradually be designed to support this more. Any needs that you cannot fulfill your child you will outsource. Groups of friends will raise children together, similar to how they did back in the days of tribes. People will drift in and out of relationships, supported by automation and increasingly surplus resources, with less and less risk of not being able to provide for their kids.


[–]KartagoPill 361 points362 points  (66 children)

Dildo is primitive sex bot. Why not we ban dildo?

[–][deleted] 354 points355 points  (11 children)

Also they come in sizes that set unrealistic standards for young men...

[–]laere 95 points96 points  (8 children)

Dragon dildos, big black dildos, dildos the size of a skyscraper, dildos wider than a tunnel.

The dildos never end.

[–]PlasmaBurst 19 points20 points  (2 children)

I'd like to see a dildo robot running around. It'd look like a cartoon with its two long legs.

[–]Code_Bordeauxx 106 points107 points  (22 children)

Aside from the obvious hypocrisy you point out, it's because feminists are very well aware that a dick, synthetic or not, is only made valuable by the alpha that's attached to it. No dick alone has ever given a woman the 'tingles'. And we know this too. Have you, or anyone else here, ever felt threatened by the invention and use of dildos? I don't think so, not me at least. But men don't care about the status, confidence and skills of women. For sex it only matters they look and fuck good. And we're on the verge of synthetically recreating this.

After that only synthetic uteruses need to be invented to render every non-LTR worthy woman completely useless. Let that sink in for a second and then realise feminists think it's men that are becoming obsolete.

[–]ReasonFreak 87 points88 points  (14 children)

That's one of the things that's so beautiful about this technology. No matter how Alpha a male robot is made to look it can never truly occupy an Alpha's place in society, it can't hold a high status job or make a lot of money. Alpha personality traits could, in theory, be programmed into them, but that would take a level of technological sophistication bordering on true AI, a technology that likely will be heavily regulated when/if it's ever created. On the other hand we men will only need our robots to look good, do chores, and mouth a few submissive pre-programmed statements and it's good bye evil feminist bitches.

[–]1sardinemanR 176 points177 points  (11 children)

If they could program an alpha bot, it would just leave her for a younger, hotter, possibly robotic, female model anyway.

[–][deleted] 75 points76 points  (0 children)

[deleted]

What is this?

[–][deleted] 66 points67 points  (7 children)

Haha. Women would program their idea of the perfect man and then wonder why they're not attracted to it. Because they don't even know what they want.

"I feel raped by my alphabot".

[–]1pluvoaz 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The TV show Humans touched on this but in a different way.

Basically, a woman dumps her husband for her helper bot. Then tries to get the bot to be more 'alpha' but it gets out of control so she calls her husband to rescue her. She then gets upset at the husband and gets protective her bot. Unreal if it wasn't so spot on.

[–]Indigo_Monkey 6 points7 points  (4 children)

women want an uncontrolled man who they can manipulate over time into something controllable; I don't think that works with robots.

[–]tallwheel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's why a woman still needs to imagine an exciting scenario of being taken by an alpha in order to get off with the dildo.

[–]Endorsed ContributorThe_Titleist 109 points110 points  (25 children)

Because then lesbians would need a man...

[–][deleted] 79 points80 points  (0 children)

lesbians are still mad because they can't actually fuck their GFs like we can

[–]Redasshole 43 points44 points  (18 children)

Most lesbian still suck dick anyway. Women who are truly disgusted by penises are very rare.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (13 children)

I can confirm this. I recently hooked up with a "lesbian", who has never had a boyfriend. She would fuck guys once a year, just to "remember why she is gay".

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (8 children)

I hooked up with a "lesbian". I ignored her all night since I was told she doesn't fuck guys, lo and behold my ignoring her somehow flipped a switch in her head and I ended up fucking her.

I was the first and by far not the last guy.

[–]Endorsed ContributorLastRevision 33 points34 points  (6 children)

It's not that I don't believe she told you that, but a lesbian who hasn't fucked a guy is truly rare. I believe lesbianism to be phony balonie.

In the lesbian community, a lesbian who never had a dick is called "gold star" as to indicate this rarity.

EDIT: I happened to just open my YouTube and this video popped up on the front page by Laci Green talking about how "everyone is a little bit bi"; of course since most girls are bi, why not emasculate the upcoming generations of boys and tell them that they're bi too! LOL right?

BUT WHAT'S TRULY FUNNY ABOUT THIS VIDEO IS THAT.... it's shot by MTV, and therefore can't use Laci's typical webcam angles and.... NO SURPRISE, SHE'S A BIG FAT FUCK.

LOL FUCKING FOREVER.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Oh she wasn't a lesbian. She just called herself that. I know for a fact after I banged her (her first week at college) she rode the CC hard.

As the other commenter mentions, and I say all the time, I truly believe some girls have never came across an alpha. Some social circles (at least around my area) are inundated with hipsters and SJWs. I almost wrote a field report about Saturday night hanging out with a group like this. By the end of the night 2 out of 6 of the girls told my friend they were into me and I hooked up with one of them. My game wasn't even that great, I just wasn't a bitch, which the girl I hooked up with described as "refreshing." That's something that I've seen here alot of people mention they are told after swallowing the pill. To me all it means is "wow someone who acts like what men are supposed to."

Needless to say videos like that I think show where this generation is going, everybody's a special snowflake and has their own unique label.

[–]KnG_Kong 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol all those special snowflakes are being tricked into fucking themselfs which is neither bi straight or gay.

To females nothing's a choice, it's all because of "Them Feels"'

[–]An_All-Beef_Engineer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

therefore can't use Laci's typical webcam angles

Reveal of the century right there. Was absolutely gobsmacked in me gabber

[–]TheSilverwolfKnight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Back in my beta days I knew a lesbian. A hard 1, super hot at HB9, but she was lesbian who 'said' she had never fucked a guy before. I managed to make out with her on the night I met her, and I was beta as fuck. If an alpha came along, I think we all know where it would've gone.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]BetterBadIdeas 40 points41 points  (2 children)

    Pam: "Aren't you gay?"

    Ray: "Please, girl. Nobodies that gay."

    [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

    What about natural remedies like cucumbers?

    [–]Nebulose11 8 points9 points  (2 children)

    OT: For some random fun try standing in the veggie isle with a tube of KY and looking perplexed. The looks you get are amazing.

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    Q: "Do you have black cucumbers?" A: "You mean Holothuria atra? They are in our fish aisle"

    [–]Tarnsman4Life 87 points88 points  (24 children)

    Going after pornography did not work and going after as of yet to be built "sex bots" it will work about as well. Lots of betas with disposable income that have not been locked down yet, looking to spend $$$ on sexual release.

    Now imagine if someone made a "bot" that could cook, clean, do laundry, run errands and have sex. A lot of guys would rather spend even 100K on one of these bots, than risk losing half their money in a divorce.

    [–][deleted]  (17 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Tarnsman4Life 43 points44 points  (1 child)

      Funny thing is, what we call high standards today was SOP a generation ago.

      [–]DodgedAFew 13 points14 points  (0 children)

      There is a cheap machine for every female chore now... Every but one.

      [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      I'm ex military, I know how to cook, clean, fix shit, buy groceries, pay the bills, keep shit neat and I do it all better than any female I've ever known. Even my mother couldn't keep shit as neat as I can.

      No maid service here, and who would dry clean t shirts and jeans? I own a washer, dryer, oven, fridge, and I can bake from scratch as well as I can cook over a campfire. Hell I own two of everything I listed there, except the dryer.

      I honestly don't need a girl around, all they do is make a mess and soak up money.

      [–]eaton80 12 points13 points  (0 children)

      than risk losing half their money in a divorce.

      Don't forget alimony, sometimes lifetime alimony.

      [–]TRP VanguardCyralea 143 points144 points  (18 children)

      Of course feminists are going to oppose it. Feminism is at its core a movement to maximize female sexual strategy. That means having exclusive, uninhibited access to the top alphas while securing the resources to carry out their children. Feminism accomplishes this by making female preferences sacrosanct ("Tall guys are just my preference") whereas male preferences are made socially untenable ("How dare you reject her for being fat/slutty. You're just insecure")

      This has bled over into male adaptations to the problem. In most places where prostitution is illegal, it's not illegal to sell the sex, but to purchase it. This all but ensures that only men are ever criminalized for the behaviour. Further, betas who don't engage in prostitution end up paying for it all the same. They're taxed to support single mothers in their whoredom. The more entrenched power feminism has, like in Canada and Australia, the more whoring around is considered a virtuous path.

      Owning a dozen vibrators isn't just socially acceptable, it's the mark of an empowered woman. Owning a fleshlight is social suicide. Such social perceptions aren't accidental.

      Female sexbots have the potential to completely undermine any advantage women have in the dating market. 80-90% of women are only good for their vaginas. Take that away and what power do they have over men? Very little.

      Feminists would sooner shave their legs and fuck a suite of obese omegas before they let that happen.

      [–]2popthatpill 62 points63 points  (4 children)

      Feminism is at its core a movement to maximize female sexual strategy.

      Yup. That's all it is and all it ever was.

      Owning a dozen vibrators isn't just socially acceptable, it's the mark of an empowered woman. Owning a fleshlight is social suicide. Such social perceptions aren't accidental.

      Everything women want gets steadily more and more liberalised, everything men want gets steadily more and more anathematised (eg. in Iceland you can buy vibrators at the supermarket but strip clubs are illegal). That's part of the strategy: liberalise things that work for the female strategy and/or against the male strategy (same thing, basically), restrict things that work for the male strategy and/or against the female strategy (again, same thing).

      And now the feminist moral propaganda squad is coming for the latest example of competition.

      [–]Username-_-2015 16 points17 points  (2 children)

      It doesn't really matter if having sex with a robot may seem wrong. The people that will benefit from it won't care. Just like the people involved with porn, they don't really care if it's against someone's religion or moral compass.

      When they start making sex robots both sex's will benefit from this new enterprise. The men making these sex robots will be making a mint and so will the tech people involved in fixing the sex robots that break down or have computer malfunctions because just like your car those robots will need maintenance. Companys that copy a certain womens "look" will be making a percentage of those robots that are made to look like them. It will create more jobs and also these robots could be used to study human behavior and or help people that have some sort of anxiety with the opposite sex or just other people.

      As to wether or not these robots will decrease rape statistics is something that cannot be said is that it would reduce it for sure. The cost of these sex robots could be in the thousands hell even silicon sex dolls cost upto a thousand and sometimes higher, the people that often are rapist are usually the lowest people in society, they can't pay for a sex doll with food stamps. Although some people could actually prostitute these sex robots and make cash out of it "is this even still considered prostitution?". Why would you go to a prostitute that usually looks like shit, when you could go to a sex robot that looks like angelina jolie for half the price of a third rate las vegas slut that looks fat and like shit and have possible std's? With robots they could be cleaned and or steralized to get rid of any std's, therefore the risk would be zero.

      This is all speculation, but what is for sure is that these robotic humanoid machines will happen perhaps not sex robots at first but they will be made and are actually being made right now as we speak not sex robots but robots in developed countries. they are making robotic soldiers to replace humans, no doubt eventually someone will realize the sexual potential in these robots. It's going to happen no matter what some beta knight or femenist thinks about it.

      [–]Nebulose11 8 points9 points  (1 child)

      With robots they could be cleaned and or steralized to get rid of any std's,

      Most (Maybe all? IANAPathologist) STDs require animal pathways to survive. HIV does not survive outside the animal body for very long. These dolls wont use living fluids, probably just a sterile lubricant that you have to refill every once in a while, so these pathogens wont have a pathway of survival, let alone transmission.

      Edit: I had thought about running a harem of robo-hoes and renting them to the less fortunate for a minute or two. Wonder how much of the beta bucks market I could take away from used up sluts.

      [–]Squeezymypenisy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

      I doubt it will happen. If its one thing the robotics industry has or will have eventually is lobbying money. Plus not every state has a strong feminist influence. We already have real dolls here and those are super realistic. If its one thing you can't stop, its change. Even super liberal groups will not be able to keep up.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 234 points235 points  (111 children)

      It's the cartel coming in to protect their interests.

      Men need to realize that the only thing standing in the way of feminists getting their way is basic civil rights which guarantee individual liberties. This is what is most worrisome of the feminist agenda: they've no problem eroding individual liberties to further their agenda. This makes them a great partner to the government which has the same goal: less individual liberties and more government control.

      What are the feminists afraid of? Suddenly, men will not only be able to have sex with an attractive woman on demand, they'll also be able to have sex with harems of attractive women, which is the ultimate sexual desire of most males.

      I wrote about this scenario a while back:

      Once they invent reasonably-priced sex robots that look and feel like real women, men will basically be in heaven. Men are programmed to spread their seed far and wide and sex robots will allow men to sleep with a large variety of fantasy women.

      The robots would have to be reasonable at sex. It would be nice if they self-cleaned and would clean up around the house a bit better than a Roomba. Anything beyond that would be icing on the cake, like being able to dress nicely or cook, maybe do some accounting and bill pay.

      Guys would have collections of these robots and swap them with buddies when they got bored with them (again, it would be nice if they self-cleaned).

      "Let's see, I'll have the one that looks like Ana Delia De Iturrondo. And Christina Hendricks. Throw in Hitomi Tanaka and Kimberly McArthur while you're at it. Finally, give me a Raquel Welch and one of those cavewoman outfits."

      Once guys are sleeping with a harem of 10s to their heart's desire, they will only have to deal with real women on a non-sexual basis...or for actual reproduction. This is also a dream come true for feminists - no more dealing with unwanted sexual advances.

      Careers based on attractiveness such as modeling and porn will disappear, gold-diggers will have nothing left to negotiate with, and there'd be no more nice guys. Men would be able to keep much more of their wealth and spend it on themselves. Another feminist benefit: prostitution would disappear.

      I'm not sure the benefits would be as pronounced for women. They'd get to have sex with the male physiques of their dreams, but we all know that they want more than that. Still, they'd no longer have to put up with creeps, so they'd have that going for them.

      [–][deleted] 74 points75 points  (18 children)

      This post made me laugh my ass off... everything you described is so weird, but so accurate. Men just peacing out en masse from the sexual marketplace. It's a very strange future ahead of us.

      [–]1PrinceofSpades 57 points58 points  (16 children)

      I can actually forsee women quickly becoming desperate after this occurs beyond the first few stages, and start doing all sorts of slutty things to keep up.

      Going to be difficult for her to prove her worth to the point of men choosing her over the harem of robotic sex dolls that don't ever say no and fuck and feel better than the real thing that they have access to.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]eaton80 25 points26 points  (3 children)

        But how will men live without experiencing Divorce Rape?

        [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 16 points17 points  (2 children)

        Maintenance costs will keep the local systems in line...

        [–]Endorsed Contributoralways-be-closing 19 points20 points  (0 children)

        It would just be societal wide result of all men having an abundance mentality.

        Withholding from women is what you have to do on an individual level to get them to behave.

        Being willing to walk and show them they'll lose something good is always powerful.

        It's like crate training a puppy.

        You want to cuddle and baby and feed it all the time, but if you're not strict with it, it'll keep peeing on the carpet.

        [–]mugatucrazypills 15 points16 points  (1 child)

        I'd probably program in a few shit tests just to keep me on my toes.

        [–]evileddy 14 points15 points  (4 children)

        Do you know how much money will be made by the company that makes a sex robot simply bring you a beer and not talk? Trillions!

        [–]LikesTacos 9 points10 points  (3 children)

        Who needs a sex robot? I want a beer robot that doesn't talk.

        [–]Nebulose11 11 points12 points  (1 child)

        Robots don't come with a portal for STDs to survive in as well.

        [–]John_E_Vegas 12 points13 points  (0 children)

        I started to write about how wrong the post was, then I realized, sadly, that you are correct.

        We're already doing this with Fleshlights and other inventions. Of course we'll bang robots and perhaps even have relationships with them.

        Sad, really, that it's come to this.

        [–]Code_Bordeauxx 95 points96 points  (42 children)

        When the betas start using these in large numbers, women will suffer a huge blow in the value and entitlement their pussy brings them. But consider this: what if engineers start making them really good? What if they find ways to make it better than the real deal? I doubt it will even come to this point, but still, it's not uninmaginable. It could cause a shift where women will almost completely be abandoned by men. I think alpha commitment robots will be siginificantly harder to make, lol. Almost scary to think about, who knows where we'll be in 20 years? Sit back and pay attention gentlemen, there are interesting times ahead of us.

        Oh, and no doubt about it that these attemts to ban them will fail. At least in the long run. Economic incentives win every time.

        [–]Anderfail 79 points80 points  (20 children)

        If they make them act truly feminine, then just watch how every single woman on Earth abandons feminism overnight and becomes a stereotypical stepford wife who is extremely feminine and treats her husband like a king. Competition like this is by far the single biggest driver of evolutionary and social change among animals because the only choice is change or die.

        What's coming cannot be stopped because it's coming hand in hand with the automation revolution. Humanity is going to be in for a rough ride for a while and who knows we may yet kill ourselves or develop a true utopia. Regardless it's going to be an interesting 50 years.

        [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 39 points40 points  (15 children)

        Shit, I got stuck with the crappy war filled 3rd wave feminazi years were everyone was poor as fuck. Sucks being born in the 60s.

        [–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (8 children)

        Asimov wrote about this. Read 'foundation and earth' or any of the Elijah Bailey stories where he deals with the Spacers, or any thing about the solarians and 'caves of steel'.

        TL:DR A group of humans with robots to do everything for them evolve into a form where they are disgusted to be in physical proximity to one another and only communicate by video uplink. Reproduction for them becomes an issue and they end up 100-200 people per planet with literally 10,000 robots each.

        [–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

        Miles and miles of land to myself and an army of robots to boot? Sounds pretty nice.

        [–]1kick6 16 points17 points  (0 children)

        Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there one planet where they had eradicated STDs so everyone smashed everyone for fun?

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]zarus 2 points3 points  (1 child)

          None of the Spacer planets have more than 100k people on them.

          [–]zephyrprime 14 points15 points  (3 children)

          It wouldn't be hard to make them better than natural pussies. There's a lot you can do with texture and mechanical force that you can't do with the real thing.

          [–]tallwheel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          Plus, you wouldn't have to use a condom when having sex with a robot... presuming shared or rental robots would be properly sterilized between uses.

          [–]bluedrygrass 5 points6 points  (1 child)

          Heck, even your hand can stimulate you better than a pussy. It's not the same for other reasons, but mechanically...

          [–]Nebulose11 11 points12 points  (4 children)

          Alpha commitment robots: But women have no idea they want a man to tell them no so when that gets programmed out and they are left with no tingles from Chad Thunderrabbit he will be getting returned.

          [–]LeFlamel 6 points7 points  (1 child)

          I actually think once these changes come to pass, feminism as blind ideology will fall and women will finally learn a thing or two about themselves and the SMP, but I might just be optimistic.

          [–]razorwan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

          That's the main target imo-- betas. If they can simulate the look and touch of a real woman, all those super fat and super skinny betas now don't have to beg at the feet of every female twitch player, or cower in social awkwardness when they see a hot chick they know they'll never get.

          Suddenly all that attention beta orbiters shower whores with goes. Striking an attractive woman's ego is pretty much the worst thing you could do to her.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 40 points41 points  (10 children)

          While the women won't have to put up with creeps, their beta orbiter attention-harems will dry up as well. They will still have their AF but the BB prospects will be harder as their pussy purchasing power will dwindle.

          [–]1AmlanceJockey 42 points43 points  (2 children)

          It occurs to me that the only men who will still be in the market for human pussy are the men who can't afford it. And we all know how much women like lower class men hitting on them.

          [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (6 children)

          The creeps helped getting victim status which lead to financial support.

          [–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 20 points21 points  (5 children)

          Exactly. Chad hits on them? Tingles. Beta Billy does the same routine? Assault charges and a spot on Oprah to sell her book about her scary experience

          [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 27 points28 points  (4 children)

          Omg! He asked me to have coffee with him while I was in an elevator!

          The horror, the horror...

          [–]TRP VanguardCyralea 21 points22 points  (3 children)

          It saddens me that that's literally happened.

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          Wow.

          Even Richard Dawkins got involved with this comment:

          Dear Muslima, Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and...yawn...don’t tell me yet again, I know you aren’t allowed to drive a car, and you can’t leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you’ll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with. Only this week I heard of one, she calls herself Skep”chick”, and do you know what happened to her? A man in a hotel elevator invited her back to his room for coffee. I am not exaggerating. He really did. He invited her back to his room for coffee. Of course she said no, and of course he didn’t lay a finger on her, but even so...And you, Muslima, think you have misogyny to complain about! For goodness sake grow up, or at least grow a thicker skin.

          [–]1RPAlternate42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Unsurprisingly, a site called "Rational Wiki" is completely biased towards anything not feminist.

          [–]PlanB_pedofile 35 points36 points  (1 child)

          What are the feminists afraid of? Suddenly, men will not only be able to have sex with an attractive woman on demand, they'll also be able to have sex with harems of attractive women,

          More like men would rather have sex with a plastic doll than their fat ugly lard asses.

          Lol imagine if men tried to ban dildos under the pretense that they are an unrealistic representation of the average male penis. Poor feminist would be lost without their 14 inch vibrating dildo with clitoral stimulator.

          [–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

          "and there'd be no more nice guys."

          Music to my ear.

          [–]2popthatpill 46 points47 points  (3 children)

          It's the cartel coming in to protect their interests.

          Did anyone seriously think that the pussy cartel wasn't going to crack down on this particular green shoot of competition?

          [–]southernmost 28 points29 points  (1 child)

          They can try, but the Japanese appetite for robot everything cannot be legislated away.

          [–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child)

          Solid observation about liberty and feminists. Most of our political, economic, and social problems could be solved with a better adherence to the principles of liberty

          [–]eaton80 14 points15 points  (0 children)

          What was the most significant legislation that got passed the minute women got the vote? The Prohibition.

          [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          swap them with buddies when they got bored with them

          It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none.

          [–]Schrodingersdawg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          http://youtu.be/9D5SgyYOOIk

          Lmao this is the ugly feminist bitch who's pushing for the ban, in comparison. I wonder why she hates them...?

          [–]Adolf_ghandi 10 points11 points  (3 children)

          If you can make the female robot clean and talk without being a bitch then you can also make a male robot that is able to give them tingles by bossing them around and behave like a caveman.

          It would be hilarious to see women being the bitches (I.e.: make me a sandwich you ho!)for their robots.

          [–]mugatucrazypills 7 points8 points  (2 children)

          pimpBot will turn those bitches out

          [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

          Offtopic but if they could bring back Pimp C as a robot that would be awesome.

          EDIT: A$AP Yams too.

          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

          [removed]

            [–]LikesTacos 2 points3 points  (1 child)

            I am thinking one robot that can change its features to be anybody I want. I might need two or three, but a harem would just be overkill.

            [–]Mitchell78 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            I think most men would be totally fine with sexrobots if they look like 10s and fuck like pornstars but will women be able to satisfy their hypergamy with sexrobots? I have my doubts.

            [–]squidracer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            Not to mention that your sex robot could wipe your ass for you when you get old and feeble.. Maybe cook, clean, like what women used to be like before Madonna

            [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            The robots would have to be reasonable at sex. It would be nice if they self-cleaned and would clean up around the house a bit better than a Roomba. Anything beyond that would be icing on the cake, like being able to dress nicely or cook, maybe do some accounting and bill pay.

            Indeed. Let's face it, which Anita would you rather date/marry/partner up with...this one, or this one?

            [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 53 points54 points  (15 children)

            The state has Sperm Banks, there are male strip clubs, male hookers, and women can contract men for labor around the house like their precious kitchen counters paid for by hubby. They think we're just a pair of cock and balls, dancing sex monkey clowns, sex butlers, and work muels. How dare they!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!1!!

            The problem here is that females in the monkey/ape species have had a monopoly on reproduction for millions of years. Most women are not valuable beyound their vag and uterus despite the fact they have the capacity to do so. They have to reel in men with sex and tie him down with familial onligations to seem relevant. For the first 8 months, her and the child are a package deal. But many men are willing to not have kids, as long as they can bust a nut, which is free or the one time cost of a $150/hr prostitute (a smokin' one).

            The majority of the sex bots are purchased by betas and incels, the providers of direct and societal provisioning. The foundation of Af/BB. There is no AF without the BB. Women dont want their slaves finding a substitute outlet for his urges. Many many men have nothing but pity, duty, vanilla, starfish sex rationed out by their 'significant' others in exchange for a highly inflated price, working like dogs.

            Without male labor in their favor, women are fucked. This is why women and the government shame prostitution. It's not because it's wrong, but because it drops the price floor of vagina of the Pussy Cartel. It's funny because women have the capacity to be more useful, they just feel entitled not. They vehemently deny any agency regarding failures or self improvement. Apparently it's a man's job to ensure that. Sounds like a parent-child relationship doesn't it? Sounds like a woman is just a child with SMV.

            She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

            1) Shame on betas for having preferences. Only women can set standards and apply their sexual strategy. All hail the feminine imperative

            2) Shame on men for attempting to take out the middle [wo]man of sexual gratification

            All relationships are time, resources, and commitment in exchange for sex. A man doesnt need anything else from a woman. A man has the physical and mental falculties to provide for himself. The only thing missing is feminine energy and a vagina. Women are for fucking/reproduction, direct or assistive servitude, and taking care of small children above all else. Women are sex objects, you literally have to have sex with them to continue the human race (expect a post on this). And they wish it to always be that way because it is the only reason men associate with them.

            In 2 years time you will be able to use your skin cells to make either sperm or eggs, by using stem cells. This will allow same-sex couples to have biological children.

            Any woman who does not have a dedicated man willing to assist her in the raising of the child shall be banned from having children. How we could we enforce that? Take away all safety nets regarding child support and welfare like WICS. Women will straigten up real quick before they trick men into having a child they dont want by lying about birth control or as /u/bsutansalt put it in his meme: "Just because He consented to sex, doesn't mean he consented to parenthood".

            [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (5 children)

            A man doesnt need anything else from a woman. A man has the physical and mental falculties to provide for himself. The only thing missing is feminine energy and a vagina. Women are for fucking/reproduction, direct or assistive servitude, and taking care of small children above all else. Women are sex objects, you literally have to have sex with them to continue the human race (expect a post on this). And they wish it to always be that way because it is the only reason men associate with them.

            I don't want children. I know how to load & unload the dishwasher, do laundry, and I do my own grocery shopping & minor food prep. I'm handy with the car, computer, and around the house. I have a successful career and have owned three properties. Exactly what do I need a woman for other than sex?

            [–]mugatucrazypills 11 points12 points  (0 children)

            social interaction and nagging

            [–]byrdcall 7 points8 points  (0 children)

            For your early death and the divorce rape before. Thats what woman are good for.

            [–]mugatucrazypills 4 points5 points  (0 children)

            i enjoy dr warlocks posts, bring on the robot babe apocalypse I say. All those austin power jokes wer graveyard humor apparently

            [–]through_a_ways 4 points5 points  (0 children)

            The problem here is that females in the monkey/ape species have had a monopoly on reproduction for millions of years.

            True, but it's much deeper than that.

            Female vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and fungi have had a monopoly on reproduction for about 1.5 billion years.

            Male disposability has existed for nearly 40% of the earth's life.

            [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

            Where the fuck do you live where you can buy a "smokin" prostitute for $150?

            [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 5 points6 points  (2 children)

            Type the following into google....

            "[insert your city] escort backpage" you're bound to find one offering a half hour.

            edit: u/gsrvtr and /u/triperfecta read online guides on how to avoid the popos before you start selecting from the candyshop.

            [–]Nebulose11 2 points3 points  (1 child)

            "Just because He consented to sex, doesn't mean he consented to parenthood".

            So do we go in and fill out all the paperwork for abortion and then sign it. When she doesn't just have your lawyer argue that you aborted your responsibility in that clinic and that she decided to take on parenthood knowing you had aborted your half of the ova.

            Come on RISUG.

            [–][deleted]  (10 children)

            [deleted]

            [–]ReasonFreak 27 points28 points  (0 children)

            Over the centuries men have been using our minds to work our way up Maslow's hierarchy of needs. There was a time in human history when only the wealthiest men could enjoy easy access to high quality food or live behind stone walls instead of in thatched huts. In present times only the most naturally Alpha men enjoy soft harems of beautiful women.

            In the future all men in the developed world will own harems filled with beautiful women, either in VR or robot form, women will have lost their chief method of manipulation, and the world will never be the same. A future worth waiting for.

            [–]What_The_Shoe 15 points16 points  (5 children)

            Nicki Minaj

            As long as she doesn't try to rap.

            [–]rpreader 2 points3 points  (1 child)

            Am I the only one here who thinks she's an incredibly talented rapper?

            [–]1commentatorX 44 points45 points  (7 children)

            A couple of girls once told me(pre-TRP) about a "weird guy" they knew of.

            Apparently his gf found an "artificial pussy" amongst his things and freaked out, possibly lead to a breakup, I honestly can't remember.

            Eitherway, the story got out. They spent a long time bitching about how "creepy" and "wrong" he was.

            Went on to mess about a little with one of the girls(couldn't get the lay, struck out, oneitis... long story) - would you care to guess what she had in her second bed-side drawer...?

            x1 Vibrating cock-ring(2nd hand, eeesh) x1 Innocuously sized buttplug x1 JackRabbit dildo X2 Handheld vibes

            At the time I just thought 'hypocrite!' - but now I know women face considerably less shame over sexual aids for a reason. It's the sexual strategy double-standard at work again.

            A woman using sex toys for herself isn't adding to her partner count, she looses little to no SMV. A man using sex toys for himself isn't adding to his partner count, automatically indicating his low SMV.

            Men will always face public ridicule for misplacing their loads. I just wonder wether this is a conscious grievance in women?

            [–][deleted]  (3 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]HappyHerpes 10 points11 points  (0 children)

              Yes, a sexbot will decrease the owners SMV. But he doesn't need SMV anymore.

              And if he decides he still wants a real girl after all, he can gift it to his buddy.

              [–]MEpicLevelCheater[M] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

              This is an important insight in sexual politics that men should understand, and you've phrased it nicely here.

              I am awarding you a point for this comment.

              [–]EvilPenName 86 points87 points  (15 children)

              Sex robots go hand in hand with why men get shamed for fleshlights. Ask any woman about fleshlights and the conversation will be very negative, then ask about her vibrators and see how thats totally different.

              Women do not want men to have options that replace them, especially for their orbiters. If the super betas start having "someone" at home to pay attention to then who will shower validation on them?

              [–]ChanThunderwang 41 points42 points  (5 children)

              I honestly think you are wrong here.

              They are disgusted by fleshlights because they associate them with the losers who own them. A high value man does not need a fleshlight. A fat neckbeard needs one. A man using a fleshlight tells them that he can not get any, so they avoid him.

              However, a girl who owns a vibrator is not seen that way by men. Yeah, she might very well be a slut. But men still prefer a woman who masturbates with a dildo once a week to a woman who has sex with another man once a week.

              [–]orange234 19 points20 points  (1 child)

              Yep. The flashlight/vibrator "double standard" is almost exactly the same as the "double standard" about promiscuous women being sluts, while promiscuous men are players. There's no point in whining about it being unfair, it's that way for a good reason.

              Everybody understands that a man is going to jack off from time to time, but if a high SMV guy masturbates, it's usually just a sideline; most of his time/money/commitment is spend on relations with women. The fleshlight signals that the guy is low-SMV: he's spending a lot of time/money/commitment on jacking off, because he knows that he's not going to be getting any of the real thing.

              Since we know that just about any woman can have sex whenever she wants if she adjusts her standards to make it happen, the girl with a vibrator is actually saying something positive. She is horny, which is appealing, but instead of hooking up with some random guy, she is waiting for the right guy to come along, which is also good.

              [–]tallwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              You just blew my mind, actually, and you are so right. How could I have not seen this before...

              [–]through_a_ways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              However, a girl who owns a vibrator is not seen that way by men. Yeah, she might very well be a slut.

              Men like women primarily sexually, women like men primarily socially.

              Social status has zero bearing on what a man thinks of a woman sexually. It has a lot of bearing on what a woman thinks of a man sexually.

              Women are more sexually attracted to men if they know that other women are already attracted to him. This is true independent of the man's actual looks, height, etc.

              The reason this phenomenon exists is because womens' sex drives are at least one order of magnitude lower than mens'. (perhaps even two)

              The reason their sex drives are lower is because they have about 20x less testosterone than men, on average.

              Imagine a group of people with an IQ 20x lower than average (which is 100 in white nations). They'd have an IQ of 5. That group of people would be considered to have not just low intelligence, but lack any sort of intelligence at all.

              It's not a coincidence that girls with high sex drives tend to have more masculine faces ('sexy' as opposed to 'cute') and often work out.

              [–]zpatriarchy 27 points28 points  (6 children)

              and when you point out how it's the same, they hamster it & blame men for having to use vibrators, because "if men knew what they were doing, they wouldn't have to use one to orgasm."

              [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

              "if men knew what they were doing, they wouldn't have to use one to orgasm."

              Are they implying that men always orgasm and that all that's needed is the hole they have?

              [–]TheYambag 6 points7 points  (1 child)

              I remember the first time that I was unable to finish with my college gf. I was cleaning up after calling it quits, and I heard her whimper, I look over and she's crying because she felt bad that I didn't finish. I had to coddle her, and I remember thinking about how strange it was, because I didn't even really care that I didn't go off, I was actually feeling awesome for lasting over an hour of vigorous sex (I was, and still am in pretty good cardio shape).

              For the longest time, I figured that she was just sensitive, but then it happened to me again years later. It's like when a girl can't get you off, she doesn't feel like a real woman or something. I don't get it.

              [–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (3 children)

              Sounds like some women are terrified at having to acknowledge that their sole power, i.e. sex, is going to be ripped away from them.

              I bet the feminist rationalizing hamster will start talking about "respect for the robot" and how a robot can't give consent and thus any sex with one would be "rape".

              Damn I need a break from this forum, I can already hear the feminists shrieking

              [–]1AmlanceJockey 3 points4 points  (1 child)

              I would be on the lookout for feminist having robots that can mimic human behavior classed as people under the law. Then they would have the legal means to "protect" bots from the rape you mention

              [–]1sardinemanR 29 points30 points  (4 children)

              Modern women suck so much that they get out competed by pretty much anything.

              If this VR stuff takes off, that will also be more popular for most men than actual women.

              Rather than change their obnoxious behavior and the ridiculous laws they've managed to get passed, I'm pretty sure women will keep doubling down and demanding laws ban whatever comes out.

              Of course for VR and robots, black market is easy for that stuff, so it won't work. And I don't think it will be banned anyway. There are blow up sex dolls now that most men don't use, but I think VR will change things up a bit. There is zero reason why any woman over 30 or below a 7 should get the attention she does today. I wonder if this stuff would balance the scales a bit.

              [–]red-adherent 6 points7 points  (2 children)

              What does this say about modern life that we are even discussing this.

              Dark, sick, cruel stuff for the betas. Fuck it!

              [–]red-adherent 30 points31 points  (4 children)

              This is so fucking sad. One it confirms what I have always known about the desire of women to ban prostitution, it is just cheap competition to them. Two it means these women don't care about any of the 80% as we know here they are not having sex. Three it means there are men out there willing to buy a robot to simulate sex. Four, I am still amongst the 80%, it is very hurtful that so many women have this kind of hatred for me, they don't even want me to be able to pay for sex, they just want me to be a fucking slave to them. Just fucking sad!

              That's my dose of TRP today, steel resolve gentleman, steel resolve!

              [–]MGTOW_player 9 points10 points  (1 child)

              You can't show these hoes any mercy. Ever. When you get on top don't forget this. It's a long, hard road for us non-natural alphas but never forget the truth, despite how nice they will act.

              [–][deleted] 113 points114 points  (10 children)

              Well that feminist bitch knows nothing about text or coding. As long as the technology exist, betas are going to get it. These are the same minds behind TOR, Bitcoin and the Internet. Hackers don't give a fuck what feminists say

              [–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (8 children)

              [deleted]

              What is this?

              [–]ChanThunderwang 48 points49 points  (7 children)

              They don't have power. They just need nobody, because they are the providers. They can provide for themselves.

              If you would ban them to a remote island, they could create a successful society. Try this with feminists...

              [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 8 points9 points  (5 children)

              Girls would build a utopia where all they have to do is sunbathe and eat.

              [–]byrdcall 9 points10 points  (2 children)

              If we put all woman on an island some somali pirates would come by and enslave them completely.

              [–]kanji_sasahara 6 points7 points  (1 child)

              Worst case scenario of survivor ever. Would also be way more interesting than any reality TV show.

              [–]rpreader 1 point2 points  (0 children)

              We had threads about this when they did the survival game show with the men and women split up on seperate islands.

              The men had started to all get along and cooperate with each other and build a very nice island to live on, whereas the women were back stabbing and being passive aggressive and petty with each other and barely got anything made and were struggling to survive.

              The funniest part was when they had one of the mail go to visit the women the immediately started ordering him around telling him to start fixing things for them

              [–][deleted] 24 points25 points  (2 children)

              A man getting sex from a robot is like a woman getting the benefits of commitment without having a man. Guess what, that exists already: divorce rape and welfare.

              Bring on the sexbots and legalize prostitution. It'll help to level the SMP playing field.

              [–]AnythingForSuccess 20 points21 points  (1 child)

              Good luck, capitalism will sort itself out.

              [–]ReasonFreak 19 points20 points  (0 children)

              Well, the only way I'd pay $7,000 dollars for an appliance was if it could fuck and suck me.

              [–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 16 points17 points  (9 children)

              There's no way they'll succeed. Why? Because there's money to be made. If they can't ban pornography with all its exploitation, as well as all the legal forms of prostitution, they're not going to be able to ban sex-bots.

              [–]whisky1111 4 points5 points  (3 children)

              I actually have the theory that most women don't mind porn being available because it keeps men thirsty and it's like free advertisement for the main female "product"(pussy).

              Sexbots on the other hand ARE the product!

              [–][deleted]  (5 children)

              [deleted]

              [–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK[S] 46 points47 points  (2 children)

              They could make the basic version alpha, and charge extra for upgrades that temporarily make him slightly beta and fulfill emotional needs. Women would get addicted. The DLC could be:

              • $4.99 he stops negging you. says your name during sex sometimes

              • $14.99 pays 30% more attention to you for a week

              • $24.99/month he will talk to you after sex for at least 30 mins.

              If they pay too much and he is too beta for them then they will be bored and not pay the next payment, and then he starts being a total dick. He might even cheat on her or run back to the manufacturer (this will be hidden in the small print of the 'return policy')

              [–]laere 6 points7 points  (0 children)

              Run back to the manufacturer

              FUCKING BRILLIANT. Even a robot doesn't want that used up ho.

              [–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

              Pretend we are back 60 years or so, when the first vibrating dildos were entering the market, and let's **translate* the article from a male point of view. How RIDICULOUS does this sound?

              A campaign has been launched calling for a ban on the development of vibrators that can be used for sex.

              Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Karl Richardson.

              Dildos already on the market are becoming more sophisticated and some are now hoping to vibrations into their products.

              Those working in the field say that there is a need for such products.

              Dr Richardson, a product ethicist at De Montfort University in Leicester, wants to raise awareness of the issue and persuade those developing sex toys to rethink how their technology is used.

              "Sex toys seem to be a growing focus in the sex industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what uses they will have - are very disturbing indeed," he told the BBC.

              He believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of men and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

              "We think that the creation of such toys will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women," she said.

              [–]LancerKagato 11 points12 points  (1 child)

              sexbots are BB dread game, they are competition to feminists who still want a beta provider once they're post wall.

              [–]1cover20 5 points6 points  (0 children)

              Or alternatively, they give abundance mentality, and from there a guy can do great things with real women too.

              [–]McLarenX 11 points12 points  (1 child)

              Crazy. We are actually shifting back to hunter-gatherer behavior. Ever since we set in motion a series of events in the 1960s that allowed human mating to take whatever course it naturally chose. I feel genuine sorrow for guys that buy into the feminist imperative. They simply don't realize they are creating a social dynamic to facilitate superior mating, which doesn't include betas like them.

              Women love keeping betas from mating. Without them always being available, hypergamy crumbles and they don't have their validative talking heads.

              I predict that simply being white (the world's racial profile is shifting as well) and monogamous 50 years from now will be akin to a woman in our day wearing a full Victorian country dress, complete with bonnet and all.

              To be honest I'm a little repulsed by high partner counts, multi-colored half shaved heads, public slutty behavior, and unapologetic single parenthood. I prefer a young woman who is somewhat pure still has excitement for sex and may have a few new things to learn. That's just the way my brain is wired. What's a guy like me going to do in the future?

              [–][deleted]  (16 children)

              [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (4 children)

              OP is a fool if he thinks Alpha guys aren't going to try sexbots. C'mon now. It's a no-brainer. Imagine a life sized porn star robot doll sucking your nuts off with unreal body proportions.

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

                Exactly. All the girls who play dead on the bed and let the guy do all the work will get replaced very fast with sexbots.

                The tipping point is when sexbots become hotter and better at sex than regular women. Men will actually stop pursuing high maintenance girls. No sex on first date? Pull out the Roxxxy 2.0 she is ready.

                [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                [deleted]

                  [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

                  Yes the old "oops I forgot to take my pill now pay child support sucker" won't fly anymore.

                  [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                  [deleted]

                    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                    [deleted]

                    [–]MerlotMcGee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                    Some of us will still be healthy and fit when we can visit our asteroid belt or Mars. There will be plenty of interesting pursuits for a man who would have headed west 150 years ago - and more time to do them when not burning precious hours and calories chasing satisfactory sex.

                    Imagine if I could effectively ignore a robot wife, one that is pleasant, dutiful, helpful, a great cook, and a tailor-programmed nympho - for 23 total hours a day, while she took care of menial tasks I'm not interested in? I could write, I could read, I could spar or target practice, I could have a drink with friends, invent things, tweak my code, swim, I could lift, I could take a suborbital flight to a floating habitat in the middle of the Pacific. I could do ANYTHING.

                    Fuck Soma. I just want time to live, and to be me. Free me from bonds of mandatory manual labor and sexual strategy, and I'm free to become anything.

                    [–]Danedina 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                    Dude, sounds like you could use a Soma

                    [–][deleted]  (7 children)

                    [deleted]

                    [–]mister_barfly75 20 points21 points  (0 children)

                    They are afraid of becoming disposable. Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

                    Which is pretty much the same reason that post-wall hags with their 1000 cock stares resent pretty 20 year olds. The new model comes along to replace them and their ride on the carousel is over, time to snag a beta. Ooops, was too busy ignoring them 5 years ago so they all saved up and got themselves a Roxxxy instead. Dear oh dear, there goes the back up plan.

                    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 27 points28 points  (5 children)

                    Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

                    Let me correct that for ya.... Shallow women who have no value other than their bodies and looks will be replaced.

                    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                    [deleted]

                    [–]Redasshole 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                    When any man can go home and fuck his Scarlett Johansson robot or Kim Kardashian robot (or whichever celebrity will be considered super hot at that time), and he can do so without her demanding dates, free dinners, a sounding board for her drama, marriage, monogamy, picking up his socks, or refraining from burping at the table, and he can fuck Ms. Robot bareback to his heart’s content without ever needing to worry about pregnancy, child support payments, or catching an STD…oh, when that happens…you will see, for the first time in human history, women lose most (if not all) of their power over men.

                    It will be a massive game-changer in man-woman sexual relations.

                    It will be a massive game-changer in dating. Just watch what will happen when women try to demand dates from guys who have a sex robot at home, who is a 10 in looks and will never age, and who never demands any dates or money spent on her for sex.

                    It will be a massive game-changer in marriage. If you’re married: Wife being a bitch? Won’t put out? Fine. Head to the closet, power up Dolly Parton (1982 Version) and away you go. It’s not a person, so it’s not cheating! Man, I can’t WAIT for women to try to make THAT argument. Oh, this is going to be so fun to watch!

                    If you’re unmarried: Can you imagine a woman demanding you to commit to her or marry her when she knows you’ve got Britney Spears (Hit Me Baby One More Time Version) at home waiting for you? It gets better. Can you imagine some bitchy girlfriend (who is no where near as hot as Britney Spears) demanding that her BF doesn’t fuck his Britney robot any more? (“Or what, Jennifer? You won’t fuck me any more?”) Oh, this can’t happen soon enough!

                    I quote this from an article written on one of the manosphere blog. Despite the pure content, I would like to bring this blog up on TRP. It is mostly unknown of most Red Pillers and it is a great, I repeat: great, blog to read for Red Pill men. He speaks mostly about monogamy, why it does not work in this era and what the best sexual strategy for men is today.

                    Please, give it a read. I am not affiliated to the author in any way. I think if people read it it would massively improve their unplugging (everybody will have their remaining BP dreams of finding the one or of getting into a good LTR destroyed) and thus improve the quality content of the sub.

                    Here is the link to the full article on female sex robots: http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2011/04/22/female-sex-robots/

                    It's a fun read.

                    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                    [deleted]

                    [–]DodgedAFew 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    "Eww! Looser cannot get laid! Err... wait a second. We need to ban sex bots now!"

                    [–]HS-Thompson 7 points8 points  (3 children)

                    Most 50 year olds have no idea that something like tinder exists.

                    Actually most of my 50 year old single male friends in NYC use Tinder to fuck dozens of girls in their late 20's and early 30's. Better living through technology I say.

                    [–]red-adherent 4 points5 points  (2 children)

                    Curious are they very good looking, rich, great game, I hear this a lot about dudes in their 40s or 50s. I rarely see it on the street.

                    [–]HS-Thompson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    I mean they are my friends so I think they are pretty cool. Typically guys that aren't deadbeats, are smart and educated and do something interesting, but besides not being losers they are pretty average.

                    NYC is a special interesting place for dating I think, just on the sheer number of people (i.e. women) if nothing else.

                    [–]JumpXVI 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                    When she states that these sexbots will perpetuate a "view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical", she paints herself into a logical corner. Such purely physically appealing bots would actually be the exact sort of litmus test for the type of men a woman should desire anyway. Real women can and will offer a quality man (one not interested in sexbots) much more.

                    But her feeeeelz make her miss a point she could easily refute:

                    "The physical act of sex will only be a small part of the time you spend with a sex robot - the majority of time will be spent socialising and interacting"

                    This should be what scares her, and what drives her case against them. But she only focuses on the physical threat these sexbots would pose, a threat that's been posed by things like realdolls and, yes, hookers for a while now. Ironic that a woman would fixate purely on the physical, huh...

                    [–]chaosmech 4 points5 points  (2 children)

                    It's not ironic at all, actually, given that she knows as well as we do that men seek sex from the SMP. We don't need women for socializing and interacting; those are just the show we put on to get what we actually want: sex. If I want to socialize and interact with someone, 99 times out of 100 I'd rather do it with a guy friend than a girl. Take any possibility of sex (present or future) off the table and that last outside case vanishes too.

                    The socializing/interacting aspects of the sexbots aren't threatening to her power. It's the physical, sexual aspect that is, because she knows the supply of non-woman socializing and interacting is high (i.e. other dudes) but the sex supply is limited to only women... until sexbots become mainstream, and then women no longer have the monopoly on vaginas, and thus have no purchasing power on the SMP.

                    The sad part is that with no shit-testing, no general craziness, etc. I can actually see sexbots being somewhat more pleasant to socialize/interact with than most women. And when you're being out-performed by a robot in social arenas, you really need to take a look at yourself(selves).

                    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                    [deleted]

                    [–]2popthatpill 6 points7 points  (0 children)

                    Related: visit the link and find out which sex is more strongly opposed to legalising prostitution. You'll be shocked (not):

                    https://today.yougov.com/news/2012/03/23/legalization-of-prostitution/

                    [–]a-memorable-fancy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    Women are officially in competition with voice-cued fleshlights. BRB packing my bags to get the fuck out of the west.

                    [–]TheSliceman 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                    I think we are getting a little ahead of ourselves here.

                    Fully immersive VR-porn will come much sooner than realistic sex-bots, and it is THAT which will instigate the change between men seeking girlfriends, wives, and hookers, to men literally going full MGTOW.

                    A fucking uncanny-valley-level sex-android wont exist for at least another 100 years. Fully immersive VR-porn? 15 years tops.

                    [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                    and apps that allow them to fuck a different alpha every day of the week

                    I read that as: tech that allows them to pursue their sexual strategy at free will.

                    So if women have tech that allows them that then of course they want to deny men the same thing.

                    [–]2popthatpill 6 points7 points  (3 children)

                    Sexbots will be for the betas who are not in the top 20% and are not getting sex. Nobody cares about these people (not even themselves) so the feminists looking to legally ban sexbots will either win or make it social suicide for men to have one.

                    Anything that competes with the sex cartel/pussy monopoly/etc is subject to either a "hard ban" (ie. illegal to do/have) or, at a minimum, a "soft ban" (socially unacceptable).

                    The obvious example of a hard ban is brothels, which will never be further liberalised in the US (or probably anywhere else in the west, for that matter).

                    As for soft bans, take jurisdictions where brothels are legal, eg. Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany, (most of) Australia: does anyone think that having sex with a prostitute has suddenly become socially acceptable in those areas?

                    So, even if you somehow manage to repeal the hard bans, you're still stuck with the soft bans, because women will never approve of competition.

                    [–]Brave_Horatius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    I don't think it'll be possible to enforce a ban anyway. 3d printing is advancing in lockstep with robotics. Fifty years time you won't be buying a bot you'll be printing it after downloading the pirated schematics.

                    [–]whisky1111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    A woman admits to masturbating and people applaud.

                    A man admits to masturbating and people put his name on a neighborhood watch list.

                    [–]Squabbles123 4 points5 points  (1 child)

                    Maybe if women weren't so much damn trouble, we wouldn't want a sex bot.

                    [–]Kellermann 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    I can't wait for bitchy women to become obsolete overnight

                    [–]natman2939 4 points5 points  (2 children)

                    Her very first words bug me the most: "(this use for this tech is) undesirable and unnecessary"

                    Undesirable and unnecessary? According to who? If it's undesirable (as in there's no demand) then you have nothing to worry about as men clearly don't want this

                    But if you mean it's undesirable to you, then who the fuck are you? You don't get to decide what people should and should not want. There's been plenty of people like you forever telling people they can't play violent games or read dirty books

                    YOU don't have to do it, but I can sure as hell can.

                    Also unnecessary is completely subjective too. Just cause you don't want one doesn't mean it's unnecessary . I'm sure there's plenty of things you use that I would think are unnecessary

                    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    And neither of those things is at all grounds for a ban.

                    They can't ban this in democratic, free societies (or at least societies that claim to be). So probably not going to happen in the middle east, but there is 0 legal way to stop this stuff in the u.s.

                    Even if they do by some miracle get a law against sex bots just look at prohibition. You can't win against the collective male sex drive.

                    [–]HappyScribe 10 points11 points  (4 children)

                    Black knight the hell out of the idea. Get women to say it's disgusting and agree - it should be banned. Only weirdos have sex with machines that look human.

                    Like those girls who use those realistic vibrators which look like dismembered male genitalia.

                    [–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK[S] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                    Get women to say it's disgusting and agree

                    I would say that a lot of porn is disgusting. And for a long time many agreed. It became normalised though and now most think its fine. Whether you want to ban sexbots depends on whether you are socially libertarian or socially authoritarian. I am rather right wing and would want to ban many forms of degeneracy, but I am in a tiny minority.

                    What I absolutely would hate would be a hypocritical lopsided ban where beta men don't get sexbots but women are allowed everything they desire. This is the most probable thing I expect to see though, as women and betas-who-seek-to-appease-them are the majority of the population, and we are in a democracy, so they will give votes to whoever bans it.

                    Only weirdos have sex with machines that look human.

                    This is the sort of view that changes with society though. This is a majority opinion now but wait 30 years and see what people think.

                    [–]chaosmech 8 points9 points  (1 child)

                    This is the most probable thing I expect to see though, as women and betas-who-seek-to-appease-them are the majority of the population

                    Yes, but once the opportunity for unlimited, free (after the initial payment, anyway), no-strings-attached, disease-free, divorce-free, willing, realistic, desirable sex is available, do you really think the betas who so crave to please women won't just ditch them for Woman 2.0?

                    I'm not so sure.

                    [–]2popthatpill 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    What I absolutely would hate would be a hypocritical lopsided ban where beta men don't get sexbots but women are allowed everything they desire. This is the most probable thing I expect to see though, as women and betas-who-seek-to-appease-them are the majority of the population, and we are in a democracy, so they will give votes to whoever bans it.

                    ^ This.

                    Only weirdos have sex with machines that look human.

                    This is the sort of view that changes with society though. This is a majority opinion now but wait 30 years and see what people think.

                    That won't change, because women aren't ever going to approve of competition.

                    [–]Endorsed ContributorNiftyDolphin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                    The lynch mob will form when the oribiters and day-to-day privileges dry up.

                    They'll utilize the State when they find that that can no longer easily trade hope for services.

                    Men will help them do it too. Some incel is going to get pissed at another incel. He'll hack that guy's bot and it'll end up hurting somebody. Queue the "Think of the Children" campaign.

                    [–]Homestaff17 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                    Basically, I don't get intimidated by women using huge dildos. I won't get intimidated by a 'fucking machine' designed for women that goes on for hours either. I know it takes into account only one aspect of the above but I think the argument is nonetheless relevant.

                    [–]theHangedGod 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                    HAHAHAHA!! This is amazing.

                    What does age think gives her the right to restrict my freedom? She thinks she can decide what is and is not beneficial to society. And only when it comes to men getting what they want.

                    Give me liberty or give me death.

                    [–]xfLyFPS 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                    Sexbots will just go under the ground. In 10 years if sexbots do get banned, you can go on Tor and download the 3D printer parts for assembling sexbots, you'll put a Raspberry Pi inside it and install the AI and it's ready to go.

                    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    Double standards are awesome...

                    [–]jckiker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                    You guys should watch Ex Machina, great movie.

                    [–]SwissPablo 2 points3 points  (3 children)

                    It has started, the social shaming of any devices that lower the price of pussy. In a world where a man could get pleasure any time he wants with little to no effort, any men, even "creepy" ones, women would have to step their game up. But rather than doing that, they shame men who even think about this as a solution. It will get worse, the "warnings" will become more intense, change is coming, it might not be in 10 years or 50 years, but it's coming, and feminists don't like it one bit.

                    [–]1cover20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    Let them shame it. Nobody will know if I have it, if I live alone.

                    [–]newls 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    "Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on - how they will look, what roles they would play - are very disturbing indeed," she told the BBC.

                    Disturbing? Disturbing to whom? Just empty shaming powertalk.

                    In any case, there's nothing that can stop these from becoming mass-produced. There's far too much money to be made by manufacturers.

                    [–]1ErasmusOrgasmus 2 points3 points  (2 children)

                    I'm just sat here imagining a montage of all the wry smiles on the faces of every guy while reading this post.

                    I think there is a legit risk they would get banned though, the most likely rationale being something vague about 'breaching the moral standards of society'. And you can see how the shaming tactics would be used - any guy who came out saying there is no basis to ban them would be met with choruses of "Ewww why would you want to have sex with a machine?" and "Awww what's the matter, can get yourself a real woman so you need a robot to get you off?"

                    At that point it would be a real test for the beta incels as a group to see if they have the balls to stand their ground and demand access to these bots because they are the target market.

                    [–]rabidrabbity 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                    Silly arguments. You can bank on sexbots happening, first with VR and then full robots. Men are not magnanimous. Women push for marriage and commitment - not men. Women will have to change up their game or live life alone.

                    [–]Drmadanthonywayne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    This clip from Futurama is remarkably on point:

                    https://vimeo.com/12915013

                    [–]watch_ping 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                    Many on this forum talk about a need to return to traditional monogamy

                    This so much. It's not going happen; give up this dream.

                    [–]thenarrrowpath 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                    This reminds me a lot of that Futurama episode with the Monroe-bot.

                    load more comments (128 replies)