711
712

Red Pill TheoryEmma Watson says, "Gender equality not only liberates women but also men from prescribed gender stereotypes" as she dates an alpha male jock (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana

Emma Watson: "I want men to take up this mantle. So...that their sons have permission to be vulnerable and human too — reclaim those parts of themselves they abandoned and in doing so be a more true and complete version of themselves."

But remember that TRP encourages you to watch what people do, not what they say:

http://theothermccain.com/2014/08/19/celebrity-feminist-emma-watson-says-something-really-stupid-on-twitter/

...she has become “Goodwill Ambassador for UN Women,” a job that evidently requires her to say silly feminist stuff on Twitter, e.g.:

Gender equality not only liberates women but also men from prescribed gender stereotypes.

Ri-iiight. Because what guys really need is to be liberated from “prescribed gender stereotypes.” All the hot babes like Emma Watson are crazy for guys who don’t fit “prescribed gender stereotypes,” right? So you will probably be surprised to learn that Emma Watson is dating a bald scrawny impoverished poet the biggest jock at an elite university:

According to a multiple outlets, the 23-year-old former “Harry Potter” film star has recently begun dating a fellow Oxford University student named Matthew Janney. . . .

The UK’s Mirror reported . . . that Janney, 21, is not only a student at the prestigious institution, he is also a star rugby player for their varsity team. Despite his prized athletic skills, Janney has also been recognized for something else: his looks. According to the report, the college student was named “Oxford’s most eligible bachelor” and “best looking player” by the university’s rugby team’s official Twitter account.

In other words, an Alpha male, the epitome of “prescribed gender stereotypes” from which Emma Watson says we need to be liberated.

Smart young fellows figure out that listening to what women say is less important than watching what women do. Women are constantly saying they want sensitive Ashley Wilkes types, even while they’re actually going crazy for the Rhett Butler types. But women are hopelessly fickle and self-contradictory, anyway.

As a man in our new feminist world, you are liberated from your gender stereotype and have permission to be vulnerable and human. And women have permission to dump you for the next nearby alpha male who decided that he doesn't need to be liberated from his gender stereotype.

Hat tip to /u/nix_on_the_glowworm for exposing me to this article, /u/TRPsubmitter for the idea of submitting this, and /u/justmanthings for posting the original quote about "taking up the mantle".

Edit: /u/We_Are_Legion suggests including this excellent image from /u/tremenfing: https://imgur.com/J5L4Ien


[–]tracer123 334 points335 points  (53 children)

All women are saying "be more sensitive" ONLY to Alpha men. They want to see inside your head which is the purpose of you keeping frame. They get high on your mystery and stoicism but don't like the power you wield. They are NOT saying this for Beta men, who are invisible anyway.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[removed]

    [–]Cousieknow 42 points43 points  (3 children)

    I want to quote you on this, but giving credit...

    [–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 41 points42 points  (1 child)

    What so hard about quoting him?

    Whenever I say something brilliant to a woman, I always cite my raging erection as the source.

    [–]muyuu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    RAGING_ERECTION doesn't lie.

    [–]Dream4eva 81 points82 points  (2 children)

    It's one big shit test to find the true alpha men and weed out the rest.

    [–]1BadgerBurger 22 points23 points  (0 children)

    This is the true definition of feminism.

    [–]2johnnight 79 points80 points  (4 children)

    They are saying this not because it would give the man a positive result, but because the aloofness is positively annoying them.

    That's like me saying to a girl "stop dressing so sexy".

    [–]Mr_Zarika 24 points25 points  (3 children)

    Actually I was talking to my mother the other day and the topic of gender roles came up. She's pretty RP (so is my dad) and quite Christian. She mentioned that in the Bible it says that the woman's curse (when they get kicked out of the garden of eden) is to lust after the power men have, but that men will always rule over them.

    Thought it was kinda interesting that the Bible noted that so long ago.

    EDIT: I realized I commented this on the wrong comment, that's why it seems like it doesn't follow from above. Either way, I found the verse, it's Genesis 3.

    It says, "To the woman, He (being God) said, 'I will greatly multiply your pain," and the Hebrew text says, "and childbirth, in pain you shall bring forth children," Then it says, "yet your desire shall be for your husband and he shall rule over you.'"

    [–]RedPill115 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    It's been the standard for forever that women prefer a more follow role in relationships. It's easier, it's less risky. But they always end up trying to get 2 contradictory 2 things:
    1. A powerful lead
    2. Influence over the lead

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 23 points24 points  (22 children)

    That is exactly what she is saying. I am liking this Emma Watson more and more. Women should be allowed to fuck alpha males and then get some beta male to support them.

    If you where female, would you want your offspring to have genetic material from a waddling American lard ass male or a beta whiney Asian male ? These type of males should be happy that the female even lets them look at her and sometimes even have sex with her.

    [–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (12 children)

    Not sure why this is getting down voted. It's mostly sarcasm but this is how women think.

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 36 points37 points  (11 children)

    People don't like to take a good long hard look in the mirror.

    Reverse the roles. Men here are always bitching about how fat American women are. There are just as many lard ass men as there are lard ass women.

    People tell me stuff like, I am a wierd old man, I am an asshole, I am arrogant, I am racist, I am elitist, I ended up in a third world country because I fucked up in a first world one. They think by telling the truth they can hurt me.

    I made a lot of bad choices when I was young, and you always end up paying for it one way or another. But despite these bad choices I still ended up on my feet.

    [–]jerrytheman1998 25 points26 points  (0 children)

    I have no idea what you're on about but I enjoyed reading it

    [–]Enisei 8 points9 points  (8 children)

    Is this supposed to be satire?

    [–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (5 children)

    Can you explain why it should be?

    Entertain the thought.

    If you were a woman. Would you not want your kids to have the best genes paid for by the richest guy?

    [–]colovick 10 points11 points  (4 children)

    That's true, but the post above was barely intelligible.

    [–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (3 children)

    Sir wankalot is like a court jester here. He's full of real red to the bone truths hidden inside an often unapproachable layer of madness.

    I love him and you'll always find him at the bottom of the thread buried with down votes not giving a fuck.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I always go to the very bottom of red pill forums and there he is with "-14 children" lmao

    Oh, just got banned from r/feminism for making a post that said 'i need feminism because it's hilarious.' I made it like 15 mins though so at least some people saw it.

    [–]colovick 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Fair enough. I didn't down vote him personally, but I got the gist of what he was saying. I'm not active enough lately to be nuanced in the sub's personalities.

    [–]tehwankingwalruses 20 points21 points  (1 child)

    Its /u/sir_wankalot_here. He is a prolific troll (or idiot) on TRP.

    [–][deleted]  (7 children)

    [deleted]

    [–]2comment 20 points21 points  (2 children)

    I think Rowling (and lesser extent Watson) play the media and fans like Vivaldi played the violin. The tidbit doesn't matter, it was just juicy enough for fans. Just like Rowling was "outed" as an anonymous author last year when the book sales were going nowhere. As a result, it got more buzz and interest than her first, arguably half-failed non-HP book, and got casual Rowling fans to buy it who wouldn't buy a detective novel, even from her.

    Happily Ever After is a static ending people like but doesn't rouse passions or get fans to argue. So shey throw gas on the fire every so often to keep the embers going, but it doesn't change anything.

    It may be because Universal opened 2 theme park areas this summer and to raise interest. It may be something else, I don't follow their careers closely enough to know exactly what.

    [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (1 child)

    I hated how she gave her pseudonym military and police credentials to up the credibility of the book and no one called her out on her shit.

    Born in 1968, Robert Galbraith is married with two sons. After several years with the Royal Military Police, he was attached to the SIB (Special Investigation Branch), the plain-clothes branch of the RMP. He left the military in 2003 and has been working since then in the civilian security industry. The idea for protagonist Cormoran Strike grew directly out of his own experiences and those of his military friends who have returned to the civilian world. 'Robert Galbraith' is a pseudonym.

    If anybody else did that they'd be ripped to shreds. Oh wait, James Frey, author of "A Million Little Pieces", was for something similiar.

    [–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (2 children)

    Ron wasn't alpha AT ALL. Constantly whimpering, complaining, acting like a dumbass. The only alpha thing he did was eat like a boss. That's how a real man eats. stuffs his face and doesn't give a fuck what anyone else thinks.

    He fucked up in the fourth movie where Hermione hooked up with the Durmstrang hunk. When you show jealousy like that you're finished. In real life she would of kept sleeping with bad boys until her looks wouldn't allow it.

    Ron hooked up with that crazy broad in the sixth movie. That's what she should have been doing since the first one. Oh, don't worry about Hermione, she wouldn't be jealous or upset, she wouldn't even notice.. head too wrapped up in bad boys to care.

    As for harry, he would of banged Cho into an inevitable pregnancy. Damn she was hot.

    [–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (1 child)

    Yeah, Harry's girl issues were completely unbelievable. Sure, the saviour of your entire community, who just came out on top against a dragon, is struggling to get a date for the dance.

    Yeah... No.

    [–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

    Bitches would have been throwing themselves at him. High school pussy for days

    [–][deleted] 209 points210 points  (51 children)

    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/01/10/article-2537317-1A8B9A6000000578-825_634x707.jpg

    Incredible. She could not date a more stereotypical 'buff athletic alpha male' if she tried to. But I'm sure he's soft deep down, right, right?

    [–]1Ill_mumble_that 178 points179 points  (29 children)

    Is it just me, or is he way out of her league? Her celebrity status is the only reason she's not a plate, or maybe she still is.

    [–]Adach 116 points117 points  (3 children)

    [–]vaker 19 points20 points  (0 children)

    He should divorce rape her...

    [–]beginner_ 41 points42 points  (1 child)

    lol my thought as well. She kind of looks out of place and ugly besides him.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorNiftyDolphin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Is that Watson or the chick from Twilight?

    [–]spaldingnoooo 23 points24 points  (5 children)

    Idk, his face looks crooked as shit but he's obviously in great shape though (forgot to add tall because obviously that matters).

    [–]youonlylive2wice 63 points64 points  (2 children)

    He has the face of a rugby player... and the attitude that goes along w/ "I've had my nose broken 4 times, its no big deal, and if you make it a big deal, well, I'm tougher than you" AKA confidence in one self and apathy towards the ridicule of others.

    Chicks don't just dig scars, they dig what the scars mean.

    [–]AveSharia 14 points15 points  (1 child)

    Is it just me or is that him, making it a big deal?

    [–]Endorsed Contributorleftajar 18 points19 points  (1 child)

    She needs to start exercising... she looks weak.

    [–]ohsweetword 33 points34 points  (7 children)

    It's mostly beta boys and comic geeks that fap to her. She's a 6 at best. Never understood the appeal.

    I'm sure this guy is just using her for her status though and has plenty of chicks to bang.

    [–]nallalalla 40 points41 points  (0 children)

    Like many jocks through history, he gets off on fucking the girl that the nerds wish they were fucking

    [–]sweetleef 70 points71 points  (8 children)

    Rejecting "gender stereotypes" is great - as long as it only applies to everyone else.

    Along with the obvious contradiction in the fact that the only reason she is given a chance to lecture others to "reject gender stereotypes" is that she fits the stereotypical beautiful woman gender stereotype.

    If she were the stereotypical hambeast lesbian with a crew cut and neck tattoos, nobody would give a shit what she said.

    [–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (3 children)

    she fits the stereotypical beautiful woman gender stereotype.

    Does she though? I've never understood the hardon so many guys have for her. She's cute, but just not all that attractive to me.

    Maybe it's because when she played Hermione as a child I was already in my 30s so now when I see her I can't unsee that little girl. Brains can be funny that way.

    [–]md619 30 points31 points  (1 child)

    She fulfills the beta male fantasy on the kind of girl you could fall in love with. Not only is attractive (by their standards) but she's supposedly smart and somewhat nerdy. It's a girl who, in their mind, would finally understand and appreciate them.

    Beta males can't compete in terms of masculinity so they have to hope that similarities will keep a girl around. What they don't understand is that opposites attract.

    [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    She fulfills the beta male fantasy on the kind of girl you could fall in love with. Not only is attractive (by their standards) but she's supposedly smart and somewhat nerdy. It's a girl who, in their mind, would finally understand and appreciate them.

    They project an image onto her that I'm sure she doesn't actually have. She's cute, but not 'hot' which makes her seem attractive yet approachable (in their minds).

    [–]walkonthebeach 27 points28 points  (0 children)

    Amazing picture. Thanks. It's just says all I need to know!

    [–]Wally_B 11 points12 points  (1 child)

    kinda looks like he was photoshopped in...

    [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    Don't want to be that guy, but Emma needs some squats in her life.

    [–]EasyChief 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I see Ringo Starr has been working out.

    [–]87GNX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Damn, right down to the inguinal crease. He's better looking than she is!

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

    [–]xu85 54 points55 points  (2 children)

    Very, very easy to denounce 'sexism' and 'gender stereotypes' when you have made your fortune off the back of your looks. It's a have-your-cake-and-eat-it situation. Get all the fame, money and power mainly through your looks, then turn around and one-up all those actresses who don't 'call out sexism' and 'do your bit'. It's like Raising Awareness, all the benefits of helping people and feeling great, but none of the ensuing criticism or dealing with difficult questions. Win-win.

    Other similar behaviours - flying around the planet campaigning against "climate change", being in an Irish pop group and lobbying for 'ending poverty', while practicing massive tax avoidance on earned income, having a token ethnic minority friend while living in a very safe white neighbourhood and sending your children to a private school thereby having a convenient buffer against any future claims of' 'racism', buying 'fairtrade organic' food produce to make yourself feel good about 'making a difference' while driving a big car and living in an inefficient household, criticising 'war' while not understanding or not realising that you are an indirect beneficiary or countless wars your ancestors faught and won, 'liking' some bulllshit about a 'noble cause' on Facebook to 'raise awareness', doing 'ice bucket challenge' to 'raise awareness for charidee' while infact using it as a convenient reason to showcase your expensive property of perfectly maintained abs/breasts/exuberant personality.

    I am seeing this type of 'champagne socialism' more and more because of social media.

    [–]VegasHostTre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I love that term "Champagne Socalism"

    I'm Emma Watson denouncing stereotypes because I made my money off of fat nerds who eat this Harry Potter crap up. I would never date any of you though, my rugby boyfriend will kick your ass if you touch me

    I'm Al Sharpton claiming racism and fighting for any cause that gets me TV time. Once said cause has died down and nobody's talking about it anymore, I'm done with it as I have kept myself in the news and keep my donations running. Did I mention soon as I made a million dollars I divorced my old black hag of a wife for a much lighter complexioned, younger mixed breed woman?

    Im Barack Obama I claim to be about change but I been in office for 1 1/2 terms now and not a damn thing has changed. I still am in the pockets of the largest multinational corporations giving them tax breaks for jobs their shipping overseas. Even though women graduate from college more than men, get more jobs than men, and are just generally treated better than men, I will still spew the irrational logic that society doesn't value women.Remember #bringbackourgirls Now I still haven't tracked down Boko Harem and the women that he has probably sold by now but still.

    Champagne Socialism I love it!

    [–]Stinkfished 95 points96 points  (8 children)

    Yes tell us of your wisdom 23 year old child star that has lived in a fantasy world for most of your life.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

    [–]RedPill115 8 points9 points  (1 child)

    What's ironic is that while feminists want more women in science, women don't necessarily want to be in science. Have you ever talked to a high school girl about math? "gross" I've heard more than once to describe it.

    [–]WarkillercR 63 points64 points  (0 children)

    When I discovered this for myself, a warm feeling consumed my insides and a giant shit eating grin wore my face. Too good to be true almost.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

    [–]yummyluckycharms 119 points120 points  (34 children)

    Typical feminist logic - or lack thereof. Kinda like how beyonce talks about being a feminist and then marries Jay Z

    There is a good reason why most ceos aren't women

    [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 39 points40 points  (5 children)

    This might be the best authority on the subject:

    http://www.cypress.com/?rID=34986

    The semiconductor business is a tough one with significant competition from the Japanese, Taiwanese, and Koreans. There have been more corporate casualties than survivors. For that reason, our Board of Directors is not a ceremonial watchdog, but a critical management function. The essential criteria for Cypress board membership are as follows:

    • Experience as a CEO of an important technology company.
    • Direct expertise in the semiconductor business based on education and management experience.
    • Direct experience in the management of a company that buys from the semiconductor industry.

    A search based on these criteria usually yields a male who is 50-plus years old, has a Masters degree in an engineering science, and has moved up the managerial ladder to the top spot in one or more corporations. Unfortunately, there are currently few minorities and almost no women who chose to be engineering graduate students 30 years ago. (That picture will be dramatically different in 10 years, due to the greater diversification of graduate students in the '80s.) Bluntly stated, a "woman's view" on how to run our semiconductor company does not help us, unless that woman has an advanced technical degree and experience as a CEO. I do realize there are other industries in which the last statement does not hold true. We would quickly embrace the opportunity to include any woman or minority person who could help us as a director, because we pursue talent -- and we don't care in what package that talent comes.

    I believe that placing arbitrary racial or gender quotas on corporate boards is fundamentally wrong. Therefore, not only does Cypress not meet your requirements for boardroom diversification, but we are unlikely to, because it is very difficult to find qualified directors, let alone directors that also meet investors' racial and gender preferences.

    [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

    Wow, just read the full text. Absolutely destroyed that nun.

    [–]HalfPastTuna 9 points10 points  (0 children)

    I did a case study on this company in school. Guy is the definition of redpill, if probably a complete asshole

    [–]1Ill_mumble_that 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    bu.. buu.. but where's the pussypass?

    That's right. It has no place in the real competitive world.

    [–]mrheh 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Consider charitable donations. When the U.S. economy shrinks, the dollars available to charity shrink faster, including those dollars earmarked for the Sisters of St. Francis. If all companies in the U.S. were forced to operate according to some arbitrary social agenda, rather than for profit, all American companies would operate at a disadvantage to their foreign competitors, all Americans would become less well off (some laid off), and charitable giving would decline precipitously. Making Americans poorer and reducing charitable giving in order to force companies to follow an arbitrary social agenda is fundamentally wrong.

    That's pretty much what happened.

    [–]1Ill_mumble_that 147 points148 points  (2 children)

    The main reason is that most companies strive to stay in business.

    [–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 40 points41 points  (1 child)

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: TRP isn't about changing women or the world. It's not even about criticizing women. It's about understanding them.

    If women were out there fucking the pasty-white math nerds, then every thread on TRP would be about how to learn calculus.

    I honestly don't care if women like tall guys or short guys or confident guys or shy guys or smart guys or dumb guys. Women can like whatever they want. But having learned that women like tall, confident, alpha, badboys - I resolve to change my behavior. I am conscious of my posture so that I look at tall and confident as possible. And I exhibit other behaviors that make me more attractive.

    Note also (mostly for the idiot blue pillers who lurk here): it's really not useful to me that a tiny minority of women actually do like shy, meek, math nerds. If I happen to meet such a girl, I will happily adjust my approach. You (you idiot blue pillers) waste everyone's time when you say that, and you give false hope to betas - which is frankly kind of a mean thing to do.

    [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

    Others have said it but getting men to show their feelings and express their vulnerability is just a way to aid in filtering out the unsuitable men. Don't fall for it.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]spaced86 13 points14 points  (1 child)

      Did anyone notice that she claims feminism has become a dirty word, but doesn't actually bother to investigate why. Could it be that where there is smoke there is fire? Oh no, not in the case of feminism. Definitely a purely holy and virtuous undertaking where all fault lies among the men in society, as per usual.

      Excuse me people, but I need to go puke.

      [–]RedPill115 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Lol, these half truths are always amusing.

      Feminism has an image problem!...that comes from an accurate view of what feminism is doing.

      It's like saying the Klu Klux Klan has an image problem...well no kidding.

      [–]Red_Shirt_Blue_Pants 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      Just read through the first couple paragraphs on HeForShe. Its like one huge joke. There is so much hypocrisy even the fucking mission statement....no EVEN THE NAME tells the truth. I cam't believe the masses are taking this seriously

      [–]dro13 8 points9 points  (2 children)

      I as a man will be vulnerable and sensitive when you can get up in front of the UN without doing your hair and make up

      [–][deleted] 37 points38 points  (3 children)

      tl;dr famous bitch put on a suit and says some silly stuff in a conference where they clap to her, goes back to living the rich and famous life because she can.

      meanwhile at the same university as her bf, some skinnyfaat guy and his fat whalt "gf" (great friend) actually listen to that stuff this is why the UN actually cares to put such shows up.

      footnote : to whoever promised to deliver the relevant 'information' on her, deliver.

      [–]malthuswaswrong 16 points17 points  (1 child)

      If 4chan actually had nudes of EW they'd already be released.

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      The nudes were a viral media hoax.

      [–]Iswearbyapollo 43 points44 points  (16 children)

      Are we actually surprised that "gina tingles" and hampstering trumps what a woman says?

      The words/promises/vows/exhortations of a woman are not worth the stale air she exhales making them. Accept it, cute as she is, she is the same jangled bag of fucked up urges, hormones and bullshit they all are, just in a more aesthetically pleasing package.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 41 points42 points  (14 children)

      Are we actually surprised that "gina tingles" and hampstering trumps what a woman says?

      Only surprised that it's reached the level of the UN.

      [–]Dark_Shroud 19 points20 points  (9 children)

      The UN extorts money from the world pandering what ever BS they can. Of course they're going to parade women up there to get money for poor women around the world then do nothing.

      [–]sweetleef 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      Of course they're going to parade women up there to get money for poor women around the world then do nothing.

      That's an unfair accusation. That money goes to fund tens of thousands of expensed gourmet meals, hotels, private jet flights, escorts, coke dealers, and construction projects granted to family and friends.

      [–]Dark_Shroud 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      I mean do nothing helpful for the world. ;)

      [–]Adach 7 points8 points  (6 children)

      it's pretty "in" right now, just wait for the next presidential election

      [–]Hoodwink 3 points4 points  (5 children)

      If Hill-dog is actually nominated - it's going to be interesting to see how they spin her loss.

      I'm betting they will blame the nearest man (either the vice presidential candidate or Obama) for the loss.

      [–]joncho 9 points10 points  (3 children)

      Why do you think so highly of the UN? It's mostly a joke organization that burns money.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Her position is very prestigious - there are people who work their entire lives towards such a position and never achieve it.

      By speaking at the UN, she has the ear of the entire world.

      [–]korewarp 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      I used to think that the UN was a great idea. But when 5(?) super powerful nations can veto ANYTHING, then it just becomes a stale joke.

      [–]joncho 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      Really? I think the idea of the UN itself is a disaster, not only the present implementation. A central authority with power over the whole world, what could go wrong?

      [–]xu85 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      I'm not a regular or even occasional contributor to TRP, I just find it it delicious that any time some 'feminist drama' comes up in the MSM somewhere, I just know other elements of reddit (SRS, SRD) lurk TRP to see what people are saying about it.

      TRP is the sub that reddit loves to hate.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Yeah, I see no less than two threads referencing this one in TBP.

      [–]1kick6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      I, for one, find this hilarious.

      [–]1raceAround126 7 points8 points  (2 children)

      I worked with a guy years ago who went through a pretty mad divorce. Details aside, there was apparently a time where he happened to open up to two of his workmates (ladies) who he'd known for 10+ years and who offered the proverbial shoulder to cry on.

      IT was interesting that, after this event, a lot of the women at that place referred to him constantly as "creepy" and "I wouldn't want to be alone with him" suggesting he was not trustworthy to be alone with. As all of this would batter him and he became more reclusive, the "creepier" women thought he was.

      All because he let down his guard, broke his gender stereotype and did exactly as these women wanted.

      This is just an International shit test of epic proportions. Lets see what men will take this advice, break frame, and expose themselves as betas.

      Welp, I know what I'm doing. Tomorrow, hitting the gym, Friday... a random fuck, I think!

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      This is the story I hear over and over again, both online and in real life.

      I'm not falling for the "feel free to be vulnerable and emotional" trick again.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Never again. I dont have any emotions, sorry.

      [–]ohsweetword 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      It's safe and easy to preach for equality when you have everything handed to you as a protected actress who's marketing firm are a bunch of scum.

      Typical feminist double speak. Use the movement to get more power, but never follow the rules.

      [–]Azothlike 19 points20 points  (20 children)

      Of all the feminist harpies out there, Emma isn't so bad. She admits the flaws in feminism, even to go so far as to say "We are searching for a word to unite us", etc etc.

      But her platform is one of social perception and stigma, so it's pretty useless. People have been free to act how they want for millenia, and they have chosen to act this way time and time again.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 22 points23 points  (7 children)

      Time will tell, though I think she might be even worse.

      She acknowledges the issues that men face, then tries to recruit men to the feminist cause which does nothing and will continue to do nothing for men.

      The whole name of the campaign, "HeForShe", indicates exactly what she stands for.

      [–]Dream4eva 12 points13 points  (2 children)

      Exactly, how can you acknowledge in one sentence that we need a word to unite us and in the next tout a slogan which places the onus on men to ensure equality.

      The whole movement is inherently anti-feminist. 'heforshe' takes away responsibility from women. 'heforshe' want men to do the work in a movement where its foundations come from self empowerment of women and women liberating themselves.

      [–]joncho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Having men do the work is anti-feminist?. Last time I checked feminist support alimony.

      [–]Azothlike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I agree on some points. I still feel it's the "lesser of two evils", in comparison to what we're usually confronted with(rape-culture screaming harpies, etc).

      I still feel that "men have suffered unfair emotional expectations of them and we should end it", while half-hearted and bullshit, is much closer to the reality of "men have suffered legal and physical inequality in many ways and we should end those" than any other contender that crazy feminists will align with, at the moment.

      At the VERY LEAST, a public figure openly admitting to the bad image of feminism is enough to rightfully shame some of it.

      Time will tell if the message swings back towards solipsistic demands or not, of course.

      [–]Dark_Shroud 6 points7 points  (6 children)

      She's probably worse. Let's take an evaluation of her so far.

      Her life is unique because her parents were smart in raising her. So she grew up comfortable but didn't have access to her money more than a $75 a week. While her parents had her money go into savings. She does films, voice acting, & modeling.

      So now she's worth $60 million USD.

      She's always been comfortable and now lives very well in a pent house that probably costs more than I'll ever make in one life time. She is used to being around power players. She's very appealing on every level. Looks, her voice, & she's smart. Doors have just opened for her. Lastly she has good genes, she'll be looking good into her late 30s possibly 40s if she properly cares for her skin.

      This is not the kind of person that should be lecturing anyone.

      [–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 4 points5 points  (5 children)

      lives very well in a pent house that probably costs more than I'll ever make in one life time.

      No. Fuck that noise that you can't do it. You can do it.

      [–]Dark_Shroud 8 points9 points  (4 children)

      She spent $15.5 million on a NYC pent house. To hell with that, I want nothing to do with living in NYC.

      I'm going to buy a water front house on some land in the country. So I can be left alone and enjoy life. Even more so if I ever have kids. I now dislike living so close to Chicago and both suburb and more so city people irritate me.

      [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

      She doesn't admit the problems of feminism at all. She thinks feminism has an image problem, and furthermore an image problem that stems from sources outside Feminism.

      [–]RedPill115 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Yeah.

      I could find what she said interesting if she was saying "the problem with feminism is that there's man hating in there that shouldn't be there".

      [–]Valendr0s 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      The article you're quoting sounds like a Rita Skeeter article about Hermonie dating Victor Krum.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      If anything is a harmful prescribed gender stereotype its: Strong Independent Woman®

      [–]guest121 60 points61 points  (94 children)

      C'mon, who the fuck would you expect her to date? With her SMV? Of course she would go for the top. Because she can.

      [–]16 TRP VanguardTRPsubmitter 58 points59 points  (8 children)

      You're missing the point. We all know women prefer to date alphas.

      The point of this post is that WHILE she dates alphas, she is also being disingenuous in telling men that "being alpha doesn't matter! let down your guard!"

      Many inexperienced guys fall prey to this; they think that by becoming "supportive allies" and by following what women say (speeches such as this), that women will respond to them and like them.

      However, reality is that women TELL men to be vulnerable and to "redefine masculinity" because that maintains womens' beta orbiters. Then they go on to date the same alphas they would in the first place.

      So the TL;DR is that women are often disingenuous in the "advice" they give to men about redefining masculinity. It's redefining it for THEIR benefit not ours. Cause they will still go after the same dudes.

      [–]triangleman83 10 points11 points  (3 children)

      Ok so would you call what Emma is doing some kind of massively broadcast shit test? Not that she has the need to vet millions of men, but it would essentially add to her beta orbiter count. I can see how lots of women do this on the smaller scale too, as in on facebook.

      1. Girl posts status update complaining about her current alpha fux not appreciating her in some way (duh he's an alpha)

      2. Beta orbiters come out from the woodwork to give support.

      3. Any new names that support her are added to her beta orbiter list, never to be considered for fux.

      [–]1MarcusDavidson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      She is paid to be the "Women's Goodwill Ambassador for the UN". Some PR agency wrote the script. She just parroted the words.

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      I swear the red pill is a cheat code for life. I remember white knighting women in the past on social media and was completely ignored, sometimes blocked. Once I said to a girl "he's out there Fuckin other bitches because you are worthless." this bitch messaged me with a very flirtatious message: "you think you're so smart don't you."

      Amazing. If you are an asshole, you are alpha fux.

      I remember ome girl I was seeing earlier this year and she was a real whore. She stopped seeing me and I decided to beg her to come back (this was pre TRP). She was always on fb so she was ignoring me while talking about parties and festivals. So after like a month I sent her a text, "I heard what you did @ xyz's party last night. Dodged that bullet, you worthless whore lol" woke up next morning, had 14 text messages from her.

      Be an asshole and they will respond

      [–]jcrpta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I don't think it's anywhere near as thought through as that.

      Women are very social creatures (by which I mean "they crave to be accepted as part of a group", not "they like to go out drinking with their friends every night"), and as such very much aware of what society thinks.

      We know what happens when someone publicly dissents from the socially acceptable view - hell, we see rp ideas absolutely buried and proponents crucified if they so much as breathe the word "red". And society is very clear on what you're supposed to think and say about what women want in a man, while being extremely tolerant of women doing the exact opposite.

      So, what does a socially aware girl who's been engaged by the UN to tell society what to think say? Well, what do you think she's going to say? It ain't gonna be "To hell with men who are in touch with their feelings, give me a rugby player any day".

      [–]ohsweetword 16 points17 points  (0 children)

      She's reinforcing the beta male factory farm while living outside that farm and going for the big swole dick.

      None of us are, or should be, mad that she wants the big swole dick. That's something we all know. That's why we're here, because we know.

      But yes it's basically a trap to seed more betas so feminists can have more of what they want. "Be open. Be gentle. Be submissive to me, Meanwhile I'll be banging my brains out with this Rugby star."

      [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 133 points134 points  (33 children)

      Who I expect her to date depends on whether I listen to her words or TRP theory. Looks like TRP theory wins this time.

      Also, I don't think fame adds much to a woman's SMV besides (1) having tons of publicity photos that makes her look perfect, and (2) bragging rights for the guy.

      A great relevant comment from Chateau Heartiste's blog: http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/12/02/how-super-alpha-males-are-similar-to-hot-babes/

      Women, would you rather date Paul Walker (pre-dead, of course) or a watier that looked exactly like Paul Walker?

      Men, would you rather date Scarlett Johanssen, or a waitress that looked exactly like Scarlett Johanssen?

      ...and the answers to these questions demonstrate one of the fundamental differences between women and men.

      [–]the99percent1 39 points40 points  (1 child)

      you are looking from a male perspective.. where male celebrities don't care who they date.

      women on the other hand rarely date down. This oxford schlub has got his life set.. all he needs to say is I used to fuck Emma Watson and the girls will go into a feeding frenzy.

      [–]watersign 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      he was probably banging all the girls before emma came along and will continue to do so after

      [–][deleted]  (8 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]ISODAK 9 points10 points  (2 children)

        This was roughly my thought as well. SJ is likely to be full of herself, while a waitress will be more likely to see you as having higher SMV.

        [–]jmg83 5 points6 points  (1 child)

        Agreed. It's not even really an ego thing on my part, it's just that things that would be a big deal to me are taken completely for granted by Hollywood stars. A lot of other people my age are struggling to make ends meet, pay off mortgages, etc. Scarlett Johnasson could outright buy most houses around here by just doing a fucking TV commercial. When I look back at the shit I've had to do in life like bullshitting my way into gigs for cheaper or for free, going to X supermarket instead of y to save money, waking up earlier and commuting the long way to work because it's 50% cheaper, tricks for travelling on trains for free, smuggling drinks into nightclubs, surviving on a pittance and a shitload lot of other things. A movie star just. wouldn't. get it. We'd basically have very little in common. This isn't to say she's not a nice woman, To return to the earlier example made by another poster, the Paul Walker clone who works as a bartender would make a nice mantoy for most women, but they'd start to see themselves as better than him. Hell, they'd choose the real Paul Walker (if he still lived) over his minimum wage clone for the exact reasons that most men would chose the waitress lookalike over the celebrity, which tells you all you need to know about men and women.

        [–]ISODAK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        True about differences. Thought now that I think about it, one thing I've heard about actors is they tend to have a lot of charisma, and are a lot of fun to talk to (even for the non-celebrity-obsessed like myself). So I guess it's worth pointing out that there's more than looks: I'm sure SJ would beat the waitress in general social skills and knowing how to be sexy. But as someone else pointed out, she can be trained.

        SJ would probably be more fun in the short run, but waitress wins long-term.

        [–]zulhadm 5 points6 points  (2 children)

        [–]jmg83 4 points5 points  (1 child)

        I don't know if this is the same place, if it is, I stand corrected.

        [–]zulhadm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        The place I listed is the most exclusive. So if it's another place it's probably cheaper

        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        I'll be damned if I'm going to have the media attacking me when I come out of the grocery store. Fuck that mess. I don't know how celebrities deal with that... oh wait cos $

        [–]jmg83 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Yeah, I guess the money softens the blow. It comes down to whether you think it's worth it or not.

        [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 51 points52 points  (10 children)

        This is something most women do not understand. I don't give a shit about your achievements, career, knowledge or degrees.

        I will inevitably have to teach you how to be an appropriate woman, so I might as well teach you all the rest as well while I am at it.

        You've got a career going? Well, giod for you and I surely appreciate that you've got goals. Does it change your attraction to me in any way? Hell no.

        [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (8 children)

        I don't think its fair to say we don't care at all. Because someone with those academic achievements will likely be more intelligent and men do value intelligence.

        But what we don't care about is fame. I think most men would actually prefer the complete opposite of fame, whatever that is.

        [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 29 points30 points  (3 children)

        I don't think that an academic degree and intelligence behave proportional.

        With today's educational system a degree solely prooves that you are able to memorize and things and echo pre-digestes knowledge.

        Also for matters of attraction and SMV intelligence is not a necessary trait. Just look how many successful high-SMV men have total dipshits by their side and seem to be completely happy.

        It might be a trait that you are looking for if you conciously want to start a family, but for a plate I don't care if her IQ is next to potatoe.

        [–]damnyouresickbro 15 points16 points  (0 children)

        Ding ding ding we have a winner. Degrees and how well you do in school only show how intelligent you are to an extent. Was talking to a girl that probably will get into medical school but had the mentality of a teenager. Social smarts and books smarts differ completely.

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        I completely agree.

        IQ in women is only important for breeding purposes. However, that can be done without marriage (surrogacy + buying eggs + genetic engineering), so spin plates potatoes to your hearts content!

        [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        The word you're looking for is anonymity and I agree. A famous woman wouldn't be very available. It'd be a part-time relationship

        [–]mrheh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        "Men build from the bottom up, Women build from the TOP Down."-Patrice Oneal talking about how men and women approach relationships. ie: we can build a dumb bitch who looks good into something, a women will not take a bum and make him into something because he looks good.

        [–]a_nus 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        A group of girls I hangout with were saying Drake is hot. I told them to pretend he wasn't famous for a moment. Picture him not being a celebrity, is he still hot? They all said no. Some even said "hm, interesting" after consciously realizing their own subconscious. Others just hamstered away.

        [–]mrheh 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        Patrice Oneal had a hilarious point abouta womens SMV (I'm guessing that means her value beside looks?). Patrice goes "A famous fat ugly guy can get pussy cause he's famous, a fat bitch who famous is still just a fat bitch, Precious (the fat black chick from that movie) anit getting dick now because shes famous.... Oprah has the same pussy as the bitch from Mcdonalds."

        [–]sweetleef 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        Men, would you rather date Scarlett Johanssen, or a waitress that looked exactly like Scarlett Johanssen?

        Is there a third option?

        [–]TaylorWolf 2 points3 points  (2 children)

        My jiu jitsu coach Eddie Bravo puts social/sexual hierarchy like this

        1 famous women 2 famous men 3 women 4 men

        He says men will do anything for a woman, and famous women like Angelina Jolie can put famous men under her

        It does seem like this is the norm to me, except I realize that TRP is exactly how a man can rise above a woman in rare cases. Justin Timberlake for example fucked like 20-30 famous women with household names.

        [–]theozoph 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        My jiu jitsu coach Eddie Bravo

        Great humblebrag. ;)

        But really, it's cool, Eddie is a pretty chill guy, if what I've heard of him on the Joe Rogan podcast is any indication.

        [–]deaduponaviral 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Yes classic tale of the king marrying the farm girl. Princesses only mary princes though.

        [–]tallwheel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I don't know. I think there are certainly guys out there who would go for the bragging rights.

        You're premise is correct, though. Social status of one's partner matters a hell of a lot less for men than for women.

        [–]usernameson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I wish I could give you a thousand upvotes for that one.

        [–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

        Napoleon dynamite,

        He is so sensitive.

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Napoleon is not amused: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmqXIUgsrP8

        Edit: not calling you an idiot.

        [–]Iswearbyapollo 20 points21 points  (0 children)

        No argument there. But since she is a woman, no one should expect her words and actions to align in any sort of approximation of reality or consistency.

        [–]1 TRP SupporterFred_Flintstone 9 points10 points  (16 children)

        I was surprised by this; he is not anywhere near the top. Being a good looking rugby player at Oxford is nothing, plus he is 3 years younger than her. Being high status in Oxford is great for getting hottt Oxford girls as its basically a bubble and people don't date outside of their uni there; but Watson is on the international scene.

        She is 24 so should consider dating the top men in the world in the next couple years and stop fucking around!

        [–]guest121 18 points19 points  (3 children)

        Really? The way I see it the girl is having fun with a good looking dude. That he is wanted by other girls makes it even better. She is during the "fun" times in her life. Settling down is for much later.

        [–]1 TRP SupporterFred_Flintstone 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        Yeah I did a little reading and she is actually an Oxford student now. Makes sense for her to date this guy while finishing her degree

        [–]AlfredTheGreatest 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        When you're as rich as Emma you don't need any beta bucks. He's super hot and super high-status. Makes perfect sense to me.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        actually Emma is executing a great strategy. Now, if naturally beta men are allowed to show their true vulnerability, it will be easier for women to screen the natural alphas from the betas.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

        [–]cooltrip 22 points23 points  (5 children)

        "Emma Watson says, "Gender equality not only liberates women but also men from prescribed gender stereotypes" as she dates an alpha male jock"

        Red Pill, you really need to improve your analyzing skills:

        1º) Feminism comprises the female sexual right (... to respond: "No, I don't want to have sex with you"). Where on Earth does it say this female sexual right contradicts the female hypergamous preference for alpha? Women use their feminist sexual right to respond "No, I don't want to have sex with you" for rejecting betas. Feminism fights oppressionTM, don't forget.

        2º) Feminism says women are not inferior. Where on Earth does it say that statement contradicts the female hypergamous preference for alpha? Feminism means "women are not inferior to inferior men (betas) ". You think women are stupid?. Tangentially, feminists use their gender equality claim for demanding bux from inferior men (betas).

        3º) What if Emma is dating an alpha? women don't use feminism for rejecting alphas, but for rejecting betas. It's their right, it's their freedom, it's their hypergamy, and it's their feminism, right?

        4º) In short: "feminism is not incompatible with female hypergamous preference for alpha; feminism is an ideological catalog women use for rejecting beta semen and demanding beta bux. Because it's women's freedom, it's women's right, and it's women's preferences. Feminism is the female agenda for institutionalizing "Alpha fux-beta bux" ".

        Don't underestimate female ancestral intelligence about males. You guys think you are winning but women were winning all the fucking time. You can win women about science, technology and progress, but not about men and man rank; cause it's women's survival. Alpha fux, beta Nobels.

        [–]tallwheel 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        It looks to me as if you and OP are in agreement. OP posted this only as proof that all of what you said above is true.

        [–]GanbareNippon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        can't believe the amount of attention everyone is giving her... this was on askmen a few days ago

        [–]TheRationalMale.comRollo-Tomassi 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Looks like it is getting serious between them. Maybe he does have a sensitive side after all.

        The 24-year-old actress looked stylish even as she carried out the manual labour, wearing jeans, a black sweater, and comfy trainers, with her hair in a top knot.

        I can feel my IQ dropping as I read...

        [–]shlomif 2 points3 points  (6 children)

        Sorry, but that sounds like a big Ad-hominem attack - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem - how does Watson’s choices in her personal life necessarily invalidate the contents of her words?

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 2 points3 points  (5 children)

        https://www.quora.com/Logic/Is-calling-someone-a-hypocrite-a-fallacy

        This is a fallacy:

        1. George says we should wear raincoats.
        2. George doesn't wear a raincoat.
        3. Therefore, we shouldn't wear raincoats.

        This isn't.

        1. George says we should wear raincoats.
        2. George doesn't wear a raincoat.
        3. Therefore, we shouldn't trust George.

        The former is an argument about wearing raincoats. The latter is an argument about George's character.

        We're saying:

        • Emma is preaching that men should not be trapped in their gender roles but she dates a manly man who is very typical of his gender role, so she's a hypocrite.
        • Emma has said nothing to prove that women would love to date sensitive and vulnerable men, so her argument is weak anyway.
        • Emma is part of a majority of women who encourage men to be vulnerable but date manly men, which proves that women like traditionally manly men.

        [–]1cover20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Regardless of what happens, being vulnerable and soft with a woman will not make her tingle. I have permission to be that way right now. But not the motivation.

        [–]Endorsed ContributorTheeRyanGrey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Watch what they do, not what they say

        Watch what they do, not what they say

        Watch what they do, not what they say

        Watch what they do, not what they say

        Watch what they do, not what they say

        [–]Position5hero 3 points4 points  (3 children)

        Some gender stereotypes are bad too for the record. Specifically, men providing for women, showering her with gifts, beta bux, etc

        Some gender stereotypes aren't Alpha.

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        I'd say that

        men providing for women, showering her with gifts, beta bux, etc

        are actually a societal expectation and not a stereotype, although maybe I'm splitting hairs at this point.

        If you want to see a stereotype for the ideal man, James Bond would be a good example.

        [–]Position5hero 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        we not splitting hairs at this point we splitting split ends

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Glad to see my hair-splitting skills have become so good!

        [–]LadyLumen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        I think she's just trying to stay relevant, now that she's not in Harry Potter anymore. Pandering to what people want to hear is a good way to do that.

        [–]TNPgaylover 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        Also notice name of moment HE FOR SHE Movement for gender equality.

        Women are equal only if men do something for them.

        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (6 children)

        Females can spew whatever they want. I'm 5'5" so I need to be mire strict about my masculinity. I plan on getting tattoos, I work out to the breaking point and then I go further, focus on grooming and making that dough. Anything other than that and women see me subconsciously as a failure.

        Emma Watson, you were my unicorn from age 9 til 17. But you now confirm that those don't exist. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some heavy squatting to do and a 1600 calorie protein shake to swivel down.

        Oh and I'm sure her boyfriend has a great personality. Everybody just loves who he is as a person.

        [–]joncho 4 points5 points  (5 children)

        Why do you think tattoos are masculine? I always felt them more as femenine/hipster.

        [–]HAMMURABl 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        with muscles= masculine/badboy, without muscles = hipster/feminine/artistic

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

        It's because the guys who used to get them were prisoners, gang members, soldiers, and other generally tough guys who had to stick together. Having a tattoo wasn't socially acceptable so you had to have a good reason to get one, and the usual reason was to show others that you were not to be messed with.

        Even though it is socially acceptable to get a tattoo now, people associate tattoos with toughness.

        [–]RegentsEnd 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        Never, ever, ever listen to a word women say. The only thing that matters is what they do.

        It can't be said enough.

        [–]Gods_Work 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        this aint no place for no hero, emma. Just carry on with your life and don't try to change people thoughts about each other. Focus on changing their thoughts about earth and our place in the universe. Make people more environmentally aware. Make them more concious of how their shit is changing the place we live on and will want to continue living on for more than 100 years. Talk about renewable energy. Talk about laws that punish those who dont respect earth, the wildlife, and air we breathe. Damn girl, use your looks and the stereotype they bring to do something useful, not something that gets drowned when the new [insert current popular musician here] scandal/song is revealed. ugh......UGH! RATM

        [–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Alphas need to go on strike against this type of shit. If some girl is hypocritically mouthing these platitudes, you say: "Okay, I'd like you to meet my friend Cadwalader; he sits in his basement and writes poetry about being a brony. Have at it."

        [–]writeonbrother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I'm sure all the Dictators listening to her speech were moved to immediately ban the wearing of burkas. The Saudi Royals will now give women the vote. Powerful stuff from Miss Watson.

        [–]Forty_Deuce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        No, there are gender stereotypes. I Guarantee, I guaran-damn-tee that the moment the man of one of these feminist chicks falls out of his gender stereotype, they will drop him with the quickness and have no compassion. They'll say something like, "I'm just not attracted to you anymore," or "the way you're acting just isn't attractive." Why is that? Because there are fucking gender roles and there is no amount of trying to make everyone equal going to change that.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        maybe shes allowed to date who she wants?( ͡° ͜ ʖ ͡° )

        [–]iiMSouperman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        The minute she implied being "a man" isn't human she instantly lost the slight ounce of dignity left over.

        She's a silly, naive, privileged schoolgirl who doesn't understand the shit she spews.

        [–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        She's young, dumb, and full of cum.

        best comment on that article:

        Exactly. And the first word that came to my mind when I read her tweet was "university". Her tweet wasn't an original thought, it's what she's been taught to say by leftwing professors. She's too young and inexperienced to know any better. She's just old enough and smart enough to repeat what she thinks she's expected to say.

        But actually we call it "The Cathedral" because its adherents follow it blindly, like a religion.

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        You lost me at "says". Who cares?

        [–]tedcase 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Brilliant! If I was the type to spend money on strangers on the internet, I would give you gold for that.

        [–][deleted]  (10 children)

        [deleted]

        [–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana[S] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

        I really got the feeling that she's just throwing men a bone here to encourage them to participate and help women. As far as I can tell, her speech is about how women have it worse and men should help out. Do you think the program is really going to address any of these issues?

        [–]tedcase 3 points4 points  (4 children)

        I wouldn't mind so much, but she is such a fucking catastrophically awfull actress too. I can't fathom how the hell this bimbo with an accent got so famous.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]joncho 1 point2 points  (1 child)

          I never got that either, I don't find her that attractive. She is cute in a non attractive way.

          load more comments (128 replies)