630
631

Red Pill ExampleFemale comedian says she's NOT victim of male harassment; feminists harass her (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by should_

http://www.jessicadelfino.com/2016/02/11/a-list-of-men-who-harassed-me-during-my-decade-plus-in-comedy/

In the post, clickbait-titled "A List of Men Who Harassed Me During My Decade Plus In Comedy," Jessica Delfino talks about all the men, listing them by name, who have helped her career or that had done something kind for her. Then she goes over a lot of unnamed women who were bitches to her that set her back, personally or professionally.

According to her social media, she took it down after getting a lot of "I'm very disappointed in you!" messages from female friends, but then she put it back up. These comments are also apparent in the comments section of this here linked post.


[–]2renzy77 330 points331 points  (67 children)

Then she goes over a lot of unnamed women who were bitches to her that set her back, personally or professionally.

Reminds me of the H.L. Mencken quote: Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another..

[–]1jb_trp 177 points178 points  (31 children)

It's funny how so many women will insist they can't be friend with other women and nobody bats an eye? But if a man makes any statement critical of women it's "misogyny."

I love TRP because everything is on the table.

[–]foldpak111 43 points44 points  (3 children)

The answer is: Eggs are rare, sperm is plentiful.

You're a misogynist because YOU AREN'T PROTECTING THE EGGS!

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Red_SoloCup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That is the pure unfiltered essence of the sexual marketplace. Learn that and don't ever forget it.

    [–]foldpak111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Shit like this happens https://youtu.be/mT3q8tba_lw and no one bats an eye. But if Amanda Todd kills herself because she's a little whore the whole fuckin' world stops revolving.

    "She's not a whore, she was a strong & independent woman!"

    "Thank god all those baby killers got shot up. Men are stupid, anyway. Nyah."

    [–]icecow 22 points23 points  (1 child)

    Reminds me of the H.L. Mencken quote: Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another..

    Reading that makes me very angry because I know I'm going to forget that quote within a week.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Mencken has many quality quotes, he had a way with insults and sarcasm.

    [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 23 points24 points  (0 children)

    "Don't try to understand women. Women understand women and they hate each other." - Al Bundy

    [–]Hamster_S_Thompson 9 points10 points  (7 children)

    Hollywood reporter stopped ranking women execs because they started undermining each other.

    http://www.npr.org/2015/12/01/457869002/hollywood-reporter-ending-annual-index-of-powerful-women-in-entertainment

    [–]ItsCold_ItsCold 6 points7 points  (2 children)

    A primitive instinct: fight over the alpha males' attention by undermining one another.

    EDIT: An alpha male doesn't even have to be present for them to behave this way. As with most of our primal instincts, it's pretty hard to keep in check. As it is, women are easily the more primal, feels-oriented of the two sexes, so it's a given that they would surrender to their primitive wiring quicker and more often than most men would.

    [–]franksymptoms 15 points16 points  (1 child)

    Here's a (true) story that may shed some light:

    My brother got an interesting insight into the female mind several years ago. His wife and 2 daughters were preparing for some large gathering of the female persuasion–– a quilting convention or some such. Two hours before departure time, they were fully engaged in dressing up, makeup, etc.

    He did a double take and said, "Why all the makeup? It's only going to be other women there."

    His oldest daughter replied, "Daddy, you don't understand! This is WAR PAINT!"

    [–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I feel sorry for them. They have to deal with all of that when my boys and I go for a beer, it's all love.

    [–]RedMoonAscendant 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    Great quote from that article:

    INSKEEP: Because there is a stereotype of women, that they are far more collaborative than men, for example. That's a thing that some people would say about women. But you're saying that for women trying to climb the power ladder as an executive or a director or a producer in Hollywood, it has actually been ferociously competitive and individualistic at this time.

    Ah, so normally women are cooperative. But when you actually look at the situation, they're vicious and toxic. But that's just "at this time." Because the folk wisdom that says women are angels can't possibly be... incorrect.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Cooperative no, but if they can see it is beneficial to them in any way, they'll jump on the bandwagon. Team girl doesn't exist, but they know if other girls get extras, privileges, and free stuff just because they have vaginas, they can get those things too since they also have a vagina. If they can benefit, they are behind it, but they don't want any other bitch to benefit more than they do.

    [–]Hamster_S_Thompson 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Here is another nugget:

    We tell it because it illuminates something about the way women have to fight their way to the top in Hollywood. 

    Right, because men don't have to do that. It's just handed to them.

    [–]1Ill_mumble_that 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    To me it honestly sounded more like the women were genuinely surprised that they had to work for something for once in their life.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorTheRedPilsner 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    I saw a similar quote that goes something like "The reason why mothers hate their daughter-in-laws is because they know what women are really like."

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 208 points209 points  (6 children)

    So let me get this straight... the female response to "men have helped and women have been bitchy" is for women to be bitchy to her.

    You couldn't make this up.

    But this is further proof of the lengths the hamsters are going to in order maintain the false narrative of Women Are Wonderful and Men Are Awful.

    [–]madhatter393 16 points17 points  (3 children)

    I agree. Especially in Western Society. It's almost as if, in order to make up for the fact they aren't men; they decide to demonize the very thing they wish to be.

    [–]ItsCold_ItsCold 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    Nah it's just a good way to get free shit (shaming men into cuck provider roles) and attention (perpetual victim class).

    [–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Don't you just love socialism?

    [–]csehszlovakze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    they decide to demonize the very thing they wish to be.

    because they hate themselves

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I find their lack of logic and reason offending and infuriating.

    [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c 101 points102 points  (2 children)

    Stop undermining the narrative, Jessica!

    The irony of the "oppressed" getting to the point of suppressing others within their OWN ranks about what they can and cannot say, what they can and cannot do. Like a snake eating its own tail.

    "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

    [–]Joseph_the_Carpenter 8 points9 points  (1 child)

    I like the wording of that comment, shameless and brazen: we're not talking about the truth here but the narrative. In other words we're talking about the lie.

    That comment is woman-speak for "stop telling the truth and start lying like the rest of us!"

    [–][deleted] 112 points113 points  (5 children)

    Patrice O’Neal befriended me

    All I needed to hear, hope everything works out for this chick.

    [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 28 points29 points  (3 children)

    FYI, he's a self-proclaimed misogynist.

    [–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 17 points18 points  (2 children)

    he's a self-proclaimed misogynist.

    Yeah, but that term really just means, "one who strays from the feminist narrative." Patrice O'Neal did not actually hate women (despite having some reason to, as he had spent time in jail on a false rape claim) any more than TRP implies hatred of women. Merely being open to the possibility of criticizing women is labeled hatred.

    Hell, the author of that article, herself a woman, is all but called a misogynist in the comments. They outright call her an uncle tom. They say she's "undermining the narrative." That's what happens when you fail to toe the feminist line.

    It's very telling that the self-proclaimed misogynist was a better friend and colleague to Jessica than the other women in the industry. And since we at TRP so often cite Patrice O'Neal's wisdom, I think it's fair to call this blog post evidence that TRP is better for women than the blue pill.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Watching what has happened to my ex's is enough to prove to me that red is far better than blue, and infinitely better for girls than feminism. They followed their impulses and now are doing far worse than they ever did with me. Every girl in their lives shouted "You go girl!" as they fucked up their future by making incredibly bad choices.

    [–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    You know women have put you through some shit when you read this comment, laugh, and just mutter to yourself, "Fuck 'em."

    [–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 49 points50 points  (26 children)

    For those who don't have time to read the whole blog entry the last two paragraphs are illustrative:

    But in short, no comedy dude has ever really harassed me that I can think of or remember. Maybe I’m not hot enough. Maybe I give off a vibe that makes their penises go soft, like those vibrating machines that keep deer and bugs away from cars. I don’t know. But I like it, and I hope whatever I do to make them not harass or come onto me in undesired sexual ways, I can keep doing it.

    Addendum: I acknowledge that there are a lot of really creepy and shitty male comedians out there who have done the whole spectrum of harassment to women in comedy, and worse. I have heard the horror stories, first hand. Just because that hasn’t been my personal experience does’t mean it’s not the reality for a lot of women. I know it to be the case for a countless number of women. Some nightmare stories have even gotten national press, as we all know. This isn’t a piece letting men off the hook for their bad behavior. If anything, I hope it will inspire men to continue to consider their actions, and look to the way their heroes mentioned above treated me as shining examples of ways to interact with and reach out to women in comedy (and to people in life).

    Emphasis mine. Notice she has no "message for women" to consider their actions and how they treat each other. Despite her personal experience that no man has ever harassed her or mistreated her--in fact they guided, nurtured, provided resources and encouragement!!--it is the men that must "consider their actions."

    She completely misses the mark in her conclusions, though we can at least be pleased that she took the time to pen her experience for us to analyze. She simply takes for granted that there are "a lot" of really creepy and shitty male comedians out there, but what is her source for believing this? Female comedians! Ya know, the same ones who sabotaged her career, told people not to hire her, ghosted her, made inflammatory remarks, and treated her like shit for no reason. She absolves herself of wrong doing but is perfectly willing to accept that there are just tons of pieces of shit men out there doing bad things to women because these female comics who lie and manipulate told her so.

    What she should have said is that the vast majority of men are good people. There will always be some assholes (she referenced Bill Cosby not by name, if you couldn't tell), but the assholes are a tiny tiny minority. The majority of men are GOOD, helpful, kind, generous, positive, encouraging, and not threatening.

    Instead of vindicating men, her conclusion basically succumbs to the dominant misandrist narrative. "Yeah basically men suck even though every one I know has helped me and never tried to fuck me." This woman's hamster revs up at the very end and just erases all of her knowledge and experience. All of her positive interactions with men is hamstered away and replaced with the feminist narrative, the feminist big lie.

    [–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (7 children)

    I see this done a lot in female spaces. The addendum thing. It's basically her response to all the negative attention from other females, she feels like she has to make it clear how she wasnt attacking them and how understandable she is of females. I see this EXACT SAME THING happen all the time with whiteknights/BP-men, just go to askwomen or whatever and look for the male comments, they are FILLED with "[inquiry]" followed by "IM SORRY I DIDNT MEAN TO OFFEND YOU! Thanks for teaching me a lesson". It's absolutely revolting. "I'm sorry i didnt mean to hurt your feelz women pls forgive me ;___; im not evil i promise look at all the good things that i can say about women!"

    It's a strategy used to stop anyone from making any sort of conclusion because "not all womynz!" and whatnot, in order to protect the idea that "women are wonderful, those are just the bad apples!".

    brb im gonna go throw up

    [–]ThrowyMcGruder 5 points6 points  (1 child)

    Yup. You see it all the time.

    Watch a guy complain about women expecting him to hold their handbags and he'll be shouted down as a misogynist and told repeatedly that not all women are like that until he's apologizing.

    Then you'll see the guys who have traversed that minefield before and try to actually keep the women on the subject at hand by saying some shit like, "Now I know it's not all women and I know that, because men don't carry handbags, I never deal with this with men, and that they'd probably do it just as much as women if they did...", and so on.

    Then the women can take themselves out of the spotlight and turn it back on him by saying, "You're hanging out with the wrong women."

    It's his fault now.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Then the women can take themselves out of the spotlight and turn it back on him by saying, "You're hanging out with the wrong women."

    This is the one I hear the most from girls. It can't possibly be them, has to be something I am doing wrong.

    [–]fingerthemoon 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Thanks for teaching me a lesson

    Shit, I used that line to get out of a Facebook problem where I offended a girl I know. She posted a picture of herself in front of a stack of kindling. My comment was something like: "There's a faggot behind you". She got super offended and wrote a long post about intolerance and homophobia etc, etc.

    I decided to publicly apologize, made a statement about homosexuality and how many gay friends I have; it was just a dumb offensive joke and wasn't funny at all; I don't know what I was thinking, thanks for teaching me a lesson, it will never happen again; etc, etc.

    Me and my big mouth. I'm much more careful what I say these days as most people have no sense of humor.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    Fuck that. What you said was factual. That she got butthurt about it is not your problem. You fucked up by apologizing, you validated her irrational bullshit. My gay friends would've laughed at that, then said something equally or even more offensive.

    You're not responsible for their lack of humor or then taking offense.

    They way to handle that is to belittle her tantrum, amused mastery, and chide her for being overly sensitive. Do not logic her, but if you wish to reach the audience viewing her tirade, you can use logic, but it will be lost on her.

    [–]cariboo_j 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    The couple gay guys I've been friends with have pretty thick skin when it comes to gay jokes.

    It's mostly self righteous virtue signalling SJWs that get offended on their behalf.

    Same with this whole Christmas thing. Jewish, Sikh and Chinese people I know have no problem with mainstream Christmas celebrations. It's self righteous virtue signalling white people that are pushing "happy holidays" and what not.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Happy holidays used to mean both Christmas and new years, it wasn't a big deal until churches started losing members, attendance dropped, and they wanted to put religion into everything in the hope of reversing the trend. It started with the evangelical nuts and spread via the media and Fox news constant war on christians bullshit.

    Gotta stay the persecuted victim. Feminists took the pages about that from the religious playbook and now we have victim Olympics. If they aren't as much of a victim as others, they will try to side with them to get sympathy and shame everyone else. That's why I call feminism a religion, they use the same tactics and have a belief system not rooted in reality, but in what they think should be that happens to benefit them personally.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I mean to offend and will state it if they didn't get it. Idgaf about her feelz.

    Don't give a fuck about what she feels. Ever. She sure as hell doesn't care what you feel.

    [–]should_[S] 19 points20 points  (4 children)

    You're right that she lets readers continue in their blue pill mentality unabated in the end, but she's saying what you quote because she doesn't want to be responsible for being anti-feminist; she wants to use plausible deniability if it threatens to bite her in the ass. Not saying that's noble or a good thing. But I do think she wrote the entire article thinking "man, I am sick of women saying all shitiness comes from men," and then wrote about her true experiences.

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Exactly!

    she wants to use plausible deniability if it threatens to bite her in the ass

    The court jester comedian is funny because they are able to see reality and twist it. But they have to be able to cover their ass.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    In short, she is being weak. Half-measures and half-conclusions are the same as no conclusion at all, it's worthless, it detracts from the whole article. She is pandering to women because they have successfully guilt tripped her and gotten away with what they wanted.

    [–]fingerthemoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Maybe she's being smart. Her comments at the end where an Addendum. She's personally witnessed how women can fuck her carrier and how men have helped her. Who does she have more to fear from?

    [–]T0000009 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I noticed that too... Not a word to the bitches who knocked her down, only the ones who helped up.

    [–]markcabal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    She likely paid lip service to the narrative so her feminist sisters would stop attacking her as anti-feminist.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    The majority of men are GOOD, helpful, kind, generous, positive, encouraging, and not threatening

    Nope. The majority of men are just as awful as the majority of women. Keep your guard up or you're in for a surprise. The only saving grace for men is that they are much more likely to act out of reason as compared to the women.

    [–]fingerthemoon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I don't know about 'just as awful', but there's some truth in what you say.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    The difference is respect. If you have theirs, you will have a more positive experience than if they don't respect you. That doesn't mean you can trust them, only that they are less likely to fuck you over.

    [–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I'm an officer at a shipyard. White hardhats (supervisor), bicycles in the yard, and in uniform. The amount of respect I get is just insane. If I ask for a smoke, they'll give me 3. I'll get free food as well. Once I wasn't in uniform and went to talk to some new guys. They didn't even acknowledge me. Now I know why people go on power trips once they gain seniority. Dealing with that everyday for years while you climb the social ladder turns you into... Something else.

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    I have heard the horror stories, first hand
    

    Ah... well if she's heard the horror stories first hand, they absolutely must be true.

    what is her source for believing this? Female comedians! Ya know, the same ones who sabotaged her career, told people not to hire her, ghosted her, made inflammatory remarks, and treated her like shit for no reason.

    Even though she knows women lie and make stuff up, she believes what women say. Even though she sees the anti-male pro-female agenda, she still believes that anti-male pro-female agenda.

    The majority of men are GOOD, helpful, kind, generous, positive, encouraging, and not threatening.

    And the agenda here is to make the GOOD men responsible for the BAD... (obviously the female good (such as it is) are not responsible for the female bad, because NAWALT!) ... if you can make the good men feel guilty, you can extract resources from them.

    Men need to understand that it is not their job to feel guilty for anything that they haven't personally done, nor is it their job to find, punish or fix the men (or the actions of the men) who are bad.

    We are NOT collectively responsible for other men, and cannot be held accountable for them. And if women try, we need to point out that they've been exploiting us for millennia and that they owe us big.

    [–]Endorsed ContributorRedPillDad 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    You're on a roll, loving these comments.

    Doesn't firsthand mean she had to fucking be there herself? Now she hears some chick's overblown story and calls it a firsthand account because it wasn't just a friend-of-a-friend urban legend... Yeah, a disconnect when she believes the nasty things said about men.

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    You're on a roll, loving these comments.

    Yeah... I'm going through a renewed anger phase and trying to productively use that to help educate the only people on the planet interested in listening (ie us).

    Now she hears some chick's overblown story and calls it a firsthand account

    Yeah, she's trying to make it seem more real by tacking "first hand" onto it. "I heard this story of abuse" doesn't sound as good as "I heard this story of abuse first hand". She's trying to imply it must be true because the person speaking to her must have been completely honest. Women are way better at PR than they are at honesty or rational thinking.

    [–]johnchapel 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    To be fair, the majority of male comedians are creepy shitheads, so she's not wrong. I can confirm.

    [–]fingerthemoon 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    It takes a sick and twisted mind to be a successful comedian.

    And what do you mean by "creepy"? They trying to get laid or something? Because that is horrible. /s

    [–]johnchapel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    And what do you mean by "creepy"? They trying to get laid or something? Because that is horrible.

    Overbearing in their social situations, inability to tell the difference between the stage and a conversation, refuses to read social cues while having an occupation that should yield one the ability to control them. Creepy. It exists whether we do or not.

    Why in Gods name would you think that I, someone who posts in redpill would ever call someone creepy for trying to get laid?

    [–]CDBaller 47 points48 points  (16 children)

    Always glad to see some dissent from the Feminazi narrative.

    Also reveals the fundamental nature of women to tear each other down because they see themselves as perpetually in competition with each other and their inability to see that personal growth is something to strive for.

    In Feminazi world, personal growth doesn't happen, therefore backstabbing to have your opportunities come at the expense of others' is the only way to get ahead.

    In contrast, Alpha men realize that an increase in value is not synonymous with a decrease in someone else's because SMV and career value, etc. are not a 0 sum game.

    [–]Indigo_Monkey 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    have an upvote for saying what I wanted to say, but couldn't find the words to execute it.

    [–]Mithra9009 4 points5 points  (10 children)

    SMV and career value, etc. are not a 0 sum game

    Is that really true? I've read people on here argue that when men collectively improve, it'll just raise everyone's standards. Women want the top 20%. If all men get better then that just creates a new top 20%. This is typically expressed along with the sentiment that they're happy that the betas are where they are and don't know what they know.

    [–]SunnyFoxes 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    I understand what they are getting at, but I disagree. At present the 20-80 phenomenon is an observational reality, but it is not the cause.

    The cause is women's sexual desire; what they are attracted to. A women does not think to herself, "Oh! Yes! He is better than 80% of men, therefore I want him."

    She rather feels... "Oh Yes! This guy is turning me on!" That only 20% of men are really turning women on, is the fault of society, that teaches men to be themselves, and not understand sexual attraction, and to "behave".

    This is why self-improvement actually works. I believe that it is entirely possible for men to expand the 20% to say 80% or a 1 to 1 ratio. Every guy here, that is effectively self-improving, is not entering the top 20% (and knocking another guy out), but rather expanding it.

    Thus the goal is to become sexually attractive to women... NOT to be better than 80% of men. At present being sexually attractive to women is to be in the top 20ish % of men; which is just correlation not causation.

    [–]Mithra9009 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    I see. My understanding of hypergamy is that, since only a certain number of men can be leaders, since the hierarchy only allows for a few men at the top (i.e. by nature, we cannot all be winners) then it really is fixed but I guess, with more people improving themselves, the hierarchy would actually expand and thus, there'd be more leaders? If there's more people playing more games then there must be more winners so I guess that makes sense.

    [–]SunnyFoxes 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Forget "the male hierarchy", it is not as important as you think...

    The "male hierarchy" is only one cue in many that women look at. The question is not, "Are you a leader of men?, but rather, "Can (and do) you lead her?"

    Many CEO's have been cuckolded and divorce raped by women. These men are leaders, among the best of the best, yet they failed with women and marriage. Makes you think doesn't it? Being at the top is not a cure all, it's just better than being at the bottom.

    If it can happen to CEO's, to those at the top of the hierarchy, it can happen to anyone. To a woman leadership of men is only a social cue for fitness... one attractor among many. These CEO's and managers fail to lead their wives just like so many other normal men.

    [–]Mithra9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    That's true but I always assumed that it's because, due to his business, that he's simply not there to lead. There's plenty of stories of alpha-as-fuck military men going abroad and finding out that their girl was cheating on them. These are men that can lead but ultimately weren't able to. I mean yes, there's guys like Elon Musk who are alpha as fuck but then go completely beta with women but nonetheless, I assumed that the cuckolding and divorce-raping is because either the woman herself was actually a power-player or she really did just get bored with her leader not being there to lead.

    [–]CDBaller 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    The 80-20 rule states that 20 percent of men have 80 percent of the sex, but this still doesn't make sex a 0 sum game. It's not the "top 20%", just 20%. I've got a buddy with a big fucking beer belly who pulls like mad because his game is on lock. His body is not what you would consider "top 20%", unless it's hanging out in the 19th and 20th percentile and he barely owns the shirt on his back. Then there are even guys who post on here with a job, house, car and security at age 25 who can't pull for shit (sidebar).

    Another way to look at it is this way. 80% of 100 units of sex is 80 units. 80% of 200 units is 160 units. The percentage does not limit the total amount.

    In terms of women getting what they "want", they actually "want" the top 5%, but this is where game, hamstering and tingles come in. "Oh, my vagina sense is tingling. Weeeeell... he looks like he's 6 feet tall. He's not that fat. Did he just say I'm not pretty enough for him? That I'm shallow and vapid? What does vapid even mean? I'm so happy my husband is working late tonight. He might want sex. Gross. Oh hey, Chad wants to do body shots." And on, and on.

    [–]Mithra9009 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I've got a buddy with a big fucking beer belly who pulls like mad because his game is on lock

    How attractive are the women he's pulling? I've heard about unattractive men getting girls. The twist is always either that the women are so repulsive that most men wouldn't touch them with a yardstick or they're actually attractive and the "fat friend" really isn't that fat at all. He's what, 20lbs overweight?

    The guys who have the looks and money but have no game wouldn't really disqualify the model either. Game is essential to seduction. A high value man who can't seduce is like a highly flammable liquid that can't ignite. The potential energy is still there, it just needs the ignition.

    How can the number of units of sex increase without increasing the population and the 80-20 rule still holding? How can there be more sex and the sex still be concentrated to the same small group of individuals? In order for the 80-20 rule to still hold, you'd need a small number of men who'd basically be nymphomaniacs, having sex borderline constantly, several times per day. These men would also be the best in terms of money, looks, etc. Basically, the picture you seem to be painting is that if more men improve and the amount of sex increases, then, due to the abundance of sex for everyone, we actually enter the communist/feminist "free-love" utopia where everyone is having just as much sex with every one else. Then again, I suppose I have seen people argue that communism is capitalism's final result. Self-improvement being taken up by everyone leads to everyone living well.

    [–]CDBaller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I'd put him around 30 lbs over, but I'll guarantee that weight comes purely from the volume of alcohol he drinks. He maintains an active lifestyle, but he doesn't lift. I'd say he averages a 7 in his women. I won't lie and say he hasn't jumped on some grenades, but I've been genuinely surprised (pre-RP) at some of the girls he's LTRed.

    Sure, even a blind squirrel eventually finds a nut or 2, but it's not like those guys are regularly getting sexed up or they're the guys getting 80% of the sex. If a guy has the assets and no game, he's probably getting married to the first girl smart enough to lock him down.

    The volume of sex increase without a corresponding increase in population because we're looking at a snapshot in time (as if we were looking at economic theory). Those newborns do not affect the marketplace until they reach maturity, by which point, the marketplace will have changed. The factors influencing the volume of sex are largely dependent on tingles and the reason they stay concentrated to a small group is because that group are the alphas or "alphas in training" of the world, who can cause those tingles.

    I wouldn't be surprised if, because of an event in the general population, such as a sudden RP awakening or a sudden interest in lifting increased the sexual volume of the country. This is a parallel to what conservative economic theory suggests when it talks about increasing the standard of living, "a rising tide lifts all boats".

    I can't quite remember the link and I'll have to look it up in the sidebar, but the distribution under a more patriarchal society was more even. 80-20 is the rule now, but was not before feminism and women's sexual liberation. 80-20 is not a hard and fast rule. It's just a rule that applies right now, barring a cataclysmic shift in the sexual marketplace.

    [–]AcrossHallowedGround -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

    It's not the "top" 20%. It's just 20%.

    [–]Mithra9009 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    And this 20% are the men at the top, yes? Would "men above the 20th percentile" be better then?

    [–]cariboo_j 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Depends what metric you use for "top".

    Top 20℅ income? No.

    Top 20% fitness? No.

    Top 20% game? Probably.

    But then again if you are really good at getting sluts to spread their legs that doesn't necessarily mean you are successful in other areas of life...

    [–]fingerthemoon 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Alpha men may not feel threatened by you but Beta men will act like women and back-stab, try to take you down a notch while being nice to your face. I've personally witnessed this so many times, even from guys I considered brothers.

    When I see a guy who clearly has higher SMV than me I might envy him a little but I don't ever feel hatred. If anything I look up to him, respect him and want to be friends. Maybe some of his awesomeness will rub off on me.

    [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    This is displayed in the automotive world, particularly in illicit street racing. If you are fast, some men like me will work to get faster than you are, lighten the car, make more power, get it to hook better, find a way to get around you and out think you. Getting faster is the masculine way.

    Others seem to know they aren't as smart, can't figure out how to go faster than you, so they sabotage your car, or try to fight and intimidate you. That is the feminine way.

    I've had two engines fucked up by jealous losers, they thought they were so badass, but then I come along with what appears to be a heap slapped together out of junk, that sounds like I am "driving to the store for a loaf of bread rather than racing" and they get butthurt. Lead shotgun shot dumped in one engine, gravel down the carb of the other.

    The same thing happens right here in trp when I mention how much I can lift. Some simply set a goal to get where I am and work towards it, others can't imagine that anyone else could possibly be stronger than they are and start shouting "Bullshit!" It doesn't make you less of a man because I can lift more than most men, it doesn't affect you in any way, but they are so insecure, so feminine thinking, that they can't stand the thought that an old fat looking guy can lift double what they have struggled to achieve.

    This is common in men (particularly weak men), but ubiquitous in females as they are almost entirely weak. It is standard operating procedure for girls to undercut each other when one appears to be better in some way. They're crabs in a bucket.

    [–]CDBaller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Exactly. When I go to the gym and see some guy with his bar stacked, I remember that he started somewhere and that if I keep lifting, I will be where he is, eventually, but I have to follow his example and put in the work.

    [–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (4 children)

    Comments are pretty amazing - ok, not that surprising after all we read here. She was asked, very pointedly, to give experiences of men who harrassed her. She wasn't able to oblige (so sorry), and in fact showed that it was women who had been the problem. The comments, many of them, could be summarized as, "You aren't following the narrative, bitch! You were supposed to say something about evil patriarchal shitlords, I mean, what is wrong with you anyway!" Poor girl, had to add an addendum pointing out that she wasn't being disloyal to feminists (who support equality and freedom for women to do and say what they want, hail Mary, hail Mary), no way! She sure wished she could have blamed men for it all, honest! And for sure her experiences are an outlier, because she can attest to other women who had problems exclusively with men, so the fault must be hers. She wasn't sexy enough, or something, to make men behave like men really are around her. Hell, even well know shitlord misogynists like Patrice O'Neil actually helped her. Must have been a mistake on his part, obviously.

    How any woman can be so naive as to think that a question like that by a feminist was meant to elicit an honest answer is beyond me. What part of 'female supremacist movement' didn't you understand?

    [–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 32 points33 points  (3 children)

    The comments indeed.

    Brianna says: February 11, 2016 at 8:50 pm I find that this undercuts the very true and real harassment of women in comedy. One might say this piece is not helpful to the movement— which is so incredibly overdue. If I was feeling outlandish, I would bring in an Uncle Tom comparison. I am not feeling outlandish, today.

    That's right. Having guys whistle at your ass is totally the same as getting beaten by a whip if you don't pick cotton fast enough.

    [–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (2 children)

    One might say this piece is not helpful to the movement— which is so incredibly overdue.

    You know what also wasn't helpful to the movement, Brianna? Women.

    I'd say they set themselves back from the very beginning...

    I'd say it started with the White Feather Movement - so Zero-Day Feminism.

    The White Feather Movement was the massive shaming of men by women to sign up for war by giving them a White Feather. It was also used as a way for women to get rid of their ex-boyfriends.

    http://the-white-feather-movement-worldwarone.wikispaces.com/

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Agree... except women didn't think of it.

    [–]Rathadin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    How telling. Women given power because they feel powerless, and then they abuse it and its taken away for World War II.

    You'd think we Americans would have learned something from that, and you'd think the the rest of Europe would have taken that lesson to heart, but I suppose not.

    [–]Assassin1476 23 points24 points  (8 children)

    Feminist remind me of cry baby Anakin Skywalker and his whiny voice right before he fought Obi- Wan "If you're not with me...then you're against meeeee!"

    [–]Money_Bags97 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooo.....

    [–]spunk_wizard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    From my point of view, the MEN are evil!

    [–]RadicalRad1 3 points4 points  (3 children)

    -Only a woman deals in absolutes-

    [–]SunnyFoxes 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Wrong.

    Only a fool deals in absolutes... Plenty of men are fools too.

    [–]RadicalRad1 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    It was just a joke/quote. That's not my actual opinion

    [–]SunnyFoxes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Ahhh... I see...

    • Only a Sith / fool woman deals in absolutes. -

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

    [–]foldpak111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    You should see my former roommate. "Fucking insane" is an understatement. To be honest, it's some undefinable shit and was epic to watch her slow, misandristic downfall from the watchtower. Fat bitch can get rocked.

    [–]T0000009 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    Men will make a thousand more pies....

    Females will fight over ONE slice of pie...

    Dudes generally will help a chick out, even if we are not to keen on getting in the knickers, but the same chick will torch her own house just to get a chance to chat up some random bloke.

    [–]johnchapel 16 points17 points  (5 children)

    I know who she's talking about when she says "A very famous female comedian" and its coincidentally, exactly who you guys think it is.

    [–]Five_Decades 6 points7 points  (3 children)

    Do tell. Please be Amy Schumer.

    [–]PaperbackParrot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    That would be the best bet

    [–]1Sir_Distic 5 points6 points  (1 child)

    [–]foldpak111 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Hilarious how people agree if you tell them the truth in a comedic way. He's basically saying the same shit we say here and everyone is eating it up. The clip of that African-American girl laughing hysterically and nodding her head says it all. It's so easy to manipulate humans it's pathetic. Whatever, as long as I get mine...

    [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children)

    Women are so good at keeping each other down. I see it everywhere I go, the cattiness. Yet we never talk about toxic femininity.

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    They flatter and soothe each other to their faces. Then when one of them turns around, they stab them in the back only others can her but not the attacked woman.

    Instead of saying "stop talking shit" people just agree with them. This even happens at my kickboxing club where the female instructor got shit-talked by women to the male instructor. Instead of calling them out he just acts like a buffoon and let's it slide.

    "Her drills are too easy for me, it's really boring and pointless for me".

    Bitch please, then why the fuck are you in the beginners' class for a second time. Victim mentality and no accountability. Nothing new here folks, move along.

    [–]RadicalRad1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    "You can't put us down, only we can put us down!"

    [–]denart4 4 points5 points  (3 children)

    Good to see there are still a few women out there breaking the feminist narrative.

    [–]gonorealover 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    lol you know nothing about women. When shit hits the fan they will side with any other women regardless if they are feminist or not .

    Female Group preference is an absolute mentality in every women.

    Do not let this one female comedian fool you . AWALT

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    When shit hits the fan they will side with any other women

    as indeed she did in the followup

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    She's targeting the male audience for the sake of her career. All of the showbiz cunts making gender based statements usually only want the limelight and the 2 minutes of fame.

    [–]nuesuh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    going against the feminist narrative

    rookie mistake. Now she's going to get roasted

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Ahahahaha. I love when feminists attack women. Their angry hypocrisy never fails to fuel my wet dreams.

    [–]tallwheel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Female comedian says she's NOT victim of male harassment

    That headline could make a good The Onion article.

    [–]sheyLboogie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Women are the worst enemy to other women. No matter what you think there will always be jealously and envy when multiple women "work" together.

    [–]AcedtheTuringTest 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    I've met and spoken with Jessica, an absolute sweetheart and does some more 'controversial' musical comedy, including a "don't rape me" type of jingle, complete with a 'rape whistle' you blow in sync with the song. It's a real blast and something overly sensitive feminazi types just love.

    [–]should_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I've worked with her once! She's great.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    No surprise there. Socialists hate it when their narrative is not in sync with reality and let's be honest, socialists are profoundly reality impaired people. However, if socialists don't like that this truth doesn't fit their narrative, then they better not interview anyone who's worked in a home for psychotic children. The hamster might fall out of the wheel with that one.

    [–]should_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    home for psychotic children

    hmm? can you say more? something to do with 70% of murderers/rapists/criminals being from single mom homes?

    [–]RICCIedm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    This title attracts all feminists, so the outrage was obvious.

    [–]anooblol 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Just saying... I read through the comments. All of them were supportive from what I saw. Maybe the negative ones were removed?

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I'm not going to give it another page view, but that is interesting. When I viewed it, there were a lot of negative comments along the lines of 'you are letting the side down'. It would be ironic if this was our doing. We know feminists and manginas read this sub (TBP is dedicated to it), so if they picked up the comments here about the comments there, and basically went back to her and told her to delete any negative comments because it was confirming the way feminists oppress women, well that would be something.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I totally believe Dante Nero would play chauffeur to some up and coming comedienne. He just seems like that kind of guy.

    [–]1iluminatiNYC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I think this blog points out the fact that when women fight with each other, it's almost always passive aggressive. Yes, you have the occasional Worldstar moment, but this are relatively rare. Since women have a hard time telling legitimate friendship from an attempt to fight obviously develop trust issues.

    Say what you will about men, but our intentions, good or ill, are usually made plain.

    [–]prodigy2throw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I respect the shoutout to Dante Nero. If you haven't already, you should check out the podcast he had with Patrice oneil called the Black Phillip Show. Subsequently changed to the Beige Phillip Show after the death of Patrice.

    Loads of red pill advice and wisdom.

    [–]tokti 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This is why I never discuss any issue (feminism, politics, religion, etc) outside of Reddit. Too little reward for the risk of being branded as "problematic."

    [–]darkrood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    ooo...Girl just diss the sisterhood.

    you don't diss the sisterhood.

    (Saves the post, takes a shower, preps the snack)

    [–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    When a group of people are the cause of their own problems and are too oblivious to realize it, that is scary. I have no words to describe my utter disgust. 2016 will be the deciding factor in whether liberal crazies get to continue their fascist regime. Their bubble is going to pop and they know it. That's why they are doubling down on their efforts with feminist/liberal campaigns on CNN (I see it daily at the McDonalds I go to).

    [–]should_[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Good comment but you shouldn't be going to McDonalds daily. Not saying that like an elitist suburbanite but in an eat-clean-and-lift-bro way.

    [–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I go there for the free wifi.

    [–]tvrdloch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    I dont think its clickbait-titled.. its a response to those wanting her to write about men who harassed her