596
597

Red Pill ExampleWomen now writing guides to gold-digging. Open hypergamy is here. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by RidleySmith

Short version:

A woman wrote a guide to how to successfully fuck for money. The rationalisations are... Exactly what you'd expect. This is another example of the open hypergamy Rollo describes. Women don't even try to hide it anymore it seems.

Body:

The book is called "fuck for money: why gold digging is safe and smart and why everyone should do it"

In th description of the book on Amazon, here's what the author (Nina York) writes:

It’s not easy these days to make ends meet. You work your backside off, but if you can make the rent at the end of the month it’s a miracle. What happened to your dreams of living the high life? Designer bags and shoes, long vacations in exotic locations, expensive lunches and beautiful dinners. What happened to the dream of never having to worry about money? Have you given up on it all? Has conforming to the socially acceptable rules of relationships and careers left you resigned to never, ever making it?

Yeah. Making rent is hard. And shoes are just soooo pretty. You should totally just fuck instead.

Why you should become a gold digger. No, I didn’t say ‘why you should become a prostitute.’ There’s a hell of a difference.

But is there really?

And if you’re open, honest, and take care to search out the right people, you can even do it without hurting a soul. Don’t listen to the voices of disapproval, with their stereotypical disgust and dismay.

Thank god women are known for their honesty, and gold-digging whores don't act like.... Gold-digging whores.

Clear the image of trashy, slutty ho's from your mind. Replace it with one of a hard-working, respectable woman, or man, who knows exactly what he or she wants and works hard to get it.

Lol.

when you do it right, your dignity will remain completely intact.

Yeah, by removing the crushing burden of dignity to begin with.

http://www.amazon.com.au/Money-digging-Smart-Everyone-Should-ebook/dp/B00VAY3RSC/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1457177749&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=Digging+up+mother

Lessons:

Women can and will rationalise anything to optimise their sexual duplicity.

Do not trust women.

Protect your assets.


[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 221 points222 points  (87 children)

Why you should become a gold digger. No, I didn’t say ‘why you should become a prostitute.’ There’s a hell of a difference.

Because gold digging can be way more profitable.

A while back there was a submission: Hedge-Fund Tycoon Hohn’s Wife Gets $530 Million Divorce Payout

As I mentioned in that thread: with that money, he could have paid for a $1000/hr prostitute 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 60 years.

Even with more "normal" divorces, many men are angry to discover that for the amount they're paying out in the settlement, they could have been serviced well and often by a large variety of mid-level prostitutes for the entire length of their sexless marriage (and maybe more).

[–]1thiasus 99 points100 points  (32 children)

Because gold digging can be way more profitable.

And much less work. Prostitutes only make money so long as they keep fucking johns. A gold digger only has to put in the work until he's said "yes" in front of a priest, then she can cash out and be set for many years if not life.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 63 points64 points  (9 children)

So you're telling me women CAN exercise discipline and commitment to reach a goal?

[–]1MCMLVII 47 points48 points  (6 children)

Ohhh yes they can.

Source: my older sister boasted of spending years scheming to trick her husband into knocking her up a few more times. It worked, he believes they were all "accidents." She feels no guilt about it.

[–]2awalt_cupcake 75 points76 points  (3 children)

I had an ex ask me after a hard fuck session one night what we were going to do if she gets pregnant.

I rested my hand on her bare stomach and said simply "we'll have to kill it." Her eyes widened. Of course I'm implying abortion.

No more "scares" from her after that.

[–]night-addict 47 points48 points  (1 child)

bruh that's some House of Cards shit, I love it

[–]nrjk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

House of Cards II: The Chronicles of Tank Upperwood

[–]LetsGoAllTheWhey 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Happened to a friend of mine too. His wife lied about taking birth control. She's a scheming bitch.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They're all scheming bitches.

FTFY

[–]batfish55 29 points30 points  (2 children)

And that's why I respect prostitutes more than women looking for a husband.

[–]Five_Decades 18 points19 points  (15 children)

If you assume 2 years until marriage, and sex 2x a week in that time period that works out to 200 lays. A prostitite may start at $100, so that is $20,000 to hire an escort instead of a gold digger.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (7 children)

A wedding alone is more expensive than that

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 18 points19 points  (0 children)

In his Be a Skittles Man article, Heartiste mentions one guy who spent $15k on the flowers alone:

I just attended a wedding the bill for which, paid mostly by the parents of the bride but with substantial input from the groom’s parents, would easily pay for the private education of several children. It could have paid for a modest but nice house in a good neighborhood in many parts of the country. Hint: The flowers cost about $15,000.

[–]PanzerBatallion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Only if you're doing it wrong.

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (9 children)

Recently there was a Chinese billionaire who bought a famous half Russian/half Japanese porn star for $5 million euros on a 15 year contract. This guy is doing it right.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/peoplesdaily/article-3083293/Chinese-billionaire-pays-5million-hire-Japanese-porn-star-personal-assistant-15-years.html

[–]1PrinceofSpades 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Well today I learned japanese people need to intermingle with Russian people and produce more hot women for the world.

[–]1thiasus 23 points24 points  (5 children)

$5 million euros on a 15 year contract. This guy is doing it right.

$300.000 a year is $820 a day. For that much you can fuck a pantone palette of different women, and their looks won't fade over 15 years unlike his chick. This guy is a sucker, just a higher class of sucker.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

Considering he is a multibillionaire, 5 mil is chump change to him.

Also, who said he's exclusive with this woman? Dude has a fucking harem of women waiting for his dick considering how rich he is. He's not a sucker, this is the equivalent of paying $10 to hire a prostitute that you can stick your dick in whenever you like.

[–]burgundypill 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Plus, even when you're fucking a bunch of different women, sometimes we all get suckered in with oneitis when we want one pussy on the reg. This arrangement prevents that.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

One of my dad's business partners is a good friend of mine and had a buddy who got a divorce. He was well off. He went and calculated how many times they had sex and then figured out how much money he lost in the divorce. It was well over $500 per lay.

[–]ShitlerParty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don't pay them for the sex, you pay them to get the fuck out when you're done.

[–]vvancruz 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Wise words. 1/2 is 1/2 and hurts regardless how much or how little you make.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would assume it hurts more the less you make up to a point.

[–]RidleySmith[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. Never thought about it like that before. God damn does the argument for MGTOW seem solid.

[–]MEANMUTHAFUKA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow..... That's some sobering math.

[–]no_face 6 points7 points  (6 children)

For the average schlub:

maid service 4x a week = $400/month
restaurant bills $20/day or so= $600/month
sex $500/week = $2000/month

So your net cost would be about $3000/month or $36000/yr

[–]1thiasus 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The average schlub doesn't get a woman who cleans his house and cooks his meals, this isn't the twenties anymore.

[–]grewapair 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Most of my ex gfs couldn't boil water. They were incensed when a proposal wasn't forthcoming.

What I finally did was to move into a small 1 bedroom apartment that I can clean in 5 minutes a day. Cheaper to live in something small and I don't need any help.

[–]eaton80 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Cheaper than marriage+divorce+alimony. Would be even cheaper if one learns to cook a la Tom Leykis.

Also can't beat the variety and peace of mind.

[–]Luckyluke23 1 point2 points  (3 children)

if i ever make that kind of money, you know i'm going out like charlie sheen.

hookers and blow everywhere... why have one ho when you can have them all?

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 7 points8 points  (2 children)

There was actually a guy on Reddit who (if you believe his story) was going to Mexico to off himself. He ended up in a brothel and had his first threesome. Suddenly things started looking up in his life and he decided to live.

[–]Luckyluke23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so your saving move to mexico and do hookers and blow?

I saw that guy it was a pretty cool stroy.

[–]garlicextract 1 point2 points  (1 child)

As I mentioned in that thread: with that money, he could have paid for a $1000/hr prostitute 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 60 years.

Yeah... That's what he actually did, if you think about it. Except it was more lie $2000/hr

[–]tedted8888 8 points9 points  (22 children)

Even with more "normal" divorces, many men are angry to discover that for the amount they're paying out in the settlement, they could have been serviced well and often by a large variety of mid-level prostitutes for the entire length of their sexless marriage (and maybe more).

Yes and no. IMO this is sort of like politicians saying we reduced the budget, when you find out that their original budget had a deficit of 1 trillion and the new budget has a deficit of 0.8 trillion. They saved 200 Billion!.

Women offer more than just warm fleshlight. There is a certain amount of companionship, bragging rights, trophy, decoration and beauty that cant be quantified by a $/hr. But if shes not offering the sex, shes probably not offering anything else. Only we can decide if we want to spend the time and effort to find a high quality woman, or we just want to pay for prostitutes.

[–]1PrinceofSpades 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure if you're paying a prostitute 1,000$/hr 24/7 for 60 years for the otherwise same price as your divorce settlement, she's going to do her damn best to make sure she looks like the hottest arm candy in the room.

[–]redzorp 13 points14 points  (7 children)

There is a certain amount of companionship, bragging rights, trophy, decoration and beauty that cant be quantified by a $/hr.

This is a beta mentality and a large part of why we are in this mess today.

Can't be quantified by $/hr? But that is EXACTLY what women and BDG have done. They have quantified it. They say all those things are worth half of everything you are worth today and half of everything you will be worth over the next 7-20 years, or in some states - over the REST OF YOUR LIFE.

Also, many of those same elements: companionship, bragging rights, status etc... are given by the man to the woman. So this is an EVEN EXCHANGE. Why in the hell should only one gender pay the other for these things? This is the age-old disease of putting pussy on a pedestal. You (and most men in the world, unfortunately) think that women are the prize. That's pure beta.

You are the prize, not woman

Btw, not attacking you. Just pointing out that your sentiment is exactly the type of thinking that has led us to where we are now.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (7 children)

"Women offer more than just warm fleshlight."

I have to admit. I'm curious of how the designers of the fleshlight toy didn't think to include a scaled down heating system like the ones you find inside heated blankets or maybe car seats and motorcycle grips.

[–]Tman5691 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Nobody wants a heating coil that close to their junk.

[–]cptspiffy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

didn't think to include a scaled down heating system like the ones you find inside heated blankets or maybe car seats and motorcycle grips.

It's like the George Foreman grill when it didn't come with removable cooking surfaces. Wait until everyone buys one, then come out with the killer app that makes everyone buy it again.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Some knob could fall asleep during the fap process with his little man stuck in the fleshlight.

This could lead to a fire outbreak or serious burn which could cause several lawsuits lol!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This actually makes sense!

I suppose they thought of it and it probably wasn't worth the risk.

[–]choikwa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you my friend have a great business idea. patent this thing!

[–]1thiasus 8 points9 points  (1 child)

There is a certain amount of companionship, bragging rights, trophy, decoration and beauty that cant be quantified by a $/hr.

Sure they can. There are escorts who'll talk to you about the fine points of stoicism, entertain your friends as the most charming hostesses and look like a classier brand of swimsuit model, all for a hefty hourly rate.

[–]BlueFreedom420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's amazing how blue pill these rich guys can be.

[–]1rporion 157 points158 points  (16 children)

There is a difference between that and prostitution.

When it comes to prostitution, what you see is what you get.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]1EarthExile 134 points135 points  (2 children)

    Yup. Prostitute is a job. Gold digging is a hustle.

    [–]Bufflegends 15 points16 points  (0 children)

    best comparison I've read to date.

    [–]aazav 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Whether it is a hustle or not, it doesn't mean you have to respect it.

    You can note it and choose to regard it as a low level scam that the hustler has to do - because that is the most they are capable of.

    This marks it as displaying limits of the scammer. That is all they have. They are playing all their cards and there is nothing else they can offer.

    That, that is pathetic and to be regarded with derision.

    [–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (4 children)

    And when you're just a corpse she cries the victim because: you ran out of blood, didn't put blood aside just in case she drank all of it, etc.

    [–]aazav 8 points9 points  (1 child)

    I just evicted a tenant's wife today who sucked his money, cheated on him, never saved anything and is now fucked because fear of her destruction of his property.

    Leeches. Opportunistic leeches.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    You were downvoted for some reason. I think we have some BPers floating around in here.

    [–]eaton80 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    And that's when the Family Court tells you to get 3 jobs so you can keep paying her the alimonies, plus a life insurance contract to keep paying from beyond the grave should you die sooner than her.

    [–]beachbbqlover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    leave the country. life on a tropical island aint half bad.

    [–]aazav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    A leech, lamprey, tapeworm, a blood sucker who feeds until she can leave to find a better host.

    [–]1thiasus 23 points24 points  (1 child)

    It's the same with gold diggers, the problem is that the plugged in can not see. Gold diggers put everything there on display: what they want, what they are doing to get it, what kind of person they are. Men who fall for it are not deceived by the gold digger, they are deceived by decades of social programming that make them superimpose images of idyllic relationships over the reality they have in front of them.

    It's the reason why even johns can fall in love with their prostitutes even as they know she's in it for the money. Decades of Disney-type social conditioning makes them still yearn for that magical happily ever after, which they project on their life.

    [–]1rporion 11 points12 points  (0 children)

    I am not disagreeing you per se, but I do believe that it makes a difference whether she does her very best to deceive you, or whether you do your very best to deceive yourself.

    I am of course aware that prostitution involves a certain amount of deception, but there is a difference between making you believe that you have the wonder cock that can do no wrong vs feelings being involved.

    [–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

    And what you get is Chlamydia.

    ...

    I'm only half kidding. At least with a whore they're just as concerned about protection as you. You never know with a gold digger. Someone who is so veiled with their intentions is less trustworthy than a whore.

    [–]intuition25 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    "The most expensive sex is free sex." - Woody Allen

    [–]aazav 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    When it comes to prostitution,…

    You get what you pay for and then you walk away.

    [–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 54 points55 points  (11 children)

    "What happened to your dreams of living the high life? Designer bags and shoes, long vacations in exotic locations, expensive lunches and beautiful dinners. What happened to the dream of never having to worry about money?"

    I'd like to take the opportunity to point several things out:

    1. These dreams are a product of television advertisements, either through commercials, or through shows like Sex and the City, which advertise women living the high life and hypergamously pursuing high-earning men in New York City as a "normal" lifestyle or as an aspirational one, depending on what rung of the socio-economic ladder the woman is born into. If she's rich, she wants to maintain her "normal," and also needs role-models to emulate to do so; if she's poor she wants to have a nice lifestyle that she's constantly seeing shown to her, but that she never gets to experience. I grew up affluent, but I voluntarily experienced several kinds of poverty, some out of ignorance, some out of stupidity, and some as an experiment, and let me tell you: it fucking sucks. And another thing, it quickly becomes apparent that the system wants to keep poor people poor. It's constantly ripping them off: low wages, union-busting, taxes, high prices relative to wages on necessities. It's like piranhas eating a cow. It takes adamantium discipline and luck to escape from poverty.

    2. The "dreams" created by the television are the product of rich people who have never-ending supplies of money relative to the common person. They create these dreams to control people. They want people to chase money, but never get wealthy. If you are wealthy, its like you have a never ending stream of money coming in because you own so many things of value that produce revenues for you: businesses, stock, bonds, land that you rent out, royalties, etc. Accordingly, with this revenue stream, you can buy and sell everyone and everything, as long as they are poor and need money to live. In order to keep a steady supply of wage-slaves, you need to coerce them into overpaying for necessities, and persuade them into buying frivolous luxury items. Everyone is subject to economic coercion, but only the poor really experience how coercive it is because their money buys them so little. The middle classes have to be impoverished through persuasion, and that's where the luxury goods marketing comes into play. For the super-rich, luxury goods are trinkets that they can toss out like crumbs because they own the means of production.

    3. The super-rich want people to be materialistic and gold-digging because they own all the gold, and if people are constantly seeking that gold, it gives them power. Imagine if nobody wanted money or gold or luxury goods! The rich would lose any insane amount of political power. To insure that won't happen, they economically coerce everyone into working for a living to buy the necessities. As a caveat, people who can afford to live can also afford to reproduce, and it becomes a never-ending problem for the elites to keep enough people occupied to not create political instability that would threaten their position. So things aren't entirely under their control, but rather they have to ride the tiger and harness and channel natural forces like the individual en masse's independent will to sexual reproduction.

    4. With regard to point 3., rich men WANT women to be whores for money. Sure, they may say otherwise, but why else would they accumulate all that wealth? Just for the "challenge?" Some would. But it's pretty obvious that wealth attracts women. In a socialist society, where wealth is evenly distributed and the necessities and even some "luxuries" are affordable to most people, extreme wealth doesn't go as far in terms of buying off women. The quality and quantity of the women the rich can buy off goes down. Their money has less power. If you have a culture where the women are moral, non-materialistic, and spiritual, the most attractive ones won't select mates based purely on income. On the other hand, the more wealth inequality, the more that extreme wealth can buy because everyone is poor and needs to toady to the rich to get ahead. And usually material poverty is a product of spiritual poverty, where people are corrupted and then can't work themselves into a material surplus.

    5. So, this is basically part of the rich people's propaganda to encourage women to do what they want them to do: be money-chasing gold-diggers who chase trinkets so they are easily and cheaply bought-off by the wealthy for the purposes of RAISING THE SUPPLY OF CHEAPLY BOUGHT GOLDING-DIGGING WHORES TO LOWER THE AMOUNT OF MONEY IT TAKES TO BUY THEM SO THE RICH MEN WILL ALWAYS HAVE A HIGH SUPPLY OF VAGINAS TO PLUNDER. BAGS, TRIPS, AND BAUBLES ARE NOTHING TO THE RICH MAN. Conversely, the poor working class stiffs have to sacrifice a years pay to buy those things.

    [–]untonyto 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Simply epic breakdown this. Kinda motivating too - in a chilling way.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (6 children)

    Nice treatise on capitalism, thank you.

    [–]steelerfaninperu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Conversely, the poor working class stiffs have to sacrifice a years pay to buy those things.

    Unless said working class stiff gets off his ass, goes to the gym, ups his game, and gives her more tingles than Mr. Pennybags got gold.

    [–]chocobaby 44 points45 points  (5 children)

    AWALT. Facebook, Snapchat, Insta, Tinder, OKC, cellphones with cameras, the "modern" world is tailor made for women's hypergamy. Get used to working with it, not against it. It's here to stay. Remember, in the most simplistic sense, females are eggs and males are sperm. The egg presents itself and waits for the onslaught of sperm suitors. The egg then decides which sperm is "best" and it gets in. As men, we are sperm. We seek out eggs, along with millions of our brethren, and do our "best" to be the one chosen. It's really that simple. No one said anything about fair or balanced. It is what it is. The "war" between the sexes has always been about males trying to limit the amount of "other" sperm reaching the egg of our desire. The egg always tries to expose herself to as many sperm as possible, so as to have the best possible field to choose from. In the last 50-10 years, women's ability to expose themselves to multitudes of sperm suitors, in a socially acceptable (or secret)way has increased a thousand fold. There is no turning back the clock gents. You just have to craft your desire-ability carefully and stick to your frame/game, or you will be replaced within seconds. Give'm an inch, and they'll take a mile.

    [–]1Jax77789 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Well I have some doubts about women being the selectors. I have not looked at any data but I think the male / female ratio is about 50/50 in the west. It is not like women were rare, far from it. Environnemental factors also favor more women. Women are as chosen as we are. I think this part of the pussy pedestalization scam/ FI propaganda.

    Moreover, unchecked hypergamy leads to dysgenic progression ( see the recent posts on the rational male) and social problems. Women cannot be the selectors in a civilization.

    [–]chocobaby 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Well, I never said women are rare. That's not the issue. On a biological level the egg allows one (and very rarely two) sperm inside. In the macrocosm, women open their legs at their discretion, hence they select. Unless you're talking rape, they are the selectors. They may select Mr X because he did a great job of seduction, or because he's a millionaire, but they select nonetheless.

    [–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (22 children)

    Women seeking resources from a high value man? How novel. So what? That's exactly what traditionalists are looking for. Staying at home raising kids using your resources? Bad. Pay your own way! Working on a corporate career? Bad. You should be at home making babies! Seriously guys. Any kind of a relationship with women will require resources. And that's all women want from you. Get used to it.

    [–]1rporion 17 points18 points  (6 children)

    You are not wrong.

    However, I would consider it a success if most men thought in these terms.

    Then, let the negotiations begin.

    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (5 children)

    Probably the biggest mistake you can make is not finding an intelligent woman. I have a RP sister who's getting her PHD. Yes she still ruled by her emotions, but she is smart enough to understand the dynamic and listen to reason after her emotions subside. Who realizes that with a PhD in stem, she will make more money than most men and has accepted that. Currently settling for a man that makes 30k a year at best. But is quite attractive.

    She was raised by her mother married to her father for 30 years. A woman who's father was born on a chicken farm and raised during the great depression. Who's mother died when she was age four. From her father, back when men were men, she was raised with pride and self reliance. My sisters mother was more masculine than most women. Never wore makeup. Negotiated salaries like a man. Would never take handouts. Handled money frugally and was never into high end fashion. She had to support herself financially from the age of 18. She understood that if a man was paying her way financially that she would have the house clean and dinner ready when he got home. Who would do so even after 20 years of marriage.

    There are smart women out there. You really have to vet them though. And for God's sake, they're still women. Don't expect a smart woman to act exactly as a smart man.

    Moral of the story? There are women out there that are worthy of marriage. I do live in a smaller town in the Midwest USA. If you're living in a large city 500k+, good luck, but I doubt you'll find anything of worth.

    [–]1PrinceofSpades 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    Are you saying men should want a woman who's socially intelligent and intellectually not so much, or vice versa? Having both is a recipe for disaster. Having a RPW is a good or bad thing depending on if she's using her knowledge to be selfish and get away with being a slut and a cheat, or to be selfless for the sake of starting a family someday.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    A woman being smart and a sociopath is a recipe for disaster. Dread game destorys women's instinct to cheat, assuming you have enough relative value. It doesn't matter whether she has a uni degree or not or if she's religious or not. If she understands the male/female dynamic, whether on an intellectual or instinct, she's already ahead of most women. Then you vet for sociopathy.

    If you do choose to get married, be prepared to get fucked. It's bound to happen on a long enough time line. Personally I would skip the country and say fuck it.

    While I believe that of the two male reproduction strategies, raising your children will give them the best chance, going for sheer numbers and letting daddy government pay for it is much more viable in this time.

    My mother and sister are not sociopaths. Both want/ed a family and never cared for vapid bullshit that most girls fall victim too. My mother understood the game on an instinctual level.* My sister understands it on an intellectual level that is confirmed by her feelings that, I assume, she is able to analyze rationally unlike most people.

    • Note: My father is a very capable man in many respects to blue collar work. A very nice man that is hard to not get along with. He flirts with almost any woman, yet never intended to cheat (unintended dread game). Though he is not a push over. He will stand up for himself if he's getting the shaft or being outright disrespected. He's the closest thing I've seen to a male unicorn. He also has two ex wife's. No matter how good you play the game, you'll eventually lose. But that doesn't mean you can't win once. And once is all you need.

    [–]beachbbqlover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    its not selfless for her to pursue a family, thats exactly her primary drive as it is yours, whether or not you accept or override it. the resources one is based more on her exposure to cooperative vs competitive resource environments, and the modern hypergamy and gold digging stems from capitalism pushing a competitive perspective.

    [–]burgundypill 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Your sister might be a great RPW, but I am certain most PhD-holding women are not RPW.

    I am currently halfway through my PhD, and the women I work with are dreadful, hateful, feminists. I have become friends with them, which has been very useful in illustrating the principles I read on TRP. I've watched them for years hitting the cock carousel, and now they are struggling to find men because they are hitting their late 20s (other than a new one night stand every few weeks). None of them are in relationships, and haven't been for years. They share inane bullshit on facebook about how hard women have it in the workplace/society/politics.

    My personal experience is that dumb women are more suitable. They are often more friendly and understand the benefits of gender roles.

    [–]bokehnikon 24 points25 points  (8 children)

    True, but women these days don't live up to their end of the bargain. They want to spend their best years CCing. They want to pursue a career and end up serving a "corporate boyfriend" during their most fertile years. Then, after she's had her fun, a woman wants a man to commit to her and play the provider role. Then she gets "bored" with the marriage and breaks up a family to seek new thrills, while grabbing child support and alimony prizes.

    The traditional marriage sought by some men entails meeting a worthy woman when she is young, not after she's been CC'd and worn out by the corporate grind.

    Any kind of a relationship with women will require resources.

    Any kind? Ask Chad, who gets his soft harem to cook for him and buy things for him while he gets no strings attached sex from them.

    [–]dazed111 5 points6 points  (2 children)

    Ask Chad, who gets his soft harem to cook for him and buy things for him while he gets no strings attached sex from them

    I would ask, but Ive never met him

    [–]1PrinceofSpades 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    Start improving your social circle, or become the chad of your social circle like I did. If you bring a woman into your life, and she sees you have a sexy toned body and a fuckload of confidence and then sees your friends and housemates as people who are complete slobs and recluses, it lowers your SMV. However, if they are overweight, for example, but clean and friendly people who go out and follow you as the social leader, then it increases your SMV because even if your entire social circle has very low SMV, you're still the alpha of the pack.

    Take a fraternity: there will always be the shy guys who got in for a myriad of reasons but aren't crushing every other day; there's the fat guys who drink a lot and pull the girls who are a little too wasted but they have the confidence to get some tail (especially with trending dad-bod vomits); there's the gym bro athletes who are good people with gorgeous sorority girlfriends; there's the gym bro athletes who are 'badass' who fuck the slutty sorority chicks on rotation like they have a schedule; lastly there is the frat president who pulls the most power and has to date the sorority president for social reasons but who still gets eye-balled by every girl on campus because unlike the alpha fuck 'badasses' and the alpha bux 'happy relationship' guys, he's one of the alphas of the campus, and carries that respect with him.

    Sure everyone's school and frat or whatever has differences... But that's the stereotypical social hierarchy in a nutshell.

    Spotting chads is easy though, even off campuses. You'll see them in corporate offices a few rungs higher on the ladder than you. You'll see them at sports bars where all the people who still think they are in college are all hanging out. You'll see them on the train to work negging their model-looking girlfriend because everyone else tells her she's pretty. You'll see them in the gym, SBTY (still bigger than you). Just open your eyes.

    [–]PostingIsFutile 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    Any kind of a relationship with women will require resources. And that's all women want from you.

    They also want protection, although that's not so much of an issue these days. Still, if a bear wanders into the camp, expectations are on you to be the self-sacrificing hero, not her.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    And that's how it's always been. I wouldn't expect her to protect herself and children if I were there. Just as I don't expect them to be bread winners and be logical. That's just the way it is. Accept it or don't.

    [–]harami_number1 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    The difference is that in the traditional way of doing things you get screwed in the family courts and live in a room eating instant noodles while she goes on shopping sprees with your alimony.

    [–]causeandcorrelation 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    Yeah there does seem to be a contradiction on expectations here sometimes.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Mostly because some people are traditionalists and others aren't. TRP is neither, but comes off as traditionalist because one of the unofficial mottos is "Women are only good at making babies."

    Edit: another great contradiction is the idea you should bag as many women as possible, and then complain that you can't marry a virgin.

    [–][deleted]  (28 children)

    [deleted]

    [–]1thiasus 122 points123 points  (3 children)

    Good. You should lose faith in the idea that people are inherently good, and that something like a 'good woman' can exist. You can only find a woman, with all the instincts that pertain to her species and gender (including hypergamy), who through virtue of circumstance, upbringing and disposition is less likely to fuck you over. But there are never guarntees or sure things, and there is never a point where you are done and you can just trust her to stay faithful and loving. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you can devise more realistic strategies to go about your goals.

    [–]ProductivityMonster 13 points14 points  (1 child)

    people are neither inherently good nor bad. They are selfish.

    [–]tb87670 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Life actually became easier for me when I expected only the worse from women and men. Guys will fuck me over for a promotion, women will deny sex as long as they can, expect nothing good from people and all of a sudden they stop disappointing you. Then when someone does do something properly or treat you in a positive manner it's a nice surprise. It's not as bad as it sounds really, people will claim this is paranoia or constant cynicism but it works for me and my stress levels dropped. Someone pulls a shitlord move oh well, I half-expected it at least. Greatly shortens anger phases.

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 29 points30 points  (0 children)

    Look at your friends and relatives... those in 5+ year marriages or with 5+ yr old kids.

    Get to know them, really well. Hear the wife's side of the story. Listen to how she talks about herself, her family, her husband. Listen patiently to all the justifications, rationalisations, petty putdowns, emotional abuses. Listen patiently and understandingly to all of it.

    And then think "is this what I want for myself?"

    All of those men also thought "wow, I've got myself a unicorn here, all those other guys were so wrong about women".

    [–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

    Don't loose hope, lose it. Lol

    I'm sorry, I don't know why this one bugs me so much.

    Seriously though, just stay red, and always hold your ground. Still, marriage is a terrible idea. It flips the power dynamic on its head. Even a prenup isn't a guarantee.

    [–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

    I'm loosing complete faith in finding a good woman to raise kids and live happily ever after.

    That's pretty much what swallowing the Red Pill is; you are seeing the reality, not the fantasy.

    [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    The myth of the "good woman" was put there for you to succumb to by our society.

    [–]Isaiah4verse1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    You lost faith in Santa Claus years ago. Put this into perspective.

    [–]SILENTSAM69 5 points6 points  (2 children)

    Don't lose faith, just maintain frame.

    I currently have a woman that is pretty good and we have three kids now.

    She cooks and cleans and I work. The funny thing is she laughs that she was once a bisexual feminist who was going to join the military. Now she is my little house wife.

    [–]1PrinceofSpades 13 points14 points  (1 child)

    Still used goods in the grand scheme of things, no offense to your happiness. Women can and will change and mature, it just takes them longer than it does for men. At least you understand you don't have a unicorn, just a reformed slut who now makes you happy, which as TRP teaches us, actually makes her happy in turn. You can't have a woman use the words "bisexual feminist" and not have expected an extra dirty experimentation phase between 16 and 22 in this day and age, though. Unless you magically took her hymen, she's lied to you about her past, even if she's given you a more honest version of it.

    Just make sure to keep an eye on infidelity; I laid pipe to some hot married chick with kids I met on a 'girls night out' for the sole purpose of proving that was why she was really out and about to my female friend/ wing-woman. Afterwards I asked her what type of woman she considered herself, since the hamster is always failing to function first thing after sex. "Well I used to be a bisexual feminist and honestly a big party girl, but then I met my husband, and I changed so much... he's the love of my life. He changed my outlook on men. I don't even work anymore, just raise the kids and stay at home and I've never been happier!" "So why are you still doing things like this?" "The house gets boring... I don't know, I miss the thrill... The way you wanted me at the bar made me feel young and sexy and desirable again" bites my arm and I asked her to leave since she should probably get back to her family before they get suspicious. Obviously I'm paraphrasing a little bit and leaving out the beforehand questions about her opinions on feminism nowadays... But this was pretty much the exact conversation we had. I remember it so well because of how predictable it was.

    Man TRP is bleak sometimes. Once a slut, always a slut.

    [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

    Make Money, learn Spanish/Chinese/Japanese, and go find one in South America or Asia and live there.

    [–]7Tomus 22 points23 points  (2 children)

    South America is total shit hole full of retards. I'm here atm and cant wait to get back to civilization.

    [–]eaton80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    There is no "ever after". That's only in children's storybooks.

    [–]LoveYourSelfish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Prostitutes have always been around, I believe it is a contender for the earliest profession in fact. AWALT doesn't mean AWAProssies.

    Mate guarding is weak, weedy, pathetic. But she is a creature of hypergamy, in a society that now accepts hypgermany.. tough times buddy!

    There is no chance I would let a chick who is with a member of the yakuza or the cartel fuck me.

    Fairy tale endings are a lie, but feeling good with a girl is a damn sweet feeling.

    It's tricky, and some men will fuck your girl just to fuck you sometimes.

    Use your noodle, use both your noodles, maybe you can carve something decent out of your life. Maybe.

    [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

    Ah, gold diggers and rinsers...

    This should make your blood boil: Sex Lies And Rinsing Guys - Channel 4 documentary

    [–]grewapair 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Why get angry. The men get what they want, the women do too. Sounds like a rational exchange.

    [–]MyNameIsNotMichael 41 points42 points  (1 child)

    A nation of spaghetti eaters cannot restore Roman civilization!

    [–]2awalt_cupcake 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    bitches can hardly make ramen

    [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (3 children)

    When has gold digging ever not been open?

    When that one legged whore Heather Mills married the veritable saint Paul McCartney and made a baby and then a few years later tried to get a half billion dollars of Beatles money no one batted a fucking eye.

    She made all kinds of obviously false claims about her "violent" 70+ year old husband so she could pressure him into giving her his fortune.

    In the end she only got 45 million bucks which is 45 million more and a kick in the cunt less than she should have gotten.

    She was the most obvious and venal of gold diggers and yet did legislators leap to pass laws protecting men from such obvious con-artists?

    Fuck no.

    It's always been open and the only thing "hidden" about it when when a woman pretends she's not a gold digger to make it easier to get her hooks in a man's assets.

    Any woman who marries a man who makes more than her and then expects him to make the greater financial contribution to the relationship while she enjoys her nice comfy job and easy home time is a fucking gold digger.

    If a woman isn't paying 50/50 for everything then she's a gold digger.

    [–]pmmedenver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Women who demand to be purchased deserve to be treated like property.

    [–]chocobaby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    All very true points. There is no point in anger however. This is how the species is set up. The red pill, is a bitter pill, but once swallowed can lead to a better position in the endless battle. Good luck out there.

    [–]Schroef 21 points22 points  (11 children)

    It's only a matter of time until men start writing guides on how to get laid more and use women just for sex. Oh wait.

    [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (2 children)

    Gentlemen: Yes, Rome is burning and there is no point in getting angry or depressed. Learn their strategy and use it against them to maximize your personal sexual gains and minimize their monetary gains.

    [–]chocobaby 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Bingo. I took longer to say it but that's it. The rules have changed. Adapt or wither and die a bitter old man. At least in this "modern" world, we too, can get away with bedding hundreds and even thousands of females, in our lifetimes. Work on yourself, not them. They will come.

    [–]MyLittleAtomBomb 10 points11 points  (3 children)

    I don't understand how men continously fall for these women.

    All you have to do to test what her interest in you is withdraw debit card access.

    Yet so many girls I knew who were massive sluts in high school and college are getting hitched with these guys who own beachfront property.

    It's fucking flabbergasting

    [–]steelerfaninperu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    I've probably posted these words a thousand times, but I'll make it 1001.

    Most people are stupid.

    Once you appreciate that, the world makes much more sense.

    [–]acetylcysteine 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    let those guys be miserable...

    [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    They will be miserable and they won't own that beachfront property for long.

    [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

    Back in the 1990s and 2000s there were these hacker groups who would look for any vulnerabilities in major operating systems and other pieces of software. When they discovered such a vulnerability they would not develop a solution, or write a paper warning the corporation (usually Microsoft), or a media press release that they discovered this security flaw. No they did much better. They developed a piece of software which enabled a user to maximize the damage they could to do a system and made it super easy to use. They then distributed this piece of software for free so within a few weeks there would be tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of school yard hackers using this software to fuck up their school computers, their friend's computers, their family member's computers. Now the big corporation has their users constantly being fucked and they have no choice but to deal with this problem head on. Their users know they are fucked and now they have to change and ANY vulnerability will be uncovered and exploited as much as possible. Fix your shit.

    I see these guides to hypergamy as sort of analogy to that. While these may cause short term pain for a lot of dudes who get fucked and women who try and fail, these guides will ultimately be what cause everyone to reassess this whole marriage thing and the divorce laws that go with it.

    If anything these guides need to be better. More strategic. How to manipulate guys who have resources, how to manipulate judges, how and when to divorce. A systematic guide to finding a wealthy guy, getting the wealthy guy to fall in love with you and marry you, things to do during the marriage that will maximize your payout and minimize his ability to hide assets, when to start having children within the marriage, how and when to divorce him to absolutely maximize total payout.

    Women are taking advantage of vulnerabilities and once its brought to the forefront perhaps laws can be changed. The attitude of the guide needs to be that the legal system is nothing more than a system to exploit for your own gain. Right now women mostly hypergamy off instinct and a few poorly put together ideas. For as much as women do it, they are seriously bad at it as a whole. If they wanted to they could exploit men and the system much much more than they are currently doing.

    Such a guide should be read by every single 18 year old girl and guy in the country. Girls so they know what they are doing and guys so they will ask themselves "does she happen to love me or did she read the book and is acting this way because I am in medschool?"

    [–]1Entropy-7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    The real danger is not "gold diggers" but rather "silver diggers". A lot of punters on this reddit claim to pull a quarter million a year but the reality is that most guys have to work their ass off to crest six figures at all.

    Enter the "silver digger". This is the chick who pushes you to work yourself into an early grave to support what she figures is an "appropriate" lifestyle. She doesn't necessarily want gold necklaces and Versace dresses but these days a house with a white picket fence runs a million in any major urban centre.

    [–]1thiasus 12 points13 points  (4 children)

    This chick is making money off of teaching women how to maximize the profit off of their natural sexual strategy in today's world. If anything, I admire her. If I could make money off of teaching men how to maximize the results of their sexual strategy, I would.

    [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 18 points19 points  (2 children)

    If I could make money off of teaching men how to maximize the results of their sexual strategy, I would.

    Many guys do. They write books or run PUA seminars. Or sell TShirts ;)

    [–]1PrinceofSpades 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    never underestimate clothing money. That Nike swoosh adds like 30-50$ to an otherwise 10$ article of clothing.

    [–]Senior Contributoradam-l 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    Feminist sociologist Cathrine Hakim has described it as women possessing greater "sexual capital", which they should exploit. It is a more "scientific" attempt to socially and morally legitimize female generalized and convert prostitution, against the “patriarchical” and “pseudo-ethical” ideology that “inhibit women from exploiting their erotic capital to achieve economic and social benefits.”

    -Adam

    [–]scamper_22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Its not just women. I read an article talking how women lie more. The professor used words like because they're nicer and more sophisticated.

    So just lie and scheme is the message as violence is outlawed

    [–]eaton80 8 points9 points  (1 child)

    Arguably this woman is the real "Red Pill Woman". I.e. She is maximizing her evolutionary biological imperative the way RP men maximize theirs.

    Those other women in the so named forum always struck me as the "how to love and accept red pill men" types and it's not really the same thing as being red pill themselves.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

    I don't want a woman who dreams about shoes, bags and instagram likes, I want a woman who dreams about being an excellent mother, raising a strong family and is good at her craft. Those might be fucking hard to find in some parts of the USA but in some countries in Europe it's easier.

    [–]internet_terrorist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Don’t listen to the voices of disapproval, with their stereotypical disgust and dismay.

    I imagine the snake said something similar to Eve.

    [–]LorneArmstrong 10 points11 points  (14 children)

    When my gf heard i got a mastercard with $300 limit on it she immediately wanted me to take her shopping.

    [–]PlainEminem 18 points19 points  (1 child)

    That's not even a high limit...

    [–]logicalthinker1 9 points10 points  (0 children)

    Lol it was the starting limit on my first credit card. Either this guy is like 16 years old or he has incredibly shitty credit.

    [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 11 points12 points  (2 children)

    Shouldn't that read, "When my EX-gf heard I got a mastercard...."

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (7 children)

    Are there cards with less than a $300 limit? Is it a store card or something?

    I didn't realize there were cards with less than a $2000 limit.

    [–]2popthatpill 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    My first credit card (back in about late 2002 or so) was a "student" Visa card with a $300 monthly credit limit. So they did exist, here in Australia at least.

    [–]Fl_l 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Was that with Westpac?

    I've still got mine from back in the day with a $300 limit, despite them trying to tell me I should move to another card with a higher limit since I'm not a student anymore.

    [–]2popthatpill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Yes, it was Westpac. From the looks of it they still offer it, although with a $1000 limit these days.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    we gave them out at the credit union i worked at. generally it's a first-timer's card when they are very young and have no credit. it's a good way to show you can make regular payments, but at the same time you're probably going way over the credit utilization threshold you should be.

    [–]Gawernator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Student cards seem to be around $300. My first one was. Next card was $7,000 and after that $22,500. Seems usual

    [–]steelerfaninperu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I got my first card from a bank whose website featured only happy black moms with their kids, so that tells you something. It also featured a lovely monthly fee of $3.

    I was approved for $200, unsecured. Used it for a year, and then got a card for $3k.

    So either homeboy here is coming off a bankruptcy, or he's 18 and just starting out. Still, AWALT. Your $300 limit is a new purse for her in her brain.

    [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

    The hamsters are spinning on some next level speeds on this one.

    [–]BitingInsects 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Part of me respects the hustle. In the sense that there are pathetic men out here practically making themselves targets for shit like this.

    [–]catacamas 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Speaking of blatant gold-digging - I recently met a woman online who actually put a link to her Amazon wishlist (with a list of things like expensive watches, jewelry etc.), in her online social media profile, along with a sexy scantily clad pic of her!

    I asked her if guys actually buy her stuff, she said yes they do, and started soliciting. I told her 'buy me an Xbox thx', she told me I'm being rude, lol

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 7 points8 points  (3 children)

    Yawn. Obviously OP neber heard of a bool called Pride and Prejudice that was written like a 150 years ago. That is the entire premise of the book, how to hook a rich husband.

    [–]bokehnikon 7 points8 points  (1 child)

    First line of the book: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife."

    [–]sir_wankalot_here 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    I had to glance at wikipedia to refresh my memory. The book is actually 203 years old and was one of the first best sellers. The customers of course where women.

    I didn't actually read the book, I was just around when a bunch of women where watching the movie. And according to the it followed the book fairly accurately. I didn't really watch the movie per say.

    But there where interesting scenes like where on of the chicks was talking about Mr Darcy who is rich versus the other guy who gets her panties all wet. And they where saying she she go for Mr Darcy because he has a bunch of money.

    But it is nothing new. Bathsheba was the ultimate branch swinger. Gets King David all horny, then gets King David to have her husband killed.

    [–]steelerfaninperu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Or how about Winter Dreams/The Great Gatsby. Judy/Daisy digs gold like a gravedigger digs graves.

    Real literature is RP as hell, just posted that a week ago.

    [–]PostingIsFutile 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    So, this is a book about basically the only legal way to commit fraud. Pretend you love a man, marry him, then divorce rape him at your leisure.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    I bet it's written by a man to make money, isn't "court controversy" one of the laws of power?

    [–]J_AsapGem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    it's not, but what you're saying makes sense, i've never really seen women put themselves in the line of fire for ridicule, so i'm suspicious of this, why put their sexual strategy in the open? unless the men has become so extremely cucked that the women realizes this and they don't care.

    [–]1Entropy-7 2 points3 points  (4 children)

    There is a girl who I won't call a "plate" but I suppose that is the closest description you could get using the lingo in this place. She is a fashion model and disarmingly honest about the fact that she wants a man to spend money on her.

    Her online profile basically says that she likes "generous" men and cheap guys can FOAD. She wants a "gift" if you contact her.

    I have never done P4P but this sort or intrigued me and I figured that her attitude was enough to scare away 90%+ of other punters.

    So first date I bought her a slinky little dress that set me back maybe 20 bucks (funny thing was, I bought it before I had actually met her; it was a size 4 but was a complete tent on her because she has such an amazing body, perhaps a 2, 1 or zero).

    Second date was just dinner. The third date was her birthday. She was so bold as to tell me directly that she wanted a gold necklace. I dropped a couple hundred bucks on a 14k piece in a move that could be viewed as totally beta except that that night she jumped all over my cock.

    It was a play that worked.

    The fuck of it is that she is a trust fund bitch. Daddy funds her lifestyle and the counter-intuitive thing is that he will continue to do so, and even pony up a sizeable dowry if she marries a guy making six-figures but will disown her if she marries a guy making a regular salary.

    I don't make six figures. . . .yet. So, I can't lock her down, but she seems to be content with me being self-unconscious about buying gifts for her and then doing the nasty. We live in different cities but I think I might fly out to see her and perhaps score a weekend wonder fuck.

    [–]Yankee_Fever 2 points3 points  (2 children)

    This guy clearly wrote this book and is trying to sell it.... Look at all the hypnotic patterns in the description. Clearly written by a man

    [–]HS-Thompson 3 points4 points  (1 child)

    How is this news, it's the worlds oldest profession.

    [–]nuesuh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Being a gold digger?

    What she recommend women to do, is lure a man to marry you and then divorcerape him. That is not an old profession.

    The two ways women could make money off of men back in the days where prostitution and marriage. Now with the divorce laws, women don't have to be faithful wifes. They'll just divorce you after a month or two and fuck off with your money.

    [–]Your_Coke_Dealer 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    ERROR

    Hamster speed exceeded wheel capacity; hamster now in orbit

    [–]randarrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Hamster speed exceeded wheel capacity, hamster now dead and oozing out between wheel tines and splattering walls.

    [–]RP_Vergil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Now this is what Woman are good at, thinking that they came up with something new when it's actually done before. It's simply Prostitution, except only choosing Plugged in Beta Bucks as their Customers.

    [–]1PantsonFire1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Mwah let them dig. I'm perfectly fine with that arrangement. At least the rich guy knows why she's with him.

    [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    It suddenly occurs that notorious food-hooker Jessica Sporty might have been aiming too low.......

    [–]WhySoRuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Do you know how expensive it is to keep a horse fed?

    [–]mr_burrito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I understand what you're trying to say with this, but I really don't see a whole lot wrong with it. TRP is a guide for men to get what they want out of women (sex), and this is a guide for women to get what they want out of men (money, attention). Saying this guide for women is wrong seems like a bit of a double standard. If you're really concerned about protecting your money, and there's nothing wrong with that, this guide shouldn't matter anyway because hopefully you're smart enough to not fall for this shit.

    [–]Leg__Day 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I need to ask a serious question on this topic.

    Who is the real winner/loser out of such a relationship? I'm sure for the insanely rich men who opt for this lifestyle make so much money that it doesn't matter. It gets replaced with even more money. They also get to have sex with extremely attractive women with no attachment whatsoever.

    This might be a mutually beneficial relationship (only for the rich, don't fool yourself).

    [–]ramaga 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Though I appreciate your post and agree with the lessons, rest assured this "book" (it's only 59 pages so only loosely merits this description) is not flying off the shelves. I have published several ebooks on Amazon and understand what the book rankings there mean. The paperback version of the book on gold-digging currently has an Amazon rank of 6.4 million, meaning it's been months since the author has sold a copy of the paperback. The ebook version's ranking, while better, is only at 337,578, meaning the author sells, at best, a copy every several days.

    On the other hand, the book has been out almost a year, so maybe it did much better when it was first released.

    [–]watcher45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Good diggers are just prostitutes with relationships.

    [–]Sworn_to_Ganondorf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    We do indeed have an epidemic of gold digging whores.

    [–]nuesuh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    No, I didn’t say ‘why you should become a prostitute.’ There’s a hell of a difference.

    Yeah. Gold diggers are well paid.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

    [–]redzorp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Yes, but as simple as that solution is, these warning threads need to be reiterated.

    I think we all know intellectually that marriage in the modern West is the worst deal ever for men. But the pull of biology, emotions and traditions are so strong that most men who should know better are always on the brink of giving in to the Cathedral. It's easy not to give in when you are in your early 20s. But just wait until you are in your 30s, 40s and beyond. The pull can be incredibly strong. Just look at George Cloony for a famous example.

    I'm 50 now and thankfully never married. But I've gotten close several times. So very tempting when you find a woman who is "almost perfect." The male hamster starts going into overdrive that fairytales can come true...living happily ever after and all that. Takes a lot of discipline, self-awareness, inner peace and re-reading TRP to pull yourself out of that delusion and not succumb. Most of my friends, some red-pilled, were unable to stand alone. They got hitched and were all promptly divorce-raped inside of 10 years.

    [–]yomo86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    What really disgusts me is that the alternative title: "how to root out all the losers and wannabes to start a family with a stable high SMV male AND get shits n prices" does not work. This is pure dark-hearted solipsism instead - and it isn't about admitting it, it is about bragging. Bragging that a woman could not care less about giving something in return.

    [–]taoofmojo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Have you noticed that there is no picture of the author? So add 200 lbs to her weight then take 4 attractiveness points.

    [–]1v1mebruh 1 point2 points  (4 children)

    Has no one here realized the irony of this post? A woman talking about female sexual strategy is receiving hate from men talking about male sexual strategy.

    [–]RPmatrix 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    BUT, gold digging isn't a sexual strategy, it's a life scam

    TRP advocates getting Real to get fucked, not getting fucked over!

    [–]harami_number1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I can only hope it is satire.

    If not, then please god send the plague already.

    [–]VeLfoR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Elon Musk should hire this gurl. The hamaster spinning could give electricity to the entire Africa continent.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It was here a long time ago

    [–]tedted8888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This book reminds me of the countless get rich quick schemes. The only person making the money is the author. Business is getting tougher and tougher. Men with assets of 1MM or more are going to see through this sharade and move on.

    [–]t12totalxyzb00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    [–]themanbat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Any guides out there to teach men how to become gold diggers?

    [–]aazav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Thank you for taking the time to alert us to this disgusting, predatory yet all too real phenomenon.

    [–]aazav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    What happened to your dreams of living the high life?

    Well, you fucked up by making poor decisions and now you need a sucker to pay for what you failed to provide for yourself.

    load more comments (14 replies)