605
606

Rant/VentingFeminist rails against columnist simply for stating women are responsible for their own actions (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by twokool2bsmort

Feminist argues women are incapable of responsibility for their actions

A columnist for the Kansas City Star wrote a post innocuously entitled "Women Can Take Action To Prevent Rapes." This columnist simply advised women against drinking beyond their limits, pointing out the obvious fact that doing so immensely increases the risk factor for being taken advantage of. The SJW's would have none of it. This Jezebel article consists entirely of a feminist whining about the Kansas City columnists' logical statements, with no actual rebuttal. The feminist lashes out against the Kansan for expecting:

women to quit asking to be raped by getting too drunk, to not “yell rape” when what you really meant was “oops!” and to stop hawing about equal rights if you’re not actually prepared to take equal responsibility for your drunken actions

The Jezebel writer and commenters respond by chorusing that it's too much pressure on women to be held accountable for their actions, especially when they decide to drink beyond their limits. The feminist whines that:

the burden of ensuring our safety will always be unduly ours to bear

Yes honey, out in the big bad real world you need situational awareness and it's your own responsibility to look after yourself (Bob Dylan's biggest hit, lauded by Rolling Stone magazine as the best song of all time and their magazine's very namesake, is incidentally about how girls like the one that wrote this Jezebel article are completely fucking inept in that cold, harsh gap between daddy's wallet and securing a beta male provider). This Jezebel article is just another reminder that for all their self-righteousness, SJW's are just as sexist as the best of them. They've once again inadvertently shown their cards: even feminists believe women are permanently children that lack the faculties to be held accountable for anything in their lives. Yet whining that you got "raped" while blackout drunk is like whining that you got mugged while wandering the streets of Compton at 3am while shit-faced and wearing a Ralph Lauren Polo. These people are incapable of comprehending that acknowledging a victim's responsibility for their own reckless endangerment does not detract from the culprit's exclusive liability for choosing to capitalize on the easy target. And the world is full of under-sexed betas and genuine sickos that'll seize upon any opportunity to get their dick wet, especially when alcohol has momentarily made them attractive in the eyes of some blacked-out bimbo that would otherwise never settle for them. These feminazis dream of a fantasy world where a woman need never worry about any regrettable consequences that might occur if she drinks beyond her limits, yet in the same breath cry that all men are rapists. The fucking cognitive dissonance is astounding.


[–]taracus 329 points330 points  (35 children)

"I drunk myself unconscious and fell asleep in a bad neighbourhood and someone stole all my stuff ! I cant believe an honest, hard-working, tax-paying man cant feel safe in this world. #StopRobberiesOfMen #StopViolenceAgainstMen #TeachPeopleNotToRob"

[–][deleted] 92 points93 points  (1 child)

"I married the sweetest, most innocent girl. She was the one! I bought her a house, a car and paid for everything only to find out she's fucking the neighbor! I said I wanted a divorce and she said go ahead, she'll still take half. How could this happen" #teachwomennottofinanicallyrape #whatasham #beta life

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There are so many instances of this it's not even funny. Feminists are the only "victimized" group that consistently take the path of blaming others. When broke as fuck manual laborers in tornado alley continue to build their houses where tornados come through (because it's their only option for livelihood), people don't lobby congress to fund research to stop the tornados, they ask why they don't move elsewhere. When a guy gets drunk in a rough bar and gets robbed or provoked, people don't comfort him and start a campaign against tough bar guys, they ask why he went to that bar and got drunk. When a guy gets tricked into a bad business deal, people don't admonish the man who made a good deal for himself and start promoting "nice business", they ask him why he didn't do his research. When you wonder into a situation time and time again where there are bad people, and you just continue to blame the bad people without altering your behavior, it's just called being stupid.

You can't change human nature. You're not going to #teachmentostopraping any more than you're going to teach all bears to stop mauling people. You're going to have some fucked up people out there. Maybe take responsibility for protecting yourself.

[–]Rafsimon 76 points77 points  (26 children)

#TeachMenNotToRape is one of the common hashtags about rape that really irks me. It's as if there are parents out there encouraging their children to rape. Makes absolutely no fucking sense.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 49 points50 points  (1 child)

I'd say we better start to teach women not to throw their babies in the dumpster.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (3 children)

We live in the most anti-rape culture that has ever existed in known history (well, by 'we' I mean the Anglosphere and related cultures, I know this board is pretty international). We are all taught not to rape, both by implication (which is the most powerful, as anyone capable of moral reasoning beyond the level of childhood can figure out that rape is wrong) and sometimes explicitly.

What it really is: an attack on male sexuality. It is often paired with statements expanding the concept of rape and sexual misconduct to absurd limits, and claims that the rape-positive aspects of our culture are implicit (so no "Johnny, it's okay to screw a passed out girl if she isn't a virgin" but more a societal-level implication that it's okay to take advantage of girls in ways it would not be considered by society okay to take advantage of boys, because society allegedly sees women as lesser) and that girls are groomed to be easily manipulated into sex (because, you know, sex in the English speaking world is bad and like an evil force that comes from outside, making you less pure).

You are correct it is absurd. At best, hate-filled misandrists and their unwitting accomplices are claiming that we have a society that normalises exploitation of women. Nevermind that their concept of exploitation is problematic in the extreme, or that it takes culpability away from women themselves for participating in the natural formation of the sexual marketplace.

They hate and fear male sexuality. It is incredibly easy to teach men not to rape, given a reasonable definition of rape and sexual assault. If fact, we in the West do it without even trying. Bad apples will always exist, and no amount of "Don't you rape no girls, Johnny-boy" will change them. We teach men not to rape quite naturally as an extension of respecting others - their bodies, their property - and the fact that our culture punishes violence and blatant exploitation (that harms the exploited) when done by an individual.

The myth of Rape Culture is a form of hate speech. I'm not against hate speech, mostly to avoid the slippery slope that the concept represents, but I'll call a spade a spade. Normal healthy male sexuality is demonised. A hashtag like the one you described is an expression of hate and fear, not of rapists, but of the natural order. Not all natural things are good, but not all natural things are bad, either.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

this. To think that we live in some unprecedented, stifling rape culture requires an extremely skewed perspective of reality. Rape has been considered a horrendous crime for quite a long time now, and it's beyond disingenuous to state otherwise

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Rape is a morally reprehensible thing that we've been taught, rightly, to avoid. It is at an absolute low in history but feminists expanded the criteria for rape to turn a relatively small issue (that is really only the fucked up actions of a tiny minority) into an attack against masculinity.

Feminists are scrambling for evidence that they are marginalized, but there's not much to work off of, so they created rape culture. They cultivated false statistics by rearranging definitions and asking women if they've "ever felt uncomfortable" around men, and calling that rape or assault or harassment.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 5 points6 points  (2 children)

It's as if there are parents out there encouraging their children to rape.

Seems to be an issue in the refugee groups, though you'll never hear a feminist admit that one. The issue is those fucking white males, of course!

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Oppression Olympics? Really?

    Relax. I'm talking about what feminists and the media choose to publicly scream about.

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 46 points47 points  (5 children)

      Even worse she gave it to Adam and told him to take a bite as well. Very first shit-test in human history and that betafag failed it.

      [–]royal_fucktard 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      To be fair, if Adam was beta, Eve never would have mated with him and we wouldn't be here.

      [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 17 points18 points  (2 children)

      Nah. He was the only dude there.

      They are branchswingers and stay with whoever they feel is the best they can get at the moment.

      Also the bible is not clear about her age when they were mating and neither when women approached the wall then, since people got much older back then.

      [–]mugatucrazypills 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      Obviously there are parents out there teaching this stuff.

      [–]canadlaw 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Think about your argument before making it. The hashtag isn't #TeachParentsToStopTeachingTheirKidsHowToRape. The hashtag is about awareness to not do dumb shit, it doesn't imply at all that parents are teaching their children to rape, it's that they don't do anything at all.

      [–]MisogynisticSh1tl0rd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      "I was a pretty crazy rapist before, but then someone actually sat me down and explained to me "hey man, did you ever realize that rape is... bad!" and I was like, oh, WOW, I didn't even think about it that way before, and ever since then I haven't raped a single person." - No rapist ever

      [–]1nzgs 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      It's as silly as believing that murders happen and keep happening because there is some culture of murder being taught to people that must be unlearned. Heinous crimes like murder and rape are committed by a very small number of repeat offenders (if they aren't caught).

      Unfortunately feminists are invested in the rape-culture meme because it's a tool to indoctrinate and control men.

      [–]1kick6 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      to their credit, there actually is a rape culture. It's just...........in the desert. The one run by ISIS. But since lefists give muslims a pass...well, we'll just quadruple down on first world white guys.

      [–]killcat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      And women, nothing like fear to keep the money flowing.

      [–]Lsegundo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      every time I hear "teach men not to rape" I think "teach minorities not to steal car radios" then I won't have to lock my car doors at night!

      [–]MajorDoobs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Has anyone taken the course on not raping? Im bad at tests and peeing in butts is kind of my thing. Since Im a guy and all. Is there a cliff's notes?

      [–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

      what surprises me even more about this shit, is it's not like the normal shit they usually whine about that's made up (non-equal pay, women forced out of video games), this is real shit where they can get raped, killed, kidnapped, etc. or at the BEST worst case - you do something stupid when you're shitfaced and get arrested.

      how the fuck do you not take extra steps to make sure those things don't happen to you? they are life changing or life ending consequences. the stupidity of these idiots never ceases to amaze me

      good job, you went out and got plastered by yourself, raped and got an STD. You sure proved a point about feminism.... enjoy the rest of your life

      [–]neveragoodtime 12 points13 points  (0 children)

      I think the fact that they don't change their actions tells you how much they actually fear and care about this "rape culture", not at all. Watch what women do, not what they say. They continue to take so many sexual risks, because we live in the least rapey society in history. 50 years ago you would not have seen the sorority sisters getting black out drunk and knowingly risking a sexual encounter with the fraternity brothers because the consequences were pregnancy, dropping out of school, and marriage. Now the consequences are becoming a social media princess hero victim. And they can count on their school administration and every other man under their control to protect them from harm while they do the stupidest things.

      [–]tallwheel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      I hate to admit it, but something like this actually happened to me. Of course I felt "violated" afterward, but I knew in the end it was my own fault and that it was my responsibility to be much more careful with alcohol in the future. Of course I reported the robbery to the police just for peace of mind, but since I was shitfaced when it happened and didn't remember pretty much anything about the perp and had no evidence, there was nothing the police could do. Total lesson in personal responsibility. I never once thought that what we really need to do is "teach people not to rob". Robbers are gonna rob. Smart people do what they can to prevent themselves from ending up in dangerous situations.

      [–]devilabit -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

      Are you now more careful about going out and drinking to much in the future? Have you learned your lesson that YOU are just not allowed the same alcohol numbers like us other guys?

      This is what your saying for all women, you can't get drunk. Is there a level of drunk they should go by ie:ten units . What mark should stop at. Let's now use your logic, no drunkedness at what level? When we're done we'll decide your level, because look what happened you.

      I look forward to hearing from you?

      [–]taracus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Anyone can drink exactly how much they want, but to somehow think that just because you are a women you are supposed to feel more safe or less responsible than a man when drinking is just misogynistic.

      You are saying "Women are much more fragile than men so we need to protect them since they cant protect themselves", I dont buy that.

      [–]rp_phoenix 102 points103 points  (12 children)

      That's insane. This would be like me not locking my car, then crying and sobbing when the car gets stolen. Yes, that person shouldn't have stolen my car, but by locking my car, I reduce the risk of it getting stolen.

      Ffs, this is simple logic. I can't believe it's gotten to a point where we expect half the population to not be responsible for their actions.

      [–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon 28 points29 points  (2 children)

      It's kind of been that way for thousands of years, though. In the 1800s if a woman did something wrong, who did society look to? Probably the husband or father, who they said didn't beat her enough.

      [–]Casanova-Quinn 17 points18 points  (0 children)

      You're right. The only difference back then was that women did not have responsibility because they didn't have power (right to vote, own property, etc.) That's the issue with feminism today; they have power now but they don't want to accept the responsibility that comes with it.

      [–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

      I once made this argument to a feminist. She was a medical student. I asked her, "So do you tell your patients to sue McDonald's instead of telling them to go on a diet to avoid fat-shaming them?"

      If there's something that can be done to prevent it, just do that thing. It's called personal responsibility, and it's part of becoming an adult. Realizing that the world isn't fair. The reason feminists preach this way is their worried about "victim shaming." It's insane that they think you can't simultaneously offer empathy while also trying to prevent others from going through the same fate.

      [–]ronaIdreagan 11 points12 points  (1 child)

      teachyoursonsToNotRob

      stopRobCulture

      • don't know how to hashtag on iPhone

      [–]callsyourcatugly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      You have to add a backslash in front of the #.

      #stoprobculture becomes #stoprobculture

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      I think people of the far left tend to place a lot of faith in the concept of social enginnering; a world in which the government/state can perfectly engineer an imperfect society into a utopian one. As we've seen throughout history, this mindset is exceedingly dangerous, but that doesn't stop the naive idealists from running wild with such beliefs.

      [–]reecewagner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      I'm gonna take a photo of a car with all four doors and windows wide open, WANNA RIDE? decal on the rear windshield, and keys sitting on the driver seat while I'm sitting in a lawn chair with my back to the car holding a beer and a sign that says "Still Not Asking For It"

      [–]1PantsonFire1234 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      If women were to listen to simple logic it would mean they were responsible for their action. And we all know what women hate the most..

      [–]allnamesfckintaken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      just because you weren't asking for the car t be stolen does not mean that you were not partially responsible for it. for some reason there is a billion dollar industry for the prevention of theft but somehow, there is nothing a woman can do to prevent rape. isn't that amazing? rape is like a magical fairy activity.

      [–]stawek 76 points77 points  (11 children)

      What do you call a person who goes for a walk in forest unarmed, in a place bears frequent?
      An idiot.

      What do you call that person when they start playing with a cuddly bear cub?
      A dead idiot.

      You can talk and write and whine as much as you like about how bears should not attack people. You can train bears to not attack human or even put bells on their necks to warn people. Or make a nice, neat list of known man-attacking bears that should be particularly avoided. It will not however change the one simple fact: there are bears in the forest and some of them are agressive.

      Edit:
      It has to be noted that people make serious mistake by shaming rape victims as sluts and such. This is not correct and rightlfully aggravates women. They should be shamed as idiots, nothing more.

      [–]taracus 15 points16 points  (7 children)

      even put bells on their necks to warn people.

      Haha, we had a lot of sexual assaults on concerts and music-festivals in Sweden lately (dont think there have been more than before, but it's been in the media a lot since the German new years assault).

      The police solution was to hand out writs-bands to young men that said something like "I know its wrong to sexually assault women". Idea being to spread some sort of awareness I guess but obviously they got a lot of shit for it.

      [–]taracus 29 points30 points  (0 children)

      A lot of men posted pictures with their wristbands saying things like. "They work, I still havent been sexually assaulted", hahaha

      [–]SetConsumes 1 point2 points  (4 children)

      What's an actual solution to the assault at concerts/festivals problem? Aside from don't be in the pit.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      Have a man around that will beat the assailants ass. Either boyfriend, brother, security, or cop.

      Or carry some pepper spray or a tazer and do it yourself.

      [–]SetConsumes -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

      I was thinking more like how do we get men to not do this without forcing them not to

      [–]toalysium 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      There are exactly zero ways to stop a criminal from using force against someone else (during any crime) except force in return. The police and courts are supposed to be the implied force which will be used in retaliation, but when the odds are against actually being caught, prosecuted successfully, and imprisoned then it's up to the individual to be responsible for employing force on their own.

      You don't have to understand it, you don't have to ponder how they could have been raised differently, you don't have to see their viewpoint.

      You do have to recognize the objectively true reality that some people enjoy hurting other people, and accept that you, as an individual, have a responsibility and a right to stop them. No one will ever care about your personal safety more than you, so why should anyone ever be more responsible for it?

      [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      There are exactly zero ways to stop a criminal from using force against someone else (during any crime) except force in return. The police and courts are supposed to be the implied force which will be used in retaliation, but when the odds are against actually being caught, prosecuted successfully, and imprisoned then it's up to the individual to be responsible for employing force on their own.

      Basically right? What else can be reasonably done?

      You don't have to understand it, you don't have to ponder how they could have been raised differently, you don't have to see their viewpoint.

      They don't need to understand it to see that it's happening and take appropriate measures. I enjoy trying to figure out why people do what they do.

      You do have to recognize the objectively true reality that some people enjoy hurting other people, and accept that you, as an individual, have a responsibility and a right to stop them. No one will ever care about your personal safety more than you, so why should anyone ever be more responsible for it?

      There is perhaps one or two people that may care about someone's personal safety, their parents and other family members.

      I find more and more that women, young naive women especially, need their fathers to protect them, need their guidance and wisdom.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      It has to be noted that people make serious mistake by shaming rape victims as sluts and such. This is not correct and rightlfully aggravates women. They should be shamed as idiots, nothing more

      That seems an awful lot like a distinction without a difference. Being a slut is being an idiot.

      But you know, since we're guys we like them slutty so we go along with the 'being a slut is fine' poppycock. There have been many many discussions here on why slutty behavior leads to poor outcomes for women. It's not in their long term best interests and leaves them damaged. Of course, most women can barely understand this argument let alone think long term.

      [–]stawek 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Irrelevant.

      We are discussing rape here, not long term outcomes for women.

      There are women who have n counts in hundreds and never got even close to being raped. There are also virgins who got black out drunk and woke up non-virgins.
      Sluttiness and idiocy might be correlated, indeed. However, it is not sluttiness that gets women raped.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Irrelevant. We are discussing rape here, not long term outcomes for women.

      I addressed your deviation from the rape discussion. See my earlier quotation of your text concerning shaming.

      Sluttiness and idiocy might be correlated, indeed.

      We agree there.

      [–]Endorsed ContributorStories_of_Red 16 points17 points  (3 children)

      If you just make men attend the right seminars, and hear the right sort of awareness-raising speakers, these problems will be solved.

      No, really, that is how you make change: you make people come to a seminar, listen to earnest people with a masters' degree in sociology-women's studies. Maybe a few seminars, for the hard cases.

      Once that is done, this whole rape culture thing will be in the past. And then the SJW crowd can start doing their show on the road, in other countries, like Afghanistan and other places, where their earnest, informed selves will be treated like honored guests.

      /smirk

      [–]RedSugarPill 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      OMG what a great idea! All we need is money! Let's go to capital hill and get some tax dollars to pay for this! Utopia, here we come!!!

      [–]Forcetobereckonedwit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      A breeze if HRC gets in there...

      [–]wisty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Adrian Bayley is an Australian serial rapist and eventually a murderer. The first time he was caught he got out after less than 2 years. Early release, because he'd done a bunch of seminars in prison, and "told them what they wanted to hear".

      [–]KartagoPill 29 points30 points  (7 children)

      ' I'm barely clothed and drunk, pls help me not get rape. I just grind at this big mothafucka to be safe'

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]blue_27 8 points9 points  (4 children)

        "OK, so I'm going to get really shitty drunk and hang all over every guy in here so they keep buying me drinks. But, as soon as one of them gets too interested, you're my pretend boyfriend, and you get to fend them off for me. K thanks!!!"

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (3 children)

        Usually it's more like I protect them and then they continue to seek it after seeing I'm capable of it.

        [–]blue_27 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        Right. You are her excuse to act as slutty as she wants with no reprucussions, because you are there to save her from her own actions.

        [–]SetConsumes 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        Right. You are her excuse to act as slutty as she wants with no reprucussions, because you are there to save her from her own actions.

        This is true. I benefit, she benefits, everyone's happy. Not like I can turn a slut into not a slut. If she's a slut by the age of 18 for example she will always be. Can't undo the past and being a slut is defined by her past.

        [–]KartagoPill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I would protect the shit out of her.

        [–]martialdylan 10 points11 points  (1 child)

        The fucking cognitive dissonance is astounding.

        This is how I feel about the world at large, haha.

        [–]skoobled 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        People are rationalising, not rational

        [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

        The SJW line that sexual assault is a conservative conspiracy against women is nonsense. But doesn't matter if it's nonsense. They aren't trying to stop rapes or help victims, they are trying to control dialogue. Foster a rhetorical environment where there opponents can be automatically dismissed then attacked as rapists.

        [–]SYL3NZR 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        I'd even go as far as to say this is their attempt at "countering" the RedPilled man/lifestyle, which basically says get a vasectomy and don't get into ANYTHING legally binding and take every precaution you can afford cos AWALT.

        If they can't force us to sign legally binding contracts or steal or sperm or get money from men who see through their tactics, their only way to have any leverage on men is to just criminalise them and be able to declare anybody a rapist or hatespeecher without being questioned.

        [–]1edwardhwhite 11 points12 points  (4 children)

        A woman approvingly posted a link on my FB feed this morning about how street harassment is a hate crime in a UK county. Last night she kissed me 3 times on the lips unwanted and uninvited and has given me unrequested shoulder massages. Shit is rich.

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Here's your mistake shitlord. You are a man. You're maximum privileged and part of the patriarchy. When a victimized woman comes to you and gives you some of her valuable, rarely given out love- you ought to take it! Remember that men have it easy and women have it hard!

        [–]Forcetobereckonedwit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Here comes the rape charge when you don't fuck her!

        [–]cozgw 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        "Last night she kissed me 3 times on the lips unwanted and uninvited and has given me unrequested shoulder massages. Shit is rich."

        Did you reply to her post saying this? If not you are beta son!

        [–]1edwardhwhite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Never call out women for their behavior. Ever. Just leave.

        [–]Planner_Hammish 7 points8 points  (2 children)

        Here are the lyrics to Like a Rolling Stone:

        Once upon a time you dressed so fine
        Threw the bums a dime in your prime, didn't you?
        People call say 'beware doll, you're bound to fall'
        You thought they were all kidding you
        You used to laugh about
        Everybody that was hanging out
        Now you don't talk so loud
        Now you don't seem so proud
        About having to be scrounging your next meal

        How does it feel, how does it feel?
        To be without a home
        Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone

        Ahh you've gone to the finest schools, alright Miss Lonely
        But you know you only used to get juiced in it
        Nobody's ever taught you how to live out on the street
        And now you're gonna have to get used to it
        You say you never compromise
        With the mystery tramp, but now you realize
        He's not selling any alibis
        As you stare into the vacuum of his eyes
        And say do you want to make a deal?

        How does it feel, how does it feel?
        To be on your own, with no direction home
        A complete unknown, like a rolling stone

        Ah you never turned around to see the frowns
        On the jugglers and the clowns when they all did tricks for you
        You never understood that it ain't no good
        You shouldn't let other people get your kicks for you
        You used to ride on a chrome horse with your diplomat
        Who carried on his shoulder a Siamese cat
        Ain't it hard when you discovered that
        He really wasn't where it's at
        After he took from you everything he could steal

        How does it feel, how does it feel?
        To have on your own, with no direction home
        Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone

        Ahh princess on a steeple and all the pretty people
        They're all drinking, thinking that they've got it made
        Exchanging all precious gifts
        But you better take your diamond ring, you better pawn it babe
        You used to be so amused
        At Napoleon in rags and the language that he used
        Go to him he calls you, you can't refuse
        When you ain't got nothing, you got nothing to lose
        You're invisible now, you've got no secrets to conceal

        How does it feel, ah how does it feel?
        To be on your own, with no direction home
        Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone

        [–]NaughtyFred 8 points9 points  (0 children)

        Sounds like Bob watched a few hippy chicks ride the cc to the end of the line.

        [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Thanks, I never realized this song is redpill as fuck.

        [–]lowbrowhaufbrau 8 points9 points  (3 children)

        No, by all means, keeping getting black out drunk.

        It's empowering!

        [–]ben0wn4g3 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        Girls get fucking messed up far worse than guys on my experience.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Because someone will take care of them. And also because Becky just made out with Jason and fuck that bitch, we're doing shots.

        [–]ben0wn4g3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        If I drank what Becky drank and then did shots I'd be a mess and I've got 70lbs on her.

        [–]GunsGermsAndSteel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

        If I said "When out in the bars, keep in mind that people may take advantage of you- watch how much you drink so you don't get robbed", that would be a completely sensible statement that everyone would agree with.

        Change the last word to "raped", and suddenly I'm a shitlord.

        [–][deleted]  (19 children)

        [removed]

        [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

        These people want to have their cake and eat it too. I actually commend them. They've simultaneously made their gender a protected class that has all the positive rights as the men without any of the negatives like "personal accountability" or "rational thinking". Truly remarkable. The shamelessness it takes to establish and support such a platform is beyond my imagination.

        [–]Ou-tis 2 points3 points  (1 child)

        I think they are : a)Insane/retarded b)Liars c)Both

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Is solipsism not insane?

        Is blame shifting not retarded?

        Is the Machiavellian not a liar?

        [–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 2 points3 points  (3 children)

        I can't for the life of me understand how these feminists reconcile the idea that they are always victims and never responsible with the idea that they are also on equal footing as men and posses equal power/intelligence/potential/ACCOUNTABILITY.

        That's where the mysterious patriarchy comes into play.

        Women are equal to men, but men oppress the shit out of them, which is why they aren't able to develop to their full potential.

        [–]ben0wn4g3 3 points4 points  (1 child)

        If they are equal why don't they oppress the shit out of us instead?

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 7 points8 points  (6 children)

        Go away this is a mans place. You are diluting the message. I know I know, women invade male spaces. Women secretly like being the only female in a group of men. We know your fantasies.

        For the love of god, if you really want to read shit that doesn't apply to you- in the slightest. Then do so by lurking only. This place is important for the younger men who just begin unplugging. The last thing these guys need is a forum with even more women. That's exactly why they got here.

        I'm not sure what TRP's official stance is on participating women but I'm sure this sub wasn't meant for both sexes. There's RedPill Women if you'd like sexual advice.

        [–]afkb39sdfb 2 points3 points  (2 children)

        Reverse the genders of your post and it fits something rfeminism would say perfectly. You are no different than them.

        Go away this is a womans place. You are diluting the message. I know I know, men invade female spaces. Men secretly like being the only male in a group of women. We know your fantasies.

        For the love of god, if you really want to read shit that doesn't apply to you- in the slightest. Then do so by lurking only. This place is important for the younger women who just begin unplugging. The last thing these girls need is a forum with even more men. That's exactly why they got here.

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

        Are you arguing that TRP isn't specifically made for men? Also you're statement is full of shit. Men don't invade female spaces. Men don't like being the only male in a group of women. Those are not our fantasies. Younger women need no unplugging.

        It's also ironic that you're comparing this to feminism since feminism is the exact reason men are in the predicament they are right now.

        [–]ChadwickStormphallus 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        'Remain "sexless" while posting' is an official rule, but it's specifically targeted at "as a woman I think..." posts. Don't argue, just report it to the moderators.

        [–]MEpicLevelCheater[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Read the rules. No one cares about your vagina, it does not get you special attention here.

        You are banned for a week.

        [–]LiftingtoAcension 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        This goes for both men and women. If you drink your self to the point you don't even know where you are, and can't remember anything, you're an idiot. If you regret what happened the next day because you couldn't control your self, tough shit, you can't blame anyone else besides your self. That's life.

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 13 points14 points  (13 children)

        Women ride the:

         

        Hamster Wheel of Subjective Happiness and Progress

         

        ...and in normal times where:

        Men love women, women love children, children, love puppies

        This works fine because the man is the masculine polarity Captain and a woman attaches herself to him and spins her hamster wheel to her blissful little happy utopia while living under the male guidance.

        It's only when this hamster wheel logic is expanded into the political space that it becomes a complete joke.

        Such thinking was perfectly fine for women... as women... in a traditional society and actually in traditional society you did see very happy women.

        Today's woman is very unhappy because her hamster wheel logic can't function in the real world.

         

        [–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

        I think it's tough to assume that housewives in the 50s were particularly happy, by and large. Happier than today, sure, but in my experience women are rarely happy with anything.

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

        Wait... I said traditional society.

        I was talking about pre-1950.

        My mother's generation (or before)... she's 83... I'm 55.

        They were much happier than the modern women even if they exist now in what pretends to imitate past traditions.

        There are no traditional women to the fullest today because the world doesn't allow them to exist.

        (well maybe some non-Western cultures possibly)

         

        [–]DeltaRecon2552 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        I honestly don't think most women can be happy. It's in their nature to always long for more. When their SMV plumets they become bitter and cold unless they have made preparations and lived a life of self control.

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        A woman actually needs a masculine "rock" to keep her grounded so that she can actually achieve long term happiness.

        That's the great tragedy of the aggressive Feminist female... her philosophy actually dooms her to a life of unhappiness.

        The Globalist Tyranny wanted to destroy the family and create beta slaves so by making happiness impossible for women "by design" it guarantees a bad outcome.

        We get the outcome that was planned to happen.

         

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 0 points1 point  (5 children)

        What's this Hamster Wheel of Subjetive Mumbo Jumbo you are referring to?

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 0 points1 point  (4 children)

        The short phrase is:

        "Hamster Wheel"

        The fully fleshed out realization of how women think is:

        "Hamster Wheel of Subjective Happiness and Progress"

        So let me explain more...

        Masculine polarity is stoic and objective.

        The feminine polarity is subjective and seeks pleasure in the form of mental happiness even if it means rationalizing away the obvious Truth to get to that emotional state.

        You might say women live in a Limbic Brain Utopia.

        The concept of "progress" is associated with the forgetting and distancing of past actions.

        Women avoid blame... they detach from past actions (like children do)... then to "feel good" about this they retroactively declare:

        "I was once such a horrible victim of circumstances (outright lie and self deception) but I've progressed to be a perfect human being."

        So basically that's it.

        I could write for hours on the topic because it is so amusing.

        Amused Mastery is when you completely understand how funny women are in their self deceptions and attempts at manipulation.

         

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 0 points1 point  (3 children)

        Thanks for the in depth response, I get it now. Do you think that women truly forget their actions/events in their life?

        From what I've seen they are actually prone to dwell on memories and use this to define themselves.

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        They alter their perception of the past.

        By infusing their "spin" on history so that they feel good about their self deception they give the lies a pleasurable label called "progress".

        Women "progress" by avoiding blame.

        "Progress" is a kind of escape from Truth... an escape from reality into Subjective Happiness.

        Happiness is the biggest obstacle to seeing the Truth.

        The Truth doesn't care what emotion you have.

        But emotions can Hate the Truth.

        These days:

        Truth is Hate

        So:

        This means that to the person seeking mythology (self deception... happiness... hamster wheel spinning) the Truth is perceived emotionally as "Hate".

        There is a close connection between:

        • Truth (free) Speech

        • Hate Speech

        ...and we see that the laws are continuing to favor the side which literally:

        "Hates the Truth"

         

        When someone "Triggers" they are in effect saying "I Hate hearing the Truth".

         

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Which is easy to do since women make allot of bad decisions nowadays. So they have many triggers. What do you mean by progress?

        [–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        "Progress" is the discarding of the past.

        It's the act of self deception... the hamster wheel core purpose.

        We "progress" in order to reject and escape Truth.

        We dumb down... we "progress".

         

        Another similar term is:

        Decomposition

         

        [–]allnamesfckintaken 15 points16 points  (3 children)

        the fact that women call it "the walk of shame" just shows that they know it is bad to be a slut. then they turn around and cry slut shaming. they know it's shameful because they feel ashamed for letting a guy who they don't have a relationship with fuck them. that shame isn't a social construct. it's morality that was ingrained into women's minds through evolution. a woman who lets random guys fuck her would not be able to find a provider and once pregnant, no man would want to take care of her. all those women with that sort of tendency and didn't feel shame about it have died out and couldn't pass on their genes. it's the same sort of morality we feel when we harm another person senselessly. even back in caveman days when violence was the way of life, that sort of morality was already there.

        [–]SetConsumes 4 points5 points  (1 child)

        An interesting view point.

        the fact that women call it "the walk of shame" just shows that they know it is bad to be a slut. then they turn around and cry slut shaming. they know it's shameful because they feel ashamed for letting a guy who they don't have a relationship with fuck them. that shame isn't a social construct. it's morality that was ingrained into women's minds through evolution. a woman who lets random guys fuck her would not be able to find a provider and once pregnant, no man would want to take care of her. all those women with that sort of tendency and didn't feel shame about it have died out and couldn't pass on their genes.

        Maybe it's more like instinct over morality?

        it's the same sort of morality we feel when we harm another person senselessly. even back in caveman days when violence was the way of life, that sort of morality was already there.

        Which is why humans need to justify their violence somehow, making the victim evil or deserving of it or subhuman.

        [–]allnamesfckintaken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        it's not that humans need to justify their violence as if humans need to be violent. it's just that if a person was violent for no reason, then they would be a psychopath and they could never survive long enough to pass on their genes. conversely, if a human was incapable of violence, he would have all his shit stolen and he would be killed. that's why humans today enjoy violence but also don't commit it unless necessary.

        [–]bisjac 2 points3 points  (8 children)

        Semi unrelated maybe.

        How does the date rape drug even work? I mean maybe at a house party i can imagine that scenario. But daughters always get the rohypnol talk when going to bars. Do girls just pass out and guys haul them out the bar over thier shoulder, flag a cab, and drag her home? This is happening enough to be the huge epidemic we hear about?

        [–]Zerwas 4 points5 points  (7 children)

        Benzodiazepines like Rohypnol cause a blackout similar to alcohol, and especially when combined with alcohol. The drugged person does not fall asleep immediately but stays awake and more or less functional but can't remember everything that happened during that period. Like with very drunk people, they will pass out quickly when laying down. Source: Been given Valium at the dentist and couldn't remember lots of the procedure next day.

        [–]thedaynos 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        add my two cents here. quite often people do not pass out when on date rape type of drugs. they stay awake and functioning. they often even consent to the sex.

        the next day they realize that they don't remember getting fucked but they feel like they did. they are unsure of whether they would have wanted to have sex with that guy or not if they were sober. also the man's reaction the following day will also guide the woman to whether she feels she's been raped or not.

        [–]NaughtyFred 0 points1 point  (5 children)

        There must be something in Rohypnol that causes the additional memory loss. Not all Benzos are alike.

        Source: Former drug addict, mixed benzos and alcohol (and other fun substances) all the time, never had any loss of memory.

        [–]justmeherointhisclub 2 points3 points  (2 children)

        if u mixed benzos and alcohol all the time and never had memory loss then u aint never mixed benzos and alcohol. Take a xan and drink a 6 pack and guarentee you won't remember anything from the night.

        [–]NaughtyFred -1 points0 points  (1 child)

        If you think a 6 pack is a large amount of alcohol you ain't never been drunk.

        Some of us can handle our shit. The only thing that knocked me out was weed, but coke, speed, E's, benzos and alcohol sat just right.

        [–]justmeherointhisclub 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        who tf said a 6 pack is a lot. I said mix it with a xanax

        [–]Zerwas 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        The memory loss is common with all Benzos depending on tolerance etc. Rohypnol is just very potent in small doses.

        [–]Kaiskov 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Uncle Ben once told me that with great power comes great responsibility.

        If these women wish to be respected as regular citizens, they should know how to take care of themselves rather than put all the weight of their problems on somebody else's shoulders.

        [–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        the burden of ensuring our safety will always be unduly ours to bear
        

        By "safety" she means of course "not having sex with billy beta despite demanding to have sex with billy beta due to her own self-intoxicated state".

        [–]TerryYockey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        If I were to use the "logic" of feminists - and to demonstrate what complete and utter horseshit it is - I should be able to drive to the inner city at 10 o'clock at night, park my car and leave it unlocked, and walk down the street wearing a suit, Rolex watch, etc and expect not to get mugged.

        If I got robbed, to suggest that I should've taken precautions for my safety and to avoid getting robbed is preposterous and victim-blaming. Because muggers shouldn't mug. Right?

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        "a victim's responsibility for their own reckless endangerment does not detract from the culprit's exclusive liability for choosing to capitalize on the easy target"

        That right there is the crux of the matter. It can be 100% the perpetrator's fault but that does not mean the victim's actions were anything other than severely ill-advised.

        [–]1The_BitterTruth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        Just translate this situation to actual victims.

        "We didn't want to protect ourselves from Hitler and the Nazis because we need to teach Nazis not to commit genocide"

        "Genocide apologists!"

        While yes it is unsettling that there are things in the world that can hurt you, only you are responsible and capable of providing your own safety and security. It doesn't matter how wrong the other person is, if you make yourself vulnerable, people will take advantage of you. Tell that same bullshit to the 250,000,000+ people that were killed by their own government in the past century.

        [–]offthebeatmeoff 7 points8 points  (18 children)

        This is just the difference in the liberal versus the conservative mindset. Most liberals you talk to believe in this "ideal" world, while conservatives seem to be more based in reality. This is a generalization and there are obvious exceptions. I was in the military so I'll give an example related to that, and you'll see some parallells to this.

        Female genital mutilation is obviously a bad thing. Especially when it is done by a witch doctor who uses a sharp rock and pretty much does everything he can to cause an infection. If you talk to a liberal they'll say "that's horrible and that needs to stop, but do nothing about it". However, these evil conservative men in the army go out and convince these witch doctors to use sterilized scalpels and make the process hygienic. Apparently that is bad because they are still doing the mutilation.

        This was a bit of a rant, but it's the same principle with this. Rape is obviously bad. Nobody wants it to happen. Liberals say it should never happen, but people grounded in reality know it will happen and want to take actionable measures to minimize the risk for everyone, but apparently that is bad because it doesn't match with the ideal image of the perfect world they want.

        It's funny because we're the people who actually try to make the world a better place for everyone through action.

        [–]gebrial 4 points5 points  (6 children)

        Your outlook on this is as bad as these feminists. Generalizing liberals vs conservatives is ridiculous because there are crazies on both sides and saints on both sides. When you ignore your own groups faults and ignore the opposing groups strengths you are essentially blind.

        [–]offthebeatmeoff -1 points0 points  (5 children)

        Of course there are. I would never deny that. I don't think for one moment that if conservatives were to have their way that we would be in some utopia. It's pretty tough to make arguments without making some generalizations, hence terms like AWALT. Most guys here with real experience with women and in general know that there are exceptions everywhere and every girl has varying degrees of behavior. It's the same with conservatives and liberals. Things become way too long winded when you try to break everything into separate echelons of intensity.

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (4 children)

        AWALT has no exceptions. Some women can suppress their AWALT behavior and you can talk to them about it too, but the fact that they have to suppress is because AWALT.

        [–]pezzaperry 0 points1 point  (3 children)

        Yes but there are different levels of AWALT

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        Based on what? What are some different levels of AWALT?

        [–]pezzaperry 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        As in some women are more like that than others.

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        In appearance, yes, some show the AWALT behaviors more than others, some are better at repressing the symptoms.

        [–]grad14uc 0 points1 point  (3 children)

        The answer you usually get is education when you ask what should change. Just teach young men not to rape. I'm sure that message will resonate with most loud and clear, but bad people exist in the world and that's not going to change. I don't know if you ever had a DARE program in middle school, but that did not deter kids from doing drugs.

        [–]offthebeatmeoff 1 point2 points  (2 children)

        I did, and it only made drugs seem cool. They made it sound like cocaine gave you super human strength and opioids would feel 100X better than sex.

        When they say education, it isn't really education. It's more of an indoctrination. If it was education, they would educate both sexes on prevention, and risk, but that isn't the case.

        I remember when I was a freshman in college. It was the first week, and we had to make our own skits showing examples of abusive relationships. It seemed like fun, and I had become friends with another really tall guy, and we pretended to be a gay couple, and I was an aggressive bear that wanted to claim his buttginity, and he didn't want to do it. It was funny and a pretty cool example of sexual abuse.

        Even though we had the loudest applause, we lost to some lame skit of a guy invading his gf's privacy by demanding to look at her phone and being controlling. We lost because we didn't follow the narrative these people want to see. I was lucky enough to always have pretty cool friends and have a good social standing because I had never really had to deal with bullshit most men face.

        [–]grad14uc 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        I remember the double vision exercise we did. Pretty sure everyone wanted a beer afterward.

        And I see we are lowering the bar for what constitutes abuse. I saw the same thing though in classes that had anything to do with liberal arts. Had a mass comm class that was blatantly making women out to be the victims in society. The saddest part was the acceptance of generalizing men after just explaining why it's wrong to do that with women. Mind boggling stuff. Real annoying that you are forced to take a course like this in order to graduate, but thank God it's so easy to bs your way through.

        [–]offthebeatmeoff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Like most things in life, you just have to keep your head down and move on. It's stupid. Everyone who has half a nutsack and an ounce of common sense knows it stupid. Everyone has to do it though, until we take another shift in our society towards the right.

        [–]Gadnuk_ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        It's like needle banks for heroin addicts. Junkies are gonna junk, at least we can bring down the AIDS rate by taking preventive action

        [–]offthebeatmeoff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Yeah that's a great example. People will do it, you might as well lower the risk so that others don't suffer as a result.

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (4 children)

        Interesting to see this as a liberal vs conservative mindset.

        Do conservatives hold ideals too? Or are they typically realists?

        [–]offthebeatmeoff 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        From my experience, yes they do. You get these conservative/libertarians who believe in a bare minimum style of government. I'm all for that as well and like Socialism, it seems fantastic on paper. They think everyone can handle the freedom, and that the private sector will completely handle everything and the market will balance itself. I'm not a political scientist. I'm sure half the stuff I say is wrong or can be proven otherwise, but I do know history and what happens when there aren't checks on industry and what happens when the government doesn't shove it's nose into things on occasion.

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Cool. Though I wouldn't call libertarians the same as conservatives, they're also idealistic.

        Im for minimum government, but to say corps wouldnt continue to control thought, fix markets, and create barriers to entry is wishful thinking.

        [–]offthebeatmeoff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Yeah, I meant conservatives leaning towards libertarianism. True libertarians are definitely very idealistic, and a rare breed where that policy would definitely work for them, but not how they think when applied to a large scale.

        [–][deleted]  (9 children)

        [deleted]

        [–]teamstreetz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        LOl ... Beef Gyro on a Stick!!!

        [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (6 children)

        I have taken measures every time I've gone out in public to not be physically assaulted, robbed, and murdered. Early in my life I had to defend myself from assault every day, I got my ass kicked a lot...for a while. Then I learned to fight, to win, to dominate others, and I got bigger. I didn't plead with society to make everyone stop beating the shit out of me. I did something about it, I was proactive, not reactive.

        The probability of me being assaulted, robbed or killed is far greater than girls being raped. They barely need any preventative measures to avoid being raped in civilized countries, yet they play like it's walking a gauntlet of sick fiends escaped from a mental ward for the criminally sexual whilst naked and covered in lube.

        Simple. Don't get drunk. Don't go to places where shit happens while you're alone. Don't be fucking stupid. Take personal responsibility for your own safety like the rest of us have to.

        The problem is, they won't and will hate you for suggesting they should.

        [–]NaughtyFred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Yep, they're having to learn the rules that guys learned and lived by since they were 13-24 and they think:

        "it's too haaaarrrddd, where's my protective bubble like I had when my daddy carried me around in his big strong arms?

        And that's why we have male privilege folks!

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (4 children)

        Can they take responsibility if they were not raised to take responsibility and society doesn't promote them taking responsibility? Don't honestly know.

        [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (3 children)

        Only if they possess some kind of empathetic intellect that allows then to see themselves from an outside perspective. So for the vast majority of people, no.

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (2 children)

        Which is essentially the ability to see outside your own solipsism. I agree.

        [–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (1 child)

        Very few girls develop that even with outside influence, I'd be near impossible for it to come about naturally.

        [–]SetConsumes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Very few girls develop that even with outside influence, I'd be near impossible for it to come about naturally.

        So then women's hypoagency must be true most of the time if not always.

        [–]darksoldierk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        It's a really really shitty reality that men can't choose to keep a child they helped make, but that's the reality. Reality sucks, we all have to accept it.

        [–]feezus_h 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I personally hate this type of thing (the origonal article), because of the implication that men are seedy rape machines unable to control themselves in the face of certain stimuli (read: your 'blacked-out bimbo').

        That said, it should of course be common wisdom that getting blackout, shitty drunk in a public place away from home is a poor idea for anyone, not just women.

        EDIT: Spelling.

        [–]SetConsumes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I've pointed this out several times, with date rape and women getting raped at parties, she could have chosen not to put herself in the dangerous situation(alone with a man in a dwelling) or get so drunk where she loses control.

        Never once have any of the women agreed. To them saying that implies I'm saying that all men are rapists.

        [–]icculushfb42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Now obviously, a person SHOULD be able to do something stupid like getting so drunk that they pass out and not be taken advantage of (man or woman) but the reality is, if you're not in control of yourself, someone else can be so if that bothers you DON'T FUCKING DO IT!

        [–]thelaptopliquidator 1 point2 points  (1 child)

        "Compton at 3am while shit-faced and wearing a Ralph Lauren Polo. "

        Pro tip: If you're gonna be in the wrong place at the wrong time, dress like an off duty cop.

        White socks, Black sneakers, jeans, and a Boston PD t shirt is my go to. (not impersonating a cop, not illegal, since I have no badge etc)

        Works often brings me to bad neighborhoods, at odd times, and I have never been molested

        If you can't scramble up the PD t shirt (most thirft shops will have), a baggy top like a sweater or a windbreaker suggests you're carrying a firearm

        [–]The1WhoCsAll 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Upvoted with emphasis. Lesson #1: Don't look like food and the sharks may not try to eat you.

        [–]1DRMMR76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        This is another way the Left has insidiously reshaped the national narrative about issues to make it so actual solutions can't even be brought up. Race, sexism, police issues, etc. All of it has been carefully shaped into a "none of it is our fault, it's all on YOU to fix everything" game. The way they've turned every single proposed solution into "victim blaming" is not an accident. Just look at President Hussein's speech at the Dallas funeral. He even bluntly said "It's not about finding solutions. It's about understanding feelings". Because solutions involve admitting that there is some fault on the other side as well. Want to start fixing the issue of blacks "feeling" that police are racist? Well fix the internal issue of blacks committing several times more crimes per capita than any other race. Then police would have no reason to pull them over more, arrest them more, or use force when they fight back more.

        The Left is actively trying to feed the public the Blue Pill, and with great success. Convincing someone a lie is the truth in order to control their actions, and manipulating their feelings instead of focusing on facts and proof is the very essence of the Blue Pill.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        This is the first time I listened to the words of like a rolling Stone without getting distracted by the weird cadence of the song. Hilarious.

        I'm baffled that women refuse to make themselves hard targets (as opposed to soft/easy targets). The logic seems hardwired into their brains that they are smaller, weaker and in need of defending/rescuing. Their dad's, teachers, brothers have always defended and rescued them so they've never had to be responsible for their safety. Now, out in the wide, cold world where none of these resources are available to help mitigate their poor risk assessment they are victims of the betas and sickos you refer to.

        [–][deleted]  (3 children)

        [deleted]

        [–]TerryYockey 6 points7 points  (2 children)

        What I find both pathetic and comical is in our legal system, if a woman is intoxicated and has sex, she is said to have been raped because a drunk woman is incapable of consent.

        Yet, if she were to get behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated and drive, whatever happened while she was driving drunk-whether it be plowing into a house, running over somebody and killing them, etc . would be completely her fault and the fact that she had been drunk would suddenly be no excuse.

        [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        The holy grail of double standards.

        [–]SYL3NZR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Just you wait. Google and Co. are making "autopilot" cars and in like 10 years they may be available for the common citizen, give it a few years from there and any vehicle related accidents are either men's fault or technology.

        [–]ecosci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        If you dont marry or ltr them you dont have to foot their bill just leave them to thier own devices and rot, let them do what they want the more the better it gives us a chance to really see what female nature is all about when men stop putting pussy on a pedestal the bs will stop because its all they are worth women have no honor and penalties, in fact they get rewarded for bad behaviour because beta men want to save the damsel in distress (state)so give her all the drinks and badboys she can (handle)big daddy will come to the rescue.Im am not condoning violence but women need to be responsible for themselves too.

        [–]Forcetobereckonedwit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Cognitive Womanance.

        (Or, I vag, therefore I win.)

        Hah, I coined another one.

        [–]chances_are_ur_a_fag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        jezebel.. now thats a low hanging fruit, bro

        [–]NikoMyshkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        The fucking cognitive dissonance is astounding.

        I wonder: how much cognitive dissonance is possible when reason and abstract thinking (and thus self-awareness) are very limited resources in your head.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Feminists are in a rage against reality.

        The idea that they live in a world where they have to take personal responsibility to ensure their own safety is infuriating to them. They have worked hard for decades to become "independent women" who don't need a father or husband to protect them and then when they realize that being independent means taking responsibility for your own safety they become outraged.

        You can't have your cake and eat it too ladies. You can't be independent, strong, powerful women who don't need a man and also have someone else be responsible your your safety.

        [–]igottennispenis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Reminds me of the CDC recommendation 6-8 months ago that women who are sexually active but don't use birth control should avoid alcohol.

        [–]Luckyluke23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        come to Trp to gain knowledge and understanding. did not expect one of my fav songs to be linked in post.

        great post man.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        This is why its a joke when they say they are our equals. They are not. Anyone who refuses to accept responsibility is not your equal. This is why women are worthless.

        Its fine though. Used to reverse SJW about it (be like WTF why and give a shit as to why they choose not to take responsibility) but realized its fine the way it is... after all they don't do shit their whole lives anyways so who cares.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        Replace "rape" with "theft" and anyone raging against the Kansas City Star columnist would come across as a twat

        [–]1PantsonFire1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        I love it when women attempt to sound all intellectual and thought provoking in their writing, it's so cute. In all seriousness though. Isn't this exactly what you would expect that columnist to think? I bet she doesn't even give two shits about the article she's responding to. Blogs like hers are purely for validation and attention points. She's just picking shit her female readers will latch on.

        Also, it must be pretty hard for a creature who's secret fantasy is in fact rape, and needs male attention like a crack addict needs another hit- to actually not get raped by thirsty men. I'm astounded no one has ever pointed that out.

        Couple weeks ago I was in the club with my mates. This girl was talking to us and being the usual infatuated slut. She was drunk and clearly dtf. I asked her to give me her drink (always do that) and she did. I went on to sip on her drink for five minutes until I let her to suck through the straw herself (all part of the game). She looked at me with big dopey eyes and asked if one of us spiked her drink. She asked this multiple times and I jokingly agreed and amplified every time. Then took a big gulp anyway. This girl wanted to black out and get fucked.

        This is consequently why women get drunk beyond recollection. Female sexually is fucked up. The amount of times I've seen women get absolutely hammered and parade around like the town bike waiting to be taken are uncountable. They actually get upset when no guy does. The writer of that Kansas City article knows this and was intelligent enough to point this out.

        And this brings me to another tale posted on here a while back. This German washed-up model was getting shitfaced at some VIP bar. Met two Arab guys with impressive beards. Went back to their hotel room and began fucking with both. Eventually she cried rape. Like mid coitus or something.

        That's like meeting a serial killer online. Talking to him about his darkest dreams. Hearing him out about some murder fantasy he's got. Meet him in real life cause 'watcha gonna do?'. Following him back to his torture/murder dungeon. And then crying in surprise when he tries to kill you.

        It's also funny to note that these SJW crusade posts are never written by women who actually got raped in their life. It's like their jealous of the ones who were or something. Guys who understand women more intimately will get the point I'm making.