Women do worse than men in technical interviews online. Of course it must be because of patriarchy so the voices of the candidates gets scrambled that gender isn't recognizable and in other cases actually reversed so that women sound like men and vice-versa.
It turns our women sounding like men do weben worse than women sounding like women. So women actually got judged less harshly than men.
A well known technical hiring company sees from it's data that women do much worse than men in their interviews. The interviews take place on an online platform including voice call and hence from voice alone the interviewer will know the gender of the candidate. Because of course genders are equal it can't be that woman do worse and women are getting treated worse than men.
So they change the whole platform that voices of candidates are now on the fly modulated to sound neutral or of the opposite sex. So women now sound like men and vice versa.
They did about 300 interviews and then analyzed the results. Officially the found no gender gap but then the article clearly says men that sounded like women did better than men that sounded like men and women that sounded like men did worse than women that sounded like women. The obvious conclusion being that it's not women that get oppressed but preferred treatment. Their experiment showed the exact opposite of what they wanted to show.
- Women really are worse than men in technical areas
- When you look closely it turns out that it's actually men that get treated unfairly not women