582
583
584

MetaEmbrace the Unspeakable Horror of The Real! (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil

A Red Pill is a truth powerful enough to destroy people and their beliefs. That's what makes it horrific and unspeakable. Once a belief system is destroyed all the social functions, fancy titles and associations birthed by it are destroyed as well. Not only are there no priests without God but there are also no rituals, no temples and no festivals. Worst of all there is no common identity to bond over.

A Red Pill is a threat because it endangers a society's ideology: the shared collective narrative that holds it together. While the narrative may differ from time and place, the basic structure remains the same. Socrates was sentenced to death for not acknowledging the gods of Athens. The Catholic Church prosecuted Galileo for challenging their view of the universe and transitively their right to impose that view. Stalin tracked Trotsky across the globe and put an ice pick in the back of his skull, because Trotsky threatened the Soviet Union’s brand of Communism.

Egalitarian Equalism is the current ideology in effect today. It's the belief that all of us are born an identical blank slate. All behavior is socially conditioned. Biological hardware has no bearing at all. Only software matters hardware doesn't even exist. This belief system is difficult to rationally maintain. Inborn psychological and biological differences have been known for centuries and with advancements in brain scans and genetics our knowledge becomes more definitive. Furthermore the internet has made ideology impossible to maintain through ignorance as in the days of old.

Which is why the priests of the Equalist Cathedral don't defend their gospel through logic or reason but through shame guilt and autistic screeching. After all, they are fighting for their lives. What does the Women's Studies department do once it is definitively accepted that gender is a biological state that leads to different outcomes for men and women? What do marriage counselors do once we collectively admit that attraction can not be negotiated? What do college admissions officers do once we admit that no amount of Affirmative Action can stop the Chinese and their SATs? Long after the priests of Equalism have personally lost faith in their false god they will defend their religion for fear of what comes next. They can never be persuaded because they already know the lie to be a lie.

Institutions can't exist without ideology. People especially the mediocre talentless sort can't exist without those institutions. Whenever an ideology is killed so are the people who depend on it. Sometimes they kill themselves. Sometimes they starve to death after the structures that fed them are dismantled. Other times they simply suffer ego death and fade into obscurity like the Nazis of Argentina. Regardless whenever an ideology with a capital I dies whether Communism, Fascism, Roman Imperialism there is always blood. Always.

The Manosphere began as a means for men to teach other men how to get laid. The goal was never to change society. The goal was to teach Beta males to maintain eye contact and stop finger fucking their god damn pockets. However in our quest to get beta males to unfuck themselves we stumbled upon the horrific unspeakable truth of human sexual dynamics. Horrific truth? You mean that women are biologically hardwired to get Netflix and drilled by uncaring unapologetic douchebags and shit test intermittently to ensure that the douchebags are in fact as dochey as advertised? Sounds pretty straight forward. What's so terrible about that? Well that truth, the truth of biological essentialism when taken to its logical conclusion and adopted by the masses has the power to destroy the Equalist ideology and it's prophets.

Just as Galileo nerding over a telescope heralded the beginning of the Enlightenment and the decline of the Catholic Church’s power, the Red Pill nerding over hot Alpha sex tips is the beginning of the end of Equalism. If we weren't a threat, the screaming wouldn't be so loud. I mean why bother a fat man behind a telescope or a dude bro shitposting behind a computer unless he is a threat? Why go through all of the trouble? Because we are inadvertently threatening to destroy them and their reputation, their way of life and take everything they have.

Ask yourself if we win and every Gender Studies department is defunded on account of being useless ideological drivel, how upset would you be? How upset would you be if a Woman's Studies professor hung herself after being ridiculed and unable to adapt to a post Feminist world? I don't think the people here would be very upset. I'm confident that many of us smile at the idea.

All I'm asking you to do is to look in the mirror. Admit to yourself who you are and what you are doing. You are a barbarian. You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result. Because that's always what happens. Look at yourself and embrace the unspeakable horror of the Real! You are uncompromising horror. You are their horror. Set yourself free by admitting who you are to yourself. Now go out, and take what you want from this Earth.

Follow me on Twitter

PM me if you are interested in becoming a fitness coaching client


[–][deleted] 67 points68 points  (44 children)

All systems defend themselves. It's not a difficult concept. Then something comes along to challenge the system - and power must be defended. In x number of years the red pill movement of that time will swing back to egalitarianism or something else - some new thing. And the cycle will repeat.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 60 points61 points  (43 children)

Life is inherently random and meaningless and this is a reality that most people can't accept. So they create a mythos to bring order to the randomness. Maybe it's religion, maybe it's the march toward equality, maybe it's nationalism or communism or fascism. Whatever that Ideology is it is always based on lies and simplifications so it can be readily understood by Normies.

Well eventually those lies and simplifications make the mythos or ideology not function as promised. Trickle down economics doesn't trickle anything down. Communism doesn't give the means of production to the worker. The product doesn't live up to the marketing.

At which point the system is torn down along with those who created it and replaced with another system.

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (28 children)

along with those who created it

I have the sneaking suspicion that those who are in true power tend to stay in power. If not the individual than the overarching class of people. You and I have seen this before. Maybe we will see it again in our lifetime. Maybe not. I give it a hundred years tops here. Realistically likely about 50-60

[–][deleted] 45 points46 points  (5 children)

The bottom line is the mass of humanity wants Netflix, porn, and SUVs. They don't have a desire to operate as free, sovereign individuals. Give them a convenient lie and let them make babies. A vanishingly small amount of people will always determine the fate of the many.

[–]dakanos 19 points20 points  (1 child)

OMG the amount of truth on this thread... I think I'm gonna come.

Maybe in the future it's only going to be one being that determines the fate of everybody. Beware, the Singularity is (also) coming.

[–]p3n1x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beware, the Singularity is (also) coming

Singularity is just a fancy word for "Evolution". Sink or Swim has always been part of the game.

[–]Fedor_Gavnyukov 6 points7 points  (0 children)

that's precisely it. most people want to be ruled. they have to be told what to do, otherwise they go apeshit. they're lost without mommy and daddy govt. they're incapable of individual thought and action.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

opiates of the masses

[–]alphabeta49 12 points13 points  (7 children)

Look up "Everything is a rich man's trick" on youtube. The same people/families have been in power, on both sides of every conflict, since WWII, and it will always stay that way. Funded the axis and the allies. Created conflicts for profit. There is no difference in political party, good vs bad, rep vs dem. The world is fucked, if you wanna talk about the big picture.

My response? To become as fucking awesome as I can and live life to the fullest, with the least amount of pain, because we're all gonna die someday and there ain't nothing I'm gonna leave behind that anyone will remember in 100 years. Except my kids. Gotta make sure the name survives. Biological imperative and all that jazz.

[–]iprefersoap 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Literally in the middle of watching/listening to this right now. About an hour and 20 in. I've been heavily looking into our fucked up world/history since about 2009/2010 and all the "conspiracies". This should be a real eye opener for anyone who believes the world truly is the way they have been led to believe. It's a fabricated reality. Hopefully most of us are past that point, however...

[–]p3n1x 2 points3 points  (3 children)

The world is fucked,

When has it not been fucked? This is a mentality that every single generations 'Old Man' has been complaining about. Now cut your hair and get a real job.

[–]alphabeta49 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Did you even read my comment? You completely missed the point. Spoiler: I agree with you.

[–]p3n1x 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I did, either you changed your post, or I replied to the wrong person. Going to assume wrong person. Somebody used conspiracy theories and the year of 2009 to claim the world is "now" fucked.

[–]alphabeta49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't change a thing. Wrong person.

[–]3LiveAFTSOV 0 points1 point  (1 child)

can write a good book

can make a good movie

can become exceptional at something to the point that you are world renown.

you can be remembered

[–]alphabeta49 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If doing any or all of those things will make you happy, then go for it. I used to want to be a concert pianist and travel the world. Then my gf got pregnant, and I wouldn't give up my family life for any stage fame.

The point still stands that you have an imperative to be happy, so go do whatever makes you happy and apologize to no one for it.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 2 points3 points  (7 children)

You mean like how that report that came out from China? that all the wealthiest in China pre 1914 come from the same families as the wealthiest post 1945?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children)

did not read the report. but I wouldn't have either. I file that stuff under the "yea, and?" pile

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 5 points6 points  (5 children)

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

wealthiest in China pre 1914 come from the same families as the wealthiest post 1945?

31 years is nothing

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I believe the point was the revolution didn't change the power structures at all

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

exactly. neither did 600 years of other history

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AH, found out we were talking about the same sets of articles, taken from the economics paper.

Yup. China rich from 200bce are still running the show today.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Upvote for mentioning Tetsuo

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It's almost like by pitting man vs. woman the masses are easily divided and consumed by these ideologies, meanwhile those in power gain more....

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yes. Only total wars and revolutions, France 1789 and UK under Cromwell (not for always), Russia 1914, great leap forward, really tilt the balance of power.

[–]circlhat 8 points9 points  (2 children)

In the grand scheme of things life is random and meaningless, but this type of philosophy has no use in the practical world, you do mean something , maybe not to anyone else, but you damn well better treat yourself as important.

When we are talking about the entire universe we are insignificant but when it comes to our community we better start speaking up

[–]oddtimesigs 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree, it's one of the hardest things to come to terms with when you really consider that ol' "life is meaningless, create your own meaning" high school philosophy shtick. As Dan Harmon once said "the knowledge that nothing matters, while accurate, gets you nowhere."

[–]tteabag2591 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Life is inherently random and meaningless and this is a reality that most people can't accept.

As in a cosmic level of meaning? Sure. It doesn't make the universe a bit of difference whether humans live or die. But that doesn't and possibly shouldn't matter to us either. So what if the universe is ultimately without a unifying meaning? It makes us no difference here and now. This nihilistic realization is part of maturing and eventually we realize that at least SOME system is necessary. But everyone has to find that out for themselves.

[–]bigTOElovah 10 points11 points  (8 children)

Life is inherently random and meaningless and this is a reality that most people can't accept.

This statement requires just as much faith as any religion.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The contrapositive is that old ladies deserve to be plowed into red mist by city busses and the obese people proles who drive them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chaos, quantum theory and thermodynamics make this true in macro world.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it doesn't, it's much more observable and explainable than "god"

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock -1 points0 points  (4 children)

Mental inferior detected.

/u/RedPillSchool please ban.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 8 points9 points  (2 children)

For what? A true statement?

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

This is the same type of retort by people who say "science is a religion too!". Morons.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 141 points142 points  (32 children)

The fact that this piece is 73% and the quote c&p Nikola Tesla circle jerk mgtow beta post piece is over a 1000 pts is blatant evidence of this reality. Not even TRP can drain the swamp of mediocrity.

This post was well written and enlightening and yet the vast vast majority couldnt even comprehend it. Just sad.

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

B-but Nicola was such a nice guy! And he knew all about those filthy whores back in 1924! Too bad that asshole Chad Edison stole all his inventions! REEEEEEEEEE

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Not even TRP can drain the swamp of mediocrity.

TRP can't. Mods on TRP can.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 8 points9 points  (2 children)

The majority of usage of this sub are silent voters. They never post or comment, just upvote/downvote. There's no way to detect who specifically is swaying the conversation. We need a way where we eliminate most of those guys from voting in the first place. A sidebar quiz, not for comprehension, but for evidence that you actually read it.

[–]Endorsed ContributorJamesSkepp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was not referring to the broken voting system. What I meant is that the "Marcus Aurelius quote"-like posts should be simply forbidden and removed.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (5 children)

Some of my best essays bombed with 50 or less votes. I wrote em to flesh out my thoughts so I dont really care.

My Ultimate Cad posts on naughty soccer moms and telling bar sluts to take their hands off my jacket were so popular.

[–]FerrusMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a bunch of essays here with less than 50 votes, that have very strong red pill knowledge and advice. I learned a long time ago to ignore the upvote count, it may or may not be accurate. Sometimes it's just a popularity vote.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 0 points1 point  (3 children)

People still talk about you hiding her gloves

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children)

That too.

These types of things still happen, I just find them less interesting as TRP isnt new to me and as shocking anymore. I had alot to make up for and was so so pleased with how "easy" life became.

Two nights ago I attended an industry event where drinks were flowing and I was talking with some sexy biznesswoman and two of my colleagues. Fairly routine conversation about who knew whom and where we had worked previously when the woman said I remind her "John from Chicago" at my former firm. Said I didn't know him but its a lock he was quite handsome. I swear the ground shook from her vag tingles and I grinned at her and ended the converstion and got a drink. To further help my cause, one of the colleagues stayed with her paying compliments and asked her out.

Naturally, she came around later asked for my card and invited me to drinks the next day by e-mail. She was blunt about meeting (Lovely to meet you!!! We need to get out for drinks!!😀) and she wanted to do it asap.

This kind of invitation most men never get ( I sure never received em) because they didn't learn to flip the script and become the chased rather than the chaser

Jerkitude works and it used to surprise me and compel me to share and the upvotes proved thats what guys want to read.

So take that lil scrap of red meat and I'll report back with a FR next week.

[–]3LiveAFTSOV 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Flip the script and become chased

You know, TRP has alot of contradictory ideas.

Be bold and ask out those you find attractive, take action.

Develop yourself, and women will be attracted to you and your success

Shit, I supposed the best is to simply do both.

I'm curious though, how did you "flip the script" ?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like when people have an open mind and are genuinely curious about things even when they see potential contradictions. I have no easy answer here but I'd suggest that you do both but in different situations using the TRP principles. Not the TRP Laws.. See the difference?

In this example, I built attraction with the irrational self confidence line and pulled away. I spoke with other people and she saw me socially engaged and that wasnt her normal experience. She had orbiters all night and forcefully had to break away and talk to others as most guys hung on. My colleague asked her out and I could tell she felt scared he was trying to lock her pussy down She approached me and asked to exchange cards at the end if the night and I cheerily obliged and made no promised to ever contact her. Not that I wouldn't, but rightfully figured if she asked, she was interested in wanting to know if I was worth wanting. thats the difference between men and women (see below). So I let her make first move and invest in the interaction.

When I replied it was brief

"Sure, would love to. Thursday at 8. Martingales"

See how she still isnt sure I am into her? It's delicious for women NOT to know. It's a challenge.

Men see and want or dont want.

Women see and want to know if he is worth wanting. Psycho social dominance comes into play after the physical. Yes, I am lean and well groomed but that is only the beginnings when inducing vagina tingles

Anyway she wrote me at noon the next day and asked me out. It's next week and THAT is when I can be bold and take action....with my sexual needs as a man, not my human needs for companionship

Betas get this ass backwards and beg for dates and are afraid to escalate because thats what assholes do and they dont want to be seen like one of those guys!

Play with it. Women are fun and exisit for your pleasure and who cares if you fuck up in the beginnings of your personal seduction learning process.

All the best and go make em swoon

Cad

[–]segagaga 21 points22 points  (17 children)

That's because too many here are here to get laid more and have no greater motivation or more lofty ambitions than that. They do not understand because they do not desire to. It's sad, I really wish the PUA community would fuck off. They are just as much a part of The Decline.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (14 children)

the PUA-ish guys that I know do pull a lot of girls, are very close to being red pilled, are aware that career and other personal goals come first, but when we go in depth on male/female dynamics something is always off. Obviously the ego of a man who fucks a few different girls a month is too huge to be challenged.

[–]circlhat 12 points13 points  (10 children)

PUA was 100% red pill, early PUA predates red pill and red pill simply build upon those concepts, even therationmale sites older books as the reason he is even red today.

Now feminist have taken over PUA so you can a water down version

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 21 points22 points  (3 children)

Feminists didnt ruin PUA, the masses did. Nothing of value can be spread too widely. Nature creates a certain eternal proportion of bottoms to prop up everyone else. Once these people get a hold of it, they fuck it up. TRP should only be for guys that were socially programmed beta/bluepill not genetically pre-destined like drone ants. Of course, how does one identify one from the other? If there is a way to create an effective barrier to entry that doesnt cost money or require a religious like structure, I'm all ears.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If there is a way to create an effective barrier to entry that doesnt cost money or require a religious like structure, I'm all ears.

We already have that thing running. It's called the sidebar and 95% of people coming here won't even make it half into the theory portion of it, let aside get anywhere near being unplugged.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have implemented numerous strategies for protecting The Red Pill since its inception, and they have worked quite well so far.

PM me if you would like to know more.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 20 points21 points  (1 child)

    Most Western women have Feminist or at least Feminist light ideas. So if you are a beta with a weak sense identity and weak frame and spend your time talking with women their ideas will seep into you.

    Beware when fucking Feminists you yourself don't become a feminist. Beware when you gaze into the abyss the abyss gazes back into you.

    [–]pencilcasserole 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I was just reading Zarathustra today. This puts it in a new frame, thank you...many feminists to show the way of the overman, but it's true, some caution is needed.

    [–]circlhat 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    they teach society to avoid it

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 7 points8 points  (2 children)

      A 'few' girls a month is deceptive. 3x12 =36/yr. That's a damn good rate.

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      poorly worded. I had in mind "a few fwb/plates", those who come over every other week -ish. If they disappear they tend to get replaced = no real drought. I used to like dating 2-3 girls casually over a few months. Something like 5-10 good quality girls over a year is a solid rate already. PUA type of volume isn't my thing and has never truly been.

      [–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      I wasnt talking about you specifically. It's the emotional connontation that comes with that statement. It sounds so casual and average but when you take the time to think it through, it's like top 5% of the male population's capabilities.

      [–]allergisch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I dont post here and rarely read this sub but noticed it. "How I fucked a girl yesterday" honestly, I dont care how a random guy I dont even know got laid.

      [–]Anon_namdre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      While I have the utmost respect for gaylubeoil, the red pill isn't about activism. The left is poison, but for most of us being a die hard MAGA won't help you get laid unless you're trying to fuck a country bitch, in which case good for you. When I started taking the pill three years ago this sub helped me fuck the hottest bartender I was working with the summer before my sophomore year of college. Now I'm about to start my first job as a tech support engineer making a little over 60k. If this sub was what it was now when I started reading, I don't think I would've gotten the same thing out of it. Donald trump could give a fuck if you get to fuck who you want. Fuck the left, but partake in activism in the appropriate time and place. Being a Die hard trump guy will not better you. Pick up a weight, focus on bettering yourself. Turn off the tv and do a push up. Those are things that will better you, not marketing trump to everyone that will listen.

      Edit/ my comment is off topic but I couldn't post to the sub. I'd like to hear your thoughts.

      [–]slumdog-millionaire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I posted about this very issue like two days ago, got like 10 upvotes. The most worthless idiotic shit is being upvoted the most here.

      [–]Roaring40sUK 88 points89 points  (0 children)

      you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result.

      I dont care, because, society wouldnt care if I starved or killed myself, afterall, its happening to thousands of men every day.

      Now go out, and take what you want from this Earth.

      I already am, brother, and it feels fucking good!

      [–]SpaceChris 14 points15 points  (5 children)

      "Regardless whenever an ideology with a capital I dies whether Communism, Fascism, Roman Imperialism there is always blood. Always." Multiculturalism in western europe. It's gonna be interesting in the next 10 to 30 years.

      [–]segagaga 10 points11 points  (3 children)

      Interesting is not the word I would choose. Bloody and horrific is certainly interesting enough to be of note, but neither I nor anyone should wish for what is almost certainly going to happen.

      [–]Disciple_of_Libertas 5 points6 points  (2 children)

      Look up Powell's Rivers of Blood speech. Bone chilling that they knew what would happen in the 1960s with multiculturalism and still did it anyway.

      [–]segagaga 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      They did it because they believed we would become like America. We did not. There is nothing multi occurring here, the immigrants keep to those of their own kind for the most part. Some don't even bother to learn English as they do not need to, as they are surrounded by their own culture. That is not multicultural, that is a colony. Mass immigration is pure insanity.

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      they're already losing. they had to fire a google engineer to shut him up, censor a shitload of youtube videos, demonetize pewdiepie, and are currently sitting through the most redpilled presidency in history.

      just remember, these people are ultra-far left and don't believe in guns. we're literally everyone else, and we have the guns.

      [–]SasquatchMcKraken 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      I've said before that TRP is like having FLIR, night vision, and heartbeat sensors while the rest of the BP world ranges somewhere between mere sunglasses and total blindness. You can see what others can't, and learn to adapt to it. I'm not sure that's necessarily a "threat" to some nebulous cabal out there keeping people in the dark. It's simply an advantage. Sexual dynamics in particular are hard work. Far easier to "be yourself" and believe in unicorns and NAWALT. Delusion and denial, if you think about it, are the natural human condition in most situations. It's people who accept reality before, rather than after, it punches them in the dick who are rare.

      [–]keonkla 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      AHAHAHA GayLubeOil Strikes agian! Love this one man.

      [–]FerrusMan 18 points19 points  (10 children)

      The goal was never to change society. The goal was to teach Beta males to maintain eye contact and stop finger fucking their god damn pockets. However in our quest to get beta males to unfuck themselves we stumbled upon the horrific unspeakable truth of human sexual dynamics. <<

      This is exactly how I felt when I figured it out. OMG, women aren't attracted to jerks in spite of the fact they are jerks, they are attracted to jerks because they are jerks. Can they really be so shallow? Are they really sexually attracted to some of the more detestable attributes of the human male? This is the year 20XX, are you kidding me? Social dominance? You know what? If I were a woman, I would be embarrassed and ashamed to admit what I am sexually attracted to.

      Just a ramble. I understand the world as it is, and take the necessary roles. But it really makes you question the intelligence of who created us. Or at least understand that maybe something went wrong upstairs and is broken. We have the intelligence to create nuclear power, understand DNA, and yet...

      [–]InfiniteAscent 18 points19 points  (1 child)

      If I were a woman, I would be embarrassed and ashamed to admit what I am sexually attracted to.

      Oh the women ARE embarrassed and ashamed to admit it too. They use words with positive connotations to describe the kind of man they are attracted to. Confident not Arrogant. Good looking not Strong enough to fuck me good and kill betas. Self assured, not Narcissistic. And on and on. Each of these pairs lie on a continuum of course, which helps them to either not see the difference or to hide a real preference for the darker side.

      [–]FerrusMan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      That's a good way to put it, and also makes it easier to see why dishonesty is so prevalent with women.

      [–]jonpe87 17 points18 points  (5 children)

      Because nature doesn't care. The male that nature want is the ones that create and destroy worlds. The survivors beasts. Nature doesn't care about civilization! Nature cares about power and will.

      [–]segagaga 6 points7 points  (4 children)

      But we do not live in a natural world, which is why hypergamy and chasing douchebags is highly destructive to civilization.

      [–]3nebder 14 points15 points  (3 children)

      Civilization is imposed upon the natural world. If the apocalypse comes tomorrow, the "douchebags" are going to do the best in it.

      Agriculture and civilization are still new in the grand scheme of things. A species doesn't change overnight.

      [–]segagaga 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      But the apocalypse won't come tomorrow, as it hasn't done for thousands of years.

      [–]3nebder 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      You are correct that the end will not likely be tomorrow. However, that is not the point at hand.

      Lets make a couple suppositions to make the time scale clear. Humans as we are now are about 250000 years old as a species. Agriculture and therefore civilization is about 8000-10000 years old. That means 96% of our existence was hunter/gatherer wild living that required a much different set of behaviors and instincts to thrive in. The extremely major change to our pattern of life is so new that we cannot expect species wide changes in behavior yet at this point in time.

      The caveman in us all is constantly trying to force his world view on us. Jealous about "your" woman fucking another man? That's your caveman. Splurging on some sugary/fattie flavor bombs and you can't stop eating them? That's your caveman. Women are attracted to physically and mentally strong leaders. That's their cavewomen.

      Recognize him. Understand that your obsolete biological systems want to push you in ways that previously led to successful outcomes but are not nearly as successful now. Put him in his place because you don't need him anymore. Your caveman will come in handy if shit hits the fan.

      [–]Shaman6624 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Why do we keep calling it jerks if it's just a man with a healthy mental attitude instead of a scared snivelling beta who thinks all other men are out to get them.

      Edit: jerks, that's what they are in the eyes of a beta.

      [–]segagaga 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Because ultimately no man would be in TRP if he did not realize at some level that women do not want soft civilized men. It's nothing to do with being a beta, beta is natural and just as important to the health of a human community. Alphas are jerks, by the standards of modernity, not simply by beta mindset.

      It's important to understand, that what a woman thinks is a beta is not the same as what a beta actually is, hence the discord within the genders in modernity.

      [–]wanderer779 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      You guys finally landed a punch and you think the fight is over. These people still own the media, academia, the internet, etc. Pretty much every institution with any power is controlled by your opponent.

      I believe this culture war can still be won but it is a long road ahead.

      [–]kragshot 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      Free your mind... and your ass will follow. The kingdom of heaven is within.

      [–]Zech4riah 18 points19 points  (3 children)

      I don't want the destruction of the old order. It's good how it is. Lot's of betas, more easy pussy for me.

      If everyone were TRP Alpha I'd had to work a lot harder on myself. ;D

      [–]nofilmynofucky 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      While I agree with you to an extent, the likelyhood of measures such as a 'single male' tax coming to pass in the near future is becoming increasingly stronger - Jordan Peterson believes the current political climate will not stop there: if left unchecked he predicts literal genocide of men as a result.

      One could argue we've already reached this stage, given the extreme differences in mortality rates/homelessness/suicide/care and assistance options etc between the 2 sexes. We may not yet be actively murdering men however it is incontestible that the disinterest shown toward supporting men has resulted in the issues mentioned above, and thus dramatically decreased both value of and length of life for men.

      Sure: for the time being, this shit is amazing - we need to prepare however, for the point where that is no longer the case. For that reason I believe posts like this show us the future of this movement.

      Embrace the horror indeed. GLO knocked this one out of the fuckin park.

      [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      +1 One of the premises of TRP is that women don't want BBs; they might say they do; they might think they do; but they don't.

      If this is true, as TRP asserts, then the more guys who swallow the blue pill "put pussy on a pedestal", the easier the pickings will be for those who don't.

      [–]2mbillion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      make no doubt about it - the current social order has nothing to do with it. Thats the falsehood of this premise. That its this current unseen thing. When were the good times, the 50s the 1700's? the time of jesus?

      Seriously, the social order has existed in suit for at least 10,000 years

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

      [–]TRebirthP 4 points5 points  (12 children)

      How upset would you be if a Woman's Studies professor hung herself after being ridiculed and unable to adapt to a post Feminist world? I don't think the people here would be very upset. I'm confident that many of us smile at the idea.

      Why not be upset about that? Why does knowing a truth that will break a system give me a license to be that callous about another human life? Sure, to change a paradigm there is almost always some people who will suffer that are invested in the previous paradigm, but why act like that doesn't matter? Why not put effort into minimizing the damage? After all, isn't one of the central reasons to go from a false based belief system to a truth based one to promote more overall good which almost always requires understanding things as they are?

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 2 points3 points  (10 children)

      Good is an ideological construct with variable meaning. So when you say you want to maximize good it's the intellectual equivalent of maximizing justice or vitue or feels. Good luck trying to maximize something that can be defined in any way and only exists as a thematic construct.

      Moses the man who carved Thou Shalt not Kill into stone tablets killed on multiple occasions.

      [–]TRebirthP 1 point2 points  (9 children)

      Most people would agree less people dying and suffering is better than more people dying and suffering given all other factors are equal. That's a pretty universal standard in ethical systems. Hell, you can even take the biological approach and just say "We're all slightly smarter apes and it's our evolutionary duty to continue the species" and you'd still arrive at a principle similar to what I described. Another way to approach it, so it's less abstract, is by asking you: Do you want to die? Do you want to suffer? I imagine the answer to both would be no and I'm sure you would wish the same on people you care about (if you have any) and I'm sure you can imagine even people you hate wanting the same thing for themselves and those close to them. Given all of that, I don't think it's necessary to get into the whole "What is good? argument.

      My question is more pragmatic than anything else. Why should I shut off my empathy for someone in this situation? What's wrong with trying to minimize the hurt of others? Why is the tragedy of men like Galileo relevant and if it shouldn't it show how wrong it is to unnecessarily hurt people cause they disagree with you or cause they want to change a system you're invested in? It doesn't really have anything to do with any traditional moral system I have and I am asking primarily because your way of framing this is very troublesome. If someone read what you wrote at face value they can easily use it to justify literal violence. I don't think that's your intention so I'm asking you to clarify.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (8 children)

      The only thing that exists is the essential biological reality known as the real all morals and values are ideological abstractions. But to answer your question animals live without morals. All they know is pragmatism. Animals don't go around killing things for fun.

      In fact I would argue that moralism is more destructive because it justifies and has justified a lot of killing that would otherwise be inconvenient and not worth it pragmaticly.

      [–]TRebirthP 4 points5 points  (7 children)

      You are talking about morality as a system. If you want to believe morals are bullshit/bad, that's fine. I'm not talking about that. I am talking about a specific situation. Why shouldn't an individual care or try to prevent the suffering and deaths of others who would be harmed by a change that individual is trying to instigate?

      Or I could frame it this way in a very different way that gets at the same overall idea. You've written:

      1. TRP is true

      2. The current gynocentric culture is in direct opposition with TRP and thus the truth.

      3. TRP individuals will be happy with the system changing and should not care what are the "moral" consequences. In fact, we are a barbaric horror that should be unleashed on the world and take what we want.

      With these 3 tenants a person can easily justify buying an AK, going to a school's gender's study department and killing as many people there in the name of changing the system. After all, this person is on the side of the truth, there's an enemy out there suppressing the truth and they are a barbaric horror that should care nothing for the human cost of their actions, but only go for what they want which may be to kill those who go against his ideology. After all, you said there is ALWAYS blood.

      So if you won't answer why a person shouldn't care for the human cost maybe you can tell me why your logic doesn't justify a shooting like I described.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children)

      Because shooting a bunch of people would be the best argument against us. It would make our argument more difficult.

      [–]TRebirthP 2 points3 points  (5 children)

      Ok then the change the situation slightly. The person doesn't necessarily care about TRP winning. The person just wants to see the "enemy" suffer, they think violence is a very effective way of doing it and blood is inevitable so they figure they may as well do it. That's pretty sound, right?

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

      Violent people will always find a reason to be violent. It's a biological state. You can't convince a hungry person not to be hungry via moral justification.

      Sadism is a psychological trait just like Openess Or Extraversion. It's not something that can be changed.

      [–]TRebirthP 1 point2 points  (3 children)

      O so it's just a roll of a biology dice. I wonder why, for example, Muslim terrorism a more common than other modern day religious violence. I mean they happen to have a ideology that says "Blow yourself up and you'll get 40 virgins" which is kind of unique compared to other religions, but, according to you, things like that don't matter. Those ideas have no influence on their actions.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

      You just defeated your own moralism argument by admitting that morals are arbitrarily constructed. You just ceeded the ground that amorality is functionaly worse than morality with your Islam example.

      But to answer your question groups of people who biologically have more violent tendencies in the agrigate are more likely to gravitate towards a violent ideology.

      [–]RedPillHanSolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      You keep saying that to yourself. To build on this example, the same professor that you save from the noose my "minimizing the damage" will throw you under the bus first time he has a chance, because you're nazi or some shit. But hey, at least you was upset and did good!

      [–]1naMlliPdeR 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      I don't want things to change.

      Never before in history could a man fuck this many prime 18 year old girls with perfect skin and tight pussies. We're living in the best times.

      Swallowing the red pill is choosing to not play by the rules and gaming the system. And it's a very gamable system.

      I hope things never turn around.

      [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      Outstanding, are you sure you did not threaten a nerd to help you write this? Too many big words for a gym brah. In all seriousness this is one of your best pieces, all I have to add is - Bravo

      [–]NeoreactionSafe 8 points9 points  (4 children)

       

      You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result. Because that's always what happens. Look at yourself and embrace the unspeakable horror of the Real! You are uncompromising horror. You are their horror. Set yourself free by admitting who you are to yourself. Now go out, and take what you want from this Earth.

       

      Well said.

      "Enjoy the Destruction" of the Blue Pill mythology.

      It's okay... it's even "Right" to enjoy breaking this system.

      "Reals before Feelz"... the mythology lives on "Feelz" and dies on Truth.

       

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

      Damn I knew you would write exactly this. If I could have bet my house that you would write "Enjoy the Destruction" in response to this post I would have bet the house, my life, my kids and parents lives as well.

      [–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points  (2 children)

       

      Well, since that was the general theme of the original post doesn't it make sense to reawaken that phrase?

      Think how many times I've used:

       

      • Men love women, women love children, children love puppies.

       

      ...in order to get a beta male to realize "Puppy Love" is not the same as masculine love.

      Truth is absolute... eternal... we destroy the myths in order to allow the Natural Laws to bubble up and allow eyes to see.

      Like Jesus we cure the blind... we Red Pill the sick and heal them.

      Is this a miracle? A fantasy?

      Or is it the return to "common sense"?

       

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      That's your schtick, you know James and I don't like it, but you do you. I actually agree with what you are getting at, I simply dislike the jingoism and conspiracy stuff.

      [–]NeoreactionSafe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

       

      We need inventive imaginations to create the symbols that open the minds.

      If you operate entirely at the "lowest common denominator" all the time then you lock people into that lower level.

      By stretching people's minds it literally forces people to think.

      The Blue Pill mythology is an unthinking thing.

      It's a fantasy where all the twists and turns are pre-programmed.

      To actually "think" means you break outside those restrictions and begin to understand the rules of absolute Truth.

      Natural Laws are awesome for a reason... they have proven themselves true for thousands of years despite heavy brainwashing which has tried to hide them.

      The Red Pill is the destruction of myth and the reconnecting with eternal Truth.

      In a sense this is all we do... we wake up... we "Think For Ourselves".

      The "official narrative" is for the beta males.

       

      [–]Senior Endorsed ContributorRian_Stone 5 points6 points  (2 children)

      Trying to move anything is like moving a river, youll only drown.

      Just grab a bucket, put water where you want it. If enough guys do this, the river moves, either way, you're not drowning in a river with your lofty ideals.

      Regardless, Rome took 400 years to fall, just enjoy the decline

      [–]AnjaJutta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      and even after its fall the Eastern Roman Empire took another 1000 years to fall.

      [–]5t3fan0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      400 is a bit too much isnt it? the empire was doing "okay" up in 4th century AD during the west-east split, even tho the seed of its demise had already been sowed

      [–]BlakTheory 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      The only thing that matters in this entire universe is our HAPPINESS. if we don't have that means why we need to exist here...

      [–]dakanos 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Congrats. That's some deep high profile Fight-Club/Matrix shit right there.

      You got my vote bro.

      [–]Pshkn11 8 points9 points  (0 children)

      That's a lot of words just to peddle your fitness coaching shit. Maybe don't take yourself and TRP Cosmo dating tips so seriously.

      [–]Platinumb2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I've had this problem recently. I am almost done with the book "No More Mr. Nice Guy" and even after reading TRP I feel like I've lost a sense of who I am. Maybe it's the reality of finally seeing what the world is like and the way I used to think just isn't going to for ME. My brain feels like it's being pulled in a million different directions of what I should do and how I should act. Maybe I'm just adjusting to this new reality.

      [–]P1000123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I stand with you GLO. You are the only reason I check this place out once in a while. You speak the truth on many levels. Thank you.

      [–]GenieGenius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      This works well until we need to use people to accrue power, then we have to wear their masks and use their unflinching acceptance against them through chicanery and jest. For instance, a President probably doesn't give a flying fuck what people think of him and had to become a monster in order to utterly devour every opponent that stood before him, but he grooms himself and gives the appearance of being what people want. TRP is great and should drive your actions but I think pretending to be TBP can be quite mortal in rendering the time, labor, and resources of these numerous useful idiots in your own quest for ascendancy. In fact, it's necessary. You will never be able to maintain a completely RP relationship without strategically conceding to your partner when a certain threshold of her feels is breached, which is known as a comfort test. Sure you can dread game and be aloof but you will eventually have to either defer in some degree to her feelings or desires to keep her (I.e. She'll give a marriage ultimatum after a certain period of time) or separate entirely, thus ending the relationship. Obviously this assumes you want a relationship, but I think we should since they can be incredibly useful and further the scope of our power and mastery over ourselves and other people (I.e. Social proof GREATLY reduces the investment we need to make in gaming a suitor or client).

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      So like a loser, i've gone through the comments section and i'm curious as to how some people are trying to argue the post... Yes, to some, most of this post is self evident to anyone with a modicum of perception and life experience but i think some people need to realise the target demographic for TRP. GLO wants to infect/save the 18-23 year olds with no real life experience, to ensure they rarely suffer the Blue Pill Ideology

      [–]Shaman6624 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      I don't really notice anything of this egalitarian equalism in my day to day life. The only place it exists is the internet in my experience and there it's usually ridiculed. Feminism is already dying and everyone knows it.

      Also there are multiple layers of ideology governing us as a society. This article is zoomed in on 1 and pretends it's the only one.

      [–]OvermanInTheMaking99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Egalitarianism is sort of the ideological basis for modern democracy.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Fuck this is motivating. I enjoy being in a movement with so many intelligent men.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      This post is the reddest red pill I ever took.

      [–]mdcrubengonza 1 point2 points  (15 children)

      Wall of text followed by a link for a business, got it!

      [–]the_gold_farmer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      I'm not mad. The post was interesting and novel, and a man is going to look after his own interests, especially men here on TRP

      [–]2mbillion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Should read strunk and whites chapter on brevity.

      [–]vorverk 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      GLO at its best. 99% of people will never get this. 80% of the self proclaimed TRPers won't.

      [–]2mbillion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      99.9% of people wont have the time or fucks to read a repetitive self congratulation.. Dude come on..

      [–]reddttt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Sometimes I don't know how to feel about the fact we were, according to the history books, naturally red pill minded and changed to this generation of zombies which are guided by their smartphones the entire day, weak men that do absolutely nothing to improve their physique and women who destroy their bodies with unhealthy eating, unnatural hair dyes and ugly pieces of metal in their faces with obnoxious amounts of tattoos.

      [–]oddtimesigs 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      Good for you, you see shit people don't, and they see shit that you don't. Sorry to break it to you, but you're a human being just like everyone else. You're not some harbinger of horror because you know women like men that aren't self deprecating, low self-esteem assholes.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      If people adopt our view en mass the resulting change will bring horror to some.

      [–]Collegia_Titanica 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      True, although with that it also brings a higher chance that some sort of retaliation/banning of this community occurs.It's already underway, anything that it related to telling stuff like it is, defense of white pride, generally right leaning views, criticism of the leftist narrative, demonetization on many youtube personalities, that google firing nonsense .. probably more

      [–]ChampOfTheFuture 2 points3 points  (4 children)

      horrors of the real

      barbarians

      Why be so dorky and dramatic about it though? is my problem.

      A guy like Paul Graham, which is as mainstream as it gets, wrote a much better text on this exact same topic (heresy), 13 years ago. http://www.paulgraham.com/say.html This is a classic internet essay.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

      Because my essay is about the consequences of upsetting established orders and the resultant fallout. Hence why the word barbarians is warranted. His essay is about the limits of acceptable speach aka the overton window.

      These are two different topics. But honestly I'm not here to administer a reading comprehension test. If you mistook my article for his, then you don't get it and I can't help you.

      [–]ChampOfTheFuture 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      He addresses the question of "what to do" with the limits once you identify them (quoted below), perhaps you're the one who needs to improve your reading comprehension. In summary, rule 38: think as you like but behave like others. Speech of "overthrowing the establishment" and "barbarians" is just a cheap way to get youtube views and sell t-shirts to videogames fans. It's ridiculous.

      When you find something you can't say, what do you do with it? My advice is, don't say it. Or at least, pick your battles.

      Suppose in the future there is a movement to ban the color yellow. Proposals to paint anything yellow are denounced as "yellowist", as is anyone suspected of liking the color. People who like orange are tolerated but viewed with suspicion. Suppose you realize there is nothing wrong with yellow. If you go around saying this, you'll be denounced as a yellowist too, and you'll find yourself having a lot of arguments with anti-yellowists. If your aim in life is to rehabilitate the color yellow, that may be what you want. But if you're mostly interested in other questions, being labelled as a yellowist will just be a distraction. Argue with idiots, and you become an idiot.

      The most important thing is to be able to think what you want, not to say what you want. And if you feel you have to say everything you think, it may inhibit you from thinking improper thoughts. I think it's better to follow the opposite policy. Draw a sharp line between your thoughts and your speech. Inside your head, anything is allowed. Within my head I make a point of encouraging the most outrageous thoughts I can imagine. But, as in a secret society, nothing that happens within the building should be told to outsiders. The first rule of Fight Club is, you do not talk about Fight Club.

      When Milton was going to visit Italy in the 1630s, Sir Henry Wootton, who had been ambassador to Venice, told him his motto should be "i pensieri stretti & il viso sciolto." Closed thoughts and an open face. Smile at everyone, and don't tell them what you're thinking. This was wise advice. Milton was an argumentative fellow, and the Inquisition was a bit restive at that time. But I think the difference between Milton's situation and ours is only a matter of degree. Every era has its heresies, and if you don't get imprisoned for them you will at least get in enough trouble that it becomes a complete distraction.

      I admit it seems cowardly to keep quiet. When I read about the harassment to which the Scientologists subject their critics [12], or that pro-Israel groups are "compiling dossiers" on those who speak out against Israeli human rights abuses [13], or about people being sued for violating the DMCA [14], part of me wants to say, "All right, you bastards, bring it on." The problem is, there are so many things you can't say. If you said them all you'd have no time left for your real work. You'd have to turn into Noam Chomsky. [15]

      The trouble with keeping your thoughts secret, though, is that you lose the advantages of discussion. Talking about an idea leads to more ideas. So the optimal plan, if you can manage it, is to have a few trusted friends you can speak openly to. This is not just a way to develop ideas; it's also a good rule of thumb for choosing friends. The people you can say heretical things to without getting jumped on are also the most interesting to know.

      Viso Sciolto?

      I don't think we need the viso sciolto so much as the pensieri stretti. Perhaps the best policy is to make it plain that you don't agree with whatever zealotry is current in your time, but not to be too specific about what you disagree with. Zealots will try to draw you out, but you don't have to answer them. If they try to force you to treat a question on their terms by asking "are you with us or against us?" you can always just answer "neither".

      Better still, answer "I haven't decided." That's what Larry Summers did when a group tried to put him in this position. Explaining himself later, he said "I don't do litmus tests." [16] A lot of the questions people get hot about are actually quite complicated. There is no prize for getting the answer quickly.

      If the anti-yellowists seem to be getting out of hand and you want to fight back, there are ways to do it without getting yourself accused of being a yellowist. Like skirmishers in an ancient army, you want to avoid directly engaging the main body of the enemy's troops. Better to harass them with arrows from a distance.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Well in that case you should take his don't say controversial shit advice and stop participating here.

      My thesis of nerds inadvertantly upsetting ideology and his of the overton window and how to stay within it are different topics.

      I give your reading comprehension a B-

      [–]wanderer779 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      He's anonymous, you're not.

      [–]RedSugarPill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      There was no bloodshed when Brazil declared independence from Portugal. Evolution can happen without revolution. Not saying I wouldn't exercise my birthright to defend myself, but centuries of clever master-slave false dichotomies never stopped a Sigma from living Free.

      Spez: not Brazil, but Costa Rica and some other Central American countries.

      [–]biggerbetterjobs 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      I bet the US looks like Syria today by 2030.

      [–]Xoramung 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      What with a Medical practitioner for a president and the people fighting in the military to defend his power?

      [–]Rollo_Mayhem3 0 points1 point  (4 children)

      What do you mean by fitness coaching client? Are you a fitness coach? As in physical fitness? Just curious, my be interested.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

      I coach people in person and online. If you want I'll give you the rundown on Skype

      [–]Rollo_Mayhem3 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      I'll pm u when I have time to sit down on Skype without interruptions. Thx. What's your time zone?

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I'll tell you over pm lol

      [–]TheHinduGodThatCould 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      Socrates was sentenced to death for corrupting the youth FYI

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Corrupting the youth involves instilling a new belief system

      [–]TheHinduGodThatCould 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Question, do you still believe in individualism after the Red pill?

      [–]Xoramung 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      All I'm asking you to do is to look in the mirror.

      And the mirror said "I'm not having sex with you tonight/im on my period/insert other test"

      Please advise.

      [–]Frigzy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      People will always cling to hope to the extent of self delusion. It's what shapes and supports ideologies. Sure TRP holds some truth, but truth in itself will never gain traction because it is disconnected from the desperate cries for delusional hope.

      If there's any aim to 'destroy' structures, you better be prepared to create one that sufficiently soothes the pain of the weak, in whatever way you think possible or necessary.

      Without such hope, you can destroy whatever you want, but people will find a way to cling to some ideology or another. It's your choice whether you have a hand in that or not.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Do they still smuggle gay lube oil in Australia?

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This can easily be compared to Plato "man in the cave". You show someone a truth in their falsely perceived reality and they deny that it exists and probably banish/shame.. kill. That's why I believe you are either included, excluded or secluded.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Interesting, I know Fredrick Nietzsche said that if most people encounter the realness of life, they will be driven into madness. Once you start cutting down the strings on the rope that is your life, there is no safety net to catch your fall, and so pretty much 99% of people will never acheive enlightenment nor have the "capability" for it. Nietzsche himself demonstrated this, drove himself to the brink of insanity.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Just don't look directly into the Real it's kind of like the sun. You wanna wear sunglasses. You want ironic distance

      [–]RPmatrix 0 points1 point  (3 children)

      Bro GLO I agree with so much of what you've posted here BUT I don't agree that

      You are a barbarian. You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result.

      I'm far more sophisticated than that and I lead what most would consider a somewhat minimalist existence. and I care about the overall wellbeing of all lifeforms and the planet we live on, I care a LOT about it and am saddened to see the barbarians who don't care ,, they benefit few, if that many

      If my brain didn't perform as it does, I might say otherwise but my wetware rocks! and it's far from 'barbaric' bro and it had computed that a co-operative world without violence and agression is far more preferable for a human to live in than a 'dog eat dog' world where the physically strongest and most selfish/socoipathic are able to 'rule with the barrel of a gun'

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      In my argument Galileo is also a Barbarian aka a destabilizing force and he was definitely a sophisticated man. You can believe whatever want about yourself but functionaly you are acting like a destabilizing force despite your belief in the well being of othera. Your actions threaten the established order and those who rely on it.

      [–]BiteAndThrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      By definiton, barbarian was used for everyone outside of Ancient Greece. So, you're right.

      [–]fenghsui 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Why destroy the system? It made us and made us strong.

      The people need illusions. Illusions sustain society. We are the flip side of the coin, but "The exception should take care of the rule, and beware of trying to make the rule after the exception." - Nietzsche

      [–]Algernoq 0 points1 point  (9 children)

      You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result.

      Since you posted this wholly political post here, let's talk politics.

      Your advice is to joyfully collapse one pillar of Western Civilization -- marriage. Since I read the entire sidebar I know that traditional marriage is illegal and has been replaced with the abortion that is today's family court system. Maybe your way is the way to fix it...create a generation of single post-wall women who are so miserable that they will vote to fix marriage (restore fault-based divorce, criminalize paternity fraud by women, etc., etc.). But it's more likely that your way leads to victory of the Left...the ruination of all remaining family bonds so that children are raised by single mothers and provided for by the State, ensuring social control by a small and secret Inner Party. You fucking Communist.

      What I want from this Earth is immortality and cheap space travel...these things require large, organized, stable groups of high-IQ men to cooperate for years doing low-status engineering work building everything required. Men will do this if they are married and getting sex...but if they aren't, they will quit engineering and start fucking up each other to get laid. Zyzzbros don't do calculus, nor do they become astronauts.

      You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves

      What's needed is the opposite of what you suggest...the RESTORATION OF THE OLD order of Victorian mores that sublimated peoples' repressed sexual urges into productive pro-social work, and the DESTRUCTION OF THE NEW order of Marxist equalism.

      Speaking of starvation, go read about the Holodomor if you haven't already. Is that the kind of thing you're into?

      Then go watch Yuri Bezmenov's lecture where he explains that the destruction of the old order by useful idiots is a first step before a Communist takeover. (Historically, the useful idiots and the educated classes are killed or at least dispossessed when the takeover occurs.)

      But I have a hunch you already know about these things, and know to what end your advice really leads. Though I guess it's confusing enough to slip past the average redditor. (I've seen one too many 'redpill thread' on /pol/ to miss it.)

      And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
      When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
      As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
      The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

      The Real is horrible, alright. God Bless America and its Constitution.

      [–]MEpicLevelCheater 2 points3 points  (4 children)

      What is your thesis here? That /u/GayLubeOil is a Communist conspirator trying to ruin the United States from within?

      [–]Algernoq 1 point2 points  (3 children)

      Did you read his post? Particularly this part?

      All I'm asking you to do is to look in the mirror. Admit to yourself who you are and what you are doing. You are a barbarian. You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result. Because that's always what happens. Look at yourself and embrace the unspeakable horror of the Real! You are uncompromising horror. You are their horror. Set yourself free by admitting who you are to yourself. Now go out, and take what you want from this Earth.

      You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who starves dies or kills themselves as a result.

      You want the destruction of the old order and you do not care who dies

      Fuck that. I am a civilized man, and a civilized man cooperates with other civilized men to destroy the barbarians.

      I'll say a little more...

      Have you ever heard of a civilization where the concept of marriage didn't exist? "Civilization" means being civilized...lawful, peaceful, cooperative...beta. Marriage was a technology where men got guaranteed sex in exchange for being cooperative little betas. History shows that marriage and sexual repression makes countries rich, strong, and happy. Old-school marriage is good.

      GLO is a smart guy and calls out new-school equalism for being wrong.

      Horrific truth? You mean that women are biologically hardwired to get Netflix and drilled by uncaring unapologetic douchebags and shit test intermittently to ensure that the douchebags are in fact as dochey as advertised? Sounds pretty straight forward. What's so terrible about that? Well that truth, the truth of biological essentialism when taken to its logical conclusion and adopted by the masses has the power to destroy the Equalist ideology and it's prophets.

      TRP is a tool that can be used for good or for evil. One way to use TRP is to organize to fix marriage laws and allow civilization/marriage to continue, maximizing long-term pleasure. The other way to use TRP is to spin plates and break hearts and create alpha widows, enjoying short-term pleasure while ignoring the inevitable long-term misery that results.

      The right answer is to fix marriage to make it fair again. The wrong answer is to collapse civilization. Guess which side GLO picked?

      GLO's post openly tells people to be barbarians -- to ruin the United States from within, as you say -- and to do it in order to tear down Traditionalism (marriage, hierarchy, religion) so that another ideology can replace it. Sure sounds like Communism to me. As a patriot who loves America, I say "Fuck Communism."

      My sexual strategy is to fix marriage so it's not misandrist. The alternative is living through social collapse.

      I know it's a lot to take in, but please let me know if any of this does not make sense to you. I'm happy to explain again using different, smaller words.

      [–]MEpicLevelCheater[M] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      LOL

      A+ troll, would ban again.

      [–]johnrosenbaud11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Ad personams reveal lack of logic, like in functionally illiterate individuals. You're lucky the device is hardwired, exercise it, and edison's lightbulb will fire at some point.

      [–]johnrosenbaud11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      To maintain such an argument, OP must have suffered from a childhood trauma.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

      I've never written on the topic of marriage because I've never been married and know nothing of it. How the fuck you connected me to the topic of marriage is anyone's guess. My guess is ingestion of peyote and cat piss.

      Furthermore my post was about the collapse of the Egalitarian Equalist order not of the institution of marriage. So I guess you must have drank some dank pol cat piss to arrive at your conclusion.

      [–]Algernoq 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      More TRP plate-spinning barbarians => Less marriage, more bastards on welfare => stronger Equalist/Marxist order.

      [–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Iv never written anything on plate spinning ever. Maybe go bother someone else with your virtue signaling or maybe drink less halucinagenic cat piss

      [–]Algernoq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      The sidebar references plate spinning so it doesn't matter if you personally haven't written about it. What part of my argument is wrong?

      Let's leave absurd ad-hominems out of it.

      [–]danoranika 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I read this post every day

      [–]2mbillion 1 point2 points  (5 children)

      Good god - get the fuck out of here - seriously - if you cant say it briefly do not say it - what a blowhard.

      Then follow me on twitter - yeah how about not

      [–]MEpicLevelCheater[M] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      blowhard

      Do not disrespect our ECs. You are free to disagree with their ideas, but do not insult them.

      This is your only warning.

      [–]afkb39sdfb -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

      I've been on this sub since 7,000 subs (original account) and GLO is a typical high on himself narcissist who's butt hurt that he (and others) can't control the narrative anymore, they are getting drowned out by the rest of the user base.

      [–]MEpicLevelCheater 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      /u/GayLubeOil has been contributing to our sub for a long time. His articles alone have helped guide thousands of men, to say nothing of the countless hours of one-on-one Skype counseling he has given away freely.

      So, what the fuck have you done for our community?

      [–]thetotalpackage7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I would say we want a return of the "old order" not the destruction of it. I base this on the premise that these truths you speak of were self-evident to innumerable generations who came before generation X and those prior generations WERE the "red pilled" old order.

      The "new order" of egalitarian equalism as you put it, in my estimation, is just a rebranding of communism. Since the true communists couldn't beat capitalists with their failed ideologies, they repackaged their ideas and into causes that SJWs can get behind to topple the workhorses of capitalism: straight, white, Christian men... hence the Social Marxism we see today.

      Blame "cis-gendered" white men as the root of all your problems and now you have a common enemy. What else could bind muslims, Jews, Mexicans, women, blacks, gays, trannies, homosexuals, fat people, lesbians other than stating that, "white men have their boot on your neck, so do everything in your power to marginalize them through: gun control, accusations of racism, sexism, date rape, fat shaming, homophobia, wage disputes etc"

      Pathetic.

      But do you really think these groups will ever have moments of self-actualization where they realize they are responsible for their own status in life? No way. The greatest lie ever told will continue because it has traction. Nevermind it is built on sand.

      Even straight white men will rally behind their causes because they think virtue signaling will get them pussy.

      Once "atlas shrugs" it will be interesting to see how fast these groups cannibalise each other. Islam ain't gonna be attending any women's rights rallies or gay pride events.

      Hooray for the red pill. Enjoy the decline.

      [–]Transist0r420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      This was not only the greatest piece of information I have read on TRP, but the greatest piece of Reddit literature. It is not about the lay, it is about the truth.

      load more comments (46 replies)