99
100

"Kavanaugh and how the patriarchy installed an enabler of rape within the highest tier of the US justice system." (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Kyson5

Summary: The SJWs went for the throat on this one, lets set the scene:

The supreme court. One man, all that's standing between him being appointed, or his life, career and reputation shattered:

IS SEXUAL ASSAULT. What else is at stake? Self imposed narratives like Rape culture tightening its grip on the balls of every man in western society, threatening to creep up on many unsuspecting men who had each got lucky one night out in the club, or the cafe, or the art gallery and got pussy later that night.

Body:

The title is how a news article written by a feminist might look if Kavanaugh is acquitted of the rape charges. But think for a minute the effect this might have for the very near future:

So to begin, we already have this little gem

This is a simple feels based article, the very first sentence reading:

"Brett Kavanaugh is rape culture personified"

"Kavanaugh doesn’t just benefit from a system that shields men in the face of endemic sexual abuse—he embodies it. "

Of course we have a checklist to tick off here:

1 in 4 women statistic? Check

Kavanaugh's drinking? Check

My favourite: "If he is lying to cover up his alcohol abuse while a teenager, who’s to say he isn’t also lying about alleged sexual assault during the same time period? "

Guilty or not, this will have been an all-in move by the Left and the democrats to sabotage one of the three branches of the government (judiciary), spearheaded of course by the MILLIONS of programmed SJWs on every social media platform and every fucking blog site. I'm talking of course about Reddit, tumblr, twitter, instagram, facebook, the list goes on.

Due to the fact that entertainment in the form of television, film, music, art, video games have all been inundated with left-wing views and ideas. These SJWs are spreading their ideas with alarming speed and reach. ANTIFA is their army, an uncivilized mob of pussies who can only beat up old or disabled people.

Don't forget ANTIFA are downright criminal, weaponizing things like bikelocks and fucking personify the word "Bodily harm". Reference: This piece of shit who held a position in a university that concealed a bikelock in a sock and split a guy's head open. Didn't even have the balls to look him in the eye, but instead to sneak up through a crowd and strike covertly from behind his buddies.

Regardless, if Kavanaugh is found guilty of the charges of sexual assault, feminists and SJWs are going to once again point their fingers, but this time say something along the lines of:}
"I mean like, do you really know anything at all? Like seriously rape culture is real! We've been telling you for years and giving you examples and all you do is talk about facts facts facts like honestly what good are facts when you don't believe the victim"

One step closer to the destruction of the rights of men, and perhaps mental enslavement


[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 65 points66 points  (38 children)

That odd feeling when Russian News is calling out the narrative.

[–]evolveorwither 55 points56 points  (20 children)

"Malignant Feminism." We need to start using this. A great counter to the ever thrown around "toxic masculinity."

[–]lastdumra 22 points23 points  (16 children)

No, that implies there is a sane feminism.

Study the history of feminism, starting by the suffragettes, and you'll see the malignant label is implied.

[–]ThePantsThief 3 points4 points  (15 children)

I'm genuinely confused. Feminism helped women earn the right to vote. Do you think that was malign?

[–]Skyhawk_And_Skyhead 11 points12 points  (3 children)

Al Qaeda raised the GDP of Afghanistan

[–]ThePantsThief 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Afgan probably didn't have a high bar set to begin with

[–]redbossman123 -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

He’s trying to say that 1st wavers were doing the same shit, bombing buildings and committing terrorist acts to have the 19th amendment happen.

[–]ThePantsThief 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We literally went to war with Britain to get our independence. If you both consider that malign as well, I'll let it go.

[–]1SirKolbath 6 points7 points  (9 children)

Actually, yes. Look at the erosion of society since then for all the examples you need.

[–]ThePantsThief 1 point2 points  (8 children)

I blame that on technology and the rise of malign journalism. These people have always been around, but now they have a voice.

[–]Omnibrad 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I blame that on technology and the rise of malign journalism.

Journalism has always been malign.

"The man who reads nothing but newspapers is less educated than the man who reads nothing at all, inasmuch as the man who knows nothing is closer to the truth than the man whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors."
-Thomas Jefferson

There has never, ever been a time in history where "news" was honest and portrayed the truth. Never. Blaming malign journalism for the erosion of society is naïve and short-sighted.

Furthermore technology has also not eroded society. When American society was thriving long ago, it was due in large part because of technology. If technology did erode society, then our society would have been constantly eroding since it was created.

Female participation in public affairs, however, has eroded every society in which it was implemented. America was not the first example.

[–]1SirKolbath 4 points5 points  (6 children)

I don’t. Brief study of history shows that when women get authority, all but a very precious few go totally berserk with it. The Temperance movement was led by women, and the states that pushed Prohibition through were those who had given women the vote first. By the time the amendment was passed to give women the vote nationwide, Prohibition was on the ballot for ratification and an easy pass. Thanks for the organized crime, ladies!

Women infest our educational system, which leans so far left it only needs one glove. The worst presidents in history, bar one, were elected with massive female majorities. JFK, Obama, Carter, Clinton, FDR. We’re talking presidents who threw their own people into camps, almost brought the world to nuclear war, were caught spying on their own people, ignored terror threats to the point of American deaths and war abroad— all because a bunch of sluts voted with their tingles. Hell, Wilson was the first president elected by women. He even ran on that platform for re-election. He’s also the president that got America into World War One, and instead of Germany and England coming to the table as equally exhausted countries done with fighting, Germany was overwhelmed, blamed for the war, and Hitler’s damn book had its introduction written. And that’s not even talking about the millions of dollars in war debt Russia owed America that Wilson pushed to “forgive” because he thought Joseph Stalin was a kind and generous soul. Even called him “Uncle Joe”.

Guy killed somewhere between 40 and 280 million people and the first president elected by women was so star struck he almost shit his pants when he met him. “I have met a great man and stand in awe of him.” - Wilson’s private letters after Versailles as quoted in Wilson’s War by Jim Powell.

Giving women the vote was one of the worst choices Americans ever made.

[–]hatguyfromXKCD 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Sorry buddy JFK made some power moves for black peole (which is in my interest and favor) Obama catered to Middle Class and Upper middle-class which is either falling into working class because of credit or the smart ones enhanced their wealth to be considered upper class; other than that he catered towards corporations as well as every president does in the late 20th and early 21st cenetury. CLinton defintely boosted up a modern version of he prison-industrial complex (which is not in my people's favor.) Carter was an ass all around.

JFK - good for me

Everyone else - complete dickheads

[–]1SirKolbath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s fine. My opinion is based on my research. I expect yours to be the same. We don’t have to agree.

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 1 point2 points  (2 children)

You forgot, Wilson also gave us the Harrison Act (war on drugs), and the Federal Reserve.

[–]1SirKolbath 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Oh I didn't forget, but those are good points.

[–]Kampfgewehr1946 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't forget that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was also the architect of the 1934 National Firearms Act, an unconstitutional bill that infringed on your 2nd Amendment right to automatic weapons and tubular launchers. Something to be expected from a character who would throw Americans in prison camps simply for being of Japanese, German or Italian descent!

[–]1KyfhoMyoba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Women vote left. Men vote right. Look at govt spending after women got the vote. They made Uncle Sugar into their BB daddy. Women hve no business voting. As a Libertarian anarcho-capitalist, I don't want anyone voting, but women, the least.

Of course it was malign.

[–]AllahHatesFags 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like it, especially because the word is so often associated with terminal cancer which makes it even more appropriate.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 2 points3 points  (1 child)

"Malignant Feminism." We need to start using this. A great counter to the ever thrown around "toxic masculinity."

I like the term. But that implies that there's a kind of feminism that isn't malignant.

[–]scallopkid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, "toxic masculinity" would imply that there is masculinity that isn't toxic, but the people who use that phrase don't really believe that, and what they use as an example of non toxic masculinity just isn't masculinity at all. So the feminism that isn't "malignant feminism" doesn't really have to be feminism at all, it can be like, floral arranging or something.

[–]destraht 9 points10 points  (6 children)

I'm looking forward to getting back to Ukraine to compare it against my new insights from Colombia. I noticed a heck of a lot of stuff this last three months in Colombia that I didn't pick up in my first six months. In particular about six weeks into my last visit a feeling really crystallized in my mind about how exactly the shitty parts of US pop culture has made its way there and how they have just about zero resistance to it due to their culture being about feel good appeasement. I feel that in Colombia and Central America that it started out being about basic human respect (for the people who aren't all fucked up) and that being nice and not forcing social friction ends up being good for everyone. This is also encouraged since it puts a dampener on very critical and pessimistic thought (of the kind that Russians are famous for) that can cause deep social change. Everything there was setup on a intertwined appeasement plan and its locked in place. Then Venezuela next door to the 9th degree and spilling over. It just seems to me though like mixing boiling water with very hot water.

So a bum spit in my eye one day and I raced to wash it out since he looked diseased and I had to think "Why doesn't that ever happen in Ukraine, Moldova and Poland?". As I wrote about here a fat American woman sexually assaulted me at a bar/club and then slapped me when I pushed her off of me thirty seconds later. It just doesn't happen in "the East", not that anyways.

I'm currently in the belly of the beast (as close to it as I could endure) in the East Bay and seeing scores of obese women that should be beautiful and sexy but just are far from it. Women here look at me suspiciously and more paranoid than ex-USSR women can do for example on the street, "I don't know you" you are nothing kind of a look. People are hurting here. Its bad, real bad but I'm not going to get any of it on me.

I really feel now how this crap is heading far South (the direction and figuratively) and how it will influence the people down there. They are being fed media and getting trained up in the universities to think a certain way. The very corrupt Catholitic Church has a little something to say about this so its a back and forth power struggle between the two. I see that my country is selling a sexier product (even if there is less sex) and so it will win out for quite a while. The people down there are primed to uncritically accept all kinds of shit and smile about it because the people running things liked it that way and the new game in town will just use that vector to take over like it was a computer worm. They don't have any cultural resistance to it and they have nothing else to reach for.

So when I do make it back I'll fly into Warsaw to be able to head over in the easy going, no bullshit L'viv border crossing. I've gotten reports from my friend about the girls in L'viv being even more arrogant than before. So my buddy is 45 and has traveled around the world and they are lecturing him and giving him their mystical beliefs as facts. So even worse than Polish girls and their newfound Westernism. They are dumbshits without exposure but they are told that they are the fancy West. Its part of the war effort. So I'll get in there and really pick some heads without trying to get laid, since that would be just frustrating and a poor use of emotional energy. Then I'll head down to Odessa to get some girls and experience the I-don't-give-a-fuck of that city that is largely about business and sex.

Then I'll make it over to Dnipro to experience a much more mixed environment that is actually rather isolated from direct exposure to the West. I'll really mix it up there and talk some war and politics. I really want to know where Ukraine is going and to understand the forces that are being directed outwards from my country. Having been back and forth a bunch of times I feel that the area does in fact have tools to use in fighting the extreme liberal Westernism that gets exported and that much of Latin America is a lost cause to for at least the next several generations. I want to investigate that grumpiness more and that ability to say "no", "no you are going the wrong way", "no you are an idiot", "take your shoes off of that couch you filthy pig". I feel that the rocket casing propped up in the center of Dnipro says enough on its own.

I'm pursuing an idea that Ukraine can't go full nutso because the whitish Chosenites won't let it since its their backup plan Holy Land. The IMF will force them to attack a bit due to threatening to withhold funds and so they can buy a little war but that in the end nobody really has it in them to do much more than they are told to do. Amusingly after I formed this opinion I was told my an ex-Colombian veteran that the FARC is paid to attack the people/government because the Colombian military needs to justify its budget. So high up FARCs get paid, the right people don't die and business carries on. I'm curious to see how this understanding holds for Ukraine and I'm very interested in buying while there is blood in the street.

I'm very passionate about Ukraine since its just the raw deal. I want to get a better grasp about how the extreme liberal Westernism is able to influence Ukraine with Russia as a counterbalance to most of the ideology and when all else fails - force. Then I will return to Colombia once again to up my understanding of how a place plays out without any direct competition, the Catholic Church being more for the loser masses to take $2/head on Sunday.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 11 points12 points  (3 children)

I am from Ukraine. get the fuck out of my country you western swine. that's the first thing.

second thing is that Ukraine is part of the war effort against Russia. so it WILL adopt western attitudes.

third, Odessa is full of westerners looking for cheap sex and has adopted many western ideologies.

fourth, lviv is western Ukraine. and western ukranians are known for having shit attitudes and for being Nazi collaborators.

fifth, if you want to see how to combat liberalism go to Russia, further away from Moscow or st petes

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Dnipro and Tiraspol are my main places. Odessa is a good counter balance to L'viv because L'viv is all hyped up on crazy stupid with ideology and Odessa is much more of a cynical cash grab from the port to sex. It probably keeps the Black Sea Azov nuttery under control.

Yeah I just need to plan properly and to get a VISA to go there. Ukraine is easier because they let me just hang out there.

[–]starky-kun 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Moldovan here. Is there legit good game going on in Tiraspol? Seems boring asf to me.

[–]destraht 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its boring but there are parties sometimes and I eat at 7 Fridays a lot. The real thing is that its a more wholesome place and then its close to Odessa.

[–]1SirKolbath 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Need a travel partner? All those places are on my bucket list.

[–]destraht 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm perfectly comfortable traveling or hanging out by myself in any place but if you want to meet up then that is great. I'm always looking out for good conversation. Not to overplay the trope but in Ukraine and Odessa in particular there are a lot of scummy and sociopathic foreigners who aren't my type. We can hang out and I'll show you to some girls, maybe we'll talk to a few "real" ones and shoot the shit over many cups of glintwine. A real mans open air cigar club.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I love it when General Gogol lays down Slavic Truth Bombs.

[–]destraht 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like his demeanor and that he doesn't make sarcastic faces and tones to make a point. I noticed in the ex-USSR just how much that I rely on it to make a forceful impact but its rather cheesy actually if use too much or sometimes at all. Its to the point that my mom's African Gray parrot will laugh at exactly that moment because its the punchline and sometimes people laugh at that moment. Its very predictable. It comes across as a certain way that I'd like to be in control of instead of having no other option than to sound like that.

[–]Quo210 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What the hell this was spot on, like someone in this subreddit wrote it.

No american, european or even south american media source would dare to throw some truths like that in national TV.

[–]U21U6IDN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That odd feeling when Russian News is calling out the narrative.

That's how the left know's the narrative must be true. "Muh Russia!"

[–]btrpb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some of those men maybe guilty. Some innocent. But none of these accusations are being resolved in legal court, instead by the court of public opinion, which as we know in this forum is feminised.

A worrying trend.

[–]1Ill_Will7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where do you find all this great content all the time?

[–]1SirKolbath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jesus, GLO, that is one of the most depressing things I’ve ever seen.

Kavanaugh vote is literally going on while I’m writing this. I hope like hell he wins, or this is going to get ugly. Malignant feminism gets a win like this and it will never, ever stop.

[–]HannibalBacara 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only the content was refreshing but also the delivery of the information as well. None of the MSNBC/Fox News talking head just yelling opinions straight into the camera.

Just a calm explanation of the current situation in this fucked up #MeToo world we live in.

[–]punchyson 18 points19 points  (3 children)

I think there is a possibility that the Dems overplayed the #metoo/#believeher card here and are going to pay for it.

[–]halfback910 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Oh for sure. The crying wolf analogy is very, very much in play. It happened in the Presidential election.

"President Trump is an un-presidential, racist, sexist, corrupt, lying bigot."

"But... you say that about every Republican candidate..."

There are pretty strong arguments to be made that Trump is at least three of those things. But so is every other Republican, right? So who cares? People have started becoming numb to the Democrats' medicine.

Another notable effect is that it causes moral hazard. If you call someone a monster no matter what they do or how they conduct themselves, you're taking away a lot of the cost of actually behaving like a monster. So there's a strong chance that one day they'll say "You know what? Okay. You want a monster? You got one."

[–]punchyson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Feminists are in complete control of the Democratic Party. Their entire game is manufactured outrage, and they don't care at all if the allegations are true or not. It's really about attention and accumulating power through fear of being the target of the outrage.

[–]1empatheticapathetic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hilary overplayed it when she said "women are the primary victims of war". It's what happens when you indulge in a false narrative too hard trying to make it reality.

[–]DeontologicalSanders 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Probably worth pointing out that the college professor who was busting people over the head with a bike lock got off with 3 years probation.

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (5 children)

Better start videotaping your sexual conquests...with consent obv (Gotta play along with that quarantine eh?).

Personally, i'd say you're witnessing the death rattle of The Left. A wounded tiger backed into a corner lashing out. Let The Left spew their bullshit, do what you want to do, keep working on yourself and pay little attention to the actions of others

[–]Shadowthrice 6 points7 points  (2 children)

This is wishful thinking. The Left dominates the government and cultural institutions.

Trump has been able to push back a little, but they still hold most of the power.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 8 points9 points  (1 child)

they still hold most of the power.

They pulled a pin on the grenade and are waving it at people. Eventually they will have to do something with it. History points to them dropping it at their own feet.

Power fades when you become a caricature, which is what is happening to them right now.

[–]SharpestMarbel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, the emperor has no clothes now that they have wasted their power on slandering Kavanaugh

[–]Kyson5[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I guess you could construe it like that, but we shouldn't be ignorant of when they do win over us. I can see shit going south real fast if this goes the way the left wants it to. They will label this as some victory and is guaranteed to hit the law and history textbooks for the future generations to learn of. What they will be told is that this man is a rapist who nearly wormed his way into the judiciary, raping the citizens legally or something like that. They can blow it out of proportion so much, that questioning such content in school at a young age would get you scolded, and questioning such content in law school or university gets you ostracized and your career prospects severed by the throat.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Like the glorious moron i am, i'm just gonna say..

What'cha gonna do?

[–]AllahHatesFags 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Anytime somebody says "the patriarchy" in a non-ironic way I know that they are a fucking moron and they should be either mocked or ignored.

[–]Imperator_Red 14 points15 points  (1 child)

They really went all in on this one. I thought they were out of chips but they had more I guess. Will this finally break the left's back? Doubtful. They will always have their army of illegal aliens and their sympathizers, womenz, weak beta males, and minorities who vote for them no matter what.

[–]liquorbaron 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They really have made me adopt this philosophy when dealing with their ilk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEd7Y2YLgTg

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The title is how a news article written by a feminist might look if Kavanaugh is acquitted of the rape charges

Public sexual assault charges are win-win for SJWs: either he's guilty and all men are also guilty of enabling and encouraging the rape and sexual enslavement of women.... or he's not guilty and the patriarchy is guilty of shielding and enabling the rape and sexual enslavement of women. Men are guilty either way - as usual.

Ironically this mostly comes from the last women on earth that men would like to have any sexual relations with at all.

[–]SuperCrazy07 8 points9 points  (2 children)

It's hard to say this, as what Democrats are doing to Kavanaugh is beyond wrong, but OP...you're overreacting.

Regardless, if Kavanaugh is found guilty of the charges of sexual assault

OK, to start, this isn't going to happen. I have no idea if he will or won't be confirmed, but he isn't going to jail for sexual assault.

Second, you've bought into the people speaking the loudest as speaking for everyone.

For example, my wife decided to annoy the hell out of me when I wanted to go to a bar and watch MNF by asking me dumb questions. (Keep in mind she's really pretty liberal and a woman)...

Her: It's halftime, talk to me. What are you thinking?

Me: Uh...well, what do you think about this Kavanaugh accusation? Should it stop him from going to the SC?

Her: OMG, what bullshit. If something actually happened, she should have said something long ago. Plus, the democrats held it for political gain. That, plus the fact that there is no evidence, BULLSHIT. Although, I don't understand why the FBI didn't interview them just to cover all the bases.

Me: Well, they probably figured hours of testimony under oath was good enough, but yeah, just to shut people up they should have.

(Conversation continued with how the police need to be held more accountable - news report at halftime of a cop who killed a guy with 16 bullets waiting on his verdict - and I said, I agree, cops should be held responsible just like women need to go to jail if they falsely accuse someone. Wifey agreed and said she's so glad she isn't male right now with all the bullshit, but we both think it has gone too far and will end at some point in the relatively near future.)

My wife is not some super red pilled republican. I'll bet she's voted Democrat in almost everything for a decade plus. Just pointing out that just because there is a loud, fanatical subset of women commanding attention, NAWALT. Once enough women have husbands, sons, fathers, etc falsely accused, we will go back to a healthy normal IMO.

[–]lastdumra 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It has been always been like this with feminism, most women do not support it. But what most women do is keep silent because of their in group bias, the allegiance to the sisterhood. And that is what feminism uses to present itself as representing women and keep pushing forward.

[–]U21U6IDN 7 points8 points  (0 children)

he isn't going to jail for sexual assault

Right. The statute of limitations passed either 15 or 20 years ago. No police report exists at the time of the supposed instance. Regardless of the statute of limitations Ford could still file for a civil suit if she thought she had a case, but she hasn't so what does that tell everyone?

There's no criminal case. There's civil case that could, if true, be won on much less incriminating evidence.

I know why the Dems are making such an issue. I don't know why the Repubs are playing along with it.

I'd really like to see a Repub say to Ford, "If this happened to you then it is a terrible thing. But as it stands, you failed to file a police report at the time of the incident. You haven't brought a civil suit against Kavanaugh in any of the 36 years since you allege the assault happened. You expect us to judge this man on evidence that, whether you realize it or not, even you believe has no merit. Otherwise you could have at least sought civil remedies. You did not. You have not. You will not. Thank you for playing. Have a nice day! NO SOUP FOR YOU!"

[–]nytonj 4 points5 points  (12 children)

I feel like this post is a subtle way of politicizing this sub. I thought this sub was about men, not politics.

[–]RedPill115 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Sime grouo of reddit admins quarantined this sub at exactly the same time as the rediculous kavanaugh accusations, something that certainly looks like someone trying to pull all the political strings at the same time.

How can you avoid politics when politics starts coming after you?

[–]ThePantsThief 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This sub was basically created out of necessity due to the current social / political climate. Politics are the reason "toxic masculinity" is even a thing.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 5 points6 points  (6 children)

Kinda, yes, but keep in mind that ANTIFA isn't exactly party politics. They have this strange belief that social change will be the catalyst for political change, despite the opposite usually being the case. So while it appears to be in the political venue, they are really just trying to affect our day to day lives.

[–]nytonj 0 points1 point  (5 children)

ANTIFA has nothing to do with the Supreme Court Nomination. OP is pulling shit out of thin air to try to support his half ass arguement of how the "left" is against Kavanaugh.

edit:

Half his post is political:

Guilty or not, this will have been an all-in move by the Left and the democrats to sabotage one of the three branches of the government (judiciary), spearheaded of course by the MILLIONS of programmed SJWs on every social media platform and every fucking blog site. I'm talking of course about Reddit, tumblr, twitter, instagram, facebook, the list goes on.

Due to the fact that entertainment in the form of television, film, music, art, video games have all been inundated with left-wing views and ideas. These SJWs are spreading their ideas with alarming speed and reach. ANTIFA is their army, an uncivilized mob of pussies who can only beat up old or disabled people.

Don't forget ANTIFA are downright criminal, weaponizing things like bikelocks and fucking personify the word "Bodily harm". Reference: This piece of shit who held a position in a university that concealed a bikelock in a sock and split a guy's head open. Didn't even have the balls to look him in the eye, but instead to sneak up through a crowd and strike covertly from behind his buddies.

[–]Kyson5[S] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Christ, if my post got you so bent out of shape, you shouldn't have replied in the first place

Your first reply was perfect to facilitate a debate, I was ready and willing. Now you're just throwing a bitch fit

Lest you forget, the topic in question is a COURT CASE (Judiciary = Government = Politics). For me to toss this aside completely would give my post no context whatsoever. Your failure to understand my post is not my problem.

I made it very clear what the consequences would be if the allegations end with a guilty verdict. The SJWs would take over and parrot this shit for years to come, while dismantling society and ostracising those who don't side with them.

Hope you get those anger issues sorted out

[–]nytonj -4 points-3 points  (2 children)

you're Politicking, attempting to spread your BS politics. Keep the sub on what its suppose to be about, not BS political agendas... I can watch CNN, FOX or whatever for politics.

LMAO... you want to mention ANTIFA when it has NOTHING to do with Kavanaugh. Youre only trying rile people up, over dumb sh!t.

[–]Incel9876 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LMAO... you want to mention ANTIFA when it has NOTHING to do with Kavanaugh. Youre only trying rile people up, over dumb sh!t.

Antifa is funded by Soros, and it was Soros behind the efforts to prevent Trump appointing a conversative judge to the SC, a connection that Trump himself has commented on, and all of which links to efforts by the Left to purge the major internet platforms of wrongthink, and thus the Quarrantine here. Theredpill is political, whether anyone likes it or not, because it is directly contrary to some foundational parts of Leftist dogma, and the Left doesn't tolerate dissent.

[–]DarkSyde3000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're missing the entire point as to why this was even mentioned. Much of what is transpiring in society right now is a direct correlation to the political climate of the country as a whole. What we're seeing right now in regards to this Supreme Court nomination is basically attempting to create a new norm of women being able to get men thrown in prison with nothing more than an accusation. In this case an accusation that is almost four decades old. Granted this isn't a court case in the typical sense where criminal indictments are being handed out, but it's a trial in the court of public opinion which can be even worse.

What is the end result? The end result is men having their livelihoods and reputations completely obliterated over something that someone else stated happened with zero evidence to back up those claims. This isn't just a case of a possible justice being confirmed, it's bigger than that. It's setting a precedent in this country that any man can be destroyed at any time for any reason and it absolutely applies to every man in this country. It's guilty until proven innocent and catastrophic to men everywhere. I can assure you the last thing you're going to want to deal with if successful is getting "metoo'd" by someone in the workplace or your personal life over some shit that never happened and having to defend your reputation with your life. That's what the discussion is and why it's worthy of mention.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well then, that just blew right past.

Rest assured, the entire metro bullshit is about change your day to to day life, not the names on the desks in Washington.

[–]Kyson5[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Hardly, I made sure to keep it within the context of men, which is what the sub is about. In terms of consequences and feminist narrative

To turn it political would involve talking more about the republicans and democrats, but I keep that to a minimum

Politics affects men, as does education because decisions or events within these volatile fields usually affecting a group of people, namely men for the most part.. it could also affect immigrants, your pet goldfish or whatever

[–]nytonj -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is a garbage post. You attempting to rile people up in this forum for whatever bs agenda you have is pathetic.

half your post has nothing to do with men. and wtf does antifa have to do with anything? your pulling these bs narratives to try to support your argument.

your post:

Guilty or not, this will have been an all-in move by the Left and the democrats to sabotage one of the three branches of the government (judiciary), spearheaded of course by the MILLIONS of programmed SJWs on every social media platform and every fucking blog site. I'm talking of course about Reddit, tumblr, twitter, instagram, facebook, the list goes on.

Due to the fact that entertainment in the form of television, film, music, art, video games have all been inundated with left-wing views and ideas. These SJWs are spreading their ideas with alarming speed and reach. ANTIFA is their army, an uncivilized mob of pussies who can only beat up old or disabled people.

Don't forget ANTIFA are downright criminal, weaponizing things like bikelocks and fucking personify the word "Bodily harm". Reference: This piece of shit who held a position in a university that concealed a bikelock in a sock and split a guy's head open. Didn't even have the balls to look him in the eye, but instead to sneak up through a crowd and strike covertly from behind his buddies.

[–]1atticusfinch1973 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I still can't believe that this guy is being held accountable for things he did 35 years ago as a stupid drunken student trying to get laid.

I'd be willing to bet every single congressman and male senator (and most of the women) did things they aren't proud of in college.

[–]one-acorn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are we talking politics on this sub again?

Fuck tying this sub to the 'Trump' train. Sleeping with women has nothing to do if you are a moron Republican or not. In fact I'd arguably say if you are a Trumper, you should probably hide that from most city women until you've fucked twice ...

I don't care if someone drinks to excess and I'd say the Kavanaugh rape question --- it's a he said/ she said so who knows what happened. BUT Kavanaugh is a childish, emotional little bitch and partisan hack.

Putting him on there is like the Dems putting Hillary Clinton or Michael Moore on SCOTUS. You'd probably be foaming at the mouth too.

Kav is a dope and I have to say, he could have taken a shit on the Senate floor and still gotten confirmed by Mitch McConnel --- he is an example of what not to do when questioned (innocent or guilty). Start lying about little meaningless things -- there's no reason to. Start yelling about revenge and letting your emotions (anger and sadness) take over your reason.

[–]xonthemark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Regardless of the motives of the Dems, I admire them for punching back at the Republicans hard on the Kavanaugh issue. Fuck taking the high road. Kavanaugh is payback for Merrick Garland and the little bitch moves that McConnell made.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]