TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

50

I find myself wondering if MRP is actually a con put over on us by women. I'm only half joking. Consider the program:

  1. Lose weight. Get in great shape. Dress better. Become as attractive as you can.

  2. Learn to become a Sex God in bed.

  3. Become OI about not getting sex if she doesn't want to. Just cheerfully move on to the next thing.

  4. Get shit done around the house, manage the kids, finances, etc.

  5. Generally improve yourself in every way.

  6. If your wife is a bitch, realize that it's ultimately your fault. If she's mistreated you in the past, that's on you, not her.

  7. Always remember that she's a free agent and you can't force her to do anything.

  8. Do this for a year or so. At the end of the process, make sure you give her a clear warning and a choice before ending the marriage.

Sure, throw in some fem-bashing and let him think he's the captain to make it palatable. But seriously, what's not to like if you're a woman?


[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The jargon... it's all about the jargon.

Oh and Chad's are supposed to just be born, not created.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yea, it's funny out hypocritical that second part is considering they get together all the time to talk about similar shit from their perspective either with their girlfriends or through guide in the form of books and magazines (cosmo)

[–]SexistFlyingPig32 points33 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

The only reason is because it takes all of the power in the relationship away from the woman.

Then again, If you're the woman, you get an awesome guy who has everything taken care of to run around with.

[–]cj_aubreyMRP APPROVED20 points21 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

it takes all of the power in the relationship away from the woman.

And, in my angry entitled beta past before I found MRP I did not use power for things that benefited my wife. I used it to pressure her to fuck a man she wasn't attracted to. I used it to push her to mommy my insecurities and help me avoid accountability for being a pussy. I used it to avoid doing the beta bitch tasks that she probably thought were the only things I was actually good for. Then I started unplugging and taking more power. I understand why she did not view this as a positive development and started shit testing me like a maniac. After a bit of time she saw me using the power for good leadership (and critically, not abusing it) and stopped fighting. Now I'm just worried that she thinks I'm cheating.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just noticed your flair - congrats.

[–]SexistFlyingPig5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Let her worry about you cheating. You don't have to worry about it at all.

[–]cj_aubreyMRP APPROVED4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

On its own I'd consider the suspicion a solid result of dread and in 6 months I'll probably actively create it. But she's 8 months pregnant so I'm trying to keep the dread super light. Thats why I don't view it as positive.

[–]SexistFlyingPig1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Even the lightest dread, when use with a pregnant wife, can result in divorce."

Sounds like maybe treat the shit tests more like comfort tests then.

Your call!

[–]rocknrollchuckMRP APPROVED2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When she makes that accusation, here's my go-to line: "Why would I want to go through the hassle of training a new girl to do all the things you've already learned to do so well?"

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I go a similar route.

Explain all the things that make me happy in a relationship. Talk about them like she already does them (aspiration, or truth) and let the hamster work for me.

No one will argue when you sing their praises, and usually strive to meet them if they don't

[–]newtothelyte2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Additionally, whether you're a sweet beta or a captivating alpha, both sides have their benefits to a relationship. Being a MRP strongly moves you to the captivating alpha side, and can leave her yearning for the beta side some times. I think I'm striving to find a balance between the two, going full alpha or full MRP leaves the nicer side of me neglected.

[–]ford_contourMarried- MRP MODERATOR1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Early on, Alpha is following your own frame, and Beta is making concessions to hers.

A primary reason people leave their own frame is when it is under-developed. If I genuinely don't have a perspective on something, I default to my wife's perspective, or my mother's or my father's.

In order to spend more time in my own frame, I have to work on it, understand it, develop it.

As my frame has developed, my worthwhile beta behaviors have gained an alpha foundation, and my worthless ones have reduced.

I used to keep house to my wife's minimum standard. Now she and I both keep house to my minimum standard. My wife and I communicated well before I found MRP, so this was not a large shift, but it was a change.

[–]40mullet8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

because becoming MRP guy is like any other new years resolution, only few will succeed. Other 90% act tough couple of months, gets his wife´s hopes up, and eventually turn back to their old habits. Real work begins after sidebar and does not end with first anal.

[–]wakethfkupneoMarried5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because power shifts to man. And that freaks them out.

You know what makes compulsive gamblers compulsive? Dopamine rush when they suddenly win. This is how they get hooked. But this is not the point. My real point is: you know who the luckiest roulette players are? Those who sit at the table for the first time and lose. Then they try again and lose. No dopamine. And one last time and once again they lose. And they say 'fuck this' and never play again. Those are THE LUCKIEST roulette players. Their loss is minimal, insignificant in global scheme of things, no matter what they think at the moment. Their mind cannot comprehend that those who win big in the beginning are the unluckiest sobs, about to enter the nightmare with the potential to lose everything. At best they'll struggle with gambling impulses, at worst ... I'm sure you've read/heard/seen many tragic stories.

Can you imagine gambler wannabe, without any knowledge about gambling addiction and mathematical odds rigged against him, accepting that losing over and over till he gives up is the best possible outcome?

Can you imagine woman accepting that giving all power to man will make her happy? Sure, there are few of them in RPW. But these days with rampant feminism their numbers are statistically irellevant.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Go ask TBP. You'll probably get a wonderful set of answers. then read and lurk here, see if it has merit.

Having said that TRP makes it very easy to hate. anger phase is a thing, sure... cheering guys on who absolve responsability and just point out every stupid woman on the internet is a horrible crab bucket (though entertaining)

When I say TRP, I generally mean the low quality guys (out of 140k) who go there to generally be malcontent. the ones who get their shit together and improve are usually great content, but it's largely drowned out. Even the subs creator admits that the place will be full of mostly failures.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

Because 90% of men are really bad at it. A man who is naturally capable, dominant and charming will never have a power struggle with his wife. If RP isn't working for you guys, it's because your wife isn't an idiot and can see you poorly playing a part.

A beta guy acting like a beta is just bleh. A beta guy wearing an alpha hat and trying to order you around is disgusting.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If a beta guy is trying to order you around, he's doing it wrong. If he's not alpha or at least on his way there, he's doing it wrong.

If he's "playing a part", poorly or not, he's doing it wrong.

And guys here will call him out on it.

And if a wife isn't going to give her man a chance, then she should do them both a favor and end the marriage.

If a wife will continue to be unattracted in spite of his improvement, then he will divorce her long before she divorces him.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

A man who is naturally capable, dominant and charming will never have a power struggle with his wife.

Never? So long as he remains the indefatigable Alpha guy through cancer, sickness, job loss, parents dying, depression and old age. No problem so long as you never slip or run into bad luck. Got it.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

ok, maybe not never, but it certainly wouldn't be a miserable constant power struggle of a marriage. women typically want to be led, but by a man who is strong and capable. that doesn't mean he can never falter in difficult times - of course he can. but to be strong is a personality trait, not something you can just start acting out and expect your wife to take seriously.

to be with an annoying beta is better than to be with an annoying beta who tries to be in charge of you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

constant power struggle of a marriage.

there's always one, don't kid yourself. shit tests wouldn't exist otherwise

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

to be strong is a personality trait, not something you can just start acting out and expect your wife to take seriously.

Actually, this demonstrates the disconnect that ALL women have- and I really mean AWALT. ALL women think that the Alpha just happens.

Just tonight I nailed my wife. Upon dropping the load I muttered something like,

"Hmmm, that was OK but it didn't go according to plan." My wife perked up her little head and had to know:

"Does there always have to be a plan? It just happens dear."

I was not amused (I have complained in the past that women don't "find themselves in bed with a guy" or "it just happened.' "No it doesn't just happen. A MAN makes it happen."

Being "strong" is NOT a personality trait like having a sense of humor or being positive. Being strong is a LEARNED trait that men can develop.

You know what? A man can develop it MUCH faster if he has the support of a woman. It is a shame so few women provide men that support these days. If I were religious I would call it a helpmeet role and if I were a moderator of MRP I would call it the role of a First Officer. Most of these "Alpha" guys are just good looking guys who were taken aside when they were 10 or 12 and told by a father, or older brother, or (rarely) by a sister or mother the TRUTH. The reality of the man's burden of performance and HOW he has to perform in order to really attract women.

Those other Beta guys? Guess what? They are EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE ALPHA except they were not told the truth.

Thus, the Red Pill.

Thus, women prove over and over again that they don't like Red Pill because it interferes with their Alpha/Beta detection system. It affects their ability to optimize their hypergamy and limit the males sexual strategy while empowering male sexual strategy.

Sure they get fucked more and better and they are happier but don't forget, everything is about power- except sex. Sex is about money.

[–]lostalex72 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

wow, you are so beta naturally. most alphas are naturally alpha. it's much more common for an natural alpha to become beta than it is for a natural beta to become an alpha.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Only because we don't train them properly. It is much more common for a guy to not learn how to read or write or speak proper English either- unless somebody sits down and teaches them.

This whole "natural alpha" is utter bullshit. I am hardly a social determinist but those freaks claim "Gender" is a social construct when it is clearly a biological reality.

"Alpha" is NOT a biological reality. What defines an "Alpha" is simply confident, IDGAF around women and THIS is purely a creation of learned behavior sets. Alpha is pure social construct and has NOTHING to do with women's mythical "intuition." Hot girls get "tricked" into bed ALL THE TIME by Spergy Play'uhs who went to a weekend boot camp.

The all powerful women's intuition is not any better than a weather vane and women have no fucking idea what they want. "It just happens" because some magical Alpha prince shit out his Alpha-dom all over your face and you eat it up like chocolate syrup.

If you take an "Alpha" and beat the shit out of him, raise him around women who tell him to "be yourself" and "be nice to girls and respect them" you get a Beta. We do this to all boys today which is why there are so many Betas.

If we took a Beta when he was 10 or 12, and taught him how to be cool and collected. If we had a hot girl sit next to him and fill him up with confidence by telling him he is awesome and initiating a make out session then guess what? The boy is probably going to grow up to be an Alpha.

TLDR: Fuck the Holy Hamster and female intuition.

[–]lostalex72 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

i know plenty of beta males that were raised by an alpha dad and were beaten and told constantly to "be a man" and it didn't make them an alpha.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Of course beating the shit out of a kid doesn't make him "Alpha." Neither does telling him to "be a man." Or telling him to "man up." Or telling him to "just be yourself." Or promising him he "a NICE GUY and ANY girl would want to be with him" (except me).

You have to teach the Beta HOW to be an Alpha. You have to teach him that women lie every time they open their little mouths if they are talking about attraction. You have to teach him to be mysterious and aloof. You have to teach him to be strong, stay calm, and know how to put a nagging bitch in her place. You have to teach him to ACT like he doesn't care and that he can get any girl he wants. You have to teach him to approach with confidence and amused mastery. You have to actually BUILD HIM UP, not tear him down like society and women do relentlessly and ruthlessly.

I didin't say beating up a kid turns him into an Alpha! In fact, I said:

If you take an "Alpha" and beat the shit out of him, raise him around women who tell him to "be yourself" and "be nice to girls and respect them" you get a Beta.

[–]lostalex7-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"You have to teach him to be mysterious and aloof. You have to teach him to be strong, stay calm, and know how to put a nagging bitch in her place. You have to teach him to ACT like he doesn't care and that he can get any girl he wants. You have to teach him to approach with confidence and amused mastery. You have to actually BUILD HIM UP, not tear him down like society and women do relentlessly and ruthlessly."

umm, what? wow you really hate women, no wonder none of them want to be with you.

thank you for finally being honest and exposing yourself as misogynist.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL, you BP's are like hunting dairy cows with sniper rifles. Your shaming may even work with young guys over on TRP but this is MARRIED Red Pill. We all have wives, many of us have had multiple wives and given that condition we are beyond shame. Try again.

In fact your shaming proves my point. If I had Red Pill knowledge and not listened to the LIES EVERY SINGLE WOMAN IN MY LIFE TOLD ME back in the day then my college and Graduate School would have been rather different. I would have in fact been a mythical "Alpha" who "just gets it" and had the sluts drooling all over his cock. I would not have been a man without a clue how to deal with women, raised by a BPD woman and an absent father.

Guess what sweety, now I DO understand women and let me just be sure the choral understands: Decrying the fact that women take every opportunity to relentlessly and ruthlessly tear down men is now the definition of misogyny. Ha!

Besides, I thought I exposed myself as a misogynist a long time ago and find it very dissapointing that people like you are only now noticing.

If you want misogyny, try this: The only thing I like about women as a group in America today is their pussy because that is all they are. Y'all are nothing but a bunch of fucking holes. Women are destroying the economy with the continual voting for socialism. They are destroying the culture by changing gender roles that had a reason and a purpose for thousands of years. (Hint: It is WHY we have civilization). They have already destroyed marriage, and families, and the incentive to work hard. Shall I go on? Or did you have to get to a Hillary rally?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's why there is a possibility of divorce. Be the man - either with a wife or without.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If an annoying beta is "trying to be in charge of" his wife, he's doing it wrong, and guys here will call him out on it.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

What if I told you that Beta guy is really an Alpha who has fallen prey to feminine manipulation? He believed the women in his life. He believed his mother, his sisters, his lovers, his wife. He trusted the women in his life and that makes him forever a Beta.

Now THAT is disgusting.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You've got to get over your obsession with blaming women for all your problems. Regardless of whether your theories about the grand feminine conspiracy are true, being constantly butt hurt about it on the Internet is not constructive. Women are not all powerful, if a man falls prey to this feminization trap, then he is just as much to blame for being blind. If he really were an alpha, he wouldn't get duped in the first place. Own your shit man.

[–]ClubLowlow3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Imagine some young boy being raised by a single mother telling him a bunch of blue pill nonsense. I don't think he even stands a chance of coming out Alpha.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

if a man falls prey to this feminization trap, then he is just as much to blame for being blind.

If a woman is raped, then she is just as much at fault for being blind.

I can do this all day. Just let me emphasize your belief:

If he really were an alpha, he wouldn't get duped in the first place.

And since he is a Beta, meh.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He didn't blame anyone. He reported a set of facts.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

yes... and?

i agree, but that wasn't the question.

women complain about MRP because quite often it's a sappy, incompetent man suddenly acting like he's capable of leading a family.

it's unfortunate that men are sucked into this lie, but it doesn't change the fact that most men are not worthy of leadership, and when they try it backfires.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Notice the female approach- most men are not worthy so we can't do anything about it.

Male approach- most men are not worthy so we need to do something about it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

most men are not worthy of leadership

If that's the case, they shouldn't be married; and their wives bear just as much blame as the husbands.

The wives shouldn't have married those men who aren't worthy of leadership and thus not worthy of marriage.

EDIT: If the guy is sappy and incompetent, and "acting like he's capable of leading a family", he's doing it wrong, and guys around here are the first to call them out on it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

those men who aren't worthy of leadership and thus not worthy of marriage.

But they still have resources that can be mined and exploited, when that wall is looming large on the horizon.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I agree.

Again, I'm not taking sides. Just explaining why, in my opinion, a lot of women are against this kind of "self improvement".

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You have the natural intelligence and probably the strong nuclear family (positive father figure) to immediately spot a poser.

Being high value is a good thing, and you are generating hostility from a place in the heart of men (EGO) that rejects the premise that he can't change enough to win over (or keep) someone like you.

If you're HAWT, you're HAWT....If you're not, this bunny isn't fooled. At least you can intelligently and dispassionately state a preference as opposed to hamstering a "gentle" reason.

Desire can't be negotiated.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a valid point about being weak and then trying to be accepted once you are strong (i.e RP aware and got game). The same phenomena goes with a promotion from within a group of peers to being the new boss of your peers. Some will follow and some will be detractors. But as the new boss you can always fire the detractors and hire a replacement. Same idea with marriage.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, to an extent.

Even before that, there were still weak men who were generally fodder for others. I argue it's just replaced one manipulation for another.

At least a strong man leading the weak has that element of pack leader (I get first meal, but I also kill first invader). The feminist is just resource extraction

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL! Hey your brigade friends are loving your post.

I upvoted this.

[–]Chump_No_MoreHard Core Nuclear Navy Red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What if I told you that Beta guy is really an Alpha who has fallen prey to feminine manipulation?

That's pretty much the blue-pill in a nutshell and the go-to explanation for why men get angry swallowing the RP.

IMO, the hostility over the RP varies and is fairly contextual in women, depending on their 'maturation stage' and relationship status. For married women, it's all about control of the relationship. Of course they're on-board with their man being awesome and 'just getting it'... it's the men taking off the yoke, being masters of their destiny, living their life on their terms, having options, and being relegated to 'a perk' in a man's life parts that plain pisses them off.

[–]cholomiteCholo Rojo - MRP MODERATOR5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's easier to have a beta under your control than it is to keep an alpha committed to you. Plus women know their value plummets after 30, the last thing they want is to have to worry about their new alpha getting eyed up from all the hot 20yr olds.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL! If that was the case then it would be front page of mainstream media. MRP is about yourself first, and the wife second. She is just gets the benefit of being in your halo.

[–]scarletspider37 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You still don't really understand women. Women want to optimize hypergamy as much as possible. That means narrowing their choice as much as possible to exclude the betas, not to help betas become alphas. They see any dating advice for men that actually works as manipulative. They want to trick the betas to reveal themselves with bad advice or program them to better serve the feminine imperative.

Not to mention that the feminist are out to sexually handicap men. They are against manspreading. Which is basically telling men not to display dominance, ie to make them unattractive. They push for yes means yes to make men ask and beg instead of being sexually dominant, ie make them unattractive.

It's all to make sure that only alphas get to have sex and betas only get to be used as ATM's. They are not out to help men, not even women in the long run, but they don't have the farsightedness to realize it.

[–]NiftyDolphinMarried MRP APPROVED2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Look at the list through the eyes of a woman with a schlub husband or boyfriend:

"He'll lose weight? That's great! Not that I don't wuv my widdle teddy-bear. Heh heh hurrnnnnn.. He'll lose weight, right? And if he get's new clothes then I get new clothes too! I think that's fair."

"He'll try even harder to please me in bed? Grrreeeeeeaat!"

"I can say no as much as I want and he won't do anything? Yuuussssss!"

"He's going to even MORE(or in some cases, any) chores! More Facebook time for me!"

"If I occasionally lose control and give him a hard time he'll take the blame? SIGN ME UP!"

"If I don'ts wansta, I ain't gotsta! <sing_song>Loving it!</sing_song>"

"If he's not happy after a year he'll leave me and be this improved person for someone else. Wait, WHAT?"

Women who don't have men that are improving themselves don't like this because of number eight. Number eight is a big, bright, flashing neon sign that reads, "You will also have to improve yourself to keep your man. If you don't, he may leave you."

The list may hold a bevy of improvements for their relationship, but it contains a threat: that every positive their man makes could lead him to dissolving their relationship.

Edit: reworded to remove excessive bullshit projection on my part.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"If he's not happy after a year he'll leave me and be this improved person for someone else. Wait, WHAT?"

LOOLOOLLLLzzzzz

[–]smidevaek0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This was hilariously well-written, thanks for the laugh.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Satire? Have you had a blow to the head today?

[–]ParadoxThatDrivesUsMRP APPROVED[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Actually, I'm feeling a little bitter today. Every time I think I'm past the anger stage, I discover a whole new layer of (self)deception that didn't occur to me until just now and get pissed again. It occurred to me that I'm going to repay all the pain she's caused me by . . . trying to become the best husband I can be (yes, I know I'm doing it for me . . .).

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, not the best husband you can be, the best MAN you can be. Different things. YOU decide when you're the best man you can be. She doesn't get to decide that.

If some benefits accrue to her as a result then that's great. If not then so be it. You'll be happier without a thirst for vengeance.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

1/2 joking is also 1/2 anger/sarcasm. Not good or bad: it just is what it is.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Like our favorite Canadian Sailor likes to say:

"That'll show her."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

He does get to the point in an absolute minimum of words.

[–]SepeanMRP APPROVED1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

First, there's the regular of elements of shit testing, keeping her beta compliant, etc. The process isn't going to be easy even if she'll ultimately end up happier (because your list is mostly accurate).

Secondly, there's the question of her knowing about MRP. Girls aren't like men who are perfectly happy that our girls cheat themselves into their SMV with makeup and implants. Girls want genuine alphas, not beta posers who read a guide. If she becomes cognisant of MRP you'll lose perceived alpha. And all the stuff about dread games, killing your oneitis, knocking women of their piedestal etc. she'll read that and see that you also lost a shitload of beta.

There's a lot not to like. My wife knows of MRP and has accepted much of it and she's gone RPW, and she still gets worked up whenever she strays into MRP.

I guess it is like watching sausages getting made, it ruins your enjoyment of an excellent end product.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

no. 6, disagree. sometimes a bitch is a bitch and all the work in the world aint going to change her.

as my mom used to say, "get a bloody good look at her mother."

[–]neocelt2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree. Though you (I , him , us) did marry her. So we ain't innocent . Wish I'd heard the mother advice awhile back.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wish I could up vote this more than once. Yes we heard, we just didn't heed the advice.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

For sure. And the way I see it, the weak man that picked her is in no position to make decisions to kick her to the curb either.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

what's not to like if you're a woman?

Red Pill is different than /r/relationshits because we identify and discuss female behavior and motivations. We lay bare the bullshit that women do.

You left out a couple things. First, Shit Test responses- which I put as Dread Level 1 for a reason. Some chicks become practically epileptic denying and deflecting on female shit tests. Second: POWER! TRP/MRP teaches men the cardinal rule of relationships and many other techniques for seizing power from women in relationships.

How could most women do anything BUT hate us? We talk directly and logically and irrefutably about female oppression of men and it does the worst thing possible you can do to women. Sure you can beat some women and they come crawling back like dogs like it doesn't matter. Maybe some of them like it? The one thing you CANNOT do to a woman is take away her victim status card and MRP/TRP does that in spades.

[–]RPAlternate42MRP APPROVED0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/relationshits

Yiou can't use this anymore... it's an actual satirical sub based on relationships.

And it is hilarious.

Or keep using it. Whatever the fuck.

[–]War2kali0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You are correct that there are tangible benefits to both parties. There's a lot of win-win here.

[–]Tollanador0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because they read only the surface of TRP and don't look into MRP and don't bother to see what it's really about. Then they hit the internet and scream WHAT TRP IS REALLY ABOUT!11one

Oh, and people like me give it a bad name when we are just starting and failing. Sorry about that.

[–]MRPguyMarried0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't have time to read all the comments, this may have been said.

They will complain when a many does each step half-way and they announces that MRP sucks. No, MRP doesn't suck, you only took half-measures.

[–]SDSAM210 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This was my thought exactly as I went through the anger phase. Then, I realized the boss man said "You shall live by the sweat of you brow.". He didn't say you shall suckle the nipple all your days. MRP destroys the lies of the soul sucking and cultural slow death of the FI.

[–]lostalex70 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

because most men on TRP think they are putting way more effort into it than they actually are, and they expect their wives to put in all the effort. Most men think they can just use it to make their wives change without actually changing themselves.

[–]ford_contourMarried- MRP MODERATOR0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To answer your question:

Lots of guys find RP and just discover NMMNG, and then end their marriage by being an asshole. While we have philosophies in place that could prevent that (i.e. try it for a year), since we're still a branch of RP philosophy, we get some credit for the bad outcomes.

To address the list of what women could love about MRP:

Absolutely. It's magical. It's particularly great when applied to high value women.

But just like magic and Hollywood, it's more fun for her if she doesn't know the formula.

And one point with your list: the wording on 8 is way off.

Step 8 is: Do this for a year or more, then decide if you are done with this relationship. If so, end it with class and without discussion.

[–]_SexMetalBarbie_0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

The biggest struggle I face is with not seeing my SO as a friend. Ultimately, it may be the one issue that keeps me from being willing to become a full fledged rpw.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Read Ian Ironwood's very recent cross-post here from the relationshits sub to see his explanation why MRP guys and men in general don't want a "best friend."

A wife, a true trusted partner to share lives and bodies with, is light years beyond a simple friend. Real men love with an all-encompassing devotion for a deserving woman that dwarfs the meaning of friend. Our love is not opportunistic, conditional, or comparable to what some feel for their pets.

This is why we guard our hearts, because women want a friend, and men want a wife.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Beyond? naw.

My car isn't beyond my house in it's utility, they serve different purposes.

I don't get sad when my house can't get me to work. And sure, I can live in my car, but it's just not as good

[–]40mullet0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ironwood described beta male thinking, oneitis and stuff. My love towards my wife is definitely conditional. I have eyes only for one woman, add 10 pounds, I suddenly see there is other women too.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

it was accurate. Anyone else reading that should know that between his explanation, and it's outcome, where that thinking gets you. That post should scare any 'on the fence' men out there.

Best friend? Wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. Even afterwards, she only wanted him for his social network.

He took the hamster away from her, which is why she was so angry.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The whole Captain/First Officer is modeled after Star Trek: The Next Generation. Captain Picard and First Officer Riker were friends. Picard was even the Best Man at Riker's wedding. They drank together. They socialized outside of work. They spoke directly and frankly to one another.

Red Pill is not a rigid praexology. The Captain-First Officer relationship in marriage recommended by MRP and RPW is popular because it is so flexible. Valid Captain/FO relationships range from "The Drunk Captain" (and usually a pissed off FO who is doing all the work) to almost a male dom/ female sub thing I see occasionally with guys cucking their wives and telling them I am in charge and if you don't like it there's the door. Weirdly the girls don't seem to have a problem with their hubs getting a little on the side.

Anyway, back to the point, nothing in Red Pill or Married Red Pill praexology precludes the Captain and First Officer from being close friends and emotionally connected and trusted confidonts. Nothing requires it either- and their is considerable evidence that women don't want to fuck their friends any more than men.

I don't fuck my friends and if you are my wife we are something very different than friends. We are lovers- and that is better than "friends." Why do you want to be "friends" with your lover? All of that stuff you value is included in the better definition without the baggage.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Control. power. It certainly brings the struggle to light doesn't it?

Personally I don't see things in that light any more, rather I strive to balance my wife. Yin/Yang. Too much of one unbalances the whole.

This is why the anger phase is the most damaging to men. Too much Yang. Strive for balance. This is also why MRP is not about subservience but about submission. It's not about domination but being dominate.

It's the truth of things.

But MRP is far easier to digest then trying to just say yin yang. So ignore that. MRP gives the road map. Understand how you will. For me yin yang makes complete sense now.

I am man.

She is woman.

That's all there is. Does there need to be more?

[–]trapped_in_a_box-1 points0 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

RPW likes you guys just fine. :)

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

RPW actually hates MRP because from their perspective: if a man does not get it naturally, he is a looser or ATM at the best for ever.

[–]BluepillProfessorMarried-MRP MODERATOR1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad to hear it but it is news to me.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

A lot of them hate CAD, whinemoreplease, and I believe I still have a ban there.

It's not a team sport, something a guy can get behind.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

They don't hate me, they hate the way I make them feel

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

that's because they can't see h ow HAWT you are

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

If they saw me and had my attention then all would be forgiven and forgotten.

Id be "misunderstood" and a delightful challenge to her

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

delightful challenge to her

"her" just one?

you slippin'

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Correction

A challenge to her (plural)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You like RP men if they truly own their shit. Posers and social retards need not apply.

If you practiced what you preach, you would search out the relationships that work in MRP and emulate, or at least ask about our SO's to get a clue.

Reading vintage Better Homes and Gardens and believing that will inform you of what modern families inundated with feminist horseshit need from a wife is just naive.

Are you willing to truly support, physically satisfy and be a smart, sexy mom to a awesome man's awesome kids? Then you might like us just fine.

[–]ThumpNuts-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

...

Wait a minute...

I was born "red pill" and since I've been married, I've lived my life according to this list [without being aware of it] naturally for years, but I have a couple of critical differences:

  1. I do these things for myself and to keep my social value high to aid in "dread game" and because I like being treated better than most people.
  2. Developed this trait through lots of practice and because I get off and getting her off - that's just what makes me tick... I'm a giver.
  3. Difference: When I want sex, I get sex. I'm not saying 100% of the time. I'll let her slide once in a while [illness, sad, period, etc...] but if it looks like it's not going to happen, I make it happen. It's called "seduction" and "dread game." If I'm not getting it from her, I can go out and get it elsewhere.
  4. Yes, mostly because I'm in control. I am the head of the house... the head of the whole operation.
  5. That's what life's about - helping each other [humanity] get better, including and especially yourself.
  6. Difference: If your wife is a bitch it's ultimately her nature. AWALT. All women are naturally bitches and it takes effort, education, and experience to keep them reasonable... on both your parts. It's not your responsibility to make her a rational human being - it's hers. The only thing you can do is help her and increase the odds that she is successful.
  7. SLIGHT Difference: Yes, and that goes double for you.
  8. Right. By "do this" you mean "LIVE IT." There is no try, only do. Also, "...give her a clear warning and a choice before ending the marriage" or doing anything really. Be clear about the consequences when she naturally reverts to being the bitch she was born to be.
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter