TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

574
575

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D33L4zxjpH0

The world needs more women like Dr. Helen Smith. Perfectly explains Red Pill attitudes towards marriage. Like the YouTube title says, this "white chick gets it!"

By the way, semi-new Red Pill lurker here. Just want to say it's getting really fucked up with this trend of marriage. I completely understand the argument, and I'm more against marriage than for it (I'm only 22 but still, I get it) but just...Damn. "WHAT'S THE WORD COMIN' TO?!" - James Conway, Goodfellas (1990)


[–][deleted]  (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TogiBear 39 points40 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you look closely from left to right, you see:

RPW, BP, Feminism, Dude who just found TRP in an /r/askreddit thread.

It's scary how accurate this is.

[–][deleted]  (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]darthsmokey 22 points23 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Tucker is the kind of guy who gets divorced raped.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men as arrogant and clueless as he are, IMO, deserve it.

[–]Disillusi0n 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wife's probably waiting until they kick him off the air before she cashes out.

[–]darthsmokey 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Would love to hear his response if that ever happens.

[–]Helmut_Newton 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Tucker was born into money, so he hasn't had to struggle or face any real adversity. No surprise that he's so clueless.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"I agree with you, but being a man is manning up!"

I cringed like fuck.

[–]isomortal 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

He is probably getting ques from a handler through an earpiece.

[–]tremondo 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess you could say for once that fox news were fair and balanced

[–]WhoGivesAShitAsshole 126 points127 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

HA! "Forgive me I just went to a wedding" -- the woman's equivalent of "I don't mean to be racist, but..."

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Haha, she probably doesn't realize why weddings like those produce that result.

Hint: money and media brain-washing.

[–]colovick[🍰] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The average wedding costs $50k... Of course going to a fifty thousand dollar party is going to make you feel good about fifty thousand dollar parties. What is it supposed to make you feel? Sad? Shit, I want my wedding to be dark, in a dungeon, with blood on the walls and the smell of death and sorrow... Why are people surprised about this?

[–]skoobled 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Confirmed: women aren't focussed on the marriage, they just want the white wedding

[–]_Dog- 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

While completely missing what the white stands for.

[–]Moneyley 31 points32 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

"just went to a wedding...gives hope"

Yea what about when that hope ends and we get stuck paying for debts we didn't accrue on our own. How about what happens if hope ends and our kids are taken from us?

[–]199639 21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ill fated voyages are often begun full of hope.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The best laid schemes of mice and men often go awry.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Too bad the women doesn't take on those roles. Also she doesn't give two shits about that

[–]1aguy01 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It gives her hope she can get a wedding. She wouldn't give a fuck about the marriage though. Or the man.

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 31 points32 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm accruing quite the backlog of books. She makes a valid point about the word of a woman being worth far more than a man's. A man saying everything she said would just be written off as a misogynist and ignored/shamed. Being a woman her voice automatically gets legitimacy, they can't write her off as a misogynist so they're forced to listen.

[–]krakosia 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

she is breaking the vow of sisterhood! What a misogynist!!

[–]colovick[🍰] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They're still trying to... The guy on the left has doormat written all over him, and if you look closely, you can see the indention where his testicles used to be before his wife put them on the mantle in a trophy case.

[–]McDoner 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That guy doesn't even have the ability to realize someone might not actually think the same way he does! "The only way to get deep satisfaction is to have people to care for." Really? The ONLY way? Get out your fucking box dude. I wanted to punch him.

[–]2wiseclockcounter 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or pity her as another helpless victim of the patriarchy. God forbid a woman sympathizes with a man, or for that matter thinks about anything outside the feminist narrative.

[–]Psycho_Delic 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd equate it to the more southern tradition of saying things like.

With all due respect

and a favorite

Bless your heart, but

[–]krakosia -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Now I know what bless your heart means.

Quote from house of cards

Francis Underwood: Jim Matthews, his right honorable vice-president. Former governor of Pennsylvania. He did his duty in delivering the keystone state, bless his heart. Now they're about to put him out to pasture. But he looks happy enough, doesn't he? The sum, is simply the size of the chair.

[–]1R_E_D_1 61 points62 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 43 points44 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A++++ would help proofread her thesis at her place

[–]knitro20 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

There's an inverse relationship between a woman's attractiveness and her adherence to feminism.

[–]krakosia 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

she is good looking enough to not need feminism.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Its rather unfortunate that she resembles Sarah Silverman in any respect, considering the striking polarity of their viewpoints on feminism.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sarah Silverman? Lmao! Give this woman some credit.

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Great video, I wish she would do an AMA, it would be interesting.

I bet she's a lurker in here.

[–]Petrarch1603 19 points20 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

She's done an AMA in the past but i cant link to it.

[–]PersianVino 89 points90 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Everyone do a quick Google search: "Helen Smith Reddit"

Some points from her AMA:

  • "I agree that complaining is viewed as "unmanly" but is fighting for justice "unmanly"? When men tell me they do not want to seem like complainers or whiners, I ask them if fighting for gun rights or for freedom of speech, etc.is unmanly. They usually say no. Isn't fighting against the lack of due process, lack of reproductive rights, or against involuntary servitude very similar to fighting for those rights I mentioned? How is that complaining? Or is it only complaining if a man benefits?"

  • "Yes, in my teens and twenties, I was very much a feminist because I felt/saw that women had disadvantages in some ways in our society. However, the pendulum has swung too far the other way now, with women having privileges and men having responsibilities. This is as unfair as discrimination against women and must be changed."

  • "Maybe that should be my next book! Asking men "why did you marry?" I did not ask men why they married, I asked why they didn't want to. I also am curious as to how many men really really thought through getting married. The younger men I interviewed seemed to have no clue about the legal aspects of marriage and some thought that in a divorce, the courts would treat them fairly if, for example, their wife cheated on them. They were shocked to hear this was not the case...."

  • "Men used to get respect and had more rights to their children in the past, and had more male space. This loss of respect, loss of freedom and lack of paternity rights are three punishments that men are getting now. I do think that concerning paternity, things have changed because of DNA testing and men now know whether they are the father of a child."

  • "Yes, I think that part of the problem for boys in school is we do not have enough male teachers --only about 16% of elementary school teachers are men. A study at the London School of Economics found that female teachers give boys lower marks and base grades on their behavior rather than on merit. How do we rectify it? Maybe we need something like Title IX for male teachers! People say that not enough men want to teach kids but they said the same thing about women and sports when they enacted Title IX."

  • "I like the MensRights group here at reddit and read it. I like other groups too. I think that calling these groups hate speech or misogynists is a way of closing down the discussion. There are many groups benefiting from men not speaking up and being afraid of being called names. I can understand this but it is imperative not to let it impede on free speech. I was appalled when I saw that Warren Farrell, author of the Myth of Male Power, etc. was shouted down at the University of Toronto by a group of angry feminists and their Uncle Tim supporters. Men are committing suicide in high numbers, dropping out of school and have issues that must be addressed and anyone opposing the right for free discussion in my opinion is the hater here."

Confirmed: She reads TRP.

[–]dabayer 36 points37 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

A study at the London School of Economics found that female teachers give boys lower marks and base grades on their behavior rather than on merit.

B-but girls perform better in school!

[–]100Timeswww 26 points27 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I've been on this sub for a while and not much phases me any more, but this struck a coord for whatever reason. Every time a moderate feminist gets asked the question "Why are you a feminist? those people are crazy?" she will respond with "Feminism is all about equality between men and women, I don't want women to have the upper hand it's about making things equal".

Well then why are feminists only complaining about a lack of women engineers or a lack of women programmers? If they are so much about equality then why aren't men given more incentives to become teachers or nurses? No, it's all about given every woman a better chance than a male to succeed in life. You will never hear a feminist fight for men's rights even though they preach equality. Any woman who identifies as a feminist is an extremist, no exceptions.

[–]parrrot_ 21 points22 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well then why are feminists only complaining about a lack of women engineers or a lack of women programmers?

It's in the name. FEMInism. Would a group fighting for equal rights for all races call themselves White Power?

[–]colovick[🍰] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a con. The true nature of any rights group is to further the presence of the people or service they champion. This isn't an issue until they reach equality because human nature isn't fair or just and people will continue to find things to complain about to protect their livelihood. If they personally benefit as well, all the more reason to keep at it. This isn't a big deal unless someone suffers as a result like with the past several years of gender politics.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women are biologically feminist. They see themselves as caretakers of species and men are the dumb wealth-producing oxen that can easily be harnessed through sexual and cultural manipulation (i.e. by restricting access to sex and the "manning up" brainwashing). It's not that taking a feminist stance is somehow "extremist" - it's a normal behavior. What is extremist is what Smith is doing - stepping aside and rationally analyzing the situation, disregarding the feminist instincts for female supremacy which are undoubtedly still buried somewhere in hindbrain, and standing up for the righteous cause.

[–]colovick[🍰] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's seeking personal gain by telling a truth and protecting an underrepresented group. She's doing exactly what you're suggesting, but political ideas aren't part of your biology. Just because she benefits from feminism doesn't mean everyone agrees with it.

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I disagree with this explanation. I think women are just individually rent-seeking. They seek the highest reward for having a vagina. If having a dick gave greater rewards (Muslim countries) they would accept that too. But they are amoral and individually greedy.

The women who seem to "team up" against men are just expressing common individual interests. You get a whole bunch of unmarried cougars telling men that they have no right to avoid old single moms. Not because it makes any sense, just because it's in their individual self interest. You don't see marriageable decent 20 year old women saying that stuff, because it's not their issue.

(Unless they get a load of crap from the feminists. But that only "takes" on a minority of women, and they don't really believe it either, until after riding the carousel it does become their issue.)

[–]krakosia 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

here's a great bit in Rick and Morty around this idea

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Established cultural narrative puts women in the role of the distressed and oppressed. Mens issues are seen as unimportant due to their societal privelege. They're looked at like a rich person complaining about higher costs of living.

Redpill explanation for this is that humanity on a deep biological level views men as having less intrinsic value as people due to breeding capabilities of men vs women.

[–]systemshock869 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

An extremist or an ignorant bandwagon rider. #OMGFeminism!!1

[–]1cover20 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

And if anyone tries to challenge that and say that the brightest people might be men, he loses his job. (Larry Summers, ousted as President of Harvard by a feminist and bluepill lynch mob in the faculty.)

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Here you go: https://archive.today/kkiGA

"I am Helen Smith, forensic psychologist and author of the book "Men On Strike: Why Men are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream--and Why It Matters." AMA!'

Probably her best comment: "It is your one and only life and you have to think of your happiness, not just hers."

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

shes probably part of /r/redpillwomen

[–]redpillalt123 36 points36 points [recovered] | Copy Link

But it still doesn't absolve men of the responsibility to stop complaining (1) about how the cards are against them, and man up and become (2) one becasue you don't become a man until you assume responsibility.

What I think i going through her head.

  1. This guy can be serious.
  2. Oh god, he is serious.

The moment he raised his voice, she solidified that these poeple is not there for a discussion. I like how she held frame thought the interruptions and over talking.

[–]Dream4eva 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, especially when that girl shoved her finger towards her to shut her up.

[–]krakosia 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, the Dr got cut out hard by the hostess. But the Dr came roaring back and was calm and poised throughout. We can learn a thing or two about frame control from her

[–]jmotrain157 points [recovered] (41 children) | Copy Link

Wow, she shut down that dumb blonde bitch. Dr. Smith is exactly right, you can get companionship without marriage. All marriage does it make a legal contract that allows a woman to fuck over a man for half his shit plus other goodies.

I was having this discussion with my blue pill brother who said that Mel Gibson's wife deserves $400 million dollars (or whatever) because she "supported him". I told him he is out of his fucking mind, she fucked him and gave him children, she didn't create that $800 million dollars. Like Eddie Murphy said [talking about Johnny Carson's wife getting half his money]:

"And I've had my share of pussy. I have yet, even if the pussy was great and sparks shot out the woman's ass and cannons blared and the mountains crumbled and the seas roared,no pussy is worth $150 million! No pussy."

[–]anonlymouse 14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Wow, she shut down that dumb blonde bitch

But no comments on how she shut down the white knight sitting on the left? What's worse, a woman trying to argue for something that's good for women or a man trying to argue for something that's bad for men?

[–]1cover20 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes she shut down the beta orbiter bluepill types. Respect.

[–]IkilledJarJar 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

But it's interesing that she had no concept of what the fox reporter meant when he said he feels like a man when he has responsibility. She could not rationalize pride, she purely saw things from an economic perspective.

In other words, she is still a women and cannot think from a mans perspective.

[–]anonlymouse 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sure she understood it well enough, but she controlled the direction of the conversation by only talking about the economics of it. Answering him on those terms would have derailed the conversation, and she only had a few minutes to get her point across - with interjections from 3 others.

[–][deleted]  (19 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]evenmoretiredoflibs 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

And? You think in the other cases the state is just like - let's garnish his wages voluntarily? No dude - the divorce lawyers petition the court such that the original decision is followed through upon.

It sounds like your anecdotal friend has a shit lawyer.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]evenmoretiredoflibs 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lawyers usually work on getting a percentage of the money they'd win on behalf of you. So you can either do that or not I guess. But don't act like choosing not to is some sort of tremendous systemic injustice when the only reason it's happening in the first place is because the other party does have a competent lawyer.

You want to get into a legal battle - you are going to need a good lawyer. It's as simple as that. If you aren't going to be able to get a good lawyer, you shouldn't get into a legal battle. That's true for men, women, people that are single, married, or people that are getting divorced.

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have the impression that courts enforce these things in a sex-biased way even if the requisite motions are filed. Opinions?

[–][deleted]  (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Espiritu13 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I've been on the redpill for some time now and I rarely see the idea of morality posted. I don't disagree with you, however I've had trouble arguing that point. Can you expound on the morality portion of your argument for my understanding?

[–]1aguy01 7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Imagine you want to enter into business with a business partner. He gives you a contract that says he can take half of your property and half of your future checks if he leaves, and he can leave for any reason at all. You would never agree because that contract is fucking retarded.

[–]Espiritu13 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Agreed but that only makes it immoral if you both agree on what morality is. I would agree from my perspective of morality, but your response says that the person who agrees to this is stupid, not that the person getting half is immoral.

[–]1aguy01 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Morality is a philosophical concept and can be debated forever. Most people would say that taking half of another person's shit when you didn't work for it, even if they agree to it, is immoral. You can take a nihilistic stance and just say everything is amoral, but your average person is going to feel like there is something wrong with that scenario.

[–]Espiritu13 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough, that's a great point. I don't take a nihilistic stance at all, I just know in some debates people tend to take that stance when it's convenient for them.

[–]krakosia -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

laconic reply - two wrongs don't make a right.

[–]anonlymouse 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

They make it so the provider gets fucked over, which in most cases is the man, but not always.

Nope, even if the woman is the provider, it can end up being that the man gets fucked over.

[–]superyay -3 points-2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol how the fuck does this guy know

[–]anonlymouse 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it has happened, hang around and read some more.

[–][deleted]  (12 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PersianVino 120 points121 points  (45 children) | Copy Link

Everyone, please watch from 1:10-1:30 of this video.

I've done a simple analysis:

1.) Beta host tells Dr. Smith that a man should essentially stop complaining about modern-day marriage being a bad deal for men. He goes on to confidently state that a man doesn't become a "man" until he takes responsibility. Translation: Beta has become a shell of a man in his marriage and has deluded himself into thinking that a man should be fucked over and not complain about it. This is the antithesis of TRP.

2.) Dr. Smith questions what man would take a raw (horrible) deal that screws him over. She shows empathy for and consideration of the man. Translation: She's almost certainly a Red Pill woman and her man is definitely giving it to her every night.

3.) Beta host achieves the peak of male hamstering by justifying that a) marriage is not a horrible deal and b) a man derives deep satisfaction only from taking care of other people. Translation: He is confirmed to be a shining example of AFBB and from his statement, it's clear that he's beaten down as a man.

Takeaways: Watch her reactions throughout these telling 20 seconds. Her expression goes from amusement at his naivete to absolute disgust. More specifically, check out her reaction to his "deep satisfaction" line. She's never encountered this high level of beta male hamster before.

PS - She's kinda hot. I'd suck a fart out of her butt.

[–]1spicy_fries 33 points34 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Her reaction at "deep satisfaction"... beta disgust. It's the opposite of the tingles.

[–]VincentPrice 17 points18 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think I heard her pussy get dry through the monitor.

[–][deleted] 48 points49 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Jesus .... great reply PersianVino .... but did you really have to add the PS?

[–]openwaves 39 points40 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha I got a good laugh out of it. Comic necessity

[–]hyorilee 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

great observation.

Remember that look gentlemen and hope you never see it in women you encounter.

[–]toworkortoreddit 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You can almost hear her call him a beta bitch right to his face. She is in complete shock at how any man can be this beta.

[–]anonlymouse 10 points11 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

There's some truth in what the white knight said though - you do get satisfaction of taking responsibility of other people. That in itself isn't a bad thing, but you need to get some rights in exchange for that responsibility, which is something he's not taking into account at all.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]krakosia 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The important line you are looking for is "what's the downside".

[–]BibliophileC 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The only thing you can trade responsibility for is obedience.

[–]anonlymouse 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't necessarily have to trade it for anything, just as long as you can leave the relationship without being screwed. There are some places with marriage laws that are reasonable - Switzerland for instance (they also have a separate marriage category that assumes you'll get divorced at some point).

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The beta host suffers from "Alan Harper Syndrome"

[–]AlphaKenny-1 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think I cringed every time either of the guys opened their mouths

[–]krakosia 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

her face at 1:38 is hilarious. He says "well I did". The subtext is "look I have already walked down this path and am suffering and I have to double down on this on TV else my wife is gonna be super mad at me. I have no choice but to oppose your rational point of view. I am too vested in my life decision". And the Dr being a woman empathized with his situation immediately by stating that maybe you have a really good wife. Thus allowing him an out in the conversation but next line she holds her frame by stating that lot of others don't feel that way.

TRP aside this interview is a good example of how to defend your points in a calm rational way in the face of hostile interviewers. Everyone of them except maybe the guy on the extreme right is rather opposed to her points.

Side note - the guy on the left has to rationalize his life choices and his assimilation of the status quo. His reaction at 2:52 is just pure gold. The Dr says there are women who make 17-23k and are using the government to help themselves and don't want a man and his reaction is "ugh, that's disgusting. That's a disgusting way" and gets cut off by the slightly more dominant male in the group who is more supportive of the Dr's points

EDIT: Another interesting point - at 3:50 she says "it's easy to sit here and say, as high level man and woman" while pointing with her hands and her eyes at the guy on the right and the woman in the middle and consciously or sub-consciously ignoring the guy on the left as he was too beta to be even considered a man. And again at 4:00 the guy on the left tries to have the last word but is blocked off by the guy on the right and notice the left guy's face at 4:01-4:02, lips pursed through frustration at not being able to close off the segment.

[–]drimadethistocomment -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't drag my balls through glass just to hear her fart over a walkie talkie, but I might suck that fart out

[–]machimus 29 points30 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Homeboy on the right had her back, nice.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 63 points64 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Its been said often here, and everyone needs to hear it. Never get married if you're a man.

I've been called bitter, misogynistic, and told they are sorry that life has treated me so badly that I think this way. Its not life, its the fucked up laws and lack of accountability and consequence for women acting poorly. They get rewarded for being horrible people, why the fuxk would anyone willingly subject themselves to that shit if they knew it would happen to them? They wouldn't.

She gets it, she can talk about it because nobody is going to say she is bitter or hates women, simply because she has indoor plumbing.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 22 points23 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

I was against marriage long before i knew anything about TRP. I drew my own conclusions about marriage based on the world around me at around 12 years old. How i saw that men get treated like work horses and a wallet long after a relationship is over. I have no reason to believe if i do get married that it'll end in divorce, but why take that risk?

Sadly, i'm willing to bet that the laws will be expanded to include relationships, not just marriage, as part of a 'division' of wealth as more men recognize the faults of marriage.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 16 points17 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

If that happens men will opt out of relationships as well, put a tax on single males to pay for women and men will eventually stop working. Most of us will only take this bullshit for so long, then we act. Some act quicker than others, but sooner or later men will react to the environment around them.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 8 points9 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that will work. Men will never stop working. We're the explorers, the thinkers, the doers of history. We find a curiosity and we examine it in such depth that entire theories, laws, models, the world itself is built around it.

Soviet Russia produced popular and prolific writers and were next to the US in the creation of the bomb. Cuba produces highly sought after baseball players, Mexico and Columbia are the sources of most of US drugs. All run by men in times of economic stress.

We don't seek prestige or wealth as a primary factor. We're in it because it's something nobody else has done, or can do. We're in it because somebody told us we can't. We want to be first. We want to be only. We want to know something nobody else knows, and be the first to tell the world.

Men aren't in it for the wealth or fame. We're in it for the challenge.

[–]caveboy77 14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Tell that to the ever increasing amount of unemployed men in america. You're being overly romantic, not too many people have jobs that nobody else has done or can do.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They don't have jobs because there aren't jobs to be had, not because they're not qualified for the jobs that aren't available.

[–]_Dog- 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The numbers are skewed. I have a job and I get counted. The couple of guys I pay in cash under the table do not, but they have 'jobs'.

[–]Magnum256 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men will never stop working. We're the explorers, the thinkers, the doers of history.

That may be true but I think if the laws were changed to give women even more rights to a mans money regardless of marital status, you'd have a hell of a lot more men pursuing jobs they enjoy rather than jobs that pay well. So men wouldn't stop working but there might be a huge shift in career demographics.

Who knows, might end up being a good thing.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My original point was that marriage is a terrible thing for a man, but despite that men will never stop inventing. Creating. Developing. We are a curious gender.

In the same instance: women will never stop taking. They don't create or invent, they take. They want to suck men dry of all they are worth. Hope, wealth, fame... these are all things a woman hopes to osmose from the man she is with, and if she can't she will find another man to absorb.

It's quite obvious.

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men are indeed explorers. Use that trait intelligently!

We have an option the left wingers hate. Overseas women. We are liked there.

Our domestic women don't get anywhere near such a positive reception from overseas men. The market is speaking. We're undervalued here.

BTW I think your post is sort of bluepill. You're so idealistic, you cannot think of a way to keep the benefits for yourself while foreclosing the wrong sort of women from getting any. Clue: there's a game going on. Learn the rules and play to win.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I am an idealistic and an optimist. This is simply my nature, and it's not a part of my character i want to overcome. I don't consider it bluepill, because i'm also quite cynical (no, i can't figure out how i'm both either).

I suppose i compartmentalize. Humanity is definitely on the right path in many ways, but feminism and certain parts of the establishment are doing everything they can to derail our progress in favor of their own elevation. It's weakening us not only as a nation, but as a species.

I think we are capable of great, wonderful, monumental things as a species... but it's not going to happen if women keep stealing money from those they were lucky enough to marry. It destroys the soul of creation itself, and that hurts all of us.

The fear of being legally robbed has infested our imaginations, and it's a poison. I'm certain man can overcome this, but it's going to hinder the growth of science when men exist in a fear that a false rape claim is going to destroy them, or they'll marry and be monetarily raped in the divorce.

It's an awful, awful thing.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Working for yourself is different from working to support others. I do the former almost entirely now, and I won't share my discoveries with just anyone. I'm not letting people take from me anymore. If they take like I mentioned above, I will find a way around it, even if it means death. I'm done being a wallet for undeserving females.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women, specifically the laws supporting them, seem to be the poison in the well. I don't believe for a second you're withholding information because you're greedy, or wicked, or any other adjective a single mom might attribute to you. I think if you have information you're not sharing it's because the world is in such a state that it wants to rob you of what you have.

Perhaps it's not because of a woman, but it's certainly a female mentality that drove this 'communal' knowledge into the social sphere. That what you invent, or create, or imagine is somehow the privilege of the many to have access to. That they are entitled to what you have for the simple fact that they exist. It's patently absurd.

I believe men still create monuments to the furthering of the human race, but they do so at great risk and despite the world around them. That is the dedication of man. Norman Borlaug saved billions with an idea that, at the time, was unheard of. Kennedy sent us to the moon, and was assassinated. Martin Luther King Jr, John Lennon, Harvey Milk, all died doing what they thought was right and changed the world because of it.

It is the visions of men that push the world into the future. It is men who become engineers and developers while nail salons are populated by women and tips. By people of low drive and even lower need for their own success.

Rome wasn't built in a day, but it was built by men.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You are on the right track, while I'm not looking to become fabulously wealthy, I have worked hard at what I do. I put it together, discovered the process, and learned the hard way, why should I share and give it away for nothing? Why should I put the info out there so someone can patent it, take it from me and bury the info because it would cut into their profits? Before I die I will compile how it works, how to build it, and all the info needed to replicate my system. The fun part is right now most who hear about it think I am crazy, just how I like it.

Really its all out there already, someone just has to have the intellect to put seemingly dissimilar processes together to achieve what I have done. The fact most haven't isn't surprising to me, since most people want everything the easy way and handed to them in a tidy shrink wrapped package.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

All i can think of is the Foundation series by Isaac Asimov. Social engineering, social understanding, social interactions. Math explains how the world, life, works; and profits are in the examinations of, and treating the world as, a social marketplace.

Whatever you're doing i hope it works out, and best of luck.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It works already. Imagine heating your home for an entire winter for less than $300, making your own cooking gas, producing electricity on the cheap, producing more food without irrigation, and powering your vehicles and generators with clean burning methane and ethanol produced as byproducts of the system. That's part of it and it can be done anywhere. I know how to get better mileage on 100% ethanol than on gasoline too....

It should be obvious why someone would say I'm nuts, lying, or patent it and hide it if they can. I live on the cheap and drive high powered V8 muscle cars, because my fuel is cheap and makes silly power.

[–]1independentmale 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no reason to believe if i do get married that it'll end in divorce

Statistically speaking, you absolutely do.

[–]ThePedanticCynic -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a statistical anomaly in every imaginable way.

[–]lightfire409 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

After watching the blowout of my parents marriage I was very much dissuaded against the concept. My Dad lost practically everything just because he was caught cheating while in a dead bedroom situation.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry about that.

I doubt his cheating had anything to do with it, though. He would have been taken for everything either way; that was just the excuse they used to do it. If it wasn't that it would have been something else.

My first clear memory not only in life, but of my father, was my mother slapping him in the face at the doorway because he brought my sister and i the wrong kind of present. It was still in his hand and we hadn't even unwrapped it yet.

She later told me (in my teens) that the only way she'd let him in the door is if he brought us a present. Let him in the door. He wanted to be there for us, but i almost never saw him. This is the world.

[–]lightfire409 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well my Mom isn't a vindictive woman. What happened was a bit more complicated. My dad is a BP Beta. Raised in the generation first hit hard by feminism. However, my mom was raised properly in a household untouched by feminism. If only my dad was masculine and not a neutered women worshiping beta, he would have been attractive and not wound up in a dead bedroom.

And i believe that sums up many marriages today. Its a man afraid to use his masculinity, thus being an unattractive husband, thus setting the stage for dead bedrooms, thus resulting in cheating and divorce.

Call me an optimist, but i don't believe women enter marriages gleeful at the prospect of being able to take half a guy's stuff. Women very much want a happily ever after marriage. Unfortunately, men aren't raised to be sexual attractive to women and losing that cornerstone of the relationship results in the wife losing respect, attraction, and she winds up being resultful of being married to this man she doesn't desire.

[–]ThePedanticCynic 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Call me an optimist, but i don't believe women enter marriages gleeful at the prospect of being able to take half a guy's stuff.

I would say this is true for the most part. 90-95%.

The problem is that women only exist in the moment their emotions allow them to. Their feelings are everything to them, and though they sometime blame it on PMS, it's a constant issue.

If a woman is mad at you that is all she is feeling. If she's in love, she's in love. If she wants revenge the law is uniquely designed to allow her your pound of flesh.

Just because a woman doesn't enter a marriage hoping to take you for all she can doesn't mean at the end of the day she won't. She will, because her vindictiveness is the only thing that matters to her in those final days, and the law has pampered feminist feelings for years now.

It's not that i don't trust women, per se; it's that i know i can't trust the system. A woman is a rainbow, but the law is black and white.

[–]1cover20 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's brave though. She will get serious shit from feminists. Feminists might actually get wet for MGTOW types who hold frame. But for a woman who says such things? Pure hatred, even more than they typically have for other women.

[–]pheonixignition 30 points31 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I love how when that first guy starts talking about how these aren't men until they responsibility, and she looks at him like he is the dumbest fucking idiot she's ever seen.

[–]jamesbond0512 52 points53 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Thats guy next to Helen has been dozed off that blue pill. Helen looks good. I'd take her home.

[–]Swiss_Cheese9797 53 points54 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

His name is Tucker Carlson and he's a piece of shit. Fuck him and his bow-ties.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

thank you!!!!!!! I fucking hate that tool

[–]lmpostor 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was thinking the same thing!

I want to attempt to seduce her...and then one of you legit redpillers do the real job after I fail.

[–]Sherlock--Holmes 43 points44 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Finally marriage material! The irony.

[–]colombianguy29 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

No kidding. Whoever marries (or married) her is one lucky son-of-a-bitch.

[–]thesaltysoup 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

She's taken, son. Her hubby looks a little meek, but she's not so bad.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's married to Glenn Reynolds, aka "instapundit".

He should be on all of your daily blog visits. Libertarian, law professor, prolific writer and he lifts. Not meek at all, in fact.

Definitely a red piller.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you summarize the good stuff? That's an hour long.

[–]shifty43210 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

find another clip brother.. that one doesn't even have audio until 25 minutes in and even then its only half of the conversation..

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]sp1z 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The audio is panned left/right based on who's speaking. You'll need stereo speakers and will then hear each speaker only on the right or left.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]chakravanti93 -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men can. They usually have better shit to be doing than pandering to bitches about the way the world works.

[–]MajorStyles 27 points28 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It's a sad state of affairs when only women are allowed to speak red pill truths in public.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No one's stopping you. But, you will probably get tired of cunts and asses spraying their stink all over you.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As Rollo has said, it's evidence of a gyno-centric society that women are the only actors given credence and attention when speaking out against the actions of other women and feminism.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Seems like she has her head screwed on in the right way.

Edit: forgot head

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Heard her recently on the Tom Leykis show and bought the book... can't wait to read it.

[–]kjax67 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That was a good interview! 7/15/14

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

That guy saying men should be "man up" and assume responsibility and derive satisfaction from taking on the responsibility of others.

I don't know where to begin. Such statements and the people who make them are detestable. He obviously is repeating something he's been told without understanding the statement at all.

Assuming responsibility is not virtuous in and of itself. Blindly assuming the responsibility of others and doing as others tell you without question or personal benefit has another name; slavery.

That guy is telling men that they should assume the yoke of slavery and be happy about it because it's his idea of "manning up". Holy fucking shit, Batman. By extension he's defending an institution of oppression and slavery. Wars are fought over stopping such things and this douchecanoe is sitting on a couch on national television supporting it.

It is the mark of a brainwashed person to repeat by rote, something they have no understanding of. He's been indoctrinated from childhood into a system in which he believes "men" are those who work without regard for themselves or their well-being, give all to woman regardless of merit and do so with their mouth and mind shut.

Seeing someone with such a monolithic misunderstanding of basic principles and values is scary shit.

[–]DanG3 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He was only the newscaster actor playing devil's advocate for those who say, "man up." But, it wasn't a "fair and balanced" reporting tactic to pull in a short clip interview where she (he) knew that to respond to the taunt she would have to side-bar into the fact that the expression "Man up" is a feminist shaming tactic to, as YOU wrote, shame men into thinking that they should "assume the yoke of slavery and be happy about it..." The proper response (other than "Fuck You") is to say, "Feminisism has over estimated the power of pussy and underestimates the power of the Manosphere."

Illustrative to the stupidity of the interview (reporters) is that the woman reporter referenced the wedding she attended as inspiring for the hope of marriage. Attending weddings is to marriages as witnessing a child birth is to raising the child.

That's show biz.

[–]krakosia 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

c'mon man the wedding was beautiful. Doesn't that mean something??

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DanG3 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said!

Yes, this sub does give the impression that there are a lot of younger men on it. But, there are also those of us (sages) who are older as well - probably surprisingly older. Join us in fraturnity.

[–]kjvlv 7 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

she is right about the culture. Just look at the commercials and the tv series. Men/husbands/fathers are played as the dope of the house. Some how the earn enough $$ to pay all the bills but even the kids are smarter about life. The wife ALWAYS is the smart one who runs things. It is reinforced at school. I constantly have to tell my daughters they need to stop thinking I am a tv dad and that it is no way to treat somebody.

I love my kids and they are an extremely positive thing that has come from my marriage but that being said, I see no reason to be married. Once they are of legal age and can not be taken from me in a court of law just because I am XY chromosome, I am the hell out of here.

[–]krakosia 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Watch some of the videos in the 2 links below from the rational male

http://therationalmale.com/2012/02/03/mans-last-stand/

http://therationalmale.com/2012/11/16/glitches-in-the-matrix/

the first one is missing a few - one of them is dodge charger super bowl ad

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PedroIsWatching 76 points76 points [recovered] | Copy Link

This is great, but I wish it wasn't on Fox News. It's going to be lumped in with the rest of their fear-mongering crazy and it won't be taken seriously by those that really need to understand.

[–]GC0W30 37 points38 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That sucks, but I suspect that if she can get on the other networks with this message she will. I think Fox News might be the only one that isn't too PC to expose this.

[–]100Timeswww 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The hosts were disagreeing and arguing with her...

[–]Magnum256 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes hosts do this deliberately to give the presenter an opportunity to express their message.

If she said "Men are getting a raw deal!" and all three hosts just said "Ya totally. Agreed." it would sort of diffuse the power of her message.

You can think of it as if the hosts arguments are the same arguments that 'Random Beta Viewer' would make, and that's a good thing because she gets to counter them.

[–]anonlymouse 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is great, but I wish it wasn't on Fox News.

It's better that it's anywhere at all. Fox first, it'll start making its way over, since the MRM has a heavy leftist political leanings.

[–][deleted]  (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Moneyley 15 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

After she rebuttals his blue pill comment on what he thinks all men want, you can almost pin point the time where it looks like he swallowed the red pill. He goes quiet and probably thought of all the shit his wife has been feeding him throughout the years

[–]VincentPrice 6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I thought Tucker Carlson was John Stewart's wife.

[–]abaine93 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. The dude on the left says that the only real satisfaction that men derive is from being responsible to his family; that there's some invisible force out there that forces you to be a working stiff. Classic white knight. Fuck you dude, I love what I do for a living. And at the end of the video he lets out a little yeah

Amazing.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It also doesn't help she barely got to make any points due to tangents by the hosts. If you showed this to r/AskWomen, based on the little info the author got to convey they would just give a powertalk version of "we don't care, stop whining".

[–]anonlymouse 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The guy on the right didn't seem particularly blue pill. He was agreeing with her.

[–]VincentPrice 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Tucker Carlson said (paraphrasing) 'the ONLY true satisfaction a man gets in life is taking responsibility for other people.' HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH lolololololololololololo HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhAHAHAHAHA... Don't even know where to begin dismantling how dumb and downright bizarre a statement that is.

[–]cdogg75 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tucker is an idiot. On a side note, I think men that are the head of a family do enjoy, or at least feel responsible to be the head of the house, and take care of their family. That is still NO reason to get married, when you can do all of that without signing that death certificate.

edit: but to say "the ONLY true satisfaction"...again Tucker is a fucking idiot.

Look at his build. He is a very typical low testosterone mangina. He proved it more when he opened his mouthgina

[–]Moneyley -3 points-2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Good old faux news! Your right l, they get occasional interviews that are very interesting but are overshadowed by all the war chants and anti Obama rhetoric. Makes this seem like just a break from their lies but its actually true.

[–]blazingcopper 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Oh Obama is a good, non lying president? I'd take Bush over him nowadays.

[–]Senior ContributorRedPope 18 points19 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I'd take a randomly selected citizen over any of the last 10 presidents.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Sorry dude, but that number includes JFK.

[–]ramaga 12 points13 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

People view JFK through rose colored glasses because he was assassinated, but he wasn't a particularly good President. The Bay of Pigs debacle, him dragging his feet on civil rights, and him sticking his penis into everything that moved, allowing him to be in put in the position of being blackmailed by FBI Director Hoover all spring to mind.

[–]Helmut_Newton 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The thing about JFK is that we'll never really know what could have been. He was the last President to seriously challenge the military-industrial complex. And there is ample evidence that he wanted to get out of Vietnam and even end/de-escalate the Cold War.

Also, Hoover had the dirt on pretty much every politician in America at that time, so JFK was no different in that respect.

[–]ramaga 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with your first sentence 100 percent. I actually meant to say something similar in my first post.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think he handled the Cuban missile crisis like a fucking boss

[–]Moneyley 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you, Id pick bush too if the situation was that dems were ruling congress at least theyd pass common sense bills to bush's desk instead of having an agenda against him. It would atleast get more done. As it is though Reps wont pass nothing cuz then the black man gets credit.

[–]blazingcopper -3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I like Hannity but that's pretty much it.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wow she played them like a fiddle. Notice when she says that they are high level males\females they put smiles on and agree with her. Fucking puppets man

[–]chakravanti93 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

K the fuck O bro. I thought I was gonna get to the bottom without a single fucking clue. Goddamn spot the fuck on.

[–]krakosia 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

actually notice she said you are a high level man and woman. Not men. The guy to her immediate left doesn't qualify for the title of man.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Well not just some woman. She's Dr. Helen Smith and has been speaking out about men on marriage strike for a long time. I highly recommend her videos. She's a trad-con though, meaning she wants everything to go back the way it was before modern feminism - i.e., men leading women in a relationship and in exchange becoming a provider/protector for her. I believe that the way feminism has imbalanced the gender pendulum, the going back to tradcon ways is less likely than going forward to a complete redefinition or even dismantling of the marriage contract.

[–]100Timeswww 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is from her AMA which seems to discredit what you are saying:

"Yes, in my teens and twenties, I was very much a feminist because I felt/saw that women had disadvantages in some ways in our society. However, the pendulum has swung too far the other way now, with women having privileges and men having responsibilities. This is as unfair as discrimination against women and must be changed."

[–]ultranationalist 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yep the path of least resistance.

[–]MickeyRoarick 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Here me out. We're swinging out of the old state, while legally defining a new one. Even then, we're still in a chaotic period where we don't even know what a full generation of feminism will result in.

  • Key word being chaos, the smartest and wiliest succeed.
  • In every setback, there is an opportunity, find it.

Those are set rules in my mindset. If someone shoots you in the leg, you get upfront handicap parking for life. If you lose a suitcase, you get a new wardrobe and look better.

I think in this redefining of what is normal, carve out a beneficial path for you.

This is my response to the idea of gender pendulum. We don't need to protect women or provide for them. We can just choose the ones we want and discard them like used trash thanks to feminism.

[–]Ehcadroj-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

you sir have never loved someone.

[–]MickeyRoarick 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

We can't be victims, we have to make do what with what we got or how the world is.

[–]TheRationalMale.comRollo-Tomassi 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's an indictment of a feminine-centric social order that only a woman can speak about men's issues with any legitimacy.

http://therationalmale.com/2011/11/08/could-a-man-have-written-this/

[–]Swiss_Cheese9797 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That woman sliced through everything 3 retarded Fox News pundits were saying. Is she a wizard?

[–]lemonparty 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit, this woman is brave to say these things on national television. Mad respect. Just ordered the hardcover, should be a good read -- and happy to support her.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow. That woman dominated that discussion and was intelligent throughout.

[–]chakravanti93 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That woman dominated

Bingo. And these bitches are losing their shit for her like they never read a single.fucking word here.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Say what you want about the guy( and you are probably right), but he is probably under contract to stick to a certain narrative.

[–]DanG3 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Shit, he's a dumb-ass actor/reporter at best. Given a 15 min interview she would make him seem like a fuck-tard!

[–]RedPillProphet 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck does that her being white has to do with anything?

[–]Ron-Swanson 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists are usually white.

[–]chakravanti93 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

White women tend to:

A) Overvalue themselves for being white.

B) Stfu if the actually had their excessive demands met yet.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It may have something to do with your lack of sense of humor.

[–]wtf_is_taken 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She is fucking hot and has her head in the right place... Where is she on the maxim top 100? Sometimes I think we do it to ourselves...

[–]kanaduhisfruityeh 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You mean to tell me that if you remove rewards and replace them with disincentives fewer people will sign up for a particular program? This is a shocking revelation!

[–]sixtysixpixistix 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

@1:48 "euphoric -- snicker"

[–]GhostOfAladdin3 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Anyone notice how when Dr. Helen Smith gave the dude on the left a subtle compliment (she remarked he was high level) how he perked up and started backing her? Sad, but that is all it took for him to get a little validation boost.

Thanks again OP for posting.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I smiled the whole time watching this video!

[–]sternje 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm one of those guys that thinks marriage is a raw deal for me, but I would marry Dr. Helen Smith in the blink of an eye. She gets it! And she's a hottie.

[–]C_D_O 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

and shes not bad looking either

anyone else notice a trend?

[–]dicklord_airplane 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

here's an interview with her about her book by Forbes. much better than this low brow Fox News bit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpFN5KT8pzw

[–]haveiseenthisnaked3 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Read the book a while back. Gives a overview of what men face in society and gives trends on how men are reacting. If you think marriage is bad, one example that is worse is men in public life that involve children. She wrote about Abigail Rae who was a toddler that drowned. She could have been saved from a man that was passing by but was afraid of being accused a pedophile if he touched her. I know that redpill is all about being attractive, strong or what have you but there is something very wrong is this world where a man can't save another person's life without being punish for it. This is a very extreme level but its the extreme levels that set the boundaries that we navigate through.

[–]jm51 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar happened in the UK a few years back. Van driver sees an unaccompanied toddler but is worried about being accused of kidnapping, so doesn't stop. Poor little boy was found face down in a ditch.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

See? NAWALT.

It's just that NAWALTs are extremly fucking rare. In my estimation, there are about half as many NAWALTs as albino alligators.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]chakravanti93 -4 points-3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's an attention whore. AWALT.

[–]r3sal 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

ok so....I've been browsing TRP for about a month. I have to ask if marriage makes you vulnerable to attacks by a women for your finances, then why is it that we don't agree to pre-nups? If they legal system is so overbearing and we lose most of our financial and parental rights in a divorce, why don't we take that out of the equation?

Can't we learn from the past and use the shortcomings of men, who have fought and failed, to our advantage?

[–]rp_divorced 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pre-nups get thrown out all the time. The only way to avoid the vulnerability is to not get married.

[–]incraved 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf that annoying fat white knight on the left

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn. That woman is beautiful. Not just her message but everything about her.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DanG3 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pre-nups are thrown out by judges all the time. AND, the older they are the less relevant/effective they tend to be.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"and if you read my book you might understand a little bit more"

She fucking lit them on fire and pissed on their ashes, a woman after my own heart. I hope she's a feminist too. It would be perfect. <3

[–]beltwaytr 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

from 1:10 to 1:30 You can tell this man is a complete and total retard. The look the Doc gives him is one that screams "You're a fucking moron...." Who is that dumb ass? I wants a poster of this man mounted in every high school on the planet with big captions at the bottom saying "Don't be this guy."

[–]lloopy 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The guy on the left in this video used to run crossfire, until he made the mistake of inviting Jon Stewart on to his show, and Jon eviscerated him (and the entire premise of the show), causing crossfire to be cancelled.

I'm too lazy to include all the appropriate links here, but the evisceration was most epic.

[–]Indianbro 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A hot woman like her who understands red pill? Wow she sounds amazing. Imagine how awesome being her BF would be

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You can see at one point she is looking at the guy to her left and thinking "what a pussy"

[–]teeelo 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This Woman is so much farther ahead intellectually than Most MEN I know.

Dr. Helen Smith

-Stone cold fox.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yzUECFwU3U

Here is a longer(better) interview of her where she actually gets to speak and is treated respectfully.

Fucking Fox news. Why is it "conservatives" tend to be just as anti-mens rights as "liberals"?

[–]smith5ar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for that, man. Just more unfortunate reality coming to light. Wish even more people knew about Dr. Helen Smith before she gets kidnapped by feminists for exposing the truth.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Here is the removed video in question:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCpBa4ITEcI

[–]ohsweetword -1 points-1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Too bad this is on Fox News. haha

[–][deleted]  (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]weller87 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What you consider "MRAs" and "Red Pill Men" are becoming mainstream. Fact: The majority of marriages end in divorce, and the majority of divorces are initiated by women.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]weller87 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You sound bitter as fuck. Did you not take the red pill soon enough? Sounds like it.

[–]Psycho_Delic -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My woman has been badgering me for about a year now for a ring. And my stance is as firm as it ever was.

I have no problem buying you a piece of jewelry. I have no problem, having a ceremony. But as far as legally/spiritually speaking. We will never be married. Everyone can think we are. But on paper, you're just my common law wife.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter