TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

13

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

I was always brought up to believe you are paid based on the value you bring to the marketplace. I mean for employment.

So if I’m a pro-tennis player and I’m top in my sport, I’m going to help stadiums sell seats and I’m also going to have millions of eyes ( watching on tv), looking at my every move.

Let’s take Serena Williams for example, she has 39 grand slam titles. Her prize money has been over $84 million and with endorsements her earnings are exponentially more. I can sit and justify or talk about whether or not she deserves this money (frankly I think she does), but the reality is - she brings enjoyment and excitement and money to her endorsers. So she is paid far more than your average tennis player.

I believe this is true for actors and musicians and anyone actually. They are paid for the value they bring to the market.

So...

I know William H Macy. I know whatever he is starring in, will be stellar. I know this because he can pick a good script and only the elite hire him. He is a draw for the show “Shameless”.

On the other hand, Emmy Rossum, I had to google her. Oh, she played the lead in Phantom of the opera. Yes, she’s a great actress, but does she have the draw and star power of William H Macy?

I feel bad he came to her aid to help her receive equal pay. I think he had to in the fear of looking bad to feminist media.

Maybe, when Emmy has the same number of film credits and Oscar nods as William has under her belt she will deserve the same salary as him.

I think people forget we are paid on the value we bring. It may not seem fair, but it’s important to distinguish that this isn’t about gender. It’s about star power.

[–]kimb007 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Except that a successful show requires more than a single star, it requires an entire cast. Rossum has said that she was comfortable accepting a much lower salary when she first started with the role, but now that the entire show has become critically acclaimed --and that she is a leading cast member if not the lead-- she should be paid a similar salary.

[–]GratefulWifeandMamamarried 9 years4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I agree with this. At first yes, she would have been paid less and that would have been fair. Now that it is a massive hit show, and she really is the main character in it, she should absolutely be getting paid equally to Macy. I don't feel like Macy had to support her to appease feminists either, because if he were just silent on the matter I don't think Rossum would have dragged his name into it.

In other thoughts, this is a really compelling article and I have always really respected William H Macy. Thanks for sharing u/Hartley7 .

[–]kimb000 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't feel like Macy had to support her to appease feminists either, because if he were just silent on the matter I don't think Rossum would have dragged his name into it.

Rossum didn't drag his name in, he volunteered it.

[–]GratefulWifeandMamamarried 9 years2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. What I meant is he chose to speak on it, and I think accrediting that decision to feminism isn't a fair thing to do and diminishes his free will and character.

[–]kimb000 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why? Is there some reason that would make you think that WHM isn't a feminist?

[–]GratefulWifeandMamamarried 9 years0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

He strikes me as more of a rationalist and the article seems to back that. I don't know him though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good food for thought. I hope she was getting raises if she brought in big revenue and they could attribute it to her performance. No doubt,

[–]Hartley7[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

This is very true. However, I was focusing on the fact that WHC was being honest about how he felt as a man given the political climate in Hollywood these days.

[–]kimb00 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Yea, well, white slave owners shortly after emancipation probably felt the same way.

[–]Hartley7[S] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Slave owners were actually committing evil deeds. Every man is Hollywood is not a perverted pig who enjoys seeing female actors being paid less. Slavery cannot be compared to post modernist hatred of men.

As a Black woman, I'll have you know that your comment was completely disgusting and ignorant. You don't know who is on the other side of the screen so watch your mouth.

[–]kimb00 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

It was a trite response, save your outrage. The point is that there was a culture of exploitation and inequality that was rampant through Holloywood that men either directly contributed or tacitly approved. It comes back to that whole "locker room talk". It's the men that are in the locker room and the men that should be shutting that down that talk and the subsequent behaviour. Regardless, when you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression. I feel like this speech sums up the manufactured outrage quite nicely.

“People like me had to wade through a sea of prehensile dicks to build the world we now enjoy, and part of enjoying that world is setting a higher standard for sex than just Not Rape. And women get to talk about it if men don’t live up to those standards — especially if that man wrote a book about How to Sex Good.”

“We know the difference between a rapist, a workplace harasser, and an Aziz Ansari,” Bee insisted. “That doesn’t mean we have to be happy about any of them.”

[–]Camille11325[M] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"Locker room talk" and the natural behaviour of men when amongst other men absolutely should not be shut down or policed in the way that you or the left advocates. Your comments are being removed because they are not RP and in the future please refrain from espousing anti male ideas in this community. There is a difference between masculinity and harassment, exploitation, etc. Conflating the two and using this warped perspective to justify limiting male expression is just so damaging to individual men and the country as a whole.

[–]kimb001 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Boys will be boys".

Got it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with you and him. It’s hard to be a man these days

[–]proprioceptorlate 20s, married 3 years0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said!

[–]bunniebell0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with your sentiments on men in Hollywood being stigmatized for pay inequality. To an extent, it makes perfect sense. If a woman is a manager at a company with the same qualifications as her fellow male coworker (also a manager), they should receive equal pay.

The problem with Hollywood is that it's a creative field. Artists (painters, writers, actors, etc) of all kinds are in such surplus that employers can pick and choose more so than typical employers. Furthermore, women have always been in surplus in Hollywood, more so than men.

There's a reason why there is a theory about a movie being feminist friendly if it fulfills certain requirements (a female not in a romantic relationship, that has more then several lines where she isn't just responding to men, etc). There is no such theory for male actors--why? Because men are in higher demand than women, in Hollywood.

Casting agents can also discriminate based on any number of reasons, since the acting roles often require specific criteria.

To close, do I think extreme pay inequality in such circumstances is ethical or fair? NO! But some inequality is understandable.

[–]WonderfulEnergy0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think that demonizing those animal like creatures crawling out of the "hot spots" right now is wholly needed! Not a single day goes by when these demons rape, kill, hit, steal etc. I think it is sad that the only women who dare to speak up on that are the followers of Emma Schwarz and the women of the right wing parties.

[–]Hartley7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This article is about punishing all men for unequal pay or the actions of rapists. I don't agree with that at all.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter