TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

13

The full title os the position is Interpersonal Violence Clinician and Men’s Engagement Manager.

Emphasis mine:

The successful candidate must have a masters or doctorate in a field related to social work or women’s studies, it adds.

I'm sure this will work out in a superlative fashion for all. Oh wait . . .

The College Fix was unable to identify a corresponding clinician targeted toward women.

But as all women studies majors know, women would never do anything untoward to men or even other women.

(Sarcasm off. I tried to write something more serious about this, but it really only warrants deep and unfettered sarcasm.)


[–]Red-Curious3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Just ... wow ...

[–]StingrayVC[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I've been thinking about this more, because of the sheer audacity of it. Imagine Rollo Tomassi becoming the Women's Engagement Manager (the Manosphere is the only thing even close to a Men's Study degree) and tried to combat the toxic femininity in women. He would address out inherent tendency to manipulate and lie to men and teach us how that ruins men's lives because deep down all women are serial manipulators and liars and are a danger to men everywhere.

Can you imagine?

[–]Red-Curious2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think that would make international news! It kind of reminds me of this article I just read yesterday (I like having my views challenged, so I read opposing views frequently). It totally bashes any "men's rights" attitude and acts like feminism is the best thing that's happened in civilized history.

The misconceptions and out-of-context statements are astounding. But what I'm most intrigued by is that they quote the TRP Glossary for feminism, explaining how convoluted and horrible it is. Then they quote the dictionary definition: The theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes, as if this describes all of feminism. As far as I can tell, feminism hasn't been about "equality" since the 90s, or even earlier (I was just a kid in the 80s, so I'm not as clear).

Then, what gets really funny is that after trashing the complex definition and quoting an over-simplified one, their VERY NEXT POINT is: "Cult leaders offer a simple solution to increasingly complex world problems."

Sorry for the mini-rant. I'm all for loving, caring for, and respecting women ... but the denial some people are in about what that should look like is just shocking.

[–]StingrayVC[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm all for loving, caring for, and respecting women

This. This is why I so despise feminism. It does none of those things. It does quite the opposite in it's drive for power. Just take a look at Linda Sarsour. Driving the idea that women are beyond reproach only serves to harm women and in the process harm men (arguably worse?), as well. How can we deal with learning about ourselves and growing if we believe we are perfect and anything we do holds no consequences? And why the hell would men want anything to do with us? Combine these two things and what does that mean for Western Civilization?

Quite frankly, as much as it ticks me off, I'm glad colleges are still stupid enough to pull this nonsense. More and more people open their eyes to what is really going on.

[–]Red-Curious0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha, no kidding. Well said.

[–]Camille113251 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree it's hard to come up with a response that isn't sarcastic! If this program is "successful" it's going to be standard at every school pretty soon. I can't believe parents are okay with their sons being treated like criminals. What is going to be the final straw? It's just so gross and stupid that an idea like this is taken seriously and implemented. Imagine the money that will be poured into programs like this - what a waste!

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter