TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

16

[–]littlegoosegirlMid 20s, Married 1 year! 9 years total27 points28 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

This entire article is full of insanity, but perhaps the most telling line is this one:

I am so grateful for the excitement surrounding my upcoming marriage, however, I often wonder why the event of getting married is put on a higher pedestal than the true successes that come along with an education and career.

"True" successes - what a fascinating phrase. Why is it that getting married isn't allowed in the realm of "true" success? Isn't this an incredibly subjective topic anyway? What about all those women who don't know how to read, couldn't afford college, have chosen not to have a career, or can't. Are they now incapable of "true" success? Who defines a woman's success - the author? Does she speak for all women? Isn't that... oppressive?

I have regularly told people that meeting and marrying my husband is my single greatest achievement in life. It's remarkable how weird they get about that. "Oh, but you graduated from XYZ University!" "Oh, but your singing!" "Oh, what about your job?"

Those things are great - they just aren't first place. Putting your man in first place on your list of achievements makes people so uncomfortable. I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that it's also quite unattainable for many women. Most anyone can get a job, or complete college. There is a formulaic approach to those things that require very little self-examination or potential change. And in the same manner, you can marry anyone you want. BUT, to be able to honestly put your marriage in first place on your list of achievements? That's not very fair to all the other women who are too mean, too ugly, too whatever, to accomplish that same thing.

Thus, "true" success means "attainable" success in this case. It's not an achievement because it appears too "random", or even too unbelievable, to a woman who has no idea how to go about marrying a man who would put even the most glorious education or top-tier job to shame. In her eyes it just doesn't happen. Or, if it does, it's so unlikely to happen to her that she can't stand someone else having what she never can.

Joke's on you, HuffPost. It's possible, and it's the best.

[–]Camille11325[S] 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Everything you've said is great! I especially like your point at the end:

Thus, "true" success means "attainable" success in this case. It's not an achievement because it appears too "random", or even too unbelievable, to a woman who has no idea how to go about marrying a man who would put even the most glorious education or top-tier job to shame. In her eyes it just doesn't happen. Or, if it does, it's so unlikely to happen to her that she can't stand someone else having what she never can.

This post really highlights the combination of solipsism, sour grapes mentality, and desire for "social justice" influencing feminists when they discuss this topic. It really does seem like they can't fathom a relationship where the woman put in effort to obtain investment from a man she admires and wants to please. Does it cross their minds that the achievement comes from being a woman worthy of the highest form of legal and social commitment? They can understand a desire for an institution or corporation to deem you worthy, but not the love of your life??

You're so right when you bring up their inability to imagine a man who outranks them. Part of this is because they've put themselves in a difficult position by earning degrees and professional advancement. If they are looking for someone on their level or higher, there are fewer options the further you are up the ladder. And how many men under 35 have the personality, lifestyle, and looks where educated and well paid women will overlook their inferior status in that realm?

[–]StingrayVC7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You're so right when you bring up their inability to imagine a man who outranks them. Part of this is because they've put themselves in a difficult position by earning degrees and professional advancement. If they are looking for someone on their level or higher, there are fewer options the further you are up the ladder. And how many men under 35 have the personality, lifestyle, and looks where educated and well paid women will overlook their inferior status in that realm?

This precisely. What she is trying to say is that anyone can go to a justice of the peace and get married. In that sense she is correct. She wants to then wind that truth around into being what all marriage are because that way she can justify her choices. I feel for her husband, but he probably has convinced himself that she's correct and that he's just lucky to have her.

[–]Camille11325[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Right exactly! And lol re: her husband. I'm pretty sure the author would be offended if her husband told her and everyone else in the world, that getting married to her was not an accomplishment, and he values his 4 year degree more!

[–]BlueState_RedHeart26, married 1yr, 7 yrs total5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This might possibly be the best post I have read on Reddit, ever.

[–]i_have_a_semicolon27 | Engaged | 7 years0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You said it perfectly

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most anyone can get a job, or complete college. There is a formulaic approach to those things that require very little self-examination or potential change.

This has always baffled me! My best friend has always been very supportive of my goals, but a few years ago, when I told her it was goal of mine to be married by 30, she was floored. "How can that be a goal?" I told her, my career goals were contingent on my finding the right place with several people and them feeling the same about me. Marriage only required two people to agree about that rightness.

I'm full time in a great career now and I'm married to a wonderful man, all in time for my 30th birthday in September.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are entrepreneurs, lawyers, teachers, CEOs, inventors, designers, researchers, writers, consultants and so much more. Women are going to college and then getting their masters and doctorate degrees. Women are endlessly working to climb up the corporate ladder. Women are key figures in our government. Women are changing the world with their innovation.

Good for them - that's something some women want. And you can still celebrate that. But not all women WANT that. Some women want a different kind of challenge - not all people are cut out for college, or specific degrees/career paths. There are lots of types of people in society. Why can't we celebrate marriage and ALSO celebrate those who want to be CEOs and such?

The author is essentially saying - My priority is ABC, and if your priority is not ABC you are wrong. Different people can have different priorities - that's totally allowed Natalie Brooke.

[–]Camille11325[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly! Isn't it funny how feminists complain about female stereotypes and the need for female unity, but they are always turning things into competitions and encouraging an us vs them mentality? If you're truly about equality why can't you accept that some women want to rank marriage as #1 and others don't? Why does society as a whole need to change so that the norms revolve around the minority of women that value degrees and careers over family?

Now I personally do not claim to be about equality and I do think marriage should be regarded as the highest achievement for women in general. But this is internally consistent with my beliefs lol they are hypocrites!

(Also just a general note to other RPW reading this, it isn't mandatory to believe that marriage has to be #1 above all with nothing on the same level. This is just my personal belief!)

[–]Camille11325[S] 14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's not surprising that something like this would get published today, but it's still concerning and I thought we could talk about it!

So obviously she has a terrible understanding of history and women's roles in the West in the past. But she is right that people have consistently regarded marriage as one of the crowning achievements of a woman's life, and today women are struggling with meshing this with feminism.

It's telling that to the author and women like her, official and public commitment from the best person in the entire world (to you) doesn't rank considerably higher than a degree or promotion. I think there are a few reasons as to why:

  • The men proposing aren't high value. We've discussed time and again how weak and non masculine many men under 35 are today. So it's not surprising that women wouldn't view their husbands as the best person in the entire world, and be in love to the point of obsession. Especially if they've engaged in AFBB and are now settling down with a man they subconsciously view as inferior. Most women are happier in the supporting role, a man doesn't have to be high DT but plenty of guys today aren't even Greater Betas and they don't know how to lead effectively in a relationship.

  • It doesn't feel like an achievement because they haven't worked as hard to earn the status of marriage. She confirms this herself in the post but doesn't see an issue with it. Women are encouraged to work harder to make a company richer, but discouraged from working hard to meet the right man and create a meaningful and satisfying life for both parties. She states that no skills, brain power, etc are needed to get married but that is just NOT true if you are trying to get a man of higher RMV, and it's not true if you are using all of your resources like homemaking skills, psychological femininity, sexuality, etc.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

[–]teaandtalk29, married 6 years, together 81 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree. Getting married to a low-value lazy/incompetent/obsequious man isn't hard, and shouldn't be seen as an accomplishment. And getting married and treating it like an accessory/disposable/unimportant shouldn't be seen as an accomplishment. Sounds like the author is surrounded by those marriages, instead of good ones.

[–]Camille11325[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I actually do think that marriage is an accomplishment regardless of who you marry, I talk about it more here! I completely agree with you that treating your husband like he is an accessory or an extra in the movie of your life is terrible. And it really does sound like that's all she's familiar with!

[–]gabilromariz13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Getting married, in an of itself, is no acomplishment, any idiot can get married.

It is quite difficult and quite the acomplishment however to:

  • find a good worthy man to share your life with
  • get said man to marry you
  • work on staying married and happy

And that difference in "groom quality" is hard to grasp for these people as they see a husband as a sort of fashion accessory to play "keep up with Linda/Stacy/etc". They see him as an inferior being, and in that sense, yes, getting a shmuck to marry you doesn't take much effort or skill

[–]Camille11325[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think marriage itself is an accomplishment, you're going from an inferior status to a superior one. As an analogy, going from unemployed to employed is an accomplishment, even if your job is at Mc Donalds. The existence of better positions doesn't invalidate that being employed at all is an accomplishment.

That being said I agree with the rest of your comment! Everything you listed is definitely more of a challenge for women. And women who think like the author probably do have a lower view of the men they're seeing, so you're right about their opinion that "yes, getting a shmuck to marry you doesn't take much effort or skill". But even with their feelings of superiority they find it hard to maintain lasting commitment!

[–]gabilromariz3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

While I agree that being married is an acomplishment, getting married is the "easiest" step, if you're not concerned about the quality of the groom

Definitely! The women who marry "inferior" men just for the sake of being married are often quick to divorce, from what I've seen.

I think a lot of these people just want the attention of their friends and family and being oo-ed and aa-d over: a proposal, being engaged and ultimately the wedding. The groom/husband seems to be an afterthought. Unsurprisingly, these people are unhappy wives. I have a feeling that this desires stems from not being "oo-ed and aa-ed over" about her "real" acomplishments like being promoted or whatever. Funny enough, a good husband would likely/surely celebrate with her and make her feel loved and admired, regardless of her income or title

[–]Camille11325[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

While I agree that being married is an acomplishment, getting married is the "easiest" step, if you're not concerned about the quality of the groom

Right, but I hate how the author is trying to downplay how important the step itself is. I totally get what you're saying though :)

I have a feeling that this desires stems from not being "oo-ed and aa-ed over" about her "real" acomplishments like being promoted or whatever. Funny enough, a good husband would likely/surely celebrate with her and make her feel loved and admired, regardless of her income or title

Yes!!!

[–]BlueState_RedHeart26, married 1yr, 7 yrs total12 points13 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm going to play devil's advocate for a second. Suppose this non-binary gender thing gets out of control, and 50 years from now we're all nongendered individuals who go by some ridiculous pronouns like xee/xer. (Shudder.) Guess what? It's going to be an accomplishment for even a xeemale to marry. Who wants to put up with someone else leaving dirty dishes in the sink, singing badly in the shower, and getting cranky for a lifetime? Marriage in of itself is an accomplishment, even if you strip gender of the matter entirely.

THEN, let's consider that many men -- even beta males and generally poor quality men -- don't want to get married. Period. And why would they, with all the free sex? Why not just live with a girlfriend, have sex with her, not be financially responsible for her at all, and be able to leave at any time? Marriage, even to a terrible guy, is an accomplishment.

THEN, let's consider that good-quality men are (1) hard to find, and (2) hard to marry. Good-quality men are scant, rare -- they're Charizards. So to even befriend one is an undertaking in of itself. Then, even if you start dating a Charizard, each one has a dozen Butterfree floosies hitting on them too, so you need to be better and beat everyone else out. Marriage, to a good-quality guy, is near impossible.

And, by the way, the following quote from the article is the biggest lie I've ever seen:

You don’t have to have a brain, drive or special skill set to get married. You just have to have a willing partner.

That's like saying "You don't have to work hard to graduate with honors; you just need the professors to give you As." You only get a willing partner if you work at your appearance, personality, fashion sense, communication skills, initiative, and lots of other things. And that's a hell of a lot more work than just getting into a college by reading some books.

[–]Camille11325[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're spot on! Any way you look at it, marriage is an accomplishment. It means something that someone is willing to commit legally and publicly to being with you forever. The quality of the people within the marriage can certainly add to its value, but your point about the various scenarios and outcomes can't be ignored.

That's like saying "You don't have to work hard to graduate with honors; you just need the professors to give you As." You only get a willing partner if you work at your appearance, personality, fashion sense, communication skills, initiative, and lots of other things. And that's a hell of a lot more work than just getting into a college by reading some books.

Yes!! If it didn't take anything special to get married, then everyone who wanted to be married would be. Any yet there are hundreds of thousands of single women and women in LTRs confused, hurt, worried, etc. that they aren't married yet. Clearly it takes more than having a pulse!

[–]teaandtalk29, married 6 years, together 80 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You only get a willing partner if you work at your appearance, personality, fashion sense, communication skills, initiative, and lots of other things.

No, pretty much any woman can find a willing partner if she lowers her standards enough.

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Even lowering standards takes effort - you have to change what you're doing to find a man, and then maintain a relationship with that man well enough that he wants to marry you.

[–] points points | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Camille11325[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're so right! It's a shame that people would rather "level up" than develop meaningful relationships. They're not mutually exclusive of course but so many women are intentionally choosing education and employment over starting a family and it's sad.

[–]cxj1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd further add to this great comment that with careers, it's like leveling up in a variety of different games that most people outside of them don't understand at all.

"I've just been moved from branch management to corporate regional management"

"Oh wow that's a big promotion?"

"Well technically no, it's more of a lateral move and my salary will dip slightly, but my goal is to get experience and develop a network to get into national brand promotions some day"

"Oh" (wtf)

This is what most big milestones look like in career advancement nowadays.

Otoh, getting married is a big "level up " in the universal game everyone understands.

It's not some conspiracy to keep women down, it's just no one outside specific fields understanding them.

[–]bleed_sugar29, Married 1 year, 2 years total0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

People don't care how good of an obedient little worker bee you are. You don't sit your grandkids on your lap and tell them the story of how you got your degree or promotion at work.

So true. Thank you!

[–]unsweetenedlemonEarly 20s, LTR, 9 Months9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I recently read a similar article written by a bitter woman crying over pregnancy celebrations when "my collleeeggggeee deegreee is more important than children". Okay, lady.

[–]Camille11325[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha sounds like she was trying to convince herself that she didn't make a mistake!

[–]melindamaga7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Jeez what is so horrible about being more excited about love and starting a family than boring "academic and professional pursuits?" Those things are never going to love you and you won't care a fig about them when you get close to the grave. All they really do is enrich some other person that doesn't care about you.

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly! It's worrying to think about how lonely many women will be in a decade or two. Even if they do settle for someone, will that man make them happy? Will they be able to have kids? And many women will change their minds too late and miss the opportunity to get married at all :(

[–]StingrayVC7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This strikes me as an article designed to destroy the status that women naturally achieve through marriage and the higher status a woman achieves by marrying well. Otherwise know as marrying a good man.

It's also another way of saying I don't need no man. It's denying hypergamy or rather by diminishing marriage, it's saying that by having my fun in my youth and then settling to marry the man I'm with now, but would not have married when I was young is great and that women who did do this, who married their young sweetheart and forgoing all those things that she holds in a higher standard are the real fools. wink, wink.

[–]Camille11325[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Omg I didn't even think about the status aspect, that's a great point. While we don't have an obvious and rigid hierarchy as we did a century ago, married women still outrank unmarried women, and they especially outrank loose women and prostitutes.

I like that you pointed out how this is also justifying their own choices, and rationalising their decision to get married to themselves and others. Since it's not in line with feminist ideas. So when you downgrade marriage and make it known that you don't care about the institution in the same way that traditional women do, it becomes more acceptable, because you've made it meaningless. The left constantly tries to make beautiful, true, and special things seem like they are terrible, untrue, and not special. Marriage has been so corrupted, not just the institution but the actual ceremony. People are in a rush to get it over with, spend as little as possible, view it as bs and unecessary, etc. Okay I'm done rambling haha :)

[–]laurenkkmid 30's, married 7(17 total)5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You've all already made a ton of great points.

My first thought was: professional/educational stuff is more important than having a caring partner that makes you happy and supports all those other goals?

All I truly want in life is to be happy and emotionally fulfilled. I never found either of those in the workplace, so I guess I'm done achieving anything in this life.

I guess I'm officially a crotchety old lady; kids these days!

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha yes agreed it's so fulfilling when you prioritize your relationship! This post ties in pretty nicely with what /u/Irisandoleander submitted earlier about the lies of feminism. So good that you're not falling into the trap those women are!

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a few days late to this so most of what I would have said has already been said, but I'd like to add one thing:

You don’t have to have a brain, drive or special skill set to get married. You just have to have a willing partner. However, getting into X school, graduating with Y degree, and landing Z job does require actual hard work.

You do have to have a brain, drive, and what are considered special skills in today's society to get married. Not one worthwhile man is going to marry a vapid club-rat whose idea of cooking is tossing a bag of Totino's pizza rolls on a cookie sheet and making sure it makes it out of the oven on time. In addition to that, no worthwhile man is going to want a woman for his wife if she can't keep up in conversation as well as the other aspects of life. A college education does not an intelligent woman make - anymore, it frequently results in a trove of worthless information backed up by a hefty debt.

Additionally, a career and an education will not keep you company or care for you in old age. A stack of peer-reviewed studies cannot help you up the steps when you're 95, nor can the framed diplomas on your wall help find a reputable care facility if you are unfortunately afflicted with dementia or Alzheimer's.

Priorities, people. There's nothing wrong with pursuing a career and foregoing what's traditional if that's what you really want. But realize what you're consigning yourself to decades down the line.

[–]LadySwitters5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Occasional lurker, first time poster. I'm 35, married for a couple of years, and so frustrated at this brand of feminism. Why is it one or the other? Look, I'm no slouch by this lady's standards. I went to a top law school, I'm a successful litigator, in a job that nets me well into 6 figures per year, at a job I even happen to like quite a bit. That being said, the happiest day of my life was the day I married my husband. I get satisfaction from my job, and money, which is also nice. I get joy from my marriage. If I lost my job tomorrow, I would get another job. If I lost my husband, I would be devastated.

My father raised me to be feminist in the old fashioned sense, since I'm pretty sure he has no concept of the modern/American definition of it (we're first generation immigrants). He raised me with the understanding that I could be and do anything. He did not cry at my graduation, or when I got a raise. He cried on the day I got married. This is simply because there's your real life, the life of family and friends, and love, and while it coexists with professional success, and hey, professional success can make those other things easier by far, professional success is not a stand in for love and family.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If I lost my job tomorrow, I would get another job. If I lost my husband, I would be devastated.

Great point right here. Additionally, your boss will never love you the way a husband/family will.

[–]ThatStepfordGalEarly 20s, LTR2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I keep trying to read it, but all I can make out is

"Whine whine whine, my man sucks and I'll sh*t on our wedding joy.."

Well, I already had my whole rant about this here.

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha your summary is pretty accurate! And great take on the article!! "Are you this stupid?" definitely crossed my mind multiple times while reading her words. I'm bookmarking your site :)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

No need to cheapen what doesn't suite you in order to validate what does. Do your thing, who the hell cares.

OP should have used the word prize rather than accomplishment. That would have at least been honest.

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Did you read the post that I linked, the title of my submission is the title of the article we're discussing! I am 100% against the idea that marriage isn't an accomplishment. In fact I think it's the #1 accomplishment a woman can achieve :)

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I meant the writer of the article you linked. She is like all the other women who use men and marriage as a social marker, like getting a DL or a job or a degree.

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh okay I was confused because of the "OP"! Marriage definitely gives a social boost but it absolutely is more than that and you're right so many women can't see it!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

How is meeting your lifetime partner and celebrating it not a huge life accomplishment? Also, the bitter tone of that article is telling. Your degree and job isn't going to hold your hand when you're 80...

[–]Camille11325[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Seriously! And yeah even though the author is married she sounds so bitter - her poor husband!

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter