TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

81

[–]Thatbiengsaid28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well i guess if money is the largest indicator of divorce and white families net worth out number black families 10 to 1 I am not really surprised.

[–]chadbhava14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Arranged cuckoldry

[–]Gello1233 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How is that cuckoldry can you explain?

[–]Unstabls6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Is the reason why the media is pushing for Black male White female propaganda, economical as in it's good for the country's economy because by having more divorces, women get more wealth and in return, spends most of it, since women are the biggest consumers? Is it also one of the reasons why the media is anti asian?

[–]TrannyPornO10 points11 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

This is a good, relevant read.

[–]ICQME12 points13 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Interesting read, always noticed Asians had less dimorphism which is why they make great traps.

[–]TrannyPornO7 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. While it's well-known now that slower life history speeds reduce sexual dimorphism, it's also theorised that consanguineous marriages reduce sexual dimorphism. China is quite a bit more inbred than the West and Africa, but this could be seriously underdetermined.

[–]Carkudo4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

How is China more inbred?

[–]TrannyPornO8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They have more ROHs and clannish kin systems have made them collectivistic. Asia is very well-known for collectivism and clannishness in general. The most outbred non-African population is core Europeans, due largely to the influence of the Catholic Church. This is the presumed origin of WEIRD psychology and the globally aberrant Western individualism.

[–]Carkudo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

WEIRD

[–]SophisticatedBean 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm wondering why NE Asians have a quite high IQ despite high degree of inbreeding. It seems inbreeding depression on IQ is often highly confounded by race and SES, so is it actually not a large effect? Or do populations evolve to deal with the mutational load (much like dropout in neural networks)?

[–]TrannyPornO2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, they aren't all third cousins. The degree of homozygosity isn't that bad, and for traits under selective pressure, it probably isn't bad at all. There is genetic evidence for heterosis on EA in China, the Netherlands, &c. But those gains peter out substantially, rapidly (they also don't apply across populations in the manner many think). Pushing good variants to fixation is technically increasing homozygosity, but with positive effects (not likely to be primary, because polygenic traits are formed by negative selection, often due to mutation-selection balance).

[–]SophisticatedBean8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is presently argued that such anatomical differences are a testament to a more peaceably monogamous mating history.

Yet, Japan appears to be the most hypergamous civilization of all.

https://japantoday.com/category/features/lifestyle/over-75-percent-of-japanese-women-say-they’ve-slept-with-a-male-coworker-survey

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/japanese-government-dating-services-2016-10?r=US&IR=T

Perhaps {collectivism, high inhibition, high IQ} is what kept hypergamy in check in the past (resulting in small sperm volume and low dimorphism), and now keeps incels in check allowing hypergamy to go rampant without destabilizing the system.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Certainly goes against the media narrative which is always trying to desperately, and to no avail, promote the black male/white female pairing.

Many of those will end up divorced with messed up mulatto kids. If the mulatto kids have some alpha qualities they can go on to ride the affirmative action train and who knows, maybe even be president one day.

[–]king_anon6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah, the right wing roots of incels in full view.

[–]SeeLimitless3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Does anybody else realize that this mean's when women of all genders pair with white men they are less likely to divorce and also that white women are most likely woman to divorce their partner,

[–]redpill_truths[S] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women of all genders

Anyways, No. Asian women are least likely to divorce with asian men in this picture

[–]SeeLimitless4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

so Asians are the most monogamist followed by whites and then blacks.

[–]whatwasthatcat3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Very simple explanation for this. Interracial couples with female hypergamy: black male white female, white male asian female. The females in these relationships are more sexually hypergamous and lust seeking. So it follows that when you choose a husband based on only sexual lust, there is a higher chance of divorce. The only outlier is black male black female couples, but that is due to the state of black people overall: they are more likely to divorce, whether they are male or female, which explains why even black male black female couples have high divorce rates even when it is not an interracial marriage. Another outlier is that white male white female couples have higher divorce rates than white male asian females. This is because whites have higher divorce rates than asians overall. As you see: asian male asian female by far have lowest divorce rates, and black male black female have higher divorce rates than white male white female. So overall, blacks have highest divorce rates, then whites, then asians.

But when you look at only interracial marriages, my theory holds true: the interracial marriages which are formed based on female sexual hypergamy are more likely to result in divorce.

[–]king_anon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Brilliant, bro. The white supremacists here couldn't wait to shout "much anti-white media".

[–]bsutansalt3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not all cultures are equal thus not all diversity is our strength. We need to be mindful of this when we hear that slogan bandied about.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter