It depends on the age of the woman. If she is young, so like roughly under 25, then she doesn't give a fuck about education, it is 100% about looks. If she is roughly over 25, and she is looking for a long term relationship, then she chooses a guy based on a formula that incorporates both looks and money/job status, the richer/higher status job he has, the more forgiving she is in regards to looks. However, the only natural/evolutionary/biological part of this is formula is the looks part: women are naturally NOT attracted to money/job status, simply because these things are very recent phenomenons in humans, and it has not been long enough to make it a natural evolutionary behaviour. When a woman chooses a high status job/rich male, it is NOT because she is "attracted" to him: she is making a RATIONAL NON-SEXUAL NON-ROMANTIC choice to benefit herself. The ONLY primitive/evolutionary/biological partner selection method of females is physical attraction: how alpha does he look (muscles, height, alpha facial features such as square jaw and piercing eyes). Basically, the ONLY thing that matters: how alpha caveman hunky wild male looking is he: if a lot, that means she wants to pass down his genes. If not enough, she doesn't wanna pass down his genes. The whole "money" thing is a MODERN, NON-EVOLUTIONARY, NON-SEXUAL/ROMANTIC phenomenon. Even a good looking young guy can date an older unattractive rich woman, that does NOT mean that he is doing this from an evolutionary perspective, it has NOTHING to do with love/romance/relationships. It would be like accepting a job for money. It has nothing to do with romance/relationships/attraction/love.

This is because long term relationships are not a natural/evolutionary thing. Evolutionary speaking, men and women are both hardwired to simply have sex and make babies. Long term relationships are not natural, they were invented by society (and for good reasons, but that is not what we are discussing right now). The only difference is that women place more emphasis on QUANTITY over QUALITY, and men are the exact opposite, they put more emphasis on QUALITY over QUANTITY. But neither men or women, from an evolutionary point of view, naturally choose partners based on an assessment of how good of a "long term partner" he/she will be. They ONLY choose based on "how good of genes would that person of the opposite sex give my offspring?" During sex, oxytocin is produced, and THIS is where "love" comes from, it is basically a hormone that is released in order to, AT THIS STAGE (remember, at THIS stage, NOT at the partner selection stage, partner selection was ALREADY done and it used ONLY LOOKS to be determined), make a bond between the couple in order for them to stay together until the baby is old enough, at which point both partners go off their separate ways and make more babies with other people. The fact that Oxycontin is released DURING sex proves that nature does NOT intend for women to think of a man's "long term potential" at the PARTNER SELECTION time. Again, ONLY looks determines that.