TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

15

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Checks for less obvious necessary yet not sufficient conditions for approval, like social status, mental health, etc.

Stuff that in absence won't make you more attractive, but when there's something wrong about those in you, they make you automatically undateable.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] -1 points0 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

But if I only wanna become a fuckboy in their eyes then all I'm gonna have to do is plastic-surgerymaxx right? I don't give a fuck about dating etc etc I just wanna be at least a chadlite in the West (I'm a white guy if this matters), so I'll be able to be a Chad in the East (I'm only interested in Asian women, no other races)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Even fuckboys require some other conditions other than proper looks, if you're a foid you can't risk screwing an imbecile that's gonna scream you're a slut to the entire planet.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

ok lmao thats true im just gonna try to ntmaxx

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

As long as you're 3-5/10 (not truecel-tier) and can looksmax to low normie-tier standards, ntmaxxing is a necessary yet not sufficient condition.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've been rated 5.5PSL and by some 6PSL by the looksmax forums lmao depending on my photos

[–]red_matrix0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

How do you plan to Chad in the East? You got lots of money? You know what the gals say in China: No money, no honey!

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 0 points1 point  (16 children) | Copy Link

No lol You're misunderstanding.

I'm white. Supposedly JBW theory works. So that'd add 1-2 PSL points to my SMV in the East.

if I ascend to Chadlite (6PSL) by surgerymaxxing in the West, I'd be considered 7PSL in the East, kinda

Every girl only wants Chads. If a non-chad/non-chadlite hits on them they interpret that as they're ugly and that's an ugly, but since you're also a subscriber here you probably already know all this

[–]ugluk12 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

You're on the right track, but don't marry there, or you won't be Chad :))) Chad never marries.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 3 points4 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

LOL no never don't worry

marrying a woman is essentially giving her half of all your money, no thx

[–]ugluk1-1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Not necessarily over there, you have more leeway there. I suggest Philippines, Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos. Search for "lanlan" in YT and there are other videos also of how to find hoes there.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

No I only want to be a Chad in Korea China Japan Taiwan

So not SEA but EA if this makes sense

[–]ugluk1-1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Those places are the among worst in Asia to be Chad, only Singapore is missing from your list. Remember that Chad sells a dream, the poorer the girl, the more Chad can sell a dream.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand. Can you please explain?

[–]aminbae0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

dont go shoot up a mosque after your travels

[–]DataEast10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're a loser

[–]ugluk16 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She wants to see through your deception and try to deceive you in turn.

[–]barbodelli3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a few reasons

1) It's traditional. In a society where the lord is great and everyone should only judge each other by their character and not looks (utopian bullshit), you have to go on dates to get to know each other. It's ingrained in us.

2) For hookups personality plays a very small role in attraction. But for long term relationships anyone with any experience will know it plays a larger role. You can only tolerate it for so long if that 10/10 you're with has a fetish for smearing feces all over the house. That's of course an extreme example. But the whole purpose of "getting to know a person" is to find out if they have some crazy flaw you can't handle.

3) It's often just an easy way to spend time with a person. If you both want to fuck each other it gives you an excuse to be around them to make it happen. I went on a lot more dates when I lived with my parents. Soon as you move out you find that a lot of those "dates" turn into just hanging out at your/her house and fucking.

Say there's a hot chick at work who likes you. You know she likes you, she knows you know etc. You can say "hey wanna come over and fuck" or you can take her on a date. The latter is a lot more socially acceptable and risk free for the woman in case she decides to change her mind.

[–]eduardkoopman2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Dating, seems more long term dating strategy/behaviour, to me. So it's more based on the man his capacity for providing.

Short term strategy, is imo less if not at all concerned about providing capacity.

So, imo. Dating, is a man casting for the role of a provider. it's usually for guys that aren't attractive/good enough to hookup with straight away (or the woman has strong want for long term something or providings), but also not ugly enough to dismiss/reject straight away.
Women may find him not attractive enough for a hookup, but good enough in looks plus provider combination to have sex with him in exchange for provider things.
The prupose of dating, is for the man to show he compensates his average (not ugly) looks, with some other things that he still is suitbale to associate with for a woman. Such a man isn't granted errors/flaws much; like being broke, living with parents, bad social skill, missmatch to her in personality traits, etc.

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

it's usually for guys that aren't attractive/good enough to hookup with straight away (or the woman has strong want for long term something or providings), but also not ugly enough to dismiss/reject straight away.

Makes perfect sense, another reason for me to hard-looksmaxx (I only want sex and validation, not relationships)

Thank you!

Tho I don't understand this excerpt:

Such a man isn't granted errors/flaws much; like being broke, living with parents, bad social skill, missmatch to her in personality traits, etc.

Explain this please

[–]eduardkoopman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

another reason for me to hard-looksmaxx (I only want sex and validation, not relationships)

To add. A beta-buck also gets validation. But that is based on his provider skills, so he gets validation for being a good provider. That's how an ugly rich man can get a hot woman on his side, which is also immediate validation for himself (and also often given from others (through compliments or jalousy)) that he is a master at providing/gathering/survival.

And attractive man, aka Chad. gets validation for his good looks, genes, attractive appearance.

" Such a man isn't granted errors/flaws much; like being broke, living with parents, bad social skill, missmatch to her in personality traits, etc."

Explain this please

An attractive man/Chad, is chosen on his looks and/or genes. It doesn't matter much if he's broke, poor, living with parents, missmatch her personality, etc..

An man of average looks, isn't chosen on his attractive looks. He will only be considered by her, if he has some other good things about him and if he doesn't have many/much/any mayor (or often even small) flaws.
What needs to come together for such a ("beta-bucks") type of man:

  1. She has to be in a point of her life, that she wants a LTR (often that isn't the case for women in their prime)
  2. He has to meet qualifications (that Chad didn't); such as: have good salary (while she accepted Chad to be broke), have a house (while she accepetd Chad to live with his parents still), he paying for her stuff/outings/trips/etc (while she accepted Chad to not pick up the bill), he has to match her personality wishes such as for example extravert, organized, etc.. (while she accepted Chad to be the opposite/missmatch). And so on.

So the man casting for the role of: boyfriend, beta bucks, husband, etc.. Is often rejected on many more things, a Chad doesn't have to deal with.

Above comes from my experience, (not the Chad part, but the beta-bucks part). Because I always got, and probably still get (if I wasn't celibate) casted for the boyfriend, beta bucks, husband role. Because I'm average in looks.
I found the costs (of being the beta-bucks type man) to high, for the "return/benifits". So I opted out, 3 years ago.

[–]reddit309 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

the purpose of a date is to give the guy time to escalate after the girl gets comfortable. just because she finds you good looking doesn't mean she will be comfortable telling a random to just "come over" and fuck her. there is risk involved in taking your clothes off and submitting to a man. did you really not understand this concept

[–]AlarmingDirt8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not, not before you explained to me.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter