Dark Theme


269,638 posts archived

991

[–]modAutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.

Register on our backup site: https://www.trp.red and reserve your reddit name today.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]ahackercalled4chan 4 points4 points [recovered]

lol "because you have a weak woman body, you can't climb a tree for fuck!"

Sophie is a fuckin trip

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt 36 points37 points  (0 children)

"I'll get to that in a jiffy, cockface"

Drink on monitor moment right there.

[–]Aggressive_Beta 129 points130 points  (0 children)

So funny to hear that shit coming out of a 14 year old girl's mouth

[–]simplecountry_lawyer 144 points145 points  (51 children)

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat 241 points242 points  (38 children)

Ain’t it funny that when 15-years-old Greta Thunberg becomes famous for her climate change activism, and 11-years-old Desmond “the amazing” becomes famous for his trans activism, people celebrate uncritically their precocious “free-thinking”, yet the first thing that’ll come to their mind when they come across a 14-years-old far-right activist is how that poor kid got so badly indoctrinated?

I’m less concerned about how kids get their political opinions than the danger of people’s confirmation bias in an increasingly polarised world.

[–]Cods_gift_to_reddit 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I guess the people who don't believe in independent thought see only indoctrination and nothing else.

[–]MaxWyght 22 points23 points  (13 children)

The thing about right wingism is that you don't need to be indoctrinated.

It involves having a working set of eyes, and an IQ above 90.

Desmond and Greta WERE indoctrinated though, since kids their age don't even have an interest in sexuality, or climate.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Thanks for providing this great illustration of confirmation bias at play.

[–]bluesnsouls 4 points5 points  (9 children)

I don't know about your country but i had sex at 14, is not common but i've seen enough 14-16yo pregnant girls around here.

Still, i also think they were indoctrinated, they kind of remind me of my 14yo cousin who decided to quit school to become a full time jehova witnesses and dedicate her life to jehova, my uncles agreed on this.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (8 children)

what country is this that girls get pregnant at 14?

[–]LavochkinSocDem 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh you sweet summer child, many British girls get pregnant at that age. As with most industrialized countries, I believe this trend has abated over the last couple of decades.

[–]bluesnsouls 0 points1 point  (4 children)

what country is this that girls get pregnant at 14?

México, uneducated people tend to have a lot of kids at a young age here, not as common as 10 years ago though.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (3 children)

ah. could that also be because people are more open with their sexuality in mexico than in the US?

[–]adminsaregayniggers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no it's because beaners are impulsive and low IQ

[–]bluesnsouls 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don't think so, I've been on the US many times and stayed for a while, here's pretty traditional and sex is tabboo , almost non existent sexual education and social pressure makes kids want to try something new and forbidden and in consequence of that, they don't use protection.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh really? I thought it was like the rest of latin america with more open sexuality

[–]bothnian-spy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had a girl give me handies when I was 14 having discovered TRP, then she took my virginity when I was 15 (legal age). She was a year older than me. Point is, kids that age absolutely have an interest in sex. I was the last of my close mates to lose my virginity. I did live in a rural area though.

[–]Diche_Bach 16 points17 points  (20 children)

I would like to propose to you that Sophie, and you, and I are actually "leftists." My reasons are not pedantic; I believe that this really is a critical matter for those of who cherish the core values of the Western tradition to be clear on.

"Amazing Polly" recently posted a video called "The Left Hunts Down Anyone Who Offends Their Cult." I don't wholeheartedly agree with everything Polly (or Sophie) has to say but I value their freedom to express themselves within legal boundaries and agree in general with their libertarian and pro-freedom perspectives. I shall repeat here the substance of my comment to Polly's video.

I now prefer to lump all of the insane cultist under the label "New Totalitarian Tribalists" (so-called liberalism, progressivism, Cultural Marxism, The Frankfurt School, globalism, identity politics, political correctness, etc.). While the question of whether this diverse mix of things should legitimately be lumped under a single term is valid, I nonetheless believe there is ample commonality among them--and perhaps more importantly shared purpose and action--that a common term to identify the relatively loose-knit cluster is warranted.
"Leftist" is a term that I find being used to refer to this broad group of people, groups, beliefs, movements and ideas and "left vs. right" dichotomy is at least 200 years old at this stage. The original meanings of the dichotomy had already been adapted to refer to new things by as early as the mid 19th century, so some degree of "over-generalization" which is based on real historical continuity is reasonable. However, I think at this stage it is long past due for a transformation in our terminology and in fact likely has been for at least 100 years. In my view, a true divergence between new applications of the terms "left/right" and the original meanings of the terms seems to have occurred when Totalitarians under the guise of "Communism" were lumped into the category "leftist" when in fact they shared much more in common with the original, i.e., ACTUAL "right."
The left vs. right terminology is generally traced to the French Revolution with, anti-royalist "reform-minded" delegates seating to the left in the National Assembly and "conservative" and generally more aristocratic and pro-royalist delegates seated to the right. Despite the "left vs. right" dichotomy being coined at this stage, the underlying philosophical divisions in Western European political theory must be traced back further though to at least the late 1600s /early 1700s and are well-exemplified in the opposing philosophies of John Locke (a leftist according to the latter terminology of the French Revolution) and Thomas Hobbes (a rightest).
The fundamental difference in the two philosophies rests on different models of human nature and the rightful degree of authority of the state over the individual. Hobbes, who was the earlier scholar--and who worked during the bloody English Civil War--held a view of human nature that was pessimistic or even cynical. To put it simply: bereft of government, people resort to savagery in Hobbes view and thus an absolute Monarch with total power was necessary to protect the People from themselves. The connection to the "pro-royalists" "Right" in the French Revolution is I think obvious, but clearly there is much less similarity if we compare these true "Right wing" views from history with the sorts of things which are labeled as "rightist" or right-wing today.
This is to say that, my reluctance to continue using the term "Leftist" is not strictly limited to applying leftist to the various tribes within the New Totalitarian Tribe, but also a reluctance to apply "rightist" to pragmatic realists who are perhaps properly deemed "constitutionalists" or "libertarians" as being "right."
From a strictly historical standpoint, a "right winger" is one who calls for a state with absolute authority over the People because the people cannot be trusted and the state of society when this absolute authority is relaxed is one of disorder, war, and suffering. Putin, Stalin, Hitler, Franco, Mussolini, Pinochet, and similar autocratic rulers/regimes are legitimately "right wing," but I can hardly reconcile any similarity between the characteristics these autocrats demonstrated in common with the ideals espoused by Hobbes and (for example) the modern Republican party, Trump, or ANY American regime which has ever existed, whether Republican, Federalists, Whig, Democratic-Republican, or just plain old Democratic . . . well . . . that latter "party" does in fact seem to be verging toward true RIGHT WING orientations with each passing year, and perhaps notably since the time of Clinton if not LBJ . . . thus, my supposition that the larger "movement" to which the Democratic party is legitimately identified with at this stage is this hypothetical "New TOTALITARIAN Tribalists" spectrum.
According to Locke, the reason for government is not to protect people from themselves but to protect people's natural rights to life, liberty and property and here perhaps the full paradox between the origins and rightful meanings of the terms "left/right" and how they are currently applied will become more obvious. From an 18th century standpoint, the Founding Fathers of the United States of America were "leftists" through-and-through in that they denounced the absolute authority of the English crown and argued from Locke's philosophical stance that there is a natural right to revolution when and if a government fails to protect the natural rights of its citizens or subjects more broadly. There is really NO DEBATING the point: the Founding Fathers were, despite all of their differences, solidary in their absolute commitment to Leftist political philosophy as it had emerged in the 100 some odd years of preceding history, and more broadly since the Peace of Westphalia (1648). Thus, the absolute perversity of calling people who wish to engage in brazen revisionism, reinterpretation or even devaluation of the Founding Fathers and the Constitution as being "Leftist."
From a strictly technical and coherent standpoint, most modern day "conservatives" (and certainly a pragmatic opportunist realist player like President Trump [labels I apply as appellations not as denunciations]) are more like the "Leftist" Founding Fathers and the preceding Lockian political philosophy that inspired them than the myriad rabble of ideologues, zealots and provocateurs on the "other side" of the conflict.
The actual roots of the "New Totalitarian Tribalists" are diverse, but for the most part the Marxist split with the rest of the West is the most notable common theme. However, there is a great deal of incoherent, irrational, autocratic and downright evil craziness mixed in there so lumping a set of actors as diverse as: The Democratic National Committee; Remainers in the U.K.; E.U. loyalists; Identity Politics "social justice warriors," etc., all under the single term "Marxist" seems inadequate.
New Totalitarian Tribalists is the best I could come up with and I'm pleased if someone can improve on the concept.

WE are NOT "right-wingers," nor were the Founding Fathers of the United States, nor were the reformers to European absolute monarchies. WE ARE LEFTISTS. We value the individual and hold their rights as sacrosanct. We cherish constitutionalism, due process, open-dialogue, empiricism, trial by jury, transparent parliamentary procedure, etc.

THEY, the so-called "Leftists" are NOT leftists. The principles for which they strive bear almost no resemblance to the foundations of the Left in Western history, i.e., John Locke and related philosophers. In fact, THEY are "Far Right" extremists, more akin to Pol Pot, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Putin, etc.

[–]iLLprincipLeS 17 points18 points  (14 children)

In the years after WW2, it became clear in the West that whatever ideas appealed to the masses would win out over ideas that required sacrifice of personal freedoms in order to have social order, as the Axis powers required of their citizens.

In order to win these conflicts both real and imagined, the West adopted its Leftward tilt from after WW1 and accelerated it. This culminated in the 1960s, after which point Western Civilization — already heavily damaged by the crass commercialism of the 1950s, the French Revolution and the individualistic fallout of The Renaissance™ — really fell apart. As such, we recognize now that we have been living under an undiagnosed regime which we might call neo-Communism.

Neo-Communism resembles the old form of Communism, but has two changes: first, it is decentralized, meaning that it is enforced by citizens to show loyalty, instead of by secret police; second, it is grafted onto capitalism, which enables it to avoid the crisis that did in Communism, namely the ability to have any kind of functional economy.

Its decentralized nature means that it works through incentives toward personal reward or social popularity, both of which require the person in question to affirm the ideological narrative in some way. The metoo frenzy of reporting of sexual assaults shows us this market for attention: anyone who can participate in the latest trends, affirming ideology, gets ahead.

In that provides a uniform series of incentives, such that members of all political parties behave roughly the same way, creating a “uniparty” of people who are working to affirm the narrative however they can while staying in the news as much as possible. Since ideology is what holds this society together, the media takes on far greater importance than in any other type of society.

Ideology thus provides both our motivation and a type of currency, in that those who wield ideology well will be rewarded in a society which is mobilized in the military style for perpetual war to enforce that belief system.

Neo-Communism specializes in making us appear “free” while finding ways to entrench us in the system. Simply surviving costs endless money, and jobs are the only way for most people to have that, making people dependent on their paychecks and in turn, on saying the “right” thing so that they do not get fired and end up in the poorhouse.


We can visualize Neo-Communism as a society centered around the idea of equality as enforced by a cultural revolution, as opposed to a political one, and having the following attributes:

  1. Political Correctness. Thoughts are pre-emptively censored for fear of what the neighbors, friends and co-workers might think; this requires establishing an absolute good by setting up an absolute bad, for example, “Hitler was racist, therefore anti-racism is good, and anything against Neo-Communism is racist.”

  2. Wealth Transfer. Neo-Communism synthesizes consumerism, which beat Communism in 1991, with the idea of the socialist-style welfare state, and so it specializes in creation of taxes to perpetually shift wealth from the top to the bottom. This also continually “primes the pump” by encouraging the least affluent to spend money that was given to them by government.

  3. Trend Culture. Neo-Communism specializes in using mass culture as a weapon of cultural revolution, but it must keep its weapon from being turned against it, so it generates constant distractions in the form of trends, or whatever “everyone is talking about” this news cycle, month, year or decade. These overlap and keep people chasing low-carb foods, small urban living, climate-friendly pollution, low-fat foods, collaborative working or whatever other paradoxical but consequently appealing idea they can spin to you to keep your mind fascinated, dazed and misdirected.

  4. Unofficial Nature. What has enabled Neo-Communism to survive for this long is that it is invisible because it consists of social incentives and fears; whatever is popular and trending will result in personal advancement for an individual in any field, and whatever touches the taboo line will destroy that same individual. As a result, you can declare yourself an anti-Communist and still be an agent of Neo-Communism.

  5. Replacement Culture. Like the Cymothoa exigua parasite, which sneaks into a fish through the gills and then replaces its tongue, Neo-Communism uses its cultural revolution to re-define what is “good,” and in doing so, replaces both culture and religion. Soon even all art and media products revolve around the ideas of Neo-Communism.

  6. Individualism. At its core, Neo-Communism appeals to the individualism of others in the form of, “Why do things the right way? You can get ahead by doing things our way,” which creates an attraction for those who do not fit in, uniting them. It also creates a “race to the bottom” as others then compete with this new and trendy mediocrity.


The rise of Neo-Communism came from attempts by the need to reconcile their Socialist leanings with the horrors of Communism, causing them to embrace market-driven communism:

But as evidence of communism’s horrors emerged over the decades, it rightly shocked liberals and leftists in the West, who shared many of the egalitarian aims of the revolutionaries.

But if we’ve learned one lesson from the communist century, it is this: That to implement Marxist ideals is to betray them. Marx’s demand to “abolish private property” was a clarion call to action—and an inexorable path to the creation of an oppressive, unchecked state.

A few socialists began to recognize that there could be no freedom without markets and private property. When they made their peace with the existence of capitalism, hoping to regulate rather than to abolish it, they initially elicited denunciations as apostates. Over time, more socialists embraced the welfare state, or the market economy with redistribution.

Since then, we have learned that to adopt egalitarian ideals at all leads to the creation of a crowd, or a herd of people dedicated to the type of behavior we see at carnivals, sporting events and Black Friday sales at Wal-mart. The problem is not Communism; it is egalitarianism.

Neo-Communism was created to conceal that learning. The ideal of the Neo-Communist is to befuddle the population with consumerism while simultaneously indoctrinating them in egalitarian ideological dogma. The thinking is that, like political correctness, this will reprogram them so fundamentally that it fundamentally over-rides “human nature” and makes a working form of socialism. The problem it faces is that human behavior is not so much “human nature” as it is a reflection of the mathematics of survival. People left unchecked will create a tragedy of the commons by which they exploit whatever they can; individualism is the rule of individuals except for the exceptional. It is why in nature, species tend to consume all resources and then die out. Nature imposes a test to see who can transcend raw individualism.

However, creating a perverse incentive by declaring reward-before-performance, or subsidy for simply being human and “equal” as egalitarian philosophies like classical liberalism and Communism demand, ensures that individualism will be rewarded. That in turn forces others to descend to that level, and herd behavior results, with the herd consuming everything it can and then running over cliffs like lemmings, which is how human societies throughout history have self-destructed.

As a result, Neo-Communism is failing just like Communism, democracy, and European Socialism are: it mutates people into selfish, morally nullified, anti-conscientious beings who are oblivious to everything around them because all of it is based on a lie. Democracy killed ancient Greece and Rome, and now it is killing the West because (apparently) people were so oblivious they were willing to try it again. Socialism, or “economic equality,” is a parallel to democracy, or “political equality,” and both lead to Communism and through it, Neo-Communism as the virus evolves.

If we look at the human condition, we see that in individuals, individualism — a denial of the reality of the inevitable consequences of our actions in preference for individual desires — causes lives to become self-destructive, and that in groups, individualism becomes herd behavior.

The herd ruins everything. Any time we have structure, purpose and principle, we succeed; when we descend into herd behavior, we fail.

[–]Diche_Bach 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Interesting! Good thoughts!

[–]wrekd 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I will need to read both posts a few more times.

I linked to Libertarian, but the bot auto-removed it. I'll try to figure out a method to get the ideas spread.

[–]bostezo22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Saved and thinking of printing it! XD

[–]sebastianconcept 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great insights! Thanks for sharing!

[–]aduar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not answering the points raised, only the term neo communism. How can you have this without referring to classic marxist question. Who owns the mean of production..?

[–]Chaddeus_Rex -3 points-2 points  (6 children)

Communism, namely the ability to have any kind of functional economy.

sigh….I was with you until here.

Everyone brings up 'how dysfunctional' a Communist economy is, but it seems to me that economies in Communist states have either 1. worked well or 2. failed for reasons unrelated to economy.

Before delving deeper into the issue, let us consider that the vast majority of 'capitalistic nations' have a failing/dysfunctional economy, lets looks at nations like Greece, Italy, most of Africa, Venezuela, Brazil, etc. In fact, if we consider 'capitalism' the right to accumulate personal wealth and own the means of production, then we see that Capitalism is in fact the default state of economics for most large human civilizations since the dawn of civilization and yet Capitalist economies have failed every.single.time (I'm looking at you Ming China, Athens and Rome), judging by the fact that none of these ancient empires exist.

The one truly functional Capitalist economy has been the United States. The US economy flourished not because of democracy or capitalism but for a set of entirely different reasons that had little to do with its political system and everything to do with Geography , becoming a monolith on the American mainland and the transport of the Industrial Revolution undergoing in England to the plains of America. Moreover, America was much larger in size than most European countries and did not engage in many petty wars that served to destroy infrastructure and people (on its own territory) and thus the State did not live in fear of constant attack (like many European countries did) because it was isolated by an ocean and it was monolithic for the most part. If we notice, that the US economy exploded after it dealt with the threats of Mexico, France and Britain on its borders as well as becoming unified.

It can be said that any economic system implemented in the US at the time would have been just as successful - provided the above criteria were met.

The highly successful 'capitalist' system that the US championed 'worked' in Europe after the US de facto rebuilt and occupied Europe as part of the Marshall Plan after WW2 - replacing centuries of tradition and European identity. The only relatively European countries under American style capitalism were Britain, France and West Germany - it didn't work quite well for the smaller European countries (under American control) because they lacked the industrial base, knowledge, identity or geographic/population size to do it (I'm looking at you Greece and Italy).

You may bring up the successes of small countries like Japan/South Korea, but remember that the South Korean economy (like Europe) was built and is currently kept afloat by the United States. Same with Japan. By all accounts the South Korean economy cannot sustain itself without the contribution of America despite the presence of a few large corporations like Samsung and LG.

Now that brings us to the communist countries. Generally when people say that 'Communism is dysfunctional' they are either 1. repeating Cold War propaganda (we will look at why its not true) 2. referencing that 'Soviet economy was dysfunctional' referencing mostly the end of the 1980's were systemic changes by the government led to its demise and yet ignoring the period of unprecedented growth under Stalin's 5 year plans (estimates of Soviet economic growth range from 13-20% per annum - compared to 11-13% for Japan during its peak) or 3. failing North Korean economy - ignoring that it does not trade with anyone but china (no more communist states left) and the fact that there is no large 'ally' keeping it afloat and the fact that it has very poor land for any productie economic endeavors.

  1. Many of the statements heard saying 'communism's economy is dysfunctional' or citing anecdotes of 'you pretend to pay us and we pretend to work' or other such hocus pocus are relics of the Cold War era were the United States government was afraid of the infiltration of Communist influence (especially since the KGB was making a concerted effort to destabilize public order in the US) and since the US had many propagandists working for the Nazi propaganda machine, they developed this highly effective myth to convince their own population that communism is evil. Evidence for this is that before the war, there were widespread pro-Soviet/communist beliefs in the United States and were exemplified by such authors as Jack London or Ernest Hemingway. Moreover the American Communist power was actively gaining followers in the early years. Many Americans thought that communism was a good alternative to the system they currently had. That is until the US government launched their propaganda campaign and purged dissentors from their ranks with the McCarthy trials.

  2. In the early years of Soviet rule, the Soviet government discovered that the Soviet union was behind the West in development and was falling further behind each year (kind of what is going on in Russia at this time). Given the rowdy nature of the Russians and the fact that Russians (and the people's living on these territories) do not like listening to laws (given that there had been an extended period of lawlessness, the existence of free steppe people's like the Cossacks and other such groups) they needed a centralized system of rule that would bend all these disparate people's to one purpose, and in this the Communists succeeded immensely. They developed an entirely new library system throughtout the country, created an archive of books that at the time was larger than the Library of Congress, threw large amounts of resources into developing every branch of society from sport to art to heavy industry to science. After Lenin's death, the groups of people (that I mentioned previously) re-emerged and growth slowed down - to pacify them Stalin needed the purges. Despite these purges in the first 3 Five Year Plans, the Soviet economy grew an unprecedented amount and still had more to grow. At this time it switched focus from 'exporting Communism' (kind of how America exported capitalism/democracy to the rest of the world) to focusing on themselves. The US government refused to acknowledge the new Soviet state until 1934, when its growth was so fast that it became impossible to ignore it anymore.

WW2 put a damper into the plans of Soviet growth and threw them back to the beginning, as all infrastructure had to be rebuilt in its Western part.

But growth continued rapidly and culminated in achievements such as the construction of sputnik, sending a man into space, etc.

With the change in leadership, because the Soviet economy was reaching a point of diminishing returns (about the same time as US economy in 1973) Soviet economy entered stagnation and never left it because the new leadership that came to power wanted to dismantle it due to close ideological ties with the United States.

Ever since adopting a capitalist system, the Russian economy (or that of any economy of the Post Soviet sphere) has not become more efficient and has instead degraded - with the post-Soviet countries currently being some of the poorest in Europe and yet they are capitalist.

  1. North Korea would not do well regardless of its system, unless it got regular cash infusions from a larger power. In fact, North Korea was doing much better than South Korea until the 1980's when cash flow from the Soviets was cut off.

Now that we have analyzed the fallacy of your statement, I suggest you save this post and refer to it anytime anyone mentions that 'Communism doesn't work'.

/u/redpillschool I know it goes against the dominant ideological paradigm (as this is a US site) but I think its worth redpilling ourselves on more things than just women - so could this be the magnum opus for a redpill on the communist powers?

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS 6 points7 points  (1 child)

before the war, there were widespread pro-Soviet/communist beliefs in the United States and were exemplified by such authors as Jack London or Ernest Hemingway. Moreover the American Communist power was actively gaining followers in the early years. Many Americans thought that communism was a good alternative to the system they currently had.

Also this happened before the Cold War, Cuban Missile Crisis, Mao's enormous blunders etc. Also consider how badly fucked over most Americans were by Capitalism in the run-up and ultimate crash in 1929, leading to the Great Depression at a time in history when Russia was in a period of advancement and prosperity. Communism was downright fashionable in many circles because it made sense in that zeitgeist.

I'm not advocating we turn to communism here, but pointing out the historical context because young people today unthinkingly attribute current-era beliefs and motives to 1920s-40s Americans when communism is discussed.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also this happened before the Cold War, Cuban Missile Crisis

If anything the Cuban Missile Crises shows the cleverness/tactical genius of the soviet leadership. Too bad they didnt hold frame and keep their missiles in cuba, they'd have more leverage over the US.

The way I see the issue is that the US see itself as being allowed to put missiles close to USSR borders but when USSR did it to them, the US freaked the fuck out. Hypocritical.

Mao's enormous blunders 

Maos blunders can be attributed mostly to inexperience, not Communism - he had no precedent to which to refer in the construction of a new society so he was in many ways operating by trial and error.

I just wanted to point out that many things people attribute to "Communism" are far more nuanced than they think.

[–]codingbuffnerd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

hope this isn't too messy, tried my best

Your arguments about USA are pretty capitalistic, because these reasons allowed USA to get more trade in and out of the state. That's pretty capitalistic reasons. Add low taxes, low bureaucracy. USA since back then dropped it's capitalistic ways and is more corpo-monopoly-listic ruled by Banksters with fake cash not supported in any limited resources that allows huge manipulations.

  1. worked well

Which ones, tell me.

lets looks at nations like Greece, Italy, most of Africa, Venezuela, Brazil, et

Greece: loaned cash, faked it's economic stats, is ruled by socialist party (or however you call nowadays neo-marxists)

Italy: huge debt, worse and worse economy, ruled by "pro-eu" leftists

Most of africa: ... only stable countries in africa are these that had UK laws and they're "pro capitalsitic"

Venezuela: you think country sitting on this much oil has independent goverment?

Brazil: never was really intrested in brasil, but they're pretty big country with huge export, so think they're doing good, eh?

No country from your little list is a "capitalsitic nation" or close to it.

Capitalist economies have failed every.single.time (I'm looking at you Ming China, Athens and Rome), judging by the fact that none of these ancient empires exist.

China exists, Athens and Rome fell for different reasons than their "system".

It can be said that any economic system implemented in the US

To implement any communistic/totalitarian system you need strong goverment with police force, army and secret services. So no, there wasn't any other way to get USA going, because it was really a wild wide west. Stop spreading lies that USA could be built on anything than a really free market, low/no taxes and huge amounts of freedom.

Germany etc

Not really. Germany was "forced" to have more capitalistic laws to have huge growth, because it was bordering with ZSRR and someone smart made the connection of "BIG ECONOMY = BIG $$$ = BIG ARMY", so they loaned west Germany a LOT of cash, made laws that skyrocketed the economy, so Germany could have bigger army to compete with ZSRR.

Other nations didn't recieve such help, money and knowledge.

Japan/SK

You really know nothing, lol. Check how BoJ fell and the TRUE reasons. SK 30years ago was a poor country and nowadays there are so many high-end tech firms from it I really can't count them all.

Regarding communism as a "its ok system"

You're delusional and I have no patience to tell you how much you're wrong. Let me tell you this. My parents were born in such country (soviet satelite state). I was born in such country. You have no idea what it does to the people, how it was ruled, how much VIOLENCE it brings. There is just "Communism party rules all"-idea and nothing else matters. You're either with communist party or you're not and only people from the party and friends had any resources. There is no fucking averging everybody, so we're all fucking rich. You can't averge everyone and make them do the same things in same ways.

https://imgur.com/a/7dPbPKP this is how shops looked like, because "economy" was centrally controlled. This is how communism ends. Because people are lazy and don't want to work. Because people are ambitious and want to work more than other and you can't averge someone that is ambitious with someone that is lazy

[–]5Imperator_Red 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Sigh...

You think communist economies aren’t dysfunctional.

[–]Chaddeus_Rex 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Go reread my comment to understand why.

[–]umizumiz 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Wow...

So we are ALL lefties on the inside...

Jfc, that makes me even MORE afraid of the left!

[–]iLLprincipLeS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Uber-skeptics like the people who will survive this dark era in history tend to view all human interactions as businesses. This is not because they like business, but because they are realists: all people act in self-interest, and in civilization, since the primary skill required is to induce others to do things for us, self-interest requires acting for personal gain usually through deception.

In this mindset, we can debunk ideology by pointing out that it is a business, specifically a variation of the entertainment business. In entertainment, one creates images that makes consumers feel safe and content, and in order to experience that feeling again, they buy the product. However, in order to make the product appealing, the sellers must ensure that it never appears to be a product.

One notices over time that successful products center around a few themes. These involve what humans wish were true, including eternal youth, sudden wealth, narcotic romances, and other fantasies that involve the human being as the center of life, more important than its context, so that the brain feels safe in its significance as if that would hold back or at least diminish mortality and individuality. Essentially, entertainment fantasies focus on the individual being God or god-like,

If you wonder why Leftism resembles a religion, this is why: it is a replacement religion with human intent at its center instead of a divine being.

The central idea of Leftism is control, which one might describe as the replacement of structure with a linear centralized authority. Under control, the intent of this authority alone matters; it removes anything which competes with it by using the device of “equality,” which reduces those under its command to atomized beings who can be commanded with identical mandates.

This serves the convenience for control and in the case of people, isolates them in their own fears of offending control or missing its rewards, eliminating the structures of organic civilization which nurture it from within. Instead, they must become dependent on the controller and act as a mass that waits on control for commands.

Through this hybrid of religion and tyranny, Leftism Inc. runs itself as a successful business that makes itself essential to the function of a civilization, but in so doing, removes any other option for order in a society. Like a parasitic worm, it enters through the heart, where people long for an end to risk, war, differences of ability and other sources of stress. Then it makes its way to the brain, where it rips out the nervous system and replaces it with a remote control that directly manipulates every part of the body to act in unison. This abolishes differences between the organs, turning the body to mush that responds jerkily and ineptly to commands, but the controller does not care. The zombie serves its intent, and therefore can be sacrificed, because only the intent matters.

This represents a different type of “game.” Normal healthy people seek to win the game of life by playing well and making themselves better in the process. Those who are dead inside instead quest for control, power and other tangible things they can manipulate. To do this, they destroy all order outside of themselves because it competes with their intent for importance. In fact, they adore having chaos and destruction all around because these only serve to emphasize the necessity of their intent, choices, whims, feelings and judgments. The ego sits in a blaze of glory formed by the incineration of everything good — because only good, not bad — competes with the self.

If you wonder why your world is a wasteland, with every normal function — jobs, government, art, culture, family and friends — perverted into a replica of the larger control structure, this is why. The West is a ruin because it is existential misery with excellent shopping. The soulless person says, “Hotdogs only a dollar! I love this country, such a bargain!” and then goes through life ignoring crises, and rationalizing the loss of time and autonomy as necessary for the highest value, which is then justified as being the shopping itself. This type of reversed order of thought is essential to surviving this time, but the most important parts of each person — the inner self — does not survive it, because it, too, is perverted into a control structure.

Leftism sells a highly successful product, equality, which makes every individual feel that they are safe even if they fail or do something degenerate. The Left sells acceptance, and this quickly morphs into a sense of being “good,” and this encourages people to feel good about themselves without needing to do anything to that end.

Since this product is eternally popular, Leftism sells it with a catch — a Devil’s bargain — in that in order to enjoy the product, users must pass it on to others like multi-level marketing, drug addiction or a street gang. The group defends itself and spreads benefits among its people, who are presumed to be “good,” and by the converse assumption, others must be “bad.”

This gives Leftists an identity: They take from the bad and give to the good. This suppresses both concerns over the inherent immorality of theft and gives people a new identity as Robin Hood styled social reformers, instead of merely neurotics who find life difficult and want to scapegoat others in order to force their way into society despite being fundamentally irrelevant to it.

As soon as it achieves traction, Leftism begins to resemble any other business, which is to say that it collects incompetence and weaponizes it by making each person fear for their own position, thus driving them into doing symbolic acts for the sake of appearing important, busy and competent.

If you wonder why Leftists are such fanatics, the basis of that psychology can be found in this development. They now feel accepted by society, but they must still demonstrate their place in the gang, and they compete among one another in a game of Who Is The Most Egalitarian. If one person liberates orphans, the next liberates retarded orphans, and the winner grants freedom and welfare to gay minority retarded disabled orphans. Whoever shows the most pity is the champion.

At the same time, this Office Space like dimension to Leftism — and indeed, to all control — creates a situation where all other political actors become coworkers. People trade favors, and prioritize “getting along with” one another above whatever job they are doing. This serves to further Leftism by co-opting normal people in because the Leftist will approach them as a colleague, trade favors, and then expect loyalty. This is how conservative movements are quickly absorbed into the Leftist morass.

When the Leftist empire reaches monopoly status, it tends to do whatever any business does when its productive years are over, which is sell out to a wealthier but directionless concern that will absorb its assets as a type of long term cash cow. The Leftists have held their competitions, and those who rose to the top make off with the funds, and then everyone else goes home to their bleak apartments in what are now Venezuelan-Soviet conditions. The civilization they parasitized is now effectively destroyed, but this does not stop each new generation from rising up to see what it can steal.

The only way to stop Leftism is to recognize it for what it is: tyranny by the unimportant, miserable, unhappy, neurotic and obsessive. In other words, those who are not the productive contributors and creators in a civilization have become a growth within it that hopes to take over. The rest oppress the best, which causes the best to drop out or leave, and renders that civilization into a wasteland of incompetence and solipsism.

Our aristocrats were destabilized by events such as the Magna Carta, which limited their power and forced compromise with the commercial class. This in turn commercialized a great deal of the aristocracy, and gave rise to the shopkeeper class, who treated government as a business and not a quest to improve civilization in a gradual basis by rewarding its best and ejecting its worst.

The rise of the shopkeeper class was unfortunate because while these were clever, especially with “making” money, they were not intelligent in the sense of being able to see a dozen moves ahead in the game. As a result, they specialized in short term decisions which created long-term problems, destabilizing society and allowing the ideologues to take over.

As usually happens, the rise of ideologues brought about instability because now, in addition to the task of being a good person and performing a role, people had to defend against ideological suspicion which was like a constant witch-hunt. This in turn made people inauthentic and driven by appearance, which pushed them further toward the ideologues in the search for a protector.

This type of “defensive personality” afflicts all societies where authority and power are not closely tied to realistic and long-term thinking such as the aristocrats display. This is the root of control: by making all people isolated and afraid, it compels them to obey, but in such a way that they rationalize it as their own choice.

As we see in the world of commerce, the best products do this as well. People go to the store and buy the bread that is always there because it is the convenient option, then rationalize the purchase by convincing themselves that they like it. Eventually the company realizes it will profit even further if it buys up or drives out all other brands. Leftism behaves in the same manner.

If the realization became widespread among the thinking people of our society that Leftism is a business, it would remove the aura of holiness which Leftism uses to induce people to believe in it. That mantle is how Leftism grows without its true nature being noticed, and when it falls, the raw profit motive will reveal itself.

[–]Diche_Bach 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those of us who value individualism and freedom, constitutional checks on the sovereign and existing codes of morals and ethics bequeathed to us through watershed events like the American Revolution, bear much more resemblance to the philosophies (e.g., Locke) and values (e.g, the Found Fathers) of 17th and 18th century "leftists," and much less resemblance to 17th and 18th century "rightists (Hobbes, and other who advocated for a sovereign with absolute power).

It doesn't seem to make sense to me that what used to be "left" is now called "right" and what used to be "right" is now called "left" but it does seem to be the case at this point.

[–]1RevolutionaryPea7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They like "free thought" when it's not an unfortunately or challenging truth. You can have any colour you like, as long as it's black.

[–]Lambdal7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the one is based on cold hard facts, the other on heavily emotional opinions.

[–]James_Rustler_ 45 points46 points  (1 child)

This is why you're seeing her everywhere, if yall are wondering.

[–]MoDuReddit 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Streisand effect at it's best.

Buzzfeed's soyboy white hating jew attempts to bring down a wrong-thinker.

Buzzfeed exposes wrong-thinker to the masses who immediatelly subscribe and raise her following even more.

[–]himsenior 8 points9 points  (5 children)

“Susan, I’ve known your address since last summer,” Soph said, directly addressing YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki. “I’ve got a Luger and a mitochondrial disease. I don’t care if I live. Why should I care if you live or your children? I just called an Uber. You’ve got about seven minutes to draft up a will. ... I’m coming for you, and it ain’t gonna be pretty.”

Do we really want to live in a world where everyone starts talking like this just to make an edgelord point about hyperbole? Just because satirists have made this exact point for centuries does not mean we should model our civic conversation on the style. We get it, you're a pissed off tween who behaves as if every slight is personally directed at you. Get the fuck over it. That goes for the insta dipshits who try to stay relevant by screeching about privilege and microaggressions.

The hypocrisy of these so called free speech hardliners is revealed when a fraction of their hyperbole is directed at themselves. They whine and moan about harassment and self-righteously condemn the platforms for not applying their policies equitably. Soph does it in the "do not be afraid" video. And she's not the only one. Despite their moral outrage of the week, people need to stop treating each other like cunts and be a bit more civil.

[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Idk man she’s pretty hilarious. Savage mockery is necessary right now.

[–]himsenior 1 point2 points  (1 child)

To be clear I'm addressing the video in the article, not the one posted by OP. I'm in favor of mockery. I'm not in favor of this self defeatist movement that increasingly tests the boundaries of free speech just for the fuck of it and then uses the blow back as verbal ammunition to undermine the very same platforms that host them. It's unnecessarily cynical and and it's childish.

I don't even condemn soph for spending her time this way, hell I did within the nascent online gaming community when I was her age. That doesn't mean people like her should be taken seriously on all issues. Especially when there seems to be a deliberate attempt to conflate the concern of misapplied bans with the bans that are a response to real harassment.

The problem is that we've been given tools and told that we can't use them to hurt others. Now, does throwing a hammer as hard as you can at a tree hurt anyone? No, but if everyone starts throwing hammers everywhere then someone will get injured. People should take greater personal accountability for their words and actions. Otherwise our tools will be taken away and we'll get the exact same digital police state that we should rightly fear. We've never had more free exchange of speech and ideas at any other point in history. We should appreciate that and not abuse it.

[–]Plethora_Ethereal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are very wrong. This is excatly an incident where our tools will be taken away, should we not use them.

[–]5Imperator_Red 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Do we really want to live in a world where everyone starts talking like this just to make an edgelord point about hyperbole?

We already live in this world. The left does this shit to us regularly. They just don’t like getting their own shit used against them.

Stop wringing your hands over the morality of the tactics used against your enemy. This is no longer about political accommodation. It’s a war.

[–]himsenior 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A toddler throws a tantrum. "If you don't play nice then why should you expect to get your way," asks the adult. "Quit being a faggot", says the toddler.

Quite amusing.

[–]rpkarma 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How the fuck do they blame YT executives? Like even if you think the video is in poor taste, the CEO didn’t fucking write it lol

[–]ScoobySquats 1 point2 points  (1 child)

By Joseph Bernstein

Oooof course it's this faggot.

[–]gastrocks 214 points215 points  (9 children)

This potty-mouthed child-woman was completely unexpected and a hilarious delight to listen to.

[–]UrgotMilk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Went in expecting to watch 30 seconds to get an idea and then check the comments, but I ended up watching almost the whole thing.

[–]riggedved 10 points11 points  (7 children)

Obviously she's reading from a script, written by somebody else.

[–]inittowinit777 87 points88 points  (0 children)

No shit Sherlock, still funny as hell and the delivery is on point. I also got the feeling that she actually understands all these concepts that she’s talking about.

[–]tunsku 44 points45 points  (0 children)

She has done streams. Those can't really be scripted.

[–]WillemDabro 25 points26 points  (2 children)

In one of her videos that got removed from YouTube she admits she has a writing partner, but the ideas are hers.

[–]1empatheticapathetic 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Lol none of the ideas spouted here are hers. She's an actor, that's it.

[–]hazelstein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, she said somewhere that her father writes

[–]grabthecactus 108 points109 points  (2 children)

Damn towards the end at around 8 min she started putting women on blast

[–]GMotor 40 points41 points  (1 child)

She sounds like she:

  1. knows exactly what she's saying
  2. enjoys winding up idiots

I'm sure she'll do just fine in life. Good luck to her.

[–]1empatheticapathetic -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

She sounds like shes rushing through a script and has no idea what a lot of it means. She misses emphasis on the right moments.

[–]whuttupfoo 244 points245 points  (22 children)

This little girl speaks like a 30 year old

[–]catbrainland 104 points105 points  (20 children)

Vaporboy's impeccable writing, soph's impeccable memorizing it.

[–]Bad_nuggets69 145 points146 points  (3 children)

Nothing more demonstrative of redpill then this. Man does thinking. Woman memorized and gets credit.

Because she is a woman though she doesn’t have to deal with white knight incels defending mi lady’s honor. Smart power move by vaporboy.

[–]catbrainland 127 points128 points  (2 children)

The way I see it, both provide value in their specific area of expertise: The guy does content, the girl does presentation, and the result of both is far more powerful than either attempting going at it separately. Sum is better than separated parts.

For what it's worth, soph does give credit when asked about it, and in their live streams you see as much you'd expect - soph being normal, if somewhat articulate 15yo girl, and vapor extremely lucid and well read older teenager.

edit: typo

[–]AlexDr0ps 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Who is vaporboy?

[–]kellykebab 5 points6 points  (12 children)

Who is Vaporboy?

[–]catbrainland 4 points5 points  (11 children)

Some random brazilian kid. twitter.com/nessykurt

[–]kellykebab 6 points7 points  (8 children)

twitter.com/nessykurt

Some dude with 500 followers. How is this rando even being referenced?

[–]catbrainland 2 points3 points  (7 children)

simple: Follower count is rarely indicator of merit of a ghostwriter. Not everyone is seeking that sort of self-validation and/or e-celeb career.

[–]kellykebab 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I'm just surprised anyone would know who this is or why there would be any evidence that he has any association with some shockingly popular tween youtuber

I think I'm just too old for the Zoomer internet though

[–]catbrainland 3 points4 points  (5 children)

I'm somewhat involved in zoomer soundcloud futurebass/rap scene as well as documenting e-celeb drama, so know the whole circlejerk of vapor/egg/soph from their CS:GO days. What is going on here is nowhere near "authentic" as people would assume, but that goes for most of e-celebs, and younger internet implicitly takes it as reality of cellphone-glued lifestyle (authenticity crisis).

Regardless of the behind-the-scenes, the end product is done and targeted extremely well, and all the fame soph gets is well deserved - there's simply not enough of potty mouthed kids with good command of english, photogenicity and editing skills, while good writers are relatively dime a dozen.

[–]kellykebab 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I'm too old to even understand what your first sentence means, but the rest of this reply is incredibly depressing. Teens are literally just scripting a political/social theory critique message for views? Is this just for advertising dollars then?

Can't imagine a more cynical development in our culture.

[–]catbrainland 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Is this just for advertising dollars then?

No, it's nowhere as jaded as that. Whores are easy to spot, whores also don't exactly crave niche audiences.

What you're seeing here is akin to kids starting a garage band. They don't do it for the money, they do it for fame and influence, and not necessarily in power/status sense of the word - many a punk rocker (or a /pol/ poster in this case) truly just wanted to spread the message they truly believe.

The crisis of authenticity is in regards to audience. A garage band having an electronic box drummer in the past would be embarrassing - it'd inauthentic, because back then, content created with "no cheating" carried weight. This is no longer the case with zoomers - they don't care about the process, they care only about the final projected image is, what you actually see in front, not the back stage nuts and bolts.

This is obviously result of growing up with computers and having large part of identity carried on social network sites. Wearing a mask in person is what you'd call authentic, zoomers wear a mask on instagram - and the wire inbetween is no longer perceived. The lack of distinction between real/virtual than carries over into nearly all other aspects.

[–]hazelstein 0 points1 point  (1 child)

twitter.com/nessykurt

"kurt Retweeted📷Wiz Khalifa‏Verified account @wizkhalifa May 15More

Guys don’t forget, GIRLS ARE SMART."

Watt?

[–]wendysNO1wcheese 14 points15 points  (1 child)

All these youngsters just biting off Sam Hyde. They worship him.

[–]stigma17 82 points83 points  (4 children)

This is fucking brilliant. Saved.

If I ever slip into BP mentality, I’m putting this on.

[–]quarthomon 29 points30 points  (3 children)

It's not "saved" if you didn't download it. So much stuff goes "missing" from YouTube when the censors hit it, and they're already working on this. I've stopped relying on any media that I don't control myself.

[–]WillemDabro 13 points14 points  (2 children)

She's already had more controversial stuff taken down. Doesn't bode well.

[–]Strictlyformischief 6 points7 points  (1 child)

[–]hazelstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After watching and searched a bit
found this
http://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htm
Now Im pretty sure this is authentic because I also found she didn't have any child.

[–]geo_gan 42 points43 points  (2 children)

Well the question is, what will Ellen make of it all when she finds this... /s

[–]wrekd 8 points9 points  (0 children)

She's a red pilled dude isn't she?

[–]UrgotMilk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao I'd love to see an Ellen interview with the same enthusiasm she has for her normal guests.

[–]VoltronsLionDick 35 points36 points  (1 child)

Oh my fucking god this has me in stitches. Did someone write this for her or is this girl a legit comedy prodigy? I don't think I've ever seen a 14 year old anyone pull it together this hard.

[–]hazelstein 4 points5 points  (0 children)

written by dad. I was confused about that too. Delivery is on point though

[–]Irtotallynotrobot 186 points187 points  (5 children)

Which one of you fuckers wrote that for her?

[–]SpinPlates 44 points45 points  (2 children)

Her father is doing God's work.

[–]AreOut[S] 27 points28 points  (1 child)

actually she claimed that her dad voted for H... her writing partner might be just virtual/gaming fellow teen friend FWIW

the kid is smart and has way more mature thinking than most adults

[–]SpinPlates 16 points17 points  (0 children)

They spoke of Elliot Rodgers and had pictures of Eggy.

Whoever wrote this had a deep understanding of incel culture. I doubt it was even her dad. Most likely brother.

[–]thesquarerootof1 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This is the first video I have ever seen from this girl and I'm really impressed. She looks like she's 9 but she is way too smart for her age.

[–]Andgelyo 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Broooo this is the funniest shit I’ve ever seen, I’m ALMOST tempted to reactivate my Facebook and post it just to ruffle all the beta males who are getting married

[–]redpect 97 points98 points  (2 children)

Mad props to the girl, She is going to be one of these girls that really need a guy with perfect frame control and total dominance to even consider attaching themselves to it.

Good training if you fail.

Also great video.

[–]spungebawbswegpants 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Wrong, she just needs to see Chad.

[–]PhotonParable 81 points82 points  (4 children)

Message aside this is fuckin terrifying. If any 14 year old could legitimately rattle off that deep of thought... Sheeeeesh

[–]cowsgobarkbark 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Nah You'd be surprised what parents are willing to do to get their kids famous, this was well rehearsed and said by the kid though.

[–]James_Rustler_ 1 points1 points [recovered]

This woman is Arya Stark in the 21st century. If she's gaining prominence, that means lots of Gen Z'ers will think like her.

[–]ZestyyyClamMeat 70 points71 points  (10 children)

This is brilliant. I started watching her other videos and can't tell if her dad/brother is writing this or if she's actually a genius.

[–]good_guy_submitter 78 points79 points  (0 children)

When their parents give a shit, you'd be amazed at how much potential kids have.

[–]jewishsupremacist88 16 points17 points  (5 children)

yea..i feel like its her dad writing/editing these vids

[–]PrincetonNarcissist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She co-writes with Vaporboy

[–]AreOut[S] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

actually she claimed that her dad voted for H... her writing partner might be just virtual/gaming fellow teen friend FWIW

the kid is smart and has way more mature thinking than most adults

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Riiiight. She just happens to be interested in all of the topics that interest our demographic.

[–]PrincetonNarcissist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She co-writes with Vaporboy

[–]AreOut[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't put it past that. The girl grew up playing CS and other shooters in what is practically a men environment.

[–]TheStumblingWolf 5 points6 points  (1 child)

It says right the description that her and someone else wrote this.

[–]throwlaca 5 points6 points  (0 children)

According to her, the writer is vaporboy, her brother.

[–]aGodofmyownmaking 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think this is heartiste guys...

[–]MatSapientia 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Brought to you by Islam.. lol

I guess Muslims are the only ones who kept their game somewhat feminist proof. It could be as well why feminists detest them.. And why most wars against Islamic countries happen in the feminist era..

Oh I have just conjured a conspiracy theory out of thin air.

[–]TheImpossible1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Holy shit.

Someone should look into that.

[–]hazelstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GODDAMN! why didn't I thought of that.
Its actually true. fuck!

[–]AshyLarry27 29 points30 points  (3 children)

Been following her for a while, very interesting and educated. She's going to be dangerous for the establishment going forward. She's 14, still learning and already is nearing 1 million followers

[–]GandMeChattri 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Some Muslim is gonna murder her soon enough.

[–]EPArt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If we are honest its more likely some white dude will in the name of social justice.

[–]StirlingG 12 points13 points  (0 children)

this is the best fucking video I've ever watched

[–]warfarinrx 23 points24 points  (3 children)

The comments are disabled on every video. Creators are actually so woke they figured out the only way to not get banned off YouTube is to silence the speech before people are even allowed to comment amongst themselves.

[–]civilizedfrog 36 points37 points  (1 child)

They didn't disable the comments for her ideas. They did it to avoid paedophiles from commenting about certain parts on kid's videos. Degenerate paedophiles started posting timeframes on the comment section of the videos, where more skin was shown. It was disgusting. It happened 3 or 4 months back.

[–]Senior ContributorMentORPHEUS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Due to a growing pedophiles-in-the-comments issue, Youtube shut down comments in ALL videos showing children in any context a few months ago, then started allowing them again. A few perfectly wholesome homesteading vlogs I follow were affected by this.

[–]420KUSHBUSH 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The High Council has spoken

[–]omega_dawg93 28 points29 points  (0 children)

glad you guys are enjoying this video... it is cool.

but please understand that women do NOT want men to know that this is their MO. they will try to ban videos like this; i'm sure youtube has several complaints.

they are NATURAL manipulators, and they KNOW how to use their tools to make YOU a tool for her survival.

[–]LordVaderKush3-2 15 points16 points  (0 children)

this is one of the best videos i've ever seen

[–]mrrooftops 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I hope his ex wife doesn't watch what he's getting their kid to say. All visitation rights removed and more alimony

[–]throwlaca 34 points35 points  (0 children)

She's great. Obviously scripted by her dad, but her delivery is great nonetheless. And her dad too.

Edit: Apparently its her brother.

[–]Luckyluke23 6 points7 points  (0 children)

brah this is fucking great! just for the comedic value.

[–]tchower 7 points8 points  (0 children)

When you think about it, it would be no surprise if 14 year old girls were lurking around this sub and reading all this stuff and reading all the other manosphere stuff on reddit. What an interesting generation that’s growing up these days.

[–]jeff_vii 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Something tells me Sophie didn't grow up in a single parent home with a weak father figure.

[–]bm_k 29 points30 points  (1 child)

I'm having a hard time believing she wrote all of that, but fuck it was brilliant.

[–]randomfire9 11 points12 points  (3 children)

This is funny and great but I can't help but think that this girl has been sabotaged by her parents to never get a good job in the future with this kind of content.

[–]420KUSHBUSH 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'm sure they're keeping their fingers crossed she'll end up as one of the more well-off Youtubers. I feel the content probably got way more, well, like this, after she started gaining traction on the platform

[–]wrekd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's what is great about being a girl. All she has to do is say "forgive me for I have sinned", and everything is cool again.

[–]sebastianconcept 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the current trend, this is a concern indeed.

[–]Orochimaru331 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wow. She describes the entirety of women's agenda in this video.

So so fucking true with the point in a paradigm shift for girls on college campuses. I see it all the time on my college campus.

[–]AAThrowaway5 5 points6 points  (4 children)

Nobody is going to talk about how bizzarre and creepy it is for some brother/father to be scripting "pussy power" language to drop sex dynamic reality that is waaaaaayyyy beyond this little child's years?

She's an infant.

Can you imagine being so damaged as a father to feel the need to write super crude, adult language and ask your 14 year old child to put her face and words on the internet for everyone to hear... Where she will always be known as that one girl.... So some internet strangers can get a laugh? Some shit man

[–]xjx545 4 points5 points  (2 children)

If you don't think girls know what sex is at 14 years old, you might want to consider that you had a really blue pilled childhood. In fact women socialize about dirty stuff much earlier than men. Not saying it is the case, but that's not beyond her years at all to create something like this.

[–]AAThrowaway5 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Wow what a revelation...

I'll try to take off my childish blue pill glasses if my weak little hands are capable.

She's not talking about sex. She's talking about the shit. To think a 14 year old is capable of this level insight, articulation and introspection of complex adult Dynamics is naieve. She's very obviously reading a prepared script.

[–]EnolaGay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sick of this girl's face being plastered everywhere and her being cited as 'epically based and redpilled' I remember her from years back when her whole gimmick was being 11 years old, swearing and being edgy over video game footage.

[–]RedKingRising 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't do this to my daughter.

[–]Snowaey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

dude shes so fucking good what the fuck

[–]bakamoney 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean the idea of kids rattling adult stuff they don't know shit about is pretty fuxking bullshit whether it confirms to our political beliefs or not..

[–]GodOfDinosaurs 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why does she look and sound like Ben Shapiro

[–]SpinPlates 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Whoever wrote that for her is deeply ingrained in Incel culture / the manoshepere. Dude had pictures of eggy in there!!

[–]TheImpossible1 4 points5 points  (1 child)

This girl is everywhere.

Controlled opposition.

[–]JohnIan101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She's about to get de-platformed.

Had a previous strike and fought it - won, but now that former strike has been resurrected with this new one, making it two.

[–]ZealousFeet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This was fuckin' brilliant man! Even though she has a collaborator, and was this was well rehearsed, she has at least the basic of basics when delving into the red pill.

Only a matter of time before she gets shut down though. Gotta enjoy the little things in life...

[–]RightHandWolf 16 points17 points  (0 children)

OMG . . . I can't help but wonder if she's good with a katana or a butterfly knife. She reminds me of Hit Girl from the movie Kick Ass.

[–]aucunejus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the end 2 from those clips are from my country.

[–]Bing_Bang_Bam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like women peak in intelligence sometime during their teenage years. Then something gets switched on (hormones?) and then it's the slow road to nuttiness.

[–]eterate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Girl looks like she is 11 or 12yo

[–]MantogeMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fuck did I just watch LMAO

[–]TheRealShafron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been subscribed to her a few years, she's always been amazing at these type of videos

[–]celloist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was fucking great to watch

[–]1RevolutionaryPea7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TRP is only for men because women already see the real world.

[–]CainPrice 1 point2 points  (1 child)

What the fuck is this?

[–]modTheRedPike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Overton Window got a new marketing department.

[–]Tyrfang91 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Buzzfeed is trying to smear her now.

She just did an interview on Red Ice TV https://youtu.be/pOxhsnmr5u4

[–]rukken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She's actually really bright, even without scripting

[–]JohnIan101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My first exposure to her was a video where she dissected Katy Perry's music and feminism - which was hilarious, the utter BS and hypocrisy.

[–]PIQAS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Comments are disabled for this video.

This gives me satisfaction knowing those frustrated about it can't spill their rubbish in the comments hahaha

[–]alexzang 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Might be because I’m new to this but this video seems like it doesn’t do a whole lot but call people out on bp behavior and AWALT-esque behavior. Doesn’t really match what the subreddit seems to be about, which is that it’s usually solution oriented

[–]RightHandWolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think of this video as being very much in the vein of a pep talk, similar in style and presentation to George S. Patton's address to the Third Army at the beginning of the movie Patton.

Very blunt, with minimal thought given to sparing any delicate sensitivities. The movie version of Patton's speech was highly sanitized; the General was a much more profane speaker than the execs at 20th Century Fox dared to exhibit in 1970. The full, raw version is archived at the Patton Historical Society website. By God, someone should get this chick an ivory handled revolver.

[–]HighTesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her and her friend have become the most feared voice on social media for globohomo after the the Jewish "reporter" for Buzzfeed tried to shut her down. Thanks shlomo.

Brilliant optics. Brilliant rhetoric. Watch her video she did in a hijab that YouTube removed.

[–]Secrets_Have_Secrets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sending this to every friend I have.

[–]xdrunkagainx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I showed this to a super liberal friend of mine and he called her a misogynist 😂

[–]themaratha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy fuck. This is legendary 😂😂😂

[–]randomTATRP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The end really got me. Great vid.

[–]Atheist_Utopia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That song in the background is my alarm clock

[–]fuschialantern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The internet barely surprises me anymore, but this video surprised me. Growing up faster than ever.

[–]flyalpha56 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy shit lmao who is this? What a champ

[–]snoozeflu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's also another little girl who dresses up and ridicules that dingbat AOC.

I think these kids are starting to catch on.

[–]LowerTheAOC 1 points1 points [recovered]

shes my oneitis

too bad she is already a cum slut for chad

[–]AreOut 1 points1 points [recovered]

one of the most important RP rules is : stop being negative and depressive, it's also a biological thing that females receive cum from males as with any other animal species, you'll have to live with it

[–]AccomplishedEase -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Omg this is my unicorn my princess <333

[–]CryptoManbeard 0 points0 points [recovered]

I didn't mind her reading her dad's script till I realized she has FAS and that her parents are assholes.

[–]Ninokun 1 points1 points [recovered]

FAS

gives her kind of a sexy look though, i like monolids

[–]Proto_Sigma 1 points1 points [recovered]

Dude, she's 14. She also seems to be a late bloomer so she's probably still half a decade from being fuckable, and even if you disagree, no woman is worth doing time. Abundance, people.

That being said either she or her writer are based as shit and would make for great conversation.

[–]Neymars_Lawyer_AMA 1 points1 points [recovered]

Dude she is 14 and looks about 9 years old.

[–]Hailteni NaHalitenina[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't matter what the laws are in your country. The reddit ToS are clear about sexual content involving minors.

This conversation will not continue here. First and only warning.

Want to download the post?
×
Download PDF Download TXT