Why are we quarantined? The admin don't want you to know.

For a group who loves to say "that's a social construct" feminists have hilariously missed the boat on this one. The truth is, verbal consent is a social construct. Meaningful consent, on the other hand, is always non-verbal.

This should be obvious for two reasons. First, if we're worried that a woman will be too afraid to say "no" to a threatening and overly aggressive man, then obviously we should be worried that when an overly aggressive man recites the magic words, "do you consent to penis-in-vagina intercourse?" she will be too afraid to say "no"

Secondly, our instincts around sex are older than our facilities for speech. Obviously, the "right way" (the way that women will be most comfortable with - the way they'll consent to) must be older than speech as well. If TRP is about getting at the truth of human sexuality, it's about getting at that specific truth.

Trying to add a contrived ceremony involving words on top of this ancient and exquisitely designed dance is just asking for trouble - asking to confuse things and lead you into more trouble.

Watch a woman's actions. Watch for her to participate, for her to carry her portion of the dance. That's the key.

I'll even illustrate this through a negative example. Remember aziz ansari? Remember when he got metoo'd? If you go back and read her account of that night, the two of them made out, they took of their clothes, she sucked his dick (twice in fact), and then Ansari proceeded to say, and I quote, "where do you want me to fuck you?"

That sentence, "where do you want me to fuck you" is Ansari attempting to obtain enthusiastic verbal consent without resorting to the extra beta-sounding "may I please touch your vagina" (and in point of fact, given that they were naked, he had almost certainly already touched her vagina). According to her, she didn't say anything at all. They continue to make out, Ansari repeats his request, eventually she says the magic word "no" at which point (again, according to her), he promptly ceases all contact. She puts on her clothes, leaves, and metoo's him.

The words didn't help Ansari. If anything, his belief that asking for consent was a get-out-of-jail-free card actually hurt him - it blinded him to her body language. In particular, note that she sucked his dick twice. That suggests that things got hot then stalled somehow. Then he went back to it a second time, got his dick sucked again (still didn't cum though, lol), and then tried for sex. He fucked up the interaction somewhere in between blow job 1 and blow job 2.

The words didn't save him because consent is not now, nor has it ever been verbal. This is not legal advice, of course. It could be that in your jurisdiction the law says even if she's literally begging you to fuck her, you still have to get a notary involved. But what I'm saying is true of human sexuality.

Feminists don't know shit about human sexuality nor do they care. It's not a movement designed to help women. It's a political movement interested only in perpetuating itself. If their rhetoric about verbal consent muddies the waters that's actually good for feminism. It's just not good for you, or the girl you're with. By contrast, TRP is only interested in what's true. If speaking words to women made them happy and more attracted to you, I would wholeheartedly endorse speaking those words ...but it doesn't.