TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

154

I'm sure this will be labelled as potentially incel content, but it's definitely not intended to be. It's merely discussing an issue which I believe The Red Pill doesn't take seriously enough, which is male looks.

Everyone has seen the statistics - that women rate approximately 80% of men as below average - that's just below average by the way. Maybe only 5% of all men are considered to be good looking by women. The bar is set so high for male beauty, hardly any man qualifies for it.

But the men who do qualify for it get a lot of attention and a lot of sex. I've created a few catfish online dating accounts to see the difference. With my normal pictures, I get no messages from women. Totally empty inbox. I send out messages and get virtually no replies. Any replies I do get, the woman gets quickly bored and stops replying or blocks me. I've been on a pitiful number of real life dates as well.

With catfish pictures of a good looking masculine man, I get a lot of messages from women. Not 100's like women get, but a fair few. And women want to continue the conversation. They're friendly and kind to me. They're open to flirting with me. They hint that they want to meet up in real life. They openly tell me about their high sex drive.

However, the women who send me messages range from average looking to ugly - nothing especially good looking. If this is the physical beauty standard that you require to get average women interested, no wonder men find it so tough. It's a similar situation in the real world too, from what I've noticed when I see good looking men.

Why do women rate most men as physically unattractive? Or at least not attractive enough to want sex with them, without some other pre-requisite being involved such as alcohol or the man having a good job or high status. The Red Pill does say that game gets women attracted to you, but it seems like the game is only tricking her into an aroused emotional state. Whereas the minority of good looking men just have to be themselves and women come to them.


[–]Lordb0lton 1 points [recovered]  (43 children) | Copy Link

You're being judged on a photo online, as it's pretty difficult for a man to express the other factors that are attractive to women (dominance, charisma, etc.) over a digital profile.

[–]oneprettycoolcat11 points12 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

That's why every woman in the world creamed herself over Jeremy Meeks.

[–]Reed_49831 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Selection bias: the comment. Coming to cinemas this August.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

At some point you reach the peak I reckon. It's not that no one is found attractive from photo alone. It's just that much rarer

[–]oneprettycoolcat3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's rare, yes, because women find most men inherently sexually unattractive. You can't make what appears to be a pile of shit attractive no matter how many neat photo tricks you use.

[–]glasraen3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

*Women find most men’s physical appearance sexually unattractive.

Surprise surprise, yet another man who doesn’t understand that more goes into sexual attraction than physical appearance (for women).

[–]Next_Flow144 points45 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

yet 40% of current relationships started online, a much higher percentage if you don't count meeting in school (I'm not in school) only 20% meet through friends/hobbies which is where all these factors are said to count

[–]TibetanWisdom17 points18 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Most relationships start irl, school hobbies clubs work etc.

I believe the most picky, superficial women who really care about a mans face are the ones who go on tinder.

The ones who look for things like compatability, confidence, etc. find guys through work and school etc.

[–]SunflowerBurst1 in 12 Americans is unaware that the bird is the word14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No. I went online because I can take a good photo, but I have shyness irl that intimidates people.

[–]Reed_49834 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, online dating can be a real blessing for men who are not super social and dislike the clubbing/partying scene but still have qualities that make them attractive to women. Asking someone out online is also easier than asking them out in real life, and since you're on a dating app, there's already a certain hint regarding the "is this a date" question. This is what I feel is missing in the "online daitng is horrible" mentality.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

People are superficial no matter where you date.

[–]LCOSPARELT1 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Relationships start in school, yes. But after college or grad school graduation it’s all online dating. Virtually no one is meeting in real life anymore after college or grad school. So if you’re a guy that’s completely out of school and unattached, good luck. You’re going to need it.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude c'mon bars and clubs are not empty.

No one is forcing you to drink there anyway

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Seconded

[–]toasterchild2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

If i had run across my husband on an online dating site with only photos im not sure i would have given him a second glance, it was his profile and interests that got me interested. And there was one photo of him goofing off that interested me because it showed personality but he'd never have picked that for something like Tinder.

Most dating profiles are horrible, simply horrible. People do nothing to stand out or look interesting. It's like they are all competing to be so boring that they don't come across as unappealing but also miss any opportunity to attract someone.

[–]Reed_49831 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what dating apps that actually allow you to fill out your profile with text are for.

[–]Next_Flow10 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

I mean you're ignoring statistics and you happen to be the 10,000th girl I've heard today talk about personality, you all seem to be rampant everywhere except the dating scene. I have an interesting bio, I'm average looking, I don't get results, does that prove or disprove anything? No, and neither does your story, you picked a hot guy though I guarantee it

[–]Reed_49831 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

How long have you been trying and how many messages do you send out? Did you tailor your messages and try out different kinds?

[–]Next_Flow10 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

I didn't come here to get advice, my personal experience is irrelevant, but I promise my chadfish has no shortage of girls who want to fuck me

[–]Reed_49832 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

These questions are relevant for the discussion though. You're arguing the poster who chose her husband for his profile text and interests is a complete unicorn, proven by the fact you don't get results despite having a good bio. If some things are lacking severely or can at least be improved in your online dating game, it makes a very relevant point in the debate.

[–]Next_Flow10 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

proven by the fact you don't get results

No I specifically said my personal experience isn't worth anything same as hers. What's important is statistics, like the fact that women swipe without looking at the profile, if they do look at your profile they're already interested in you cause looks. I purposely made my chadfish profile boring, said I worked as a cleaner, and only said sexual things to my matches, this is what half the people on r/braincels did and we all got tons of matches and meetups. Since no one got any matches without an attractive man, but with a profile they worked on, what does that tell you?

[–]Reed_49832 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Good point, I didn't notice you said personal experience doesn't matter in your original post.

Looking at the "statistics" from incel forums is showing only one half of the truth though. Only posts that align with their worldview get posted and upvoted there, you won't see a story of an average guy meeting an average girl through a dating app and them clicking over their personalities, the incels will just say it's fake or it doesn't matter because the girl is an ugly roastie or something similar.

"No one got any matches without an attractive man" is also a little dishonest, what is "attractive"? To an average girl, an average looking man can be an attractive, but incels will deem him ugly and say all hope is lost for him. Being visually appealing always helps, but that's not the same as being Chad. To be very pedantic, matching with someone is also not proof these women will actually want to meet and fuck that man since most Tinder users never meet anyone from Tinder. Tinder is also not the only dating app (u/toasterchild specifically mentioned that). Also, actual meetups with Chadfish pictures? I haven't come across one of those occurences, how are there "tons" of them?

[–]Next_Flow11 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

you won't see a story of an average guy meeting an average girl through a dating app and them clicking over their personalities

No one is denying this happens on occasion.

To an average girl, an average looking man can be an attractive

Right except women rate 80% of men as unattractive, so no.

Also, actual meetups with Chadfish pictures?

Yes many, I modded the forum, some even got her to meet up twice after standing her up the first time. On my personal chadfishes girls were very enthused with me and clearly wanted to meet up, or in one case ask for phone sex, but I wouldn't make her go somewhere and waste her time/money. I wanted to prove a point, and I did, getting her to actually meet up would only cause pain. From my experience, when I match with girls with my face, they're begging for a reason to ghost me, ALL the girls I matched with as chad were begging for a reason for it to work. One even admitted she hated talking to me, cause I made her feel like shit with me only talking sex, and she still continued.

In summary, chad gets it zero effort, average can succeed with enough effort, bottom 20% its over, but that 1 in a thousand who gets lucky doesn't disprove anything.

[–]toasterchild1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha. Yeah, all women only date or marry hot guys and all those average guys with women aren't real. Plenty of average dudes meet women, in real life and online. Average guy with boring photos and averagely interesting profile isn't working? Blame all women instead of trying to show that you're interesting.

[–]Reisiluu 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

As someone who started a relationship online, a still photo of a guy is secondary to how he behaves. I got to know my husband over text chat and phone calls and was attracted to him before seeing him in our first video call.

Appearance is a part of being attractive but not as big as men think. Women are not men and we don't visually evaluate if a guy's body is healthy and young enough to carry a baby inside him. We evaluate whether we can count on him.

[–]Next_Flow15 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

right you and every other girl on the planet says this, that's why chadfishing never works, and all the average looking guys on tinder have no problems, o wait. Women rate 80% of men as unattractive, what happened is you probably went for one you consider attractive, and when he gave you red flags you were affected by the halo effect

[–]Reisiluu 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

tinder

Tinder is a looks based platform. Those physically average looking guys wouldn't go on tinder to actively hide the qualities that make them attractive if they internalized how attraction works for women. You seem to be familiar with rp terminology but won't acknowledge that "game" affects how women feel about a guy.

what happened is you probably went for one you consider attractive

Yes, attractive based on qualities other than looks. I already said I didn't see him until later. How do you rationalize that whilst believing looks are everything?

[–]Next_Flow11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

honestly you're ignoring everything I say and moving goal posts over and over, I'm done debating you, you should reevaluate how you come to conclusions

[–]Next_Flow10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes game can help, but its hardly the largest determining factor. You argue scientific data with personal experience, your opinion is trash

[–]fevertree-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They started online...like eharmony.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Idk though as a guy if you show me a photo of another guy, its pretty easy to tell whether they would be successful with women or not.

[–]MrEctomy5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

And so women are content to not try at all? I actually met my gf without even knowing what she looks like, just because she sounded interesting. I wonder how many women would take the same chance?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Like blind dates?

[–]MrEctomy3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

When someone is offered a chance to go on a blind date, what is typically the first question they ask?

[–]vileoatRussian mafia1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm from the part of the world where blind dates never happend. What is the question?

My guess is "is he got"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Heh fair enough

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If it was rl i could be like “swipe left on this” and go for the k close out of nowhere.

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband121 points122 points  (99 children) | Copy Link

They rate pictures of men as mostly unattractive because women don't find still lifeless images attractive.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin75 points76 points  (53 children) | Copy Link

This. The biggest audience for Playgirl was gay dudes. Men are just more visually wired.

[–]jessicaannpin33 points34 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

No. I think the issue is that women are slut shamed so much.

Also, Playgirl didn’t show any erections. Women need to see erections (based on fMRI studies of female genital arousal).

Anyway, try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–]UselessYetUnrefined10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with most of your opinion here, but I wonder if women are picky because of biological consequences, not social consequences. I mean, I suppose it's both, but the biological consequences were there first.

[–]ferretsRfantasticBlue Pill Woman17 points18 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

To add onto this, a man banging women willy nilly will probably have less of a physical consequence. Nevermind STDs and pregnancy on women's end, women could be physically hurt by random men. So, sometimes, a woman might look at a photo of an attractive man and think, 'Oh yes, I'd love to fuck him' but then the risk factor of safety ways in and she hesitates on that decision.

I know I've done it during online dating. Dude was hot, cute, etc. but they were being weird and making me uncomfortable and, now, he is unattractive.

[–]Dwarf900 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder who you need to be to willfully call yourself "Blue Pill", while knowing the meaning of the Red Pill metaphore.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin12 points13 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Sorry Don’t want to look at naked dudes, don’t want to look at naked dudes just posing with a boner either. And I am aroused by some porn, just not solo boners.🤷‍♀️

My husband loves to stand out naked in the yard and wave his wiener while he knocks at the window. Never fails to make me laugh. It’s “sexy” that he still teases and flirts, but it’s not sexxxy

[–]grand_tiremasterjust curious1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

LMAO!! Sounds like something my boyfriend would do.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hope you live in the middle of nowhere like we do!

[–]glasraen1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Soo much agreed. I can get turned on just by my boyfriend’s boner, but sending me a dick pic is NOT gonna do it. Pretty sure no woman in the history of the world has seen a “solo boner” and gotten instantly turned on, the way men obviously think they do.

The best part is a guy will send a dick pic but then if you don’t respond, or tell him to F off, he’ll assume there’s something wrong with his penis. Like, no, your penis would be fine in the right circumstance. We’re just turned off by being sent pictures of erect penises in general.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hmm what are your views on casual sex?

[–]Nodoxxintoxin4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Had casual sex a few times a year for a few years. Never could do the fwb thing, the only time I didn’t catch feels, he did, which was still not good experience. But casual was okay for me at the time.

No judgement on casual sex as long as no one gets hurt.

[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man8 points9 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

You gave a great reply, and I hope people read it all.

There are more consequences when a woman has sex; in addition to shaming, she could get pregnant. The stakes are high and that kind of thing is mostly an afterthought for men.

Also, men have testosterone, we biologically have a higher sex drive. So for a guy, fewer things "matter" to reach the "end goal."

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

What I fundamentally never understand is, insofar as sex is a commodity that women have more control over, how would women not have had the power to make their partners pull out?

[–]YasuotheChosenOne0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

For the same reason they didn’t have the power to take their plan b pills... they forgot lol. Ive always wondered why the human population exploded after the advent of female contraceptives.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Untrue. Look at data on population growth in US.

https://www.billkingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/US-Population-Growth-Rate-2-1.jpg

Here is another plot, showing similar pattern with dated "milestones of family planning."

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4847a1.htm

What's unclear is how birth rates were decreasing in 1920s and began increasing again in 30s and 40s. The steep fall off in the 60s is obviously due to the birth control pill being approved by the FDA in 1960.

This is interesting:

https://www.mercatornet.com/features/view/what-makes-people-have-babies-the-link-between-cultural-values-and-fertilit/22493

also:

https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/why-did-french-fertility-collapse-in-the-1800s/

[–]YasuotheChosenOne1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

“What's unclear is how birth rates were decreasing in 1920s and began increasing again in 30s and 40s. The steep fall off in the 60s is obviously due to the birth control pill being approved by the FDA in 1960.”

Sexual revolution.

[–]OfSpock1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What's unclear is how birth rates were decreasing in 1920s

Apparently douching was popular and a lost of women used them for 'hygiene' and introduced infections which caused miscarriages and infertility. Some of them knew, of course, what the reason for the ads was, some of them fell for the advertising.

[–]YasuotheChosenOne0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I said human, not US. Interesting how the population begins to spike at 1960, which is the year the FDA approved the first oral birth control pill.

coincidence?!

edit: your post got longer? eh, whatever lol

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

What source shows the population beginning to spike at 1960?

None of the data I presented shows that. Rather, it shows a sharp decline starting in 1960.

[–]YasuotheChosenOne0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Yo, in the 1950s there was ~2.5b people. Today there is ~7.5b people.

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fertility decreased but life expectancy, especially in childhood, was blown out of the water around the same time. That’s your answer.

[–]lemonfluff2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't think most women enjoy seeing penises, erect or otherwise. It does nothing to turn us on. Its about the man attached, attitude, sense of humour, how they hold themselves, voice etc as well as looks. Personally I find tall guys with good arms and shoulders a huge turn on. Just look at r/forearm porn. Women LOVE some nice arms with the sleeves part way rolled up MUCH more than some gross penis.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

MRI studies of genital vascular engorgement show women get physiologically turned on when looking at erect penises

[–]glasraen1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Being turned on doesn’t mean we will act on it, though. Aren’t men always telling their SO’s that just because they find another woman attractive and get a boner looking at her doesn’t mean he’s going to act on it? Well I guess it’s the same thing. Unless men lie.... oh. Wait yeah Nevermind.

[–]piguy3141511 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Never been more acceptable or easier to be a slut, yet male sexlessness is rising, female standards are rising.

[–]OfSpock3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And levels of obesity in men are rising. Maybe we need to knock up a Tinder full of pictures of men from before the obesity crisis.

[–]piguy314153 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most fat people are older than 29. Yet sexlessness is most pronounced Among 18 to 29 year old men. Also I think the obesity rate has been stable over the same period where sexlessness tripled.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What evidence is there that female standards are rising?

Last I checked, female sexlessness was more common than male sexlessness in young people. There may be other cultural factors involved, such as porn.

[–]piguy314158 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Have you just not been paying attention?

Where did you "check" because ALL of the studies show male sexlessness is higher than female sexlessness.

https://bestlifeonline.com/celibate-young-men-survey/

And that male sexlessness is rising FASTER than female sexlessness. It trippled from 2008 to 2018 (10% to 30%)

[–]ShitArchonXPRFurfag autist|Too misogynist for BP|Too socially liberal for RP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I saw one chart on Twitter where virginity rates rose dramatically for all young men between 2008 and 2018--particularly for nonwhite men--but not for young women. Stats like that really put the pearl-clutching about "hookup culture" into perspective.

[–]jessicaannpin-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmm that’s not consistent with this https://vitals.lifehacker.com/here-s-how-much-sex-everybody-is-having-1795561168

Looks like men need to eat more pussy lol

[–]boatyscxslave0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's actually because of evolution that women are so picky. They are selecting for the best genes, why would women make babies with the chubby low status dude when the athletic smart dude is around? It's called hypergamy

[–]MrEctomy15 points16 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It seems that women are also visually wired. If you're unattractive, they aren't interested in ignoring that facet of a person for the time being and trying to find out about the rest of you.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin21 points22 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Sure buddy, and guys need to make sure their porn stars love kittens and are nice to their grandma before they beat off to them

[–]Crispytrip4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I mean we judge on looks for sure more when picking a partner but we find like 70% of women attractive, you guys are way harsher and have more unrealistic expectations, in almost every part of life. I’m not complaining as I think a women’s choice in partners is important and has a lot to do with evolution, but you often find an average girl unrealistically reaching now a days, the egos are too inflated. An average 7 really thinks she can land an A-list because everybody called her pretty on Instagram, why would she date a good smart hardworking guy? You even hear middle age ladies that have nothing special/going on for them still say they are really picky.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Saying you see 70% of women attractive is hilarious to me. 70 percent of women are not between the ages of 16 and 29 to start with and the majority of women are overweight. We grow up knowing we have a short shelf life. I knew it even before puberty.

[–]Crispytrip2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Attractiveness does start fading for women faster then men but I don’t think that’s fair to assume we only like women 16 to 29. Milf is one of the biggest porn genres. I’m only 22 and I’d love to (u know ;)) my neighbor who’s in her late 40s, shit I find older women attractive all the time. It’s really no denying it, women are the physically attractive sex, it’s works out for both sexes that men are more visual, and you guys aren’t. But you guys also need to understand you are not special, we find a lot of women attractive.

The new found narcissism/ego is what has most men frustrated now. This seemed to be understood before, women didn’t have unrealistic expectations and got married instead of ending up single and 40 complaining on social media with nothing going on for them when they had plenty of chances to land a good guy. These unrealistic expectations also most likely can help explain women reporting lower satisfaction and happiness levels every year despite having the most rights and freedoms they’ve ever had.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know some overly picky women who are single, but I know more single women who complain that guys won’t commit. I think it’s bad news for sexless guys because the women I know might bitch, but they won’t settle. I think that women without sex are not as unhappy as men without sex.

Idk, I honestly don’t talk to that many guys, but they generally complain about lack of sex, not lack of marriage.

[–]webernicke1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Nah. Women are just more binary about it. Either your looks matter a lot (positively or negatively) or they don't.

Looks always matter to men. It's more an issue of how positive or negative.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s not that looks don’t matter, Don’t be naive, looks always matter to women to some extent. We just respond to most visual images of strange men differently than men.

[–]webernicke2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what I said. Looks always matter to women but it's a binary question of whether or not they matter a lot i.e. "enough to override everything else."

As always OLD is a good example of this (Chadfishing)

Men are not binary about this. Looks always matter enough to override everything else about a woman.

Edit: I think of it like a thermostat. Women treat physical attraction as if it has three modes. AC on (he's unattractive) Heat on (he's attractive) or off (his attractiveness is not enough to override things like personality.) The state of the thermostat matters in that you either are or aren't controlling the temperature in the room. There is such a thing as letting the ambient temperature outside control the temperature in the room.

Men treat looks like those thermostats where you have to set a specific temperature. There is no "off." You are always actively controlling the temperature in the room, even if you've set it to match the temperature outside.

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. We don’t really CARE as much about what he looks like. It’s not that it doesn’t matter at all, but it’s maybe 15-20% of the overall equation. So on a medium where photos are the primary means of judging the attractiveness of a man, what would normally be worth only 15-20% is now worth like 80%. If you’re going to ask me based on a photo alone if I find a man sexually appealing, he has to be hot enough to make up for that 60-65% lost by not being able to judge other aspects of him. Or put another way, for me to even care that much about how a man looks for me to say “yeah, sure, he’s attractive,” he has to be very attractive. The mistake men make is assuming their equation for being sexually attracted to someone is the same as the equation for women to be sexually attracted to them (i.e. 95% looks), and that couldn’t be further from the truth.

[–]VictoriaSobocki0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why were they the gay dudes? Interesting

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because gay dudes are men, men are more visually wired, and like to look at naked men a lot more than women do

[–]VictoriaSobocki0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Aw my bad, I read it as playboy. Sorry, you’re right

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew23 points24 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

women don't find still lifeless images attractive.

yeh

i have always said men should be able to post gifs and videos on OLD

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

"Hey gals, Chad here, come check out my awesome life maybe you want to be apart of it."

Then its basically an episode of mtv cribs.

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Suddenly Chad is just the A/V club president.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

they can on tinder but it always looks cheesy. i think video snippets would be a great idea. voice alone matters so much for male attractiveness

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

right?

[–]neubsWizard5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As much as people like to talk about Danny Devito he actually has an authoritative and alpha type voice which showed in his roll as Louie De Palma on Taxi. General Patton actually had a high and squeaky voice and sounded nothing like George C. Scott who played him in the movie.

[–]DOSGAMESPaladin Ridding the Corruption6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tinder/Hinge now allow looping ‘boomerang’ videos. They are only 3-5 seconds long. No audio.

I’ve added a few and there was a small but noticeable increase in matches.

Still, I do wish these apps would improve in showing how big of a badass I am. It’s still an uphill battle. But this is the future of dating, I try not to let it hurt my feelings and just have fun with it.

[–]Ofourkind20 points21 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I've tried explaining this so many times. In no way can I tell if I'm attracted to someone by looking at a picture. I've been completely repulsed irl to men who look gorgeous in pictures, and insanely attracted to dudes irl who look repulsive in pictures. That's why I never did online dating. Waste of time.

[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is exactly why I stopped OLD 2-3 years ago and exclusively met people in real life. My GF is the best relationship I have ever had (I'm 36) and I met her in an elevator at work. And she's way more attractive than I am, we'd have never met online.

[–]passwordgoesherelate 30s purpleman2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You can’t online date, you just meet online. If the dating doesn’t happen afk, you’re not dating.

[–]PM_Happy_Puppy_PicsPurple Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What I mean is, I stopped meeting women online and I met them in real life, through random encounters in the real world.

[–]bonusfruit7 points8 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

r/ladyboners would like to have a word

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband12 points13 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

Ladyboners is mostly comprised of celebrities that have back-stories and personas.

[–]bonusfruit1 point2 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

They are still lifeless images nevertheless. And the comments are so ravenous as to be embarrassing. The is a formula. Tall, white, symmetrical face, European features, stubble, good hair, fit/muscular. It's an extremely narrow formula compared to what men like. But its clear

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband6 points7 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

They are still lifeless images nevertheless.

No they aren't. They are a symbolic representation of whatever role endeared the actor to the woman. When she looks at the picture she's not "seeing" the picture, she's seeing the character she's already attracted to.

[–]bonusfruit4 points5 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Why do people attempt to deify women's behavior and make it out to be so deep and ethereal. They just like looking at hot guys and don't like looking at average guys

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband11 points12 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Because women aren't men. Nothing about this is deep or ethereal, your projecting. It's just a different type of attraction trigger, a different kind of shallow.

[–]bonusfruit6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Okay listen. Chris evans doesn't need any symbolic representation for women to drool over his images. He was objectively hot to them before captain America or whatever roles he played prior. He's a tall, built white guy with a handsome face and good hair. No context required.

[–]bonusfruit9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You mean like alex from target? The young good looking random nobody working at a store that became a celebrity overnight because a girl took a creep shot of him? Nothing but looks explains why countess girls were stalking him after that. Or maybe Jeremy Meeks, the unremarkable petty convict who's photogenic mugshot propelled him to god status among women. Completely with comments on his images of women wishing he would abuse/ impregnate them. Now he has a billionaire baby mama. Looks=everything

[–]TotalBasturd2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. This is like those YouTube videos with titles like "How to have more charisma" or "How to get girls", and the dude in the thumbnail is Chris Hemsworth.

Taller than 97% of men (he's 1,90m/6ft3in), more handsome than like 98% of men, better body than like 95% of men, white, blonde, blue eyes... When it comes to looks ALONE he is already in the Top 0,01% of all men.

Women will desire him wether they know about his personal life and career or not. If they just saw him for the first time today they would still want him.

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So why aren't women posting pics the hottie Todd who works down at the gas station to that sub? Where's the men's equivalent of /r/gonewild?

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Except my catfish accounts prove that women do like hot men and they are happy to message them first. Even when I sent the first message, I got replies virtually all the time and women were happy to continue the conversation with me, with many hinting they wanted to meet me. That just doesn't happen with my own photos - women almost always ignore me and when I do get a reply, they quickly get bored and stop replying/block me. And getting an actual real life date is near enough impossible.

I don't change anything about my profile either. It's just a generic profile, only the pictures are changed. Completely different responses from women, it's amazing.

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No your catfish accounts prove women like talking to strangers on the internet for validation.

[–]Monkey_Jerk2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And these strangers just happen to be good looking. You're not proving the point you think you are.

[–]ready2ropePinkpilled former femcel1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I mean, you are catfishing. Maybe the photos you’re using on your catfish accounts are just inherently better quality, more flattering etc than your real accounts’.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not really, because I've got basically the same shots - the catfish ones are of guys with selfies either outdoors or in cars, my ones are selfies outdoors or indoors. All with good camera quality.

I understand what you're doing. You're thinking to yourself "women can't possibly be this shallow" so you are trying to come up with possible reasons to justify why I'm not getting messages. Other people on this topic are doing it too - it's all clutching at straws, as someone else put it.

[–]TotalBasturd2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because they need moral superiority over men. It's the only weapon they have.

They need to convince you that women are majestic creatures that care more about personality and career than men do. But the reality is that a man only needs to be physically fuckable to be successful with women. You look good enough? You get the girls.

[–]we-are-men-with-ven1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

ethereal

Lol, what?

[–]TotalBasturd0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

When the man in the post is a complete no-one that just started modeling, the women love him anyways. Even though they don't know absolutely anything about him other than his face and his name

You people here trying to convince everyone that women aren't visually-oriented and that is a lie that not even yourselves believe

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Once every three years, six women will comment on what a cutie some rando guy is. You got me there.

[–]littleprincesrose5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Also a looot depends on the quality of said pictures. Someone hot can look quite bad if the angle/lighting sucks, while below average people can appear more attractive on a photo taken by someone who knows what they’re doing. I haven’t used Tinder for years now but when I was single it was full of dudes who posted pictures where I could barely figure out how they look like, group pics only, selfies that look like the ones you accidentally make while trying to open your camera etc. Girls spend a lot of time figuring out what pose, angle etc suits them, so most of them can look better in pictures than IRL, of course they will be rated more attractive. On the other hand the only guys I know that may look better on pics than IRL are the ones with a friend being into photography, or have had a professional photoshoot, or them being photographers. I’m not saying it’s good or bad- but the judgement IRL would probably be different for both men and women.

And yes, beyond looks a lot can make a man attractive. Women react differently to other stimuli- voice, smell, let alone personality count a lot. Most crushes I developed were on guys I wouldn’t have found very attractive by pictures only, or even at the first sight, but it quickly changed after being around them for a while. On the other hand, there were ones attractive at first, but their personality killed interest quickly, so for the thousandth time, it’s quite a stretch to draw conclusions to the entire dating world from a single OLD study🤷🏻‍♀️.

[–]TotalBasturd1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You have never read the comments at r/LadyBoners, huh?

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Please see my other comments in this thread about ladyboners.

[–]jessicaannpin5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No. I think the issue is that women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The same guys are still attractive irl as in pictures though so it doesn't really matter in the end

[–]officerkondoRedder Shade of Purple Man1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

because women don't find still lifeless images attractive.

Then what do they think they are doing whenever they post pictures of themselves to Instagram? They think they are not looking attractive?

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Then what do they think they are doing whenever they post pictures of themselves to Instagram? They think they are not looking attractive?

They don't untill they get 1M upvotes or likes or whatever telling them they are attractive.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Even then it's probably not enough for some of them. I think situations like that have a "chasing the dragon" element to them.

[–]Santaclause37 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Damn that's a really good coping mechanism

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No "cope".

[–]cabbagebikini0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly this! Whenever I try to show a pic of a guy I find super attractive to my girlfriends, he somehow always looks like a gremlin in 2D. Same thing goes with attractive movie stars - I don’t “get it” why people like them until I see one of their movies first.

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad I came here and saw the obvious answer was most upvoted.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account63 points64 points  (36 children) | Copy Link

Because women have a higher bar than men for evolutionary reasons.

A woman can have a specified number of kids, maximum (lets say 10). This is limited by her biology. She can have 1 partner, or 10 partners, or 100 partners.... and she's still going to have no more children than those 10.

As a result a woman's sex drive is orientated towards "Getting the best man she can to be the father of those 10 children" more or less.

Her drive is towards having the "best quality" within her limited reproductive capacity. This causes women to set a "high bar" for "attractive enough I want to sleep with him".

Men, on the other hand, are not limited by their biology. They are only limited by the biology of their partners. If they have 1 partner they can have 10 children. If they have 2 they can have 20. If they have 3 they can have 30. If they have 100 they can have a 1,000 children.

If you think I've "over egging it" by saying 1,000.... Take a look at Ismail Ibn Shairf. 525 sons, 324 daughters.

This is just not possible for a woman.

SO..... Men are orientated towards quantity in a way women are not. Sure, they'd like to sleep with the prettiest girl. But also to sleep with her uglier sister too. And that girl that serves in the kebab shop. And that girl that..... etc.

So their instincts are setup to give them a much lower bar for being attracted to a female. Sure they want the pretty one, but they want all the other less pretty ones too.

Any given Women's "attractiveness bar" is therfore going to appear incredibly high to any man assuming her instincts to be the same as his. It's going to appear she requires a much more attractive man than the male would expect based on his personal instincts for where "the attractiveness bar should be set".

So thats the bulk of your answer right there.

The rest of it is.... women are attracted to a whole range of features in males that is NOT just pure physical attractiveness. She finds the whole package attractive or not.

This causes a particular problem for catfishing experiments, in that almost all of the rest of these attributes are not present and can't be demonstrated online. Only looks can, effectively.

So wheras a woman might find a "male 8" attractive, a huge component of that "8" are attributes that will only contribute to that assessment in person. Maybe 50% of that is physical looks, 50% other factors.

If she's assessing guys online what is going to happen is those other factors are not available. So she's going to require that 100% of that "8" is made up by purely physical attraction alone to be interested. She's essentially going to pick out guys who are SO physically attractive, that they will reach her threshold whatever their other attributes are.

So women online gravitate to those highly attractive guys online much more than they do so in person. In person the "physical attractiveness 6" can make himself an "overall 8" by being witty, charming, dominant, ambitious, etc etc. and easily meet her bar. Online the "physical attractiveness 6" just stays a 6, and she's not interested.

Finally, there is another factor here. Simply that women don't usually approach/initiate the interaction (for various reasons, mostly evolutionary too).

So if you're grading them on "what is required to get her to approach/message me first" and your assuming that is "the level you have to be to be attractive to her" you are almost certainly over-calibrating.

Going back to our woman who is attracted to 8's. She'd be happy to sleep with an 8, but she's almost certainly going to require him to "make the moves" and approach her. To actually go and contact/message HIM he's going to have to be basically a 9 or 10 for her to overcome that instinctive preference. So god awfully attractive that she just can't help herself. To get her to approach the guy he'll have to sail over her bar, be so far above it as to make her approaching desirable.

So, TL:DR.

Most of it is (you are right) women's standards are higher. There are good evolutionary reasons why this is the c ase, and this is not "optional" it's likely thats instinctive in a way she can't consciously overcome.

The remainder is.... Online interactions are going to be MUCH more unbalanced towards the guys who can effectively "get all of their attractiveness from looks" than they are in real life.... and on top of that in requiring girls to work the same way boys do in regards to approaching. You are taking her "make a move on HIM" bar to be the same as "I would be interested if he made a move on ME" bar. And the first bar is way higher than the second.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If they have 100 they can have a 1,000 children.

Hashtag goals

[–]sophii11 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

this!

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (12 children) | Copy Link

No. I think the issue is that women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do not spam.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

OK you're coming t this from the wrong angle.

The societal pressure are there because of the instincts. They instincts aren't there because of the social pressure.

We are not blank slates on which society imprints our values. We're evolved beings. Our instincts and brains are evolved organs. Brains are built by genes, not society. And society is the product of the brains that genes built.

There just isn't a society where "Men are shamed for promiscuity, and women are not". There are plenty of societies where "Women are shamed for promiscuity, and men are not".

Because there is a reason outside of societal setup that the instincts work this way round..... and societies are (by and large, with limited exceptions) moulded around those instincts. Like plastic in a vacuum former machine.

"Schluuuuuuuuurp and the society is moulded to the shape of the pre-existing instincts."

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both.

Its possible. But it turns out that, nah. It's biology.

The same evolutionary factors producing the effects above also produce this outcome.

In this case, concealed ovulation in human females, and the fact that sex with additional partners doesn't increase womens reproductive output but it does increase males reproductive output, and the fact that males have evolved instincts to deal with paternity certainty by mate-guarding and preferring non-promiscuous females for LTR.

This means guys have sex, and are ready to have it again a few hours later with the same woman (concealed ovulation) or even a few minutes later with a different women (you're going to want to google "The Coolidge Effect" here). This is driven by male biology. Women don't have the same biological setup, so they don't feel these needs in the same way.

I see the difference you're trying to outline, but I don't think it's in any way a big factor.... partly because you're talking conscious decision making in relation to a consciously understood social paradigm.... and we all know that "attraction" isn't consciously mediated.

You are either attracted, or you're not, and this is all worked out by a subconscious process outside of your control. It's actually really hard to find a man/woman attractive you're not instinctively attracted to (as gold diggers find out). And it's just as hard to find a man/women unattractive if you're instinctively attracted to them, despite social sanction (as pool boys and bored housewives find out).

You're just not "cutting reality at it's joints" here.

Genes came first. Societies are built by the brains genes built. You're mistaking effects for causes and vice versa.

It reads to me that "The politician won the election in order to conform to the societal pressure to be popular with the people" rather than "Because he was popular with the people, he won the election".

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. The reasons this pattern has emerged is because women are biologically limited by being smaller and having to bear the burden of pregnancy.

The male need for paternity certainly incentivizes actions to control and suppress female sexuality. That is why in societies where women have more power and control, they are much more promiscuous. In those societies, women are not shamed for sexual permissiveness.

Brain development is actually highly influenced by culture/environments.

Sex with multiple partners does increase a woman’s reproductive output. It is evolutionarily advantageous to produce genetically diverse offspring.

It is ignorant to say that biology is the only cause of lower desire in women when desire in women is highly dependent on cultural variables, as has been demonstrated extensively. As one example, gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors have converged tremendously has women have gained more power in society. This has been validated by a large body of research on gender differences in sexuality, conducted over the past 5 decades or so.

[–]TwentyX4-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

in societies where women have more power and control, they are much more promiscuous

When comparing, say, Sweden to Saudi Arabia, yeah. But women in Sweden or anywhere else don't approach anything close to the number if sexual partners of gay men. Even in the homosexually-repressive past, gay men had way more sexual partners than women anywhere in the world today. So, no, you're wrong in saying it's all about slut shaming or anything like that.

For some perspective, consider the survey of gay men in San Francisco before HIV: roughly 1/4th of them claimed fewer than 100 sexual partners, 50% claimed 100-1000 sexual partners, and 1/4th claimed over 1000 partners. Lookup Gaetan Dugas: "Dugas is described as being a charming, handsome sexual athlete who, according to his own estimation, averaged hundreds of sex partners per year. He claimed to have had over 2,500 sexual partners across North America since becoming sexually active in 1972." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ga%C3%ABtan_Dugas

There's also studies showing that lesbians are the least sexually active and have the fewest sexual partners.

Sex with multiple partners does increase a woman’s reproductive output. It is evolutionarily advantageous to produce genetically diverse offspring.

Not really. Is generally better to have babies with the best males. In some species, where the males don't do any raising of children, but only contribute sperm (i.e. tournament species), the reproductive success of males is very skewed to the "top" males. In prairie grouse, for example, only about the top 5-10% of males reproduce each year. Basically, he impregnates 10-20 different females. If diversity was important, this wouldn't happen. Females mate assortatively when males are contributing a lot of time and money to raising kids.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You make good points regarding gay men versus lesbians.

However, you are sorely mistaken regarding the evolutionary advantages of producing genetically diverse offspring. Getting the highest quality sperm is important, but so is diversity. Having two offspring with two high quality males is preferable to two offspring with the same high quality male.

[–]MrEctomy-2 points-1 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If slut shaming were a thing, why is tinder so popular? It's a hook up app, everyone knows it, and everyone uses it without shame.

[–]jessicaannpin2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

  1. Slut shaming is a thing.

  2. Tinder is not just a hook up app. Many people find partners for relationships on Tinder.

  3. The perception, by some, that Tinder is a hook up app may be why it is less popular among women than men.

  4. Apps like the League attract a higher percentage of women by marketing themselves better as dating apps.

[–]MrEctomy-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Would you agree that pop culture in America at least has become very sex positive and anti slut shaming in the last decade if not longer?

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

More so, yeah

[–]MrEctomy0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

So then you would agree that culturally, slut shaming is not really tolerated anymore?

[–]jessicaannpin3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Slut shaming occurs all the time. Just look at the content of this subreddit.

[–]MrEctomy-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say they're a vocal minority.

[–]planejaneRemove head from sphincter, THEN type.1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Do you ever actually check for a word count on these things? Jesus.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account16 points17 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Nope. I write what I want to write, and only edit if I feel like it. If someone wants to offer to pay me I will happily adopt professional editorial standards for professional rates of pay.

Until then, If you want to skip over it and deprive yourself of the majesty of my mind go ahead. But it is majestic, and you're missing out.

[–]planejaneRemove head from sphincter, THEN type.2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

But it is majestic, and you're missing out.

I want to crack such a joke here. Decorum prohibits.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

MAJESTIC!

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Let's hear it. Some humor is great on this sub

[–]planejaneRemove head from sphincter, THEN type.-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well the easiest idea is to swap his manhood for his comment.

"it's *majestic and you're missing out.*

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well if you're going to talk about my manhood we're going to have to use the word cyclopean.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

TLDR - women are different than men. OP is shooting himself in the balls because he doesn't understand women well enough. You can up your "point value" by being a charming motherfucker or have witty humor. OP, your weird ass test is ill placed due to your misunderstanding.

Just like with askTRP, OP hasn't done enough RP sidebar homework.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

As long as you are socially competent being charming and funny is subjective and doesn't really matter to women.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not really. There are objectively funny and charming people.

It's true that there is a halo effect, and it's easier to be seen as charming and funny if you are attractive, or dominant.

But there are plenty of attractive guys who wouldn't be counted as funny or charming, because they can't (or won't) carry that off.

[–]nakedborg[🍰] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

But their (wordy, detailed) response is the only one worth reading. (I've read the whole thread).

[–]planejaneRemove head from sphincter, THEN type.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I generally don't have a qualm with TGP's content, it's the wordiness I refuse to put up with, tbh. When I can convince him to pare it down he's quite on the money most of the time

[–]ThisIsJustATr1buteHas what plants crave0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

10

Bach’s wife would beg to differ.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Alright, what did she get to ? 12 ? 15 ?

Those are rookie numbers. You gotta bump those numbers up.

Well, of course she can't. But Mr Bach can !

In fact, looking up his numbers he had 7 with his first wife, and 13 with his second wife for a Grand Total (for Mr Bach) of 20.

A number his wife couldn't reach, no matter how many choirboys she slept with (or didn't) on the side.

Mrs Bach was limited by her Biology. Mr Bach was only limited by his partners biology. Seeing as he had at least 2, he doubled his reproductive output by doing so.

[–]ThisIsJustATr1buteHas what plants crave3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Like 24 I think, it was impressive.

[–]-TheGreasyPole-Pissed Off that Reddit Admins killed my old account1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well as I said I checked. 7 from the first wife. 13 from the second wife.

Mr Bach Lifetime Total = 20

Mrs Bach I = 7

Mrs Bach II = 13

Quite a neat example of exactly what I was saying. Without Mrs Bach II Mr Bach would have been stuck on 7. By taking another partner he more than doubled his output in a way a woman can't double her output by taking further partners.

[–]TotalBasturd0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The all-time record for most children by a woman is 69.

The male all-time record is "at least" 867, possibly many more.

Female and male reproductive methods are VERY different, and this fact has numerous implications for the way each sex selects mates.

[–]Solanthas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct me if I'm wrong but couldn't a healthy woman have a child every 9 months? Say from 18 to 35. So that's like 9/12×17=12.75. Ok fuck.

My great grandma had 16 kids tho... and I was born when my mom was 47.

So 18 to 40, we're talking like yeah, 16. Ok, dang.

[–]Solanthas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Great explanation, online dating struggles for the average guy isn't just a "girls only like hot guys, bleh", there's a whole whack of subtle factors

[–]JawsOfTheMachine0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Let’s also be honest here.. most men don’t put anywhere near the amount of effort to look physically attractive and presentable as women do. Especially online.

[–]Kaydragon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah this makes sense.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

My current view is this. To tingle her vingle a guy has to be much hotter than a woman for a guy to tingle his dongle.

This means that women aren't as thirsty as men (basic biology) and women don't need to. It's natural. It's pretty logical too from evolutionary perspective and it gives uglier guys a chance to stand out from the rest of lazy men playing video games and whining on incel forums by going to fucking gym, getting jacked and become greek gods, even though they can still appear having ugly face.. but those muscles, man, no matter what women say, they love touching them. It's masculine. Ignore what women say. Watch what they do.

Sure muscles are not enough. Don't get false idea. It's just first step into transforming yourself into desirable man.

So it's possible to flip the script. Provided you don't use tinder as your sole experiment. On tinder it's easier to overlook nice body. So tinder experiments prove shit. They are incomplete. They give only 1/3 of a picture. Women prefer nice face over ugly face. Who would have thought?

But with muscles, charming personality, assertiveness, confidence, green paper and game one can snap almost any woman. In real life.

This is the truth. Easier said than done but it gives a lot of room for nuance. And incels hate this. OP gonna hate and disagree with me because it's easier to cry and whine that world is unfair. Women aren't doing it (picking most attractive males on tinder) on purpose. At least not 100 percent. They can't change the game like that. They see beauty, they choose beauty. In real life when you approach girls, suddenly their value system changes (as it seems). They start to value more intangible things compared to what's offered on tinder. And that's where and ugly guy can cash in with his greek body, confidence and taking no shit from no hoe. That's ultimately attractive to women.

There is no bar. It's artificial. If you want failure keep using tinder for your experiments. If you want success, approach it from different angle. But it requires hard work on yourself. Lazy men stay lazy.

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

No. I think the issue is that women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I would agree that each woman is interested in maybe 20% of guys. BUT each women’s idea of “top 20%” is VASTLY DIFFERENT.

Every single one of my friends has different taste in guys. I like the standard tall muscular guy. One of my friends PREFERS guys shorter than her. One of my friends only likes skinny guys. One of my friends only likes chubby guys. This is not just my friends but something that is consistent with all women, from what I have heard in conversation and seen on the internet.

Guys should take this to be a good thing, as this means that the less “standardly attractive” guys are genuinely top 20% for at least a portion of women out there.

[–]learn2earn8915 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is true in my experience. My friends and I were discussing this a few weeks ago. I like tall skinny dudes, but two of them like shorter, pudgy dudes (one of them is engaged to him) and the other is being plated by a fat average height dude. (Don’t have the heart to tell her this) I find that only one of the dudes is cute, but I don’t have the urge to “bang” him. This is where men and women differ.

[–]glasraen2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep. There are plenty of hot guys in the world that I absolutely would not “bang.” Meanwhile, there were plenty of average looking dudes with high IQs who I have drooled after but they didn’t notice.

[–]learn2earn893 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Right! Adam Driver comes to mind. I happen to think he’s hot but my best friend thinks he’s ugly. She thinks Jason Momoa is hot but he’s meh to me. Jason is objectively attractive, but he doesn’t do it for me. Adam is not conventionally attractive but his voice and his demeanor are attractive to me. Chris Hemsworth is attractive but I’m not attracted to him. Idk

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would agree that each woman is interested in maybe 20% of guys. BUT each women’s idea of “top 20%” is VASTLY DIFFERENT.

And this is what OP should be hanging his hat on. But I believe they don't give a shit about the rest of the girls, these types of dudes (ones that would create fake accounts to further steep themselves into celibacy) aren't attracted to women that aren't in the top 20%...or they're scared of success with women because then they'd be vulnerable to ouchies.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

i have a friend who seemingly prefers guy shorter than her too. she's like 5'9" so it could be luck of the draw but she's a literal model and could certainly be dating taller guys if she wanted to

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If that were the case how come ugly girls and guys almost always date each other and attractive guys and girls almost always date each other.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ugly guys are the top 20% for ugly girls and attractive guys are the top 20% for attractive girls. People typically know (ish) where they rate and seek out people who have the same level of attractiveness. tinder did a study on this. I know for me personally, i have seen people who are very attractive but super out of my league and I don’t view them as part of my top 20% because of this difference - they are unattainable and that makes them less attractive to me.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol what

Ugly guys are the top 20% to ugly girls? Then who the hell do the ugly girls think is ugly?

You're basically saying someone somewhere thinks you are attractive no matter how ugly you may be

Sorry to burst your bubble bubble but studies show that what we co Sider attractive is very consistent and most people can reliably distinguish between ugly and attractive

  • One man's 9 is another man's 7, but no one thinks a 3 is an 8. That is the only subjectivity that exists in attraction

[–]the_calibre_cat2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

My anecdote: my tall, construction worker friend has absolutely no trouble fucking slaying pussy. He is as conventionally attractive if l as it is possible to be.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Unconventional attractiveness is almost a cope

I say almost because I did fall in love with this girl older than me when I was a 2nd year who had some fucked up teeth and almost looked like a goat with that pointy jaw. But God damn she was nice and just being around her her positivity rubbed off on you. And she was just so damn likable

But that only happened once in my 22 years alive

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the issue is also that women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–]poison-fang-blade5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The Red Pill does say that game gets women attracted to you, but it seems like the game is only tricking her into an aroused emotional state

Don't think so, it's just that game only gets you so far. Game alone won't get you laid. Looks always matter. The better your looks, the less "game" you need.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The better your looks, the less "game" you need.

You would be surprised. Sometimes being good looking leads to the expectation that you'll act in a correspondingly confident manner, and when you do not it's presumed there must be something wrong with you. That there's some reason you're giving a discount on your own worth.

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is an interesting observation and kinda accurate. Hot dudes who are awkward do seem to bomb worse than average dudes who are awkward, if only because visual expectation vs in-person reality is starker. Men don’t fare as well is they depend solely on looks.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman19 points20 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Most men are not very attractive. When men here post pictures of men that they think women think are hot/attractive they are wrong.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well I think I'm a good judge of the men women believe are attractive, because my catfish dating accounts got plenty of attention (see my OP for details). I'm good at gauging what is attractive and what isn't.

But I'm wondering why so few good looking men exist in women's minds?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's super unhealthy my dude

[–]yaseedog will hunt1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

can you show us a catfish pic you used? I'm curious

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

PM me if you want, I can show you them there.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just because you have the opinion you are a good judge of that does not make it so. I saw your OP I remain unconvinced.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew38 points39 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

when asked just to rate photos women can almost never see body language, presence, smell, tone of voice, stature, bearing, posture and all the millions of things WOMEN are calibrated to honing in on for attraction

if i had just seen a bare picture of 99% of the men i had sex with on tinder i would never have given them a second glance. the sexual attractiveness of men cannot be captured in a photograph

also, most men are sexually invisible until they engage in seduction behaviors

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Where do you people live that girls don't openly hit on good-looking guys

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah this is a thing that I really haven’t seen much. Pennsylvania.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

dunno, where did i say that?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

i dotn know what has occured with all of you to create this. this is the standard required to GET WOMEN TO INITIATE which they will almost NEVER do EVEN with CHAD

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

will almost NEVER do EVEN with CHAD

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Really covered your bases there lol. I'm not even that good looking and all my relationships/hook-ups have been started by the woman.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

thats what the word almost exists for, to make statements that are generalizations that cover broads swaths withotu covering the whole

there is some cognitive defect that causes some people to read "almost" as "All"

[–]Tyler_GatsbyNo mas Sancho9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is a big reason why I have never tried OLD. I really don't look as good in pics as irl, and am apparently only really attractive irl.

I have friends that love FB and online dating- but they like looking at pics of themselves b/c they can look better than they do irl. This irks the shit out of me b/c I'm actually cuter irl.

I've literally had a woman turn down meeting me over a pic her friend snapped, then met her at a party irl, and was about to walk in the room when I heard the mutual friend tell her that's the guy I was gonna hook you up with. She was like, "Naw, that's not the same guy. Can't be..." Kinda helped ruined me on pics of myself.

[–]sexfarming5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This could be a problem I have on online dating.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

That means the SMP is going to shit as more and more people meet through OLD and less through every day Life

As it becomes less and less acceptable to approach in real life (like the risks of workplace where your career can get ruined. Which used to be a more common avenue) it's gonna screw over guys who don't look great in photos and don't go out enough.

Do you think this stuff will even out eventually or do you think it will continue to get worse and people will be worse off than in the 70s and 80s and 90s

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

There was absolutely no chance the sexual revolution dating scene of the seventies eighties and nineties was going to last forever anyway. That was a historical blip

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

God damn you guys were lucky

Amazing real estate prices, jobs everywhere, a full fledged orgy, cars that were actually sexy instead of the bloated hippos they make today, music that didn't all sound exactly the same etc...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I miss it.

Am teaching my kids about the music tho.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Any good recommendations for singers or albums or songs? I listen to everything, even chick songs and country music, doesn't matter to me

Parents are from a different country so they aren't much use for music recommendations

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

u/Atlas_B_Shruggin and I can probably set you up. I'll PM you.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

80s music?

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya, got any recommendations for singers, or albums or songs

I listen to everything: chick music all the way to country, I love it all.

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

the sexual attractiveness of men cannot be captured in a photograph

How about a short presentation video. Would women rate men higher that way?

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps a power point.

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think the issue is that women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I am not a man that for experiment just doesn't work on me I can't put myself in that position

I don't believe that what you just described is actually how it works for women because I am in fact a woman with female sexual nature.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

What do you believe defines “female sexual nature”?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'm not gonna sit here and explain all of that on purple pill debate. Familiarize yourself with the red pill so you can participate in the discussions here

[–]TradiWaifu4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is soooo much that goes into the attractiveness of a man. It really isn’t all physical and certainly not captured in a still photo.

[–]squadfleekgoalz3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Uh, dude here...because dudes are gross.

[–]THE_MASKED_DOWNVOTTO8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

First you say " However, the women who send me messages range from average looking to ugly - nothing especially good looking. "

and then go on to say

" Why do women rate most men as physically unattractive? Or at least not attractive enough to want sex with them, without some other pre-requisite being involved such as alcohol or the man having a good job or high status. "

You literally do the same thing.

But I digress. OP. There is no manifesto out there that tells women to rate the average guy as unattractive. There's no propaganda or religion out there that spreads this message. We're just using our eyes and our crotches. You either are or are not attractive. It's as simple as that :( :(

that sucks though. Quick question. How old are you and how old were the "average to ugly looking" women you met online?

[–]constantcube1328 points29 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

While women rate more harshly on attractiveness, they are much more willing to date people that aren’t physically attractive, if they have an attractive personality (imo)

What I mean by this is, a good looking guy with a boring personality will be outshone by a worse looking guy with a great personality. I will admit the worse looking guy has to try harder, but it is true. However, while guys are more likely to rate an average girl as attractive.... they are less likely to date a girl they deem physically unattractive girl

However, don’t get the term ‘great personality’ confused with being a ‘nice guy’ ... they are very different.

You have to play your strengths... so if a macho goodlooking dude is just a ‘nice guy’ that might work for him bc his physique is already masculine enough to provide what a woman is looking for.

If you are obese, short, unattractive, feminine voice, etc. you will have to have a more masculine attitude to give the majority of females the masculinity they desire... but in my experience it works. I have some ugly ass friends that have great game, and some goodlooking friends that can never seal the deal even tho he has the initial advantage

[–]ohheyhi99Conflicted Feminist Man, No Pill4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Are your “ugly ass” friends actually ugly or are they just average? There’s a difference. I’m probably somewhere below average in the face, but I know things would be way worse if I was truly ugly.

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Average for a dude is ugly to a woman. Average for a woman is pretty to a dude.

[–]constantcube132 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends on which friend and some are average in some factors, below average in others, etc. Some are definitely average in general.

One of them is definitely below average in the face, very out of shape, terrible haircut, but he’s very confident in himself, he’s smart, and honestly is more fun than the majority of people and he does great with girls.

Another one is pretty short (like 5’2”) but he has a decent face, spends a lot of time in the gym (muscular), and he’s another one with a very charismatic personality that does way better than most of my friends that are 6’3” and look good in the face. (This friend is probably the one that does the best with girls)

Another guy I know is tall (6’3”) but is way below average in the face and the body. He is pretty good at sports though... but he’s confident(probably over-confident tbh) and used to date one of the hottest girls I’ve ever seen. Although he’s way more confident than he should be (he’s also kinda dumb), it works with girls and getting the respect of peers.

I have more examples but these are the ones I know are at least below average (by most people’s standards) in at least one or two categories.

When I say ugly ass friends, I’m kind of playing, they’re not truly butt- ass ugly... but definitely below average. Now there definitely are some people that are truly ugly, I’ll admit, but times I ever see these people are few and far between... and the people I usually think that about are ugly due to a result of drugs

I just don’t want people beating themselves up and not realizing their potential , cause if you go on the r/amiugly subreddit almost none of them would be considered ugly. Tons of them are even above average imo

Even with myself... I’ve noticed with a simple shift in attitude and mindset drastically changes the way that women(and friends) react to me. If anything I’ve noticed that you can’t put women on a pedestal... they can tell and subconsciously don’t like it. The philosophy is similar to the one in the book “subtle art of not giving a f***”. This also helps with getting friends and strangers to respect you imo

This is what I found works for me, but my friends I talked about above do it a lot differently and they have better success than me... so I don’t think there’s any one way to do it

[–]oneprettycoolcat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To a woman, there is no difference between ugly and average.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew11 points12 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

If this is the physical beauty standard that you require to get average women interested

i dotn know what has occured with all of you to create this. this is the standard required to GET WOMEN TO INITIATE which they will almost NEVER do EVEN with CHAD

MEN are the pursuers. who told you all that the mark of male attractiveness is BEING pursued by women?

ive IOIed alterna-Chad til i almost broke my own neck, but i STILLL never PURSUED him openly and aggressively and directly

youre being sold a bill of goods by someone. if youre looking to BE pursued as a mark of attractiveness youre fucked

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Wait if you think someone is hot, barring shyness or fear of rejection (mental weakness), why don't y'all go up and start a conversation?

I don't get it, if you want something and think you can get it, then why wouldn't you go get it? It makes me wonder if you were even attracted to the person and even felt any desire in the first place if you choose not to do something about it. Hiding behind, "it's the man's job" doesn't make any sense to me assuming you actually think the guy's attractive and want a bite out of him

[–]oneprettycoolcat4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Wait if you think someone is hot, barring shyness or fear of rejection (mental weakness), why don't y'all go up and start a conversation?

Women do. Go hang around a legitimate Chad or two and see how differently women act. They become the equivalent of teenage boys seeing their first pair of tits.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I've seen that a few times, but those girls were usually fat or kinda ugly in general

I've never seen cute girls act like that with a stranger, but they do dote on their boyfriends

[–]oneprettycoolcat0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Then those guys likely weren't actually attractive or you didn't spend much time around them.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen the 6'6 Chads in my program who are dumbass a door knob

Girls like them because I hear their conversations about the chads. But I've never seen them become nervous awkward wrecks around those guys

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

it wouldnt count. any man will fuck you if you initiate, so what?

women sexuality is generally contingent on being DESIRED by an attractive man

why would i approach a man when another man will approach me soon? why is any one man worth that?

[–]ReachForTheSky_ 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

why would i approach a man when another man will approach me soon

Because being the selector is a more advantageous position than being the selected?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

For a woman? LolNo

Any man you approach will fuck you, no big whoop. A man you have to approach wasnt interested enough or bold enough to pursue you. This has ramifications over time

[–]ReachForTheSky_ 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well the latter is me, guess I'll be sifted from the gene pool

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

im sure some nerd woman whos proud of not being able to girl will eventually approach you so she can be angry and disappointed at how passive you are in 4 years

[–]OiLoveMoiBrick2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think this says more about the looks-heavy tyranny of online hookup sites like Tinder than anything else.

Those of us guys who aren't aesthetically blessed would be better of going to real life events such as those set up on Meetup.com and meeting and getting to know women that way, where our looks exist alongside our personalities and the connections we make with others.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I've heard about events from meetup.com, but apparently they are filled with mostly single guys and it's like 9 guys for every 1 girl or something ridiculous.

[–]OiLoveMoiBrick0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not really. Maybe "singles" events are like that. However specific interest events (i.e. photography, walking, artistic) are a mixed bag. Being a vegan, I used to go to local vegetarian and vegan meetup events near me. They tended to be much more balanced if not shifted the other way).

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot19 points20 points  (48 children) | Copy Link

because most men are unattractive. they don't present themselves as desirable beings. women literally grow up grooming themselves for desirability in a way that few men do. everything from our hair to our faces to the clothes we wear to our bodies are designed to present as desirable. how many men can you say are that intentional about their desirability?

i noticed that when i was in sweden, denmark and norway i found a much much higher proportion of the guys attractive because more of them seemed to present with desirability in mind.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Go to any higher tier college or big city financial district and there are plenty of guys who are very focused on appearance

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot2 points3 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

i know, but thats a small fraction of men

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Just in my office, I would say over half of the guys workout regularly, have a skincare routine, get frequent haircuts, and dress sharply. Probably higher for kids right out of college and lower once people start having kids.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot6 points7 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

yeah, half is low. the vast majority of women do that. hence the gap

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

that is fair. Still more than a small fraction though

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot5 points6 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

well no its not when you consider that most men don't go to elite colleges or work in a big city finance sector

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

True well that's my world and all I can really speak to. Which is probably why I don't relate to a lot of this subreddit.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot6 points7 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

i dont get this. i went to a good school and work on wall street. you have to know that the people in your immediate circle are not a reflection of the average

[–]MyDogLovesCorn0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

NYU is not a "good" school...lol

And you may technically work around Wall Street as I'm sure...but you don't work on Wall Street.

[–]MrHerbSherman🤠 howdy6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Specifically physical attractiveness

The situation is sorta mirrored in how men invest into being appealing for a relationship— many men invest into that area heavily, developing hobbies, skills, etc whereas a lot of women neglect it

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Lol "hobbies and skills" have zero to do with female relationship desirability

[–]sophii12 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Men tend to love a woman who cooks well no?

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

idk i can barely heat up a frozen dinner

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Prehistoric woman could knit and sew fabric into fitted clothes and cook like no one else, but could not read

Today's woman can read but not do anything else. Progress!

[–]GroundPole0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Good skills and hobbies should drive confidence and social life. They should indirectly increase your options or desirability. Too bad there are a lot of modern skills and hobbies that dont contribute to the above.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

so its confidence and social life that increase relationship desirability (i agree), which is totally possible without developing skills or "hobbies" (using the reddit defintion of hobby and not like, "thing i enjoy doing in my freetime")

[–]GroundPole1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree its possible without. But if you have hobbies and you want to increase desirability. You can totally pick ones that contribute. Ie working out, group fitness etc

[–]MrHerbSherman🤠 howdy0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

What does a woman’s RMV consist of?

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Being attractive and fitting well into a mans life

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

how many men can you say are that intentional about their desirability?

That's so true. I really wonder how much romantic success guys leave on the table by not putting more intentionality into this.

i noticed that when i was in sweden, denmark and norway i found a much much higher proportion of the guys attractive because more of them seemed to present with desirability in mind.

Interesting, I noticed there that women seemed on average less hot there than America, the "hot swedish blonde" stereotype notwithstanding.

Maybe their intensely egalitarian culture is turning things into a "men do the displaying like peacocks do" kinda deal.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

the women there are drab androgynes in monochrome and no makeup lol. those societies are so gender neutral that everyone is trying to meet in the middle but it helps that the women are relatively beautiful if often potato faced

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

potato faced

Lmao

[–]MyDogLovesCorn1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry, but I'd wager my life savings that the average Swedish woman is far more attractive to the average man than you.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

non-attractive people assume everyone is similarly ugly becuz of their solipsism so they think their valueless assessments of the looks of ppl theyve never seen hold any merit lol

[–]MyDogLovesCorn1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Swedish women are consistently ranked to be among the most attractive on Earth by literally every male demographic, and only a not-so-attractive dingrat would feel threatened enough to start insulting them lmao...the fact that you think that NOT being caked up in shitty makeup makes you ugly definitely means that you're ugly and need to be caked up in shitty makeup to feel otherwise.

Oh, and you also apparently think that people who weigh 200 pounds are "skinny". You're fat. Fat people are not attractive unless they're funny, smart, or kind. You're neither.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Swedish women are also consistently ranked to be among the most attractive on Earth,

okay and im hotter so what about it

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those women have good bodies, and butter faces

Still, body goes a long way if the is not ugly

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men spend a lot more time at the gym. Most men put more effort in than I do

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

attractiveness doesn't begin or end in a gym

[–]TibetanWisdom0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Those guys in sweden ,denmark, norway, are white , and on average taller. This is why you found them attractive.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

most of the guys im around in the states are white and taller than average lol. guys over there were still hotter

[–]TibetanWisdom-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

They have foreign DNA which appeals to your evolutionary instinct to produce offspring with strong immune systems

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

interesting that "foreign dna" only appeals to me in the package of an attractive guy the same race as me who lives in a different country and not the multitude of other incarnations of foreign

[–]TibetanWisdom0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

They have different habitat, diet, environmental stress etc.

I bet those guys were not dressed any different than the guys in you home country.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

they were dressed much differently than guys in new york lol

[–]NeedRealityShockSerious senior7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Think about this. For most of human history, sex for a man meant having a good time and a chance to pass on his genes

While for a woman it meant a good chance to pass on her genes, 9 months of physical disability and higher maintenance, a chance to die on childbirth and an extended period of vulnerability in which survival chance for the kid depended as well on the father's genetic fitness

[–]Kouki_S147 points8 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Your logic doesn’t really make a lot of sense to me. You’re complaining about women judging by looks, yet you’ve stated you get messages from average to ugly looking women. You’ve done exactly the same as those you’re complaining about 🤦‍♂️

[–]boomcheese447 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. He needs to admit he just wants the top 20 percent of girls himself. Like all men do.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Because even when we lower our standards to butt ugly girls-average girls, it's still a shit show and basically random luck to get any matches at all on OLD

I swiped right in damn near every girl and stopped even looking at their profile and did it for 3 DAYS on every dating app I could find... Got like 3 matches and 2 conversations. Both stopped replying after 2 messages

[–]boomcheese440 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

But do you really want those ugly girls though? Are you sexually attracted to the average girl?

Even if two average people match, they still have to like each other. Sometimes I think you men think those average girls should just automatically want you just because. I mean, dating isnt exactly easy. Especially when using superficial fuck apps.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't have high standards. I think average girls are fine, I've dated a few when I was in middle school

As long as the girl isn't so fat she has a gut hanging off her waistband. Has hair that looks decent enough (no major hairloss or unwashed). Doesn't have too much acne. Doesn't stink, is good enough

Listen man, when I wasted like 7 hours on dating apps for 3 days and got fuck all, something is wrong. I don't expect to be treated like a king, but there is 0 comparability between the experience of men and women on those apps. My city has over 500,000 people and I had the parameters set to 20 mile radius from me

[–]boomcheese44-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You are one impatient person. Is this how the average man is? 7 hours and 3 days and nothing came of it? Thats normal! Dating isn't like ordering online or getting pizza man! Your city is small and not everyone is on a dating app. Give it a few months? Maybe a year?

Remember this. Most people have 1 to 3 significant relationships in their lifetime. Everything else is going to be just to pass the time.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude my city is right beside a major international city, it's not small. In the next 5 years we should have a million people here

The point you're missing is that I must have swiped on hundreds of women. When you can't get a single match out of HUNDREDS, something is not right. I got 2 conversations that stopped replying after 2 messages

Point was that I can't keep wasting 2.5 hours each day on apps. I'd rather keep my eyes open in real life since I don't go out looking for women, but find them through every day Life randomly

[–]boomcheese440 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Real life is always best. I think people need to not take these apps too seriously.

[–]JosephZheng1116 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I experimented with different pictures of good looking guys. In general I dont think there a lot of women on online dating sites besides bots and dating site employees

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's for sure gotten worse over the last year. Everyone has noticed that as soon as Tinder tried to grift more money off women with Top Pics those women essentially disappeared because suddenly top men had a paywall behind them.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

wHeRe da hOes at noW?

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably either some other dating site or else some trendy bar.

[–]meeselbon57314 points15 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

It is hilarious all of the excuse making in the comments—grasping at straws to say women aren’t really like that. They are. Women are cruel in how they judge men.

[–]learn2earn896 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think I agree that many women can be cruel in their judgments. Unfortunately you can’t force people to be attracted to anyone. I couldn’t force dudes to be attracted to me back in high school when I had acne and my hair looked like crap and I had no boobs or ass. I can say the same about men. I used to work at a movie theater. One day I found a paper where all the women were ranked by attractiveness. I was at the bottom of the list. It was a guy who made the list. Would you say that was cruel?

[–]meeselbon5730 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m sorry you found that list that must have hurt.

However when you say “I can say the same about men,” that isn’t really true. Men are far more generous in evaluating women than the other way around.

Being unattractive must suck. Tbh, I am fortunate that I am significantly above average. It is amusing to see people react to my objective observation (women judging 80% of men as below average is cruel), by thinking I must be a loser. I guess that when it hurts to confront the facts, people hurl insults.

[–]praisethesun799Not actually a fag 😉-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol Cruel , boohooo 😢

[–]tgertcherTake The Grimace Pill1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol abuse, boohoo

[–]praisethesun799Not actually a fag 😉0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

World is unfair. Boo hoo. You seem to be young and inexperienced. Take action. Stop whining. Become a man. Take no shit from no hoe. Let them judge men however they want. Pussy is plenty.

[–]meeselbon5730 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I’m not young, inexperienced, or whining. Lol. I do really well.

Your response is typical: shame anyone who recognizes a fact that is unflattering to women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Don't give a fuck about women. I want men to stop whining.

[–]meeselbon5731 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Why do you call making an honest observation whining? That is a manipulation tactic.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Your observation is incorrect

[–]meeselbon5731 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s better. I respect honest disagreement, but not shaming.

[–]tgertcherTake The Grimace Pill1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why shouldn't we whine? The shit is more rigged than a poker game

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Whining doesn't achieve anything. Vicious cycle.

[–]graaarg2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's Just biology. You are just describing natural selection at work here

[–]rhyth72 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Most men do not try or do not know how to maximize their good looks. The only time I see men trying to improve their appearance on a large scale is when they are either in high school or college. When I was in hs and college most guys put way more effort into their appearance and health compared to men in the workforce.

Also the groups of men who seem to put a lot of effort into their looks are people in frats or sports, UMC, or are a minority like Latino, Asian, and Black. Those men seem very interested in how they look, they have an interest in fashion and finding what angles look best in photos, they always want crisp and clean clothes, they're sneakerheads and like brands. They actively follow those things. They have their hair gelled and styled. They have clear skin from good diet amd may even use some skincare products too, they wear cologne and smell nice.

People in the categories I named invest in themselves more. They're not nursing a beer belly or eating garbage. They don't think it's emasculating to care about what they're wearing or how they look. If you don't care about fashion or skincare or about health then don't be sad when you're picked over for that. Most men say they don't care about living past fifty and their lifestyles show that.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

They don't put as much effort into their looks because there's no one to impress beyond college age. Most men are working in some sort of office, where people are getting on with their work or gossiping about what was on the TV last night and not really caring about impressing anyone.

Then they come home and too tired/not enough time after work to do much. Then at the weekend, they might catch up with friends or generally relax. It's very easy to go a whole week without really speaking or coming into contact with a woman.

[–]rhyth72 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No effort means no results. If there's no one worth impressing then why complain? It's better to be alone and soothe yourself online with porn anyway in that case. Plus a man who doesn't want to take care of himself isn't gonna attract anybody anyway, women do not want to date someone they have to treat as a son. Low quality ppl remove themselves.

[–]tgertcherTake The Grimace Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most people are low quality and still have relationships, so that's not true.

[–]crackrocksteady7buying gf6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was just talking to an Indian dev with a crazy acne breakout all over his face that was bothering me. I dont think any woman who hadn't completely given up would just let that happen without freaking out and dumping half a pharmacy on her face until it went away

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Go to an engineering class... Adults dressed like children in I'll fitting clothes EVERYWHERE including the overweight Prof with a long ponytail and huge cargo pants. SMH and somehow those idiots miraculously get a girlfriend... eventually

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's just way easier to be attractive as a woman. I've always operated on the rule that women need two things out of a good face, nice body, or pleasant personality to be attractive to most men. Whereas men can only be missing one out of height, good face, nice body, hair, sociability, status if they want to be considered attractive to most women.

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is why an online chat room is a much better place to meet someone than an online dating site. A chat plus a picture of a guy will give a woman a much better impression of a guy than just a picture itself. A guy will have to be either exceptionally attractive or have some kind of indicator of high status to make an impression on a woman based upon a picture alone.

[–]LonelyCosAutistic0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]UTC240 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Failed.

[–]TradiWaifu1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most men actually look the same to me.

[–]openlystupid1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Although I feel that women don't value physical attractiveness as much as us men do.

[–]TopOccasion29Mostly Red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

How so lol?

[–]ArcheryDude1011 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You are trying to compare the women standards of attractiveness to the male standards of attractiveness, which you can't really do, because they are like apples and oranges. Women tend to get attracted by someone's personality more than their looks. In this sense, game is perfectly fine, because it's what they want you to do.

[–]TopOccasion29Mostly Red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women tend to get attracted by someone's personality more than their looks.

LMAO what?

[–]ArcheryDude1011 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I did an experiment on this once. I acted really beta to a group of girls. Once they started to ignore me(obviously), I then pulled a really alpha move out of the blue, and I got a girl to invite me to 'hang out' over snapchat. Woman are not men, and contextualizing female sexuality under a male lens will not help you when it comes to girls.

[–]mrchoon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Looks are only a small part of what makes men attractive

[–]ginwithbutts1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe we should stop thinking of attractiveness as where 50% of the population is below 5/10 and 50% is above 5/10. Maybe men are just ugly and like 80% of men are below 5/10.

[–]droolunderpressurePurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Have a walk around in public and count the number of fat, smelly, poorly dressed, insecure, unhygienic men with no determination in life.

[–]FjamsDK1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The bar on male physical attractiveness is set so high. Why do women rate most men as physically unattractive?

Don't rely on dubious statistics from online dating portals. They do not give an accurate picture of the real world. Go out and you'll see all kinds of attractive women who have chose to be with men which are considerable less attractive than themselves. Looks don't matter that much to women as long as you're not a deformed midget.

[–]WhisperTotally LARPing. Really.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because of the combination of two factors:

First, women are the gatekeepers of sex. Second, male attractiveness is mostly behavioural.

Because of the first, women are hardwired to assume that men are unattractive until proven otherwise. Because of the second, a photograph isn't enough to show attractiveness except in extreme edge cases.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Evolutionarily speaking a good looking man does little for a woman. A strong and masculine man can offer protection from other men, but in order to offer protection by definition you have to be well above average. A man average or in the 60 percentile can’t defend you from anyone else as much as another average man. A man in the top 10 percentile though can ward of many men

Additionally, women are wired to want men on status, social standing, ability to provide. These things are often not innate but can be displayed through conversation

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy Link

No. I think the issue is that women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There are 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Fundamentally, when you ask a man if he considers a woman attractive, you are asking:

“Would you bang her? There are no consequences for banging her. You can bang as many women as you want. You don’t have to date or have relationships with the women you bang. This woman only has to be attractive enough to bang. It won’t limit your access to other women.”

When you ask a woman if she considers a man attractive, there are typically a different set of constraints, so you are really asking:

“Would you bang him? If you bang him, you will be somewhat socially penalized. You are only allowed to bang a small number of men, so you must be selective. Don’t bang men you wouldn’t consider for a relationship. So actually, the real question is: would you marry a man who looks like this?”

See the difference?

So, to assess actual differences in pickiness, men and women should be asked:

“Would you marry someone who looks like this?”

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Women slut shame each other, they realize sex as a resource is better when scarce

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

That is certainly one explanation for why slut shaming occurs. However, I don’t think it is the only explanation.

Curiously, though I am very promiscuous (n>100), I have never been slut shamed by women except one time on the Internet, after I told the woman’s boyfriend that no woman of quality would ever fuck his misogynistic ass (lol).

I have, however, slut shamed other women, which I regret. Based on my experience, I believe that when women slut-shame, it serves the following functions:

  1. To regulate status. In college, I called a girl who wanted to be in my crew a “slut” to keep her out of my crew. Her tasteless, overly revealing style of dress and the way she talked about having sex in the bathroom of a low status fraternity was a problem.

  2. Jealousy. I called a girl a “slut” because she was with a guy I liked. It was clear she used her aggressive sexuality to attract him. When I was dancing with him, she pulled him away from me, took him to the bathroom, and fucked him in the bathroom. She crossed me, so I shamed her. I didn’t realize I was using systemic misogyny to do this. I was simply using the tools made available to me by culture.

  3. Social rule enforcement. Women grow up being told we have to dress a certain way, act a certain way, etc. When we see another women break those rules, there’s a sense of unfairness. Why should they be able to get away with it? “If I can’t dress like a slut, she shouldn’t either.”

  4. Mate guarding. Women call other women sluts when they go after the men they have claimed.

Ways promiscuous women avoid getting called sluts:

  1. Maintaining social status, social dominance.

  2. Dating and hooking up with high quality men.

  3. Being discreet.

  4. Staying away from guys other women have claimed.

  5. Dressing well.

  6. Generally projecting shamelessness may be a factor.

When these rules are followed, it seems women actually encourage promiscuity in other women.

I postulate that wealthier, more attractive women can get away with being more slutty without encountering any shaming.

Meanwhile, slut shaming from men takes a different, more nefarious form. It is more directly about shaming and suppressing female sexuality.

Still, it is mainly men I’ve rejected who slut shame me personally. And when men slut shame in general, I think this may be due to jealousy because they are not easily getting laid.

In my experience, high status men who get women easily never slut shame. Then again, sometimes conservative guys get bothered when I talk about my sexual history or call myself a slut in bed (dirty talk). However, this issue can be solved by assuring them of fidelity, assuring them of no STDs, and assuring them they are enough in bed.

I'd also argue that empowered women view the commodification of female sexuality degrading, so raising the price of sex isn't really valued. Modern women are more likely to respect the woman who is financially independent and takes what she wants. Consider how gold diggers are not respected.

Perhaps there are two types of sluts:

  1. The woman who takes what she wants according to her desires.

  2. The woman who gives into what men want according to men's desires.

Type #2 is essentially a threat to women's status in society. Women don't like type #2.

[–]dval92White Anglo-Saxon Hebrew0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Good analysis re the motivations for why women would stigmatize promiscuity.

I don't get this however:

Ways promiscuous women avoid getting called sluts:

  1. Maintaining social status, social dominance.
  2. Dating and hooking up with high quality men.
  3. Being discreet.
  4. Staying away from guys other women have claimed.
  5. Dressing well.
  6. Generally projecting shamelessness may be a factor.

When these rules are followed, it seems women actually encourage promiscuity in other women.

A woman can follow all six guidelines (maybe just the first five, since 6 contradicts 3), but if her social circle views promiscuity as a vice, they may disown her anyway because she's committed a social crime. Sure, her social standing might convince some easily impressionable women that promiscuity isn't a bad thing, but it that effect won't be widespread.

Meanwhile, slut shaming from men takes a different, more nefarious form. It is more directly about shaming and suppressing female sexuality.

Potentially. Based on your descriptions a more realistic explanation is that scorned men target a women's promiscuity as weakness, framing it as poor impulse control and an indicator of an empty personality.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I guess. I was “popular” in high school and in college (before transferring). My current boyfriend literally called my crew at Vandy “the hot, popular girls.”

I guess my body count was only 4 going into college, but I used to take a lot of guys back to my dorm to “hook up” (make out plus hand stuff, lol).

The first time I got laid at Vandy, I got congrats from all my friends. It was a guy id known for months but had tried to just be friends with bc his ex was kind of crazy. After that, I dropped out of school, so it never turned into anything, but we stayed in touch for 7 years afterwards until he got engaged and then unfriended me on Facebook and told me to not contact him again (funny bc he’d been the one reaching out to me).

No one popular would have endorsed virginity or celibacy. That would have meant you were weirdly religious or couldn’t get a boyfriend or something.

Then again, I didn’t have a one night stand involving actual intercourse until transferring to Wash U, where I wasn’t very social. My first one night stand involved girls saying, “OMG he is so hot! How did you do that? You HAVE to hook up with him.”

We had just walked into the bar at around 1 am. I had walked right up to the hottest guy and talked to him. This was par for the course for me. But these girls were not as attractive and were impressed. Bc there were 3 girls saying I “had to,” I took him home and fucked him. Then I didn’t give him my number bc it was a bit weird. He didn’t go to Wash U. It didn’t seem like we had much in common. I was 21 by this time. He was #9.

Re 6 versus 3, I see what you mean. I guess it’s “be discreet, but if you do talk about it, be shameless.”

I guess it’s like did anyone on Sex and the City ever slut shame Samantha Jones? Probably not. Right?

[–]dval92White Anglo-Saxon Hebrew0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

No one popular would have endorsed virginity or celibacy. That would have meant you were weirdly religious or couldn’t get a boyfriend or something.

That isn't an endorsement (or disapproval) of promiscuity though, just that you would need to meet a baseline of sexual and romantic activity to be perceived as "normal" within your social group.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I don’t know. My point was I’ve never been slut shamed by women and there must be a reason for that.

[–]amber2244 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because men are lazy and don't put effort into male beauty.Also men discourage each other from putting effort into their looks.I don't date ugly menBecause men are lazy and don't put effort into male beauty.Also men discourage each other from putting effort into their looks.I don't date ugly men unless they're richBecause men are lazy and don't put effort into male beauty.Also men discourage each other from putting effort into their looks.I don't date ugly menBecause men are lazy and don't put effort into male beauty.Also men discourage each other from putting effort into their looks.I don't date ugly men unless they're rich.

[–]squadfleekgoalz3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because men are not that attractive.

[–]crackrocksteady7buying gf5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sperm is cheap eggs are expensive the end. Make yourself high value

[–]Fizney2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are mostly praised for being pretty. Men are mostly praised for their achievements. It's been like this for a long time. It's no wonder we're still subconsciously wired to think 'women pretty. men work' to the point that it takes a lot more for a man to be considered very attractive. It works vice versa in that it takes a lot more work from a woman to be seen as hard working in her field of work than a man.

(edit: though an attractive woman in her work will probably be more noticed due to her being pretty)

[–]strangelovesglassesstay still, eyes closed3 points4 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

most men aren’t amazing to look at its as simple as that and they’re nothing amazing. women objectify men as accessories a lot time and if you’re not going to make her look better or raise her social status or add anything to her life then they’re not going to talk to you.

from another perspective women on average add a lot more to a man’s life and most women aren’t going to hinder their social standing too much if they’re not quality or they offer something men like a lot that being sex.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie3 points4 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Out of curiosity, how old are you?

I see a lot of dudes hold this outlook too and it completely fucks them over (because the believe this bs). Men, if they just don't fucking stagnant, will be good "prospects" for some chick in a relationship. And on the surface level, it's a decent "exchange" of values.

As for the male perspective, what do women on average bring to a mans life? Because there's usually a lot of fucking projection of useless "benefits" only women care about. So they think they are doing you a favor, which is a disastrous mindset with dudes that start figuring out women.

So lets hear it, what do women on average bring to men's lives?

[–]strangelovesglassesstay still, eyes closed0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

old enough to know these tricks.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

uh huh. Hence the inability to admit your age. I'm late thirties and you sound like your are in your early twenties. Like 21, 22.

[–]strangelovesglassesstay still, eyes closed0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

yes of course you’d like to know, you need as much dirt as you can get for you insults, now fuck off curious george.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Dirt?! Are you fucking kidding me. I just want you to be honest, which you aren't. You got to be taking notes from Trump or something.

[–]strangelovesglassesstay still, eyes closed0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

explain why you need to know anything about me seriously.

[–]dval92White Anglo-Saxon Hebrew0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I just want you to be honest, which you aren't. You got to be taking notes from Trump or something.

That's rich coming from the person clearly trying to infantilize another person for sayings things about women that you didn't like.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Her answers are poor. Untested. Young. Foolish.

She's about as intellectually dishonest as the shitty men she seems to be an expert on.

[–]im_am_a_loser 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe people wouldn't have to do that to you if you weren't such a c*nt

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband[M] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–]PMmeareasontolive-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I disagree with people who are saying men aren't physically attractive. Most men and women are average. There are a lot of women who are only moderately attractive at best, but men are willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and at least get to know them a little and see if the personality puts it over the top.

Women rarely grant that opportunity to men.

I do agree that a women will be unattracted if men appear to be in a lower social or economic class than them (which clues they are adept at picking up on).

[–]brian_bore_u2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The simple answer is hypergamy.

[–]ontherailstoday1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why? Well... why not?

[–]red_matrix1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The simplest answer I can give is men and women are opposites: yin and yang, you know what I mean?

The male’s penis is his spear, he’s on the attack. A woman’s “flower” is inviting, she attracts men to it with sugar and honey.

Men are on the hunt, they cast a wide net, male thirst is strong which is why they will bang anything that moves. Men are chasers.

Women don’t attack, they’re emotive. That’s why through the ages women spend so much time looking pretty, they dress to impress and wear makeup and all that to attract their mate of desire. Subtle signaling is their game. Women are choosers.

[–]thasixohfour0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Some of it is that women are just as delusional as men. Take someone like Rebel Wilson, she would definitely want some of that Jason Momoa D, even though she's a two at best. Or Lena Dunham, who accosted Brad Pitt on the red carpet. Imagine a man of her equally subpar looks, doing the same thing to Scarlet Johanson. Low quality women have become as out of touch as incels, they just aren't violent about it.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because the law lets women off when they do it to a man. If an ugly man does it to a hot woman, the cops get called and that man is given a restraining order. The cops would just laugh in a man's face if he reported being sexually harassed by a woman.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased Against Humans[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]thundrthy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women arnt good at judging men on looks alone. we care about social status, skills, humor. We just want a guy who is better at life than we are.

It seems that men care much more about looks alone than women. Men want the hottest woman they can find without her being a complete psycho.

[–]IAMA1240 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well... I mean... most women I see when I'm out are pretty unattractive to me tbh.

[–]Thinkingard0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

On the internet it's a sellers market, and the sellers are women. The buyers, men, can only choose between so many girls selling (someone they'd be willing to meet), compared to how many men are buying (men will buy just about anything, so demand is always high). IRL I mostly see couples who are about the same on the SMV chart. Couples, mind you. People who simply hook up, who knows, because they are difficult to spot IRL.

[–]jmitch880 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Your findings with the catchfish profile explains a lot. You just need to read between the lines. You posted a top 5% attractive male picture. Your most responsive catches were decent to ugly. Women are driven to date up. There are many other factors of why low attractive women take shots or are very forward with a traditionally attractive male but it plays into knowing where they stack up and needing to overcome that deficit.

Also women are not as visually excited as men. This explains why women have such a higher bar for physical attraction. It just takes more to get them going.

You said little to none of the replies to your catch fish where very attractive. This goes back to the lifetime difference between attractive and unattractive women and how the world interact with them and they with the world. Attractive women seldom make the first move and even less so from an online profile. These women have a very different view of dating and almost always fall for a guy for a combined set of reasons. Looks would get him in the door of their interest to investigate if he fills most of their preferences and zero red flags(all subjective to the woman in question). An attractive woman has a whole tool box of ways to get into the targets sphere then attractive his attention. Once she has it she will offer hints and clues that she is interested in him.

[–]pnadlerlaw0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

You realize that’s a double-edged sword, right?

Unlike women, you can actually become a 9-10 as a man just by dieting and going to the gym. Once you’re even a 9, as a man, you’re like in the top 5% of all men. You have your pick of injured bird 7s, submissive 8s, down to earth 9s, and slightly mentally disturbed 10s.

On the other hand, do you have any idea how many female 9s there are? Add the fact that men are flexible and not as egotistical when it comes to the minimum they’re willing to reasonably accept from the other person, and those 9s don’t really have THAT MUCH MORE bargaining power than 7s or 8s, or THAT MUCH LESS than near perfect 10s.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

you can actually become a 9-10 as a man just by dieting and going to the gym

No that's not true at all. 9 or 10 males are genetically gifted. They also go to the gym and diet, don't get me wrong, but they are gifted with the perfect face genetics, great muscle insertions on their body and good bone structure (such as naturally wide shoulders). Plus they're usually tall too, like 6ft1-6ft4.

Many people don't realise that there's a wide variety of different body types and some look better with muscle on than others. If you have naturally wide obliques for instance (this is the case for me, and yes I've dieted down to low bodyfat and still have them), you will never have a v-taper equivalent to someone who was fortunate enough to be born with narrower obliques. The tendons on your arm may be longer than average (this is the case for me as well), meaning your bicep starts further up the arm and it looks like your arms aren't as big or impressive. Things like this are very important, and in order to be a 9 or 10 male genetics do need to be strongly in your favour.

That said, you could get up to like a 6-7 with diet and lifting for several years. Then the rest falls down to genetics.

[–]pnadlerlaw0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Even the most egotistical and self-absorbed women who externally put men down (he’s below my league, hahaha!!!) just to feel better about themselves can’t genuinely deny that a guy who has a high level of fitness is more attractive than a man with an overweight or obese body (facial structure, height, genetics aside).

Obviously, if it’s “extreme,” like the guy’s face is butt ugly, he’s 5’4”, and his shoulders are somehow as wide as his hips, then yes. But a guy with an average face, average genetics, and average height ... if he’s hitting the gym and dieting and has a high level of fitness, he can be a 9. He’s not limited to a 6-7.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

narrower obliques

As a hourglasser, I assure you, you aren’t missing much.

Interesting, V taper is small hips and broad shoulders, I can’t imagine how big obliques would matter, unless they stick out or something?

[–]ItsOverBoyosLDARKeep calm and get cucked by Chad1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, in the west you also need to be aryan, tall, have great facial aesthetics and a full head of hair. If you are exceptionally shredded you might add 1.5 - 2 points out of 10 but the notion that anyone can become a 9 just by going to the gym and dieting is frankly ridiculous.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So, Jeff Cavaliere and Scooby Werkstatt are 9/10? You’ve got a weird homo taste.

[–]pnadlerlaw0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who? Don’t know who the second guy is. But for men their age, yes. Go outside the home. Walk into a café or bagel store. Look at actual men out there. Go to the beach. These two guys are in the top 5% of men in their respective categories just from their level of fitness alone.

[–]sunsinclair0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My feeling is this. As a guy to be attractive you have to be above average IN SOME WAY. On an online profile almost the only way to stick out is your picture. Profile matters a bit but honestly most people are such bad writers pictures really are like 1000 words.

But meeting people in real life you can stick out in other ways.

[–]SpecialSpnk0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do yourself a favor.... Go onto the real trp and search Tinder. There is a genius tech written in there that will help lay it out for you.

I am by no means a male model nor am I tall. I am in good shape and look fairly sexy. Once I changed up my pictures and profile I am now rolling in likes... Literally I match 5-10 women a day if I am on it. I have 99+ likes in my match cue... Read that shit and learn it. There is a reason TRP WORKS

It was never like that until I changed what wasn't working. But now I have oneitis like a lil bitch and even fucking a chick in the ass for an hr straight dom style doesn't cut into the emptiness I feel rn.

[–]fevertree0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Those statistics are based on tindr...where women are just looking to hook up based on a photo. Insofar as women are not as thirsty for sex as men 1. They select hookups based entirely on the photo. And 2. They’ll only do it if a prospect is physically appealing.

[–]mandoa_sky0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

i don't care how hot he is. if he doesn't have a decent amount of detail in his profile, i don't swipe right.

if he fails to hold a decent convo, i always ghost.

[–]slavicgypsygirl 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Men I consider unattractive are often very attractive to other women & vice versa

I just have a certain type

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

That "type" is usually similar among most women. It's never short chubby and balding. It is tall, fit, muscular, strong jawline etc. It's why my catfish accounts get a lot of attention from women, but a large number of men (including me) get essentially nothing out of the online dating process. Women's physical standards are very high and very narrow.

Real life is a little bit more forgiving, but those high physical standards still largely remain.

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

The bar is set high because we don’t actually care that much. For most women, so much more than physical attractiveness goes into the equation for being interested in a guy. I’m sure it’s impossible for most men to understand, but when physical attractiveness is maybe only 15-20% of the equation IF THAT, for us to “rate a man as physically attractive” he has to be hot enough for us to actually notice.

It’s like asking someone who doesn’t like cats to rate how cute your cat is. Your cat has to be hella cute to even register on the radar of someone who simply doesn’t care in general about how cute cats are.

Edit: I just read beyond the title and if your question is based on dating profile pics, yeah, the data is going to be quite skewed. As I said, in real life, so much more goes into the equation, but when a woman essentially ONLY has a picture to go by.... yeah, gosh I just don’t know how else to simplify it for you: the data is going to be skewed.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ahh the good old "women aren't that bothered about looks" line. Is that still perpetuated in 2019? I think I've seen enough of the real world to know that they care a lot about looks.

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yup. Read the rest of the comments, buddy.

Sure we can be turned off by particularly bad looks, but to be turned on by looks ALONE, they have to be particularly good looks. If you can’t understand that, I’m sorry. You’re just not capable I guess.

I’m an average to above above average woman. I don’t know what you consider good looks for a man, but my boyfriend is morbidly obese with a cute face and cute smile. He does have facial hair and that probably helps. It wasn’t his looks that got me interested. It was his humor and the way he made me laugh. I’ve drooled after guys simply because they were my intellectual match which was always difficult for me to find. They weren’t particularly attractive. Trust me.

If you’re not capable of understanding this concept, you’re definitely not the kind of guy I’d be interested in, and I don’t need to see a picture of you to know it!

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I know when women lie about this stuff. I think I read somewhere (not sure if it was this thread or somewhere else on reddit) that women basically grow up to lie about this sort of stuff. It's like an evolutionary trait of some kind that they all pick up - it's all part of their dual mating strategy to get good genes + a good provider for her kids.

[–]glasraen0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I won’t argue that women want good genes and a good provider for her offspring. But why you are so unilaterally focused on looks is beyond me. There are more to good genes than looks. Looks is the external most indication of “good genes.” “Good genes” are also indicated by scent, taste, sound (voice), sense of humor, other social skills, reasoning skills, communication skills, memory, strength, agility, patience, ability to empathize.... the list goes on.

Looks are most important when it comes to casual hookups because, evolutionarily speaking, if you have no expectation that a mate is going to stick around and be a provider, he’d better AT LEAST be able to provide heritable good looks to those offspring. Even then, the other factors matter, but looks matter more in that scenario than they do otherwise.

Any woman who disregards those other signs of a quality mate is herself severely lacking in either intelligence or general life experience—probably both.

An intelligent man will feel the same way about a long term partner: looks are very important, yes, but if he is going to give up some freedom and the chance to reproduce with as many women as possible, he better make sure his long term partner is worth it (“has good genes”), and that involves all of the above indicators. In a casual sex scenario, looks still matter but he’ll “bang average Beckies” because evolutionarily speaking there’s no disadvantage to him doing so. In modern times, however, the tables are turning (awww poor men, being held accountable for their offspring today... must be so difficult).

[–]LillthOfBabylon0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

that women rate approximately 80% of men as below average - that's just below average by the way. Maybe only 5% of all men are considered to be good looking by women. The bar is set so high for male beauty, hardly any man qualifies for it.

And? If you haven't noticed, women dont put looks at a high priority.

But the men who do qualify for it get a lot of attention and a lot of sex.

And?

With my normal pictures, I get no messages from women.

Are you trying to date or hookup?

Any replies I do get, the woman gets quickly bored and stops replying or blocks me.

So it's your personality. AND YOU TRIED CATFISHING PEOPLE. Definitely a personality problem.

However, the women who send me messages range from average looking to ugly - nothing especially good looking.

Definitely a personality problem.

no wonder men find it so tough.

- Complains about being lonely.

- Scoffs when average looking girls talk to you.

Definitely a personality problem.

Or at least not attractive enough to want sex with them,

If I'm just trying to get a one night stand, why would I choose a guy that I find unattractive?

without some other pre-requisite being involved such as alcohol or the man having a good job or high status.

r/ChoosingBeggars

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's not a personality problem. My photos are almost exactly the same poses, lighting and photo quality to the catfish's. My profile is virtually identical to the catfish's and the way I type is virtually identical to the catfish. Nothing changes other than the face in the photo. Yet the catfish gets multiple women throwing themselves at him, I get fuck all.

I'm personally not turning my back on or scoffing at average looking women. I'm saying that in relation to the hotness of the catfish, these women are average or ugly. Please actually understand what I write.

I did have a good chuckle at "personality problem". That's what's always diagnosed to average or ugly looking guys in online dating - yeah, must be that awful PERSONALITY that's causing you to get no interest from women. :D

[–]TrueReligionGenesLooxist0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Its simply how sexual selection works. Its not a one to one looksmatch fairy tale. Its more a winner take all competition where everything has to go right developmentally, and there's very little room for error along the way.

To be hot as a male, you need to have a sexually dimoprhic face and build. Forward grown maxilla, long ramus, low gonial angle, prominent zygos, large skull, wide clavicles, thick neck, height, etc. (whereas these things can boost a womans looks but arent absolutely required). Testosterone and hgh is taxing on the nervous system/immune system and not every male has the genetic or environmental capacity to develop the requisite masculinity to be considered universally attractive by the female sexual instinct. It's a very complex topic, but it basically boils down to having "it" , which i like to think of as a very strong masculine spiritual essence that manifests as a sexually worthy male. Women select for these essences, and they are for the most part rare in the human male population.

[–]GalaxyBejdyk0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

and they are for the most part rare in the human male population.

Are they though?

I am hardly the manliest of men , but if I take a look on myself on from the side, I think I have a decent maxilla (which was the only benefits of an my mild underbite), decent ramus and gonial angle and fairly big face/skull. And pretty good clavivles, I would say so. No prominent cheekbones, but hey what can you do?

There are plenty of men with these features around me, in fact, I think that most men I've seen have some of these features to a degree.

Also, isn't a large face generally considered unattractive?

Most of the pop star sweetherats, have really small face.

[–]folasanmi0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thing is most guys have the wrong definition of attractiveness. You don’t have to have male model looks with a perfectly square jaw and six pack abs to be attractive ( although that helps no doubt). You just need tot have a look and it needs to make sense. Are you in shape? How do your clothes fit, are you well groomed? How do your teeth look, your smell. Just your overall look.

I think if some guys took care of this, they would go up 2 points easy.

But yeah since tinder and all these other apps are strictly looks then it’s harder for males to succeed unless you are too whatever percent in looks. I think black pill guys use tinder as a means to justify “ all girls care about is looks when that’s not that true

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Don’t worry; I’m in my 40s, and get some response from my photos. But the quality of both the messages and people messaging me is so low it’s basically worthless. People who misspell my name, take ages to reply to messages, or get hung up on stupid shit early on blows my mind. I honest can say that a large majority of women on these apps are undateable. It’s just a buzzkill trying to engage with them, even when they Initiate. Good quality women don’t go on these apps; they don’t need to.

[–]duckylilaa0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm curious where your statistics come from. Personally, I've always been pretty eclectic in what I considered to be a good looking man. I had a thing for the chubby, hairy guys who look like bears. My best friend likes the slender bony guys with glasses. My husband is handsome and has a great moustache but I do find him attractive when he puts on a little weight. I don't know if I ask my female friends (In our late twenties and early thirties) I think we all like men who aren't your typical male underwear model. I think people are receptive to little details more than they are to a perfect physique so don't feel defeated!

[–]shonenhikada0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because sperm is cheap and eggs are valuable. Because even a 4/10 female will be swarmed by 5-6/10 males asking her out and wanting to commit to her. Because so many men are white knight betas that do things for women just because they are women. Hell, there is this story of a 5/10 female that made 30k in a month from selling her adult exclusive snapchat. So yeah. If men want it to stop, males have to control their thirstyness and stop white knighting nearly every damn female and calling every 4/10 female in reality a god damn goddess.

[–]DownvotedFreethinker0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Idk as a "good looking" male. I think that that 80 % nonsense is bullshit. I only consider myself to b an 8.... and since I'm an arrogant s.o.b that must mean I'm a 7.5. I don't have abs and I dont have huge muscles. What I do have is a uniform and a steady paycheck that is above average. But yea women tell me im a 9 or a 10. What u need to understand, as I do, is that women cant help but lie. That's all they do and they r actually trained by society to do so. I get hit on all the time. It happens enough to where it isnt a conversation to have with anyone about... nothing out of the ordinary. Havent you ever wondered why male strippers wear uniforms and female strippers dont?

[–]-Mavs0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

That 20/80 number for men always made me think if women didn't have makeup to hide behind, the number would be the same for women, that only 20% of females would be attractive to men and 80% are unattractive.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It does make you wonder. How can males offset the advantage that makeup gives females? By using makeup themselves?

[–]sunsinclair0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Your best bet is to find someone you know who’s real good at taking pictures. Like a Facebook friend who posts pictures all the time that make you look. Have her take your pictures.

[–]hanniebunches0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men don’t have a good grasp of aesthetics

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think maybe is bc women are slut shamed so much.

Try this thought experiment:

There 100 women. You can have sex with 50 of them. When asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Now imagine you can only have sex with 5 of these 100 women or you will be severely penalized and shamed. Now, when asked to rate who is and isn’t attractive, how picky will you be?

Women have lower sexual desire on average, yes. This is a fact, regardless of how politically incorrect it may sound to some. And finding less men attractive is a symptom of that.

Is lower desire in women a function of biology or culture? Its possible that it is both. People often identify an issue with eggs being more expensive than sperm. However, I think the effect of culture is tremendous.

What I think is going on with women who are asked to give a “yes” or a “no” regarding attraction is that they are conditioned to be picky due to restrictions placed on female sexuality by society. To be too open to sexual encounters is to make oneself the target of slut shaming.

If you ask men to say “yes” or “no” regarding whether a woman is attractive enough for a relationship, I think you might observe a similar level of pickiness as is seen with women.

Personally, I have access to, say, the top 5% of men. Maybe the top 0.5% of men are out of my league, but I rarely encounter a guy who isn’t interested based on my looks alone (and then I let out the crazy, mwahahaha). Because I have access to very high quality men, I choose very high quality men for relationships.

When it comes to casual sex, however, I am less picky. This is because I let go of slut shaming around age 27, so I have no qualms about having sex when I want, just because I’m horny. Often, I will prioritize convenience, safety, and efficiency in casual sex encounters. The truth is I only really need a guy to be attractive enough. And how attractive is attractive enough in a given moment depends on my level of hormones and options at the time.

Picking a casual partner is liking finding a pair of shoes to match a dress at the last minute for an event you have the same day. You only have time to go to 1-2 stores. You can’t order them online. Chances are you’ll have to overpay and make do with a pair of shoes that isn’t up to your normal standards. You’ll do this because you have to get shoes in a matter of hours. For women who allow themselves to seek out sex when they want it, a lower standard is needed, just as when shopping for shoes at the last minute. This is especially the case when seeking out sex on vacation, or in a new city.

This is different than impulse buying the perfect shoes you are lucky enough to run into, which is how casual sex works in cases where women are approached for casual sex by men of higher quality than they normally get. Women who only have this type of casual sex are still restricted by slut shaming, only making exceptions for the most high quality men. These women will exhibit high pickiness restricted only to men of relationship quality.

However, my ego still keeps the sample of men I sleep with relatively high compared to the total range of men I’m actually attracted to. This is because I want to feel like a highly desirable female, and dating and hooking up with high quality men supports that narrative.

Also, attraction isn’t really like an on or off switch. It is a spectrum. I’ve noticed that the sex is better the more attracted I am to my partner. Insofar as my goal is to optimize the quality of my sexual encounters, I prefer to have sex with the most attractive men I can get. Other factors that affect the quality of sex for me personally include penis size, athleticism, kinkiness, and skills.

Sometimes if I learn a guy has skills and/or is well endowed, I will sleep with him even if he’s not that physically attractive. Sometimes I feel like I can sense it so I’ll try making out with a guy, then let him finger me and see how he does. This is slutty of me, but it’s a way for me to uncover guys with special talents I appreciate (only about 5% of men can make me squirt, for example). I’m getting off track ...

Back to my point. The truth is, if I were put on a deserted island with just two randomly selected dudes, the odds are I’d be attracted to at least one of them.

[–]BumblingBetaWannabe Chad Thundercock[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You have high standards for relationships but low standards for casual sex? I thought that should be the other way around - women have high standards for physical beauty and masculinity when it's just sex, but for relationships they're prepared to lower those standards and put emphasis on other areas, such as security, dependability, loyalty etc.

Also is penis size an important issue for most women? I've always had a gut feeling that size matters a lot (particularly for women with plenty of sexual experience), but virtually every thread on the internet says it doesn't matter.

Thanks for post btw. I read it all (I've read all posts on this topic). Interesting read, though some parts do sound like they were written by a male.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

See shoe shopping analogy.

If I want to get laid ASAP on a given day, I'm going to have limited options relative to if I have time to shop around for a boyfriend.

The only times women can have higher standards for casual are: 1. She is not very attractive and cannot get high quality men to date her, so the bar we are comparing to is low. 2. She has casual sex when men initiate rather than when she wants on her schedule. 3. She only has casual sex rarely.

To have causal sex on a frequent basis is not that easy. In my experience, it is difficult to maintain casual sex partners. The retention rate is low. And the supply has to be constantly replenished. To get laid frequently in a year, you will need at least 10 casual sex partners. Say you have sex with each 5 times, that gives you sex about once a week. So depending on your libido, you might actually need 15, especially because 5 will probably be one night stands. You will also need to maintain at least 2-3 at any given time because casual sex partners are typically less available than romantic partners. This is another inefficiency.

To have a relationship that lasts a year, you need only find one relationship partner.

It is going to be harder to hold all 10+ casual partners to the same standard as the one, especially when casual sex partners are typically procured under time-sensitive conditions. Refer back to shoe shopping example.

The one relationship partner may be selected from a sample of 100 men who are interested. This selection process involves exposure to a much wider range of options, such as with online shopping versus shopping in one boutique when you need new shoes ASAP. Each of the 10 casual partners will likely be selected from a sample of maybe 10 (maybe less, maybe only 1 such as in case of being at a bar, maybe there are only 3 hot guys at the bar, only one is interested - you fuck the one option because he's there).

It also may be that higher quality guys are more likely to stick around because they are less insecure. Or maybe I am nicer to them. Or maybe I am biased in favor of the men I date because I get to know them better. Studies have shown people basically see the attractiveness of those they love with rose-colored glasses. But they are objectively 1.2" taller on average. I know because I put them all in Excel. Haha I'm a nerd.

But also I personally am so slutty that sometimes I am just really horny and am like, "Okay you'll do," with the most convenient option. Factors like trust and safety are also relevant. It comes down to risk/reward and effort/reward. With casual sex, the bangs/dude ratio is lower, so you cannot justify a high effort/dude ratio.

Penis size matters a lot to me. I have clitoral nerve damage. I am not representative. Women orgasm more with other women than with men, so having a penis is not even that important for many women. Studies have shown women prefer just slightly over average, on average, for relationships. Women prefer bigger penises for casual sex than for relationships, on average. I find that interesting, but in my sample, the guys I date probably have the bigger penises. This is bc sex quality is such a big component for me, almost to a degree that is depressing, because everything else can be perfect, but if the sex isn't good, it won't work out.

Very good sex leads to feelings for me. Then again, maybe it is more of a positive feedback system where more feelings also lead to better sex, but if the sex doesn't meet a certain threshold physically, it can't work and the loop won't be activated.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter