TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

126

Sex is a pleasurable act between two engaging (and consenting) people. It takes two to tango. The way people word it in their posts in comments, they treat sex as something women gift men for being good little boys. But women get just as much pleasure from it as well, they want to have sex.

Any theories as to why? Genuinely curious as to why people are socialized this way.


[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (39 children) | Copy Link

Women's libido is overall lower than mens.

There are many men here who will be like "THATS NOT TRUE, MY GIRLS WANT TO FUCK ME MORE THAN I DO THEM!" Which is either like... bragging and cosplaying and being fake on the internet (my first guess), or legit being dumb or inexperienced enough to never had an LTR/cohabitation with a woman. No matter the hotness or fitness or status or whatever of the guy in question, most women's libido starts going down given enough time in a relationship.

Combine this, with the fact that men are usually more eager to have sex with women at the start of the relationship too, and you end up with the inevitable conclusion that women are the gatekeepers of sex. They largely control when it happens. Take any human behavior involving more than one person; the person who needs it less has the most power and control over it. Denying this is just willful ignorance, or perhaps ill motivated lying and fakery as I previously described to try and pump yourself up and make it out like you're some big dick Chad and everyone else is a loser. It's just wearisome how many men engage in that particular line of bullshit at this sub, like it will somehow get them laid. Validation points on the internet are addictive i guess.

[–]Nobodykers9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Was searching for your comment, was not disappointed.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Glad i could be of service.

[–]Nobodykers2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It sucks for single undesirable men. We feel like as if we are lesser human beings for being unable to attract a partner. But your comments show the dirty side of things. You show us that achieving pussy validation is not the best thing ever to happen.

Thanks for that.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Glad i could be of service... but with even more sarcasm and dismay at me being miserable enough to cheer up others

In the black comedy that is my life, im the only clown not laughing

[–]persceptivepanda260 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude it does not matter how attractive you are as a guy, women will always put humor and tenderness above looks. Date a blind chick if you look like fuckin Igor

[–]rus9384Misanthrope3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

LTR/cohabitation with a woman

So, when there is no LTR/cohabitation women have their libido higher?

Man's libido does not in general go down in marriage, but his desire to have sex with a certain woman, namely, his wife, goes down.

[–]tylmin 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Where this has actually been studied, in younger people, this isn't the case.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0092623X.2011.569637

women's sexual desire was significantly and negatively predicted by relationship duration after controlling for age, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction. Men's sexual desire, however, was not significantly affected by the duration of their romantic relationships.

[–]rus9384Misanthrope0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

What does

controlling for age, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction

mean? That depending on age, relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction affect whether woman's sexual desire diminishes?

Or do you mean I'm wrong on men's part?

[–]antariuszRed Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re wrong about men. Men want it just as much, we just tend to want it less, in general, as we get older.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside[S] 2 points3 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

But just because a woman might want it less often over time it doesn't change the fact that it's an act between both parties. What is the difference between "Having sex" with each other, and "Giving sex" to him?

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here9 points10 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Dude, women GIVE men consent. Men seduce and physically escalate, women give consent of their bodies.

That doesn’t mean both parties don’t enjoy it or they are not “having sex.” They are still having sex and she is giving her body to him.

[–]rus9384Misanthrope5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

This is the root of the belief that when both parties are drunk, it's a man who is a rapist.

But often it's a woman who acts seductive when drunk and man's response is just reactive. I.e. it's a man who gives his consent.

[–]Sociallyfunctional 1 points [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yes

"Agreement" makes more sense to me than "consent"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

"Capitulation"

[–]Sociallyfunctional 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

No that means something else

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

"She gives in"

[–]Sociallyfunctional 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

How does that come into play if she's fucking someone she wants to fuck in the first place

If she doesn't want to fuck him but changes her mind because it will benefit her somehow then yea OK she capitulates but that's not the norm for relationships or hookups

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

How does that come into play if she's fucking someone she wants to fuck in the first place

She gives in to fuck him because he's earned her spamflaps. With presents, with money, dates, or status.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

To the extent that sex is a consensual act, and it usually is, then having sex makes sense. However, that aspect of sex is completely pointless to discuss since there is no difficulty or really anything intellectually interesting about it.

The only aspect of sex that matters to a sexual strategy subreddit is the part where you have to actually apply a strategy to get it, since women generally don't just hand out free sex. After you earn, or win, or negotiate, or wily tactics your way into sex, THEN the woman decides she wants to have it, and it becomes having sex. Not before.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here5 points6 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Why are we having such a hard time here? This seems obvious. It’s self-evident that men just don’t “have sex.” They have to earn it and win it.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

The blue pill springs eternal in the human breast

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here5 points6 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

The women here are acting like it’s not true when it’s self evident that women act like their pussies are made of gold, only to be given to the most worthy.

[–]edge_lord_super_171 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

We should have the same attitude to how we give our.resources to them

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes but we also shouldn’t deny it when we do lol

[–]edge_lord_super_171 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Haha, Ill be as blatant as I can. Next thing you know a female Red pill subreddit is made(Not RedpillWomen) with the aim of understanding why us men do that and how to snake their way into our pockets. It would be so ironic

[–]kragshotDon't mind me...I'm just studying all of you talking monkeys....0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't there a subreddit for Cosmo already out there?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Theres already books on that which are top sellers.

Not to mention mainstream magazines and plenty of youtube channels.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Its coming.

[–]edge_lord_super_170 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]Sociallyfunctional 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes. Why don't you?

[–]edge_lord_super_170 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't you worry about me, I surely will.

[–]NaturalQueer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's less about my pussy being made of gold and more I want to be with someone I am at more than a little attracted to.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women must slap this truth down. When men finally realize how much they have to chase this shit, and how little it's worth for what they put out, FFS the free ride for them is OVER.

[–]sebbegerbert0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

On the flip side men are sometimes called gatekeepers of LTR or marriage.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here33 points34 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

It’s part of how women frame relationships. He “won me over” among many of phrases suggest that men win the favor of women and therefore wins her as a prize. Women think very highly of access to their bodies and such vulnerability, while men typically do not.

Furthermore, it is just female and male sexuality. Men pursue and physically escalate and women consent. Our consent culture is nearly exclusively framed as men asking women for consent. If a women is typically the one who gives consent, then she will be giving herself to him. She gives herself to the man when he asks.

[–]Cho_AssmilkArrogant RP S.O.B.9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women think very highly of access to their bodies and such vulnerability, while men typically do not.

Men think very highly of access to their time and giving it away so freely, while women typically don't

The yin yang analogy

[–]bluehorserunning4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

It's not so much that we 'think highly of our bodies and our vulnerability' as that society trains us to be afraid of men. All of the CSIs, all of the crime dramas, all of our parents' warnings, all of the news stories about this or that woman attacked/killed for turning a man down tells us that men are dangerous and not to trust them too quickly. That, combined with a significant subset of men whom you can tell do not think of you as human, makes women (in general) more cautious on whom they get alone with.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

That’s your vulnerability

[–]bluehorserunning4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

shrug I go out armed and have trained in martial arts for 15 years, and I worked at overcoming the fear that my mother tried to instill in me for a long time, so I can beat the tar out of most men who would try anything. That doesn't mean that I would, when I was single, go to meet some stranger in a parking lot at 2 am to have sex with no condom, but most men wouldn't do that either, because it would be stupid.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Disregarding the no condom thing, men absolutely 100% would do that, just ask any gay man ever. Actually even without the condom tbh.

[–]bluehorserunning2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Most of the gay men I know would not, but then they’re also the types to get married and settle down just like the straight guys I know. Honestly, I think it’s a little misandrist to say that all men are whores with no sense of self preservation, which is about what it would take for a man to do that.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly, I think it’s a little misandrist to say that all men are whores with no sense of self preservation

Who cares if its misandrist, it's true. Like did you miss the HIV epidemic that still continues to be a huge thorn in the gay population? The existence of gloryholes? (No way do lesbians come up with that)

If you're a man just make a grindr and hop on at 2am and see how long it takes for someone to offer to blow you. Or just catfish if you're a woman.

Guaranteed your gay friends have all sucked each other off in your local park at some point, you just don't know it.

[–]bluehorserunning1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m not saying that there aren’t men like that, I’m saying that all men are not like that, gay or straight.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple93 points94 points  (123 children) | Copy Link

Supply and demand.

Not as many women want to have sex as men. It's not 1 to 1. So it's more likely that a woman will be having sex she doesn't want and thus feeling like she's doing a service.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here41 points42 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but idk if it’s supply and demand more than female and male sexuality though. If men are going to pursue and physically escalate and furthermore ask for consent, then women will always appear to give themselves to him.

[–]angels-fanCrooning over hellscapes33 points34 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Exactly this.

Women don't need to use the standard of affirmative consent with men.

It stands to reason if men are the ones asking permission, then women are the ones giving permission.

[–]jessicaannpin5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The affirmative consent thing is ridiculous.

That said. It’s supposed to be gender neutral.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well a man pursuing a woman has already given his consent by default.

Unless he's drunk out of his mind, or she pulls out a giant dildo and shoves it up his ass during sex without asking him, the man has likely already consented.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Not true. A guy might want to use a condom. A guy might want to wait

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

What does that have to do with consent?

You say that a guy might want to wait, but how many women are there will take the lead and push for sex unless she is really drunk.

Even then if the guy is more sober than her, he can physically enforce his lack of consent and discourage the woman if he wants to wait.

As for using a condom what does that have to do with consent? Women don't usually pull the condom off a guy's dick.

Most women are not forward enough (and even for those who are the man has to be HOT) to invalidate a man's consent regarding how far he wishes to go.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I take the lead all the time. Now you’re just making me feel like I shouldn’t.

The biggest issue is how physically hard it is to rape a guy.

But the affirmative consent thing is bogus. I’ve def pressured guys into sex. Pressuring is acceptable everywhere else in life.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

asking permission

Who the fuck "asks" for permission?

[–]angels-fanCrooning over hellscapes0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Woke soy boys.

[–]JustRuss79RedPurple Man16 points17 points  (40 children) | Copy Link

Slightly more women than men in the world, all of them want sex, but they only want meaningless sex with like 5% of men in the world.

Meanwhile men will have meaningless sex with at least 10% of women, possibly up to 50% of women.

It isn't that women don't want sex, it is that they have both Higher Standards, and the ability to enforce them (outside of rape)

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple13 points14 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

The reality is most women aren't chasing their adonis cum-ten-times sex. They are hardly motivated by sex or sexual attraction and will likely end up having sex when they aren't as into it. Thus the supply and demand.

[–]AggravatingTartlet0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They are hardly motivated by sex or sexual attraction

Women are very motivated by these two things.

[–]lemonfluff-1 points0 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

No it's that women want GOOD sex. And most men cba to giving it because it requires more effort than for them to just get themselves off in a woman.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (12 children) | Copy Link

Most women can only have GOOD sex during ovulation with a top % male.

Everything else will generally feel mediocre to a woman.

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

What? Thats complete BS. Good sex is about stimulating her body and mind, anyone can do that.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy Link

But her body is only stimulated by men in the top < 30%.

And her mind will not allow you to stimulate her if she finds your presence as a sexual being gross.

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

You really think all women find 70 percent of men gross and creepy just because of their appearance? Appearance matters to an extent but you can be hot af and a total turn off sexually. Oe you can ve average looking and your attitude makes you so damn hot. Everyone likes different things.

Also women are not all bombshells. People tend to go for partners of a similar attractiveness to themselves.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

No women don't find 70% of men gross, just sexually invisible. Only the bottom 15-30% of men are seen as gross by women.

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Where are you getting these statistics from? It's just not true.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You really think all women find 70 percent of men gross and creepy just because of their appearance?

I'd say women find about 50% of guys gross. Another 40% or so are just asexual beings to most women. That leaves about 10% who they find physically attractive.

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Where are you getting these numbers from?

[–]carrawayjames0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

They do find 80 percent of men unnattractive

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Good sex is about stimulating her body and mind, anyone can do that.

Any guy who is attractive enough can do it. Ugly guys need not apply.

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Any guy that you are attracted to.

What is ugly anyway? A big part of attraction is how you hold yourself, attitude etc. I tend to think I value looks quite highly but I've had major crushes on guys that were not massively attractive at first glance. But their attitude, the way they talk or act, what they say, makes me feel things I can't describe. And you just, dont see the bad and onkg see the good. His face isn't symmetrical and he's not tall but he's got good arms. Or he's super skinny and looks like a gust of wind might blow him over but I love his eyes / hands / stubble. These guys have made me feel much much more than the Channing tatem lookalikes or weirdly perfect looking guys I've met that either have had no personality, or worse, are complete arseholes (and inept on bed). They've made me go crazy thinking about them.

Trust me, a guy that looks very average can make a woman go weak at the knees.

[–]carrawayjames0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

If anyone could do that then why would prostitution exist?

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What? Because some people can't find anyone to sleep with them?

[–]Esk1mOz4mb1kFormer Nice Chad-2 points-1 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Good sex for women is merely related to the performed acts, it mostly comes down to how the man makes them feel.

[–]allweknowisD3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Keep telling yourself that

[–]Esk1mOz4mb1kFormer Nice Chad-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I will dear girl gamer.

[–]lemonfluff0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you actually that ignorant? Why would you possibly think that?

[–]Esk1mOz4mb1kFormer Nice Chad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's my nice chad experience. Making a women cum isn't that hard (technically speaking).

[–]AggravatingTartlet0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Untrue. Good sex starts in her own body and how it physically feels. The emotional stuff springs from that. Can't start a car flat on batteries though.

[–]party_dragon14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It isn't that women don't want sex

Yeah it is. Lesbian couples fuck less than straight couples. Gay couples fuck more.

Draw your own conclusions.

[–]BrianFantanaFan0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Genuinely curious as to how you'd validate this if questioned - that's some pretty high level generalising

[–]salami_inferno11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-passion-paradox/201206/the-ins-and-outs-sexual-frequency%3famp

They arent wrong. The following were their findings for straight, gay and lesbian couples having sex 3 times a week or more in their first years G=67% S=45% and L=33%. After ten years it drops to G=11%, S=18% and L=1%.

Take from that what you will but it clearly shows that other than straight couples that had been together for a long time generally the more woman you have in a relationship the less sex is occurring.

I honestly do not believe woman want to fuck as frequently as men.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

No, there are more men than women in the world in the age range of 18-40. Which is the prime age range for plentiful sexual activity.

Sure people over 40 still have sex but their libidos tend to decrease and for women 40-45 is the age around which they often stop having sex entirely.

SOME women might still have sex on occasion up to the age of 50-55 but after that it's pretty rare (taking into account the "normal" population) to find women who are still having an active sex life.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sure people over 40 still have sex but their libidos tend to decrease and for women 40-45 is the age around which they often stop having sex entirely.

WTF? I'm 55 and my GF is 46 we're had sex five times in the last 24 hours.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Awesome, but that's not true for most 55 year old men.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I might be a bit of an outlier but I'd think that most 50 something guys with a wife and/or GF would be having sex at least a couple of times per week.

[–]bluehorserunning-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

And yet most people still get married to one person whom they love, and the vast majority have children only with that one person.

The accuracy of a hypothesis is measured by how well it predicts an outcome. This outcome is not even slightly predicted by your theory.

[–]Daniel07392 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Used to*

Have you seen the 50% divorce rate in most civilized countries?... marriage nowadays is a complete joke, and not a very funny one.

[–]glassSkullCandy2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This could be a a result of less people getting married.

[–]bluehorserunning0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you seen the divorce rate declining in civilized countries? https://time.com/4575495/divorce-rate-nearly-40-year-low/

Edit: even if the rate were 50%, it would not preclude my earlier statement: most people marry someone they love, and have children with that person, even if they later fall out of love and get divorced.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

And yet most people still get married to one person whom they love

LOL, sure, keep believing that

[–]bluehorserunning0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, it’s illegal to get married to more than one at a time, and the poly community is quite small. And most people getting married do so because they love the person that they’re getting married to, and genetic testing shows that the large majority (75% in the lowest study I’ve seen, >95% in most studies) of children are genetically the husband’s.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was referring to the idea that most people don't get necessarily marry the person whom they love.

And the rate of cuckoldry (in terms of paternity) is far worse at the low end, 48% in the UK, 30% in Nigeria.

In the US it is CONFIRMED that mating cuckoldry is at least 4% (some studies put the figure as high as 10%).

[–]bluehorserunning0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

snort that still means that 90% to >95% of children are fathered by the husband in the marriage. That means that the vast majority of women are faithful.

IIrc 10% is the rate of confirmed extra-marital paternity in cases where the husband suspected infidelity, which means that 90% of the time jealous husbands who thought they had reasons to suspect extra-pair paternity were wrong.

[–]jessicaannpin-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My standards are actually lower for casual sex than for relationships. With casual sex, I optimize for safety and efficiency.

With casual sex I do optimize for attractiveness only and don’t worry about intelligence.

Men I date are over an inch taller on average than men I just hook up with. They also tend to be more successful, more affluent, more educated, funnier, and skew slightly older on average (versus younger for casual).

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (69 children) | Copy Link

Do you mean don't want sex in general or don't want sex with a specific guy?

[–]myrtlebtch9 points10 points  (59 children) | Copy Link

It’s probably means that women generally don’t need sex every day especially when have been married a while. Most or some men prefer sex more often than their wife/gf.

[–]ForeingFlower18 points19 points  (53 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. Women experience desire as much as men, but there are other elements that limit it such as:

  • Societal expectations.

  • Lack of orgasm (it takes more effort for a woman to come and some men are not willing to put the effort. If a woman rarely comes, she will rather masturbate)

  • Higher standards (women choose their partners more carefully)

  • Different way of arousal (women are more aroused by the situation created around sex than by the attractiveness of their partner, specially later in the relationship)

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Would also add women have less capacity to compartmentalize life. If she stressed, tired, grieving, fighting with him, it’s harder for her to shut that out of her mind and get in the mood.

[–]abqkat4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

100% this, IME, and from what I hear from my women friends. Plus, I think that there is a lot more invisible labor and expectations for women, which can affect many working women when they are expected to work the "2nd shift" after work. I put a lot of time and effort, for instance, into grooming and looking decent at my work (nails painted and tidy, hair treatments, packing lunches, setting out clothes) which definitely shifted once I got an office job, and my husband works from home like I did for years

[–]reluctantly_red1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah -- once shes stops throwing stuff you can have really hot make up sex!

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist16 points17 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

They have higher standards and are harder to arouse because they have lower sex drives and find fewer men attractive.

[–]Uberwensch4 points5 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Women don't necessarily have lower sex drives - I'm a woman and I have a higher sex drive than my male partner. But women need to have higher standards because, simply put, the risks of sex are higher for women...

Almost every time a woman has sex, she is at risk of getting pregnant. The risk varies depending on a number of factors, but most contraceptives only have about 90-99% efficacy anyway. Now getting pregnant is just the tip of the iceberg. She then has to decide whether to keep the baby, terminate, or adopt; follow through with 9 months of pregnancy, loss of job, loss of income, loss of earning potential for the next 18 years. Or come up against legal and medical barriers to get an abortion, again, sacrificing income. Also, the social messaging and double sexual standards, etc. Women run the risk of being seen as easy, being called a slut etc.

I think its reasonable that (some) women want to wait and see how a relationship progresses before jumping into this kind of risk with some guy she's not compatible with.

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist8 points9 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Women don't necessarily have lower sex drives - I'm a woman and I have a higher sex drive than my male partner.

Assuming this is true (men are experts at hiding how much sex we want, otherwise women would never associate with us again), it's interesting that whenever this comes up, women who claim to have equal or higher sex drives always refer to their partner rather than some other man. Why might this be?

Here's why: I'm betting that if you weren't with him, you would reject the overwhelming supermajority of men for sex -- especially if they just outright came out and asked for it. But I also guarantee that your partner would accept the majority of women if they propositioned him for sex. The difference here is insurmountable.

Almost every time a woman has sex, she is at risk of getting pregnant. The risk varies depending on a number of factors, but most contraceptives only have about 90-99% efficacy anyway.

That's an extremely high efficacy, and it doesn't change in the circumstances in which women do have sex.

Now getting pregnant is just the tip of the iceberg. She then has to decide whether to keep the baby, terminate, or adopt; follow through with 9 months of pregnancy, loss of job, loss of income, loss of earning potential for the next 18 years. Or come up against legal and medical barriers to get an abortion, again, sacrificing income.

Whereas men have no decision whatsoever after the fact, and will be paying no matter what.

As for social messaging, just look at gay men. They run the risk of being ostracized, assaulted or even murdered for their sexuality -- not to mention the much higher odds of contracting HIV -- but that doesn't stop many of them from having an insanely high number of sex partners. Far higher than lesbians do. That's because men have drastically higher sex drives.

I think its reasonable that (some) women want to wait and see how a relationship progresses before jumping into this kind of risk with some guy she's not compatible with.

As do I. But to pretend women have the same sex drive as men flies in the face of all reality.

[–]jessicaannpin2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

I think on average, women have lower sex drives. However, I’ve had a higher sex drive than many, if not most, men I’ve dated. But I’m also quite promiscuous. I’ve also had more partners than most men I’ve dated.

I think that women are less open to casual sex and are have higher sex drives in a relationship context. I think female sex drive is more contextually dependent in this way.

In studies of sex propositioning, gender differences nearly disappeared when researchers controlled for safety and predicted pleasure.

One reason women have less desire for casual sex is due to social norms that dictate men having casual sex don’t feel as responsible for their partners pleasure. There is less oral sex, for example. There is simply less activity that leads to orgasm. And many women may not feel comfortable asking (that’s on them, but it is what it is). This lowers the incentive.

Also, female sexual drive outside of relationships is extremely inhibited by slut shaming. That’s why the number one personality correlate of sexual permissiveness in women is disagreeableness.

It’s hard to say how much female sexual desire would be openly expressed and acted upon in more casual contexts if slut shaming disappeared.

I did not used to have much of a sex drive unless I was in a relationship. With my boyfriend, I wanted sex all the time. But after we broke up, I would just masturbate. I would masturbate twice a day, but I could go months without sex.

Does that mean I had lower sexual desire? No not really. I think having to go months without sex bc you don’t have a boyfriend, as a woman, feels just as real and constricting as having to go months without sex bc women just wont fuck you. In the former case, you don’t realize you can actually just fuck guys who aren’t your boyfriend bc there’s all this negative bs you’re afraid of. And you have to get past that before your sexual desire is going to manifest more like a guy’s. This is my opinion.

In my case, I went without a boyfriend bc I was convinced no one would want to date me bc I was unemployed. I went 11 months without sex when I was 24-25 lol.

Since getting over slut shaming, I will frequently think, “I need to get laid I need to get laid.” And I remember telling a guy friend this and having him be like “lol didn’t you just get laid 2 days ago?” “Yeah but I need to get laid again.” “Why don’t you just hit him up?” “Ehhh.” So there I was lining up more “dates.” I think I invited a guy straight to my place. So maybe now it’s gone a bit too far.

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I think on average, women have lower sex drives. However, I’ve had a higher sex drive than many, if not most, men I’ve dated.

As I said to another user, I have my doubts that your sex drive is really higher than theirs. Of course when someone is in a relationship with someone they're very much attracted to, they're going to be hornier -- I'd have a much higher sex drive around Kaley Cuoco than Melissa McCarthy.

Let's put it to the test -- if you were single, what percentage of men could come up to you, ask for sex and get it?

But I’m also quite promiscuous. I’ve also had more partners than most men I’ve dated.

You have more sexual partners because you can have more sexual partners. If men could fuck basically anyone we want, every one of us would have counts well into the triple digits.

Also, female sexual drive outside of relationships is extremely inhibited by slut shaming. That’s why the number one personality correlate of sexual permissiveness in women is disagreeableness.

Gay men have faced far more shame and even violence, but it doesn't stop them from fucking every chance they get.

In studies of sex propositioning, gender differences nearly disappeared when researchers controlled for safety and predicted pleasure.

Source? Whether you have one or not, the "predicted pleasure" part is the key word here -- the fact is that women will get no pleasure (worse than none, in fact) from having sex with the overwhelming majority of men. Which is, of course, caused by having a far lower sex drive.

I did not used to have much of a sex drive unless I was in a relationship. With my boyfriend, I wanted sex all the time. But after we broke up, I would just masturbate. I would masturbate twice a day, but I could go months without sex.

This is what I'm talking about -- it's not that you have a high sex drive, it's that he specifically made you really horny.

Does that mean I had lower sexual desire? No not really. I think having to go months without sex bc you don’t have a boyfriend, as a woman, feels just as real and constricting as having to go months without sex bc women just wont fuck you.

No, it absolutely does not. Being able to have sex whenever you want and not being able to have it at all are in no way even remotely the same thing. It's pretty easy to just fuck guys on the DL without telling anyone who would slut shame you.

Since getting over slut shaming, I will frequently think, “I need to get laid I need to get laid.” And I remember telling a guy friend this and having him be like “lol didn’t you just get laid 2 days ago?” “Yeah but I need to get laid again.” “Why don’t you just hit him up?” “Ehhh.” So there I was lining up more “dates.” I think I invited a guy straight to my place. So maybe now it’s gone a bit too far.

The "ehhh" part really drives my point home -- no man would ever say that if they had a chance of getting sex.

[–]jessicaannpin2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Most of the guys I’ve dated can get sex when they want it. For some it is “almost too easy.” In fact, I often feel like the men I’ve dated have an easier time getting laid than I do.

Among guys of a certain quality level, their number can range from ~10-100+ based on their preferences. Not all guys will choose to have a lot of casual sex just because they can.

I don’t think desire and predicted pleasure are closely correlated. Predicted pleasure has more to do with whether the man gives her what she needs.

You’re not getting that women restricted by slut shaming are just as shackled and frustrated as men restricted by lack of options.

Maybe read this for my perspective:

https://www.quora.com/What-is-an-unpopular-opinion-you-hold/answer/jessica-pin-2

I also wrote this (which links to the study you asked for)

https://qr.ae/TWtkGl

[–]lemonfluff2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You're getting confused. Having a high sex drive doesn't mean saying yes to sex from every guy that asks for it. It means wanting a lot of sex. I can really want a lot of sex but not with just anyone. Men are less fussy, that doesn't mean they have higher sex drives. Comparing your sex drive to your partner means one of you wants more sex than the other, that person has a higher sex drive.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I think on average, women have lower sex drives. However, I’ve had a higher sex drive than many, if not most, men I’ve dated. But I’m also quite promiscuous. I’ve also had more partners than most men I’ve dated.

Do you think women with high sex drives who aren't promiscuous are missing out in a way? I had an extremely promiscuous past before meeting my husband but I don't think of it as a bad thing. "Slutty phases" are underrated lol.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I think women who are single and not getting laid are missing out. If women are in relationships, they’re probably good.

For me, it’s hard to enjoy sex because I have clitoral nerve damage, so I think it’s a bit different. A lot of my sexual encounters are basically shopping around. And a lot of them happen because of issues I’ve had with being afraid of relationships.

Even right now I’m seeing someone, and though he’s great, it’s killing me that I can’t see other people. It’s hard to have one person check all boxes and keep me happy sexually.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women don't necessarily have lower sex drives - I'm a woman and I have a higher sex drive than my male partner. But women need to have higher standards because, simply put, the risks of sex are higher for women...

Exactly! There's a difference between your sex drive and your standards for casual sex. Saying I have a higher sex drive than my husband would be an understatement.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I find a lot of men attractive, as evidenced by my hundreds of matches on apps. Each match means “yeah I’d do him.”

I wonder what methodology other women are using with the swipes.

But yes I agree partly. However I think slut shaming is a huge reason for pickiness.

One thing is you can get away with being a slut around other women if you snag super hot guys because they are so impressed that you get them rather than judgmental of the behavior.

This is how I’ve been such a huge slut but no woman has ever called me that in a derogatory way. The first time I had a one night stand, I had walked up to the hottest guy at the bar and he was into it (of course). These girls were like “omg how did you do that?!” And when he was asking if I wanted to get out of there, they were like “omg you have to take him home!” So I did. And then I kicked him out after sex without giving him my number because I felt awkward.

There’s all this slut shaming baggage that limits women. I had to get over that before I could be less weird about casual sex.

The second time I had a one night stand, I was on vacation, having just gotten out of a serious relationship and not had any new partners in a long time. So I thought to myself, “You’ve been good and you deserve this.” And so that was fun.

But the next time was years later after I got on Tinder. And I remember feeling weird and guilty. And then I just thought through it and decided it was a bunch of bullshit. So ever since, the only damper is the threat of STDs.

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I find a lot of men attractive, as evidenced by my hundreds of matches on apps. Each match means “yeah I’d do him.”

The fact that you get "hundreds of matches" to begin with indicates the vast difference between men and women's sex drives.

But yes I agree partly. However I think slut shaming is a huge reason for pickiness.

Regarding slut shaming, there are two reasons why this does not hold up:

1) The primary reason for the "stud/slut" double standard is precisely because it's so easy for women to obtain sex.

2) Gay men face a far greater deal of shaming, discrimination, violence and increased likelihood of contracting HIV, and yet many of them have n-counts into the thousands.

[–]jessicaannpin 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

My ex had over 200 matches on tinder and he was pretty picky

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

My ex had over 200 matches on tinder and he was pretty picky

Again, having that many matches means he is in the top 5% of men. When you have that many options, you can be picky. Few men can.

It would be easier for men to obtain sex if you dropped the double standard, dumbass

Right, men are the only ones who slut shame. And I didn't just prove why that doesn't have any effect.

/s

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women have never slut shamed me. There might be one woman on Reddit who has. Women never say anything negative to me about being promiscuous.

But actually now that I’m 32, an older girl friend is on my ass to be more serious about dating.

Anyway I hate being exclusive. It’s flattering at first and I felt like I had to agree bc oh gosh this great guy who checks all my boxes wants to date me seriously. But the reality is I feel trapped.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually no. Women have less desire on average. Just look at the higher rates of sexual desire disorders in women.

Higher standards are caused by less desire. If you’re easily turned on by the opposite sex, you don’t need a 10.

Also, do girls get all crazed if you tease them? I don’t. Maybe some girls do

[–]Skuggasveinn0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

Can you elaborate on your last point? I'm intrigued.

[–]ForeingFlower5 points6 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

I'll try. Women find the situation in which sexual encounters take place to be very important. That's why you hear that you have to "arouse a woman's mind". It's about creating exciting situations that lead to sex rather than just going for it. At the beginning of a relationship that's easy, but as time progresses it becomes harder, specially as for men it's not as important and well...routine. It's easier for women to become uninterested in sex if there is no excitement or build up to warm up her mind.

You can see an example of what I'm talking about in the porn made for women. The storylines are much stronger, they take longer to lead up to sex and the characters are better developed. Women not only want sex, they want an exciting story to go along with it.

Women are the primary consumers of erotic literature and have been for a long time. If you read some of those books you'll understand better how female arousal works around it. Even though there is plenty of sex on those books, they also have storylines full of passion and excitement.

Now, I know how difficult to achieve this might seem. At the end, most of us have jobs and can't dedicate our time to create all this hot situations, but often all it takes is a bit of role playing or dirty talking and letting her mind do the rest.

[–]SaberX913 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

so how does that play into evolution? why did females, as you say, evolve to need the planets to align circumstantially in order to be aroused enough to have sex? wouldnt that have caused the human race to die out pretty quickly since there were more pressing matters such as hunting and surviving and building homes rather than thinking of ways to get a womans mind off?

[–]UnluckyMisanthropist 1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

Females (of most species) have more to invest, and lose, through sex. A male making a poor choice of mate only loses time and sperm. A female loses her entire term of pregnancy and the massive resources it costs. Those females who are more choosy will have higher evolutionary fitness.

[–]jessicaannpin2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah except most sex isn’t really reproductive. How early do you think humans figured out the pull out method? Like 10 thousand years ago? 100 thousand years ago?

[–]UnluckyMisanthropist 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sex isn't necessarily tied to reproduction now, you're right, but it was much strongly in our past. A lot (but not all) of our current sexual behaviour are evolutionary artefacts from our ancestors who had higher fitness due to, for example, men being more promiscuous and women being more choosy. As for pulling out... I've no idea when it started but I assume it was some time after we became self aware and understanding of what sex is and leads to. Until then, there would have been little pulling out and so the ramifications of being choosy or not would be much greater: Pregnancy would be more common.

[–]Mystery_Tragic0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm a man but I enjoy seeing porn with stronger characters and a more developed story line. The videos where the sex happens quickly doesn't seem as good.

I also enjoy reading literotica. Especially the buildup to the sex.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My male ex was like this too but I’m the opposite.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tbh when I watch porn, I just fast forward to like pounding it doggy. Might watch some throatfucking also.

I loved Tumblr bc I could collect all the gifs of just the parts I liked. No story though clearly. But I guess I did like captions. Nothing too long though. Just like “take that cock like a good girl” to a gif of some doggy style pounding. Focus on mental image >> orgasm.

One thing I like is to get guys to send me dirty texts of their fantasies or what they want to do to me. And it bothers me so much if it’s too verbose or complicated bc when I’m horny, I’m basically an idiot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So it's not about the sex, but the head space she's into blah blah blah.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Lack of orgasm (it takes more effort for a woman to come and some men are not willing to put the effort. ...)

If a woman isn't having an orgasm its usually because she's not that attracted to the guy -- not because he isn't working it.

[–]ForeingFlower0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

You are very wrong. For many women ptv is not enough to orgasm and that's what many guys offer. You can be very attracted to a guy and not be able to finish with him.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

If PTV isn't doing the trick for her its time to find a new GF.

[–]ForeingFlower0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

😂😂🤣 your comment makes me feel very bad for your partner. Makes sure she is young, inexperienced and unsecured so she takes longer to leave you for someone better.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's neither young nor inexperienced. But not to worry she isn't deprived. Indeed she gets to orgasm more often than I do from our PTV sex.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. Women experience desire as much as men

LOL nope

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

men are not willing to put the effort

This is male shaming at its finest.

Men aren't manning up to go to the gym and get fit.
Men aren't manning up to marry single mothers.
Men no longer want to do dangerous jobs or join the army.

It's all about how men are not putting in the "required" effort, while 22% of the men are cleaning house with 60% of the women without doing all that much other than simply socializing.

[–]ForeingFlower0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

First of all, you are making up those facts. 60% of women just socialising, not looking after the house, not working? Ha.

Second of all, if you check the number of studies that show female sexual satisfaction, how many women usually reach orgasm during sex...etc You'll see that no, men are not willing to put the effort.

[–]vosidit98 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's across their whole lifetime. It doesn't mean that 60% of the women are having sex with 22% of the men in this second.

[–]ForeingFlower0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You are talking like only a very reduced group of men would have sex with all the other women, which is basically a unfounded incel idea. I'm not even going to take time to prove it. You can do your own research.

[–]SqueaksScreech2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It reversed for my partner and I. I used to have a low sex drive now I have a bit higher sex drive. His is now lower than mine. It's weird cause I'm fucking embarrassed to ask for sex because I'm not use to being the one who wants it more often.

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why did it change

[–]SqueaksScreech1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He's working a lot more hours. So he'll be too tired and stressed out and it doesn't help he gotten a bit sick. He's taking a while to recover because he's not sleeping enough.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

BUT WOMEN LIKE SEX AS MUCH AS MEN DO BLAH BLAH BLAH

[–]ZeebussFederal Boob Inspector0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Compelling point.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Women only want SEX with MEN (this is key to the discussion, so any woman bleating up with "but my giney tingles sometimes so you're wrong!") only want to do so if and only if

  • the man has high enough status
  • he has "proved" himself a "worthy mate"
  • he has gone ahead and stimulated her reactive not active sexuality
  • he does all the work while she condescends to let him inside her
  • with the proviso he has paid for at least three meals, etc. etc. etc. and they're "in a relationship" (not valid if it's a Chad and she gets status or feels WILD and CRAZY and gets tingles that way)

[–]rus9384Misanthrope5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

What about women's active sexuality? When it comes to play, a woman uses toys?

he does all the work while she condescends to let him inside her

Women often get aroused by giving a blowjob to a man. That's how reactive sexuality works.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What about women's active sexuality? When it comes to play, a woman uses toys?

Or fingers

Women often get aroused by giving a blowjob to a man. That's how reactive sexuality works.

Sure. My point is, she ain't tripping him up and getting underneath him before he hit the floor.

[–]rus9384Misanthrope2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I dunno. Reactive sexuality often is fed by hugs and cuddles.

[–]jessicaannpin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I sleep with a lot of guys. The guys I date are higher quality on average than men I just sleep with.

Even among the casual relationships, the higher quality guys stick around longer, take me on more real dates. This isn’t bc I’m less slutty with them btw

I’m aware of this narrative but I find my experience perplexing. My retention rate is directly proportional to attractiveness, height, and education

[–]Sociallyfunctional 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Agree with first 3. Last 2 depends on whether she's looking for a door mat or someone with standards

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

She'll bend the rules for Chad

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

a woman doesnt feel like that naturally, it was instilled in her the first time she could talk.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not as many women want to have sex as men.

Perhaps -- but the ones who do are at least as hungry for it as any guy.

[–]pnadlerlaw12 points13 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Think back to the 6th to 9th grade.

What messages do we feed girls?

  • if you have sex, it’s bad
  • if you have sex, you’re a slut
  • if you’re a slut, no man will ever want you
  • if you’re a slut, no man will ever marry you

From the opposite POV, how do you think that comes off to boys, who compared to their female counterparts, are sexually honest and uninhibited?

  • Jeez, I guess girls aren’t that interested in sex
  • girls are less interested in sex than guys
  • sex is just something girls do because guys want it, but they don’t really enjoy it for themselves (if they did, they wouldn’t act that way towards sex).

It’s those experiences that shape those beliefs and that mental framework in men

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Top post of the day.

You nailed it in one.

I'll tell you flat out right now, I can't vouch for "what girls are told" (though honestly I don't think its as dire as you say it is, but I don't mean to malign your experience) but the second bullet points are accurate as hell. I flat out believe everything in that second bullet point set and nothing you could say or do would ever change that.

[–]katymarxPrairie Vole THOT1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yes the single isolated PIV thrusts are not that great a deal for us. It takes a lot for it to be pleasurable and it holds the greatest risks w pregnancy plus disease.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

So since you don’t get anything out of it I’m not gonna impose it on you.

[–]katymarxPrairie Vole THOT0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

It's good with all the other stuff surrounding it, we've discussed this before no need to rehash.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

You just want the other stuff then

[–]katymarxPrairie Vole THOT0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

No, I like intercourse too usually. Kind of off it now because I tried a week ago and the angle irritated my hip injury and I had to stop and kick the dude out early lol.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

No you don’t you enjoy the other stuff

[–]katymarxPrairie Vole THOT0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh FFS stop it already. I almost agree with you but don't tell me what my body responds to is always false. There is a bio reason intercourse can feel good, ie stim self lube and make teh babiez.....

Again women, and some men, aren't defining sex and their drive for it in the same way as you are so your argument isnt even valid overall.

[–]lilacluna5480 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I love PIV sex. Even if my boyfriend agreed to do other things to me without it, Id still hate it if I didnt get to have him inside of me. Your posts always crack me up, I dont know how you can actually believe that no women enjoy sex

[–]jerdle_reddit0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I disagree with them being uninhibited and honest. We're expected to have sex just as much as women are expected not to.

[–]Five_DecadesKnows what women want. Knows he doesn't have it8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Whatever gender invests more in procreation is the selective sex. Women are the gender that invests more (I think one way biologists determine an animals sex is by looking at which animal has the larger and less numerous sex cells)

Women have far more to lose by making a bad decision with sex since they invest so much more in procreation, so its something men generally have to earn by presenting themselves as good material either for short term or long term mating.

Also all this stuff about discrepancies about sexual value is more about strangers and one night stands. In long term relationships, these rules don't apply as much.

[–]MellifluousMaple|||7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men want to have sex.

Women want to have children, they want to have a house, they want to live in a good school district, they want to have good credit scores, they want their boss and coworkers to like them, they want to have friends, they want to go to church, they want their family to go to church, they want to observe holidays in a proper way, they want to have safety-rated cars, they want BPA-free baby bottles, they want to pay their bills on time, they want an affordable price on their homeowner insurance, they want good chocolate, they want to travel abroad, they want a good education, they want a good education for their children, they want to maintain their family's social status, they want their pets to have good veterinary care, and they want to have sex.

[–]Findingthur0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No. Nawalt

[–]carrawayjames15 points16 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Because it is something a women gives to a man. You ever heard the saying "women are the gatekeepers of sex"?. It's because they are.

Their are indeed men that women truly desire for sex but they are rare.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993-1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

spoken like a true male who's never seen a naked woman in front of him.

[–]formerly_MCTGA 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh my dear God honey, spoken like a true woman with no desire to understand the male experience. Go learn more, baby.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

oh my dear, you mistook me for someone who gives a shit about men's experiences.

[–]formerly_MCTGA 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Someone has hurt you in the past, and I’m sorry. My initial comment was abrasive and a bit rude, but it was simply to make a point: we can all do better to empathize and understand the experiences of others. I know that you’ll overcome the pain of betrayal and deceit, and I hope that one day you find a man that treats you well like all women deserve.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19931 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

oh dear, it is as if it wasnt enough but you had to resort to shaming tactics that no longer work.

oh so original...

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

not to mention you assume im hetero. it's as if all you men think of is your dicks since you think dick can help a woman. pathetic.

[–]Actuallyconsistent2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've had women enthusiastically want to sleep with me before. But acting like it's not a woman "giving it up" really misses the intersexual dynamic

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's an idea too deeply ingrained in pop culture for us to get rid of it in only a few years. You will see this mostly in media geared toward men - men "gets" the girl with little to no effort, sex is a recompense for him saving the day. In media targeting women, the woman's sexual desire is generally acknowledged and the relationship builds up so sex is a moment of connection rather than a reward for anything. So I definitely agree there is a disconnect in how men perceive female sexuality and how we actually are.

I do think women are naturally more selective with partners. I think this is because biologically, men can have hundreds of children a year, while women can have a very limited number. I'd say we want sex just about the same, but women won't usually have it with just about anyone. Mix that with the sort of insecurities we are made to feel, and I'd say the mental component of sex is harder for us too.

So for men who don't understand that women are far more similar to them than they realize, this creates a perceived "scarcity" which leads to "competition" for access to our bodies, which ends up feeling like something they "earned."

[–]CosmicBioHazard6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think that the idea of “women as a reward” is actually taken so seriously as for men to literally think of her as a reward.

The difference in perspective that the media offers is a simplified version of what the sexes see, I think. Men, I think, do acknowledge women’s sexual desire, but they acknowledge as well that that connection will only occur if you live up to the woman’s standards for a good quality mate. The mans’ perspective shows the lead-up to that: Be good enough, stand out enough, have a high enough SMV/RMV to get your foot in the door and make that connection. No chance with that girl, try another; you’ll be building that connection from the ground up one way or the other, whichever girl likes you enough to make that happen is fine, any one of them will do, no sense wasting time on someone who doesn’t want to let you try to connect with her.

...Until it is worth it, which is where you start seeing “the hero gets the girl.” He has his eyes on one specific girl and he’s getting his foot in the door to make a connection, damn it.

beyond that though, basically any girl could ask any single guy out for a coffee date and the dudes’ first thought is something to the effect of “lucky me, she wants to see if we can build a relationship, but more importantly she’s handing me a hall pass to skip the part where I have to “earn” something.”

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because men usually want it more often, even if women do enjoy it.

[–]87AudreyHorne13 points14 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

When it comes to most things, like character traits or interests, I find this subreddit to be extremely stuck in the past with stereotypes. Individually I dont believe in gender differences much.

But when it comes to two things, they are hard to deny. One is physical capacity, and other is sex.

No matter how much anecdotally every woman is different, its simply a fact that as a gender, generally speaking, women dont seek out and crave sex in the same way men do. No matter how cool they are with it in theory.

I tend to agree that getting sex isnt an achievement for virtually any woman, but it might as well be even for perfectly fine guys. So while perhaps a woman isnt giving anything in a literal sense, a guy can get quite an affirmation from the encounter that the woman simply isnt getting unless he also has strong feelings for her and validates her in other ways (through attention, sacrifice etc). Both may get physical pleasure (and even this is less achiavable for many women), but only the guy gets validation.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside[S] 7 points8 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I think this comment covers it thank you.

So while perhaps a woman isnt giving anything in a literal sense, a guy can get quite an affirmation from the encounter that the woman

I meant the act of sex literally and that appears to be where the disconnect is. I don't mean to toot my own horn here, but the only times I have sex personally, is when the woman desires me just as much if not more. So I don't look it as something I need to bend over backwards and beg and plead for. But for the guys that do, I get why they see it as "gifted" to them but it really shouldn't be like that at all.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I think there's a big disconnect between men who have non-sex sources of affection and validation and men who don't

Ime men who feel generally loved and valued by their partner and/or social circle don't "need" sex the same way affection deprived men do, and the 2 camps talk past each other a lot

[–]rus9384Misanthrope1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Sure they don't "need" sex, they can jerk. But what a man would prefer jerking to sex with a woman he likes? If she has a menstruation or something hurts or else, sure, he'd understand that unless he's a self-obsessed dumb narcissist. But otherwise, a man feels entitled for sex with his woman.

[–]Sociallyfunctional 1 points [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

Ime men with partners who make them feel shitty often use sex to measure whether she cares about him. Men who feel loved in other ways too enjoy sex but they dont use it as a relationship windsock

[–]rus9384Misanthrope6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Most men don't use sex as a relationship windsock. Sex to most men is not of instrumental value, it is of intrinsic value.

[–]AndemanMan0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So these men stay with these women so they look grown up? They acquire a partner as a sort of lifestyle accessory and the sex is an indicator of relationship success like a tick in a box?

[–]throwaway_dadvice5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men have higher sex drives than women, on average.

This makes sex something women can bargain with. She holds the cards. That's what it means. Rarely will she just "give" it though, usually there's some sort of exchange.

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

For the same reason an employer “gives” a job to an employee, even though the relationship is mutually beneficial — one person is in a position of power while the other is seeking permission.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not a perfect anology but I understand what you mean. When a person has the skills and experience employeers seek them out. I get plenty job offers in my email in the industry I work in, but I only "give" my time to companies I want to work with.

[–]a-WaltzingMatildaPurple Pill Man5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think it’s socialised, it’s biological.

Men display and women pick.

It’s pretty common in mammals. Especially primates.

Humans are mammals. Humans are primates.

Culture arises from biology.

[–]Sopesud570 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

What do you mean by display?

[–]a-WaltzingMatildaPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Their abilities, their prowess, their skills.

[–]statusincorporated3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Generally because a man has to bring A LOT of attractiveness to the table for a woman to view sex in that way, hence my earlier rule of +2 attractiveness for consistent casual sex with that rank of woman.

He has to be so attractive that just having sex with him validates her or whatever in some way.

Otherwise, yeah, she's gonna want more.

[–]Sopesud570 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women also often need to be in certain mood and an emotional connection to be fully aroused. Where men are usually always horny and ready to ready to fuck

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Because that and food prep women bring nothing to the table. In 2019 feminism has made sex the only thing a woman brings to the table so they act like it's gods gift to man because it's all they can negotiate with.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is correct answer. Women are so useless nowadays. Just a toy to carry around and show off how hot she is..aside from that, they have nothing else. No ambition no hobbies no nothing. Smart interesting and hot women are hard to come by. So men settle for hot boring rather than boring and ugly.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup

[–]Ofourkind10 points11 points  (44 children) | Copy Link

Just remnants from the puritanical idea that women lose something by having sex with someone.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here6 points7 points  (34 children) | Copy Link

If I ask you for consent to have something and you give me that thing, the interaction will be framed as you giving me something.

[–]Ofourkind5 points6 points  (33 children) | Copy Link

And what do I lose by giving?

Giving something doesn't necessitate losing anything. You could argue that men lose something by giving women sex as well, be it time, energy, etc.

Women don't "lose" any more or less than men by sex alone.

The point is that whatever is gained is worth whatever is lost. If you sold me a brand new car for ten dollars, did I "lose" ten dollars?

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here6 points7 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Nothing. I never said you lose if you give.

Nobody is saying that. You’re making that up in your head.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

Then why bring up "giving" consent at all?

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Because if I ask you to touch your body, and you give me consent to touch your body, then you are giving me your body. You are literally giving me access to your body. You are giving me consent.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

Right. And you must also be willing to give consent.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here5 points6 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

If I ask you for consent to touch your body, my own consent is assumed. You’re giving your body to my request.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Right. That's you giving consent

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yes my own consent is assumed though. Asking for consent is not giving consent itself

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Like people give a shit about men's consent.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Its necessary for a vast majority of sexual encounters whether or not people give a shit or not

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yes. Sticking it in is easier than a squat-hover, somehow docking onto it.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

And what do I lose by giving?

To further negotiate terms under which to give access to your vulva.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

But the goal is sex

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

For the man yes but not the woman.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

oooh

you're one of those dudes who thinks women don't like sex.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

Knows it doesn’t do anything for them yes

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

Such projection.

Sex with competent men is one of the greatest pleasures in life.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Yeah sure.

[–]HossMcDankEdgy Centrist1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

She DOES lose power in said situation; though unlike puritanical types I do not believe she’s lost anything moral.

[–]Ofourkind1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

She's only giving up power is she doesnt actually want to have sex. By holding on to that "power" and not giving consent, everyone loses and no one benefits

[–]MMDTwomen, try to use your brain0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Shes loses power cos now that the men has got fucking her out of his system, he can finally see her with a clear mind and act rationally again.

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

That's a far fetched hypothetical

She wants sex, she gets sex.

[–]MMDTwomen, try to use your brain-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What does that have to do with the guys mentality I just described

Its not a far fetched hypothetical. Its what every guy goes through. Before sex and after sex with a girl is usually two completely different feelings

[–]Ofourkind-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

What does that have to do with the guys mentality I just described

The guy's menreality is totally irrelevant in this scenario. What's in question is whether or not the woman loses anything by having sex with a man. If she wants sex and gets sex, she loses nothing. .> Its not a far fetched hypothetical. Its what every guy goes through. Before sex and after sex with a girl is usually two completely different feelings

I'm guessing I've slept with dozens and dozens more men than you. Every single one of them came back for more. So whatever change happened in their mind wasn't significant enough for them to stop offering me what I wanted. Often, they offered much much more than what I wanted or expected.

[–]MMDTwomen, try to use your brain0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

sure thing hoe

[–]Ofourkind0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Whatever you say, incel

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But they do. If women just put out because they dug putting out, society would collapse.

[–]CamoWoobie10000Women are SHIT5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because women act like sex is something a woman gives to a man. Ideally I would like women to treat sex as something they just "do" with no ulterior motive. But a lot of women dont treat it that way, they use it as a bargaining chip.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I have one.

The act is indeed pleasurable between two engaging people, the problem is that for many married couples that is not exactly the case.

Women look for many traits in a potential husband: good career/intelligent/reliable/good father etc...Some of these traits are normally distributed and thus start decaying rapidly once you approach the higher end.

So to put it in other words the chances for a woman to lock down a 6'ft tall man who is good in bed, 6 figures salary and above and who also happens to be reliable and won't cheat is not trivial.Most realize they would have to compromise on some of the above, and I believe that in many occasions attraction is the first parameter to be compromised on.Since women find only about 20% of men to be above average looking and much more than 20% of women get married should tell you that my theory is quite solid.

So the reality is that such women give away sex to these "lesser" men in exchange for stability and the ability to raise a functional family.

[–]XrayBullfrog2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I imagine it's partly to do with the fact that men are generally the ones asking for/pursuing it, for whatever combination of reasons that may be

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because that’s how feminists frame it when they constantly discuss how a woman’s “consent” is “important” while the issue of a man’s “consent” is laughed out of the room.

If women didn’t “give” sex to men — if men could just take it whenever they pleased — that would be called legalizing rape.

Simple OKCupid stats prove the obviousness of the fact that sex fundamentally IS something a woman must GIVE to a man — in all other scenarios, that is called rape.

[–]Malibu_Barbie2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

But women get just as much pleasure from it as well

Actually, women are far less likely to have orgasms from sex than men. It's not that we don't want sex or like sex. It's that the chances of getting pleasure from any sexual encounter are not in our favor.

[–]corporalkii 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

That’s true, but orgasming isn’t the only way women can experience pleasure during sex. You can still like sex and feel good during sex even if you don’t orgasm, and so any sexual encounter where you don’t experience any pleasure is...weird and something is not being done right.

[–]Malibu_Barbie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

True, but any man can experience pleasure without orgasming, too--but how many would call that fulfilling if most of the time he didn't get off? The truly weird thing is how many people--mostly men--think it's totally cool and nothing at all wrong with women getting many fewer finishes from sex than men. Primarily because so many men are terrible, selfish, incompetent lovers.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Right, and part of that is due to intrinsic libido, but a big part is also physiological; the clitoris is near the entrance of the vagina but you can have PIV without ever stimulating it. And penetration, if you're unaroused at initiation, can be unpleasant or even painful, which is why foreplay is so important - arousal causes the vagina to lubricate, and it also dampens pain reception so pleasure goes up and pain goes down.

Women CAN get as much pleasure out of sex from a man - maybe even more - but for us bad sex is a lot worse than bad sex for a man. There's a much bigger range of experiences, getting sex can often be worse than getting no sex.

[–]Malibu_Barbie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, I totally agree with you. I can have an orgasm 100 percent of the time by myself or with an attentive, thoughtful lover. Unfortunately, it seems, a great vast majority of men aren't attentive or thoughtful, so in terms of sexual fulfillment, we are far behind the dudes.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19932 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

it all started many many centuries ago when men realized women held the power of life and death aka womb envy and started realizing how small they are.

so they came together in their all-male group therapy sessions where they discussed strategies of how to make themselves important in the large scale of things. they came up with shaming tactics and anti-women rhetoric because it is always easy to blame someone else than to admit one's shortcomings.

hence women being divided into mothers and whores and ultimately objects to use, abuse, buy and sell.

sex was only for his pleasure and she is not supposed to enjoy it. if she does, she is a whore that must be punished somehow. men never loved women, they loved getting off. sex is power, according to males.

history is a great teacher.

[–]jerdle_reddit0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wait what, you really think men get together in packs to intentionally oppress women?

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 19930 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

not men in packs

men as a class

[–]jerdle_reddit0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm more disputing the active part and the goal of oppressing women.

[–]TheBookOfSeilAn ounce of Snu Snu is worth a pound of cure3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it’s literally used as a tool in relationships, maybe. Most often times, by women. Men can’t/don’t use sex as a bargaining tool or a carrot on a stick because women can have sex just about whenever they want to. There are legions of men ready to throw their dicks at anyone who even looks like a woman.

[–]passwordgoesherelate 30s purpleman3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The biological purpose of sex is pregnancy, not pleasure.

A woman can get pregnant about once per year, a men can get different women pregnant potentially every day.

That's all biological. You're asking about socialization but I think at some point feminists will have to look beyond sociology for real answers.

[–]skystar861 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes it is. What woman wants to voluntarily have sex with a soyboy without getting the betabux?

[–]bluehorserunning1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Odd thing is that liberal couples are more likely to cohabitate without marriage than conservative ones.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

How is that at all odd?

[–]bluehorserunning0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Liberals are the group most often called ‘soy boys’ by cons, and ‘beta but implies a man who a woman only married in order to get her hands on his money. If they’re cohabiting without marriage, though, everyone’s money remains theirs. So no ‘beta bux’ parasitism for the ‘soy boys,’ contra TRP theory. Yet another way in which it fails.

On other words, I was being sarcastic.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Their marriages also divorce more often.

Their divorces are also initiated by women more often

[–]bluehorserunning1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Conservative/red states have higher rates of divorce: https://divorce.lovetoknow.com/Divorce_Statistics_Republicans_vs._Democrats

As far as I know, most divorces in general are initiated by women, who decide that they are better off alone than married. They do not, as TRP would predict, divorce in order to marry someone of higher status.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait.

We know that divorce is the easiest way to financially destroy your ability to retire on time because you lose out on so many assets

Are these women saying they're better off emotionally alone? Or are they taking into account the financial ramifications? (Perhaps they are confident they'll get good settlements)

You've intrigued me since this doesn't make financial sense. Then again most Americans are shit with their finances

[–]bluehorserunning1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are usually financially worse off after a divorce, but happier; men are usually financially better off after a divorce, but angry.

https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/divorced-men-better-off-but-not-happier-20090707-dbvr.html

https://www.liveabout.com/reasons-women-are-happier-after-divorce-1103045

[–]BelieveinyourflynessPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The same reason a job is considered something the employer "gives" to the employee. Supply & demand

[–]09f911029d7Purple Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because a sexual marketplace exists outside of that one relationship.

To make an analogy. Alice has an iPhone but wants a Nokia. Bob has a Nokia but wants an iPhone. They trade phones and are both happy. But based on pure market value, this is an exchange of unequal value: the iPhone is worth $1000 and the Nokia is worth $400.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because most people are having shitty sex. They don’t know it. They just think it’s “sex”

[–]ceereality1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You mean like how people keep acting like babies are something a man "gives" to a woman?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Babies belong to women. The bills belong to men. Ask anyone in a family court.

[–]ceereality0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure, but if they belong to women then who gives them to them? Ask any biologist

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Family courts.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat1 point2 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Because sex is riskier for women than men (pregnancy), so they exercise more caution around it, and a lot of men CANNOT UNDERSTAND that you can exercise caution around something you like and desire (even the most ardent scuba divers make sure their gear is in good repair).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

Because sex is riskier for women than men (pregnancy)

LOL nope. He's taking the pregnancy risk, not her.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Look up maternal mortality rates historically.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

It’s not 1884 anymore. We have antibiotics and doctors and epidurals and stuff.

I understand though it’s the standard feminist response. “Why are you complaining to me you have no rights” “well in Saudi Arabia..,”

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

The question was about a pattern--thousands of years of human history are damn hard to undo with less than a century of effective medicine.

And the United States has the highest maternal mortality rate of any developed nation, fyi. You can surely spot why with a little imagination.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

I've seen thousands of years of human history undone in 20 years with feminism.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

That's ahistorical nonsense. Especially since feminism is over a century and a half old.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

Rubbish. Contrast 197x with 199x. In many ways, frankly, for the better.

[–]flamingoinghomeIs three lizards in trench coat0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

The 1970s? So........the sexual revolution was in full swing, the Summer of Love was in the books, Kennedy had been shot a decade past, the Vietnam War had reached its crescendo, there was the whole Nixon thing and then Ford and the pardons............really? And this was somehow less tempestuous than the decade of Beanie Babies and boxy Windows PCs?

As for "thousands of years of human history" being undone in, apparently, the 1990s, other than some fairly primitive internet, I cannot think of a single thing that happened in the 1990s that wasn't previously done by humans in some time or place in previous centuries.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Between 1970 an 1990.

And yes.

[–]playful_mythPink Pill Woman1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think that's because women barely get much satisfaction from sex with men. They barely orgasm with them if at all, so it's not really something they're obsessed with. Lesbian women get the best deal, bisexual women get the second spot and well... Straight women are the last ones. There's actually a study and everything.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/health-39077293

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This. Women hold out for dinners, commitment and presents because that's all they get out of it.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are brought up to believe that it's foolish to "give it up" (or "give it away") without getting something of value in return. To do otherwise is to "sell yourself short."

Basically, women are socialized to be whores.

[–]MisterJose1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It comes from the idealization of women. As a teenage boy, women are these goddess beauty creatures you can't stop thinking about. I do NOT think this is pure socialization, I think it's something deep and primal. This kind of admiration and desire to protect and put women first probably kept our species alive.

So, if you're idealizing someone, the rest comes kinda naturally from that: They are going to give sex to the most 'deserving' male, one who acts virtuously, because to think otherwise destroys the idealization. So, when you get sex, it's because you did something right, and because the women/Goddess has granted you that 'gift'.

Like I said, I think there's something seriously primal to this that we're gonna have trouble totally getting rid of, and we may not want to. I can kill the ideal in my own head, and largely have, but then that fucks a whole bunch of other things up. I might get sex, but it won't mean as much to me. And the other way felt somehow more natural.

The other problem is that you cannot underestimate the power of desirable women to shape society. What gets the women, men will do, so if there's a perverse incentive structure, it's going to promote worse behavior in men. I entirely sympathize that women may not want that responsibility, but sometimes life doesn't care if we want responsibility or not.

I also will say that, personally, I don't 100% relate to never ever thinking about what my potential sex partners deserve. It only works if I think I have something of high value to offer other people sexually, and men sometimes have difficulty thinking this way. But when I do (even if it involves something silly, like imagining I have a giant dong and am masterful at using it), there is definitely a sense of, "What a shitty person she is, no dick for her," that emerges. So, even if I first I find it hard to argue against the idea that women should get to sleep with whoever they want, when I think from that perspective, it does start to seem really self-centered, in a way I don't think I would be.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.5 points6 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

IMHO it's vestigial zeitgeist haunting us from patriarchal times. It's part of the whole "women are the reward" thing boys get indoctrinated with.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here4 points5 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Are you doubting or rejecting the idea that women view themselves as the reward to be given to a worthy man?

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

I don't really feel like it's my place to speak for how women view themselves. Ask women.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here3 points4 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Do you reject the claim that women say “he won me over by doing X” ?

We can surely speak to how women talk about themselves.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.4 points5 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

I have literally never considered a woman who remarks "he won me over" to be making a statement that she sees herself as a sex trophy who is obligated to sexually service him.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I never said she sees herself as a trophy who is obligated to sexually serve him. Try replying to my actual comment

I’m saying when a woman says “he won me over” she is implying she is something to be won. It’s framing heterosexual relationships as a woman giving a man something.

[–]lefactorybebe3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I think it's just a phrase, i don't think you should be looking at the particular word choice for some kind of meaning.

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/won+me+over

It can, and is, used in many other contexts besides a man and a woman's romantic relationship. I'm surprised you've never heard it in any other contexts.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think it’s just a phrase without meaning. I think women really believe that the guy won over her favor.

I just don’t see what the point is in denying this. There’s nothing wrong with it a guy winning the favor of a woman. That’s just how heterosexual relationships are.

[–]lefactorybebe2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Okay then. I mean it's literally used in other contexts, the link I posted didn't even mention anything between a man and a woman, there are so many other contexts it's used in. It's just a phrase that means someone convinced someone else that their position was favorable. But if you wanna keep reading tea leaves, go at it I guess.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don’t doubt there are other contexts. I disagree it has no meaning. I really do think that women think very highly of giving consent to access their bodies and that men have to win her over to do that.

I don’t even see what the point is in denying this? It seems self-evident to me.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What if... you have to win each other over

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ideally, you want to be such a desirable man that she wins you over. But that’s really not how typical heterosexual relationships form from my observation.

But until women stop viewing access to their bodies in such high regard, this really won’t change. I don’t see the point in even suggesting it should change. There is nothing wrong with women viewing accessing their bodies as something to be won by a desirable suitor.

[–]funobtainium4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is a neutral phrase, like, "I didn't want to enjoy raw fish, but my friend's samples of sushi won me over."

It means, "x convinced me of the value of them/that thing."

If a woman wins a man over, or vice versa, they have convinced the other person of their value as a partner. It could be sense of humor or personality or tits or whatever.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think it’s a neutral phrase. I think that women genuinely believe they are of high worth and require men to earn their bodies. And this phrase is an example of that.

It could certainly be said by men, but I just don’t hear it often if ever from men.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Does that have anything to do with OP's topic? I'm really not following this non sequitur.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m saying when a woman says “he won me over” she is implying she is something to be won. It’s framing heterosexual relationships as a woman giving a man something.

Explain to me how this has nothing to do with the OP

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

idc seems pretty obvious that it's at most tenuously unrelated.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

then where was this attitude 20 years ago?

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

It was the same.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

not anywhere i was on in the popular culture or anywhere outside the bible belt

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

So, what you're saying is you grew up a boy and know all about being a boy? I didn't grow up in the bible belt.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

male cultural beliefs are not invisible

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

And yet it's completely obvious when women pretend to be men. How odd.

[–]WhatIsTheMeaningHere1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or the other way around hehehe

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

?

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You can read and observe all you want about being a male. But the minute you attempt to speak about the male experience, males will quickly realize you have not lived them.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

thats nice, whos pretending to be male? probably you because certainly not me

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because women treat men like contestants, something that you see in every animal species, not just humans.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Because men want it, and women have the capacity to provide it, if they wanted to.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I could argue that, Men provide the sex. We do the penetration and the physical work to make it happen. If the man doesn't want to have sex its not going to happen. There are plenty of women in deadbedrooms too.

But as I said before, real sex is an act between two people. We provide it to each other.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Never heard of a girl on top, I take it?

I agree, we should provide it to each other. Some men are not very good at making sure they are pleasing their partner, as long as they bust a nut. That would definitely be a situation in which I would say women are giving it to them and getting nothing out of it.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Never heard of a girl on top, I take it?

She is still being penetrated just from a different position. If the guy is flaccid and doesn't want to its still not going to happen. But you understand what I mean though

Some men are not very good at making sure they are pleasing their partner, as long as they bust a nut.

Undoubtedly you are correct, but is it even "sex" at that point. If she doesn't want it and its not pleasurable it sounds like she's on the cusp of being sexually assaulted. But that's a slippery slope. I don't think guys should be having sex with women who aren't enthusiastic about having sex with him. It should be pleasurable for both parties.

[–]Orange_PaisleyOrange pill is best pill2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m not talking about women who are unenthusiastic. I’m talking about women who are sexually frustrated because their partner has no interest in their pleasure.

[–]SqueaksScreech2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Girl yes. Missionary gets boring after a while. Doing the same boring routine becomes a chore. Sex becomes more frequent when the other person feel appreciated, their needs are being met and sex is no longer boring.

[–]DREADC0RSAIRNo Pill | Just Dead Inside[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know what you meant but maybe didn't address that part enough sorry. It is the responsibility of both parties to make sure the other is having a pleasurable time. I was saying that if a guy fucks for only his pleasure, I don't even define that as sex.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to Littleknownfacts[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]gopher_glitz0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. It's what woman have to offer men, while men offer resources/'protection'

  2. Sex for women carries a massive risk and cost, for men not so much.

[–]Bayard200 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it's the reality we live in. Women are the gatekeepers of sex because men want it much more than they do.

[–]MattcwuJust sticking up for the oppressed and voiceless women0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women "give" permission or consent.

[–]ThisIsJustATr1buteHas what plants crave0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well y’all keep asking for it

[–]I-adore-your-vagina0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because men have to work hard for it with a lot of luck sprinkled on top.

A woman just has to snip a finger or shake her ass, and guys are lining up.

There's why.

[–]waxedmintfloss0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because sex is more likely to end in pleasure and orgasm for a man.

[–]Lonny_zone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You are interpreting the intent of the language that way, women do "give" on a certain level, and that does not mean they do not "get" in return. It's easier to talk about it as a short hand as something that they "give."

More often than not we are discussing ways and reasons why they have the sexual behavior they do, whereas men are pretty straightforward about why they "give" sex to women.

Furthermore, even women in real life will say "he isn't getting any" or that they will or will not "give it up" because they have an awareness that it is a buyer's market for them since the average woman will always be fielding more offers than the average guy. On the flip side only top guys ever get to feel that way about it, most guys are scrambling around trying to "get some."

[–]SepeanMarried RP Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s because most people understand sex as it happens with betas. They don’t think about how it is with alphas.

[–]MDMCrab0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Taking sex is coercive, giving sex is consensual.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman has to do nothing but exist and even if she is dog ugly or a complete mess, there will be a dude out there willing to have sex with her and probably another dude who will give her money to have sex with her.

A guy is born and is worthless. He has to prove himself and earn respect. He has to become a leader of his social group. He has to become more dominant. He needs to become pre-selected. He needs to project his voice. He needs to create feelings in a woman. Then a woman may be willing to have sex with him, maybe.

Sex for men is a chore, sex for women is a choice.

[–]SmurfESmurferson0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s desperate thirst. They can’t imagine a woman feels any sort of sex drive, because they’ve never been on the receiving end of it

Stereotypical Chad types generally enjoy the thrill of making a woman want them, having the women express it

[–]ohheyhi99Conflicted Feminist Man, No Pill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s one factor, but it’s not just men who frame straight sex as something that a woman gives of gifts to a man. Lots of women talk about sex as something only given to men who prove themselves worthy with the right moves or gifts. As cringeworthy and outdated as that is, the supply and demand of sex allows many women to practice that outlook in real life.

But, as you might agree, a man who a woman finds viscerally attractive probably doesn’t actually need great moves or gifts to get sex.

[–]wingbarkplacid not flaccid when im kissin’ on a bitch0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women want to be seduced by a man they’re attracted to and respect, men want sex.

[–]SepeanMarried RP Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because most men here are betas, and that is how they understand sex. And women talk about sex in the same context.

How sex is for.alphas, that is supposed to be a secret.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Most can’t imagine a woman ever legit being attracted to them so they see sex as something transactional that they have to “pay” (in one way or another) for.

I think some also are from weirdo religious families that screwed their heads up on the topic of sex. If you’re raised to believe that sex is dirty and only for procreation, of course you’re going to view it a very mechanical way.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Which is reinforced by women like you having "no woman would ever fuck your worthless ass" be the first go-to insult you can think of.

Just saying.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Don’t blame me for your insecurities.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not insecure

Way to comically miss the point, too. This issue is "you can't so something and then be mystified why people think you do something".

[–]jessicaannpin0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is really stereotypical sexist bs stemming from the suppression and historical commodification of female sexuality.

These guys see women as sexually passive and lacking in desire.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, that happens to be the case, you've got issues with empirical observation or something?

[–]HostileErectile-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s not like that all the time. And I personally don’t view sex as something I’m allowed to do as a man.

But in the average sexual power balance, it’s the woman who have been given all the power. The average man is emasculated, weak and pathetic. Don’t be that.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because women usually want something in return for that sex. They also often use sex as a tool for money or for manipulation.

For women, sex is about gaining power so she wants the greatest power she can get for the sex she offers. For men, power is a tool they use to get sex. So men give women power (or provide access to it through money, working and protection) and women give men sex.

You're right that sex is something people enjoy together consensually but they must see each other as roughly equals. Otherwise women wouldn't be angry when Chad doesn't commit after sleeping with him. She gave him sex and all she got was sex in return, which annoys her because sex is easy for her to get.

Remember this the next time women argue that their past promiscuity does not matter.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

the number of males here who think women dont like sex for sex yet they slept with them anyway is shocking.

ya'll rapists.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, they still get consent, but the agreement is "relationship", free meals, etc or whatever she really wants

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sex is a pleasurable act between two engaging (and consenting) people.

Oh, you sweet summer child.

What does that have to do with who makes the decisions to bless who with sex in exchange for something else.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter