TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

41

[–]GrumpyOldHistoricist37 points38 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Red:

1.) Hit the gym. You don’t have to be Mr. Universe, but being in decent shape definitely makes you more attractive. Plus, routine and discipline in one area of your life will help you establish the same elsewhere.

2.) Play the field. Nothing succeeds like success and a dude who gets around (so long as he conducts himself ethically) is more likely to be assumed to be a decent lay. Just as importantly, a guy with options is less likely to come off as an emotional burden. This is vital. Most women already have jobs. Don’t be another.

3.) Be reserved. I mean emotionally here. See above about emotional labor.

4.) Have your shit together financially. You don’t have to be rich. Women worth knowing are attracted to more than wealth and status. But nobody needs another burden.

5.) Don’t put the pussy on a pedestal. Worshipful dudes are fragile dudes. Fragile dudes mean emotional labor. Again, don’t be that.

Blue:

1.) Fuck “frame.” Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. “Frame,” as the TRP community circle jerk has come to depict it, is an unsustainable, superhuman degree of masculine composure. Any woman you attract with it is a stupid prize. Dignity is always attractive, but we’re all human. We all have our moments of weakness and vulnerability. This is normal and healthy. Decent women won’t abandon you for these. But the bitches who dig “frame” definitely will. Nobody who expects you to LARP 24/7 as Sean fucking Connery is worth your time.

2.) Be a good listener. You need to be able to actively participate in a conversation, but people love feeling listened to. Open the floor for them and listen. Maintain eye contact, interject commentary that evinces engagement, and don’t interrupt. The key for dudes, however, is to not listen like women. Women have plenty of girlfriends to complain to who will give them the standard “aw, I’m sorry,” “ugh, that sucks,” etc. Your job is to respectfully challenge them, offer non-patronizing advice, make joking but credible offers of violent retribution on their behalf, or crack an inappropriate but not tone deaf joke.

3.) Be respectful. Her boundaries, preferences, and beliefs are important. Act like it. You can challenge them as needed, but ultimately you have to be respectful of them. Any woman who wants you to be legitimately disrespectful toward her and uses boundaries as shit tests is broken and a potential life ruiner. Stay away and give your time fo healthy people.

4.) Understand give and take. Show appropriate gratitude for her acts of kindness and return them accordingly. And expect the same from her. If your relationship is all acts of kindness from one person, one of you is a doormat and the other is an asshole.

5.) Be honest. This one should speak for itself.

This has been working for me for a good long while now and I have a healthy relationship with my family, a stable core friend group of ten plus years, a wonderful (and ridiculously hot) girlfriend who sends me to work every day with a lunch and cooks dinner multiple nights a week, and an N count over 100. Don’t be ugly, thirsty, or shitty and you’ll do alright.

[–]sketch16200014 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is good, but what stands out to me is how much longer, nuanced and expository the Blue suggestions are, which I think highlights why a lot of men fail trying to apply it. I think in many ways it's kind of describing an idealized partner/person rather than a practical one. Not to say that it's wrong per se, just that it is more describing what would improve a person that already knows how to date. To wit, there are plenty of people who have absolutely no trouble finding partners and do exactly the opposite of every Blue suggestion listed and worse.

On the other hand, the Red suggestions are short, basic, to the point and practical. These are suggestions that you need to know as a baseline, and there are very few men that get anywhere if they ignore more than one of those. The issue that a lot of men are at this level, NOT at the level that Blue advice becomes relevant. The reality I think is that you need to start with the Red and then temper it more with the Blue as you become more sophisticated. It doesn't really work well the other way around. Naturals and women do this automatically, but the men who are susceptible to RP start out on the wrong end, and then are encouraged to keep going in that direction because it's more politically and socially correct, to their repeated failure.

[–]ThrowFaderEnlightened9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]anon6781230 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like it’s more like the type of person you want to attract. People from both sides claim to be successful. You’ll most likely end up attracting the type of person you’re looking for.

Also I feel like red pill guys tend to blame rejection on either himself or the girl. Sometimes it’s just not a good fit, you know?

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks a lot this is exactly what I was looking for

[–]Nodoxxintoxin7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Don’t be ugly, thirsty, or shitty and you’ll do alright.

Well folks, we can close down this sub. Most concise summary of advice for both sexes right here🌟

[–]Esk1mOz4mb1kFormer Nice Chad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you want that well paying job, you just have to be competent for that job.

Simple right?

[–]jax006Wants to bang ~20% of PPD chicks3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dang this comment nails it

[–]Sondrety43 points44 points  (35 children) | Copy Link

BP- Anyone not acting like themselves will almost always come of as creepy. Fake confidence, signaling and following a routine makes you stick out like a sore thumb
- People are attracted to skills, passion and confidence. If you master a craft, or at least show some interest in attempting to master it, you will be more attractive.
- Making yourself look tidy, appealing and clean makes you more attractive (so lookmaxxing as some call it, here the two sides agree)
- It's a numbers game, get out there and meet people. Most people only have a 1% chance of another person being attracted to them. Go out there an meet 100 people.
- Be nice. Not creepy nice, not nice because you think it will get you laid, or some shit like that. Just be a person other people like being around

[–]DominemmBlack Girl, Purple World9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This was the only advice that actually sounded blue pill.

[–]Sondrety14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, brother. Blue pill is not about "respecting women", "putting them on a pedestal", or any thing like that. That is some white knight shit. You should respect people, because that makes you more agreeable to be around. Also yeah, I do enjoy blue pill more than red pill, as the latter is so.... sterile and lifeless.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Anyone not acting like themselves will almost always come of as creepy. Fake confidence, signaling and following a routine makes you stick out like a sore thumb

Guess what, you need to fake confidence and achieve success before you develop real confidence. There is no thing such as a confident 30 y.o virgin

  • People are attracted to skills, passion and confidence. If you master a craft, or at least show some interest in attempting to master it, you will be more attractive.

Useless advice. If you're ugly and lack game, you could be the best pianist/programmer/sky-diver/etc in the world and still be a virgin. There are a lot of incels who are "masters at their craft"

Be nice. Not creepy nice, not nice because you think it will get you laid, or some shit like that. Just be a person other people like being around

Again, doesn't do shit. Not only is niceness 99% of the time confounded with weakness, halo effect exists which means that if you're hot people will think you're smarter/nicer/etc

Realistically, only 3 and 4 are remotely good advice, and even then many blue pillers would still disagree with them, with platitudes such as "only shallow people value looks, there's someone for everyone" and "you cannot treat human beings as if they were numbers" respectively

[–]unicorns-Married Feminist1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you're ugly and lack game, you could be the best pianist/programmer/sky-diver/etc in the world and still be a virgin.

If you're an unattractive and socially awkward pianist, you won't have a problem dating unattractive and socially awkward female classical/jazz musicians. You will have a problem if you are trying to appeal to attractive women or women who have no interest in piano or classical/jazz music.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Retarded argument. Unattractive and socially awkward female classical jazz musicians are vastly outnumbered by male ones, so no, you will still have a problem

And even then, unattractive socially awkward females still want attractive socially skilled males, which they can afford to do in current society

[–]washington_breadstixM'gtow3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

(so lookmaxxing as some call it, here the two sides agree)

Ironically enough, the two sides agree on a bunch of the other stuff in your comment too. The numbers game thing also sounds like pure red pill advice if you re-phrase it to "Approach, approach, approach!"

Same applies to your point about mastering a skill or craft. The red pill always preaches that a guy shouldn't make women his number-one goal. You're supposed to turn yourself into a well-rounded person and then enjoy female attention on the side. So the red-pill equivalent of that advice is "If you build it, they will come."

Just goes to show that the difference between RP and BP tactics isn't as significant as people think. It largely comes down to semantics as well as whether you think the advice is in line with the common accepted narrative or not. I know that dating strategy is only one facet, but it's the specific aspect where BP and RP are not really two different ideologies in my mind.

The only thing I don't think belongs on your list (even if you are BP) is this:

Be nice. Not creepy nice, not nice because you think it will get you laid, or some shit like that. Just be a person other people like being around

Doing something "not because you think it will get you laid" is decidedly not dating advice, and OP asked for pieces of dating advice.

[–]Here4thebeer3232No Pill1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much this. Red Pill advice IS existing blue pill advice, but presented in a unique way so that it seems original. You can find a lot of analogs between the two. I personally don't disagree on a lot of RP advice, cause a lot of it is good advice. But the same material can be found elsewhere, without the accompanying framework and worldview.

[–]Sondrety1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I would also spit in that a lot of red pill advice is also taken a bit too far. Like approaching women all the time. Sure, women do enjoy being approached by likeable people (so do we men too, so women, up your game there), but it has to feel natural. Someone down the thread actually makes a point about this. Personally I just fucking love to flirt, so I do it all the time. I almost never ever get any bad reaction too it, which I put down to me actually not having any ulterior motives with it. I just like to smile, joke and have fun.

[–]Here4thebeer3232No Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh definitely. In their quest to take women off a pedestal, they forgot to take pussy off as well. As a result, it seems their only pursuit of socialization is to get sex, and forget that socialization without other motives is fun and fullfilling as well.

[–]Sondrety0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If it is a advice about how to get good at dating, then it is a advice. Think of it like this, a striker needs to improve his stamina, do he think about scoring goals while he runs? No, he focuses on the objective. If you just look at everything from the "will I score with this approach", you will lose focus on what you are doing right now. Becoming a pleasant and nice person, with interesting skills and opinions, is as good as you are ever going to get. A lot of things you can't change in life, but your persona is one of them. For better and for worse. As you said it, if you build it they will come.

The reason why blue pill and red pill overlap so much, is because they are trying to explain a natural occurence, the relationship between people. Neither side can completely ignore the facts and experiences we have, so they need to incorporate them. People are just looking at it with their own lenses, blue, red, purple or as I do, my own.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

If you master a craft, or at least show some interest in attempting to master it, you will be more attractive.

I don't see women running behind the ordinary mathematicians. They are among the most passionate people I know.

Better advice would be to master a craft women are interested in.

nice because you think it will get you laid

This one is wierd. People in generally act differently to the people they are attracted to.

[–]Sondrety10 points11 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I have friends who are mathematicians and can woo girls with that, especially the ones that are students themselves.. It is all a composium, not a quick-fix. If the person ain't physically attracted to you, or find your passion interesting, it doesn't matter if you are tidy. In the end attraction might, or might not, be all of the above. These are just things that increase your chances, not something that guarentees it.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

If the person ain't physically attracted to you, or find your passion interesting, it doesn't matter if you are tidy.

This. IMO looks happen to be the bigger variable.

These are just things that increase your chances, not something that guarentees it.

I agree.

[–]Sondrety0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, looks is of course a massive part. Albeit, I am suprised time after time after time how much taste can vary from person to person. Jesus christ, anyone who has dabbled in the wild world of fetish porn knows that there is so much variance in attraction.

[–]warmestblack 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

The variance indicate male preference. Men have a wider scope of what they find physically attractive in women.

[–]Sondrety4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That doesn't seem to be my personal experience. Women I speak to differ greatly in who among my friends they find attractive, we boys on the other hand have our preferences, but all agree on the base line. It is something I even noticed as a wee lad back in the days. I personally have always thought it is because women are more attracted to mental than physical attributes, relative to us men that is.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just a consequence of their desperation.

[–]Shazoa2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This one is wierd. People in generally act differently to the people they are attracted to.

It's still weird to act nice to someone as a means to an end. Generally when people are acting differently to those they're attracted to that isn't just with the intention of getting some action - those people make you excited, bring you out of yourself, and make you happy. That's why you end up acting different.

[–]Barneysparky3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I married a single thinking math brained person.

He was broken up with a few times before he met me. Nicest guy ever but I'm just not feeling it was always the break up.

We've been married almost 20 years, he's brilliant but has a very hard time holding a conversation with other peole without it being something he knows or alcohol.

So I get it, but that's not the majority of guys out there.

We got rules about conversation. 50/50 when possible monthly on the boring stuff. We talk alot now, not just about information we need, but hobbies and work. We debate opposing views in politics, we talk about a lot of "what ifs", we talk about what would be the best dissision for us and for ourselves when our days haven't quite finished yet.

He really is liking it. Btw this is maybe 30 minutes a day in small impliments.

If a couple doesn't have this, they are not a couple

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I loved reading your anecdote. Thank you.

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The nice part, I agree, but it should be totally divorced from any sexual intentions--it should be nice for the sake of being nice alone and no other sake.

[–]Sondrety2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it's one of those things that don't work unless it is natural. If you are nice because you are a nice person, people will respond to it.

[–]quadtodfodder 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

be nice for the sake of being nice alone and no other sake

I think the classic nice guy fallacy is that there si something wrong with treating somebody you are interested in an extra special way.

"Hi, you're cool, I'm attracted to you, and you get special treatment" is (if not creepy, misplaced, or over aggressive) is damned flattering and cuts through the bullshit.

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you elaborate? Are you referring to negging vs. flirting vs. showering with praise?

[–]quadtodfodder 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I suppose I mean "It's ok to flirt with people you are attracted to"

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you sure though? I don't know about morally speaking, but generally I find that flirting only works practically when there's indications of interest to begin with, prior to the flirting.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

1% chance of another person being attracted to them

I think thats being a bit bleak.

[–]Sondrety2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why, no. I don't mean that they barf at your mere sight, just that out of 100 people you meet, a conservative amount of 1 person would want to fuck you. Sure, for some that might be higher.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

a conservative amount of 1 person would want to fuck you. Sure, for some that might be higher.

Well if I meet 100 random people of all ages and sexes then maybe? If I meet 100 women between the ages of 25-50, its going to be much higher. Mind you a lot of them I might not want to have sex with, but I'd guess conservatively, at worst, I'm having a bad day, 30% would.

[–]Sondrety0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, personally, if I meet 100 random people atleast 120 of them will want me for ungodly, carnal pleasure. But I was trying to be nice towards all the people who aren't as charming as you and me.

[–]unicorns-Married Feminist1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you went to a bar with exactly 100 women, what percentage do you think would want to sleep with you?

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

100 eligible women between 25-50 years old, I'd say 80%.

I have community status, a very good living, and slightly better than average looks.

Just based on looks and game? Probably 35%, maybe a bit more but a lot depends on their quality too and if they are looking for sex.

[–]DubsPackage10 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Bluepill advice is for men who are already successful with women. ie "Be yourself, be confident."

Redpill advice is for men who could be successful with women but maybe aren't. ie "Be yourself but make your self be more like this."

That's not to say that redpill guys are worse or less eligible, it's to say that in a multicultural society not everyone knows how to act "normal" or maybe in your previous country guys beat the shit out of each other and that made women's panties wet, every culture has its own assumptions, presuppositions and mating rituals.

So the red pill doesn't assume that you know what everybody else knows, it tries to break down the whole interaction step by step.

Top 5 suggestions (red pill)

  1. Self improvement (Gym, school, work, hobbies, projects)
  2. Go out, go out, go out
  3. Fake confidence while you work on establishing a basis for real confidence
  4. Be "friendly and cool" not in hopes of scoring but so that others want to be around you
  5. Don't pedestalize women, understand your own value, don't be desperate - Don't think in scarcity terms, like "I only have 1 girl's number, so I will try to make her put out somehow." Instead think, "I will get more girls numbers, and only give my time to those who seem enthusiastic." Abundance mentality.

All of the above is not just for getting women, it is also for yourself and general success in life.

[–]sturbine 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Bluepill advice is for men who are already successful with women. ie "Be yourself, be confident."

This explains it. This hits the nail right on the head. Bluepill is just saying to the naturals, 'keep it up.'

[–]ThrowFaderEnlightened1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]jkonrad-Pill6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Is it just me, or does it seem like what TRP defines as "BP" isn't how self-described BPs would define themselves?

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's because there are two BPs.

There's the Disney-fantasy blue pill. It's the "women are perfect angels that would never lie", "put her on a pedestal", "just act nice" and "looks don't matter at all" pill that TRPers used to swallow before they switched to the red pill.

But then there's also the /r/TheBluePill blue pill. It's all the people who think that /r/TheRedPill is wrong, harmful, misogynistic or stupid.

They also relate to attachment styles.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When I think of BP I just think of common advice I would hear from people.

Things like, dress well, be yourself, good hygiene, be confident..etc which I don't think is bad advice but I don't think it fully encompasses the whole picture.

[–]jkonrad-Pill4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I suppose a denial of the masculine/feminine polarity would be a valid contrasting point

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

TRP has some good advice but it's more designed as a fascist, authoritarian indoctrination framework with built-in negatively-driven self-esteem boosters. They portray the "other side" as cartoonishly, impossibly stupid in order to create an "us vs them", "elite bro team" feeling. The whole TRP thing is designed to foster this feeling more so than to produce romantic success. It's a "Cheat to Confidence", similar to the bashing of minority races etc. to make people feel better about their shitty selves rather than improve said selves.

[–]jkonrad-Pill7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think that’s a fair assessment. Their chief opponents aren’t “BPers”, it’s themselves. That’s also why their definition of BP differs from what self-described BPers would define themselves as. As an easy example, think of the admonition “be yourself.” That’s anathema for RPers... being themselves is what brought them to their current dilemma. But for a BPer who doesn’t sufffer the particular issues that RP men do, “being themself” works just fine.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil14 points15 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

Does TBP actually have any tips?

[–]yungvibegod215 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the only decent advice blue pill gives is:

Every person is an individual and therefore different, there is no “one size fits all” way of getting laid. Some women are materialistic and some are not, this is because they are people and differ from one another.

[–]daymi3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Every person is an individual and therefore different

People are more alike than different. Over the years you'll see the same few people again in new people. It's not true that every person is (more than marginally) different. Especially not in a shared culture.

there is no “one size fits all” way of getting laid

There is, it's called game and it works very often - much more than if it were due to chance.

I agree that those are the usual blue pill tips, but I don't agree that they are decent. They are feel-good platitudes with no grounding in real-life experience and I don't know why people keep on believing that stuff when they just have to try game and see that it works - which it shouldn't have.

[–]storffish8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

go outside and learn social skills.

[–]washington_breadstixM'gtow1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But that does not distinctly differ from red pill because the red pill does not discourage learning social skills. I think the difference is how much of your strategy "social skills" account for. To red pillers, it's just part of the battle whereas blue pillers seem to think that one concept is 98% of the battle.

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

  • People aren't all the same and don't all operate romantically/sexually the same

  • Showing vulnerability is an important part of confidence

  • Conforming to macho social standards is total bullshit and a waste of time. Far better to work with genuine passion on things you actually care about, no matter what others think of them.

  • Keep an open mind, meet new people, learn new things. Not only does it make your life much more fun and fascinating but it makes you far more flexible and resilient too.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

Be yourself. Be honest. Don't be a fuckboy. Women like kind considerate men with feeeeeeeeelings. Women don't like sexist men. Respect women.

But the red pill is almost as bad as the blue pill. They both mostly cater to women's desires. TRP is all about appeasing women. Most will eagerly debase themselves for a little bit of pussy. MGTOW is superior in so many ways.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil17 points18 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Most will eagerly debase themselves for a little bit of pussy. MGTOW is superior in so many ways.

See I actually like women, not all women but a lot of them. I like hanging out with them. I like when they want to have sex with me, desire me, lust after me and give themselves to me, and I like rewarding them for it by giving them mind blowing orgasms where they forget everything but that very moment. Ever see a woman orgasm in such a way she can't control anything about her body, her head rolls back and she screams so loud that it hurts your ears?

If I "go my own way" I get fishing and video games, maybe pay for a hooker? Not my thing. I can already fish and play video games.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

God forbid you admit that here lol

[–]TheBookOfSeilAn ounce of Snu Snu is worth a pound of cure2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fishing and video games ftw

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points [recovered]  (21 children) | Copy Link

Ever see a woman orgasm in such a way

Yeah, if you have a big dick. Tongue action does fuck all.

[–]allweknowisD5 points6 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Get better

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points [recovered]  (11 children) | Copy Link

Bullshit.

[–]allweknowisD1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Maybe in your world

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points [recovered]  (9 children) | Copy Link

No, in reality.

[–]allweknowisD0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

And your basis for this is?

Cause literally every piece of information on the female orgasm shows it’s less likely with PiV. Hence why a large majority of women haven’t experienced an orgasm and most do not orgasm with every sexual experience

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points [recovered]  (7 children) | Copy Link

The full body orgasm that women experience where they scream their lungs out is only possible with big dicks. The fact that the majority haven't experienced an orgasm is proof that most men are not packing big dicks because the average penis size is not good enough whatsoever.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

You've never had good sex. Most women can't orgasm from PIV.

[–]oftheinfinite 1 points [recovered]  (6 children) | Copy Link

Most men don't have big dicks.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I have a big dick it doesn't matter much. Seriously I don't get the big dick love, its recockulous on the reddit sex subs.

[–]GrumpyOldHistoricist2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Cervical orgasms. That shit is real and a sight to behold.

But you don’t have to be some kind of Don Johnson to make it happen. I’m above average without being huge and I reliably give them. The dudes on here who are obsessed with other guys’ enormous dongs watch too much porn.

[–]SavingMasculinitySAVINGMASCULINITY.COM1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Gravity. Positions like reverse cowgirl really help.

[–]diffdedbedGreen Eyed Devil-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Cervical orgasms.

I'm 7"x6" (very slightly smaller) my wife has never had an orgasm vaginally, not once, not with me, not with guys even bigger.

Now I've given vaginal orgasms but for most its oral or manual to get them there. You can probe that fornix all you like and they might enjoy it but the clit (and g-spot which directly related to the clit and only in some women) is where the O action is at.

[–]yumthepus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

https://mosex.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/the-rule-of-thumb-vagina-types-and-variability-of-female-orgasm/

I found some history that caused me to scream. This princess tried to surgically move her clitoris closer to her vaginal opening. Needless to say, she was not aware of the complete structure of the clitoris.

I also recently learned that the internal clitoris can extend all the way to the anus, which explains why some women so greatly enjoy stimulation there..

Just knowing where the clitoris can be stimulated opens up new possibilities for enjoyment. The way you move your hips while inside her can make a dramatic difference.

(TMI: Some of the best/worst sex I've had is with big dicks. One guy had a horse cock, but was so skinny I had nothing to stimulate myself with. The other guy, above average girth and length, had a nice soft belly. That was a lot more enjoyable for me.)

http://centerforeroticintelligence.org/internal-clitoris/

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

[–]SavingMasculinitySAVINGMASCULINITY.COM0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't get it either. I am only slightly above average. It's about how you use it. Because I am not a 9 incher, I use gravity to the woman and I's advantage. This means using positions like reverse cowgirl to ensure she feels absolutely every inch of what you have.

Women always thank me for sex after we have it, so I must know I'm doing.

[–]WhatIsTheMeaningHere5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

MGTOW is a superiority superior complex for in so many incels ways.

Fixed that for you.

[–]Whodunnit88Survivied Purge Week 201859 points60 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

BP:

  1. "Just be yourself."

  2. Humble brag about their life, whilst only vaguely answering the question about how to get with a woman.

  3. Give off the impression that women are wonderful and that as a man you should be honoured to be in the presence of one.

  4. When confronted with evidence that women aren't exactly wonderful they roll their eyes and say: "Yeah, so what? Everybody knows that."

  5. Blame men.

RP.

  1. Say something sexist.

  2. "Lift".

  3. Write a ten page essay full of grammatical and logical errors.

  4. Reference random pick up artists from two decades ago.

  5. Blame women.

[–]toronto87 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

To really drive home the point you should randomly bold words in the RP section

[–]ThrowFaderEnlightened0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I LOL'd.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

it's over the perfect answer has been found.

[–]_Neon_Shadow_1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice.

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Assuming that you are looking for the GOOD advice:

Red Pill:

  • Be physically fit as much as possible

  • Understand that women are usually more engaged by indirect teasing and flirting games and will be put off by "autistic" straight-talk.

  • Understand that women are attracted to confidence in men more than almost anything else. Confidence meaning steady emotions, consistent good attitude, making few mistakes, matching of words and deeds, commitment to goals and projects.

  • Practice and improve social skills to improve your romantic options and results.

Blue Pill:

  • Be self-directed, pursue your passions and enjoy life. This is the true source of confidence and meaning. This is the most important thing in life, NOT sex.

  • Be morally good for its own sake--completely unrelated to any sexual selection. Do not throw this away in order to appear "cool" or "macho".

  • Respect others' consent and comfort. Don't pressure others into sex or other things. Encourage positivity, meet diverse people.

  • It's OK to show vulnerability and openness. Always learn from mistakes and always keep an open mind - the universe is still hapenning and there are always new things to learn

  • Appreciate women not just for their beauty but also for their personality, and understand that both genders have equal strengths and flaws and humanity.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you, this is what I was looking for.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled15 points16 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

I'll boil it down further for you.

Red : Actionable, observable advice that may not be politically correct, that is non-obvious. (Frame, dualistic strategy etc)

Blue : Feel good tripe that won't do anything to improve your situation beyond what is already obvious. (Dress better, talk to women, "be yourself")

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

What actionable advice can be gained from the knowledge of women's dualistic mating strategy? I'm not disagreeing, genuinely curious.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled11 points12 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Lot's, I could type an entire essay on this. This is basically the foundation of "being red pilled." It is to understand how women choose mates.

This is how most men begin to understand they were in fact "betabux." I really wish they'd kill this term, this is the biggest misconception by far. It's not about money at all. Conceptually TRP's BB is a woman's LTR mate preferences.

AF is a woman's STR preferences. Women select against their raw arousal preferences (in what we call assortative mating) for LTRs (betabux\bb\provider\beta).

So this lets guys understand fundamentally why being in a provider position is a bad idea and why there's no such thing really, as a "combination of both."

Either you're the guy that makes her comfortable, or the guy that brings excitement. I used this to retool the way men should get involved with families.

I treat myself as short term mate and provision to the level I am comfortable with, and such a realignment would never have been possible without intimately understanding how women select mates.

I will never in my life ever date a woman above board as a man of comfort, because I understand what that means. Men gain nothing from this position. Nothing.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

So it's impossible to be both, be a man who brings her both excitement and comfortability? Why are these things mutually exclusive? Is it because over a longer period of time the STR man will eventually slide his way into the comfortable man if he commits to her?

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled4 points5 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Women select men that are more controllable and the sexual economics dictate the man unwilling to commit is more physically attractive.

Think of it in reverse. Imagine if a bunch of women that were on average more attractive (sometimes a lot) than your girlfriend were trying to sleep with you all the time.

Do you want to be "your girlfriend" in this spot?

Is it because over a longer period of time the STR man will eventually slide his way into the comfortable man if he commits to her?

This is related but not it, we call this Beta Slide.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

I totally get that but if I had a gf who I was attracted to and found very sexy, and then let say I switched jobs and all of a sudden a bunch of hot women were hitting on me. Would I probably fantasize about sleeping with one of the hot new girls? Yes. But I wouldn't lose my sexual attraction to my current gf. Of course the new girl would seem more exciting because novelty gives it a super charge, but I wouldn't automatically view my gf as less sexy because a new girl with bigger tits and ass making moves. I would desire them both but look at other attributes and qualities (not thinking with my dick).

Another point what about a Tim Tebow character or a brad pitt... man who a women considers very sexy but also wants a LTR. Wouldn't that be the ultimate combo for a women and stimulate both sides of the dualistic strategy? Even if its not that extreme but lets say a man who she finds very hot and would have a STR with but it turns into a LTR. Could he not simultaneously be the man of excitement and comfort?

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled7 points8 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

That because you're using male solipsism. You are designed to be attracted to many women at once. She is designed to be attracted to the most powerful one. Furthermore, you have a much wider arousal window to ensure that you can procreate at will.

She's designed to procreate with the best.

Another point what about a Tim Tebow character or a brad pitt... man who a women considers very sexy but also wants a LTR.

Brad Pitt got divorced.

The closest you can get to balancing this is to be a woman's short term choice and to provision to a level of comfort that you'd do if she'd leave tomorrow. What you're doing is called High Beta Game. You're trying to be the most exciting provider. Same problem exists. Every guy does this, it's the foundation of my post about "Nice Guy with an edge." Every median male thinks he's got a clever game.

Then you know she's selected you for how arousing you are and you're not overinvesting in her, only to the degree you'd be willing to lose.

It's like gambling. If you walk into the Casino with the idea you're going to beat the house and you play for your house, odds are, you'll lose your house.

If you go in there with the idea that you're going to play $100 an if you win you win and if you lose you lose, you spent that $100 or you won $100 but you didn't lose $100.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for the convo, you are very knowledgable and good at distilling the info.

I guess high beta game is what I'm aiming for. Being in STR parameters that will only last until she finds a better prospect, that may be a week, a month, or years..who knows. It honestly seems like the fairest way to do things. I want a LTR but I don't want a gf who doesn't think I'm the best she can get, and im not trying to bribe her to stay with resources and provisionings.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It honestly seems like the fairest way to do things. I want a LTR but I don't want a gf who doesn't think I'm the best she can get, and im not trying to bribe her to stay with resources and provisionings.

Until you really have a handle on things, date how you have, just keep your eyes open. You have to spend a lot of time before you'll be comfortable with this.

Most guys it takes about a year to fully digest and maybe another year to reorient themselves.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Im just starting to orient these concepts into my life after my gf broke up with me a while back. Theres so much nonsense out there from the " all women are money grubbing whores" camp to the "women are pixie dream girls". There's so much convoluted bullshit in this sphere, Ive just been looking for some rational actionable concepts that will improve my life. So thanks again, good luck out there.

[–]antariuszRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, appeal to her alpha fucks side, especially if you’re going after younger women. Completely ignore any provider traits, in fact it’s better if you hide your 6 figure salary or nice house in the burbs if you want to get laid. Don’t talk about it, in fact it’s better to lie than tell the truth (tell her drug dealer). But the expensive impractical 2 seat sports car, not the practical hatch.

If you’re trying to date a 34 year old woman looking to settle on a beta provider, do the opposite. Supplication, please and thank you, pay for dinner while being gracious about it. Invite her to meet friends (alpha fucks is more about fucking without societal approval, like a quickie in the bar)

[–]Barneysparky-1 points0 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Become a person who can have a conversation on a variety of subjects.

Be a person who talks 50% of the time within their friendships and partnerships about their day, and keeps track that it's equal not in a has to be 100%, but you are interested in what they are saying.

My husband talks about technical aspects of both his job and hobby that hold no interest to me in the least nor anyone outside of the people who are interested in that.

I talk about my job and my hobby as well. I work with hopefully not in the future BPD tweens right now, with keeping anonymity I think mines slightly more interesting then his manufacturing job. Both of our hobbies are interest to each other, his means time devoted to it on my part, mine as well.

Listen when others talk. You don't have to agree, honestly you don't. But you have to acknowledge the others view points.

Don't talk for more then a paragraph unless you are telling a story, and they know in advance.

Just don't rant. Both my husband and I don't talk alot, then we talk.. We are good enough to say now.. ok 2 minute rant. But ONLY when we can do that without a raised tone.

Be polite and don't attack the other person when you disagree. When someone tells you "you are yelling" don't tell them you aren't or yell louder, take a moment to breath and change your tone.

If your partner escalates remind them of your rules. Time out (walk away for 5-15 minutes) then ask again if we can talk about this politely.

Is the above advice red or blue pill or just common sense for people who relationship well.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled6 points7 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

This is blue pill stuff. It doesn't fundamentally alter the way you view your relationship or how men can obtain what they want, unless what they want are female partners who feel comfortable. This is basically serving female perceptual agendas. I say perceptual, because the largest lesson men learn when becoming red pilled is what a woman says is rarely important and her actions generally dictate that arousal is paramount.

Let me put it this way.

At one time, the largest point of contention in our house was literally dishes. And of course there were "I'm sick, I have a headache, I'm tired" rejections etc.

It's not about the dishes, or how much you talk etc. In her mind, she was 100% right that this was important. Her actions dictate that it wasn't.

If your husband is worried about how much you talk, walk into the middle of the next game buck naked and blow him, tell him to relax, watch the game and enjoy. And then start yammering. Doubtful he cares how much you talk.

It's comforting for us to believe we have a high degree of control over ourselves and our relationships, but the lesson we learn is that evolution plays a heavy hand. We are passengers.

If your partner escalates remind them of your rules. Time out (walk away for 5-15 minutes) then ask again if we can talk about this politely.

This is the type of logic men find out doesn't work for women. It might work for you, but it won't work in reverse unless you're very male brained. And even then, when you become unattracted to your husband I'd worry for what's in store for him as you calculate your path to his destruction.

The post reads very neurotic and it's not healthy IMO. For a week, don't keep track of anything he does or you do, and focus on making him happy. And then tell me what happened.

I bet you neither of you will be worried about who is talking or 50% of this or that or whatever and he'll tell you how much he loves you. He'll start bringing more heat and maybe enough that you're not worried about this stuff, hopefully.

Fighting is fine, I'm no longer friends with my wife, we're lovers. The biggest fight we've had recently she made me so angry I didn't even want to spank her.

I'm not even joking.

That was a real fight. When it wasn't about who wins or loses or taking your anger out or sex etc. Just, that I'd had enough. She was hurt by that. Her being hurt by that was the closest I've ever felt to any woman.

I never expect to reach a point with anyone else that is so pure. Nothing is fair or rational about it, it's just a manifestation of natural power exchanges and sexual dynamics.

[–]Barneysparky0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

If I walked into the room naked and told my husband I would blow him... He would at best do so begrudgenly because he loves me and obviously I'm in the mood.

If he wanted to spend that time getting head he'd ask me.

When you express that a blowjob is all men want I seriously question your seriousness and or maturity.

Relationships are not built on blow jobs, at least not more then 15 minutes a day (30 minutes when you are young).

What the heck are you doing or talking about the other 23 1/2 hour a day?

Sitting on your computer? Life win there I guess, I like the computer and Reddit and all but also like real life interactions that happen most often with the person you live with.

For most people. Honest.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Wooosh!

[–]sturbine 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Man, if this thread was a conference, I'd follow you outside and beg to become your apprentice.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well lucky for you just go to my profile, follow me and then look at my postings. If you're going through some serious shit I can do a GLO style consult with you for something reasonable.

[–]Barneysparky1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I just read your post history.

You messed up your marriage and you blame everyone but yourself.

Go post all about how you know about women more.

[–]sadomasochristnAWALT = Not red pilled0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My life is awesome, so... ehh?

The only thing that happened in my marriage is I overvalued her and undervalued myself. I changed that. No regrets. Anyways through that I spent a lot of time doing research and quantifying and post that for people to learn from. Men find it valuable. You are not a man, so it doesn't matter.

Anyways, you did miss the response but that was sort of part of the reply itself. That's why guys get it and you can't understand it.

My position on the matter is if I can live my best possible life with the knowledge I gained, so can any man.

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

He’s not married btw. Has two yard children with a salon manager

[–]Barneysparky0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

His post history is: "I'm not a nice person, hay want to give me money to teach you have to be miserable as well".

[–]Nodoxxintoxin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol, yeah. Sums it up.

[–]Barneysparky-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well you can't expect me to comment on your strange comment about how I track our conversations! That's just an odd thing to take from that. I'm an artist type, not prone to spreadsheeting anything.

Before we talked about even time for our boring stuff I heard in length about technical aspects of my husband's job without him reciprocating. That sucked. He still talks more about thingamegigs then I do about the crazy kids I work with but I don't feel ignored anymore

I'm guessing from your responce that either you haven't had a sucessful relationship, or never a long term one. Maybe instead of being dismissive of my advice (someone who is genuinely in love and lust after 20 years) you might try listening to it the next time you have a chance of finding love.

It wasn't the dishes...

[–]SilentLurker6664 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

and how do they differ?

They'll probably be the same except Bp would protect the female narrative. For example if TRP would say wealth because they want beta providers and you can't be a provider without money... BP would also say money but because the men should at least provide a suitable lifestyle for himself and the ones he loves... and what follows would be argument of semantics.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Suggestions Red Pill Blue Pill
1 Live your own Life Live your life to serve a woman
2 Put yourself first Put a woman first
3 Follow your dreams Do everything in relation to her
4 Don't put any woman on a pedestal Put her on a pedestal
5 Hit the gym, eat healthy, take care of your body and mind Women love soyboys with dad's bodies

[–]flyawaylittlebirdierabid feminist10 points11 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Now, this is the most ridiculous answer here by far.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]flyawaylittlebirdierabid feminist-3 points-2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Eh, sure. When your argument has no basis except a strawman in your head that doesn't even agree with what others of your group believe, its pretty ridiculous. And seeing as everyone else here uses a reasonable approach to their thoughts on the matter, whether or not I personally agree, your argument is the weakest and the least based in logic.

[–]jax006Wants to bang ~20% of PPD chicks7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Uh.. wut? Please explain how is his comment a strawman?? He laid out 5 points that he considers RP in response to this OP. Wtf does a "logical argument" have to do with here??

Ironically that hierarchy of disagreement is making comical sense in the context of your comments.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The strawman are his BP points

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

u/flyawaylittlebirdie states:

Eh, sure. When your argument has no basis except a strawman in your head that doesn't even agree with what others of your group believe, its pretty ridiculous. And seeing as everyone else here uses a reasonable approach to their thoughts on the matter, whether or not I personally agree, your argument is the weakest and the least based in logic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Graham%27s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement.svg

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Repeating this doesn't make your argument any better. It's still a poor strawman that's entirely based on extreme black and white thinking.

[–]jax006Wants to bang ~20% of PPD chicks3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Can you please explain how his comment is a "strawman"

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Because there's not a single TBPer that has ever suggested these things.

Either he's completely incapable of understanding nuance (which wouldn't be surprising given that he's red-aligned) or he just made it up (which wouldn't be surprising either considering that red people generally do not care about facts at all).

Either way it's just a strawman argument without any basis in reality.

[–]jax006Wants to bang ~20% of PPD chicks1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh I cant see the BP points, I can only see the RP points table

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's weird, but here it is:

1 Live your life to serve a woman

2 Put a woman first

3 Do everything in relation to her

4 Put her on a pedestal

5 Women love soyboys with dad's bodies

[–]flyawaylittlebirdierabid feminist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm telling you to put some effort in your strawman if you're going to bullshit so hard.

Suggestions Red Pill Blue Pill
1 Live your own Life Live your life to serve a woman
2 Put yourself first Put a woman first
3 Follow your dreams Do everything in relation to her
4 Don't put any woman on a pedestal Put her on a pedestal
5 Hit the gym, eat healthy, take care of your body and mind Women love soyboys with dad's bodies
Suggestions Red Pill Blue Pill
1 Live your own Life Live your own life, if you have a SO realize your life includes their life
2 Put yourself first Put a yourself first, if you are in a LTR, realize that there is give and take for both sides
3 Follow your dreams Follow your dreams
4 Don't put any woman on a pedestal Women are people, don't put them on a pedestal but don't treat them like an object to be used
5 Hit the gym, eat healthy, take care of your body and mind Women have different things they want in their partners, some women would rather you work on your hang ups than your body

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Straw man arguments just make the padded cell you're in that much more obvious.

[–]SavingMasculinitySAVINGMASCULINITY.COM-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

L oh fucking L

[–]happycheese86No Pill-3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is more likely to pass on your genes and the children survive and thrive?

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to Littleknownfacts[M] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The advice would probably be very similar, but trps would be unnecessarily edgy and bpers would be confusingly vague.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed

[–]AllahHatesFagsBLACK PILL MOTHERFUCKER!2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Top 5 Blue Pill Rules:

  1. Do whatever women says and give them whatever they want regardless of what they are or aren't offering you.
  2. Increase your intake of soy.
  3. As a male you don't get to have preferences so if a 300-lb trans-woman wants to date you then you should feel lucky.
  4. In LTR or marriage, cuckoldry is to be expected and if you don't want to share your 300-lb trans queen you are a misogynist shitlord!
  5. Be sure to prep the bulls yourself.

[–]ThrowFaderEnlightened2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

deleted What is this?

[–]tnais0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like this would be better if red flairs answered on behalf of TRP and blue flairs answered on behalf of TBP

[–]UnconfidenceSocial Anarchist - BP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

BP - I can't speak for the ideology as a whole, here are mine.

  • Think of other people as humans just as capable and intelligent as you. Don't look for excuses to condescend. That man walking down the street at 50 who looks like they're on their way to work? He's not a loser, and you should hope that when you're 50 you still have the strength to do what's necessary, rather than falling into destitution. Instead of thinking how bad his life must be, stop and give him a ride. Thing is, a lot of people really unconsciously devalue others, and it puts off those who recognize it and have a distaste for it. Within hetero men, these people can just be dismissed as "sensitive" but within women that distinction isn't supposed to be negative, so women who are still considered traditionally appealing will often have this sensitivity. Within hetero women, it's more of a personal choice to go after someone who displays that sensitivity. If you don't devalue other people, prospective partners will be less likely to presume you might devalue them.

  • Don't make romance or attainment of love your first priority. You'll get the same rhetoric from TRP, but the reasoning is different. They say don't do it because it makes you attractive. That seems utterly hypocritical to me, as it's making romance the reason for seeking the passion. The reason you do so is because it will make you a better and happier person both before and during any relationships you may have. When you're regularly having moments where you feel fulfilled, then people are more likely to believe that you are capable of being fulfilled by the world and the things in it, specifically other people.

  • Don't press for any information the person is uncomfortable giving. It may seem like they're dropping hints that they want you to press further. Likely, they're just nervous as hell and babbling, and trying to avoid certain subjects but failing, as people are prone to do. This ties back into the first point. They're a person, they're just as awkward as anyone else, not some graceful or powerful creature. We're all just lumps of flesh, pooping our way through life.

  • When entering a long-term relationship, make sure everything is clearly defined. Clear communication is key. If you feel that continued, regular sex is essential to the continuance of the relationship, let that be known. If you think that PDA is off limits, let that be known. If you think that your girlfriend kissing other girls at the bar when drunk doesn't count as cheating, let her know. Pretty much any quirk you have that isn't something you can justly assume about 99% of relationships in existence, you should hammer out.

  • Don't go looking for a list of traits. Don't go to the internet or to media. Hell, you shouldn't even be listening to me, I'm a fucking stranger on the internet with no knowledge of your individual circumstances. Look around you. What kind of people are your parents? What kind of people are your siblings and cousins? What kind of people did they marry? How many of them are the models you see posing on Instagram? How many marry those models? Or perfect housewives? Or always-attentive-but-also-financially-capable husbands? Look to your surroundings and your individual circumstances to find the answers to your questions, they have much better insight into your situation. I spent twelve years from 18-30 searching for some hot thing who would be the perfect submissive sexbot, by casting the largest net I could. Seemed rational. Really, I'd met the person who would really take my heart, when I was sixteen. The size of my net wasn't the issue, because the treasure was under my nose the whole time. Of course, it's hard to smell human treasure when you've taught yourself that humanity is filth (see point 1). I feel like this is the vast majority of people. Unless you're a recluse, by the time you're 25 you've met dozens of prospective life partners. There are no soulmates, and these dice are constantly rolled with every person you meet. Roll as many dice as you like, unless you can actually tell what you roll it's useless. Likely you've already rolled a few 20's in your life, and don't know it. So like I said, look around you, look at your circumstances and what your situation really is, devoid of all these universalist platitudes, and really look at other people as humans worth respect, and you might find that you don't need a wider net, but rather a finer net.

[–]IlluminatedElf0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't speak for RP suggestions but I've received a lot of Blue Pill suggestions (and this is why I disagree with them)

  • There is someone out there for everyone, so just be yourself.

(The above implies that there is no need for any sort of critical self-assessment and the respective improvement. Instead, a person should choose the path of least resistance. Apart from that, there is the perpetual idea that a person should accept/appreciate anyone that "accepts" them, which is in itself, a stupid strategy.")

  • Don't judge yourself too harshly and don't judge others.

(*The expectation from another human being should be as low as the floor; a reflection of the expectation one has for themselves. This breeds cycles of self-pity and self-loathing, which leads to permanent emotional and mental disorders, requiring the assistance of drugs and circle-jerk communities.)

  • If you fail at something a few times, this means that you should not attempt said endeavour anymore and just accept the failure as a status quo and be proud of it. The pride will be the reason someone will admire/adore you.

  • Women are superior beings but also people who constantly require assistance to enforce superiority, therefore men need to constantly respect those who need their assistance whilst women need to constantly clamor for respect and assistance from men.

  • A healthy relationship is one where women hold all decision-making authority and veto power. Women are innately kinder human beings and therefore the moral authority for the interaction/relationship. All authority exerted by men is toxic/negative, by default. Men can only exert authority if the decision is pre-approved by many women.

[–]abicus43430 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

As a woman, only one thing would make me open too dating down on the socioeconomic/status ladder....a pure, unwavering, masculine, dominant attitude and energy. Most men would not have the confidence to be able to pull this off when a woman is more successful then he is, but it's the only thing that would work.

This is not blue or red, this is just reality.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

So no sensitive bob ross type man for you then huh?

[–]abicus43430 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

A dominant, masculine man can still be sensitive, that's imperative actuality. I never said "abuser". I think people here confuse abusive and controlling with masculine and dominant.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Im always confused by what people mean by dominant. Dominate what?

In my circle if someone tries to act dominate over others it's a sure fire way to get excommunicated, made fun of, not taking seriously..

Can you explain what you mean by dominant?

[–]abicus43430 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

I think you are confusing dominant with arrogant, obnoxious or controlling. What dominant actually means is being 'in control' a man that is in control of himself, his emotions, his actions, his environment etc, is dominant. He dominates a room with his presence, not by being a bully or pushing himself over people, but with his calm, controlled, unfazed nature. People trust him. Dominant men are born leaders, they are the ones people naturally gravitate towards as leaders in the group, the ones people look to for guidance and the ones women want to be with.

Women are drawn to dominant men because they make us feel safe and we know they wont buckle under pressure or let us take the lead in the relationship. No woman wants to be saddled with a weak man, it's a fate worse then death. women are very very concious of dominance in a man. It's our primary instinct. If a woman is the bread winner in a relationship then the man is already coming from a disadvantage, if he is also weak in character then she will completely dominate him in the relationship and he will become like a child in her eyes, a burden. She will lose respect for him and in turn lose sexual attraction to him.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I get that a women wants a man who can handle his shit, who wont take shit from any body. A man who has a strong character and isnt swayed by his emotions, other people, or lifes circumstance. I would consider that a man of strong character and internal strength.

But where you lose me here

"He dominates a room with his presence, not by being a bully or pushing himself over people, but with his calm, controlled, unfazed nature. People trust him. Dominant men are born leaders, they are the ones people naturally gravitate towards as leaders in the group, the ones people look to for guidance and the ones women want to be with."

Being a leader is context specific depending on what type of situation you are. Bob Ross is a leader in a painting seminar, but if he were to start practicing jiu jitsu he would immediately be dropped to the bottom of the totem poll. Bear grills would lead if lost in the jungle, but if he were to be put on a cooking show I presume guy fieri would have dominance in that situation. Theres infinite examples. Leading often comes down to expertise and dominance is dependent on the situation.

Also with regards to

"He dominates a room with his presence". This does not have to coincide with having strong character. I know quite a lot of people who can own a room that are also huge push overs. Including my own brother. They mainly do it with humor and being outgoing. A lot of commedians can own a room with humor, wit, and intelligence. Yet it is well known a lot of them all also insecure, depressed, needy,..etc

You wouldn't necessarily want to go to the people who dominate the room for advice, unless you wanted to ask them how to get better at the skill of owning a room.

Tldr: Dominance is context dependant and does not always coincide with strong character.

[–]abicus43430 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

You are getting way too hung up on details, that was just one example, women test for dominance in many ways, not just the man that dominates a room, if he is weak in other ways she will find out quickly. She will start with the most dominant man in her social circle though, if that is Bob Ross in a painting class then so be it, it depends on her type. It will be very clear to her which is the dominant man in her world though.

My point is that dominance is not about being abusive or controlling like your first question, it is about being a strong, masculine, dominant man that takes control, naturally. If a woman is financially supporting a man, then he better show up as utterly dominant emotionally and sexually in the relationship or it's dead in the water.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

For the record I understand what you're saying and agree. If the women is bringing home the bacon the man will have to be beneficial to her in his sexuality/emotions.

My bob ross comment was not to contrast some one who is abusive or an asshat. Merely he not being the protypical masculine or dominate man.

I don't think I was getting lost in the details. I was arguing the conecept of dominance. Which a loy of people just like to throw a patchwork of selective qualities and definitions to. Making it a nebulous and useless concept. I was working towards a more precise definition, and pointing out that the qualities you ascribed to dominance i.e strong character, room control, presence, unwavering, leadership etc.. are not qualities of dominance per say.

[–]abicus43430 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well im not sure what the answer you are looking for is then if you wont accept anything i said as a definition of dominance. I'm a woman, I know exactly which man is the dominant one in a group almost instantly, it is what it is, we are hardwired to see it and be drawn to it. It doesn't matter whether its Bob Ross or a silver back gorilla, we will know which man in the room is the dominant male.

[–]neverwinter1717[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Dominance requires a hierchy and not every group and situation has a hierchal structure. Different people are more dominant in different areas and for most social interactions dominance is fluid and varies with time. So I don't buy you instictively know which male is dominant in a group just because you're female. Buts it's all good, agree to disagree.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

how do they differ

I'd say the main difference would be where they start.

Blue pillers usually provide suggestions that are helpful for people that already have basic social skills. Like be more confident, dare to be yourself, don't be an asshole, have fun and find your niche.

Red pill usually provides suggestions for people that need to learn what basic social skills are, that looks matter, that women aren't all just perfect angels that would never lie and that people aren't always talking a hundred percent literally.

Blue pillers try to give them the necessary confidence to approach while red pillers try to teach them the very basics.

That's why they are useless for each other. TBPers don't expect that someone would need to learn how to handle social situations and TRPers don't understand why we do not even mention those basics.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

"Be more confident." Lol The most useless advice ever.

Realize that TRP and TBP both are full of cunt worshiping fuckboys who'd sell their soul for a chance to eat rancid pussy.

Mgtow is the only rational response to modern society.

[–]AzkikRide The Tiger3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

MGTOW is an evolutionary dead-end, a white flag.

[–]Zaorish9Around humans, never relax2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I've flirted with the MGTOW fantasy that cosmically, reproduction doesn't matter, but since this is the only reality that we know exists, I can't deny it, evolution and sexual selection is important, and it's exciting, so let's engage in it.

[–]AzkikRide The Tiger2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Precisely. I was interested in it for a time, only to find it is ultimately another ideology cordoning itself off from reality in a box of rationality. It is, in Nietzschean terms, life denying.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Mgtow is the only rational response to modern society.

But why? Women like me and I like them. I enjoy dating, so I see no reason why I should stop.

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And MGTOW tell you it's ok to date, but don't commit because the social climate screws men who do.

[–]reluctantly_red-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

RP = be true to your animal nature -- compete with other males for the the spoils.

BP = be a trained seal performing tricks for her amusement.

[–]vitringur-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no blue pill. That is just a derogatory term used by self described red pillers so you are in essence asking for a strawman.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter