TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

40

Common monogamous thinking is that the gold standard is "Til death do us part," but if people break up mutually, after determining that the other is not right for them, that's a rather good thing if the only goal is to have a good time with the other person.


[–]passepar2t51 points52 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Tis better to have loved and lost than be an incel or however that goes.

[–]FatmanSlim9315 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was gonna disagree with you but then I saw incel and yeah anything is better than being an incel

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks both of you this exchange made me laugh and I felt pretty bad.

[–]darudeboysandstormSoup on the stove, bread rising, apple pie7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Better to have loved and lost than to have c*ped and roped.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Ah the old rope a dope c*pe.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You a boxing fan?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No?

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

JW. That's where the term "rope a dope" comes from.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ohh TIL.

[–]passepar2t1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

perfection

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Was FA, can confirm.

[–]eliechallita15 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I think so. People change over time, and if that change takes you in a direction that is too different than your partner's then you might be better off separating. I'm not saying that you should walk away at the first disagreement, but eventually you might both be better off separating than trying to contort yourself into a lifestyle that you aren't happy with.

It doesn't invalidate or lessen the time that you shared together, any more than an Olympic medalist's retirement lessens the medals that they earned. The time for it has simply passed, and you're better off quitting than trying to hold to something that just isn't possible anymore.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy14 points15 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

The majority of relationships have an expiration date. And yes they can all be successful by an individuals personal definition of success.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill-2 points-1 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The majority of relationships have an expiration date.

Make sure to add that's primarily the case in the Western liberal countries of decadent and repugnant nature.

[–]xthecharacterdoes this dress make me look pretty?!6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry it's upsetting you so much.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry you prefer people to act more like feral bonobo's instead of humans with stable families.

[–]DriedUpPlumBlue Pill Man4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol. People being able to leave a destructive or unhappy relationship is worse than people effectively being legally locked into abuse?

Your stable family myth is a carryover from when marriages were simply property exchanges. Infidelity and unregulated prostitution are rampant in countries with very high marriage and birth rates.

Get over yourself. Evolve yourself or be left in the dust of history.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes, the Liberal positivist belief that history is a linear progress of humanity so that you can accuse anyone who doesn't agree of being an archaic nut because nearly everything was supposedly worse for people in the past. Very original, intelligent, objective and well educated from your part.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're correct, we deal with the environment we live in.

[–]abqkat4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, absolutely. Just like a job can be a success, but need to end or be moved on from. Not all relationships are meant to last forever, some serve the purpose of a period in one's life or companionship through traveling/ college/ loneliness, but are not equipped to last forever. And that's okay.

What I consider to be unsuccessful is something I am currently witnessing in my social circle: couples clinging on to something fundamentally incompatible under the guise of "making it work" or staying together forever, when it so clearly doesn't work. This approach wastes each other's time, potential, youth, fertile years (if applicable), and the ability of each person to find a compatible partner and a happy relationship. My dear friend is with a gal who, on their own, they are each great. But together? They just don't mesh, align, want the same things, or seem to complement each other - and staying together through those hurdles is the true definition of "unsuccessful" IMO

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed and this is exactly why I see no point in marriage. It exists to encourage you to "make it work" even if you're incompatible and make each other miserable.

[–]petrichordiummidsommar pill6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m friends with literally all my exes besides one. They have all seen me in the most raw and unfiltered way possible, and it has always seemed like it would sort of be a waste to lose them. I’m not saying you NEED to stay friends for an experience to have been worthwhile in life, but i would say all those relationships have been successful

[–]satanhandshake4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. I am friends with my exes as well. Some people act like that just can't happen lol

[–]DriedUpPlumBlue Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Same here. Avast majority of my long term relationships ended amicably and I gained life long friends out of them.

[–]Barely-moralMostly red though2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

If the relationship is a mean to an end, as long as the relationship ends up providing you the benefit you were after then the relationship is successful to you even if it ends.

If the relationship is the end, if the objective is that the relationship endures and lasts forever then a relationship that ends cannot be considered successful.

In the example you gave I don't know what were those people looking after. If they wanted just to have a good time, the relationship seems to be a success. If they wanted a relationship "til death do us part" then the relationship is a failure.

[–]ivegotsomequestions0Purple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say this is about right. A lot harder for a marriage to be successful if ending in divorce, than for a week vacation fling to be "successful."

I'd just amend a little to say that the test is whether you end up better off than you would have been without the specific relationship, rather than whether you fulfilled your starting goals. Sometimes, the objective going into the relationship won't be fulfilled, but what actually happened was as good or better. This is pretty much never going to be true in cases of divorce, though.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

If the relationship is a mean to an end, as long as the relationship ends up providing you the benefit you were after then the relationship is successful to you even if it ends.

If the relationship is the end, if the objective is that the relationship endures and lasts forever then a relationship that ends cannot be considered successful.

Why can't it be both? Assume you're with your HS crush and you think that you'll marry one day, but split up in your early 20s. If you ask me, unless the relationship was highly dysfunctional that's still better than still being a kissless hugless virgin at that age.

[–]Barely-moralMostly red though0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Success can only be achieved by achieving the goals that were established. I could be that there were two objectives, a "forever" relationship and experience in relationships. In that case it could be a parcial success.

I don't know how both of those goals can coexist. But I am sure some people can make them coexist.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, if

1) you got what you wanted from it

2) you end it on reasonably good terms

3) you learned from it and why it ended

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the best answer

[–]satanhandshake3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I would consider my first relationship successful. We were in love (for what we knew love to be at the time). We were good to each other, talked issues out, took care of each other. Was 50/50 most of the time, but there were days she was 80/20 and vice versa. The end was a little messy. We were together for three years and I think we both wanted it to end, but still clung on because we cared about each other still.

It's been about 4 years since we broke up. I think you need a considerable amount of time to pass in order to reflect on relationship to determine what you took away from it. Good or bad.

But after these few years I look back on the relationship and see it as a positive experience, so yes I would consider it successful. (For insight purposes we were both 19 when we got together and 22 when we ended it)

[–]abqkat4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This is real, bittersweet, relatable, and mature. I think everyone has a "young love" like this, where everything is new and raw and you don't know the ins and outs of how to be in a relationship just yet. I agree that it does take time to mend the wounds and to move on, but after that, you can be grateful for the purpose they served in your life, and reflect fondly.

I think fondness comes, though, from not hanging on too long. The bitter divorces I am currently witnessing in my social circle are due to people trying to 'make it work' for years and years past the point where it just doesn't work. And that's really tragic. My friend is in an ill-aligned relationship, and I can tell that when they call it quits, they are both going to be far more resentful and bitter than if they had just recognized it for what it is: many hurdles and impasses that can't really be worked through.

[–]satanhandshake1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Also I think trying to make it work when it's past that point causes resentment in both people, which leads to the bitterness.

[–]abqkat3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Agreed. And all the people I know who did/ are doing this, inevitably end up at the entire gender after the split: "women, amirite" and "marriage is a trap!" Wellllll.... no. You stuck around with someone you're not compatible with for far, far longer than you should have. It's not wo/men or marriage or relationships, this is on you!

[–]satanhandshake1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly!

[–]satanhandshake0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes I would agree with you too. I see it a lot myself. There's no shame/harm in walking away once you realize it's not what you want it to be.

Her and I are still on good terms, both moved on. She's married and moving up in her career and I'm in school. But every once in a while we'll contact each other and touch bases and wish each other the best. I think it's awesome and just a healthy way to be lol.

[–]LUClENSociology of Sex &Courtship1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a cool thought. I would agree. If I and someone else are great for each other from 2018-2021, and then become different people, breaking it off to pursue relationships w/ people more like our current selves, it doesn't seem like a loss (unless one of us takes the house or whatever).

I think the thing that prevents people from viewing breakups more positively is that they expect eternal love, till death, so anything short of that is uncomfortable and unpleasant.

[–]Pope_LuciousSeparating the wheat from the hoes1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Not to be weird about it, but all of my relationships with women taught me valuable lessons.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill4 points5 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

No, it can not under any circumstance with the sole exception of death.

Don't enter a relationship you're not certain of and don't break it off when inevitable tensions occur. A sustainable relationship is and always has been hard because it continiously demands you to work on yourself.

Anything else is lowering yourself to a wild impulsive lecherous chimp.

[–]321PK 1 points [recovered]  (16 children) | Copy Link

This is the variety of reasoned commentary that so endears ppd. What would be a worthwhile reason for ending a relationship? Also how can you “be sure” of a relationship before you’re actually in it.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

lso how can you “be sure” of a relationship before you’re actually in it.

By getting to know the person before you enter the relationship and not jump into one after a mere 2 months. I say that approximately one year is appropriate before making it official.

What would be a worthwhile reason for ending a relationship?

Anything that is worthy of lawful punishment.

[–]woyspawn1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I say that approximately one year is appropriate before making it official.

What would change after making it official? How are the expectations modified after making the relationship official?

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill-1 points0 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe in premarital sex, maybe you have an idea now.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

Aren't you an incel anyway? That's kinda like me "not believing" in buying a Lamborghini lol.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

Very weak response and more of a projection from your part that anyone who does not endorse a certain pattern of action is compelled that way by his circumstances, it's basically denial of free will and self-reflection.

I'm sure you're a very impulsive type who mainly obeys his carnal drifts and lacks anything that resembles long term thinking if that's the only inference you can make.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I asked a simple question you refused to answer: are you an incel?

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

That was clearly a rhetorical question. I see already you're more of the provocative and less of intellectually honest type.

Anyway, I refuse to answer for the reason that whether I'm incel or not has nothing to do with the argument at hand nor would it prove any counterargument against mine more right.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

I'll take that as a "yes" then.

So if you're an incel why should we take anything you have to say about relationships seriously?

[–]DriedUpPlumBlue Pill Man1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

You are probably over the moon happy with the sole partner you have had in your life. Congrats. I’m still over the moon happy with my exes and we get along great. So you 1. Me 10. Math says I win.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

This isn't about "happiness", it's long term thinking for the good of those beyond your own generation. Not something you or liberals in general are very good at, keep selfishly pursuing your YOLO dogma.

[–]DriedUpPlumBlue Pill Man-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

YOLO? That is the neo-conservative/alt-right motto. With their attitudes towards pushing everything from the national debt to climate change onto the backs of the younger generations all while pillaging our social security and Medicare to pay for their crony capitalist tax breaks. If they were actually fiscally conservative and for small gov. They would get out of our bedrooms and try to balance the budget.

But, they are obsessed with what other adults are doing in the privacy of their own home and want to give donors as much as possible and use their constituents as a flock of sheep for votes.

They are so small government that they want explicit control over an entire genders bodily functions.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Was this your attempt of making a "subtle" jab towards me by assuming I'm an American Conservative republican and economic liberal? Or is it a random out of the blue rant?

[–]DriedUpPlumBlue Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I stated “liberals” which means you aren’t one and you are running the classic American Conservative narrative. I was merely pointing out how the conservatives are truly the party of YOLO in America. I was correcting you. Enjoy your loveless marriage.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because anyone who's against liberalism must be part of that one and only other team within your small western sphere of thought? I'm not even American.

You're not correcting me for shit, you're only showcasing that you have a very limited perspective.

[–]DriedUpPlumBlue Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Never said you were American :P. That is all you. Wow, blackpills really are snowflakes.

[–]CyJackX[S] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Can I get some perspective on why such an unforgiving attitude? More specificity instead of the hyperbolic comparison?

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

You're not asking any specific question.

[–]CyJackX[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Why is it akin to becoming a chimp?

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Because you're impulsively driven.

[–]CyJackX[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

How does one avoid impulse? Does not every action have its initial motivation in impulse? Even if one were to obey an external responsibility instead, that requires an impulse to do so.

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's synonymous for basing your actions on shortsighted quick gratifications. Clearly, you can avoid this by doing the opposite.

[–]CyJackX[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Circling back to the first post, you think there is no reason for dissolving a relationship that is not impulsive? And why?

[–]KwangiraBlack Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no reason to be impulsive, that's my point.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Yes. I've had numerous successful relationships that ended amicably. Most of the time, it's because we realized we weren't going to spend our lives together.

I split up with my most recent ex for exactly this reason--she wasn't the woman I was going to marry. She hated me for a few weeks, but she's starting to understand what I meant. I don't want to waste anyone's time.

Still friends with all of my exes except the one who ran off to Michigan and left me with a mortgage! Some things, you don't forgive easily.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Yah paying a Mortgage in Michigan with Michigan winters. Bleh.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

No no, she took off for Michigan. I stayed here with a house I couldn't afford.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ah. So much fun getting stuck with the house.

[–]SlimLovinHigh Value to Own the Libs0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I defaulted eventually because she never kept up her end of the bills. Still have 4 years before I can own property again or get a loan with a co-signer.

[–]goatismycopilotJohnI'monlydancing0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Bleh.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I still think you got the better deal. I'm from Michigan. Those winters be cold!

[–]LeaneGenovaBreaker of (comment) Chains1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey now. Thems fightin words.

[–]Russelsteapot42Non Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course. The purpose of a relationship is not in fact to still be together when you die. That's religious hogwash.

The purpose of a relationship is to create mutual happiness and support between the two partners. If a relationship created more of that than the pain of the breakup and consequences thereof, then it was a successful relationship to that degree.

Anything else is just measuring yourself against an external and usually arbitrary standard.

[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I certainly think so. I credit a disastrous breakup with my ability to have a healthy and strong relationship now. We can't always accurately assess our own strengths and weaknesses until we're put to the test. A failed relationship is a minefield of difficult but vital life lessons.

I'm on good terms with all of my exes, qnd friends with a few. For better or worse, I'm at least grateful we met

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If it’s a mutual breakup, yes.

[–]TheBookOfSeilAn ounce of Snu Snu is worth a pound of cure0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends on what the goal is or was. If the goal was to just find someone, congratulations. It was successful. If your goal was to stay together for the rest of your lives, then it was not successful.

[–]FeO_Chevalier0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the objective. If you’re just trying to get experiences, the sure, a relationship that ends can be a net positive. If your goal is to have children though, the loss of fertile years and years-of-parenting-in-good-health is a pretty big negative. If you have children, the loss of a stable two-parent home is also a big negative. The loss of financial stability that having two incomes (or a live-in home-keeper and child-rearer and a single income) is also a significant net negative in the long-term.

[–]CatchPhrazeMaster Of Memeology0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Me and my ex are still great friends. I love him. But not romantically. We fought a lot, wanted totally different lives. But he taught me to be respectful in disagreement. I did the most growing as a person with him. My relationship now would not have the communication without that learning experience.

I'm forever grateful to that man and I hope he finds a partner that can give him the things he wanted. I consider it a success. At the end of it I have a friend I can trust and whom I'd do almost anything for.

[–]thoth5431Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I would say so. Looking back on my past relationships, it was clear that they were right for that period of time but they weren't meant to go the distance. Not everyone is meant to be there forever and that's okay.

[–]Mr_White119811Hugh Mungus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

“We have this idea that love is supposed to last forever. But love isn't like that. It's a free-flowing energy that comes and goes when it pleases. Sometimes, it stays for life; other times it stays for a second, a day, a month or a year. So don't fear love when it comes simply because it makes you vulnerable. But don't be surprised when it leaves either. Just be glad you had the opportunity to experience it.” ― Neil Strauss

[–]TauregPrince0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a thought, all relationships end.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure. You guys never broke up with anyone because going to different schools or anything?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think calling a relationship "successful" in a summary fashion makes no sense. Relationships are not static, they are dynamic. They might be successful one moment, and failing the next, but still be maintained. The end of the relationship is not its failing, but its destruction.

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Relationships that end based upon location factors could still be considered successful. Otherwise, probably not, even if they end in friendships.

[–]MamaTR0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hell yeah, you can have a great relationship if you get what you want or need from it for the time. People dont say that a job was worthless if you dont retire from it. If a relationship teaches you something that helps you improve or you get what you need during that time (sex or intimacy) it was worth it for the time spent

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea why not? Some of my closest friends are people I dated. And even if you have a huge falling out you are now free of toxic people.

[–]mistercheeez-o____O-0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

no it can't be, but it doesn't have to be overwhelmingly tragic, and it learns you heaps. That may be tremendously positive.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think a good analogy would be changing jobs. Sometimes you grow and leave your job, change occupations, go to school, etc.
You have learned, grown, re-evaluated and you are ready to move on. Hopefully, you don’t burn bridges and can look back and be grateful for the opportunity you had and the growth you have made.

[–]ratsparadedarapstar0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think an amicable breakup is not a relationship failure. Like most things in life, it’s not that black & white, pass/fail. If two emotionally developed adults acknowledge that they simply don’t fit well in a highly intimate capacity, and can do a controlled landing as opposed to stalling til crash n’burn, then that’s fantastic. That’s a success.

You both grow & learn from the process. You learn more about yourself, and what you may need from a partner that you hadn’t recognized before. How to convey these things. How to listen and be present. List goes on.

Mutual trust, self insight, respect, calibrated expectations & decent communication skills really increase your chances of a healthy relationship and/or healthy breakup.

[–]Texastentialism#1 gimpgirl stan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think a relationship that ends is by definition not a successful relationship, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The whole point of non-marital relationships is to test drive a person and see if they're someone you want to spend the rest of your life with. If not, then the relationship SHOULD end. It wasn't a successful relationship but that doesn't mean it's some blight on the character of the people in it. Relationships either end or last forever, and the vast majority are going to be the former. Frankly I find this whole line of thinking odd.

[–]killallthenarcs0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I learned what I needed to learn about a bunch of things I needed to learn to be free and in control of myself, he finally got the fuck out of his parent's house? I mean it isn't like we were either of us happy for more then the first third of the relationship, but it did the job.

[–]Theseus_The_KingI’m a lady king dang nammit!0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. It all depends on what your goals were coming into the relationship. Sometimes, til death do us part isn't the goal, or isn't the central goal. The goal could be "To know more what I like in a person" , "to experiment sexually" to overcome some fear, anxiety, or trauma/pain from the past etc. Some approach relationships with "if this is the one, than so be it, if not, then so long as I learn and grow from this experience than I am satisfied and it's a success."

When it comes to relationships, or anything else, failure and success are contingent on the attainment of goals, so what constitutes failure/success is based on what the goals where, and if they were achieved to a satisfactory extent or not.

[–]Mr_White119811Hugh Mungus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What do you class as success?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you want to gauge whether relationships that ended can generally be a good thing, just ask yourself where you would be without that relationship. And as someone who has gone long times in his life without relationships, I can safely say that even relationships that ended can very well be considered successful in the light of perpetual and involuntary solitude - if only because it helps you grow personally to some extent.

[–]Gravel_RoadsJust a Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure. It just depends on what the goal of the relationship was and whether you matched it. I had an 8 year relationship in Philly where I was just super compatible with this girl. We just seemed to have a lot of similar values, where I got her and she just kinda got me in return. We lived together because we loved each other and found it easy to support and improve each other’s lives, and felt good doing it.

After a number of years, we just stopped being compatible in our goals. I wanted to move and explore other biomes and cities. She really liked Philly and wanted to stay. So we shook hands and I moved away, no harm, no foul.

[–]Willow-girlProud 2 B an American farmer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think so. For instance, I was married to my second husband for 12 years. He had had a dream of building his own house, and together we worked really hard to accomplish that, starting with raw land and turning in into a real nice spread with a big house and two barns. Later there were things I wanted to have and do but he didn't support me, so I decided to go my own way and pursue my own ambitions. We parted as friends and I do believe the relationship was mutually beneficial (during that marriage I established my career and was helped by the fact that his family had a good reputation in the small town where we lived). We each got something out of the deal.

[–]Betty_420-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If it ends in death, sure.

[–]AllahHatesFagsBLACK PILL MOTHERFUCKER!-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Only if they end because one of them died or something like that.

[–]hammerhauntsbread pill-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

no

[–]abaxeron✴️Indian Programmer-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. For a man.

[–]CyJackX[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are never satisfied to end a relationship?

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter