TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

40

https://www.vox.com/world/2018/4/25/17277496/incel-toronto-attack-alek-minassian

Note: This is not an attempt to discuss incel content, but rather a major news event involving a pill-related topic. Hopefully mods will allow this.

So to directly quote:

Alek Minassian, the man who killed 10 people by driving a van down a busy street in Toronto on Monday, is a terrorist.

We know this because he told us so. On Tuesday afternoon, Facebook confirmed the authenticity of a post in his name, in which he pledged allegiance to something called the “Incel Rebellion.” This is not an organized militant group but rather an ideal developed by the so-called “incel” movement — an online community of men united by their inability to convince women to have sex with them. (“Incel” stands for “involuntarily celibate.”)

For reference, this is a photo of Alek

So, Alek is a part of some online movement called the beta or incel rebellion. Didn't expect something of this extreme case to happen.

Discussion questions:

  1. Do you believe Alek was ugly or repulsive looking?
  2. Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

Feel free to discuss anything else!


[–][deleted] 62 points63 points  (198 children) | Copy Link

Minassian is not at all ugly. His looks are not why he struggled with women. He was on the spectrum and couldn't connect with people - his schoolmates said he would walk the corridors meowing like a cat. Like almost all incels, his lack of women had nothing to do with his looks and everything to do with being odd and socially stunted.

Robin Holloway, a psychologist who specializes in treating youth with autism-spectrum disorder, said having autism or other social or mental disorders is not a cause of violence. But, he said, there are rare cases he has labelled “uninhibited/aggressive” types who “over the years have built up a list of grievances based on being scorned, rejected, bullied, including sexually” and are prepared to act.

“They have built up a tremendous volume of internal anger … and want others to experience their suffering and mental agony in the way they experienced it,” said Dr. Holloway, author of Asperger’s Children: Psychodynamics, Aetiology, Diagnosis and Treatment and a clinician at Toronto’s Willow Centre. “Vengeful fantasies can turn into horrible reality.”

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-facebook-post-connected-to-suspect-in-van-rampage-cites-incel/

I think this social ineptitude and isolation is a very real problem to young men and something we'll see causing more problems.

I don't know if it's the way they're raised or the internet or video games or what, but lots of kids aren't developing normally nowadays. It seems like with black holes like incel online communities there isn't the usual social checks in place to snip this kind of mentality in the bud.

In the past if you had weird ideas or behaviours you were forced to interact with normal people in the real world and that weirdness was diluted or stamped out pretty quick.

I had an old elementary schoolmate add me on Facebook recently. He was soooo weird as a kid, definitely on the spectrum, but his parents never pulled him out into a special needs school. He struggled through regular school with normal kids and eventually learned how to act fairly normal. He's now a pastor at his church and married to an average sort of Christian woman.

Now you have all these kids who go through a good chunk of their social development online where they can find the handful of weirdos who will confirm and amplify their weirdness and pathological worldview. They encourage each other until they've all convinced themselves that they are the normal ones and the rest of the world is messed up.

Social pressure and conformity plays a very real part in righting these weirdos and helping them fit into society. Removing that social pressure entirely and letting kids learn to socialise through fringe online subcultures is a baaaaad idea imo.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't think it's quite that simple. This past year i met someone who has a teenage son with severe autism. And i mean it's really bad. It kinda opened my eyes a little because i don't see this kid simply "just getting along with normies"

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh totally. I'm more speaking about the more high functioning kids with social difficulties and personality quirks. Obviously there comes a point where they're so affected that they won't be able to learn these things, but I do think that more typical socialisation is always better than less.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe this guy in Toronto is past the point of help? This kid i know comes from a well off family. They have spent allot of money on special schools trying to get him integrated into society on just any level at all.

I don't think it'll ever happen. He freaks out around people and just walks around with his doll(he's an adult man too). Guess he talks about suicide. Hopefully he doesn't think I'm a Chad 😨

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Shame. Poor guy.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (38 children) | Copy Link

I don't know if it's the way they're raised or the internet or video games or what, but lots of kids aren't developing normally nowadays.

Demonizing young boys and men is not helping, especially because the weaker ones (personality-wise) will be the most influenced ones.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (34 children) | Copy Link

Am I demonizing them?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

Not you, but different aspects of Western society are.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 4 points5 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

Please, I'm curious. I'm not being sarcastic, do explain to me how different aspects of western society is demonizing and doing harm to young boys and men?

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

Some examples:

  • Continuous poor portrayal of men in media (advertising, TV shows, movies)
  • Pushing concepts like "toxic masculinity" or "rape culture"
  • The change in evaluation systems in many schools in Europe has led to a situation where girls are heavily outperforming boys and the gap continues to increase
  • Female teachers vastly outnumber male teachers, so young boys are left without positive role models in school. Even male teachers may take the "girls' side" (more on this below, personal anecdote). Boys are considered to be "defective girls".
  • Things like discouraging playing rough in recess have shown to cause a negative effect on boys in school

I've, personally, gone through all of those except the 2nd. I grew up in guilt-ridden post-Francoist Spain, with the raise of hardcore feminism and the total demonization of men and masculinity. I've been shamed by teachers (together with other boys) for playing football (Soccer for you Americans) or for grading girls. One (male) teacher in high school called me out because I didn't want to give away my seat to a girl just because she asked. I was not a real man, I was a misogynist, I had to learn how to be a gentleman. I've seen the men in my family being scolded like little boys in family gatherings by the women in the family, using social and emotional blackmail to avoid any backlash.

If boys like me have a strong role male model at home, I think that these things don't have that much of an effect. But if you're lacking that, like I did, you soak it like no tomorrow. The problem is, those young boys, like me, turn into very soft men who then go on to have soft kids who are even more vulnerable to those messages. I can see it with my old friends and their children.

A lot of these sentiments are shared by other Spanish men of my generation that I've met when living abroad. Many of us only woke up when we moved abroad.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I just want to say that Toxic Masculinity is a real thing. It’s just way overused. It’s meant to describe a guy who is insecure with his masculinity and acts super “bro-ey” to overcompensate for his insecurities (picks fights, super controlling/bossy, etc).

[–]rebbit_reddit 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well then, it should be called insecurity. Women also feel insecurity and express it in undesirable ways. Why is this not called toxic femininity?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Because it’s not expressed by acting extremely extra feminine. Toxic masculinity is referring to a very specific set of behavioral characteristics.

[–]rebbit_reddit 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Being conniving, passive-aggressive, manipulative, emotionally abusive, neurotic and irrational is being extra feminine.

[–]dakruNeither 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Continuous poor portrayal of men in media (advertising, TV shows, movies)

I recently read a book called Media and Male Identity by Jim Macnamara, which indeed found that commentary and representation of men in the media is overwhelmingly negative. Summary:

Chapter 6 is the meat of the book. It presents Macnamara’s PhD research on portrayals of men and male identity in Australian media, focusing on non-fiction (such as news, lifestyle segments, and opinion columns) in TV, newspapers, and magazines. His analysis looked at themes or profiles for how men were represented. The four most common ones were negative: villain, aggressor, pervert, and philanderer. Positive themes also existed (good father, hero, protector, leader, etc.) but they were notably less common. In all, 69% of the reporting/commentary on men was negative, 12% was positive, and 19% neutral.

[–][deleted]  (19 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

>90% of directors and scriptwriters etc are male. Who is putting out these poor portrayals?

90% of education is in hands of women. Who's teaching those "young misogynists"? Just because men are on charge of direction and producing ads, it doesn't mean it's going to portray men in a positive light. Fact is, it doesn't.

>These concepts are real and ignoring them because it makes some men uncomrtable puts women at considerable risk.

[Citation needed].

> I’d have to see evidence of this claim. Even if it were true, the amount of time this has been in place is vastly less than the centuries in which women were discouraged from academia and that tests were made to purpisefully discriminate against women.

On purpose? Not a chance. There's enough evidence, but most of it is in the country's native language. I recently had a chance to review some study about it in Finland which was in English. I may have a chance to find it. But basically, girls outperform boys at already the first exams until university, where the gap is growing bigger and bigger.

>If teaching you basic manners is enough “oppression”, to thwart your masculinity, you were never going to be great.

That was my seat, it had been for a while already because we never swapped classrooms, it was always the same. Why would I have to give it to someone just because they ask?

>Also not women’s fault that your fathers declined to raise you.

My father was there to raise me. Can you say the same? He surrendered to the narrative that he was evil. I had to hear my mother scolding him because he didn't help with housework. He worked 12 hours a day, my mother was a housewife. It's hilariously sad that I actually sided with my mother as a boy on this.

>These jobs don’t pay much, that’s why men don’t do them. That’s not women’s fault- pay teachers a fair wage and you might attract more men. Also screen heavy for pedophiles.

That's unrelated to my point.

> Do that at home - no school is going to put itself at a liability by doing nothing while two kids beat the crap out of each other. Especially Not in the age of school shootings.

I'm talking about Spain, not USA. We don't sue schools because a kid hurt himself. The age of school shootings lol.

[–]TomHicksAntifeminist sans pills 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That was my seat, it had been for a while already because we never swapped classrooms, it was always the same. Why would I have to give it to someone just because they ask?

I hope you didn't give in, not in that instance or any subsequent incidents.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't, which was a miracle considering how much of a pushover I was at that age.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993 -1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

girls are outperforming boys not because the system is rigged (it's not, stop blaming everyone and everything for your shortcomings) but because girls are simplly better students.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

So why were boys outperforming girls until now?

[–]the_calibre_cat 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

90% of directors and scriptwriters etc are male. Who is putting out these poor portrayals?

And I can guarantee you that 100% of them are shamelessly on "team women" as part of their ideology, and at best do not give a fuck about team man.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is not an accurate description of people in the film industry....at all.

[–]the_calibre_cat 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm gonna go ahead and say... yeah it is. Sensitive Joss Whedon, Patton Oswalt, J.J. Abrams, Rian Johnson, Quentin Tarantino, Mark Buffalo, and I'm certain countless others who all demand we all kneel before the altar of gynocentrism because reasons. They all espouse the same, neofeminist rhetoric, where they can't acknowledge their talents and skills because of course they're white males who didn't get to where they are because of perseverance and talent, but because of "bias" towards them.

Hollywood is perhaps the largest collection of feminists and social justice warriors in American society.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol no they’re not. They’re too busy sexually harassing.

[–]the_calibre_cat 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they have a guilty conscience, and that's their way of paying it forward.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because people with his viewpoint think this was the result of some vast feminist conspiracy to make men appear evil, when it’s clear they’re doing a good job of it all by themselves.

[–]TomHicksAntifeminist sans pills 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If teaching you basic manners is enough “oppression”

Giving up your seat to a woman is basic manners... how?

[–]Optickone 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting short little video on boys in education. I really think that's just one of the many aspects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFpYj0E-yb4

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 15 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You're both right.

Your assessment that the internet (generally) doesn't make things for those guys better but worse due to one's filter bubble.

And Szalvat that especially the guys who would need proper guidance the most and are looking for it in socially acceptable venues usually only find gynocentric stuff and implicit or explicit male-bashing.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah. Boys need proper male mentors and social structures again imo. They're being coddled and hovered over by mothers and it's not working out for them.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They're being coddled and hovered over by mothers and it's not working out for them.

That too.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty off topic. The causes of autism have a genetic and biological component that has little to do with culture. Autism is not caused by Hollywood or teachers or discouraging rough play on playgrounds.

Culture may play a part in how autistic individuals can be better integrated into society, but one of the biggest problems lie with AloneOnTheStranges observation that most aspies have non neurotypical parents. Blaming teachers, Hollywood and playgrounds is a stretch at best.

http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/children-with-autism-have-elevated-levels-of-steroid-hormones-in-the-womb

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 19 points20 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Speaking as an aspie, I can shed a bit of light onto how kids with ASD are raised, and how the system generally doesn't help us.

One thing that most ASD children have in common is they have at least one ASD parent, usually the father. When it comes to parenting, that becomes a case of the blind leading the blind. In my case my father was just so zoned out and emotionally distant that he didn't have the slightest concern for any of my troubles. If I expressed my struggles with friends and girls, I would very often hear "I didn't have many friends either, it's not a big deal". It didn't help that my mother has some pretty severe BPD, which meant she was more focused on regular temper tantrums than anything else.

Mildly autistic kids need three things, which are often in short supply. The first is some guidance, the second is some proper discipline, and the third is some masculine influence.

Western society doesn't really prioritize proper training and skill building. If a kid's not good at something, people just say it's not in their "aptitude", so they try to focus them on something else. They should teach kids drills. Tell them to practice things, over and over, until they improve. For autistic kids, they need to be guided on how to talk, and how to hold themselves. How to deal with the complexities of the social world, instead of just thrown in the deep end and hope they'll figure it out on their own.

As for discipline, sometimes you've got to be a little harsh. But note that discipline needs to be controlled and focused, else it's just abuse. Looking back, my parents should have said "shut the fuck up and stop being so weird", or "I'm not letting you quit sports, and that's final". Firm but fair. A lot of kids are indeed coddled, and it means they don't develop proper self discipline habits.

Finally, masculine influence. If a boy gets bullied, they need to be told to smack that asshole as hard as they can. They need to get used to dealing with a bit of pain. They need to be told to stand up for themselves, to not let anyone push them around. To become dominant. That people respect size and strength, so start hitting those weights and carbs. Now it's obvious why people don't want to teach this. People want nice, complaisant, manageable boys. Not domineering, competitive young men, who aren't afraid to speak with their fists.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

masculine influence. If a boy gets bullied, they need to be told to smack that asshole as hard as they can. They need to get used to dealing with a bit of pain.

This is true for all boys. Getting punched in the face is not the end of the world -- you need to learn to fight through it. I was a fat kid who got bullied until the eighth grade when I finally started to fight back.

[–]T-14 -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

getting punched in the face is not the end of the world -- you need to learn to fight through it.

what about the people it is the end of the world for? one punch can kill m8

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This all makes a lot of sense, thanks for explaining it to me.

Can I ask how old you are now and if you feel your ability to engage in NT socialisation has improved over time?

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm 29 now. I began properly pushing myself to socialise better, and become more normal, when I was 20. I've worked in hospitality since then, which helps a huge amount. I'm forced to interact with people, and I get along great with my co-workers, and now friends.

A lot of what helped was engaging in a lot of self awareness about how I was acting and coming across to people. On top of that there's some time spent understanding psychology, and red pill advice on masculinity. Trying to be a lot more relaxed, joking around more, even some playful teasing. Also cutting out the toxic people in my life that were holding me back.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That all sounds great. I'm glad you found something that works for you :)

I'm NT but have always been quite shy and introverted. When I was at uni I took a job doing telephone sales in a call centre. I got quite good at it and ever since then can just talk and talk and talk lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Were you officially diagnosed with ASD or is it a self diagnosis?

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It was first suggested by a counselor when I was a teenager. But my mother refused to have it investigated or treated further. I wasn't formally diagnosed until I took it upon myself to do so a couple of years back.

[–]vhemtmgtow 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's difficult because when a man is taught to assert himself it is in relation to competition against other men. When the man asserts himself against women, it's looked down upon eg if he becomes MGTOW and never wants to marry or have children.

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom -1 points0 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

It didn't help that my mother has some pretty severe BPD, which meant she was more focused on regular temper tantrums than anything else.

It's interesting to me that the guys begging for social acceptance seem pretty unaccepting ....

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's interesting to me that you focus on his description of his mother's behavior as being unaccepting.

In my case my father was just so zoned out and emotionally distant that he didn't have the slightest concern for any of my troubles.

That's not very flattering, either, but you ignored that bit. Is it because he was describing a fellow aspie, or because he was describing his father, rather than his mother? You can be totally accepting of other personality disorders, but still point out how they screwed up your childhood.

It's like my friend's mom, who had a psychotic break when he was eight. It wasn't her fault that she thought he was a demon. It's not "unaccepting" to say that it's pretty fucked up to have your mother chase you around the house with a knife. It's not stigmatizing mental illness to describe the negative effects that can have on a child.

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The way he described his dad is different from how he described his mother.

Regardless, as I said to him, I was commenting more on an overarching trend, and less on his particular situation.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 4 points5 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry, are you saying I should be more accepting of my mothers abuse?

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom 1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

I'm just saying that it's pretty interesting that you want so badly to be accepted by normies, but no other personality disorders qualify to be accepted by those circles.

It's honestly very typical of Aspergers - "accept ME, but not those weirdos"

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

What the hell are you talking about? When did I say anything about excluding people with personality disorders from social lives?

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom -1 points0 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

I'm making an observation that goes beyond you.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Okay then. Is it common for awkward people to reject personality disordered individuals?

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom -1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

From the outside looking in, yes.

And it's especially true of "male brained" awkwardness (like Aspergers) to reject "female brained" personality disorders (like BPD).

My comment wasn't a barb at you, more of a comment on how annoying that trend is.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

BPDs do often get rejected, but it has nothing to do with BPD being a generally female disorder. It's because BPDs are toxic, and people who know what's good for them get toxic people out of their lives.

Interestingly enough, my experience with BPDs has shown that awkward, shy guys are more likely to enable a BPD's abuse. They'll put up with that shit when it happens to them, and ignore it when it happens to others they know, just for the pleasure of being around a girl.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

It's in everyone's best interest to "reject" people with BPD. It has nothing to do with it being "female brained" it's because BPDs are manipulative psychopaths who will drain your life if you get close to them. Fuck BPDs.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Meowing like a cat down the hallways?

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s actually an enlightening explanation for me. Thanks.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The New York Times quoted a former high school classmate as saying Mr Minassian was “a loner and had few friends”. He was isolated and others made fun of him in private, Ari Blaff told the paper.

He added: “He had several tics and would sometimes grab the top of his shirt and spit on it, meow in the hallways and say, ‘I am afraid of girls’. It was like a mantra.”

Another student told the Times Mr Minassian had difficulty communicating and was worried that women could hurt him.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/alek-minassian-toronto-attack-latest-incel-rebellion-facebook-elliot-rodger-a8321241.html%3famp

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a theory put forward by Simon Baron Cohen that most autism is genetic, and the cause of the increase is due to modern technology rewarding those on the spectrum with high paying careers and increased social acceptance. As such, they are increasingly getting married and reproducing. He self identifies as aspie, pretty sure his late wife as well, and has at least one child who is aspie. High functioning, high achieving autism runs in his family.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 4 points5 points  (88 children) | Copy Link

Social pressure and conformity plays a very real part in righting these weirdos and helping them fit into society. Removing that social pressure entirely and letting kids learn to socialise through fringe online subcultures is a baaaaad idea imo.

So you're advocating for the cultural genocide of individuals with Asperger's Syndrome basically? Because that's what you're arguing.

Why should people with ASD be compelled to adjust to the norm? Why not compel the norm to be more accepting of atypicalities and nonviolent quirks?

Look, I'll be honest, I have Asperger's Syndrome myself. I never fit into peer groups, was the target of atrocious levels of bullying and have been fucked up by it. Why are you essentially victim-blaming people who get socially alienated because they don't fit in? Why do you seem to treat fitting in as a moral imperative?

You also seem to forget something; there are cognitive tasks at which individuals on the spectrum outperform the neurotypicals/"normies." The perpetrator here was allegedly a "tech expert" or at least very smart in computer-related fields. Perhaps if society weren't so extraverted-emotionalistic-social-skills-oriented, and had a little more tolerance/respect for the introverted-rationalistic-systemizing type of person, this atrocity would not have happened in the first place.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Why should people with ASD be compelled to adjust to the norm? Why not compel the norm to be more accepting of atypicalities and nonviolent quirks?

I think the problem is that while society is becoming more superficially accepting of the quirks, you can't alter someone's visceral reaction to it. By encouraging and celebrating atypical behaviour you're preventing ASD kids from learning proper socialisation, which makes them unhappier in the long term.

You cannot compel a woman to be attracted to a man who is lacking social skills, but you can encourage that boy to expose himself to normal social behaviour and learn to act a little more "normal". It is in his best interest to learn how to act normal if he wants to interact with the non ASD world.

Look, I'll be honest, I have Asperger's Syndrome myself. I never fit into peer groups, was the target of atrocious levels of bullying and have been fucked up by it. Why are you essentially victim-blaming people who get socially alienated because they don't fit in? Why do you seem to treat fitting in as a moral imperative?

I'm sorry to hear that, honestly. I'm not blaming the victims here, and it's not a moral issue to me. I'm simply saying that they will be happier in the long run if they learn to socialise in a neurotypical way. If you're not concerned with NT interactions, that's fine, do what you want. But if you crave these connections then learning NT communication is a necessity.

You also seem to forget something; there are cognitive tasks at which individuals on the spectrum outperform the neurotypicals/"normies."

I know this, but Minassians unhappiness seemed to stem from not being able to connect to people. Being a tech genius didn't help him meet girls. Social skills would have.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 11 points12 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I think the problem is that while society is becoming more superficially accepting of the quirks, you can't alter someone's visceral reaction to it. By encouraging and celebrating atypical behaviour you're preventing ASD kids from learning proper socialisation, which makes them unhappier in the long term.

"Proper" socialisation? What you mean is typical socialisation. Not "proper." People with ASD or even subclinical levels of certain ASD symptoms get along very well with eachother all the time. They are not incapable of being social, they simply happen to be best at socializing with those like themselves... which is precisely true of "normies" also. The only difference is that there are more normies than ASD individuals. But something being more common doesn't mean it is inherently better or correct.

In addition, you're missing one important fact. Whilst some individuals with ASD can learn conventional methods of socialization, some cannot. I tried my hardest to fit in for years and failed absolutely miserably. I just couldn't understand the normies. I didn't have a systematic guide to understanding how they operate (and yes, there is such a thing, because that's what social skills ultimately are if they're taught properly). And even if I could get one, why should I have had to sacrifice my authenticity/individuality on the altar of popular acceptance?

The thing is, fitting in imposes huge psychic costs on those who cannot fit in. Trying to fit in is difficult. Trying to do it when being fundamentally unable to is literal torture. You seem to think we can just deactivate the weirdness switch but the reality is ASD individuals have to work very very hard to do what comes easily, by osmosis, like a reflex to normies.

That is, unless the individual in question has a huge sociopathic streak and begins to start enjoying manipulating and 'gaming' other people. Do you really want that?

You cannot compel a woman to be attracted to a man who is lacking social skills, but you can encourage that boy to expose himself to normal social behaviour and learn to act a little more "normal". It is in his best interest to learn how to act normal if he wants to interact with the non ASD world.

This is frankly fair if we're talking about sex. But the point is the torture of aspies doesn't start or stop at sexual rejection. It is pervasive social humiliation, ostracism, bewilderment, a sense of being an entirely different species at times, and it is inflicted upon you by others with an immense amount of glee. This is the kind of stuff that makes people like Alek. You can see it in Rodger's case pretty easily if you read his manifesto. It isn't just girls saying "I don't want to fuck you." This kind of warped resentment and rage comes from a huge number of built-up frustrations over time, including buckets upon buckets of bullying. Sure, you can't make girls want to fuck an unsexy dude, I agree. But why can't you make people simply treat each other with basic civility and respect for their rights? Why can't non-harmful eccentricities simply be thought of as permissible things? Why can't we develop some degree of respect for the advantages that ASD individuals have, particularly at certain kinds of cognitive tasks and also the ability to think very independently of normal orthodoxy?

We can't rewire the sex drive. But can't we at least give some degree of basic kindness and understanding to these people? That will soothe at least some of the pain.

I know this, but Minassians unhappiness seemed to stem from not being able to connect to people. Being a tech genius didn't help him meet girls. Social skills would have.

Minassian didn't center his entire sense of self-esteem on how much puss he could crush in a cultural vacuum (ditto with Rodger). We're talking about people who were born into a culture where their masculinity was measured by the girls they could attract, where they were repeatedly indoctrinated with "normie" value systems that focus on "empathy" and "feelings" and "having friends" and "fitting in" and sexual/romantic success as the most important things and the only sources of worthiness and dignity. They were taught, systematically, to value themselves according to their social success rather than their talents or anything along those lines. They became complete psychological dependents.

There is an alternative. It is one that requires radical cognitive independence. It requires a Nietzschean rejection of the "normie" values system and an assertion of one's worth irrespective of what society thinks. This kind of individualism, however, is not exactly taught to people. But it might stop people doomed to the fate of Nikola Tesla from lashing out. It would certainly be a superior narrative to that of Inceldom/TRP (which affirms the normie values system and says Incels are gene-waste).

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

"Proper" socialisation? What you mean is typical socialisation.

Ok sure, typical socialisation.

And even if I could get one, why should I have had to sacrifice my authenticity/individuality on the altar of popular acceptance?

You don't have to. I don't care. I'm saying that if an ASD individual wants to feel connected to the non ASD world (which Minassian and many ASD folk do), then learning typical socialisation as best you can is going to help.

the reality is ASD individuals have to work very very hard to do what comes easily, by osmosis, like a reflex to normies.

I know. But parents obsessing over their kid's ASD status and encouraging atypical behaviour and separating them from NT kids doesn't help them to learn these skills.

That is, unless the individual in question has a huge sociopathic streak and begins to start enjoying manipulating and 'gaming' other people. Do you really want that?

Oh settle down.

But why can't you make people simply treat each other with basic civility and respect for their rights?

I am absolutely not advocating for bullying or cruelty and I don't know where you got that from. I am saying that it is in an ASD child's best interest for their parents to attempt to integrate them into NT socialisation as much as possible.

Why can't non-harmful eccentricities simply be thought of as permissible things? Why can't we develop some degree of respect for the advantages that ASD individuals have, particularly at certain kinds of cognitive tasks and also the ability to think very independently of normal orthodoxy?

Sure, but this alone won't help them gain social connection with NT people.

We can't rewire the sex drive. But can't we at least give some degree of basic kindness and understanding to these people. That will soothe at least some of the pain.

Agreed. Kindness = good. I don't know where you're getting the idea that I want to hate on ASD folk.

There is an alternative. It is one that requires radical cognitive independence. It requires a Nietzschean rejection of the "normie" values system and an assertion of one's worth irrespective of what society thinks. This kind of individualism, however, is not exactly taught to people. But it might stop people doomed to the fate of Nikola Tesla from lashing out. It would certainly be a superior narrative to that of Inceldom/TRP (which affirms the normie values system and says Incels are gene-waste).

Cool. That's great if ASD people want to live that way and are capable of doing so. Minassian wasn't, and he went and killed a bunch of people.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 7 points8 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I know. But parents obsessing over their kid's ASD status and encouraging atypical behaviour and separating them from NT kids doesn't help them to learn these skills... I am absolutely not advocating for bullying or cruelty and I don't know where you got that from. I am saying that it is in an ASD child's best interest for their parents to attempt to integrate them into NT socialisation as much as possible.

I'll concede, I admit this topic is a sore spot for me and I was wrong for presuming malice on your part. Please accept my apologies.

I'm sure you do want to help ASD kids. Where I got the "cruelty" thing from is that integrating ADS kids into a "normal" peer group teaches them "normie" socialization through basically making them engage in a process of trial and error where they get bullied every time they make a mistake. Basically, putting them into a neurotypical environment and telling them to just "adjust" is throwing them to the wolves.

If you want to teach these kids social skills, putting them into this environment is arguably the worst thing to do. Why? Because this "tacitly pick up on how the normal kids act and adjust to it" method of learning is quite literally the neurotypical way of teaching social norms. People with ASD are precisely the kind of people that benefit from abstract theoretical frameworks and explicit instruction (this is why Red Pill ideas are so attractive to people on the spectrum.. they're presented in a systematic, deductive fashion), not tacit/observational/pick-up-on-subtle-cues/just-get-it-by-osmosis/trial-and-error learning.

I am speaking from experience here. I never "got" the normies. There was never any "why" or any understanding of the principles behind and teleology of their actions. None of it made sense to me. My sense of alienation from them got worse, not better over time. The way I absorb information is explicit-abstract, not tacit-concrete. Explicit social skills instruction is one thing... it may indeed be a good method of helping ASD kids... but putting them into a pack of normies is almost certainly going to result in them being bullied brutally.

Not to mention, I think you underestimate the value of having some ASD peers or having an ASD "safe space" (I hate to use this term, but I'm using it in the valid, therapeutic sense). Sure, I can see why an ASD kid shouldn't be constantly kept inside such a space, but by the same token it can be exceptionally draining to constantly be "in enemy territory" all the time. Surely we should respect that ASD kids also need their alone time and their time in ASD-normative spaces, alongside time in neurotypical spaces, right?

Cool. That's great if ASD people want to live that way and are capable of doing so. Minassian wasn't, and he went and killed a bunch of people.

But as I emphasized, Minassian's inability to live that way wasn't random and it didn't happen in a vaccum. An important question, in my view, is why didn't he have any kind of culturally supportive environment to help him live that way? Ultimately, I think that if such culturally supportive environments for ASD people were developed (as opposed to either the mockery/torture of normie spaces or the "you're just gene-trash and women are right to hate you" of Incel spaces) we wouldn't end up with people like Minassian or Rodger.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Ok, this actually makes a lot of sense. Thank you for explaining it so clearly for me.

I think the disconnect here is partly coming from us talking about people on different parts of the spectrum. Most of the ASD people I've come across have been nearer the higher functioning end. With some practice and patience from their peers they can learn these skills.

I have a close friend who is aspie and he'll often ask me questions about how he comes across and how he could make people feel more at ease around him. He makes a real effort to understand and learn these things in his own way, and while he's still socially clumsy I've seen him improve a lot over the years.

My issue is more with parents who latch on to any tiny quirk in their child and turn it into a bigger deal than it should be. Like they want an abnormal child so will proudly rattle off all their diagnoses and food sensitivities. They'll enrol them in special classes they don't need and convince this child that they'll never fit in. This is horribly damaging in my mind.

I do like your approach of engaging in the NT social systems while still having an ASD friendly space to retreat to. I can't imagine how much work it must be to make sense of social nuance.

Can I ask how old you are now? Has your ability to understand NT social cues improved over time? Are you satisfied with your ability/inability to engage in the NT world?

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok, this actually makes a lot of sense. Thank you for explaining it so clearly for me.

No problem. Happy to help.

I think the disconnect here is partly coming from us talking about people on different parts of the spectrum. Most of the ASD people I've come across have been nearer the higher functioning end. With some practice and patience from their peers they can learn these skills.

This certainly may be true, although I'm Asperger's myself and very verbal... so I think I count as "high functioning". You're probably right some ASD individuals can learn-through-osmosis eventually with the social skills but I'd maintain it would be quicker and less painful to give them the explicit instruction. If it works better for all ASD individuals why not make that Plan A?

My issue is more with parents who latch on to any tiny quirk in their child and turn it into a bigger deal than it should be. Like they want an abnormal child so will proudly rattle off all their diagnoses and food sensitivities.

I certainly agree the "want an abnormal child to show off just how tolerant and progressive you are" thing is terrible. Its certainly a non-negligible factor in the case of some transtrenders.

Can I ask how old you are now? Has your ability to understand NT social cues improved over time? Are you satisfied with your ability/inability to engage in the NT world?

I'm 31. I don't think my ability to understand the social cues has gotten better... it might have gotten worse depending. It helps that frankly I wear my atypicality and "fuck society/fuck normal people" attitudes on my sleeve (sometimes literally... I'm pretty obviously countercultural). I'm lucky enough to be in a situation where (at least at present) I don't incur any massive costs over it any more. It helps that I'm a PhD student so a lot of the time I end up discussing highly abstract ideas with other somewhat-eccentric types... amongst more ideas-centric company people overlook my weirdness and look at my ideas, which plays in my favor.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You're probably right some ASD individuals can learn-through-osmosis eventually with the social skills but I'd maintain it would be quicker and less painful to give them the explicit instruction. If it works better for all ASD individuals why not make that Plan A?

Yeah fair enough! I guess I'm thinking of a situation where the kid is slightly atypical, but straight up told that they're not normal because x, y and z. I see kids needlessly developing these complexes about how weird they are and how they'll never fit in so let's just give up now.

I certainly agree the "want an abnormal child to show off just how tolerant and progressive you are" thing is terrible. Its certainly a non-negligible factor in the case of some transtrenders.

I think the problem lies with this generation of parents, not the kids. They're so obsessed with being special and progressive that it's a badge of honour to have a "trans" kid. I heard a woman refer to her 6 year old tom boy daughter as non-binary. That kid is going to have issues.

I'm lucky enough to be in a situation where (at least at present) I don't incur any massive costs over it any more. It helps that I'm a PhD student so a lot of the time I end up discussing highly abstract ideas with other somewhat-eccentric types... amongst more ideas-centric company people overlook my weirdness and look at my ideas, which plays in my favor.

Yeah this sounds ideal. I'm glad you've found something that works for you.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm glad you've found something that works for you.

Thank you very much. I appreciated this discussion by the way, I'm glad we managed to have it without things becoming uncivil. Thanks again!

[–]GridReXXThe "XX" in my name means I'M A WOMAN 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

My colleague has two sons. The youngest one has ASD.

They picked up on it very early.

Essentially their niece who works exclusively with kids and toddlers like him would come over to their home on a regular basis and help their son develop mechanisms to relate to the world. How to calm himself when sensory overload occurred etc.

Because of this their son never had to enter a special needs school. He got along swimmingly with the normies. He even used to joke about his quirks as a kid. He is very self aware and humorous.

Now yes both of their sons play video games. But both sons are in Team sports and social clubs etc.

One thing it taught me is that if I have kid like that it’s best to have early intervention in the form of someone like their niece. And in their case both parents are exceptional at being understanding, providing guidance, and being generally cool and not stressed about the whole thing.

[–]sketch162000 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

People with ASD are precisely the kind of people that benefit from abstract theoretical frameworks and explicit instruction (this is why Red Pill ideas are so attractive to people on the spectrum.. they're presented in a systematic, deductive fashion), not tacit/observational/pick-up-on-subtle-cues/just-get-it-by-osmosis/trial-and-error learning.

I'm not on the spectrum (I think) but this is exactly how I do social interaction. It helps a ton to have a literal checklist/flowchart when you experience anxiety over social nuances. Honestly, I have a hard time understanding why "normies" seem to have such a negative reaction to social skills being broken down in a step-by-step manner a la Red Pill. Is it so horrible to show specific and generally predictable behavior? To me, it's like playing a board game. There are known rules and parameters of the game, and manipulating those aspects to win makes it fun. Not systematizing social skills is like trying to play a game that I don't know the rules to. It is no fun, it's frustrating and losing (making social errors) feels like I'm just being cheated, but I don't know enough to prove it.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, I have a hard time understanding why "normies" seem to have such a negative reaction to social skills being broken down in a step-by-step manner a la Red Pill. Is it so horrible to show specific and generally predictable behavior?

It isn't horrible in fact but it does tend to hurt some people's egos. Especially if they're in-fact-conventional people who have been taught every day that they're really special snowflakes that are so unique and wonderful... I mean look, to be fair it is true that everyone is biologically unique but in some respects that's a vacuuous truth since even if we're all unique, there are still general trends.

To me, it's like playing a board game. There are known rules and parameters of the game, and manipulating those aspects to win makes it fun. Not systematizing social skills is like trying to play a game that I don't know the rules to. It is no fun, it's frustrating and losing (making social errors) feels like I'm just being cheated, but I don't know enough to prove it.

I don't find any joy in manipulating anyone (since it requires me to play their game and as far as I'm concerned they could be dead to me for all I care), but I entirely see your point and this is what I mean about how people with ASD, and even people who just have introverted-rational-abstract temperaments (ever had a Myers-Briggs test? I'd guess your type is one of the INTx types), would benefit more from explicit social skills instruction with a theoretical/deductive framework and not from being thrown to the wolves.

[–]couldbemage 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Get along with each other? Not that I've seen. Put up with each other because everyone else refuses to associate with them? I've seen that.

My personal experience says that the quirks associated with asd are if anything more difficult fir other asd people to deal with. Meaning that tolerant neurotypical people handle socially inept people better, because they can better understand what is meant vs said or done.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I've had some different personal experiences. Perhaps it depends on the level of symptoms displayed? The thing is, I've noted that people with Asperger's Syndrome almost always have INTx Myers-Briggs types, and speaking from personal experience pretty much every single one of my friends is an INTP or INTJ. I don't think this is an accident.

As I see it, Asperger's is basically an extreme case of a rare but naturally-occurring psycho-cognitive type. The "nerdy brain" we can call it. It doesn't always reach a 'clinical' threshold of course, but as it is a minority psycho-cognitive type and because people relate better to those of the same/similar psycho-cognitive type, this kind of person is going to be at the very least quirky and have a smaller group of friends than people with common/plurality/majority psycho-cognitive types.

Your observation is interesting. It might be that these ASD individuals you're speaking of had very obvious symptoms and were more in the range of what used to be called "high functioning autism" rather than what used to be called Asperger's Syndrome. I can only speak from my experiences here: I find Asperger's Syndrome individuals get along perfectly well with INTx individuals without any Asperger's diagnosis. If we get into the "high functioning autism" territory I can see why you've had the experiences you've had... frankly, I have a relative with actual-hardcore-needs-assisted-living-autism and I don't enjoy said relative's company.

[–]couldbemage 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm talking about people that in the old days would be just be called awkward. They fairly often do things that are in the realm of "kinda not okay" and while I can tell they aren't acting maliciously, often they can't spot that. Thus I've ended up having to mediate between friends that have stopped talking to each other.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that's interesting. All of my friends are pretty nerdy and thus 'awkward' in their own ways (less than me admittedly) but I've never had problems with them or their quirks or the like. But all of our experiences differ.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why should people with ASD be compelled to adjust to the norm? Why not compel the norm to be more accepting of atypicalities and nonviolent quirks?

We're a social species. Without social norms society cannot function. Children (all children) need to be effectively socialized.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

We're a social species. Without social norms society cannot function.

That doesn't follow.

Yes, we're a social species. Society also needs some norms in order to function.

This doesn't imply everyone must socialize in exactly the same way or operate exclusively on the basis of an extremely narrow set of norms. Whilst obviously there are some things which should not be accepted, it seems reasonable to suggest that a society can accept a very wide range of different personality types and ways of interaction, and insist only on a thin set of requirements.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A parents primary role is to make sure that their offspring are likeable. Any person who isn't properly socialized is destined for a painful life. It should be noted that this doesn't mean a person cannot intentionally and mindfully reject portions of his or her socialization in later life.

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom 6 points7 points  (45 children) | Copy Link

Should society cave to accommodate the 1 person in a classroom whose socialization is off putting, or should that person learn to socialize normally?

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 7 points8 points  (44 children) | Copy Link

Apply the same logic to racial/ethnic, cultural, sexual and gender minorities. It seems somewhat cruel and bigoted, doesn't it?

Most atypical, quirky, eccentric or even neuro-atypical people are harming absolutely no one. It isn't necessarily difficult to deal with them if you're just honest and direct.

You can claim their 'weirdness' imposes costs to some degree. That's fair, but at stated before it also comes with benefits (the cognitive advantages spoken of in my other posts).

Finally you need to remember that to demand outsiders "act normal" can impose an immense cost on them individually. Its absolutely possible their pain at doing so would outweigh the minor discomfort normies feel about gasp having a non-normie in their midst!

We tolerate difference all the time, don't we? Why is this difference unworthy of toleration?

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom 3 points4 points  (35 children) | Copy Link

Except it's not racial/ethnic, sexuality, gender, or any other thing that people can't control.

It's social behavior. Which is 100% within a person's control.

It's fine if they don't want to conform, but they also don't get to bitch about being ostracized. It's their choice.

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 13 points14 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

It's social behavior. Which is 100% within a person's control.

Wow. You really don't get it, do you? Dressing like a boy or a girl is 100% within a person's control. Wearing a hijab or not is 100% within a person's control. It's not cool to tell those kids to conform.

I assume your social behavior is 100% within your control, and solipsism did the rest. If it was that simple, this thread wouldn't exist. I would go so far as to say Asperger wouldn't even have a syndrome. Everyone would just fit in with the neurotypical and be happy, with no disorder to diagnose.

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom 2 points3 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

Wearing a hijab is in no way similar to this guy's unsettling behavior - spitting into his shirt, meowing in the school hallways, openly complaining about girls.

Trying to draw that parallel is insane, honestly.

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 4 points5 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

I didn't draw any parallel. You said:

Except it's not racial/ethnic, sexuality, gender, or any other thing that people can't control.

So I pointed out two things that are actually 100% within a person's control, but are related to the things you mentioned. Do you think he meowed in the school hallways just for the hell of it? Do you think he spit on his shirt to be edgy? Call me crazy (you very nearly did), but I think he would rather not have been a weirdo. I think that if he was 100% in control, that he wouldn't be doing those things.

That was pretty cool how you turned "saying he's afraid of girls" into "openly complaining about girls". You just had to make it about the girls. Saying he's afraid shows vulnerability, while complaining makes him just another incel. People tend to have sympathy for people who are afraid, and we can't have that. This guy has to be a monster, 100% in control of his behavior, to fit the narrative.

[–]SmurfESmurfersonStacy’s Post-Wall Mom 2 points3 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

You're trying to draw a parallel between socially off-putting behavior, and religious garb. That doesn't track.

That was pretty cool how you turned "saying he's afraid of girls" into "openly complaining about girls".

Yes, he was openly saying - repeating - that he's afraid of girls. This wasn't a one-off emotionally vulnerable confession to friends, this was a constant complaint. In a public setting.

It's socially maladjusted behavior, any way you slice it.

I think that if he was 100% in control, that he wouldn't be doing those things.

Ultimately, any sympathy I may have had for the guy went right out the fucking door when he chose to take 10 innocent lives along with his own. He could very easily have not murdered people - that wasn't out of his control.

If you're comfortable defending a murderer, that's your prerogative. He gets no such empathy from me.

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..|| 6 points7 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

I already explained that there is no parallel, and your response was to repeat your original statement. How many ways should I defend what I said, when you didn't even pay attention the first time? It was never about the hijab. Forget the fucking hijab. It was never the point. The point, which you so thoroughly avoided, was that he was not fully in control of his socially off-putting behavior. Saying he was is like telling a kid with ADHD to just pay attention, or a kid with Tourette syndrome to just stop with the tics, already. It's not that simple.

Yes, he was openly saying - repeating - that he's afraid of girls.

That's not complaining about the girls, it's complaining about his fear. But again, you have to make it about the girls. Male feelings don't matter to people like you. Nobody cares until people die, then everyone wrings their hands and asks "how could this happen?"

If you're comfortable defending a murderer, that's your prerogative.

Nice. Real nice. I try to explain that an autistic kid is not to blame for meowing, and you hamster it into my saying he's not to blame for the murders. The words exist to express my disdain, but they are not allowed here, so I leave you the Minnesota version: interesting.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

But social/cultural differences manifest in people's behaviors. Even sexuality can in the absense of stereotypes - asked to bring a partner to an event? Gay people bring a same-sex partner, thus expressing their sexual orientation through social behavior. Whilst strictly speaking race doesn't control social behavior, race/ethnicity is correlated with culture which does influence social behavior. Would you say someone is tolerant of the French if they hate people who speak in French accents irrespective of ethnicity? I mean that's social behavior right? Its fully in their control! Why don't they learn to speak proper English with the proper accent goddammit!

Religion, too, is 100% within someone's control. People can change faiths. Does this mean its okay to force people to convert if they're members of a non-mainstream religion?

It's fine if they don't want to conform, but they also don't get to bitch about being ostracized.

You completely ignore the issue of whether or not social groups can make unreasonable demands, or whether or not mainstream social groups automatically deserve to have their demands accepted. Being ostracized by society is not some mechanical reaction, it is the product of individuals making choices with their own free will too; why isn't the choice to ostracize any particular individual open to moral judgment?

I'm sure you'd accept that there are some rational bases upon which a person can and should be denied membership in a social group. But you seem to think any group (which, again, is merely a collection of its members) can ostracize anyone at all for any random reason and that would still be permissible.

You're also conflating two issues. It is one thing to be excluded from a social group. It is another for members of a group which excludes you to engage in repeated harassment and persecution of you. The stories of aspies make it very clear that they are not merely ostracized, they are persecuted.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It is one thing to be excluded from a social group. It is another for members of a group which excludes you to engage in repeated harassment and persecution of you. The stories of aspies make it very clear that they are not merely ostracized, they are persecuted.

Oh come off it. Do you genuinely believe that 'normies' don't face similar hurdles, similar struggles to mesh, similar anxieties about making friends? Do you not detect how your own gatekeeping is espousing the exact same non-inclusivity you're bemoaning? Are you seriously using the word persecution to describe your grade school difficulties, like you're a Jew in pre-revolutionary Russia?

Everyone is too stuck in their own heads to relate to others from time to time. Everyone struggles to find their social niche. We aren't all given a handbook which perfectly systematizes the social world for us, and which was denied to you in exchange for your oh so rarefied abstract reasoning skills, because that book doesn't exist. Raw reality is an unaccomodating bitch. We all get tossed in the deep end. You aren't special.

It's so perfect that you're able to see the undignified charade that is SJW identity politics yet totally blind to how you're playing the same pathetic game.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh come off it. Do you genuinely believe that 'normies' don't face similar hurdles, similar struggles to mesh, similar anxieties about making friends?... Are you seriously using the word persecution to describe your grade school difficulties, like you're a Jew in pre-revolutionary Russia?

Appeal To Worse Problems. Yes, some groups in the past have had it worse. Doesn't mean that how people with ASD are treated isn't a problem.

Do you not detect how your own gatekeeping is espousing the exact same non-inclusivity you're bemoaning?

This is idiotic bullshit. Everyone wants to spend at least some of their time with likeminded people, in spaces that operate on norms that reflect the type of person they are. Christians enjoy spending time in Christian communities and Churches (this applies to every religious group). Gay bars are for gay people and operate on the norms of gay culture; are they "exclusionary" and "gatekeeping" now? Socializing with likeminded people is a value to everyone, but it is harder for the neuroatypical to get such social experiences. Why are you begrudging them for frankly wanting to have the same experience that conventional people can get just by default?

Everyone is too stuck in their own heads to relate to others from time to time.

I know this trick you're trying to play. Claim that it is really aspies who need to show more empathy to the normies. Yeah. We get far more brutal ostracism and bullying its really you guys who need empathy directed your way. Even though you're surrounded by people with empathy-marinated brains and in a culture which values feelings and empathy above reason and logic, you're the ones who are being denied empathy and understanding...

Everyone struggles to find their social niche.

Some moreso than others, for neurological reasons.

We aren't all given a handbook which perfectly systematizes the social world for us

That's because you don't need a handbook; neurotypicals learn it all tacitly via cultural osmosis.

and which was denied to you in exchange for your oh so rarefied abstract reasoning skills

Yes, how dare I cultivate some degree of pride in what skills I have. How dare athletes be proud of their athleticism, how dare people whom are good at manipulating others socially be proud of being able to play others like a fiddle, and how dare intelligent persons be proud of their intellect!

We all get tossed in the deep end.

Some moreso than others. Everyone faces different sets of challenges and people can face the same challenges but at different levels of severity, as well. The fact that everyone's life has a "challenge value" >0 does not imply that everyone's life has the same "challenge value" nor does it imply we can't talk about any specific factors which may increase specific challenges nor does it imply we cannot or should not try to make these challenges easier.

It's so perfect that you're able to see the undignified charade that is SJW identity politics yet totally blind to how you're playing the same pathetic game.

I'm not playing identity politics. I'm not demanding the government fix my problem. It isn't "identity politics" to acknowledge that people have heterogeneous backgrounds, it isn't "identity politics" to acknowledge that patterns exist, it isn't "identity politics" to suggest that some groups face challenges other groups do not.

[–]SkookumTreeWhere do you want the ambulances? 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is only partly within a person’s control. It’s like having one leg or something: maybe you will play varsity basketball like Sugarfoot Wilson, but it’s unlikely. Our awkward heroes and heroines deserve some tolerance when they’re not hurting anyone. And they also need to make a good faith effort to do as the normies do.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Most atypical, quirky, eccentric or even neuro-atypical people are harming absolutely no one.

but some of them are committing terrorism and driving through crowds of innocent people or shooting up schools.

society should NOT simply tolerate everyone with mental issues. violent psychopaths shouldn't be allowed to roam free. severely disabled people who constantly scream and throw their shit shouldn't be mainstreamed. and if autism people tend to lash out violently because they can't fit in and get laid, we shouldn't tolerate them either, even if their disability coincidentally makes them good at programming computers.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

but some of them are committing terrorism and driving through crowds of innocent people or shooting up schools.

There are two perps of massacres who were confirmed Aspies; Rodger and this guy. Two. We don't know if any of the other school shooters were ASD even though a lot of them were in therapy, so if you want to demonstrate that Asperger's Syndrome makes people more likely to engage in mass murder you need more than two data points and you need to remove confounding factors.

There are huge numbers of people with Asperger's so those whom are violent will be a tiny minority of those. Even if you read the Globe And Mail article about the perp, it was stated that the perp had a particularly rare manifestation of Asperger's and was an outlier even among aspies.

You're also ignoring the obvious fact that these people were not merely "not popular", they were actively denigrated, persecuted and bullied. Read Rodger's manifesto or the history of this guy; they were victims of immense amounts of bullying and this is what helped warp their minds. Why shouldn't we work to stop bullying? That would actually save lives.

if autism people tend to lash out violently because they can't fit in and get laid

You have two data points, not a trend. Considering that the vast, vast majority of people with ASD are nonviolent people you can't claim ASD itself makes someone violent.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

autism, aspbergers, autism spectrum disorder, whatever you want to call it, there's definitely a link between this kind of mental disability and mass murder.

the parkland school shooter was diagnosed with autism.

the sandy hook school shooter was aspie as fuck.

the va tech shooter had autism.

and i'm sure there are lots of other spergs who violently flip out but don't kill enough people to make the news, or are so inept to be successful murderers.

they were victims of immense amounts of bullying and this is what helped warp their minds.

no their minds were warped because they were born with an impaired brain.

the rest of society (all the normal people who don't have fucked up brains) shouldn't have to constantly walk on eggshells because all these autismos can't deal with normal social interaction.

and there has been a huge societal effort over the last 30+ years to both eliminate bullying and to mainstream all the people with autism. not that long ago, the people with these disabilities either learned how to act normal or they got put in a home for the disabled where they wouldn't do any damage.

and the only thing this effort to force aspbergers onto society has accomplished is more and more violence and murder committed by these people.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

the parkland school shooter was diagnosed with autism.

the sandy hook school shooter was aspie as fuck.

the va tech shooter had autism.

Sources please.

and i'm sure there are lots of other spergs who violently flip out but don't kill enough people to make the news

So in other words you fully admit you don't have enough evidence to substantiate a trend.

no their minds were warped because they were born with an impaired brain.

By the same token are the cognitive inferiorities of the "normie" brain defects and impairments? Maybe we should start giving aspies more jobs in research-type fields because they don't have epistemologically defective brains like normies do.

the rest of society (all the normal people who don't have fucked up brains) shouldn't have to constantly walk on eggshells because all these autismos can't deal with normal social interaction.

Its not hard to be civil and refrain from bullying people who are different to you. You don't have to like them. Just refrain from bullying them.

and there has been a huge societal effort over the last 30+ years to both eliminate bullying

Not only has this huge societal effort not worked at all, but it only was about stopping the bullying of members of politically favored minority groups. It wasn't a general effort against all bullying. Bullying people whom are socially atypical or quirky wasn't frowned upon like, say, bullying gay kids.

and to mainstream all the people with autism.

Evidence please.

the people with these disabilities either learned how to act normal

"Normal" is not a good thing. Sure, you can talk about people who meow to themselves or spit on their shirts or don't bathe enough, blah blah, but plenty of people with asperger's syndrome or subclinical levels of these traits are simply a bit strange/odd/quirky/eccentric and are not violent in the least. If dealing with people whom are different from oneself is a skill that people should learn, surely it is unfair to demand everyone be entirely normal/conventional and surely it is more than possible to accept a wide variety of different kinds of people within a broad/thin set of civic norms that are generally tolerant of interpersonal difference.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sources please

literally just google any of their names + autism and you will find plenty of sources. you keep talking about how your autism brain supposedly makes you some kind of computer wizard so stop being lazy and use it.

So in other words you fully admit you don't have enough evidence to substantiate a trend.

there's plenty of evidence, you just don't want it to be true. don't move goalposts. you said there were only 2 autistic terrorists, and named 3 very notable ones who you conveniently forgot about.

By the same token are the cognitive inferiorities of the "normie" brain defects and impairments?

no, that's just retarded. a normal brain is normal by definition.

stop pretending that autism is some kind of special X-men mutation that makes you better than normal people. because it's not. it's a brain defect that impaira your abilities, but fortunately it's relatively minor and autistics can still marginally survive among, non-disabled people.

Its not hard to be civil and refrain from bullying people who are different to you.

life's not fair. humans are animals. bullying is natural and normal human behavior. weak and flawed individuals are bad for the larger group. the weak get bullied and they either get their shit together or they get forced out.

It wasn't a general effort against all bullying.

sources please

that's exactly what it was. all these anti-bullying efforts have a general focus, it's not about "don't bully black girls or gays, but please continue to bully the spergs" that's ridiculous.

"Normal" is not a good thing.

that's one of the most retarded things i've ever read. of course normal is a good thing.

your whole ridiculous attitude shows just how much coddling you have been given. being an awkward eccentric with weird traits that make everyone else uncomfortable is NOT a good thing. you SHOULD strive to be normal and fit into normal society. you should be extremely thankful that you were born in a time and place where autistic weirdos are tolerated by normal society as much as they are.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

literally just google any of their names + autism and you will find plenty of sources.

Why didn't you provide links in your text?

you said there were only 2 autistic terrorists, and named 3 very notable ones who you conveniently forgot about.

I asked you to provide sources. Don't make it incumbent on me to support your own argument.

no, that's just retarded. a normal brain is normal by definition.

You're equating "normal" in the statistical sense ("typical") with being moral/right/good/correct. This is a massive epistemological error; by the same logic, being gay is wrong because it isn't normal.

stop pretending that autism is some kind of special X-men mutation that makes you better than normal people.

"Better"? I said that individuals with Asperger's Syndrome typically have superior cognitive capabilities at certain tasks. This is a scientific fact. I did not say it made people with Asperger's some sort of superior master race. If I say black people are typically taller than white people I'm not making an argument for black supremacy. There are some cognitive tasks the average man is better at than the average women (spatial rotation is the big one I think) but this doesn't mean women are less human or worth less in the moral sense.

Frankly I think you are not merely lashing out at a position I do not hold... I think you're presuming I hold some sort of attitude that "I should be the philosopher-king of society" or something like that. I'm a libertarian so the reality is I think philosopher-king-ism is the most atrociously evil ideology around. I have no desire for power over others.

t's a brain defect that impaira your abilities

It certainly does reduce some abilities relative to the baseline. It also increases other abilities relative to the baseline too. Why are you so utterly invested in saying I'm the mental equivalent of a paraplegic?

life's not fair.

Not an argument.

humans are animals.

Naturalistic fallacy. Just because certain conduct is natural amongst other animal species doesn't mean it is good when practiced by members of ours.

weak and flawed individuals are bad for the larger group.

Evolution isn't a moral sanction, and we're no longer part of the evolutionary environment. We rose above it because humans decided to use their neocortex instead of their lizard brains, and we started shaping the environment to us rather than adjusting ourselves to the environment.

Not only that but you seem to have forgotten this little thing which happened a while back called "the enlightenment," in which we came to embrace the idea of individual human lives having an innate dignity and that it was wrong to treat individuals as nothing more than means to collective ends. "The good of the group" is no longer an unquestionable moral standard, and given how the two great 20th century totalitarianisms were all based on treating the individual as a means to the ends of the collective, you may want to ponder the fact that operationalizing your mindset tends to produce body counts.

the weak get bullied and they either get their shit together or they get forced out.

So... what happens when the weak get bullied, snap, massacre a bunch of people in revenge? Don't they just prove by the very same animal kingdom standards you espouse that they're really really alpha? Aren't they just acting naturally, according to natural human behavior?

See the problems with your reasoning yet?

sources please... that's exactly what it was. all these anti-bullying efforts have a general focus, it's not about "don't bully black girls or gays, but please continue to bully the spergs" that's ridiculous.

Remember the It Gets Better campaign? Targeted exclusively towards the bullying faced by gay students. I cannot for the life of me think of any general-purpose anti-bullying (of anyone) campaign whatsoever, certainly nothing with the profile of It Gets Better.

that's one of the most retarded things i've ever read. of course normal is a good thing.

Normal just means average/typical. Are record-breaking athletes bad for being outside of the norm? They're not normal! Yet our society seems to celebrate their abnormalcy...

Normal is a value-neutral term. Average is a value-neutral term. Typical is a value-neutral term. Deviating from the normal, average or typical is therefore not inherently bad.

being an awkward eccentric with weird traits that make everyone else uncomfortable is NOT a good thing.

Just imagine, if all of the awkward eccentric types, with all of their brains vanished. No Nikola Tesla and none of his inventions. Just imagine where we would be technologically. Do you think we'd have nearly the same amount of intellectual and viewpoint diversity either? Of course not. We'd be culturally, intellectually and technologically substantially behind where we are now, with a lower quality of life.

That said, your mindset is one that worships brutish animal-biology and the like; its neo-primitivism writ large. So maybe you want to go back to the African Savannah. If so you're welcome to leave Reddit and go to there instead.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 4 points5 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

As an aspie I can totally see where you're coming from, but disagree with your conclusion.

Now I'm not saying this as victim blaming. If someone bullies or victimized someone, then the aggressor needs to be punished. I was bullied a lot and it certainly didn't help at all.

It's unfortunate that success is far more dependent on social competency than actual skill. People that are outgoing and social have sexier resumes, and are the sort of people that others recommend for jobs. Don't get me wrong, it pisses me off sometimes. I can paint pretty damn good, but I only get the occasional compliment when someone sees them. But then someone popular shows some minimalist piece they spent half an afternoon on, and everyone gushes.

But at the end of the day, society will not change, so the only thing to change is yourself. It is possible to build those social skills. I have made drastic improvements to my social skills over the years. Most people I know have absolutely no idea I'm autistic, even actual psychologists or psychologists in training.

[–]GridReXXThe "XX" in my name means I'M A WOMAN 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Social competency is a skill.

[–]SkookumTreeWhere do you want the ambulances? 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, in the same sense that basketball ability is a skill and a 5’3” man is at a significant disadvantage playing ball with 6’4” guys.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 2 points3 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

If someone bullies or victimized someone, then the aggressor needs to be punished. I was bullied a lot and it certainly didn't help at all.

Agreed.

It's unfortunate that success is far more dependent on social competency than actual skill. People that are outgoing and social have sexier resumes, and are the sort of people that others recommend for jobs.

You're certainly not wrong about this. And I know you agree its unfortunate to say the least. But there are some sectors in which skill matters more than sociability. Tech was one of them until the hipster/normie/SJW types invaded. In addition, people with Asperger's are pretty good at innovation and starting something new, which means they can create their own spaces to at least some degree. Perhaps if we "gatekept" a little more that would prevent aspie/nerdy/etc. spaces from becoming terraformed/colonized by normies.

But at the end of the day, society will not change, so the only thing to change is yourself.

And this is where I must disagree. Society has changed incredibly even over the last 10 years. Society changes all the time. In addition, society is just a collection of individuals... it isn't a mind-independent/objectively real thing. As such, if individuals can change, so can society, because social change is really just large numbers of individuals changing.

I guess what you're really trying to say (correct me if I'm wrong) is that any individual cannot change society so it makes no sense to try. But I honestly don't see why creating parallel institutions or neuroatypically-normative spaces is something that cannot be done. Subcultures and countercultures can exist within parent cultures and these things aren't necessarily lacking in opportunity/profit.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 5 points6 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Do you really want to isolate yourself to safe spaces though? Being around normal people, and dealing with normal socialising, is a huge positive influence for awkward people. Especially in a place like tech, where the awkward people can show their value in other ways. And you know what you don't find a lot of in socially awkward places, like STEM? Girls. Do you want to be isolated to a sweaty, socially awkward sausage fest all the time?

I assure you, gatekeeping is not the answer. And normies are actually pretty nice people, most of the time. Only a minority are assholes.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

When you advocate gatekeeping you end up with gamergate 2.0, which will be brutalised by the majority. I'm not saying gatekeeping is wrong but it needs to be done properly

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

Do you really want to isolate yourself to safe spaces though?

Some of the time yes.

I'm not suggesting that people never move in social circles other than their own. I'm suggesting that people should be able to cultivate/join social milieus that run on their norms alongside mainstream society.

Being around normal people, and dealing with normal socialising, is a huge positive influence for awkward people.

Often it isn't. Often it is a source of acute pain and rejection and humiliation. Often it is a terrifying experience. As I explained in another post it isn't even the best way to teach social skills to ASD individuals. A formalized framework with specific instructions would work better.

Especially in a place like tech, where the awkward people can show their value in other ways.

Then why not appreciate them for the value they already have? Why not value them for whom and what they are?

And you know what you don't find a lot of in socially awkward places, like STEM? Girls.

Just because someone is a girl does not mean she automatically is a positive asset to any particular social space. Given the number of spaces which have frankly been deeply damaged by the entryism of SJW politics and attention whore women, its become a self-protection measure. Especially since a lot of those women are normie-as-fuck Mean Girls types that love to socially climb.

Do you want to be isolated to a sweaty, socially awkward sausage fest all the time?

I was never speaking about 100% of the time. But sometimes, people need to be around other likeminded people. Sometimes, people need to be in a social milieu that is comfortable to them. Birds of a feather flock together and sometimes people need to spend time with their own flock. Not 100% of the time, but some of the time.

I assure you, gatekeeping is not the answer.

Please explain why a subculture's space shouldn't gatekeep against outsiders. Why, for example, should gay bars start encouraging straight people to visit regularly? Why should goth clubs put Top 40 on their playlists? Same principle.

And normies are actually pretty nice people, most of the time. Only a minority are assholes.

The fundamental issue isn't even the issue of "nice" versus "asshole." Of course plenty of normies are great people. The issue is ultimately able to be boiled down to the following:

  1. People naturally come in a variety of different "cognitive types" (i.e. ways their minds operate), and this cognitive type influences how one socially interacts.
  2. People generally find it much easier to socialize with people of their own cognitive type than those who are not.
  3. People whom are nerdy or aspie are best characterized has having (to atypically high degrees in the case of aspies) introverted-rational-abstract type temperaments, and such temperaments are relatively rare. Conversely, conventional people tend to be extraverted, emotionalistic and concrete, and this is a common temperamental type.
  4. Even if completely unintentionally and without any malice at all, the normal/conventional/mainstream culture will inevitably take the conventional cognitive type as the 'normative' type of person to be.
  5. This means the introverted-rational-abstract kind of person is going to be a misfit to at least some degree, and fitting into the normal/conventional culture will impose some degree of difficulty upon them.

Why don't we call it something like, I don't know, Neurotypical Privilege (or maybe Concrete-Bound-Emotionalistic-Extravert Privilege). Because Neurotypicals are... well... typical... they just usually have the opportunity to interact with people relatively similar to them almost all the time and thus the social interactions are somewhat more natural/easy/pleasant for them. Neuroatypical people do not have this - socializing in normal methods with normal people can be challenging and even uncomfortable. So why is it wrong or bad for Neuroatypicals to want to create their own milieus where their natural methods and styles of cognition and socialization are the reigning ones?

Again, this holds even if there is no malice, no bullying, no harassment etc.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 4 points5 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Often it isn't. Often it is a source of acute pain and rejection and humiliation. Often it is a terrifying experience.

I totally understand that. I used to have really serious anxiety when in social situations. Like almost to the point of panic attacks. It made it really difficult to focus, or develop social skills. What really helped me get past that was weed and anti-anxiety medication. It calmed me down, so I could be more at ease. Then, after I learnt enough social skills to get by, I was able to function without drugs. The social anxiety became a lot better. Then, being around normal people was a blessing, not a curse.

Then why not appreciate them for the value they already have? Why not value them for whom and what they are?

The former is a gateway to the latter. If people appreciate what you provide to a team they're more likely to appreciate you as a person.

Please explain why a subculture's space shouldn't gatekeep against outsiders.

Because gatekeeping is toxic. You don't want to exclude people for the sake of some sort of artificial exclusivity.

The last part just boils down to socializing being difficult for ASD people. Which is obviously true. But this is not an insurmountable issue.

Now I'm not discouraging any sort of temporary safe space, in the form of say support groups, or just nerd friends doing nerdy stuff. A place to unwind, and let your guard down, if you will.

But if you ever hope to actually surmount these issues in a constructive way, you're going to have to get over this whole "protect me from the normies" mindset. Believe it or not, being forced to integrate with normies is one of the best ways to learn socialising. I started to get particularly good at socializing when I started working in a cafe, with normal girls and boys my age. I'm still a little awkward, but I get along great with my normie friends.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But if you ever hope to actually surmount these issues in a constructive way, you're going to have to get over this whole "protect me from the normies" mindset. Believe it or not, being forced to integrate with normies is one of the best ways to learn socialising.

This one is too committed to the identity to be reasonable, despite his self-professed superior logic skills. I knew it as soon as he started adding non-germane references to 'SJWs'. His mindset and theirs are two sides of the same coin, and his lack of self-awareness (which he touts as a virtue that the rest of society should recognize) will ensure that he likely never gets it.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

The former is a gateway to the latter. If people appreciate what you provide to a team they're more likely to appreciate you as a person.

As an enlightenment-values individualist I find something quite disturbing about this whole "your only value will be instrumental value to other people" mindset. Aren't we meant to respect the innate human dignity of each person?

Because gatekeeping is toxic.

Why?

You don't want to exclude people for the sake of some sort of artificial exclusivity.

But that's not why subcultures (should) gatekeep. The point of any subculture is to collect the likeminded, whether that be defined by common interests, common personality styles, etc. If a subculture cannot serve this function it ceases to have use. If the goth club down the street starts playing top 40 and the club becomes overran with non-goths, goths start staying away from the goth club down the street. If the 'gay bar' down the road gets full of straights, it becomes much less likely gay people will be able to enjoy that sensation of at-easeness and being able to calmly hit on someone of the same sex without having to hope they won't get all offended.

Now I'm not discouraging any sort of temporary safe space, in the form of say support groups, or just nerd friends doing nerdy stuff. A place to unwind, and let your guard down, if you will.

But that's what subcultures are. Temporary safe spaces. That's all I'm advocating. Of course it is very difficult, perhaps impossible, to live one's life entirely within such safe spaces and there are many benefits to avoiding echo chambers etc, so I am not advocating living exclusively and entirely amongst the likeminded on every issue. When I speak of gatekeeping I mean the preservations of these safe spaces (or more accurately, spaces for group X, governed by the norms of group X).

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

But that's what subcultures are. Temporary safe spaces. That's all I'm advocating.

So what's the problem? These things already exist. Is the problem that you find it difficult to find like minded people and form social groups? That is understandable. Awkward people that aren't outgoing are less likely to cross paths and mingle. Have you considered taking up hobbies or studies that appeal to people like you? Perhaps hit up your local community college for tech related courses. Meetup has a tonne of nerdy events available, like LAN gaming, or data mining seminars.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

So what's the problem? These things already exist.

Yet are under seige and subject to extreme criticism, particularly those things which cater to nerdy males.

Intersectional feminist advocacy has consistently engaged in entryism into these spaces, sometimes with the impact of destroying them (look what happened to the atheist movement). It has consistently defamed these spaces as misogynist and "hegemonically masculine/toxically masculine" (which is so obviously untrue I barely know where to begin; its a subculture of men who aren't ultra-macho in any way).

Indeed strong strains of feminist advocacy are now going against any "male space" (conventionally masculine or otherwise), saying that any such spaces promote rape culture and the abuse of women.

Indeed, the concept that men (even gender-atypical men) may need safe spaces will get laughed at by the Social Justice brigade.

We hear horror stories about evil online misogyny and the discussion is always framed as one about how we "need more women in tech" blah blah. The men's rights movement gets accused of supporting rape, for pete's sake. Any time men... even awkward, lonely, atypical, gender-nonconforming men... get together outside of the feminine panopticon its considered a potential threat to women.

Yes, subcultures already exist and this is a good thing. But there are those whom are trying to colonize and thus destroy said subcultures if they aren't ran according to the norms of the PC brigade. My interest is in preserving the right of people to form whatever subcultures they like and the right of existing subcultures to have their own norms/values as determined by the people within those subcultures (as opposed to what outsiders think those subcultures 'should' be like), with the only proviso being peacefulness (any peaceful subculture, even if eccentric, should be allowed to exist by itself).

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 3 points4 points  (33 children) | Copy Link

 Minassian is not at all ugly. His looks are not why he struggled with women. 

https://i.cbc.ca/1.4633139.1524587532!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/alek-minassian.jpg?imwidth=100

Huh, he looks like he was beginning to go bald, and at the age of 25 he looked to be fortishy, he was indeed ugly , but he seemed to be in decent shape and that should have been enough to get him at least a woman a year, but I do agree. It's not his looks what kept him from getting laid. It was his untreated mental illness.

> I think this social ineptitude and isolation is a very real problem to young men and something we'll see causing more problems.

I'm curious about what you think of this. Social ineptitude in young men who aren't suffering from autism or any other mental disorder, what would be the cause of this social ineptitude? Is it overprotective parents? Those parents don't allow their sons to be near other boys and girls?

> and isolation is a very real problem to young men and something we'll see causing more problems. 

But how can people be isolated when the world has never been so connected as it is right now? I'm on the other side of the Pacific Ocean talking to you in real time. When, in Mankind's past, have people ever done this? Never. Most people today frequently talk to people who live on the other side of the world. You can hop into any social app and talk to so many people, how do you reckon these kids grow up in isolation with millions of people around them physically and virtually?

I don't know if it's the way they're raised or the internet or video games or what, but lots of kids aren't developing normally nowadays. It seems like with black holes like incel online communities there isn't the usual social checks in place to snip this kind of mentality in the bud. 

You mean lots of men aren't developing properly. Women don't go on school shootings. Women don't take serial killing as their hobby. Women aren't raping men, certainly not nearly as much as men are raping women, or other men. Women aren't the ones who lose their temper and start punching guys, and women who can't get laid(stfu blackpillers) don't go on rampages trying to murder as many people as possible because they are unwanted by the opposite sex.

What's wrong? Is it because boys these days are raised in a lax manner? my grandfather used to beat up my dad and he grew up to become a fine man, an awesome husband, father and a very productive citizen. And my father was raised during a fascist regime, which makes it even more impressive. Is it because my father joined the armed forces at the age of 17 and became a pilot?

is this what young men need? Structure? Discipline? Having a drill sgt. kicking their asses, shaping them into real men? I agree. Mandatory military service should be enforced in every western Country. It would create a nation of healthy, strong men who aren't developing diabetes and heart disease before they are 30, and these guys could finally get the porno robotic sex kids these days, and middle-aged red pill entitled fuckers think they are owed.

One of my nephews is 9 years old and he spends most of his time between school and soccer practice and swimming, and he's going to learn boxe as soon as he turns 13. His parents don't coddle him, they put him near scores of people of different races, social backgrounds, sexes, so the kid gets used to people and doesn't develop OH WOEEEE SOCIAL ANXIETY that seems to be plaguing young lose-sorry, men, these days.

I love that kid.

Now you have all these kids who go through a good chunk of their social development online where they can find the handful of weirdos who will confirm and amplify their weirdness and pathological worldview. They encourage each other until they've all convinced themselves that they are the normal ones and the rest of the world is messed up. 

The internet brings too many social fallouts. You have 20 year old boys jerking off to cartoon girls from Japan, you have guys watching daily tv shows about loveable losers that somehow end with harems of hot cartoon girls. At least when I was a young man, so long ago the Sun was still a child, the time we'd spend watching tv was spent watching manly tv shows like Dragon Ball, The Zodiac Knights, Captain Tsubasa, and other goal-oriented, aggressive shows.

Look at twitch. There are people making a living sitting on their arses all day, playing video games. What are young men going to think and feel when they see a 30 year old neckbeard making fortunes out of playing video games? Young boys should be looking at the living gods who play at the soccer Championship league and want to be like them, to be strong and healthy and fit.

I always get emotional about this shit. It worries me that men are becoming weaker and weaker, both physically and emotionally, making it so that the recruitment % into the army drops and drops. I dunno about you, but I kinda enjoy living in the free world. Who's to protect the world from fanatical young men if most young men on the opposite side of the world are trying to cosplay Jabba the hutt?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

he was indeed ugly

I don't think so. He's not great looking, but he's symmetrical with a strong jawline. If he made an effort I'm sure he could look alright. There are guys dealing with a lot worse in the looks department.

I'm curious about what you think of this. Social ineptitude in young men who aren't suffering from autism or any other mental disorder, what would be the cause of this social ineptitude?

In people with and without autism. Kids are coddled, too much internet, parents are celebrating their children's social quirks instead of encouraging them to be normal.

I grew up with lots of kids who were quirky, but they were forced to normalise and learn social skills. My husband is very dyslexic and struggled with writing when he was young. His mother never told him as much. He felt stupid and worked extra hard to catch up. He's still got it, but functions just fine.

Nowadays they're pulled aside, called aspie or ADHD or depressed or whatever and they're not expected to act normal anymore. I'm not saying these conditions don't exist, but I think they're very overdiagnosed and it becomes their identity. Kids don't learn any resilience.

But how can people be isolated when the world has never been so connected as it is right now?

Sure. We're connected in that sense, but I think kids especially need a lot of face to face contact to develop normally. They need to go outside and play with other kids and learn normal social skills, not hide behind a screen where 90% of their communication is through a keyboard.

You mean lots of men aren't developing properly. Women don't go on school shootings.

No, girls are equally fucked up, they just express this very differently. Look at the rates of self harm, eating disorders, antidepressants in teen girls. Girls are neurotic and anxiety ridden. Look at the whole Tumblr trigger warning oppression olympics culture going on online. It's nuts.

What's wrong? Is it because boys these days are raised in a lax manner?

Like I said before, it's too much coddling and not enough proper socialisation with other kids. This weird obsession with uniqueness and celebration/amplification of quirky behaviour.

Also, for boys, lack of male role models and masculine hierarchies. Boys need MEN to teach them how to be a man. Not a single mum, not weirdos online. It's not enough to complain that women are feminizing boys, boys desperately need men to step in and teach them how to do it.

Mandatory military service should be enforced in every western Country.

I disagree here. I joined the military at 18 and I don't like what it does to young people. Discipline and structure is good, but this can come from parents and family.

Young boys should be looking at the living gods who play at the soccer Championship league and want to be like them, to be strong and healthy and fit.

Yes, they need role models.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

I don't think so. He's not great looking, but he's symmetrical with a strong jawline.

Your standards in men are low. It's to be expected from someone who lives in a Country where nearly 80% of the men are obese or near that.

He's ugly, he looks worn out like he's spent a few decades working the field, and there's a hollow space behind his eyes.

This is what the average 25 year old man looks like in my area

https://www.diversityvoice.com/images/thumbnailcache/image_fulltext/20160412144024000000_952x0.jpg

, he's nothing special but I've met as many average guys having trouble getting laid as much as the chances of Greece becoming a world power. That guy still has some youth to him, around the eyes, the hairline, and the boyish grin. The Canadian guy on the other hand looked like he was the father of a 20 year old already!

In people with and without autism. Kids are coddled, too much internet, parents are celebrating their children's social quirks instead of encouraging them to be normal.

Yes, I noticed that. Boys these days are treated like they are young kings, who need to be protected from everything or everyone or they are going to end up damaged. It's so silly. My father and his brothers would spend most of their time outside climbing hills, getting into fights, playing soccer, coming home all scratched and bleeding. Nowadays I see kids with more feminine hands than many girls have!

Young boys need to be directed away from computers, cellphones, and they need to step away from their mother's shadow. They need daily, constant contact with other boys and with young girls to grow accostumed to the presence of girls. It's hard for young men to develop social anxiety and approach-anxiety when they're 24/7 near girls, getting to know them, learning how to flirt with women, how to make girls like them, how to figure out the way to SMASH.

They need sports and a boxing club, they need sun and sand and the sea. They don't need computers. They don't need video game consoles or porn.

Nowadays they're pulled aside, called aspie or ADHD or depressed or whatever and they're not expected to act normal anymore. I'm not saying these conditions don't exist, but I think they're very overdiagnosed and it becomes their identity. Kids don't learn any resilience.

They're put in medication regimes, their bodies grow weak and vulnerable over time and their minds become addicted to the help of medication to deal with their mental issues. It's so sad. Doctors are too busy making sure they keep clients by making young boys and men addicted to medication, physical treatments that can be prevented by physical exercise, for their only concern is in making as many millions out of people as possible.

Nowadays they're pulled aside, called aspie or ADHD or depressed or whatever and they're not expected to act normal anymore. I'm not saying these conditions don't exist, but I think they're very overdiagnosed and it becomes their identity. Kids don't learn any resilience.

yessss, I've been saying this for a long time. They need to learn how to fight, how to solve differences, how to talk to girls, they need to become at easy in the presence of girls and that is only possible by talking to as many girl as possible. It will kill off the anxiety and approach anxiety, and they are going to learn to deal with rejection and shrug it off.

No, girls are equally fucked up, they just express this very differently. Look at the rates of self harm, eating disorders, antidepressants in teen girls. Girls are neurotic and anxiety ridden. Look at the whole Tumblr trigger warning oppression olympics culture going on online. It's nuts.

And fat. Don't forget about the fat. Girls start eating to comfort themselves and then bam, if they couldn't get and keep a man when they ''only'' had to contend with their mental problems, good luck getting a decent guy now.

Like I said before, it's too much coddling and not enough proper socialisation with other kids. This weird obsession with uniqueness and celebration/amplification of quirky behaviour.

It's the whole feminist mantra of ''everyone is a winner, there are no losers, and no one has to compete'' which only breeds losers. These kids need to learn that in life all that matters is winning, if you are not #1 in everything that you do you are nothing but a failure and no one will remember you, your name will become as obscure as the sumerian language. You will never achieve godhood status like Alexander The Great.

They would rather be invisible than doing what is necessary to become a winner, to be noticed by society and by women and men in a positive manner. My father once starved me for a week because I came second place in a cross country competition. Did I ever come second? Fuck no. Take away all of the modern comforts these young men have(porn, computers, cellphones, tv, video games, cheeseburgers) and only give it back, slowly, little by little, when they start showing results of being worthy of being called men and inheriting the western world.

Also, for boys, lack of male role models and masculine hierarchies. Boys need MEN to teach them how to be a man. Not a single mum, not weirdos online. It's not enough to complain that women are feminizing boys, boys desperately need men to step in and teach them how to do it.

Precisely. Men need to be taken away from their mothers. They need to be taught how to fish, hunt, how to survive in the wild with nothing but their wits and what's around them. They need to learn how to fight and mend wounds and heal them, they need to learn how to change a tire, charge a car's battery, change the oil, how to build stuff with their hands, how to fix pipes and an eletrical board instead of waiting for another dude to save them.

We need to make physical exercise mandatory. Instead of the 2 hours of Physical education, we need to increase it to 3 hours everyday.

For western civilization to survive we need men to be strong, healthy, and fuckable, to inspire young women to want to fuck them and want to have babies with them.

These young men were Soviet teachers back in 1950.

https://i.redditmedia.com/ypNMi60WMOhXnxJLiCVEeTiUir_z-AJxArnKXqe6Zl4.jpg?w=350&s=81a38df5afc29b3815815401c8c59c01

We need to get our young men to look and act like this, and I assure you all of this nonsense of red pill black pill and young men throwing their lives away cuz they can't get laid will disappear.

I disagree here. I joined the military at 18 and I don't like what it does to young people. Discipline and structure is good, but this can come from parents and family.

I loved it. There was a sense of unity amongst the troops, united in our warm hate against the ones who bore down on us, it created true bonds of brotherhood and love. All that anger, all that hatred made boys into men, and in the end, we made our officers proud.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Your standards in men are low. It's to be expected from someone who lives in a Country where nearly 80% of the men are obese or near that.

Your obsession with fat Americans is getting boring. I'm not American.

These kids need to learn that in life all that matters is winning, if you are not #1 in everything that you do you are nothing but a failure and no one will remember you, your name will become as obscure as the sumerian language. You will never achieve godhood status like Alexander The Great.

Too far. You don't need to give them a god complex, just don't celebrate the fact that they're weird.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill -1 points0 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Your obsession with fat Americans is getting boring. I'm not American.

Unless you live in the heart of Scandinavia, Imma still going to say your standards in men are low.

Too far. You don't need to give them a god complex, just don't celebrate the fact that they're weird.

Nothing wrong with a god complex when they can back it up. We need to create overachievers, not underachievers. We need to create more young gods like Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar, Michael Phelps, Michael Jordan, Jon Bon Jovi, George Michael, and we need those men to have as many sons as possible to spread into the world their genes.

Wouldn't it be lovely if every woman looked like a 20 year old Angelina Jolie and every man looked like a 25 year old Cary Grant? That is within our grasp, if we motivate Mankind to improve and improve. But that last part are just the rants of an old man, so don't pay mind to me, child.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I know you're not an old man, honey.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill -3 points-2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I am, lady. I was born in the 80's, the further away a man is from his early 20s, the closer he is to old age and decreptitude. Even Cristiano Ronaldo says he can no longer do stuff he easily did when he was a 20 year old boy, and we're talking about a god who is in the top 1% worldwide in looks and physical prowess. I can't wait to see how much better his son is going to be, with the perfect genes he inherited from his dad.

Cristiano Ronaldo has 5 kids. But he should have 500. 5000. Millions. He has the money for it and tell me the name of a guy who deserves to be a dad more than him?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Lol ok, I'll let you get back to your weird wankfest over hot men and their hot sons.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

How so? Don't you agree with me? Wouldn't be much better if there were more and more men who looked like a young David Beckham, Neymar, and Cristiano Ronaldo? Look at how much happier women would be, and how much more they'd care about their boyfriends and husbands.

I don't know, lady. I've never heard of or met a woman who wouldn't bang Cristiano Ronaldo.

[–]AloneOnTheStrange 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He does not look good in that photo, but he is in no way irreparably ugly. He has a short haircut, which makes his hair look thin. If he grew it out properly his hair would look normal. He's also got a monobrow. A monthly trip to the salon to get it waxed would fix that.

But worst of all is his expression. As is not uncommon for autistic people, he doesn't know how to properly emote. His eyes look crazy. His smile looks so unnatural. This is what makes him so unphotogenic. All of this stems from his awkwardness and mental illness making it difficult to compose himself, and groom himself properly.

[–]AutismoCircusNo pills 2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Well the people will have to protect themself then, won't they?

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Identify the defective ones as early as possible and then get rid of them. Lock them up in mental institutions and concentrate on the good ones that can still be raised into productive citizens, fathers and husbands.

[–]AutismoCircusNo pills 1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Not exactly what I meant but ok. Wouldn't an execution be better if you don't think that they can be saved

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Hey, no need for that, I'm not a 1950 Soviet school teacher.

Lifetime incarceration in a mental hospital will suffice.

[–]AutismoCircusNo pills 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why not? Why should we bother with incarceration? We could use the ressources for different purposes especially since you need trained personal to deal with the disabled.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because we are human beings, we aren't the Turkish govt. getting rid of 1 million people due to ethnic cleansing. Besides, those people can be studied. They can be examined. We can come up with a way to prevent or fix those who suffer from those problems.

[–]SkookumTreeWhere do you want the ambulances? 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

That is a modest proposal you have there. Why not enslave them, or exile them to Interior Alaska, a gulag for the socially awkward?

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Alaska wouldn't be a bad idea. I've actually mentioned this solution a couple months ago. Or they could be sent to Russia. They have a shortage of men, due to I dunno, losing more than 20 million young men to the German Nazists, and they could do with some help building up their Country.

Maybe the Russians could shapen up these guys and they would stop posters from wondering wtf is wrong with these guys to think and talk like this, don't they have sisters or mothers they love

[–]SkookumTreeWhere do you want the ambulances? 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

You are channeling Johnathan Swift here!

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Careful, that person with a green flair might consider that an attack and give you a warning!

[–][deleted]  (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

> How old are you?

I'm an old man.

I was born in the 80's.

> Did your father hit you when he disciplined you?

Yes. It made me hardy and able to endure physical punishment and clenching my teeth through it to try harder, to become better. My father had it much worse with his old man, and both him and his brothers grew up to become good men.

> Was his word the law, or did you have some influence in family matters? I'm curious.

I'm from the Iberian Peninsula. A man's word is law when he's the leader of his family, and no matter how much you grow, doesn't matter that you are a physical match for your father now , and beyond, he's still your father and his word is law. And one day you will be like him.

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm an old man. I was born in the 80's.

ROFL! You're young enough to be my son ...

Off to take my Geritol and renew my AARP membership ... blargh.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The fix is in on Twenty-One.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

ROFL! You're young enough to be my son ...

But I can't shrug off a hard knock anymore and go back to the game as I used to do at 20, and I can't stay up for 3 days in a row like I used to do at 16. I get bags under my eyes if I don't sleep 8 hours straight and that never happened when I was 18.

Man, I wish I was 15 again.

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Me too, my friend ... me too!

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf. Bad bot.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

my pleasure.

[–]couldbemage 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it was still a problem in the old days, but the violence was masked by all the other violence. Because everywhere was way more violent in the past.

An example: Arguments or insults leading to lethal violence was common, and actually expected.

[–]vhemtmgtow 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'm pretty weird myself but I can't tell whether the problem is with me or the normies. That's the problem with this post-truth world: nothing is wrong and there is no truth.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here 11 points12 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Sexually frustrated men are especially susceptible to joining radical movements. There’s a reason ISIS promised their foreign fighters a submissive sex slave war bride who they could rape at will.

As far as I’m concerned, he’s an average looking dude. I see plenty of average dudes who look like that get girlfriends. He should have just gone to the gym instead.

Maybe the fallout against this man will make its way towards TRP. Not sure how they could logically though. I recently read a evolutionary anthropology paper on female mating strategy from the university of Utah written in 1994 that talked about status, wealth and genetic fitness. Academics have been studying and theorizing about this stuff for many decades. I wonder if this will make it more mainstream or at least less taboo.

That paper would be incredibly taboo today. Feminists hate that shit.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

He was heavily autistic by the sound of it. I don't think the gym would have helped him getting women. Everything I've read on him has described him as very very weird.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't think the gym would have helped him getting women.

well, when people say "hit the gym" they usually imply it as a start of a change, not a "cure" or some "magic trick". Gym sets the ball rolling for majority of men. Some need more push afterwards. I needed it myself a bit. But I had a great hobby that I did and made me sort of... important. It's all about what a person does with his life.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If "hit the gym" implies "get off incel forums, go outside and work on your social skills" then I agree.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, it means start somewhere, and hitting the gym is the easiest thing to do. Building muscle is way way more easier than building your social circle from scratch or changing your personality little by little. That's why it is used as a "go to" advice for anybody with mental/physical issues. It is a start of discipline. If one can not do this... one won't be able to change anything about himself, most-likely.

People do not like when they are told "go outside, work on your social skills", it is akin to saying "just be yourself", in a sense that it is a bit loaded advice to say the least. How to go outside, start where, do what? say what? Hitting the gym heals a bit of your physical body and mental too, since you get testosterone and energy boost.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough, can't argue with that

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I recently read a evolutionary anthropology paper on female mating strategy from the university of Utah written in 1994 that talked about status, wealth and genetic fitness. Academics have been studying and theorizing about this stuff for many decades. I wonder if this will make it more mainstream or at least less taboo.

That paper would be incredibly taboo today. Feminists hate that shit.

In reality feminists hating academia like that makes things worse. It just creates more confused men.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here 11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

They’ve dug their own grave with the unofficial yet universal rejection of gender essentialism.

You see them come and go to this sub quite regularly but the amount of people I know in real life who genuinely believe men and women are the same (besides a few superficial physical characteristics) is astonishing.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You see them come and go to this sub quite regularly but the amount of people I know in real life who genuinely believe men and women are the same (besides a few superficial physical characteristics) is astonishing.

Personally, I don't mind if this stops at professionalism. Like no issue if people say lets have more female coders/doctors etc.

But denying this on the level of sex and relationships is really bad. I mean it's just not how things work.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope the ones who come and go to this sub don’t simply rage quit and instead leave with something learned.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe the fallout against this man will make its way towards TRP.

The fun part is that I am pretty sure that TRP guys are infinitely less likely to go on killing sprees. TRP may have a pretty misanthropist approach, but at its core it's still a surprisingly optimist philosophy because it promotes the mindset that at least for you individually, things can definitely get better if you do the right stuff: redpillers are either guys for whom things did already get better or those who are convinced that it is a valid scenario for them. Guys who turn their back on the community because they've given up hope are the greater problem.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I see plenty of average dudes who look like that get girlfriends.

not only do they get girlfriends, they get fucking models compared to some chad looking dudes in my gym or on the streets, who date uggos or landwhales sometimes.

Average dudes like him (I mean, with looks like his) could be either "normies" or "slayers" of pussy. No in between. It's all about that stuff that those guys do/act. How they be around women. That's their secret. Looks were never an issue for such men.

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 22 points23 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

1) He was reportedly socially and mentally retarded. Had weird physical ticks and stuff. He probably weirded the girls out. Much worse than mere bad looks.

2) Now that he is a bona-fide certified mass-murderer he should expect to begin to see all the love letters streaming in from young wet girls, as is the norm for such cases. The worst case scenario is if the incel community starts to realise that being a mass-murderer is the surest and fastest way to pussy. Liberals disagree when I state this, but I don't think these kind of prisoners should be allowed to have marital or sexual relations, or communicate with girls not of their immediate family. They should not be rewarded or incentivized with the attention of infatuated young girls.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

He was reportedly... mentally retarded

Sorry, but this is plain wrong. He was reportedly a highly skilled software developer and was reportedly very polite and intelligent:

"The recruiter, who asked not to be identified, said Minassian seemed to be an "intelligent" and "articulate guy" with "no issues with written communication."

Lots of women seem to sniff out "weirdness" and are much more preoccupied with avoid men who are "strange" or give off "bad vibes" rather than men who are outright distasteful or violent. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it's wrong to assume that all men who are lonely or in emotional turmoil are retarded and deserve their fate.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep.

And anyone who's met people in IT knows this, you got guys who have no problem writing their thoughts out, coding, troubleshooting, and having a deep understanding of computers and other such topics, but are still utterly terrible at face to face human communication.

Hell it's literally the stereotype. Elliot from Mr Robot is a pretty accurate representation.

[–]oihaoerhg 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Lots of women seem to sniff out "weirdness" and are much more preoccupied with avoid men who are "strange" or give off "bad vibes" rather than men who are outright distasteful or violent.

How do you not give off "bad vibes"? I can only get laid off tinder because if I talk to them in person for too long eventually they just think I'm a weirdo.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol, sounds like me dude. If I knew the answer, I'd tell you.

[–]oihaoerhg 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've always felt like the solution was some Buddha-tier enlightenment that apparently all the normies have naturally.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The New York Times quoted a former high school classmate as saying Mr Minassian was “a loner and had few friends”. He was isolated and others made fun of him in private, Ari Blaff told the paper.

He added: “He had several tics and would sometimes grab the top of his shirt and spit on it, meow in the hallways and say, ‘I am afraid of girls’. It was like a mantra.”

Another student told the Times Mr Minassian had difficulty communicating and was worried that women could hurt him.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/alek-minassian-toronto-attack-latest-incel-rebellion-facebook-elliot-rodger-a8321241.html%3famp

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He was medically diagnosed with high functioning autism, so being unable to connect to others isn't an opinion.

I had one autistic friend who benefitted a lot from using some prositutes, not sure if this would apply to all of them though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

False if his parents where not abject failures he would have been fine

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

This isn't necessarily a bad thing

No, this is necessarily a bad thing.

And women shouldn’t whine about violence too much if they willingly prefer a violent man over a “weirdo”, which they of course do.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It's not one or the other, you know. there are plenty of men out there who are not violent or weird.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey I'm both!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

😂

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

That's an interesting point. I somehow doubt that he'll get the same fangirling that other killers tend to get. His motives were very unattractive ones, I think even the crazy girls would be pretty turned off by someone who went on a rampage because he was too dysfunctional to get laid.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Elliot Rodger got fangirling for his killing spree, but one might argue that this was because his decent looks compensated for his oddness.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I feel like Rodgers was a little different. He was a pretty boy specifically going after the sorority girls and targeted them. I could see girls from the other end of the social hierarchy, the ones who were excluded by the sorority girls, latching onto that and loving it.

Minassian seemed mad at everyone and though he ranted about Chads and Stacies on fb he went out and started mowing people down indiscriminately.

I'm not sure how it'll go, but my gut feeling is that not many women will be sympathizing with Minassian.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure how it'll go, but my gut feeling is that not many women will be sympathizing with Minassian.

Well, let's not forget that the number of women who sympathize with these guys already is vanishingly small, it's just that dudes who go on killing sprees are so rare that they're still outnumbered by women who are nuts enough to be wet for that by a fair margin.

Sure, he doesn't have Rodger's looks, or Ted Bundy's looks and charisma, or Manson's charisma (at least he had enough of it to have his own cult), but at the end of the day it'll be less his ramblings and more the fact that he actually killed people. (though looking better wouldn't hurt)

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFMs 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

James Holmes got inundated with thousands of love letters. The girls are so numerous they organised under the moniker "Holmies". And James Holmes was mad as a box of frogs and looks like a freak. He also murdered people indiscriminately.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Source?

I’m not saying you’re wrong...I’m just interested to see who the hell would suddenly want to fuck that kid after his killing spree.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No source, just girls suddenly posting "Aaaw a pity he was actually pretty cute" online.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ted Bundy fucked the corpses of the women he killed and he still had fangirls, I doubt this guy's motives will be enough to put off the crazies.

Tumblr and in particular fandom communities are full of awkward aspie girls, the crazier ones may very well sympathise with him.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'll be interested to see how that plays out

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Now that he is a bona-fide certified mass-murderer he should expect to begin to see all the love letters streaming in from young wet girls,

Not too sure about that. The story isn't on CNN or any major news network's front page. The parkland shooting was a huge huge case that made nation wide news for several weeks.

[–]GridReXXThe "XX" in my name means I'M A WOMAN 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn’t hear about this except a blip on Twitter.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly for your second point I think that should be true for most cases. Unless they were married before.

[–]EqualinaPurple Pill Woman 6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Looks have nothing to do with it for this guy. He looks fine. But if he was capable of flipping out and killing 10 people, there was something wrong with his mental health. People pick up on that - often without being fully conscious of it, especially women, who are better at reading between the lines and body language in general.

Looks have, imo, not nearly as much to do with a man’s attractiveness as many TRPers insist. But getting physically fitter doesn’t just improve body condition, it improves confidence, mood and even self awareness. Those are the things that ultimately attract women. This guy could have been the epitome of a Greek statue come to life, but if he was insecure, very shy and awkward around women, it wouldn’t do squat to get him female attention (no more than an admiring glance - and then a quick excuse and exit when he couldn’t talk to them or seemed ‘off’).

It’s a harsh truth, but many women do have a ‘sixth sense’ for personality weakness in others - we often aren’t even aware we’ve picked up on it and it’s why we might find it hard to truly get across to a man what ‘creepiness’ is or when someone just seems ‘off’. I’ve talked to men who were just shy and a bit awkward but could see that was nothing to worry about - and I’ve talked to guys who made me uneasy even with confidence and easy conversation. I can’t pinpoint exactly why I can pick these things up, but I do, and many women are the same. If we feel uneasy around a guy, then it’s curtains for his chances with us. Of course, there are plenty of women who don’t pick up on this stuff...

Will incidents like this continue to happen? There’s been a trend of more and more terrorist attacks in recent decades attributed to several factors - religion, white supremacy and frustrated, mentally ill young men who just snap and want to make an impact in some way. The world seems to be at a place where many are falling through the cracks if they don’t or can’t fit in with the mainstream worldview and behaviors. This is much more likely to apply to men as they are more extreme and more prone to externalising their problems and impacting others. Until we start addressing the root causes of all this rage, alienation and sense of injustice in at-risk groups of people, these acts will continue to happen. Incel-type outbursts? I think the more these types of men don’t get the mental health help they need and the right advice to change their views and lifestyles, the more these types of violent outbursts will occur - and have a root in their sense of injustice and negative circlejerk narrative. Not giving them outlets to vent is not the answer - nor is pretending they don’t exist. They need help and guidance. TRP can help them in some ways to better themselves, but not by pushing woman blaming or solidifying the idea that they’re just unloveable and the modern ‘gynocentric’ society will never be anything but a source of antagonism and rejection for them.

There’s got to be hope and support for these guys, not denigration and dismissal. Better and more easily accessible and destigmatized mental health care is vital. But also getting a unique handle on the types of issues only men are likely to be dealing with and the different strategies and treatments needed to target them.

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 8 points9 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I can’t pinpoint exactly why I can pick these things up, but I do, and many women are the same.

I think we evolved this way. Women who couldn't read the cues probably didn't survive to pass on their genes.

[–]EqualinaPurple Pill Woman 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You could well be right

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are primed to see it. False positives never get talked about, so we assume women are all professor x.

Its a confirmation bias.

[–]oihaoerhg 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I feel like what really happens is the creepy guy is tired of being perceived as a monster so they're like: "Oh, you think I'm a monster huh? I'll show you a real monster."

It sounds messed up but I don't think these guys would snap if it wasn't for girls rejecting them for putting off these elusive "bad vibes".

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's kind of a chicken-or-the-egg question, isn't it?

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Can we talk on skype or something? I just want to understand what's throwing women off about me.

[–]EqualinaPurple Pill Woman 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Umm...listen, I might not even be able to tell what could be ‘off’ about you over Skype...it could be so many things that only actually being face to face would show. Even then, there might be nothing ‘off’ to me, but maybe to other women there’s something. This is what I mean - it’s hard to describe and I don’t think there’s some fix that can be simply applied.

Best thing you can do is work on making yourself well rounded and happy in other ways. And get out and socialize. I know it’s hard enough for me as an introverted woman, I’m sure it’s much harder for guys who have been rejected or ignored. I wish there was a magic fix to make it easier, but I don’t think it exists...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

the same women who get lured into traps by serial killers?stop with this bullshit that women sense weirdness.Women care only about looks,look at Ted Bundy,he lured many women only because he was good looking.Also on a post of a rapist/serial killer a woman just commented how good looking he is!

[–]EqualinaPurple Pill Woman 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is not true.

A) there were women who escaped Ted Bundy or refused to help him. He asked many women to help him and only some agreed. It was not just that he was good looking, it was also that he pretended to be hampered in some way by an injury and needed help. That was what made him seem vulnerable and therefore non-threatening to his victims. His good, clean cut looks helped him for sure, but the main thing was his seeming need for help. If you see a ‘normal’ looking man (well dressed, clean cut) struggling with his study books because he’s on crutches or has a cast on his arm then you’d maybe help him if he asked for it. He was not picking up women who thought they were going to have sex with him - he wasn’t a seducer. He played on sympathy and then clubbed women over the head and drove them away to be raped and strangled.

B) It’s documented by research that women do actually read between the lines and read people’s emotions better than men on average and the centuries old idea of ‘women’s intuition’ doesn’t come from nowhere. Also women seem to be more sensitive than men across the 5 senses - that could explain picking up some cues from others as well.

C) Identifying a serial killer as good looking is something many men do too - it doesn’t mean the man is actually attractive to a woman. He’s just objectively good looking. Ted Bundy was relatively good looking as was Richard Ramirez - doesn’t mean I actually find them attractive.

Edit: to fix embedded link

[–]Million-SunsMarriage is obsolete 13 points14 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

Of course we will.

That goes beyond the sole sexual frustration aspect. It's a global frustration.

Modern technology + mainstream media initiate now an easier and easier propagation of a successful livelihood image.

With false but common spread narratives according to which "if you work hard enough, you are going to get the same kind of success", people who feel they don't fit in said picture are going to react out of frustration and some of them violently.

TRP PUAs admit that the "game" has become harder, due to partially an inflated sense of SMV and RMV felt by modern women. So if you combine that with what I explained earlier, sexual frustration grows exponentially.

I can't remember where I read that millennials are having far less sex than the previous generations, despite the hook-up culture.

Eliot Rodger was one manifestation of it and was a symbol for the Incels and we know how it turned out. This incident was only a few years ago.

The more sexually frustrated people the mainstream create, the higher the chances that such events occur.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

TRP PUAs admit that the "game" has become harder, due to partially an inflated sense of SMV and RMV felt by modern women.

In my opinion i don't think it's so much the liberation of women though. I think lately with America's gym culture the standard of masculinity has gone way up.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

> That goes beyond the sole sexual frustration aspect. It's a global frustration. 

No, it's not. It's an Anglo-saxon phenomenon, that seems to be based in the United States, mostly. Tell me how many Europeans are getting other people killed because they can't get laid, and don't talk to me about the Muslims, it's not our fault their society is stuck in the 7th century still.

> With false but common spread narratives according to which "if you work hard enough, you are going to get the same kind of success", people who feel they don't fit in said picture are going to react out of frustration and some of them violently. 

haha, nah, people over here are too busy working to bother with illusions of success. We're glad to do the basics, like pay the rent and the utilities and food. Guys are too overworked to grow frustrated with ''sexual frustration'' not that stuff like that exists in considerable quantities because young men are communicating face to face with women since a young age and they enjoy sports, and the guys who don't, they aren't using their jaws to practice for a pie eating contest.

TRP PUAs admit that the "game" has become harder, due to partially an inflated sense of SMV and RMV felt by modern women. So if you combine that with what I explained earlier, sexual frustration grows exponentially. 

Women do not suffer from an inflated sex of SMV and RMV. Most women know where they are in the sexual attractiveness scale, and they aren't pursuing men much hotter than them, it is men who are hypergamous and who have no idea where they are in the SMV and RMV scale because they always go for women who are fitter and more attractive than them, and no. Don't talk to me about how 80% of women are fucking 20% of men because that is as likely as Jennifer lawrence falling on my cock.

 So if you combine that with what I explained earlier, sexual frustration grows exponentially. 

What sexual frustration are you speaking of? It's never been easier for a man to get laid, in the History of the human species. Women these days are as sexual as men are because they are no longer going to be stoned to death because they aren't virgins anymore. There's 150 million women in the united states alone. If most Icelandic men can get laid in a Country with only 150.000 women, the vast majority of Americans can sure as shit get laid. There is no reason for young men to be sexually frustrated. Unless they grew up on a diet of watching young, attractive women getting fucked in porn movies and now they feel they deserve the same.

I can't remember where I read that millennials are having far less sex than the previous generations, despite the hook-up culture. 

American Millenials are having far less sex than the previous generations because they are too enamoured with chiptole, tacobell, playstation 4, and porn. Is that our fault that these kids would rather jerk off to porn while eating a handful of heart-inducing death, instead of pursuing women?

The more sexually frustrated people the mainstream create, the higher the chances that such events occur. 

You said people. When was the last time a woman who couldn't get dick went into a rampage to kill people? My memory is failing me and I have an elephant's memory. I don't want to hear blackpillers saying that every woman can get laid, nah. First meet some real women instead of your sex doll and talk to me again, when there are even attractive women who can't get laid because they are so shy, or the guys go for easier marks, you can talk about how ''even obese women can get laid it's unfair!!111111 I love chiptole look at my fat ass I'm an average looking man111111!!!''

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You want a European example of a disenfranchised man killing people with a vehicle?

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Depends. is that European man the son of muslim immigrants?

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Nvm. I've read a few of your posts... You read like a van renter yourself...

Im out, good luck with this

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no idea what van renter means in this context.

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Think real hard

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 11 points12 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

I think one of the factors that will only exacerbate this problems is that there isn't really any actual willingness to truly analyze this phenomenon - instead, what we get is virtue-signalling and phony indignation like in the vox article.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 8 points9 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

I think one of the factors that will only exacerbate this problems is that there isn't really any actual willingness to truly analyze this phenomenon

Indeed. "Nerdy guy with a huge history of being bullied and treated like crap finally snaps and goes on a rampage" is simply not taken seriously. The idea that the bullying of the guy-who-snapped is indicative of a problem and that its something which needs to be fixed? Its at most paid lip service at one time, and then it is discarded. All potential solutions focus on trying to stop someone who's already been bullied-to-breaking-point from carrying out murders, with nothing being put into actually lessening bullying. "Anti-bullying" campaigns typically only happen when the victim of bullying is a member of a trendy minority.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Meowing like a cat, spitting on your own clothes and talking to yourself is not just “nerdy”. Yes, I’m sure he was bullied, yes I have empathy, but his problems go beyond being bullied.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 3 points4 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Indeed, this particular perp had some obvious ASD symptoms/quirks. But he still reported substantial amounts of mistreatment from others. The overall point is still the same even if there is a difference in degree; his illness itself cannot be the factor that caused his crimes because if ASD were enough to make someone go postal then everyone with ASD would go postal. More than one factor is at play here, and cruel treatment from society is clearly one of these factors.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

He reported bullying, I’m sure he was bullied, but I’ll bet he was largely avoided. Being shunned and avoided by all of society is just as hurtful, if not more hurtful, than being bullied by a few. But it wasn’t feminism or bullies or politics or society, it certainly wasn’t lack of sex, that made him spit on himself and meow like a cat.

What 4 Chan gave him was a sense of normalization and a way to express his feeling to others. It told him the world was the problem, not his own brain chemistry. If he had any hope of any kind of a happy life this was the worst message he could have gotten. Instead of giving him coping mechanisms to deal with the shitty hand his genetics dealt him, it encouraged him to lash out in anger against people who did him no harm.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

But it wasn’t feminism or bullies or politics or society, it certainly wasn’t lack of sex, that made him spit on himself and meow like a cat.

Sure. His symptoms were a product of a mental illness. No surprises there.

But by the same token, it wasn't his spitting-on-himself and meowing-like-a-cat that 'made' other people bully him either. Other people made the free choice to treat him that way.

What 4 Chan gave him was a sense of normalization and a way to express his feeling to others. It told him the world was the problem, not his own brain chemistry.

So you think he should've had it drilled even harder into him that he was an outcast and wasn't like the others and didn't fit in? As if he didn't know? As if he didn't pervasively feel that all the time?

In addition, if his brain chemistry made him act that way it wasn't "his fault" in the sense of moral responsibility. The world's reaction to him, however, cannot be described as a product of mere brain chemistry.

Violence is inexcuseable, and I won't defend his actions. What I will point out is that you seem to treat him as responsible for the symptoms of his brain chemistry yet treat society's reactions to him as devoid of any element of choice/free will/moral responsibility. Personally I would've thought the more accurate assessment is the exact opposite; people are not responsible for the symptoms of a disease they suffer but are responsible for freely chosen actions.

it encouraged him to lash out in anger against people who did him no harm.

Indeed. And this is a terrible thing. Its why we do in fact need compassionate, understanding, therapeutic spaces for people in his situation.

The problem is that far too many people are advocating brutally drilling aspies into complete normalcy on one hand, or alternatively telling them that they're absolute gene-trash and might as well go postal. And I don't particularly like either alternative.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it should have been drilled into him that he was different. Not undeserving of understanding or respect, but different. He needed the information that his difference was just that, a difference. A barrier to many, many things that come naturally to neurotypicals, hopefully a potential benefit in other ways. ( He apparently was very bright).

It needed to be drilled into him that if he was going to be mainstreamed, he could expect , at best, to be shunned by strangers who might not understand his behavior. It needed to be drilled into him that when his anxiety reached peak level, he needed to remove himself from the halls of his high school and perform his ritualistic behaviors in private. Not complete normalcy, just an understanding of how to deal with his more extreme behaviors.

He needed to be given the self awareness that there may be times where he needed to just face up to the fact he was different and be able to call people out at times for their non inclusion. Look at the comments of the people he went to high school and boot camp with. “I figured it was some kind of condition “. Yeah he was weird”. His life could have been measurably better if he was taught to introduce himself and explain “I have a neurological condition called Asperger’s, it makes be behave in peculiar ways when I am stressed”. Would that get him laid or make him prom king? No. Would that make people more likely to understand his behavior and be less freaked out by it? Hopefully.

He tried to join the military and lasted two weeks. How in the holy hell did anyone, him or his parents, think that was a good idea? How did he manage to lack the self awareness that he was not going to be successful in the MILITARY? The one place where conformity to rule is a demand.

It sucks that society has such limited understanding of autism and Asperger’s. Sesame Street has a new character with autism, to help kids understand it better. That is a promising direction. I would assume that for the most part, the worlds reaction to him was predominantly avoidance. When we see signs of “mental illness”, we typically cross the street, and with good reason. I’m not qualified to deal with someone having a psychotic break or paranoid delusions. We aren’t taught to recognize harmless behaviors like tics and quirks as essentially harmless.

As for bullying, I certainly don’t condone it, and realize that a few bullies can cause horrible damage to people. And for what it’s worth, high school is one of the most brutal places on earth that most humans will encounter in their lives.

Incel forums did not teach him that his brain chemistry was a barrier to social acceptance, it taught him that society was the problem. There can be no improvement when the source of the problem is not identified and accepted.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

e needed the information that his difference was just that, a difference. A barrier to many, many things that come naturally to neurotypicals, hopefully a potential benefit in other ways. ( He apparently was very bright).

You think he didn't know that? Seriously? This is a guy who experienced social alienation for a very long time. He knew he was different, he knew he didn't fit in.

You acknowledge he was apparently very bright. Maybe if society had a better willingness to tolerate eccentric people we could make use of that intelligence and have less of an efficiency loss?

As for the particular, specific, concrete steps you recommend as practical coping strategies, I don't object to those. I think they're probably very useful actually. But that's the kind of stuff I'd want to see get taught in a therapeutic, understanding space for people with Asperger's Syndrome.

It sucks that society has such limited understanding of autism and Asperger’s. Sesame Street has a new character with autism, to help kids understand it better. That is a promising direction.

Agreed there. But to a degree, you're kind of thus accepting society could do its part to help treat people with Asperger's Syndrome (and people whom are just eccentric or have subclinical levels of ASD traits) a bit better than it currently does.

As for bullying, I certainly don’t condone it, and realize that a few bullies can cause horrible damage to people. And for what it’s worth, high school is one of the most brutal places on earth that most humans will encounter in their lives.

Very, very true. I appreciate your sympathy on that issue. I'm sure you didn't have a happy-playful-cheery-yummy time there yourself.

Incel forums did not teach him that his brain chemistry was a barrier to social acceptance, it taught him that society was the problem.

Correct me if I'm wrong but are you implying that he didn't know he had Asperger's? I think it was obvious he knew he did. Tons of people on Incel forums are people with Asperger's and they know it and identify as such.

And to an extent I'm sure you've already agreed that society can be part of the problem in how it mistreats people with Asperger's Syndrome. Not spitting all over your clothes, fine, that's a reasonable accomodation to society owing to the perfectly rational subject of hygiene. But if someone is very quiet, introverted, and shy... or even if they're a little bit weird and quirky... or perhaps they're a touch loud and maybe use blunt language sometimes... they shouldn't be thought of as freaks to be reformed. If someone's cognitive skill set is intensely preoccupied with truth rather than diplomacy, ideas rather than feelings, and that kind of stuff, surely they should be recognized as having value in themselves.

I'm sure you'd agree there.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

He needed behavior modification to change what he could, but he desperately needed to be taught acceptance that he had some challenges and that his path in life might not look like most peoples. The fact that he tried to join the military makes me think that no, he did not understand or accept the reality of his condition.

Lots of aspies “know” and will say they have Asperger’s. But I wonder if the condition itself is precludes a true processing of what it really means to have Asperger’s. Anosognosia can occur in a host of neurological disorders. I sometimes wonder if the lack of emotional connection common with Aspergers doesn’t extend to themselves.

If you don’t treat the denial, the lack of insight, you can’t begin to negotiate a satisfactory path of appropriate behavior modification. These incel forums deflect away from the root of the problem and focus the anger and frustration on normies, not on the syndrome. It’s completely counterproductive.

Of course I agree that they have value, all humans have value, but some highly functioning aspies have contributed enormously to society. People who are quirky, quiet, introverted and fixated on a subject can be some of the most interesting people!

As far as feelings and diplomacy, well there’s a bit of a two way street in some ways. You can’t demand it from society and celebrate your own deficit. If someone tells you, “hey you’re weird” aren’t they just valuing their truth over diplomacy? Being blunt? And yet you would rightly feel put off by such a comment. Sorry, but if you have Aspergers and you expect positive interactions with “normies” then yes, those are behaviors you will have to reform. The shit some aspie/incels post on message boards is unacceptable. To pretend otherwise does them no favors.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

he desperately needed to be taught acceptance that he had some challenges and that his path in life might not look like most peoples...If you don’t treat the denial, the lack of insight, you can’t begin to negotiate a satisfactory path of appropriate behavior modification.

Waitwaitwait... so you're saying that Aspies need to accept their quirks must be eliminated? I thought earlier you said they just needed some modest coping strategies, and at the same time normies needed to develop the ability to accept people with quirks. Which is it?

These incel forums deflect away from the root of the problem and focus the anger and frustration on normies, not on the syndrome.

Well didn't you concede that normies need to be more accepting and its unfair to demand a process of "one way acculturation" or complete conformity? Again I can understand the "don't spit on your own clothes" thing, but many aspects of Asperger's aren't those repetitive self-soothing behaviors but rather facets of how you think, process information etc... in short, there are parts of the syndrome which are parts of the personality, and shouldn't society tolerate personality differences?

[–]prodigy2throw#Transracial 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Just more shaming is the solution apparently

[–]catemlBlue Pill Woman 6 points7 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Its interesting because I hadn't seen a picture of him before I clicked that link, but he looks almost eerily like a friend of mine (who is also prematurely balding).
In the few years I've known this friend I've witnessed him happily date and have casual sex with no issue.

The mental health argument is misleading, to be perfectly honest.

This guy had ASD, and difficulty with social interaction likely related to that. But you know what, loads of people have ASD. And I don't mean to minimise the difficulties of living with that disability, at all, it can be incredibly frustrating and demoralising. But it's incredibly unfair and damaging to those people to pretend like the 'reason' this guy committed mass murder/a terrorist attack is 'because he had ASD'.
Many people with ASD enter long term relationships, the two (male) adults with ASD I know best socially are both in LTRs. Many have functioning social lives - a relative of mine who when we were kids I remember the grownups all worrying whether he would be essentially non-verbal for his entire life, now has a job and friends who he goes out and to events with. Yes, it can be really fucking hard, and some people with ASD don't ever manage to function on that level. But the internet likes to pretend ASD is synonymous with being a 4channing malcontent 'lol, hanging out with all the other spergs' when really it isn't. Struggling socially and being frustrated (generally with yourself) is related to living with ASD, dealing with your life problems by becoming bitter and aggressive isn't. A person with ASD can also be those things of course, because people with ASD are people and some people are those things, but its damaging to somehow pretend that its natural one flows from the other.

I also genuinely don't think a focus on mental health in general really helps either. Not that we shouldn't massively increase mental health support for its own sake anyway, but that won't make mental health problems disappear any more than building hospitals could ever eradicate illness.
"A person was depressed, and they did this because they were depressed, so if we had better depression treatment it wouldn't have happened". Maybe, but maybe not. Depression and mental health issues in general aren't as simple as taking pills for a couple of weeks and a couple of therapy sessions and then you're right as rain. We should give people those things, because with the right medication balance/talking interventions most people with mental health struggles can eventually either recover fully or manage to lead a functioning and fulfilling life. But some don't. People with depression who have had years and years of treatment and support still kill themselves, people who have spent a decade in and out of intensive Eating Disorder treatment still starve themselves until their organs give out.
It isn't that we shouldn't keep striving for a world where no one has to suffer or die due to mental health struggles, or we should just shrug and accept them as a part of life and forget about it. But the truth is the majority of people will have some form of mental health issue in their life time, and we don't really know what 'causes' it, and while treatment has come on leaps and bounds there is still an element of flailing around to see what sticks to it.
Its safe for the realistic future to just go ahead and assume that whatever funds/awareness we pour into mental health, people are still going to have problems that dramatically impact themselves and those around them.

So we can't keep focussing on the vulnerabilities of the person, there will always be vulnerable people, as if that is the bit we need to prioritise on fixing. We know that groups and ideologies specifically go for those people.

Maybe the Toronto killer had mental health issues and struggled to get by in life. But don't Radical Islam suicide bombers also have mental health issues and struggles? We know for a fact that ISIS and Al Qaeda both intentionally target young people who feel hopeless and alienated for recruitment. If we could magically turn everyone in the muslim world into a happily confident and functioning being, ISIS would probably really struggle to find an audience for their bullshit, but realistically that isn't going to happen.
Same for White Power/far right groups - again we know that they purposefully target those who feel hopeless and say 'Hey, you know what will give you hope? Channelling all your feelings into this."
The IRA used to do it as well.

How is someone joining groups which channel their feelings and struggles into an ideology that women's nature is responsible for their problems all that different to when it's 'infidels' or black people?

TL;DR I struggle to see how all these forms of the radicalisation of people with significant life problems into ideologies resulting in extreme violence aren't pretty interchangeable. Only apparently when its Radical Islam or White Nationalism we are supposed to focus on the ideology but then its this we're supposed to focus purely on the individual.
The events and factors leading to the following of the ideology and eventual act are complicated, or course they are, but that one element of it is pretty damn simple.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 5 points6 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

The mental health argument is misleading, to be perfectly honest.

It's pretty valid, it's just one part of the problem.

For starters, I think that the guys you know aren't strange enough to qualify in this regard (and I assume that they got lucky at some point which further improved their standing): it's one thing if you just behave strangely (i.e. have a slight uncanny valley-vibe) or really act out your strangeness like Minassian or Elliot Rodger did, who apparently didn't even make an attempt to socialize normally with women.

And then of course there's another thing about people on the spectrum - they usually tend to rely more on learning things through directions instead of normally. And if these guys get blasted with misleading messages about dating, flirting, gender relations, female priorities etc., of course they end up failures with women. One can say a lot about PUA flirting techniques, but the way they are designed and also the way they are explained, they are infinitely more helpful to guys who are struggling in this regard than the usual female-approved bullshit floating around.

But don't Radical Islam suicide bombers also have mental health issues and struggles?

This is a part that is usually ignored - if a religion promises you hell if you commit suicide but heaven + 72 perpetual virgins if you take a few infidels with you while doing so, suicide bombings become a lot more attractive to people who are both religious and terminally depressed.

[–]catemlBlue Pill Woman 1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

For starters, I think that the guys you know aren't strange enough to qualify in this regard (and I assume that they got lucky at some point which further improved their standing): it's one thing if you just behave strangely (i.e. have a slight uncanny valley-vibe) or really act out your strangeness like Minassian or Elliot Rodger did, who apparently didn't even make an attempt to socialize normally with women.

I don't think it's a question of levels of strangeness though.
These guys I know are pretty damn 'strange', it's just that some girls don't really care if they've got other good qualities (and based on the girls I know who date guys with ASD, it's not that its the ASD that they're attracted to, but they like people that are 'different' and are the type who enjoy helping people, not infantilizing them but are happy to act as a sort of conduit with 'normals'). Maybe they're not the blonde sorority girls that Elliot Rodger was obsessed with, but they're girls and both parties seem to love each other, which is kind of the point for people who aren't status obsessed.

Both Roger and Minassian seem like they were actually pretty high functioning, all things considered. I know that people have a more complicated profile than just 'more autistic' and 'less autistic', but they were people who generally got by more than a lot of people with ASD do. Roger in particular went to college, lived in unsupported accommodation, and while he might not have had many friends he seemed capable of interacting in social situations. At what point would it be fair to say that his isolation was primarily a result of his bitterness and anger rather than his social abilities/'strangeness'?

What really I'm questioning is whether it is fair to say that they are 'acting out their strangeness', when it seems less likely their 'strangeness' was what was being manifested here (considering that 99.999% of 'strange' people don't murder others and most murders are committed by people who would not be considered 'strange' in that sense), but that their 'strangeness' may have been one factor (amongst other in their personality) in their being vulnerable to an ideology, and it was that ideology which was being manifested.

One can say a lot about PUA flirting techniques, but the way they are designed and also the way they are explained, they are infinitely more helpful to guys who are struggling in this regard than the usual female-approved bullshit floating around.

People say this all the time, but I'm not sure.
Full disclaimer, I find PUA shit pretty revolting so I've only ever looked at it out of morbid curiosity rather than to use it for its intended purpose.
But a lot of it seems to be based on acting more like your classic charming sociopath than something you could ever take as a step by step guide to social interaction. 'Negging' for example - that is only going to work if you actually have a really good read on cues, which people with ASD famously tend not to. Walking up to a woman and saying 'You are fat but I like you anyway' is not going to be more successful than saying 'You are pretty. Will you go out with me?' unless you are already someone who has a handle on manipulation, and 'smirking' will just make you look crazy unless you're a good actor.
In that way all this 'black pill' stuff makes sense. Because these guys are going "I tried your manual and it didn't work, it's because I'm hideous" when really the 'be a charming sociopath' technique is only going to work if you were already a charming sociopath and its just giving you a few new ideas.

they are infinitely more helpful to guys who are struggling in this regard than the usual female-approved bullshit floating around.

Like what, though?
Because a lot of these guys say that the 'female-approved bullshit' is "Just be yourself and be respectful, women will realise that you're amazing and come flocking" - which is clearly from a female in the sense that it is from their mother.
Advice from actual not-your-mother girls is going to be more 'act confident even if its fake-it-till-you-make-it' and 'don't treat her like she is a perfect angel because it comes across as needy, just talk to her as if she is a person on your level'. Which is basically what the PUA stuff is trying to get across with all the 'manipulate her into feeling bad until she wants to fuck you' bit taken out.
I'm sort of convinced that the reason in the instances where the PUA stuff actually works, 90% of the time its just that feeling like he had a 'tactic' gave the guy a sense of power which came across as confidence. Which could have been more easily achieved with "Act like you're confident and don't act like her very presence if enough to make you pass out".

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

People say this all the time, but I'm not sure. Full disclaimer, I find PUA shit pretty revolting so I've only ever looked at it out of morbid curiosity rather than to use it for its intended purpose. But a lot of it seems to be based on acting more like your classic charming sociopath than something you could ever take as a step by step guide to social interaction.

It's more complicated than that.

PUA promotes a slew of techniques and bits of wisdom which all in all are pretty helpful especially if they're the polar opposite of what you've done before. In fact, they can even be helpful if they technically aren't correct.

  1. Most fundamental: it promotes guys getting out of their shell and approaching, approaching, approaching. This might sound self-explanatory, but I'd wager that the biggest problem of guys with next-to-no success with women is that they don't proactively pursue them in large numbers but either hope for a stroke of luck or try the "sniper approach" (latch onto a girl they're into and orbit her). This is mostly for practice reasons.
  2. Tied to that: Not taking rejections personally and also getting used to them. This is an entire chapter in itself, it ranges from "oftentimes women reject you for reasons that have nothing to do with you" over "rejection as such isn't the end of the world" and "a rejection isn't necessarily humiliating" to "the more you're used to rejection, the better you become" and so on.
  3. The supreme value of confidence when it comes to dating - because not only does it make 1 and 2 easier, but it also makes you more attractive to women in itself. And the value of confidence is not only through one's resilience regarding risk and rejection, but also projection a certain sense of self-esteem when it comes to yourself: you don't belittle yourself, or apologize, or cowtow when faced with adversity - instead you radiate the feeling that you're great and at ease. And all that while simultaneously avoiding to show off . It's basically "impress a woman without telling how impressive you or your feats are".
  4. The fact that PUA offers a lot of routines, flirting scripts and canned lines - this might sound spergy, but for a guy who actually is spergy this is a godsend: before, he couldn't flirt his way through wet paper, but now he at least has some crutches for talking with women in a romantically charged manner.
  5. Not sucking up to women - because that's what guys who want to ingratiate themselves with a woman do. Showing that you're not intimidated by her, but that you see through her show - that you basically have the upper hand in your dealings with her. Negs belong into that context.
  6. The white lies can be pretty helpful too, depending on the circumstances: "looks don't really matter, personality and confidence do" can be pretty helpful if you let hangups about your looks prevent you from trying in the first place. "women like sleeping around as much as men" helps you if you have hangups about soliciting women for sex. "it isn't negative if a woman is a slut and they make for great relationship material" helps if a guy has the tendency to let his resentment towards slutty women (who coincidentally are the best target demographic for redpillers) bleed into his dealings with them.

For a guy who is thoroughly clueless when it comes to flirting and dating, these pointers are indeed infinitely more helpful then "treat women like people" and "respect them harder".

Like what, though?

that

I'm sort of convinced that the reason in the instances where the PUA stuff actually works, 90% of the time its just that feeling like he had a 'tactic' gave the guy a sense of power which came across as confidence.

This definitely plays a role in this...

Which could have been more easily achieved with "Act like you're confident and don't act like her very presence if enough to make you pass out".

...but this on the other hand doesn't. Not at all. This is by the way advice that's typical for people who really suck at putting themselves in another person's situation.

An anecdote! When I was far younger, I was pretty easy to rile up. My mother had the annoying habit to say "just don't let them provoke you" . A piece of advice that managed to be simultaneously spot-on (had I managed to be totally unfazed by my classmates' attempts of riling me up, it would have stopped) while simultaneously being completely and utterly useless - for the simple reason that you can't control your own emotional response (and the way you communicate it to the outside) at will.

I mean, assume that there was an incredibly dangerous animal that would however only attack those people who were afraid of it. Would you, knowing this, suddenly stop emanating a very real sense of fear just because you were aware that doing so is basically a death sentence for you - that you basically just had to "stop being afraid" because that's all that was necessary to get out of that situation unscathed (if you say "yes", I call you a liar)? Because that's what you're essentially suggesting here - that the directive "rein in emotion X and display emotion Y" is enough to make someone do exactly that.

....and this is why TRP is so adamant that you shouldn't pay attention to female advice - because even in instances where it isn't flat-out wrong, it's still sorely lacking.

[–]catemlBlue Pill Woman 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

An anecdote! When I was far younger, I was pretty easy to rile up. My mother had the annoying habit to say "just don't let them provoke you" . A piece of advice that managed to be simultaneously spot-on (had I managed to be totally unfazed by my classmates' attempts of riling me up, it would have stopped) while simultaneously being completely and utterly useless - for the simple reason that you can't control your own emotional response (and the way you communicate it to the outside) at will.

You're missing my point.
You can control your emotional response, it's just how you do it.
So you're correct saying 'don't let them provoke you' when you're someone who is easily provoked is pointless in itself.
But it's what needs to happen eventually (you can never stop people doing whatever they're going to do, the only thing you can ever hope to change is your own behaviour, which can be what people mean by that) a starting point to figure out HOW not to let them provoke you. There are more practical ways to do that (reminding yourself that what they want is a reaction, reframing those people in your head as more unimportant, practising techniques like counting to 10, coming up with more calm comebacks before time and practicing them so they're ready when you need them, etc.). And even recognising that you can't control other people's behaviour only your own helps. The problem was that your mother didn't give you bad advice, she gave you half a piece of advice, which while for an adult might be enough (you get what they mean and figure the rest out yourself) is kind of just confusing to a child.

that

Well you see, this is all terrible advice that I have never once actually heard any woman say, apart from someone's mother or grandmother.

Some of it though is somewhat hyperbolic misinterpretations of actual advice, which I see people do all the time.

So for example:

"Women don't like guys with muscles. Also women are never shallow". - False
"Many women prefer more a slim athletic look (thing soccer player) than a roided out gym bunny look. Some women care more about body type than others, but generally people are attracted to attractive people". - True

"Being a "bad boy" with morally questionable behavior (i.e. not putting women first) means that you're an undesirable piece of shit, a bad person and will die alone and unloved" - False
"Being cruel and inconsiderate to people makes you a bad person. Also you run a serious risk that whoever you're with will cotton on and realise they're well rid of you. However life isn't fair and sometimes bad people get good things." - True

"Women would never want just sex" - False
"Sometimes women just want to be fucked, sometimes they don't, but if you just want to fuck you want to look for those in the former category. Women are bundles of nerve endings just like you, but if you are considerate etc. and make her feel safe and desired then she is probably going to enjoy it more and more likely to come back for seconds." - True

"Classic/stereotypical masculinity is undesirable, juvenile, destructive, toxic; being the feminized sensitive, friendly, communicative New ManTM who is a good listener is the way to go" - Probably false, depending on how you mean it.
"Being a robot who seems incapable of relating to human emotion is hard to make a relationship with, and dealing with the feelings that you absolutely do have because you're human by bottling them up and being angry or aggressive is unpleasant and scary to be around. However being an emotionally incontinent sap who heaps your problems on others and crying all the time isn't particularly attractive either. As with most things in life you kind of want to be someone in the middle. The same way you probably wouldn't want a woman who either is unable to understand or relate to your emotions, or cries constantly like a toddler, either." - True.

Also guys on here constantly misunderstand the whole 'treat women like they're people' thing on here. It doesn't mean 'respect them harder', thats a bizarre way to read that sentence. It means 'women are people like you are people, they're not particularly special and they're not above or below you, they just.... are people. They can give and take just like you do, if you've giving them happiness/support/etc. you should expect them to give the same in return and vice versa.' And that women are sometimes shallow about looks/money but then sometimes they're less so, just like men.
It actually is supposed to quite clearly mean the opposite to 'women are special creatures who can do no wrong, you should go by their every whim, female sexuality is a mystical force and you should lie at its feet and assume anything wrong is with you'.

But that is what I mean - I don't think any of the examples you gave was women giving terribly lacking wishy-washy advice, it reads more like you took what generally floats around as pretty straightforward advice and amped it up to 100 to make it sound absurd.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem was that your mother didn't give you bad advice, she gave you half a piece of advice, which while for an adult might be enough (you get what they mean and figure the rest out yourself) is kind of just confusing to a child.

I didn't say it was "bad" - it was just plain and simply useless. Which it was. And, no offense, the same applies to the way in which you try to reframe PUA advice. What you're saying isn't incorrect, it's just not helpful at all. I guess that's better than being completely counterproductive, but still not something I would want to reky on.

Well you see, this is all terrible advice that I have never once actually heard any woman say, apart from someone's mother or grandmother.

Do you remember when I said that some people learn things through directions than organically? The entire bulk of of these messages are basically the essence of what I have read about intergender relations, female priorities, female preferences, the role men played in our society, contemporary as well as historical etc. And even if an article communicated something that wasn't total bullshit (for example when it said something about fit guys being more successful with women), this was never left uncommented. Because either those fit guys were roidies (and you don't want to be a roidy), or the chicks were thots (and you don't want a thot), or men were ultimately worse in their superficial desires.

And let's be honest - the stuff feminists want us to teach our boys ultimately amounts to exactly that: they're telling an awful lot of nasty shit about men and about how we're indebted to women by default and should by all means do everything in our power to improve their lives in perpetuity - and then you wonder why a guy who got exposed to these messages all his lives gets a fucked up understanding of gender relations?

The problem is that especially in the progressive spectrum it's considered to be of paramount importance that men while growing up develop an overwhelmingly positive idea of women - probably intended as some sort of "correction" to men's innate feeling of superiority towrads them or as some counterbalance to the overly patriarchal makeup of our society, or maybe they just thought that for every guy who is not nice to women, the scales must be balanced by indoctrinating young boys into being twice as much in awe towards them as compensation - I don't know. And well yeah, maybe it does help with guys who - if confronted with a more ambivalent (but more realistic) depicition of the genders - would have developed a negative idea of women otherwise but ultimately came out pretty positive.

But you also have to live with guys who take everything they read at face value developing a thoroughly fucked up idea of all that - and them not reacting to kindly if they realize that they have been taken for a ride all the time.

It means 'women are people like you are people, they're not particularly special and they're not above or below you, they just.... are people

Objection. You can't on the one hand say "women are just people as you are, hmmmkayyy?" and then on the other constantly blast boys with messages of how much better women actually are. And before you disagree here - just for a second think what would happen to a guy who wrote the stuff as written in those articles with inverted genders (if it helps, you can think of James Damore and Tim Hunt and what happened to them). What seems to be the definition of "women are people too" is ultimately a lot more orwellian than you seem to realize.

I don't think any of the examples you gave was women giving terribly lacking wishy-washy advice, it reads more like you took what generally floats around as pretty straightforward advice and amped it up to 100 to make it sound absurd.

Oh, I didn't even intend to make it sound absurd - there isn't really much to amp up to 100 if you're constantly communicated stuff like the articles I just linked.

What you seem to forget: this was the constant background noise of our culture when it came to gender. These were the messages that were always packed into articles, books etc. - stuff I never really questioned because it was told from all sources I was exposed to. It basically took roots at the back of my mind and constantly influenced my thought processes whenever I was confronted with issues regarding gender relations. This doesn't mean that I was unable to see if individual women were behaving totally unlike that ideal - but because of my cultural upbringing, I dismissed them as outliers as a rule (even though ultimately, they weren't really); and generally without even consciously realizing it generally expected women to be at their most pristine behavior and as a collective perceived them as being beyond reproach (because thinking otherwise would have been sexist). Basically the Women are Wonderful-effect as my baseline mode.

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

for the simple reason that you can't control your own emotional response (and the way you communicate it to the outside) at will.

Yes, you can. May I recommend Marcus Aurelius's "Meditations"?

As a side benefit, it'll also teach you not to fear death.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, you can. May I recommend Marcus Aurelius's "Meditations"?

You also tell that to 10 year old kids?

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Never too young to learn! In fact I'd say that learning to control your emotional responses is one of the cornerstones of maturity. "Meditations" would be a fine gift to a young man or woman.

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The supreme value of confidence when it comes to dating - because not only does it make 1 and 2 easier, but it also makes you more attractive to women in itself. And the value of confidence is not only through one's resilience regarding risk and rejection, but also projection a certain sense of self-esteem when it comes to yourself: you don't belittle yourself, or apologize, or cowtow when faced with adversity - instead you radiate the feeling that you're great and at ease. And all that while simultaneously avoiding to show off . It's basically "impress a woman without telling how impressive you or your feats are".

I have a really hard time understanding what confidence is. I'll make an analogy to muscles. There are slow twitch muscles for endurance, and fast twitch muscles for quick bursts of power. I'm really good at fast twitch confidence in the sense that I can approach on demand now, but I don't understand what confidence means in the long run. I've never had a successful approach and have only ever gotten laid off tinder and by paying.

[–]WavesAcross 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Full disclaimer, I find PUA shit pretty revolting

It isn't. You should read models to get a sense of what it is.

Walking up to a woman and saying 'You are fat but I like you anyway'

You don't know much about pua if you think that is what it suggests.

just talk to her as if she is a person on your level'.

This is terrible dating advice.

Which could have been more easily achieved with "Act like you're confident and don't act like her very presence if enough to make you pass out".

Consider a child who has stage fright. You could say, "Just don't be scared". Is that good advice? No.

Advice would guidance on how not to be scared. For example, telling the child "just imagine the audience are all in the underpants and laugh at how silly they would look".

Similarly, "act confidant" is not advice, its the goal. The "tactic" is the advice.

Like what, though?

This

45k upvotes, gilded 7 times. "Keep looking 'til you find someone who appreciates you for who you are." is terrible advice. If your not finding people then you should change who you are.

But basically most dating advice is either platitudes, or the wrong advice. The essence of good dating advice for men is centered on masculinity. Most dating advice given by women/feminists either ignores or detracts from that.

[–]oihaoerhg -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

act confident even if its fake-it-till-you-make-it

I really don't understand what "acting confident" even means. I thought all the confidence I'd need was the ability to approach on demand, but now I've got to put on a confident performance too? Fuck.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

This is a part that is usually ignored - if a religion promises you hell if you commit suicide but heaven + 72 perpetual virgins if you take a few infidels with you while doing so, suicide bombings become a lot more attractive to people who are both religious and terminally depressed.

Those "houri" are 90 feet tall, 10 feet wide and transparent up to the marrow of their bones. They sound more like giant sex monsters than regular virgins.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

And I have read interpretations of the term "houri" that turned them into white/bright fruits (sometimes said to be grapes).

But it doesn't really matter what has been written originally, and whether the actual meaning was lost in translation or became a victim of a changing language. What matters is what people believe: and here you have the problem that the general consensus among Muslims is that they get 72 nubile virgins in the afterlife if they're good boys.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

What matters is what people believe: and here you have the problem that the general consensus among Muslims is that they get 72 nubile virgins in the afterlife if they're good boys.

How do you know that this is the general consensus among Muslims and not simply what non-Muslims believe about Muslims?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I know that you're an SJW and fervently believe that anything that might be seen as negative and/or unflattering about Muslims must be a vile, totally made-up islamophobic lie, so there isn't really any use to debate that topic with you.

I mean, even if I could summon a source that corroborates that specific claim at a moment's notice (and it's not as if there weren't loads of surveys that signal that the average Muslim's mindset isn't particularly progressive or rational in certain regards), by now I am sufficiently familiar with your debating style that I know you would outright ignore it anyway, because that's what you do - when someone posts something that refutes your claims, you tend to ignore it and then repeat your claim another day as if nothing ever happened.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I only ignore shitty arguments.

Yes those are the majority because for some reason many people here can only argue against the most hyperbolic misinterpretations or against unsubstantiated strawman arguments, but once in a blue moon someone makes an actual argument and I do take those into account.

Like I don't talk about Jordan Peterson all that much anymore because someone debunked my source that debunked one of his claims.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I only ignore shitty arguments.

You're either lying, in denial or have a very fleeting memory.

My favorite example is you insisting that no real feministTM actually really meant that the bogus wage gap-claim actually meant that women got 23% less money for the same work. And when I confronted you with sources that proved that this very well was the case, you didn't respond only to come back later in another thread to repeat your counterfactual claim.

And yea, this is your standard debating technique.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not sure if I remember the correct one, but I may have ignored it because I don't think that Obama equals feminists.

It's just that any explanation I've got from feminists included sticky floors, glass ceilings, female oriented jobs not being valued as much, unequal distribution of household chores and child raising, etc and wasn't just a simple "women get paid less"

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Man, reading your comments are frustrating.

Is it malice or a lack of self awareness in them? I can't tell

[–]theambivalentroosterLiteral Chad 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Ugly people don't commit mass murders. Mentally ill people do.

Some mentally ill people might be ugly, but there are literally tens of millions of ugly people in the West alone and they aren't out causing a rising blood tide of normie annihilation.

For some strange, unfathomable reason I feel like the mental illness is more relevant to the mass murdering than the ugliness.

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The only problem with "mental illness" being used this way is that it's a cop-out. I believe that anyone, put in another's shoes, would make the same decisions that they made. It's not about some random mental disease rising out of nowhere, it's about the experience. We should treat these things by analyzing the experience of people rather than writing it off as "Oh he was just crazy, a normal person would never do that. Put him on meds and give him some happy thoughts".

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

1 in a million guys will lose it like this. With millions of guys being marginalized, or medically unfit without assistance, I'm surprised we don't see them more.

[–]wtknightGen X Slacker 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There will always be incidents like this because we can't just give every man who has trouble with women a woman, and for every man who might commit a violent act expressing his frustration there are a very large number who will never do anything worse than complain on internet message boards, and some who won't even do that but will just sit quietly in their homes living their lonely lives, so you can't put every involuntarily celibate man into mental health programs. The fact that he used a vehicle rather than a gun shows that gun control isn't going to stop the problem either. In the end, since we can't read minds, this kind of thing will probably continue on a sporadic basis.

It also doesn't matter how he looks. A decent looking guy with anxiety being around women can be an incel.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Laughing my ass off at people claiming this guy isn't ugly af.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thousands of guys heavier and less masculine looking then him have beautiful girlfriends.

Autism is the issue here.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

To be honest, the bottom half of his face is very attractive, that nice broad jaw is really doing it for me. But his nose is to lumpy and his eyes are derpy. If he waxed that brow that might have tilted things in his favor. Overall, my his picture leaves me feeling very confused, he's definitely not ugly af...

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 9 points10 points  (65 children) | Copy Link

Depression probably begets depression. This guy would have likely been better off had he not followed the religion of “incels.” He was clearly mentally ill. People like him need help, not other mentally ill people feeding into their illness.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

This guy would have likely been better off had he not followed the religion of “incels.”

This guy also would have likely been better off if he had had a modicum of success with women.

The problem with the public perception of cases like his is that it's usually presented as if guys like that fail with women because they are misogynist assholes by default and everything would be better if they just respected women harder - completely dismissing (outright ignoring, actually) the possibility that it was his complete lack of meaningful positive feedback that led him there in the first place.

[–]poppy_blu 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

"Public perception" based on what? Most people IRL don't even know what an incel is.

[–]dakruNeither 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They do now.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Based on articles like the one linked in the OP.

[–]poppy_blu 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The fact that the article had to explain in great detail what incel means and that fact that there's an online incel community should tell you it's not common knowledge.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, and when interpretational authority over matters like that is left to outlets like Vox, guess what idea of incels (or FAs, or ABs, or whatever you want to call them) people will get.

[–]poppy_blu 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're not saying anything that disputes my point.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

He probably would have been better off if ANYONE was friendly and nice and supportive. What was his family life like? Did he have any friends?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

But at the same time it may have been his only friends. Isolation is even worse on a person. I know a severally autistic kid, they just can't interact with people in real life. They just can't

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

True. That makes it even sadder as a community.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a great point. The incel echo chamber is toxic, but for some autistic incels, it may be the only human interaction in their lives. I crept around incel.me the day after this incident. There was a suggestion to ban anyone who claimed to have a friend :(

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

He was clearly mentally ill. People like him need help, not other mentally ill people feeding into their illness.

Exactly,

I have yet to see any sort of incel or lookism guy that is truly displeasing or at all terrible to look at.

I mean this guy had a good jawline, was masculine looking. If he went to the gym and did stuff right he would have turned out ok.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

If he went to the gym and did stuff right he would have turned out ok.

This platitude is pretty gross tbh. I've been involved in the amateur fitness scene in my area for a long time. I know guys with Greek god-tier bodies who don't pull any female attention; if you're awkward, shy or short, working out is not going to help you.

did stuff right.

Nothing this guy could've done would've put him in most women's definition of "right". Check out subs like /r/ForeverAlone to see how hard some of of these people are trying to find literally anyone. Many already workout and are fit and/or intelligent.

This is all another play on the "incels just aren't trying hard enough" trope, which is pretty much BS. Incels are lots of failed TRPers; lifestyle changes are not going to be enough to attract women to them. There is something intangible about them that makes women avoid them, and putting a finger on that is a lot more helpful than telling them to work out or something similar.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

The "intangible thing" is always always social skills.

[–]oihaoerhg 1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Why am I so good with my guy friends and not with women then? I was rated like a 6 or 7.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Because you don't know how to socialise with women you're interested in.

Are your guy friends nerdy?

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

I have a diverse range of friends but yes, the ones I tend to be closest too are a little nerdy. I really feel like I could fit in with anyone if I tried, just not when it comes to girls I'm interested in.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

The reason you get along with those guys is because they're nerdy and socialise in a similar way to you. Girls tend to do things very differently, with a lot of emotion and social nuance.

Maybe look for a quirky, nerdy, male brained girl and flirt with her.

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

with a lot of emotion and social nuance.

Is this referring to when people just say random shit and they aren't focusing on the words but on the feelings of the person? I prefer to talk about topics and joke about topics or joke about something I see and make it sound ridiculous, but generally I think there's a lot of focus on the words and the implication that the words mean something whether it be ironic or insightful, whereas girls like to communicate where the words don't have to mean anything? The way I feel close to someone is relating to them in some way through a similar perspective. Relating to someone through a similar feeling seems so shallow because feelings change second to second. I don't know if I'm on the mark or not describing what you mean. Rather than find some anomaly, I'd rather learn girl speak to appeal to a wider range of girls.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Kinda. Social interaction and flirting is not about sharing facts and information, it's about bonding and making your friends/date feel a certain way. It's a powerful thing and looking down on it as "saying random shit" is not helping you.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

if you're awkward, shy or short, working out is not going to help you.

I am awkward and shy and lifting definitely helped me. Of course it is not a cure, but it is a first most important start for such a man towards changing his life.

And no, incels are not failed terps. Once an incel turns to TRP (and PUA) he is on a healing path. Once you learn the stuff and that you are the only person in control, you stop having incel mindset even if you are still physically virgin. You slowly move forward until you either get laid or die trying.. or of old age.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Once you learn the stuff and that you are the only person in control,

More importantly, that you are the only person you are in control of.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, dealing with your own emotions and attitude takes lots of psychological work and even mind tricks. I used to imagine people naked on the street just to lessen my anxiety and similar stuff. Now I just am me. At least I try to be, sometimes bad mood still hits me.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I was going in a different direction with that.

  1. You can't make people see you differently by influencing them (well yes you can, but it's hardly worth your trouble), but you can change yourself so they automatically see you differently.
  2. You can't really make people feel a certain way about you by influencing them (for example fall for you), but you can to some extent control how you feel about them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree with all that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm confused, are you trying to woe is me here or are you saying improving personality is more important than fitness ?

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No woe is me posting.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

boo hooo it's over. You sound like edgy 16 year old.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

> This platitude is pretty gross tbh. I've been involved in the amateur fitness scene in my area for a long time. I know guys with Greek god-tier bodies who don't pull any female attention; if you're awkward, shy or short, working out is not going to help you.

You forgot to mention that those Greek god-tier bodies were attached to faces so ugly they could make Shrek look like a top class male model. Short, women don't care that much about it. Back at the University, I met a load of American students who were living here and studying here and they said they had never seen so many attractive men, most of them weren't even over 5'8'' so how about guys stop complaining about their height and start judging their faces instead, that might be.. just might be.. what is keeping them from getting ''any'' female attention.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Black pill is retarded to begin with. But yes, he wasn’t ugly. Just mentally ill and obviously disturbed.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

The problem is, if you open with those problems to others, you won’t get any empathy.

Incel community on the other side, does give such men empathy, even if among other mostly negative things.

If “normal people” could say anything beyond “you’re not entitled”, “it’s almost like women are people” and shit like that, there would be much less “incels”.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I would like to believe this is true. I’ve seen them do some of that Eliot Rodger worship bullshit and it just looks like they do a lot of feeding into their defeatist “normies are out to get me” mindset.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What exactly isn't true of what I said?

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I would like to believe the empathy is doing more good than the rest of the shit those communities embroil themselves in, but I’m not convinced.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't say it was doing more good, only that it's natural gravitate towards those who empathize and not towards those who scorn -- so those frustrated men do; that's my point.

Those are venting subs, I think spending time on them regularly does more harm than good.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have a lot of empathy for the incel community, but the problem is that the incels aren’t as interested in help as they are with revenge. Revenge against Normies is understandable when you been bullied, but the attitude only puts you further from your goal. If you are an incel and are unhappy as one, it’s counterproductive to just try to learn to hate what you desperately want. If you want success, you need to stop blaming the world and acknowledge that you aren’t successful in your social life because your brain chemistry is different. Instead of getting in echo chambers that amplify your hate and desire for revenge, incel forums that blame Chads and Stacys, if you want to have any hope you need to actively get help on learning social cues.

I say this with compassion and hope. The problem isn’t external. You need to accept that you need help.

[–]celincelinNeeds to be taught not to rape 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No offense, but I don't need internet therapy. If the society doesn't care about sexually frustrated men's problems (which it clearly doesn't), they will go to those damaging echo chambers simply because those damaging echo chambers care -- that's all I'm talking about.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

He does needs help but sadly he is male and less likely to get help even in Canada where they prove women's health with more money than men's.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 13 points14 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

FFS do you always have to make it into some gender war?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, but it seems to be the only way to get help for men especially in regards to depression and that suicide. Two things that are increasing among men least in western countries with very little done about it.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

BECAUSE IT IS A GENDER WAR!!!!!

throws dildo at your head, bounces off

“Lol was that supposed to hurt?”

runs away

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Heh, I enjoyed this. <3

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

awakens in the night

“Wtf is that noise?”

pebble hits window again

“JFC we already got a restraining order!”

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women made it a war when they stepped out the kitchen.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]  (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]GridReXXThe "XX" in my name means I'M A WOMAN 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

She was a vegan animal activist. And yes those people are weird ☺️.

But it isn’t why she’s a failed mass murderer. She wanted her YouTube views.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

trans

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq. 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Idk what was her motive? I thought she was some sort of disgruntled employee or user?

Incel communities have an ideology they follow. It’s like a religion. Terpers are similar but less extreme, from what I’ve seen.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What about the youtube female shooter?

uh, yeh. "female"

not

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

She was obviously a female. She couldn't even kill anyone

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

While that's funny lol, it was a tranny

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't keep track of all the mental illnesses anymore 🙄

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't describe him as ugly. His eyebrows could use some grooming and let us be honest, some may have considered him less hot due to his ethnicity. He's not horrifyingly deformed or anything. That said, looks aren't the only aspect of getting laid; his mannerisms could've been nerdy/spergy/etc and that would've greatly helped reduce women's interest in having sex with him.

Will we see more incidents like this in the future? That's an interesting question. An interesting thing about this incident is that the perpetrator was not white by conventional definitions. It should also be pointed out that the last Incel-related terrorist attack, the Elliot Rodger killings, was perpetrated by someone who was half-Asian... this certainly doesn't fit nicely with the "privileged white males lashing out over losing their privilege" narrative that some on the left like to push as an explanation (sometimes for mass shootings in general).

We could make the argument that these killings are at least in part a consequence of contemporary/intersectional/tumblr feminism which creates an environment that encourages/exacerbates a lack of sympathy for men suffering from these kinds of issues, thus creating a radicalization effect where women/feminism become a priority target for retaliation... Indeed, I think Incel-type communities are pretty good examples of the same model of radicalization that the Quilliam Foundation uses to analyze Islamist radicalization... which basically says that Grievance (real or imagined, it doesn't matter) + Identity Crisis + Plausible (to the believer) Ideological Narrative + Charismatic Recruiter = Radicalization.

Since SJWs Always Double Down, the response will be "we need more feminism and more training to purge men of Toxic Masculinity," which in turn will heighten the sense of identity crisis and thus further contribute to radicalization. This isn't inconsistent with the fact that many people in the alt-right and related groups freely admit that they were radicalized by left-wing identity politics; the more extreme the SJWs get, the more people are radicalized in response.

Honestly I don't know, however, if this will 'get worse'. We've seen only two mass shootings related to Inceldom, and mental illness is clearly a contributing factor (Rodger had Asperger's Syndrome and I wouldn't be surprised if Minassian did too... Incels often have autism-spectrum conditions). I don't know if this is enough to constitute a 'trend' though since it is only two incidents and we can't really separate out issues of causality (how much was mental illness, potential side-effects of psychiatric drugs, incel radicalization, snapping after years of bullying, etc).

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

his mannerisms could've been nerdy/spergy/etc and that would've greatly helped reduce women's interest in having sex with him.

Yes in the other article linked he was diagnosed with high functioning autism, and described by classmates as being afraid of women.

We could make the argument that these killings are at least in part a consequence of contemporary/intersectional/tumblr feminism which creates an environment that encourages/exacerbates a lack of sympathy for men suffering from these kinds of issues

I would say it's more that a man doesn't have a safe space to say he is having trouble sexually and not be attacked or painted as a misogynist.

I mean in other countries in Europe they sometimes have programs where the government pays for prostitutes to visit physically disabled men, so I think America's puritanism might be at play here.

the alt-right and related groups freely admit that they were radicalized by left-wing identity politics

Right but alt-right guys, the real one's aren't lacking in women. They are more about general politics.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We could make the argument that these killings are at least in part a consequence of contemporary/intersectional/tumblr feminism which creates an environment that encourages/exacerbates a lack of sympathy for men suffering from these kinds of issues

I would say it's more that a man doesn't have a safe space to say he is having trouble sexually and not be attacked or painted as a misogynist.

These two usually go hand in hand.

I mean in other countries in Europe they sometimes have programs where the government pays for prostitutes to visit physically disabled men, so I think America's puritanism might be at play here.

Or gun laws, because incels sure as hell don't get state-sponsored prostitutes here. Also, I am under the impression that the nice guy-hate isn't as strong here yet - at least in Germany, we're still in the "wtf such a thing as incels exist?"-phase (seriously. Whenever I read an article about inceldom or "absolute beginners", it usually has some "explorer found a tribe of strange unicorns"-vibe to it).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry. A guy who meows like a cat, spits on his own shirt and talks to himself needs more than “a safe space” to discuss his sexual frustration.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes in the other article linked he was diagnosed with high functioning autism, and described by classmates as being afraid of women.

Exactly. That's why young men with mental problems should be locked up and kept away from society because they are too dangerous.

> I would say it's more that a man doesn't have a safe space to say he is having trouble sexually and not be attacked or painted as a misogynist. 

But there's a wonderful safe space for a man to talk about having problems, sexually.

It's called the Army. Just pick up all of these weirdos, send them to the Army, they'll get the guy laid fast enough.

> I mean in other countries in Europe they sometimes have programs where the government pays for prostitutes to visit physically disabled men, so I think America's puritanism might be at play here.

> I mean in other countries in Europe they sometimes have programs where the government pays for prostitutes to visit physically disabled men, so I think America's puritanism might be at play here. 

those men are men who are physically incapable of attracting women because of their physical problems, the only thing that kept that Canadian kid from getting laid was his mental illness, and mental illness does not disappear by getting laid, because if it did Ted Bundy would have never become a serial killer as he was one of the most attractive men in his continent back when he was young, let alone today.

This kid could have been taken by the hand and walked to a brothel, he could have been given a session with beautiful prostitutes, and chances are he'd still do what he did.

Rodgers was rich. Sodini was rich. Those school-shooting domestic terorrists are rich. They still aren't interested in fucking prostitutes. If it wasn't sex, if these guys had more ass than a stadium's toilets, they'd still go off over something else, like they failed to get all of the achievements in god of war or somethig.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah you're right, minassian was very much on the spectrum.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

We've seen only two mass shootings related to Inceldom, and mental illness is clearly a contributing factor

I would be surprised if all those school shootings were perpetrated by guys who regularly got pussy.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, but that doesn't mean they were all involuntarily celibate, or that it was romantic rejection that drove them to do what they did.

That said, more sex may indeed have dramatically improved their mental health.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

According to his mother, he had Asperger’s. He also spit in his own shirt, meowed in the halls of his high school like a cat and talked to himself.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that certainly sounds to me like a more extreme case of Asperger's than what Elliot Rodger had.

Much more extreme than me too, although I fully admit I am prone to talking to myself.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

So he had time to join an incel rebellion but no time to wax that unibrow? Ok.

[–]JezebeltheQueen5656Crushing males' ego since 1993 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you believe Alek was ugly or repulsive looking?

let's just say, if we were to pass by each other on the street, i wouldn't even notice him.

Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

yes, sadly, which is why i urge women to be alert and govt. to treat these males as terrorists. because they fcking are. terrorists shouldnt be negotiated with. nip it in the bud.

[–]SkookumTreeWhere do you want the ambulances? 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. Incel shooters are terrorists just like suicide bombers.

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My comment about loading up virgins in boxcars was hyperbolic.

Youre starting to make me wonder if you prefer it, so long as you think the people on question were "vermin".

I dont know if you're aware of what you're saying, but it scares the living hell out of me

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the gulf between men and women. For all their talk about achieving equality to us men, women will always find a place sitting on their back when the action begins.

[–]daveofmarsFor Martian Independence 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you believe Alek was ugly or repulsive looking?

I don't think he was ugly by appearance, but he likely had a ugly personality and attitude.

Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

Absolutely. This is only the beginning. As more people see these terrorist attacks, more Incels will be encouraged to do it. The same effect has been observed for school shootings - when the media shows a school shooter's name and characterizes them as a villain, the other would-be school shooters see them as an anti-hero and want to emulate them. It's a terrible positive feedback loop. The media has largely stopped doing so on that front, but here is a new anomaly, so they can't help but report on the way they have before.

[–]Vaca_SagradaFlawless Victory 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's astounding how these people lack the courage to speak to a single woman (Elliot Rodger admitted to never once in his life asking a girl out) but have the courage to commit a mass killing.

This speaks volumes as to how deeply we fear rejection as males.

[–]rulenumber303 2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

He's kind of average looking for a 40 year old, ugly-ish for a 25 year old.

We'll keep seeing these incidents (and not just about sexual issues) because apparently mass murder is one of the things thwarted dudes do when thwarted, but rest assured, a mass murderer who was not given the opportunity to reproduce is not a sign that the system of mate selection has failed.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Oh my fucking god, this is what I've been saying for the past hour. This 25 year old guy looks like he's 40, and even for a 40 year old guy, he's average looking. This guy was probably trying to bang women who were 18-22, like typically entitled unattractive men do, they don't pursue women who match them in looks or age.

[–]rulenumber303 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yep.

Just going on looks, if all else (sanity, wealth, status etc) about him was average, then with some effort he should be able to get a LTR with a very average 25 year old woman who has one major flaw. Fat, stupid, crazy, extreme butterface, old before her time, addicted, extreme spendthrift, infected with HIV etc... one major flaw. But obviously he was crazy as a cut snake too so that would mean an otherwise average 25 year old woman with at least (depending on if he had even more flaws than we know of) two major flaws would be his match.

If he insisted on only genuinely pretty but otherwise average girls a bit younger than him that would mean he had a gap equivalent to four major flaws between what he thought was his due and what he could reasonably expect. That's just so not happening.

[–]SkookumTreeWhere do you want the ambulances? 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He also had the social intelligence of a rock. That is much worse than slightly below average looks.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

balding, armenoid eyebrow life support system. in canada

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

balding 25 year old going on 40, mental problems up the nose, weird skull shape, and 0 social skills. Just a totally average guy in the eyes of the red pill men.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

weird skull shape

thank you. his armenoid skull stuck out to me right away. the refusal to understand the role of diversity in the dating problems of men in the unregulated multicultural SMP is making it extremely difficult to discuss these issues

he was in CANADA

[–]Vaca_SagradaFlawless Victory 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

So white males are more attractive than non-white males?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

in northern euro SMPs like the bulk of canada? to northern european women? i mean do you need that explained? in diverse multicultural SMPs the men actually sort out by the robust masculinity and T markers that travel with heir ethne. black and white men end up on top, asian and indian men end up on the bottom and all the other ppls sort around the middle depending on their rations and robustness. the MORE closely a man adheres to his noneuro ethnic phenotype (like this very armenoid looking man does) the less attractive hell be COMPARED to other ethnicities in the open, diverse SMP. its not platonic, its comparative. this is why diversity is extremely bad for men and good for women

[–]Vaca_SagradaFlawless Victory 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks. It was an honest question. I am spanish so I don't see how such a diversity plays out in the SMP.

My guess is that the chinese and indian men around here are struggling to get dates but I was never told that explicitly.

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 25, FDS ban count: 2[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (3 children) | Copy Link

Edit: This will be approved for now because I am sure some people here want to discuss it. I will be clear about this, this will be the only post this event that will be allowed, all subsequent posts on this topic will be removed. If this gets out of hand it will be removed.

Also a reminder: no “woe-is-me I am a poor incel”, as much as I love banning people, I do not want do it. Thank you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

The moderation team will discuss it.

ok thanks for considering it. I just feel it's more of a major news event.

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 25, FDS ban count: 2[M] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Okay, it is approved, there will be no promises it stays that way.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks,

[–]DarkLord0chinChin 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's face it, he's not very attractive, he is an aspie programmer so he's not charismatic either. Between the fact that programmers have little free time for productive hobbies and everyone being less social in general I can sort of see how this could happen

[–][deleted]  (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Proof?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Check when it was made and compare to the time of the attack

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Nice try:

Within minutes of learning of the attack and the suspect’s identity, Facebook took down Mr. Minassian’s account. The alleged attacker had posted praise for a mass murderer in the United States who was part of the “incel” movement – a women-hating collection of “involuntarily celibate” men in online forums and other sites frustrated by their lack of success sexually attracting women.

“This is a terrible tragedy and our hearts go out to the people who have been affected,” Meg Sinclair of Facebook Canada said by e-mail. “There is absolutely no place on our platform for people who commit such horrendous acts. We have found and immediately deleted the suspect’s Facebook account.”

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It was made 30 minutes after the attacl

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Buddy where is your proof? Do you work for FaceBook?

If not your making yourself look like a fool here.

[–]oihaoerhg 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why is it that anyone who questions if something is real from the news is a fool?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because if the company running the website states something is true and multiple people at that company confirm it it's true.

Unless you have superior evidence to Facebook questioning it is just coping.

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't exactly agree with the extremity of this title, but I agree with the general concept. Check it out.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 1 point2 points  (36 children) | Copy Link

Do not make this guy a martyr for the incel movement, he clearly had a mental illness and turned violent, who couldn't even drive and in no way a terrorist.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Do not make this guy a martyr for the incel movement, he was a retard who couldn't even drive and in no way a terrorist.

Um don't follow here? He pledged allegiance to the beta-incel rebellion.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Betas would fucking hate to be lumped in with the incels. Most betas are actually quite happy fucking their average frumpy gf once a week.

[–]Monkey_Jerk 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

He pledged allegiance to the beta-incel rebellion.

It's an internet joke that a mentally ill person took to heart. There's no such thing. You've been had fella.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 0 points1 point  (19 children) | Copy Link

So that's the your justification for changing the lives of 10 families forever?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

So that's the your justification

Where did I say anything is justified?

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy -1 points0 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

The fact that you are even connecting the two. With your train of thought if this guy was a Hello Kitty fan, we could also blame it on that. Wtf, he was sick and damaged, he killed people because he was sick and damaged, not because he visited some incel website. Rebellion? Give me a fucking break.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

The fact that you are even connecting the two. With your train of thought if this guy was a Hello Kitty fan, we could also blame it on that. Wtf, he was sick and damaged, he killed people because he was sick and damaged, not because he visited some incel website. Rebellion?

Buddy it's not me, it's the article.....

We know this because he told us so. On Tuesday afternoon, Facebook confirmed the authenticity of a post in his name, in which he pledged allegiance to something called the “Incel Rebellion.”

I don't get what your trying to say here, this is literally true.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 2 points3 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

You realize he's fucked up right? You realize there's no incel rebellion right? You realize that what you read in the news is not always true but usually has an agenda right? Use your fuckin' noggin' and don't read anymore into it than a fucked up guy killing people.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

You realize that what you read in the news is not always true but usually has an agenda right?

Unless you have proof multiple, credible news sources, and Facebook themselves are wrong I have no reason to believe you.

Yes he is obviously fucked up, but people do not spontaneously start doing these things out of the blue. We have to consider what he personally stated in his own facebook post.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

So you give credence to what mentally ill people say? So if he said Hello Kitty told me to kill people you would take it serious? Would you still post here about the Hello Kitty rebellion? Tell us what exactly your motivation is for posting this?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

So you give credence to what mentally ill people say?

Well of course. To what their perception of things are yes.

So if he said Hello Kitty told me to kill people you would take it serious?

Hello kitty is not a radical or cult like movement so this is a straw man.

Do you not believe that someone who is already mentally ill, can be influenced by spending large amounts of time in echo chambers where people like ER are worshipped or radical perversions of truth are discussed?

[–]quotient_isPurple Pill 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The Hello Kitty community doesn't regularly congregate to share violent fantasies and wallow in self-hate.

He was a fucked up guy whose issues were likely exacerbated by the echo chamber of hate he admitted to being involved with.

[–][deleted]  (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We need to talk about incels. They are becoming the most prevalent mass killers in the US

What?

There have been two massacres by incels motivated by being incel; Elliot Rodger (USA) and this guy (Canada). These massacres are hardly enough to make incels "the most prevalent mass killers in the US" (only one of them happened in the US in the first place).

I agree we need to discuss inceldom. I disagree with the idea that they are anything like the kind of systemic dangerous threat we find coming from Islamism.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

So inceldom is an ideology now? Perhaps we should grant religious protections next. Incels are going to glom onto this guy and use him as their next martyr "see, if I don't get sex I'll kill people!" and completely ignore the fact that he was mentally ill. Maybe the conversation that comes from this tragedy should be about mental health in this country or what's causing the rise of autism but that's boring and doesn't sell papers. What was the headline I saw the other day, "is it terrorism if you kill people because you can't get a date?", nice bit of sensationalism there. You can talk about it all you want and I can give my opinion all I want, my opinion is this post was low hanging fruit. I can sympathize with the Incels plight but you cross a line when you start killing innocent people. And you can fuck off with your amateurish personal attacks.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well then the secondary problem is lots of people have mental illness and do not commit acts of violence. He also flamed out of the Canadian armed forces in 16 days, he attempted to join in the last year or two. Be interesting to know about that. The good news is the bad ass TPS guy did not kill him so it is remotely possible we may in time get a few answers. Canada does not have the death penalty so there will be plenty of time for an army of whoever to interview him extensively.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it's a complex problem with many layers and no single simple solution. Mental illness is sad, the death of those 10 people is sad, seems like plenty of tragedy to go around nowadays.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Right now we do not know enough about this incident to even say whether it is based in mental illness or even connected to the incel thing.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

True, this actually turned out to be a much better thread than I was expecting.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 25, FDS ban count: 2[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil. Consider this a warning

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To late. You know incels love the internet.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Incels UNITE! lol what a load of bullcrap

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It was hilarious to wake up to 100s of comments lying about this balding, whey faced, beat potata looking, eyebrow life support system armenoid in Canada not being ugly

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

He's no looker, but the only reason OP asked about his looks was to relate that to his inceldom. Uglier guys get laid all the time, him not getting girls was a factor of his social weirdness, not his looks.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Most people are a little ugly. He could've landed a fatty

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not the uglinessfor a man, it's how you're ugly. Hes ugly in a foreign dorky beta potata way

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Incels scare me almost as much as feminists.

Why everyone so crazy? Should we just make pot legal so everyone can just chill the fuck out?

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]abaxeron✴️(Not Actually) Indian Programmer 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you believe Alek was ugly or repulsive looking?

No. He looks better than Stefan Molyneux looked in his best years.

Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

Absolutely. There are too many of us. I mean people in general; not men, ASD people or incels. All sorts of incidents will inevitably happen simply because of pure multiplication of probabilities and amounts.

I find it ironic that the incident happened merely around a month after the Canadian government has decided to dedicate separate funding to ASD research and intervention (for the first time in history, around 70 years after ASDs were described for the first time in medical literature; I don't want to say "gynocentrism" but I'm saying "gynocentrism"). I'm not speculating that autistic people possess an imminent threat to humankind, but there's no "if" or "maybe" here - this guy was severely mentally ill, and the dedicated educational program designed to help him - didn't work.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But he isn't ugly to the point where he is repulsive to any woman. I have seen Asians who look way worse than him get beautiful girlfriends.

The point is there is not some looo threshold these incels are actually below.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Automod is here if you want to move your comment:

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/8fhhs9/toronto_man_pledges_allegiance_to_incel_rebellion/dy3lpqj

I won't remove this one, but you might get more visibility there since lots of the late commer comments are getting collapsed now.

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin✡️🐈✡️ the purring jew 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

ill move it

[–]truedemocracy3Such An Asshole! 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol at this piece of shit. If he groomed his eye brows and spent time in the gym he could easily be a 7+ in the looks department. Incels are their own worst enemy.

Now for #2 - It's very possible. Physically speaking the majority of men arent attractive to women. In the past they've had economic status and financial security to offset this. Now that women can provide for themselves their dating pool is shrinking while the pool of sexless men is growing. Will they result in outward violence, inward violence, or just quit altogether? Who knows.

[–]YesICanWhoopUrAssRedskins 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Ten dead? No footage? Fake. Like the Elliot Roger event. Next.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ten people were run over by a van.....

Can you at least read the article? lol...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]YesICanWhoopUrAssRedskins 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

And Facebook deleted his account why? Because veiwibg it would have made tge fraud obvious.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Facebook deletes the accounts of all mass shooters.

You know you need to prove things....no one cares about your assumptions lol.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes I’m convinced we’ll see more of this. The hysteria around it will lead to people voluntarily surrendering their civil liberties for “safety for the children” and down th slippery slope we’ll slide!!!

[–]solorathain 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol what loser.

[–]ganso_bum 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

Obviously. Feminism and entitled women aren't going away, so of course some of the losers of their system are going to retaliate.

[–]Doom_and-Gloom 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. He's not hideous, but I certainly wouldn't describe him as attractive either. Ultimately, it doesn't matter though since as the OkCupid study demonstrated, any sub-8 man is basically Eggman in the eyes of women.

  2. The more men find themselves priced out of the dating market, the worse the situation will get.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sorry if I'm derailing, but I'm worried that this sort of thing could be very easily twisted to fit an agenda to fuel a power grab

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Twisted how?

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mydikishomofobik 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Time to start rounding up all of these potential killers. Put them in preventative custody.

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if this is a natural outgrowth of our participation-trophy culture? The SMV after all is merciless, and it may be the first time some young men have ever had to actually compete on their merits.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (19 children) | Copy Link

This is why blackpillers need to be identified(every guy above the weight of 160lbs with 15%+ body fat/ugly guys/5 feet tall guys) and rounded up and put in jail before they lose it and lash out. Look at those kids, Elliot, that old guy Sodini, and now this 25 year old guy.

They weren't ugly, they were in shape, but their mental illness still prompted them into doing what they did. If guys like this, with money, social standing and normal, average looks, end up doing this what can be said about men who are so ugly and obese they call perfectly normal men ''super chad'' and have no social interactions with anyone other than with the peopel they work with?

On a lesser degree, we have the middle-aged red pill men who insist wives owe their husbands sex, the guys who keep complaining about hot women fucking hot men and then marrying men with money, funny how they forget they gotta give something in return to get someone much more attractive than them.

Let's not forget that there like 200 million guns in the USA alone, privately owned by citizens. Women in North America are truly amongst the most courageous women in the world to deal with these weirdos.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Women in North America are truly amongst the most courageous women in the world to deal with these weirdos.

GMFB! Even with the insane number of guns in the USA -- the western world, and especially places like Canada, are the safest places women have ever known -- the safest in all history.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

It's still a hard world for women in the western world. Without even mentioning Africa, China, North Korea, South America and Mexico. But.. the red pill sub says women have wonderful and easy lives. WHO'S LYING TO ME.

[–]oihaoerhg 1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

They do have wonderful and easy lives.

[–][deleted]  (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]oihaoerhg 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I could easily make my life sound this horrible but I don't feel like writing that much.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Instead you should be using that time to join the Army. It would make a man out of you and you would learn about this simple truth.

A man isn't a man for being born with a pair of balls and a dick. A man is a man because women, children, and other men look up to him and admire him, respect him and want to be near him. that isn't achieved by being a 10/10 silly imaginary Chad red pillers have dreamed of to explain why they fail to find a mate making themselves appear to be blameless and powerless, let's just blame it on feminism and women's new-found ability to choose their own mates to cover up our fucking glaring flaws and defects.

A man is a man who does what is necessary to make the lives of the people he loves, the people who are part of his community, as good as possible. A man sacrifices and builds and protects. He doesn't go around whinning how fucking hard his life is, or how the other sex, you know the sex that brings life forth and carries it inside of her has a ''much easier'' life.

What is wrong with young men these days

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 25, FDS ban count: 2[M] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Can people talk at all without it being considered an attack, or we are supposed to talk between the pills with a dictionary of good manners as to not hurt the special people sensitive feelings?

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 25, FDS ban count: 2[M] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is primarily a debate subreddit, if you want to write a paragraph attacking someone, find another platform for it.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Alright. i'll start reporting everyone that attacks me. Get ready to have your hands filled, dude!

[–]PPD-AngelIncel Ban Count: 25, FDS ban count: 2 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you

[–]mydikishomofobik -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

For the most part, men are much more violent towards other men than to women. Attacks by men on women they don't know are exceedingly rare. (Attacks by men on romantic partners or exes are much more common).

[–]Willow-girlACAB (All Cows Are Beautiful) 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

This is not a totally new thing. About 10 years ago, a guy shot up the local LA Fitness here because he was frustrated over his lack of game.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

There you go! That is one of the major issues I have with the red pill, they claim men are wonderful and the best to happen to Mankind since goat milk, but it's men who are shooting up people because they can't get laid, not women.

Who are bombing shit in Europe? Young men with their whole life ahead of them. Who are school-shooting in America? Young men, with opportunities at grasp's reach, they give it up just like that, not only destroying their lives but the lives of so many other young people.

But as always red pillers are going to put the blame onto women. It's feminism, it's women's imaginary extremely high standards on men, it's more and more men not being able to get a girlfriend because they aren't 6 feet tall or they aren't Anglo-Saxon Americans, or they lacked a father figure growing up(and to spice it up, they say women kick out their husbands because they grow bored of them. Divorce is hella fun for women!)

Never do they blame men. I don't get it. 150 million women, of varied races, backgrounds, levels of education, levels of expectation, and these guys make it seem like they're sailors lost in some desolated island covered in magical mist where no women tread on, and no way of escaping the island exists.

I wonder how many young guys are like Sodini and Rodgers and the Canadian guy but they haven't done anything yet because they're afraid of the consequences. Reminds me of when I saw the news with my father and I asked him what on earth could a Canadian man have to be so pissed about to do what he did.

[–]oihaoerhg 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

it's men who are shooting up people because they can't get laid, not women.

women don't shoot up people because they can't get laid

women can't get laid

LOL WUT

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's this place, I heard it being called Avalon. King Arthur and his knights travel those roads. In the lands that surround Avalon, the majority of the average women look like this:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTViH27JLQUzI0uz2wH2SgIiUK698Yz9qh2ExQTMgGEU2W38uah

https://ifyouwanttobefree.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/img_2395.jpg

And the men are their equivalent, in the SMV, which means most men have no trouble getting laid, which can result in some women be ignored for relationships or even casual sex.

Why is that, my dear squire? Because when there are so many women who are physically attractive and have a high sex drive, and only expect a man to be average-looking -> http://www.fotothing.com/photos/b50/b5053284740fd9ea8625150debe5a91d.jpg and have decent spcoaç skills in order to bang, there are going to be women who can't get laid.

Here's a little secret.

Not every woman is an extrovert. I met a 4'10'' 80lbs girl who was pretty as sunshine on a summer day who hadn't had sex in 4 years, at the age of 21. She felt self-conscious about it and said, ''what do you expect me to do, approach men?''

See, the problem with men wanting women to approach them is that it's the 0/10s who want this because they can't get women at all, the guys who are normal, who are average, the men who are truly 5/10 feel that their masculinity is diminuished if a chick is to approach them, and of course they wonder what's wrong with her for her to have to approach. That means the girls who don't get approached - usually the really pretty ones -are going to have an easy time getting laid as much as Donald Trump is going to become a young, attractive man in the next 5 minutes.

There's shy girls who are attractive and feminine, but they haven't had dick in years because men either ignore them for the chicks with their ass cheeks out and a bright smile on their lips, or they approach these girls and get turned off with how awkward the girl is.

Back at the University I met like 5 girls who were from pretty to hot, all fit, and they were still virgins, and I met a guy who was only 5'5'' and 110lbs who got to sleep with chicks out of his league because he was the one who bothered to approach those girls, as the hotttttt guys had their eyes set on bigger fish, and there were plenty of average-looking men who were suffering from male hypergamy and only wanted to sleep with the hottest thots around.

Remember. Only 0/10 men suffer from thirst, that's the mark of a severely low value man, kinda like Cain's Mark, whereas Cain's curse repelled physical attacks onto his person, the thirst turns pussies into a desert as dry as the ones near Rgypt.

If red pillers were ever to visit the Iberian Peninsula they'd have a cognitive dissonance brain stroke so hard, what is this shit, attractive women who have a low N count and aren't at all fixated on Chad dick like red pillers who are stuck in the closet are?

IMPOSSIBLE.

BUT BUT THIRD WORLD COUNTRY USA IS THE BESTT!11111

[–]paccount112You're delusions are making me red 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You forgot your jack boots, sir.

[–]Neoprime -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Preach brotha Preach!

[–]fschmidt -1 points0 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

I can't judge his looks, but attacks like this have been happening for a while and there is no reason to expect them to stop.

I am a former incel and I wrote my thoughts about this event here:

/r/WhitePill/comments/8f1gkq/preventing_mass_killings/

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

> I can't judge his looks

You can't judge his looks? Why? You do have eyes, no?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (20 children) | Copy Link

Interesting post.

But what exactly is your idea here? There is some comment about you using back page or prostitutes ?

Did you escape inceldom by using prostitutes ?

[–]fschmidt 0 points1 point  (19 children) | Copy Link

No, I escaped incel by going abroad and getting married.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

Oh i see,

I have a few buddies in college who moved to China or Japan and found great wives :)

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 3 points4 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Congratulations on your buddies finding themselves a maid, sex slave, and babysitter to their kids.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

You have some serious issues...seek therapy.

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill -1 points0 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Yes, because men who have to move aboard to find themselves a ''good'' wife are perfectly normal and lack issues, dude above even said he escaped ''incel'' by buying himself a poor woman to marry him, he just didn't use those words.

You want me to believe women in his native Country have extreme standards in men and there's nothing wrong physically with him? Yes, that's right. That's why he needed to move to a non-western Country to find someone who'd fuck him. It has nothing to do with him having money to burn, and young, poor women being willing to get fucked by some very unattractive man to get it.

Or is he a strapping young Henry Cavill, Superman, and there were so many obese women around him and the poor fella just had to move to ASIA to find a feminine woman?

You have a brain. I advice you to use it besides giving it a go to watch Big Brother.

Remember, kids. Women in the western world are only interested in fucking 7 feet tall, 300lbs 1%bf super men with a face like Michaengelo's hairline and face, and with a 10 feet long cock. women in Asia are all feminine, beautiful, have a high sex drive and are down to fucking anything that moves.

They should start a business in Asia catering to white, severely below average young men who can't ge tlaid in their home countries. They could call it.

Third world desperate brides.

It has a nice ring to it doesn't it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Japan’s not third world, Hong Kong has a per capita income twice that of Paris.

Nice rant tho

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

Funny how you didn't mention China, where the majority of the women are poor as shit. Are these white guys moving to Japan seeking their little own KAWAIIIII TSUNDERE girl that is so in-love with the strapping white man?

Makes me wonder why they'd need to move to the other side of the world, leaving behind their families and friends just to meet women. Even in fucking Iraq, there are attractive women for attractive men to meet, even if they have go to through the religious channels or whatever to get them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I mentioned Hong Kong in an edit above.

Get out of Europe more homie

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ohhh Kaayyyy

[–]PrieneNon-Red Pill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

k

[–]prodigy2throw#Transracial -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure I predicted one of these losers would go postal when that sub got banned.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you believe Alek was ugly or repulsive looking?

I guess not?

Do you think we might see more of these incidents in the future?

Possibly.

[–]Vaca_SagradaFlawless Victory 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

He was ugly as a sin and lacking any testosterone-influenced traits in his face. He might as well has been an eunuch.

His father is far more masculine, if that is his father in the pictures on the internet.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do you let yourself become so aggravated?

[–]Entropy-7Old Goat -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I was born and raised in TO. I have been living in China for the past 5 years or so and this is just one more reason why I do not intend on coming home.

[–]Elmorean -3 points-2 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

What is not really talked about is white male rage. That's a bigger motivator imo than being an incel.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Armenians are white

Lol

[–]poppy_blu -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Armenians are an outlier by the US census definitions of race. They aren’t white (European, middle eastern or North African) and they aren’t asian, which the census limits to east and south Asian peoples. But most Armenians in the US consider themselves white.

[–]Elmorean -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice try you SJW.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Are you being sarcastic here? Neither this man, no Elliott Rodger is white.

Also black men commit far more violent crime than white men do. Why is this not talked about?

[–]Elmorean -1 points0 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

The Toronto guy is white. Most mass murderers are white.

Most black crime is black-on-black, and gang or drug related. If you're not in a gang or pushing drugs, you have little to worry. This is a fact. Reals > feals .

If you are minding your own business in public, or at school, or an upstanding citizen, and you suddenly get killed for no reason, chances are it was by a white guy. You won't ever hear this on right wing "anti PC" media though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

He's not white

[–]Elmorean 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You don't get to decide, sweetheart.

[–]poppy_blu 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

The term Caucasian comes from Southern Caucasus region (or what is now Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]poppy_blu 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

“the term "Caucasian" has often been used in the United States in a different, social context to describe a group commonly called "white people". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

All whites are caucasian, but not all caucasians are white. Armenians are caucasian, they are not white.

[–]poppy_blu 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

So then what do you believe they are?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Middle eastern, not white.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Your making up stats as you go along.

The statistics show that the 500 killings of white people attributed to blacks last year were the most since black perpetrators were determined to be responsible for the homicides of 504 white people nationwide in 2008. Last year's total was up 12 percent from the 446 recorded in 2014 and 22 percent from the 409 seen in 2013, a year that saw the lowest total this century and one that capped seven years of general declines in black-on-white homicides. Prior to that, 2006 saw the most black-on-white killings since 2001, with 573.

The 229 black lives taken by white killers last year, however, marked an even larger leap from 2014, jumping more than 22 percent from the 187 black victims killed by whites that year, which was the second-lowest total since 2001. The tally was last exceeded in 2008, when 230 blacks were slain by whites. The highest total in the last 15 years came in 2007, when 245 black people were killed by whites.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers

There is DOUBLE the amount of white people killed by blacks then there is blacks killed by whites.

[–]Elmorean 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

In your anger in rushing to copy+paste the first results in Google, did you ever stop to think...what are ratios?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Need to resort to ad-hominem huh?

The ratio wouldn't matter in this case, we are simply asking who is committing more crime.

And if you want to take ratios into account t hurts your argument. Since there are 3* as less blacks than whites, and there are twice as many blacks killing whites, that's an even higher amount in a smaller population.

Also the idea of black on black crime is distorted by only counting violent crime. Tons of college towns are filled with black on white muggings and robberies.

[–]poppy_blu -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think she means that when white men commit a mass murder, he’s “mentally ill.” When a black man commits mass murder (on the rare occasion it happens), it’s “their culture is violent.”

You just did it yourself.

When a black guy in Dallas shot a cop and said he was ispried by BLM, the right was “see, BLM is a terrorist organization”

When a white guy in Toronto says he was inspired by incels, it’s “he’s mentally ill/autistic/whatever.”

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I never claimed this man isn't a terrorist. Him along with any white passing or white men who commit mass murders are terrorists.

As a whole though if we want to designate what group is causing the most violence or gun violence it isn't white people, or muslims.

[–]poppy_blu 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So you agree that he was motivated by an ideology that encouraged violence?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh definitely, 100% agree. The incel forums are cesspools of rage ready to explode.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter