TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

57

Feminists cry that the media presents an unrealistic picture of women. This may be true but visiting a beach you would see much more women close to that "ideal" image than men that look like the guys on a superhero movie poster. Looking good for a women implies some genetic luck and some maintenance while a man has to have top genetics, put a huge amount of work and dedication. This may be controversial for some people but the human male doesn't even look impressive without steroids or other substances, no matter how much he trains. I know most women don't prefer muscular guys but the idea is that the "ideal" image (think Henry Cavill as Superman or Hugh Jackman as Wolverine) is extremely hard to get, even for genetically gifted men.

Even the image of the "average" man is deceiving. Humans have a lot of variability so you can be tall with a small dick, muscular but short, tall with a big dick but dumb as a rock, handsome but a drug addict, a really cool guy but doesn't last long in bed. A hypothetical totally average man will beat all of these men because he can't go wrong in any aspect so discussing about the "average" man is pointless.

There is a reason "Chad" is presented in a flawed way, it's because it's hard to get all things right. You can't spend time chasing women, get a ripped body and work as a university professor, life doesn't work that way. And today is easy to make fun of men for everything it seems. Asking for a tall man, with an average face that earns more than you might seriously limit the number of men for a woman and then she will wrongly think she settled for a "lesser" man.

Men aren't like that. Men don't care about income, height and other things. A man will not really care about how "sexually experienced" a woman is, it has no benefit to him. It seems men truly have preferences while women have requirements and this thinking can cause resentment towards their future partners (maybe a cause of the high rate divorce initiated by women?).

Not to mention that men are ridiculed even for daring to approach women, the standards are high even when simply initiating a conversation. You don't have to look like a "creep", it's ridiculous. You always have to do things right as a man.


[–]Ultramegasaurus44 points45 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Don't forget that women are allowed to cheat on their flaws a lot more than men, in addition to being less consequential in general. Women have makeup and a myriad of socially acceptable clothing and styling choices which conceal flaws and emphasizes good parts.

Men on the other hand cannot hide an ugly, pockmarked face behind makeup. Men cannot wear high heels to appear taller. Men cannot wear toupees to hide their balding. Men cannot wear anything similar to push-up bras. "Cannot" as in, it's not socially acceptable. These things are widely considered insincere and insecure, often even comically so.

[–]Archibald_Andino20 points21 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

"Cannot" as in, it's not socially acceptable.

Lol.

True. Judged harshly by someone in 4" heels, layers of make-up, hair extensions, dermafilllers, push up bra, Spanx, dyed hair, lip injections, etc, etc, etc.

[–]ContrasexualWomanPurple and Polyamourous WGTOW11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that would be the poster child for hypocrisy, wouldn't it.

[–]ContrasexualWomanPurple and Polyamourous WGTOW0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Well that would be the poster child for hypocrisy, wouldn't it.

[–]reluctantly_red-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes -- of course -- but it happens -- that's why its funny.

[–]ContrasexualWomanPurple and Polyamourous WGTOW0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Kinda sad, imo.

[–]eliechallita4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

There's nothing keeping you from using low-key makeup to hide skin flaws: that's the only way for actors and models to look like they do on cam, anyway, and most of the time you can't even tell the difference.

There's also a lot you can do with clothing to hide certain defects: A tailored shirt won't help if you weigh 400 pounds, but it can easily make a dad-bod look much better than it would while naked.

[–]sivariasMauve Dragovian3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

BINGO!

[–]sivariasMauve Dragovian2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men's fashion also hides the flaws.

You can easily hide being overweight as a man with a proper fitting shirt that doesn't tuck in and good posture.

I do now while I'm still losing my last few lbs.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

'scuse me, sir, men invented make up. for themselves at first, then it suddenly became ''unmanly''. oh, and heels too. then suddenly women were the ones who should destroy their backs and feet, not men anymore. cmon

[–]Nu_Guy4 points5 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

He is talking about social acceptability.

I would compare telling a man to wear makeup to telling a girl not to shave her legs and armpits.

Of course we can do it, but I don't feel it is accepted in our society.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

yes, indeed. however, if women collectively decided to ''stop lying to men'' through makeup, you'd lose your shite. ''unwomanly!'' ''wanna-be-men!'', ''thot begone!'' you'd lose fap material. tsk tsk

[–]Nu_Guy2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I disagree. If women collectively decided to not do those things, we'd eventually have no choice but to accept it.

A lot of women say they do those things for themselves and competition with other women.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

before you accept it, you'd do things I listed and some more.

A lot of women say they do those things for themselves and competition with other women.

doesnt change the fact it's men's doing; they just sit back and enjoy the cattiness.

[–]Nu_Guy1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

before you accept it, you'd do things I listed and some more.

Some people will have a harder time than others, but that's why I said eventually.

doesnt change the fact it's men's doing; they just sit back and enjoy the cattiness.

In America women are not forced to dress any certain way. You cannot blame men 100% anymore when you have the freedom to choose.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

In America women are not forced to dress any certain way. You cannot blame men 100% anymore when you have the freedom to choose.

so, are you gonna ignore the not-so-subtle media in all of its forms?

[–]Nu_Guy0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

so, are you gonna ignore the not-so-subtle media in all of its forms?

This is a deep issue, and there are many factors involved. I try not to ignore anything but I stand by my statement:

"You cannot blame men 100% anymore when you have the freedom to choose."

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

it's a ''damned if you do, damed if you dont'' trap. I dont wear makeup and deal w/ consequences.

[–]incelchad8 inches and thick0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why don't you ignore whats socially acceptable and wear makeup anyway uggo?

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Natural selection is a biiiaaaacth!

I mean, you don't see pretty and handsome people complaining about those things ;)

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian5 points6 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

I'm really handsome & I still complain.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

why complain, though, social justixe for other men?

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian5 points6 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Anyone with any insight can see it isn't sustainable & our cultures a complete shitshow.

During the war between the Greek gods & the Titans 2 of the latter group knew the gods would win & switched sides. One was goddess of wisdom represented by the owl.

  • only a fool thinks that we're producing healthy sustainable outcomes. But I supposed narcissism is what got us here in the first place.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

wait now, do i get what you're trying to say? people who don't complain about physical appeal being an unfair trait, are narcissistic?

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (12 children) | Copy Link

No, I'm saying that the general trajectory our societies heading in is disastrous & I don't care how many advantages I get from it currently.

We need a society that's more rational & fair.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

what's that got to do with the topic at hand?

society can still be saved if people start developing themselves individually and stop playing identity politics. ez pz.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian-1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

I don't think so. Things have gotten categorically worse in recent years. We need to rethink the decisions we're making.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

go look up statistics on global poverty within the last 20 years.

go see at what rate 3rd world country people are getting connected to the power grid.

saying what you just did, sorry, not very convincing.

the world is better than it's ever been before, right now.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Increases in base poverty isn't the same as a lack of instability. Our world is about as unstable as around WWII.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I mean... Attraction doesn't happen only towards the physical aspect. If your brain is rotten in nihilism, can you really consider yourself handsome?

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Not everyone is only driven by selfishness. Crazy right?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

aha. well, have you heard of the term "virtue signalling" before?

because that's what social justice or "thinking about others" and "being the voice for the less fortunate ones" is.

unless you're also really out there, practically doing something to make the conditions of such people more fair.

eager to see what you hallucinate for your next stunt!

[–]UnjustDuality24 points25 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]neomancr4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/81klxr/ok_cupid_studies_proving_how_women_have_much_more

So men have more uniform and higher standards.

Women have more general broader sporadic standards

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth28 points29 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

Grow up and be an adult about it.

Men like looking at pretty women and women like looking at handsome men.

The people with a problem here is not society at large, but the people who whine about it. So far that seems to be feminist women and incel men.

So that’s who needs to get their heads straight.

We shouldn’t join them (the feminists whining about unrealistic body image) we should beat them. Metaphorically of course. I’m not advocating taking a hammer to the nearest feminist.

[–]lezze[S] 14 points15 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

I like your way of thinking but this is a debate subreddit and I don't get all these "grow up", "just do X", they're just cheap remarks.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth10 points11 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Thats OK. I do lots of debate too.

But I'm also a red pill guy, and there is a whole aspect to Red Pill of "Stop with your bullshit and sort yourself out. The universe doesn;t owe you, or anyone, fairness" and that comes through as well.

Part of your post was talking about women crying to get the media to change itself to post less hot women. Lots of the rest of it was you complaining yourself that the media do the same with men.

Your title was that "standards are much higher for men than women".

Then a lot of the rest of it was whining about one aspect of this situation or another in a "oh woe is me, for I am a male, and this puts an unfair burden on me. Sob sob sob." way.

All of that has a solution.

It's just not a solution you (or the feminists for that matter) are going to like.

I gave it to you.

The view I'm specifically trying to change here is the "Oh woe is me, for the universe has conspired to make my life hard. My god, My god, why hast thou forsaken me ~rends garments~. Can someone convince me that my life is not harder than yours. Oh woe, oh woe"

The way to deal with that is not to enter into your frame of how this has to be somehow rectified... It's to tell you, from outside your frame.... Get over it.

Now you can get on with the rest of your life if you want to, or we can carry on discussing whether your whining is fair, if you want.

Thats just not going to help you as much as being told to grow up about it would.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They are. Go look. Unless it’s changed radically in the last 6 months or so.... there are lots and lots of comments on both TRP and MRP telling guys to stop whining and be a man about it.

A great deal of the interaction with noobs is telling them “This isn’t the universes fault, son. This is YOUR fault. YOU did this to YOU and now only YOU can dig yourself out of it”. Hyper-Agency. “The only thing you can fix is you, so get on with it”.

[–]the_calibre_cat-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure most Red Pillers here will concede that T.R.P. the subreddit is lost. P.P.D.'s bloops are redder than the whiners over there.

[–]lezze[S] 3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I am stating the facts as I see them for the sake of debating. If I say "California has a much higher earthquake risk than Texas" does it mean I'm whining? Facts can be discussed without caring what you and I do in our personal lives and whether or not they're fair.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

No.

But your post isn’t a bald statement of fact like that, you mention the females “whining” concerning the obverse, and your seeking people to change your view, and you’re hevaily implying if not outright stating the solution is to “change the world to be fairer”.

It isn’t the solution. The solution is to accept the inherent unfairness of the universe and get on with your life and acheieve your goals anyway.

Sometimes the sun IS in your eyes. Sometimes your “bad knee” really IS hurting. Sometimes the other team had the unfair advantage of just being better, or having a better field position.

You’re going to have to win in those situations as well as win when the field is tilited your way.

[–]lezze[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm not stating any "solution". I have no problem with men or women being presented unrealistically, it's all fantasy. I was trying to point out one double standard, that's all. "Changing the world" is an exercise in futility.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok, sounds like you’re reasonably happy with the state of affairs.

[–]cattermelon34ADHD medication is a feminist conspiracy1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

feminist man

Yes! Guess I'm not the problem.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth5 points6 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Do you support the movement trying to make the media use more realistic portrayals of men and women' bodies ?

If you do, you're part of this problem. If you don't, you're not, although if you're a feminist male you're probably a part of other problems.

[–]detanny2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

If you're talking about overweight people, that's a different story, but what's wrong with using more realistic portrayals of men and women's bodies in the media?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because realistically the average man and woman is overweight which is unattractive, and we want to see attractive people in our media.

[–]the_calibre_cat3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What's the problem with using ideal portrayals in forms of escapism?

[–]lezze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No problem whatsoever.

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The media won't do it because of money. Average people don't attract anyone's attention. We already know that women don't see average men as sexually attractive so that's a chunk of your audience gone.

For men, average is okay but they keep getting better results from slender, prettier women. They wouldn't do it if it didn't make them money. If they noticed the audience getting excited to see Average Joe and Josephine in movies, they would be super heroes in a heartbeat.

Most movies with average looking folk tend to be comedies because it's easier to laugh at dad bods falling around than a crotch with a six pack.

Until you find a way to change society such that women find average more attractive and men are throwing money at overweight women, Hollywood is going to keep offering it's most fuckable people to us. That aside, sport is big business and sports men and women tend to be physically attractive. Showing physically fit people being active or competing gets people interested.

Feminists concerned with a better representation of society are welcome to create their own media instead of asking billionaires to change their businesses to suit the minority who have an issue with it. But then they cannot complain when no one wants to consume their media. Money doesn't care about morality.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

People like looking at pretty things, and companies are giving them what they want.

Doing otherwise would mean imposing rules and guidelines where they are not wanted, in order to hinder the pleasure of a vast majority permanently, for the purpose of making a small minority feel better temporarily.

I say temporarily because if you’re getting your nose out of joint and making yourself unhappy because the girls on TV are pretty.... you are exactly the type of person who, if that was “fixed”, would go off and find something else to blame your unhappiness on.

[–]blarg_nah0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

lol I agreed with some of the things you said, but absolutely not this. Feminism (actual, non-cartoonish extreme "feminism") is the cure for a lot of society's ills, including what I think OP is describing here.

Recognizing what you said that both genders like looking at attractive members of the opposite gender is important; the realization that women are pretty much the same as guys in most ways is really liberating. That's what feminism is. I'm assuming (correct me if I'm wrong) you mean the kind of feminism that makes its way onto TumblrInAction, which if so I would agree 99% of the people featured there are goofy as fuck and need a reality check. But I can promise you average, everyday feminism isn't the poison I heard described in your post.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

lol I agreed with some of the things you said, but absolutely not this. Feminism (actual, non-cartoonish extreme "feminism") is the cure for a lot of society's ills, including what I think OP is describing here.

I disagree. I counted myself as a feminist for a long time on this basis, argued their corner on political discussion sites and so on. I abandoned them over the years because I increasingly became convinced this was NOT the case, they’d gone past demanding equality, and gone out into the sphere of “demanding special favours under the banner of equality”.

There was definitely a time when what you said was true. I was there. That period of feminism ended during the 90s and certainly by the 2000s. Now, under the hood, it’s “goodies for the girls at the expense of guys and fuck equality” even if the car still has big fat equality stickers plastered all over it.

Recognizing what you said that both genders like looking at attractive members of the opposite gender is important; the realization that women are pretty much the same as guys in most ways is really liberating.

Everyone likes to look at good looking things. Men and women are different in lots of ways. But looking at attractive members of the opposite sex is not one of them (despite the feminist protests that “objectification”, to use their term, is a strictly men objectify women affair)

That's what feminism is.

In so far as saying men and women are the same accross everything, that is what feminism is. And it’s one of the primary reasons feminism is wrong. Accross lots of very important things (but not looking at prett humans) men and women are very different.

We are male humans, and they are Female humans.

And we are not more “women with a penis” than they are “men who don’t have one”.

A lot of the damage caused by feminism stems from this root cause.

I'm assuming (correct me if I'm wrong) you mean the kind of feminism that makes its way onto TumblrInAction, which if so I would agree 99% of the people featured there are goofy as fuck and need a reality check.

That’s a pretty extreme example. But not just feminism on tumbler. I’d argue against feminism as it’s presented on TV, on feminist blogs, in female oriented magazines, feminism in general.

To use an analogy you might understand. Yes I’d argue the Nazis/alt-right are wrong, but I’d also argue the red hats and the trad cons and the pseudo-libertarians who “don’t go that far” but are ideological moderate supporters of the ideology the extremist supporters push to extremes are wrong as well.

But I can promise you average, everyday feminism isn't the poison I heard described in your post.

I know. As I say, I used to be loosely ideologically attached to feminism myself (as part of being a good lefty). I’m still on the left. But I don’t want anything to do with feminism anymore.

The tumblr feminists are the easy case. They’re the poison everyone can see as poison. The cyanide that kills quickly and obviously. Anyone can identify those.

The more moderate feminism is much more like lead, or Mercury, or arsenic.... something people wrongly believed had health benefits causing them to swallow small amounts of it... that poisoned them slowly and insidiously over decades in a way not easily detected.

[–]blarg_nah0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus Christ, that was a really well thought-out and detailed reply. I appreciate it.

I'm on mobile right now, so I'll try to come back to this tomorrow and put together a more detailed response.

[–]S1imdragxn0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

“Men and women are mostly the same” feminism is worse than tumblr feminism

[–]S1imdragxn0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

“Men and women are mostly the same” feminism is worse than tumblr feminism

[–]cattermelon34ADHD medication is a feminist conspiracy0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Out and proud, I guess

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Proud of what ? Goodies for the girls ? Tilting the already tilted field more in their favour ? Taking things from men in order to present them to women, like a cat bringing home a bird, in order to curry their (sexual?) favour ?

How’s that going.

[–]cattermelon34ADHD medication is a feminist conspiracy0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Tilted towards women? Cry me a river. Let's talk when women make on average the same as men and have the same representation in congress and positions of power.

"something something courts favor women and STEM"

Most of the people and power are still men. Including law makers, policy makers, and judges. They're the one's making that happen. They see women as weak and defenseless which is part of the problem.

Also I'm gay. soo

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Tilted towards women? Cry me a river.

Yes, tilted towards women.

If you take all the fields that are 70:30 men:women (like engineering) and make those 50:50.... yet you leave alone all the fields that are 30:70 men:women (like psychology)... you end up with an overall landscape titled towards women.

Let's talk when women make on average the same as men

Ok. Let’s talk universities, which are currently more female tilted in undergraduates towards women... than they were tilted towards men in the 1960s.

If that was the heyday of an “unfair tilt exposing sexism” in 1965 (when it was tilted towards men) why is it not today an “unfair tilt exposing sexism” when the ratio today is more women biased than the 1965 ratio ?

If that’s primae facie evidence of sexism. Why isn’t the current system as obviously sexist ?

and have the same representation in congress and positions of power.

And seeing as any woman can stand for Congress already... and voters should be free to vote for their candidate of choice (whoever that is)... How would you propose doing so without restricting voters choices to pick the candidates they deem qualified ?

"something something courts favor women and STEM"

No. Stats show education is massively tilted towards females. And whilst stem is still tilted towards men.... psychology and veteranarians (to pick two examples) are even MORE tilted towards women.

Where is the campaign to stop women entering psychology to “give the boys a fair shake” as there is for STEM ?

Or why don’t they just leave STEM alone, as males leave psychology alone. I’m as sure the men are as well qualified for stem as the womenare for psychology. So why are we tilting one field away from men.... but not the other from women... as,unless we do so, the overall landscape becomes tilted to women. As has already happened in universities in all western countries.

Most of the people and power are still men. Including law makers, policy makers, and judges.

They are. Because men sacrifice more to get ahead overall than women do.... and so in any extremely competitive field this is going to mean more men claw their way over the piles of dead bodies and get to the top.

They're the one's making that happen.

They are. By fairly outcompeting the women. Usually by doing 100 hour work weeks where the women only sacrifice 90 hours a week.

They see women as weak and defenseless which is part of the problem.

Maybe they do. Maybe when you do 100 hour weeks, and so get to the top you think all the people only doing 80 or 90 hours are weak, and you deserved to win because you worked harder at it and were “stronger”.

Also I'm gay. soo

And ? That gives you extra debating brownie points because...

[–]truedemocracy3Such An Asshole!0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

that's why feminism is led by ugly low SMV women. They are trying to flip the script and be judged on things men are judged for instead of looks. All sexual strategy end of the day

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Really? Emily Ratajkowski, Scarlett Johansson, Mika Kunis are low SMV women? Only ugly women care about reproductive rights?

[–]truedemocracy3Such An Asshole!1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

anyone that has to use celebrities to state their case doesnt have one to begin with

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's funny bc most TRPers love to use male celebrities as examples that men age like wine.

Most college educated women agree with mainstream feminist concepts even if they don't identify as feminists. In fact I don't even know if I would identify as a feminist.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this31 points32 points  (184 children) | Copy Link

This is pretty funny considering the women that were posted as "average" in the other thread were hot.

[–]crackrocksteady7Jason tell me what you're chasing55 points56 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

does hot just mean healthy bmi now

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this24 points25 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Considering the majority of women are overweight, overweight is average.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp19 points20 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

That’s an overall average of the entire population and it includes fat baby boomers, most young people aren’t that fat

[–]storffish7 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

average is still in the high-overweight range for women age 20-27 (just shy of 29 with obese starting at 30) which means half are at least close to obese.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Is it really? I thought that total population was like 1/3 healthy, overweight, obese, so i figured that it must be significantly better in younger people in less obese parts of the country (ie cutting out old people and Midwest/southerners)

[–]storffish2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

according to livestrong, ya. that's probably concentrated mostly in rural areas though.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

there are a LOT of VERY obese poor people living in trailer parks and public housing who skew the average for all ages and races.

[–]ShitArchonXPRFurfag autist|Too misogynist for BP|Too socially liberal for RP0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

You sweet summer child, have you ever seen the average BMI of Tumblrinas on Tinder?

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok but a few crazy outliers don’t make a trend

[–]ShitArchonXPRFurfag autist|Too misogynist for BP|Too socially liberal for RP0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

If they were a few crazy outliers, the gay dating pool would be as good as it was two decades ago. Ask /u/dranedry.

[–]dranedry0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The mentally ill ones were still closeted 2 decades ago and not in the dating pool. They came out due to the internet.

[–]ShitArchonXPRFurfag autist|Too misogynist for BP|Too socially liberal for RP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good point.

But they weren't nearly as obese two decades ago.

[–]Blaat1985-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

In the US of fatland.

[–]sivariasMauve Dragovian7 points8 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Under your definition the same could be said about the guys.

There were few if any non-overweight men. There were one or two overweight women (or three IIRC). It seems both sexes consider average to be decent looking and not fat.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.9 points10 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but women here routinely get accused of “apex fallacy”.

[–]the_calibre_cat10 points11 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

According to the data, women are squarely guilty of it. And, like, whatever, that's the way that it is, but Jesus fuck is it some raw-ass hypocrisy for feminism to have this moral outrage shaming squad policing men for being into hot chicks, while most of them must eventually come to the realization that to get any they're going to have to adjust their standards or be lonely.

Women face this far, far less often. Go for who you want, the fact that women think most men are butt ugly kind of sucks, but it's not that that bothers me - it's the bitching about how shitty men are for digging hot girls while being objectively worse about digging hot guys that's frustrating.

I literally had a feminist friend of mine tell me that she approached her current boyfriend at his job (cue the feminist outrage, "she's just being nice to you because IT'S HER JOB, YOU CREEP" had the roles been reversed) because she thought he was fine, and then had the gall to bitch me out in the next breath for saying that my preferences were for someone that wasn't fat. Incredible, just awe-inspiring hypocrisy.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The “data” isn’t realistic. Idk what the rest of your comment is about outside of anti-feminism tbh.

[–]the_calibre_cat5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The “data” isn’t realistic.

Man, that's a hell of a cop-out. I factor in blue sources into my arguments and opinions, even if they make a solid point in favor of blue - such as when blues point out men's higher rates of infidelity to counter red's absurd, childish insistence that men are totally honorable when it comes to women.

This is a pretty big dataset. Not entirely representative, admittedly, but to think that getting a large, statistically significant, representative dataset among women both on and off online dating sites would drastically change the curve (especially in light of the other - actually academic - studies we have that comport with this worldview) is pretty ridiculous, tbh.

I didn't call women shitty people over it, I just said it sucked, and feminism's hypocrisy on this matter is as clear as day.

Idk what the rest of your comment is about outside of anti-feminism tbh.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

By “unrealistic” I mean stuff like the OkCupid data isn’t necessarily how female attraction works IRL, surely you’ve seen this play out IRL?

In any event, I see a lot of comments alleging women here are guilty of “apex fallacy,” but few people point out the other side of potential bias, ie perhaps some of the posters here are guilty of “bottom of the barrel fallacy,” ie they think obviously unattractive men are representative of the “average man”. Is that not a possibility too?

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

By “unrealistic” I mean stuff like the OkCupid data isn’t necessarily how female attraction works IRL, surely you’ve seen this play out IRL?

Honestly, I feel like that comment that this girl I was hanging out with recently was pretty goddamn telling. As were other events in my life, such as my Chad friend, who's a solid guy but who women of literally any age just swoon over, that cued me into it. I work for it and have dry spells that last months or years. He walks into a bar, and a 50 year old goddamn woman with a couple drinks in her can't control herself. I don't think I'm ugly, but shit, what I think doesn't really matters where it comes to choosing a mate.

In any event, I see a lot of comments alleging women here are guilty of “apex fallacy,” but few people point out the other side of potential bias, ie perhaps some of the posters here are guilty of “bottom of the barrel fallacy,” ie they think obviously unattractive men are representative of the “average man”. Is that not a possibility too?

But you're asking me to believe that based on not potentially bad data (like the OKCupid set, which isn't perfect, but which I don't think is nearly as bad as you're alleging - and it is something), you're asking me to believe that on no data. There is no study that says what you're asking me to believe, and an abundance of studies that indicate that... yeah, women think most men are literelly below average in attraction.

I mean, I feel like "bottom of the barrel" would generally be comprised of obviously fat guys, with not necessarily disfigured but potentially chubby, unmasculine facial structure, etc - no purple or red male here posts such guys and proclaims them as representative of the "average" male. They post guys who are reasonably thin to maybe slightly overweight (not obviously so), not built, and don't have horribly disfigured faces or are overly short or anything. I feel like I'd probably qualify for that, I don't have movie star looks, but I'm slightly above average height and reasonably well built. If I went to /r/truerateme, I feel like I'd be lucky to get a 5.5, but I certainly don't think I'm worse looking than 45% of men.

Sure, plenty of the posters here DO suffer from ridiculous "bottom of the barrel" fallacy - no question, some go to an extreme and imply that you need to be Adonis to land a lady. That's hyperbolic, no question - but my argument has not, at any point, relied on posts made by purple or red posters here. It's all based on my own personal experience, that OKCupid data, and other studies from more rigorous, academic sources. That body of evidence does not cast a favorable light on the idea that women are innocent of "apex fallacy," unfortunately.

That just seems like one more of those things. I can't do anything about it...

...but that doesn't make it suck any less.

[–]auto-xkcd37-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

raw ass-hypocrisy


Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This comment was inspired by xkcd#37

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep and congratulations, I'm not arguing that.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Men will fuck below average girls anyway tho

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this7 points8 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Yep and those women will likely die alone because they aren't wanted for relationships by their looksmatch.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

That's not why they will die alone. More like they divorce their husbands then die alone

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Show me where unattractive women are more likely to divorce.

[–]the_calibre_cat6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean, women are absolutely more likely to divorce on the whole, and then there's those studies on women who get bariatric surgery and get thin - I just learned the divorce rates following that surgery are between 75-85%. 75-85%. That's just incredible.

Men are fucked up, sure, but this "women are wonderful" myth is hot steaming bullshit.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

but this "women are wonderful" myth is hot steaming bullshit.

Point to where I'm saying that.

[–]the_calibre_cat-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't say you said that, it was more a general observation about society's position at large.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I didn't say they were more likely. I said that's the main reason women end up alone.

[–]Lovemesometoasts4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

and you know this from...? or was it just a theory you made up in your head without any basis

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not hard to figure out if you just look around

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

Women have makeup which makes them artificially more attractive than they actually are.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this12 points13 points  (31 children) | Copy Link

Sure and the women who don't wear makeup are automatically unattractive due to that.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

That's not the point, it does drive up their "average"

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this6 points7 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Except that those women also had perfect bodies.

[–]crackrocksteady7Jason tell me what you're chasing11 points12 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Lmao. I see perfect bodies at the gym all the time, those were not perfect bodies. Skinny and plain is not a 10, just doesn't have the eye popping ratios

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And since 3/4 of women are overweight, tell me how skinny is not perfect.

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because when men post pictures of "average" women that are a size 0 and then turn around and slam women for having too high of standards, I think that's bullshit.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

You may want to look again

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

They we're basically all a size 2. You're tell me that isn't perfect?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Then you didn't even look at most of the pictures, which expecting the person who lived in an asian country, more or less depicted average women with imperfect waistlines.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

So a size 2 is average now? We're just ignore the 3/4 of women who are overweight and pretend the top 25% are average?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You didn't even look at the pictures in that thread, did you?

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

I personally think most girls look better without make-up. And not in bullshitty trying to make them like me way. I've had a few girlfriends and have compared them with and without make-up and they always look better without... do you really think make-up makes them hotter?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this3 points4 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

do you really think make-up makes them hotter?

I think guys do, hence the "make-up artificially makes women more attractive than they are" statements.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (14 children) | Copy Link

I'm a guy, though. A pretty stereotypical cis-gendered one at that. have you heard guys say they like girls in make-up more? I always thought make-up was like diamonds. Something that only exists because people believe in it.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

have you heard guys say they like girls in make-up more?

Nope, but I've seen men go after the women who do wear makeup time and time again.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I think that's more about perceived difficulty than attraction

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

I don't care the reason. "What what they do, don't listen to what they say."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

depends how you define "they". I don't like make-up. I tell my girlfriend to not wear it around me. that's actually what I do. If you're at a bar trying to get laid wear make-up because dudes will think you're easier. otherwise, I don't know where you're getting your "what they do" stats from.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap...8 points9 points  (89 children) | Copy Link

Most weren't.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this6 points7 points  (88 children) | Copy Link

You're joking right? Most of the top comments were women who were a size 2 or below.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (73 children) | Copy Link

Skinny is not hot. Just healthy weight

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this10 points11 points  (71 children) | Copy Link

Maybe not, but overweight is unattractive. Since 3/4 of women are overweight, you're only looking at the top 25% to pick the "average" from.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (34 children) | Copy Link

But overweight isn't natural. Looking at girls of a normal weight makes it easier to compare actual genetics

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe not, but it doesn't make the majority of women who are overweight just disappear to not be counted as part of the group of women you are picking them average from.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

To be fair, i think most people judge average based on who they typically date

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That makes zero sense. No one looks at a land whale dating an attractive guy and thinks she's average.

[–]GridReXXit be like that1 point2 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

Actually average size is natural.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

Nothing about the American diet is "natural"

[–]GridReXXit be like that8 points9 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

I’m not talking about America.

Size 2 isn’t natural for a lot of women.

Size 6 is more natural.

Even Europe’s thinnest women, the French literally stress themselves out with diets and scams to say thin. If it were so natural they’d be naturally not stressed about it.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Europeans are only marginally better on obesity than Americans. Problem for all westerners is the same, too much food and too little physical activity, sedentary lifestyle is not “natural”

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Still modern day problems. Look at old pictures, like really old, and not just the super rich.

I've seen lots of family photos dating back to the late 1800s, but mostly from the 50s. Everyone was thin and muscular.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Size 6 is more natural.

I'm a size 6, still overweight, so no.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually women are naturally fat. Chunky women were more likely to deliver healthy babies, survive famines, and make it through cold winters. Evolution has selected fat genes for women.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

chubby chasers do exist among men (the kind that only gets hard for fatties), but women who go for fat men do it for money or ego.

Chubby chasers are an outlier.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

they're just pressured into dating thinner women by society

Oh, it's totally okay if they don't want to take the skinny chicks and are forced into it by society! Are you for real with this? What does TRP say? Watch what they do, don't listen to what they say.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I remember coming across an article on r/MGTOW a couple of months ago which proved (based on porn consumption) that men would prefer fatter women, they're just pressured into dating thinner women by society.

As a guy who's pretty sure men are well ahead of women on looks flexibility, I think this is red hot bullshit

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn3 points4 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

Maybe not, but overweight is unattractive.

That's not exactly true. Overweight people who are unattractive are unattractive. Attractive people who are overweight can still be attractive as long as they aren't too overweight.

I've seen plenty of attractive "overweight" women.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

Attractive people who are overweight can still be attractive as long as they aren't too overweight.

That's a lie.

I've seen plenty of attractive "overweight" women.

You likely think these women are considered overweight because they aren't stick thin.

[–]thesalmonwhisperer2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

no it isn't. "overweight" can look a ton of different ways depending on how it's distributed on someones body.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Right... Than why do you keep putting quotes around overweight? Nobody has fat that distributes well. Most people accumulate it on their stomach first.

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

That's not true. Overweight is one tier of weight above normal - if you're one pound above what your height and agree say you ought to be, you're "overweight," but people probably wouldn't call you fat. Women can wear some of that weight well, frankly I think more women than men can do so - but there is an upper bound - and for all of our bitching, I suspect men (who easily receive more shit for being picky about weight) are probably more tolerant of weight than women are. That makes this particular feminist criticism straight hypocrisy. I know I have definitely seen more thin, relatively fit guys dating straight up fat women than the reverse - I can't actually recall the last time I saw a thin woman with a fat dude.

[–]thesalmonwhisperer0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

cause you can define overweight as literally undesirable or heavy for a height and weight like BMI. You can be overweight in boob and thigh fat. It doesn't all just go to the stomach for everyone.

[–]FuckYourselfUCunt0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

That's not true at all, women hold fat in their thighs, pelvis, buttocks and upper arms most of the time, men tend to store fat around the organs.

Obese men on average have less fat in their legs than women in healthy weight ranges.

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

That's a lie.

No, it's not.

You likely think these women are considered overweight because they aren't stick thin.

No, they were clearly overweight. Like this or this. This will never be "attractive."

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

How the fuck did they not gain any weight on their face? That's bullshit.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol I thought the same thing. Maybe time to rethink the "there's no way to wear weight attractively" premise...?

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

How the fuck did they not gain any weight on their face? That's bullshit.

No. It's probably genetics.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women one and two aren't bad. Not ideal, but I'd hit that. Ball's in your court, ladies.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Loneliness it is, then. I want good sex in my relationships, and I've maintained my body. I work out, I eat well, I cook, and I'm chasing my dreams - I don't think it's unreasonable to demand a partner who is least similarly caring of their body, and of reasonable maintenance.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Then you likely aren't average and don't have to settle for an average woman.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

And they say men don’t have demands, they just have “preferences”. Lol.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Demands, preferences, you're talking pure semantics. That's not a remotely useful observation.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Your snarky tone aside, I’m actually going to save this comment for the next guy that tries to make the distinction and argues with me about how men have preferences and women have demands, mostly because he’s biased against women.

Thanks!

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Feel free to. It's not snarky tone, you're holding this up like it's some kind of gotcha (missing the forest for the trees while doing so), and it's just not. "Preferences," "demands," what fucking difference does it make? Women objectively have more of them - and they're the ones who have a social movement to bitch at men for having literally any, when the data shows overwhelmingly that women are super picky while men are considerably more equal opportunity partners.

It is nothing less than unbelievable hypocrisy for feminists to sit there and bitch that men like thin, attractive girls, when men are beyond certainly willing to compromise on their preferences where women aren't.

That's my gripe. Call them demands, call them preferences, it doesn't matter. Men get shamed for having them, women get accolades, and that is some straight bullshit especially in light of the fact that men have less.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

never, ever settle. these miserable peeps want to drag u down

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish I believed that was an option for me, but the evidence suggests it isn't.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It may not be hot to you, but it is to others.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap...0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a 12 hour difference between you posted this and I posted mine. I concede that there likely was a great reshuffling in the thread between that time.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Body size doesn't automatically mean a woman is going to be attractive.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this5 points6 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

No, but it takes a serious butterface to make her not hot.

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, serious. If we're fucking and I can move her around and do all sorts of wonderful positions, good God it would take one hell of a fucked up face for me to be turned off. She'll still moan, she'll be light enough to pilot around the room/house.

[–]ShitArchonXPRFurfag autist|Too misogynist for BP|Too socially liberal for RP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Precisely.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, the problems women have, eh?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Either argue with my point or don't comment. But dont patronize me when you have nothing else to say.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

You benefit from an entire social order dedicated to solving your problems. I don't have anyone backing me up. Cry moar.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You benefit from an entire social order dedicated to solving your problems.

What are you talking about?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You've never heard of feminism?

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I think it would depend on your definition of "average." Average doesn't mean the "median" (or middle, which would be a "5"). Average means "add everything up and divide," which would probably land most "average women" somewhere around a 6, which is either on the high end of the "average," or on the lower side of "above average."

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Average means "add everything up and divide,"

I agree, but since 3/4 of women are overweight, that means the average woman will be overweight.

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Are they? Also, even if they are, who cares? Weight is more manageable than facial features and bone structure is.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Congratulations, that's not what I'm arguing. Men see skinny as being average when it's not. Ergo, their standards being too high.

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think "average" is being conflated with "attractive" here, which is related to preference. Something to consider.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Okay, so they're not talking about average then.

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Depends on what "average" you're talking about...

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh for fucks sake

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Did we even see the same thread? The posts at the top were average women

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this6 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Size 2 women with symmetrical features are average now?

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

When I read it the top post was a joke, the 1-10 chart was 2nd from the top and the poster said 4-6 are average, seemed accurate to me

The next post was an average looking girl who was a little overweight, and cute but not beautiful and not ugly

So yeah seemed alright to me

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

And when I looked it was all skinny chicks in the top comments. It's likely people changed their upvotes upon viewing my comment.

[–]aznphenix2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Eh, I don't think they changed based on your comment - you possibly came into the thred much earlier than others when it was still shifting or mostly sorted by new.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That is likely, or people changing their upvotes to spite me.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah maybe so

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Ya that's debatable. As what one considers hot can easily be average for another.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

So their standards are too high, which is exactly what we are talking about.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

How are their standards are too high when looks are subjective?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Because they think skinny is average when it's not. So when they're going for an average girl, they aren't.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It could very well be on a micro level for them. Some people live in places where the average woman is thin/skinny/etc. I happen to live in one of those places. You actually have to look for an overweight woman.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And that's fine, but that isnt at all what people are arguing down below.

[–]EsauTheRed0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

If you want companionship you need to get in shape and be your best possible self

You will inevitably slide during the relationship and neither of you will have great options

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you want companionship you need to get in shape and be your best possible self

No shit, what do you think I'm doing?

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, I'm thinking men likely have what is average skewed hotter.

[–]Salty-Bastardjust an excitable boy13 points14 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Welcome to the Burden of Performance.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Bit of an underestimate.

[–]Archibald_Andino2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Explain please

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic9 points10 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Everyone has high standards. Men just settle before women do because men are sexually thirstier.

[–]lezze[S] 19 points20 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Men simply don't have higher standards. Why would a man care about a woman's height? And most men also don't care about the woman being high status or rich. You can say both men and women have high standards when it comes to physical appearance but that's just one aspect. And there is also a big difference in how each sex sees each other, men rating more members of the opposite sex as average compared to women.

[–]Throwawaygrieves4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this is pretty inaccurate. One of the biggest drivers of income inequality has been the number of couples where both have high paying careers. There are more two doctor/two lawyer households than ever. Some successful men have trophy wives, who bring mostly youth and looks to the table, but lots of men with high standards /achievement are looking for similar ambitious women. Bill didn’t marry Hillary for her looks.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap...13 points14 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men care about essentially unchangeable facial features (eyes, cheekbones) and body bone structure which is a baseline requirement of having an optimal waist-to-hip ratio for a woman.

[–]storffish11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And there is also a big difference in how each sex sees each other, men rating more members of the opposite sex as average compared to women.

no no no, men rate more pictures of women on dating sites as average. because women take better pictures. you ever seen the crap guys put up on their dating profiles? blurry, friend cropped out, red eye, bad outfit, look fat for some inexplicable reason... compare that to women's perfectly posed selfies. even fat chicks look good on tinder.

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I do think men put a lot more weight comparatively on female appearance when it comes to attraction. Women who want to be with men eventually end up settling just as much as men settle for women. It's just that it does not come across as "settling" for men because they are so thirsty for sex that they settle very quickly. The existence of an "HB scale" among TRP is proof that men do have high appearance standards when it comes to women.

[–][deleted]  (5 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I meant more as settle into a steady sexual relationship rather than settle into marriage.

[–]ContrasexualWomanPurple and Polyamourous WGTOW3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Both men and women are told we are selfish, irresponsible, childish, "peter pans", immature, or stupid for not getting married and/or having children. At the same time, none of us have to get hitched when we don't want to.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]ContrasexualWomanPurple and Polyamourous WGTOW4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

We must live in very different subcultures then. I'm in a very Republican and Christian/Jewish area of the US.

I've never once been told my unmarried and childfree status is a good thing, by either family, co-workers, teachers, or strangers. The only ones who are understanding about it are my (male) friends, but even they don't outright support it...they think it's a little sad. In fact, my mother cried when I told her I got sterilized and I've been told by customers or strangers who strike up conversations that I'm going to regret my choices "someday". I'm 32 now, and have been told this since I was 16.

[–]theambivalentrooster9 points10 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Men set standards for women, women set standards for men. You could ask men to set higher standards for women instead of asking women to lower their standards.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men set standards for women, women set standards for men.

True. But each gender also sets standards for their own gender as well.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Good point. Just that men have standards, women have requirements/demands.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

No woman is forcing you to be what she wants. Ergo, not a demand. You either are or you’re not what she wants, and she can reject accordingly. Most men are just salty because they know they’re subpar.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Just like most women are subpar. That's why the only thing such women usually offer to a man is sex and her beauty, that's it. And those subpar males must offer much more, money, attention, care, security, being available, kindness, love etc. Subpar women think they "deserve" better. Subpar men think "they deserve at least any woman".

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Imagine how valuable you must be, to be able to just exist and get everything you want. You don’t even have to put out, you can just drop suggestive hints and pretend like you would. By definition, women, are never subpar. Way too valuable compared to the average man.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

yes, and that's where the problem is. Women do in fact feel they deserve better.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Because they do.

The world pre-feminism has been pretty shitty to women, probably from envy of the female inherent value and the desire to diminish it, so women don’t realize their own value. It is much easier to take advantage of someone when that person doesn’t know what they’re value is.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

would you rather women put out for subpar men like you?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, at least I do not put out with subpar women like you who rode CC and still claim higher moral ground.

[–]HarpyMasterSeasoned C.C. rider0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I never claimed high moral ground, there's nothing immoral in me riding the carousel. subpar males invented stupid morality to keep liberated women like me under them. I pity them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

"stupid morality"... ok.

[–]InformalCriticismProbably Red5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've said it many times before in this sub: the bar for a "good woman" to clear is indefensibly lower than a man's. It's our sex drive, mate - the more demand, the less spending power. Pure econ 101.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Not really. Seems a lot of physically unattractive men feel as though male beauty standards are impossibly high when in actuality women are attracted to average men all the times. Just not to ugly ones.

[–][deleted]  (6 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

They're attracted enough to average men so that they're with them. That's all that matters. Will she be as attracted to him on a pure raw sexual level or be just as into the sex as if she was with some Chad looking guy that TRPers homoerotically always goes on about?

Well no. We're genetically hardwired to be attracted to the hottest, fittest mates for reproductive reasons. And average men just don't quite fit the profile. Tough shit. But you know what? Most people don't think their partner is the hottest person alive and they still manage to find someone. So incels and TRPers should stop obsessing about Chad and concentrate on people at their level.

[–]Reed_49831 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some BP women have said they find their SO's to be the hottest guys on the planet, so I'll put my hope into that.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

The thing is, I had to move my ass, get rejected shitload of times, adapt and learn, for several years, before an average woman felt I was worthy enough. If women were attracted enough by average men, I wouldn't have had so much problem. Women are really just about "what can men offer me" which is why so much men are just bitter about how women are entitled. In a society where "how men are hardwired" is morally wrong and socially punishable, I find it pretentious for women to think the way they're hardwired makes things legitimate.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

The woman you're with, is she the hottest woman you've ever seen? Probably not (and even you described her as average anyway). Well, neither are you the hottest guy she's seen. It goes both ways. You don't get to complain about not being able to find a physically attractive partner when you're average yourself. Why should an attractive person sacrifice their own desire to be with someone they actually want? This goes for both men and women btw.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol did you just flip the entire subject?

This is about how women's standards are high, this is on the basis that average people get with average people. My point is that women expect more that average people and for average men to be even considered, average men have to bring in more value, give more of themselves, ect. Why should an attractive man sacrifice everything to get what he's worth when the average woman is given it on a plate, tell me.

why you talk like this is about getting attractive women, why do you flip the context?

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

that the "ideal" image (think Henry Cavill as Superman or Hugh Jackman as Wolverine)

Ideal image according to whom? Your examples are movies that are mostly geared towards a male audience. In my observation movies and series with an overwhelmingly male audience (especially action movies/series, violent/action videogames, and typically "nerdy" things) are the ones that feature the most handsome, suave, muscular/juiced up men.

Movies and series that are aimed at a female or mixed audience often feature men with more realistic bodies. Of course there are exceptions, and all men in movies still have gorgeous faces, but then again that goes for women too.

Men don't care about income

Men don't care about income when looking to hook up, or when most women they interact with have a similar income and social status as they do.

And yes some men, especially rich and powerful ones, use their assets to get the hottest woman they can find without regard to anything else. However, most UMC/UC men end up dating women with a background similar to their own. And a man at the high end of the middle class is still very unlikely to end up with a woman from a dirt poor family that hardly ever managed to make ends meet, unless that woman managed to get a college education and has worked herself up well into the middle class as well. Again, exceptions exist, but they're exceptions for a reason.

A man will not really care about how "sexually experienced" a woman is

Again, I'm not sure what world you live in, but most men do care. No man wants a girlfriend who has had sex with the entire football team in high school and another few dozen men in college. And while female virgins are romanticized plenty of men reject virgins because they do not want to be the very first, especially if the woman is past her early 20s.

It seems men truly have preferences while women have requirements

Men who are in a position to have requirements have requirements, so do women who can afford to have requirements. Everyone else has preferences.

TL;DR just because you don't have a standard doesn't mean that other men don't have a standard either.

[–]antariuszRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Here is a good example.

Compare :

http://fitnesshacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/taylor-lautner-workout4x5.jpg

And

https://goo.gl/images/MShUHr

Same person, only a few years different.

It’s not diet, it’s not skill. It’s not his “workout routine” that changed. He wanted to make millions of dollars by changing his body to represent himself as the sexiest he could possibly be. Steroids helped. You can see what his “natural” genetics look like in the years afterward. He’s still a good looking guy, but he isn’t going to have teenage girls throwing their panties at him with the dad bod.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

TL;DR just a mini-essay to explain why I think you're wrong and I'm right. Doubt you're gonna read it but it was fun to write this up, so whatever.

http://fitnesshacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/taylor-lautner-workout4x5.jpg

And

https://goo.gl/images/MShUHr

Okay, let's compare. First picture is taken to show off and have him look as good as possible. It's posed, he's probably flexing all his muscles, the light is very flattering, so is the angle. And is this a shit from Twilight? Looks a lot like it, so I'm gonna assume it is, in which case it's probably digitally enhanced, if only to make the shadows and highlights more visible thus making his muscles look more defined (I go to an art academy that covers cinematography, you can't tell me that a movie image vs a non movie image is anywhere close to a fair comparison).

The second picture is snapped at a moment the actor was not paying attention at all. No lights that make him look better than he actually does, no pose, no flexing, and the picture does not show enough to judge what his body really looks like.

So for a more fair comparison I'm gonna bring in a picture of my own.

https://www.google.nl/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4396708/amp/Billie-Lourd-PDA-filled-getaway-Taylor-Lautner.html

There ya go, click any picture to get into the gallery and look at pictures 5 and 6. If the date on your second picture is month/day/year mine were taken about 4 days after yours.

How familiar are you with how hobby bodybuilders look during competition season and how they look during off season? Because that's pretty similar to the comparison between your first picture and mine. If you have an eye for it you can tell that most, if not all of the muscle in the first picture is still there. He has just gained some body fat and he's not flexing, which makes him look way less impressive. And guess what? Gaining fat is 100% related to diet.

Either way, how is your example relevant to anything I said? That's a serious question, by the way. I said nothing about steroid use or diet or fitness routine whatsoever, I genuinely don't see why you felt the need to bring it up.

If you were trying to disprove

Movies and series that are aimed at a female or mixed audience often feature men with more realistic bodies

then you probably missed

Of course there are exceptions,

I already covered that the former statement was not a 100% always accurate universal truth.

But now you brought up steroid use anyways... do you actually have any idea how steroids work at all? Have you done any research on it? My guess is you don't and you haven't, because this statement

It’s not diet, it’s not skill. It’s not his “workout routine” that changed.

is total nonsense.

You don't just look like the dude in the Second picture, inject steroids and magically turn into the guy in the first picture.

Injecting steroids is gonna do jack shit for you if your diet and workout routines are not already on point, since steroids work by boosting someone's natural testosterone levels and enhancing muscle rebuilding, a natural process that occurs after extreme muscle strain, more commonly known as working out. And then I haven't even mentioned diet yet, without a proper diet you are not going to get a low enough body fat percentage to get a body that defined, no matter how many steroids you take and how much you work out.

Plenty of actors use steroids, but a lot of them do so because they can't possibly switch from their look for one movie to their look for another in time, unless they speed up the process artificially. Most don't juice to get unrealistically big.

Oh and besides, Taylor Lautner is not nearly as big as he looks he was 5'9, weighing 170 lbs with, I'm guessing, sub 15% body fat when the movie was shot. It's just the low body fat that makes him look impressive. The body fat percentage is going to take some strict dieting, but other than that these stats are very achievable for most men.

Okay, last thing I want to address:

You can see what his “natural” genetics look like in the years afterward

Genetics do not determine what someone's body is destined to look like, it only determines the outer limits of someone's look, and some characteristics that are unchangeable to begin with.

Bone structure is genetic, muscle and body fat percentage are part of an equation that genetics is only a very small part of.

Take two people of the same race, gender, age, and height, that both eat the exact same amount of calories and get the exact a same amount of exercise. Them both having different amounts of muscle and fat on their bodies is genetic.

Two men living entirely different lifestyles, one of them being toned and muscular and the other overweight, is not genetic.

I guess you get the picture.

And even if "natural genetics" were a thing you absolutely cannot tell what actors naturally look like without pre-acting career pictures (your guy weighed about 140 lbs at 5'9 before he had to up his game for twilight).

Something to prove my point, check out Christian Bale's changes in physique from 2000 to 2012 here: https://m.imgur.com/gallery/IYA2t

His looks in some pictures are more attainable than in others, but I can assure you that none of those are anywhere close to what he'd naturally look.

Source: been doing different sports since I could walk, got an interest in fitness at 15, did lots of research, went to a gym 4 or more times a week from 16 to 19. Currently working on sorting out my diet and setting up a workout routine again. Also some quick Google searches for pictures and facts about Taylor Lautner.

Edit: whoops, ended up writing an essay again. I should really stop doing that just to prove people wrong lol

[–]antariuszRed Pill Man-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

https://goo.gl/images/RWnVGg

I did read your essay. And I still think you’re wrong. The massive amount of muscle gain, in a short period of time, without any fat gain at all, along with the million dollar paycheck... that’s why it’s steroids.

And yes, he is in “the offseason” after the films. The off-season from steroid use.

Ok, it’s possible that the striations in his muscles are digitally enhanced (they aren’t), if this was just a random photoshot. But his appearance was like this throughout the movie, and cgi 8 years ago hadn’t advanced far enough to give him that vascular appearance full time over a moving image.

You seem to have created a “bullet proof arguement”

Women prefer natural bodies in movies directed for them, except in a few exceptions, which don’t count, because most women are not like that. Those movies aren’t “real” movies directed and marketed toward women.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The massive amount of muscle gain, in a short period of time

Your source to back that claim up being... what exactly? If you're going around making this sort of claims, be sure to back them up.

He had a minor role early in the first movie, didn't go walking around shirtless until way into the second. That means he had at least a year and a half, probably 2+ to get in that shape. And that's assuming he only started after being selected for the first movie, which is probably not the case.

Also, ever heard of beginner gains? You can get a lot out of them if you hit the gym start with a proper workout routine right away, rather than doing a lousy at-home workout for the first however long. My beginner gains were about 15 lbs in the first year of a full body exercise schedule and I'm a woman, was 16-17 at the time. If I can do that what do you think a healthy, late teens or early 20s man, who has 10 times or more the amount of natural testosterone that a woman has, is going to be able to do naturally?

By the way I'm not saying he's not using steroids, I'm just saying that if you're gonna make a claim like that you should back it up with logic and reason. Hell, I even acknowledged that he might have used steroids, I'm just arguing that he could as well not have . More specifically, I wrote this:

"Plenty of actors use steroids, but a lot of them do so because they can't possibly switch from their look for one movie to their look for another in time, unless they speed up the process artificially. Most don't juice to get unrealistically big."

I was pointing out that, regardless of steroid use or lack thereof, his physique is attainable for everyone who is healthy and does not have shit genes. It might take them a few years, but it's doable nonetheless.

his appearance was like this throughout the movie, and cgi 8 years ago hadn’t advanced far enough to give him that vascular appearance full time over a moving image

Come again? I think you're doing the thing again, the one where you make a claim like you know what you're talking about while you really don't.

Ever heard of or seen Avatar? You know, humans invading a planer, extraterrestrials fighting back, that sort of stuff. Pretty much everything about that was CGI except the human actors.

Production of the visuals of that movie started in 2006, the release was about a year after Twilight, in 3D nonetheless. So technically you're right, CGI wasn't at the level to artificially create the image of a vascular human. It was already miles beyond that.

Women prefer natural bodies in movies directed for them, except in a few exceptions, which don’t count, because most women are not like that. Those movies aren’t “real” movies directed and marketed toward women.

Those are entirely your words, not mine. You're not becoming more convincing by purposely misinterpreting what I'm saying.

I would argue more, but I'm making a pretty strong case and there is nothing more to say anyways, because my previous post already covers all claims in your last post.

I wrote you a mini-essay and you did not only fail to refute any of the facts I presented to you, but you just had to resort to twisting the one single argument that could be twisted. I'm guessing you did that in the hopes of discrediting me, but the fact that your only "argument" was an attack speaks for itself. Up your debate game, buddy.

[–]reluctantly_red0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

No man wants a girlfriend who has had sex with the entire football team in high school

Another red flag I ignored -- but to be fair it was really just the offensive line.

[–]Willow-girlSuffering from bovarian oppression0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not as offensive then?

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Overall, I totally agree with your post (which is why I gave you an upvote), except for this

Men who are in a position to have requirements have requirements, so do women who can afford to have requirements. Everyone else has preferences.

While that might be true in general, there is still a (moral) difference between actually doing something and hypothetically doing something under different circumstances. For example, a desperate guy could be willing to date almost any woman, while a normal woman will have much harsher standards on who she will date (because she can afford it). It wouldn't be right to criticize the desperate guy for him lamenting on women being picky, by saying "if you could afford it, you would be just as picky." The first thing is the woman actually being picky, the second thing is just someone making up a theory that the guy would be just as picky under different circumstances. That's a stark difference, and that should be considered.

[–]reluctantly_red10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

The big difference is the amount of effort required. A woman with decent genetics just has to eat reasonably well and buy a few cloths that fit well. A guy with decent genetics has to do that too AND he has to hit the gym AND he has to get the credentials and experience to make money.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]reluctantly_red3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But they don't have to. There are lots of guys who like fat women. Obviously not all guys like fat girls but enough do that fat women have no problem getting dates.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men loose weight more easily but only if they don't care maintaining their muscle mass.

[–]simcity400011 points12 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Looking good for a women implies some genetic luck and some maintenance

"Some maintainance" is underplaying the amount of shit women do, as well as how much it costs. You ever seen how much make up goes for?

Wheras, as a guy "doing your hair" means going to the barbers once in a while, no salon treatments required or expected. Doing your face means wearing moisturiser. A guy might have something like 3 sets of shoes (nice casual/smart/running shoes). You're not expected to pluck eyebrows or shave anywhere other than maybe your face (unless you don't want to shave there either). Getting a few scars or wrinkles around the eyes as you grow older can be seen as sexy etc.

The idea that many or even most men put as much effort into maintaining their looks as the average woman makes no sense to me. Women carry round bags full of tools in their daily life purely for aesthetic maintance - and partly because the clothes that look good on them have no functional pockets.

[–]ganso_bum4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Some maintainance" is underplaying the amount of shit women do, as well as how much it costs. You ever seen how much make up goes for?

To be fair, women aren't doing a lot of them for the sake of men.

[–]Willow-girlSuffering from bovarian oppression1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha, when my man starts getting shaggy, I hogtie him to a chair (not really) and run the dog clippers over his head. Last week he had a really long eyebrow hair that was bugging me; I mean, the thing was a half-inch long and stuck out like an antennae! He humored my desire to clip it short (no, I didn't tweeze it out, lol). So easy being a guy .... sigh.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

But I thought women did it for themselves and not for men?

Women wear make up because they don't want to attract men of their league, they want better, because if their higher standards.

Make up also mostly attract thirsty men, wife gets shitload of attention when she wears lipstick, not because it makes her more beautiful, but because it makes her sexually available.

[–]simcity40002 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Women wear make up because they don't want to attract men of their league, they want better, because if their higher standards.

That makes no sense. Your league is just the pool of “who you can attract”. If people find you attractive you’re attractive.

It’s not “who you attract when you put zero effort into your appearance, because anything else would be unfairly inflating your league”. There isn’t your “actual league” and your “inflated league”

Y’all are obsessed with the idea of “levels” to the degree it becomes nonsensical.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

You make no sense. By your logic I can basically wear a mask and appear more attractive and the women I'll attract will be of my league.

What's nonsensical is to be a potato and to expect a model to be attracted to you, and you'll achieve it by giving an illusion of beauty that you never had and will never maintain throughout a relationship.

[–]simcity40000 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

By your logic I can basically wear a mask and appear more attractive and the women I'll attract will be of my league.

If the women you’re attracting aren’t fucking dumb they’ll know you’re wearing a mask. (Unless we’re taking about some sci-fi transhumanist false skin shit) If they were somehow still attracted to you regardless then you must be doing something right. Maybe you’re funny as hell I dunno. Or maybe it covers up your horrific burns. But regardless if they’re attracted to you - then that’s your league.

makeup doesent transform a woman’s facial structure, it just maximises what she has. Guys aren’t dumb either and know women are wearing makeup. They factor it in to deciding whether or not they find her attractive.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Women and the perception of "funny men" is widely linked to attraction.

makeup doesent transform a woman’s facial structure

Hide skin defect, change eyes shape, change eyebrows shape and density, change face's perceived shapes. Hairstyle changes face's shape. Push-ups/padded bras gives impression of bigger and more beautiful breasts. ect ect... Some of these are sometimes not impactful enough to be considered that much of a bad thing, but some are just way too much.

And countouring... You know about it? Look at this example, she goes from average arabian girl to los angelas white hottie. Seriously this isn't the same face at all. It isn't maximising what she has, it's making it into something else.

The best boobs I've seen were those who looked the worst clothed on, the worst looking boobs I've seen were those who looked the best clothed on, all this is that much deceptive.

Guys aren’t dumb either and know women are wearing makeup.

Guys can know consciously that women are lying about their looks but it won't prevent their subconscious to still scream SHE IS GODLIKE OMFG. Just like you always do things you know aren't good for you but you still do them.

[–]simcity40000 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

And countouring... You know about it? Look at this example, she goes from average arabian girl to los angelas white hottie. Seriously this isn't the same face at all. It isn't maximising what she has, it's making it into something else.

There’s no way you could look at the final image and assume she’s not wearing makeup. And she’s already cute before, its just highlighting and maximising her best features. Already full lips become fuller, dark eyes become darker etc.

I’ve worked in beauty. There were some women I wasn’t attracted to except on days they did their ‘look’ in a certain way. That’s not “lie” attraction though. If you pop a boner, that’s a real boner.

Everyone has good days and bad days, looks which work on them and looks which don’t. Days they look a bit puffy and tired and days they don’t etc. Any prospective romantic partner factors that in. When you date a person you date their “look” as well, just like goth girls won’t be interested in you unless you have tattoos and big stompy boots.

There’s no “objective” valuation of attractiveness where you decree that a person is only ever as good looking as they are dressed in rags on their absolute worst day and anything else is a falsity.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

There’s no way you could look at the final image and assume she’s not wearing makeup.

And? If I just assume she's wearing skin correcter like most women I'll fall from very high when she removes it.

And she’s already cute before, its just highlighting and maximising her best features. Already full lips become fuller, dark eyes become darker etc.

She's not highlighting nor maximising, she's crafting a new face, she's creating volumes and curves that aren't even here. And even though, maximising something is still adding things that weren't there..... The difference is so much big that I can't even tell if she's arabian with the last picture only, while she definitively has an arabian vibe in the first one.

I'm not saying women should never use make-up, but there's a difference between correcting your everyday inconsistency and changing face.

There’s no “objective” standard of valuation of attractiveness where you decree that a person is only ever as good looking as they are on their absolute worst day and anything else is a falsity.

Facial features don't go away, your skin quality is surely inconsistent, but your nose doesn't grow bigger and smaller from day to day...... I've waked up next to the same woman for 10 years, if I wasn't into her natural face I wouldn't.

[–]simcity40000 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Facial features don't go away, your skin quality is surely inconsistent, but your nose doesn't grow bigger and smaller from day to day...... I've waked up next to the same woman for 10 years, if I wasn't into her natural face I wouldn't.

...thats my point.

Make up isn't some kind of trick because men aren't fooled. You factor how she looks with and without makeup in. Its not like she looked good with makeup and then you married her because of it but oh no you were bamboozled.

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

But your point doesn't address make-up that is meant to create features.

And yes, make-up is some kind of trick. Men aren't fooled but they're still sensitive to it because they cannot NOT be sensitive.

You factor how she looks with and without makeup in.

You would be surprised how that is difficult to do. White men in France are convinced arabian women have straight hair. Majority of them have curly hair, you gotta be married to one to know they straighten their hair after any shower, they never get out of their bathroom with their natural curly hair, straight hair being more beautiful is extremely strong in their culture.

Its not like she looked good with makeup and then you married her because of it but oh no you were bamboozled.

Women will make men believe they're more attractive than they are, once men are committed, they're less likely to break that commitment even if the mask partially falls. I don't know how to express this, it's really common, you don't want to throw away what you invested even if you got a bad deal... People all do this in all sort of shape, attract, make the other commit in a way or another, then reveal the flaws and hope it doesn't weight enough.

In the end, it's like men who pump and dump, eventually in both scenario one is deceived and has lost their time.

[–]NordJitsu-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

To look good men have to buy more expensive clothing (suits) and either shave daily or keep a trim and maintained beard. About the same maintenance I’d say.’

But men have to put way more effort into exercise.

[–]SubjectSchedule3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Suits? Seriously? Lol. Since when does anyone think men have to wear suits to be attractive? The answer is nobody thinks that, plenty of men are considered attractive in everyday casual wear as long it's clean, fits the guy, and doesn't have big-titted anime characters plastered all over it.

[–]NordJitsu0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I admit it depends on your local culture and profession. If I didn’t wear a suit every day with nice shoes I’d be a pariah.

[–]SubjectSchedule0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Where do you live? I have never heard of this before.

[–]simcity40001 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No one expects guys to wear suits outside of specific situations. For a college age guy even going around in a suit would be seen as weird.

[–]reluctantly_red-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The idea that many or even most men put as much effort into maintaining their looks as the average woman makes no sense to me

Its a whole different game for guys. Sure he may only have three sets of shoes but he had to put in untold hours of hard work to even get on the radar of a reasonably attractive girl (i.e. everything from the gym to medical school).

All she has to do is go the spa and/or mall.

[–]simcity40001 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Attractive girls don’t go to the gym?

All she has to do is go the spa and/or mall.

And what does she buy at the mall? How much does that cost? How much time/money at the spa/salon? What’s the average cost of skin/hair treatments? Who's the target market for the vast majority of the beauty industry?

[–]reluctantly_red-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

If you call that effort we're not speaking the same language.

[–]simcity40003 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You ever waxed your bikini line? Threaded your eyebrows? Bleached your moustache hair? You know what an epilator is? Ever bought hair straighteners?

It’s amazing. Red pillers claim to understand gender relations but when it comes to a question which anyone off the street could answer like ”which gender spends more effort on appearance” you flunk.

[–]reluctantly_red-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm aware -- I'm not an Incel -- I have lived with women. This is all stuff you have done to you at the spa (or the place in the strip mall if you're not that up scale). It takes very little effort -- just some guy's Visa card (I've paid for all this stuff many times).

And BTW -- I never understood the need for hair straighteners.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It takes very little effort if you are in the income bracket to go to the "spa" sure. You need to quit projecting your experiences on to ordinary women and assuming they all have some brah with a Visa card handy. Outside of suburbia with the SAHMs in the UMCs and Cali land it isn't like that.

[–]swegggz2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I agree, but I think that it's unfortunately just part of nature. If I remember correctly, approximately 80% of women and only 40% of men that ever existed reproduced. Natural selection seems to act through female choice, leaving low quality males with no luck.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

People always say that as if " natural selection" in natures the same as social Darwinism which isn't a thing.

[–]swegggz0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Social Darwinism is a thing. Evolution includes everything that could influence whether someone reproduces or not.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah. Both of those replies are inaccurate.

[–]antariuszRed Pill Man3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It’s somewhat shocking to me, as a 35 year old man at how mainstream steroids have become.

It used to just be a few, notable, movie stars, Stallone, Schwarzenegger. Now it’s roughly 75% of the big male stars. It’s just “accepted” that that’s how things are and if you’re a man, you adapt, you do what you need to do to compete.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Wow. That's pretty crazy. Also, it doesn't stop people are seriously desperate for this.

I severally underestimate how obsessed some guys are with getting laid. I showed my ex to some dude with money he was like "WHYD YOU DUMP HER!?" I said, she was crazy. He said "I would've had to put up with her crazy". The more I explained how crazy the more he laughed it off.

Dudes especially guys with money don't give a Fuck. They will do anything for a whiff of vagina.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

They just say that. If they were with actual crazy women I doubt they would stay calm for long... Take their "laughing" with a big big grain of salt.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I thought that for while. But as I meet more people in the successful realm. I don't think so. Guys will cheat the system, & invest unreasonable amounts of time & money into women.

I'm literally shocked by how far some guys will go just for an opportunity. Men twice my age will risk their careers/finances for girls my age I can't even tolerate listening to speak for more than 10 mins.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hm... fair enough. Then again, I'd say there is another type of "alphas", I call them betalpha, men who act masculine, promote it even with lifting etc (so mostly bodybuilders or just guys who are into lifting seriously) but with women they act like total beta chumps, they put up with anything and would shut you down instantly you said something bad or radical about women/relationships etc. Kind of like SJW alphas. But alphas only from first glance, appearance.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree.

Yea, Higher beta's &/or Alpha traits with Beta tendencies. I consider myself a Sigma I know natural alphas. But I'm not a spineless moron even if I'm not necessarily charismatically social. It's just crazy. Most men lie to build an image to get laid more than they actually spend time increasing their SMV. They're so invested in women it's completely insane.

Most dudes don't even want the girl they just want to conquer her.

[–]WestsideMoonWalker"That fucking WestsideMoonWalker boomed me" "he's so good (x4)"14 points15 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

while a man has to have top genetics, put a huge amount of work and dedication

Lol. Just don't eat unhealthy and gain a shitton of weight. You can weigh nothing and look well-defined as long as you don't put on fat.

This may be controversial for some people but the human male doesn't even look impressive without steroids or other substances, no matter how much he trains

So what you are saying is you like bodybuilders.

Even the image of the "average" man is deceiving. Humans have a lot of variability so you can be tall with a small dick, muscular but short, tall with a big dick but dumb as a rock, handsome but a drug addict, a really cool guy but doesn't last long in bed. A hypothetical totally average man will beat all of these men because he can't go wrong in any aspect so discussing about the "average" man is pointless.

Oh my god. You figured it out! Men are totally an amalgamation of various traits. How could I have known THAT? A true revelation.

Men aren't like that. Men don't care about income

Lol really? My girlfriend makes a significant amount more than me. It's pretty nice. Seriously though, I would never consider dating someone making a decent amount less than I do.

A man will not really care about how "sexually experienced" a woman is, it has no benefit to him

This is why super promiscuous men always end up with virgin brides, right? /s

It seems men truly have preferences while women have requirements and this thinking can cause resentment towards their future partners

If you like men so much, go date them. For real though, I have requirements too. Everyone does.

Not to mention that men are ridiculed even for daring to approach women, the standards are high even when simply initiating a conversation. You don't have to look like a "creep", it's ridiculous.

As a goofy socially awkward guy, I cannot say I have ever experienced this.

This is a literal shitpost.

[–]VermiciousKnidzzBlue Pill Man10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

feminists complain about not being able to pursue certain careers due to societal sexism, not being properly represented in the government, or the fact that that old dudes are deciding what women can/cant do with their own bodies

men complain that its too hard for them to get laid these days :P

[–]Reed_49832 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you are a sexual being, feeling sexually desired is a basic need to your well-being. It's not "fun" or unimportant if a person never experiences being desired.

There's so much one could argue about feminist goals, some are indeed important while others are questionable to put it mildly.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]VermiciousKnidzzBlue Pill Man3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

this sub is about gender dynamics and Red Pill.

OP talked about feminism in a way that misrepresents it so i wanted to note that.

this thread in particular is literally about feminism

And why shouldn't officials elected by the general population to represent them in the legislature, vote on bills which will effect their constituents

there's still a crazy bias against women that makes it generally more difficult for women in politics to be taken as seriously as their male equivalents.

either that or women stay out of politics because they actually enjoy having their access to healthcare infringed upon

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This may be controversial for some people but the human male doesn't even look impressive without steroids or other substances, no matter how much he trains

So what you are saying is you like bodybuilders.

You’re wrong here, I take part in a sport which requires a slim/strong physique, but even in this, all the top guys use PEDs and steroids. There’s no way even gifted people could match them naturally

[–]WestsideMoonWalker"That fucking WestsideMoonWalker boomed me" "he's so good (x4)"6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, I wasn't being totally serious. Everyone knows professional athletes juice at least somewhat frequently.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Just don't eat unhealthy and gain a shitton of weight.

You can gain weight from even eating healthy.

This is a literal shitpost.

Because you don't like the position taken here I take it.

[–]WestsideMoonWalker"That fucking WestsideMoonWalker boomed me" "he's so good (x4)"9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You can, but most weight gain is likely due to poor eating habits. The average American diet is loaded with sugar and carbs.

And eh, this is a textbook shitpost. I don't really take it seriously because it's silly.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol really? My girlfriend makes a significant amount more than me.

This just establishes that you, an outlier, care about women's income.

[–]Willow-girlSuffering from bovarian oppression2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll believe that when I see men cramming themselves into Spanx and getting bikini waxes. :-)

[–]mistercheeez-o____O-2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I will admit that it would feel like a luxury to have feelings for a woman, and date her without constantly thinking about not "fucking it up" all of the time.

At the end of the day though, It would be great if we weren't judged so quickly in negative ways, but I try and stay natural when I'm on a date instead of psyching myself out. Not an easy task, but I have had moments of brief success.

[–]goatismycopilot 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

The feminists ( fill in blank on stuff that makes you mad/sad/butthurt ) do this ( undesirable thing/make voodoo magic) that causes ( bad stuff/ pouty face/icky stuff) OP to link many things to make many generalities that are berry berry bad.

[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Gee it's not like feminism spent the last couple decades shitting on men. Why would any man take offense? So weird.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.

[–]NalkaNalkayou call it virtue, I call it cowardice4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol Woman certainly have become accustomed to privilege. They is why they shit on MRAs demanding equality.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

shitpost

[–]PM-ME-YOUR-STOMACH1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is something I agree with. Getting buff as hugh Hackman is almost purely genetics. For example there was a class I did in high school where it as just basically intense workouts every day. Me and 2 of my other friends basically just lost fat. One of my friends though, who I’m guessing had hypertrophy or something, got super buff in like one semester. For the thing with women and losing weight there’s also some genetics there, like where they lose fat first, and where they gain fat in general. It’s just calories in < calories out. I’ve seen the thing too that women like average men, but this is said by women and I don’t know what average is to women at this point, it’s completely all over the place. I’ve seen women say that 6 ft is average, 7 inch dick is average.

[–]NordJitsu3 points4 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

So I’m very decidedly not average. I’m 6’5 and 220 lbs. I’ve got low body fat and good muscle. I don’t look as muscular as Superman or Wolverine or Captain America, but I look damn good.

That said, I 100% agree with you. I’ve struck the genetic lottery and still have to work my ass off to get close the male “ideal.”

Women don’t even really have to exercise to achieve peak hotness. Just don’t be a fat slob. Eat a reasonable calorie restricted diet and do some light activity a few times a week. Your average woman can stay in shape just by eating right and talking a 20 min walk 2-4 times a week.

Now, some men prefer women who do squats (for the ass) or ab work (for a lean stomach) but this isn’t required for hotness the same way muscles on a man are.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman3 points4 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

No she cannot, for one thing the recommendation is 30 minutes a day not 30 minutes 2 times a week. Next "light" activity doesn't get anybody in shape, it can keep you from gaining more weight. The 30 minutes a day is the light activity, if you need to do a mix of high and moderate intensity cardio to get your heart rate in the proper training zone, along with some kind of strength training it does not have to be weight training, you don't know shit.

[–]reluctantly_red2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry but to actually gain muscle (without steroids or great genetics) requires heavy high intensity lifting. And even then lots of guys will never be more than moderately muscular.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I am amused because some lame chide down voted this? Damn some kidlet must be new. Oh is it Spring Break? I know I keep getting confused about when it is but whenever dumb people show up I just assume.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey unknown coward, keep down voting me and I will keep posting comments for you to down vote it will be a fun game. edit, I am not sure about this and mods will correct me but I am pretty sure I can say go fuck a porcupine as long as I do not name that person, right? So go fuck a porcupine, which if it is a clever it will easily escape.

[–]DarkLord0chinChin2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol take these upvotes goat

[–]throwinoutex-Red Pill, now Purple Man1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

He did say eating right though, and for women that is the biggest part. A nice body is mostly made in the kitchen. Because women aren't expected to have muscle or do much manual labor, they really don't even need to eat that much. But they still do overeat.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Eating properly is important. As for manual labor most men are office drones so they don't do much of that either.

[–]NordJitsu0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

The recommendation is that people get 30 mins of exercise 5 times a week. I’m not talking about what’s recommended, because that’s overkill to stay in shape.

Again, a woman who doesn’t eat/drink like a slob, has average genetics, and performs light activity for at least 20 mins 2-4 times a week will be able to maintain a healthy weight.

And maintaining a healthy weight is pretty much all girls need to do. Intense cardio and weight lifting are for the 1% of women.

[–][deleted]  (3 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]DarkLord0chinChin2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Point being? Are you hot?

[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]DarkLord0chinChin0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Right.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

No, you're wrong.

[–]DarkLord0chinChin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Muscles on a woman look repulsive if anything. Literally not eating too much is all a woman needs to do

[–]Ultramegasaurus2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The "men are the shallow gender with too strict beauty standards" is part projection and part apex fallacy.

Projection because it's women with the high standards and women who judge each other harshly, so they think men do too.

Apex fallacy because most women only care about a small minority of attractive men who can afford to be picky. The leniency of average Joe is frequently dismissed entirely.

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Okay, so let us pretend everything you wrote in this post is true. So what?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But then if women apply their agencies and preferences and don't view every single men as equally attractive some men will not be viewed as attractive! (/゚Д゚)/

And that's a Really Big Deal (/s).

For real though, some men are desirable some are not. Who didn't realize that? Seriously dudes, no one cares if you fail to meet some attractiveness threshold. Your problem. Deal.

[–]Mr_SmoogsThe 2nd most obnoxious poster here0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. But people don't give this advice equally to women, and not only the women on this sub.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Maybe women should stop complaining about the unfairly high standards set of them in the media ?

Or campaigning to have the media not depict such high standards of female beauty ... in the same way I don’t see men’s campaigns against “size 0 fit and muscley models”.

I’d say the answer here is for females to grow up, and act like adults regarding media depictions of female beauty in the same way the men (excluding the incels) take it like an adult and don’t complain about media depictions of men.

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

What does this have to do with what I commented?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

well it's a legit answer to

So what?

If you don't want those you can swap that question for something like 'it doesn't matter'.

[–]TheGreasyPoleObjectively Pro-moderate filth6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You said if what he said was true (men are depicted as unrealistically as women and also that women seek to change this on their side so why shouldn’t men) what should we do about it.

What we should do about it is recognise that fact... and when we meet girls saying “what should we do about unrealistic body images?” Say... “ignore it and grow up”... which I just did, but I’m pretty sure you won’t do.

That way the playing field stays level. And everyone (not just the gals) can look at pretty models.

And you can also (as I was about to do before I interrupted myself to write this reply) tell the incels to grow up and be adults about it too.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah Jordan Peterson's https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/851464151708950528 and his work in general is the sort of thing we need more of for the whole incel situation.

[–]Five_DecadesKnows what women want. Knows he doesn't have it1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women evaluate men on a longer list of traits than men evaluate women.

In some ways it sucks for men because women are more demanding, but in other ways it is a benefit. Even if you suck in some areas, you can compensate in others. There are more opportunities to prove value.

However for women, if you are low in fertility (old and ugly) your options are going to not be good. Men are evaluated on more traits, so there are more opportunities for redemption or building value.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Typically if you are a woman and you are old or ugly you are aware of this and you settle for what you think you can get and adjust attraction expectations. And that a man who is also ugly or is economically sub par or who has complex health issues, I know some couples who fit that criteria who are in pretty happy partnerships because they were realistic about themselves.

If you are a hot woman there is no reason to adjust expectations.

There are some disgruntled people who have a distorted view of themselves who need to get their shit together and understand their standards and expectations might be a partial explanation.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap...3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Warning. Warning. RoganJoshcel detected.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

What’s RoganJosh

[–]WestsideMoonWalker"That fucking WestsideMoonWalker boomed me" "he's so good (x4)"5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

a lamb curry dish. It's pretty tasty.

[–]philomexaIF THE POISON WON'T TAKE YOU MY DOGS WILL3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

boo hoo.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

handsome but a drug addict, a really cool guy but doesn't last long in bed

Yep, that's me

[–]MercedesBenzoAMGbringing percocets molly percocet back to ppd0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DrippyskippyMonk0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Overall I would agree. It takes a lot more work and good genes (something you can't change ex. height) for a man to look attractive. A woman has to stay thin and learn to use makeup decently.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

"Staying thin" is partially mediated by genetics as well. Otherwise that takes work as well.

[–]DrippyskippyMonk1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

"Staying thin" is partially mediated by genetics as well. Otherwise that takes work as well.

I agree with you that it does depend on your genes and being thin can be work if you have "fat genes". However, its generally more difficult and takes more work to build muscle than to lose a bit of weight and keep it off.

[–]A_Wizard17170 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Males have to compete for women whats new. buuuuut i get your point

[–]eliechallita0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Henry Caville is to the average man as Jennifer Lawrence is to the average woman, generally speaking.

If men don't care about many criteria regarding their partners, that says a lot more about men than it does about women.

[–]bagoonga0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no general set of standards because individuals vary. It's flawed to presuppose that there is one. The standards you list are not everyone's.

Looking good for a women implies some genetic luck and some maintenance while a man has to have top genetics, put a huge amount of work and dedication.

I would say this is true for me, but for some guys there are almost no standards and others want nothing less than fancy-looking (for lack of a better word).

This may be controversial for some people but the human male doesn't even look impressive without steroids or other substances, no matter how much he trains. I know most women don't prefer muscular guys but the idea is that the "ideal" image (think Henry Cavill as Superman or Hugh Jackman as Wolverine) is extremely hard to get, even for genetically gifted men.

Exactly, most women don't want this. This is a pop culture ideal that not everyone wants. Also, it's just as hard if not harder to have pretty much no body fat on a regular basis and not look like a heroin addict. When you're building muscle, the amount of calories you consume doesn't matter as much as when you're trying to stay at a certain weight and not be too muscular (the "ideal" for women in pop culture).

Even the image of the "average" man is deceiving. Humans have a lot of variability so you can be tall with a small dick, muscular but short, tall with a big dick but dumb as a rock, handsome but a drug addict, a really cool guy but doesn't last long in bed. A hypothetical totally average man will beat all of these men because he can't go wrong in any aspect so discussing about the "average" man is pointless.

Unless you factor in the standard they're being judged on changing for each specific woman doing the judging. Some women like small dicks, some like big dicks, some don't give a shit, some will date junkies, some won't, etc.

Men aren't like that. Men don't care about income, height and other things. A man will not really care about how "sexually experienced" a woman is, it has no benefit to him. It seems men truly have preferences while women have requirements and this thinking can cause resentment towards their future partners (maybe a cause of the high rate divorce initiated by women?).

Lol. I'm a guy and I care about all of those things you mentioned. In an SO I want someone making as much money as me or more because I'd rather spend my own money on my own stuff. I find heights between 5'3 and 5'7 most attractive. I care about their level of sexual experience, but mostly their recent because it doesn't matter to me (from a relationship standpoint) if someone was promiscuous years ago if they're not now. But it's something I want to know about.

I think you're just frustrated because you imagine most women's standards being higher than your own.

[–]AFuzzyMuffin-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fantastic post sim. It is one of the sad truths of being a woman.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter