The studies cited suggests otherwise. Additionally, there was talk from bloops yesterday regarding reading and studying academic feminists and how the radical and loudest (and often contradicting) voices within the movement are unworthy of discussion because they don't represent the movement or ideology.

At this point in time “feminism” is just used as a catch-all term by a lot of people to describe something that they do not like and a scapegoat. It is easy to notice how quickly someone is labelled a “feminist” or how something is labelled “feminism”? Wrote a Huffington Post opinion piece on sexual harassment? Feminist. You want men paying child support? Feminist. Colored your hair? Feminist. Alimony? Feminism. Dyed your hair? Feminist. Say anything negative about males? Obviously, feminist. This is just tilting at windmills.

The issue with attacking “feminism” is that, similar to most movements in the post-modern era, it has split into several sub-sections, “feminism” itself does not actually exist as an ideology, but rather there are different ideologies within the schools of feminism. The foundations for the ideas of feminism can be traced back over 200 years, people act as if these ideologies just spawned out of the ground one day. There is: radical feminists, liberal feminists, Marxist feminists, post-structural feminists, TERF-radical feminists, libertarian feminists, post-modern feminists, separatist feminists, intersectional feminism, anarcha-feminism and the list goes on. These all have their own unique ideas, goals, writers, leaders and people, so just saying “feminism” is effectively useless. An individual person cannot even be all the types of feminists at once, some of the beliefs contradict each other: sex-positive feminists and sex-negative feminists, intersectional feminists and TERF-radical feminists for example.

This "feminism" that everyone here is searching for, this united belief, this monster that is an amalgamation of news articles, it simply does not exist. Most of your posts are just news articles with your little commentary on these awful articles sprinkled with a bit of "feminism is bad". It is comically ironic that the staunch anti-feminists are more concerned with feminism than the actual feminists on here.

what is a more reasonable solution to the radical and conflicting messages young men are receiving?

I see an advertisements for fast food and fitness, users on here have called me both a "prude" and a "slut", if you get married your a "cuck" to MGTOW and your miserable to another group, how can you possibly win, there is contradicting messages everywhere. There is not some person called "feminism" telling you to treat women with respect and stick your fingers down their mouths at the same time, if you ever meet this "feminism" person, give me their address so I can personally give them a piece of my mind please.

the message young men are receiving

Have you ever been around a young man before? They can be quite awful and they usually hate listening to most people. Also, do you realize how many grown adult men do not even know what feminism is or care about, this idea that men are just listening to their feminine overlords and weening on their every word is so farcical in itself. Have you ever been around men? I mean not the males on The Manosphere who are all obviously simpy and neurotic, an actual man who is not some banshee screeching about feminism. As sensitive and gentle as men can be, they can be equally stubborn and unwilling to listen to anyone. It is so difficult for a lot of the users here to imagine a teenage boy or a grown man just not listening to anyone, this is really common, but probably not among the social circles of what a lot of users on here are in.

I look forward to your next post tomorrow, just let me know before hand if you will be using Salon, New York Times, Huffington Post as the vehicle for your half-baked rant so I can prepare a little.