TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

42

This is mostly a response to this post from earlier today:

Do Red Pill criticizers realize that most men at The Red Pill WISH it wasn't true?

What struck me as curious about that post is that pretty much all the RP posters who responded had some odd ideas of what constitutes as Blue Pill dating advice. To be more concrete many seemed to think that just because we blue pill sheeple believe in genuine, repectful and mutual relationships, we also think that as long as you are a nice guy™ you don't have to pay attention to anything else because women will eventually come to you due to your niceness.

That kind of idea is of course pretty stupid. Red Pill is not wrong when they say that many young men enter dating with wrong expecations of what is expected of them and have a hard time because of it. If you want to be in a relationship and aren't in the top 5% hottest men you have to work for it.

However TRP also completely overcompensates with their dating advice.

What I want to do is set things straight and share some dating tips that I as a blue pill man belive you can follow to be more successful in dating without entering the moraly gray to flat out disgusting area of some TRP dating advice and provide a counterexample to the "Hehe stupid blues think that women will come to them if they just wait enough" mentality.

1. Be proactive

As a man you have to do the asking out. If you are super hot some women might approach you but for the vast majority of men this won't work. So you need to be active and put yourself into situations where you meet and talk to women. This might be the classics of bars, clubs or tinder (though most studies seem to suggest they are a bad place to meet women for most men) or elsewhere like in some hobby, at school/university or work, during travels or wherever else you might meet people.

2. Be yourself

This piece of advice seems to get grossly misinterpreted by most of Red Pill.

What being yourself means:

You should not fake character traits or interests to attract a girl. Don't pretend to be super into some band just because your date told you she likes them. Don't pretend that you are outgoing and visit clubs and parties all the time even though you would much rather stay at home and read a book or play videogames.

Just be genuine about your interests and if your date does the same you will probably find some common ground. If you need to fake to find any common ground then a relationship would probably not be a good idea anyway.

What being yourself doesn't mean:

Being yourself doesn't mean you can't do anything to improve yourself. If you are lazy, don't properly take care of yourself, don't do sports, don't shave, and just sit in your room all day, those aren't character traits, but habits and bad habits at that. You are allowed to change those. You probably should in fact.

Also, if you are an asshole and make others in your vicinity uncomfortable you should probably change that too but that's more a matter of basic human decency than just dating advice.

If you are overly shy you might want to work on that too which brings us right to the next point:

3. Be confident

One of the basic tennants of TRP seems to be that women prefer assholes. This is of course bullshit but there is a reason why people believe it. Women for the most part (exceptions exist) don't seem to like men who are unsure about themselves in a conversation.

Of course one way to to not be unsure about yourself in a conversation is to not give a fuck about anything and treat everyone around you like dirt. This approach will in fact probably work better than stammering all the time or not saying anything at all, but it will also alienate and disgust a lot of people. It will also make you an asshole. You don't want to be an asshole.

The important thing is to go into the conversation being happy with yourself. How you achieve that is up to you. You might go to a fitness studio to improve your body image like TRP often proposes, start meditation, give yourself a 20 min pep talk in the mirror, or just adopt a more relaxed attitude to life in general. Whatever works for you really.

Another good tip is to go into the conversation with the main goal to have a fun time regardless of the outcome. TRP actually has some somewhat similar advice, telling you to be dominant and steer the converstation wherever you want. The thing is, women do not actually like being shut up about something they want to talk about. What they do like are men who are not afraid to talk about what they are passionate about instead of just saying whatever they think she will see as positive.

TRP are right when they say you should not constantly worry about what your date wants and instead steer the conversation towards where you want. However the important thing is to be pleasant about it and to allow your date to steer the conversation towards where she wants in equal measure.

4. Be aware of what women want

Women enjoy relationships and sex as much as men do, but their attraction works differently. Now, Red Pill often claims that women are only attracted to the top 20% of men and that every one else needs to use game to essentially trick women into thinking they are more attractive than they actually are.

This is partially right but also wrong. It is true that if you ask women who of a room of random strangers is above average attractiveness they will only point to the top twenty or so percent. However the reason for this is not that women are overly picky by nature, but that female attraction is not primarily visual based in first place, but emotional based. (This is also the reason why women usually prefer written porn focusing on emotions like 50 shades over visual porn like men consume it)

Unless you are rediculously hot a woman needs to get to know a man before she really starts finding him attractive. Thus if you want to ask a woman on a date unless she feels particularly charitable you'll need to talk to her and establish some common ground and mutual attraction before you ask her out.

Incidentially this is what TRP's "game" is all about, though in reality it doesn't have to be nearly as fake and manipulative as red pill makes it out to be.

There are essentially two components to female attraction, familarity and desire.

Familarity is really just stuff that you know about each other, common interests, common humor, essentially most of the stuff you would also find in a normal same-gender friendship. Of course at this point I can already hear you typing something along the lines of "Stupid Blue Pill if you do that you'll totally get friendzoned!", and yeah that is true but that is where the second aspect of desire comes in.

Female desire is to a large part derieved from mutuality. If you want a woman to become attracted to you, you need to show here that you are attracted to her. This is where many of the infamous nice guys™ go wrong. They are afraid of coming across as disrespecful or creepy and stick to safe small talk, but doing so signals their date that they aren't attracted to her and in turn she doesn't become attracted to them. To have a woman to fall for you, you need to flirt.

In contrast pick up artists make the opposite mistake. They focus too much on flirting, and don't build familarity at which point most women will dismiss them as creepy and only interested in sex (not tha they are wrong about that.)

Women don't want to be desired just for their body but also for their character. A woman wants you to see her for who she is and like her for who she is. This is why premature flirting comes across as fake and too late or too weak flirting will end you in the frienzone.

You have to ramp up your flirting with your familarity. The more you know her and the more she knows you, the bolder you can flirt, and the better you can flirt, because compliments build upon familarity will obviously be better than generic ones.


So yeah, that's it. Feel free to disagree with me or criticise specific tips.

I mostly wanted to to show that there IS some middle ground between sitting in your room all day and hoping for girls to like you just for being yourself and seeing women as fickle inferior beings that need to be manipulated into sex via pua startegies.

edit:

Many Reds have written in response that this is not really blue and that most Blues wouldn't agree with me. However so far I haven't had any Blues disagree with me on major points so I suspect that's mostly a "no true scottsman".

But yeah, if you identify as blue pill and think some of which I wrote is wrong, please tell me. Seriously, I want to know.


[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (83 children) | Copy Link

Women enjoy relationships and sex as much as men do, but their attraction works differently.

This part alone goes against a number of common BP beliefs that focus on egalitarianism to a fault

[–]Hellothere_111 points12 points  (24 children) | Copy Link

Well Blue Pill is hardly homogenous. Here on PPD all Blue Pill really means is that you oppose Red Pill in it's views. Which I do. Quite strongly for some of them.

As for the other opinions among BP, those range from hardcore SJW openly-anti-men feminists all the way to "Red Pill is bad because God and marriage" conservatives.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Well Blue Pill is hardly homogenous.

I didn't say it was universal. Just common. It is quite common for BPers to insist there are few or no differences between men and women's mentalities on the whole. This is a belief reflected in academia as well.

[–]Hellothere_18 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that is kind of stupid. It's pretty obvious that there are some significant differences in behaviour between men and women. However there is a big difference between egalitarian behaviour and egalitarian values.

It is pretty important that we as a society adopt egalitatian values, i.e. don't discriminate based on sex, don't try to press people into gender specific roles if they don't want to, and minimize gender differences in areas where they are social and not biological.

However that doesn't mean we can't acknowledge differences in male and femal behaviour where they exist.

[–]theambivalentrooster6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

It is quite common for BPers to insist there are few or no differences between men and women's mentalities on the whole. This is a belief reflected in academia as well.

Because this is used historically to restrict women in all areas of life.

Men and women exist on a spectrum and there is a lot of overlap between them. But there are also areas where there are general gaps between men and women.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Because this is used historically to restrict women in all areas of life.

Not an excuse to try and sweep it under the rug entirely

[–]theambivalentrooster5 points6 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

No, there is definitely an over correction especially in academia, but don't act like women don't have reason to be sensitive about tradcon normative values.

Men and women are NOT exactly the same are NOT all suited for exactly the same things. Don't discount women for their sex should be the baseline. Not 'men and women are identical'.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

You do have to discount them for their sex to succeed at dating

[–]theambivalentrooster2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I didn't. And I'm not the only one.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Want a cookie?

[–]theambivalentrooster2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You should keep the cookie and eat it when you eventually change your mind about women.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

That's dismissive.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

Can you give some examples?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Is there a specific comment? The first few say it's rediculous to think we're a blank slate

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Proceeded by "... but we can't make any general assumptions"

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well...that's true too. We shouldn't make general assumptions for an individual.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Men have to when dating

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Well you can have the general assumptions as a guideline but not as a rule, as any individual woman can defy an assumption or two and sticking hard and fast to assumptions can blow up your opportunities with those women. Calibrate and adjust as needed.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ctrl-F "Pinker" on that thread means it's garbage.

[–]newName543456went volcel1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well Blue Pill is hardly homogenous.

Not like RP is.

I've seen many conflcting ideas. It's almost as if some things worked for some group but not for others.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

As for the other opinions among BP, those range from hardcore SJW openly-anti-men feminists all the way to "Red Pill is bad because God and marriage" conservatives.

...no they don't.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man14 points15 points  (33 children) | Copy Link

Women enjoy ... sex as much as men do

No, they fucking don't.

In fact, I'd say that a major reason why TRP believes that women are going around fucking all the high-status assholes is because people (like the feminists and blue pillers who believe that men and women are the same in all kinds of ways that they aren't) mindlessly repeat that women love sex as much as men. But, men look around and say, "Gee, women don't seem to be fucking me or my friends or women are constantly putting the breaks on sex. The only logical conclusion is that they only fuck high status guys that are 9s and 10s. Hypergamy!" Women don't like sex as much as men. I wish we would shoot this myth in the head already. Women are massive cockblockers, which sucks because sex is one of the great pleasures in life. It sucks that women treat sex like they're rationing food in a famine.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are massive cockblockers, which sucks because sex is one of the great pleasures in life. It sucks that women treat sex like they're rationing food in a famine.

Lol what’s the alternative? Give sex to every Tom, Dick (heh), and Harry that asks for it? This is so dumb because if women weren’t ‘rationing sex like food in a famine’, you would all call them sluts. And hardly anyone would commit to them. Uhh nope, no way, hombre.

Imagine how ridiculous it would be, and how much heat I would get here if I started crying that men are massive relationship blockers and it sucks because relationships are one of the greatest pleasures in life and it’s terrible that men ration it so much and are so unwilling and hesitant to get into it. I mean, wtf? Honestly, all of this whining has got to stop.

[–]Hellothere_15 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well an important distinction to make here is that women enjoy sex differently from men. Men essentially enjoy sex for sex and nothing else. It's not like having sex with someone you love isn't better but sex with a random stranger is pretty good too.

For women this is different because the way attraction works for them is emotional so the idea of sleeping with a bunch of random strangers that they have no emotional connection with is not nearly as appealing to them.

Women also have a harder time getting into the mood for sex but that doesn't mean they don't enjoy it as much.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Men essentially enjoy sex for sex and nothing else.

This is false, there are many men who do not like sex with a stranger, despite the cultural pressure that tells them they should. This is also a myth.

[–]Hellothere_10 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So how many would you say there are? Because obviously there are the groups of men who are pansexual, asexual or just really low libido.

There are also lots of men who would not like sex with strangers, most of them some variant of the fact that they simply prefer deep monogamous relationships or would consider sex with strangers cheap but for that later group that's more a question of personal prefecences rather than the fact that they wouldn't enjoy it sexually.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's hard to say. Added to the fact that we as humans want different things at different stages of life. I would say excluding the asexuals but including LL men roughy 40-45%

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, they fucking don't.

Then you're doing it wrong. Women have significantly higher capacity to experience pleasure during a sexual encounter. More nerve endings, multiple orgasms, larger erogenous zones.

On an unscientific note they also seem (in my experience) to get more emotional gratification out of sex as long as the mood is right and their partner knows what he's (I'm assuming heterosexual sex here for the sake of argument) doing and can connect with them in the way they need - which is a skill that can be learned.

It does take more skill and time to give a woman the same amount of pleasure as a man, meaning a selfish or unskilled partner is more of a liability for them though. Greater risk, greater reward.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.4 points5 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Oh so sorry we aren’t men and our attraction doesn’t work like a man’s.

The only logical conclusion is that they only fuck high status guys that are 9s and 10s.

That defies reality. You only know “9s and 10s” who have sex with women?

[–]the_calibre_cat3 points4 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

You only know “9s and 10s” who have sex with women?

On the reg? Yes.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.3 points4 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

That’s insane

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

It's not, they have that option. The rest of us are most likely only having sex when in the context of a relationship, which seems on the level of... pulling teeth out of life's mouth.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.7 points8 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, no. I've seen too many regular dudes get casual sex and too many regular dudes having happy romantic LTRs to think only "9s and 10s" get sex.

[–]CatchPhraze3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most pick-up artists who make a living at it, aren't even 9's or 10's.

[–]ffapod 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Maybe your average is statistically attractive

[–]decoy88Black Male in London2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe your average is statistically butt ugly

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I like to say “maybe you have bottom-of-the-barrel” fallacy.

[–][deleted]  (2 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Could be my region. While I know an awful lot of blue pill/feminists/S.J.W.'s for being in such a red state, I also know that even among these people, somewhat socially conservative mores persist. So, while sluts have undoubtedly carried their species to every nook and cranny on the globe... there are probably fewer here, and those that are here, probably select for more attractive men.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Hi, I'm a 6 or 7 on a good day, usually a 5 or less because I'm kind of a slob, and I get laid a lot. "On the reg", so to speak. Now you know someone. I am upfront that I am not "a relationship person", and I am just available for sex and/or friendship, and women still want to bang me.

Guess what? Looks don't matter as much as you think.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Now you know someone.

No, I don't. You're an anonymous person on the internet who I already know has a vested interest in protecting the blue pill narrative. This is like the furthest thing from a credible anecdote from someone I know.

I will say that I don't think looks are everything, but they're a lot - more than women imply that they are, too.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Okay, so get to know me. I'm a wierdo, but I promise I'm a fun guy and it couldn't hurt to challenge your worldview a bit.

What would convince you? References? I'm sure I could get several of my FWBs to agree to talk to you to confirm everything I'm saying if only for the sheer weirdness.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

...but I promise I'm a fun guy and it couldn't hurt to challenge your worldview a bit.

I challenge my worldview all the time.

What would convince you?

That looks don't matter? Literally nothing, to go all Ken Ham on you. I'm not a lookist, I'm not saying they're the be-all, end-all, but I am saying that they are a significant variable. I've experienced far too often with friends of mine who are either taller than me or who have a near-movie star face.

References? I'm sure I could get several of my FWBs to agree to talk to you to confirm everything I'm saying if only for the sheer weirdness.

Really, man, it's okay... I appreciate your dedication, I don't know what my issue is. Actually, that's not true, my issue is "I don't have nearly enough women in my social circle" and "I certainly don't look like I bring much to the table with a 30 year old car and living with roommates" etc. I'm working on these things, but they're not gonna go away overnight.

And I suppose I could probably make these things be non-problems, but they do nag at me pretty often - when I'm out sometimes I'm reminded of the Joker's use of the old anecdote in the Dark Knight: "I'm like a dog chasing cars, I would have any idea what to do if I actually caught one!" It's like that with women for me... would I take her to my place? Okay, it's reasonably clean but it's not, like, the sexiest pad... it doesn't have super modern IKEA furnishings and cool colored walls and shit, it's pretty boring. Clean, but boring. And then my car? Fuck, that shit is probably an instant turn-off, and that shit matters, man!

I'm not a Chad. I do okay with women, and I would like to do better, and I certainly recognize that a lot of it is attitude and the way one carries one's self... but a lot of it is also looks. There's just no getting around that.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not a lookist, I'm not saying they're the be-all, end-all, but I am saying that they are a significant variable.

You literally said that you only know 9's and 10 who have regular sex.

If you started with "they are a significant variable" no one would have disagreed with you. Looks matter, just not nearly as much as most guys think. I try to look good, especially when I'm meeting someone for the first time or going out somewhere, and I'm sure it helps, but at best it gets your foot in the door. Most of the time it has less to do with being smexy and more to do with being a visual indicator that you care and can take care of yourself.

I do okay with women, and I would like to do better,

Are you interested in my opinions on this? I've been pretty much where you are and I might actually have something helpful (or maybe not), but I don't want to dump unsolicited advice on you if you're just venting.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

You literally said that you only know 9's and 10 who have regular sex.

Regular casual sex, yeah, I'd stand by that. Hell, at least where I am, I feel like even they have to work for it a little.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women like and want sex as much, but have more prerequisites to enjoy sex.

They are also more skeptical of those prerequisites being met, therefore cockblocking strange from average guys. However when women feel confident all their preconditions are met (eg in a healthy relationship), they often crave sex even more than their male partners! I know a lot of women who wish their husbands would fuck them more, but just because they crave sex doesnt mean they want some random incel to give it to them. Whereas husbands who arent getting enough sex have no qualms paying hard-earned money to some low-value toothless crack addict just to get off.

Men have fewer preconditions to enjoy sex, so have a hard time understanding how women could crave sex yet still not put out for low-effort from some random incel.

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

women like sex with men she's attracted to

[–]sketch1620000 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women enjoy ... sex as much as men do

No, they fucking don't.

This. Most people seem to ignore the vast difference between liking sex and liking sex on par with men.

Do women (in general) like sex? Yes.

Do women (in general) like sex as much as men (in general)? LOL No.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Did you mean to reply to someone else?

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you mean to reply to someone else?

Sorry, I read the quote. I thought that was your comment.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia3 points4 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Can you show me anyone who said that attraction works the same for straight men and straight women? The idea that straight men are attracted to women and that straight women are attracted to men seriously isn't controversial. That's simply what being straight means.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

If attraction differs that means men and women's brains also differ.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

The idea that their brains differ isn't controversial either because that's the basis for why we believe in transgenderism. We simply don't believe that these differences explain everything just like we don't think that the differences between the brains of gay and straight people means that gay people shouldn't be doing straight jobs and should be forced to design fashion instead.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

It's only acknowledged in regards to transgenders. Otherwise it is not spoken of

[–]Hellothere_14 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I think that's because most people don't think it's controversial. Heck, even feminists regularly complain that men are pigs for being attracted to certain kinds of women. They couldn't do this if they didn't think it worked differently for men and women.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Heck, even feminists regularly complain that men are pigs for being attracted to certain kinds of women. They couldn't do this if they didn't think it worked differently for men and women.

They can. They just attritute this to cultural factors instead.

[–]Hellothere_12 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well to be fair we can't completely regard all current differences between male and female sexual attraction as biological since there deffinetly are cultural differences involved too, that are almost impossible to single out and dismiss. Granted, most of it is probably biological but scientifically proving that would be difficult.

However, ultimately that doesn't even matter apart from scientific curiosity. Fact is, that whatever the cause, these differences do exist and that you need to adjust your dating behavior accordingly.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

these differences do exist and that you need to adjust your dating behavior accordingly.

Why should one adjust anything? Doing so anyway is just going to make you attract someone you likely not mesh with.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Heck, even feminists regularly complain that men are pigs for being attracted to certain kinds of women.

Feminists bash male sexuality all the time.

[–]the_calibre_cat3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We simply don't believe that these differences explain everything

That isn't true, you regularly assert that these differences explain little to nothing, which is why you instinctively react to disparities in given career fields with the certainty that it must be "discrimination!" as if that's some kind of proof positive of evil being done.

[–]Alth12Purple Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Then why the controversy over the Google memo? Granted he misinterpreted some research, but some of the conclusions he drew are actually pretty interesting on the back of it.

Eg. Psychological profiles show on group projects women trend towards egalitarian cooperation and men towards an individual group leader and the rest deferring to him. Research also shows that the leader is more likely to get promoted or favourable reviews from bosses.

His conclusion from that and looking how companies often operate was that they currently set up rewards such as promotions to reward individual excellence. That this age old system is inadvertently holding women back, so companies need to work out ways to reward cooperation more.

So far from companies not promoting women due to sexist men holding the women back, the truth could be that companies just aren't recognizing women's achievements because they simply aren't set up to recognize their skill sets.

I'd say that's a useful perspective to have on the gender debate in the workplace. Yet even that got roundly dismissed.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

I’ve seen “just treat me like a person, why does gender even come into it” countless times on Reddit

[–]Hellothere_12 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Well for conversations on reddit the biological differences between men and women aren't all that relevant so if you treat someone differently on reddit for their gender that probably IS sexist.

Some more context might help though.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp2 points3 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

No I’ve seen that as dating advice

“Just treat me like a person what’s so hard”

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Because whatever trend in differences men or women have its not enough to predict and theorize an entire personality of a perspective man or women. It's as stupid as thinking "Men like sports. So I'll talk to all guys about sports, and then they'll like me" Some women do actually think this btw. You can apply that logic to NPC's in a game but not real people. We're too complex.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

It isn’t that way at all tho, the way you relate to a woman in the early stages of dating or a hookup is completely different from how you relate to almost anyone else

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

the way you relate to anyone in the early stages of dating or a hookup is completely different from how you relate to almost anyone else.

"Dating" has its own social conventions that vary between cultures. And even in that there's not too many hard restrictions because of its extremely informal nature.

A one size fits all mentality is often counter productive when getting to know a person. Being adaptive is the best way to be.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

So then I’m not treating them like a generic “person” then am i ? Do you actually believe that dating conventions are not gendered?

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Huh? What? I never said that. Of course dating conventions exist. But they are loose and can be broken at any time with no fierce repercussions (and they often are).

I was explaining the sentiment behind..

No I’ve seen that as dating advice “Just treat me like a person what’s so hard”

[–]Hellothere_10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah okay.

Well most people, male or female, are usually pretty bad at introspection so that's not really a surprise.

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm a feminist blue piller, and I don't see a lot of blue pillers deny that women and men's attraction works differently

we just don't like it when TRP says that women's attraction or love is shallower than men's

[–]larrythetomato10 points11 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

One of the basic tennants of TRP seems to be that women prefer assholes. This is of course bullshit but there is a reason why people believe it. Women for the most part (exceptions exist) don't seem to like men who are unsure about themselves in a conversation.

Where is the second part of that tenet? Women will prefer an asshole over a pussy....

Now, Red Pill often claims that women are only attracted to the top 20% of men and that every one else needs to use game to essentially trick women into thinking they are more attractive than they actually are.

This is not quite right. The claim is that 20% of the men get 80% of the sex. Game is not about tricking women, it is more the language of social society and thereby seduction.

Overall you are confusing the old school PUA movement with RP. I recommend reading the sidebar at RP (don't waste your time for the regular threads, about 95% of the top 1000 posts are trash). PUA did lay the foundation that later became the RP school. A bit of a history lesson.

As far as I know, the first book that sparked the PUA movement is the Mystery Method. There is actually really interesting theory behind the Mystery Method, but of course the methods themselves are laughably old fashioned. It is a good book, read it, learn about the core of the courtship dance, then laugh as Mystery proposes methods to try and get around this dance. You probably do the courtship dance automatically, but it is interesting to see it laid out in writing.

The PUA movement fizzled after a while because many men are interested in longer term relationships, not just casual sex with club sluts. The problem with pretending to be high status is that you can't keep up the charade forever. And high quality women do NOT tolerate insincerity. RP was born when people realised that instead of pretending to be a high status man, you can instead become a high status man, this is more sustainable, and it also has benefits outside of sex. On reddit, there are the Vanguard posters, who post really important analysis into the social landscape. They created the amoral space where most of the useful parts of RP was formed. This attracted a bunch of people. At this point, you have to be quite smart, open minded and sceptical to be come on, at this point most of the theories could be the ravings of conspiracy theorists. There is no popular mainstream support or the equally valuable mainstream infamy. Few people knew about it.

Eventually it grew and grew onto the point where 'normies' wanted to see why everyone was crying about. At this point the posts started getting shitter and shitter. Because of how powerful anger is, and the structure of reddits upvotes, short angry ravings get pushed up, and useful theory gets drowned out. This is kind of the current system (at least it was a couple of years ago when I stopped reading daily). It hasn't and I don't think it can change from here. If you want to get any value from RP nowadays, read the sidebar, and a couple of the blogs. Most of the threads are useless, and unless you already know the theory, you won't be able to discern the differences, making it a waste of time.

[–]Hellothere_111 points12 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I did read the sidebar which is where most of my issues with TRP come from.

The biggest offenders I see are:

but there is also lot's of smaller stuff that I find pretty problematic.

If all that TRP did was giving sexually unsuccessful men advice and the push needed to improve yourself I wouldn't have any problem with that. But it's not.

TRP indoctrinates you into a power dynamic with rational, sensible and caring men at the top and irrational, manipulative, fickle women at the bottom who need the guidance of a dominant men to achieve happyness in life.

This world view is not healthy, I have yet to see any scientific evidence for it and it's all over the sidebar so you can't claim it's only because of recent users. That's my problem with Red Pill

[–]larrythetomato4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If you have some time, we could go over one in detail.

For example in the first, personally I don't like his writing style but he makes a important point:

Women are utterly incapable of loving a man in the way that a man expects to be loved.

This is actually a important and ugly truth. There is a thing called maternal love which you mostly get from your mother. I think this might be the purest form of love that can exist. It is actually unconditional, it is warm, loving and comforting. Boys get this for a certain time, then suddenly lose it, and may never get it again.

Many men are looking for is that same feminine, maternal love. Women are incapable of loving a man in this way as well as loving them in a romantic. She can't do both, she isn't wired that way in her brain. The modern meme of "I'm not your mother" is an expression of this problem

The second post is a model. This is what that guy thinks is the best way of managing relationships. I haven't tried it so I can't judge on that aspect. However the language is harsh. It is up to you whether you use civility as a way to dismiss arguments.

The third post, again I have a feeling you disagree because of the harsh language again, because there is an important statement there which (I'm paraphrasing): Women reach full maturity at around 18 while it takes men until around 28, and women mature faster than men, while they both tend to reach different levels. There is no judgement here. There is no implied "haha men are more mature then women therefore we are better". This statement is what it is (according to the author).

If all that TRP did was giving sexually unsuccessful men advice and the push needed to improve yourself I wouldn't have any problem with that. But it's not.

It isn't and it doesn't claim to be. It is an amoral place to discuss male sexual strategy. This means you will see advice that only a psychopath would use.

TRP indoctrinates you into a power dynamic with rational, sensible and caring men at the top and irrational, manipulative, fickle women at the bottom who need the guidance of a dominant men to achieve happyness in life.

For most men, the suggested strategy is 'spinning plates', which involves casually dating multiple women, that is not the same as this weird power-based co-dependant relationship.

I don't quite understand your word usage, how can someone be indoctrinated into a dynamic?

This world view is not healthy, I have yet to see any scientific evidence for it and it's all over the sidebar so you can't claim it's only because of recent users. That's my problem with Red Pill

There isn't scientific evidence that justifies the suggested actions (I don't think that today's society will permit it). There are studies which show the premises that RP theory is based off, such as women preferring taller, confident guys with higher status. And anecdotal evidence that the actions that people take work.

[–]Hellothere_15 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is actually a important and ugly truth. There is a thing called maternal love which you mostly get from your mother. I think this might be the purest form of love that can exist. It is actually unconditional, it is warm, loving and comforting. Boys get this for a certain time, then suddenly lose it, and may never get it again.

Well okay I can agree to that. However, to quote that article:

Men believe that love matters for the sake of it. Women love opportunistically.

and

By order of degrees, hypergamy will define who a woman loves and who she will not, depending upon her own opportunities and capacity to attract it.

The message I take from this is pretty clear: Men love and want to be love romantically (you know, the way it always gets idealized in books and movies) but women are biologically incapable of this. Their "love" is just an expression of their desire to raise their status through a successful spouse and it will disappear once you can't provide that anymore.

The implied message here is even more troubling. The way the author describes his idea of female love it does not really sound like love at all. It sounds like disguised economic rationalizing.

Of course, you might argue that true love does not exist in first place and that on a biological/hormonal level we are all looking out for ourselves and that's probably true.

However, the article creates judgment, rating male love as the higher, truer one and female love as the opportunistic fake one.

Taking this to its logical conclusion the article essentially destroys empathy towards women with a broken heart.

Empathy is a pretty important feeling because it's the main reason humans avoid hurting each other. People feel guilty about making others suffer.

However, by placing female love on a lower step than male love this article implicitly rationalizes breaking a woman's heart. Because after all, if female love is so much less wholesome than male love, should we really consider a woman with a broken heart as substantial as a man with a broken heart? No of course not. Should you feel super guilty about breaking a woman's heart? No, since she never loved you as deeply as you loved her in first place.

Of course, you might think I'm over interpreting things but psychologically this is what a person will take away from reading this article.

You asked me what I meant with indoctrination and this is it. TRP rationalizes immoral behavior.

  • Normally you might feel pretty guilty at leaving your wive after 20 years of marriage but after reading this article, just like that, it doesn't feel quite as bad anymore.

  • Normally you might feel guilty to deliberately use conditioning techniques on your girlfriend to get her to have more sex with you and do your laundry, something which she clearly doesn't want, but you see, actually women are using sex as a bargaining chip against men to get you to do stuff they want, so conditioning her only serves the purpose of restoring proper balance. You don't have to feel guilty about it.

  • Your girlfriend/wife is annoying you with all her demands and needs and you just want to tell to shut her up? Well normally you might feel like shutting up your SO all the time might lead to an unhealthy one sided relationship, but you see, women have the emotional maturity of a teenager and need the firm guidance of a dominant male, so of course it's okay to boss her around.

Are you seeing the pattern here?

TRP claims that all its ideas come from rational unbiased observations, but isn't it kind of strange that all the core ideas somehow end up being able to be used to subconsciously alleviate guilt at doing immoral stuff?

From what I gather most of the people who enter TRP are often desperate for answers, they are sexually unsuccessful and feel like they need to take some more drastic steps to find/ fix/ end a relationship but feel guilty about the possibility.

Then along comes TRP with all it's supposedly scientific observations (again, not that I've ever seen any real evidence beyond some anecdotes from a, lets face it, in no way representative sample) and tells you that, don't worry, you can do all that and more without having to feel guilty about your actions as long as you believe in TRP, because we tell you that women are childish, immature, and can't feel love and it's for their own good anyway. Also, they kind of deserve it since all women are calculating bitches by nature who were given way too much power over relationships to begin with. So really, what ever you do it's okay.

If that can't be considered indoctrination then what can?

It isn't and it doesn't claim to be. It is an amoral place to discuss male sexual strategy. This means you will see advice that only a psychopath would use.

Every action that has an effect on other people has some moral value attached to it and there is little that directly affects another person more than sexual intimacy.

As long as you plan to use it, or plan to sell it to other people as advice, sexual strategy cannot possibly be amoral.

For most men, the suggested strategy is 'spinning plates', which involves casually dating multiple women, that is not the same as this weird power-based co-dependant relationship.

So this strategy only applies to people in monogamous relationships. Great, that's only like 90% of all people who are in relationships. I feel way better about all of this now! /s

Seriously though, regardless of what TRP recommends, most guys in our current society prefer a monogamous relationship (or if they don't they probably can't do any better anyway.) This is the advice TRP gives for men being in a ltr or semi longish relationship, which, for the better or worse applies to most people in a relationship.

Thus, if the advice in question is morally questionable (which I think it is) that is worrisome.

There are studies which show the premises that RP theory is based off, such as women preferring taller, confident guys with higher status.

And most men prefer thin, hourglass shaped blonde chicks with low maintenance. That's hardly a surprise, not all that relevant (since few people, men or women, end up with their dream partner anyway) and is in no way enough to support a theory as monumental as Red Pill core ideas.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very, very well said.

[–]larrythetomato0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

On the actuality of female love,

I think we agreement except on this point:

Their "love" is just an expression of their desire to raise their status through a successful spouse and it will disappear once you can't provide that anymore.

The point which I think is missing from your analysis of his argument is that while female love is opportunistic, it is still real.

For example with a real gold digger type, she is literally turned on by wealth. If you are wealthy, she will love you completely and sincerely, as sincere as she can be, and as you can love as well. However if your money disappears, she won't be able to explain how her love for you has fallen. The author here is trying to get to the idea that women are more pragmatic, you have to appreciate this if you want to be with her.

The bulk of your reply on the morality question.

Of course, you might think I'm over interpreting things but psychologically this is what a person will take away from reading this article.

This is interesting, because a moral imperative is not what I take from RP writing, and that is not the point, the point is the tools and models of reality that you can apply to life.

However, the article creates judgment, rating male love as the higher, truer one and female love as the opportunistic fake one... Taking this to its logical conclusion the article essentially destroys empathy towards women with a broken heart.

In the short term, this might be a conclusion. To use RP language you are describing the denial into anger stage: which is the 'women aren't like that... if they were fuck them all'. The end goal is an acceptance of this, when you do, not only will you be happier, you can make her happier by not demanding things she can't provide you, and appreciating what she can, in the fullest way.

Should you feel super guilty about breaking a woman's heart? No, since she never loved you as deeply as you loved her in first place

You are not quite there. She did love you deeply, probably as deeply as she could, however her love is fickle. It is not the same as male love which is loyal. When she said how much she loves and cares about you, she is being fully sincere. Yet in this moment when you are experiencing her rage, she despises you more than anyone else.

I think you are implying that loyal love has some higher value than fickle love. When they come from different people, they aren't comparable. This is where that harsh truth about female love comes in, and what messes up so many guys, your lover can't provide that same love that you mother did.

Normally you might feel guilty to deliberately use conditioning techniques on your girlfriend to get her to have more sex with you and do your laundry, something which she clearly doesn't want, but you see, actually women are using sex as a bargaining chip against men to get you to do stuff they want, so conditioning her only serves the purpose of restoring proper balance. You don't have to feel guilty about it.

I think you need some more experience with non-manipulative women. My girlfriends like to do things for me, and sex. There is no manipulation, which I define as using persuasion to get someone to do something that is against their own interests. For most men, what you would suggest as conditioning is what I call 'not positively reinforcing bad behaviour'. If your dog pees on the floor, you don't reward him, or you will get more pee stained carpet. If your friends keep insulting you for status, you don't take it and laugh it off unless you want to become the loser of the group. If your girlfriend argues irrationally with you and buy her a gift to make up, guess what's going to happen next time she feels lonely? (You might think I'm going to stop here but I am not). If you happily answer your boss's calls at 11pm, you are going to get more.... This is another discussion, which I'll put on hold for now.

Also, women love sex, and they also love taking care of people they love. The only conditioning that you will probably will need to use is to be appreciative.

TRP claims that all its ideas come from rational unbiased observations,

I think you are making a strawman here. The base is that there is a biological difference between men and women, and that sperm is cheap, but eggs are expensive. Much of the theory is practical based. It is not about agreement, it is saying "here is a tool that I discovered, it's the best tool ever and will get you laid 100%" (notice that it is a sales pitch, so expect heavy exaggeration).

but isn't it kind of strange that all the core ideas somehow end up being able to be used to subconsciously alleviate guilt at doing immoral stuff?

If the first thing that you think when I give you a sword is about how you can murder people with it, be careful. Words are powerful, and sneaky, you can anything to justify anything else. This is why Religion is able to preach both peace and war. I think I could use any modern Ideology to both promote kindness and murder, anything with a high level of complexity can.

...because we tell you that women are childish, immature, and can't feel love and it's for their own good anyway. Also, they kind of deserve it since all women are calculating bitches by nature who were given way too much power over relationships to begin with. So really, what ever you do it's okay.

Hopefully I have given enough to shake those beliefs off. But say if you don't think so.

sexual strategy cannot possibly be amoral

The problem with morality is the argument can't end. If RP placed allowed continual discussion on morality. That would dominate the conversation and would make the places useless. When we say it is amoral, we are saying "Morality and living with your decisions is your own fucking problem you sociopath. This is the instruction manual, nothing more." You might argue that it is immoral to share the knowledge, but that is not the topic, or the meaning. This is another really long discussion, so I will leave it here.

Seriously though, regardless of what TRP recommends, most guys in our current society prefer a monogamous relationship (or if they don't they probably can't do any better anyway.) This is the advice TRP gives for men being in a ltr or semi longish relationship, which, for the better or worse applies to most people in a relationship.

The TRP reddit is not for guys in long term relationships. I talked a bit about this in my earlier post. Due to the influx of newbies, it can't be. Angry and disillusioned men drown out any possible conversation. The conversation on LTRs ends at "you better know what you are getting into", and if you are a daily reader of TRP, you definitely don't. If you know how human courtship works, and can get a woman into bed with you, then you are past TRP reddit.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

If you have to "go over one in detail" it's probably just rationalizing the beliefs to make them "better/more reasonable". Aka, not listening to what they literally say, trying to find "good" intent behind it. I don't think it's fair to seep through every RP post to find the "virtue/wisdom" behind it. I think some of them mean exactly what they say verbatim.

[–]larrythetomato2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Some of these posts are complicated, with subtlety. I know it is really easy for you to dismiss them as sexist. It is easier and won't make you comfort ugly truths.

I'll even help you, if you are trying to shame me, or other readers, don't waste your time with this sexist/misogynist label, calling me a loser is a way easier and more powerful label. Call me a loser then go and fuck off. No one gives a fuck about your moralising.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Um what I have no idea how you got all that from my comment. I was neither calling anything sexist, calling you a loser/misogynist, or “moralising.” I think some RP posts mean exactly what they say. Re-read.

[–]ayovitaBurgundy Pilled Woman5 points6 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Unless you are rediculously hot a woman needs to get to know a man before she really starts finding him attractive.

Swing and a miss.

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease4 points5 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

Nope, entirely true. Source: am actually female

[–]ayovitaBurgundy Pilled Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lots of things aren't entirely true but true nonetheless.

Source: also a woman

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

You cant feel desire for a man unless you "get to know him"?

The second you see someone you make like 50 or 60 judgements about who they are and what their personality is like simply based on their appearance. Women are good to go just based off that all the time, especially if they are lonely and want to feel strongly towards someone so badly that they actually do

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease3 points4 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

It's more like, I might think a guy is attractive for a few minutes, but as soon as he opens his mouth I lose all attraction. On the other hand, sometimes I'll meet guys that I don't find particularly attractive until we've been talking for a while.

Trust me, I'm a woman. I know a thing or two about what it's like to be a woman.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Are you sure you are blue pill? Since when can one woman represent all women?

My girlfriend likes when strangers at clubs grope her

Does that mean all women like it?

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

No, good god. I literally never said that I'm an accurate representation of the entire female population.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I know a thing or two about what it's like to be a woman.

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

a thing or two

as opposed to

my word is literally the bible

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Because all women share the same experience right?

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Actually, that's not true. Fun fact.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I might think a guy is attractive for a few minutes

That right there is physical attraction! Just cus it dissipates faster than others (due to other external factors I might add) doesn't mean anything.

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

physical attraction != actual attraction.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Attraction is a multitude of things, usually encompassing some level of physical attraction. Sure many women require emotional familiarity before they can be intimate. However there are many women that don't.

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

IDK, you can find someone attractive that you're not attracted to. I know tons of hot guys that I wouldn't even think of being friends with, much less in a relationship with.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think we need to more clear in the difference between attraction and "turn offs" in PPD. You sound like you're describing being turned off more than lack of attraction.

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

ehh, that's a good point. However, I do hold the theory that we literally start to see people differently the more we get to know them. Like, literally see them differently, with our eyes. I've known plenty of men that are probably considered, objectively, strong sixes that I would have considered nines or tens at the time that I knew them. Now I know it's because I just liked their personalities so much, but at the time I really thought they were much more attractive.

I also remember a few specific examples of guys that, for the first few minutes of knowing them, I found very attractive, and as I got to know them, their physical attractiveness seemed to dissipate. At the peak of me knowing them, I might have considered them something like strong sixes, when they might objectively be nines.

The human mind is crazy shit, man

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Going from physical attraction to actual attraction isnt about showing attractive personality traits, often it is just about not turning the girl off, not showing negative traits

The physical looks can be actual attraction, as long as you dont ruin it when you open your mouth. Plenty of women will give you the benefit of the doubt because they think you are so sexy, so its just about not fucking it up. He doesnt necessarily need to add, he just cant subtract

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

See, that's my problem with RP. As a woman, I would highly prefer that you do open your mouth. I don't want to accidentally go on a date or have sex with someone that secretly thinks women with careers are the reason for humanity's demise. Please, please open your mouth.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

My last post was not to be taken literally, I was talking about negative traits, not human interaction and communication lol. And when I say "negative traits" I dont mean sexism, racism or anything involving morality or ethics, I mean insecurity, neediness, submissiveness, overly sensitive, lack of interest, lack of ambition, etc etc

Your problem with RP is just a false perception if your last paragraph is accurate

[–]dailyqtProcreation should cease1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh yeah, of course I don't mean things like "yeah my grandmother just died" on the second date, or saying "you too" when the waiter says "enjoy your food." I have no problem with people trying to be less weird or awkward. It's just that a lot of people here on PPD debate do actually fall under the category I mentioned before.

[–]VoidInvincibleFull Measure4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey. This is not bad actually. You actually gave good advice. I am thoroughly impressed someone with a blue flair wrote this. Of course, a man wrote this. I doubt a woman would give this kind if advice. It seems women in general give shit advice on dating.

But you know they say...don't take fishing advice from a fish.

This is actually good advice. I just wish blue pill women would be as honest.

The only woman I would take pick up dating advice from is Kezia Noble. Of anyone knows who that is. Since its her job to give good advice in getting into womens nickers, she can't afford to give bullshit advice.

I went off the rails. This is good, solid advice.

[–]Hellothere_14 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems women in general give shit advice on dating.

But you know they say...don't take fishing advice from a fish.

This is actually good advice. I just wish blue pill women would be as honest.

I don't really think this is mallicious in nature. To be honest if you asked me to write a similar post to this one about men for women I wouldn't even really know how to start.

Like, I could probably give some tipps but I would probably miss most of the important stuff because it either happens subconsciously or is so self evident to me that I don't even think about it.

Creating a model for the behaviour of other people is far easier than creating a model for my own behaviour.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Blue pill dating advice: Be confident

Political advice: Be president

Career advice: Be famous rapper

Why dont some of you blue pillers see how useless that is?

  1. Be aware of what women want

If you mean by listening to what they think they want, youre in for a bad time. Thats why trp says only judge behavior, not words

What being yourself means: You should not fake character traits or interests to attract a girl. Don't pretend to be super into some band just because your date told you she likes them. Don't pretend that you are outgoing and visit clubs and parties all the time even though you would much rather stay at home and read a book or play videogames. Just be genuine about your interests and if your date does the same you will probably find some common ground. If you need to fake to find any common ground then a relationship would probably not be a good idea anyway.

This is not really advice, its the truth, but not actually useful. What if you cant do that? What if you are so insecure that you cant do that? Fake it till you make it is a actual solution to that problem, thats why TRP promotes it

  1. Be proactive

This is true, but you arent actually giving any advice in your explanation lol. Actual advice would be likes methods to deal with rejection, methods to judge who is likely to respond well to you(IOIs), how to develop the confidence so that you dont show anxiety during these approaches, etc etc

Long story short, you arent actually giving any advice, and none of the actual few tidbits of advice that you did give is different, in the confidence paragraph you are just saying things we all already know

A lot of people think that TRP teaches men to be "fake", but they arent actually faking their interests or anything like that, its about faking the way you come off, but not the actual content. Its like dressing up, youre the same person, but with a better more professional presentation

[–]crackrocksteady7Jason tell me what you're chasing6 points7 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Also, if you are an asshole and make others in your vicinity uncomfortable you should probably change that too but that's more a matter of basic human decency than just dating advice.

being an asshole and making others in my vicinity uncomfortable is literally my game now

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

bet you couldn't break me, cowboy.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

I have a friend and we like to "clear out areas" wherever we go, you either love us or hate us

Depends how much you like loud conversations about rape, torture porn, threats made out of love and food. Doesnt matter the location, I have zero awareness of my surroundings when im focused on someone, I always have to tell people that if you try to talk to me while im driving WE ARE GONNA DIE lets listen to music we can tlak later

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

I love the torture porn genre I’d probably inject myself into that conversation and annoy you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

That depends on whether your prefer emotional, impulsive, psychotic OR cold, clinical, calculated

Basically the first half of martyrs or the second half

Ah fuck it, who am I kidding, im not that picky, I like both

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Everything about martyrs is perfect. I heard they are planning to redo it those fucks.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I typically dont like the old people who wanna know about immortality or some shit cliche, but martyrs managed to be so fucking great that I didnt even mind that

I didnt watch the girl with the dragon tattoo remake and I wont watch a american martyrs, not that there arent good american movies but the french know whats up, they know they gotta live up to de sade

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

I found it to be more about “transcendence,” there is some actual deep themes to it, which is rarely done well in the horror genre much less in torture porn.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it wasnt actually about living forever, more just curiousity

I felt like it was kinda meta, like she implied its worse than you can imagine and KILLS HERSELF TO GO THERE FASTER, like this old bitch loves torture porn too and isnt willing to wait a few years to get there, is it her turn to be the victim tho? I would assume so but I havent really put too much thought into it lol

But it still reminds me of the old people immortality thing which is why I bring it up

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Did you watch a Serbian film. Absolutely disgusting.

[–]PBRScagsquad(((Prima Illuminatus)))2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You know nearly all of this advice is literally old school RP before the sub got filled with bitter omegas and weirdos of a certain demographic right?

[–]Hellothere_14 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well my bigges issue with RP is that it is so anti-women. It's not just the current users, the articles in the sidebar all look down upon women as irrational and immature and say that as an average man you have to establish dominance and emotionally manipulate them because if you don't they won't be attracted to you and will leave you for some alpha.

I know that most of my advice is somewhat similar to some TRP advice (there is a reason why TRP advice exists after all, it can't all be completely useless) but the big distinction is that unlike TRP I don't believe you have to look down on or manipulate women to find a girlfriend.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

but the big distinction is that unlike TRP I don't believe you have to look down on or manipulate women to find a girlfriend.

Do you actually think TRP beleives that? They are just willing to do it, that doesnt mean that they think its the only way lol

[–]Hellothere_13 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If they don't believe it's strictly necessary but do it anyway, does that really make it any better?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It means that you have to focus on the individual, rather than just throwing everyone under the bus

[–]boredthenyoureboringMr. 661 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

That’s great and all, none of it is really wrong, but it doesn’t actually have any concrete advice on what to actually do. Be proactive and flirt. Well no shit, but if I don’t know how to do that, the advice is just kind of rubbing it in. Believe it or not, it’s actually kind of difficult to approach a random person and lead the whole conversation if you don’t even know the first thing to say.

[–]Hellothere_12 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Believe me I know. That's also my problem when tying to talk to a woman. That's something you just have to learn I think, there is no secret trick to it. Besides, Redpill dating advice doesn't really tell you anything about that either.

[–]Dweller_of_the_Abyss0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or if your interests and perception vastly differ from the demographic you're trying to persue.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Saying that men don’t actually have to put in any effort to be attractive, is by far, the biggest (albeit, most embarrassing) straw man that RP has ever come up with, regarding BP thinking.

If RPers actually believe that BP says that men should not put in effort to their physical appearance in order to attract women, then you’re all fucking nuts.

[–]bala-keyMarried Red1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This is at least purple pill dating advice. I think it already admits so many gender differences that if you tried to push it in the mainstream, people would find it sexist and 'problematic'.

Also you conflate PUAs who mimicked the traits of a high value man for short term relationships whereas the red pill approach is to actually raise your SMV (being fit, having interesting hobbies, strong skills, true abundance mentality and a social circle).

What you call 'familiarity' Is called 'rapport' in PUA / red pill parlance btw.

[–]Hellothere_11 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The thing is, I strongly believe in mutually loving and respectful relationships that require equal amounts of investment, trust, and sacrifice from both partners.

I also believe that despite the minor biological differences between men and women in terms of sexual behaviour they generally reach a similar level of intelligence and emotional maturity as adults and will as a society reach the highest happyness and productivity in an egalitarian world with no social restricitons gendered carreer and life choices.

I'd say that puts me quite firmly on the blue side.

Not all bottom line dating tips of red pill are completly useless, what I detest is their general attitude towards women.

I also didn't really have any other blues criticise what I said in this threat so it doesn't seem like they have any major issues with my oppinion.

[–]bala-keyMarried Red0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not all bottom line dating tips of red pill are completly useless, what I detest is their general attitude towards women.

That's a tone policing / moralizing argument that reds won't care about. They focus on whether stuff works not who gets upset.

I also didn't really have any other blues criticise what I said in this threat so it doesn't seem like they have any major issues with my oppinion.

Blues here have a much higher tolerance for the idea of gender differences in behavior. (IME they are more purple than the mainstream population.) If you posted this on a super mainstream sub, I think there would be a backlash.

EDIT: the Overton window of blues on PPD is not the same as the mainstream.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Bluepill dating advice is thinking that you need to "just beee confident', "beee yourself", that women aren't visual.

Unless you are rediculously hot a woman needs to get to know a man before she really starts finding him attractive. Thus if you want to ask a woman on a date unless she feels particularly charitable you'll need to talk to her and establish some common ground and mutual attraction before you ask her out.

But that's what dates are for, so that we could get to know each other. How is she going to get to know me before she gets to know me.

If you want a woman to become attracted to you, you need to show here that you are attracted to her.

And at that point she'll just say "I don't see you that way", "we just don't click", etc. Every time in my experience.

[–]Hellothere_11 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But that's what dates are for, so that we could get to know each other. How is she going to get to know me before she gets to know me.

Well that's a problem, and I am aware of it. Honestly this is one of the reasons why I think the classic "dating grounds" of bars and clubs aren't all that great. In those settings you essentially have to the asking out the moment you approach a woman.

Thus, my tips would be:

  1. Put yourself in settings where it is normal to talk to other people without wanting to ask them out.

  2. Talk to women without the necessary goal to get a date. Just do some small talk and find a bit out about their interests.

  3. Eventually your small talk will either devolve into banalities or you'll "click" and find a topic you both like and can have some actually interesting conversations about.

  4. If that happens you ask for her number or ask to meet again at the end of the conversation.

And at that point she'll just say "I don't see you that way", "we just don't click", etc. Every time in my experience.

Obviously without knowing you or the details of your conversations I can't really know where exactly your problem lies.

However, one important thing here is to gradually turn up the flirting. The moment you start to flirt with a woman explicitly you implicitly ask her to make a decision about you and if at that point she isn't at least a little interested in you there's a good chance she will just reject you.

So what you should do instead is to just start out with compliments (you know, the normal niceties you expect from small talk) and slowly turn them more personal and intimate. Demonstrate to here that you can compliment her on things that are unique to her and show her you like her for her and not just for being the first woman agreeing to talk to her and there's a good chance that when you eventually do start to openly flirt she'll be interest enough to respond in kind.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Put yourself in settings where it is normal to talk to other people without wanting to ask them out.

And where would that be?

Talk to women without the necessary goal to get a date. Just do some small talk and find a bit out about their interests. If that happens you ask for her number or ask to meet again at the end of the conversation.

Umm, that's exactly what I've been doing.

So what you should do instead is to just start out with compliments (you know, the normal niceties you expect from small talk) and slowly turn them more personal and intimate.

Sorry man, but you're not telling me anything different from what I already do and it doesn't work.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (34 children) | Copy Link

Please show me where all this advice exists and is given, EXPLICITLY and in PLAIN ENGLISH. Other than at TRP and the manosphere, of course.

While you're at it, kindly show me sources dating back to the late 1970s and early 1980s, which would have been widely available to men of my vintage, for my review and perusal.

EDIT: You do understand, don't you, that most of this is straight TRP/manosphere material, right? You do understand that nothing the manosphere advocates is new, right? You get that all the manosphere has done is "rediscovered" what women have been attracted to all along and that society, feminists et al have been trying to change, and when they couldn't change it, concealed it, and when they couldn't conceal it, shamed men about, right? I mean, you do understand this, right?

[–]Hellothere_110 points11 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

As I said in this very post,

Red Pill is not wrong when they say that many young men enter dating with wrong expecations of what is expected of them and have a hard time because of it.

I completely agree that good dating advice for men can be hard to find. I can't even give you a good source for this since I pierced most of it together myself from various online articles, studies, conversations with women about what they see in men and the actions/thoughts of fictional characters in books written by female authors. However, most of this does exist on the internet somewhere I believe.

As for the similarity of some of my points with Red Pill advice, I am aware of that. In fact, I did a compare & contrast with Red Pill at several times in my post.

TRP advice wouldn't exist if there weren't at least some aspects to it that actually work.

However, I make a few important distinctions from core ideas of Red Pill that I have pretty big issues with:

  • Women don't naturally like assholes. The idea that they do comes from the fact that they like confidence and a feeling jealousy among reds. You don't need to be an asshole to attract women.

  • Mutual relationships based on love and respect are possible.

  • Women are different from men in some aspects but not inferior and don't need to be coerced into sex.

  • Young men need to learn to date women the way women want to be dated but this does not require manipulative tactics.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Young men need to learn to date women the way women want to be dated but this does not require manipulative tactics.

I hate how this narrative is always pushed. It's always dating women how THEY want to be dated, but nobody cares about how MEN want to date women.

Yes yes, it's due to supply and demand, but it's still messed up.

[–]Hellothere_11 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well it has it's advantages too. At least as a man you are usually in control of your own dating success.

As a woman it's much easier to get a date, true, but it's also much harder to ensure quality. Women can for the most part not choose who hits on them so if only assholes or inexperienced men who don't know what they are doing are asking them out the whole thing can be pretty frustrating for them too.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

At least as a man you are usually in control of your own dating success.

How? Assuming the guy is interested, women are the ones who have to agree to the relationship, so they're the ones in control, not men.

As a woman it's much easier to get a date, true, but it's also much harder to ensure quality.

Yeah but that's more to do with women being way more picky than they need to be. I mean, I seriously doubt it's that hard for them to find a good person to date.

Women can for the most part not choose who hits on them so if only assholes or inexperienced men who don't know what they are doing are asking them out the whole thing can be pretty frustrating for them too.

I guess, but it's really, REALLY a non-issue compared to the male side. Having to ask out 500 women is WAY harder than having the option of picking out one of 500 men.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Women don't naturally like assholes. The idea that they do comes from the fact that they like confidence and a feeling jealousy among reds. You don't need to be an asshole to attract women.

The three stages of understanding:

Rookie: "Women are attracted to assholes"

Intermediate: "Women don't like assholes, they are drawn to their confidence."

Master: "Women are attracted to assholes."

It's like martial arts and belt colors. After the highest black belt you go back to a white belt.

[–]SkookumTreeWe are DONE with "cope"3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Assholes are strong, if they last very long. Weak assholes get their asses kicked.

Corollary: men love bitches.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Weak assholes still get away with it if they are goood looking, narcissists are as weak as you get. But their outbursts of anger can be attractive, even though its based around immense insecurity to the point that they need to 100% lie to themselves about who they actually are

Women love them, but only for a few months

We do love us some bitches :D

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Weak assholes are the worst. I respect assholes. I resent weak assholes.

[–]SkookumTreeWe are DONE with "cope"1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Weak assholes don’t last long

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Thanks.

So you admit, or at least you cannot deny, that you are unable to point me to any sources where this is all set out.

And you also are unable to show me anything where any of this is even alluded to in the most oblique fashion from the 1970s or 80s, and which would have been available for a developing boy like me to read.

However I make a few important distinctions from core ideas of Red Pill that I have pretty big issues with:

Interesting, but irrelevant.

•Young men need to learn to date women the way women want to be dated but this does not require manipulative tactics.

No, young men need to learn to stand up for themselves and go for what they want.

If anything, young women need to learn to date men the say men want to be dated.

[–]Hellothere_15 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Well my main motivation with this was to show that not all dating advice from people outside of Red Pill is as horrible and stupid as most reds in that other threat seemed to think.

No, young men need to learn to stand up for themselves and go for what they want.

If anything, young women need to learn to date men the say men want to be dated.

Doesn't red pill claim that the whole dating experience is unfairly skewed towards women? Why would women change their behavior then?

Besides, I would argue that seeking a better understanding of what potential dating partners want of you is never a bad idea.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And my main motivation is to demonstrate to you and your Blue allies that this dating advice is

--pretty much the same as what TRP and the manosphere advocate; and

--more or less unavailable and nonexistent outside TRP and the manosphere up until the late 2000s.

Doesn't red pill claim that the whole dating experience is unfairly skewed towards women? Why would women change their behavior then?

They won't. They should, but most of them won't. They have most of the power in the SMP/RMP; and they're not about to give it up.

EDIT: Actually, growing up, I do remember where some TRPesque advice MIGHT have been available growing up. My dad was an avid Penthouse "reader". So therefore, on the downlow, I was too. I remember seeing in the backs of most of those magazines, ads for books and videotapes you could buy with advice for "picking up women" and "seduce any woman" and "how to meet girls". I never got any of those books nor did I ever read them, but from the ads you could tell that a lot of it was rudimentary pickup/PUA stuff from the 1980s, which was never in any kind of "respectable" publications or available from "respectable" locations. You couldn't go to a regular bookstore and purchase those books. They were available by mailorder only (including tax, shipping and handling).

Remember -- this is in the days of videotapes, VHS, Betamax, late night TV, dial 900 telephone number for phone sex, newspaper personal ads, USA Up All Night with Rhonda Shear, Solid Gold, Playboy/Penthouse/Hustler. Porn was videotapes and magazines; you had to go to a store to rent/buy it, and you had to then return it when you were done. (No one pays for porn anymore. No need.) PUA/Pickup was seedy, nasty, clandestine stuff not widely available, and if you had any of it you were roundly shamed for it.

[–]Hellothere_12 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And my main motivation is to demonstrate to you and your Blue allies that this dating advice is

--pretty much the same as what TRP and the manosphere advocate; and

--more or less unavailable and nonexistent outside TRP and the manosphere up until the late 2000s.

Well in that case I'm glad we can find some common ground. However, this still leaves one glaring issue:

There is no denying that TRP and large parts of the manosphere are pretty anti-women. They look down upon women as irrational and immature and openly advocate dominating and emotionally manipulating them.

TRP justifies this by saying that beta men need to do it because women will just go for Chad instead if they don't.

However, my dating advice does not contain those tactics so if it worked that would take away TRP's justification for using them.

Judging by what you wrote so far you don't seem to think that my advice is bad, so do you agree with me that the anti-women sentiment and borderline abusive dating tactics within Red Pill are bad, or if not, how do you justify them?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no denying that TRP and large parts of the manosphere are pretty anti-women. They look down upon women as irrational and immature and openly advocate dominating and emotionally manipulating them. TRP justifies this by saying that beta men need to do it because women will just go for Chad instead if they don't.

No, TRP "justifies" this by pointing out that women aren't attracted to men with overly "beta" characteristics. Because... they aren't.

Your advice, while pretty good, won't help the usual AFC get over the hump of his "niceness" and it won't help him stand up for himself and refuse to take shit from women.

The justification for the hyperbole of irrationality and immaturity and "dominance" (NOT "dominating) is to shake men out of their stupor and to get them to reach down between their legs, grab their balls, and fucking DO SOMETHING.

("emotional manipulation"? Are you even serious right now? Do you think women don't "emotionally manipulate" men? If you don't, you have no idea what's going on at all.)

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer4 points5 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Does the Red Pill have intellectual property rights to advice?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

No.

What does this have to do with my comment? No one at TRP claims copyrights over any advice, and the argument has never once been made. The point is that all this advice has been out there since time immemorial, but has been covered up and shamed and bullied and laughed out of the public square for about 60 years, and is now making a comeback.

Witness Blues saying to Reds "well, DUH! Of COURSE women like hot dudes with muscles! No one EVER said otherwise!! You dummies! Why would ANYONE EVER believe women DON'T like those guys!?" Blues are claiming "oh, we have ALWAYS said women like and fuck hot guys with muscles!"

Well, NO YOU HAVEN'T. And if you have then SHOW ME. Show me sources from the 1970s and 1980s that would have been available to me.

I note that my comment has been up for more than 20 minutes, and no one has made any attempt to show me where people were plainly and clearly saying the things OP said, back in the 1980s. Or any time before about 2015.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You won't believe how difficult it was to convince one of my real-life blue pilled beta friends to start lifting weights.

He wanted to go to the gym but he said he only wanted to do body-weight exercises there.

He really thought lifting weights instead of "just being sportive" was morally, yes, morally bad and only for braindead jerks.

I wasn't surprised at all.

He grew up with even more emasculating messages than I did.

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

The user is allowed to make their own post and label it as "Blue Pill Advice" if they want to, and that makes it "Blue Pill Advice".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Um.... OK. Whatever.

What do you have to say about the rest of my comment? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

"well, DUH! Of COURSE women like hot dudes with muscles! No one EVER said otherwise!! You dummies! Why would ANYONE EVER believe women DON'T like those guys!?" Blues are claiming "oh, we have ALWAYS said women like and fuck hot guys with muscles!"

Right, and I could ask you for a source on this, you would not provide it of course, because you made this up and it does not exist.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you even serious right now? Half of PPD is Blues saying to Reds "We Blues have never said women are sexually attracted to nice, kind, affable, friendly men who aren't assertive. Everyone just KNOWS women like good looking, hot, confident, dominant men with money and status. I mean, come on, Reds! I mean, DUH, right?!"

This is u/biggerDThanYou 's entire shtick.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hehe

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I am being serious.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol. I wish I could upvote this more than once.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.2 points3 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

The fact that all you can seem to do here is pivot to waiving your hands at some conspiracy by women to keep men in the dark for some unknown sinister purpose is just a concession that the only truly discriminating feature of TheRedPill is misogyny.

[–]LewisCross 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I asked for sources; no one has given me any. That's not a concession of anything, cuck.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Sources for what? This is advice proffered as a "Blue Pill" alternative. Provenance is unimportant. Critique the advice. What's missing? Is it bad advice? You already conceded that it's equivalent so now you're arguing that it was hidden.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Provenance is VERY important for the specific query I made, which is where is this offered, where do I find it, and was it available in the late 1970s and early 1980s when I was coming up.

The "advice" is offered in part to show that this information is and always has been widely available and specifically taught and made available to ALL men, everywhere, at all times. That's just wrong. No one has offered any evidence to the contrary.

As for other critiques, I've already offered those.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Your concession that you accept the validity of the advice:

You do understand, don't you, that most of this is straight TRP/manosphere material, right?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Answer this question, since OP apparently couldn't:

Please show me where all this advice exists and is given, EXPLICITLY and in PLAIN ENGLISH. Other than at TRP and the manosphere, of course.

While you're at it, kindly show me sources dating back to the late 1970s and early 1980s, which would have been widely available to men of my vintage, for my review and perusal.

It doesn't matter whether the advice is valid or not. What matters is how AVAILABLE it was/is.

I'll wait.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Isn't it... right here in the OP?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Good God.

Please show me where all this advice exists and is given, EXPLICITLY and in PLAIN ENGLISH. Other than at TRP and the manosphere, of course.

While you're at it, kindly show me sources dating back to the late 1970s and early 1980s, which would have been widely available to men of my vintage, for my review and perusal.

[–]wekacuckLife is settling.1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Let's just assume it wasn't readily available to us. How would that invalidate OP's advice?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

but that female attraction is not primarily visual based in first place, but emotional based.

So why do women have a "thing" for bad boys?

[–]Hellothere_11 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because those who do usually are hormonal teenagers who want to rebell against their parent's rules and end up making bad decisions in the process?

Like seriosly I don't think there is much more to that. Doing forbidden stuff is exciting so doing bad boys is exciting too.

Either way this hardly applies to all women and for most who do go into a "bad boy craze" it does not persist beyond the end of puberty.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I like your distinction between character and habit. That's a good way to explain what we mean with Just Be Yourself.

I looked for a way to express the same sentiment and the best I could come up with was "you shouldn't try to change what you are, but you can change what you do"

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Said the same thing when he posted that in a comment in another thread. Good distinction OP.

[–]Hellothere_13 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah that other thread was my main motivation and inspiration for writing this. I was actually a bit shocked by what many people on RP seemed to think what is considered good dating advice outside the manosphere.

[–]pinkgoldrose1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Great post.

[–]rainisthelifeFacepalm 😑0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Can this post be the ‘/thread’ for all PPD posts?

No joke.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't pretend that you are outgoing and visit clubs and parties all the time even though you would much rather stay at home and read a book or play videogames.

But what if none of the girls a guy in question likes are into guys who play videogames and stay home? Like why does BP have so much hangups over guys just trying out new things?

but it will also alienate and disgust a lot of people. It will also make you an asshole. You don't want to be an asshole.

That's a just world fallacy. Being an asshole may or may not lead to this. Your insinuating being an asshole always leads to eventually being punished for it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis

Unless you are rediculously hot a woman needs to get to know a man before she really starts finding him attractive. Thus if you want to ask a woman on a date unless she feels particularly charitable you'll need to talk to her and establish some common ground and mutual attraction before you ask her out.

This is misleading because it implies emotional connection can make up for a lack of physical attractiveness, which is false.

What I do agree with you on is female lust or sexual chemistry isn't aesthetically based, but it is known up front, or within the first 1-2 conversations.

Like knowing someone better doesn't create more sexual chemistry. The point at which a girl knows someone and how attracted she is to them are two separate things.

[–]Hellothere_10 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

But what if none of the girls a guy in question likes are into guys who play videogames and stay home? Like why does BP have so much hangups over guys just trying out new things?

If staying at home and playing video games are your distinguishing features you should try out new things. What I'm saying is you should not pretend to be an extrovert if you aren't, but even introverts can try out some new hobbies from time to time.

That's a just world fallacy. Being an asshole may or may not lead to this. Your insinuating being an asshole always leads to eventually being punished for it.

No that is not what I meant. What I meant is:

  1. I don't want to be an asshole. That's not just a question of punishment/ reward, its also a matter of personal pride. I hate seing other people behave as assholes and wouldn't want to do the same.

  2. The people you primarily attract by being an asshole are not the people I want to attract.

  3. Similarly the people who you do push away by being an asshole are probably the people I do want to attract the most.

To me it's just not worth it. If there was no other way to get a date I might consider it but that's not the case.

Like knowing someone better doesn't create more sexual chemistry. The point at which a girl knows someone and how attracted she is to them are two separate things.

That's why I made the distinction between familarity and being desired. One alone does not create sexual attraction but both together have a chance to.

This is by no means a secure method mind you because I don't think such a thing really exists. It is however the best thing you can do in hopes of success.

[–]eliechallita0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty blue and I agree with most of what you wrote. It's the kind of advice that I've followed pretty much since I had a love life, and it's worked out pretty well for me.

I would like to point out that one of your sentences is going to be easily misunderstood, and that's the claim that women enjoy sex as much as men do.

I do think that women can enjoy sex as much if not more than we do, but it's harder to get there. Most men, at least according to RPers, will enjoy almost any sex that they can get, and the quality matters less than the sheer fact that they had sex.

Most women don't operate like that: there's a much higher chance that a woman will dislike sex relative to a man disliking it, and it's pretty common for women to develop hangups about sex either because of bad experiences or because social pressures dictate that sex is something that they should restrict and not give out any time they feel like it, for fear of being pumped and dumped or labeled sluts. That trend is much more pronounced in conservative societies.

So far the only correction I'd make to your statement is that women enjoy sex as much as men do when it's good, but that it's harder for them to get there, and therefore that ends up placing a greater burden on men which leads many RPers to think that women don't enjoy sex, or only enjoy it with uber-Alphas.

[–]newName543456went volcel0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What's wrong with pretending something you're not, esp. if you're only interested in hookups?

Just get your act airtight and if it's exciting enough, you'll find an audience.

Women don't want to be desired just for their body but also for their character

Yet it's TRP that is evil for painting all women with one brush, right?

Plenty of women just want hookups and don't care if you appreciate their character.

[–]blametheboogiefresh dressed with the fly green socks0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good stuff. I wish I understood this better at 15.

Listing things that are some of the biggest turnoffs for the average woman would make this this list more complete in my opinion.

That was where I messed up the most growing up, undermining myself by saying and doing unattractive things.

[–]WhisperSecretly a Talking Dog0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What struck me as curious about that post is that pretty much all the RP posters who responded had some odd ideas of what constitutes as Blue Pill dating advice. To be more concrete many seemed to think that just because we blue pill sheeple believe in genuine, repectful and mutual relationships, we also think that as long as you are a nice guy™ you don't have to pay attention to anything else because women will eventually come to you due to your niceness.

I think that this confusion results from some unintentional equivocation.

"Blue Pill" is a term coined by TRP participants to describe the messages about sexual/dating/mating that they had typically received from modern western culture at large.

Some people who strongly objected to TRP then founded a group called the blue pill. Which is NOT modern western culture at large, it's a small, self-selected, non-random slice of people from it.

So when you say "we", you cannot speak for what the whole culture is saying, and certainly not for what young men are hearing.

You can only speak for yourself, and others very like you. You can only say what you mean by "be yourself". You cannot address how that message is sent on a larger scale, and you certainly cannot address how it is received.

Ultimately, it is unimportant whether the failure is in the intent of the message, or in its transmission. The clear and present issue is that young people are far less effective, happy, and satisfied in their relationships with the opposite sex than they were several decades ago.

TRP exists to address this problem. TBP exists to... do what, exactly? Fuss?

[–]MistuhG0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Female desire is to a large part derieved from mutuality. If you want a woman to become attracted to you, you need to show here that you are attracted to her. This is where many of the infamous nice guys™ go wrong. They are afraid of coming across as disrespecful or creepy and stick to safe small talk, but doing so signals their date that they aren't attracted to her and in turn she doesn't become attracted to them. To have a woman to fall for you, you need to flirt.

The fact that this is the case is actually 100% all on blue pillers and the ideologies they support.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter