TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

42

Someone sent me an interesting piece where a bi-sexual woman talks about her respective issues dating men and women.

I thought I would post it, in the interest of getting some content that's not about affirmative consent on the forum. I also think the perspective of bi-people on dating/gender issues is always interesting. I've pulled out some sections of the article below.

  1. Do people here identify with her descriptions of dating men/women?
  2. Is this provider/property dynamic changing via feminism, technology, etc.? Or is it fundamentally the same?

Her experience dating women

Something like 80% of women fake their orgasms sometimes. What does this mean?

It means that, when women date, they’re optimizing for something that’s not sexual pleasure. So what are they optimizing for?

Security and status, I think. Sure, not all women, but a lot of women. Enough women. And, maybe you think that lesbians aren’t like straight women on this front, but enough of them are for it to be inconvenient. I have observed...

One thing is, when attracting women, their attention always seems very contingent — contingent to my continued conformation to a certain set of standards. However, what’s weird is what they say to me will be nicer than what men say to me. I dated a guy who told me he’d dump me if I put on 10 pounds; I can’t imagine a women ever saying that. However, I have definitely received a frosty “no calls returned” after voicing a few controversial political opinions. A perverse irony is that men actually tend to be a lot less superficial than they claim (when I told 10lb guy obviously we could never have kids because he’d dump me, he cried and said he hadn’t been serious) and women are often a lot more superficial than they claim. But, women won’t vocalize their judgements. Men will knock out all this hurtful shit, but when push comes to shove, sometimes they don’t actually care. Women often won’t complain, but will seethe in silent dissatisfaction.

Her experience dating men

Men, on the other hand, do voice their dissatisfactions. They seem to derive significant parts of their identity and masculinity from traits their partner has, traits often their partner can’t control. So, the nice part of this is that, once you make the cut, you have relative freedom. I can have completely different political opinions from the men I date, for example, and this usually isn’t a problem. On the other hand, if there’s something they don’t like about you, the game’s over before it begins. You don’t get a chance, there are no personality admits to this ride.

And, this has a deeper more sinister, objectifying vibe. There are three things that seem to matter the most to men I date:

  1. How pretty I am
  2. How smart I am
  3. If I am willing to physically bear young

I feel like a horse being analyzed as breeding stock. Men don’t date me because they think we can have a nice life together, they date me because they think I will produce good children. (And, while I have met men who didn’t want kids, I have never dated one. They’re a little rare.)

Conclusion

When dating, women look at me and wonder “will this girl give me the life I want?” and men look at me and think “is this girl worth the money I had to earn to get her?” For women I am a provider and for men I am a purchase. But, is any of that love?

As much as we wish it weren’t so, it’s very hard to step out of our assigned social roles (though I do think it’s possible.) I don’t think these things are love, but it’s possible that these dynamics can exist alongside love. But, for many people they don’t. Many people opt for what they can get from their partner, and assume that is love.


[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this13 points14 points  (139 children) | Copy Link

  1. How pretty I am
  2. How smart I am
  3. If I am willing to physically bear young

#2. XD Where is she finding these men?

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I know right? That's her imagination I'm sure.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this8 points9 points  (117 children) | Copy Link

It's gotta be. I would kill to have a man who was attracted to me for how smart I am.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 6 points7 points  (87 children) | Copy Link

It depends on the guy. I'd rather marry a smart 7 than an dumb/average 9.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this6 points7 points  (85 children) | Copy Link

Right. But it's still a "you must be this tall to ride this ride" kind of thing. Being smart is never a virtue by its own merit. You still have to be pretty to attract anyone. So translating what you said "I'd rather have pretty and smart than gorgeous and dumb".

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 12 points13 points  (70 children) | Copy Link

I would agree that being smart is not enough on it's own. But I think smart men place more weight on intelligence than women think. Same is true for smart women.

To look at it slightly differently, smart people date other smart people. I'm no genius or anything, but I am bright enough that I wouldn't seriously consider dating someone dumb long term, no matter how gorgeous they were. And I'm sure they wouldn't be that into me either.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this5 points6 points  (68 children) | Copy Link

Right, but again it doesn't mean shit if you aren't attractive.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 4 points5 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

Sure, but "attractive" isn't a super high bar. Most people can be attractive if they put in work.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

It can be for certain people. When I put in the work, I was just average.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

That could be true, no idea.

It's so hard to know with people on the internet, because a lot of people say they've tried really hard, but they didn't.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

How do ou know? Did you go to r/rateme ?

[–]Shipcake1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Not enough work

Get an Instagram model body via the squat game

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

Someone has to be more on the 'downright ugly' side to be irredeemable by their inner qualities.

People who are both beautiful and smart put far more weight on internal qualities and how a person presents themselves than on facial genetics.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

People who are both beautiful and smart put far more weight on internal qualities

How does that follow? Beauty isn't an internal quality.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

People who are born with the genetics to be externally 'beautiful' and also have a well developed intellect realize that the external beauty is a happy accident, and the real value of a person lies in what they make of themselves.

[–]blerkel0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

You sound like a nice guy.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Not a guy.

[–]blerkel2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, you sound like a "nice guy"(TM).

it doesn't mean shit if you aren't attractive.

This is exactly what nice guysTM say

[–]yayeey150 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

you can get a bf by only being smart, assuming that you are smart enough of course. But now it is on you though, would you be attracted to a man only for how smart he is? Even 5'6 asian Eugene? Obviously 7 foot chad, or even most average guys don't give a flying fuck whether or not you're top 1% intelligence or whatever, but I think that goes both ways between the genders.

If you're a high performer in grad school for (male dominated) stem you will have no trouble finding a bf (for only how smart you are). You probably won't find someone that is smart and also hot (hottest guy in your program), but you will certainly find just some smart guy that is in your program.

[–]oneandforall 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

you can get a bf by only being smart, assuming that you are smart enough of course.

no you can't. my boyfriend likes that i'm smart, but he would never have found that out if he hadn't first thought i was hot.

for men, intelligence is an afterthought that is really only relevant to long term relationships.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I understood the context of this post as referring to committed relationships, not casual sex.

[–]yayeey150 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

what are you even saying man? smart people will socialize with smart people, period (regardless of gender). This is just what happens in 'intellectual' environments. Also In 'intellectual environments', everyone is smart anyway.

The best performers in said environment are usually some of the most social as well.

Why wouldn't a guy that is interested in learning talk to a girl he can learn something from ?

[–]aznphenix0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Same here.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

you can get a bf by only being smart, assuming that you are smart enough of course.

Doubt it. People are shallow. I'm no exception. Looks are a priority, everything comes second.

[–]yayeey150 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

certainly but being smart is a factor that can help and even out a bit from what you are lacking in the looks department (depending on environment of course).

I'd easily date a less good looking girl if I knew that I could benefit from it (i.e a girl that is extremely high performing in the same major as me). The higher performing the less I would care about her looks, and i'm not even joking.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Studies have shown that higher intelligence is linked to healthy weights and basically health in general. And anecdotally I'll say that intelligent women often figure out fairly early that crappily we are all pretty basic deep down so they take steps to learn makeup, eat healthy, and try to find clothing that accentuates their natural given body.

These girls are not the same as dating a basic bitch and they do struggle with this stuff but let me tell you that is sooooo cute to see. To know as a guy that your girlfriend/wife is watching a youtube video about makeup because she wants to look pretty. Though it is also very important for men to learn the same thing. You've got to work to look good. Basically the only thing TRP gets right.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

You've got to work to look good. Basically the only thing TRP gets right.

Agreed, but there's a limit. Some of us can only ever be average.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I have no doubt that there is a great guy out there for you. For example I'm so much more extroverted than my wife its mind boggling, but like they say opposites do attract. It was just very difficult for us to meet and it happened by chance. It's very very difficult to meet high intelligence women because they aren't out doing the basic bitch stuff so a lot of guys end up dating Becky not even by choice but because we don't even realize that you're there. It sucks I know and it takes a guy a long time to figure out. If there's any ways for you to put yourself into social situations you should try. Maybe a dog group or a book club? Anything that gets you into a mixed social scene. Trust me there are guys that want to meet you, they just can't.

[–]IckyStickyPoo0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

But I think smart men place more weight on intelligence than women think.

I think a wide range of men value it highly. That's been my experience. Am not saying they value it above looks, just that they are impressed by intelligence in women and more likely to want a relationship with you.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Right. But it's still a "you must be this tall to ride this ride" kind of thing. Being smart is never a virtue by its own merit. You still have to be pretty to attract anyone. So translating what you said "I'd rather have pretty and smart than gorgeous and dumb".

For a lot of men the minimum bar in looks is low though. I honestly think you're overestimating it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed

[–]Love8DeathPost-RP0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

That's not true. Smarter women produce smarter babies and learn better.

Being attractive isn't exactly a high bar for women to reach.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Being attractive isn't exactly a high bar for women to reach.

Sure, if you were born with the right look.

[–]Love8DeathPost-RP3 points4 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Women just need to not be too fat and be pleasant to be around to be attractive. Seriously low bar. Nothing at all like men's standards as imposed by women.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You're confusing 'attractive' with 'fuckable'

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

No he isn't. To be "fuckable" a woman just doesn't have to be too fat or way too old or sometimes not even that. A woman who is pleasant to be around can already not be unattractive.

Anyway, imo the main difference between male and female attraction is that with women it matters how much "effort" they make, with men it matters how many "results" they have. There is no meaningful way to say what's easier. There're both men and women who will find it easy or hard. But conventionally speaking, "bringing results" is probably harder than "making an effort"......

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women just need to not be too fat and be pleasant to be around to be attractive.

Sure, that's worked out fabulously so far.

[–]Love8DeathPost-RP0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Right, you're not much of a recluse and often would put yourself in social situations where men could see you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You still have to be pretty to attract anyone.

Not if you're a woman. There are plenty of women who get guys just for "existing".

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

+1. Kids are no joke, dumb good looking dudes will get weeded out, hot dumb girls will be exploited

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

It can be a bad thing. I dated a really smart mathy type once and she was always lording it over me, and going on about how much better maths/stem are than verbal skills

Now I sorta assume any mathy type is gonna be like that

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Now I sorta assume any mathy type is gonna be like that

I'm a mathy type and I don't do that. I love anyone who is more people-oriented than myself because it's a skill I lack / have trouble with. And you can always learn something from someone, no matter how much smarter you are than them.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

You know, I hadn't thought of it that way. It is pretty cool when your partner can show you a side of things that you wouldn't be able to see yourself. I dunno, I guess all the good cancels out once they start coming at it from a place of superiority or condescension

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I dunno, I guess all the good cancels out once they start coming at it from a place of superiority or condescension

Yep. They've closed themselves off to further learning.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately 'smart' doesn't always translate to 'socially adept', as indicated by the number of people with advanced degrees who have trouble with basic interpersonal interactions.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

It can be a bad thing. I dated a really smart mathy type once and she was always lording it over me, and going on about how much better maths/stem are than verbal skill

Who ended the relationship? lol

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

it's a long story lol

We broke up during a huge unrelated fight

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

I don't think anything's unrelated in break-ups :p. So who ended it?

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

She broke up with me, she said she was over it and told me to leave during the fight, and I did

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Women typically are the ones to end the relationship, even if the woman is the problem. They tend to be less tolerant than men.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I mean looking back, she was not the best match, and by the end we were fighting pretty often. But I still wanted to make it work even though that wasn't the best idea anymore

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Now I sorta assume any mathy type is gonna be like that

(Shrug) It was just one experience. You probably shouldn't put too much weight on that.

[–]WhiskersNTreddish purp0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I mean I know that on a rational level but intuitively it's something else

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

SMV vs. RMV. Intelligence may not affect SMV but it absolutely affects RMV.

Also lol at calling yourself smart on the internet.

[–]IckyStickyPoo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've found it really common that men like intelligence. I'd be willing to wager that it's high on most men's lists.

[–]SexyMcSexingtonThe Alpha and the Omega1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't find smarts by themselves sexy, but a quick and clever wit can still work charms on me as a guy. Smartness on a lay is kind of a waste but smartness on a wife is important.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Those guys are all over the place. But like the author stated you have to meet the prettiness threshold first. I have broken up with attractive, fun women because they were seriously lacking in the brains department and over time I found that I grew frustrated and frankly bored with their level of conversation. Hanging out and watching Pretty Little Liars while listening to the latest gossip isn't exactly my idea of a stimulating evening.

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

But like the author stated you have to meet the prettiness threshold first.

Yep. Smarts mean nothing if you aren't attractive.

[–]yvaN_ehT_nioJI'm just here for the spicy bantz0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps it depends on one's social groups. Intelligence is about top of the list for me and my mates' "requirements" for lack of a better phrase. Essentially that and not being obese.

Course we're not actively looking for girlfriends because we got to get our own shit together so we can be a good catch for that hypothetical girlfriend. That and I'm pretty much a homebody for the time being so there you go. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–]rreliable-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

How smart do you feel you are compared to the average?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Fairly smart. I learn / understand things pretty quickly.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Fairly smart. I learn / understand things pretty quickly.

Are you a pro pole dancer yet?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I pick up the moves pretty quickly. I lack the strength for a few of them though.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll record something the next time I attend an open pole.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I know right? That's her imagination I'm sure.

I prefer smarter women.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Of course you do. They're more susceptible to your attraction killing strategy!

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

They are, sadly. I'd prefer it if they weren't.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Why not try a relationship nurturing strategy instead of a relationship killing one😀?

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why not try a relationship nurturing strategy instead of a relationship killing one😀?

I have in the past. It's not like I do "bad" things for killing their attraction, I just act feminine. Last I checked "nurturing" was supposed to be feminine.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Try again.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why don't you try dating women as a man, and tell me how that works?

[–]wubooAlpha Blue Pill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have guy friends who have dumped women because he though she wasn't smart enough.

[–]rreliable2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

She's not kidding, men really don't like dating far below their intelligence level, unless it's a fuckbuddy thing.

[–]tiposkChad Thundercock: the story of a manospherian homoerotic fantasy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who likes to? On paper people either don't care or they claim to love incredible intelligent people with high IQ. IRL, people flock to people similar to themselves. People with very different IQs don't even end in the same group of friends.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok well how pretty is at the top. Then two rungs down smart and child bearing happens. Makes sense to me, you want your kids to have the best genes

[–]trail221 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Female programmer probably dating other programmers. Yeah 2 programmers will probably respect each other's intelligence.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Which won't be high by default

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They'll have autistic kids though. Bunch of small autists in Silicon Valley.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not enough women in sillycon valley for every man to have a family. Until they start importing them from cheiyna

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

What's the matter with those three? I don't rate smarts so high, but absolutely look at her prettiness and her mother potential.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Where is she finding these men?

Me!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Generally, these types of men are not the ones going to bars or clubs. Perhaps they have an online dating profile or something like that.

[–]Seiglerfone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

As a man, #2 is absolutely the most important in dating for me.

I don't care how attractive you are if you're so dumb I want to suffocate you within two minutes of being near you.

3 is iffy, and depends. My views on children have changed as I've gotten older. I desire to have children. If you were unwilling to bear them, our relationship would be contingent on your acceptance of finding an alternative.

1 is kind of the least important factor. My life has consisted of me being friends with women I wasn't particularly attracted to only for them to win me over with their personality. Over time, they start to become more and more attractive to me because I already have such strong positive emotions towards them.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

I've never dated a woman, and I haven't experienced the male dynamic she's talking about so I can't really identify with it.

From my perspective, every dating scenario boils down to 'this person can provide me with something I want'.

Short sighted or selfish people take what they want without ensuring the other person's needs are met; perceptive people recognize that in order for the relationship to stay stable in the long run, they also need to be meeting the other person's needs.

In terms of who is the 'provider', I provide what my partner needs and he provides what I need.

While I'm sure some people want a provider/property dynamic, no man I've ever dated has made me feel like my primary purpose was to be a good breeder.

I'm also curious about why she is thinks it's "objectifying" that men want to date women who are pretty, smart, and want children.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS18 points19 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

I'm also curious about why she is thinks it's "objectifying" that men want to date women who are pretty, smart, and want children.

Well, she goes into this:

And, this has a deeper more sinister, objectifying vibe. There are three things that seem to matter the most to men I date:

  1. How pretty I am
  2. How smart I am
  3. If I am willing to physically bear young

The third one is often assumed (something lesbians never assume, btw) which usually leads the first two being the criteria of judgement. Often when dating men, I feel like a horse being analyzed as breeding stock. Men don’t date me because they think we can have a nice life together, they date me because they think I will produce good children. (And, while I have met men who didn’t want kids, I have never dated one. They’re a little rare.)

There is also something a little bit socially darwinian about the whole thing. The overriding assumption with guys I date seems to be that the most valuable thing I have to contribute to my children is my DNA. My life experience and wisdom? Worthless. I mean, maybe that’s too harsh — many men do care about personality — but only after I’ve made the DNA cut. And, it’s worth mentioning, I think many men care about intelligence more than looks, so they’re not “superficial” exactly, but they view intelligence as an inheritable trait and they like me because they think my kids will get that trait from me. My primary bartering chip with men is what I was born with.

That said, I don't see this as particularly offensive. I mean, women do shit like that and with harsher standards all the fucking time. Maybe she's different on that front, but a woman who complains about some arbitrary "DNA cut" gets the world's smallest violin from me unless she abstains from having physical standards for dating herself.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I could be totally wrong but it seems like she's looking for reasons to be offended.

I can't see what practical difference it makes to distinguish between 'born with' and 'became' traits- all I care about is that he likes and respects the whole package and wants the same future I do.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I could be totally wrong but it seems like she's looking for reasons to be offended.

To me it looks more like she's looking for unconditional love and is offended that it doesn't exist. Now if only if there was a theory that helped you understand this and why it isn't necessarily a bad thing...

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah good catch. "Unconditional love" should be reframed as "we have proven that we prioritize and pursue our mutual best interest"

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

she's looking for unconditional love and is offended that it doesn't exist.

I think it's slightly different than that, though. She doesn't want her genetics to play any role (or she wants it to play a minor role). She wants her personality and experience to be the major factor here. If it's about personality and experience, that's not unconditional love, either. It's like she wants to believe that her attractiveness is something that she accomplished, and that she's ahead of all the other women because of something she did. It's almost like she wants love to be something she can earn if she works hard enough, or is special enough (via her own experiences and hard work).

I would imagine that "every man wants me because of what I was born with" is kind of a disheartening message - both for the women who are attractive (they didn't do anything other than survive to adulthood) and for the women won aren't (they're basically screwed by the genetic lottery). It also seems like a "locus of control" thing - people who have a internal locus of control believe that they are in control of their lives (through effort, experience, etc). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locus_of_control

[–]bornreddMarried Red Pill Man-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

True, but why would I choose a mate based off of experience? I don't care if she went to Peru, or if she has a PhD. Those things have literally zero to do with having and raising children.

[–]iponi 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Intelligence is an inheritable trait, so these men are right. The correlation between the intelligence parents and their adopted children is virtually zero, the correlation between parents and their biological children, even if they have been adopted into a different family, is very high.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You got a source for that? I read an article that said the complete opposite.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

In childhood, it's about 50% genetic and 50% environmental. As a person gets older and their parental influence wains, it shifts to being more genetic. (Perhaps there's a genetic component to curiosity, and curiosity leads to higher IQ. Meanwhile, parents help to drive a child's curiosity early in life?)

The general figure for the heritability of IQ, according to an authoritative American Psychological Association report, is 0.45 for children, and rises to around 0.75 for late teens and adults.[5][6] In simpler terms, IQ goes from being weakly correlated with genetics, for children, to being strongly correlated with genetics for late teens and adults. The heritability of IQ increases with age and reaches an asymptote at 18–20 years of age and continues at that level well into adulthood.[7] Recent studies suggest that family and parenting characteristics are not significant contributors to variation in IQ scores;[8] however, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease can have deleterious effects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ

(For context, if the heritability of IQ was 1.0, it means that genetics accounts for 100% of IQ scores. If it was 0.0, it means that genetics has nothing to do with it. A value of 0.45 means 45% of the variation is genetic.)

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

TIL I'm cancelling out my objectification of women by not wanting kids. What a great feminist I am.

[–]mgtownigga1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah lol, that is hardly a male-only phenomena. Unless you're seriously dating people that are unattractive and/or stupid, I find it pretty hypocritical to bash others for acting in this way.

[–]ThorLivesSkeptical Purple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My life experience and wisdom? Worthless. I mean, maybe that’s too harsh — many men do care about personality — but only after I’ve made the DNA cut.

I don't know why she's offended by that. I can deal with all kinds of different personalities. It's just an small adjustment that I have to make, but not a big deal. I can't deal with stupid, and stupid can't be fixed.

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya.

[–]Seiglerfone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course relationships are about getting something. Everything is about getting something.

But if you're ever thinking about what you can get, you are in a bad relationship, because you do not really care about the other person. If your priority isn't satisfying your partner's needs and desires, you don't care about them enough to justify a relationship.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Hey, can you help me out for a second? I keep smelling shit everywhere I go. It smells like shit in my house, it smells like shit at my friend's house and it even smells like shit at my workplace. Does anyone know what's going?

I'm bisexual and I've dated both men and women, it's a really mixed bag, but I think if everyone I was dating was that way, I'd start questioning who picks me out and what I pick out.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 10 points11 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, tbf the author is pretty open about the fact these observations may be more driven by her personality more than anything.

But with that said, I don't think she's just picking terrible people. She describes a pretty common issue people face in finding "the right person" from an SMV perspective, and also trying to find love. And how men and women, to some degree, are prioritizing different things.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I can see the demographic she's dating might be diving those attitudes. Maybe it's a little bit different where she's livin'. It's kinda like how rich rappers complain about gold digging hoes.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 11 points12 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It's kinda like how rich rappers complain about gold digging hoes.

Interesting that you bring this up, because it's like rappers "complain" about that, but they totally love it.

Similar to how middle-class non-rappers will "complain" about how their wives are so expensive or whatever, but you can tell it's really a kind of humblebrag.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar to how middle-class non-rappers will "complain" about how their wives are so expensive or whatever, but you can tell it's really a kind of humblebrag.

I think this can sometimes be a sort of 'happy-male inside joke' that some guys can't interpret, so they take them as serious complaints about women and marriage.

Obviously there are many awful wives and girlfriends out there, but someone misinterpreting the affectionate subtext of the superficially disparaging comments would think the marriage is a catastrophe.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, it's like that Kanye West song, he complains about Cutie the Bomb who he met at the beauty salon, but he still loves her.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes with a baby Louis Vuitton under her underarm 🌊 🌊

[–]wubooAlpha Blue Pill0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's pretty easy to screen out the women she's dating though. All she has to do is not date anyone who is not in a career that has a similar earning potential to her own.

[–]Love8DeathPost-RP3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe 10% of both sexes defy this gender norm, it's a lot more than just shitty people.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I'd wash my dick after anal sex if I was you

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

You should be wearing a condom, you dirty, dirty backdoor lover, you

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm not the one with the problem

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she is if she likes it raw, you dirty, dirty back door lover, you ;)

(Totally not a serious post).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she is if she likes it raw, you dirty, dirty back door lover, you ;)

I like it clean. pre sex enema's lol

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You clean, clean backdoor lover, you! Hehe.

High 5 :D

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I like all doors.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Nurse cxj will change ur diaper 4 u

Uh oh smells like u got c-diff

Sorry

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have no idea why, but this cracked me up more than anything I have seen on Reddit, ever. Even on r/army.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

😎

It's actually some of my finest work imo but only advanced users will understand

premium content

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

I'll never date a woman. So yeah. For guys it's all about how you look and if you look good enough they will haul a lot of crap around.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 6 points7 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much our curse.

Though I do think intelligence matters more than a lot of girls think. At least to men looking for something more serious.

[–]storffish8 points9 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

as I've said here before, I'm not about to give anyone an IQ test on a date but I've dated dumb broads before and it gets old real fast. a lot of stupid girls think their stupidity is cute, like we like redoing shit that they fucked up and pausing the movie every 5 minutes to explain the basic plot point.

[–]TheBlackQuillMisanthrope0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn... That really sucks... :( They should focus on their intelligence first really instead of acting cute. Otherwise, they are nothing but empty dolls. How funny they think that a decent guy want to ltr a stupid, pretty girl. They are pretty much for a fling only lol

[–]bornreddMarried Red Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dated a dumb girl who tried to hide it under a veneer of "so random".

Worst 6 months of my life - and I lived through cancer less than 5 years later. Cancer was better, no question.

[–]bornreddMarried Red Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Dated a dumb girl who tried to hide it under a veneer of "so random".

Worst 6 months of my life - and I lived through cancer less than 5 years later. Cancer was better, no question.

[–]Seiglerfone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can confirm that this is annoying.

Playing dumb can be cute. Actually being dumb is not.

Being asked to do something is an odd bit of reaffirmation of our value to our partners in a way we collectively know is just an act. Having to fix their mistakes because they're grossly incompetent is just tedious.

The last bit is just annoying. Nobody ever wants to pause a movie to explain the plot to you. If you're legitimately this dumb, just be quiet and fake it.

[–]Love8DeathPost-RP-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

If your woman is a fucking idiot you don't be friends with her. She can still do the other wife/mother stuff just fine.

[–]storffish8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

if her company annoys me she's never going to become "my woman."

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I cannot for the life of me imagine why a man would commit to or marry a woman he doesn't actually like or respect.

[–]Seiglerfone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Terrible advice. Wifely/motherly duties should not be trusted to anyone of questionable intellect.

I question yours if you would trust the care of your self, property, and children to an idiot.

[–]TheBlackQuillMisanthrope1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep no one wants to ltr an idiot: Those girls are nothing but pretty dolls only.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

For thirsty desperate guys that don't know better. Yeah.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Nah, most guys actually. Beauty surpasses intellect in power.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

No I see it's the guys that are starved for sex beforehand usually putting up with crap "because pretty" usually inexperienced ones. Eventually they realise that the pretty isn't worth it on its own. And dump them.

Because, like with all humans, you get used to their face soon enough, even the hottest woman loses her "stun" factor if you see her enough.

The ones that hang on are worried they'll never get sex again.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Lol, yeah no. Beauty is like the pointy thing on the front of a train. Men chase it, crave it, and want to revel in what they can drape themselves in that other guys can't. Like I said, I didn't make the universe.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know men with model-tier faces/physiques dating women I'd generously describe as "average" in terms of facial structure. The women are charming, stylish, fit, clever, good at what they do, and really enjoyable to be around.

For many people who are surrounded by beautiful faces, the beauty fades into the background. Compatible lifestyles and values are more important.

[–]decoy88Black Male in London0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Once you get used to it, it's not a big deal. Personality wins out. A man will be initially drawn in and turned on by physical beauty, but that's it. He will most likely fuck her true, but sex =/= commitment.

The 1-10 rating is just another way to communicate attraction.... If you don't have pictures.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Why would the guys desperate for sex only go after the prettiest women? And succeed at it?

[–]decoy88Black Male in London2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

They don't. If they get that lucky they hold on with vice grip.... until her bitchiness becomes too much. Mature men with options next girls like that because, what's the saying? "For every beautiful woman, there's a man sick of her shit"

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And move onto the next beautiful woman

[–]decoy88Black Male in London1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe. But likely they've learned from he experience about what to/what not to put up with. I like pretty women too but next anyone too but next anyone that's not compatible

Then again some people need to make the same mistake 1000 times before shit sinks in, so that's down to the individual.

[–]wubooAlpha Blue Pill4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oof she has some issues she needs to sort out. If I were to give dating advice, I'd suggest she date people who are in that borderline area of acquaintance and friend. I'd also suggest her to expand her friend group to women who have more traditional career paths - lawyer, accountant, IT, etc. She needs to be with someone she can stand toe to toe with.

I do get where she is coming from in terms of dating women. A large portion of lgbt are involved in social causes (lgbt homelessness & poverty, HIV which is more politically loaded than you'd think, BLM, etc.) which means: A. they tend make less money, B. their lives are much more focused and rooted in their social/political beliefs.

[–]wub12344 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

One thing I have learnt from being here is that I'm not like most men. That was quite obvious to me anyway, but being here has really driven it home relentlessly.

Men don’t date me because they think we can have a nice life together.

This is the first and most important thing that I'm thinking about. If I go on a date with someone, and I have absolutely nothing in common with her, and we're struggling for things to say to each other after 90 minutes (I can always keep up my end of the conversation, but I've met plenty who cannot) then I don't want to see her again. Whether she's pretty is neither here nor there. It won't work, I'll just get bored of her, sometimes I'm already bored of her before the end of the first date.

There has to be a connection, otherwise the whole thing is pointless. Of course, there also has to be an attraction. I've definitely had a connection with women to whom I haven't been attracted, and I've usually felt a bit regretful that we can only be friends.

I've been seeing someone recently, and we just have an amazing connection. She is also very attractive, but that wouldn't be enough in itself. I would fancy her regardless of her personality, that is biological, but I just love spending time with her. She will try anything, we've done all sorts of stuff together, we talk for hours, we can go into the deepest subjects, I give her a book and she devours it. The idea that she is interchangeable with anyone pretty and fertile is ridiculous.

Things have been a little complicated recently, which is a shame because it was going really well. Hopefully it will work out. I don't want to lose her for many reasons, but not least because I know finding someone else who I have that sort of connection with is extremely difficult. To come back to the original point of the OP, I precisely want to be with her because I know we could have a great life together. That is absolutely the key reason.

I know there are loads of other hot women out there, that is quite obvious. But many of them are pretty boring people when it comes down to it. And it is not fun hanging around with someone boring and unintelligent, I don't care how beautiful they may be.

I can't believe that anyone feels differently to this.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

"I'm not like the other girls"

[–]wub12342 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't really understand this comment.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

It's a joke. Girls are notorious for saying they aren't like the other girls, but they usually are.

Then ur all like "I'm not like the other guys"

[–]wub12342 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm a weird person, that has rarely proven to be a social advantage.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Being weird is a big social advantage once you learn to own it.

[–]wub12340 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have learned to own it, I always embraced it. But I don't have good relationships with my family because they don't understand me. I couldn't fit in back home, so I always grew up feeling like an outsider. I've had a raft of dysfunctional relationships. I don't have many friends. I've finally found a woman who understands me, and she has reported the same thing, her family relationships are far from ideal. I don't even want to leverage some social advantage out of my particular qualities, many people are quite boring, as far as I'm concerned.

[–]Seiglerfone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You seem fairly normal to me.

No guy I've known wants to be around someone that annoys or bores them. Personally, I can be bored by someone within the first sentence they speak, or even just by looking at them. I'd say I was presumptuous, but I'm basically always right, to my own disappointment when I doubt myself.

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Do people here identify with her descriptions of dating men/women?

How pretty and smart she is definitely what makes her attractive to me. How willing she is to physically bear young does not interest me as much. Her personality and interests are definitely important to me, though. I think a lot of men don't care as much as I do, though, because they figure men and women are very different and will have different personalities and "masculine" vs. "feminine" interests. I am very introverted though and don't go out much with friends so I probably spend more time around my relationship partner than many guys do, however.

Is this provider/property dynamic changing via feminism, technology, etc.? Or is it fundamentally the same?

I don't think so much. Men still feel enormous pressure to be successful and breadwinners, and not being so makes them unattractive to most women. Some women are becoming more open-minded about this, but I'd still say that the majority are not and that it will be a very slow process of change. Until this happens, she is right about men considering a relationship an investment, especially as he stands to lose a lot if there is ever a marriage and an unfortunate divorce.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This description looks like core TRP descriptions to me. I mean before TRP got all lookism and chad obsessed.

This also looks exactly like what I've seen play out over and over in my life. At least from anyone in "dating" the exceptions being people who paired off very early and permanently from within social circles, seemingly without too much thought and are easily content. These people didn't "date" really.

An old mentor of mine once told me "women fuck us band dudes because they actually like us. They marry dudes for the house and kids. Be the fuck guy, then marry them if you really want to."

IME when women pick guys it really is based more on the lifestyle aspects than sexual attraction. The guy just has to not be repulsive, like fuckable. I remember reading an article on Asian girls dating white guys and marrying asians due to them basically getting the high context culture that white guys simply couldn't grasp. This also explains so many beautiful women with average or somewhat above average guys.

[–]Supernumiphone5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Great read. It's too bad that she is clearly so deeply enmeshed in feminist thinking that she's not even considering the possibility that some of the trends she's seeing could be due to innate tendencies rather than cultural conditioning.

Here she says:

They used to get social status from the men they married — and, it seems like this mindset has continued (and, even penetrated into the lesbian community.)

If she were to apply Occam's razor here she might see that it's less likely that some toxic mindset has persisted despite decades of pushback, even in communities that devote so much energy to this, and much more likely that this is a biologically determined tendency.

It seems to me that this is one of the things that's holding her back from fully grasping what's happening and the implications of it all.

[–]LyaninaBlue Pill3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I am still too young for the provider or childbearing stuff to have been an issue (at this age we date for love and excitement and discovery, I guess?), and I haven't date huge, statistically-interesting amounts of people, but everyone I've dated has cared about "how pretty I am," not just guys. It seems kind of normal. There is nothing I "hate" about dating men versus dating women or vice-versa.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse3 points4 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

I've never gotten the idea that I would "produce good children" but maybe that's because I'm a nonpassing autistic from a family that is more dysgenic than the lannisters mixed with the hicks from the simpsons

Moreover, I think the "produce good children" thing is probably in less diverse areas: in NYC where people can be mixed with anything, it goes out the window. The only thing I can think of like that is this guy who said that hes genetically advanced due to being mixed with "every race". There were also people who said they were descended from a "Cherokee princess", or "highlanders".

For me, color doesn't matter, the genetics thing never came up. I don't care what melanin production gene they have. However guys try to get money from me. Nobody thinks i'm smart either or that it's heritable. People here say smart ass instead of smart unless u have $1 million dollars. Also being good at computers makes u Sheldon.

Emma Lindsay hangs out with a lot of garbage humans tho:

I’d get messages from guys 20 years older than me who didn’t want to date women their own age because they looked “busted.”

So many men act like a girlfriend is just something they deserve, but have no concept of how they might improve the life of the women they’re with.

These are boys not men

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Moreover, I think the "produce good children" thing is probably in less diverse areas: in NYC where people can be mixed with anything, it goes out the window.

Interesting. I live in a pretty big city, and while it's technically diverse, the various groups don't interact/intermingle as much as in NYC or similar places. I wonder if the dynamic is very different there.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse2 points3 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

The only people here who don't really mix socially are people for whom English is not their main language. There are generalized "black" and "white" categories but the people within them are admixed like Irish-Italian, or half black half Jamaican.

The only time I heard of someone saying "produce good children" is people affected by "colorism" in Brazil and a few other countries. I only heard that from hearsay and it has nothing to do with anything but skintone.

Nobody here thinks being smart is hereditary. Wtf?

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Huh, interesting. No one thinks intelligence has a genetic component in NYC?

I think the article also means good off-spring in the sense of being attractive, intelligent, desirable, etc.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Social mobility and entrepreneurship from extreme poverty and low-IQ parentage is literally part of NYC's founding legend, like the Trojans and Rome.

You can't change class in the modern day (though you could before - the head of Chase Bank grew up in the Brownsville Projects) but you can change "intelligence", whatever that is. We have an extensive public library system that was designed for people from low IQ, low income backgrounds.

attractive, intelligent, desirable, etc.

Most people don't think these things are heritable. The heritable factors that most people think about are ethno-racially linked traits like "dark skin", the "ginger gene", and height ("my sons gonna play for the NBA").

Height isn't that heritable either. In a thoroughly admixed ethnic group, race probably wouldn't be heritable after a few generations (a possible solution for prejudice?).

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

You can't change class in the modern day (though you could before - the head of Chase Bank grew up in the Brownsville Projects)

Agreed that you can't change class in contemporary America. But I don't think you could before either. Having a lot of money or a certain job doesn't necessarily mean your class has a changed.

Defining intelligence is so hard. But I do agree that it can be changed via education and learning how to think. However, it seems hard to deny that it's also driven by genetics. There was a guy in my a lot of college philosophy classes who was dumb as rock. Nice, great guy, but so stupid. He did get smarter as the years went on, but he never got that smart, if that makes sense.

The other attributes - physical attractiveness, height, etc. I do think are founded on genetics. But that's not to say that bad circumstances can't make someone with the potential to be hot or tall short or ugly.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Most importantly, how do I create social mobility for my "progeny" (since I'm too old, this means my roommate's nieces and nephews)? Should I introduce them to financial ratios when they are 5 or 6 years old?

My area is going through massive downward mobility, the millennials go before us like a pillar of heroin by day and a pillar of crime by night. Lots of folks my age have been beaten by cops starting at age 13, for spitting into a cop's face, and I don't know why.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

I'd check out Bourdieu and his writings about Habitus. Link here and here.

Essentially, class would be defined as something like aesthetic taste or cultural capital - "the collection of symbolic elements such as skills, tastes, posture, clothing, mannerisms, material belongings, credentials, etc. that one acquires through being part of a particular social class." The physical embodiment of this is a person's "habitus, the physical embodiment of cultural capital...that we possess due to our life experiences." This includes "our “taste” for cultural objects such as art, food, and clothing."

While your job or occupation is a part of your class, it's not the totality of it or even the most aspect. Like in Europe, class is hugely important as well. But you know someone's class based on how they dress, what they eat, how they speak, etc. and not their job.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

The thing is, you can class "pass", but it's still different. I would rather equip these kids with the tools they need to succeed rather than to try to front like they're not from the city. This is the same strategy immigrant parents use. But immigrants are new to the country while I'm actively rejecting class.

The main problem I observe is that being middle class or lower in modern society predisposes you to many risks like getting beaten by the cops, becoming a sexist, becoming a racist, dying young, addiction, and chronic disease.

I don't want to be a kid who has to try to act ritzy and bourgeois to not be thought of as dumb or broke, or ghetto/redneck/etc in a bell-shaped economy.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Just seeing your edits. And sorry to hear about your friend.

And yeah, police are shitty and oppressive to lower class people, idk why.

There's a book Class: A Guide to the American Status System which is old, but has a lot of good, concrete info on social class in America and how that is divided up. The best way to appear higher-class than you are is by having the right taste in clothes, art, food, etc. It's incredibly stupid at one level, but that really is the core of it.

[–]LittleWindowpane 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Damn...Were these Black or Hispanic dudes that got roughed up by cops for copping an attitude? Fucking pigs.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This guy (the one who was beaten by cops) is actually Jewish and Russian. Some of the other guys are Black or Hispanic but not all, by far.

[–]LittleWindowpane 1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link

Well damn: cops are beating up White dudes too. Seems like if you're broke as fuck and they can get away with it, they'll kick your lily-white ass as well.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

more dysgenic than the lannisters mixed with the hicks from the simpsons

😂😂😂

A+++++++

That's like the third hilarious BP comment I've read this month I should have compiled these

[–]GawernatorI race motorcycles3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men want pretty and smart women and good genetics, stop the presses!!!!!

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men don’t date me because they think we can have a nice life together, they date me because they think I will produce good children.

Overthinking it. Men want good sex. Whether that will bear out to any children or not is up in the air

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have definitely received a frosty “no calls returned” after voicing a few controversial political opinions

I'm on another board with way more women than men. And half the topics discussed are women who discovered their love interest doesn't share their political or ideological view on some subject, and how distraught they are about that.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why men need apolitical girls lol

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Do people here identify with her descriptions of dating men/women?

I have limited dating experience

Is this provider/property dynamic changing via feminism, technology, etc.? Or is it fundamentally the same?

It changes it slightly but it has not drastically changed yet.

[–]hyperrrealLoves fun[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It changes it slightly but it has not drastically changed yet.

What makes you say this?

[–]Love8DeathPost-RP2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Good find

Yes it's pretty accurately describing the underlying base of dating and choosing a life partner.

Love comes with it, ideally, but isn't caused by passing the status resources and/or DNA requirement.

The provider dynamic has changed a little, women can support men now, but for the most part, women still expect their man to make more money than them and hold it against them if they don't. Women that don't do this tend to not be status focused, rather wanted a guy to be theirs and experience him regardless of how others see her.

[–]blackedoutfastRed Pill Man2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

the reason she is mostly getting men who are interested in good genes (looks and intelligence) and the willingness to bear children and see it as a very transactional provider/resources type deal is because she seems to be "dating" in a hookup culture.

the men who still use the traditional "ask a girl out to eat at a fancy restaurant and maybe we can have sex after a few dates" strategy tend to be more traditional ornodl fashioned guys seriously looking for marriage candidates, and bluepill beta dudes who are trying to play provider game because they don't know any better.

she's not getting a lot of interaction with the guys whose relationships start by either hooking up with a girl who is in one of their social groups, or hooking up with some attractive rando in a bar or on tinder. a lot of those hookups are ONSs or fuckbuddy situations that never lead to serious relationships, but sometimes there is good non-sexual chemistry and it turns into a romantic relationship.

in the past, pre-sexual liberation, the typical relationship started with romance and casual dating, and if it went well it would lead to a sexual relationship. now, it starts with casual sex and hookups and if it goes well it may lead to a romantic relationship (dating).

by focusing on dating random guys to find a good one instead of hooking up with random guys and then dating the good ones, she is limiting herself to a certain subset of the male population who is still following the pre-sexual liberation paradigm.

[–]bornreddMarried Red Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, this is a really good comment. I didn't realize that my relationships tend to grow out of hookups and not dating. Hrm...

Hell, I met my wife at work but we hooked up after I quit while I was cheating on someone else.

[–]bornreddMarried Red Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, this is a really good comment. I didn't realize that my relationships tend to grow out of hookups and not dating. Hrm...

Hell, I met my wife at work but we hooked up after I quit while I was cheating on someone else.

[–]wont_tell_i_refuseRed Orchestra2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually seems fairly honest. I don't know what to conclude from it, though.

[–]GridReXXit be like that3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I relate to this as a bi chick.

[–]disposable_pants1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, not all women, but a lot of women. Enough women.

Sums up every discussion on AWALT.

Men will knock out all this hurtful shit, but when push comes to shove, sometimes they don’t actually care.

Men say all sorts of offensive shit and only mean a handful of it. This is why criticizing offensive male speech isn't very persuasive; anyone who has spent any time around men knows there's a good chance it was a joke or boast. That's just how men talk.

[–]TheBlackQuillMisanthrope1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course a guy wants to date a smart woman. Who wants to put up with an idiot? Intelligence is a long term asset compared to beauty anyway and it makes you sound more interesting and not shallow. The pretty one without a single brain cell in them are for flings only. If you want an ltr, you should strive to be smart first and make yourself useful. Learn as much essential skills as possible. Don't be an empty shell.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]ivegotsomequestions0Purple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it's accurate that men often care about beauty and intelligence very much for ltr. Id add social skills in there as a third important trait. Definitely never had conversations that implied anything about their desired future children, except a brief statement about whether or not they wanted them. I think she's assuming the breeding stock thing, with no idea whether it's true. What confounds it is that beauty, intelligence, and social skills are also important to just enjoying life with a person.

If men do want beauty and smarts for their children, though, I fail to see what the problem is. Even if men could control this desire, there's absolutely no value in them doing so.

As for whether I agree with her conclusion that men see us as a potential purchase, definitely not. The men who were evaluating me for ltr seemed to care about finding common ground and enjoying each other. With my husband, there was a tremendous spark that kept us both coming back, not a cold analysis of my mating value. There were also men who seemed to write me off for ltr (something she doesn't cover) and who I sometimes got the feeling were coldly evaluating me as a "rental," based on beauty and fun quotient. But the ones who hoped for something serious seemed to want a genuine heart and mind connection.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter