TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

98

It's weird to me. It's hypocritical. Women expect men to uphold all of their archaic gender roles because "reasons" but they don't want to be held to theirs.

Men have to strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich or making a large six figure salary, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence, never show any signs of weakness and have to be a total badass that takes no shit from anyone. Men have to be all of that and more or else.

Archaic gender roles.

But women bitch and moan when men want them to adhere to theirs. They go into tirades about slut shaming, fat shaming, patriarchy, men being insecure, etc. You want all these things in a man, all these oppressive antiquated ideals of manhood but it's a problem to say you want a woman that's under 30, not a slut, not a single mother, not fat or overweight, who's attractive, knows how to cook, clean and not nag, and fucks you more than once a month.

It's hypocritical. Its completely okay for you to want a walking stereotype of an Alpha Male but, wanting the equivalent in a female is patriarchal oppression and men being insecure.


[–]wub123481 points82 points  (118 children) | Copy Link

We have thread after thread on here where people make assertions like this.

Men have to strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich or making a large six figure salary, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence, never show any signs of weakness and have to be a total badass that takes no shit from anyone. Men have to be all of that and more or else.

This is just an absurd exaggeration. Do you walk around in everyday life with your eyes open? Men who are nothing like that mate all the time. If you had to be anything like that to date successfully, I wouldn't bother going out on any dates, it would be pointless.

Dating is somewhat more challenging for men than women, in my opinion, but you don't have to be some super-male to attract a girlfriend.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.36 points37 points  (51 children) | Copy Link

This is just an absurd exaggeration.

Absolutely agree, the whole premise of the OP crumbles because of this mistake.

[–]darkmoon0932 points33 points  (42 children) | Copy Link

Not really. It's just the go to BP response - "Oh, you're exaggerating. Stop being so dramatic". The whole Alpha/Beta paradigm is a core tenet of the debate here, for you to just say "your exaggerating" is just a callous way of dismissing the notion to avoid debate. Tell us Why you think it's bullshit instead of just saying "Your exaggerating. Case closed".

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia15 points16 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Because, as we always say, we know plenty of men that aren't strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence, never showing any signs of weakness and also aren't a total badass that takes no shit from anyone.

Men don't have to be all of that. Average men with good social skills do fine. Sure they might not sleep with 9s every weekend, but they do pair up with other average people.

[–]darkmoon099 points10 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

I don't see how your response refutes the whole Alpha/Beta paradigm though.

men that aren't strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence, never showing any signs of weakness and also aren't a total badass that takes no shit from anyone.

...but men who are those things are still going to pull more ass than a guy who aren't those things.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

but men who are those things are still going to pull more ass than a guy who aren't those things.

And feminine women are going to get more dick than trigendered demisexual tumblrtards

[–]darkmoon094 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

and your point being? that (shocker) being traditional masculine/feminine is going to be more attractive than not? Good. RP point proven.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

and your point being?

That OP is full of shit if they think women aren't held to traditional gender roles to the same extent that men are. Women are removing themselves from the dating pool by not adhering to gender roles, but they also just don't seem to care as much as men who do the same.

[–]darkmoon096 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That OP is full of shit if they think women aren't held to traditional gender roles to the same extent that men are.

Let's cut the bullshit though - women these days are encouraged to abandon their traditional gender roles. The same cannot be said for men.

Women are removing themselves from the dating pool by not adhering to gender roles

How do you figure that exactly? because from what I see, men are pretty flexible with their standards, you'll plenty of testimonies from guys who say they want a dominant Amazon type woman to throw them around the room, you don't hear a lot of women saying how much they crave to dominate a submissive guy.

but they also just don't seem to care as much as men who do the same.

That could possibly be because women don't have this thing called testosterone running through their veins that basically compels them to be horny and wanting to fuck all of the time.

[–]ProbablyBelievesIt0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Because we're talking about force. "I'd probably need to wait for years to find a single young HB9 with an open mind and deep personality." isn't any form of violence, implied or otherwise.

[–]darkmoon094 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

physical force? how exactly did that enter the equation...

[–]ProbablyBelievesIt2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no force at all. You're insisting that if you want to life like it's a porno, people are going to want you to be their porn. Of course the standards are high, then.

They're lower in a committed relationship, because most people value someone they can count on more than porn.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men don't have to be all of that.

But least have to have some of it as women by and large don't want feminine men.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.13 points14 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Anyone who has aged past the age of 15 and who has any real life experience or observational experience knows you do not need all of these traits to be successful with women. This isn't a "go to BP response" it is obvious that this portion of his OP is exaggerated or that he's operating from a false belief. This is an incel-type mentality. It's like he got his information from r/ChoosyBeggars. You want more proof than that you're going to get anecdotal proof which I'm happy to provide you.

[–]darkmoon0911 points12 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

The whole point that OP was trying to make is that women reward alpha male behavior with relationships and sex, hence why men feel compelled to be as close to that as possible. Just because non-alphas may get their dick wet here and there doesn't change he fact that the traditional alpha male gets a lot more ass then non-alphas.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.15 points16 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Which isn't at all what he said, he's complaining about women's expectations, which he's vastly inflated. Then he's tacked on the end of it "you need all this and more."

[–]darkmoon0911 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Which isn't at all what he said, he's complaining about women's expectations, which he's vastly inflated.

Women's standards and expectations indicate that they have little patience for a non-alpha male, at least not on the same degree. OP is saying that women largely have a narrow look on what they find attractive in men, the things that OP describe. In that sense, women expect men to adhere to traditional gender roles or a least the traditional ideal image of masculinity. Just because no pone is forcing men at gunpoint to adhere to certain roles and images doesn't mean that those roles and images are not being enforced by female sexual selection.

[–]ProbablyBelievesIt0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh, please. There are women who pair bond with their equals every single day. There are even women who find bowed heads of shame hot. (Even if they seem to prefer Tumblr and DeviantArt to Reddit and 4chan.)

Why are you pretending they're rare gems?

Edit: Check out the women in the Youtube comments sexualizing this guy. Are you really going to pretend his fanbase just wants his paycheck? They could have made anyone a celebrity.

Edit 2: Wow, I called that one.

[–]darkmoon095 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Don't you think it's funny that these women capable of thinking outside the outside the box only seem to exist online? and that video you posted isn't saying much considering the dude has fame, fortune, and status. Of course women will like him, women even go for guys in local garage bands because it's some form of "status".

[–]ProbablyBelievesIt2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't you think it's funny that these women capable of thinking outside the outside the box only seem to exist online?

Not at all, since I've met them offline. For internet bots, they seem surprisingly well constructed.

women even go for guys in local garage bands because it's some form of "status".

It's almost like people like and reward artistic talent. How DARE they?!

and that video you posted isn't saying much considering the dude has fame, fortune, and status.

Because he has outstanding talent. How DARE they!?

You just seem upset because the arts are more prestigious than any random STEM major, and because you don't know how to meet good women.

The latter at least, is understandable. Some places are way more dysfunctional than others.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Twitter, Reddit (this sub-reddit being one), Facebook, various online platforms and media outlets, real life and millions of girls say differently.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.4 points5 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

The only people on this sub who say what you just said are men, usually the incelish ones.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Women on Red Pill Women, Purple Pill Reddit, AskWomen, TwoChromosomes and NiceGuys say otherwise.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

No they don't, link me some threads from each which say you have to be all those things to get a woman (besides r/NiceGuys, come on). Bonus points if they are by women. The only sub I've seen crap like that is r/ChoosyBeggars, which has its name for a reason. What is "Purple Pill Reddit"? I've been on purplepilldebate for a long time and never heard of a sub with that name.

[–]wub12340 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

The only sub I've seen crap like that is r/ChoosyBeggars, which has its name for a reason.

What is the premise of this? It says I have to email the moderators in order to look at it!

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

What? I just subscribed. Maybe you have to modmail them to post, idk.

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Some women on these subreddits say that. Others say they don't mind weakness or are even attracted to sensitive men. There's even a girl here with a self-proclaimed fetish for short guys.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone who has aged past the age of 15 and who has any real life experience or observational experience knows you do not need all of these traits to be successful with women.

No but you largely do at the same time. Meaning men have to be masculine based to be successful with women as men who are feminine based are not.

You want more proof than that you're going to get anecdotal proof which I'm happy to provide you.

Which can be easily countered with anecdotal proof.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

None, 0%, of the things he mentioned as gender roles are actual gender roles "strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich or making a large six figure salary, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence" these are not things specific to either gender. I mean really WTF

[–]darkmoon097 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Explain how those things have not typically been associated with traditional masculinity?

[–]Gorgatron1968 points points [recovered] | Copy Link

That is not the topic . The topic was enforced gender roles. the OP can't tell the difference between gender roles and Other factors that either sex are attracted to.

[–]darkmoon097 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol seriously? how is it off topic? I'm asking you to explain how those things have not historically been associated with masculinity in a thread about traditional gender roles.

I see what you're doing, you can't respond to me by explaining what I asked you to explain so your go-to response is "that's not the topic". That another thing I keep noticing people use as a tactic to avoid debate when they're pinned in a corner.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well "strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich" change the handsome into beautiful and which of those could not be an equally feminine quality.

[–]darkmoon093 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're just moving the goalposts now.

[–]locriologyNon-Pill Shitlord0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I agree. It sucks that OP was hyperbolic because it gives BP a target to criticize other than his point, but his point is a valid one nonetheless. Women are breaking out of their traditional gender roles by pursuing careers and being independent, but they still typically don't even glance at a man who doesn't have career ambitions of his own.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But we should not have to break out the spirit board to "intuit" hi actual meaning.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

They were going to criticize anyway. Every single time they criticize and dismiss instead of actually debating the topic. It's so transparent.

[–]locriologyNon-Pill Shitlord3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Try being more precise and honest instead of deliberately hyperbolic next time. Don't give them such an easy out to dismiss a valid point.

[–]Returnofthemack3 points points [recovered] | Copy Link

which is a shame, because this is a GOOD discussion, but fucking idiot is an anger phase retard baby and decides to be as hyperbolic as possible. I sometimes wonder if these are anger phase retards or trolls, but whatever

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I agree, we could have this conversation, but given OP's biases, probably not a great one with him specifically.

[–]Elite-hacks2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Is there a difference? Between anger stage, and troll

[–]Returnofthemack3Purple Pill5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

i dunno, i hate the phrase anger stage to begin with. I didnt really go through a stage of intense anger or anything, but it's a commonly used thing so whatever

[–]Elite-hacks0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have been through that stage, its when you start abusing people around you and pushing them away. I wonder if all trolls on the internet are secretly going through a tough time in real life.

[–]the_calibre_cat2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, anger stage is a stage.

Troll is committed purpose.

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

👹

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My friends, strawmens.

[–]darkmoon097 points8 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

This is just an absurd exaggeration. Do you walk around in everyday life with your eyes open? Men who are nothing like that mate all the time. If you had to be anything like that to date successfully, I wouldn't bother going out on any dates, it would be pointless.

The walking epitome of the alpha male gets more ass on average though, a lot more ass, for many guys that's how they measure what makes someone 'alpha'. Just because some non-alpha dweeb may get his dick wet here and here doesn't change the fact that by and large the walking epitome of the alpha is the top tier male compared to other males. This is observable by how women practically throw themselves at the alphas while non-alphas have to do a whole song and dance to get girls to notice them.

[–]GridReXXit be like that7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

The walking epitome of the alpha male gets more ass on average though, a lot more ass, for many guys that's how they measure what makes someone 'alpha'. Just because some non-alpha dweeb may get his dick wet here and here doesn't change the fact that by and large the walking epitome of the alpha is the top tier male compared to other males. This is observable by how women practically throw themselves at the alphas while non-alphas have to do a whole song and dance to get girls to notice them.

This is a tangential point, but do you guys ever stop and consider that maybe the "alpha dude's" life is an entire song and dance?

I hear self described "betas" complain, but do they realize that the only time they work on being "attractive" is when they see a woman they like. Being attractive is a lifestyle not a quick diet pill.

I have many male friends who slay pussy. It's a marathon. They have always cared about how they present themselves at all times. How they groom. How they dress. The sports they play. How they exercise. The careers they choose. The events they go to. How they socialize. How they maneuver in the world.

I guess to me it reads like a guy who just decided he wants to play pickup basketball after work being upset he lost brutally to a bunch of guys who have been conditioning and training and practicing and playing basketball their whole lives.

No those guys didn't beat you because the basketball magically chose them over you. They've simply been doing the "song and dance" longer than you. To them it's a lifestyle. To you it's a pickup game.

Also sort of like people who treat sex foreplay as the five seconds before they stuff their dick in a vagina versus guys who treat existing as foreplay, building up her sexual interest at all times so she's the one begging you to pull it out so to speak.

Tl;Dr - 99% of Alphas don't wake up Alpha. They curate that shit. Their life is a "song and dance."

[–]littyagain111111 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most accurate description of why these men can pull so hard.

People who have never seen the Alpha guy "behind the scenes" don't really get that the men spend similar amounts of time and energy as women looking good. You mirin' brah?

lmao

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I see what you're saying and I largely agree, but what I'm saying is that for natural alpha types they don't really have to put on much of a show because as you said, they are just automatically attractive by default, women make it easy for them. But for average guys who lack the alpha's genetics or charisma; they have to put on a show in a sense because they have to find a way to stand out from the crowd. Alphas automatically stand out from the crowd without having to exert much effort, they're the guys who can just sit a bar by themselves and have women approach them because they're just that attractive. That's not the experience for an average guy. An average guy has to actively approach women, 'spit game', and do the whole 'song and dance', they have to do that because they don't command that automatic attraction that alphas do.

Tl;Dr - 99% of Alphas don't wake up Alpha. They curate that shit. Their life is a "song and dance."

In the sense that being blessed with genetics and physical attractiveness, as well as having an 'interesting and exciting' personality/lifestyle (bad boys, criminals, drug dealers, etc) they kind of are just born that way.

[–]GridReXXit be like that1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm just thinking of my male friends. Yes a few have gorgeous faces. But many don't. And still slay. My experience is that the yuppies I hang around cultivated an aesthetic.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

My experience is that the yuppies I hang around cultivated an aesthetic.

Curious, what do you mean by this?

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

They were nerds in HS who became cool in college and even cooler post grad.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, well your use of the word aesthetic made me think it had something to do with physical attractiveness. When girls say they like nerd guys what they're picturing is a ripped Chad with glasses, not a skinny dork who plays Magic: The Gathering.

[–]wub123414 points15 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

The most attractive men are going to do better. Life isn't fair. You've got to make the best of what you've been given and run with it. I wasn't given the best looks in the world, but there are many people worse off than me. I was given an exceptional brain, and I'm very thankful for that, but it doesn't mean anything if you don't do anything with it.

It would be great to be super-attractive, but not many people get dealt that hand. But I'm not going to just discard the cards that I have been dealt, I'm going to make the best of them.

[–]darkmoon097 points8 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Right. So then you're in agreement in RP then because RP tells guys to work with what they got whole still being real and acknowledging that nothing is guaranteed because of certain reasons.

The most attractive men are going to do better. Life isn't fair.

Of course. But I feel that this is often treated as a huge understatement. Of course attractive men are going to do better, but nobody really seems to keen to look a bit deeper than that and realize that for some guys it's literally an impossible situation because of women's standards, if a guy is even slightly off his game in terms of looks, style, etc then he's going to find himself being ignored by mos women the majority of the time.

[–]wub12343 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Right. So then you're in agreement in RP then because RP tells guys to work with what they got whole still being real and acknowledging that nothing is guaranteed because of certain reasons.

I didn't specifically say that I disagree with RP, I said people come on here and say stupid things. Which they do.

Of course. But I feel that this is often treated as a huge understatement. Of course attractive men are going to do better, but nobody really seems to keen to look a bit deeper than that and realize that for some guys it's literally an impossible situation because of women's standards, if a guy is even slightly off his game in terms of looks, style, etc then he's going to find himself being ignored by mos women the majority of the time.

Most women aren't attracted to me or won't date me, but you just have to keep plugging away until you find the ones that are. It is a challenge and it's more challenging for men than women IMO, but it's not impossible.

[–]darkmoon091 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well, however one may choose to look at it, a lot of men feel that it's so much of a steep uphill battle to climb that it more or less feels like an impossible situation, it may not be objectively true, out of 3.5 billion women on Earth one of them is mathematically bound to like you, but it nonetheless feels like it's something that requires too much work and investment for little to no practical gains. Especially when you're competition is Mr.Genetics who barely lifts a finger in terms of work and effort and yet gets to enjoy an abundance of options at any given moment.

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean, it's way more than one out of 3.5 billion, but you probably know that. And being Mr. Genetics isn't a free ticket to a happy, satisfied life. You can get casual sex a lot easier, but you won't necessarily get a great relationship or the perfect soulmate without hard work to find her.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

And being Mr. Genetics isn't a free ticket to a happy, satisfied life. You can get casual sex a lot easier, but you won't necessarily get a great relationship or the perfect soulmate without hard work to find her.

I never understood why people stand ground on this position. That somehow just because one can easily get casual sex doesn't mean they'll make good LTR partners. That doesn't make any sense to me. If you can pull ass easily, you're already halfway through the door; an LTR can naturally evolve from a fuck-buddy or casual hookup situation because if someone is willing to have sex with you casually then there's a chance they may be open to a more long-term thing. At that point it's just a matter of being a reasonably adjusted person to pull off a successful LTR.

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

An LTR is not done with one hookup, getting to have sex with her is not "halfway through the door". It's a relationship that can last possibly decades, and that will most likely require mutual investments in time and work to keep it blooming, even for Chad.

She wants me to spend more time with her on the weekend, but I love drinking beer and watching football with my buddies. How do I solve this? She wants me to spend more time with the children, but I already have not enough me-time. How do I solve this? I'm attracted to the new girl at work but I want to be faithful. How do I solve this? Perhaps a divorce would be the best for both of us, but what about the kids?

At that point it's just a matter of being a reasonably adjusted person to pull off a successful LTR.

That can be a very difficult task with a lifetime of work required.

[–]wub1234-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, I have four reasons for trying.

(i) I'm not a quitter;

(ii) I think I have a lot to give;

(iii) I really want to succeed;

(iv) I know I'm going to die, as you get older you begin to understand your mortality, and I think if I got to the end of my life and reflect that I didn't even try that this would be a big regret.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The problem with looking deeper ... reason is that you are not going to explain your way into a good looking woman's bed . Even if ya did all it would be is a pity fuck.

[–]darkmoon093 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Huh? what does "explaining your way into a woman's bed" have anything to do with what I'm saying? I'm saying the phrase "Life isn't fair" when it comes to sexual/dating dynamics is a huge understatement because it is. It's literally feast or famine for many guys. I know guys who have a long list of booty calls they can hit up at any point and have someone over in no time ready for some fun. Then you got guys who've never had a successful date or even been kissed.

I didn't mention anything about pity fucks. I'm only stating observable patterns of behavior of the SMP.

[–]BPremiumMeh-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

but with guns and violence, we can make it fair!

[–]BiggerDthanYouBluetopia7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women throw themselves on several different types of men many of which aren't alphas in that sense though

[–]darkmoon093 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No they don't. Not from what I've seen. Like I said, just because nerdy poindexers can get laid here and there doesn't change the fact that the jocks and gangbangers are going to be at the top of the food chain.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a tautology. If alpha is defined by how much pussy he gets => alpha will be having a lot of pussy. it's like you define 2+2=4 and the bitch about 2+2=4.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

There a lot of crazy weird scuzzy looking guys getting laid . that don't adhere to the op's list of attributes.

Edit (clarity ..)

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

It's true. Weird scuzzy guys still represent four billion years of evolutionary success.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Alphas die younger. Betas are playing the long game.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The way I look at it if I can get laid ... and I have just purely middle of the road qualities, also I could make more money be in better shape

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that's nuts. My dad is great and I love him but none of those would describe him, and that's totally ok. And he has a wife.

[–]BPremiumMeh0 points1 point  (35 children) | Copy Link

You do if you dont want to date fat girls

[–]wub123416 points17 points  (34 children) | Copy Link

I've got two dates lined up next week. I am nothing special in terms of looks. Maybe I can claim to be slightly above average for my age. No better than that. Neither of these women are fat. How did I do it? It's possible, it can be done, with some perseverance.

It fucking makes me laugh. People on here say the following:

You have to be an ultra-alpha male to get dates and women. Average women get hit on right, left and centre. I myself would date any average woman. Rate this supermodel out of 10...6/10.

Whereas I say the following:

You don't have to be an ultra-alpha male to get dates and women. Average women do not get hit on right, left and centre, with the exception of online from guys who are trying to bang anything presentable. I myself would only date a woman I consider to be attractive, and I certainly wouldn't get involved with anyone that I don't consider attractive. Rate this supermodel out of 10...clearly this is an 8/10 woman at least.

Either I'm incredibly perceptive and a human being of rare integrity, or, more likely, I'm somewhat honest and self-aware, have working eyeballs and the sense that I was born with.

I don't know what other people's reasons are for claiming and stating the things that they do.

[–]Returnofthemack3Purple Pill4 points5 points  (17 children) | Copy Link

this is an issue with red pill ill admit to. When we dicuss these things , it's under the assumption that the girls in question are fairly high value. Therefore, it becomes hard to debate with others willing to date average or below. I agree that if you compromise or adjust your standards, the situation is pretty ok. I seen it. With that said, some of us cannot compromise our standards, so the behaviors and selection criteria we discuss are definitely in play. Attractive women fit into every model of trp more often than not. That doesnt mean you have to be a rich handsome model like the idiot above posted, but it's def a different game

[–]wub123413 points14 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

My standards are:

I won't date anyone overweight because I'm not, never have been and never will be.

Must be reasonably pretty, otherwise I just won't fancy her.

Must be reasonably intelligent.

Must have no children.

Must have a job, or be studying; ie. must demonstrate signs of independence and that I'm not a meal ticket to her (ideally she would be similar social status and income to me, but this is not essential).

I consider those reasonable standards, but if you're setting yourself higher standards than that, and you'll only go for women who are in the top 5% of beauty, then you've set your standards too high.

I will be 100% honest and say that I am shallow. I wouldn't date someone that I don't like the look of. I wouldn't even consider anyone overweight. But I also know that if I limit myself to 25 year-old supermodels that I'm batting out of my league because they are better looking than me. That doesn't mean I won't try with some supremely attractive women, but you have to accept that they have a lot of options, and in all probability more attractive options than me!

If you're taking any other approach, look in the mirror and ask yourself whether you're in a strong position to do this.

[–]Returnofthemack3Purple Pill2 points3 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

well as for your last line, that's why you keep yourself in shape and lift. like no shit, you're not gona pull the top 20 percnet of women if you're a flabby piece of shit. This is one of the first things red pill emphasizes

[–]wub12343 points4 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but the way some of you go on you would think that you need to look like a Men's Health cover model to get a girlfriend.

I live in Britain; most guys my age are fat. More so in America! It's not that hard to be above average.

[–]Returnofthemack3Purple Pill0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

dude you realize you can't just listne to one or two random idiots that say they're red pill. There are trolls, there are idiots, they arne't representative of the core concepts. If you look at top posts and the side bar and rollo's site, you'll get a better picture of what it's about.

I'm aware you don't need to look like a model, i've gottne attractive women without. But it's a lot EASIER to get those women when you are closer to that standard. The closer you look to a men's health model, the more success you get with virtually no effort. I've lived both lives, it's fucking night and day.

For me, it's less about what I can do, and more about what I can do with virtually 0 effort. I want hot women but I dont want to put in any real effort and time like I did in the past. It's working out fine so far

[–]wub12346 points7 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Good for you, mate. I would say two things to what you've said here:

(a) I am never going to look like a Men's Health model, nor are many other guys;

(b) It's not necessary to look like that in order to date;

(c) It's not realistic to expect to pick up really hot women with zero effort. If you can do that, more power to you! But guys who are setting themselves this as their 'standards' are not being realistic.

[–]Returnofthemack3Purple Pill1 point2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

it's not literally 0 effort, but far less than the alternative. If you get into a healthy weight range and you put on 25-40 lbs of lean muscle, I promise you that the difference will be severe assuming you don't have some insanely glaring flaws in another category, like crippling schizophrenia or an obscene face deformity. I dunno, I think your average guy can achieve this look and slay.

But yes, in my opinion, the juice is rarely worth the squeeze when you're not 'all that' yourself. It's insane how much attention you get after you've put in the work. It's so fucking stupid, i wish everyone could experience it

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Man I think those are really pretty high standards. I don't think people could accuse you of bottom feeding or whatever .

[–]wub12342 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, you are probably right. But I still say they are reasonable because I am all of those things, except pretty!

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You think they're high? I don't know, reasonably intelligent and having a job, not overweight is pretty much an average woman from where I live. "Reasonably pretty" is subjective, we don't know what he finds pretty. Ok, no children might be tricky, if he is a little older.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu points points [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh it could be how you Englishman are so weird 😂 Lol jk. Enjoy your dates!!!

[–]wub12342 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, we are weird! Thanks, I will enjoy them!

[–]BPremiumMeh1 point2 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Cause you have the option to meet chicks not going online. most men outside of college dont have that ability. OLD has become the new normal, and it sucks

[–]wub12346 points7 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Both of these women are from dating sites, so it can be done.

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Jesus. I use Tinder, and where I am...

...it's just bots. Using Tinder is a complete waste of time for me. I don't think I've ever spoken to an actual human being on there.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I thought Tinder was just like a drive by screw thing not an actual dating thing?

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, it is, but you still need to be able to talk to, you know, real people, even for drive-by sex...

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's both...somehow. Some people do get serious relationships out of Tinder.

[–]BPremiumMeh0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Since you said women arent bombarded with attention anywhere but online, and yet you set up dates with 2 women using OLD, you "beat out" the competition. So I can extrapolate that you are either better looking than you originally let on, or these women are hideous if youre merely "average".

And OLD has become the new normal, and its just going to get worse.

[–]wub12343 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Well, you're wrong on all counts.

I may be above average for my age. I am no better than that. If I put my picture up here, half of the women would go "yuck, I don't want that bearing down on me, thank you very much!". About 25% would be indifferent. Maybe half of the remainder would think "he's not bad, he's dateable". And maybe a few would think "he's pretty attractive, actually".

The only way I managed to get dates is because I am persistent and I never give up.

[–]BPremiumMeh0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

and youre thin, which helps TONS! And youre not American, IIRC

[–]wub12343 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I am slim, but this isn't some God-given privilege, if you're not slim then eat less and move more!

And you are correct that I'm not American, but Britain is probably more akin to the US than any other Western nation, even though there are differences.

But I assure you that the same challenges exist in dating over here as in the States, you just have to make the best of yourself, keep plugging away determinedly and never give in.

[–]BPremiumMeh-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

being slim is a God given privilege. As you were blessed with a healthy body with a fast metabolism.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is just an absurd exaggeration.

Its really not tho.

If you had to be anything like that to date successfully, I wouldn't bother going out on any dates, it would be pointless.

You basically do. Women aren't dating down and at best date at their level.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I experienced different. All you're proving is that girls eventually settle down with a beta when they're done riding the cock carousel. The girls I know between the ages of 22 - 26 are chasing after the sort of man I described. And these chicks aren't super models either (that's Purple Pill's go to argument). These are 5's, 6's & 7's with major entitlements. I have noticed that girls who are 27 - 29 come back down to Earth and are less crazy but who cares by then.

[–]wub12341 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have noticed that girls who are 27 - 29 come back down to Earth and are less crazy but who cares by then.

Yeah, your life is over when you're 27!

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Biased question.

"CMV: people shouldn't do blatantly awful BS"

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]meh613no pill anymore7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

You need to stop giving a damn about what a woman wants and focus primarily on what you want.

[–]BPremiumMeh7 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

thats called rape lol

[–]Ercole-- points points [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm gonna focus primarily on getting money.

This guy's gonna rob a bank!

[–]BPremiumMeh2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

its easier and much much faster than the alternative of working hard and earning it

[–]Ercole-- points points [recovered] | Copy Link

Hopefully society develops a system of prohibited actions and appropriate deterrents to prevent things like this.

[–]Alth12Purple Pill Man2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Hah, get your head out of the clouds. Wishful thinking helps no one.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

No one is forcing men to do anything. If you don't want to adhere to masculine ideals, the police aren't going to show up at your door to throw you in jail, you just won't get as much sexual opportunity.

but it's a problem to say you want a woman that's under 30, not a slut, not a single mother, not fat or overweight, who's attractive, knows how to cook, clean and not nag, and fucks you more than once a month

Attractive men can and do have standards like these, and no one bats an eye. But, low value men have nothing to offer, so they can't ask for this much.

[–]Jex1176 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If you don't want to adhere to masculine ideals, the police aren't going to show up at your door to throw you in jail

Failure to intervene is a crime in my country. I doubt any woman would get prosecuted for failing to intervene in an assault.

Not to mention the plethora of ways men end up in jail because of our gendered family courts.

[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeahhh ending up in jail because you beat you wife doesn't mean that you have to be super masculine to get laid...

[–]Jex1177 points8 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

....What?

Did you reply to the wrong comment? I'm not sure how this applies to what I said.

[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

You said that men end up in jail because of "gendered family court" and that some how women force men to fulfill this masculine role by not having sex with them if they don't.

[–]Jex1177 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

And wife beating is in any way relevant to a discussion about family courts........ how, exactly? I really don't follow your line of thought. Please elaborate.

[–]ZoidbergluverBluePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Dude I'm making fun of your comment. Men don't go to jail because women make them commit crimes to have sex with them and courts aren't in a conspiracy against them.

[–]Jex1174 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. I thought you were sarcastically making some kind of rebut.

Men don't go to jail because women make them commit crimes to have sex with them and courts aren't in a conspiracy against them.

You don't seem to understand what "family courts" means. You're talking about woman beating in response to gender bias in our family courts. Family courts and criminal courts are two entirely different court systems - I'm not going to take your opinions seriously. When you brush this off as some kind of conspiracy theory it demonstrates to me that you don't know what you're talking about.

[–]JackGetsItRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure you're not thrown in jail... oh wait you are. Men are false accused all the time because they are men with masculine behaviors. Police are called out on fake domestic violence calls as well because women will use the government and modern narrative as a weapon. Men are also shamed socially and in the media for trying to adhere to traditional gender roles.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No one is forcing men to do anything.

Despite society doing so.

If you don't want to adhere to masculine ideals, the police aren't going to show up at your door to throw you in jail, you just won't get as much sexual opportunity.

No but women will less likely to date you and society will totally not shame/bash you for not being masculine and mock you for well being gay.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (92 children) | Copy Link

I'm selling a car. it's OK... 2006 Camry in decent condition. nothing fancy but it'll get you where you need to go. I'd value it at about $6500, at least that's what I reasonably expect to get for it. I'm willing to go down to $5500 if I haven't gotten any offers on it in a week. I'm not looking to make a fortune, I just want someone to take it off my hands and hopefully get good use out of it like I did.

I put it up for sale and I'm immediately flooded with 20 buyers. a lot of them are willing to pay $6500 for it on the spot, but some of them are offering me $8,000. $10,000. then $12,000. obviously I take the best offer, I sell the car for $12,000.

well, now the people who expected to buy it for $6500 are sending me angry messages saying if I was going to sell a car for $12,000 I could have at least had something newer and higher end so I hadn't wasted their time. they figured that even if $6500 wasn't the final agreed upon price, a 2006 Camry would definitely be in their price range. I mean... that car's an ugly piece of shit anyway, they were doing me a favor by even considering it. what they don't seem to understand is that I was just responding to the market. people wanted my car-- warts and all-- so badly that they were willing to pay double what I was asking. it's not my fault, it's supply and demand and I just happened to get lucky. and you know what? now I'm motivated to take it further... why not go out and buy a 20-year-old clunker and sell it for $10,000? even if no one will give me that I'll probably easily make what I thought I'd make on the first car.

this is how dating sites are. men are thirsty and desperate, they're throwing themselves at any girl who will swipe right and competing with each other for those girls' attention. women don't want sex as much-- at least not the kind of casual sex that these men are after-- so they have no reason to settle. someone has to make it worth their time for them to have sex with him, because the opportunity casual sex with some average guy isn't going to be enough to motivate her to turn off netflix. men don't have to settle either, but for many it's their only source of validation. for very attractive women, just sitting on tinder and getting those adoring messages is validation enough... no need to actually meet these guys.

if you were in my place selling a car, would you take the $6500? if you had beautiful women throwing themselves at you all day would you go out of your way to romance the fat chick? of course not. and again, it wouldn't be your fault... you're responding to the abundance of higher value women around you. the fact that the fat girl is lonely isn't your problem.

Now, in the real world it's not like that as much. Most people meet their partners through friend groups, so they already know something about that person and don't evaluate them as critically. you know each other, you know you're cool, you give it a shot. but online? for people who don't have social groups where that's an option? it's a feeding frenzy.

sellers market.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas8 points9 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

the opportunity casual sex with some average guy isn't going to be enough to motivate her to turn off netflix.

I think most of the time, average guys aren't losing in competition to other better guys, but rather netflix, jammies and wine lol. I think part of this is the millennial "indoor culture" or whatever

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Yep!

Don't forget sleep and naps!

If I'm not tired and restless and have no leisure activity to settle me (wine / books / music / tv / friends / Reddit / etc) then I may just hit up that average guy who's been asking to go on a date lol.

[–]JackGetsItRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

If you don't mind me asking what's your end game. Do you just netflix and winechill alone till your thirty and panic and grab somebody?

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

When I was single there was no "end game."

I dated when I felt more aroused or compelled by someone than I was by my book.

I don't force myself to date. That's weird. I want to enjoy the company I'm around. Not be there because someone on Reddit said dating should be an end game.

Though I'm sure if I had a high perpetual never ending libido I would have been more eager to date whomever whenever.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't force myself to date. That's weird. I want to enjoy the company I'm around. Not be there because someone on Reddit said dating should be an end game.

that's a healthy outlook. you see why i need to get on your level???

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

A healthy balance is key! It's fine to date. Especially if it's enjoyable. I just get exasperated easily 😪

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I just get exasperated easily

story of my life. This should be your flair lol

[–]JackGetsItRed Pill Man0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Not be there because someone on Reddit said dating should be an end game

I'm not really suggesting what your own personal end game should be; that's why I'm asking. Now mother nature might have some polite words with you because as you age all those average guys that are so abundant will at some point stop knocking. It might even happen sooner then you think. Don't you have an internal drive/feeling that you need to use your prime years to secure a quality man that your passionate about?

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Now mother nature might have some polite words with you because as you age all those average guys that are so abundant will at some point stop knocking.

I'm well aware that the thirst from men dies down as I age.

Don't you have an internal drive/feeling that you need to use your prime years to secure a quality man that your passionate about?

No I don't really have an internal drive to secure a man for the sake of it. Again my sexuality is reactionary. A man or woman has to arouse that in me. Basically on a day to day I don't necessarily crave it unless someone is compelling it.

The closest thing I've had is a rational thought that if I want kids and a "family" I should find a good father.

More importantly you asked

quality man that your passionate about?

If I'd rather watch Netflix or hang with my friends or sip tea reading a book or go jogging or peruse Twitter or Reddit, do you think those "average guys" are people I'm passionate about?

How am I doing them a favor by getting into a relationship with them when throughout the relationship I'd rather be doing anything but hanging with them? That's not even fair to them.

Also this is all moot because this was how I treated dating when I was single. And quite frankly it works.

Only date when you're aroused and compelled by the person and they're compatible with you and your goals. Basic rules.

[–]JackGetsItRed Pill Man1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

If you don't mind I have a few more questions. This is purplepill 'debate' right? I respect you and don't want you to feel like I'm judging you. I'm just trying to understand your position better.

So if how do you expect to meet people that stimulate you if your at home all the time?

Also do you anticipate that someone will stimulate you enough to want to marry and have a long term productive faithful relationship or is that part of your reluctance that you don't predict anyone can awaken that much commitment in you?

Is this attitude something you've always had or did crappy early dating experiences create it?

[–]GridReXXit be like that4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I have a vibrant social life. Ask /u/sunhappy_dc. We're friends on FB / IG lol. While I do enjoy napping and look forward to chilling/ relaxing by myself, my friends always tease that my social calendar is replete.

As far as not being easily 😍😍😍. Ive always been like this. It's not due to crappy relationships. For example I didn't date in HS because I didn't find anyone attractive enough to make me feel like "omg I have to be around them or I feel sad."

I've felt it in college with a guy.

Then again with my ex boyfriend who I dated for 3 years mid 20s.

2 women I've felt that way about.

And as I said I'm dating a guy now who gives me a nice "aww I like him" sensation. For me that's rare so when it happens I take extreme notice.

I don't think I'm all that rare. Most of my female friends are the same way. We don't easily fall for every person who says Hi to us.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I have a vibrant social life. Ask /u/sunhappy_dc . We're friends on FB / IG lol.

its' like her own private extro militia. i never see the same person in any of her pictures except her.

[–]JackGetsItRed Pill Man0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think I'm all that rare.

That's why I'm asking so many questions because I'm seeing this trend with a lot of women. A complete step back. I'm wondering if because of Tinder and Social media there's just so much male attention that women are just upping the bar with what they need to be fulfilled, captivated. Do you have any more incites and why you and a lot of your friends have this approach?

I think some of it might be generational too. I'm 35 and as much as I try to socialize, interact with younger generations I never really 'get it' I almost exclusively date 21-25 year olds and I'm seeing this trend with them a lot too.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

And the key word here is "go on a date." Not "have sex." Most likely that date will turn into a "friend date" very quickly, although you will hopefully at least have the tact not to make some fb post publicly friendzoning the guy lol.

[–]TheGrayPillMan11 points12 points  (64 children) | Copy Link

if you were in my place selling a car, would you take the $6500? if you had beautiful women throwing themselves at you all day would you go out of your way to romance the fat chick? of course not. and again, it wouldn't be your fault... you're responding to the abundance of higher value women around you. the fact that the fat girl is lonely isn't your problem.

Maybe you should use this analogy on all those 30+ women whining about how they are invisible on the meat market.

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment17 points18 points  (61 children) | Copy Link

Maybe you should use this analogy on all those 30+ women whining about how they are invisible on the meat market.

They aren't the ones here bitching about how sad their lives are. If they were, trust me, we would tell them.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (50 children) | Copy Link

Well women don't know what loneliness is and they can always get a Beta, but at the same time they are lonely after 30 and no one wants them

The guys on here just hate women, no matter what you do they can't win. Easier to see it that way. Men are wonderful after all.

[–] points points | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

A feel good statement but I disagree, women can adapt much easier than men. They can have girl friends, a SO pretty easily, and sex very easily. Much easier for women to not be lonely than men. I've never met a woman with no options and no friends. I know quite a few guys without either.

[–]fiat_lux_Red Pillar4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men suffer loneliness better than women. This assumption is based on how men will actively choose to isolate themselves at higher rates than women, for whatever purposes: career, fame, fortune, popularity, thrills, etc.

[–]LittleWindowpane points points [recovered] | Copy Link

There are fewer lonely women than lonely men, I'll agree. And women are more social than men. I've met one woman with no options; she had a facial deformity. Good body and decent personality.

Still, it's like this: more women are short than men. A 5'0 person, male or female, isn't reaching the top shelf. Loneliness sucks, even if there are fewer women in this miserable state.

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Still, it's like this: more women are short than men. A 5'0 person, male or female, isn't reaching the top shelf. Loneliness sucks, even if there are fewer women in this miserable state.

What does that have to do with loneliness??

[–]monkeysinmypocket0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I mean, if you've never met one..

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

they're jealous and resentful so they build walls made of revenge fantasies around their feelings.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think that part of it is that we all have been fed an exaggerated idea of what a normal attractive woman looks like. People who get most of these cues are seeing the "homely girl" on a sitcom and think that is a what a semi- unattractive woman loos like when in all reality even the ugo's on "sitcoms" are still in the top 5 % of attractiveness.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Top 5% I don't even know where people get all these cray cray numbers from. I can't even.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You think that the people on television are a good example of average Americans ?

[–]darkmoon093 points4 points  (22 children) | Copy Link

I think it's rather fair to say that women really don't experience the same degree of loneliness as men do. Men are the disposable sex while women have the halo and WaW effect.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (21 children) | Copy Link

Men aren't disposable, the misandry here.

[–]darkmoon092 points3 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

Really? men aren't the ones expected to fight in wars, work hazardous jobs, take casualties in doing that, etc?

Men are disposable in the sense that men are the ones expected to be the cogwheels in society, if one gets damaged it's quickly replaced by another. No one really gives second though about the men who die in conflict while seeing female soldiers in coffins provokes an emphasis on the poor women who lost their lives.

There's also the question of male suicide and depression - Be a man. Suck it up. The world isn't fair. Quit bitching. No one owes you shit. You're not entitled. Etc, etc.

Men are offing themselves everyday because of deep shit they're going through but no one really cares that much because...they're just men. Men are troublemakers anyway, right? they're misogynists and potential rapists so society doesn't see male pain and struggle as valid.

[–]thebassoonist06Purple Pill Woman6 points7 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

We need a culture change around those things.

[–]darkmoon091 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

There won't be a culture change so long as man-hating feminists harpies and their lobbyists remain in power.

[–]thebassoonist06Purple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

The same was said about every other cultural and civil rights movement. Gotta work for it.

[–]Reed_49831 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, the feminist government of Sweden just enacted the military draft for men and women, so perhaps not all of them are manhaters.

[–]monkeysinmypocket0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Those red pills sure are powerful hallucinogenics...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

When was the last time you personally were expected to fight in a war?

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

You can bet you ass that when if (when) WW3 kicks off the draft will be reinstated and young men will be "expected" to answer the call, because men have always been the ones in the tribe to fight and protect the tribe against enemies.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And yet there is not WW3 right now so again I ask, when have you personally been expected to fight in a war?

[–]monkeysinmypocket0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

You're like a parody of self-pity at this point. It's hilarious. The only people I've ever seen disparage men's problems are red pilled guys who call them faggots and claim depression can be fixed with more lifting. This is all on you.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

lol GTFO. You know damn well what I'm saying is true because it makes fucking sense. You going the low-ball and labeling me a parody of self-pity is a pretty lame way of trying to avoid debate because you have no ground to stand on and you know it.

[–]monkeysinmypocket0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You know damn well what I'm saying is true because it makes fucking sense.

It makes sense to you because it's motivated reasoning. It isn't really born out by the facts

You're the one dismissing me to avoid debate. My questions is how can you complain about the way men are treated by society when the red pill treats them badly. I reiterate:

The only people I've ever seen disparage men's problems are red pilled guys who call them faggots and claim depression can be fixed with more lifting.

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Interesting. I've never had a response to seeing a dead female soldier versus a male one.

But maybe that's because I'm a woman. I don't feel as protective of women as maybe men do.

That said my rational brain does realize that in times of extreme human survival a dead woman is more costly than a dead man. A dead woman = wasted womb.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That said my rational brain does realize that in times of extreme human survival a dead woman is more costly than a dead man. A dead woman = wasted womb.

Exactly. Which is why men are expected to be the fresh meat for the grinder if need be because in a purely biological sense men are disposable.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men aren't disposable, the misandry here.

What do you think soldiers are if not disposable?

[–]TheGrayPillMan3 points4 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

The guys on here just hate women, no matter what you do they can't win.

To borrow an argument from feminists. "We don't hate women, we just hate toxic femininity".

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

But... But... FEMINISM. Is that the only thing guys can say on here.

[–]the_calibre_cat2 points3 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

I find that men have their fair share of problems, and I don't even think the red pill members here deny that. I won't deny that there is some amount of digging their heels in on ridiculous concepts, such as "You need to be Greek God six-figure salary macho alpha male" to get a girl...

...but there is no shortage of heels being dug into the ground from the reverse, where things like "muh Patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" somehow aren't literally shaming men for being men. Feminism literally talks about those "RadFems" like they're an accepted, welcome part of the movement - despite them... pretty openly harboring misandrist views. Like, you can't even hamster them away the way you guys do "Patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity," yet strangely, there's no calls to disavow! DISAVOOOOOW! which is just bullshit.

The holier-than-thou attitude makes it just that much worse, frankly. At least T.R.P. acknowledges that they're being butts.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

where things like "muh Patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" somehow aren't literally shaming men for being men.

That's because they literally aren't. Nothing about the concepts of patriarchy or toxic masculinity are about shaming men. If you think they are, then you don't understand what these concepts mean.

Feminism literally talks about those "RadFems" like they're an accepted, welcome part of the movement - despite them... pretty openly harboring misandrist views.

There's no governing body of feminism that decides who is and who isn't allowed to be a feminist, or what the official beliefs of feminism are. RadFems are exactly that: feminists who hold views that are considered "radical" or out of the mainstream. Even then there's no single set of "radical feminist" beliefs, it's a catch-all term for all sorts of beliefs that most feminists don't agree with, including transphobia, misandry, and many others.

Like, you can't even hamster them away the way you guys do "Patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity," yet strangely, there's no calls to disavow! DISAVOOOOOW! which is just bullshit.

I'm sorry feminists aren't disagreeing with each other the "right way". If it would make you feel better, you can become a feminist and then shout "disavooooow!" at some RadFems.

[–]the_calibre_cat0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

That's because they literally aren't. Nothing about the concepts of patriarchy or toxic masculinity are about shaming men. If you think they are, then you don't understand what these concepts mean.

Yes, I do. They are absolutely employed to shame men for doing things that men do. Men are aggressive. Men are competitive. Men are violent. Men are driven by their sexuality. These aren't things men choose to be, it's what men have been bred to be, since the beginning of time, by the very people who are the ultimate selectors of mating: Women.

These are precisely the characteristics that are zeroed in on by the terms "toxic masculinity" and "patriarchy," and that's fucking bullshit. Take those away, and you no longer have men. Feminists make the rationalization that, oh, if men would just jettison these characteristics, they and society would be an idyllic utopia. If that isn't shaming men, then I don't fucking know what is. You don't have a welcoming platform, and people are right to resist it.

I'm sorry feminists aren't disagreeing with each other the "right way".

I'm sorry right-wingers aren't disagreeing with each other the "right way." Then again, I'm a random internet commenter, not Jake Tapper.

If it would make you feel better, you can become a feminist and then shout "disavooooow!" at some RadFems.

I'm not expecting RadFems to disavow their rhetoric. I'm expecting moderate feminists to, you know, the way they expect Donald Trump every non-leftist to disavow David Duke every meaningless, contrived villain eleventy bajillion times.

Also, I'm a male, so no - I couldn't become a feminist. I don't possess nearly enough self-loathing for that.

[–]OfSpock1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

by the very people who are the ultimate selectors of mating: Women.

You think women have had free choice over whom they married for most of history? It's like you don't understand patriarchy and arranged marriage, war or social circles.

[–]ifelsedowhilelocal cop - cherry top-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

so when a feminist suggests we need to cull male population to a 10% of the total (and there's more than one who said it) I'll see that as legit feminism as much as anything else.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

That's fine. It is "legit" in the sense that they are free to hold and express that opinion. That doesn't make it mainstream though. If 99% of other feminists disagree, that doesn't make that person stop being a feminist.

On the flip side, if you don't hear the 99% disagree because they're not doing it in the way you want them to, it doesn't mean shit about feminism. Your opinion of what feminism is doesn't matter any more than the opinion of the radical who wants to kill all men.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yea they are horrible, But really have you seen the women who routinely do the "Patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity," thing . I have yet to see one of them I would bang with charlie sheens dirty dong.

[–]the_calibre_cat-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Man. I wish I saw that. I know the internet is all "lol landwhale blue hairs," but... I see plenty of uberfeminists that are reasonably hot, but... man. I just... don't hate myself, or my gender, enough to want to be in a relationship with that kind of partner. That's where I'm kinda like... "...yeah, loneliness wouldn't be so bad."

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I get you .. For me it has not been an issue cause i literally have never seen one of those types who i would even throw a grudge fuck into .

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

You do see them bitching on reddit though.

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Where?

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Relationships

askmen/women

twoxchromosmes.

The threads quite often get self deleted when the peanut gallery calls them out for (quite often) sounding entitled.

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Relationships

askmen/women

twoxchromosmes.

I don't really hang out there. And I'm not going out of my way to yell at sad women about all the wrong things they did. But trust me when one pops up in /r/rpwives I'm first in line to break it down for them.

The threads quite often get self deleted when the peanut gallery calls them out for (quite often) sounding entitled.

... Wait, weren't you trying to point out that these women need to be told they are being shitty and nobody is doing it? Yes, people tell women when they are being shitty too, don't worry about that.

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait, weren't you trying to point out that these women need to be told they are being shitty and

...No, just giving examples of women bitching on reddit.

Yes, people tell women when they are being shitty too, don't worry about that.

Not as much, relationships is pretty infamous for ts gender bias, a good rule of thumb is if you want to receive more honest advice switch the genders if male.

[–]TheGrayPillMan-3 points-2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

that isn't the topic of this post and no one is in here arguing that huffpo author's point. start a post if you want to discuss it

[–]ifelsedowhilelocal cop - cherry top-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

like you never used the whatabout argument!

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't talk to those women through an article... Like spaceboobs said, if those women came here, posted a thread on PPD, about being invisible, then it would be different.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That has nothing to do with the OP, but ok.

[–]Temperfuelmma3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

What you're describing is a woman going for the best dating option she can afford.

I don't understand what relation it has with OP where he is claiming that while men maintain their same set of tradition gender roles; women don't and call it misogyny if they have to.

He is addressing a lack of quality women while you're acknowledging a presence of quality men...precisely proving his point.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

because most of what OP described (height, attractiveness, confidence, wealth, social aptitude, intelligence) isn't a traditional gender role, it's a series of traits that are attractive in men. the male gender role is a series of responsibilities mostly oriented around providing and fatherhood. an unattractive man who lacks many of OP's traits could still play a traditional gender role to a tee, and an attractive wealthy man could be completely unwilling to.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

How are they not gender roles? If you're short, fat, not confident, poor and unemployed, with no social/emotional intelligence or mental aptitude, how are you fulfilling any traditional male gender roles?

A guy that's 6"2, making great money, handsome, built like Troy Brad Pitt with leadership qualities (confident, aggressive, able to defend himself), high intelligence and social status is someone that's considered a man's man and that's why I wrote that in the OP. What you wrote was just a bunch of nonsense.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

you're confusing conventionally attractive with gender roles. an unattractive man is just as capable of providing for his wife and kids as an attractive one.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not confusing anything. I know what male gender roles are. You obviously don't. If I'm wrong, then you're saying that the opposite must be true. So explain how a broke, effeminate, weak, unconfident, chubby man with no friends or experience with women is adhering to traditional male gender roles. I'll wait.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

is he providing for his wife and kids? does he do manly tasks around the house?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Having a good job was listed in the OP.

Do you have any real rebuttal or nah?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

is he striving to get a good job or sitting on his ass?

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No hey is responding to the underlying pulse of what the op is saying. and he is spot fucking on (future boobs is )

[–]ShitArchonXPRFurfag autist|Too misogynist for BP|Too socially liberal for RP0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

sellers market

Exacly. The worse the ratio of single men to fuckable women, the more miserable the single men will have it--and lesbians have it even worse, just ask the ones on Voat. You see why there are compelling reasons to date outside America?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

People are hypocrites. More at 11.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

Men have to strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich or making a large six figure salary, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence, never show any signs of weakness and have to be a total badass that takes no shit from anyone. Men have to be all of that and more or else.

You need to stop listening to what women say they want and you need to stop listening to little girls telling you they all want Christian Gray and won't settle for less.

They're all so cute and silly, and they also say cute and silly stuff, just don't take it word for word!!!

[–]darkmoon092 points3 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

We don't have to pay attention to much of what they say, but rather pay attention to what they actually do and what we see them doing is going after the walking epitome of the alpha male. Women will tell you all of the time that they like nice, nerdy guys but they don't actually date them, instead they lust after the jocks and gangbangers. Actions speak louder than words.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

That's not what I see.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (27 children) | Copy Link

Try looking beyond your happy little social circle of liberal hipsters, sex-positive sluts, and bisexual fags. You might see then.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You forgot wikins, treefolk and faeries.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

You forgot the Birkenstocks ...ya damn hiippy

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

and druggies, apparently.

[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want1 point2 points  (23 children) | Copy Link

Just because we hang out in different circles, does not make what we see less true

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (20 children) | Copy Link

My point is that what you're seeing can be largely credited to the fact that your social circle is going influence how you perceive the world around you. Just because you may hang out in a crowd where the RP concepts sound completely alien and crazy, doesn't necessarily mean that RP concepts are bullshit. Do you agree with that? because to be fair, as someone who's largely red, I think it can go both ways - maybe it would be beneficial for some RP guys to expand their horizons, get into different crowds and perhaps realize that there's a little more nuance to human nature. But I also think it's only fair for you to acknowledge that what RP observes isn't complete bullshit and that there's some weight to it.

[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want1 point2 points  (19 children) | Copy Link

I honestly do think RP can work on certain women. I also think it can be wrong and harmful and it not the only way or even the right way in a lot of situations. Some act like it is the only way which I hate.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (18 children) | Copy Link

Think of RP strategy as the 'shotgun approach' - it's the best way of getting the most net results as opposed to the 'sniper approach' where you treat every situation as individually unique but at the price that you're likely to get the most minimal results that you're looking for. RP guys are aiming for the maximum results so they take the shotgun approach.

[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want1 point2 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

To a lot of BP the "sniper" approach works better, because you may not get as many dates, but you get dates that fit better with your personality. So many guys on RP complain that women act like children and only go to the bar and party, when those are specifically the type of girl these things will usually work on. If you want a different type of girl, the sniper technique is better

[–]PurpleBanner0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Fuck the RP/BP approach. I think most of the men in RP/BP are pathetically weak and backwards because you both spend so much time trying to figure ways to make yourself a suitable applicant for the affects of a woman.

[–]Reed_49830 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

To a lot of BP the "sniper" approach works better, because you may not get as many dates, but you get dates that fit better with your personality.

Yup, thank you. This is what I always thought and still do. I've seen terpers admit that they look for a submissive woman who looks up to her man in a relationship. It's fine if that's what they want, but they shouldn't claim that this is the only thing that can work or that their strategies work with the woman an individual person is attracted to.

[–]darkmoon090 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy Link

The idea that RP "only works on party girls" is debatable. The whole idea behind AWALT is to show that it's not just the party girls who are like that, that mousy nerd girl you see at Starbucks can very well have a Tinder profile and is riding the CC.

[–]PurpleBanner0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Just because we hang out in different circles, does not make what we see less true

Actually, the social circle you associate with does have an influence on how you perceive the world.

[–]shogunofsarcasmI do what I want0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So that goes the same for RP then

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple10 points11 points  (88 children) | Copy Link

How do women force men into gender roles? Men force themselves into the roles because they fear how they will be perceived by other men with the alternative. The manosphere is enforcing male gender roles and stomping out anything else.

[–]cholomite6 points7 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

No. If men want to get laid, they need to adhere to these gender roles because that's what women are attracted to. It's not other men, or the manosphere, it's men's desire to get laid that causes them to fit into these roles.

[–]LittleknownfactsVaguely Uncivil Comment6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No. If men want to get laid, they need to adhere to these gender roles because that's what women are attracted to. It's not other men, or the manosphere, it's men's desire to get laid that causes them to fit into these roles.

I think are confusing two separate thoughts. No, no one is forcing you into gender roll. There are all sorts of gay and trans people out and about, and hate crimes against them are at an all time low. If you want to break your roll, go ahead no one will care. But make no mistake, your actions are not without consequences, mainly being that women will not be sexually interested in you.

[–]Temperfuelmma1 point2 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Not really. If we all woke up tomorrow with no Alpha's alive women would undoubtedly lower their standards.

The root of the problem is the opportunistic, competitive, rational, lone wolf, anti-group-think nature of men. There will be that one guy in the hoard of the beta's that'll think to himself, "Wait. These idiots are a dime a dozen, I just have to be a little bit alpha and I would be able to get more women than them."

so the other men think the same thing and be a little more alpha than the previous guy, and so on......

whereas women would be like, "oh stacy isn't adhering to gender roles so I don't have to either"

[–]Battle-Scars4 points5 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand why a man improving himself to gain more access to women is a "problem" in your eyes.

[–]BPremiumMeh1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

because it forces every other guy to do the same, so they arent left out of the fun. Women are all about team woman, where as every man is out for himself, since women reward it.

It all comes back to the fact that women get to choose, so they dont have to compete for anything other than the best of the best. Men have to compete for everything. It sucks being a guy

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

You could always get gender reassignment surgery if you hate being a man so much.

[–]BPremiumMeh-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Sweet, so I can be a mutalated man lol.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

But then you'd have something new to complain about, at least. And, you'd escape the burden of performance.

[–]BPremiumMeh-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Id rather complain as an intact man, than complain as a mutalated man

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

You don't have to get "mutalated" (it's mutilated btw), you could just throw a dress and some makeup on. The trick is finding a dress to match your lazy, entitled, and self-defeatist attitudes :)

[–]Battle-Scars1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

And think what an awesome world it would be where every male maximized his potential through intelligence and hard work. You think maybe the current sexual marketplace would change in favor of Men a little more?

[–]BPremiumMeh0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

nope, cause men still want women more than women want men. I could reverse the situation. Imagine how wonderful our world would be if every woman was hot, nice, and didnt have a biological advantage demanding men compete

[–]Battle-Scars3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women are attracted to OP's description of the male gender role and reward that attraction with sex. And Men, well we like sex so we are going to improve ourselves to get more sex. It is also possible to not be any of those things and still get sex but your chances diminish. The manosphere is promoting male positivism which leads to more sex.

[–]OfSpock0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Men are choosing to alter their behaviour, women aren't forcing them.

[–]Battle-Scars0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly my point.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (29 children) | Copy Link

Umm....by not dating guys who aren't 6"0, successful, ripped, confident, dominant, aggressive with tons of social status/value. Are you serious? Whenever girls get shamed for their "standards", girls just say "we like what we like". "I need a man that I can look up to (height)". "I don't want to be able to walk over him (bad boys/aggressive)". "I want stability, a man who's secure (money)." "I'm allowed to want someone I'm attracted to (muscles, abs, Chad)". "I don't want a loser that sits in the house playing video games all day. He has to have an interesting life (social status)." So yes....you are forcing guys to adhere to all these gender roles if they want a chance with you but you bust a blood vessel when a guy says he doesn't want a single mom or a fat chick or a chick who boned 20 guys. It's the same coin. Just flipped. The guy has to fulfill all of your biological desires to make your reptilian brain feel satiated but you are unwilling to fulfill any female gender roles that does that for a male.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch10 points11 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

"Not dating guys" who don't meet your standards is not the same as shaming them. People are attracted to what they're attracted to.

If these standards truly mattered as much to men as to women, they could easily just not date women who don't measure up. The fact that they do shows it must not be a big deal to men.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple2 points3 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Yeah and women date men who aren't meeting the criteria that was presented here. They do. All the time. Have you been in public? All sorts of couples exist.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch7 points8 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, no shit. There are ugly couples everywhere. For the most part, couples are looksmatched.

But when it comes to gender roles, women have more flexibility to be exhibit traditionally masculine behaviours than men have to exhibit traditionally feminine behaviours. If men truly valued women being happy homemakers the same way women value men being confident and focused on their careers, then men would only date women who aspire to be housewives. But they don't, meaning traditional femininity seems like less of a priority for men, than traditional masculinity is for women.

[–]GridReXXit be like that2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

Men could not date women who don't meet their standards.

But this never happens.

For every guy who claims the only attractive women are carbon copies of a Stepford Wife there's a thousand other guys who fall head over heels for Olivia Munn or Rihanna or Zooey Deschanel or Jemima Kirke or even Michelle Rodriguez.

As long as a chick is physically attractive and gets on well with the guy, she doesn't have to conform to some 1950s Betty Draper archetype. Guys will still love her.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple1 point2 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

If your point was about roles and not appearances you probably shouldn't have brought up the whole six foot and ripped segment.

Yeah men should have as much flexibility as women when it comes to roles. I'm all about equality in my relationship when it comes to decisions and delegations of work. If my husband wants to be a stay at home dad and watch Batman all day then I will work to get to the point to provide for us all.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Are you replying to the right person? I didn't reference "six foot and ripped" at all.

If my husband wants to be a stay at home dad and watch Batman all day then I will work to get to the point to provide for us all

I don't think I could ever respect someone who does nothing but watch Batman all day, but you do you.

[–]Battle-Scars7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't think I could ever respect someone who does nothing but watch Batman all day

Unless you're Alfred the Butler, whose job it is to watch Batman all day...

[–]shoup88Report me bitch1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Very nice lol.

Other than Alfred, I believe the word you're searching for is "bum".

[–]dj10showhell in a handbasket1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But even Alfred got fed up with Batman's bitch-ass-ness, and left him.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

lol

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

You're right. I was thinking of what OP said in this line of comments. I'm on mobile so I didn't notice a distinction between the two.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Maybe double check before you cop such attitude.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Check yourself

[–]BPremiumMeh0 points1 point  (13 children) | Copy Link

yes it is. and it is a big deal to men, but most have no option to change it.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch4 points5 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

You have the same option women have - just don't date people who don't meet your standards. Have you heard of MGTOW?

[–]BPremiumMeh0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

lol, but unlike women, we have much higher sex drives on average and most of us dont have multiple options to choose from. Makes saying no much harder if you dont know when the next time you'll even be touched by someone again.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch3 points4 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

That's true - men and women are different. I'm not saying holding out is an easy option, but it definitely exists. You just don't want to do it.

[–]BPremiumMeh1 point2 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Nobody wants to do it. The issue is women and a handful of men can afford to hold out, cause they have place holders ( plates & orbiters/FWBs ) to provide for their needs. Most men dont have that luxury, so holding out is a poor strategy as well since it won't help them move closer to their goal

[–]shoup88Report me bitch3 points4 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

If giant swaths of men held out, you would move closer to your goal. That will never happen, though. Because sex matters more to men than traditional feminine behaviours. Which is my point.

[–]dj10showhell in a handbasket0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

How are giant swaths of men that are already not getting laid/into relationships holding out going to help those already not getting laid/into relationships? Girls are already fucking/dating who they want. Those unselected removing themselves from the game has no effect. It's like if I were to tell Manchester United my beer league team isn't interested in selling me to them. Manchester United does not give a fuck.

[–]whichbladeNA Paler Shade of Purple4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Well men are only going for large breasted, hour glass, feminine, submissive, with a beautiful face and skin, etc etc. That's what they want. Attractive women. Don't say just because they will have sex with a woman without those things means that the men don't still desire the best of the best. Men will cave to their own hormones before they wait out getting to the most beautiful woman.

If you disagree with all that personally then you'll understand how I might disagree with your assertion as well. I love a man who is none of the criteria you listed and not a moment has ever gone by where I wished he was more of anything.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Only sleeping with men we are attracted to and want to sleep with isn't "forcing" anyone to do anything. Have a little respect for men and their own choices.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't feminists reinforce this by screeching things like "lol male tears" at any man who seeks to discuss his issues?

And their various "real men" campaigns about how real men ought to put women first.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're completely missing the point of the "male tears" meme.

When I've needed to discuss or express my feelings the most feminist women I know are the ones I know won't judge me for it.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming1 point2 points  (37 children) | Copy Link

They mostly reward the masculine men with sex and relationships, not the unmasculine or effeminate men.

Dwayne Johnson got man of the year! Lol.

[–] points points | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming-1 points0 points  (35 children) | Copy Link

I'm never silly. If I was silly what would I need a woman for?

He got Sexiest man of the year actually.

Shows you what feminists gush over!

[–]shoup88Report me bitch5 points6 points  (18 children) | Copy Link

You're talking about People magazine? Haha, I'm not sure I'd call that a feminist rag.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (17 children) | Copy Link

No, but it reflects our feminist culture's desires.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch7 points8 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Ah right, everything is feminist, feminism is everything. Comparing women's bodies to each other is feminist. Ruthless takedowns of women are feminist. Baby bump or big lunch?: obviously feminist.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (15 children) | Copy Link

I mean, can you show me a single anti-feminist magazine or TV show or movie that's mainstream?

Just one.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch6 points7 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

The O'Reilly Factor

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh man I can't wait for him to try and hamster that Bill O'Reilly is a feminist.

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..||[🍰] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Billo is mainstream? Don't tell him that. All those Fox Noise talking heads rail against "the mainstream media" several times per hour. It's in their contract or something.

Face it. Feminism is mainstream, and the mainstream media are feminist. Why is this? 1. Women control 70% of household spending. 2. Most women are feminists. 3. Feminists are easily offended. 4. Offended people like to boycott sponsors of the offending programs. 5. Advertisers hate that. 6. Corporations like money. 7. Media corporations like advertising revenue.

All of these factors combined make "The Factor" a niche program , or counterculture, if you will. The right wing may control all three branches of government, but right-wing media is still not mainstream.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

most aren't either, and have nothing to do with feminism.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

All mainstream media reflects society's general beliefs, currently all mainstream media has feminist themes and pushes feminist ideas, values, principles.

Again, one example that shows otherwise.

I don't think you can do it, because such media would not become mainstream to begin with.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Tucker Max

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Idk anything about him. What of his is mainstream?

[–]orcscorper..||. |.|.| ...|| .|.|| |..||[🍰] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Never heard of him, and a quick Google told me I would probably enjoy his stuff. He's not hosting the Oscars; he's a guy with a website. I think your definition of "mainstream" differs from mine considerably .

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

What is "sexiest man of the year"? Who gives out this award?

[–]shoup88Report me bitch3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Gay men and publicists.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Okay.

And do you think People Magazine is 1, a feminist publication, and 2, genuinely believes that Dwayne Johnson is the most attractive male human on the planet?

Or do you think maybe they chose him because he had a lot of upcoming projects to promote and would sell a lot of magazines?

Keep in mind that "Sexiest Man Alive" also includes a photo shoot, an interview, and advertisements for said sexy man's upcoming movies/albums/whatever (which means $$$$ for the magazine.)

Also keep in mind that post-wall Jennifer Aniston won their "Most Beautiful Woman" award in 2016 (a year where she just happened to release two movies, with several more in the works for 2017.) Do you think that's an accurate portrayal of what men find attractive?

Come on Set, you're smarter than this.

[–]ThirdEyeSqueegeed0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

the most attractive male human on the planet?

That would be this guy

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming-1 points0 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

It's feminist propaganda in my book, pushing a hypermasculine man with high status, pushing an older woman as beautiful. Both show you what feminists want to be viewed as most desired.

Even if it's half bullshit to sell mags and push movies, it's exactly what the feminist society wants and likes to see, which is why they do it. A pretty nice circle really.

To say it's meaningless and indicative of nothing would also be incorrect.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71GV79NPpZL._UX425_.jpg

(Also wouldn't feminist propaganda be pushing a beta man as the sexiest man alive? I thought feminists didn't want people to know they were attracted to masculine men with muscles.)

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

Nope, betas are not the ideal man, they're the ideal husband/nest slave, not the ideal Genetics, the ideal form of a Manly Man.

Any man that's muscular as shit probably has good genetics, high testosterone levels. Granted, steroids sure fuck that perception up don't they.

[–]TheGrayPillMan0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

How do women force men into gender roles? Men force themselves into the roles because they fear how they will be perceived by other men with the alternative.

My male friends are totally ok with us spendning a weekend playing Fallout/Skyrim and not leaving the couch. My male friends don't give a shit how much or how little sex I have. It is women who call me and my male friends disgusting nerds who will never get girlfriends and who will die as virgins.

[–]Lonny_zone2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically, men still want to fuck women despite all this. Women aren't quite as easy to please.

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic11 points12 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

It's not hypocritical, because women aren't telling men that they have to desire non-traditional women. If a man doesn't want to date a non-traditional woman, then don't, and find a woman who is more traditional.

[–]contrasupra5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like this issue gets confused because so many men are such incredible assholes to women they see as unattractive for whatever reason. Like, I'm a not-particularly-attractive woman. I know a lot of men wouldn't be interested in having sex with me. And that's...fine with me? I have a significant other, if I was trying to date it might be demoralizing, but I certainly don't object to men having preferences. That would be insane. I DO object to men going out of their way to tell women that they are unattractive, not because it's wrong to have preferences, but because it's simply rude as hell. I have a friend who literally yesterday posted screenshots on Facebook from Tinder where a guy messaged her just to let her know that he thought she was a fat pig. How can anyone think that kind of behavior is acceptable?

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS13 points14 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It's not hypocritical, because women aren't telling men that they have to desire non-traditional women.

Oh, the women who are the most vocal constantly complain when any non-traditional trait reduces a woman's datability in the eye of men.

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the women who do this are easily ignored. My point is that women's embracing of new gender roles has not stopped men from still desiring women. If men are really that mad that they are being held to a double standard then they are free to abstain from sex or relationships with women. This would be the only thing that I could see that would make more women embrace traditional gender roles again. Unfortunately, most men don't seem to be able to do this, so they have to live with a double standard where they have to be masculine if they want to be sexually successful, and women can choose to be either masculine or traditionally feminine and still be successful.

[–]OfSpock4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, this whole argument boils down to "Women have standards but men don't. Wah. Make women give up their standards so men don't have to change."

[–]ginasaurus-rex3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And guys who bang anything that moves will still complain and cry "where have all the pure virgin women gone?" and "why can't they find a nice virgin girl to settle down with?" after they've had sex with 200 women. Hypocrites gonna hypocrite.

[–]thebassoonist06Purple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Usually the most vocal people of any group are the idiots.

Edit : also isn't that the same thing OP is complaining about? No one likes their own gender roles but wants the other gender to adhere to theirs I guess.

[–]Ercole-- points points [recovered] | Copy Link

Men have to strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich or making a large six figure salary, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident and never wavering in said confidence, never show any signs of weakness and have to be a total badass that takes no shit from anyone. Men have to be all of that and more or else.

Try being strong, powerful, dominant, intelligent, in shape, having a work ethic, and being sociable. Don't waver from it and you'll be preselected by women and you'll even be allowed to show vulnerability so long as you've earned it and you aren't just whining about things that other men she knows are capable of overcoming. You'll even have your pick of women who are worth these demands.

Nobody's forcing you to give all this to a woman for free.

[–]Blaat19852 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

The effort is not worth the reward.

[–]IamTheWalkingMenu points points [recovered] | Copy Link

Then opt out. Nobody cares if you do what you want to.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But women all wanna marry MGTOWs and stuff!! They're all soooo high value.

I don't know why these guys think girls who want relationships give a shit about guys who don't.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Then don't do it and learn to be happy with being alone.

[–]Ercole-- points points [recovered] | Copy Link

You don't even know what the reward is like.

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

You're right that it is hypocritical, but they can't do anything about it, manly men just make them feel so good.

Idk who's lazier women or men, but women sure do try to do as little as possible.

Although feminism and women working allows for men to be weaker and lazier too to some degree. Lose lose.

[–]Gorgatron1968where are the craps5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I think (unfortunately ) that it is human nature (men/women) to do the minimum.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. Though there's still some difference. I think men are more likely to be proactive and want to work, compete.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think men are more likely to be proactive and want to work, compete.

Then why are wages paid and prizes offered?

No one wants to do something for nothing.

[–]OfSpock0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No, check out different cultures. When not forced, men don't work nearly as long hours as women.

[–]godfatherchimpRed Pill Man3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not a male gender role, thats what women are biologically attracted to. You can't control attraction.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

If you don't want to follow traditional gender roles, DON'T.

You need to learn to be strong enough to stand up for yourself once in awhile. And quit blaming women for what they are out are not doing. They have nothing to do with your life.

"Butbutbutbut... WOMEN!!" FFS, so much whining. Do what you want.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck yes. This. So much this.

If you like your gender rule, follow it. If you don't like it, do your own thing. If you like some parts of it, embrace those and drop the rest to the curb.

Analyze it, decide for yourself what works for you and what is healthy for you and live your life the way that makes you happy.

There is nothing sexier than a man or a woman who lives their life on their own terms with their eyes open.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you don't want to follow traditional gender roles, DON'T.

You need to learn to be strong enough to stand up for yourself once in awhile.

Lol! I got banned from Menslib for this line of thinking.

This is my point man, you are red in ideas, just moral whereas rp isn't.

But of course, asking pussy men to do what they want would make them not pussies now wouldn't it. Lol.

[–]ifelsedowhilelocal cop - cherry top0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

nice RP advice.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure.

But every time I give that advice to RP guys here I get bitched at. Go figure.

[–]happyface7120 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly this! If you're a beta and don't have the masculine traits you wish you did, don't you want a woman you wants you for who YOU are? Wouldn't it suck to be with a girl who only likes you for your looks and the traits you cultivated specifically for getting laid? I think a lot of people here have a pretty narrow view of women and what they want.

I mean, don't men ever like women for who they are and not just their faces and boobs?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, don't men ever like women for who they are and not just their faces and boobs?

If you read red pill they clearly state that a woman's worth is based solely upon her looks. It's a short trip from that to looking in the mirror and thinking the same thing about yourself.

At its core, red pill dehumanizes everyone it touches.

[–]Princeso_Bubblegum☭ The real red pill ☭2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

absolutely

fuck gender roles, no one should follow them

[–]Battle-Scars1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But, if you want me to respect your gender role, shouldn't you also respect mine?

[–]Princeso_Bubblegum☭ The real red pill ☭1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

no one should be respecting gender roles

[–]trail222 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I think you are overstating a lot of it, but I do think men are suffering. The suicide rate for men is rising. I think that is a lot of ways because of the destruction of gender roles for women but not men.

Men have historically depended on their wives more for emotional support, then vice versa. That's why a lot of men I believe tend to be happier when they are married then men. The destruction of gender roles I think has taken away a lot of the emotional support they had histrionically. Happy wife happy life seems more prevelant then a women should take care of her man.

Im not saying its always the case, but I feel like this is becoming more the case. Obviously not all women are like this, but there are still women who dont see the hypocrisy when they expect men take on the traditional male role in dating. They expect men to be as ambitious as them, ask them out and generally pursue them; yet still complain how women are expected to do all the cooking and cleaning and put on makeup every day.

[–]YetAnotherCommenterPurple Pill Man, Sexual Economics Theory0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men have historically depended on their wives more for emotional support, then vice versa. That's why a lot of men I believe tend to be happier when they are married then men.

Arguably the opposite is true - marriage often takes men away from their emotional support networks... bonds with other men.

[–]PurpleBanner0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you are overstating a lot of it, but I do think men are suffering.

men are suffering because they are constantly told that they are rapist a and that they are the source of problems that women in general face on a daily basis.

[–]winterriderPurple Pill Man2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. It is hypocritical. Men are attracted to what we are attracted to and women are attracted to who and what they are attracted to. All the social justice campaigns in the world won't change these things. Women need to stop shaming men over what we find attractive and men should accept the fact that women are attracted to ruch, muscular hot guys. Men need to work towards being these extremely masculine, dominant, rich and hot guys.

[–]Temperfuelmma3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Part of the reason is how little standards men have for women.

For a man a woman is simply a series of holes, while for a woman he is a breadwinner, fun guy, intelligent, capable, social, protective, strong, dominant etc etc

If a woman don't adhere to traditional gender roles she still has her series of holes whereas if a man doesn't adhere to traditional gender roles he basically loses his purpose.

[–]SetConsumesAlways Becoming0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, and feminism refuses to acknowledge this massive difference. Women can be anything waaaaay more than men can be.

Who is better of beta and/or effeminate than alpha and/or highly masculine?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol, this is a good insight. But I think the rise in unmarried couples is that men worth marrying want a woman to more than a series of holes, and working and making money is nice, but if the guy is already doing that he would want something that complements his life. Like a helper at home.

[–]Temperfuelmma0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I'm not afraid to be shamed a misogynist because I want my woman to maintain the house. She does all the work around the house and I do all the work outside it. That's how it is. Sadly, 99% women these days can't even make boiled water.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 1 point2 points  (35 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]cuittlerಠ_ಠ7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh look, another garbage CMV full of strawmen, sweeping generalizations and no evidence.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes sure its hypocritical. so what? want to change it? Stop men from giving attention to fat over 30 sluts. or what ever negative characteristics you like.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Prisoner's dilemma.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not . unless the prison is mental

[–]purpleppparmchair evo psych0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a prisoner's dilemma because fat pussy is still worth a lot to fit men, sadly.

[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women3 points4 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Yes it is. And if you fall for it you are beta. This is a societal test.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Not everything's a test lol

[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women-1 points0 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

That's because you're thinking of a "test" in the formal, authoritative way schools etc give them. Not the way a child tests the boundaries of a parent. People say insane shit just to see how people react to it, just to TEST if they can get away with it.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, people just say insane shit, and if you react to it they're gonna lose respect for you, they're not conciously doing it, it's not a test it's just kinda there.

[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

Use whatever term you like best

Edit: but yes this is almost exactly how I think of it

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Everything is a test against my masculinity.

[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

A lot kind of is. Masculinity is another way of saying accountability.

[–]AnarchkittyBetter dead than Red0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Hanaha! I can't even tell you how much shit I have gotten away with over the years because "boys will be boys".

EDIT: I personally believe that part of the reason so many men are in prison is that they are so rarely held accountable for anything until they cross the wrong line and suddenly they are.

[–]IIHotelYorbatreats objects like women0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Sorry but statistically nothing backs up your claim. Men are penalized and sentenced far more harshly than women. Let me know when a man rapes a child and gets paid child support for it 😉

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Pretty much this is the basis of modern western feminism: they pick between being progressive or being traditional depending on which benefits women more.

For instance: traditionally it's considered worse for a man to hit a woman than a man to hit a man. And a woman hitting a man was a joke.

Equality​ would say treat each the same and judge them as individual cases.

What does feminism side with? Traditionalism of course. Which is why we have things like VAWA and Duluth which legally enshrine this inequality that benefits women.

[–]ClarityofDisasterPerson Going Their Own Way0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I wish I could give you more than one upvote...

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Create some alts!

[–]ClarityofDisasterPerson Going Their Own Way3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol. I'll just do this instead 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This post seems to be an upgraded version of that deleted super whine post from yesterday. You just don't date a woman under 30 who is not fat and can cook. Cooking is not some magical super power from another planet.

[–]ClarityofDisasterPerson Going Their Own Way1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

It's hypocritical. Its completely okay for you to want a walking stereotype of an Alpha Male but, wanting the equivalent in a female is patriarchal oppression and men being insecure.

Couldn't agree with you more if I tried, OP. It's why I hate that the media/society in general keeps pushing masculine gender roles.

Listen, if you want to be a traditionally masculine guy or feminine gal...that's fine. More power to ya. And if you want to be a career-oriented female like me...hey, obviously I think that's a good path to take. But for the love of all that is just and fair, STOP saying males MUST adhere to old roles.

[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

But who is saying males must adhere to these roles? Who is forcing them?

[–]ClarityofDisasterPerson Going Their Own Way1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not saying anyone is literally putting a loaded gun to the head of every male.

But as feminists are always very prone to pointing out on behalf of women, things like societal expectations...peer pressure...media representation...work environment...how one is raised, etc can make it difficult to go against the grain of what society as a whole is telling you to do.

I'm definitely not saying it's impossible. There are men and women who go their own way and refuse to let such pressures influence their lives or decisions. But women have had their renaissance, men have not.

[–]happyface7120 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

You're completely right. Feminism is the REASON women are now able to break free of gender roles. And I think it's about time that men have their own movement to promote their own breaking free of gender roles. One that goes hand in hand with feminism. Men shouldn't be penalized for being short or having emotions. And now, since women are becoming breadwinners, men should be able to be stay at home dads. The only thing stopping men from breaking free of societal norms are themselves. Women have a movement! Men should too!

TRP is not good-- it enforces gender roles. There are alphas and betas in both genders who pair up with one another. By trying to change men who are naturally betas into being alphas, trp is pushing them farther away from finding their ideal match. Alpha women like beta men. Beta women like alpha men.

[–]ClarityofDisasterPerson Going Their Own Way1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You're completely right. Feminism is the REASON women are now able to break free of gender roles.

I think that first wave Feminism, and some of second wave, is the reason large amounts of women were initially able to break out of traditional roles. But now, in 2017? It's not needed in Western society anymore. It's needed in countries where women are actually oppressed.

And I think it's about time that men have their own movement to promote their own breaking free of gender roles.

I agree very much.

One that goes hand in hand with feminism.

I'm not necessarily saying I disagree, but why do you think a Men's Rights movement has to do this?

Men shouldn't be penalized for being short or having emotions. And now, since women are becoming breadwinners, men should be able to be stay at home dads.

Truth.

The only thing stopping men from breaking free of societal norms are themselves.

I suppose this is true IF you're also willing to say that the only thing stopping mass amounts of women in the past from breaking out of gender roles was also just themselves. I personally wouldn't say that, however, because in both cases there is/was a LOT of pushback from society and the government to keep to the status quo.

Remember that when it first began, there were more women against Feminism than for it. Any type of Men's Rights activity today is going to come up against not only male and female tradcons/conservatives, but also some Feminists. Not saying all, but they are most definitely some Fems who are against Men's Rights in general...and not just people like AVfM or The Spearhead.

I went to an extremely liberal/pro-Feminist college, and when some men and women tried to create a legitimate Men's Rights club, the 3 existing Feminist clubs made a petition to prevent it, saying it was "sexist" and "made a mockery of women's real struggles". And it's not only my campus this has happened, I've met handfuls of guys who have said their own efforts to make public Meetups or college groups to discuss men's issues where removed or refused due to pushback from Feminists.

Women have a movement! Men should too!

I agree, obviously. But that is easier said than done in a society that says men are the oppressors.

TRP is not good-- it enforces gender roles.

Correct. Which is why I'm incredibly supportive of MGTOW and like-minded men who simply live their lives as they choose without caring what others say, but I think TRP is scummy, especially with how it utterly bashes Beta and Omega men.

There are alphas and betas in both genders who pair up with one another. By trying to change men who are naturally betas into being alphas, trp is pushing them farther away from finding their ideal match. Alpha women like beta men. Beta women like alpha men.

Ummmm. I'm still on the fence about this one. Even very female friendly sites, like Evan Marc Katz blog for example, have scores of Alpha women writing in to say they have a lot of trouble finding a man who is more Alpha than them. I know of at least 2 multipage threads on that site alone where Evan tries to get his female commenters to see that most relationships are complementary and an Alpha guy isn't usually going to want an Alpha gal...he's going to want someone who complements his traits, not somebody who doubles them.

The issue, from what I can tell, is that Alpha women and Beta women are generally looking for Alpha men. BWs want them because they are complementary, AWs want them because they (mistakenly, imo) think they need an Alpha so they can feel feminine in the relationship. It's as though AWs are saying "I'll wear the pants all day at work, but once I get home I want to be the one in a dress and leave the decision-making up to him". Which is why we see tons of women who make $75k a year who "need" a man who makes over $100k, and women who are 5'8" who "need" a man that's 6'4". And then they say that anything else is "settling", which I think is an unhealthy way to view the opposite sex.

I for one agree with you though, as I'm an Alpha woman who likes Beta men, and I love my Beta boyfriend precisely because his personality traits complement my own. But then perhaps it'd be more accurate to say that masculine-minded women like Beta men? Because I think many other Alpha women are still feminine-minded, they just take on masculine traits at work.

[–]LaToroBlanco0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure is

[–]SilentLurker6660 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

While it isn't as drastic as it sounds, there's still a certain degree of truth in regard for the OP. For example male is still expected to make the first move in the relationship.

TRP is the answers to deal with the changing gender dynamics on the male side of the equation by either adjusting to the new social norm and/or apply dating tactics that female has already employed in the SMV... however too much of it is labeled as "misogynistic" because people like the BP only see it from the perspective that it disadvantage the female gender.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I shall quote what The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson says about hypocrisy.

"You know, when I was a young man, hypocrisy was deemed the worst of vices," Finkle-McGraw said. "It was all because of a sort of moral relativism. You see, in that sort of a climate you are not allowed to criticise others - after all, if there is no absolute right and wrong, then what grounds is there for criticism?" ...

"Now this led to a good deal of general frustration, for people are naturally censorious and love nothing better than to criticise other's shortcomings. And so it was they seized on hypocrisy and elevated it from an ubiquitous peccadillo into the monarch of all vices. For you see, even if there is no right and wrong, you can find grounds to criticise another person by contrasting what he has espoused with what he has actually done. In this case you are not making any judgement whatsoever as to the correctness of his views or the morality of his behaviour - you are merely pointing out that he has said one thing and done another. Virtually all political discourse in the days of my youth was devoted to the ferreting out of hypocrisy."

I would say that we are living in such a climate where people feel they cannot make right and wrong judgements and that is why you think hypocrisy is such a big deal.

I reckon so what people are hypocrits who even cares.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

The responses are basically going to be: fuck you, men will put up with it. Remember kids, liberals always love regulated markets unless free markets benefit their interests

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Consequence of not doing well in a free sexual market: no sex :(

Consequence of not doing well in a free economic market: DEATH

I think it's obvious why liberals (and people in general) care about one and not the other.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol nobody dies from starvation in America except for crack addicts kids and that's not an economic issue. Poor people die from obesity here (LMAO)

Consequence of not doing well in the economic market: no new iPhone, living in a bad area.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, when we're referring to the modern regulated economic market, with food stamps and homeless shelters. But, in a truly free market, the people who fail don't get taken care of, they just die in the streets.

A free sexual market does not result in death, only loneliness and frustration. I care more about taking care of people's physical (legitimate) needs before their personal needs.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is hypocritical, but I have come to the realization that people react to it in ways that are polarized, just any political agenda. The one element I do like about it is that it raises the bar little bit when it comes to dealing with people in modern day social situations. The people that are openly saying that they wish not to be shamed for being fat, slutty, or whatever it is change the way we communicate with each other and be more careful about what we say to each other.

On the contrary, my stance is that it hasn't changed very much in terms of what people think and feel. It has become more of a "vote with your dick" situation. Every overweight unattractive woman knows what it is like to be ignored and passed over for a skinnier girl. They know they are not nearly as attractive in general public as their 20.5 BMI colleagues. There is nothing you need to say to anyone about fat-shaming ever, they don't already know themselves.

[–]lecedditIron Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men have to strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape, rich or making a large six figure salary, have social status, be wanted and preselected by other women, intelligent, confident

Sounds like good things to aspire to as a man. I'm glad these are all things I can work towards. If you don't like being masculine you can always become a trap

[–]phantasic791 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

What is the deal with everyone trying to control their BF/GF? I just want to get together hang out have fun and if I'm lucky she'll want to touch my weiner. After that I don't care if she makes me a sandwich(which is a really nice thing), wants to cuddle or exits out the window like a ninja. What is with all the expectations everyone has? Let people do what they want to do.

[–]PBRScagsquad(((Prima Illuminatus)))1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This could be easily solved if men on average stopped being so fucking thirsty and actually had some standards. Supposing that average women have it easier than men this is probably one of the major reasons why. If they suddenly were faced with a market of choosier men, assuming those men had something to offer and the top tier men were now totally inaccessible to them then in this scenario we would see more of an effort. However, in the scenario you describe this is not the case therefore there is no incentive for women to put in the extra work if they can get what they want anyway. TL;DR: Contain your thirst a little better lads! It's for your own good!

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

== Results from bdsmtest.org ==

87% Vanilla

20% Non-monogamist

17% Dominant

I guess there's just not enough pervert in me to be a real red-blooded rp, that's why I'm purple :(

[–]PBRScagsquad(((Prima Illuminatus)))1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I think you're in the wrong post.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

oh yeah. Goddamn can't even get my perversities into the correct post!

[–]reepbotEven when I lose I always win.0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you had changed the word "force" to "shame" then I would have agreed with you.

[–]badnews4u0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Alpha females vs beta female. The alphas who understand this stuff win big

[–]honeypuppy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Few people have a problem if you have certain expectations of the women you date. Just don't be a vocal judgemental asshole about the women who don't meet your standards.

[–]JackGetsItRed Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why feminism is often referred to as a female supremacy movement.

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

Women don't force men to adhere to gender roles. They pick guys they are attracted to, but the guys are free to do what they want. They're also free to not date non-traditional women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy Link

That's forcing guys to adhere to gender roles, genius.

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

No it's not. We're not coming to your houses with tanks and saying "YOUR NOT ALLOWED TO DO STEREOTYPICALLY NOT MALE THINGS."

Men who are only attracted to Stacy are allowed to only be attracted to Stacy. Women who are only attracted to Chad are allowed to only be attracted to Chad.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Your argument makes no sense. That's like saying companies aren't forcing kids go to college but, companies only want to hire kids with college degrees. You're forcing guys to adhere to your biological desires if they want any shot at sex or female company. And it's funny because you bitch and moan about men who are stuck in the Stone Age and want women bare foot and pregnant when your sex drive is just as stuck in the Cro-Magnon Era.

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

That's like saying companies aren't forcing kids go to college

They're not.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Unless you want to work at fucking McDonald's, they are. This is where our convo ends. Save the disingenuousness for someone else.

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I can't CYV if you're not open to getting your view challenged.

You don't understand the meaning of the word force. Force is when the government says "go to college or we'll arrest you and put you in jail." "If I don't go to college, I might not get a good job as people who do go to college" isn't force, it's economics. (There are also many good jobs that don't require college education, but let's just ignore that for now and assume all the good jobs require a college degree just for the sake of a hypothetical debate)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I understand the meaning of the word force. You're being dense. You don't have to be physically/violently forced to do something to feel like you're forced to do something. "Yea, you guys can do and be whatever you want. You don't have to adhere to traditional male gender roles. But we will think you're a loser if you don't and we will only fuck guys that do. Okay. Great. Nice talk."

Great incentive. No. You aren't physically forcing guys to adhere to traditional gender roles. But the shame from society of not living up to traditional male standards is. The disincentives of women not being attracted to them if they don't live up to traditional male standards is. If you can't see or understand this, you're either daft or being neglectful on purpose.

Also, I'm pretty sure on any other sub-Reddit people would agree with me 100% that kids are being forced to go college and incur debt because our society necessitates doing so to have any shot at all at getting a good paying professional job but because you don't want to admit I'm right you're going to continue to double down on your bullshit and pretend millions of people don't say this. No. Companies don't have a gun to their head. The gun is the employment offers they only offer to those with the appropriate credentials (coughs a degree preferably from a reputable school)

[–]EliteSpartanRangerNice Guys Don't Ask For Rewards0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Women don't say men have to date non-Stacies either.

I'm unconventional and single. I'm ok with that and I don't want to force men to date me if they don't want to. See, making someone date someone they don't want to would be force. Not dating someone is not force.

Also, I'm pretty sure on any other sub-Reddit people would agree with me 100% that kids are being forced to go college and incur debt because our society necessitates doing so to have a shot at getting a good paying professional job

It's economics.

Are people being forced to buy cars? Most people who aren't in NYC need a car to get around. But nobody's being forced to buy a car.

[–]tossa010 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not showing signs of weakness is the most important one

[–]Lisa_NY220 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men have to strong, tall, powerful, dominant, handsome, in shape

You don't have to be any of these things you can be weak, short, submissive ugly, loser, etc etc etc.

The secret services won't come knocking at your door during the night because you're unattractive to women.

You're free in being a loser: women are also free to not be attracted to you, men are free to not see you as someone commanding respect. You're free in being a loser and people are free to see you as such.

Feminism is about liberating people (women AND men) from forced traditional gender roles. It's not about forcing people to be attracted to you or respecting you because you don't have that right. You seem to be confusing hypocritical (which there are none in this case) with things that you are not entitled to.

[–]bala-keyMarried Red-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

OP, you're demanding some sort of fairness from the SMV where it's mostly just a function of biological firmware and supply and demand.

You're trying to shame women as a group for being the way they are. It can't and won't change anything.

You know the rules of the game, you either play or not. Bitching about it makes no sense.

[–]monkeysinmypocket-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

TIL being under 30 was a part of the traditional female gender role...

Guess that means I'm free! Woo-hoo! You can stick your traditional gender role up your arse!

(I've never demanded men be anything or conform to any type role. I also don't feel entitled to them sexually causing me to get all bent out of shape when it turns out most of them don't want to fuck me. That's where normal people and the red pilled depart company.)

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter