TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

74

Maybe I'm way off, but from my observations (both OL and IRL), single mothers are more likely to be considered anathema, untouchable, damaged goods, etc, in the dating world. Conversely, single fathers, anywhere between full-time and 'weekend dads', as long as they haven't fully blown their kids off, are seen as 'sexy', like they've already shown that they can be a good parent. Hell, single fatherhood can be used as a pickup line, but single motherhood often makes a dude run away screaming.

It seems to me that the overall opinion is that single mom == irresponsible, but single dad == responsible.

Thoughts?


[–]LittleknownfactsAutomod is my husband[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (1 child) | Copy Link

OP please be aware we have a 12 hour per post rule. I'm leaving this up for now since it's already been up for two hours.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train83 points84 points  (99 children) | Copy Link

I’m in my 40s. Every single person I know is dating people with kids because everyone our age has kids. It’s normal.

The dislike for single moms comes largely from the 20 something crowd. The difference is probably that a single mom in her early to mid 20s might not have made the best life choices, and I think that’s a fair argument. A generalization, of course, but I’m not hating.

In my 20s i would not have dated a man with kids. If I were single tomorrow I fully expect that I’d be dating men with kids.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (27 children) | Copy Link

The dislike for single moms comes largely from the 20 something crowd.

Consider the ages of the children. A woman in her 20's isn't going to have teenagers. Teenagers suck, but from the POV of someone dating a single mother, it's really helpful that any kids are actually wanting to just do their own thing.

Toddlers and babies.....totally different matter, and a far riskier preposition.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train10 points11 points  (26 children) | Copy Link

It’s one thing to prefer not to date a single mom. as I said, i would not have dated a single dad in my 20s.

It’s another thing to rage on the internet that single moms are subhuman scum and believe it. There’s something else going on there.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (25 children) | Copy Link

Do you not recognize the higher danger to a man, dating a single mother with, say a couple toddlers, rather than a single mother with a couple teenagers 2-3 years out from leaving and being on their own?

[–]soggycephalopod4 points5 points  (14 children) | Copy Link

Danger? Is opt-in parenting a danger?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Yes. If you parent a child that isn't yours, you can be on the hook for child support.

[–]soggycephalopod7 points8 points  (11 children) | Copy Link

This is possible, but I think you're grossly misrepresenting how this works. You don't just get suddenly stuck with child support for someone else's child. From what I've read about it, this is when the child is raised, for all intents and purposes, as your own. From what I've read, if this is the case, you have a very strong case for visitation/parenting rights. "Danger" seems like a funny way to put it.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes. What you say is correct.

Here was my strangest "seduction." I dated a single mother, once. I went to her place one weekend, played football with the older son, video games with the younger son, ignored her, drank beer and grilled burgers.

That night at bed time, there were 30 candles lit, and she gave her best Linda Lovelace impression.

Yeah......there's nothing "sudden" about it.

[–]soggycephalopod2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, wtf.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, wtf.

I'll tell you. TRP is evidently about to be banned, and it's discussions like this that are the reason. Not white nationalism. Shit like this. Practical note sharing.

[–]Shanguerrilla1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

LMFAO, I feel you. I fell harder and longer before pulling the second net off with a seemingly VERY motivated single mother after finally getting divorce's off a few years earlier

[–]eboy4hire0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

I don't want to visit Chad's kids. I definitely don't want to get so attached to them that I'd even consider wanting to.

[–]soggycephalopod0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough--if you don't want to be part of a child's life the child is probably better off not being involved with you.

[–]eboy4hire0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

I want to be part of my own children's lives.

[–]couldbemage0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Mostly not. Unless you formally adopt them. Step parents have little in the way of rights or responsibility.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train4 points5 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

It's not a "danger," it's just a lot more restrictive.

And my point is these guys are not concerned about the mechanics of dating single moms. They're bro signalling because they read on TRP, MGTOW, ROK, etc that single moms are bad.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

It's not a "danger," it's just a lot more restrictive.

sigh.

It's absolutely a danger. If you support a child, you can end up with child support.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train6 points7 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Dating doesn't mean marrying. I assume if a guy marries a woman with children he knows what he's getting himself into.

Unless you're trying to tell me that courts will try to force child support on a guy simply becuse he's dating the mother.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

5 years later, after you've lived in the child's home and provided parenting...yes.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

non biological parental obligations are not assumed because you lived with someone else’s kids.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Fuck it. Again, it's over. Whatever.

I pray PPD gets banned when TRP does.

[–]soggycephalopod4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh--you can probably ignore my other comment. I see you (sorta) addressed it here.

Not sure where you're from, but that's not how it works in the US, and I doubt in most of the developed world. You don't have to pay child support for someone else's child just because you were involved with the mother.

[–]eboy4hire0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I will say that I used to respect the role of step dads and how they step up to the plate for an otherwise deadbeat dude, but yeah after reading TRP it's turned me off from that idea. I still respect when someone else does it, but if I did it I'd feel like a chump.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you bonded with the child and vice versa you wouldn’t feel that way

[–]SmurfESmurferson26 points27 points  (57 children) | Copy Link

I think the dislike for “single moms” is also a class thing. When I see “single mom,” I think a mid-40s divorced woman sharing custody. I don’t automatically go to the dependa stereotypes

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish I could pull up my old post on why the manosphere hates single moms but I don’t feel like searching for it right now.

But yeah

[–]skystar8611 points12 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

When I think of a single mom I think of a poor woman working in fast food, in a grocery store, or on welfare who has multiple children by multiple dads. Hates men because shes been burned by so many.

[–]i_cri_evry_tim1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

on welfare who has multiple children by multiple dads

Translation: makes shit choice after shit choice.

Hates men because shes been burned by so many.

Always deflect responsibilityTM

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes6 points7 points  (51 children) | Copy Link

Single parenthood is strongly correlated with lower education & income levels iirc. Same with having kids out of wedlock.

My other spicy take is a lot of the hate against single moms is low-key racism.

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater16 points17 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Most of the single moms I know who got knocked up young were white as driven snow. They were just not very smart and made poor life choices

[–]ontherailstoday9 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

This.

Manosphere be "well where's my low hanging fruit then... I like my low hanging fruit perfectly fresh and unblemished" and then they get angry at the low hanging fruit for being low hanging fruit and doing low hanging fruit things and ending up a bit bruised and not so pristine.

See also "I don't care about your job and degree, I can't fuck them" it is a very similar argument... "so where's my low hanging fruit then? I like my low hanging fruit to be hanging real low, both desperate and stupid... you look pristine so why aren't you hanging low enough for me to pluck?"

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok, this is my new favorite analogy.

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure how that relates to my point but ok.

[–]LowCredditRead the sidecar14 points15 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Nearly all of the ones I saw happen in person were white Jesus Freaks. They all got pregnant by one of the three hottest dudes at church who all laughed into the distance. The prettier girls married a patsy stupid enough to adopt the children. The thing that astonished me was the complete lack of surprise or shaming of any of the parties involved. Now that I am older, it all makes sense.

I still think all of the parties involved are fuckwits. I just keep it to myself.

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah the entire reason the manosphere exists is this has gone on long enough theres a script a lot of people go by for this script. It's been a couple of generations of this. The only problem is people who didn't get a copy of the script and don't like the part they want to play.

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They sound like fuckwits.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

To be expected by people who think God had to kill himself to forgive man

...But God did not kill himself, he killed his son... But father, son and Holy ghost are one but not 3... But then who is in charge? If they're all in charge then what happens if any disagrees with the other... But if any disagrees, who ever wins is THE most Goddiest of all Gods

  • WTF makes no sense

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes25 points26 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

It's not racism.

It's classism.

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

bit of column A, bit of column B

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Nope

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yup. It's cheaper not to get married at a very low income bracket.

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Nope. It's just cheaper

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

True for me, I make too much $$$ for any tax breaks and wouldnt marry a man with so little income that one would come up.

[–]Wallstreet316 points17 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Why the fuck is it always an -ism Why can't it be a simple value judgement that her being a single mother is indicative of her character, decision-making and her value?

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's an ism because the perpetual multiple kids single mom is more common amongst lower socioeconomic classes. In my middle class world, she's a divorcee who has always worked and continues to do so even if receiving child support.

[–]AggravatingTartlet0 points1 point  (10 children) | Copy Link

Why can't it be a simple value judgement that her being a single mother is indicative of her character, decision-making and her value?

Same for single dads?

[–]Wallstreet37 points8 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Considering the courts try to keep kids with mothers, a father getting sole custody speaks volumes about him.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Or it might speak volumes about his lawyer

[–]PrehistoricPrincessNothing is sexier than mutual empathy and respect1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

a man who can find, chose and pay for a lawyer THAT good is a guy I would marry, and Im a hetero dude. Mad respect.

[–]Tomatoccino-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s my experience, tbh.

[–]AggravatingTartlet4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Considering the courts try to keep kids with mothers, a father getting sole custody speaks volumes about him.

Not so fast. It might speak volumes about the mother but it might not.

He might be abusive to the kids but she's unable to prove it, and she takes the kids away to protect them - and then the courts might award the kids to him.

She might have a job that requires a lot of hours, and the kids are mainly with the father's mother after school. She might then lose custody after divorce.

They might both be drug users, but her use is worse. And so the father gets the kids.

The mother might have a mental illness, and during an episode, the father leaps in and uses it to his advantage, taking the kids and making her look unfit.

Nothing is black and white.

[–]Wallstreet32 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

As the son of a mother whose mental illness made her severely unfit to be a mom, good.

I am sick and goddamn tired of this idea that women all over the place are peddling that women can do no wrong.

And that men can never render a judgement of worthiness for sex or relationship.

[–]mwait1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol.

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I know, have those scenarios at east dont happen in practice given the bias.

[–]ToraChan23Red Pill Man2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

My other spicy take is a lot of the hate against single moms is low-key racism.

How?

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes6 points7 points  (15 children) | Copy Link

This is just my personal experience but I've seen a lot of the hate for single moms be directed specifically at poor black women (or poor women in general) whereas single moms of other races and classes get the benefit of the doubt ("maybe her husband died" vs "she made terrible decisions").

Don't get me wrong I think 95% of young single parents are idiots with bad decision making skills and I don't blame a 20-something guy for not wanting to be a step father. But it's weird to me when a dating preference turns into hate. I have a hard time believing that's it's just the single parenthood that's causing those feelings.

[–]ToraChan23Red Pill Man7 points8 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

Growing up black and in both middle and low class areas that are majority black, the vast majority of single mothers were the result of terrible decisions and a willingness to rely on government assistance, with no intentions of finding legit work even when they 100% were capable.

That's were the resentment comes from the black community at least. I couldn't count on both hands how many single mothers I know personally who continue to have kids from multiple fathers and who BOAST about getting "paid" by the "white man" and living in Section 8 housing.

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes4 points5 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

That's fair. I grew up in a UMC mostly white and Asian area where single moms are almost none existent. So when I see people in those demographics rail against single motherhood it's hard for me to believe there isn't a racist or classist element there.

[–]soggycephalopod5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I grew up in an almost exclusively white area, very poor, extremely high unemployment, and plenty of single mothers, and, unsurprisingly, the idea that race might have something to do with single motherhood never occurred to me. I guess it depends on where you're from.

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Again. Class not race.

Come down to coal country sometime

[–]redditmobileuser2019 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

So people who complain about single moms and don’t live in the same neighbourhood or know a lot of single moms are therefore racists??? There’s a few missing steps here to this argument

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Why would you care about the dating habits of people not in your dating pool

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This all says more about you than anything else

[–]JamMan0070 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

This is a BS conservative wet dream interpretation that couldn't be further from the truth. The vast majority of single mothers aren't Black. Teenage pregnancy statistics have been absolutely plummeting for decades.

Most of the reasons for some of the terrible single mother statistics are a reflection of a few important factors that are constantly ignored. Many single mothers live and cohabitate with the father of their children. They might not be legally married, but have a functional father figure that won't be reflected in government data. Secondly, our communities are militarized with police state tactics and a very racially biased and classist War on Drugs that locks many Black fathers away for decades for simple possession. Furthermore, they criminalize poverty. Jurisdictions like Ferguson, MO make much of their revenue off of tickets for every simple thing a person can do that function effectively as a poor tax. When an exorbitant fine isn't paid in 2 weeks, a warrant is issued and private prisons are beating their revenue projections.

Ultimately, much of the lack of family cohesion is mirrored by working class White men as well as wages have stagnated and working class factory jobs were shipped over seas. Many working class Black and White men don't have access to jobs that would allow them to support a middle class family and stable home. As a result, women make strategic decisions to not pursue marriage with men that have low paying jobs or illegal income. In actuality, 2 broke people do better than 1, but decisions are imperfect strategic calculations.

[–]ToraChan23Red Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The vast majority of single mothers aren't Black.

Did you not see that I said "growing up black and in both middle and low class AREAS THAT ARE MAJORITY BLACK"?

I wasn't speaking on the country as a whole, I was speaking on the environments I grew up in.

[–]Dash_of_islamBidet 4 Life>Toilet paper unwashed proles0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

War on drugs is a BS explanation

Why would black people possess drugs more than other races of they know they're gonna get caught? Are you saying the blacks are too dumb to know that actions like breaking the law have consequences, or are you saying blacks don't care and do it anyway

Possession of drugs should be a lazy person issue, but we do we see blacks more often than other races shooting themselves in the foot with this?

[–]JamMan0071 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

They have scientific drug studies that show White people use drugs at much higher rates than Blacks. Also, a much higher percentage of White people get charged with drug crimes and acquitted than Black people. If you are an impoverished White person or Latino or if you are Black you receive the brunt of the War on Drugs. Police don't do regular drug raids on suburban teenage house parties, Wall Street firms, and other elite venues. Look at the opiate scourge. It is a mostly White phenomena and the tone has always radically changed to one of treatment and medical intervention. Wake up and examine the data that is still skewed because they militarize our neighborhoods. White people use way more drugs.

[–]Jaktenba0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow a mostly white phenomenon in a mostly white country, that literally means nothing. Everything ought to be mostly white in those circumstances. Just as every statistic in Japan should be mostly Asian.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train-2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

She's talking about white poeple judging black single mothers differently than white single mothers. I think you knew what she meant.

"paid" by the "white man"

Haven't heard language like that since Good Times went off the air.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

you get the same exact anti-Single Mom mechanism in countries that are near 100% white.

[–]PrehistoricPrincessNothing is sexier than mutual empathy and respect3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, a lot of single moms are just middle-aged divorced women. About half of all married couples divorce, so.

[–]st-johnson1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Single mums aren't a race sweetie

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It is not low-key racism; it is high-key and out-loud classism.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train-2 points-1 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Single moms is code for black women for some, absolutely

[–]Nodoxxintoxin2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It cracks me up that the guy here who is always dog whistling and sometimes outright talking about black single moms has a baby momma, not a wife, himself.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Who’s that?

[–]buddboy0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

that's interesting the first thing I thought of when I heard single mom is girl in her mid 20's. Of course this could be because I am in my 20's and the only single moms I know are also in their 20's.

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Am I weird if I don't think of divorced women as single moms? In my country people co-parent.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel the need to clarify my comment beacuse I suspect some of the bros upvoted it because they thought I was taking a cheap shot at single mothers. But I was not. I'm saying that having a child too young isn't the best choice, specifically for that child. I do get it, teenagers get pregnant, it happens. And I'm not saying every teen/early 20s mom is a bad one. I just think the child fares better when the parents are older. That's all.

[–]AggravatingTartlet3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is what I see, too.

Only, someone who is just a weekend parent is viewed as less of a parent than a parent who has full-time or half/half custody. Every-second-weekend parents are suspected of being self-serving.

Single mothers who keep having kids with each new man they meet are also not viewed in a good light. If you've got 5 kids to 4 or 5 different men, something has likely gone very wrong somewhere. Mental health and drug addiction might come into it, which points to more services being needed.

[–]couldbemage2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

But having been a single thirty year old with young children, they're right up there with puppies when you want to pick up twenty something's.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough

My aversion to men with kids back then largely had to do with the fact that kids mean there’s a baby mama (or 2) somewhere. And because I wanted to marry a man and have our first children together.

[–]red-priestess≧◡≦0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Im early twenties and would not date a man with kids right now unless i knew him very very well and understood his situation and who he is now. But in 99% of men... It is an automatic no. I also sympathize with men who wouldnt date a single mom my age.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The difference is probably that a single mom in her early to mid 20s might not have made the best life choices

"might"

[–]adool6660 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m in my 40s.

All your opinions make sense now.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

As does your low effort trolling

[–]BelieveinyourflynessPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

The difference is probably that a single mom in her early to mid 20s might not have made the best life choices,

But why don't you think the same about single fathers? The same thing can be said about them

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely.

My point is that the younger you are the less likely you are to be able to properly care for a kid. This is why people wait, get an education, get a good job then start a family. Having a kid at 18 isn’t that smart regardless of who you are — statistically it’s not likely to turn out well, and when it does, it’s likely you could have given the kid an even better life had you waited until you were more emotionally mature and financially stable.

That’s where I’m coming from.

[–]BelieveinyourflynessPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes I agree with you. But the point I'm making is that your argument doesn't explain the double standard as to how single fathers and single mothers are viewed differently

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I do not have a double standard and I though I was clear in my reply that I was agreeing with you.

And as I said yesterday, the idea that single dads are viewed positively is dependent on who you are in America. Black single dads are not viewed positively for example.

[–]BelieveinyourflynessPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I do not have a double standard and I though I was clear in my reply that I was agreeing with you.

I see. The OP request reasoning as to the double standard though so that's why I thought you felt that way

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes15 points16 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because it takes more effort to be allowed to be a single dad in most cases.

Because frankly more often than not women will take you to child support money but fight against you having time with them .

So yeah.

You fought for it and you won.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This.

The children going to the mother is the default, so she must be a pretty terrible person to not get the kids.

The children going to the father is very much not the default, so he usually has to be a pretty good person to get the kids.

[–]NiceGuyNumber470 points71 points  (66 children) | Copy Link

Women control pregnancy. If you're a single dad, someone thought you might be a good dad. If you're a single mom, someone didn't pull out.

[–]Ofourkind10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Most single moms are divorced, so assuming that these kids were all accidents is a huge stretch.

[–]AggravatingTartlet7 points8 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

If you're a single dad, someone thought you might be a good dad.

Untrue.

Some women simply do not believe in abortion or cannot go through with it after becoming unexpectedly pregnant. Others made a decision together with the man, without really knowing whether he'd be a good dad or not. And still other women went ahead while knowing that the man would not make a good dad.

Finally, yes, some women would have had the baby with a man they thought would make a good partner & father.

[–]NiceGuyNumber42 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Women often let their vaginas do the thinking.

[–]AggravatingTartlet7 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women often let their vaginas do the thinking.

Yep. Like men often let their penises do the thinking.

[–]NiceGuyNumber48 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I agree. We have more in common than we give credit.

[–]AggravatingTartlet5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

We have more in common than we give credit.

We do indeed.

[–]existentialdadjoke 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

The point remains, most women are psychologically able to have an abortion. Regardless of whether he'd be a good father or whether they made the decision together, she decided to have his child which implies some value (him being a good father increases this even further.) On the other hand virtually any fertile woman can get knocked up by some guy if she wants to, it doesn't imply any value in itself.

[–]AggravatingTartlet0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

most women are psychologically able to have an abortion.

I'm afraid you cannot claim that when the studies have been inconclusive:

"Still, both sides agree that (a) abortion is consistently associated with elevated rates of mental illness compared to women without a history of abortion; (b) the abortion experience directly contributes to mental health problems for at least some women;" (2018)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207970/

From an evo psych perspective of a female or mother of daughters the highest value female is one that can invoke emotional commitment and resources from any man while bearing the children of the highest value man she can find.

Interestingly it's mostly the female lens that makes single mom's less valuable, especially if they failed to invoke any commitment/resources from the father unless of course he was extremely high value and she can get a lot of others to willingly step up and provide. It's basically AFBB, men who mutually commit to single moms implicitly devalue themselves in that sense, whereas women who mutually commit to single dads don't.

That's possibly true. Except that some single mothers do continue to gain resources from a man for their children. And single dads would also be devalued in women's eyes, because they are spreading out their resources to prior children.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Some women simply do not believe in abortion

if that is not a valid reason to lose respect for someone I do not know what is.

[–]AggravatingTartlet0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

if that is not a valid reason to lose respect for someone I do not know what is.

You have no respect for women who don't believe in abortion?

Ok.

I'm fine with whatever women believe about abortion, as long as it concerns their own body.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, because I think that bringing an unwanted child to this world is extreme cruelty, and a sign of immature and irrationally selfish mind.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

And women will often talk about dead beat dads being irresponsible, so...

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train8 points9 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Not sure how this follows from his comment

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Women will criticize a "dad" that doesn't stick around to help raise a kid. So it stand to reason, a dad that sticks around is being responsible.

I'm not sure how you aren't following this line of logic.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t follow from what he said.

But ok

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (46 children) | Copy Link

So it’s ok for men to be irresponsible because they weren’t born with vaginas. A+ logic

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

Woman has all the control over having a child. Who decides if she’s pregnant? The woman. Who decides if she keeps it? The woman.

That’s why there’s a positive stigma for single fathers and a negative stigma for single mothers.

Men have zero control over a pregnancy. Hell, a man could be raped and still have to pay child support.

[–]goldmedalflower14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Woman has all the control over having a child. Who decides if she’s pregnant? The woman. Who decides if she keeps it? The woman.

That’s why there’s a positive stigma for single fathers and a negative stigma for single mothers.

Men have zero control over a pregnancy. Hell, a man could be raped and still have to pay child support.

Nailed it.

/thread

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie24 points25 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And there's a general sense that men are losers for not being able to fuck women. And there's a general sense that women are losers for not being able to keep a man.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train-2 points-1 points  (9 children) | Copy Link

Who decides if she’s pregnant?

50% the dude that fucked her raw

That’s why there’s a positive stigma for single fathers and a negative stigma for single mothers

No that is not why.

First off there is no such thing as a “positive stigma.”

Second all single fathers are not viewed positively. Black single fathers are not viewed positively. Poor white single dads are not viewed positively for the most part. Joe Whiteguy Banker who splits custody with his lawyer ex-wife and employs a nanny during his on weeks is viewed positively.

Men have zero control over a pregnancy.

If I started a petition to require sex education in STEM programs, who’s gonna sign? Who here is with me?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

How is it the mans fault if the man has no control over the woman’s body? She gives birth. Not the man. She can terminate the child. Not the man. She can force the man to pay child support against his will. She holds all responsibility.

The positive stigma is that. Women of high value will still want the single father.

Men of high value will never want a single mother.

What does sex education in stem have to do with anything? These are college kids, not 12 year olds.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

How is it the mans fault if the man has no control over the woman’s body? She gives birth. Not the man. She can terminate the child. Not the man. She can force the man to pay child support against his will. She holds all responsibility.

The fact that the women of this sub won't accept this reality kind of tells you everything you need to know about this sub.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The fact that women of this sub won't excuse irreponsible behavior from men cuz horny and entitled tells you everything you need to know about the men of this sub.

There, FTFY.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't worry. The buzz at TRP is that a ban is coming. If TRP is banned, I really hope this sub is too.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

“Their body their choice” unless they want to defer blame, apparently

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

✈️

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

So you've never heard of a girl saying no to raw sex ora woman buying her ow plan B ?

Jesus

It's like you don't think women are adults capable of making bad choices.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wut?

[–]finch22000 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That last bit seems a bit odd. Not sure how you’d incorporate topics dealing with biology and psychology into mathematic and technology fields.

I’d still sign though.

[–]NiceGuyNumber418 points19 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

So it’s ok for men to be irresponsible because they weren’t born with vaginas. A+ logic

Hmm, I keep rereading my comment, but I keep missing the part where I said that. Like the other person said: preselection.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

Women control pregnancy but men control where they put their dicks.

[–]NiceGuyNumber410 points11 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Women also control what they put in their vaginas? So same control as a man in having sex, plus control over the pregnancy.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This one at least took a sex Ed class

[–]NiceGuyNumber42 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha what did I say that was incorrect?

[–]tritter211Pragmatic5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Thats the kind of logic that religious people use. Except women here use that logic only towards men, not women.

"If you don't want a child, don't have sex!"

[–]i_cri_evry_tim1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Shhhh! You are dismantling the progressive narrative with your crazy coherent ideas.

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater9 points10 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Life isn't fair Poppy. Deal with it.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

That’s not how life happens. It ain’t me coughing up 18 years of child support cause I was too lazy to put on a condom, is it? There’s your fair, “Nocker.”

[–]NockerJoeKing Hater2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Why did you put my name in quotes, is this meant to be some kind of internet threat?

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

No. Calm down

[–]brotherblackpillABC 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sex takes two parties. Either it was rape or she consented.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sex takes two parties

The whole ever fucking point

👍🏾

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled2 points3 points  (16 children) | Copy Link

Women: get bodily-autonomy rights

Men: ANY BIRTH OUT OF WEDLOCK IS 100% THE WOMAN’S FAULT NO MATTER WHAT!!1!

[–]statusincorporated9 points10 points  (8 children) | Copy Link

ya, seems fair.

that's what autonomy is, homeslice.

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Abortions aren’t possible for everyone.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

some extreme 0,00000001% of women cannot have abortions due to medical reasons. The rest can, just won't.

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Or they believe life starts at conception, they feel a connection to the fetus, they aren’t mentally able to go through with the procedure or they live in a country that illegalizes it, or they found out too late and can’t scrap together enough money in time for the 24 weeks cut off.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

except for the illegality part, all of those can and should be circumvented, and illegal abortions are also possible, if risky (far less though than senseless motherhood).

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Alright well you seem to think that getting an abortion has the equivalent emotional impact as getting a flu shot so we’re just gonna have to agree to disagree.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

not at all, it is a dramatic, awful and life changing decision. But it is STILL a better choice than unwanted motherhood, which is absolutely life-destroying AND a tragedy for the child as well (and the father, AND ther extended family, and the society as well).

[–]CMOAN_MAYNE1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

username checks out

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve never been pregnant lmao

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Let’s just be glad none of these dudes are fucking and call uncle.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m definitely fucking and plenty of other redpill men are too

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Aren’t we defensive

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

No not really

[–]007_pp72 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Religion: ANY BIRTH OUT OF WEDLOCK IS 100% THE WOMAN’S FAULT NO MATTER WHAT!!1!

Fixed it for you. If a woman consents to sex without any form of birth control thats 100% on her. Think gatekeeper( even though i hate phrasing it that way), her judgement is the last line of defense before sex. Unless she wants to get pregnant. I guess while im at it a guy could also do self introspection and visualize these what if scenarios if this happened and try to get some clarity beforehand?

If she gets pregnant, on or off birth control. She has 100% control on having the baby or aborting, adopting.

The potential dad does NOT have any power whatsoever when a woman is pregnant.

Some single fathers are single because moms think a baby will form a relationship with the man, even though they would sleep together doesnt mean shes the right person to move in with and share a roof/finances with.

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled8 points9 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

If a man nuts into a women who isn’t on birth control and doesn’t believe in abortion then the onus is on him also.

Men have birth control options, men can select who they have sex with. These are equal between both the sexes.

The only thing that isn’t equal is that women might have the opportunity to have an abortion. Abortions are expensive, potentially traumatic and might go against her personal or religious beliefs. I know this might be hard for you to wrap your head around but for some people abortions just aren’t an option.

If a woman gets preggo by fishing out a used condom from the bottom of a trash can and turkey basting herself, and also wouldn’t be negatively affected by an abortion but chooses to keep it solely for taking the man’s money, then it would be her fault.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Abortions are not that expensive and in most states planned parenthood subsidized them for poor people. I’ve paid 30$ for abortions twice . Abortions have very little traumatic risk compared to pregnancy. Personal and religious beliefs are within her control and if she has those she shouldn’t be having sex outside marriage anyways.

Abortion is absolutely an option, she’s just too stupid to take it and thus should bear 100% sole responsibility unless the man decides voluntarily to opt into parenthood.

[–]Taipanshimshonhere for the downvotes1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Facts don't care how you feel about them.

The above poster is 100 right

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If you're a single dad, someone thought you might be a good dad.

facts

😂😂😂

Am I the only one who suspects this thread is being trolled by middle schoolers?

[–]sparksjoy 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol no. There's a solid chance someone enjoyed fucking him and was stupid enough to let him bareback it because her free 3-star period tracker told her she wasn't fertile.

I love my sister and nephew to death but fuck she's a handful sometimes.

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

her free 3-star period tracker told her she wasn't fertile

My parents used the calendar method pretty successfully until my mom heard from someone that women in their late 30s are infertile and said "fuck it".

[–]Trad_MetalMod_Wife 1 points [recovered]  (31 children) | Copy Link

Society has mothers and motherhood on a pedestal. Fathers and fatherhood are just secondary byproducts under the influence and control of their wives and ex-wives or GF.

For a man to get full custody indicates that he has risen above the cherished role of mother and has been deemed by the court as a capable and responsible father who can fulfill the role of mother as well.

Women who lose custody are trash because custody is geared in favor of them.

Men who gain custody are exemplar and stand above as men who are capable and loving towards their kids and are viewed as extremely responsible.

Sort of like the court and society has already vetted the single father for being responsible and trustworthy for those under his care.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train16 points17 points  (28 children) | Copy Link

Society has mothers and motherhood on a pedestal. Fathers and fatherhood are just secondary byproducts

Society doesn’t seem to give fathers much respect anymore and that’s sad.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie10 points11 points  (20 children) | Copy Link

Its the "want a cookie for doing the right thing" mentality. Dead beat dad? Loser. Father that stuck around to coparent? Expected.

That's why I love my flair.

[–]PickUpScientistMaroon Pill5 points6 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

cookies are empty carbs. you should ask for celery sticks with peanut butter instead.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Or I could be the kind of guy girls give cookies to. Hmm...wonder how I can do that.

[–]SmurfESmurferson0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Find your local Girl Scouts. Rumor has it, they have the good cookies

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Those fucking boxes are so expensive. I feel like I'm giving money to corporations that don't agree with child labor laws. I donate to cub scouts though. Plenty of boys AND girls on that one...and they look way better in caps. I like popcorn more too. After 12 years with my wife, I no longer have a sweet tooth.

[–]ZodiacBrave98Open Hypergamy Triggers Me0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]LowCredditRead the sidecar1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Celery with peanut butter is no shit my favorite dessert. I love that stuff.

[–]ScarletNumeroo0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Raisins too?

[–]PickUpScientistMaroon Pill1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

that goes without saying.

[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Ants on a log ❤️

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol just said the same thing

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Bugs on a log!

That’s what black folks down south call them.

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn’t co-parenting be expected??? It would be weird if society was fine with men just abandoning their children.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie7 points8 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

"Society" isn't fine with men just abandoning their children. They are also disproportionally apathetic to men not abandoning their children. Its expected.

You create a situation that you can always lose and at best can only break even. Which has led to a movement among men to act "amoral" when it personally suits them no matter who will disprove of them.

So when Poppy says men aren't respected for doing the right thing, this is the whole picture behind that comment. As a society, we've somewhat lost the ability to be grateful.

[–]shithappenslolblack stacey | PREMED WAS A MISTAKE | African-American Pilled4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh I think I misunderstood you. Yes you should absolutely be validated for the efforts and growth you’ve achieved in parenthood.

Someone feeding, housing and watching a kid shouldn’t be applauded because those things are the bare minimum. Not abandoning kids shouldn’t be applauded.

Going above and beyond deserves praise, though.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its kind of tough. I have to actively notice things my wife is doing well at first. I think it becomes a effort in learning to be grateful for what I have. I think we can appreciate people and not see it as the bare minimum most of the time.

So it's less of the act in giving some one praise (give my wife a cookie) and more just feeling appreciative of my wife. Does that make sense?

[–]binkerfluid0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

and yet when people do shitty things, men and women, no one bats an eye

so they do shitty things to you and no one cares and they get rewarded and you try to do the right thing and are screwed over.

[–]EminemLovesGrapesSpongebob0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

''Just sticking around'' is not the default right thing to do. Maybe society says so,

But from my poor upbringing I've seen dads who ''stuck around'' but nontheless ignored the child uttely.

It would try everything in its power just be noticed, usualy the negative kind.

At that point it might've been better if he fucked off.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Stuck around to CO-PARENT. I will never support passive aggressive starfishing. It creates too many people motivated by negativity.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

And it fucks up the kid. One of my sisters has had pretty interesting luck with men, the father of her youngest daughter likes to parade himself around as father of the fucking year because he picks his daughter up on the arranged weekends...and then usually drops her with his mom, or the girlfriend du jour, and goes out to party all weekend. She's old enough to understand it, now, and it's currently being compounded by his selfish habit of threatening to take her away from her mother (who is not perfect, but adores her kids and does the best she can...which is way better than he does/would do). She acts out (always has) because there's a lack of stability in her paternal relationship...but my sister also doesn't want to alienate him from her daughter's life, because that's also damaging. He gets no cookies, imo. What he's doing is not co-parenting, it's putting on a half-assed and selfishly motivated show to avoid a 'deadbeat' label from his friend group/family.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

The two are related. I think you just made an argument and didn’t realize it.

[–]test17297 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is so sad, alexa play despacito

[–]LowCredditRead the sidecar1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Fathers are literally the Patriarchy and Capitalism. If you don't hate them then you are a fascist.

[–]AggravatingTartlet1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fathers are literally the Patriarchy and Capitalism.

They are not.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Go away

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fathers are literally the Patriarchy and Capitalism

Oh how I wish that was true! You know how hard is to be Capitalism?

[–]erman880 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't really think you should just automatically "get respect" based on the fact you impregnated someone.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That wasn’t what I was saying. I’m talking about fathers in general.

[–]BelieveinyourflynessPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this is the correct answer. Well done

[–]jackandjill22Red Pill misanthropic, contrarian0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

[–]Ofourkind10 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Most men have no problem dating single moms once they reach a certain age.

Source: am in my forties and know boatloads of divorced single parents, none of whom have any problems dating

[–]azngirl76899 points10 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah this is more a 20 something hang up. Says the 20 something.

[–]abqkat4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think as more women opt out of parenthood, it will become more common. I'm almost 40, childless by choice, and wouldn't date a guy with kids. Neither would any of the women I know in my boat who have also opted out of parenthood. For many reasons, people are forgoing child-rearing, and I think that will shift harder to dating options

[–]tritter211Pragmatic2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not a "hangup".

Its genuinely a big risk for the young guy. Younger moms genuinely look for guys to have a "father figure" for their child. Thats a big no no for any young single guy unless he is terribly naive.

for older men and older women, its not much of a problem because the "kids" they have are mostly late teens who will become young adults in a handful of years, and you don't need to worry about them.

for younger men, they risk getting roped in supporting a child that isn't theirs for the next 18 years. There is also a possibility that the women will take risks and also deliberately get pregnant against the wishes of the guy to force him to support both their children. These are the kinds of risks that men have to deal with in a "my body, my choice" rhetoric laden world... So guys excludes single mothers right off the bat to not deal with these complexities.

[–]SmurfESmurferson3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I’m 39 and I see a lot of my divorced friends not having an issue finding dates and relationships with high quality, divorced guys

[–]escapethesolarsystemActually Too Red for "EC" Snowflakes on r/TRP6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because single motherhood is much more likely to be due to irresponsible behavior, where as single fatherhood is not. Since most divorces are initiated by women (in the west, please note, not globally), it's more likely the single mother choose to be a single mother, where as a single father likely had to fight to care for a child after the woman selfishly dissolved the relationship.

Even more, there's a difference in the role of fathers and mothers in parenting that makes a single mother a liability when a single father is not. The role of the mother (an important role, no doubt) is to comfort and protect the child, while the role of the father is to discipline and challenge the child. Certainly, there can be some overlap, but the roles to some degree instinctual so the overlap usually won't be that great. The problem is, the single mother will be wired to see the new man in her life as a "threat" to her child whenever he tries to challenge or punish the child, basically ruining the dynamic and making him unable to be a proper father to the child.

All this is not the say the relationship isn't ever workable, but it's very high risk for major problems for the man. Why should the man take the risk? On the flip side, a single father doesn't provide much risk for a new woman in his life, in fact, he looks extra responsible - if he can take care of a child alone he can probably be trusted to take care of her too.

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes29 points30 points  (32 children) | Copy Link

What fantasy world are you living in that single fathers are considered sexy? Most childless women my age (mid-late 20s) absolutely would not date a single father. The women I know who are fine dating single dads are older (>35) and often have kids themselves.

You are correct that there is far more vitriol against single moms than single dads though, although ime I've only seen this online. The men I know irl would not date single moms but don't seem to hate them either.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse13 points14 points  (30 children) | Copy Link

As a married father I get female attention when I'm out alone with the kids. I've no doubt that if my wife was gone and I had the kids I could pull in the attractive pussy. Which sickens me a lot because it tells me a lot about women, none of it good.

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes23 points24 points  (10 children) | Copy Link

Do you get more sexual attention? I'm nicer to men with wives & kids because I perceive them as less threatening, not because I want to bang them.

[–]we-are-men-with-ven17 points18 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Bingo.

This comes up on r/askmen and r/askwomen quite frequently. Men ask 'why are women suddenly flirting with me now I'm married/ have kids?'

The women always answer with 'you're less threatening and I feel comfortable knowing we can have an enjoyable conversation without you trying to fuck me'.

And the men are like 'oh shit, yeah'.

[–]Nevidimka-7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

it's just cute seeing a man being a sweet dad. I can just look at that like "aww" (just like i sometimes look at moms cuddling their babies). Doesn't have anything to do with flirting.

[–]we-are-men-with-ven4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep! I also genuinely like the company of men.

When I meet a married/ taken man, it's a great opportunity to talk to them without an uncomfortable air of sexual tension. Neither of us have to worry about all that flirty crap and we can just have a nice conversation.

I have spent hours and hours talking to dad's and grandads at the local park.

[–]couldbemage-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

But they do sleep with you... Meaning me. Certainly not all of them, but being a good dad is one of the most notable positive attractive traits.

[–]moddestmouse17 points18 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Every few months some guy will open up his marriage to get all that pussy he’s missing out on and then he realizes women just find him less threatening because he’s married with children and mistakes that kindness with interest.

[–]findingfemininitysend birb memes7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's baffling to me that TRP men claim to know all about female nature but then can't make the distinction between sexual interest and general niceness.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

i really wonder if the young dad in my building thinks i wanna fuck him now lmao nooo

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

My coworker in a nutshell.

[–]chaddad9000-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, but its not that he's married, its that his wife knows.

[–]chaddad90001 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a minority of women out there looking at you like ooo-do-me-next, but for the most part no. (and yes I know what an IOI looks like.)

[–]ResponsibleCharacter10 points11 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

They think you’re cute, like if you had a puppy. Unless they’re 35+ they wouldn’t line up to sign up to step mommy your kids I fucking promise.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

As well they shouldn't. If I were a single dad I would prefer a single mom for a mate.

[–]ResponsibleCharacter2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

That makes complete sense. Someone who not only has experience with kids but has kids of their own. No "evil stepparent" type situation from someone who doesn't know how to deal with children.

[–]couldbemage0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Hilarious. So many women have done exactly that.

And are you saying puppies don't work? Because I have news for you...

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

So many women have done exactly that

Older women who are desperate for men who show signs they commit or are ready for children.

[–]ResponsibleCharacter0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Puppies might actually work for childfree women in their 20s. Actual kids won't. If I see a hot dude with his toddler: yes I might get mushy inside. I might say hi to him and his cute beeb. It's adorable. He's a good dad. You get this vague sense of "wow the woman who landed him is lucky, this is adorable." But none of that translates into wanting to actually fuck him and parent some other lady's offspring. I don't even have kids of my own, I don't need to deal with someone else's, and I want a relationship without baby mama/exwife drama because... I can still have those. I'm still young enough. If I end up single again 35-40+? I'll have to leave those preferences in the dust because of reality.

[–]SmurfESmurferson7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m with u/findingfemininity on this. A man out with kids for the day lowers the distrust I naturally have for strange men - I’m more likely to treat them like someone I already know, and start with random chitchat and small talk

It’s preselection, but not sexual preselection. I just figure even the most hardened criminals wouldn’t do something that would traumatize the kids, so I’m safe

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well here we are on ppd trying to figure out which gender is worse, basically. You think not?

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Sadly, yes.

[–]reluctantly_red3 points4 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

father I get female attention when I'm out alone with the kids.

Yeah -- a cute kids is better than a cute puppy for attracting women.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse-1 points0 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

That is part of what bothers me.

[–]superlurkage-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Why? Has child, is probably not a predator — not nuanced, but logical, no?

....oh, you think she wants to fuck you, ha ha...

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Lots of single dads attract women into bed. Having strange women parading in and out of a single dad's bedroom is a thing. But she ain't into it for his kid, no more than a guy who fucks a single mom is into it for her kid.

[–]couldbemage1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Not for the kid, but the kid signals safety for her to talk to him. Icebreaker. Still have to close the deal, but that foot in the door helps.

[–]superlurkage1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

My point was that you are probably mistaking their interaction with you for interest —- women see you as safe and non-sexual if you have your kids around.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Anything is possible.

[–]007_pp71 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can relate. Its almost indescribable. the women with baby fever come out of the woodwork when my toddler and i are out and about together.

I definitely dont get that much attention thrown to me when its just me.

[–]binkerfluid0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

preselection?

[–]nevomintoarcePurple Pill Woman-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

They're not flirting.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

SIngle dad here: you miss another angle; women who date single dads (or even taken dads) precisely because said dads are unlikely to fall for them and make it awkward - a perfect FWB material.

To be sure, this is not my opinion, this was explained to me by my FWB who wants to keep things casual.

[–]mazeforgays5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd never, ever, ever date a single father. Or any other type of a father. Won't even fuck them. Guy could be an 11/10 Chris Hemsworth look alike hung like a fucking elephant, but the second he mentions any offspring, I'm OUT. Like gtfo with your fuck trophies, I'm not interested.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol it's refreshing to see this coming from the other direction.

[–]abqkat3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Same. But the difference, for me, is I'm almost 40, with options and no biological clock. For women who want their own kids, the timing and stakes and standards are a lot different

[–]statusincorporated3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Ya it's one of those inexplicable BETA qualities that is somehow seen as sexually attractive. or maybe it's an alpha quality to have a kid? who knows?

both probably. you have a kid and you take care of it.

but you have to have some good SMV/RMV to snag a chick with no kids if you already have kids.

[–]couldbemage0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Combine both. Once again, I'm going to bring up Jax Teller. Outlaw biker that loves his son. I know tons of women that love that character.

[–]mybrownsweater0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Red pillars make it sound like betas are happily married men. I'd rather be someone's wife than be with some man whore who breaks my heart and gives me an STD.

[–]TheBookOfSeilAn ounce of Snu Snu is worth a pound of cure2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

It probably has something to do with single fathers appearing more virtuous in society than single mothers because single mothers are more common since women tend to get custody more commonly than men do.

Also, it really depends on who we’re speaking of, here. Sure, there are great women out there who just happen to have a child, but there are also some women who are still (mentally) children themselves, and haven’t cultivated a mature personality which shows that they’re suitable partners nor suitable parents.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

...this seems a fair assessment, I appreciate it.

[–]SkylineCrash2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because if you get custody as a dad then you're probably a great guy

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Or mom was a shit human (equal with 'deadbeat dads'), and you got it by default. My father got custody because my mom left him for being a (he admits and understands) shitty husband, simply because he was in a better position, at the time, to provide for a child. I don't think it was a bad choice, but aside from housing/income, my father was no better than my mother at the time. Those things are important, but don't necessarily mean that my father was 'better', just that he had stability...she was a SAHM by mutual decision, of course she didn't have those attributes.

(Edit' 'you' in my comment not necessarily meaning you specifically, just how it was naturally phrased)

[–]volchonok12 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't have any large statistics, but it feels like single dad is usually a conscious choice, something that a father wants to do and fights to have a right to raise kid on his own - so it kinda shows some value/determination in that man. While being a single mother is kinda default option for women after breakup/divorce, it doesn't inherently mean any positive qualities of that person.

[–]SmurfESmurferson8 points9 points  (12 children) | Copy Link

The last time I was single, I was in my 20s

Now, I’m 39. Chances are, if a guy hasn’t been married and/or had a kid by this age, that’s a huge red flag. That’s multiple decades of multiple women, all coming to the same conclusion: he’s just not that attractive for an LTR

EDIT: Please note that “had a kid,” I don’t mean with someone random. Either an ex-wife, or (and I only know one guy in this situation) with a LTR gf of a decade

EDIT 2: Seriously with the downvotes? 🙄

[–]007_pp74 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I wouldn't include marriage. That pretty patriarchal these days. I dont want ownership of somebody or vice versa.

I personally have never seen a single marriage in my life last longer than 5 years before someone cheats or gets an addiction. Friends/family/coworkers. I could be an outlier but i have personally heard so many stories of " i cant afford to leave"

Only 31 but im taking a pass on marriage. My state has no common law either 👍. Its a piece of paper and some metal around your finger. I dont even go to church, and marriage is a religious ceremony.

[–]SmurfESmurferson2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s a red flag for me because it tells me that my values aren’t in line with his

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

LMAO non pre selection = red flag

[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

100%!

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie-3 points-2 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

They are downvoting everyone. I just see it as a tap on the mat that you've won because they've conceded

[–]SmurfESmurferson-2 points-1 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, wtf is going on with that? Are we being brigades again?

EDIT: To whomever downvoted this, well played, good sir

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish I could tell. I see reds and blues get downvoted. But what I notice is they are downvoting really good posts. Like they want to stifle the fun out of PPD.

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

To whomever downvoted this, well played, good sir

Now they are just being cheeking with their loss. Very funny.

[–]planejane 1 points [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

Idk most of my comments have dipped down to -1 or -2 lately an hour or so after I comment. Eventually they go up again but it'll even be in comment chains a dozen deep.

I think they're bots at this point. Was mildly irritated at first but in some ways it feels like I made it, too, since this is my main sub I frequent.

[–]SmurfESmurferson0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

“I’d like to thank all the little people I had to step on to get here!”

[–]Aaren_AugustineWants a Cookie0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think they're bots at this point

If it is, they are attempting to control the flow of the conversation; very manipulative.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse3 points4 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

I posted a thread about this once. Single fathers are no better, most went and stuck their dick in crazy and that shows very bad judgment on his part.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn, there's so much irrational hate on this sub for people capable of getting laid.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

In most cases the crazy did not surface, until years after the sticking. We are not all psychiatrists, and most of the red flags do not pop prior to the 3rd year of a relationship.

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Not true, the crazy usually surfaces right away, it's just that people refuse to see the crazy until it's brighter than the sun.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

depends on the KIND of crazy. For example, a lot of people are perfectly reasonable until they have children.

[–]sunshinecentered3 points4 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

Men seem to have significantly more trouble with knowing a woman was a full living human being prior to him coming into her life.

[–]binkerfluid0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

men know they are going to have to pay for that kid I guess when I would assume the reverse is likely less true?

But to be honest dating anyone with a kid is just going to be a lot harder doesnt matter if they are a man or a woman.

[–]sunshinecentered0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I don’t want kids and don’t particularly like kids. If something fell apart with my SO, I would not be willing to date a parent. I believe if you date a parent, you have to be willing to stand up and be a parent and it just isn’t in the cards for me.

I don’t know any step parents with significant financial obligation to their step children but I’m sure it happens on occasion.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

nah, we do not care, we jsut want to be treated nice, like all humans. SInce Single Moms are far more bitter than single dads, nobody wants to be around them.

[–]boomcheese440 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

It's stupid, but men just want a clean slate. Woman seem to want a ready made man.

[–]sunshinecentered2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The idea of finding an adult clean slate is just moronic. The desire to have someone you can mold yourself instead of a fully formed human being to fall in love with is gross.

To clarify I think you’re spot on, I just thinks it’s nasty. I think the clean slate bullshit is why dudes are so much more into pedophilia than women.

[–]SeemedGood4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Men and women are not the same.

[–]AggravatingTartlet1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't see this in my world.

Single mothers are just seen as women with children who are not with a man.

Single dads who have custody as seen the same as women are above.

Single dad who are just weekend dads are seen as not doing enough for their kids. They are not seen as good parents.

[–]poppy_bluBeware the freight train2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I'm going to amend my earlier comment and say that a lot of this irrational hatred also comes from the same place all of their hate for women comes from -- women are fucking men who aren't them and thus are worthy of scorn.

[–]LillthOfBabylon1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Despite what the red pill want to believe, women actually like good men. It’s just that being a good man requires sacrifice. Being there for your child is a noble sacrifice. Basically, we have a very low expectation for fathers, in general. Also, we can dad have more free time than the full-time mother. Also, women have baby fever. A guy who’s already a good dad will be a good dad to her own offsprings with him.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because single mothers have many more toxic traits then a single fathers do.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Like what?

[–]Eastuss༼ つ ▀̿_▀̿ ༽つ1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Wtf? Men are more vocal online about criticising single mothers but eventually men still date single mothers.

I hear load load load load of women saying they wouldn't want to date a single father just because he still has contacts with his exes.

[–]FreevoulousPurple Pill Man1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Freshly minted single dad here, Im currently living that situation:

  • single dads are often more fit and in better shape than single moms, who are often saggy and fat. MILF is largely a myth.

  • single dads often experience a "renaissance" of their freedom, and are happy dudes drunk on freedom, single moms are miserable and negative

  • guys often become single dads in their late 30s or so, when they are in their physical, intellectual and financial prime. Single moms are almost never in their prime, it was probably when they got pregnant first.

  • Single dads compete with younger single men, but beat them thanks to experience, wisdom and woman-skills. Single moms compete with young pre-pregnancy women who have far better bodies.

  • Single moms are usually more bitter and talkative about their divorce/breakup, and that tends to scare people away. Single Dads rarely mention their exes.

  • both single dads and single moms are often busy, unavailable, and hard to win over, because they have their priority with kids. Being hard to get is sexy in men, and NOT sexy in women, regardless of what media wants you to believe.

  • Single Dads often get to show their parenting skills, which are a combo of being caring and sweet to someone vulnerable, but also hard and strict when needed. Women find these behaviors sexy in men, but the reverse is not true.

[–]planejane 1 points [recovered]  (9 children) | Copy Link

Anybody who willingly dates a single father who isn't a widower gets the shit end of the stick. I didn't used to think this but after seeing enough of my peers get knocked up by guys who were already part time dads and couldn't be bothered to call their kids on their birthday and were more concerned with their own lives, just stay the fuck away from single dads.

There's a reason his ex and kids don't have much to do with him and it's not just because she's a bitch or something. 95% of the time IME he'd rather drink and fuck barsluts than go to his kid's birthday party. The kid or you will NEVER be a priority.

[–]SmurfESmurferson5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Most of the time, you’re right. But I’m friends with two guys who got seriously screwed by their ex’s - to the point that one of them is litigating now for custodial interference

The mother of the other one refuses to file for child support so she doesn’t have to set up visitation, and can deny him access

[–]planejane 1 points [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure, but you said it yourself-they're the exception.

[–]SmurfESmurferson1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, absolutely. They’re the exceptions that prove the rule

[–]lilacluna5481 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess what you say would apply to a lot of dads who dont see their kids (or hardly do) but my dad had full custody (my mom didnt want it, she had visitation rights) and he was a good parent. They're out there. He never dated again, though

[–]binkerfluid3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Fuck you, I see my kid way more than my shitty ex who hardly makes time to even be a part time mom for our son.

[–]planejane 1 points [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you have shared custody or just visitation rights?

Being better than a shitty parent doesn't necessarily make you a good one, and I never claimed women were better parents universally.

[–]binkerfluid0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

We have an agreement of 50-50 but in reality Its more ike 70/80% me taking care of our child

[–]ResponsibleCharacter0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A dude who has a kid and doesn’t talk about them all the damn time (aka is involved constantly in their lives, sharing custody) is a piece of shit. I don’t even feel bad for the dumb bitches who think THEIR magic pussy or THEIR special baby will be different. Nope, and now you’re baby mama #2.

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

None of the single moms I know, and at my age there have been plenty, have no trouble finding men to date, LTR, and marry. Most single moms started out in relationships where the child was wanted, but the couple didn't work out. It's a temporary state, not a core partlf their being.

All of this single mom hate here does not represent reality. And these guys dating these women are not low value thirtys. They are normal dudes.

[–]tritter211Pragmatic2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Most single moms started out in relationships where the child was wanted, but the couple didn't work out.

Thats what men here call "bad judgement". If your relationship doesn't pan out without you even reaching the middle of 20's, its a HUGE redflag. And everyday on tinder, I see atleast one girl who is literally pregnant and searching for a guy to have a "father figure" and has a "no games" and "no hookups". (which basically says, she used to like guys who played games on her, had ONS's constantly and liked bad boys and now became a "born again virgin" to compensate for past actions.)

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Ummmm ok. Or she married a RP guy young and innocently and he got tired of her and dumped her on her ass with a baby. Having a kid is not indicative of any of these things. But whatevs, move along, I don't care and neither do they

[–]tritter211Pragmatic2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

or she married a RP guy young

RP men in marriage usually only want one thing: long term relationship and to keep her hypergamous instinct in check. The rest of RP world doesn't endorse the concept of marriage at all due to the way the current society is built up for women centric world.

he got tired of her and dumped her on her ass with a baby.

Why would a woman have baby with a guy who dumps him? Why did she ignore all the warnings and red flags to have baby with a guy like this? You are basically taking ALL of personal responsibility and will power away from women by saying this. She chose personal feelings over making level headed decisions.

Having a kid is not indicative of any of these things

Unfortunately for you, it definitely is. There are exceptions to single mothers of course (abuse victim, trafficking victim, widows... you know, women who clearly had to face single motherhood with no choice on the matter) but the rest of them have to face personal responsibility. Thats what guys are told right from their early childhood.

[–]katymarxPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol.. now we have to predict the future too.

[–]kandyapplezincel larping as a thot4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah ive never actually seen that single moms struggle with dating. the ones i know seem to do just as well as any woman of their attractiveness level and are sometimes with pretty "high rmv" guys

[–]pnadlerlaw1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Single dad ... he’s responsible ... is clearly filling the role of a father ... which is more than I can say for most other men out there in the dating pool. So, this is consistent with my desires as a woman.

Single mom ... her focus is on her child(ren) ... which is not at all the case with other women out there in the dating pool. So, this is inconsistent with my desires as a man.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

This makes some sense. And of course, anyone who truly wants to be childfree wouldn't want either one.

[–]pnadlerlaw-1 points0 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Well, the percentage of men who want to be child-free is like 90%. The percentage of women who want to be child-free? Probably less than 50%.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if that counts women who wanted to be childfree but had an 'oops' (a real one, not an 'I stopped my pill just for the fuck of it' type thing) and for whatever reason didn't/couldn't abort. While they're not actually childfree at that point, it may not have changed the initial preference (I see a lot of 'one and done' types that fall into this category). Probably no way to tell, just a curiosity.

[–]pnadlerlaw0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

If the amount of marketing dollars and multi-billion dollar decisions of companies making baby and children’s products is any indication ... from budgets that can hire neuromarketers, devote millions of dollars to studying focus groups, testing revealed preferences, etc. ... I would put my money on women being by far and substantially more desirous of children than men.

An ad for babies and children directed towards men is wasted money at worst, and “socially progressive PR” at best.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, yeah, they market towards their customers, and by and large, women buy the majority of baby products, even if they're married/LTR, even to the kids biological father. Just how it seems to work out, at least from what I've seen. I don't think that has much bearing on whether or not they actually wanted kids, though. Maybe I'm missing something.

[–]pnadlerlaw0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes ... because women are their customers.

[–]ScarletNumeroo1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

A lot of women like the idea of having a family, so dating a single dad makes it easier to make a family. Also, the single dad wants someone to help take care of his kids, so he is more likely to be willing to settle into a LTR.

Also, due to preselection, a single dad already has the stamp of approval from some other woman. Even if you don't know who she is, she decided that his man was good enough to bear his child, so he must be worth something.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Also, due to preselection, a single dad already has the stamp of approval from some other woman. Even if you don't know who she is, she decided that his man was good enough to bear his child, so he must be worth something.

Which is one of the weird things to me, actually, because if this exact same ex-couple had a flipped scenario and the woman ends up a single mom instead of the man being a single dad, she's now stigmatized for poor selection. Exact same people, entirely different views based on their gender and parenting status. If that makes sense.

[–]ScarletNumeroo0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

entirely different views based on their gender and parenting status. If that makes sense.

Yes, the scenario is judged differently based on gender. That's the whole point of the topic.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

That it is. I asked the original question because I'm looking for insight into why that is. I am getting some interesting answers, even if the whole thing still seems somewhat hypocritical, though, and yours was one of the interesting ones, so thank you :-)

[–]mybrownsweater0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I wonder if this could be related to the statistic that women are more likely to leave? So if the man left then she really must have been a demon?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Could be, every situation is different. To me, the devil really is in the details. The kicker about that statistic, to me, is that while most play it off as AWALT, it doesn't include stats for men that had affairs, ONSs, were abusive in some way and she decided not to take it anymore...not saying that those traits are exclusive to men, but we just don't know what the circumstances were that caused the initiation of divorce. I will say that men do tend to put up with more than women do these days, so unless he was a philanderer that wanted to be 'free', there's likely some truth to what you say.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased Against Humans[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]MuleFool420 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Good question. I think the distinction has to do with whether or not the person dating the single dad/mom is without a family. If a woman or man is single, childless, and has never been married, then the single mom/dad is more likely to be avoided because no matter what, their kids come before you do. Maybe that's sexy on a guy, I don't know, women will have to answer that. But for a single guy, a single mom is a raw deal. Even if you marry them, you're second, third, fourth, etc.............in line for consideration. Also, if you marry, you're also agreeing to raise pay for some other dude's kids instead of your own. That's a raw deal too, especially if you end up divorcing her.

Society's laws make it a higher risk for men to get involved. I have a friend who lives in CA. He let his single mom gf move in with him for 5 months until she could get back on her feet. The child was very young. They broke up, she moved out. A while later he got hit with child support. CA is making him support the child until she's 18. He's still paying. So, it could be that single mothers just represent more risk.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

I suppose I can see that. I know a dude who's getting screwed kinda like your friend, except they also had more kids together...I think it was one prior, two together, and then she had another after? He pays for the first three (well, two now, one of their joint kids killed herself a couple years ago). She actually embodies the irritating single-mom-welfare-queen stereotype, pisses me off to no end. Though she picked a good ATM for the last kid, his family had money...she forgot that that meant his family could afford a good lawyer, while she could not lol.

I'd say that a good indicator of that risk, though, is whether or not she's taking child support, and why she is if that's the case. If she brags about how much she took him for, or is constantly bitching that the state isn't doing more to force him to pay, huuuge red flag. But some don't want or need it, so they don't get it, by choice. And some don't want/need it, didn't ask for it, but the courts mandated it anyway, which isn't really her fault (I know one or two that literally just send dude's check back, they actually don't want or need his cash and refuse to keep it).

As far as coming in last place, eh, I do get that. It's a bit different when it's also your own kid, so jointly-produced children wouldn't have quite the same effect. At the same time, in a healthy (long-term, of course) relationship, everyone is important, and things should be decided not on who's '1st', or who's biologically whose, but by the needs of everyone. Say, not being able to do X activity with your partner because the kid is sick, but your partner will also skip X activity with kiddo to take care of you when you're sick, that seems reasonable, y'know?

[–]MuleFool420 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

in a healthy (long-term, of course) relationship, everyone is important,

Agree that this is the optimum scenario.

[–]we-are-men-with-ven0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

In the UK the media has a bit of a hard on for demonising single mothers, exclusively working class ones.

It's partly political, as these women are usually on welfare they become a target for changing certain policies. People get angry that they pay taxes and these women use them.

Aside from politics, the moral outrage is something I have ONLY found on the Internet. I've been called a slut, a loser and had a load of nasty PMs (it's one of the reasons I drop accounts regularly.

In real life - almost everyone is very supportive and kind to me.

[–]Purecope20190 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The single dads that are RP def arent sexy LOL

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Systematically negative worldview is unattractive in general lol. Regardless of gender, but I get your meaning fo sho.

[–]paladine76a0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

My take on single mothers is they always put their kids first. How can you have a successful relationship when your partner is always second? Where is the logic in that?

So every man who dates a single mom knows he will always be placed after someone else's kids. What reason would a man want to enter that relationship?

If you as a woman must put your kids first then don't even bother men. Live single and put all your focus on the kids. Mom doesn't need a relationship. Have your "special friends" and keep them separate from your kids.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

A man who is trying to build a career will generally put his partner second, as well...should she also avoid him because of a usually temporary situation?

Edit: I get where you're coming from, not saying you're wrong, just sparking discussion.

[–]rockinhard130Do I even lift, bro?0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

This has NOT been my experience or the experience of other single fathers. If I only had them weekends I'd probably be in a relationship right now.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

So you have your kids full-time, and think that if you didn't, you'd have a partner?

[–]rockinhard130Do I even lift, bro?0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. My struggling to deal with being a single father with custody is the reason that my ex gf and I broke up.

[–]_Anarchon_0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

In general, a single mother denotes trickery and/or mental illness. That's not necessarily true for men. The stigma exists because of how much more control women have over their getting pregnant, and staying that way.

A single mother is generally someone who has tricked a man into an unwanted pregnancy or willingly got pregnant by hiding her true personality, only later for the man to discover her real one. Your observation that they are damaged goods is true, in general, at least moreso than men.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Are men unable to hide their personalities as well? I know a few single mothers who were decieved until it was too late. Surprise pregnancy has a habit of eventually bringing out the worst on both sides, ime...

[–]_Anarchon_0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Are men unable to hide their personalities as well?

Men do it too. But, I'm speaking in generalities. Women are crazier than men. And, they are much more adept at hiding it long enough to hook a man. An honest woman will admit this, if you can find one.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair lol. I had a stepmother that hid that shit long enough to get pregnant and subsequently take off with my brother. I will say that regardless of gender, the ones that have abusive/unfaithful tendencies have figured out how to hide it long enough to trap the next partner.

[–]glofcast 1 points [recovered]  (5 children) | Copy Link

They’re far more prevalent. And usually stupider people.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Sooo if single dads were more prevalent, they would conversely be considered irresponsible?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

Depends why they were more prevalent.

If the court system turns to favoring fathers in such a way that it currently favors mothers (despite single mothers generally being far less responsible than single fathers, despite women usually getting a better deal in family court) then the stigma towards single fathers will probably shift negatively along with it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Sounds fair. I'll add in that while the court statistics definitely do point towards women gaining custody in the majority of those situations, the statistics for the number of those cases that end up in court is something like 11%...meaning 89% (give or take) agree on custody outside of the courtroom, so if the majority of mothers get custody, it's a mutual decision in the most cases. I accept some standard deviation based on men that gave in because they thought they'd lose, but the numbers still generally point to them handing over custody for whatever reason.

I myself was raised by a single dad, because my mom left when I was young. Many reasons, don't hate either of them, but it's an example of custody being decided wholly out of court, and in the father's favor. My mom was smart enough to realize that she couldn't provide the stability that my father could at the time, and that didn't change until it was pretty much a moot point anyway.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Well kudos to your mom for doing what was in your best interest, even if it required her to be absent for a while. That’s a big sacrifice.

Also I was unaware of that out-of-court settlement stat. Do you have sauce on that? I’d like to think most parents care about their kids like that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's one from a quick google search:

https://erlichlegal.com/blog/single-fathers-single-mothers-child-custody-statistics/

I've looked it up a few times, and while all of the stats would take a bit to compile, the overall consensus is that most of these cases don't even make it to mediation, much less court. Pop up google and type in 'custody statistics usa' or the like, most of the top hits will be from family court lawyers that also display that statistic. Truth is, while the majority of court cases favor the woman, those don't seem to be anywhere near the number of 'cases' overall.

[–]Shanguerrilla0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy Link

The ONLY reason I as a man get that treatment or notice that trend with women I've dated since being a single father... is likely 'because' single mothers have a partially true and not true stereotype. If society equally delt custody when regards to gender of parent--- THIS would NOT be an issue. In OUR society, it IS a value of some merit-- to those who value it. Who values it? Single mothers. Who is the large group of women that most men for many reasons biological, psychological, societal, and even rationally wouldn't be their top choice? Single mothers, as you said. To answer your question-- well you already did! It's because of the single mothers that us guys get that treatment. Other parents can respect it platonically or we can relate on another level in passions of life.... but a lot of people 'become single' after having children, women get VASTLY more custody for various reasons... so when a guy does, it actually can speak toward his character rather than a woman's default (most of all toward qualities 'single mothers' may statistically prioritise more than others as well as maintain slightly less options than similar women without children).

That said, 100% of the women I have dated since being a dad (and whether I included the info in fun or seemingly attractive ways or not) I've only been with single mothers since divorce 3 years ago. Seems they are attracted to me, I'm attracted to the availability and occasionally find someone I am beyond that.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy Link

Your comment was somewhat hard to follow, so I'm going to paraphrase to make sure I understand: Your view is that single fathers gain interest mainly from single mothers, exclusively, specifically because they are single fathers?

[–]Shanguerrilla0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

not exclusively, just of higher likelihood. Sorry I can be unclear at my best and just shot that out without re-reading earlier. Seems that as a single father I am self excluded from a subset of women that I am not interested in. But that is like... for these kinds of subs, higher SMV, younger, no children women. That's a smaller pool that I can kinda sometimes almost reach to. But losing most that potential dating pool is a very small overall hit to my potential partners.

I'm more interested in GOOD single mom's to an extent.... there's a lot to unwrap in that first and I won't bother. But I am saying men as single dads DO lose some of our dating pool a bit when we make it known. I tried advertising it and not. When advertised I got a few 20-30 year old dates with women not moms, but most were single moms of all those ages and quality of 'mom'. I also went from like pretty dead apps to having a lot of women matching me and talking, giving numbers, going on dates more- when I present that upfront in the right way.

So it doesn't make me more 'attractive' or less judged. It excludes me from some. But for most dad's it's excluding us from a smaller subset that was never the one we most desired casting our line right now. I don't even mean limited to relationship rather than friends with benefits... even that's usually better with a woman that understands my kid comes first, mom's better do (if good moms). I'd prefer having fun with someone available to me and attracted and attractive to me. Well, for single mom's they do lose a larger pool of men (less men are single dads NOT for lack of want often.. but socially and legally). Math rules, this 'evens things' if only that they lose a larger pool of potential partners. My proportional stock increases.

IDK, mostly I just can best relate to them and find a good balance, but honestly it did increase my opportunities seemingly, while even I 'judge' other single parents / potential partners the same as we are all talking about too-- just value finding good ones and people I can have fun with along more common understanding sometimes?

I'm sorry, I'm likely still not being very clear! But thanks for trying to help me better explain what I was trying to say. I didn't want to come off TOO ignorant or belittling any group involved about this, just made sense to me for awhile as an abstract idea I'd not really talked about.

[–]abicus43431 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

Jesus. This is the most garbled rambling piece of I'm not sure what I've read in a long time.

[–]Shanguerrilla0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Luckily yours hasn't been my friendliest.

[–]abicus43430 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

Again....what?!

[–]Shanguerrilla1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank god... I thought it was me.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Sooo..my interpretation was mostly correct, except that it's not exclusively single mothers in your dating pool, just a majority?

[–]Shanguerrilla0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup! You clearly said it better than me haha. Just that to me it's less that single fathers are getting the inverse of single mothers stigma- more that single mothers do lose out on a larger dating pool from male preferences and many real reasons...

If we are only looking at something oversimplified to "SMV," it lowers a man's a little bit as a single dad and we lose some purchase power and potential buys. Meanwhile your OP while I disagree about your take on "single dads" I agree the effect takes place because it DOES kind of 'lower' a lot of women's "SMV" if for no other reason than it excluding them from the DEFAULT (guy isn't single dad). Now they can't shop at a lot more stores than single dads and most the 'negatives' to the single dad are negated or positives to that now large group of single moms with less relationship potential or power than before being a single parent. Outside all else, just statistically, men by default DON'T get custody or as much, those who do it's seen as meaning something more or more positive than the DEFAULT woman with custody or more. More importantly we have a large group of women excluded from more men and if single dad's didn't get any boost / reverse stigma- if we just don't go full retard or dad bod.. we haven't moved, single moms dropped down. It seems like we are treated backwards, but only because at that point the minorities and majorities shifted.

Anyway, I do and did agree with you just for different reasons to the effect. But what do I know, I clearly need you to follow me to other threads and try to summarize my gibberish so folks know what I'm trying to say

[–]FaraunLoveShady0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy Link

The average single dad is less attractive than the average single mom.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy Link

How so? Is this statement from personal experience?

[–]FaraunLoveShady0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

The sexual market is pretty much favored towards women while pretty difficult towards men. Both men and women start declining in looks at 30 but women's requirements to succeed in dating are quite lower compared to men's requirements.

A single mother just has to take care of her skin and stay slim while a single father has to be considerably attractive while having a good amount of status and money.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

The average single mom has stretch marks and ankle-biters, where the average single dad has maybe one of those things. The only way that I (usually) see the SMV favoring these women is out of 'desperation'. The dumbass dudes that want to lay whatever pipe they can are encouraged by single mothers that think this is either a shot at an productive LTR, or validation that they're still attractive. Near as I've seen, having several people in my circle that are single parents of both genders, that desperation is not equaled in the single dads. They tend to pull more poon than their counterparts because of the female viewpoint that men with kids are somehow more responsible. Even if they're broke like Joe Dirt. Personally, I think SMV is either irrelevant or at least skewed (probably for both) once offspring exist.

[–]FaraunLoveShady0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Never described how the average single mom or dad actually looks like, I described what the average single mom and what the average single dad had to do to be successful in the sexual market. A single mom just has to be slim and don't have a wrinkly face, a single dad can "pull more poon", but the requirements to do so are much more higher.

They tend to pull more poon than their counterparts because of the female viewpoint that men with kids are somehow more responsible.

I'm very doubtful about single dads having sex merely because of perceived responsability with their kids, either way celibacy rates amongst men skyrocketing contradict your point

Personally, I think SMV is either irrelevant or at least skewed (probably for both) once offspring exist.

SMV matters as long as someone is sexually active.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

A single mom just has to be slim and don't have a wrinkly face,

I mean...stretch marks are a thing lol. Unless it's only about getting laid, in which case, they likely don't matter, I'll grant that. For more than that, well...physical imperfections certainly seem to matter in general.

As far as the single dads getting poon because of their status, well...it's entirely possible that my local marketplace is different than yours, I can absolutely accept that as a reality. Around here, chicks drop their panties at the hint of a 'responsible' father. It's honestly disturbing.

SMV matters as long as someone is sexually active.

That's fair enough. I tend to think of SMV as more applicable to people that don't have real prior attachments, but I'd also never heard of it as a term until my recent forays into the depths of Reddit.

[–]FaraunLoveShady0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean...stretch marks are a thing lol. Unless it's only about getting laid, in which case, they likely don't matter, I'll grant that. For more than that, well...physical imperfections certainly seem to matter in general.

Like I said, I recognize that women's looks decline with age, but the average older woman simply has to put less effort to have sex compared to the average older man.

As far as the single dads getting poon because of their status

How does responsability with children equals to status in this context?

Keep in mind that as men get older, we tend to self-deceive ourselves about our sexual achievements, this phenomenon is called sexual false conciousness.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A single mom means one of three things: getting pregnant without considering who you are getting pregnant with, or considering who you are getting pregnant with but with the intent to use the child to manipulate them, or that the woman was mislead/abused.

The last category is safe to date imo, nobody is omniscient. BUT the last category is the smallest in my anecdotal experience.

Single dads are actually shittier in my opinion but that is because as a man I have higher expectations for fellow men (example: dont nut in a woman you arent prepared to raise kids with for the next 20 years)

[–]frugaholic12010 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Cause mothers are the ones putting in the hours to raise their children, while fathers only spend the weekends doing “fun” stuff. The life of a single mother is consumed by their children. The life of a father who only sees his kids every other weekend stays mostly the same!

[–]mybrownsweater0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's because single dads are thought to be there by choice, therefore they love their children. Whereas a single mom is there because she has to be and not necessarily a good parent. Also, if she couldn't make things work with the father of her child she might be a bad wife, "single for a reason."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

Not saying that either is sexy because neither are but a single father is showing responsibility for cumming in a woman who for whatever reason didn't stick stick around and a single mother is a constant reminder that she was letting a loser cum inside her who was most likely just using her for sex or that she displayed poor mate selection

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

But why is it that the man is not considered to have also exhibited poor mate selection?

[–]Purecope20191 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Because red pill duhhhh

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. And kinda what I figured, but I enjoy being aware of all views...thus, the original asking :-)

[–]LeJacquelopeHaving a son is child abuse4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nut uh, not that fucking easy. Unless she is dead, he is showing that he has such a terrifyingly poor taste in women that he got with a demon of a woman who either abandoned her kids or the courts found her grossly unfit to be a mother. Or she's still in the kids' life which means baby mama drama (words echoing loudly into the sky as a dire warning to other women).

[–]LotBuilder0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I have really cute kids, a really cute dog and a nice house. A lot of woman with or without kids view it as a plug and play situation. I’ve got it handled, they won’t be dragged into anything they don’t want to be dragged into. For a guy, you see a single mom with kids and you automatically know you are 7th place in her life at best. If the ex is a deadbeat then you know it will get expensive, you are paying for damn near everything. If the ex is in the picture then you will constantly deal with that. I have sex with my ex wife pretty much any time I put in a little effort. I pay her bills and bang her... how much room is there for a serious boyfriend,

The ideal situation is casual when they have split custody. You hang out when she is kid free and keep it there.

[–]smokecheck1976-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because 85% of the time, the guy loses his children in family court and basically is reduced to being a serf to the mother under the gentle administrations of the state. Literally, all she has to do is show up to court and not do a line of cocaine off the judge's bench to win full custody, and I'm not sure she couldn't still win if she did a line. After that, she can be completely irresponsible, spending the money he is forced to give on herself, pawning the kids off on relatives and friends, and loudly telling anyone who will listen, and way too many will, how her baby's daddy is an abusive piece of shit and a deadbeat dad even though she forced him out. I have heard that song and dance far too often to believe it without proof.

The single dad on the other hand, in half of the remaining cases the mother didn't bother to show up, in the other half, he had to fight like a demon. He had to prove he was a good parent and prove that the mother is a horrible parent. He had to fight the bias of the court. He had to fight the bias of family services. In most cases, even if the mother is ordered to pay child support, she can walk away from it and never be held to account.

[–]matrixpush-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

If anything its the opposite.

[–]Kos_-_Omak-5 points-4 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Objectively, single fathers are just as bad and "damaged goods" as single mothers. The only difference is that women are incapable of logic. When a chick meets an attractive single father, her primitive lizard brain takes over and she will come up with some ridiculous rationalization for why she should ignore his obvious red flags. Whereas men have the intelligence to understand that single motherhood means a woman is not LTR material.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I can see this, as a generalization.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter