~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Symmetry played no role in the perception of female facial beauty (doi.org)
submitted 3 months ago by Njere
[–]Zippo-Cat 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
That's definitely unusual.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
No it's not, symmetry doesn't matter, bodyfat percentage, hunter eyes, cheekbones and mandible matters far more isolated. LMAO, imagine boogie with a perfectly asymmetrical face, he will still look like shit haha
[–]DankMemer4401 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Nigga symmetry is very important, all of the best looking people (Barrett, Chico, Gandy) have very good symmetry. Asymmetrical faces are inherently unattractive.
[–]LordEppley 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
How do you define "harmony"? I've been told I have bad harmony, wtf does that mean? Lookism board, looksmax, etc
[–]DankMemer4401 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Harmony is about the ratios and failos. If you have a high or low IPD (interpupillary distance), that ruins harmony. If you have low fwhr (sub 1.8) that ruins harmony. If your chin to philtrum ratio is bad it will ruin your harmony. If your midface ratio is bad then that also throws off harmony. Also in terms of failos, it includes things such as narrow mouth, receding chin/jaw, negative canthal tilt, any eye area flows, big crooked nose, basically any feature that looks bad. A harmonious face is one in which all the ratios are good and there are no real failos, and the symmetry is good. Also asymmetry will throw off facial harmony.
[–]Virskovskiy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
1.8 FHR Is low?
[–]DankMemer4401 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
1.85 is average, ive got fwhr of 2 personally
[–]Virskovskiy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How did you identify it?
[–]Virskovskiy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't see it. Dm me with link plz
[–]LordEppley 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
https://imgur.com/a/pSTYzZy
Do I really have bad harmony? I'm hapa btw if that matters
[–]th3Soldier 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Man, IDK about those flimsy "harmonies", but you genuinely look like some kind of a model chosen for advertising a men's beauty product. Nice!
[–]DankMemer4401 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I wouldnt say so, how do you do with women IRL?
[–]LordEppley 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Quite well, as I only go for asian girls. I've been with 50 asian girls (mostly korean and japanese) in the last 5 years, they range from average (5/10) to slightly above (6-6.5/10) which is plenty enough for me personally.
[–]DankMemer4401 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Do you have height? Then you could easily bad boy maxx (so gymmaxxing, tattomaxxing, motoryclemaxxing, and maybe marlboromaxxing), to acquire white stacy's.
[–]LordEppley 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm 5'10, in shoes I'm 6'1
I don't want white stacies, I'm a creepy white guy with yellow fever
[–]statusincorporated 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
facial adiposity has a higher correlation with facial attractiveness than does masculinity.
lower, prominent cheekbones are masculine. higher prominent cheekbones are feminine. blackpillers fetishize a lot of feminine facial features.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I am not talking about the height of the cheekbones, it's the size of the cheekbones that matter. The bigger the better. Men who have no cheekbones look like shit usually, while prominent cheekbones is an insane halo.
[–]Njere[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Four separate samples of participants were recruited for this study, one for each of the traits. Participants were recruited through social media platforms, and data collection was carried out for the duration of one month, with data collection stopping after this time. Thirty-five participants completed the symmetry task (age M = 29.06, SD = 8.19; 12 females), a different 30 participants completed the averageness task (age M = 27.70, SD = 7.72; 11 females), a further 32 participants completed the femininity task (age M = 33.06, SD = 10.66; 8 females), and a final 31 participants completed the masculinity task (age M = 32.58, SD = 10.24; 11 females).
© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Zippo-Cat 11 points12 points13 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankMemer4401 8 points9 points10 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordEppley 3 points4 points5 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankMemer4401 8 points9 points10 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]Virskovskiy 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankMemer4401 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Virskovskiy 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Virskovskiy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordEppley 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]th3Soldier 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankMemer4401 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordEppley 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankMemer4401 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LordEppley 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]statusincorporated 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link