503
504
505

Rant/VentingFeminists accidentally agree with a Red Piller in r/relationships. Red Piller gets banned, all comments culled. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by dat_shermstick

So, obviously anything that remotely resembles TRP philosophy is going to go over like a lead balloon on the rest of Reddit. I know the mods of r/relationships hunt redpillers and pretty much anyone expressing an opinion that dissents on what usually boils down to feminism, so I keep my comments tame. Covert is the way to go when you're in enemy territory.

Anyways, this thread was about a dentist whose wife was surreptitiously squirreling away money in a secret emergency account behind his back. He's considering divorce, and of course the white knight brigade shows up to say she's right for having the account if he's this quick to anger.

Then this guy drops this gem and gets gilded.

[–]mlwep 392 points 6 hours ago* holy shit. i can't believe the responses youre getting. if people here are ok with her doing whatever she wants with her money then they should be ok with you doing whatever you want with your money. why should you have to spend more than her? i think you mightve come to the wrong place since people here are siding with her about* how deceiving she has been. i really hope there are more sane people who will tell you that what she has done is pretty fucked up.

Great post, and I felt inclined to expand upon his idea.

[–]dat_shermstick 28 points 5 hours ago This. In the interest of equality, OP should be entitled to putting the same proportion of his earnings in a separate account. Whatever she can afford to split with him to pay a mortgage and all other shared expenses will determine their new lifestyle -- or rather, her new lifestyle. OP can spend his discretionary money as he pleases, just as she can hers. The equality you champion is a wonderful thing, ladies. Now live it and see how it works.

I figured I'd get buried with downvotes, but women and feminists took the time to upvote me and voice their agreement.

[–]zuzuspetals37 7 points 4 hours ago As a woman, I am totally ok with this comment lol

[–]fire_dawn 1 point 3 hours ago As a feminist, I agree with this comment. It would take a pretty unreasonable person not to.

Cool. An opinion everyone can get behind.

you've been banned subreddit message via /r/relationships/ sent 42 minutes ago you have been banned from posting to /r/relationships: Relationships.

...except the mods.

Haha. So awesome.

They deleted my post, and the ladies who agreed. Wonder if they got the banhammer too for cosigning a shitlord like me?

Massive fight after discovering my(36m) wife (31f) has been secretly putting money in a private bank account even though we are supposed to only have one joint account together. Considering divorce.


[–]Endorsed ContributorTheRedPilsner 376 points377 points  (128 children)

I'll bet one of the mods checked your post history, saw that you post in TRP, and decided to ban you.

Actions like this show just how afraid the feminist mods of r/relationships are about what we have to say. If they didn't take us seriously they'd leave your post online so that people could laugh at you. The reason they deleted your post and banned you is because they're scared that people would agree with and upvote you. They're terrified of TRP viewpoints gaining a foothold outside of this sub.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 193 points194 points  (2 children)

"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say."

[–]1beerthroway 28 points29 points  (1 child)

That quote was from George R.R. Martin in A Clash of Kings (A Song of Ice and Fire, #2).

[–]dat_shermstick[S] 69 points70 points  (15 children)

I'll bet one of the mods checked your post history, saw that you post in TRP, and decided to ban you.

Yeah, definitely a real good chance of that being the case.

If they didn't take us seriously they'd leave your post online so that people could laugh at you. The reason they deleted your post and banned you is because they're scared that people would agree with and upvote you.

Exactly this -- people were agreeing, and it was their people. That's super unacceptable. If there was open dissent, they would have let the comment go to -50 and let people berate me, but that didn't happen, so it had to go.

There was a thread someone cited in here yesterday that was very Red Pill, and they deleted that as soon as it got some traction.

[–]GregariousWolf 39 points40 points  (12 children)

Yeah, if you say anything contrary to the groupthink, people immediately go through your posting history looking for a reason to discredit your opinion.

[–]AZTRP 8 points9 points  (10 children)

When I first joined Reddit I never thought to do that. To go through posting history, then I saw people commenting on other's post history. I've done it twice now, once on a hot chick (for more hotness) and once on someone that was very upset about something I posted and tried to incite me (I wanted to see if that was their normal reaction to people, it was).

[–]mister_barfly75 5 points6 points  (0 children)

someone that was very upset about something I posted and tried to incite me

Had the same thing happen to me in an /r/askreddit thread a couple of weeks ago. I just laughed it off as the Reddit equivalent of Scrappy Doo and went on my merry way.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

I wish that wasn't necessary. It pokes holes in old reddit threads that you can't get back. Once complete conversations become incomprehensible. I manage multiple accounts (one per subreddit) and delete them (without deleting the comments and posts) and re-create them every few months or so.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

You realize even if you delete your comments, reddit still keeps a copy, right? They just don't display it. Has to do with the inefficiency of removing a record from a database.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Newdist2 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Everything is backed up somewhere.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 14 points15 points  (1 child)

see if you posted that shit with a new account or an alt account they wouldn't have done jack shit. Shows how fucking stupid mods are in most subs.

[–]stevredpill 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Everyone can make their a non-RP account and start posting lol. Would be an interesting social experiment.

[–]4_YRT 123 points123 points [recovered]

I was banned from r/writingprompts. When I asked why, the mod said that he checked my history, saw that I posted on TRP, and they don't want people like me on their subreddit.

[–]H42 447 points447 points [recovered]

B..b..bu..bu..but ...My past has nothing to do with who/what I am now! /s

[–]foldpak111 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Oh that is fuckin priceless. Funny how the past matters when it doesn't fit their agenda and especially when it involves men.

[–][deleted] 38 points38 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And quite well earned, to boot.

[–][deleted] 12 points12 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 29 points29 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]1Zanford 26 points27 points  (8 children)

"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say."

'Liberal' (aka 'Progressive') means the opposite of 'liberal' (aka 'classical liberal'). Classic Orwell.

The only thing liberal about them is how they spend your tax dollars.

[–][deleted] 6 points6 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]CornyHoosier 7 points8 points  (6 children)

Everyone should be clear at this point that the political parties have flipped. What was the old name for them? Dixi-crats? President Lincoln and his era of Republicans would be today's Democrats.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah the Emancipation Proclamation was probably the most liberal thing any president has ever done

[–]CornyHoosier 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The emancipation proclamation was simply an executive order allowing the federal government to obtain American's property (at the time slaves).

Now the 13th amendment ... that seems pretty liberal.

[–]Endorsed ContributorLastRevision 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Integral to the idea of being a liberal is the idea of persecution and rebellion from persecution as an ideal with no accurate and current world view required. America is founded on this idea; Rebels are good and just merely for taking part in rebellion.

Look at Star Wars, you don't question whether the rebels were good and just or whether they had a plan for running the galaxy after the desimation of the Empire; they were good and just merely for existing as rebels.

The way modern liberal message boards are run is under the presumption that the entire world is against them and that they are providing a "sacred garden" where liberalism can be freely expressed without "triggering content."

Because that isn't everywhere, you see. Lolz.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]CornyHoosier 4 points5 points  (4 children)

I think triggering and this new-age feminism is bullshit.

I think homosexuals/blacks/humans should all be treated as equals.

I think that government departments/agencies & social services are a good thing.

I think the environment is worth saving.

I think that businesses and people should be able to do whatever they want as long as it's doesn't negatively affect others.

I think that anyone should be able to own a gun and any woman should be able to get an abortion.

........ I'm not overly liberal, conservative or libertarian ... I don't know what the fuck I am.

[–]Jusdubbin 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Me? Is that you? Sure sounds like me.

[–]Doomblaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

am I your alt too? How many of me are there?!?

[–]1Ronin11A 1 point2 points  (0 children)

........ I'm not overly liberal, conservative or libertarian ... I don't know what the fuck I am.

You're rational. Personally, I've taken to calling myself a "Militant Moderate"

[–]Endorsed ContributorTheRedPilsner 54 points55 points  (48 children)

I've also heard that they'll ban you from r/AskMen if they find out you're a red piller.

[–]Endorsed ContributorObio1 130 points131 points  (39 children)

So you're banned for who you are, not what you say. I believe that's called bigotry.

I wonder if they hate black people too?

[–]PlanB_pedofile 66 points67 points  (36 children)

Yup. They judge you by your activity in other places, not based upon what you currently say in the now. Feminist / liberal types can be the most discriminatory people when it comes to interacting with others.

This is EXACTLY like racism or bigotry. A person is judged by their background, (who they are, where they from, what beliefs they hold) not based upon their actions. History is filled with this. Being judged for being black, jewish, or immigrant. No matter how hard working or upstanding you are.

[–]crazytrpr 23 points24 points  (26 children)

Wait until they doxx you and send the information to your employer.

I said it back in the early 2000s social media will be like living in a small town with a billion people in it. Everyone knows your business in a small town.

[–]1independentmale 24 points25 points  (8 children)

That actually happened to me, though they didn't have to doxx me. In the nineties and early 2000s I used my real name online. I had nothing to hide, so why not? Until someone printed out my entire Slashdot comment history and anonymously dropped it in my boss's inbox.

Unfortunately for them, the boss and I were bros. Used to wakeboard with the guy every weekend. He handed it right over to me with a warning, "Somebody is out to get you. I don't know who or why. Be careful."

I never did find out who was responsible, but I abandoned every account I'd used my real name on and created alternate, separate identities everywhere.

[–]crazytrpr 18 points19 points  (6 children)

Wow, yup they were out to get you.

With social media of today its even easier to ruin someone, get them fired. Most people don't care or understand about the liability of libel or slander. Many companies that have the general public as their customer base are very susceptible to PR pressure. They'll fire you as soon as anything goes viral, even sooner if HR sees it first. Its like reliving JR high. ;o/

[–]1oldredder 1 point2 points  (5 children)

You point it out: you're paranoid. Enjoy your tinfoil hat.

They get fired: in absolute disarray and can't understand how they couldn't see it coming.

[–]1oldredder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So we finally learn the argument is invalid that people should expose everything who "have nothing to hide"

Everyone has something to hide. And should. Someone who says they don't is either a liar or stupidly risky. Everywhere in the world someone can be found who simultaneously doesn't like something about you that you're not hiding, and can fuck your life up as a reaction to it.

[–]Endorsed ContributorObio1 13 points14 points  (14 children)

Which is why anyone with a Facebook account is lacking foresight. Lose. That. Shit. Now.

[–]crazytrpr 12 points13 points  (12 children)

Too late. Even if you don't have one, they do and they use it to amplify their message.

Its also gotten if you don't have a FB, Google+, twitter, Instagram etc you don't exist. LinkedIn has become your resume. HR will google you as they are reading your resume. Under 45 and don't have a social media account, why? Wow look at all these negative posts...

Besides positive posting and doing fairly frequently will bury some negative google searching. Don't reply to the negative crap, it gives it credibility by ignoring it will allow it to die. Just post the fun things you are doing that won't offend anyone, keep in touch with family and friends. Eventually the negative crap gets buried and forgotten. Do not post drunken selfies type stuff. For the security conscious don't post pictures of your car, house, kid's school or place of work. The negative crap will age off peoples radar

Reputation management 101

[–]Ovadox 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You should expand this into a full on post. Lots of people are oblivious to this sort of thing. One thing I'll add - in addition to being mindful of what you post about yourself, extend that courtesy to your friends as well. People are not going to want to keep you as a friend if you post embarrassing/unflattering/legally incriminating pictures of them.

[–]crazytrpr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks and good point about friends. Exposing friends like is,a,blue,falcon thing to do. Blue falcon is mil speak for buddy fucker. Folks who grew up in a small town will have an advantage in social media age. They know how fast rumer mills get going. I wish i was better writer or i would.

[–]1oldredder 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Not too late. I don't need a resume on LinkedIn and I don't need those other social media profiles. Ever. I shall not ever.

I will not act like a special snowflake celebrity making public PR pages in place of real life, nor expose real life to those who have no business to see it.

The negative crap NEVER ages off the radar and I mean never. Don't create a space for it to inhabit and it never gets on the radar.

[–]curiousthis 0 points1 point  (1 child)

LinkedIn has become your resume.

This. This.

There are companies whose sole purpose is to trawl the internet, and link everything together. They are selling these services to HR and hiring managers. So if you do not have a social media presence, you will not exist. Yes, most of the companies buying these services are startups and trendy companies, but give it 5-10 years and everyone will be jumping on the bandwagon.

Another company I know of is applying machine learning algorithms to applicant resumes. When you email your resume, it gets analyzed, linked to social media/linkedin and the HR/hiring manager only sees the top 2-5 resumes.

It's gonna be a brave new world. But hold your horses - a RP mindset gives us such a huge advantage over everyone else.

[–]1oldredder 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Nothing to doxx if you never put it online - I come from the generation where common sense was never to share private information. I watched facebook & similar nonsense unfold and shook my head at their ignorance.

To this day not a single file of my voice or picture has ever made it online. I don't update "the internet" on where I'm going or have been and especially when.

[–]mister_barfly75 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Feminist / liberal types can be the most discriminatory people when it comes to interacting with others.

Because they have to disregard everything you say because as soon as there's the slightest hint that you're saying something reasonable that people can agree with then there's a slight possibility that you're not the brute monster everyone paints us out to be and people might start considering other things you've got to say and think for themselves.

There's no room for dissenting voices in the echo chamber.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A person is judged by their background, (who they are, where they from, what beliefs they hold) not based upon their actions.

Although posting on a certain forum is an action.

[–]docbloodmoney 19 points20 points  (0 children)

they don't want any men there, it makes the userbase of effeminate boys feel bad about themselves

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 10 points11 points  (1 child)

No i post in there occasionally

[–]TrueBro 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Not true, RP ideas are becoming more and more mainstream in askmen. People are waking up.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Common sense and reality triumphs any false and clearly made up narrative that gets pushed.

Want to attract women? be a nice guy: FALSE!!!
Evidence clearly states the contrary.

[–]RPthrowaway123 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Which is why I use an alt to post here. RP points get upvoted like no tomorrow as long as there's no label attached.

[–]Endorsed ContributorTheRedPilsner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here. I've got a different account and I occasionally post in r/relationships. There have been several times I've posted TRP wisdom in there, but I'm careful to avoid mentioning TRP or using TRP terminology. These posts usually get upvoted.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted in a confession thread a week ago or so and was upvoted for a while, then downvoted into oblivion. Haven't been banned AFAIK, though.

[–][deleted] 9 points9 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Modredpillschool 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Please do not encourage brigading. You can do what you want in other subs, but don't advertise it here.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ok. Point taken. For the record though I think I produced some very good content for writing promps and no one is banning me.

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]evoblade 14 points15 points  (0 children)

they don't want people like me on their subreddit.

Makes me think of some old racist hillbilly saying "You n%@#r$ better get out of this town, we don't like your type here."

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was banned from ExpensiveMaleFashion for the same reason. Or rather, not accepted into the invite only sub, because I sub TRP, according to the mod who denied my request to join.

[–]BlackHeart89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wtf? What did you say in that forum for your postings in TRP to be at all relevant???

[–]ihazcheese 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guy got banned from /r/redditgetsdrawn for having the username "CaptainNigga" or something to that effect; "We don't tolerate casual racism here"... I called it out and said it's a bit ridiculous, to ban someone for that. ItWillBeMine banned me too for ALSO "promoting casual racism" and "arguing with a moderator". God I fucking despise her, and that shit sub with the utmost hatred.

[–]Scroph 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like that subreddit, lots of creativity in there. Did you write something that attracted a lot of upvotes and therefore the mods' attention, or did they just randomly go through your post history ?

I thought about creating a separate account just for posting here but then I decided against it, that would imply that posting here is something one should be ashamed of. Even though I try not to write offensive comments, I assume the responsibility of my posts, as defiant as they may be.

[–]CornyHoosier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? I love r/writingprompts ... I spend so much time on there reading fun stories.

[–]koncept61 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the kind of shit that should prompt action from the admins

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

This has happened too often to me. As soon as someone checks your post history and notices "redpill" they assume we are some women-hating, frustrated neckbeards that cannot get laid. It's as if being from redpill automatically makes my opinion invalid. The very discrimination feminists claim to be fighting for is the discrimination they dish out on the daily.

[–]CornyHoosier 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I love that these women don't realize that by calling someone a "frustrated neckbeard" they are justifying our sub-reddit. They are chastising a man based on his sexual abilities and appearance. Two of the things we tell all men here what women overwhelmingly care about.

[–]TerryYockey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"BAN THAT MAN, silence him immediately - the CJ/echo chamber must be protected!"

[–]Moldy_Gecko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% this. /r/sex is the same way. I got banned and was actually told that it was cuz I was part of TRP.

[–]RP_on_TV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As I've gone through my young adult life, I have found that a group of people that actually wants to SILENCE their opposite, whether in politics, or around the office, is consistently NOT the side I want to be on.

Those who resort to actually removing those who dissent are usually fearful or power hungry.

This has been proven to me time and time again and now it's something I notice and try to live by.

[–]foldpak111 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I was recently looking at a twoX thread, and that sub is becoming awakened, slowly but surely. People were agreeing mostly with the content, except for the bit of misogyny. What they were seeing was people that are in the initial anger phase so it's understandable. They will learn about that soon enough and fully accept TRP.

Slowly, but surely, we're seeing the change. Men are really starting to wake up. If everyone wakes up, we can openly be red pill and act how we please without fear of retribution. What are the feminists going to do? Attack every living man on this planet? They need us.

[–]AZTRP 2 points3 points  (3 children)

What would be openly Red Pill look like? I describe it to my wife basically as going back to the manly roots that were lost in the past few generations due to the extreme and sudden absence of men as a result of world wars, vietnam, two working parents, and more single mothers. I told her I have no idea what it's like being a woman and shouldn't advise to that, as such a woman has no idea what it's like being a man and shouldn't tell us how to be, but they had no choice in the absence of fathers in the house (due to above).

She agrees 100%

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I had a similar conversation with my girlfriend the other day. I didn't use any buzzwords, but I tried to convey the idea that men are unhappy in marriages and relationships and starting to realize the bullshit that Feminism spouts about equality and double standards. She agreed as well. Hopefully soon we'll see some sort of social revolution and things will go back to how they are supposed to be, albeit changed slightly of course.

[–]AZTRP 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I agree. It'll happen but there'll always be remnants of the ultra Feminists SJW. We're the spearhead.

[–]foldpak111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They will become the vilified. The emasculation of men is very real. Men ages 40 and below are lost beyond lost and it is disturbing. It's not so much being 6'4" or having a square jaw line, it's more the behavior. I'm only truly concerned with a mans behavior and the amount of estrogen society pumps into him.

[–]Groshub 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's only a matter of time

[–]TRPn00b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This shit right here is why I made an account to use for this sub only.

[–]Sunshinelorrypop 60 points61 points  (8 children)

This maybe obvious to everyone now but after following gamergate, I can see that reddit has been targeted by a certain clique of feminists and they have been trying to infiltrate any popular sub by becoming mods.

They've even done it to /r/anarchy which is completely against their ideology.

[–]prodigyx 21 points22 points  (3 children)

It is worse than you think. Some mod chat logs got leaked confirming that a ton of mods were working together to push SJW agenda and bury stuff they didn't like. Check out /r/subredditcancer/

[–]Ovadox 3 points4 points  (2 children)

If they succeed then Reddit will become irrelevant since their shit irks most people and the rest find it boring. Some new site will emerge to fill the void and be cool for awhile until the cycle repeats.

[–]1oldredder 1 point2 points  (1 child)

already is - 99% of reddit could be erased and I'd never miss it.

[–]boredepression 46 points47 points  (2 children)

We are partly seeing this because its women who have the time to devote to doing this. They either don't have a job and are living off a bb or they are at work not doing any actual work; instead they're screwing around on their phones or their work computers.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

thanks for this good laugh.

[–]newls 7 points8 points  (0 children)

SJWs have infiltrated a lot of popular websites. The Wikipedia page on Gamergate is incredibly biased towards the SJW side, and the admins actively delete any edits or citation requests on it.

[–]CsMcG 55 points55 points [recovered]

The comments in that thread are completely insane.
"Take her out to a romantic dinner..." "I don't see how it's unfair..."

It's unfair because she's hiding away money from the small amount she can contribute. Meanwhile, the husband is throwing in 100k+ to their joint fund. Am I going fucking crazy?

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 27 points28 points  (2 children)

Am I going fucking crazy?

Yes. A marriage is not a joint venture, it is a man doing things for a woman venture. He contributes to her, she contributes to herself. Because she's an independent wimmin. And the fact that he is supporting her does not change that!

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (1 child)

"What's mine is mine and what's yours is ours." - women everywhere

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 105 points106 points  (39 children)

I will slowly draw down my use of reddit and eventually switch to a different outlet. I am grateful for subs like TRP and DarkEnlightenment, but I'm arriving to a point where I don't want to support reddit or its feminist overlords, or Ellen Pao sitting on top of the whole thing.

Reddit became a feminazi ghetto circlejerk, and red pill aware men are the jews. Step out of line and it's the gas chamber for you! Lucky for us it's the internet so the worst they can do is ban people for telling the truth.

But for someone who loves the truth, even an uncomfortable truth, there is no greater sin than what those mods are doing. They are the Soviets of our time. The beatings will continue until morale improves, comrade! The internet is a vast canvas. As Nick Land put it: Exit over voice.

[–]1Dark-Ulfberht 63 points64 points  (7 children)

This is my thought as well.

Social justice types ruin absolutely everything. They never have a hand in creating a thing. I guarantee you that none of the SJW mods who are currently making Reddit into a virtual shithole wrote even a single line of code for the site.

The parasitic class never plans, builds, develops or contributes to the production of a thing of value. Instead, they wait until the thing is built and then climb on board and scream at the builders to give them their "fair share" of the spoils. If resistance is met, they apply 21st Century Scarlet Letters of "racism," "sexism," "patriarchy" and the like until their goals are met.

[–]evoblade 16 points17 points  (3 children)

The best part is, their extreme intolerance is passed of in PC-speak as "tolerance". In what world is extreme intolerance of any alternative viewpoint anything close to tolerance. When SJWs say "tolerance", they mean "tolerance only for the viewpoint that we would like to shove down your throat".

[–]1Dark-Ulfberht 14 points15 points  (2 children)

War is peace.

Freedom is slavery.

Ignorance is strength.

[–]1oldredder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well of course. We've always been at war with Eurasia.

[–]DrXaos 4 points5 points  (2 children)

| Social justice types ruin absolutely everything. They never have a hand in creating a thing.

After the 18th century the advocates of the classical Enlightenment did not ruin everything and made some of the planet much better.

Post Stalinist Cultural Marxism is the problem and I'm a (USA-definition) liberal. I don't enjoy the exclusive appropriation of "justice".

"Social Justice" is the Maoist version of "justice", like a straightjacket vs a jacket.

[–]CornyHoosier 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Agreed. As a liberal-leaning person as well, I will say that these people have a completely skewed definition of what "justice" is.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 8 points9 points  (2 children)

It's the evolution of all internet places. Free thinking and free speech build something great. Marginal people are attracted to the shiny object. They work tirelessly to mold it in their image while thinking they can suck off the greatness like a never emptied teet. The originals leave to build greatness elsewhere. The whole place turns into a shitstir and starts to fall apart. The marginal people end up warring with each other as the ship ducks under the waves.

Rinse and repeat.

Hell, I guess that applies to more than the internet.

[–]sithman25 9 points10 points  (1 child)

"If you saw Atlas, the giant who holds the world on his shoulders, if you saw that he stood, blood running down his chest, his knees buckling, his arms trembling but still trying to hold the world aloft with the last of his strength, and the greater his effort the heavier the world bore down upon his shoulders - What would you tell him?

I…don't know. What…could he do? What would you tell him?

To shrug."

[–][deleted] 7 points7 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (9 children)

Is there any app similar to reddit that provides access to TRP posts that I could put on my phone? I'd be very interested in anything like that.

[–]AZTRP 2 points3 points  (5 children)

yes, "Reddit is Fun" on android.

It can handle multiple accounts as well.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I have that one actually. I mean something that's exclusively red pill.

[–]AZTRP 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Ah, I don't know if one exists specifically for that purpose.

But you can:

  • create an alt for TRP, unsubscribe from the default subs, then subscribe to the RP subs. (In the app hit the three vertical dots in top right and select 'Manage Accounts')

or

  • get an RSS reader app and add RSS feeds for the different subs and blogs you want to follow. You can add RSS feeds from subreddits (search for 'reddit rss feeds' it's in the reddit wiki)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hadn't thought of thought. I'll try the former. Thanks for the advice.

[–]1oldredder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there's mgtowhq.com - it's more redpill than everything redpill put on Reddit combined. The entry is: you must introduce yourself and not fail the sniff test. If you fail the sniff test you're wiped. Bare minimum an intro showing who you are.

Women are not permitted whatsoever, nor whiteknights.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I'll be releasing one in the next couple of weeks.

[–]RPthrowaway123 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I wish we could have a separate forum all of our own. I know that there's a "lifeboat" site of course, but I agree that I hate supporting Ellen pao and the admins.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 107 points108 points  (15 children)

"As a woman, I am totally okay with this comment"

"As a feminist, I agree with this comment"

It's hilarious how women think that the possession of a vagina gives them expert testimony.

[–]HumanSimulacrum 41 points42 points  (2 children)

I don't see it that way at all, at least in this case. If someone makes a comment about dentists, and you know that the general stereotype is that dentists would disagree with their comment, then it's entirely relevant to point out that you are a dentist who agrees with them.

These comments in /r/relationships that were deleted talked about equality, and they ran counter to the opinion of most people in the comment thread. Pointing out that you are a feminist or woman (who would be assumed to disagree with the comments) is again entirely relevant.

[–]dat_shermstick[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was exactly the point I was trying to articulate.

This comment is like the thesis of my OP. Well put.

[–]mister_barfly75 3 points4 points  (0 children)

These comments... were deleted talked about equality, and they ran counter to the opinion of most people in the comment thread.

Of course it did. Third wave feminism isn't about equality, it's about supremacy.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If one vagina allows you to speak for all women, you are admitting that all women are the same.

[–]BlackHeart89 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In this case, I think it was to show that not only RP men agree. It actually made his point stronger.

Whenever an enemy (lack of better words) backs you up, it forces everyone to take a closer look at whats being said.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (8 children)

Didn't you know that possession of a vagina makes you an expert at everything?

Well, not an expert, but more knowledgeable than whoever she's arguing with at the time, that's for sure.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 4 points5 points  (7 children)

Didn't you know that possession of a vagina makes you an expert at everything?

Where can I get my vagina? I want to be an expert at everything including nuclear physics.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (6 children)

Become a fuckin tranny, then you can become even more insufferable and get twice the number of "oppression" cards to play.

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The act like that.

But as we know, if you want you can treat it like a shit test, and squash it. Women almost always fold, even when they're in the right. I guess they have no idea whether they are in the right or not.

They hate it, but the need us to lead the way -- then they'll shit on us rather than thanking us.

[–]TW_RPAwake 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Just remember - these are the same people who "celebrate diversity" and preach tolerance.

As long as the diverse opinions match their view of tolerance.

As Machiavelli stated - "The tyrant will always first appear as a protector"

[–]panzergling 28 points29 points  (5 children)

I got banned from r/personalfinance for laughing at a guy who wanted advice on how to save up for a vacation.

Nothing to laugh at?

Well the vacation was for his stay-at-home wife who needed an escape from the reality of dealing with the stress their relationship causes her.

Still not enough of a laugh?

His biggest gripe with her is that she did nothing (no kids), she didn't clean, was overweight and she'd been caught cheating.

Twice.

Be sure to tip your waitress.

[–]notseriouslyserious 9 points10 points  (4 children)

Pf is rapidly becoming a laughingstock in my eyes. Ever since it became public it went from a place to discuss finance to a bunch of idiots asking "how do I money?".

Not to mention the mods who openly admit they give advice on subject they are not familiar with, because "just because i dont know it doesnt mean i cant give advice on it".

Also, you got banned because "break up with her" type of advice is against the rules. Not even joke, check the rules on sidebar if you dont believe it.

[–]1oldredder 2 points3 points  (2 children)

reddit itself is a joke outside of 'theredpill' and 'theredpill' isn't the full red pill either because it lacks the finance side of the red pill which truly is the core, not sexual relationships or lifting. That definition of redpill predates the existence of reddit itself.

Thankfully now there's a /r/trpfinance, hopefully it will go somewhere.

Until then there's www.zerohedge.com

[–]evoblade 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You got banned for that? Seems like the most vanilla, neutral post I could imagine. Probably looked at your TPR posts and decided to send you to re-education camp. Fucking SJWs...

[–]BlackHeart89 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thats insane. So this dude, all dedicated to the marriage, opted out of getting a prenupt. But she goes and puts away $25000 unbeknownst to him while he pays for 80% of their expenses. Thats fucked up.

I honestly think having a back up savings account for a divorce is a good idea, just like I think having a prenupt is a must. But why did she hide it? She hid it because she knew she was being deceitful. She knew what he expected within the marriage and she ignored it.

I would like to think that her saving money on the side would mean that she wouldn't seek alimony in case of a divorce. But for some reason, I doubt that.

He really fucked up by not getting a prenupt.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 10 points11 points  (1 child)

As a feminist, I agree with this comment. It would take a pretty unreasonable person not to.

In my experience finding a reasonable feminist is difficult but I have met a few. The feminists that are reasonable actually agree with a surprising amount of red pill thinking once they are exposed to the reasons behind it.

Sometimes they have a initial knee-jerk reaction based on feelings, but when you explain yourself like OP did, they come to realize that: "The Red Pill is the radical notion that women are people."

[–]1cover20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surprisingly often, those feminists are lesbians. Lesbians can be very down to earth. A little strange because they don't give the usual female IOI's since they are attracted to women not us, but OK folks usually.

And they understand all the problems we have with women. They have all the same problems, usually worse, and no possibility of PIV sex to grease the wheels.

Whereas a feminist who identifies as heterosexual female, is supposedly interested in men while simultaneously shitting on them. That's contradictory.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Going dutch teaches the woman the value of money and I encourage everyone to do it in the name of feminism.

Anytime you post something extremely logical and against the status quo the immediate response from people who don't want to listen to logic is to find some post on TRP because apparently that discredits logic.

[–]Endorsed Contributorbalalasaurus 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Who said anything about reddit being an equal platform for expression, let alone r/relationships? What did you really expect? As far as this site goes, I find myself distancing myself from it more every day.

[–]screamingATtrees 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any other place but here:

"the past is the past.. Don't judge me by who I was"

"I disagree and here is why..."

"OMFG he's a redpiller.. Case closed"

you have been banned from /r/feelsbeforereals/

[–]ho_made_apple_butter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Props. I got banned once from there too for saying a guy who took a female friend to his house to crash and then she jacked him off while he "just sat there frozen" wasn't "raped". That was a while ago, but last week I made the front page of SRS so I'm still firing on all cylinders.

[–]desylid 4 points5 points  (4 children)

LOL about a dentist on reddit posting on a throwaway to /r/ relationships. I would love to know if this dentist is a regular on /r/ dentistry, the shittiest, most BP subreddit I've ever been a part of (and the only banned from).

Although in real-life some of the male dentists I'm friends with are some of the hardest lifting pussy pounders I know, the profession as a whole is abhorrently feminized, and /r/ dentistry is a cesspool of it. I bet OP in this story is a regular there.

Also, making slightly over 100k as a dentist is pathetic.

[–]dat_shermstick[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Lol, how does one get banned from /r/dentistry?

[–]desylid 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Autobot said my post was removed. Were you able to see the link to the thread that got me banned?

[–][deleted] 22 points22 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]dat_shermstick[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Yeah, I know, I usually dial it back -- but it played well, and somehow even women agreed.

I have like maybe three posts here, I'm a lurker.

It's funny I get roasted here and not there, honestly.

[–][deleted] 12 points12 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]dat_shermstick[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

How did that play well? It caused a moderator to click your name, find out you post here, delete your comment and ban you.

Up to the deletion, it had upvotes in a place where it traditionally would not. It was so iconoclastic that the mods had to delete it to silence me. My goal isn't to be king of the tards on Reddit. I said my piece, people agreed, and a mod was upset enough that people agreed that they deleted it. That's a win.

If you want to make the argument that "Oh well it got deleted so what was gained--" what's gained if it wasn't deleted? Fucking Internet points. Ooooh. I'm more happy that some mod was wringing their hands over my post, stalking my post history, and so upset over her cohorts liking it that she deleted it.

The women liking it is why it got deleted. If they downvoted it, the mod would have left it as they tend to do as a warning to others -- disrupt the circlejerk and get berated. So that's why it's noteworthy.

[–]MHOOD01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're not being "roasted", stop being melodramatic.

Anybody that's been here since we've hit 100k subscribers knows that we have nothing to prove. The mods have pointed it out that going to default subs or wherever and doing this is a waste of time, what more are you trying to prove?

You got attention and now feel validated ("a woman and feminist agreed with me", "I got under a mods skin"). You can word it anyway you want.

[–]IronBallsOfKnowledge 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Feminists always need something to fight against to justify their cause. If they couldn't say theredpill were the beacon of misogyny and bigotry, they'd find a different subreddit to say it about. But since we don't align with their view point on the world and human behavior, we're painted as the bad guys.

It's especially ironic because isn't that oppression? Silencing minority viewpoints from a position of power? You know, the thing that feminists are supposed to be fighting against? We don't have an equal chance to post comments and participate in discussions simply because of a subreddit affiliation. Imagine if these same feminists/sjw types had some real power in the world. Imagine their censorship and oppression then.

It's also ironic because we do not care at all if women post on here. As long as they don't start off by saying, "As a woman". And everybody thinks we hate women? We just honor truth and objectivity.

THEY WANT THE TRUTH? THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is not called equalism. It is called feminism. It is about equality for females, not for males. Once you realise this is how it works it all makes sense, even though it makes no sense. It's a gigantic shit test power grab and needs to be treated as such.

[–]thenarrrowpath 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's crazy you got banned from /r/relationships. I comment with RP stuff all the time and have never been touched. What you said wasn't even as aggressive as what I have posted in the past. Insane. Oh well, Reddit isn't about free speech its about posting your opinion that better be popular or else you'll be banned and silenced forever.

[–]98347598374096273947 4 points5 points  (6 children)

What can be done about this? Are there repercussions for moderators on reddit abusing the post?

[–]dat_shermstick[S] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

What can be done about this?

Probably nothing. Not to sound like a hipster, but whatever, they're fucking Internet points, and making some fat feminist mad enough to ban me is a badge of honor. These people have small fucking worlds -- that's honestly half the fun of posting on r/relationships to begin with.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

stop, you sound hipster as fuck.

no, but you provide a great point. they only have as much power over us as we allow them to.

[–]r3voltz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Admin won't do anything unless mods are breaking reddit. Glad i have never bothered with what looks to be a terrible sub.

[–]HermesHermeneus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just use throwaway accounts.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're a male. Not just any male, a male who posts on TRP. You'll get no sympathy from admin.

[–]larrythetomato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The counter to 'bad speech' is to leave, and avoid participation. Otherwise, TRP would have been killed years ago.

[–]KettleMeetPot 5 points6 points  (6 children)

After I read that it sounds very similar to my marriage and eventual divorce. He seriously needs to consider a lawyer.

Lessons learned from my marriage -

Never "pool income". Pay your own bills, and split mutual bills Never give ANYONE access to your accounts

My ex had been secretly stashing away a "in case of divorce" fund just like this guys wife. Unfortunately she didn't make enough to have it be a relevant amount and thus took money meant for things like car payments. When we split, on her mothers advice, they both went to the bank and drained the accounts while I was at work leaving me with absolutely nothing.

Even where he says

in fact she tends to spend more on luxuries than I do since I don't have any expensive hobbies. I never questioned what my wife did with her earnings as I did not want to be controlling. She has been putting in a large amount of her earnings to her private account, and using the joint account for all her purchases, as there have only been deposits into her private account with no money taken out.

Holy fucking identical batman. Her mentality is "whats yours is mine and what's mine is mine" and it's fucking bullshit.

[–]1independentmale 3 points4 points  (3 children)

When we split, on her mothers advice, they both went to the bank and drained the accounts while I was at work leaving me with absolutely nothing.

This is very, very common and women are rarely held accountable to it. My buddy's wife waited until he went to work, packed her shit, drained their accounts, re-opened a previously closed home equity line of credit (on his house that she was moving out of that day) and withdrew the entire credit line as cash.

The bank's response: There was a "feature" in the HELOC allowing either party to re-activate it within x months of its closure. Both parties signed the contract. Both parties are responsible. The lawyer's response: It's not her house anymore so she doesn't have to pay it and besides, the money is all gone (she pissed it all away living in a hotel for months on end). Even if he could get a judgement against her, which was unlikely, she could never repay it so why bother?

He had to made payments (with interest) on that for years after she was gone.

[–]1cover20 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just months after the HELOC was closed ... sounds like she was timing it until the full line of credit would be available.

Cold.

[–]KettleMeetPot 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Wow... Luckily I was stopping to get gas, and when my cards were declined made a call to her. After a kind gentleman offered me $5 in gas to at least make it home I went straight to the bank, put a hold on all accounts, and opened one for myself. Luckily she wasn't able to do too much damage, but it sucked losing a few grand because of a spiteful mother and bitch.

[–]1cover20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

THAT is men sticking together. Kudos to that man.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

What's really fascinating is how so many there are trying to justify why it's perfectly reasonable for her to break the agreement she made regarding mutual finances (And very quickly too - like within weeks it seems) then confusing the causality timeline.

[–]KettleMeetPot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which is why I'll never have a joint anything again. There will be separate accounts, and one that will "joint" purely for living expenses with absolutely no access to my private account.

[–]1cover20 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I just checked out the thread, and there are a lot of comments saying basically what OP reported he said, and they are being upvoted. Just saying ...

Look sometimes I comment over there. There are certain kneejerk reactions, but it's actually gotten more redpill, maybe because people like me are willing to state and defend the ideas and attack the purveyors of abuse -- usually it's abuse of men but sometimes it's men abusing women, and I don't like that either.

Sometimes people say "oh he's a jerk from TRP look at his posting history" but not usually.

As I recall I got banned from there with another username for saying something that was perceived as not gay-friendly. I can't remember exactly, sorry because it is something ppl should know. But recently I've had no trouble there (other than downvotes, sometimes) for calling out women on bullshit.

[–]newspaper_nerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they won't co-operate with you, compete with them. Red pillers just need to start their own relationship sub.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This pisses me off. Thanks for pointing it out. Unfortunately the mods there do have the power and that's why /r/relationships will always be the shittiest place to get your relationship advice. Censorship and banning for offering a dissenting opinion, classy...

[–]bitches_be_crazy86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny they can't admit we're right but still they are the same sluts who get gina tingles and are willing to get downgraded for men exhibiting TRP qualities, not white knight pussies.

[–]FishFoxFerret 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a absolutely ludacris. This is fair. Even the most beta guy could see how this is not fair nor equal.

Many of the followers actually want "fair and equal" but the higher up leaders just want woman above all else to have more of everything without any work. If they really wanted fair and equal (which they don't) they would post articles with the genders concealed so that readers could be truly unbiased. Of course, that would make it too easy to see their true nature.

[–]TekkomanKingz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a load of trash. He already will owe her alimony and she needs even more money on top of that?

[–]AugmentedFury 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I don't bother visiting that shitty sub reddit.

Thinking isn't welcome there.

[–]yummyluckycharms 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Agreed - just another sub that used to be good but now has become infested with SJW. Then again, this does help fuel the rise of TRP has men flock to where they can get advice that is legit and unfiltered.

[–]Upvote_To_The_Left 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reddit mods are morons sometimes. You're post want offensive at all. It was reasonable at worst.

[–]ben0wn4g3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Am also banned from /relationships

[–]1Zanford 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're catching flak, you're over the target.

[–]rocafella1321 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there such a thing as a post-nup? If so maybe that guy should look into it. If not well some lawyers should start it. Ill take any royalties for the idea. Thanks.

[–]adave4allreasons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typical rationalizing of wronging someone due to the victimizer being female. Her actions are theft pure and simple, and he needs to protect his assets immediately before she takes everything.

[–]unsure_RP_initiate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use an alt for TRP sub if you don't want to be downvoted on the basis of your posting history rather than the basis of what you say.

I use an alt so that my gf and some family can't see that I like TRP.

load more comments (10 replies)