MetaFeminists Don't Actually Give a Fuck About Women (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil

Put down your protein shakes and put on your thinking caps, because I have a challenging question for you. What do modern feminists actually do to help women? First wave feminism got women the right to vote in 1919. Second wave feminists successfully won the war against fetuses and traditional marriage, arguably helping women. But what the fuck are third wave feminists doing to help women?

How do slut walks help women? How does claiming psychological trauma and PTSD over offensive internet comments and Tweets help women? How does complaining about men and their numerous microaggressions help women? The majority of the writing on popular feminist websites like Jezebel and Everyday Feminism is predominantly about how bad it is that mean men hurt their feels.

Feminists will tell you that all of these things do in fact help because they raise awareness. Well by that logic, certain adult films raise awareness of interracial relationships and are an equal asset in the march toward equality. This man helped raise awareness about Islamic extremism. Peta says this raises awareness.

Let's take a step back and think about what Team Red Pill does to help our fellow man. First and foremost, the Red Pill offers its members health and fitness advice. This in and of itself aids men in fighting depression, succeeding in the dating market, and living healthy lives. Next, the Red Pill is a place for people like Rollo Tomassi to share their life experiences and in so doing potentially save younger men from repeating the mistakes of the older generation. Finally, the Red Pill is one of the last bastions of masculine free speech, which is something that is rare and dwindling in our current climate of progressive censorship.

The closest thing I've seen third wave feminists do to help women is: Madam Chunkles brandishing her key fist. Which is actually pretty shitty advice given the fact that punching with keys is a great way to break a wrist. The best thing to do for a woman when confronted with a violent assailant is run. Then again Chunkles isn't much of a runner and probably has never taken serious steps to prepare for physical confrontation. What she has been doing however, is indulging in a Fat Violence Fantasy.

Why do feminists spend most of their time writing about themselves and what makes them angry instead of creating content that actually helps women? Because feminists don't actually give a fuck about women, they only care about themselves. Pretty much everything they do demonstrates this fact. Slut walks are an opportunity to get attention. Tear jerking blogs are an opportunity to get attention. Holding a stupid fucking piece of paper with your fat fucking sausage fingers is a chance to feel important and an opportunity to get attention. Everything feminists do, is done first and foremost for themselves and not for other women. Feminists don't actually want to help women themselves. They want men to do something about the problem. They need men to solve the problem because they sure as fuck don't want to do it themselves.

The type of women that are really committed to the feminist movement, the kind that march with placards at demonstrations are more often than not psychotic broken women. Lena Dunum fucked around with her fiver year old sisters Vagina. Zoe Quin from Gamergate is visibly damaged. Jezebel's Lindy West doesn't exactly look normal.

Feminists and SJWs aren't normal women. They don't look like normal women, they don't think like normal women, and they don't communicate the way normal woman do. Because of their abnormality they can't function in society in the same way that normal women can. They can't hold down a job. They can't have a normal healthy relationship. They can't enjoy a movie. This makes them jealous and deeply resentful of normal women. However since it is not politically safe to attack women, their anger spills over on to white men; the only group that it is still politically safe to attack.

Feminists are not interested in helping the weak. Their primary objective is attacking strong beautiful people like GayLubeOil and his equally handsome Twitter followers because we highlight their inadequacy. Feminists will never do anything tangible to help women themselves. They despise normal women and prefer creating moral outrage and playing the victim. Feminists want attention, they don't actually give a fuck about women.

I'm not a piece of shit feminist. PM me for life, fitness, and nutrition advice. On a side note, I'm holding a contest to find an illustrator for my upcoming book and brand.
If you think you have what it takes check out /r/ BlackKnightContest

[–]Lesic 98 points99 points  (34 children)

Modern "feminists" are payed tools or useful idiots of the oligarchs.
They work for the oligarchy and corporate feudalists and against both men and women.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 64 points65 points  (24 children)

The internet censorship feminists are trying to push through is going to be used to silence dissidents by the government.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 68 points69 points  (22 children)

This is one of my big beefs with feminism. Feminism can't exist without censorship because the main planks in their platform will snap under free debate and criticism, thus feminists tend to be very pro-censorship...censorship enforced by guns and prisons.

This debate between feminist Kathy Lette and free speech advocate Alex Deane is always enlightening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CzGxqdmsrk TL;DR: feminist gets destroyed by logic and resorts to ad hominem as a favorite tactic.

[–]yesidoes 28 points29 points  (0 children)

But remember that guns can only be in the hands of those who work for the government.

When law abiding citizens exercise their constitutional right (US) to buy guns, they turn into homicidal psycopaths.


[–]TheDNote 15 points16 points  (13 children)

at 4:30 in that video "of course I have the right to speak for all women" wow

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 13 points14 points  (12 children)

Feminists can be so entitled.

[–]1beerthroway 9 points10 points  (11 children)

Gender reversed: I can't think of a single man capable of the job of speaking for all men that would actually do it. Some are capable, but those that are capable realize how difficult it is to do so effectively.

[–]1aguy01 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"Why not say it's going to give us all rainbows and pots of gold?"

He came across very mature and composed, and she came across as a petulant child. Good example in frame.

[–]Orflarg 5 points6 points  (2 children)


holy fuck. Alex makes 2 very simple points, followed by 10mins of Cathy going in circles about the most benign points. This physically hurts me, I would not have had the patience to deal with her.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Unfortunately this is typilcal of debates with feminists. They are used to being coddled due to the “women are wonderful” effect, so when someone actually debates them with hard logic, they break down.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They don't even know it, though. She has no idea that she held an intellectually indefensible belief that was simply struck down with logic. In her mind, she was being bullied and shouted down by a mysoginist pig.

"All I wanted was to talk about this one thing that I wanted, and he had to try to keep making it all about HIM! Typical man!"

[–]foldpak111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whenever someone resorts to ad hominem I immediately cut contact. It's about as low of a level you can go.

[–]screamingATtrees 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the exact same ploy women use on Facebook.

A woman posts some feminism drivel like "please help stop 1 in 2 women from being sexually assaulted by clicking like and sharing this picture of Tits"

Then a guy will post "ummm. 1 in 2 is false..here's a link to some facts"

Then the women all start posting "why are you invading my private space you woman raping asshole!"

And delete his posts.


[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 34 points35 points  (3 children)

SJW feminists are gullible, obnoxiously loud, easily riled up, and most importantly, easily parted with their money. Some sociopathic individuals see their horking masses as an opportunity for easy single boosting, agenda pushing, or cash prizes.

There are cultmasters exploiting the feminist machine, and then there are clueless pawns with no self-awareness who simply whine about "privilege" and "patriarchy" because they like the warm squishy feeling of being a victim. But every member of this cult from the top to the bottom has one thing in common, they are 100% interested in themselves.

Feminists are not humanitarians.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

It's quite hilariously revealing how many feminists oppose calling themselves egalitarians instead. But when you call them out on their misandry, they give you the dictionary definition of feminism that is equivalent to the definition of egalitarianism.

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Yes, feminists absolutely do not consider "egalitarian" or even "humanist" to be acceptable enough as equality labels. You HAVE to call yourself a Feminist with a capital F or you're their enemy.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because egalitarian implies that in some cases other groups might have it worse than women, but your mistake is not realizing that any of their woes are a direct result of patriarchy.

Men are way more likely than women to be homeless, incarcerated, suicidal, injured, or dead, all because of toxic masculinity; other men encourage these men to take dumb risks and dangerous jobs.

^ completely serious argument against men's rights I got more than once.

[–]RedPill115 18 points19 points  (2 children)

Modern "feminists" are payed tools or useful idiots of the oligarchs.

You could not have put it better. If you watch the common themes between conservatives and feminist liberals, though they appear the opposite they're actually the same. Scare everyone about sex and the opposite gender, give them the most corrupted and opposite "dating advice" possible.

The person who benefits is the "unseen" person - by making sure women don't get attached and don't have kids, women are more available for jobs, longer hours, working.

[–]2Overkillengine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Corporate harems, etc.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's because this isn't a left and right issue, it's an authoritarian vs libertarian one.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (4 children)

"Put down your protein shakes"

It's kinda disturbing how I was literally about to sip my shake when I read that

[–]1London-Bananas 10 points11 points  (2 children)

There's a little bit of GayLubeOil in all of us.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a frightening mental image.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c 39 points40 points  (9 children)

That "victim mentality" is unfortunately ubiquitous in our modern era, almost a religion unto itself. Really, Feminism needs to be replaced by some philosophy that emphasizes the personal responsibility that comes with freedom. That a focus on self-improvement and self-mastery are critical. That one's unbridled feral nature is as much a cage as any other.

TRP is such a philosophy.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 19 points20 points  (5 children)

Feminism is a religion, and it uses the same tactics. It comes to you in a smiling ingratiating way, claiming to be peaceful and for everyone, but if you disagree you're wrong at the very least, burned at the stake at worst, but they'll always try to shame you and assume themselves morally superior to you and all other non-believers and dissenters. Favorite tactic of those with flimsy faith in non reality based beliefs? Shout louder than you.

If you're religious, step back from it and lookmat it objectively if you can. Feminism is a religion. Quite a bit like scientology and evangelical christians.

[–]newls 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They use straw men and false associations quite a lot too.

"You don't like feminism? So you think women should be stoned and whipped like in the Middle East?"

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Exactly. There is a lack of empirical evidence for most feminist positions, which is conveniently glossed over by most feminists and society-at-large. I once challenged a feminist on their concept of patriarchy. Feminists can't even agree on the meaning of the word, let alone run studies that prove its existence. Yet it forms the core of many of their arguments. Many other examples of course. Feminism is mostly conceptual, it's arguments mainly philosophical.

The feminist came back with some supposed examples, a few statistics on women in congress or construction jobs and the like. I pointed out that they were all just statistics, not scientific studies. That I could provide just as many counterexamples to the concept of patriarchy and male privilege: for instance, nearly 60% of college students are now female, over 70% of divorces are initiated by women, 80% of suicides are men, most homeless people are men, 92% of workplace deaths are incurred by men, not to mention disparities in murder rates and prison sentences (for the exact same crime) and child custody laws, etc. etc. etc.

For every example he gave, I could provide a counterexample. My point was that patriarchy and other feminist notions are something you choose to believe in. And that's fine, you can choose to believe in whatever you want. But that doesn't make it valid, any more than someone's religious beliefs.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I once challenged a feminist on their concept of patriarchy. Feminists can't even agree on the meaning of the word, let alone run studies that prove its existence.

The term,'patriarchy', like god, is purposely left vague, ambiguous, and abstract to allow a lot of wiggle room for interpretation.

[–]Myrpl 4 points5 points  (1 child)

They also both exploit the "desire to feel important".

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, thats true. They couple it with perpetual victim status and guilt about something, but offer a cure for how they make you feel about yourself.

[–]nomad-oz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Victim Mentality" is a leaned personality disorder.

Strategies to Deal with a Victim Mentality

Smile and say kindly, “Our relationship is important to me, but it’s not helpful to keep feeling sorry for yourself. I can only listen for five minutes unless you’re ready to discuss solutions.”

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feminists does not want freedom and responsibility.

They want authority and exemption under the guise of safety.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 38 points39 points  (1 child)

Feminists and SJWs aren't normal women. They don't look like normal women, they don't think like normal women, and they don't communicate the way normal woman do. Because of their abnormality they can't function in society in the same way that normal women can. They can't hold down a job. They can't have a normal healthy relationship. They can't enjoy a movie. This makes them jealous and deeply resentful of normal women.

This needs some expansion.

Feminists are inadequate women, because they are unable to do the things it is important for women to do:

  • Look attractive in order to attract male attention.
  • Be sweet, pleasant, and empathetic in order to attract male love.
  • Be loyal, affectionate, and and a good prospective mother in order to attract male commitment and resources.
  • Have social graces and insight which allows them to help create a happy, harmonious social circle and community.

Healthy, well-adjusted women who can do these things don't need feminism, because feminism is, at its core, an attempt by inadequate, broken women to remove the necessity of doing anything they cannot or will not do.

  • They cannot make themselves attractive, so they demand "fat acceptance".
  • They cannot act pleasant to those around them, so they demand we "ban bossy".
  • They cannot be loyal, affectionate, or giving, so they denigrate motherhood, and demand we stop "slut shaming".
  • They cannot get along and play well with others, so they demand we respect their bullshit "careers" they chose to have instead.

And yet healthy women often swell the ranks that feminism lays claim to, because, being NOT bitter, NOT resentful, NOT full of hate, they have trouble seeing or imagining how feminists are. They hear the rhetoric, pay some casual attention, take it as face value, and embrace "feminism-lite". "Gee, free birth control pills would be nice." "It would be nice if people weren't mean to fat girls", and so on.

The feminists-lite don't really mean badly, they are just naive. They fail to understand that feminism is an attempt to abolish femininity and feminine virtue, by those who have none. It is an attempt to drag the healthy women down to the level of the freaks.

[–]janet_snakewhole 157 points157 points [recovered]

Most feminists I know are ugly, loser, man-haters. They are bitter because they have been rejected by men time and time again. They pursue frivolous things like getting amazon to stop classifying toys as 'for boys' and 'for girls'. One feminazi I know is a total dependapotamus - she is completely dependent on her husband, Does absolutely nothing around the home, doesn't have a job and recently got pregnant. She is on Facebook all day reposting articles from everyday feminism and jezebel. She loves to claim that she is oppressed when she is actually very happy spending her husband's money. Her husband is the one who is oppressed by her bitchiness and laziness.

[–][deleted] 70 points71 points  (15 children)

"Dependapotamus". Just wow. Using that one today. HT city.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 52 points53 points  (10 children)

That's what we call dependent military wives, especially the ones who sit around complaining and are enormous. They complain because they can't fuck all the single guys on base/post like the attractive dependent wives do.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 41 points42 points  (5 children)

I figured that there are a lot of veterans in TRP so I specifically included this image for you guys

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 7 points8 points  (4 children)

I got a kick out of it too, as if any female could dowhat I did in the military. I guarantee no girl could since most men couldn't. Strapping 100lbs to you then doing your job, try it while sucking air through an M117 and wearing a charcoal suit designed to prevent air from touching you. It even sucks on cold days.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

lol if anyone ever needs to see up close why you shouldn't get married, I just tell them to join the military

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Still some of them marry the bitch who leaves her military husband to fuck them, then they're appalled and surprised she cheats on them and leaves.

This fits it perfectly.

[–]coffee_and_lumber 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Every time I saw a hot civilian woman on base, I assumed she was an officer's wife. If she looked like a caricature of a post from PeopleOfWalmart.com, probably enlisted wife.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was USAF so we occasionally got non people of Walmart enlisted wives...Who promptly traded in the back home hero for Ssgt Thundercock.

[–]TheRealMouseRat 12 points13 points  (0 children)

isn't the hippopotamus one of the animals that kill the most people? makes it extra fitting.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Dated military term rooted in the fitting Leave and Earning Statement reference for wives and children- Dependents.

[–]fuck_da_haes[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's usually used for military wives, had over to some "fat people ..." subreddit for more.

[–]loin_fruit 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Feminists can't contribute to society anymore than their degree for gender studies will "let them". They feel as if correcting that classification of toys being labeled "for boys" "for girls", is justified and makes them feel like they are doing something worth while and right. When in reality it is petty and it is childish to complain about everything under the sun, and blame everything else for the problems that happen to them in life, instead of looking at themselves and going "what can I do to change my outlook and succeed?"

No logic, only emotion.

[–]Dr_Morsu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Feminism is the ugly woman's (inside & out) tantrum.

[–]Walksaway 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Poor guy probably picked up his Dependa as a private. Wanted that sweet BAH.

[–]1Sergnb 0 points1 point  (1 child)

While it's funny to laugh and point at people that get mad at society because they can't hold a grasp of their own lives, let's also remember that ad hominems is the fool's tool to win arguments. There's plenty of attractive feminists out there who get more cock than chicken farmers, and give no fucks about tribial tumblr concerns like the one you mention.

Let's not resort to pointless tribalist vitriol, you are better than that.

[–]Hennez 67 points68 points  (41 children)

Yesterday I had an exchange with a feminazi about how women are the greatest thing the universe had created and how because of their ability to "create" (yeah, like the can do it out of air) life they should be worshipped.

I just said that men and women need each other and all feminist hell broke loose. There were feminazis, white shining armor knights, SJWs and all the like calling me a failed attempt of a man and all that sort of stuff.

One thing that really made me laugh was when a girl said: You envy us for being so self-sufficient, we are mothers, lovers, friends, etc.

I tried to contain myself but I couldn't. So I said an unforgivable truth: Self-sufficient you say?, yeah, like when men went out to kill elephants, lions, wage wars, go into space and you simply stayed home or in the cavern combing your hair or taking mirror selfies of your ass.

I'm a bad human being guys.

[–]janet_snakewhole 39 points39 points [recovered]

This always amazes me. That women think they are special as soon as they get pregnant and have babies. Even unicellular organisms can replicate. Is that something to be proud of? Are their lives so empty that they have made no real achievements?

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (21 children)

True. When women point out that they are "superior" (more valuable) than men because of being able to give birth, they are claiming superiority for purely BIOLOGICAL reasons. Funny that.

If a man was to do the same, that is, point to how biological differences like the fact that men have superior strength from having a bigger bone structure and more muscle mass, then he is labeled a sexist for pointing out this obvious fact.

Bitches love talking about difference of the sexes only when it makes them look better. But when it makes men look better...misogyny! lol

[–]Hennez 18 points19 points  (20 children)

Oh man, I did exactly that.

I told them that we were stronger and that I never read about an army of any amount women facing men in battle.

The misogynist card was inmediately played. It was fun.

EDIT: misspelling

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (8 children)

Yup, never fails. The funny thing, is the bitches do it literally all the time when it comes to bragging about women vs. men.

I was listening to this radio station the other day and I hear some female announcer come on and talk about how some scientific studies (probably done by PC feminist cunts) show that females have a better sense of smell (study link), vision (study), hearing (study/ragebait), touch (study) and taste (study). And then she said something to the effect of "just more scientific proof that women are betterTeeHee ".

If you actually click on the links, you'll see a common theme, it's all about the politically correct bullshit of making women seem better and more valuable (increase their value - sound familiar?) while making guys seem worse (decrease their value).

Hell, just look at this bullshit Rage-Bait from Cosmopolitan (be warned, this shit will annoy the fuck out of you). Imagine if this was turned around to make men seem better lol, bitches would be crying misogyny and demand heads roll.

[–]TimeHo 28 points29 points  (2 children)

If humans start out as female in the womb and are formed into male, wouldnt that make us upgrades?

[–]Hennez 8 points9 points  (3 children)

I went through the links. And yes, its intent it's clearly leaned towards making women seems better than men.

My question remains: how comes that if they are better at everything they simply didn't kill elephants, go to war, discover how gravity works, state that nothing travels faster than light, etc.

Having all the perks (I don't really think it's this way but I didn't really read further than the title of each study) is useless if there's not a drive to use them.

We are the ones that achieve, that create things, that carry the whole weight of this species (in the sense that we seek and attempt things to keep making our lives better) to keep going forward (there are notorious exceptions but proportionally it's so).

And now think about this: how many great thinkers, scientists, writers and so were limited in the time they could spend furthering knowledge?. Women spent almost all their time at home free from other stuff.

This mathematician died early but he achieved a great feat hours before going to a duel and dying. There was a drive (and a very powerful one) and that's why they have continually failed at giving mankind new knowledge.

In that sense, you can see that mostly one half of humanity does the advancing: the male half. They are too busy talking shit about us on facebook (a thing a man created).

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

You are 100% right in your observations.

Men are responsible for 99.999% of the advancements in human society. That is precisely why feminists come up with this kind of bullshit pseudoscience.

They do it to protect their self-esteem, by telling themselves that they're awesome and special, that's all there's to it. It's no different from how some ugly fat bitches tell themselves they are beautiful just the way they are, they do it to protect their perception of themselves.

It is precisely because they are inferior in all areas relevant to the advancement of the human species that they feel the need to hamster away their inferiority with whatever bullshit reason they can find.

Remember, there is no better insult than the truth. Calling a mentally challenged person a retard is a huge insult, calling a normal-intelligence person a retard is a small insult. Calling an obese person a fatass hits them pretty hard, but calling a skinny person a fatass is not even an insult, it's a joke.

Many feminists are aware of their female inferiority. This is actually why they emulate men. And also why telling them about their inferiority hurts them so much (triggers anyone?), because it's true.

[–]HahahahaWaitWhat 20 points21 points  (1 child)

Q: Why are there Women's Studies programs but no Men's Studies ones?

A: There are. They're called "History."

[–]cariboo_j 1 point2 points  (0 children)

some people never grow out of the boys vs girls kindergarten stage.

a surprising amount of people, actually. A surprising amount of WOMEN, too.

[–]RedPill115 13 points14 points  (8 children)


misogynist: anything a feminist doesn't like

The new one they hate is pointing out that people are having less sex. There's a number of studies pointing out the worst birth rate we've ever had, people are not getting married, and now they've done studies showing people aren't even having sex. "misoynist" for pointing it out.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 14 points15 points  (7 children)

If they acknowledge the low birthrates and dropping marriage rates, it will obviously be solely the fault of men. Men too afraid to man up and marry a fat chick, support her, then give her cash and prizes for being so awesome.

[–]Hennez 3 points4 points  (6 children)

Who wouldn't want to marry this example of a healthy woman.

I personally am sick and have all my standards wrong and I go for women like this

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Sadly I do as well. There must be something wrong with me because I just can't get attracted to girls as heavy as I am.

[–]Hennez 2 points3 points  (1 child)

With us man, with us. TRP is just a bunch of sick guys who need medication and feminists are more than willing to help us recover.

I want to keep being as ill as I am now. Or more.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like being so sick in the head that I want to fuck 22 year old girls who are lighter than 120lbs. I'm not searching for the cure.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

The average American woman is 166 pounds, and 5'4''. That's pretty fucking fat.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)


What is this?

[–]rygar_the_red 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get a kick out of them using 'misogyny' in so many of their rants.

They are only draining the word of whatever power it has.

[–]Hennez 3 points4 points  (6 children)

It amazes me too. Every-single-time.

I honestly don't know. I hadn't seen it the way you put it (unicellular organisms) though. Great point.

Personally and according to TRP and biology the most logical explanation would be that the need to reproduce in order to survive as species was so strong that it's what drives women (being the carrier of descendance) to be identified by that function.

We have somewhat stopped evolving and if it's not so then it has passed a very tiny amount of time with the levels of knowledge and technology we currently have. 5000 years is way too little time in order for our species to change and would explain why that drive for them to be accomplished in life by having babies would be so strong still.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 3 points4 points  (5 children)

10,000 years is too short for our species to evolve, thats only 5000 generations (give or take) but our technology has grown by monumental leaps in just the last 100 years. Just 200 years ago birthrates had to be high because of high infant mortality, wars, famines, disease, etc.

We'll evolve, but you'll never see it personally. You'd be hard pressed to see your great, great grandchildren despite medical advances. Maybe if your family tradition was first kid at 13 and otherwise living healthy you would have more than four generations present for a photo op.

[–]Hennez 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I agree. It's far too short a time for major evolution to be appreciable.

I think I read that our cells are constantly evolving but nothing major, just minor changes. (Correct me if I'm wrong)

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't know if you're wrong. Some people think evolution is like a duck giving birth to a scorpion. It's gradual change over a very very long time. The length of the life cycle for each organism dictates how much time is required for a sizeable change. If the life cycle is a few hours the change will be far faster than if it's 100 years.

[–]GregariousWolf 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Populations evolve, not cells and not individuals. Evolution is the change in the occurrences of all the different genes within an entire population of organisms that happens over time as subsequent generations are born. Some individuals pass on their genes, some do not. Mutations occur due to errors in the machinery of copying DNA or to damage from environmental causes. If a mutation occurs in a sex cell (egg or sperm) the mutation may be passed on to the next generation.

[–]Hennez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, roger. My term was not correct. Individuals and cells do mutate and they can or can't pass on those changes. If these changes happen in a large enough scale that's when an evolution takes place.

Thanks a lot for the clarification.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 6 points7 points  (4 children)

This is worth making into a snappy comeback. Something like "So can an amoeba ... "

They'll say "sure, but you can't", because women get straight on the offensive.

Then we'll be into "you need sperm" and then it will be "I can get sperm anywhere".

So.... we need to preempt that. "Hahaha so can an amoeba... I give it five years before we have artificial wombs and then all human beings can reproduce at will".

Expect a shit storm of indignation gentleman, as she tries to define herself as special for reasons other than her reproductive "talents" ...

[–]janet_snakewhole 2 points2 points [recovered]

The woman's comeback would be 'why pay for the pig when all you want is the sausage.'

I cringe when i come across discussions like these where women claim they are better. I have never heard men screaming from rooftops that they are better so why do women feel the need to engage in this asinine behavior!

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 8 points9 points  (0 children)

so why do women feel the need to engage in this asinine behavior!

Because they feel that it's the way to make it true.

Major factors at play:

  • Dunning_Kruger_Effect(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect) - ie they cannot see what men actually do.

  • Due to "equality", they think they must be as good. There is no objective comparison.

  • Due to solipsism they believe that anything they say is true.

  • Due to females strong in-group bias, they support each other in their delusions, encouraging it.

  • Due to women in the workplace (less dependence on men, but more need to compete) they now engage in inter-sexual competition. This is classic inter-sexual competition.

  • Due to the inherent victimhood that seems to be inherent in females, they perpetually hold up the patriarchy as their oppression, themselves as victims, and society/men/you as obliged to rescue them.

All the above go round and round in one great big self-reinforcing circle. It's horrific.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I have never heard men screaming from rooftops that they are better

Then you haven't been reading a lot of the comments on this sub. Tons of people think that way here.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say most of us know we're more capable in many or most areas, but girls have to shout and make a scene to prove they're not just capable, but better than men. Pat yourself on the back and ignore reality. Yes you're awesome snd unique, just like everyone else who is just like you.

[–]sirpsycho3 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Men are the life givers, women are the life bearers. A tomato seed needs dirt and water to grow.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I've had many similar dances with futility. The last SJW I disagreed with told me I was a misogynist, rape apologist, and demanded that I go fuck my dog. She did not know my dog was sixteen and dying from cancer at the time. When I buried my dog a week later, I vowed to bury the next vile POS SJW I ever encountered, no holds barred. I have not deviated from this path and have the scars to prove it. You keep it up. It's now a game to me, as in "How many moves will it take to completely take her down?" I am down to five, working on one. This new mindset is pure bliss.

[–]Hennez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just did it for the lolz. Old-hyper-beta me would have never dared defy the holy words of feminazis and the like.

Sorry about your dog man. Dogs are better than the average person and they really are good companions.

As /u/gaylubeoil would say: offer him a tribute of feminists skulls and shattered hopes of seeing a completely feminist world happen.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 30 points31 points  (11 children)

The primary motivation of many feminist and SJW leaders is to further their own careers and power base (e.g. Anita Sarkeesian, Lindy West, Jessica Valenti, Rebecca Watson). They do this by giving women the female equivalent of bread and circuses, stirring up anger and victimization where there is really no cause resulting in a perpetual anger against society among their followers. Most of these feminist "thought leaders" would have to do actual real work if it weren't for their "cause".

Take women's studies professors for example: they have PhDs in women's studies which is the ultimate bullshit major. They are the alpha feminists and their career is what all feminists strive for (with the exception of the internet celebrities mentioned above). They are on the front lines in indoctrinating and radicalizing young women and men into the feminist movement, as many young students are forced to take women's studies classes. All the flawed studies and bad statistics proving that women have it worse come from them. By disagreeing with them, you're removing their entire reason for existence, and this is why debate/dissent is not tolerated within the feminist community.

I'm sure many of these women have some intelligence but they have to play incredibly dumb to further their cause. Lindy West is my favorite example of Argument from incredulity/Lack of imagination - here's what she says about the sexual marketplace:

My vagina is livestock? My boyfriend is a customer? I should charge men for my milk? Um, okay, Casanova. Clearly you're highly qualified to be making declarations in this field of study, as you've definitely "laid lots of times" with girls you met in Niagara Falls whose boobs felt like bags of sand. Got it.

She comes off as incredibly dense here, and note she uses both argument from incredulity and ad hominem in the same argument. If you can't understand the concept of a sexual marketplace, it probably is from a complete lack of effort or willful disbelief.

The quote from Upton Sinclair always comes to mind: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

[–]RedPill115 6 points7 points  (7 children)

She comes off as incredibly dense here

When people sound stupid, often they're actually very smart.

This is what I think she's saying here:
- Girls, guys who want to have sex with you think your vagina is livestock, your boyfriend is a customer, and you should charge men for your milk. Also, if you sleep with these guys, later they'll describe you as "your boobs felt like bags of sand". Women, this is what anyone who wants to sleep with you or talks about how things work are thinking.

It's telling women that guys who want to sleep with them is bad, and will make them feel bad.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, when the woman in question is an ugly ham-planet (like most of West's audience) – then yes, men wanting to sleep with her is bad, and when they ultimately reject her, she'll feel bad!

[–]1Sergnb 2 points3 points  (5 children)

uh... what? Are you joking or you just missed her point entirely?

Girls, guys who want to have sex with you think your vagina is livestock, your boyfriend is a customer, and you should charge men for your milk.

No, she is questioning what the "sexual marketplace" means with those. She is not saying "this is what guys think", she is saying "this is what people that believe in the sexual marketplace think".

Also, if you sleep with these guys, later they'll describe you as "your boobs felt like bags of sand".

Nah man, it's a reference to the movie "40 year old virgin" whereas a guy is lying to his friends about him touching a woman's breasts and he describes them as feeling like "bags of sand". His friends then start breaking his balls about ever feeling one as that's obviously not how a boob feels like. In essence; she is accusing whoever was talking about the sexual marketplace of being a loser who has to make up his sexual conquests because he can't get poon for shit (and incidentally anyone who believes in that theory too, to boot)

It's telling women that guys who want to sleep with them is bad, and will make them feel bad.

No, she is saying "the sexual marketplace is a made up story propagated by sexually frustrated guys that want to make themselves look like they are casanovas".

[–]1London-Bananas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."

cough cough global warming cough

[–]cariboo_j 1 point2 points  (1 child)

...What? Bags of sand? Did I miss something?

[–]Endorsed ContributorGarl_Vinland 11 points12 points  (0 children)

How do slut walks help women? How does claiming psychological trauma and PTSD over offensive internet comments and Tweets help women? How does complaining about men and their numerous microaggressions help women? The majority of the writing on popular feminist websites like Jezebel and Everyday Feminism is predominantly about how bad it is that mean men hurt their feels.

You actually answered those questions yourself:

However since it is not politically safe to attack women...

All of those things you listed help forge a culture where attacking (read: questioning) a woman's actions or words is verboten. It's power talk through and through.

Now a lot of the writers are just making shit up as they go along. What else are they going to do with a gender studies degree? But even when they're just pulling an injustice out of their ass it still has a purpose; to increase their power and justify the need for their existance in society.

[–]johnnygeeksheek 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The 3rd wave is a shit test on the cultural scale. It is the natural result of the mass beta-fication of baby boomers who didn't have proper male role models as a result of WWII casualties. It both makes separating the betas from the Alphas easier and securing BB easier for low quality women.

[–]TimPartendale 8 points8 points [recovered]

GayLubeOil represents TRP so well, somebody buy this man a beer (or a tub of whey)

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 23 points24 points  (3 children)

Or buy my book once its published :)

[–]antihostile 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Women don't actually give a fuck about other women.

[–]GregariousWolf 16 points16 points [recovered]

Carrying around a mattress is an opportunity to get attention.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

A very obvious one at that.

[–]slerpaderp 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I was personally shit-tested by the mattress girl. I had a class with her. AWALT

Edit: downvote all you want. Doesn't change the truth

[–]liquorandkarate 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Would you mind sharing the story ?

[–]slerpaderp 6 points7 points  (1 child)

We basically had to present something in a class, and she complimented me on it after class one day, and asked how long I had been involved in that kind of work. I had told her since high school, and she responded in a bitchy tone, and said something along the lines of implying I was full of myself. I had been on guard not to piss this girl off lest she accuse me of verbal assault or something, so I didn't respond in alpha fashion and purposely bowed out of that one.

She would bring the mattress to classes and leave it up by the front of the room for everyone to see, and occasionally would ask the professor loudly in front of the class if she could leave it by the front, even after she had asked him once or twice before. Obvious patterns of attention-seeking behavior.

One day she commented to me "ugh, can you believe not ONE person offered to help me carry it all the way from [x spot on campus]??"

I spoke with one of her accused "rapists" (yes, there are actually more than just the infamous Paul Nungesser, though it shouldn't surprise anyone), and got his account of their interaction, which long story short was definitely consensual, and she's definitely kinky and was down for whatever rough stuff they did. Of course she'd later pull a 180 and file a complaint with the administration, which the guy was cleared for. Also I knew Paul briefly early in our freshman year. Definitely an eccentric dude, but doesn't seem like the rapey kind to me. I was always curious to reach out to him, but would only see him in public, and obviously the social opprobrium for being his friend wasn't worth the curiosity.

[–]manwhowouldbeking 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Modern feminism is a joke, Social media platforms like twitter, facebook and tumblr have women thinking that there opinions are relevant and insightful no matter how stupid they are. The problem comes from building there ideologies on sand is when another group with a more solid grounding becomes a threat, because its easier to try and rip down someone else's house than to rebuild your own(see feminism vs gamers, feminism vs mra, Feminism vs gays and straights, white feminists vs colored feminist). Modern feminism fight the patriarchy and privilege things that do not exist and when called on those fact they do not refute the argument they attack the arguer. These women have zero value to a red pill man and are essentially land mines filled Entitlement and ignorance. The best way to fight a feminist is to ignore them because if you give them attention they have already won cos daddy didnt give them enough attention.

TLDR Feminisms love of ignorance and entitlement are essentially the anti thesis of what it means to be red pill.

[–]1London-Bananas 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Note that they choose social media that are pretty much a one way street. Tumbler and especially Twitter have almost no framework to have any kind of debate. It's just shouting left and right.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a damn good point. I had honestly never thought about it that way.

[–]WardlyHasted 12 points12 points [recovered]

I really think there is a lot to be said about the notion that appearance is ideology.

Feminists are usually damaged people. They look gross, their personalities are gross, their behaviour is gross and they most likely feel gross. Whether they're willing to admit it or not is irrelevant. All it takes is one look at your average feminist to know that there's no way that person actually feels good about themselves.

GayLubeOil touches on something here that isn't exactly a new idea by any means, but is nonetheless still important: most, if not all, of what women do is for attention/validation. These gross, damaged individuals identify as feminists and support it's sister-movements of fat acceptance, LGBT issues and socialism because they have nothing else. All they have are these "movements" and their feelings about them, so they use them to get attention.

Why else would anyone pay attention to these people? No one wants to give the time of day to Tina Tumblrina -- who weighs 275 lbs and has a neon blue pixie-style haircut -- much less date her. And so Tina must find another way to get her attention fix. She decides to tweet about fat acceptance and "why she needs feminism" because that's something she can identify with.

There's no chance in hell someone like Tina will advocate a healthy lifestyle (an actual one, not healthy at any size), conservative politics or education reform to help young boys who continue to fall behind. There's no way she will do these things because she cannot identify herself with them. But she still wants to be part of the club, so she chooses the club of neon-haired, cat owning hamplanets.

Is it a "chicken or the egg" situation? Does looking like a feminist make someone a feminist? Or do you decide to look like a feminist after you've chosen to believe feminist ideology?

I would argue the former. For the most part, people are insecure, lack self-confidence and have fragile egos. The few people who rise above these shortcomings have a positive outlook in life -- they see themselves as the prize and have no time for those at the bottom of the bucket. But the crabs -- the weak-willed and weak-minded -- will still try to pull them down with their bullshit notions of "fairness" and "equality". People don't like to see when other people enjoy success -- unless those same successful people eventually fall from grace.

Don't fall from grace. Get the fuck out of the bucket so no one can pull you back in.

[–]jdgalt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would explain "slut walks" the same way. Their direct purpose is to make sex harder for men to obtain, both by shaming those who provide it (especially sex workers) and those who consume it. Why would anybody want to make this harder? Because she has recently hit the Wall and is in the anger stage about it, therefore "sour grapes!"

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

The best thing I ever heard about SJWs and internet feminists was from a woman. Parapharsed for clarity and brevity:

"I got called an 'ignorant bitch' by some 35 year old cow. I tried to start a discussion about the status of women in the rap industry, as a woman working in music production. It was like talking to every other stuck up bitch I've ever met, but this time she had a keyboard instead of anything real. I realized why they always talk nonsense: they don't actually have any problems. They know mainstream rap talks about bitches and hos, but they don't care because those songs are about black women. SJWs aren't black women, so they don't give a shit. They just want more people to subscribe to their blog. They are internet blog sluts, and their customers are women who won't even get off their ass to make their lives better."

[–]LeFlamel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A lot of SJWs are actually fat black women that despise white women for taking away "their men." They van actually believe with a straight face that they're entitled to a white man but get frustrated when black guys sleep with girls of any other race. They'll cry about patriarchy and objectification one moment but then twerk to rap music. I'm black but the culture is way too fucked up for me, especially the women.

[–]red_gerb 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Feminism is rebellion. Rebellion against themselves, what they were designed for, they're very nature. Going against design results in frustration and anger. Anger leads to hate (in all directions), hate leads to suffering.

I suppose men have a polar situation. One in which they reject 'The System', disregard law and attachments, perhaps run with a biker gang.

Ultimately, these may be simply symptoms, of societal collapse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Get your "theirs" right so nobody can divert the argument or say some bitchy shit to appear smarter. You know feminists would take advantage of your spelling error, rather than actually argue based on merit. They're practically begging for some other thing you said to respond to and ignore everything else you said.

[–]mryddlin 5 points6 points  (1 child)

First wave feminism got women the right to vote in 1919.


It appears they invented time travel, the suffergates were not feminist, that didn't come until I think the 60s.

Feminist have totally co-opt the historical record for every civil movement through out time like the bandits they are.

[–]machimus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not that neo-feminists don't care about women...

It's that they care about women like politicians care about their constituents.

[–]1CowardlyPetrov 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Feminists didn't get women the vote or reproductive rights.

That's retarded. Men gave it to women when they asked for it sans responsibilities.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Oh my god...thank you so much for this. I was just introduced to this sub by my boyfriend about a month or 2 ago...but I kind of forgot about it until I saw this post.

I am a 24-year old white female. I am in graduate school at a large public university and I am getting my masters in sociology. Before you freak out, I take absolutely no part in gender studies; I stay as far away as humanly possible. Instead I study race, racism, poverty, crime, and American education...and all of the inequalities that exist in that part of our social world.

I hate modern day feminism SO. MUCH. Everything you said in this post--absolutely everything--is brilliant. You reeled me in with that PTSD thing...holy shit nothing pisses me off more than a Fembot Tumblr blogger that claims she has PTSD because her feelings got hurt on the internet. Their agenda makes me cringe..."Lets bring down the Patriarchy! I'M A WOMYNNNN!!!!!! HONOR ME AND MY BEAUTIFUL [unattractive] BODY...BOW TO ME!" Why can't you just be a normal person? What "freedoms" are you fighting for? I also think its hilarious that most of these women are white and middle class. SO OPPRESSED right?

As a sociologist, I can tell you that everything you said is 100% accurate. I see it every. single. day. in real life. My program has so many female SJW's...and they drive me absolutely insane. When I first got to grad school, they used to pick on me in class and talk about me behind my back and say that I was stupid...JUST because I am skinny, pretty, from a wealthy background, and because I am a sorority girl. After I finished my first year (just a few weeks ago) they found out my GPA was a 3.9 (2nd highest in my program). I don't think they will be making fun of me anymore.

They see other ("binary/cis") women as a threat. They're incredibly bitter that some women do much better than others...and all they want is to get attention from the [cis/RedPill] men that they secretly, desperately want (they they'll never get). So instead they rebel and make outrageous claims of oppression. Us other girls aren't stupid; we know every single heterosexual SJW womyn wants a dominant man...they're so full of shit.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Read some of my posts to them. Hopefully one of them will do a masters dissertation on GayLubeOil

[–]1oldredder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

should work it into some philosophy / mythology course too! "Hammer of THor, or Guns of Brodin?" Look at those guns.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When a man sees another man who has what he wants, his natural reaction is to be more like that man.

When a woman sees another woman who has what she wants, her natural reaction is to try to tear her down to her level.

This is how men became the dominant, driving force of our species.

[–]DaphneDK 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Feminists cater to their own audience. They care about the, mostly white, women in the upper middle class. Just look at all the noise about women quotas on company boards in Europe. It's only the top 1% of the population that be affected.

[–]dat1dork 4 points4 points [recovered]

Team Red Pill!

Take no shit.

Gay Lube Oil. You are a god among Red Pill-ers. The Patton to my own World War.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 6 points7 points  (3 children)

I kind of want to make Team Red Pill gym tanks to take our shitlording into the real world

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An official logo or slogan would also be appropriate for those that would like to design other gym gear like sports bag.

I have a hand handing a red pill towards me as a phone background. Like a gentle reminder every morning to take my supplements.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

We should climb a rope to get into the gym. No shrimps

[–]Zchavago 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Feminism assumes that everything and everyone else is a problem facing women, and expects outward change. TRP assumes the more logical opposite.

[–]foldpak111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like the military references, that is the reality of what men endure. Even if you aren't a combat veteran, there is a war going on in our heads. Especially financial war. Women can just become a webcam model, prostitute, stripper, run to daddy government, one of their 1000's of orbiters willing to throw money at them And make six figures. Men on the other hand, have to go through Chris Gardner type shit to get to that six figure salary. Women know nothing about the struggle.

[–]docbloodmoney 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Feminism started as a way for ugly women to try and gain the value that beautiful women have, and it never left that stage

[–]stolidfact 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The reality of the world is that it takes vision, strategy, tactics, and execution of all of these to get to some change and some goal. When one wages a culture war based on feelings with loosely defined goals and no real way to measure the connection between an action and the consequence (eg "awareness" decreases rape or some such), then logically any action can be attributed as helping, because the target is ever shifting. It's brilliant. Yell loudly enough and someone will get tired of that shit and do things your way. I think it's called equality in the modern age.

[–]Jakenbake781 2 points3 points  (2 children)

That fat violence video has me in tears, thanks for the laugh

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fat Violence Fantasy, is something that iv seen frequently and explains all of the tumblr calls for violence

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

RBK says it best about Feminism. They are united and do what's best for women with no regard to anything else. They don't fiddle with left/right politics, fairness, or the truth. They simply ask, "does this help women?" And go from there.

Unfortunately for them, these so called advantages have been built on a house of cards that is going to collapse.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

PM me for life, fitness, and nutrition advice.

Nobody has ever been that kind to me.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Talking with men from across the world UK Australia and today Netherlands and Spain is pretty fun. So its not a problem at all.

[–]Kelly_Gruber 2 points3 points  (1 child)

When have you heard a feminist stick up for Muslim women? Point proven.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

May the Strength of Brodin be with you in his great Temple of Iron.

Swole be with you.

[–]Doctor_Mayhem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What girls need to understand is that the powers-that-be who instituted feminism (all 200 years of it) did not at all care about the plight of normal girls.

1.) Companies wanted women in the work force because they wanted a larger labour pool. The larger the labour pool, the less you can pay your workers.

2.) Politicians wanted women to vote because they knew women would vote for more government. More government means more secure jobs for politicians and bureaucrats.

3.) Companies knew that if women started making their own money, it meant that they could sell more goods to more people. A lot of those goods being absolute crap/trinkets.

4.) Those Whose Names Echo wanted to undermine the family in order to further subvert our culture and civilization. What better way to be parasites than have the men and women of your target society bicker with each other.

[–]littlemogmog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a long-time redpill lurker I feel like this is the first post I can chime in on. I have dealt first hand with the feminists in academia and they spot-on fit this description. A group of feminists recently hosted a "free the nipple" rally at my university and then proceeded to go on facebook complaining about all the "sexually repressed nerds" encircling the event to stare at a bunch of topless chicks. How this is supposed to help me as a woman? How is this furthering my education or encouraging me to respect myself and others? I don't like to comment on the redpill often because I understand that I probably can't offer as helpful advice as other guys can, but I see how it works even with my own LTR. Anyways, just my 2 cents.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feminists as a general rule consist primarily of professional scam artists like Anita Sarkeesian or just batshit crazy man hating obese monsters like Andrea Dworkin. Neither of them truly give a shit about women; there's either a hateful agenda, or an opportunistic self-benefitting agenda at work.

You DO get your occasional glassy-eyed SJW type who truly believes they're doing right in the world, but are too shit-eatingly dumb to see what's really going on. However, those people usually aren't the figureheads of feminism or SJW nonsense; I'm convinced the ones in charge, the leadership figures, basically all fit neatly into one of the two categories I laid out.

[–]Washedupoaf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

GLO you are a bad motherfucker. Thanks for the good shit.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Good post GLO. Help me out. In your post you reference the phrase "normal woman" multiple times. I have yet to ever meet this species. What do you perceive as a normal woman? I've known a lot of woman in my 40 years on earth and am not sure what a normal one is like.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

A normal woman has a normal weight, hasnt shaved her head, wears feminine clothes and doesn't have large tattoos like a 1930's sailor

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tarnsman4Life 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No shit ;when that Ex-CEO of Ebay (forgot her name) ran for Governor of California as a Republican, her opponent called her a whore. Nationally NOW finally sort of half heatedly stuck up for her; but the California chapter chimed in basically half justifying it. Feminists care about women who tow the line, strong career women good, traditional wives bad, male abuse bad (unless its from a 3rd world culture), males bad, marriage bad*(unless you plan to divorce rape). Unless you discourage lifestyles which keep the price of pussy high and keep the thirsty men coming feminists don't give a fuck about you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I even disagree that feminism give voting rights to women. In Europe most people got voting rights around WW1 for fighting.

[–]mikesteane 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also disagree that feminism played a role in getting women the vote. They were given it.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman 1 point2 points  (0 children)


They can't enjoy a movie.

Hey, the Bechdel test is awesome, if only because it demonstrates that the stuff women actually want to see fails it every single fucking time.

[–]Kid_Crimson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That moment when you recognize that the dominant feminist-imperative culture has become an unfunny joke. Most people are laughing, not because it's funny but because it's mandatory. Who knew that the "promise" of progressive post-modern feminism would devolve into an inevitably malignant transgressive post-parody dystopia, right? ...handle your shit, stack paper, and enjoy the decline gentlemen.

[–]latino666 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey GayLubeOil,

Great post as always.

Also, I'm a graphic/web designer who might be able to help you with your book/brand if you want. Specially if you could give a complete noob like me some fitness tips ;)

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]8thhenry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Touch one the wrong way and equality will disappear.

[–]Johnny10toes 0 points1 point  (1 child)

By contest do you mean looking at portfolios and selecting?

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you have something to submit? please do.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

women hate other women because they're just as weak & they know it. they know all the weaknesses and manipulations a female is capable of, and that disgusts them - they disgust themselves- and they compete-- like crazy. they compete at work, with friends, in relationships, everywhere! bitches be waiting for that one guy that puts them into place and takes them away from all the daily drama.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you ever witnessed women attack each other with the dress code? Truly a sight to be seen.

[–]Redpillc0re 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I have a question, that girl in your vine, did she hurt her back lifting you? :)

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

That girl can deadlift 185. So no

[–]rockumsockumrobots 0 points1 point  (1 child)

GayLubeOil living the dream. Glorious.

[–]MrRexels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not trying to white knight here, but Lindy West looks pretty normal to me in that picture. She's gotta be more broken than a piece of IKEA after I fuck on it if she writes for Jizzebel though. Or wait, is she the baby?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women and feminists/SJW's are synonymous. Just bring up male prison rape in a public setting and prepare for your introduction to the female borg consensus.

[–]1oldredder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly many can hold down a job and that's something I wish would change so I won't run into them.

[–]jakethesnake76 0 points1 point  (4 children)

This https://vine.co/v/eADBQUBDQWZ reminds me of an old hero of mine from the Pride days,Fedor...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw2NBJ0Huc4

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Yea thats because we're both Russian and have some similar facial features

load more comments (13 replies)