TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

6

I realized that I keep a lot of female friends around that I would hook up with given the right circumstances. These friends remain on facebook or occasionally I see them at events or functions, and they're remnants of the old life. The plugged in life, where I thought, I'll just act cool until the time is right.

But every time I see their face on facebook, I get that frustrated urge. Every time.

So this week, during the holidays, I decided to trim down the fat.

I told each one individually point blank that I'm taking them out.

And it's funny, because most of them declined.

And I expected that. They only know the beta me. It just occurred to me that keeping them around wasn't doing me any favors. So pushing this issue solved the question:

If they say yes, then finally! If they say no, they weren't interested and waiting around isn't going to make them more interested.

Win/win, there's literally no reason not to do this.

Single men of theredpill, I challenge you, shed your unnecessary weight, break the ties that are holding you to your blue pill days.


[–][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]residentassociate 0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy Link

wouldn't recommend.

it's great having a harem of women, even platonic, for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which: female social proof/preselection, introductions to hot female friends, easy targets on which to practice indifferent game. I've pretty much never "asked out" a girl ... either she digs my vibe and I close or she doesn't and I let her hang around as long as she wants. going through your facebook contacts and asking girls one by one "do you like me?" is pretty fucking beta, and you're really shooting yourself in the foot.

can't believe this is coming from a mod

[–]pk_atheist0 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

There's no proof/preselection in having a large number of facebook friends who don't like you. Believe me when I say I cringe when I hear the term "inner game" but that's what this is- being realistic about your options. Clear out the large number of chicks that you'd bang and are "working on." If you didn't haven't set the frame with them by now, you're not going to "work" on it.

Shed the weight.

Realize your actual options.

Go out and make new ones.

[–]Snowley 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Social proof tends to not be about what is, more about what it seems to be. If you go out with a bunch of women, you look valuable, even if youre just friends with them all.

That said, if this helps your inner game enough that it feels worth it to you to toss this resource pool, by all means.

[–]pk_atheist1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Understood. I mean, if the women are at least interacting with you, keep them around for sure. When I post a new profile picture and I get 20 likes from the ladies, yeah that's social proof. I should've been more specific. I'm talking about the ones you want to bang who won't even engage you unless you start the conversation.

[–]Snowley 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, no point with them. Now if they'd go out and wingwoman for you... haha

[–]squarehouse -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Hear, hear!

You hear, from time to time on seddit, a division about "the friend zone". Some even think that having a bunch of LJBFed female friends is good preselection.

But you can tell who the red pill/alphas on seddit are, because they understand this as negative preselection. Positive preselection is being surrounded by women who want you or at least seem to want you. If you absolutely have no friends, having LJBFed female friends might be better than being a loner in terms of social proof, but they aren't going to work in your favor.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter