TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

18

Ask Women Experiment (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by pk_atheist

So we saw Tokyo's stint in http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/15k7wg/its_threads_like_this_that_remind_of_why_game/

And that got me wandering through the askwomen sub.

My god, it's terrible. Nowhere else is there such a great collection of terrible advice and ideas. It's astounding how obvious it is to me now, but the guys over there are eating it up! These women will give you everything you need to hang yourself.

This goes without saying, but never ask a woman for advice. She genuinely will never give you advice that will help you. Always listen to a woman's actions, not words. (This mostly applies to matters of the heart, but on the whole, I apply it to my whole life)

But that got me to thinking. This is a great resource. What are some good questions we could ask over there to test some of our red pill theories?


[–]OlearysCow12 points13 points  (13 children) | Copy Link

A lot of those guys there aren't there to get advice. They want women to tell them comforting lies. (no, we don't care about how much money you make. no, the size of your dick doesn't matter. no, we don't like to date jerks.)

I got fed up posting there and pulled a kamakazi and got myself banned. But if you actually want people to listen to you, you'll have to be extremely diplomatic when explaining your point of view because the truth for a lot of the guys there is going to be more than a little bit distressing.

[–]pk_atheist 5 points [recovered] [recovered]  (10 children) | Copy Link

Even better- I don't want to communicate. I want to drop in a few questions and record the results as an experiment. Test our theories.

Ask something simple like, "Hey ladies, would you prefer friendly or handsome?" and record the hamster wheels for science.

[–]prince_of_persuasia 2 points [recovered] [recovered]  (3 children) | Copy Link

What would asking a question like that even show and/or prove though?

[–]pk_atheist 0 points [recovered] [recovered]  (2 children) | Copy Link

It wouldn't. It's a bad example. That's why I posted an open question here. Anybody got anything?

[–]prince_of_persuasia 2 points [recovered] [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I've never posted there, but I've read around a little bit... it just seems like asking any sort of question there for the purpose of "recording the hamster wheels for science" is operating under a pretty heavy confirmation bias. You're going to set up a question to receive the type of answers that you want and then you're going to disregard the dissenting opinions, that does seem like it's really helpful to any rational argument.

[–]OlearysCow1 point2 points  (5 children) | Copy Link

I was working on a little project just to show the gendered hypocrisy on reddit by digging up old RA and 2X threads and reposting them under throwaways with the genders transposed.

I ran out of steam shortly after I started but here's one of them. The original is in 2X. gimmie a second to dig it up.

[–]pk_atheist 1 points [recovered] [recovered]  (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm dying to see the original

[–]OlearysCow1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm trying to find it. damned reddit search is a piece of shit. the text in the original post is literally word for word, just with the genders transposed.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

You can't find it because I deleted it. I was the original author. I definitely did not get very much support in that post, ha ha. Post stealer :P

[–]pk_atheist 2 points [recovered] [recovered]  (1 child) | Copy Link

I tried googling it, to no avail

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

same here. I've got do idea how to find it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

I've just found most people in any subreddit, sans ones like im going to hell for this, are very sensitive and will jump on words or phrases THEY deem offensive.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot of those guys there aren't there to get advice. They want women to tell them comforting lies. (no, we don't care about how much money you make. no, the size of your dick doesn't matter. no, we don't like to date jerks.)

Freud with his defense mechanisms would have a fucking FIELD DAY at this forum. They will say whatever makes them seem less shallow, more loving than men.

[–]itsmehobnob2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

This is an interesting idea, but, it wont go anywhere. You'll get ad hominem "arguments" exclusively.

[–]squarehouse2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

The key is to ask questions in a way that doesn't provoke indignation. That's something you'll see in the women-oriented subs (or women-oriented media), is that women love indignation, and they are offended easily. It doesn't matter what the "truth" is, women are more interested in how offensive a proposition than if it is true.

It's basically solipsism of intellect. The primary concern of a proposition is "How does it make me feel?" Women will avoid reading things that make them feel lousy, and cherish things that make them feel good.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2024. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter