Dark Theme


271,050 posts archived

789

TLDR: When woman get put head to head with men, the truth comes out and it's a painful truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw&app=desktop

Thought this was a very interesting video, the men work together and build a cafe on the beach and the woman hadn't even built shelter yet and were busy sat stealing from each other. So much for feminism and girl power. Men seem to constantly be portrayed as useless by the media but when you put woman and men head to head the truth becomes painfully obvious.

There were also other posts here following bear grylls the island when he put woman and men head to head and a similar thing occurred.

Lessons learned: Men are not inferior to woman as feminism tries to make out.

Edit: http://i.imgur.com/i6gKGp3.jpg Found this image too thought it was funny so I'll include it.

Edit2: Apparently the USA version also had similar results.


[–]Asoka11111 148 points148 points [recovered]

I know this is a repost, but I do always appreciate this reminder.

[–]Linoran 37 points38 points  (11 children)

You sure? Because there's this one and it's the one with Bear Grylls. The women fuck up pretty badly in both.

[–][deleted] 63 points64 points  (4 children)

Although the women actually do come out on top in the Dutch 2006 season. See youtube: expeditie robinson 2006.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Solid post. Why do you think the men performed so poorly in that case? Was it a poor sample? Or something else?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

They probably selectively choose tougher women and bitchier men to get this outcome.

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If this episode was aired after the one where the women failed miserably, then that is likely true. They probably selected pussy beta males and awesome females to even it out after that first episode.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they choose nothing but alphas for the male team? since nothing can get done if there are too many alphas and not enough betas.

[–]Asoka11111 9 points9 points [recovered]

Yeah, I've seen very in-depth descriptions of both.

[–]1 Endorsed Contributormordanus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this one has been posted about 4 times now that I've seen. I love it. I talk about this from time and really enjoy the comments each time it gets brought up. Men are constantly told how awful we are and how much better the world would be without us. If women ruled the world there would be peace and food and blah blah blah blah. Then we see things like this and it clicks with men how valuable we are as individuals and as a group and it lights a fire in them. I honestly love seeing this reposted.

[–]jolly--roger 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Sure about what? whether this is a repost?

[–]rpreader 182 points183 points  (13 children)

they approved of a merger.

They reverted to making the men do all the work yet again, except this time the men had no choice and weren't even getting holes for it

[–]ProudRedPill 41 points41 points [recovered]

"They APPROVED of a merger."

as if they had a fucking choice regrading the matter and were kind enough to allow the other team to merge with them

[–]Francois_Rapiste 24 points25 points  (2 children)

deleted What is this?

[–]rpreader 19 points20 points  (1 child)

"Man we suck at this. Lets make the men do it.

Yay guurrrrl power!"

[–]SilentForTooLong 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They get their way. They get to do nothing, while reaping all the rewards. The only thing viewing this did for me was make me wish I was lucky enough to be born female.

[–]Stormcrownn 12 points13 points  (7 children)

I mean, aside from the obvious that's not nice...

One of those two groups accomplished the goal.

In survivor the objective is to win.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (6 children)

and why did the men just not MGTOW on the island with the women then?

[–]updock 15 points16 points  (4 children)

They don't in society why would they in fake society?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

The logical thing would be to keep their barter system? If the women are incompetent and lazy there's something they can do with no effort at all.

[–]rpreader 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The fake survival show wasn't going to let them ?

[–]magus678 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I chose those words (when I posted it yesterday) because I felt like it was more compelling. I guess the reposter agreed as he didn't change a thing.

I wanted people to actually watch the video, and that seemed a better way.

[–]rossiFan 38 points39 points  (2 children)

Like every office in Corporate America, the women backstab and gossip and criticize until their effectiveness at completing anything is eroded to zero.

[–]PowerValve 12 points12 points [recovered]

Yep, the only thing they accomplish is organizing annoying Luncheons/Potlucks, which for some stupid ass reason scores high points when annual reviews come around.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is that pesto? Is that pesto in your omelette?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imZ52DHBtug

edit: forgot link

[–]ktchong 63 points64 points  (10 children)

Here is a clip from the USA version of a Battle of the Sexes season of Survivor: Survivor: One World - Men vs Women (i.e., the second half of the video shows the difference of male vs female's shelter situations.) Got a similar outcome.

Here is another clip, this time from the UK version of a Battle of the Sexes season: Survivor UK Women vs Men and Part 2: Update. Got a similar outcome, again.

But, Survivor is not a game about working together to build shelters. The game can have only one winner. Ultimately, Survivor is a game of elimination, of backstabbing and double-crossing. Which is what women thrive at. So, in the Battle of the Sexes seasons, more often than not, a woman end up winning in the end.

[–]ktchong 110 points111 points  (9 children)

BTW, in that clip of the Survivor: One World, the women had made a deal with the men: the two tribes would hunt and forage together, and share whatever food they could find. In return, the men would build a shelter for the women. I know, that sounds like a really rotten deal for the men, but the men agreed to it.

Of course, as we see in the clip, the women and men worked together to chase, surround and catch two chicken. The women immediately took both chicken and said they would decide which one to give to the men... but the women never did. The women took off with both chicken and ate both. They cheated the men out of the chicken and broke their agreement. So the men refused to build a shelter for the women. However, when it rained, the women (without a full shelter) went over to the men's camp and used the men's shelter. They took advantage of the men, again. That is just how women roll.

[–]PowerValve 38 points38 points [recovered]

Get a load of that White Knight who agrees to allow the women to come warm up at the men's camp.

"They said my name"

No, she did not. She said "Hey boys"

That Matt guy is seems Red Pill as fuck though. I remember watching this season and I think after 4 episodes they combined the camps because the women were getting destroyed.

[–]HettGutt 5 points6 points  (4 children)

Actually, the combined camps twist started on Day 1. US Survivor had already done Men vs Women twice (Seasons 6 & 9). Each time went as you would expect, until the tribes were shuffled. Also as expected, the men who ended up at the ex-female-only-tribe beach are appalled at the state of the camp. My guess is that producers came up with the combined camp twist so the women wouldn't have to be put through the laborious difficulty of having to fend for themselves.

Season 9, Vanuatu, is a very good watch, and rewatching it a few years ago was one of my earliest RP moments.

[–]PowerValve 6 points6 points [recovered]

I would pay good money to watch a real life experiment of Men VS Women in a survival situation with ZERO interference (unless its medical).

[–]HettGutt 1 point2 points  (2 children)

The Island with Bear Grylls, Season 2.

[–]Rathadin 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Where these fucking beta bitches screwed up is letting them into the shelter in the first place... I'd have said, "Oh yeah, sure you can come hang out in my shelter... its one blow job per woman, and if you want to sleep on my leaf bed, it'll cost a fuck."

And every guy should have said the same thing.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women sound like they are amazingly superior to men in every way in that case. Fuck.

[–]BlackHeart89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like the men were a bunch of bitches to me. Can't fault the women for that. I fault them for taking the chickens, but not for the shelter.

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."

[–]LionLaw 59 points60 points  (11 children)

That entire video looked like a group of children whining and bitching while their daddies solved all their problems. How fucking sad

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (9 children)

Sad?... What's sad about doing nothing, and getting other people to serve you like you are a master for doing nothing?

You mean it's sad because you are male, and watching this makes it obvious how much of a tragedy it is to be born male? If so, then yes, I agree.

[–]LionLaw 3 points4 points  (7 children)

It's sad because it shows just how completely useless women really are.
I'm extremely thankful to be born a man, our capacity to achieve is so much higher than that of women

[–]SilentForTooLong -1 points0 points  (6 children)

Huh? Those are some serious mental gymnastics you're doing there lol

[–]LionLaw 0 points1 point  (5 children)

How so? What would those women do if a man was not around or was unwilling to get her shit done for her?
I'm happy to be a man that has the capacity to get shit done instead of a whiny useless cunt that has to rely on other people to make things happen.

[–]SilentForTooLong 1 point2 points  (4 children)

There will never not be men around. It's like asking "what if the species stops existing?" well, idk, but it won't affect you at all, so it's not relevant to bring up.

You just sound like you're rationalizing the situation. Women have the power to make men do whatever they desire. I would rather have the power to get people to give me or build whatever I want a million times over than just the ability to put work into something.

How do you even cope knowing that your only purpose for existing is to put hard work into things just to build the dreams of the people you are calling "whiny useless cunts"? They literally own you, hah.

[–]LionLaw 0 points1 point  (3 children)

You realize women only "own" men for a very brief period of their lifespans right? Between the ages of 18-35 at BEST do women have the looks necessary to manipulate men into doing shit for them, and that is entirely contingent upon them being very attractive and the man in question being pathetic enough to fall for her ploys.
Women don't own me at all, I don't do a fucking thing for them if it does not directly benefit me more, so don't compare me to thirsty beta trash like yourself that would lick your mothers vagina for a whiff of pussy.
I am a man with the ability to build my own dreams for MYSELF, and will be able to enjoy a life and body I am proud to have earned through years of dedication and hard work. If you are content to live an unambitious and unmeaningful life that is set to expire the moment your looks do, then you live a pitiful life I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy

[–]SilentForTooLong 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Jeez man, at least be honest... women have the looks from like 12-45, at least. And relatively speaking, the women that age are still dealing with men that are aging, and those men are still bound by the women in their lives. Yeah in a wider social scope women might lose it, but not in a relative scope. It's a bit dishonest to suggest otherwise. We've all seen this in action. Just because men's wives turn 35+ they don't stop listening to them hah.

"the man in question being pathetic enough to fall for her ploys."

Well, 99.9% of men are that type of pathetic, so it's not really worth discussing if you want to pretend like the wildcard 0.01% are really "all men".

Women don't need to go out and do any work to build their dreams, their dreams just come true for them. I guess you can rationalize it and say it's better for you since you "got to do the work", kind of like Tom Sawyer got the other boys to say they "really liked painting Tom's fence". Personally, I'd rather be Tom Sawyer than the suckers painting his fence. We all acknowledge that Tom was the superior one, so why do we not acknowledge that women are the superior group when they do that en mass every day?

I'm sure if you could manipulate people so simply into giving you everything you desire you would... since you can't you rationalize that you prefer it the hard way. Just seems like bullshit to me.

The fact that you feel the need to reduce the topic to ad hominems reveals that you are doing nothing but drowning in your own bullshit. I guess I hope you've at least gotten used to the smell =/ I'm just trying to look at the world objectively.

[–]LionLaw -1 points0 points  (1 child)

You're not a man. You can be male but no real man would want to be something that is that far beneath him.

[–]BlackHeart89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its sad because it shows how women just sit and whine and seek help from others. If they were capable of doing it themselves, then they would have.

Its also sad that so many men just roll over and take it. They encourage this weak shit child-like mentality.

[–][deleted] 75 points76 points  (9 children)

This article was posted somewhere in the comments as well, which I thought was super interesting. Basically a woman who talks about the "male run media business" and "boys club" that is the modern film industry decides to create Utopian female-only production company with top talent, only for it to tear itself to shreds from the inside out much in the exact way you would imagine. AT least as a kudos to her (the author) she admits that she should probably NEVER hire women again (literally says, if she did again, she would only hire men).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html#ixzz3fQjEJVTH

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 38 points39 points  (5 children)

In this climate, I didn't dare employ any men because of the distraction and - even worse! - catfights they created.  

Imagine employing only men and telling women who applied that you can't hire them because the men would flirt with them or fight over them.

[–]truchisoft 38 points39 points  (4 children)

Oh wait, didn't a Nobel laureate say that a month ago?

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 34 points35 points  (3 children)

Oh wait, didn't a Nobel laureate say that a month ago?

Yes... yes he did but not nearly as bad as this article.

Said in a joking way, as requested before his presentation.

The media that is run by the patriarchy totally sided with him, and because of his male privelege nothing was said. Oh wait.... no... the exact fucking opposite

[–]snakeob 18 points18 points [recovered]

Actually what he said was completely taken out of context, it was a joke and reflection on this life, after dating his lab assistant who was married at the time and later marrying her himself.

Its actually a really fucked up situation. As they told his wife to tell him he was fired.

[–]wanderer779 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I didn't know about the last part. Telling his wife to tell him - that is some grade school shit.

That situation was insane. An entire career thrown down the toilet and a great man dishonored because of a joke. And from what I heard the joke actually went over well and the people in the audience didn't even care because they knew there was no disrespect intended.

[–]The_Ralph 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Nice cleavage, too. Good grief, the attention-whoring never stops!!

[–]NightGod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I read the other day that Sienna Miller had said there was no such thing as 'the Sisterhood', I knew what she meant.

AKA: Women help each other like crabs in a bucket.

[–][deleted] 67 points68 points  (6 children)

Call me old fashioned, but if I thought I might be booted off while my hard earned labor went to support those who didn't do jack shit, I'd wakeup in the middle of the night and lay waste to the settlement. Preferably by torching everything, that way they won't be able to reuse the same materials.

Russian style during the war against the French when they gave up Moscow. It's good to know history and use it to your advantage.

[–]reddumpling 26 points27 points  (2 children)

We're taught to destroy the shelters we built in the jungle as well for this exact reason.

[–]Red_Shirt_Blue_Pants 43 points44 points  (1 child)

Idk about you lot, but I'd masturbate furiously everywhere and leave my seed on as many things as possible. So when I got voted off, I could watch with my mates and say, " EY LOOK! She's taking a sip of water with MY coconut cup. Little does she know theres a little more nut than coco!"

[–]billcosbyeatsbabies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aye aye aye ay ay ayye wots all dis then mate? You spunkaloogin' in tha cocahnuts arr yah??

[–]Dopamine37 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Gotta love scorched earth policy.

Unrelated but a French soldier said "when I saw what the Russians were capable of doing to their own people I knew we didn't stand a chance"

[–]account_rp 39 points40 points  (17 children)

With all of this talk of men effectively working together and women backstabbing and gossiping. I surely can't be the only guy here who has had experiences dealing with shitty guys who constantly lie, gossip, backstab, don't pull their weight, etc. In the corporate world that shit is rewarded.

edit. Lots of guys like that in work, school and social life.

[–]anonsc1 27 points28 points  (2 children)

I work with someone exactly like that. Gossips, backstabs, pawns work on other people and takes the credit as his own, constant one-up-manship with entirely ridiculous additions (think the battle chess queen duck scenario times a million), etc. All around a worthless piece of shit. I can't think of one single reason this guy should be allowed to live another day on this earth with decent people. The guy is promoted and receives praises about as often as I take a shit.

In case you're wondering he works for the federal gov't. Ever wonder why the OPM breach happened? Why over 20 million people's information was let into the hands of hackers? People exactly like this fucking dickless faggot I work with. Past a certain point it's mostly ass-kissing and office politics. You evidently need few skills to make it in an engineering role. It's mostly being a piece of shit.

Sorry, needed to rant.

[–]SilentForTooLong 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do people take credit for work they don't do? Aren't names attached to shit? Don't people have specific job roles/assignments/skills etc??

[–]PowerValve 19 points19 points [recovered]

I'd say that maybe 2/10 men are gossiping, backstabbing, lazy, etc.... , where as 8/10 women are like that.

[–]Red_Shirt_Blue_Pants 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Idk man....here in the states it's much closer than that.

[–]1twinyix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd argue it's because most men in the states are highly feminized.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

These are men raised by women to be like women.

A man raised to be a man by men would get his ass kicked pulling shit like that.

[–]MarvelousWhale 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Can vouch for this fact. But it is essentially the man acting like a woman when he does this. Either way, its true.

[–]1CowardlyPetrov 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can you also see the connection the feminization of men?

[–]Ketaminewarrior 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Apparently construction is a huge bitch fight, can anyone confirm?

[–]Rathadin 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I can't say from first-hand experience, but its pretty telling that every man I know from high school that went on to work in a construction-type industry is kind of a beta bitch who acts alpha...

There's a guy who's calling everyone and everything gay, constantly, and always talking about how someone's a fag...

Then there's a guy who married a broad who had two kids before she met him...

But I get it... construction is not glamorous. Even if you are making $60,000 a year, there's a stigma to blue collar work for a man nowadays, and I see it all the time.

Khaki slacks and a thin button-down shirt are no match for a three piece suit... the businessman look will win every time.

[–]TheGurw 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I've always found that as a tradesman I may only make $90k/yr (only a third year apprentice) but I can carry myself with confidence knowing I did an honest day's work. Apparently that works for women. Never had an issue getting a "temporary roommate" as my buddies call them.

And I usually wear my work clothes to the pub. They're comfy and easy to wash if someone pukes on them. Thick denim (Carhart brand) jeans and a light tee usually.

Anyway, you get a lot of betas in the trades, yes, but I think it's more a result of society here and the whole "real men don't _____ " movement that's going around. Annoys the shit outta me. Regardless, having also been an office drone on occasion (between contracts they bring apprentices to the office to do busy work so they don't have to rehire them later), I can say without a doubt the office is easily 10x worse for that drama shit. Out on the site, I'm given a task, and if I don't complete it in the time allotted, I either have a really good reason (there's a crane parked on my access hatch) or I get in shit. And the same applies to the women. No special treatment here. Pull your weight or take the heat.

I actually think the few women on site with me hate the office drama the same way the guys do. Yes, AWALT and all that, but I'd actually be surprised if one of them came up and asked for a favor with a sexy smile.

[–]physics-teacher 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I may only make $90k/yr

haha, that's an objectively high income unless you're somewhere with insane costs of living (maybe San Francisco or NYC). Just curious, what is your trade?

[–]TheGurw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm an electrician working in the Alberta oil industry. Cost of living isn't particularly high, but the average wage is. I also work 12+ hour days up to 24 days in a row (followed by 4 days off), which is why my income seems high but my wage really isn't. I just do a lot of overtime and work a lot of days. If I do a whole year of 12 hour 24&4's my salary is higher (I personally call it potential green) but after three rotations of that I'm pretty burned out and usually take a couple months off.

[–]unassumingusername7 15 points16 points  (8 children)

Why did the men approve the merger?

[–]ktchong 28 points29 points  (6 children)

Merger is part of the game. The game eliminates one player or "castaway" at a time, (i.e., the tribes compete in a different "challenge" every three days; the tribe that lose the challenge would have go to a "tribal council" and vote out one of their members.) After enough castaways are eliminated, the tribes merge to become one. Then the game become an individual competition. Individual castaways make alliances and vote decisions based on lies and deceits. That is when women - with their advantages at scheming and backstabbing and double-crossing - begin to thrive in the game.

The first part of the game, before the merge or "pre-merge", is about working together as a tribe to defeat the other tribe in challenges, which is what men are good at. The second part of the game, after the merge or "post-merge", is about staying the game for as long as possible as an individual in an alliance or multiple alliances by using lies, deceits, manipulations and whatever means necessary, which is what women are good at. In the "Battle of the Sexes" seasons in which tribes are divided along the gender line, men usually dominate the pre-merge game but falter in post-merge game. I believe Survivor (the USA version) has had three Battle of the Sexes seasons. In all those three seasons, men dominated the pre-merge games, but in the end a woman ended up winning the game through her (in Survivor lingo) "social game" aka backstabbing, double-crossing, lying, manipulating, which is really the most entertaining elements of the show.

[–]1sardinemanR 50 points51 points  (4 children)

Men build society, then get devalued and lose out. Sounds about right.

[–]ktchong 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Here is a very common strategy for women to win the game:

Find a strong man (an "alpha") and ride his "coattail". In Survivor terms, those women are called "coattail riders". Then, when the alpha and coattail rider are near the end of the game, when she is done using him, (usually at the Final Two, Three or Four,) she finds a way to get rid of him or even convince him to let her win. Famous examples of coattail riders who won Survivor in the US are:

  • Tina from Season 2 (who rode Coby's coattail;)

  • Amber (who rode Rob's and ended up marrying him;)

  • Parvati Shallow, Seductress Supreme and the Queen of Coattails, (she was in a few different Survivor games, and rode different coattails with different players in different games; absolutely useless in practical survival skills, helping out at the camp and winning challenges, but ruthless in her "social game".)

In early seasons, coattail riding was the most common strategy employed by female winners of Survivor. (Female castaways usually, but not always, combined coattail riding with another strategy, "under the radar".) However, I've heard that many female contestants in later seasons, due to being conscious of women's reputation on the show and afraid of being called "coattail riders", are reluctant to use that strategy. They do not want to show women in a bad light on national TV. Also, male castaways have become wary of coattail riders after having seen female coattail-riders winning a number of seasons. So coattail riding may no longer be as effective as it was. I have not watched Survivor in many years, so I do not know if female castaways still ride coattails or if they use a different strategy to win nowadays.

[–]Midas_Warchest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a series a few years back (I can't remember which one exactly) where the woman made a pack to get all the men out: this was with something like 9 players left and 5 women. They had the numbers and systematically voted each male out until only they were left. It was actually a good strategy to get out the stronger, more challenge capable people (i.e. the people that could win immunity).

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well at least the one actually married the guy I guess...

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say women are vastly superior to men given this.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is a lovely illustration of a rule I mentioned before. Men evolved to extract value from their environment: women evolved to extract value from men.

We talk about the women lacking survival skills, but manipulating men is a survival skill. When the men and women are on separate islands, naturally the women tend not to do well, because that is not the situation they evolved to excel in. When not living together in a tribe, if a group had to go out and explore new territory, it was a group of men who did that, not a group of women. But once you put the two together, then women can easily get the upper hand unless the men are aware. The problem now is that men have forgotten all this (aside from TRP), we have had a few generations raised on the Disney Women are Wonderful stuff, and so are ripe for picking.

But, women have overplayed their hand when they came up with feminism. This is pissing off men bigtime because it is so blatant even dumbasses can see it. So, the cycle turns...

[–]PlayerXz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Basically they had no idea the female camp was such a mess.

[–]Rhenthalin 53 points54 points  (8 children)

It finally made the front page.

[–]ferengiprophet 37 points38 points  (5 children)

I think the tides are turning in our favor. I was able to post some RP stuff using our terminology on default subs and actually got upvoted.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Even though I don't really care for around 40% of the terminology, it will spread. Why? Because sometimes it's easier to say ASD than to say "you know when a girl really wants to fuck, but feels like she can't fuck, so she kind of puts up a front?" Language always permeates. Even if people don't approve of the source.

[–]1 TRP SupporterFred_Flintstone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ive noticed signs of the pendulum swinging the other way too. Next 5 years are going to be fun

[–]reddumpling 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Taking one for the team man

[–]ferengiprophet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not really. In the grand scheme of things, imaginary internet points don't mean a thing but I have been able to collect a lot of them by posting about TRP

[–]magus678 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It made the front page yesterday, when I posted it. This guy totally ripped it off word for word

[–]HitlersCow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this is...bad? I'd call it a good thing that people are spreading ideas you agree with.

You seem upset that he "stole" your intangible internet points or something

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 34 points35 points  (6 children)

Women are not for getting shit done. Women are for fucking and making more people.

And the only reason you're not hearing this everywhere is that people are afraid to say it.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedPillDad 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Notice that look of lust on the girl's face at 4:55? She hadn't seen a man in a while, and stared at him like he was Zeus. Demonstrates this law: in the land of the pussy, the one-eyed snake is king.

[–]Rathadin 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I had to pause the video when I got to that point... the dude has the, "I'm gonna fuck this bitch..." face, and the woman has the, "God I hope he fucks me" face on.

Too. funny.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they allowed to fuck on the show?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (1 child)

It sounds fucking horrible to hear even when you know that is an evolutionary fact.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's cruel, but the cruelty is not exclusive to women. Genes are harsh masters. They use for for their own ends, and don't particularly care if anything is left of us afterwards.

Women being baby machines is not really any crueler than men being disposable fighters and and workhorses.

Still, if we manage our behaviour carefully, striking a balance between letting the wild horse run, and steering where it runs with our intellect, we can have lives that are worth living.

[–]DysfunctionalBrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truer words were never spoken. I think some women realize this, but they are in denial because of feminism.

[–]Starcruiser28 31 points31 points [recovered]

Like it at the end when these twats admit to the fact that they provide no real value to the camp. One of them admits it, that woman provide no value to advancing the civilization, they take but usually do not give.

They were all looking for validation from the men, did you see that? Why couldn't they contribute to fixing the camp? They could of asked for direction and assisted in fixing things up, hauling shit away, etc... but no they want to stand around and do nothing but flap their lips.

This really shows their value....

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedPillDad 41 points42 points  (2 children)

The guy hasn't even stepped out of the boat and they proudly tell him, "We've already created a to-do list for you." Then soon after, "While Raymond toils, the women blather on about there new hero." He was cleaning up their mess while they sunbathed. He didn't seem thrilled about his role (2:45 to 3:07).

In another recent post, someone talked about the manliness of fixing shit. Protect your time and resources. Getting tooled by any woman you aren't fucking is a sucker's move. She'll sing your praises while keeping you stuck doing endless mundane shit for her.

[–]PlayerXz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly it's a shame that it doesn't have subtitles for the others around here.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was sent there as a slave though... same with the woman to the men's island. They were losers of some previous challenge.

[–]The_Ralph 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Like it at the end when these twats admit to the fact that they provide no real value to the camp.

FYI to all, this is at about the 14 minute mark, put it at 13:45 to see the lead up. Good stuff, especially when another woman actually says, Don't talk like that! Then the first one says, But it's true!

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opposite members were given to the camps explicitly as "slaves" though for losing some challenges... so doesn't it make sense to use your slave, as a slave in some sense?

[–]magus678 19 points20 points  (2 children)

I'm actually the guy that posted it yesterday in TIL, and got it big. It hit like 4k karma and 2k comments yesterday. I guess I should be flattered.

Of course, if won't show up in a search as the mods ripped it down, but it still exists if you check my post history

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

SJW bullshit strikes reddit again!

[–]lemerou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean they ripped it down?

[–]NotRoosterTeeth 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I love how it was reposted on Tumblr and somehow they turned it into Male Privlage

[–]through_a_ways 22 points23 points  (14 children)

Not surprising. Women are literally afraid of doing new things.

[–]NidStyles 14 points15 points  (13 children)

"Women are afraid of doing things."

[–]through_a_ways 34 points35 points  (12 children)

Women like doing things that are "approved" by others. Just like with men, inanimate objects and habits also need social desirability.

This is why they get great grades, but ultimately flounder in the job market, and are virtually nonexistent in innovation. Innovation needs inherent interest, high intelligence, high self confidence, and a total lack of concern for others' approval. Women are highly deficient in all these traits.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

ESPECIALLY the lack of concerns for others approval. I work my main job and am launching a separate business on the side. It takes a ton of work and while my male friends look up to me about it my women friends simply just do not get it. Women care about social standing above all. They aren't idea people

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apple, microspft, google, tinder, instagram, youtube, twitter....all started by men. You are correct

[–]NidStyles -5 points-4 points  (5 children)

"Women are afraid of doing things."

Says's that without the endless banter. They as individuals can not do anything. So they are afraid of doing things.

[–]TheGurw 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Forget as individuals. The evidence shows that collectively they can't do anything either.

[–]NidStyles -1 points0 points  (3 children)

They collectively took over the country.

[–]TheGurw 0 points1 point  (2 children)

They can't even agree on that. I honestly think they accidentally confused themselves so badly that it started wearing off on the men around them and a few bright ones stumbled their way to convincing the rest to keep it up.

[–]NidStyles 1 point2 points  (1 child)

They actively manipulate men to do their bidding, what makes you think they are not organized at a higher level?

Every ardent college level Marxist/Feminist I have dealt with is on that level of manipulation and deception. To assume that they don't actively procure agendas through their think tanks is to ignore that they established feminist focused think tanks for a reason. It certainly wasn't to promote breast cancer awareness either.

That these think tanks do not speak out when one of their own goes off on a crazy spree tell's me everything I need to know. Silence is a form of tacit support for women. Remember, AWALT, and that makes them predictable.

[–]TheGurw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough opinion. I respectfully disagree.

[–]SilentForTooLong -1 points0 points  (3 children)

There are women out there with intelligence and tons of self confidence... seems to me like most women have way too much self confidence. So not sure what you mean on those grounds? If your average man had as much self confidence as your average women, nearly all men would be alphas lol

[–]through_a_ways 0 points1 point  (2 children)

If your average man had as much self confidence as your average women, nearly all men would be alphas lol

No they wouldn't, they would be desperately overcompensating losers.

Women aren't self confident, but many of them try to outwardly appear self confident.

The one exception would be in the realm of dating, where women are about 100x more adept than men, so the sheer mathematics necessitates that they be self confident.

[–]SilentForTooLong -1 points0 points  (1 child)

What is the difference? If you manage to fake something to the entire world...that's about as good as it gets.

The whole world is dating for women...isn't it? Why wouldn't that insane self confidence translate to everywhere else?

[–]through_a_ways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Confidence can be intrinsically or extrinsically derived.

Women get a lot of the latter (social validation), men get the former (testosterone).

If you're trying to come up with something new, and you inevitably hear dozens of people telling you it's a waste of time, you will believe what they say if you derive your confidence from your environment, rather than from within yourself.

[–][deleted] 6 points6 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]Red_Shirt_Blue_Pants 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Idk man, needs to be posted like 3 more times so I can translate the credits....

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I've read of this in the past and proceeded to watch a couple 'survival' shows. Most of them lack true survival and are essentially soap operas or put participants in stupidly harsh conditions for very short periods.

Survivor- the most popular one - was painful to watch. They don't need to make anything besides fire for a day - then they get a firestarter -, have clothes washed for them and the whole thing is about who is gonna vote who at the end, the entire show consisted of people scheming to not get voted out next turn. watching men do this was disgusting. In a season(twenty-something I believe), it was separated by gender for a couple weeks in the beginning but they were next to each other... The couple alphas were instantly voted out and the woman who was nice to everybody won in the end. lmao.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Back in the day it was depressing as fuck to watch. Everyone looked like they were starving, they were filthy and tattered up. They were eating rats at one point. I dont doubt they either got sued or faced enough liability that they softened things up a lot. I could also see that they might have done it to improve ratings with women. They want things to be nice and clean all the time.

[–]TRPApprentice 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Well, duh, all women have done since Biblical times is leach of the epic creations of the superior man. It is easier to destroy than its to create and women are specialized destroyers. Who built the pyramids? Men! Who built the Lighthouse of Alexandria? Men! Who built America? Men! Who is destroying the world? Women

[–]TheGurw 3 points4 points  (2 children)

America isn't exactly something to be proud of in its current state. Just gonna point that one out.

[–]TRPApprentice 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Heh, you'll get no argument from me on that one. I love my country, but I'll be damned if I say America is perfect

[–]real-boethius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well women have had the vote for a while. There is a lot of ruin in a country but they are working on it.

[–]Sir_Shitlord_focker 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Left to their own devices, women would still be living in caves. I know that to be true.

[–]PowerValve 6 points6 points [recovered]

Not a chance, they wouldn't dare go into a cave and chase out whatever is living in there first. They'd likely try and take shelter under a tree.

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 3 points4 points  (1 child)

"If a man could fuck a woman on a cardboard box he wouldn't BUY a house!"

-Dave Chappelle

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (13 children)

Men are in no way inferior to women. Even with the full weight of society brought against them, men still excel in many cases. If it werent for men, women would still be living in caves if they werent totally extinct.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (12 children)

Women have gotten men to be their slaves and give them everything they desire while doing nothing...... doesn't exactly seem like how I think of an inferior class to me. Sure as hell sounds like the master class to me.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (11 children)

By that logic cats are superior also. I would put women more in the category of parasite.

[–]SilentForTooLong -1 points0 points  (10 children)

Cats are superior to...whom?

Parasites with more money and power than you are usually called masters of you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (9 children)

To people. Women exploit the backing of society to take resources from men. That makes them parasites. If they were truly superior they wouldn't have to take from men, they'd have their own. But that's how I view superior.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (8 children)

Once you take something from someone it becomes yours...no?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Uh no. After I raped you it becomes consensual? Nope, its a crime and the only change is if you make sufficient restitution. I dont buy that possession is 9/10 of the law crap.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Well, how else does capitalism work? You have to take things from others to get anything at all...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Taking from others is more like socialism or communism.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (4 children)

How the hell does capitalism work then?...

[–]Alarid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They selected specific women for the show for their looks, not their intelligence or skills. But I want to see what would happen if they used industrial women (doctors and scientists) and put them in the same situation.

If it's the exact same results, I'd laugh my ass off.

[–]ABProsper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shockingly I saw this very same Red Pill think on an episode of Family Guy called Forget Me Not) I guess its a court jesters privilege to tell the truth

[–]NightGod 1 point2 points  (1 child)

How is nobody commenting on the absolute beauty of the phrase "queefing out books" in the article?

[–]Icanus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After building a little civilization, men got the shorter end of the stick.
I saw this on live television many years ago and I remember how much those lazy bitches pissed me off.
That might actually have been the time I got my Red Pill!

[–]toysjoe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of off topic but I work at an elevator company taking calls.

Building managers and superintendents call us and ask for the "service department" if their elevator breaks down.

Our mechanics call in and ask for the "Dispatch Department" to speak to a dispatcher about details for their next job.

Occasionally people who call for service ask for dispatch so we always ask them "are you a mechanic"?

The women that call would answer "uh no" in this voice like I'm fucking retarded. I know every one of our mechanics. They're men.

In my head I'm just thinking "where's the feminists fighting for equal representation for females to be elevator mechanics"? Where's the women can do anything men can?

Oh that's right you actually have to get off your ass and into an elevator shaft.

Men make this world go round and it has always been for their children and women. Now that the women aren't worth it and children are not being had or taken away from them, it is time to sit back and enjoy the decline.

[–]SilentForTooLong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So long as we're embracing reality...a producer did explain that they specifically chose women that were clueless and men that were more capable as a way of kind of manufacturing this outcome.

I mean, it's is still a television show after all. Reality TV is still a Hollywood facade.

Not saying it's necessarily 100% bullshit, no ties to reality at all... but there's a grain of salt to swallow with this I imagine.

[–]alezit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men work together when women aren't around, if women are around they rather help women instead. It's psychology

[–]Eurasianpersuasion01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really a fan of the women bashing ITT. I think it's obvious that the men would come out on top. In a harsh environment, male physicality and logical thinking will win out. The survival game plays to the men's strengths.

What I think would be a more interesting social experiment would be putting in a mix of young, single men and women on the same island + contraception(?). That's where the most interesting social dynamics would begin to surface. It would be an environment much more conducive to female success.

[–]Rougepellet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feminists are pretty fucking stupid to think they come override thousands of years of evolution and societal traditions simply by bitching. We have already biologically adapted according to our gender roles, trying to suddenly change it is fucking us over. Imagine if In a lion pride the males took on the roles of the females of hunting on packs caring for their young. Then the females took on the role of leading the pride and defending from other lions. Both parties would be poorly equipped to handle it and the herd would be damned.

Want to download the post?
×
Download PDF Download TXT