New York Magazine's cuckold probably a spinster's hoax.

dr_warlock · 2015-07-24T15:10:32+00:00

I once had a summer job at a breakfast stand and got bored. To pass the time, I started trying to sell customers whipped cream on their eggs. At first I just tried going to them with a normal sales pitch but they all thought it seemed unappealing and had absolutely no idea why I was trying to sell them such crappy dish. I wisened up pretty quick and changed my approach. Instead of selling to customers, I just offered it as if it was normal. Someone would order a breakfast sandwich and I'd just ask, "Whipped cream?" and then call out "Breakfast sandwich, no whipped cream." At first I got weird looks but eventually my coworkers got sick of my shit and stopped reacting. They treated my behavior as mundane and ordinary because it was.

When customers saw this, all they saw was some bored kid with an offer he seemed to think was normal and they saw nobody reacting weirdly. My customers were also repeat customers mostly so they saw this day in and day out. When they asked about it, I didn't try to sell. I just said it was really really popular. I'd normalized egg sandwiches with whipped cream. After a while, a few brave customers ordered the abomination of a sandwich themselves. Now, the sandwich made a mess and probably tasted like shit so we didn't sell too many and nobody ordered it twice, but I did get people to buy that sandwich by presenting the illusion that it was normal. That's what this magazine writer's doing with cuckolding. She's presenting it as normal and trying to alter public consciousness. She's not saying "Hey men, do this!" because she knows she can't argue it any better than I could argue egg sandwiches with whipped cream. She's just saying, "Hey guys, it's normal".

Btw, I plugged this into a gender analysis. It's a tough call to make if this is a hoax or not because it's a cross between formal/informal writing and those gender analyzers are only so reliable, but Heartiste's theory isn't too unlikely.

FLFTW16 · 2015-07-24T14:43:33+00:00

I thought "ocean of red wine" was the biggest give away. Not even the biggest cum guzzling faggot would write that particular phrase. Good catch!

PaulAJK · 2015-07-24T17:44:59+00:00

"if she only likes sex with her husband or boyfriend, she’s boring and lame..."

No husband or boyfriend in the entire history of the world has ever thought this. Obvious fake.

Stayinghereforreal · 2015-07-24T14:41:28+00:00

"Paolo?" Seriously?

That alone made me start laughing. The rest quickly then identifies as a knowing nod to places like this. The thing is what someone here would write as satire. My bet is this is just that, and not a true first person account.

MattyAnon · 2015-07-24T15:06:30+00:00

Monogamy meant I controlled her sexual expression

Yup. In exchange for the man's commitment. To get married and then declare it a trap is a bait and switch.

It's a bait and switch because having made the exchange (sexual fidelity in exchange for commitment) ... keep the commitment and cancel the sexual fidelity. No-fault divorce enables this and removes the man's option to cancel his side of the deal.

This is classic Briffault's law. The man now has no choice but to continue the financial commitment, therefore his side of the deal and indeed the man himself is now expendable.

Remember gentleman... it's not about what you bring to the table, it's about your control over what you bring to the table, and your other options. Never give up control, never give up your options.

SouthernPetite · 2015-07-24T16:50:26+00:00

If a woman likes sex, she’s a whore and a slut; if she only likes sex with her husband or boyfriend, she’s boring and lame; if she doesn’t like sex at all, she’s frigid and unfeeling.

I've said this in another post, but this line, with the exception of the third part, is complete bullshit. Even churches encourage an active sex life (within marriage of course).

If women enjoying sex was frowned upon by society, we would hear people comment on it regularly enough to know it's a taboo (after all, social norms are useless if hardly anyone is aware of them), yet I have failed to ever hear anyone state that position or know anyone else who has.

They conflate enjoyment of sex with promiscuity. They're not the same, and they know it.

nyrp · 2015-07-24T16:17:03+00:00

By the way, I recommend going online anonymously and try writing as a woman. It's hard!! You realize there are so many mental movements that are caused by you being a man that it's hard to come at the writing, from the very first initiative, as a woman. What you realize is that men and women have vastly different worlds they navigate as men and women, though we live on the same planet.

I had to do this recently as I am setting up a fake female profile as a pawn in a documentary I'm making. So I have to create a believable female profile months in advance of the day I plan on actually using it so that it doesn't appear to have come out of nowhere and it's credible.

Besides it being hard to think and joke like a female, I was surprised when I wrote some idiotic feminine bullshit about can someone help me cause I can't figure out how to get dressed for work without changing my mind all the time and I end up late for work. And it got three full, detailed responses. You learn lessons there like the way females have no shame in asking for help and vulnerability is a real technique to get what you want. Whereas a man who was so stupid that he couldn't get himself to work on time as an adult because he lost time matching outfits would not be treated with as much respect.

CopperFox3c · 2015-07-24T16:27:11+00:00

There was always something fishy about that article, I think Heartiste may have nailed it on the head. It was so fucking outrageous ... suggesting that "male feminism" has become in essence the complete emasculation of men. And not only willing emasculation, but a sort of celebration of it by men themselves.

Seriously, if that's the point we've reached, we're all fucked.

darkstout · 2015-07-24T16:57:23+00:00

This reminds me of the Rolling Stone UVA hoax rape story. It seems with feminist journalism, the message is more important than facts. But then again, this is how feminism in general operates.

2015-07-24T15:15:45+00:00

How dare you!

Cat prejudice disparages a person's pet choice and undermines their confidence.

2015-07-24T17:27:57+00:00

It's agitprop either way.

The intended effect is an overton window shift in the cultural narrative, whether written by an actual beta cuckold or spinster cat lady.

favours_of_the_moon · 2015-07-24T21:06:07+00:00

We aren’t afraid of their intellect or their spirit or their ability to bear children. We are afraid that when it comes time for sex, they won’t choose us. This petty fear has led us as a culture to place judgments on the entire spectrum of female sexual expression: If a woman likes sex, she’s a whore and a slut; if she only likes sex with her husband or boyfriend, she’s boring and lame; if she doesn’t like sex at all, she’s frigid and unfeeling. Every option is a trap.

SHE's afraid that when it comes time to cash our checks, WE will choose someone else.

OneRedYear · 2015-07-25T04:44:36+00:00

|if she only likes sex with her husband or boyfriend, she’s boring and lame;

No man feels this way. Most men hold women who do this in high regard as decent women. Also most boyfriends hold them in high regard as decent women. Most boyfriends and husbands look for that in a woman. Only women, particularly sluts, would call a woman boring and lame for not cucking her husband. This is the true giveaway.

battyryder · 2015-07-24T19:07:39+00:00

just read that shit, it was shit by the way. drivel, no actual man would fall for it.

MikePatton-yakyakyak · 2015-07-24T19:17:58+00:00

I knew something didn't smell right. In fact, I called it days ago when it was first posted here.

2015-07-24T20:06:08+00:00

[permanently deleted]

2015-07-24T22:56:15+00:00

Notice that there has been no follow-up -- No other media outlets have managed to interview Mr. Cuckold. Fake.

sardinemanR · 2015-07-25T09:48:35+00:00

I don't believe there is any proof that this is fake. In fact I think it's probably real, or rather it's based off of a real story with maybe some alterations.

The real red flag to me was that an old married carousel rider could get so many willing partners. But TRP claimed that wasn't an issue, and a bunch of dudes here got so thirsty they were writing how it's such a great thing. If even TRP is going to be thirsty for an old married hag, then yeah it's probably happening.