Field ReportWhat I Learned From Being Chad a Few Times and Approaching Women (Field Report) (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Contributordr_warlock


There seems to have been a high demand for my 'Chad posts' series. So here it is.

I don't claim to be a player, there was even a time where I was an SJW and bluepill beta with women. Even EC's have had anger phases. But I have been chad a few times and have had positive approach experiences with women. I've been on both sides of the fence; The grass is definitely greener on the other side. Here is what I learned & some of my personal theories. This is a primer for my upcoming posts in the 'series'. I encourage others to share their experiences and compare notes, especially if you've been Chad.

Lessons Learned

Lesson 1: TRP Theory works in practice with extreme effectiveness, it's necessary, and no hate, rape, abuse, or violence is required.

  • Where is this rape people talk about? I don't see any. There I am, balls deep in a girl/woman's warm, wet pussy. I look to my left, there aren't any weapons of mass misogyny (WMM's). I look to my right, there aren't any dungeons. I tilt my ear into the air, but no, no blood curdling screams there, just someone asking me what her 'place' is and to call her a slut. I look at her face, no tears or signs of pain, just delirious expressions of enjoyment. I look at my cock sliding in and out her hole, it's bigger than a girl's pinky. I check my neck, there's no neck beard. I look within myself, there's no hate, just animal lust.

    • Men, even TRP men love women very much. I laugh at how people say we at TRP not only hate women, we hate all of them, the definition of misogynist. I don't think it is possible to be Chad and hate women simultaneously. Sure, you may hate a specific few, but all of them? Nah. That is such a waste of time and energy, an emotion that could only be motivated by rage from being unsuccessful with women or childhood abuse. Being naked in a bed with an attractive woman that desires you is great. Post-coitus, you turn her around and she nuzzles her ass on your crotch, you press your dick between her butt cheeks like a hotdog in a bun, you place your arms around her tits and she folds her arms over yours, you get a whiff of her nice smelling hair and natural body aroma, and she's giggling and smiling -- that is absolutely amazing and drives me wild. The masculine-feminine kino makes a man ecstatic.Touch is powerful, especially mutual affectionate caressing. You can truly feel the complimentary masculine and feminine spirits coalesce in that moment. Yin and Yang. It feels very manly to see her willingly physically submit to you and truly enjoy it. Lol, I don't hate women. Just because I only find non-blood relative females useful for sex, doesn't mean I hate them. Just because you only deem someone useful for specific tasks and they wish they were more to you, doesn't mean you hate them. "Misogynist", "asshole", "douchebag", "jerk" and other words like them are just code for, "he doesn't put up with my shit, pander to my irrational emotional whims, and doesn't give me the commitment I want". They do not mean what comes to mind when a man imagines examples of them in their head. I further expand upon this in my physics metaphor post, Women don't want to feel good, they want to feel.

"Often times you showing self-respect will be the very thing that induces the allegedly "bad" feelings. You not allowing her to manipulate you can result in her to use the last resort, crying. Why would you ever be hesitant or apologize for showing self-respect? A person who cries because they can't get what they want is acting childish, treat them accordingly."

  • I used the very tactics that are considered 'misogynistic', I was an 'asshole', I cared only about myself, the things women and society says wouldn't work, and yet, there I am, watching a girl's tits bounce to the rhythm of my cock. Many times it doesn't end up with a lay, but they are receptive and clearly enjoyed my presence and behavior. Just yesterday, a woman told me, "woah, you're really direct, it's a breath of fresh air, most guys don't do that. I bet you really like approaching girls". Mind you that these are the same girls that society says would never 'fall' for it. The same girl that says, "I'm not like other girls", the same indypyndynt woman that would be too 'mature' for that. Even married women and girls with boyfriends. Society says that a man who holds my beliefs in this sub would never get laid, I'm just a butt-hurt loser who needs a life, yet girls eat it up. My family members tell me that I should talk to women better. My sisters say that "dr_warlock, you'll never get a girlfriend by talking to girls that way", yet the girl in question is giggling, showing IOI's, and prying for more information about me. They don't know I've been laid outside my first LTR behind the scenes, and keep my success stories away from them. In short, don't ever listen to what bluepillers or women say about intergender dynamics. Don't ask fish how to catch fish, ask the fisherman. Watch what they do, not what they say. Don't let shaming and noise distract you from and make you deny what you see with your own two eye balls.

  • I have been hearing some talk about how some people are already in a relationship and don't need TRP-like theories. I can tell you now that your relationship will improve or be destroyed using TRP theories based on whether or not she only ever intended to have someone to control. The relationship either:

    • 1) Immediately improves the second you implement the theory (even just marginally). Immediately declines when you fail (very shocking transition, almost robotic on her part).

    • 2) She puts up some resistance because she's thrown off balance by your sudden display of aloofness, self-respect, assertiveness, or any other 'RP' traits. Women don't like men that act outside their assigned mental box (Great RSD Tyler video). It is not uncommon for her to shit test to see if this is really 'you'.

    • 3) The relationship ends. If the relationship ended because of the implementation of TRP, then that's probably a good thing. Either it was toxic and one-sided (in her favor), she was only looking for a beta bux, or your life goals did not align. TRP is not against LTR's, we're against LTR's that don't provide value beyond pussy. Male's commitment >>> woman's sex, most men don't realize this. When someone brings value into your life and assists you in your life goals in a way that you can't do all by yourself or get easily, it's advised to keep them around, because that's rare. As soon as they don't, when the cons outweigh the pros, when they become liabilities, kick them out w/o a second thought and move on. If the relationship ended because of TRP, I guarantee that this is the case. And that's okay, you were fine before her, you'll be fine after (read the top comment too). Despite what society and women like to proclaim, most girls are indeed replaceable, and girls love/hate that you act that way. Just because you're in a relationship, just because a woman chose you as a provider and source of commitment, doesn't mean you've 'won'. And it most certainly doesn't mean you can stop playing 'the game'. For a man, the game never ends. A man can't just exist and be stagnant. It's the same thinking that has men wifeing up post-wall women after her ride on the cock carousel and thinking they won out in the end, that they no longer have to try so much, to play 'the game'.
  • 'Naturals' and blue pillers believe that it's not necessary to implement our theories. False. The natural just does this instinctively. They don't have words to label their actions and other phenomenon. They really are just 'being themselves'. TRP naysayers think that just because you had to think about it, that the implementation is 'manipulative', 'toxic', and 'misogynistic'. Analyze any natural, especially how they communicate electronically. They often don't answer immediately, ignore calls when they're busy, take time to text and call back, or just flat out ignore them. You will see them causally flirt with other girls, focus on themselves, and pass shit tests with women. Naturals will often deny this and resort to reciting the same ol' vague and general platitudes ie "just have confidence", "just have fun", "just be yourself", blah blah blah. For every successful relationship where the women clearly respects and desires the man, I want you to look for muscularity, money, IDGAF attitude, social proof/status,not paying her too much attention (like she's nothing special), pre-selection, dread game, not taking his girl seriously (treating her like a child), not afraid to tell her she's being nonsensical, not being afraid to walk away, passing her shit tests, and/or if possible, how he talks and texts her on the phone. See what you discover.

Next Sections

  • Lesson 2: Chad gets a woman's true love and affection

  • Lesson 3: There is no such thing as a 'strong' woman in the presence of Chad.

  • Lesson 4: Forgoing LTR's in exchange for Chad conquests will cause people, especially women, to directly question you.

Want More?

Read the rest on my blog: http://www.redpilldoctor.com/learned-chad-times-approaching-women/

Subscribe to my blog: RedPillDoctor.com

Subscribe to my channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeYmhOVwwIJxtZV_l5cS_dg

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/dr_warlockTRP

Follow me on trp.red: https://www.trp.red/follow/dr_warlock

[–]ECoast_Man 38 points39 points  (8 children)

Lesson 3: There is no such thing as a 'strong' woman in the presence of Chad.

I can definitely confirm this one. This is so true.

Not just 'oh, I'm a feminist' - types, but twitter feminists can't contain their natural urges when confronted by Chad. They get strong tingles by fucking a manly man, and you see relief in their faces when they get to let it all go and just give in to their natural urges.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 10 points11 points  (7 children)

and you see relief in their faces when they get to let it all go and just give in to their natural urges.

Their natural urge is to be care free, little responsibility ==> child-like, feminine. But generally, femininity in it's fullest form is a luxury. The spirit can't exist outside an already existing masculine presence, something to lean on, to rely on. That is the relief she feels when she knows he's a man (worthy man). She can comfortably submit and not worry.

[–]marty2k 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I wonder what in our evolution caused this. The fact that this is prominent even in women who are heavily socialized not to act feminine is all released in the presence of an alpha. It's obvious why women need a strong man, but why do they desire to be completely carefree and child like when they have one? Maybe it has something to do with a healthy birth or benefiting child care. Maybe it is related to having a stronger orgasm (and orgasm is linked to higher fertility) with alphas and more of those pleasure chemicals being released.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 12 points13 points  (3 children)

Sexual dimorphism (two genders, the invention of the male) exists for two reasons 1)Genetic diversity via competition and 2) division of labor.

There can't be two leaders of the 'household' so to speak. There needs to be an hierarchy. Opportunity cost and the division of labor in most mammals makes the system more efficient when the male leads and the woman follows. This instinct to be care free and child-like helps encourage this process.

[–]marty2k 2 points3 points  (2 children)

But that same dynamic exists with beta and alpha males. One must lead, the others follow. Yet men under the leadership of an alpha male don't become care free and child like. There is a certain tendency towards being follower tied with estrogen (women in leadership positions tend to have more testosterone than average), but it doesn't explain that pure relief you see when breaking in a usually bossy and hard shelled woman. It's definitely related to sex, women release much more oxytocin during orgasm than men, and as I've personally experienced women orgasm much more with alphas than they do betas.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But that same dynamic exists with beta and alpha males.

But there isn't a sexual dynamic. That makes a big difference. Males are meant to compete with one another. Some fail, some decide to submit, but it doesn't change anything.

[–]bluedrygrass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not stricly the evolution-but it's lack thereof.

While men had to posses specific social and inner traits to just survive, if not to have the belly full and something more, what was required to female for most of the times was to sit on their asses and do nothing but chit chat and at most do some menial tasks.

Childs pretty much have always raised themself, or each other, in primitive communities.

So women weren't required to develop certain traits like self control, or loyalty, or logical reasoning, or cooler blood.

Generation after generation, the constant in a woman life have been to be "less" than a male: less big, less strong, less smart, less loyal to his given word (an important thing in primitive societies), less emphatic, less of pretty much anything.

Males will bring the food, and regulate the society. Females at most criticized male's works.

Even the only thing that generated a certain evolutionary pressure, giving birth, wasn't enough to really mold women to fitness in that direction: today, most of the males are fertile and able to impregnate a woman with their seed, while the majority of women wouldn't be able to give birth and survuve it without c-sections, medicines, painkillers, doctors and nurses assisting them.

Check out some stats.

The majority of women today are unfit to give birth. They would die in the process, and the child be crippled due to less chances of receiving food and dedication.

Let that sink in for a moment, and you'll realize that after all, the real expendable gender isn't the male one, after all.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children)

My favorite plate is an ex I broke up with by leaving on the side of the road 30+ miles from home, at midnight, in a shitty part of town, in nothing but flip flops and a bikini. "If I'm such a bitch, pull the car over." I'm guessing she thought I'd beg her to get back in. I drove the fuck home. She was at my apartment two days of radio silence later sobbing because she "didn't know what to do." Since then (almost a year ago) this girl has not been able to go more than 2 or 3 days without catching a dicking from me. Routinely cooks for me, buys me shit, blows off her plans for me (she dates other guys and continues to fuck me, often after they drop her home from taking her out) and makes sure to tell me how much she hates me before bending over for me. Anytime she starts to act up I put her in time-out by leaving her hanging for a few days. Whenever I do this she usually drops whatever she's complaining about and fucks my brains out to get my attention back. She's one of those "strong independent women" who daddy pays for everything. It's almost sad, but she's a good lay and a decent cook so I've kept it going. When we first dated I hadn't internalized TRP yet and she ran my life for a good 6 months before I kicked her to the curb. Our total interaction is the epitome of this post and how you can turn a beta bux situation around through a change in behavior. They crave this treatment. It's addicting to them.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why even acknowledge him? I couldn't give less of a fuck about him. She knows she's a filthy slut. I remind her every time I'm balls deep. She loves it.

[–]1NV0K3R 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Have you ever seen a woman in love? Oh you have huh? Then let me ask you another question. Have you ever been a girl's Chad? Oh, you haven't? Then you lied to me and yourself, albeit unintentionally. If you've never been Chad, then you've never seen a girl in love.


Right on the fucking money.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 16 points17 points  (3 children)

I don't hate chefs just because I want them to cook for me.

I don't hate mechanics just because I want them to fix my car.

I don't hate tailors just because I use them for their scissors.

[–]crack_tobi 5 points6 points  (2 children)

and of course the infamous, I don't hate men because I use them for their provisioning.

[–]bluedrygrass 12 points13 points  (1 child)

But they do. That's a big difference. A man can pump and dump a plate without hating her.

A woman will generally hate the beta while he's milking his moneys out.

[–]crack_tobi 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ssshh, dont say it out loud. You will tried for misogini.

[–]Dustin_Bromain 6 points7 points  (1 child)

This post is gold. Absolute gold. dr_warlock, you are definitely my favorite endorsed contributor.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For the first time in history, someone made a Warlock blush.

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP 10 points11 points  (7 children)

If you're a single guy that keeps his sex life under wraps (what I do), women think something's wrong, asking "Why don't you have a girlfriend?". If you state that you don't want one, they'll respond with, "of course you do! (insert condescending laugh), you're eventually going to want to settle down and get married. You don't want to be lonely do you? You'll see when you get older". This will happen often. They won't let you escape when you respond with "eh" and try to change the subject. Many people conflate not wanting an LTR with not wanting women sexually. To them, the two concepts are inextricable; the thought has never occurred to them.

I think this is possibly even more complicated than that. My standard response is "I have lots of girlfriends." followed by a sly look at her face then a lingering look at her body (I want her to catch me doing that so she knows exactly what could happen.)

However, I was once shot the question about whether I was seeing anyone by my best friend's girlfriend HB7, maybe an 8 on a good day (the very second he'd left us alone to go to the gents. Anyone smell that fresh groundwork for a branch swing?) - I decided I didn't want to go full beta, but I also didn't want to lead her on. So I told her I had two fuck buddies. Hoping she'd get the message that she was unworthy of my ultra-high SMV. This worked like a charm in the past and the other girl had moved on... not this one though. She immediately responded by asking whether I was thinking about settling down anytime soon.

Comparing this experience with your own analysis, I'd say women are in very simple minds when they're analysing this. Women are only interested in your status if they are weighing up your potential in their mind. Saying I don't want an LTR triggers a simplistic shaming tactic by them assuming you don't have any sex at all - a man who has no interest in pussy is very dangerous to the feminine imperative because he can't be controlled (hence why there's so much hate of MGTOW rather than ignoring it... which would be the logical step for women.)

If we compare the response declaring fuck buddies, she knows there's interest in pussy, so she can't shame on that front. Though I think there could be a potential attempt at shaming for not committing. It just so happened that this one fancied either a branch swing or a chance to join my harem in the hope of obtaining future commitment. She obviously rates her own SMV extremely highly.. or she's taken my basic politeness to her... (combined with my dismissive mocking of some more attractive Irish chick we met that night) to mean that her value is higher.

I think from this, we could refine your initial conclusion to something much more selfish and solipsistic. That women who find a man not looking for an LTR will either try to shame him into fulfilling the feminine imperative, or she will entertain the idea of her taking him into an LTR. The latter comes before the former due to selfishness. The rest is the solipsistic feminine concept that men can't exist without women or without having an LTR with a woman. - Because women rank themselves based upon the value of the man they can obtain, they can't exist without a man in their lives (it's the worst kind of misery for a woman) they seem to assume that we think that way too... and probably consider their shaming tactic to be "helping him to see the light."

I'm looking forward to the rest of the series.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 11 points12 points  (3 children)

I decided I didn't want to go full beta, but I also didn't want to lead her on. So I told her I had two fuck buddies.

Just because he's your friend, doesn't mean you should ever act beta. Her hitting on you is not your problem. But if you do consider him a friend, you shouldn't lead her on.

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Women need men and need the feeling to be mutual, but the presence of our male exclusive spaces are evidence to the contrary. It shows that a man, even one women categorize as a provider, can have an enjoyable existence outside the presence of a woman. If a man cannot be controlled by sex, women are powerless.

Absolutely! I suspect I probably picked my understanding up from that very piece.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm surprised you caught that because I deleted that portion seconds after clicking 'save'. But glad to hear that post did you some good.

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fluke that I'm browsing around at the moment and hit the button at the right time. You should put it back in. It says what I was trying to say much more eloquently. Plus that post should be linked for any newbies reading this who could do with the extra reading.

[–]Gelu_sf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well, when somebody asks me why am I still single, or why I'm not married (if I'm with somebody) or whatever BS question they put out, I tell them "When I find somebody that deserves it...sure thing" .

This shuts down betas and women alike instantly and never bring it up.

[–]Endorsed ContributorPopeman79 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My go-to response to the question "Are you single?", is "I'm single but not alone" Then they ALWAYS look at me in a weird way, and tell me "So you have a girlfriend?" "No, I've been single for a year. I'm not committed to anybody"

[–]evileddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Do you have a girlfriend?"

"There are a few ladies that would be mad if I said I was single"

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (5 children)

Women fuck something like this:

Betabux : Wait impatiently and let him use her pussy for sex. It's transactional and she does this as infrequently as she can get away with. She likely runs to bathroom to clean up when done and immediately changes subject to her job, kids, favorite tv shows etc

Alpha Fucks. She will pay for the room and beg you to do whatever you want with her. She will be very excited and tell you things like "I want your babies" and "Please don't leave, stay all night".

Be Alpha Fucks

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Be Alpha Fucks

Once you go Chad, there's no going back. I'm not against the idea of an LTR (with side action) if she brings value beyond her pussy but for an exclusive LTR? She better have a horn sticking from her forehead and mystical clouds of fairy dust trailing behind her every levitating stride. Only then will I consider pulling out my lasso to reel in that mustang and break her in like a good cowboy.

[–]McLarenX 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Hmm I needed to hear this. We fuck every day she'll do anything for me but I have that itch like a wolf who needs to hunt

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

but I have that itch like a wolf who needs to hunt

That's perfectly natural. Don't give it a second thought.

[–]jameygates 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Every human action is "natural" because we are just animals in nature. That has nothing to do with whether doing so would be ethical.

Are you saying everything "natural" is morally and ethically permissible?

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm saying unless a woman can prove to me she has more to offer than her pussy, I'm not even going to entertain the idea of exclusivity and fidelity. This has nothing to do with ethics. Fucking the same girl over and over gets old. Eventually you've done all the positions in various locations. The novelty and excite begins to fade. It becomes too comfortable, more like a chore. Letting a woman be your only sexual outlet for release is a bad idea. She has too much power over you and will cause your game to atrophy, making your recovery back into the SMP difficult. No thanks.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"She will tell you that all her past lovers were jerks, but you were her knight in shining armor that saved her." I remember like how this angered me, when my girl (in highschool, so nothing special) brought this up. Why she would be with jerk? I am really nice, I am all that she needs, I would never hurt her. But today it comes to a clarity - she said that because those guys gave her tingles then and she wants me to behave like those guys in some way or form just to bring how she felt then.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Betas finish last, Chad finishes on her face while she's smiling

This is amazing, I'm quoting this from now on.

[–]ASAP_Bickle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Finally. Finally a post that brings something to the table, that adds some fucking value.

I've seen so many AWALT posts in the last week, and I get that there are those in the anger-phase who need to vent, but if it's not creating knowledge and going over stuff we already know, it's kind of useless.

This was a great post. Keen for part 2.

[–]magus678 17 points18 points  (5 children)

I might be the only one here, but using lots of hierarchical reference ("Redpill Vanguard", "Even endorsed contributers!") feels off putting for me.

Not that I don't appreciate the content of the posts. I just think they can stand on their own merit without the trappings of state.

[–]Knehmo 14 points15 points  (1 child)

But...but... appeals to authority make things seem more credible!

[–]Myrpl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually, the fact that they stand out from the rest means that their errors are even more visible. It works both ways.

[–]Areimanes 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I might be the only one here, but using lots of hierarchical reference ("Redpill Vanguard", "Even endorsed contributers!") feels off putting for me.

When citing people who are experts on the subject, it's quite common to include their titles (e.g., Nobel Laureate, Ph.D, Dr. Msc, etc.). It does not in any way, shape, or form mean that their arguments cannot be questioned or scrutinized.

To me it simply means they are not the average TRP submitter. It does not mean I take the word of Whisper as gospel (though I see eye-to-eye with him on many a great deal).

[–]magus678 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I completely get what you mean here. I don't even disagree for the most part.

For me the rub comes from the fact that I have seen comments with flair next them that honestly were just not all that good. I mean no one bats a thousand, but if we are going to treat being an EC like that big of a deal, I would like a little bit more quality control on who gets it.

Further, and perhaps most damning, is the fact that those posts are often up voted ridiculously for no real reason; I suspect people just are drawn to the flair more than the content. This reminds me of the personality cults that exist in the pua community, and I would very much hate to see the same thing happen here.

[–]ITHOUGHTYOUMENTWEAST 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You become endorsed by posting good information regularly. If you can pick apart every endorsed post you see, go right ahead.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

when girls ask "do you have a girlfriend?" my favorite responses are either "multiple" or "girlfriend?, plural miss". They usually work very well and the female often just giggles or just says "oh really",while coming in close and touching me.

[–]epixs 1 point2 points  (7 children)

So the question arises, if she asks why don't you have a gf or if you have one ...what is the best answer to say?

The theory states "yes" because they gives her questioning mind if other women find you attractive like she does, but then that just seems to simple .

Are there better more witty answers to this?

[–]Senior ContributorSkorchZang 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I get this a lot, so here's a couple of boilerplate nonanswers I drop in the "do you have a girlfriend" situation:

  • "Why, are you volunteering?"

  • "I could always use another one." (best with a cheesy smirk, challenge her with it)

  • "No, I am actually married. To six different women and we all love each other very much. Now, seven wives might be pushing it for some, but hey I'm just looking for that one special woman I really click with."

You get the idea. Blow up the expectation that she automatically deserves a straight answer out of you. Make the hamster spin. False modesty, unafraid to disqualify yourself and disqualify her. It is cute, interesting, and although she knows it's bullshit, it's entertaining bullshit that gives her vague tingles.

The unspoken content of your sub-communication: "I'm a high value man, tired of hearing the same old questions, I like to have fun teasing you, and there's nothing you can do to stop me or make me play your girl game by the usual girl rules."

[–]epixs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you, this is also a very great way to respond to her and it shows her you aren't taking her seriously!

[–]rpscrote 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Are there better more witty answers to this?

Yes. Some examples:

"No, girlfriends cost too much money"

"Depends on your definition of single"

"On Thursdays, but my mondays are still open"

"Dont need one"

etc. etc.

[–]epixs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are awesome, thank you!

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

The only possible escape route for this I can think of is "I just got out of one, I'm taking a breaking, just want to have fun and explore". Of course, this will only work if they don't know your personal time well.

I would keep it short and simple with no explanation. Your dating life is none of her business. Any wit you come up with is likely to go over her head, you'll ramble with your words, or it won't come out as cool as it seemed in your head.

[–]halfunplugged 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about the ole' mitch hedburg answer, "No, but I know a girl who would be upset if she knew I said that" or "Yeah, but nothing's facebook official... [smirk]"

[–]froggyfreshrap 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great post OP, im looking forward to the how to be Chad guide!

[–]you_dont_even_no 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phenomenal post. Absolutely what I needed to hear right now: saved.

[–]Nearox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some memorable quotes in there, thank you

[–]willowhawk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good post. Looking forward to your post about how to utilise red pill theory and "be Chad"

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

My only issue is I want to live a life solely of Chad and his conquests. I do not ever want to settle down. But..... I do want children. I want a son. I want to be the father that my father was not. How can I accomplish this? I am still very much in the anger phase.

[–]magus678 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Someone with more experience with children will probably have better advice, but mine would be to absolutely not have a child during the anger phase, for too many reasons to even list.

Also, you mention having a son, which is great, but are you prepared to love a daughter just the same? Are you willing to have multiple children if that's what it takes?

Having a kid to assuage past issues for yourself seems dangerous to me; kids are a monumental amount of commitment and work if you want to do it right. I wouldn't enter into it lightly

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah. Both and more if possible. But yeah, definitely not now. I'm think 5-15 years down the road.

[–]pdtrading 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need to view the chad threads.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Can you mention how old you are, just for reference?

[–]Reflexiver 1 points1 points [recovered]

He should be around thirty.

[–]garrettruskamp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy shit those bold points are spot on. This may be one of the best RP posts I've read in a long time. Thank you great work

[–]chwed2 0 points1 point  (1 child)

"Many people conflate not wanting an LTR with not wanting women sexually."

Categorically not true. The default/regular thought in response to that is "Oh, they don want something serious they only want a fling". How could you get that so backwards?

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What you'll find in the hivemind is that flings don't really 'count'. I usually encounter statements that insinuate that I'm MGTOW, gay, or asexual, not as a guy that only wants flings. Your experience may be different than mine. If I had to guess, it's because I don't ever discuss sex and women, or check out and hit on girls around my family, family friends, or neighbors so they probably get the wrong impression. I intentionally wait until they're out of earshot to do so, especially the females of those groups.

[–]magus678 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Parents want to have grandchildren, so they prefer you to conduct activities that result in a family, especially your mother. On the one hand, your family doesn't want you to be a beta loser, on the other hand, they want to support the female imperative and have children. You'll often see that other parents are willing to sacrifice their son's well being just a little bit in exchange for this goal.

I suspect this has to do with you validating their own sacrifices in bringing you up.

The idea of supporting a legacy probably becomes something of an internal mantra during child rearing. The idea that the family will endure and be fruitful not only validates their own choices, but also represents empire building; an accrual of power that they will have primacy over in their older age.

Refusing to have children negates that entire time line. Even when not being aware of it consciously, I think a lot of the pushback from refusing to play the game has roots in this.

[–]bea5tly 1 points1 points [recovered]

I personally love dominating girls who are in a relationship. Nothing turns me on more then a girl giving me everything and being a good girl while her beta bf sits at home wondering how "girls night" is going.

[–]frys180 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Why not just feel indifferent? I see where you're getting at but what are you really gaining by taking pleasure in having sex with someone else's girl?

[–]bea5tly -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Power. And the no strings that I want makes it all the better.

[–]McLarenX -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Fuck. I might be a Chad. Before me she never gave a bj now she begs to swallow. All of that relationship interaction describes what I do. I'm very interested in this there might be something that I'm missing.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

She's sucking your cock and wants to swallow like a good girl. I don't see the issue here.

[–]McLarenX -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I used to get really confused by friends who can't get their chicks to swallow. It's fucking easy you dominate the sexual interaction, give her a good tease leading up to a nice orgasm, and she's yours.

[–]squirtmasterd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm a fairly blue pill liberal bar my insistence that red pill dating strategy is correct and the evidence for it is overwhelming.

Lesson 2: Chad gets a woman's true love and affection

Let me ask you a question dear terpers. Have you ever seen a woman in love? Oh you have huh? Then let me ask you another question. Have you ever been a girl's Chad? Oh, you haven't? Then you lied to me and yourself, albeit unintentionally. If you've never been Chad, then you've never seen a girl in love."

I have and it's disgusting. Back in Uni my girlfriend of one year fell hard in love with me and was as nasty as I wanted her to be, and I wanted her to be absolute filth. I still have a hold of her to this day and it sickens me. She got fat and settled down with some loser over 8 years later she would still do anything for me. The lack of self respect is appalling. Finding that balance of a ltr that will have the good points but not not the bad is impossible, as sadly, awalt.

My current ltr is fantastic but her past indicates I'm a beta bux in her time line, and the sex is drying up on both our ends. Its problematic, I almost wish I wasn't self aware or knew of trp, then I might be frustrated but could focus on what I thought was the issue, not the unfixable nature of society.

[–]ZioFascist -5 points-4 points  (13 children)

this only applies to men that are atleast 5'9

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I have girls drive up to 5 hours to come pay for my food or cook for me and beg, I mean literally beg for me to fuck their asshole whilst turning down multiple propositions back home and staying committed to me ( until she gets bored) 2 of my plates have been exclusive to me for a year and treat me like a king. Knowing there are others openly.

I'm 5"8 and balding, they're HB8. Am I amazing? No, you're just a defeatist bitch and funnily enough I know personally how much girls want to fuck one of those.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 2 points3 points  (10 children)

If you're not at least 5'9", you definitely better be liftin' if you haven't already. I would also advise you aim for shorter girls (note: I didn't say less attractive).

Why TRP Always Tells You to Lift Weights

[–]mightysultan 2 points3 points  (6 children)

I'm 5'7"" and, oddly enough, I find it easier to get chicks who are 5'7" or more. What I found out is that girls who are 5'4" or less are absolutely obsessed with height, and think you are a criminal for not being tall - of course, she's the only one entitled to not have to live up to a physical standard.

But yeah, absolutely lift. A short skinny guy gets no physical respect.

[–]McLarenX -2 points-1 points  (5 children)

You're absolutely right I'm 6'8 and most of my romantic interest has been 5'4 and under.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

At your size, you literally do smash the pussy.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Not talking about this guy but imagine being that tall with a micropenis. It'd be the ultimate tragedy.

Big dicks are overrated. Sex that is 33% ow, ow, ........ Ow... Bloody sheets and physically being unable to fit it in the girls mouth so you can't get head... Sucks.

[–]CumForJesus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy.

If you would like to do the same, add the browser extension GreaseMonkey to Firefox and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]mightysultan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. A buddy of mine who is well endowed said it sucks getting blowjobs because he keeps getting unintended bites at his dick, he can't face fuck them (even pros) and anal is 99,99% of the time out of question.

[–]blacklaptopbag 1 points1 points [recovered]

Doesn't always work. I'm 5'9", used to be fat, been lifting everyday for 4 years straight and now I'm absolutely shredded, but still a virgin. I go out every week approach ect. Not only do you have to be tall, you also need a good face. Lifting wont do shit if you have shit facial aesthetics.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I said you should be lifting, and that you should go for women a little shorter, not that it would solve all your problems.

[–]NightOfTheBlackSnow -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

I didn't like some of the paragraphs for lack of specificity. And too much generalized ranting. But I loved the rest of it and some areas had specifics so I liked that.

7/10 would read again.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which paragraphs would you like elaboration on? I can cover it in my next posts.