Red Pill ExampleUSA's Women's Olympic Hockey team loses to Boy's high school hockey teams (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by SatisfiedMan

With all the brainwashed feminist bullshit about genders being exactly the same (except for scenarios in which women are better and men are apparently worse) here we have a thoroughly amusing example of just how poorly this perpetuated western world view works in reality.

The USA's own Olympic team for Women's ice hockey... Should do pretty well against the boys, right? When I first heard Milo Yiannopoulos mention this I thought he was joking... Surely they'd do okay? Nope. That's just your brainwashing talking. They got beaten in five separate matches with various High Schools. They used these matches to prepare for the Sochi Winter Olympics last year. Didn't hear about it? I wonder why.

This is also relevant to the idiotic assertions that the Women's UFC champion Rhonda Rousey is "pound for pound" the best fighter, male or female, in the world. This stupidity I have heard repeated to me by a female MMA fighter too... Who presumably should know better. Alas, the potency of feminist truth-distortion is amazing.

Men and women are different in a variety of ways, both physically and mentally. Refusing to educate yourself in these differences limits your effectiveness. Seek to be scientifically correct before being politically correct.

Don't believe the bullshit. Continue to challenge the mainstream thinking to discover the truth. To be your own man you must think your own thoughts. All else is not the path to being a more satisfied man but the path to a ruinous existence.

The report on it: http://nesn.com/2014/01/u-s-womens-olympic-hockey-team-preparing-for-sochi-games-by-playing-boys-high-school-teams-in-new-england/

Thanks to u/cptfizz for giving the source for the Serena Williams tennis example too (a few people keep mentioning it wondering who the guy was): "Karsten Braasch is a German former professional tennis player. His highest ATP singles ranking was World No. 38, which he reached in June 1994. His career-high in doubles was World No. 36, achieved in November 1997. He was well-noted for his service motion and his habit of smoking during changeovers. Braasch competed in a "Battle of the Sexes" contest against Venus Williams and Serena Williams at the 1998 Australian Open when he was ranked 203. A decade and a half older than the sisters, Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centred around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager." He nonetheless defeated both sisters, playing a single set against each, beating Serena 6–1 and Venus 6–2. https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1298&dat=19980127&id=kqJjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=mggGAAAAIBAJ&pg=3506,5011601"

[–]born_to_end 129 points129 points [recovered]

I'm from the UK and fed up of constantly hearing about Womens Football (Soccer) and the various arguments about why its wrong that they don't earn as much or get the same respect as male footballers.

Anyone who knows anything about soccer and is not deluding themselves knows exactly why this is. It is because the professional male footballers earning the big money are the absolute elite at what they do. And millions of people worldwide are prepared to pay good money to watch sport played at that elite level. Like the OP story, Womens International level football is the equivalent of mens non-league football in terms of standard, skill and entertainment. There could NEVER, ever be a woman that could play soccer like Messi, Ronaldo etc. Or even to lower league standard. The same applies to any other male dominated sport or discipline. And that is an axiomatic fact.

I have no problem with women playing the same sports as men, good luck to them if thats what they want to do. But spectator sports are, by definition, there for the entertainment of the masses. I pay hundreds of pounds a year to watch Premier League football because its worth every penny. I wouldn't pay a fiver to watch womens football because it simply isn't anywhere near as entertaining. Its embarrassing, in fact. But the media here is constantly going on about how talented these lesbians women are and why its unfair that they don't earn the same fame and fortune as the men.

I could get onto female football fans as well here but that is another thread entirely.

[–]cazzah123 45 points46 points  (16 children)

Agreed man. You ever put on the womans world cup? Some of the games looked like any average game from a shitty town sunday league.

I've said it before. Take the best female football team in the world. Place them against any league 2 youth team. They would get destroyed.

[–]born_to_end 21 points21 points [recovered]

It makes me laugh though how Sky Sports News are now championing womens football all the time and even have exclusive shows about it. But then most of their female presenters are stereotypical eye candy because of the vast majority male viewership.

I'm confident my old school football team would thrash any womens premier league side.

[–]drallcom3 43 points43 points [recovered]

That's a big problem for women's sports.

Female fans aren't really fans. They're just women who like to be part of the social circle that male fans form. The women don't watch the sport because of the sport, but simply because of the entertainment of the group. They don't really give two fucks about what sport it is.

[–]RedAccount1330 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Another invasion of a male space

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure the US women played the U-16 men's team and got roundly smashed, but you don't hear about that.

[–]nsummy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did. I thought it was more exciting. Higher scoring games and less fake injuries.

[–]newls 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I've said it before. Take the best female football team in the world. Place them against any league 2 youth team. They would get destroyed.

At best it would be embarrassingly close.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 40 points41 points  (13 children)

The level of hamstering required to explain away the unpopularity of women's soccer... Is almost inspiring... Except it isn't.

When I played soccer I knew a girl who was... very good. But she was literally the only one of hundreds who also played... Terribly. What counts as excellent for women in soccer counts as just very good for men.

[–]born_to_end 22 points22 points [recovered]

Exactly. All of the attributes required to be a good footballer; physical strength, pace, stamina, co-ordination, spatial awareness, quick decision making are not exactly strong points for most women. Oh, and carrying around a pair of tits is somewhat of a disadvantage too.

There are some superb female athletes in the world. I'll never deny that. But it is impossible that even one of them could be better than the top male equivalent. When a female does make real headlines, they are usually a total freak (like Rousey or Serena) and not indicative of the rest of their female opponents.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 27 points28 points  (6 children)

Sport is in many ways a simulation for war and hunting... The skills you just described for success in football would also be required for success in war and hunting... So if one would assume a gender superiority in one... It would proclude a gender superiority in the other.

And yeah Rousey and Serena are the shit... But still no where near the top performing men. Serena knows this because she got beaten by other male tennis players who were only in like the too 200 for men, and Rousey knows this because she's presumably not retarded, trains with men, and refuses to fight a trans-gendered "woman"

[–]PlayerXz 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Relatable story. Back in the days there was a famous female martial artist called Lucia Rijker. She was a Boxer/Kickboxer who was undefeated in both sports. Her boxing record when she retired was 17/0 and her kickboxing record was 37/0.

Anyways when she was at her peak people were losing their shit over her like they are over Rousey now and started talking about how she could beat a man and what not.

So they decided to make it happen. They got some no-name amateur thaiboxer to fight her (he is still unknown as shit, the only thing that comes up when you google him is his fight with Lucia Rijker). And as you might have guessed she got messed up badly. She lasted about 3 minutes with him in the ring before she got knocked out, all the while being dominated completely. There you go that is the best of the best female martial artist versus a random male thaiboxer of the same weight. The topic of women fighting men has since then been buried, until it was recently brought up again in the whole Mayweather vs Rousey thing.

There is a video on youtube of the fight if any of you are interested, but it's complete potato quality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsaTPtUl4vs

Edit.: Better quality https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2QgDWSfQik

[–]newls 19 points20 points  (1 child)

In a BBC interview at Wimbledon this year she claimed that she was the best in the world because she had beaten some other male tennis player once.

Her hamstering logic was:

  • She 'beat' some guy in a jokingly friendly game
  • Guy had beaten quite a few other top men in his time
  • Therefore she had beaten all of those men
  • Therefore she was the best in the world

Don't remember who it was she 'beat', whether it was a game or a set, or if it even happened. But there you go, that's hamstering.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sports are a way of channeling competitive instincts into something harmless.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As a former collegiate soccer goalkeeper, let me say this. I was talented, but small built for a male. I would say I was probably an average, middle of the road goalkeeper, not good enough to start for a DI team, but good enough to be on the bench. If I had the same talent, but been a woman, I would have been beyond world class. I knew some female goalkeepers who were very good among women, and went on to play for DI schools, but were roughly equivalent to a decent 13-14 year old male keeper.

[–]spectrum_92 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mate it's the same here in Australia. The mainstream channels don't really show much interest in women's sport, but SBS and ABC (our two public broadcasters) go out of their way to report on women's soccer, cricket, hell, even rugby (YouTube for lols). They've even hired female sports reporters for their news programs.

The thing is, it's so obvious that the people (usually feminist journalists) who try to promote it are only doing so for ideological reasons, and don't actually regularly watch them at all themselves! They're only interested in sport to the extent they can criticise it and spoil it for the true fans.

[–]DPestWork 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just had this discussion with a female complaining about how they don't have opportunities to earn equal money in pro sports... We debated, I realized that she couldn't hear facts over the noise of her "equality" BS so I queued up my favorite women's motocross video. https://youtu.be/GRB2QTP8DpU . One of many examples.

[–]hores 2 points3 points  (0 children)

one simple answer is match attendance by fans. there really aren't any

[–]1AmlanceJockey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

When I watch sports, there is nothing more boring than watching a bunch of lesbians play a slower, less daring, disorganized version of a sport I enjoy.

We should vote with our wallets and support the Lingerie Football League. Now that is some shit I can get behind.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]BannedBandit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sick of the BBC publishing shit on women's football... No one fucking cares.

Why not post about the U14 level as well? Same skill level.

[–][deleted] 90 points90 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]1WidmerBeer 56 points57 points  (4 children)

When the women's soccer team won the world cup, my sisters friend posted on her Facebook,"They should be making more than the men, the men haven't even won a world cup!"

Needless to say, I face-palmed. I wanted to reply with "Well to be fair, the women haven't won a men's world cup either."

You see this happens in combat sports too. Some women's wrestling Olympic medalists win only a few matches in the college leagues against the men, and lose the rest... yet they're top in the world among the women. Food for thought. Cough --Women's MMA-- Cough

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Women's sports are the same concept as the special olympics. Seriously, think about it...

[–]Ubermensch33 4 points5 points  (1 child)

The most hilarious part of

They should be making _____

Is there's this crazy implication that the money just comes out of the sky from some arbiter of skill, when the truth is that they're making almost exactly what they ought to because it's what people are willing to pay to see them and support them.

If you think they should be making more than the men, then start paying $60-75 for a ticket to a Nat'l Women's Soccer League game or something. C'mon, pony up! They're worth it, right?!?1

[–]SexistFlyingPig 14 points15 points  (1 child)

The high school I went to had a female swimmer who was a 4 time state champ and held individual state records in multiple events. She went on to go to an out of state school on a full ride athletic scholarship for swimming.

She wouldn't have been good enough to make men's varsity at our school. JV would have been a struggle.

[–]cliffotn 13 points14 points  (0 children)

When I was a High School swimmer, my non-tapered (no rest) race times were over a second faster than the Women's World Record holder in the same event. (Dara Tores)
I made it to State, but didn't make it out of pre-lims.

[–]CptFizz 154 points155 points  (30 children)

This is my favorite:
Karsten Braasch is a German former professional tennis player. His highest ATP singles ranking was World No. 38, which he reached in June 1994. His career-high in doubles was World No. 36, achieved in November 1997. He was well-noted for his service motion and his habit of smoking during changeovers. Braasch competed in a "Battle of the Sexes" contest against Venus Williams and Serena Williams at the 1998 Australian Open when he was ranked 203. A decade and a half older than the sisters, Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centred around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager." He nonetheless defeated both sisters, playing a single set against each, beating Serena 6–1 and Venus 6–2.


[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

He is my hero, just for the smoking part, that's hilarious

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (21 children)

its funny how these feminist morons set themselves up to fail

nobody with a brain cared about mayweather fighting ronda rousey. nobody would even think it's a contest. but feminist morons will keep talking about it, and when matches like that or the tennis or chess or hockey happen and the guy wins obviously, they're mad

[–]The_BeardedGentleman 26 points27 points  (0 children)

"Feminism still has a long way to go before everyone is equal!!!"

[–]1thiasus 17 points18 points  (7 children)

nobody with a brain cared about mayweather fighting ronda rousey.

Anybody with a brain would be actively opposed to such a matchup. It wouldn't be even remotely fair, and quite possibly dangerous for the woman depending on how the fight plays out. I don't want to see rousey's career ended because of a stupid battle of the sexes fight.

[–]VodkaTankerSpill 20 points21 points  (1 child)

I do. I want all feminists cheer and foam ay their mouth how she will be victorious. The watch her eat shit in the first round.

[–]chaosmech 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'd agree with you if Rousey was just as delusional as they are, but she isn't. She's not an idiot, she knows she couldn't beat any guy of equivalent weight, and even refuses to fight a MtF transgender fighter of the same weight.

Yes I'd like to see the rabid feminists eat their words, but I don't want it to be at her expense; she hasn't done anything to deserve that.

[–]ChadThundercockII 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Some morons on Youtube and Facebook argue that if the fight happens she will beat Floyd on the mat. Haha, that if she ever touches him. One 'check hook' and she is out.

[–]Cashews4U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But she aint a do-nothing-bitch tho

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I like the smack talk afterwards.

Venus Williams:

He thought we couldn't get a point. He didn't think we could play. We showed him we could.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A few others have commented with the tennis example but not known what the guy's name so I added what you said to the post, thanks for the contribution

[–]ChrisBenRoy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To add to this, John Macenroe has come out saying he'd beat them too, and I believe him, being that he was one of the best in the world at one point in his career.

[–]kazcovic 399 points400 points  (170 children)

It really isn't surprising that men are better than women at sports because of the obvious natural physical strength. What I find surprising is that men are also consistently better than women in chess.

[–]abdada 265 points266 points  (16 children)

Chess is part of the patriarchy I learned in both my gender studies masters degree programs.


[–]CruiseCruise 65 points65 points [recovered]

Obviously. Look how the pieces are shaped.

[–]Dopebear 73 points74 points  (8 children)

The bishop is clearly the shape of a man's penis.

[–]gg_s 93 points94 points  (6 children)

And that poor queen! So oppressed, she can move any distance in any direction, while the king is free to move one space at a time.

[–]Endorsed Contributormonsieurhire2 70 points71 points  (1 child)

In feminist chess, the queen can also move like a knight as well, because it's only fair and realistic that a woman can do anything a man can do.

[–]MelodyMyst 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I thought it was because they go on tangents.

[–]TheRedThrowAwayPill 11 points12 points  (0 children)

FYI : the Persians & Arabs didn't call it a "Queen"

Thy called it the "Viceroy" (wazeer) - the King's right hand man who does everything for him and has wide power to move about as needed.

Makes sense, no? Otherwise what the heck would a queen do on the battlefield? She'd move as slow or slower than the king anyway.

[–]through_a_ways 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Or, looking at it another way, the queen is so oppressed that she does all the work, when really the king is what ultimately matters.

Like an alpha lion and his harem

[–]2CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Never trust a man who goes straight for the bishop

[–]Barrebaron 20 points21 points  (2 children)

If chess were about fefes and not about logic and strategy, women would be pretty damn good at it.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 23 points24 points  (1 child)

The ruthlessness and efficiency of the female hamster is awe inspiring. Women run their own virtual reality, superimpose the virtual reality over actual reality. Then do little more than emote both inwardly and outwardly to shape reality in a way that maximises both return on investment and resource extraction.

[–]pavista 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its not really surprising when you think about it from an evolutionary perspective, men are hunters, women mind to the tribe. Hunters obviously need a physical strength and speed advantage, but they also need more cunning, better reflexes, better capacity to endure mental torment, better endurance both mental and physical etc etc.

Men have been training at this tasks for all our time existing as humans and tens of millions of years prior to that in any species with clearly defined gender roles.

The bigger question is, why do they think men wouldn't be better at this?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should post more around here... your low reward living post a while ago was excellent

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 134 points135 points  (79 children)

Funny you should say that about Chess, Milo Yiannopoulos (gay anti-feminist journalist) actually explains why men beat women in chess (in reference to some grandmaster implying that men are naturally better).

IQ is an astoundingly accurate indicator for chess ability, as one might imagine for what is essentially a puzzle game, and whilst men mightn't have higher IQ's on average than women they do have a greater variation. So there are more very high IQ men just like there are more very low IQ men compared to women who are more clumped in the middle of the two extremes. Because of this, there are more high IQ men than women and in Chess... We see this reflected. If it were chess between average men and women with very similar IQ's, we probably wouldn't see much of a difference in ability.

[–][deleted] 80 points81 points  (35 children)

I think it's something beyond IQ too though. It's what men are interested in. It's about becoming so enthralled with one thing that you don't care about anything else. Very few women are going to put their entire lives into chess, but hundreds (probably thousands) of men have. Also Milo Yiannopoulos is based AF. Honestly single handedly changed my opinion about homosexuals.

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (10 children)

Just learned that Milo is gay, didn't even cross my mind to be honest. He is so fucking eloquent and straight up destroys feminists every time he goes on screen.

[–][deleted] 80 points81 points  (4 children)

being gay gives him special powers among feminists. They can't simply dismiss him because homosexuals have been more oppressed than women, historically. So he can say things and not be dismissed as just a "white hetero cis scum". He, of course, acknowledges this and points out its ludicrousy.

[–]JohnPeel 9 points10 points  (0 children)

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's fantastic. These fuckwit feminists don't respect science, just "privilege" and so they can't say shit against him whilst he's quoting the science. They long to just make an ad-hominem attack (because that's all an idiot can do when they lack evidence or logic) but they won't do it because he's "oppressed"

[–]slavetothought 10 points11 points  (1 child)

And he's pretty grossed out by the flamboyantly proud gay community. He's definitely an interesting voice.

[–]CumForJesus 7 points8 points  (2 children)

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy.

If you would like to do the same, add the browser extension GreaseMonkey to Firefox and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points  (13 children)

I think I read earlier that having obsessions like this is a trait of testosterone. Anyone know any link between the two?

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (4 children)

Excess testosterone in the womb is an indicator of autism, and autists tend to find obsessions and be very skilled and knowledgeable in that field.

[–]trpMilo 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So I think part of it may be due to the fact that testosterone causes the male brain to be more compartmentalized (the average distance between connected neurons is smaller than that for the female brain). The female brain is less modular and more inter-connected. The extreme end of the "male" spectrum leads to the autistic brain, which has an even shorter average distance between connected neurons, and autistic individuals are known for their obsessions so there is likely a connection between these phenomena.

[–]through_a_ways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, both girls and boys with higher androgen levels show a greater interest in "male" toys (read: spatial and motion oriented, rather than personal and social oriented).

[–]Myrpl 14 points15 points  (4 children)

Milo is good, but reading "the way of men" by Jack Donovan was what changed my opinion about homosexuals. He really understands what it means to be a man.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Yeah same, except I had no idea he was gay until like a year later, funny that it might be the gays who reawaken masculinity

[–]beginner_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it's something beyond IQ too though.

Agree. IQ does matter of course. But also patience. You need to sit through a game and tournament which can last for hours and days. Later on someone mentions poker (I assume texas holdem) and that women should be better but men are. I think it's for the same reason. Patiences. You need to keep still, sitting at a table for hours. You need to control your emotions. If you blow up, thats almost always the end of the game/tournament. Women find chess and poker plain and simple boring. And I actually understand why the feel that way. But especially in poker it is a major part of them game. Poker face.

[–]MaDSteeZe 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Yup, I'd buy that guy a steak dinner.

[–]through_a_ways 6 points7 points  (0 children)

and whilst men mightn't have higher IQ's on average than women

Men have had higher IQs on average for a pretty long time. It was only a couple of years ago that female IQ reached equality, and I'm not sure how much of that has to do with biasing the tests.

Non verbal IQ would be significantly greater for men, and coupled with the higher standard deviation for men, would produce far more male geniuses in any non verbal field, including chess.

[–]SilkTouchm 4 points5 points  (8 children)

And what about Esports, where women are just as irrelevant, on every game? (Dota, LoL, etc).

[–]OctaShot 13 points14 points  (3 children)

Well, most women wouldn't want to live in a house that consists of their teammates who sit around and practice for 8-12 hours a day. MOBAs at that level highly revolve around reaction skills and twitch reflexes. I have no proof but I'm willing to bet that these skills are mostly seen in men.

IQ scores in MOBAs don't matter because even the most genius player wouldn't be able to outreflex a pro without the same amount of practice.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

I was surprised to see a woman in the top tournaments of Starcraft 2... And then I read months later that she's trans. Well.

[–]Grain_Man 3 points4 points  (2 children)

... men mightn't have higher IQ's on average than women they do have a greater variation.

There's some debate about that: http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/sexdifferences.aspx

I suspect that it may have become the conventional opinion, for the simple reason that "men have more retards and more geniuses" is while not really politically correct is at least in the same ballpark as politically correct.

It doesn't actually affect your conclusion either way of course, since men are going to dominate the higher end of the scale regardless of which explanation you accept.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (23 children)

IQ is an astoundingly accurate indicator for chess ability

Source? Everything I've read has said otherwise.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 6 points7 points  (17 children)

I've got none, just heard Milo talk about it in an interview and it made sense to me. IQ tests measure your ability to solve cognitive puzzles... Chess... Measures your ability to solve cognitive puzzles. Didn't seem a huge stretch that an ability in one would relate to an ability in the other.

You've read studies that suggest IQ is not relevant to chess performance? I'd be interested to read them

[–]slavetothought 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really wish Milo would stick with discussing feminism and stay away from American racial and economic issues. He's out of his league.

[–]garlicextract 10 points11 points  (3 children)

Also racing and video gsmes

[–]PlayerXz 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Motor racing is definitely a big thing. Men excel by a good margin in pretty much any sport, but they seem to do so much better in motor racing specifically.

If anyone comes up with that "Women drive better" crap, I just ask them how many high-level motorsport drivers are female. As you might have guessed, none. If they drive so well, then surely someone would want to hire them right?

It is the same thing as the gender pay gap. It is not true because if women really earned less for doing the same job in the same way for the same amount of time, every office building would be filled with women.

[–]Rooi_Aap 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The reason insurance companies give better rates to women (in countries where it is legal), is because they claim lower, not less, thus they are a cheaper liability (let's not count that men drive more, or drive the dangerous times, like a couple going home after a party). Once again men do a better job. Might be wrecking cars, but they are still better at it.

[–]1grubek 13 points14 points  (9 children)

Its not only strength or physical advantages only.

Men are stronger, quicker and have more resistance than women.

But there are also mental advantages. Men have quicker coordination and are more precise for quick moves (women are more precise when there is no time limitation). We also have better spatial perception. On top of that we are more competitive, more independent thinkers and more prone to enjoy puzzle solving type problems.

This last three, together with the fact that there are note highly intelligent men than women, is probably a big part of why men are better at chess.

When it comes to sports and competition women have no chance against men.

[–]bluedrygrass 9 points10 points  (8 children)

women are more precise when there is no time limitation

I don't believe that. The best snipers, archers, whatever requires slow precision, are men.

And there are men artists carving statues in the frame of a pencil's graphite core, as you may happen to see seldomly posted in the frontpage (happened recently).

The only advantage they might have, in general, is to have really fucking petite hands, and this help. As it helps not having to slam, force, and abuse their hands in any way that the average male is required to do.

Also having very short arms helps, too, since you have to control less angular movement and the nerves have to cover less distance.

Males are still better.

[–]Grain_Man 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't believe that. The best snipers, archers, whatever requires slow precision, are men.

While men do tend to dominate those fields it's hard to tell how much of that is some sort of male superiority with slow precision and how much is simply greater male interest/competitiveness.

[–]1kick6 12 points13 points  (10 children)

It really isn't surprising that men are better than women at sports because of the obvious natural physical strength.

it is when you've bitten off the idea that "we're all the same except for plumbing."

[–]kazcovic 6 points7 points  (9 children)

I don't think even the most hardcore feminists deny that men are physically stronger than women. I beat my sister who is 7 years older than me in an arm wrestle when I was 12 years old.

[–]bluedrygrass 19 points20 points  (7 children)

Then you haven't heard enough or spoken with enough females. Many feminists do claim women can be stronger than men, but they'll often do it in indirect ways, like claiming better reflexes, fastness, resistance, "multitasking abilities".

The old, stupid theory about "men being more powerful, but female more resistant" is often thrown around even by males.

And while the average female may be self-conscious of her limits enough to admit, against their will, that males are phisically superior, talk with some athletic woman that practices a sport and is good in it to be maybe better than the average male in it, and you'll realize this fact makes her think she can be better than any male in it.

Beat her, and she'll always be painfully surprised. Women are completely delusional and detached from reality, and the costant bombing from medias about scrawny 120 lbs girls throwing 200+ lbs muscle men to walls has already made his way in the head of many boys, too.

[–]GuitarHero07 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Most women who seriously pursue any sport are well aware of the huge differences in strength/athleticism between men and women. Sure some of them might talk smack for the media but they are well aware of the facts from personal experience. It's usually the lard beasts who have never picked up a barbell who are most delusional.

[–]PlayerXz 4 points5 points  (3 children)

"men being more powerful, but female more resistant"

Never heard this before. What is being more resistant supposed to mean though? Better at resisting force or something?

[–]Piroko 28 points29 points  (6 children)

What I find surprising is that men are also consistently better than women in chess.

Its lookahead.

Women do not think strategically. Whether it's ten years or ten minutes. It's why they can't figure out that feminism ultimately impedes them from getting what they want.

[–]FatStig 19 points19 points [recovered]

Also better at spatial reasoning. Many problems can be mapped to geometry. For instance when negotiating a political resolution at work I feel the same way as when I play my brother in chess. First get people to maneuver themselves into limited number of moves(let them talk and write it down). Then maneuver yourself to make there only one viable move that sets them on a path to complying with your wishes. On top of that you manipulate their emotions so they perceive it as some sort of compromise. Ultimately you are moving through a multidimensional space at the same time as another and trying to corner them.

It also reminds me of the similarity of the experience of throwing a baseball vs a football.

[–]Hoodwink 13 points13 points [recovered]

This is just a small theory of mine, but I actually think spatial IQ is related to hunting in a pack. When I was a young boy, when I would play frisbee football, I could just 'feel' where my teammates were on the field. My head was almost keeping track of them automatically. And multiple members of the team as well - it was human radar. It also seemed all the men had a similar 'radar'. What's more? Women didn't. And these were women who played as much as we did.

I have no doubt it's ultimately also related to our neolithic 'hunting' and team sports abilities. IQ, I think, was originally evolved from group hunting.

[–]Senior Endorsed Contributormax_peenor 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I see this all the time when playing hockey when women are involved. They may be able to skate and stick well, but unless it is one-on-one they are never where they should be. You put more than two women on the ice at the same time and it's comic to watch the chaos. This is why the boys HS teams beat the the olympic girls team.

[–]SexistFlyingPig 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Focus and 3-dimensional modeling are masculine traits.

[–]fucktales 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I find surprising is that men are also consistently better than women in chess.

Why on Earth would you find that surprising? Chess is a very logical game of tactics and strategy.

[–]drallcom3 52 points52 points [recovered]

The German women's football team, multiple world champions and probably the best team in the world, lost 0-3 against 14-16 yo boys.


[–]L0rdMaul117 34 points35 points  (1 child)

Good God.....

Well guys, that's it. Wrap this one up. Points have been proven over and over in this thread. From world class teams losing to teenage zit faced boys. To some D2 scrub guy beating former WNBA MVP in 1 on 1. I think.... This one is busted good and proper, lol.

[–]nishal1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably the sexiest team in the world too.

[–]Cmon_Just_The_Tip 51 points52 points  (10 children)

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 40 points41 points  (2 children)

You see some of the women going around a difficult obstacle (cheating) and getting away with it? Perfect analogy for feminism

[–]ElPujaguante 25 points26 points  (0 children)

No, no. She was "showing some wit."

I hope the commentator didn't believe his own B.S.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And this is what they do on tv. God knows what cheating they do when noone is looking

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I only got 30 seconds in... That's so cringe-worthy. I knew a girl who competed in the WORLD championship for motorcross too... I think so much less of her now. Fuck me.

[–]jmg83 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was pitiful. These women are professionals? I could do better, and I'm by no stretch a motorcyclist.

[–]randarrow 34 points35 points  (35 children)

[–]TheRealMewt 44 points45 points  (13 children)

Already, criticism is mounting, both from MMA fighters and the greater public at large. Mixed martial arts champ, Ronda Rousey, has refused to fight Fox over her “unfair advantage.”

Remember, Ronda Rousey is on record saying she could beat Floyd Mayweather but she won't take on a MTF transgender because "it's not faaaaaaair".

[–]evilquesadilla 26 points26 points [recovered]

Well, that's a bit different, because Mayweather wouldn't know how to defend against take downs and submissions. Take downs and submissions are specifically design for fighting against a physically stronger opponent, which is exactly the case here.

With that said, with some basic MMA training and preparation, and being that Mayweather is an elite athlete even though I dislike him very much, Rousey wouldn't stand a chance.


[–]nsummy 11 points12 points  (4 children)

I totally agree with the first paragraph but have to disagree with the second. Rousey is a 4th degree black belt and olympic medalist. Grappling takes years to master. I'm a former wrestler and a bjj player for 1 year and when I roll with this female black belt judoka at my gym, I have to go 100% to not get submitted, and she probably weighs 40 lbs less than me. He would at least need 2 years of training to be competitive. But thats neither here nor there, she says she could beat him now. She isn't claiming that she could beat an elite male mma fighter.

[–]evilquesadilla 4 points4 points [recovered]

Point taken. I've never sparred against anyone elite, male or female, so I would defer to your first hand experience.

As of now without any additional training, and fighting MMA rules, Rousey definitely has the advantage. Maybe I'm giving Mayweather too much credit for being an advanced athlete. I was also assuming that he'll learn and pick up MMA faster than say, someone like me.

[–]nsummy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I honestly don't think there is much correlation between being a good grappler and a great athlete. BJJ is one of those sports that technique will always trump strength. Probably the main factor that stops someone from becoming good is their ego. You have to get your ass kicked daily and submitted multiple times over and over and over before you even feel like you have an idea of how to defend yourself. Its fun at first but the honeymoon ends pretty quick when guys who look like someone you could destroy in a bar fight regularly works you over. Its all hypothetical but I couldn't see Mayweather picking up BJJ and practicing against a guy like Dean Lister who shows up to practice drunk and still beats everyone. His ego is too big. By the way, everyone should read about Dean, this guy is a class act: http://fightland.vice.com/blog/the-tao-of-dean-lister

[–]Sofakingcoolstorybro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not a fan of either by any stretch. But in an MMA match, unless Floyd can manage to avoid the takedowns and that's a big if. It's a wrap, she'd choke him out too fast. He'd have to tag her a couple times to slow her down and even then I have no doubt she would eat a couple to take him down.

[–]fortifiedoranges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You couldn't pay me money to touch a tranny.

[–]PlayerXz 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Nah. If she fought Mayweather, which is never going to happen by the way, everyone would know it is a male/female fight just to see what happens. If she however, lost her status as UFC champion because someone with essentially the bone and muscle structure of a man beat her that would be unfair as fuck.

Transgenders competing in female leagues is bullshit. That southpark episode explained it best, it is all just cosmetic. A transgender is still a man on the inside.

This whole debacle is just media-made drama again. Right now this Fox girl/guy/kid is some random no-name with a completely unimpressive record. Professional martial artist only fight 2/3 times a year and other girls actually have to earn a title shot to fight Rousey. So let's talk about it again when this transgender is actually in a position to earn a title shot, as of now she has no business in a fight with Rousey.

[–]SexistFlyingPig 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Bill Burr has a piece about transgender (male to female) 'athletes' who are mediocre 200th in the world before surgery and number one afterwards.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 26 points27 points  (4 children)

God damn.

Dave Chapelle probably says it best in his bit about a trans-gender. To what degree do I have to participate in your delusion?

[–]ChanThunderwang 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Dave Chapelle probably says it best in his bit about a trans-gender.

Do you have a link to the vid?

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it's shit quality and goes for like an hour. It's in his 2015 special which I've only found awful Camera phone footage of so far

[–]Whereyoursisterwent 7 points8 points  (8 children)

My girlfriends friend is a staunch feminazi and she went on and on about how it's unfair that Rousey wouldn't fight her. She just couldn't understand that there were physical differences.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Already, criticism is mounting, both from MMA fighters and the greater public at large. Mixed martial arts champ, Ronda Rousey, has refused to fight Fox over her “unfair advantage.”

And yet they still managed to make out that Ronda wouldn't fight an actual man because 'it would give a bad example for people seeing a man beat up a woman on television', while still not refuting the idea that she could take on the men. Yeah, right.

[–]jmg83 3 points4 points  (6 children)

Wasn't Rousey mouthing off recently about how she could kick Floyd Mayweather's ass? I don't care about Mayweather, but I think she's all talk.

[–]Sofakingcoolstorybro 2 points3 points  (1 child)

That's disgusting, can't hack fighting other guys so you beat up on women. Pathetic in so many ways, just head to the hills with your ridiculously tailored dresses.

[–]evilquesadilla 3 points3 points [recovered]

Interesting, I thought Rousey wanted to fight men, but Dana White wouldn't allow it. But now she wouldn't fight Fox. Maybe that was all just Dana White marketing bullshit... he's trying to turn UFC into WWE.

[–]ChadThundercockII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uhh..he cut off his penis to beat up chicks ?! This is madness !

[–]WardlyHasted 30 points30 points [recovered]

I don't think a man will ever fight Rousey, but if it happened, it wouldn't be pretty. Rules dictate that she would have to fight someone in her weight class (135 lbs), so she would be fighting against a male Bantamweight.

This isn't tennis, golf, chess or whatever. This is a physical fight; where the winner is determined by KO, submission, or decision. I honestly don't think Rousey would make it out of the first round. Sure, Rousey could probably kick the shit out of a lot of men, I'll give her that. But there is no chance in hell that she could beat a man who fights in the UFC (or any other MMA league to be honest).

Pound for pound, Rousey is probably in the top 0.1% of females in terms of physical strength and raw fighting ability BUT this doesn't matter when she's fighting against men.

[–]jewishclaw 25 points26 points  (6 children)

Rousey is probably in the top 0.1% of females in terms of physical strength

Nah. I'm not saying she isn't athletic at all, but she is one in a half dozen women who have competed in combat sports her entire life. It really doesn't take much natural ability to outclass people who have never wrestled, never thrown a punch, never been hit, never cut weight, never done anything up until 2-3 years ago if you've been in the game for 20+ years. When she throws these girls around, its because she's in a position of leverage (JUDO!). Its kind of funny to watch how out of position these "professionals" can get before they get tossed. Rousey's success is less an indication of her skills and more an indication of show shitty female "professional fighters" are.

[–]WardlyHasted 11 points11 points [recovered]

I agree, but that's exactly what puts her in that top percentile.

If 1,000 people write a test and everyone fails except one person, that puts that individual in the top 0.1%. It doesn't matter if the other people writing the test were brilliant or retarded.

However, whether the other people were brilliant or retarded determines how impressive an accomplishment it is to be in that top 0.1%.

[–]jewishclaw 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I think the disagreement is more nuanced. You said strength and natural ability or I misread it.

AKA nature put her in the 0.1%. I disagree, it was nurture. I think if most girls competed in combat sports from the time they were 4-5 years old, Rousey would look unremarkable against the best of them.

[–]squidracer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I get soooo tired of everyone (women) acting like she's able to best up men.. The other day on the radio a female DJ made the comment that she could probably beat up shaquil O'Neal because of her "training"..

Women watch so much TV they start to think it's real

[–]L0rdMaul117 15 points16 points  (2 children)

I think that chick does roids bro. She's way to aggressive for even a fighting female. I mean, Ali's daughter wasn't that aggressive and she was a gold medalist in boxing.

Something ain't quite right about that Rousey chick.

I hope Floyd fights her, that would be hilarious. Give floyd 6 months to learn some judo and shit, that stuff is geared for novice and physically weak people to be able to take down someone stronger, can't be that hard to learn. Especially if chicks can do it.

Floyd would kill her. In I think he could kill her. Especially if they use those light gloves that MMA uses. I can't imagine getting hit by Mayweather with 4 oz gloves.... She'd be dead, I think he'd kill her in one blow. He'd definitely cause massive fractures if he got a loaded and delivered a hook or uppercut. She might die if she fought him.

I'd love to see it, so she would shut up already. Big mouth. Obnoxious women are such a turn off.

[–]Christian_Kong 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Rousey comes from a family of Judo practitioners. Her mom is super competitive(she was a top competitor in her youth) and seems to be the type to push her kid too far. Rousey was bred to be an athlete, doing judo since she was like 5. I would not say shes on roids, she was bred to be an aggressive competitor by an aggressive, competitive parent. Ali's dad was very much against female boxing and Leila didn't start training until she was 18 and while I dont have citation for this, probably wasn't much of a father as he went through plenty of wives and 8ish children. Rousey pretty much admitted most of the shit talk on Floyd is to help sell her fights, so nothing of the sort will every happen.

[–]DaPhanthom 75 points76 points  (16 children)


What is this?

[–]CptFizz 80 points81 points  (0 children)

They'd still beat the Leafs.
I'm a Leafs fan.

[–]CrazyLeprechaun 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Yep, and the Canadian women's team is, for all intents and purposes, the best womens ice hockey team in the world. I honestly would have guessed that they would have to play mens teams before they started losing consistently, but not so.

[–]1jb_trp 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Oh, gosh. I was hopeful that the name was just a joke. "Hey guys, let's call ourselves the Canadian Women's Hockey Team because we're not very good! Derp." But no, it wasn't a joke.

Now I want to watch the US Women's basketball team play against Oak Hill Academy just for the carnage. We should have high school boys play all Women's Olympic teams until our oceans are filled with feminist tears.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jesus christ, dude. Take no prisoners kinda guy, eh?

[–]Frdl 5 points6 points  (4 children)

To be fair, I watched a 18 under Canadian AAA Midget practice before hockey last night, and they are fucken ridiculously good. This isn't anything groundbreaking, although feminazi's are probably rattled, but you'd only have to watch them play to know no women's team would ever stand a chance.

[–]itsmehobnob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Southern Alberta under 18s even. If they played in a national league (there aren't any at that age) they'd have to play against under 16s to have a chance.

[–]kanji_sasahara 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Didn't something similar happen to the Williams sisters when they played someone ranked outside the top 200 in men's tennis? I know that when Annika Sorenstam, one of the most successful players on the LPGA tour, was allowed to play a unimportant PGA tournament and missed the cut finishing 96th. I don't think any of the top players at the participated, but I could be wrong.

Edit: A word.

[–]Xstasy14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I recall though I think Michelle Wie played in some PGA tour event and beat some guys, still obviously didn't come close to winning.

[–]KungPaoEllenTheFist 27 points27 points [recovered]

Rousey would be torn apart by a guy in her weight class. It would be just like the time the Williams sisters got their asses kicked by the 200 something ranked man in tennis.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Yea she is claiming she is better than Dominik Cruz, the current UFC bantamweight champion, who has a current record of 20-1. Gimme a break Ronda

[–]L0rdMaul117 33 points34 points  (9 children)

lol, hahahaha. So true. I got a story that's like this.

Background on me a bit, I played D2 basketball at a very good D2 program. I wasn't a beast tho, and never played a ton. I was on the roster all 4 years and recruited out of HS, but I wasn't a good college player. PG, 6'2" about 190ish. I rode the bench was a role player most of the time. I did see minutes by Jr. and some of my sr. years tho.

Anyway's, I played Diana Taurasi in 1 v. 1 one time, well two times. To 11 by 1's, no 3 point BS, win by two make it take it after 4.

First game I beat her 11-3 and dunked on her 3 times.

So she, like a typical girl, makes excuses. About the ball, I was using a real ball, not the youth hoops ball they use in WNBA.... So 2nd game we use her ball and play 11 again, same rules. But we don't do make it take it.

I win. 11-4. But I don't think I dunked on her that time.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 12 points13 points  (3 children)

Damn son!

if I were telling that story to a chick I'd leave out the "I wasn't a beast tho" part and just have them use their existing hamstering trajectory to have them project a higher level of necessary skill onto me

[–]L0rdMaul117 15 points16 points  (2 children)

lol, ha. The girls I date/bang aren't really "sporty" type of chicks. I find that shit gross. I like feminine women.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

it was always bizarre to me that the female "athletes" were often overweight at my college. How the fuck are you d1 carrying an extra 20 pounds? But, an extra few pounds doesnt really matter when nobody is moving that quickly In the entire league.

[–]nsummy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool story but all you really need to do is turn on a wnba game and compare it to a college or inner city high school game to know how well the women perform.

[–]Strongbhoy 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Minnesotan here, can confirm (they play our hockey teams too).

Also, US women's soccer loses (and these were their best ever teams) to high school boys teams, the last 100m record for the women in the Olympics was the U15 boys record in like 1985.

Rousey is doing it for publicity, she doesn't even like to get hit in the face by women.

[–]bcb77 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nobody like getting hit in the face.

[–]Air4ce1 8 points9 points  (1 child)

I saw a similar story like this when I first arrived on TRP about a year and a half ago. The differences in men and women in sports is astounding. While all my evidence is anecdotal it has solidfied my position on the matter nonetheless.

My high school basketball team would regularly scrimmage the girls. This wasn't done for our benefit at all because playing girls is similar to playing little kids. (A little caveat girls playing against guys does get them a lot better. Just look at the best WNBA players and most of them are good because they played with their older brothers or fathers). Anyways, playing against girls is absolutely terrible. They will bite, claw, scratch and hit you in the nuts just to steal the ball. It's pretty much their true selves in physical display.

My team mate has a younger sister who now plays D1 at the highest level. I asked him about it the other day and he said that he literally taught her everything she knows. Of course, he destroys her everytime they play together but it just goes to show that even being half as good will get you to be at the top on a woman's scale. My teammate isn't really anything flashy or special he's a solid player that works hard and is efficient, not even a start on our team, but he created a superstar at the collegiate level.

[–]seattleron 10 points10 points [recovered]

Not a peep out of any news media source. NOT A PEEP.

Had this been the other way around, hell hath no fury.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Had this been the other way around, hell hath no fury.

Oh god, I can't even imagine how over-the-top nonsensical it would be.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (1 child)

Haha, upvoted for pure schadenfreude.

[–]cazzah123 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I had an argument about this recently.

Some woman was complaining about the wage differences in men and woman soccer players. I tried to explain to her that people want to watch the best soccer at the highest level, thats what brings viewers and sponsors in, and woman just cant provide that.

She couldn't understand just how much of a difference there is between the two.

Take the best womans soccer team in the world and place them against a b-league teams YOUTH TEAM, they are still going to get fucking destroyed.

[–]eaton80 11 points12 points  (2 children)

That darned Patriarchy wins again! [shakes fist]

[–]riding_stoned 16 points17 points  (6 children)

Why do you think that Ronda Rousy is afraid of fighting Fallon Fox? She's just being realistic, she knows she would be trashed.

And yet, Business Insider names Ronda Rousey the 'the most dominant athlete alive'.

Unplug from the mainstream media: that's the first step to swallowing the red pill. It's been over a decade since I owned a TV.

Edit: for grins, you might want to watch the celebrity boxing match between Joey Buttafuoco and "Chyna" Joanie Laurer. Before the match, "Chyna" talks about how she's going to trash Joey on behalf of women everywhere, because he's scum, but then she gets thrown around like a rag doll by an out-of-shape, overweight male in his 40s.

[–]L0rdMaul117 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Business Insider"... A economics magazine ran by nerds and wannabe's that never played high level sports writing about "the most dominant athlete alive".

Yeah. Sure, lol.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Incredibly biased commentators, but what do we expect? Every time the girl decided to throw a punch they praised her, but he was knocking her around all over the place, even though he generally looked like he was holding back. Yet he was much older and well out of shape.

[–]cantstopper 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Didn't Fox lose against a woman a few months ago?

[–]ThreeLF 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, she lost to Ashlee Evans Smith. I'm no MMA fighting pro, but from what I can see Smith just grappled better and burned Fox out. Fox hits way harder but just cannot keep her footing. Apparently Smith has a lot of wrestling experience.

Edit: that was one of the most incredible feats I've ever seen. Smith was clearly weaker, but she just refused to take hits.

Edit 2: interview where she's talking about the clear advantage Fallon had: https://youtu.be/TRBGnjoWdo8?t=195

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ref did not let Joey do anything to her. That whole match was a setup to artificially prop up women. If that was a ufc match, she'd be KO and bloody.

I was looking for this video to place in the Red Pill Video Compilation Nuke under the 'Gender Equality Narrative' section.

[–]MrAlester 14 points15 points  (12 children)

Ex GF was studying to be a PE teacher. She supposedly trains her body everyday (paraphrasing her), unlike me a lazy engineer.

She took special pride on her swimming skills, and got very sour when she pushed a swimming race against me and lost.

In her mind she was a top athlete among her peers, and didn't care that I train every single day and I enjoy running marathons, rock climbing and do halterophilia (dont know how to translate, sorry).

[–]L0rdMaul117 17 points18 points  (3 children)

lol, only a bimbo female would think that she's in better shape than a male marathon runner. Holy fuck. My God the delusion is real!

[–]MrAlester 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Dont get me wrong, I was in a really good shape but I never was a pro. I ran 10K at least 3 times a week, I ran a lot of marathons and just one ultra marathon, average times every time.

Of course my body didnt look like her steroid filled classmates, which I guess was what she called an athletic guy.

[–]Wilhelm_Stark 11 points12 points  (2 children)

The connotation of engineers being wimps nowadays is a strange concept to me. I come from a family of engineers, and from what I see, we're just as much workhorses as any mechanic, just with the capability to actually input design as well.

[–]HappyNacho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I googled "halterophilia" and since I guess you speak Spanish (like me) it would translate to Powerlifting.

[–]the99percent1 5 points6 points  (1 child)

This Kaarsten guy is hardcore amused mastery!

His story is stuff made of legend..

Smoking during interchanges, one serve handicaps, & playing like a ranked 600th player. Any guy would take this challenge seriously or let the girl win.. But this, he just took the piss out of it.


This is what he said after the match.

My advice if you're ever in a position to play a match of this nature is be patient - don't be annoyed or surprised if your match against the Williams sisters is cancelled, as they both have very busy schedules. My game against them had to be re-organised at least a couple of times. Preparation is crucial. Remember that a game like this is light-hearted - taking it too seriously would be a mistake. My training regime consisted of a leisurely round of golf in the morning followed by a couple of shandies. I turned up on court feeling suitably laid-back...

And here is the punchline..

... Apparently, after the game, Serena and Venus immediately told the press they wanted to challenge a male player again. This time they revised the ranking of the man they wanted to face, to 350 in the world. I informed the journalist who told me this that in the next week I was set to lose a lot of ATP points and drop down to 350 in the rankings. I told him that if Venus and Serena waited just one week they could challenge me all over again

[–]EnriqueRoz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That goddamn site is unreadable. Who picked that font? And no line spacing? WTF?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

It's not the "world view" though, just the "western world view."

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good point, I edited to reflect that, we need to keep a broader perspective

[–]inspiringpornstar 5 points6 points  (6 children)

"Women can fight alongside men in war" I don't disagree but how well are they going to do in hand to hand or when they're taken hostage and raped. Or say hiking a dozen miles with a 60 pound plus pack.

[–]newls 18 points19 points  (1 child)

A study by the Norwegian military (yep, Scandinavia of all places) showed that even having one woman in a fighting squad drastically decreased their overall effectiveness.

Something to do with them looking out for her all the time at the detriment of the mission, them going to help her when she fell regardless of the circumstances or her relative injury compared to the other guys in the squad.

Military forces around the world are standing firm against the silly hens flapping their wings. If they don't, people will die. I'm absolutely serious. And all so some self-righteous arse-covering politician can grin to herself smugly and say she 'made a difference'.

[–]SatisfiedMan[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, in Australia the politicians are saying that they need to lower the entrance requirement for women because... None of them are passing.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Another commenter did say that in the Israeli Defense Force they do have some mixed companies. Those have casualty rates 7x higher than men-only companies. Now in both UK and US there is pressure (from politicians, and feminists who swallow the Hollywood bullshit) to take women into the front-line. Naturally, the military are under pressure to reduce standards to allow this, just as the police and fire services had to. I only hope they have the sense to have separate companies for women, not mix them.

[–]hores 3 points4 points  (1 child)

is there a link available for that stat? (7x casualty rate)

[–]TheBredditor 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can confirm this. My high school team (in Minnesota) scrimmaged the US Women's National team when I was a senior in 2004, and we kicked their asses. Like 9-2 or something like that, and both of their goals came because our goalies were fucking around and gave up super soft goals.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The MMA fighter boast is safe because we'll probably never see a fair match between her and a male MMA fighter (other than Hollywood where she'll have magical athletic abilities)

[–]Hunter2isit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh don't forget that because they were playing high school kids they weren't playing at their best / didn't want to get hurt / it was all for fun / different rules and sized rink / hamster

[–]Hatehype 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm really surprised no one has given a reason for men surpassing women in most categories, including non-athletic ones such as chess. Men have more genetic variation then women, so the extremes of intelligence and physical prowess are both higher and lower for men than women.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's a reason that we have women's sports. It's because women can't compete. We already knew this and women already know this.

Was it last year that a woman was in the news for winning a marathon against men? Oh, and they gave her a 17 minute ad 41 second head start.

Oh and she got a 50k bonus for it too.

Feminism has always been about advancing women's interests. It's a sexual strategy but it's also a competition strategy where they do all they can to hamstring male achievement while removing barriers to themselves.

Then they call this, "equality".

[–]aazav 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Africans from the east make great long distance runners, because that's what they had to do for tens of thousands of years.

Africans from the west are much more heavily muscled due to environmental pressure of a different type (they didn't have to outlast an antelope over a week of running).

There ARE genetic differences. They are built in. With men and women, it ls called sexual dimorphism. It is real and it is documented.

[–]cheerfulwish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe 10 or so years ago the united states women's national soccer team played some high school team in Connecticut and lost

[–]paynehouse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The u16 boys soccer team regularly faces and beats the women's national team. The team that won the World Cup. The best woman's team gets defeated by an average u16 team.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Too true. I would bet $500 that I could beat the shit out of Rhonda Rousey

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Any guy who can keep his hips below hers when she is going for a judo throw would beat her. If you don't know judo she would decimate you, of course.

[–]exoduslife 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see their raking is 8th at the moment so they have aimed a bit lower in terms of opponents. Regardless, it's another feminist driven tactic where you pitt women against men (because that's what has been happening since the beginning of time right?) and once the women lose, bring out the feminoms with their trumpets and banner to hold a parade about how "you can't compare men and women, men have more muscles....".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I was in 7th grade, I'd practice with the old Portland Fire, an early WNBA team. Some of the starters were way better than me (Jackie Stiles, Sophia Witherspoon), but I was just as good as everybody else, and actually better than their bench players.

Note: I'm not that great at basketball, but I was just stronger and could jump higher than all of them.

[–]xPURE_AcIDx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I beat the canadian women's hockey team when I was 17 in midget AAA.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of when the 2010 Canadian women's hockey team(gold champions) played my local major junior hockey team in a non contact game. The league(qmjhl) is among the best in Canada for guys aged 17-20 and they crushed the women. Imagine if it was contact which is one of the biggest factors in hockey.

[–]fullhalf 1 point2 points  (1 child)

i've always said, if ww3 broke out, gender roles would come back with fashion. women would suddenly realized their position in life and let the men take charge. it would be time to put up or shut up. there would be no excuses.

[–]itsforhismum 1 point2 points  (1 child)

When i was was in university in Maastricht me and some friends played baskettball for fun maybe once a week.none if us played baskettball from Childs age. We all played football since were from germany and thats just the way it is. 2 of the guys were really overweight like 150 kg at 1,75m (about 250-300 pounds at 5'10 in freedom units).all of us were heavy smokers and drinkers. we usually played outside so come Winter we go play in the University gym were the unis girls Team had training they trained 3 times a Week full time they had about 10 players so they could switch we couldnt and yes you guessed it they got fucked in the ass really hard. (74-10) if i remember correctly. The look on their faces priceless!

load more comments (74 replies)