tl/dr - Women are far more cunning and Machiavellian than most men could ever hope to be.
I want to post a video today that was uploaded to YouTube within the last 24 hours by a man calling himself Paul Joseph Watson. Now, after watching the video, I would like to immediately hamstring your hair-trigger on the Reply button to make the obvious points, which I will get out of the way now:
Yes, I know the video is sponsored by InfoWars, and yes, I know everybody has mixed bag feelings about the validity of InfoWars. That's not what I'm discussing today.
Yes, I know that the actual likelihood of the UN wielding this sort of power, or attempting to wield this sort of power in post-modern, free, industrialized nations, is not high.
Whether they could actually pull something like this off within the United States is not what I'm talking about either. What I am talking about is that
THESE FEMINISTS THINK THEY ACTUALLY HAVE THE SELF-ENTITLED JUSTIFICATION TO TRY IT, AND IT REVEALS HOW FIERCELY MACHIAVELLIAN WOMEN INNATELY ARE.
I think if Niccolo Machiavelli were alive today and witnessing the absolute gall of these women, of their ability to embrace their true, inner Dark Triad, of their willingness to use their "Women Are Wonderful" advantage to such a cunning level, well....I think old Niccolo would be furiously taking notes on how to up his own DT game.
The very idea that our favorite Hug-Box Trigger DumplingsTM , Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn, think they have the moral sanctity to actually censor internet traffic that doesn't meet their perverted, twisted ideas about "cyber bullying", reminds me of a blog from our very own esteemed /u/IllimitableMan, and I'm going to highlight some parts of his post "The Red Pill Constitution" to show just how prescient that post was in the context of these current events:
01.) – Feminists claim they want equality but their actions and reactions indicate it is power without responsibility that they strive for. They desire both male and female privileges consolidated to form a perverse type of “feminist privilege,” thus upsetting the balance of power and social dynamic between the sexes.
As is illustrated in the video, and also astutely pointed out by Mr. Watson, Anita and Friends want to use the ruthless hand of international governmental power to censor (and potentially jail) any man who tells her she "sucks" or "is a liar", yet do nothing to censor the expression of slut walkers, MRA convention protesters, or HamPlanets who want to vandalize weight loss campaign ads.
They want the power to shut down speech they don't like, without the responsibility to censor themselves from saying crazy loon-ball feminist shit.
Their decisions are based on their current emotional state rather than logic. Once overwhelmed by the feeling of the moment and riding on a tidal wave of emotion, even if an awareness of what is fair and rational remains intact in the woman, she shall opt to ignore it in favour of indulging “what feels right.”
"Doing what feels right, in the moment. Think about this fellas; here we have a bunch of (what is usually) young, free-speech loving, censor-ship hating, progressive liberals, who under most **logical circumstances would absolutely ABHOR the notion of any type of censorship, especially on the internet...
...and here they are lobbying for censorship on the internet. Why? Because FEE FEES, that's why. Anita fancies herself a logical, rational, progressive woman, and here she is asking big daddy UN to shut up anyone who dissents with her feelings. She even says at the beginning of the video, something that could only spawn from the fluffiest of hamsters:
"I mean, it's not only about what's legal and illegal, right?" - Anita Sarkeesian
Yes, Anita, that's exactly what it's about. But I wouldn't expect you to understand or to grasp that concept in your perpetual emotional state of being offended by the collection of pixels on your computer screen.
03.) – Women are Machiavellian in nature. In comparison to the average man they are far more proficient in the art of manipulation as well as comprehending the realm of subtext to “read between the lines.” The theoretical evolutionary basis for this sex difference is that due to smaller body mass and inferior musculature women had to learn to use men as tools rather than directly oppose them in physical competition. This makes the pronunciation of female strength a propensity to be mentally violent rather than physically. Physical violence is outlawed whereas mental abuse is not, and it is this which allows women to get their way using their favoured method of coercion without being held accountable by a system of law.
As I stated in the TL/DR, women are capable of far more Machiavellian behavior than a man could ever hope or dream to possess.
I mean, what could be more narcissistic than to presume you have enough credibility to address the UN, and actually be manipulative enough to actually get a seat at the table?
What is more Machiavellian than using the strong arm, or attempting to use the strong arm, of other men to do the bidding that you cannot do yourself? Are weak men calling you dirty names on the internet? Get bigger, more powerful men to stuff a sock in their mouth.
From Wikipedia: "Psychopathy is characterized by enduring antisocial behavior, impulsivity, selfishness, callousness, and remorselessness". Anita and Friends demonstrate psychopathy to a tee here. It doesn't matter how many men are censored, how many men are fined, no matter how many men are socially ostracized, no matter how many men are literally stripped of their freedom for 6 months for disagreeing with a feminist on Twitter. None of it matters as long as the Hugbox remains intact and unfettered.
So JP, what's the takeaway here, you ask? Well, the takeaway is to learn to spot the traits in women that society has trained you from a young age to ignore. I can't imagine how many plugged in feminist manginas could watch Anita give that verbal vomit, and just nod along with her, waiting to take up against the evil misogynists. The takeaway, especially for the lurkers, is to not take shit at face value, and realize that the "Fairer Sex" is capable of far more subliminal ruthlessness than you realize.
When it comes to getting what they want, women are about as "fair" as a mafia-rigged unlicensed boxing match.
minor grammar edits