AMA - Milo Yiannopoulos - Thursday, Dec 10th, 5pm London time, (12pm EST) on TRP (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Modredpillschool

EDIT 12/10 12:22 EST - Milo appears to be running late. Rest assured we'll sticky the thread when we begin.

British journalist, Breitbart writer Milo Yiannopoulos, who is well known for his coverage of Gamergate and defense of the masculine in the media will be here Dec 10th at noon (EST) for an AMA.

Special thanks to /u/CisWhiteMaelstrom for doing the legwork.

Don't miss it. It's gonna be good.

ninjaedit: fixed my typo

[–]foldpak111 97 points98 points  (6 children)

Let's not waste his time, gents. I got a pretty good question for him, you should as well.

[–][deleted] 31 points32 points  (2 children)

Up-vote this. We need to be prepared and not waste the man's time.

Does someone have a recommended reading/watch list so we can get to more specific/valuable/current topics than re-hashing what he has already said?

[–]GooseJuice-xo 7 points7 points [recovered]

You can check out his recent appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience to get a decent idea of what he's about.

[–][deleted] 258 points259 points  (119 children)

It's amazing how our biggest public defenders are a gay guy and a woman. The little ironies in life are fantastic.

[–]Sdom1 101 points102 points  (99 children)

Irony, or the tyranny of identity politics?

Milo would be a fantastic defender even if he were straight. If you've ever seen him debate, he's quite a swordsman. You don't face him and escape without a few cuts.

[–]gamewolph 161 points162 points  (7 children)

However, if he were straight, he would be dismissed outright. Milo confuses the opposition because they don't want to dismiss a marginalized homosexual, they're forced to at least hear him out.

[–]Cheveyo 50 points51 points  (6 children)

It's rather enjoyable to watch his opponents. You can tell they're just DYING to scream obscenities at him.

But none of the ones that could be used on him are very PC.

The best part is that he knows this. So he can go full diva and there's nothing anyone can do about it.

[–]satanicpriest13 37 points38 points  (3 children)

Good on him for fighting the good fight to be honest. He could have cashed in his gay points and reaped SJW sympathy, but he is more manly than most men today. His talents are better spent on defeating the feminist agenda than talking about microagressions against gays. Loads of respect for him for embracing who he is yet being rational.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

He does all the time:

Look, I don't even care, I dont' have skin in the game on this fight.

He has a variation of this on most interviews

[–]Subcommandante_Khan 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yep, its a winning strategy.

Only a fool would not play to their strengths.

[–]srtor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He is like 'The Daily Show'. You can't attack it because it is actually a comedy show. But it delivers all hard hitting news and criticisms.

[–]worldnewsrager 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Wait.... You're saying that the man who has said 'I think my god put me on this earth to infuriate SJWs" knows he's getting under their skin?

[–]DogeMcDogeyDoge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So he can go full diva and there's nothing anyone can do about it.

As Milo himself said, "As a gay or lesbian you can get away with anything, especially bad behaviour!"

[–]doublereignbeau 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've read he is quite deadly with a katana.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (83 children)

I don't like him much to be honest.

He argues the point until he runs aground on something then uses the gay card "I am absolutely fabulous hahaha darling" to wriggle out of it a tactic he shuns feminists for, being strong and assertive on point, and when losing revert to "I'm just a girl".

I can respect what he's doing - and that's building an empire, I don't really believe he is sincere for "The cause" whatever that would be. The AMA will be interesting none-the-less.

[–]MortalSisyphus 40 points40 points [recovered]


He trounced this woman in debate and didn't once use any "gay card" to wriggle away.

For those who can't be bothered to watch the whole thing, at least watch the brilliant closing remarks.


[–]RiseAboveRuin 5 points6 points  (2 children)

That closing speech was excellent but damn he moves around a lot.

[–]ILoveSunflowers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Joe Rogan said he thinks he's on speed

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (61 children)

He's generally good at trashing women because they don't know how to attack a gay man, I drew my conclusions from the JRE podcast, I have heard him be well presented and slick in often smaller segments but the meandering nature of the JRE podcast had more than a few cracks appearing in the armour.

I compare him rightly or wrongly to a negative version of GayLubeOil - GayLubeOil I believe is riding TRP to earn an income but does legitimately care about the issues contained therein and for the welfare of his fellow man. I believe Milo can and will just abandon the current wave he is riding the second it becomes profitable to do something else.

I don't deride him for that, I'm merely pointing out that he's a smart businessman - which I can respect but not admire. I find Karen Straughn to be much more interesting personally.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 15 points16 points  (15 children)

He's trying to build an empire AND defending men? How is that not to admire?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (14 children)

Because I believe he would happily deconstruct "men" if there was a counter culture wave for him to ride doing that too. I guess we will just have to see. The takeaway message is don't advocate taking women off a pedestal only to replace it with a gay man in it for the money.

I'm merely cynical in the true sense of the word.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (19 children)

I know GLO personally, he breathes TRP shit 24/7.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (18 children)

This is the impression I get. I would rather it be GLO on TV than Milo.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 29 points30 points  (17 children)

My onscreen presence needs a lot of work and I'm doing my best to develop this skill.

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (9 children)

I don't know why you're fucking about with T shirts.

I've heard nothing but good from your skype calls and you can articulate about a variety of topics and you obviously have a gallows humour. Get on Patreon and let me pay you £1 for each video you do. Get 500 of us doing it, make 3 videos a week.

I don't want a T shirt, I want to give money to something that has actual value.

Your thoughts are more valuable than something made in China.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 13 points14 points  (2 children)

My Shirts are printed in the United States on American Apparel blanks which are also made in the United States. The illustrations are created by a professional out of London. So to be honest with you I worked very hard to create a product with lasting value because I believe that it is a reflection of myself and my brand.

I went to a factory and felt a bunch of different shirts to figure out what feels and fits the best. I also worked my ass off trying to find a good artist which is really fucking hard.

However point taken I understand what you are getting at and I am moving in that direction.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another kickstarted video campaign. promise 12 videos, and spend the next 3 years at the UN complaining, and release 3 videos.

Sounds like a solid career path to me

[–]TRPShill 6 points6 points [recovered]

I've never understood criticism for anyone supplying anything. The demand side of all economic exchanges is where the guilt lies. Only moral idiots refuse to capitalize on would be consumers. All shirt purchases are voluntary.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (4 children)

I guess you are the most vocal public figure RP has at the moment.

too bad the whole of our contributions is to tell the MRA movement to go fuck itself, and start lifting fatty...

[–]lycanthr0py 2 points2 points [recovered]

That's not the whole of our contribution to MRA. RP is aware of, and concerned with the quality of women as well as the economic reality of the world. MRA is interested in these things too. That's the reason the sun has an MRA flair. There is a dialogue between the communities, although it's mostly indirect.

[–]worldnewsrager 7 points8 points  (8 children)

nah... it's not just women. He obliterated some male university academic not long ago. Fucking just left him for dead. It was glorious.

edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUVY-ZDwkxY

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (5 children)

Male university academics are women. I hadn't seen this debate though I'll add it into the rotation thanks.

[–]2rp_valiant 5 points6 points  (0 children)

he's a critical theory professor no less.

[–]Subcommandante_Khan 2 points3 points  (2 children)

What a shyster. The madness of this whole dogma in academia is a complete rejection of the obvious facts of life. Religious idealism by other means.

[–]worldnewsrager 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What? You mean you don't agree that if someone feels victimized, that that means they WERE victimized?! Color me shocked.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the time of empire it was pragmatic to teach the gifted how to think. In post empire it's only purpose now with little exception is to teach the average what to think.

[–]2niczar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're thinking of the clowns in sociology departments. Look at Chomsky or Dawkins, that's a different story. By the way, hard to find more of a bleeding heart liberal than Chomsky, but he's been kicking SJW butt decades before they were called SJWs, back when it was merely postmodernism.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedPillDad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glancing at the comments below that video, loe and behold is a heavily upvoted one from Karen Straughan... and she nails it.

[–]MortalSisyphus 7 points7 points [recovered]

Did you watch the closing remarks? Karen Straughn has never come close to that level of eloquence. If you want to criticize Milo you at least have to point to someone who is better. I haven't seen anyone who comes close.

[–]PedroIsWatching 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I actually just got done listening to the JRE where Milo was on. Jesus, Milo got insufferable when he was getting triggered by Rogan challenging his religious beliefs. It also revealed his style of filibustering an argument he's losing - stalling while slipping facts and quips in every so often so you don't realize he's stalling.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah for some reason on JRE he was acting like a dick - normally he's better. I thought he was really good until I saw him on that - had to turn it off half way through...

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

U have any more Milo Yiannopoulos debates like that? I enjoyed watching that

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a solid minute at about 59:00 where the awesome ginger moderator kid is personally identifying with Milo's description of MGTOW. He's focused like a motherfucker.

[–]L33TPWNERS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watching the debate now, at 40 mins in, the topic of male circumcision came up and he made a joke about how he prefer circumcised, because he has to look at them. it's not a big play of the card but its still there, ever so subtlety.

It's nothing to dramatic, and I love his style of debating and he hit a home run on every single point.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He uses the gay card to highlight how ridiculous the left is. He's got the card that trumps the woman card so he uses it as a bludgeon to show them how ridiculous it really is.

[–]selfsufficientnigga 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am fine with that. Fight them with their own weapons.

[–]deepfriedcocaine 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Link? I'd like to think he'd say that ironically to point out the irrational power of pulling an "-ism" or "-phobia" card in today's society but I haven't seen the video. If so, and if it worked, it'd probably prove his point (but at the expense of nobody noticing).

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (4 children)

[–]Subcommandante_Khan 3 points4 points  (3 children)

You should give a specific point in the interview. Most people are not going to sit down for 3 hours and watch this.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Without being an edgelord5000 i'm not concerned that most people won't listen to Milo for 3 hours except to reflect that if you want to enter into an AMA with him you kind of owe it to yourself and to Milo to listen to the JRE podcast no matter your bearing on what I am saying about him.

Memory serving Joe cornered him on a matter and Milo then went all effeminate whilst claiming he had a 6-some as a 15 year old and has drunk loads of cum, the feigned outrageousness used as a tool to distract from the line of questioning came up about half a dozen times.

[–]Subcommandante_Khan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good point. I remember that, both on the circumcision and religion issues. I'm not surprised when your average person has some dumb closely held belief that they won't budge from. Religion never was about logic.

He's good at bird-dogging the left, a shitty job that I don't want to do personally, so I appreciate it.

[–]BoTuLoX 0 points1 point  (1 child)

then uses the gay card "I am absolutely fabulous hahaha darling" to wriggle out of it a tactic he shuns feminists for, being strong and assertive on point, and when losing revert to "I'm just a girl".

Would you suggest writing a thesis for debating with SJcunts? The ones whose ground is supported solely by these petty victim tactics?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Disengage from them, don't give them air time.

They're fire and every time someone talks to them we pour petrol on them. We don't elevate westboro church by debating them, we shouldn't debate SJW either.

You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into. SJW are mentally ill, they truly are and so you can't grapple with them or debate them, same as feminists you cannot ever change a feminists mind. How many YouTube fights have you seen with feminists or debates where one of them has said "oh wow you're right that's bullshit"?

The entire Anita Sarkeesian thing is such an obvious scam she can be dismissed with nothing more than "OK dear".

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's how you play the game when you're fucking with the public media. If he didn't do it as well, people wouldn't hear him out.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 7 points8 points  (1 child)

That's no coincidence.

Our biggest external advocates are a bisexual woman and a gay man, because if they weren't a bisexual woman and a gay man, they would be us, getting all that lovely hateraid right along with the rest of us.

/u/girlwriteswhat is shielded from criticism by her vagina. Milo is shielded by his metaphorical limp wrist. We all say the same sorts of things they do. We can be dismissed as bigots spewing "hate speech". They can't.

The trick is to let that work for us. Let it train us not to care about it. Better yet, let it train us to crave the disapproval of cowards and idiots as the sincerest possible flattery they are capable of.

Bask in the hatred. And one day, you will discover that most of the men capable of doing anything useful are standing on our side of the great divide.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's because they are the only one's allowed to have an opinion on the matters. If you are a straight male, you aren't allowed to participate in the debate because you are automatically a shitlord blinded by his privilege.

Being gay or a woman is the only way to dodge the sexism accusations in today's society.

[–]BlackPhoenix01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It completely messes up the Politically Correct narrative.

Black and conservative? You're not a real black person and you're an uncle tom sellout.

Female and anti-Feminist? You don't know what feminism is and you're not a real woman

Gay and anti-liberal? Gee, I don't think the regressive left has come up with anything to take that down yet.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)


What is this, MRA? GWW and that femenist 'filmmaker' do not speak for the community in any way.

He doesn't really either, he is just anti femenist, not pro RP.

the closest we have to a public spokesperson was Roosh, until he told RP to go fuck itself, and then rag on homosexuals and american girls with neo-masculinity.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

That is why I said defenders and not supporter or member. Karen Straughan even defends TRP against other MRAs. While I don't agree with everything that Karen and Milo say, the great war right now is between rationality and insanity.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

meh, it's a little heavy on the 'validation of others' side of things for me to care enough, but good point.

[–]rpscrote 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Dont forget Rollo Tomassi (The Rational Male). Great writer with remarkably keen insight. Maybe not as "public" but still public enough as a manosphere leader. He posts here too

[–]ECoast_Man 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In fairness, they both acknowledge that. Milo has said repeatedly he wouldn't be taken seriously if he wasn't blowing black guys.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amazing? No. A product of social justice politics. If our biggest public defenders were men, they would hold no credibility in our current climate. It should be the same for all groups. Someone with no stake in the game hold far more credibility.

[–]TheSilverwolfKnight 68 points69 points  (8 children)

Love seeing the change of everyone going from strong framed men to cheering fangirls for Yiannapolous. But then again, I don't blame a single one of you.

[–]PedroIsWatching 52 points53 points  (1 child)

You'd fuck him too, don't lie

[–]TheSilverwolfKnight 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I would, I really really would.

[–]DoesNotMatterAnymore 18 points19 points  (0 children)

True, but let's not forget that I've got massive tingles every time, when he crushes some random female feminist journalist on TV. In a debate, where his opponent has 0 chance against him, usually they can't even keep up with Milo's rational explanation.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The exposure that be will provide is very beneficial to the men who spend countless hours creating content.

[–]Subcommandante_Khan 15 points16 points  (1 child)

I admire his unshakeable narcissism.

[–]2undead_keyboard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's raised narcissism to the level of an art form. It's a wonder to behold a master craftsman like him at work.

[–]2niczar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hard to compete with Milo's frame.

[–]gamewolph 55 points56 points  (4 children)

Can Reddit handle the most fabulous mother fucker around?

[–]1rporion 48 points49 points  (0 children)


But we will try to.

Even though he dyed for our sins.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 13 points14 points  (2 children)

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 22 points23 points  (1 child)

This is the picture he posts whenever some university deems him "too dangerous" to come on campus.

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The claims of PTSD must go through the roof when he does this.

[–]Subcommandante_Khan 24 points25 points  (7 children)

I wonder how much milo frequents TRP, if at all. I assume he must have gone through it at least once.

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points  (6 children)

He told me that he reads it regularly.

[–]2rp_valiant 19 points20 points  (0 children)

what a lad.

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. We have our finger on the pulse of the manosphere and he's really fucking on top of what's been going on, evidenced by the Sexodus articles.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 7 points8 points  (3 children)

I suspected as much. Does he ever contribute?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (1 child)

He didn't say.

[–]Sneeksl 24 points24 points [recovered]

Tomorrow's the 10th, did I fall asleep in a TARDIS?

But seriously though, this is cool. Looking forward to it. Serious props to CisWhiteMaelstrom.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Tomorrow is a typo. The AMA is on the tenth.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Will you be taking questions for those of us that cannot make the time? or nah?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you tell me what it is then I'll ask him him for you when he does his AMA.

[–]playofthegods 18 points19 points  (3 children)

You can tell he does in his convos with Roosh, or Gavin McInnes. Milo does his best not to talk publicly about the subreddit for good reason. Rule 1..

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 10 points11 points  (2 children)

I suspect the same is true with Joe Rogan. When you listen to them speak, they channel nearly the same language we see here. They're savvy enough not to reveal their ties to this sub.

[–]Senior ContributorNightwingTRP 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Cracking stuff! Really looking forward to this one, Milo is such a fabulous faggot. Legwork much appreciated Cis.

[–]MSoftHarem 10 points11 points  (2 children)


[–]Modredpillschool[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Fuckin right. Where you been son?

[–]MSoftHarem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Living the dream, and by dream I mean working like a slave. Good problems though. I'll get on IRC sometime soon.

[–]BroSheaga 21 points21 points [recovered]

Straight males going crazy over a gay male. I don't know why I can't get over this aspect of Milos fanbase.

Milo is the fucking man.

[–]mrprm 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Maybe some people appreciate someone for what they have to offer and don't care what their gender/race/sexual orientation is...

[–]VictorEremitaK 6 points7 points  (1 child)

He is so logical and rational when debating feminism, but also incredible naive and ignorant on other stuff (like religion and circumcision).

[–]angryuser_trp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Heard him say some silly stuff on religions before too. He's still got a way to go in that department...

[–]1rporion 52 points53 points  (2 children)



I am all stoic....

-_- .....

edited: O_O/

[–]Endorsed Contributorgekkozorz 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Keep your frame dammit! Don't let his fabulous hair distract you!

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorCopperFox3c 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Holy shit, awesome. Nice work mods, and /u/CisWhiteMaelstrom.

I remember some discussion about Milo a month ago or so here on TRP. This should be good.

[–]Alanranks7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is awesome. Milo is one of few journalists that openly criticize the feminist agenda. Good for him i hope the AMA is productive.

[–]Endorsed Contributorredpillbanana 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would even skip leg day to see this AMA. Thanks for setting it up, /u/CisWhiteMaelstrom!

[–]stunningandbrave 17 points18 points  (4 children)

I love that man.

Would suck it, no homo. 10/10

[–]Disc26 8 points9 points  (3 children)

But would you cup the balls? Take your dedication to the next level, stunning. Still no homo.

[–]stunningandbrave 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Sure. It's only gay if balls are touching anyway.

[–]mugatucrazypills 2 points3 points  (1 child)

let me tell you the type of man Gary is ...

[–]stunningandbrave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's a man who knows that when you put another man's cock in your mouth, you make a pact.

[–]DeathDealer8 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the heads up. It'll give us all time to think up some questions. This will be pretty sweet.

[–]100usernames 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Is this real life

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That will be /u/jaredschaffer27 's reaction too, after he eats his birthday cake and then goes to get his wisdom teeth pulled on the day of the AMA.

[–]jaredschaffer27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna be high as hell. Please don't downvote me if I ask a retarded question.

[–]0xdada 3 points3 points [recovered]

Fantastic. He's like a super villain to SJWs. Maniacal antagonist, yet for reasons they can't explain, untouchable.

[–]1bradyo2 12 points13 points  (6 children)

Think Milo speaks a lot of sense and is pretty enjoyable to follow on social media, but Jesus Christ it's embarrassing watch straight men fawn over him like 6 year old girls do over Justin Bieber.

Nevertheless, I'm looking forward to his AMA. Good work in getting him on.

[–]Sdom1 20 points21 points  (5 children)

A lot of that is joking, and plays into his schtick.

[–]fcjnews 6 points6 points [recovered]

Is breitbart a legit news org? Every time I've heard about it it's either about a scandal they broke and then that they highly manipulated and set up said scandal a few months later.

[–]2undead_keyboard 9 points10 points  (0 children)

When it comes to their articles about SJWs and insane feminists, they seem to be on target. Like pretty much every news site in the world these days, take everything they say with a grain of salt.

Plus, it was Milo/Breitbart that gave us those brilliant Sexodus Articles (part 1 and part 2) a while back.

[–]emergingred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Suddenly I've been watching Milo Yiannopoulos videos for an hour now. Where has this man been all my life?

[–]Raskolnikov1817 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Milo was my conversion from feminism entirely (was on the fence between feminism and mens rights) but I think seeing somebody who, like me wasnt posturing with some macho bullshit on the side of men was what really got me and suggested that it wasnt just men angry they couldnt get laid.

That and he is adorable and I want to kiss him (im drunk and reading his artciles at midnight)

[–]1mr_nate_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I read the name Milo, and thought to myself (not being too familiar with him): "Wait is it THAT guy?! Could it really be?" And then I saw that it IS that guy. This is going to be amazing, I can't wait. What a fucking boss.

[–]theredpilluminati 12 points13 points  (8 children)

Defense of the masculine... by an elite worshiping catholic brit homosexual who thinks genital mutilation is great 'cause he likes to suck pretty cocks. Can't wait to miss it.

[–]DONT_reply_with_THIS 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Yeah the circumcision talk on the Joe Rogan Experience was unbearable. I understand he likes cut cock, but supporting unnecessary genital mutilation on a new born strictly because of preference seemed off to me.

I generally agree with Milo though. Can't agree with everything I suppose.

[–]attemptist 8 points9 points  (4 children)

You sound a lot like feminists who attack their own support base such as Tim Hunt and other male feminists, women who aren't 'feminist enough', etc. Leave the internal division and henpecking to them.

[–]theredpilluminati 13 points14 points  (3 children)

Someone offering a different opinion is not an internal division. I don't agree with his views on monarchy, abrahamic religions, and circumcision.

[–]attemptist 1 point2 points  (2 children)

That's fair enough. I got the impression you didn't think he should be here because of it. Whatever our differences, he does a good job of wrecking feminists.

[–]theredpilluminati 1 point2 points  (1 child)

When one has a ridiculous position and defends it with ridiculous evidence as feminists do...pointing out how they are ridiculous is not heroic. If he wants to think critically he should question the validity of a system of government based on who's vagina you fall out of...he should question if humans are born with a stain of original sin and should be punished for it. He defends those positions so I question his motives.

[–]Swelfie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I, for one, love my pretty cock. So do the ladies.

[–]nowayback2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Excellent, looking forward to it

[–]Bung_Eye 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's great! I can't wait!

[–]Solitary_Wolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fantastic news. looking forward to it.

[–]Batou_Red 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of my favorite people along with Patrice O'neal. Milo is the defender of the masculine faith.

[–]unseen1unknown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

5pm thursday in London is 3am Friday in Aus...looks like I'll be rocking up pissed.

Are we allowed to ask him on politics and such or we keeping it to sexual strategy?

Is he going to link this to Breitbart and his Twitter? if so then the Subscribers to TRP are going to increase by quite alot

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fuck. Don't think I've ever been excited for an AMA before..

[–]CouldntFindGudName 2 points2 points [recovered]

I have no idea how he stays calm when hearing all the bs the feminists are throwing at him. I mean I've seen his debates, he goes out with facts and numbers, and since the beginning what the feminists do is start with "I feel that..." or "In my opinion/experience."

seriously wtf! Milo gives scientific facts and these people don't get it. It's either that they're way too dumb, or they are willingly denying that they understand it. I would definitely lose my cool and become frustrated.

My question is, Milo how do we become better at debating these leftists. How not to get frustrated, and how to make them understand?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Milo makes claims, supported by reasonable evidence, and presents them as a set of arguments to prove or disprove something. Femicows then attempt to negate his reasoning by moving the argument to the Fee-Fee Dimension, where the laws of argumentation do not apply, and discursive re-definition of key terms occur in order to avoid cognitive dissonance and make them think they've won. That, and a liberal heaping of logical fallacies.

[–]oolevityoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[–]Washedupoaf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I for one cannot wait to hear from this fabulous motherfucker

[–]174pounder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You guys should link some of his best youtube stuff - in the OP if you can.

  1. because it's entertaining and informative

  2. because it will help people ask more intelligent questions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGL5eRw7rXU Joe Rogan Podcast

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm so proud - somebody just accused me of being your reddit account.

[–]666Evo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say I'll bring the hookers and blow but I'm not sure I'd provide the right hookers... or good enough blow for that matter...

I'll just come and watch.

[–]The_Adman 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Milo's awesome, the only issue I have is he's a bit nutty on the religion front.

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, but he is on-point on a lot of other things.

[–]waynebradysworld 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are two types of male cheerleaders; tops and bottoms.

Milo is definitely a top. Dude is a stud (for a fagget)

[–]TheMGhandi 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Seeing as that's the day I was born, do I get a present?

[–]2rp_valiant 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure having Milo do an AMA on TRP is your present. It's what I wished for for christmas.

[–]jaredschaffer27 2 points3 points  (1 child)

My birthday as well, getting my wisdom teeth out same day though, hope I can participate.

[–]TheMGhandi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a bitch dude...I went to the dentist for the same procedure only to find out I needed a root canal soon. Still don't know whether I should kill my tooth or let it die slowly, but whatever.

You know what I did there. lol

[–]CaptainObivous -2 points-1 points  (16 children)

On Joe Rogan's podcast, he said, and I quote "Ultimately, our sense of right and wrong comes from the Bible," and "Everywhere that doesn't have a strong Christian heritage is a fucked up place with bad morals."

I have no time for such Xian bullshit and Xian bullshitters. I'm going to pass on this one, thx though.

[–]worldnewsrager 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So, yea, he's wrong. Ben Sharpiro is a virulent zionist, but I agree with him on virtually all his other arguments, I'm not going to throw away such a staunch Constitutional defender who's quite rational in every debate that isn't Israel, where he thinks 'god did it' is a sufficient answer.

I support him, where i agree with him, and i detract, in areas where i don't. It's that simple.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (3 children)

you're acting no different from feminists and the rest of reddit who take one bit of information about someone which isn't necessarily even related to the topic and because they disagree with that person on topic y they dismiss any of his views on topic x.

It's pathetic and is about as good as a feminist saying "yea but those red pillers are neck beard virgins". Classical ad-hominem attack.

Or if I have a math tutor telling me you have to show your steps and I tell the guy "yea but you're fat! You can't even count the calories you eat , genius!" I thought we don't do that on this sub.

[–]CaptainObivous 0 points1 point  (2 children)

you're acting no different from feminists and the rest of reddit who take one bit of information about someone which isn't necessarily even related to the topic and

How insulting that you think that just because I commented on one aspect of his persona that that's the sum total of my opinion on him. And how is my commenting on his Catholicism different than others commenting (getting wet, actually) over his homosexuality? Do you bitch at them, when his gayness is not "related to the topic"? Or is it just me you get pissed at, because my nipples are not getting hard at the thought of Teh Great Milo coming to this sub.

But it's not just his raging Catholicism (which is at least as important to him and his identity as his homosexuality). It's that he's a fuckin' mess of a man and a clown. Listen to his performance on Joe Rogan's podcast and tell me you don't agree. He's a complete mess, a troll and a jackass and his affiliation with men's issues should be a source of embarrassment rather than pride. Maybe some of us can or are willing to ignore his frequent and public ass hattery in favor of his ability to pen an occasionally fine essay, but I cannot.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How insulting that you think that just because I commented on one aspect of his persona that that's the sum total of my opinion on him. And how is my commenting on his Catholicism different than others commenting (getting wet, actually) over his homosexuality? Do you bitch at them, when his gayness is not "related to the topic"?

Um.. difference is they are kidding? You don't always have to be playing "Donald Trump AMOG game", we're on a subreddit with a bunch of other men discussing stuff and learning and sharing, not at a bar in LA. The purpose was not to compare you to feminists, just your strategy which is very typical of all of reddit and part of the reason why no one critically thinks anymore.

But it's not just his raging Catholicism (which is at least as important to him and his identity as his homosexuality). It's that he's a fuckin' mess of a man and a clown. Listen to his performance on Joe Rogan's podcast and tell me you don't agree. He's a complete mess, a troll and a jackass and his affiliation with men's issues should be a source of embarrassment rather than pride. Maybe some of us can or are willing to ignore his frequent ass hattery, but I cannot.

His raging Catholicism is not relevant and is distorting your views about him. Him being a mess of a man and a clown apparently is also not relevant to the fact that he can be more educated about a certain topic than me or you and is free to express his views on them without people bringing up his personal choices. I'm not responsible for the actions or lives of others so I find no reason to apologize for the actions of be it another terper, man, whatever. I also tell my religious friends to not apologize for something they didn't do. Fuck that.

Similarly, I find no reason to be embarrassed by another person's actions. I can't even mentally fathom that anymore. If you are embarrassed by him, then you need to be less emotionally invested and a bit more selfish. You sound pretty angry, and I can't understand that because the only source of anger should be something that directly impacts you and your life.

You get mad when some idiot posts about some slut on 2x over here to get upvotes as well?

[–]jaredschaffer27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Blaze on, my intrepid friend. You shall be missed.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I too think his views on religion are ridiculous. But that doesn't discount the rest of his message

[–]Endorsed Contributornyrp 8 points9 points  (8 children)

Everywhere that doesn't have a strong Christian heritage is a fucked up place with bad morals."

It's true though.

[–]InAStateTRP 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Japan vs Nigeria

South Korea vs Russia

[–]Endorsed Contributornyrp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nigeria is less than half Christian. 50% Muslim. And Christian heritage only arrived principally in the last 200 years, that's not a "strong Christian heritage."

I don't think South Korea is particularly more moral than Russia. At best they're maybe equal. But North Korea, of course, is way worse, which probably just goes to show that the American and international aid given to South Korea since the Korean War makes up a lot of its culture. What was Korea like before 1951? Not like Italy.

I will concede that Japan and South Korea are two exceptionally bright, civilized and sophisticated societies. But can you really name more than two high-IQ East-Asian countries that could even compete?

Not even Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Phillippines compare. Isolated Japan, and half of the Korean peninsula might be unfucked-up.

[–]national_sanskrit 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I would much prefer to live in taoist Buddhist Taiwan than one of the oldest Christian country Ethiopia.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

When I first heard that I thought it was rhetoric. Then I thought for a minute and couldn't find a substantial fault.

[–]Endorsed Contributornyrp 3 points4 points  (2 children)


Column A: France, Italy, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, USA, Canada, Spain, Belgium, Argentina, New Zealand, the Netherlands

Column B: Tajikistan, India, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, Tunisia, Zimbabwe, Iraq, Syria, Sri Lanka, Jamaica, Indonesia

Which would you rather live in?

Even among poorer countries: Poland, Hungary, Romania, Croatia.

More decent cultures than rich non-Christian countries: Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Colonialism is a factor as well. Those places occupied by Column A generally have higher standards of living.

[–]Endorsed Contributornyrp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Places with stronger morals colonize lesser moral powers. That's how they're able to organize and take control.

When Islam comes, they don't colonize, never have. They conquer and force into submission, which is what happened from the Balkans to India.

[–]PROVERBIALLEMONADE 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Just did a little research on him, I never heard of him before now but this looks like a promising ama

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

There are youtube interviews you should watch if you haven't already. He is a great critical thinker, and doesn't take bullshit. His verbal destruction of multiple feminists on TV is a sublime experience to watch.

[–]PROVERBIALLEMONADE 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I just watched some of his stuff. If you haven't check out his video when he went to the Amber Rose slut walk. Guy is hilarious

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amber Rose slut walk

Saw this one a while ago, and just re-watched it. Makes the blood boil to see someone kicked out of a public place by cops who personally witness someone trying to steal from him, then assaulting him with her hideous arse.

[–]prodigy2throw 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I should read up on this guy...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone should read and watch videos before the AMA so we don't waste his time and ask better questions.

[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sad I have to miss it. I'll try to pop in and ask a question.

[–]Tom_The_Human 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww yes

[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I wonder if any of his fans are going to criticize him for "supporting those TRP misogynists" like Karen Straughan's fans did

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It would be a good test to see how Milo does with his feet to the fire. He's been writing articles literally about the people on TRP. To alienate us now wouldn't make much sense.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I think they see him as enough of a misogynist now that it would come as no surprise to them... although, since he's gay and automatically a "victim", I think they have some cognitive dissonance about calling him a misogynist.

[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not so sure. A lot of Milo's fans are moderates, and could be better described as "sympathetic" to men's issues and anti-feminists. They don't consider themselves MRA's either, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of them would not be sympathetic to TRP, or would just go with the "TRP are the real misogynists" narrative that the moderates and MRA's have been trying to brand us with.

[–]mister_dice 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I stopped liking him when he said that gay men are superior, maybe it was one of his jokes that I didn't get, but I just can't stand people like that.

[–]dontdrinkthekoolade 2 points2 points [recovered]

Statistically they do have higher IQ's, and from an evolutionary point of view I can see the argument for it.

[–]stawek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's likely only the smarter gay people come out of closet, so it's selection bias.

Anyway, every hypothesis is worth considering.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Likely a joke... but superior to what, and in which context? I'm sure he doesn't think in such black-and-white terms.

[–]JuiceIncinerator 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Reminds me of a question; do feminists (or women in general) have a harder time arguing against a gay man or an asexual man?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A gay man is a primary victim in their perception of the world. He is effeminate, and therefore a pseudo-woman. They can't call him a misogynist or other terms they'd like to use, because he's a pseudo-woman and a member of the underclass they are "heroically" trying to protect.

An asexual man, on the other hand, is not only a man, but a fraction of a man, simultaneously unworthy of pity and worthy of contempt. He is not to be protected by them, nor is he of use to them since he can't be convinced to part with his commodities (money, status, semen) because their only weapon is ineffective on him.

[–]CuntyMcFagNuts69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't get enough of this dude. Every interview he just spits logic after logic. I loved his bit after the Oregon shooting. Made so much sense

[–]HomosapienX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure someone has mentioned already, but if you haven't listened to the Rogan podcast with him as a guest you are missing out. He is one interesting dude.

[–]Redasshole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any advices for mommy issue boys?

load more comments (28 replies)