Red Pill TheoryCorpse Feeders (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil

The selfishness of women knows no bounds. What's more is that they utterly lack the self awareness to ever notice it themselves. The Red Pill knows this to be by design not by accident. In Prehistoric times this instinct helped women survive when their tribe was conquered. In ancient times, it helped Roman women reproduce as the Vandals burnt the empire. In WWII, it let Parisian women enjoy a rotation of American, French, and Nazi wiener meat after their husbands were dragged away. For a woman, her dead husband is an all expense paid ticket to the cock buffet.

When I was in college I trained a guy named Steven. Steven wanted to be the cool Asian from Need for Speed Tokyo Drift. He wanted round shoulders and a six pack, a hot girlfriend, and a fast a motorcycle. I wasn't going to give him a motorcycle but I could definitely get him a ticket to the gain train. I got him to deadlift properly and eat real food instead of MSG ramen. After a year of fixing his lifts and policing his diet, Steven was up 15 pounds of muscle. For some time, Steven was the buff dude on the flashy motorcycle with the hot girl. He was the guy drag racing at intersections with his girlfriend. Steven upgraded to a motorcycle so fast that he couldn't help but smash it into a tree and permanently undo all of my deadlift coaching.

I didn't know why Steven's mom was calling me from his cellphone until she told me that he was dead. There was a stark contrast between Steven's university friends and his Filipino family. Both groups knew two very different Stevens. Steven's family always knew the programmer Steven but they never met Steve the gym bro. At his funeral, Steven's friends comforted his parents with stories of his mad gains. His girlfriend did no such thing. She spent the whole funeral talking about herself. This was her chance to be a local celebrity. Steven's girlfriend spoke more than anyone at the funeral and she didn't talk about Steven.

But Steven's girlfriend didn't stop at the funeral. Steven's girlfriend kept attention whoring on his grave even while she was riding other dudes cocks and motorcycles—and she's not special. All women are like that, in fact I've seen this phenomenon play out countless times with different dudes and different corpse feeders. A dead boyfriend is the ultimate source of drama which can be redeemed indefinitely for attention and sympathy. The attention is instrumental in helping her find a replacement.

For women Corpse feeding is hard wired. They have been cannibalizing their husband's bodies since the day Cain slew Abel and nothing has changed for ten thousand years. The only difference is that her corpse feeding is now on Facebook just beside her cleavage shots and booty pics. Women use men for whatever men can be used for. Beta are used for bucks while Alpha are used for fucks and dead men are used for an endless stream of social media validation. Behind the push up bras and makeup, women are soulless baby machines who's only drive is reproduction. The only men that are important to women are those that can be used to achieve that end, regardless of whether they are dead or alive.

Give yourself the gift of a Swoletastic Christmas grab an Alpha Shirt and Hoodie
For updates on my posts follow me on Twitter.

[–]ChairBorneMGTOW 208 points209 points  (75 children)

We often caveat our "don't date single moms" policy by saying that widows are excluded.

Having dated a widow (no kids), I can offer first-hand experience here. Her deceased hubby was core to her identity. She would explain away shitty behaviour by citing the tragedy of her loss. It was a get out of jail free card, as well as a pity generator.

Not saying that I wouldn't ever date a widow again, but you are absolutely right, fire some women widowhood is an emotional tool in their social toolkit.

[–]1animal_one 137 points138 points  (26 children)

I knew a girl in high school whose boyfriend died from driving while drunk. They weren't really that close, and right before he died, her best friend told me she was going to break up with him. After his death, he became (like you said) a core part of her identity. She would do memorials every year for like 10 years, she got really involved with his family, involved in DUI classes and prevention, and even got a full back tattoo in remembrance of him. I'm remember years later sitting around in her living room while I was home on leave, and she said something like 'he'll always be the love of my life, no man, not even my husband, will come before him'.

[–]2comment 28 points29 points  (2 children)

What a strange mirror to a major male pedastool.

I know a guy, very omega, who has the same exact attitude toward a girl who he was crushing on hard in High School, who died their senior year from some car accident. It's been 20 years for him but he gets insufferable around her birthday and death day. I swear he probably lights candles to her various anniversaries and sends cards to her family and shit, and just mopes in between in general from time to time.

Mind you, they were "friends" but I suspect its in the way of inconseqential and short interactions typical among school acquaintences. Like if you asked her his name, she'd shrug before remembering vaguely "Oh, that guy?"

It's like he's been female alpha widowed for 2 decades. And nope, no one can help him. Dug his own emotional grave and he refuses to climb out.

[–]Eugenics2015 8 points9 points  (1 child)

This is actually super understandable.

You have to acknowledged the psychology of crushes and how irrational they are.

Her death froze him in a state of irrational attraction, only now she can never age and only exits idealized in his mind.

[–]1Ill_mumble_that 4 points5 points  (0 children)

only now she can never age and only exits idealized in his mind.

I've gotta say I've had 2 or three girls I crushed on pretty hard back in HS. They were the hottest girls I'd ever known. I've always thought about them time to time and compared them to women in my life now. But it was always the perky 17 year old version of them.

But I've since been cured of this. In combination with TRP, but mostly it was just looking them on Facebook and seeing that time has been much kinder to me than is has to them. I'm in my late 20's and through diet and exercise I look like I'm 19-20 still. They are a little younger than me yet they look like they are approaching 30-35.

I can see how if the crush died you'd never be able to make that person real and make your mind realize the irrational perfection you've associated with that girl. That sucks.

[–]redadactyl 181 points182 points  (6 children)

Hello Anger Phase, my old Friend.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

best reference to the anger phase ive ever seen haha

[–]Call_me_Loretta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've come to break with you again

[–]PlanB_pedofile 13 points14 points  (4 children)

Seems to me like an easy ticket to alpha widow.

Such behavior and nostalgia seems not far distant from women who have been alpha widowed.

[–]1Snivellious 17 points18 points  (3 children)

She is an alpha widow, in a strange sense. He's dead in a tragic way, so he brings her social validation but never argues or gets in the way of what she wants to do. Whatever he was like in life, he's the perfect benefits-only man in death.

[–]morsX 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Over time I imagine the way she described the deceased was increasingly virtuous. After some years the deceased stopped being an average guy and became someone befitting a legend. All this to instill sympathy from anyone she could as the 'love of her life' was ripped so harshly from this plane of existence.

I feel like I am making this shit up -- clearly this occurs more than rarely in practice.

[–]1Snivellious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is very much a thing, and not just with partners. It's a common pattern to see people get super invested in charity and memorials for people they never really liked.

I think it's partly absolution - if you treat them well in death then you can whitewash every wrong and conflict you gave out in life. Beyond that, it creates a "cause" and a sense of tragedy that's far more interesting than your average middle-class life. I don't think it's an accident that you never see this from people with truly interesting lives (or lives that have already had an excess of loss).

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (6 children)

And what's amazing is that she had to compare him to her future husband, and she feels no remorse about apparently keeping a theoretical guy as #2. There's nothing like a good untimely death to make a woman forget all of the bad things about a person and fill her head with an alpha sillouette.

Anyway, just in case you needed more incentive not to date chicks with full back tattoos...

[–]GC0W30 16 points17 points  (5 children)

Can you imagine fucking a chick with a full-back tattoo to an ex, dead or not?

It doesn't matter if the guy was my best friend, a mortal enemy or somewhere inbetween, my dick would be softer than loofah.

So much fucking crazy!

[–]CQC3 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I was thinking the same thing. Some guy out there is probably fucking a chick with a back tattoo of her ex.

That's probably the gayest not gay thing I've heard recently.

[–]GC0W30 1 point2 points  (0 children)


I had a thought after I posted:

If she was one of those chicks that wore black and purple all the time and listens to Morrissey a whole lot....

maybe she only plans on fucking bisexual men?

That was the ONLY way this made sense.

Thing is, it just doesn't make any sense.

[–]momomotorboat 5 points6 points  (1 child)

One of several tactics they employ. Girl I know has lupus. Used that as her explanation/reason/excuse for EVERYTHING.

Then she met some foreign guy whose dad was loaded, so homeboy floated through life living large and being the benefactor to women he saw as his muse. She used the lupus ticket on him too. She barely spoke to him, was repulsed by him and never mentioned him when he disappeared for months at a time. But shockingly accepted his gifts and vacations.

Then he dies. And wouldn't you know it, the lupus story has been replaced by the death of her BB. (funny, her name for him was 'BB' irl). His death is the defining moment of her life.

These bitches, man. Sheesh.

[–]DBTeacup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I knew a girl who broke up with an old friend, he killed himself because of her, and she pulled the same shit.

At least I got out.

[–]Johnny_Monsanto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should have called her out.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 72 points73 points  (3 children)

There's nothing special about widowhood. All women are like that. All women will dodge responsibility using whatever excuse they have at hand.

In a typical conversation, the sudden mention of a lost loved one conjures up an awkward social situation that most people deal with by remaining silent and willfully loosening their grip on the frame of the conversation. Trying to maintain control of the frame is seen as rude - it is seen as invalidating the feelings of the person experiencing the unpleasant memory. More often than not though, it's an attempt by the person telling the story to seize the frame of the conversation. I call it "dead baiting", and women are the most frequent offenders.

The solution is to simply not let a woman dead bait. If the bitch is obviously using the story as a manipulation tactic, call her out on it, and consider shaming her for using the death of a loved one for personal gain (this works especially well if you also knew the dead person).

However, if you didn't know the dead person, and you don't want to appear callous, then you can dismiss the bitch out of concern for her feelings. Tell her that she's obviously still grieving and should probably take some time away from the group to sort out her feelings on the matter. This strategy has the benefit of both intercepting her frame control attempt AND proactively preventing future uses of the dead bait - because subsequent attempts are already cast in the light of a troubled and irrational women who can be politely dismissed on account of her distress. It trivializes and marginalizes her without being inconsiderate.

Widowhood isn't a special status. It's just a handy excuse some women have found for rationalizing their need for attention. Never forget: women will use whatever excuse is available to accomplish some personal agenda.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Say like "Don't use him dying as an excuse for what you did" ?

[–][deleted] 45 points46 points  (39 children)

We often caveat our "don't date single moms" policy by saying that widows are excluded.


They're excluded from moral culpability, provided she didn't drive him to suicide. I would NEVER date a single mother EVER.

[–]BaconEggsAndSleaze 46 points46 points [recovered]

Just yesterday I saw a post made by some chick (maybe 29-30) who wrote a long thought out memorial (on fucking Instagram), about her dead boyfriend.

It's been a year since his passing apparently.

How'd he die? Suicide of course.

Men have no real outlet to talk about their feelings.

I'm sure he tried, and it probably pushed her away and made him feel worse.

It isn't so much about the deceased person, it's them saying "don't forget about meeeeeee today!"

Shes a confirmed CC Rider, I actually met her because she approached me, disheveled, missing and mourning the love of her life.

Cocks make great pacifiers.

[–]Turkerthelurker 11 points12 points  (2 children)

It isn't so much about the deceased person, it's them saying "don't forget about meeeeeee today!"

Somebody has been watching Anthony Jeselnik. For anyone that hasn't seen it, his stand up is fantastic - especially the last 20 minutes when he breaks character. The relevant bit here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FLGEr1zJYo

[–]TacoNinjaSkills 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is brilliant. You just gotta love truth from the mouths of comedians.

[–]DoubleTappp 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Cocks make great pacifiers."


[–]menial_optimist 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Read this and weep: My beta friend hooked up with a 30 year old single mom ex-meth/speed head with 3 young (all under 7) children from the same father, while my friend was 21.

He's been with her for 4-5 years now, they live together in a townhouse.

In the beginning I warned him that eventually he'd be paying for her children one way or the other. He laughed at the idea and even ridiculed me infront of his girl about it.

Fast forward to present day and he does pay for her children via food, roof over their heads etc. His girlfriend hasn't worked in years and collects child tax credits and child support. She was working a full time warehousing job when she met my friend.

Convenient now she doesn't have to, so she doesn't.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 18 points19 points  (29 children)

I fuck them, but I don't date them. Easy lay, but I'll never get attached in any way. She gets crazy or clingy she is gone. I have well developed methods to get crazy bitches to leave on their own without damage to my life, so I fuck anyone really.

Never date or marry a single mom though. Fuck that shit.

[–]cleftscout 22 points23 points  (15 children)

Getting rid of crazy bitches is no problem. All it takes is to consistently break frame around them, they lose attraction and they let you leave. I've done it a few times myself, once as a literal get out of jail free card when I was 18 and my crazy ho I'd been dating for a few years at the time was not.

Her step dad was a cop and she said a few things that aligned her with the feminist agenda and I needed to ditch FAST. I broke frame, talked about "muh reelz feelz" and within a month, I was able to slip away off into the distance, leaving behind a burning trail of her family hating on her for letting me slip away.

Her mom still hits me up sometimes to ask how I'm doing and lets me know when her daughter gets dumped and is single. Its been over two years. I shit you not.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 3 points4 points  (8 children)

That's how I do it, and ask for sex. Works great.

[–]CQC3 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Isn't it sort of dangerous to suddenly 180 and go insanely beta on a girl? I mean, wouldn't you run the small risk of a girl being so repulsed that you must have sexually abused her?

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not if you do it gradually. Also her perception takes time for the hamster to work. Remember girls are not logical creatures, they're emotional first.

[–]cleftscout 1 point2 points  (5 children)

I've only initiated sex a handful of times. There were plenty of days that we'd go at it 3 out more times. I have mad LTR game, and learned how to make girls want more and more always (foreplay,) but sub par writing skills, which is why I haven't submitted my already written posts.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I've gone 8 years twice with two different girls. Never again. I'm too old to start from zero again after this one. I'm two years past my last divorce and finally have somewhere I can call home that is warm and dry.

I'd rather be alone the rest of my life than give another bitch everything I worked to earn simply because she doesn't want to fuck only me anymore. Every girl I fuck now knows that in advance, and they know they aren't a priority in my life. They keep coming back for more vengeful cock despite knowing I will never commit to them.

Sometimes I need to get rid of them, and going beta does it easily without much drama.

[–]coolwords 8 points8 points [recovered]

Care to share these well developed methods?

[–]bluedrygrass 7 points8 points  (2 children)

I suppose they all gravitate around giving off beta vibes

[–]cleftscout 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's a great way to get rid of many crazy bitches. Especially if done in private, but alpha personality is still displayed around everyone else. If one is ballsy or stupid enough, they may use that as an attempt to hook up.with all.of her friends.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points  (7 children)

I have, and u/cleftscout reiterated some of them. Ask for pussy, tell her about your feelings, go full on beta bitch and within two weeks she will leave and think it was her idea.

[–]cleftscout 0 points1 point  (6 children)

I've decided to try out writing some posts on the topic of crazies, I feel like there are a lot of misconceptions on the difference between bad crazy who stab men and the crazy that is very pliable in an LTR.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Too much risk of literal alpha widow. No matter what you do, you'll always be compared to him. Honestly I think the women in those cases do really deserve a husband, but count me out. I'm not trying to be a hero in my romantic life.

[–]ColdEiric 12 points13 points  (1 child)

So basically, that shtick is 'Look at me, me, me! Look at how loyally loyal I am! Look at me, me, me!'

And how it is higher than any other talk of how doubleplusbad some other persons think of her.

[–]botornotscott 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If anyone needs a recent very public example, there's these 2 Aussie surfers who recently went missing in Mexico and their van turned up torched in the middle of nowhere with charred human remains inside.

Go online and see how surfer bro getting shot in the face point blank, surviving and then getting torched alive with his friend has affected his gf (not wife, not fiancée). Sure she's in shock but dammit if my blood doesn't boil to see every picture of the lad with her taking up most of the frame, and every facebook post of hers somehow turning a man's nightmarish death into a sympathy-gain for herself. Disgusting, I feel for the boy's family, having to deal with her selfishness...

[–]billythebeta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This goes into the realm of fucking disgusting behavior.

[–]MyLittleAtomBomb 83 points84 points  (2 children)

I witnessed this first-hand when my brother self-terminated a few years back.

His widow still occasionally "speaks to him" when she wants attention at family gatherings. She'll look upwards and act like he's floating above her.

Meanwhile in the months preceding his suicide, she had separated from him and had taken the kids to another state.

The other women in his life pulled similar stunts. My cousin who had met him once had to take two weeks off from college to contend with the grief while posting tributes on facebook. Most of my immediate family went back to work and school within a week.

He was pretty alpha in his day so he had a bunch of his former conquests show up and that was pretty amusing to me. I could tell which girls had fucked him by the amount of tears staining their face.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedPillDad 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Sounds like she expedited his demise then circled back to squeeze profit from it.

Fucking drama. If they're not grandstanding as a victim themselves, they're aligning with a victim to score social points. Corpse feeding to a tee.

Milo mentioned something the other day about "virtue signalling" that caught my attention. Women do this opportunistic shit - socially positioning and projecting themselves as a good person - so pervasively that it seems their empathy is real. And other women, even when they see through this ploy, will jump on the fake empathy bandwagon to demonstrate their social virtue. The whole thing becomes a shitshow of holding up "bring back our girls" signs to gain maximum social profit for minimal effort.

Edit: I tried to look up a recent video of Hillary hugging a young girl as she shared her victim story. I could only find this one with a sentimental soundtrack added to it. Pure virtue signalling, and the Democratic media are exploiting it.

The Democrats will keep fueling public victim mentality and Hillary will play the rescuer to Trump's bully.

[–]Endorsed ContributorObio1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." - Hillary Clinton

It really is that unbelievable.

[–]HelloImRIGHT 57 points58 points  (17 children)

I've been with my girlfriend for over two years. She's had two "friends" die both of whom I had never met nor had she ever talked about. HOWEVER, after they died she insisted each one was her best friend. Literally, any time she talks about one of them or the other she says, "my best friend so and so died earlier this year".

I'm not saying she isn't upset, and I'm not saying they weren't friends. I'm saying throwing the "best friend" in there is attention seeking. I can't stand it.

[–]BaconEggsAndSleaze 18 points18 points [recovered]

Take for example all the shitty posts you see on social media when a Famous person dies.

It's attention grabbing and making sure that the world doesn't forget about them for the day.

Women can make anything about them - i.e. feminism.

[–]politicize-me 5 points6 points  (10 children)

Do men not do the same thing? How many guys have you seen post some thing about Paul walker? What about a guy pouring out his drink "for his dead hommies"? It's a social badge of pain everyone tries to wear every chance they get (we as a nation do it consistently with memorial day, veterans day, 9/1q, etc.)

I think this is making something up to describe women when in reality it describes everyone. It is a product of today's atenttion seeking society in general, not specific to women.

[–]BaconEggsAndSleaze 36 points36 points [recovered]

How many guys have you seen post some thing about Paul walker?


Only the beta faggots.

What about a guy pouring out his drink "for his dead hommies"?

Usually not done in social media to grab attention. You know people who film themselves pouring out beer?

It's a social badge of pain everyone tries to wear every chance they get (we as a nation do it consistently with memorial day, veterans day, 9/1q, etc.)

Theres a difference between participating in holidays and making every holiday about you. On veterans day I don't post a selife saying god bless america.

[–]whiskey__wizard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, insecure men absolutely do this. On the anniversary of the death of one of our friends, a friend said he was pouring out some expensive cream double stout. The guy is also a beer snob. Somehow he managed to use the opportunity to display his vast knowledge of beer.

And he barely even knew the guy who died.

[–]douglas_p 3 points4 points  (4 children)

You might want to re-evaluate the people you associate with.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's interesting to me is that this seems to be a uniquely female phenomenon. Most guys in the same situation seem to have a more "yea that's unfortunate, but I didn't really know him" when an acquaintance dies

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 118 points119 points  (20 children)

Women use men for whatever men can be used for. Beta are used for bucks while Alpha are used for fucks and dead men are used for an endless stream of social media validation..... women are soulless baby machines who's only drive is reproduction. The only men that are important to women are those that can be used to achieve that end, regardless of whether they are dead or alive.

The rules are rather similar for men. Women are our soulless sex robots. We regard the young fertile feminine submissive ones as useful to our goal for lust, pleasure, and progeny. The old haggard droopy masculine ones are invisible at best, annoying at worst. I point this out for guys in the anger phase. Yes, women seek to use you. But we use them, too. Those are the rules of the game so don't get butt hurt over it.

Where we diverge is the "dead or alive" part. In life threatening situations it is common for men to sacrifice themselves to save the lives of women (and children). Think of the slow sinking ship with women given the limited spots on lifeboats. In recent memory during the Aurora, Colorado theater massacre a guy on a FIRST DATE with a girl threw his body over hers. He died from being shot three or four times. She survived uninjured.

Male sacrifice is so ingrained that men who save themselves are to be mocked and shamed. There is a racial/tribal reason for this. Men sacrificed themselves for the good of their tribe so that the wombs could be saved so that the tribal population could be maintained rather than go into decline. For the vast majority of humanity's 200,000+ year existence we only had small groups that competed against each other and every womb counted in the battles that were 15 or 20 years down the line. In other words, tribes where men did not sacrifice themselves to save women were most likely conquered and destroyed by tribes made up of men that were willing to save their women. They were willing to do this probably because their wife, if they had one, would just get passed to his brother in the case of his death. As such it would be just as if he got use of the womb. Wombs were regarded as collective property. The property of the family, and to a larger extent the property of the tribe or race.

Fast forward to today where tribe and race is an afterthought yet still very much in play. It's been so effectively stamped out and disregarded. All tribes live in each others' midst and women are constantly sleeping with the enemy tribe--so no need to sacrifice for them since the tribe's property has already been defiled by its genetic adversaries. Rather than self-sacrifice for the benefit of the group, modern man must wake up to the fact that today's conditions dictate selfishness and self-enrichment. His works must not be used for the common good but only for his own good.

Multiculturalism leads not to peace, love, and trust but unending conflict and competition. C'est la vie.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (1 child)

You know, in a lot of ways George Costanza really had life figured out.

[–]fortheloveofpercy 56 points57 points  (0 children)

The most unfair thing about life is the way it ends. I mean,life is tough. It takes up a lot of your time. What do you get at the end of it? A death. What's that, a bonus? I think the life cycle is all backwards. You should die first, get it out of the way. Then you live in an old age home. You get kicked out when you're too young, you get a gold watch, you go to work. You work forty years until you`re young enough to enjoy retirement. You drink alcohol, you party, and you get ready for High School. You go to grade school, you become a kid, you play, you have no responsibilities, you become a little baby, you go back into the womb, you spend your last 9 months floating...then you finish off as an orgasm! Amen."

[–]bluedrygrass 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The old haggard droopy masculine ones are invisible at best, annoying at worst.

Blatantly untrue. Most men still treat a woman, old or not, ugly or not, unfit or not, better than they'd ever treat a similar man.

Women always receive special attentions, and get away with more, always, since they're like 3 years old (and out of the sexual market) till the day they die (while out of the sexual market).

[–]menial_optimist 5 points6 points  (2 children)

The RP truths you outline suggest that nearly all human actions are motivated solely or at least have an element of self interest in the initiation of them. This coincides with my own study on the general nature of man.

On a different note this is why any left wing philosophy will never work, because Marx and others like him say human nature is selfless, caring, sharing & cooperating with others. This is not observable throughout history at all and in fact contradicts our nature.

Anyone who puts the society or group ahead of their own survival or immediate needs is destined to misery.

[–]2IVIaskerade 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Marx had something right - it is possible for most humans to be selfless and caring.

What they neglect is that the selfless ones never end up at the top where the real decisions are made.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children)

What books have formed your opinion on this? In particular the idea that multiculturalism leads to violence

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Robert Putnam is great.

His research shows that the more diverse a community is, the less likely its inhabitants are to trust anyone - from their next-door neighbour to the mayor.

The core message of the research was that, "in the presence of diversity, we hunker down", he said. "We act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it's not just that we don't trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don't trust people who do look like us."

Prof Putnam found trust was lowest in Los Angeles, "the most diverse human habitation in human history", but his findings also held for rural South Dakota, where "diversity means inviting Swedes to a Norwegians' picnic".


[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow, this is fascinating. Thanks for the reply.

[–]Lord_NShYH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, modern day Germany/Scandinavia/etc.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

TLDR: women/men are not irrational, we just follow behavioral patterns that have evolved to facilitate reproductive success

[–]2Overkillengine 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Well, those behaviors can be considered maladaptive when considering current conditions- and as such, irrational.

Male self sacrifice is one of those.

Female hypergamy is another.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since multiculturalism doesnt lead to peace and love but unending conflict, lets instead promote competition and unending conflict!

Competition doesnt exist in any vacuum without cooperation in nature. Both are necessary.

Your saying half the cure doesnt work, so lets only use the other half of the cure and it'll fix everything.

Why not both?

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper 40 points41 points  (4 children)

women are soulless baby machines who's only drive is reproduction

Oh, come on now. I can't agree with that. That's outrageous. How could you write that?

It should be:

"Women are soulless baby machines whose only drive is reproduction."

[–]PoliCock 4 points5 points  (1 child)


The most amazing thing about TRP is the process of going from "it's bad"

to "some of it is true but a lot of those guys are nuts and I am keeping a distance"

to "most of it is true"

to "it's even worse than what they say there"

And that learning process really just comes with experience in the field. Mistakes. Errors. I didn't learn that these statements were accurate, as in factual-rational, until living for years and experiencing the reality. Deviating from such realities can only bring disaster.

And that sort of disaster is what makes you just keep realizing the need to solidify various thoughts and ideas as objective reality within your mind.

I am not saying the above is objective per se - but this process of making such "truths" as real to your mind and influential on your thinking and behavior as, say, the truth that a dog might bite you and its influence on your actions and thinking, is essential.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Reproduction or validation?

[–]getbackdownhere 17 points18 points  (13 children)

All women are like that, in fact I've seen this phenomenon play out countless times with different dudes and different corpse feeders.

Do you work at a hospice or something?

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 36 points37 points  (12 children)

If your friends are Marines, Bodybuilders and/or Motorcycle dudes you are going to see a lot of this very early on.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 13 points14 points  (10 children)

If your friends are Marines, Bodybuilders ...

Bodybuilders!?? GayLubeOil you promised me the gym gains would make me immortal, not kill me! Now where did I put those 'roids...

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 10 points11 points  (9 children)

The 90's bodybuilders were all really into taking painkillers preworkout a lot of them got addicted to newbain.

[–]whyalwaysm3 4 points5 points  (7 children)

Why were they big on painkillers before workouts? Very curious.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 7 points8 points  (6 children)

you can push further on pain killers. Also bodybuilders have horrible joint and tendon pain.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

That and oxy makes the user feel euphoria... Killer moods, hyped to lift.

[–]masnera 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so "No pain, No gain" is a misnomer ....right?

[–]Annoyinggorilla 1 points1 points [recovered]

I've seen supplements specifically for joint and tendon health. Would you know whether they are worth trying?

[–]1aguy01 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Collagen powder is the way to go. It contains the amino acids used in the synthesis of new bones, tendons, skin, scars, and even helps your liver's processing. Collagen has historically been a part of human diets, as it is found in the bones and skin of animals. Everybody should be getting collagen, either through bone broth or powder supplements.

Glucosamine and Chondroitin are also often recommended, but they act more like lubricants for joints. It's pretty cheap though and doesn't hurt.

[–]scamper_22 35 points36 points  (7 children)

At the core of all this is cognitive dissonance and our ability to believe in stories. Men and women have it. Many say we wouldn't have society without it.

Women just need this ability to a far greater level than men. Just as we all have muscle, but men have a greater need for it. As a result we naturally have more of it.

Historically, it would be hard for a women who was loyal and factual to survive to reproduce. But a women who could forget her loyalties and invent a story would live and reproduce.

Ghenghis Khan comes and conquers your village. He naturally kills or enslaves the men. He kills husbands, fathers, sons...

Women who are loyal might try and fight or not submit to his rule... Killed or at best have a low position.

A women who can forget her loyalties, forget how he slaughtered her son or husband.. come up with a story to claim khan is a good man and she should be with him lives reproduces and maybe gets a high position.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

"The warbride Dynamic" as Rollo calls it is fundamental to a woman's reproductive success as you mention. It also explains why women are much quicker to get over relationships and move on despite being madly in love/soooo distraught

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (14 children)

Ah, the third item of the woman's holy trifecta of Attention-Whoreism

1) "being raped"

2) "being abused"

3) dead husband/bf

[–]Beam_Me_Up2016 16 points16 points [recovered]

  1. "being raped"

  2. "being abused"

3) "being a mother"

  1. dead husband/bf

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 23 points24 points  (12 children)

Being a mother.... it's the hardest job of all you know.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (8 children)

So hard that I did it as a teenage boy, on top of school work.

Dad was divorced, incompetent and lazy. I looked after a household comprised of one adult man, several teenagers and a little girl. In the morning, I got everyone ready for school. After school, I did homework and grocery shopping. At night, I cooked and did laundry. We didn't have a car, so we took the bus everywhere. Dad didn't work, so we didn't have that sweet cappuccino and cute-little-car money provided to most women. I did the household finances - I budgeted welfare money to house, feed, clothe and transport all the above people.

Being a single mother is so hard a teenage boy can do it on top of school work, and not even be aware that it was "hard".

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 6 points7 points  (2 children)

That's awesome that you did so much.... you shouldn't have had to though.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thanks, man. Yeah, but life's circumstances change for us all. Perhaps I shouldn't have had to do it, but I got dealt that hand, handled it, and now value the experience. It turns out that the hard shit is often the most valuable in life, and the good times are just the nice rewards once the results of hard work has accumulated.

[–]masnera 2 points3 points  (1 child)

you're the Man..... not your dad.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, man. 20 years later, he's still the same and I'm still managing his shit, but he's still my Dad. Incompetent, lazy, and under the thumb of a complete snake of a woman, but still my Dad.

[–]coffeecult 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's just amazing how brainwashed you can find yourself being. This idea, right here, NEVER occurred to me as a fallacy until this moment. Without all the puzzle pieces in front of me I would have continued thinking of motherhood as a "difficult job" without ever once putting my own past job history into context.

[–]Beam_Me_Up2016 3 points3 points [recovered]

Definitely harder than the work being done in NK labor camps img. Yup. Spaghetti-O's in a high chair followed by coloring and nap time, during which you wash dishes... definitely harder than a NK labor camp.


[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Dude... seriously, don't underestimate it. You also have to spend 3 hours a day on facebook saying how hard your job is, engaging in mindless cow-clicking for two more hours, updating your instragram, going on Tinder (with your pre-baby body) "just for a laugh" and reading reddit to give your hamster fuel to keep on spinning its little wheel.

And that's before you use your child support to pay for a babysitter while billy beta takes you out on an expensive date.

Working on an oilrig for 16 hours a day pales into insignificance compared to all this.

[–]Vasallo7G 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Maybe there were women who gave a shit about losing their husbands in the pre-historic era.

And were faithful til the end, and never procreate with other males... So without a male hunter and protector, they and their children died and that gene disappeared.

Only the ones capable of switching dicks survived.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nature was counterproductive towards creating loyal women unfortunately. Prehistoric men needed to just kill the women they conquered along with the men. They would have left a better world for us today.

Fuck you Genghis you bastard

[–]darkvinc 25 points26 points  (7 children)

not even husbands .... some guy in my town died and some girls just post ridiculous pics of them like : them eating his favorite meal and whoring out over his death..... Its pathetic

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children)

This picture's on the front page right now. Now I couldn't find a story behind it, but it looks to me like whore's don't even take their own death/suicide seriously. This is equality!

[–]SteveChiefy 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Pretty sure she's escaping a fire in a rush. This would make more sense then stripping naked for attention to attract people to save her...

As I type this I actually don't really know what would make more sense. Like I think that trying to get attention that way is ridiculous and she's definitely GOTTA be trying to get away from the fire.. then I'm thinking... hmm.. I really just don't know.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Would a woman do this in a fire or would she scream and hope a man came to her rescue?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's no smoke there, so there is no reason to be outside the window if it was a fire situation.

[–]TheMGhandi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She did take it seriously.

We all know the tingles generated by a man who saves you a woman. She was...merely showing her savior what was his for the night.

Edit: format

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend Tyler just died and now all the girls are doing the same fucking thing. He became a dopehead and I'm pretty sure none of them had talked to him in years. But any chance to whore out, right?

[–]hke12 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would say NAVALT on this one, there are people (men and women) whose grief is bad enough that they cannot recover and get another partner.

But you need to lose a loved one for that.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Meh, I'll be dead for this one, she can do what she wants.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Or maybe your best friend will be dead for this one. That's the other possibility in which case you will have front row tickets.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

True, I'm sharing your equal indifference to this.

Remember one of my ONS back in the day kept telling me how great her boyfriend was (while I was inside her) I try not to take them at face value anymore.

Never thought about the corpse feeder though until you brought it up. Did she at least wait until the body was cold?

[–]Borsao66 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My last LTR was a corpse feeder.

She and her twin sister were abandoned by their father at 2 or 3. SERIOUS daddy & abandonment issues. I met her in May of 2012 about a year after my divorce and it turns out that her husband (who was 25yrs older, this is where I first learned of her daddy issues) had died about 2.5 months before, but I didn't learn about this until later and was the first in a LONG string of lies. AWALT

Anyhow I was a mix of red and blue pill traits at the time and after about a year of horrible frame breaks on my part mostly centered around her lack of honesty (she could push my buttons at will) I finally broke it off. The whole time we were together I would constantly be reminded of what a great man her dead ass exe was. My only regret is that her 16yo daughter had come to see me as a positive male role model.

What I didn't realize is that although she was literally a widow, I'd left her an alpha-widow in the bedroom. I did wreck her in the sack (/humblebrag) After being gone for about a year and a half, and her dating another guy seriously, she started contacting me for "help" with her new house (ceiling fans and the like) and since I was still close to the daughter I agreed (bad move). Turns out her new beta boyfriend was fucking useless with home shit and a potato in the bedroom.

Sure enough it led to me banging the shit out of her for a few months and another breakup initiated by me when I realized again what a lying whore she STILL was, and to boot, a total starfish. After her BB found out about the affair, she trickle truthed him and cried her crocodile tears and got him to forgive her. Betas gonna beta, sloots gonna sloot.

But hey, AWALT.

Anyhow the point to this story is that during the time we were together she actively sabotaged any efforts that I made towards self-improvement. Building my business up (oh, money isn't everything), losing weight (hey, don't get skinny, I like a bigger guy) were all to lower my SMV to keep me under her thumb. In retrospect, she probably contributed to her husband's death by keeping him fat which lead in part to his poor health and getting the big C.

No single moms guys, including widows.

[–]mrmeyhemn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

little over a year ago a cousin was killed in a car wreck. his widow has been riding the cc ever since and using his corpse as a sympathy ticket since the day he died. she is a disgusting attention whore that knew him for 2 years total, yet milks his death like she was his mother to this day.

[–]Eugenics2015 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is so brutal... FUCK

They should call this shit "beyond the red pill." Warn a nigga next time, I wasn't ready to swallow this one

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 20 points21 points  (5 children)

Ever wonder how so many raped women report experiencing intense orgasms during the assault? Part of our dark history is the selective pressure rape put on female sexuality. Rape was a very real part of our ancestral past. Women who were receptive to it, and could bond with their aggressors and bear his children simply passed on their DNA better than those who resisted and got stabbed after being passed around like a joint.

Combine that with the inherent validation seeking behaviour in women and this kind of thing isn't surprising, despite how shocking it appears at face value.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Ever wonder how so many raped women report experiencing intense orgasms during the assault?

I don't doubt this is true... but I've never heard it. Can you provide some links or references or more info?

It's somewhat sick that a woman will be alpha widowed by a rapist.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Certainly. There was an IAMA by a child therapist here on reddit a while back. She states that the number of women who reach orgasm is anywhere from 10% to 50%. Potentially half of women who are raped orgasm. When you consider that it's commonly accepted that only 25% of women are able to orgasm from penetrative sex alone, something clearly doesn't add up.

When you think about that, it's mindblowing. The obvious answer is that an underlying evolutionary mechanism exists.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Thanks... fascinating.

The more I know about women, the more I find out how poorly they are adapted to relationships and how well they are adapted to being outright conquered / taken / dominated / used... even to the point of experiencing orgasm during an otherwise extremely stressful event such as this.

Especially given (as you say) the percentage of rape victims experiencing orgasm may be higher than the percentage of women who experience orgasm during normal sex. Something not adding up? I think it adds up perfectly - women are still lying to us about their nature and it's even worse than TRP currently believes.

In my experience as a therapist, it has been somewhat less than
half of the girls/women I've worked with.

Yeah, and the remaining half are totally honest about this. Uh huh.

Good info, thanks again.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That would be the logical conclusion.

We see how dedicated and inherently they all collectively, but unspokenly, KNOW to hide their true nature from men.

That's the real reason they HATE TRP. We're uncovering their nature, and they know deep down there is some BAD SHIT underlying. They don't want us to keep digging, and that's why the irrational reaction to it.

If it were just simple neckbeards, why bother? No there is something bigger to the violent reaction.

[–]1favours_of_the_moon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

His girlfriend did no such thing. She spent the whole funeral talking about herself. This was her chance to be a local celebrity. Steven's girlfriend spoke more than anyone at the funeral and she didn't talk about Steven.

But Steven's girlfriend didn't stop at the funeral. Steven's girlfriend kept attention whoring on his grave even while she was riding other dudes cocks and motorcycles—and she's not special. All women are like that, in fact I've seen this phenomenon play out countless times with different dudes and different corpse feeders. A dead boyfriend is the ultimate source of drama which can be redeemed indefinitely for attention and sympathy.

I've seen this happen, and many times the girl really didn't even care about the dude that much and kind of drove him to it. lol

My mom was like this to some degree when my dad died, although she was more terrified of being "alone."

[–][deleted] 32 points33 points  (22 children)

Great post.

In Prehistoric times this instinct helped women survive when their tribe was conquered. In ancient times, it helped Roman women reproduce as the Vandals burnt the empire. In WWII, it let Parisian women enjoy a rotation of American, French, and Nazi wiener meat after their husbands were dragged away. For a woman, her dead husband is an all expense paid ticket to the cock buffet.

The best way to see how truly heartless a woman can be is to see the reaction she has when her husband dies. I swear to god they give zero fucks. Women treat strange dick like an infant treats their thumb when they get scared. The recent Paris shootings probably got a lot of men seriously laid, because there is no fucking way in hell that you can have the entire world watching a tragedy and not have women whore the entire thing out.

Women cannot build, they cannot fight, they cannot negotiate or hold frame. They can't do a whole lot, which is why no amount of benefits can get them to study something more useful than sociology. They were not built as "doing objects" or as what feminists and blue pillers call "people". They were built as sex objects made to throw sex at every problem and solve every problem with sex. The reason men can't look at women nonsexually isn't because we're defective, so much as because we're perceptive. Her sex object status doesn't only exist with regards to her body. It 100% fills her mind and she is literally incapable of thinking of things in terms other than how she can acquire sex next.

Men think of sex when appropriate, because we've always been too busy constructing the world. Women think of it always, because it's their way of life. Believing that she can turn that off just because her husband got dragged off to a concentration camp is a fantasy in males that's never gonna come true. Men should NEVER rely on a woman's love. Her love is fickle and she can't help it, it's her nature. I seriously wonder what tweets would have come out of women during the Holocaust. They'd probably be red pill all over.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I seriously wonder what tweets would have come out of women during the Holocaust. They'd probably be red pill all over.

Hahaha. There's no feminist in a warzone.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 10 points11 points  (4 children)

Men should NEVER rely on a woman's love

Not only is it capricious, it doesn't even really exist. Beyond some needs and a tiny amount of care, female "love" comes with more obligations than benefits.

The best they can do is a temporary feeling of attachment in order to secure even more resources, commitment and attention from the man - just enough to make him believe she's sincere and monogamous and sexual (with only him). Once that's locked down (to her benefit), this so-called love will evaporate again. There will be no point in her life where she ever gives more than she gets.

Nah... I don't believe in it, and I'm so gullible I think Santa is real.

[–]whyalwaysm3 5 points6 points  (2 children)

In every relationship I've been in so far, without even concisously trying (at least to my knowledge) I've always had the girl give more than I gave. Probably why I've also had a lot of luck with females, I care about myself first and many times a girl will be like "what?! Are you serious?" when I tell her that my feelings and myself come first. You would think they would leave me and move on but instead they try even harder with me lol.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 5 points6 points  (1 child)

My experience was the exact opposite... I always gave more, and I always got less. When I noticed and started cutting back on what I did, the girl then did even less.

Eventually got sick of the lack of gratitude and effort for doing things their way (ie long term relationship) and started doing things my way (short term, multiple women, no commitment) and noticed that they put in far more effort for much less of mine.

When it gets stacked up like this.... I get more for less for doing what I want... rather than less for more for doing what they want... the life choices become obvious.

I'm more subtle about me coming first than you are, haha. I make that happen, but I'm subtle about it. I don't directly say it, but I do act it. "Can't see you Thursday, I'm doing X thing". There is nothing to argue, it's just that the my-thing is first.

[–]MelodyMyst 2 points3 points  (8 children)

So after reading this a question comes to mind. How does the phenominon of the old Italian lady dressed in black who has mourned her husband for the last 30+ years, never remarried nor dated, play out in this?

is it still an attention grab? Possibly the most extreme example of one ever? Is it due to culture? Religion? A mixture?

When I was a young boy I always thought it was sweet that the woman would never marry and mourn the rest of her life (when I was really, really young) now after a few decades on the planet, and after having met some of those types in real life I only see batshit crazy.

Would love to hear your thoughts.

[–]ventuspilot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm only guessing here. 30 years could mean that her husband died when she was 50+ and had grown children. So she would not be that attractive, had company (assuming that her children lived nearby) and probably not too much needs. So the goal could be to guilt her children into providing for her.

My grandma was similar without the black clothes. Had a house, two daughters, one of them lived in her house with her husband, and she was seeing my mum once a week. Also had a small state pension. You could say she needed a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

[–]Eugenics2015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You guys are brutal lol.. holy shit.

[–]2comment 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It 100% fills her mind and she is literally incapable of thinking of things in terms other than how she can acquire sex next.

Nitpick but that should be "other than what she can acquire with sex next". The average woman needs to know seduction like a cat needs to know how to pet someone.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nahh. The average woman has more trouble than a similarly situated man would. When they reach up, they can get less out of the man they reach to. It's a bit like just flexing their uterus depending on how hypergamous they are. The more they flex it, the more they run into the issue that literally every other woman can provide the same thing. Setting themselves apart is hard and most of em can't do it. It's a different kind of seduction for sure, but it's an active seductive role that takes skill.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've seen this play out more times then I can count and it goes a little something like:

  1. Acquaintance who girl barely knew/talked to dies

  2. Acquaintance magically becomes "best friend" who she was "soooo close with"

  3. Makes the dead persons tragedy her own

  4. Whores her feelz all over social media

  5. Reaps In endless amounts of attention, all while not giving two shits about the dead persons family or others who were actually effected

  6. Uses the death of the person as an excuse for every ounce of shitty behavior

  7. Completely forgets about the dead person once their usefulness as an attention/sympathy catalyst runs dry

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Recently a female friend had a baby. Having babies is prime attention whoring time, and she was enjoying the attention. Another friend commented on her facebook wall saying "Two years ago I lost someone very important to me (some isignificant distance relative) today I've gained someone even more important (her friend's baby)".

This bitch couldn't have just said congratulations. She had to twist it into something that could possible be about her. The fucking narcissism gymnastics.

[–]ChuckBronsoncomedy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

not sure if this comment has been made but, this completely explains why women are so attracted to men who do dangerous shit. Fire-fighters, Cops, Drug dealers, Motorcycle riders...and so on. In West Virginia, Coal mining is the most dangerous job. In WV coal miners are sexy. FUCKING COAL MINERS! nothing against coal miners but nothing about that work is sexy. They are attracted to the fact that these dudes might die soon.

[–]GunsGermsAndSteel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love this phrase. Corpse Feeders. I happen to know a girl just like this... she was sending me nudes and flirting around, doing that whole "I'm not gonna fuck you wait yes I am" dance that takes about three days usually... I'd met her boyfriend, but he was weak... so anyway one night they get in a fight and he hangs himself, made himself braindead, they put him in the ICU on a bunch of machines and stuff. Anyway, she was all over Facebook talking about herself and how this effected her... pretty soon it was "who wants to smoke a bowl with me and kick it"... then back to being sad... back and forth. It was ridiculous to watch her doing the Facebook prayer thing, writing him little soliloquies and posting them on his wall, yet still getting on every dick in town. I finally blocked her because I couldn't take it anymore. I should re-add her just to see if the dude died or what.

[–]1Str8_Pillin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what Scott Weiland's ex wife just did. She divorced him, kept him from seeing the kids, took 2 houses, demanded $60,000 a month for child support (yes, a fucking MONTH), and then she wrote a letter to Rolling Stone not even 2 days after his death telling fans not to grieve because of how shitty he was and that he didn't want to see the kids.

What she didn't realize is that not everyone is on her side, and one of his tour managers wrote that a few days before his death he started tearing up while talking about the inability to have contact with his own kids.


[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A little late to this party-

But i see some girls post on my dead friends Facebook wall every so often talking about how much they miss him and some memory they had and all that shit. What a simple and sick way to get attention.

He's clearly dead. He's not on Facebook reading your posts. If you really feel sorrow, talk to his family and friends who can still use your support.

[–]ChickenBalotelli 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Flashback to another RP post about women in groups competing to be the one with the biggest sob story..........the mother hen that the other chikadees crowd around. (and ultimately, give attention to, which is their drug....along with the other neurochemical drug.....babbling)

[–]TheReformist94 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Women truly are despicable cunts.I don't care if its their nature.theres no positive way to spin this with the male hamster.don't give me women are water filling the container shit

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Goooood, goooood. Let the anger flow thru you.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Old women also use their dead husbands for sympathy. Maybe not to get another cock but to use men to fill in the void where her former husband was. My grandmother used my grandfathers death as a way to guilt people into doing everything for her. I don't put up with that shit so I made sure my family saw her bull shit. She's a much nicer person now than in all the years I've known her.

If some bitch is manipulating the people around you. Honestly, sometimes it's a good thing for the people around you to have a healthy fear of what you may do. If the people are worried that you may get too aggressive to fix the bitch whose testing they make sure things are fixed in a peaceful manner. It also puts the person in a place of understanding who is in charge. If they don't tow the line they know everyone else will make sure to check that persons entitlement.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, sometimes it's a good thing for the people around you to have a healthy fear of what you may do. If the people are worried that you may get too aggressive to fix the bitch whose testing they make sure things are fixed in a peaceful manner.

Well said, this whole thread has been great.

But this is a good point. People are so scared of confrontation and want to white knight to protect the feelings of a woman, they will be forced to settle the problem.

[–]wadebarlow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reminded me of this bit from Anthony Jeselnik's stand up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FLGEr1zJYo

[–]1PantsonFire1234 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And this.. is why you ignore all their tears and do whatever you want.

[–]rockumsockumrobots 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Obligatory...also, fucking trigger warning if you're getting out of the anger phase. https://archive.is/34dzV


girl talks boyfriend into killing himself by shaming him.

sucks up social media sympathy and even sets up a fund raiser to ca$h in on her boyfriend's suicide she talked him into.

later comes out that she was the one who talked him into it.

[–]Red_Pill_Raskol 9 points10 points  (4 children)

This is misogynistric tripe. If this is what Red Pill amounts to I'm out.... just kidding. Amazing writing and a great piece of RP theory regarding corpse eaters. Love it. Never seen this particular distinction made and it's another great handle on understanding female nature.

This is why I read TRP.

EDIT: I'm reminded of IM's war brides theory. They are Corpse Brides.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil[S] 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Tripe is pretty good actually. I like it in Pho, which is Vietnamese soup.

As for Corpse Eating, I'm pretty excited to be the first one to write about the phenomena.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I think you're the first to name it.

There was a thread a month or two ago about the girl who pressured her boyfriend into suicide then commenced a pity party. I'll try to find a link.

This is actually standard affair in all but severe alpha widows. (imho)

No link, edit, her name is Michelle Carter, charged with involuntary manslaughter.

[–][deleted] 5 points5 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Men would die in a lot of situations for their wives. Women talk a big game but I never see shit. War brides is a well established concept for a reason. Honor doesn't exist for them.

[–]1Sir_Distic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have to remember that everything on TRP is made by guys with different thoughts and opinions. Take everything with a grain of salt and decide what works for you and what doesn't.

That's what I do. When people talk about the hate for women, or things like the above quote, I simply mentally shrug indifferently and move on with my thought.

[–]Eugenics2015 1 point2 points  (1 child)

seriously... this whole thread is way too fucking hardcore. I consider myself a radical but the shit these guys are writing is scaring ME.

[–]aa223 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Not only girlfriends or widows but when my friend's mom died a few months ago his older brother's girlfriend also put out the same behavior. She made the funeral about her and wanted the older bro to introduce her to people. She even told my friend in a condescending way about how she knows how he felt and the like.

Honestly, I don't know why the older bro was out with her I mean she fat and looks like a bridge troll. But in any case, it isn't just widows but any woman who is associated to the deceased in some way that will make it about her.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'd smack a bitch or at the very least say the most fucked up shit on earth to a woman who tried to make my mother's death about her..

[–]Johnny10toes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My mil has recently had an ex yes ex husband die. They probably have known each other for 2.5 years total. Married after a few months and divorced a few months later. She's walking around like the widowed bride. They're both old like 70's and 80's. She told her daughter "No one has ever loved me the way he did." She told her to shut the fuck up and that her dad was married to her for over 30 years. Truth is that the old dude was a sob and hated everyone.

[–]donmagicjohn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny this is the first mention of this I've read after ~6 months on TRP but it rings true, and close to home. My buddy "little debbie" passed away at 23, freak accident. We always hated his controlling SO who actually, at one point, made him sign a contract that he would not hang out with my roommate and I more than once a week. At his funeral she gave a eulogy that was the most disusting self-centered "tribute" I've ever heard. Her high and mighty attention craving mother then proceeded to babble about how she just hoped her little girl would be OK without our buddy. In a time where this poor kids mother was spilling tears and his father was visibly shaken, all Mrs. bitch could do was worry about her little princess. Fuck. That.


[–]ItsCold_ItsCold 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Looks like the downvote brigade came through.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The butt hurt train, stamp your ticket?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Noticed a lack of blue links from GLO's thread.

Anyway great read.

Easy way to say this is that: Basically,yes there were unicorn-like women who were loyal. They just got killed off. Its the hypergamous "unloyal" women who lived and passed on their genes.

Basically more reasons(as if you didn't have enough) to not get married.

[–]Eugenics2015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"good" women were killed off in the same sense that alphas were killed off.

They are very rare, but still exist. Probably around 1%

[–]azrise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your evolutionary reasoning is flawed. In prehistoric times, the surviving women of the tribes that were invaded, were raped by the invaders and forced to breed. To say that those women who were more selfish had better chances of survival is foolish. There was no choice, so it made no difference.

[–]redpilltaste 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have seen this with many veteran friends who have checked out. One of my mates left (suicide) two kids behind to a women who had previously left him. I tried to organise a retroactive pension and get his kids the war orphans pension which is possible here in Australia. She sabotaged the fuck out of it. She preferred the story that he left them all, she has a little money from an inheritance. I have seen so much of that warped nature that it does not surprise me at all anymore.

[–]menial_optimist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yours and Napoleon Bonaparte's opinion on women is one and the same.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(slow clap turns into fast clap, which turns into standing ovation)

[–]drummmmergeorge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we instead focus on my brand instead? My brand is more Chad's type of appeal than OP's and woman will like you*

Anyways, think of the audience who participates. The people who post are 20% clueless and want attention and validation 40% gloat and just want others to laugh with them, and then you got 35% who try to sell their shit on here and then you got me the 3.69% those that study people for fun and laughing at the comments, while enjoying the conversation in a light matter. I just wish we can stop focusing on trash women, and make it solely japanese girls. They're what Hitler wanted.

*not really, but you want to believe so.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is a mix of several key tenants of emotional thinking.

I witnessed something similar in a few instances in my lifetime, and have some theories:

  1. If they are not directly impacted by the loss of this man then they FEEL like they should be so they will make themselves publicly upset.

  2. They are over correcting for NOT feeling upset so by outwardly appearing upset they are doing the lip service.

  3. with men i have heard "it should have been me" or "If only x had happened" in a way to logically break down the accident, or what not, and think their way through their guilt. With women it is "I cant believe this is happening." or "it isnt fair" which is spilt milk. You will never hear a woman say "it should have been me" And we all know WHY.

[–]dabrah1 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I just had a similiar experience last week. One of my close friends committed suicide, it was horrible. Everyone was/Is devastated. Anyway, one of his friends, a girl named Anna, who only knew him for four fucking months took his death as an opportunity to get attention from everybody.

She constantly posted quotes and statuses on his facebook wall, kept snap chatting about how depressed she was, and even had the fucking gall to snap chat pictures of the memorial mass and funeral. All this while his closest friends, and me, have known him for 8+ years and were actually devastated by his loss.

Also, Anna threw a memorial party at her house. SHe set up a microphone system so everyone could tell stories about good times they had with the kid. When it was her turn, all she talked about was how she was going through a lot of things that he helped her with, and how hard of a time she was having with this. Hardly mentioned the kid, it was all about her. It took all I had to not stand up and say something- its horrible. I don't think i'll ever look at her the same way again. Oh, and while he was alive, she would talk shit on him all the time. Fuck.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could see how the guilt of not voicing your opinion at the time weigh on you. Id hope we all have the courage to say something if this happened to us.

load more comments (26 replies)