tl;dr Writer for Daily Mail despises the fact that Leo can pull young and beautiful women every month well into his mid-life. Article is full of passive aggressiveness, hamstering, and (unsurprisingly) RP Truths.
For at the age of 41, Leonardo DiCaprio has become Hollywood’s number one toxic bachelor, its biggest lothario and most wretchedly dedicated modeliser...His carnal appetite seems to be incorrigible, his taste in women immutable. His famous preference is for box-fresh blondes aged 25 and under — usually lingerie models, but any random glamourpuss will do at a pinch. He replaces this much-loved prototype as frequently as some men change their socks.
Right out of the gate, Jan Moir (author) shames him with emotive language so common from bitter harridans. "Toxic" -- "Wretched" -- even throwing out "lothario", as if the women chasing him are not acting in their own self-interest. Remember -- only men can be selfish when their is a significant age differential in any relationship.
And why not? Our boy is unattached and at a loose end after ending a six-month relationship with girlfriend Kelly Rohrbach. Their break-up came shortly before the blonde swimsuit model celebrated her 26th birthday. Coincidence or strategy?
Of course it's strategy. Relationships are reproductive strategy at their core. He trades up because he can. You said it yourself -- "Why not?". He is living life as an attractive, millionaire actor. He has an incredibly high SMV, and has no problem living a life of abundance vs scarcity.
Some might argue he is a handsome Hollywood millionaire with his pick of willing beauties. If he can’t behave like an emperor of lust, then who can?
Some would argue this -- and they would be absolutely correct. It's amazing how a feminist can literally refute her own argument before she even makes it.
Yet what is acceptable at the age of 21 just starts to look sad and seedy two decades on.
And here we go. It only looks sad and seedy to post-wall women who are envious of the fact that a guy like Leo who hasn't "settled down or committed" can pull beautiful partners at 40+ years of age, while a single female at that age (even a millionaire actress) is relegated to the dust-bin of relationship potential.
This is a classic case of projection, because she knows that post-wall single women are typically a sad sight, so they assume it must be so for men as well.
Even George Clooney settled down and got married! Surely DiCaprio can do better than this?
George Clooney is 13 years older than Leo, and did not marry until he was 52.
But the real question is: Why the hell would Leo ever invite the government into his relationship, and sign a binding contract with a woman who can literally take half his assets if/when it "doesn't work out"? As the saying goes, why buy the cow when the milk is for free?
And despite this, he always looks as miserable as a man stuck at a Luton bus stop on a wet bank holiday...Many might envy his lifestyle, but be careful what you wish for. Don’t laugh, but there is clearly a sadness and emptiness to it; ...For, ultimately, all that beauty must corrode the soul, especially as he seems not to be interested in intellect or personality, kindness and wit. Instead, there is only the eternal chase for a vision of physical perfection; a pursuit that is becoming more unbecoming with every year that passes.
More projection: Intellect, personality, kindness, and wit don't get a man's dick hard. Men aren't women. Leo could give two shits how well his plates did on the SAT's, or if they have a PhD in molecular biology.
He can’t commit to a proper cause and he can’t commit to a real woman — with one honourable exception. Leonardo DiCaprio’s first love, and quite possibly his last, is his beloved mother, Irmelin.
The classic "real woman" line. What, pray-tell, is a "real woman", Jan? A post-wall, nagging wife in her 40's that gives up starfish sex once every 3 months? Does it take a "real man" to settle down with something like that, when he can clearly pull younger, more attractive, less nagging women at his whim?
She has one thing right though -- no woman will ever love a man more than his mother.
Nothing drives post-wall feminists more crazy than a successful man who has peaked his SMV being able to date beautiful women as he please -- especially when he refuses to commit and prefers to trade up.