Rant/VentingI'm pregnant and you are the father. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by random13571357

Age: 36.

Height: 6'5"

Weight: 225lbs (single digit BF 200/365 days a year)

Property: 4 bedroom house, mortgaged.

Car: £22,000 - 1 year old (Credit)

Salary: £63,000 (2014-15)

I predominantly date women between the ages of 28-32 at this time in my life.

In the last 2 years I've had 3 different women claim I've impregnated them.

Oh and the twist. I got the sip at 28, 8 years ago and I've had 4 sterile checks since.

If you are at the top, they want you tied down.

1 admitted lying about being pregnant to see my reaction.

1 recieved my text explaining I was sterile and i've never been contacted again.

1 remained adamant I was the father, and 2 days ago I was cleared of parental responsibility through DNA test. (The child was not mine.)

Welcome to the real world gents.

[–]brbomglolwtfbbq 384 points385 points  (77 children)

A girl I very briefly dated and slept with only ONCE tried to pull the "surprise you're the father" bit on me. She showed me a positive pregnancy test and pushed really really hard to move in with me.

A week or two went by and I started to become suspicious about some, lets just say, inconsistencies in her story. After snooping around I got to the real truth.

She had heard that I was making a pretty good living and lived in a nice area of the city. So she got a positive pregnancy test from a friend who was really pregnant and then put on her whole deception show.

What her ultimate plan was, or how she thought I wouldn't figure it out, I have no idea.

Should be a crime.

[–]herewegoaga1n 175 points176 points  (25 children)

Fraud. Plain and simple, which means it's completely fucked.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 159 points160 points  (23 children)

No, you misunderstand. Female crimes are not fraud. Women can lie, cheat, steal, misrepresent. All for financial gain, and society will deem it "not a crime".

This is why there are so few women in jail - everyone accepts female crimes as "that's just fine" but male crimes as "life sentence for you".

[–]NewestHouse 94 points95 points  (9 children)

Women need "help and treatment", men need punishment. -western society

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 56 points57 points  (5 children)

[–]NewestHouse 40 points41 points  (3 children)

I read this a while ago and it fucking infuriated me.

"Women almost never scare us; commit random acts of serious violence; violate our sexual integrity; or form organised crime networks and yet their prisons numbers are now the highest in recorded history."

thats the first fucking line, "women never commit violent crime or rape or participate in organized crime, ALMOST NEVER. what a goddam fucking joke. The fantasy world feminists live in continues to astound me, yet it shouldn't...

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 32 points33 points  (1 child)

Women are guilty of constant proxy violence, more than half of domestic violence, and when they go mental are both fucking terrifying and have the full force of the law behind them.

In terms of not violating our sexual integrity - male sexual interests are expected to be ignored, sacrificed, used, abused and violated by society from the second we are born. Our sexual interests are deemed to be simply not valid, instead we are expected to sacrifice everything (including our lives) for the female imperative.

In terms of forming organised crime networks: feminism is an organisation designed to exploit men using threats of violence, emotional and economic abuse.

In other words: everything feminists say is completely true (including this particular white knight mangina) so long as you take the words and infer the exact opposite.

[–]NewestHouse 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You explained everything perfectly here, well done. Proxy violence and domestic violence by women are ignored by feminists and the majority alike, its kind of astounding. The reality of how violent lesbian relationships are should be a huge galvanizing reality.....but it isnt.

[–]SACRlion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And women are never serial killers, and yet there is La Dama del Silencio in prison for killing 10 people.

[–]herewegoaga1n 26 points27 points  (2 children)

rpussypass is becoming less of a joke and more of a documentary.

[–]1-TheOutsid3r- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Actually, it's that case for quite some time and longer than many of us have lived. Things started going astray somewhere in the 60s. Most of the feminist goals i.e equality before the law had been achieved way before it. Which means that breaking up fundamental necessities of a working society such as the nuclear family, second and third wave feminism and movements such as the Hippy/68th one pushed things way into absurdity.

We're being told that society is still as it was before the 60s but made to view that situation through the lense of the "education" we get to enjoy nowadays from kindergarden all the way through college.

[–]RadioactiveTentacles 18 points19 points  (4 children)

Wait.. you mean to tell me that women are capable of having bad intentions?

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Wait.. you mean to tell me that women are capable of having bad intentions?

Of course not, everyone knows that Women Are Wonderful, so anything bad they do must be your fault for being judgmental.

[–]Gadnuk_ 46 points47 points  (14 children)

I've seen this before, the old double down trick. If they can convince you they're already pregnant then you've got less reason to use protection as the damage is already done (apparently). Then she ACTUALLY gets pregnant and locks down resources, leaving the beta schlub none the wiser about her ruse.

[–]rundownweather 31 points32 points  (13 children)

It's quite brilliant when you think about it. I'm convinced women actually sit down with each other and think these strategies up together, a single person wouldn't be able to be this deceptive.

[–]smartscience 23 points24 points  (4 children)

It would certainly explain why they can genuinely think (maybe) that men sit down and plot schemes to maintain their privilege and power...

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (3 children)

This is why (or part of why) feminists were so determined to break in to gentlemen's clubs. They were convinced that the men in there were plotting with each other to keep the opposite sex down. They thought that because that is what women would do - and in fact were doing. The other part of it is because rather than build up their own companies and social structures, it was much easier and more fruitful to parasitize the companies, organizations and social structures built by men. Which actually I would not object to if they didn't trash them in the process.

[–]kayne2000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

you are spot on Sawagurumi.

it's important we impart this knowledge to the young ones as slyly as possible too.

for instance....I was playing video games with my 5 year old nephew....boys that age, even if already partly brainwashed can be great fun. the boy wanted to show his grandma something, grandma was being slow, so I told him go down and get her because you know women like to talk a lot. its a small point or another time his mother was saying how its so hard to make sure you raise them right...subtle influences and all....the boy was there and i mentioned one subtle influence was the boy had learned from TV girls hit as hard as boys....i corrected that then and there and used it to answer the mothers question about subtle brainwashing.

throw it in there slyly gentlemen. it might be the only way.

boys even if they are young and already partly gotten too....they still havent at a young age had their natural "I want a boys only club" beaten out of them just yet....they will look up too and respect you.

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (4 children)

They do. There are groups where they discuss how to sabotage condoms, for example, and women are quite free with 'advice on how to lock him down'. There is no honour here.

Some classics are where the NBA issued a warning to their players in 2004 to dispose of condoms down the loo, not just in the trash, after a rash of cases where women had fished them out of the trash and impregnated themselves. Naturally, the cuck femcentric judges decided that the players were still on the hook for child support, instead of finding the women guilty of fraud and coercion. This is why you provide your own condoms (don't leave them at her place, subtle work with nail scissors works wonders), and you either flush them or put tabasco or bleach into them before putting into the trash.

Another case was where a couple decided to get married on the firm understanding that neither wanted children. A few months later the woman changed her mind, so she 'forgot' to take her pill. This went on, and she didn't get pregnant. When she finally brought this up, the guy told her that he had a vasectomy. She was furious, and the studio audience sided with her, even though she was trying to fraudulently get him on the hook for paying for a child for 18 years and he did nothing that was not in keeping with their agreement.

Here is another studio audience, note how they support a woman deciding to come off the pill without telling her husband (and how she discussed it with her friends): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CNHwhHWPoQ the hostesses opinion is that it is fine because 'men are not in control of women's bodies', but women are in control of men's finances, right?

[–]sharp7 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Its shit like this that makes me think masterbation was the most important invention for man. Imagine you couldn't fap and had to fuck every fuckin time to get off, much harder to avoid pregnancies.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points

[permanently deleted]

[–]jrrtrp81 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When talking NBA that sperm is worth 6 - 7 figures....

[–]Endorsed ContributorRunawayGrain 29 points30 points  (5 children)

What her ultimate plan was, or how she thought I wouldn't figure it out, I have no idea.

Either actually get knocked up by you, or the good old 'miscarriage' fallback.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 23 points24 points  (4 children)

Don't forget about a good ol fashion cucking.

But, I think the miscarriage route is one of the most effective routes. She extracts commitment by using a man's tendency to "cowboy up". The man didn't want to be with the chick for atleast 18 years but men tend to clean up their own messes. So he moves her in, marries her so she can get prenatal care with his insurance, and finds himself settled down before he knows it. Then the miscarriage. She activates his protective instinct. He emotionally invests in her. He wants to console her. And what's most fucked up, while she knows she is faking, he actually thinks he lost a child. Shared hardship makes men bond. So she's got him hook line and sinker. A dastardly plot to enslave and trap him in a relationship.

Don't be mad at her. The way her brain works, she doesn't consciously know what she's doing. From her perspective she is just testing him to see if he would stick around. Well once he passes the test she can't reveal the lie so she needs another out.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 27 points28 points  (3 children)

Don't be mad at her. The way her brain works, she doesn't consciously know what she's doing.

No. This is just handing out the pussypass under another prerequisite.

Just because you are influenced by your programming does not mean that you aren't able to act against your instincts.

I could fuck 24/7 and I see at least 20 strange women a day who sexually arouse me. So because I can't help that arousal I am allowed to use my MMA-trained 230lbs body to submit these bitches and rape the living shit out of them? Probably not.

Part of our society's problem is that men unlearned how to teach women about options and consequences.

Be fucking mad at them and do your good deed and teach them right from wrong. If you won't, who will?

[–]sharp7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It is absolutely true that we have forgotten how to teach women of consequences. Get fucked and abused by a douche bag? Instead of learning to choose better they expect betas to just fix the baggage so they can go out and get abused somemore. I've seen a girl do this several times in a row. Fuckin ridiculous.

[–]1AmlanceJockey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She knows what she's doing on some level. But, she rationalizes and hamsters so much, that if you could read her mind i expect you would find more I deserve this and relationship feelz and less enslavement protocol initiated.

I agree we dont hold them to a high standard. But, until we do, the idea that doing something could be wrong or bad will not cross their mind. It doesnt exist to them.

[–]yomo86 10 points11 points  (2 children)

You can even order those positive pregnancy tests online.

I dont want to live on this planet anymore

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You can also buy fake birth control pills on the internet, so she can take it right in front of you for that extra bit of convincing. 'You don't need a condom, honey! See, I just took my pill!". Women are Machiavellian by instinct.

[–]TedTheAtheist 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Girls will tell you they are pregnant when they aren't, just so you'll start fucking them and not caring, thus REALLY impregnating them. I've had a girl try this on me before. Bitch finally came clean when she wasn't getting knocked up.

[–]NightGod 78 points79 points  (15 children)

The plan was "we don't need condoms honey, it's not like I can get MORE pregnant!" giggle And then the baby is born a month or two "premature" and looks surprisingly full term.

[–]dkbuss 186 points186 points [recovered]

It would be born late then....

[–]Aziz_92 36 points37 points  (1 child)

Yea, wtf? Had me questioning my sanity for a few seconds.

[–]behenchodd 5 points6 points  (0 children)

once knocked up, what choice do u have really.

[–]NightGod 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, bad early morning math on my part, but the same concept.

[–]aanarchist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

idk about you but my feelings would be hurt.

[–]trpthrowaway1852 460 points461 points  (93 children)

[–]random13571357[S] 251 points252 points  (44 children)

That is epic.

Mine was a lot different, as soon as she told me through txt, because I wouldn't meet her in person.

I told her I was not the father and not to contact me again, all messages and calls were then ignored. She has been dragging my name through the mud on social media with an angry horde of women demanding my head. (according to a close friend who has her added, and her brother even threatened violence if I dont do the right thing.)

Cms contacted me 3 months ago in regards to a child a woman was claiming was mine, and I had a time limit to reply as to whether the child was mine. I confirmed that I was not the father and was willing to submit to a dna test and provide proof of my vasectomy.

Dna test was scheduled and I had to pay for it.

I recieved the letter 2 days ago confirming I was not the father and now I am trying to claim the cost of the paternity test back off the cms people.

[–]solidsnork 97 points98 points  (25 children)

What would they do if you refused to submit a test unless they paid for it first? It seems illegal that just because you would deny a test they would just declare you the father.

[–]random13571357[S] 138 points139 points  (16 children)

The test was £365 and while I had no problems paying that sum I imagine there are individuals who couldn't.

I don't know the outcome if you cannot afford it.

[–]herewegoaga1n 144 points145 points  (10 children)

I don't know the outcome if you cannot afford it.

We know, it's just too terrible to fathom.

[–]nezamestnany 92 points93 points  (6 children)

Actually not that bad in the UK, which is where op is

If you can’t pay for the DNA test, the CMS will pay the fee for you. But if the test shows that you’re the father of the child, you’ll have to repay this money.


[–]AskYouEverything 72 points73 points  (4 children)

That's like, entirely not bad. That's pretty damn good actually

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points  (3 children)

It's the tax payers who end up paying for it when the woman is lying, so I don't know how good that is.

[–]AskYouEverything 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Taxpayer dollars to help child support be a functioning thing rather than a burden on any or all parties involved? A pro-feminist society having to monetarily support a set of pro-feminist laws? the horror

Just to be clear: I was saying that it was the best case scenario for the male involved

[–]rundownweather 9 points10 points  (1 child)

If you couldn't muster 300 odd pounds on short notice, I don't think women would have much to do with you.

[–]nezamestnany 13 points14 points  (2 children)

According to the uk citizens advice page

If you can’t pay for the DNA test, the CMS will pay the fee for you. But if the test shows that you’re the father of the child, you’ll have to repay this money.

[–]trippinallday 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Even if you can't afford it now you have to find some way to get the cash, as you sure as hell won't be able to afford supporting the child for the next 18 years.

[–]aanarchist 88 points89 points  (11 children)

DO THE RIGHT THING MANLET. i don't understand how retarded someone has to be to not understand that even if she was pregnant and the man wanted nothing to do with her, that it's on her for gobbling the dick of someone who doesn't give a shit about her. any woman could have a responsible man in her life to take care of her and father her children, inside of 2 weeks of looking. "deadbeat" dads exist because that is what women want.

[–]Eyes_Of_The_Dragon 69 points70 points  (9 children)

As a society we choose not to make women accountable for their actions. This needs to change.

[–]NiceKicksGabe 48 points49 points  (1 child)

Thomas Sowell said it best. If a group is used to preferential treatment, equality starts to feels like discrimination.

[–]KorianHUN 46 points47 points  (3 children)

Women are too weak to work and too stupid to think for themselves. At least that is what FEMINISTS say.

[–]_LuckyDucky_ 15 points16 points  (2 children)

It's why I'm an egalitarian even if I am a woman, I do not agree that women are too weak or stupid. Feminists are poison.

[–]NewestHouse 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Feminists are CANCER, a parasite living off the host (first world nations) and it is in the process of killing off its hosts, mainly in europe, but the death will spread.

[–]RadioactiveTentacles 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Unfortunately, this probably isn't going to happen, because pretty much all of western society is too concerned with being politically correct that they baby women in the name of feminism. Women are immune to pretty much anything unless you're willing to break your back for it.

[–]CrashXXL 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's why I'm voting for Trump.

[–]alecesne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But that's where new troops come from!

[–]PolishHypocrisy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

now I am trying to claim the cost of the paternity test back off the cms people.

Good luck , I feel if you were then you should have to pay for the test but you weren't so hope you get it back

[–]MessyEnema 55 points56 points  (12 children)

The only thing he did wrong, was the final fuck.

Her backup move is a false rape accusation.

[–]KorianHUN 18 points19 points  (11 children)

Rape accusation is like pulling out a card form your sleeve in most western countries. Until everyone sees it was false (video record of the male or female being in public space during the time when the rape allegedly happened), the female always wins. Except if the accused male is rich enough or has good enough connections.

[–]_LuckyDucky_ 9 points10 points  (8 children)

You don't know about the true statistics here do you? It's a very small percentage of successful rape prosecutions and there are no winners in rape.

[–]redzorp 60 points61 points  (7 children)

The false-accuser always wins in the court of public opinion, even if she LOSES in court.

Just to name one quick example - Canadian TV celebrity Jian Ghomeshi. He was recently cleared in court of any wrongdoing. His accusers were even shown to be liars in open testimony. The result? The entire Canadian media, political and celebrity establishment STILL smear Ghomeshi as a sex offender while his "victims" are STILL treated as poor vulnerable women who were wronged by the big bad wolf.

A false rape accusation is indeed a trump card for women in the West.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (2 children)

It doesn't even have to come from the woman. In the UK we have a feminist Director of Public Prosecutions who pressures the police to bring more rape convictions (because, you know, 'rape culture'). In the Ched Evans case, the woman had a few drinks (and therefore the goto excuse these days, 'she couldn't remember') and he was found guilty of rape and sent to prison. However, in the morning she had sent texts to friends claiming to have 'scored big' by sleeping with two professional footballers, and she only went to the police to report that she lost her handbag. When she gave the details and it came out that she had been drunk when she had sex, the police then brought rape charges.

[–]CrashXXL 4 points5 points  (0 children)

holy fuck...someone shoot that bitch.

[–]_LuckyDucky_ 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Yes, that it is. I hope that it changes.

[–]joeyjojosharknado 76 points77 points  (24 children)

The thing that gets me is no matter how spiteful, deceptive or downright evil women can be, they always act like butter won't melt in their mouths. No, worse than that, there is an absolute disconnect between their behaviour/actions and how they perceive themselves. In a man that would be borderline sociopathy, but for a woman it's SOP. This is why they can behave in the most reprehensible fashion without it even being the tiniest blip on their moral radar. I know, I know, sidebar, hamster etc. Logically I get all that, but emotionally the outright, in-your-face hypocrisy and entitlement still staggers me sometimes.

[–]aanarchist 37 points38 points  (14 children)

that's because if they stopped for a moment and considered who they really are based on their behavior, they couldn't live with the guilt and we'd have what like a 70% female suicide rate.

[–]KorianHUN 21 points22 points  (13 children)

But this is because society mostly allows them to do this. Most people defend them and think of them as mentally challenged children. If this would stop they would behave differently.

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (7 children)

It's evolution. Seriously. Try to pin down a woman logically and she'll hamster like it's a Martial art. If you finally get her pinned down she'll just be angry at you for making her feel bad. If by some miracle you get her to accept her behavior for what it is give it a week... or an hour and see if she still sees it that way. (Here's a hint, she won't.)

Women have evolved to be able to do terrible things (from a moral standpoint, but very effective in passing on genes) and not kill themselves for it. Thus evolved the hamster. Men have evolved to solve problems and be strong and inventive which requires consistency of thought and action. This is why a masculine man can cut through bullshit has great spacial awareness, creativity, etc. We are the strange ones for being aware of our nature. Our species alone is self aware, and just barely.

We invented fire, they let the wolves eat their husband so they could fuck the guy who invented fire instead. But her last husband was abusive and was terrible at hunting and she was feeling neglected and the wolves were scary so she just ran and couldn't help it. :((

Most people defend them and think of them as mentally challenged children.

This last part isn't true btw. You're right that they are defended, but most people actually treat men like mentally challenged idiots and women like gods of justice and peace. They're so strong and independent. She must have a really valid reason for throwing her husband off a cliff. The only people who see women as they are (mentally challenged children) are in this sub.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (4 children)

As I said before, men evolved to extract value from their environment; women evolved to extract value from men. How do you extract value from men? By deception, by knowing how to manipulate people's feelings and get the tribe on your side to back you up.

But if you are a man in a hunting party or war party, this has no place. You are either there at the kill or you are not, you can't pretend. People either rely on you, or they pretty soon find out that you cannot be relied on. Jack Donovan wrote about that stuff.

[–]Alphaemote 2 points2 points [recovered]

I've sidebar'd to death. I've come to know, then hate, then love hamster.

However, this passage is the first time I've truly, truly got it. Thanks for the words that finally got it into my head. Great post.

[–]JihadDerp 14 points15 points  (7 children)

The difference between women and men: women lack reason and accountability.

[–]JourneymanTRP 15 points16 points  (4 children)

Accountability. Women's actions are like children's simply because they haven't been shown that people wont put up with their shit

[–]WillSmokeStaleCigs 7 points8 points  (3 children)

I was just saying this yesterday. A dent showed up on my car with a yellow paint scuff, when I was parked right next to a yellow volkswagen beetle. The dent was NOT there before. This woman had the audacity to tell me to my face that she didn't do it. I know she is lying, but there is nothing I can do because I dont have a witness to the incident.

[–]CruelHandLuke7 14 points15 points  (1 child)

This should be required reading material for every male when they reach 18.

[–]Gawernator 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That was epic indeed. Ahahah. Hopefully it was true

[–]Subtletorious 130 points131 points  (2 children)

HER: I'm pregnant!

HIM: That's fantastic. If it's a girl you can name her Vasectomy.

[–]1WidmerBeer 252 points253 points  (71 children)

All I can say is... BOOM SHAKALAKA.

Telling them you're not the father is like fishing with TNT. So easy and so overkill in crushing their lies with that ammo.

Not sure if it was this forum or not, but I read a great story about someone in your situation who played with the situation much more deviously. To make it short, he asked his gf every month if it was his once she got pregnant. She always replied yes. Little did she know that he had his vasectomy and kept it a secret. Finally when she was in the third trimester or so he was at her parents house for Xmas or something. He asked her if she's ever cheated on him, she said no.

Finally, his plan came out like a Magicians final act. He had all the documents in order from his lawyer that he had been in contact with months prior. In front of her parents he asked one more time if she had ever cheated on him, she told him no. He then pulled the rabbit out of his hat and explained how he had a vasectomy years ago and that it couldn't possibly be his. All this as she told a bold faced lie in front of her parents. He handed her the documents and told the family that if she ever contacts him again he'll be contacting his lawyer. What a boss.

[–][deleted] 131 points132 points  (24 children)

A friend of mine had a daughter with his wife. He got a secret vasectomy. After his divorce he had a string of girlfriends all wanting to get pregnant. When the girlfriends couldn't get pregnant, he would say, "it's not me, I have a daughter, we are going to have to try harder".

[–][deleted] 50 points50 points

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 109 points110 points  (2 children)

Absolutely a dick move. We laughed about it many times.

[–]Izzenw 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Absolutely a dick move. We laughed about it many times.

Literally a dick move. I would do that as much as I'm laughing about it.

[–]Peter_Principle_ 25 points26 points  (11 children)

Sound's like fraud to me.

Compared to "child" support debtors prisons, income imputation and rape shield laws? Shrug-worthy.

[–]broken26 11 points12 points  (8 children)

Thats what separates us from them, You don't act like a child in response to them. Aren't we better than that? Sure TRP is about sexual strategy, but it's not about lying to get laid, its about self improvement to get laid.

[–]Man_Jose 20 points21 points  (5 children)

I used to think like you. High moral ground. Then I realized that we're practically living a modern world with medieval humans. Once I truly swallowed the pill, I started caring more about my family, my parents, siblings, cousins more than the random chick who, until proven, doesn't deserve my trust. I still don't lie much but I keep my cards close.

This is modern day Game of Thrones. Relationships are the biggest window to exposing you to legal fraud.

[–]Peter_Principle_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Aren't we better than that?

Obviously. A minor trick doesn't even compare to legalized extortion or imprisoning the innocent.

[–]RedSugarPill 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Honestly that still is a dick move to do. Don't waste someone elses time for sex when they want a child. Sound's like fraud to me.

Seriously? Who let the morality police in here? Show us your tits or get the fuck out.

[–]Blackbeard345 21 points22 points  (28 children)

Damn what happen after? What was their reaction?

[–]aanarchist 82 points83 points  (25 children)

shaming the man for being an asshole, obviously

[–][deleted] 99 points100 points  (23 children)

Do not mistake my post for blue pill whiny justification.

Yes, she is the colossal cunt in this story and deserves her comeuppance - but he is not guilt-free. He had a chance to call her out early enough for her to abort. He didn't. In a way that dude did add one more fatherless single-parent child to the world that will statistically grow up in misery. He's obviously not 10/10 responsible as she is and there are no legal or monetary implications, but it's still a dick move. Not 10/10 dick, but at least a 3/10.

Please people, take a step back and look at the bigger picture sometimes.

[–]aanarchist 54 points55 points  (5 children)

i'm all about the big picture you're in good company brother.

the thing is, he did the right thing imo. she needed to be disgraced in front of her parents, and her parents needed to see just how much of a failure they were in raising their daughter. the light of truth is never pretty, but it clears away the darkness. if he had just ghosted she'd just continue hamstering in another direction, or she'd have found another guy to sucker in without her parents knowing.

the major factor in this clusterfuck we're in right now, is a lack of female accountability, and a lack of shaming them for the blatantly retarded and evil shit they do. truth is she probably didn't learn a damn thing because there must have been at least 20 orbiters ready to pay for another man's child. i've been in a situation where i felt like i could teach a woman the value of personal responsibility and holding herself accountable, and it's just heartbreaking how she has so much orbiters validating her every degenerate choice she makes, that she can never learn to see reason, that she'll always take the path of least resistance. the more men do what that guy did, whether it's 10 on the dickmove chart or 5, the closer women get to coming out of their comas and joining us as contributers to society, rather than as detriments.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (4 children)

the thing is, he did the right thing imo. she needed to be disgraced in front of her parents, and her parents needed to see just how much of a failure they were in raising their daughter. the light of truth is never pretty, but it clears away the darkness.

He can do all that and not bring in a child that will grow up in single parent misery. In this scenario you're buying your own smug satisfaction of bitch-got-told with someone else's life and presumable pain of resentment.

the major factor in this clusterfuck we're in right now, is a lack of female accountability, and a lack of shaming them for the blatantly retarded and evil shit they do.

That is true.

[–]aanarchist 18 points19 points  (3 children)

as if she'd have gotten an abortion if he took another route? wrong, she'd have cucked some beta if he ghosted her.

[–]verify_account 34 points35 points  (7 children)


Who the fuck gives 2 cents about what happens to her. She got what she had coming.

[–]weatherstorme 26 points27 points  (4 children)

They don't care about her, they care about the kid who will more than likely be a BP (if it's a boy) since it will be raised by a single mother who is awful.

[–]main_motors 13 points14 points  (3 children)

And if it turns out to be a girl, she will have daddy issues and feminist bullshit brainwashed into her head from the mother at a young age.

[–]NaughtyFred 8 points9 points  (0 children)

She got what she had coming.

She did and she deserved to be humiliated. The kid in her belly he let gestate until past the abortion window didn't.

There's a reason why gangsters rarely shoot a pregnant woman deliberately.

[–]RadioactiveTentacles 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He's not saying it's a dick move because he embarrassed her, its a dick move because now there's pretty much no chance of that kid having a great childhood. He bartered with another persons innocence and childhood. That kid is going to grow up with a young, dickhungry mother, and if it's a boy she's going to indoctrinate him to be the man she couldn't land. Technically, if he told her right off the bat, she might have had an abortion. Is it likely? No. But it theoretically could have happened. So he did fuck a kid over, sort of, but it was still her actions; he wasn't responsible. The dude kind of acknowledges that, but mostly in implication.

[–]RatBastardJones 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Damn what happen after? What was their reaction?

Everyone stood up and clapped. That magician's name? Albert Einstein.

[–]trpthrowaway1852 13 points14 points  (7 children)

Where's the pink dildo in the story? Lol.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children)

Is this a reference to something?

[–]Specter242 9 points10 points  (1 child)

There's a video on youtube about a dude who knew his gf/fiancee was cheating and exposed her on camera in a cool way. A pink dildo was present in that video

[–]ChadThundercockII 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Maybe a British movie. It's the story of a guy who got an STD from his girlfriend but thought it was from a hooker. When he finally confronted her, she told him she was in a party with her girls and were passing dildos around. Turns out, she was fucking his friend.

But that's just a guess.

[–]CallMeStarfish 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Anyone have a link to the story?

[–]4D6N2 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It's currently the top comment in the thread.

[–]PedroIsWatching 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've heard so many variations of that story, it's basically a copypasta at this point.

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points  (1 child)

Great first i lose my job then this. Its ok you dont mind spotting me for a while?
"its not yours."

[–]iamz3ro 84 points85 points  (38 children)

Hypergamy dictates that she is to look for the most alpha male her looks/etc can attract. Nearly-wall-hitting and wall-hitting women are very dangerous. OP I suggest you start plating up younger girls who won't be so quick to pull the P-Card.

[–]vagbutters 72 points73 points  (22 children)

Hypergamy dictates that she is to look for the most alpha male her looks/etc can attract.

IIRC women look for alphas most when they're ovulating, and once impregnated look for beta males who can provide for them.

Getting the best genes for their kids while finding someone who can raise them. 2016 is pretty much the dreamworld for every slut who can get a mangina judge behind them.

[–]iamz3ro 39 points40 points  (20 children)

You're mostly correct. Woman's inner game, her most hardcore desire is to find a Alpha Male who she can tame with Beta qualities. She so badly wants to meed Chad in a club, get fucked doggystyle very roughly, then for him impregnate her and once the news is out, exclaim his love and commitment to her.

The whole "alpha when ovulating / beta all other times" is just generally followed by women who are at least aware enough that Alpha males will not commit. So she wants go clubbing 1 week in the month, fuck alpha's, and then come home to her Beta provider.

But, again, the Main Mission, is to tame an Alpha.

[–]JourneymanTRP 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's not the inner most, really. That's more like what she thinks she wants. If she actually tames an alpha, she'll get bored and look for the next one.

Women want an alpha 'project' and someone to make decisions for them, for the most part. They're not going to be satisfied even if they tame one.

[–]vagbutters 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I don't even know if it's a matter of self-awareness. The study that someone linked a while back suggested that this was an evolved behavior.

[–]Ayleir 11 points12 points  (1 child)

If seen a couple of studies about this as well. They showed different faces of men to different women, letting them rate their attractiveness, and the ones who were ovulating would choose the men with harsher faces (i. e. stronger, more pronounced jaw lines, full beards etc.) while the ones that were not ovulating would choose the softer, more "feminine" faces.

I'll see if I can find that study.

edit: I found an article about this, however I do not know if this source is credible, as the actual scientific paper is not linked.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (11 children)

Multiple studies have shown that it's not something they're aware of doing fwiw

[–]RadioactiveTentacles 18 points19 points  (10 children)

No, as a girl, they definitely know they do it. All the girls I work with are that way, but they pretend they're not. After a while, though, it just becomes so second nature to them, they forget that they're doing it, and everyone just accepts this kind of behavior.

[–]JihadDerp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think the order of operations is that rigid. A lot of women try to lock down their meal ticket first, then go around fucking genetic superiors.

[–]random13571357[S] 17 points18 points  (9 children)

I get all of my dates through tinder and pof apps. These sites don't let younger women see my profiles unless they choose to do so.

So I wont attract any girls under 28 unless I go looking for them or they go looking for me, where as I get about 2-3 messages from different women every day between 28-40.

When a fish jumps on the boat, its hard to throw it back.

[–]iamz3ro 38 points39 points  (0 children)

That's the thing though, OP. THEY WANT YOU. They want you to settle for them. You're literally in the peak of your life. Quite literally. Don't pay attention to the old bitches and hit up the young sluts, who, coincidentally are also in the prime of their life.

I read that craigslist post, shit was hilarious. I just want to restate that the fish WILL jump into your boat as that's exactly what they want, they want you, to pull the P-Card and make you commit. Those fish? Poisonous bro. Better to catch your own fish, that way you can choose which fish you want to eat.

[–]forcevacum 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Change your age on Facebook and it feeds through into tinder then delete you cache. Then explain its a bug in tinder when you meet

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dude, you already pull a ton of older women. Considering how many younger women go for older men, you'd pull twice the tail.

[–]JihadDerp 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I'm 31 and consistently pull 19-24 year olds. Also pof is garbage. You should try okcupid.

[–]PedroIsWatching 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Where I'm from Tinder has turned OKC into an obese single mother wasteland.

[–]NakedAndBehindYou 7 points8 points  (1 child)

OP I suggest you start plating up younger girls who won't be so quick to pull the P-Card.

Well, if he's infertile, he doesn't have much to worry about, does he? Girls about to hit the wall would be more desperate and thus easier to bang. With no major downside there's nothing to lose.

[–]aDrunkenWhaler 13 points14 points  (1 child)

As long as he's shooting blanks he has nothing to fear. 28-32 range is actually pretty good. They still have the looks, very easy to lay, go overboard to please you and have a lot of experience to fuck your brains. Their only problem is the wall closing in, but that's a manageble concern, especially if you have a vasectomy. Younger girls are usually hotter, but not always, and they take much more of your time to keep and chase after, and are usually lazier and more boring and entitled. They're still worth it, obviously, but as long as you're in the 18-32 range it's all good, it's just a matter of what works best for you and how you handle your shit. If you go over 32 you're a thirsty idiot fucking wrinkles.

[–]Jerkboy13 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The problem is 28-32 is the danger zone. The baby rabies zone. The time when women hear their biological clock start to tick, realize they don't have a man, and will do exactly what OP described. If you're looking to play, you have to go younger or older, or else you'll be walking on eggshells.

[–]Apexk9 23 points24 points  (15 children)

I hear UK has weird parental DNA stuff with how court handles it what if she refused the test and claimed you as the father either way.

[–]Xenotheos 19 points20 points  (6 children)

You might be thinking of France.

[–]phx-au 33 points34 points  (1 child)

Yeah France has some culture around cuckoldry and not wanting to allow paternity tests in order to 'protect the family unit' or some shit.

[–]jav253 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. I was just thinking reading this thread it would be a feminist wet dream if they could outlaw paternity tests. Cucked France made the dream real.

[–]no_face 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"Am I alone in hating the French? Didn't think so" --Al Bundy

[–]random13571357[S] 6 points7 points  (7 children)

I would really like more details? Can you clarify?

[–]Apexk9 15 points16 points  (6 children)

NO validity to statement.

just a hazy memory of a thread about something about court ordered paternity tests excluding the father from the information.

First time checking the sub on a browser. Wow very nice header sharp as fuck

[–]random13571357[S] 24 points25 points  (5 children)

Did a little google.


Says that they can force it on you if you were married to the woman between the dates of conception, but as long as you are not married and you refuse paternity she has to submit to a dna test for child maintenance.

[–]trp_angry_dwarf 15 points16 points  (2 children)

I read everything on that website and it's a fucking red flag minefield.

I don't know how many times I read a sentence that could easily turn into "If you are willing to submit to a DNA test but the mother does not provide consent, you're the father."

[–]forcevacum 9 points10 points  (1 child)

A judge will throw that out of court in the uk immediately once he sees sperms tests and a vasectomy report.

[–]Endorsed ContributorDenswend 60 points61 points  (4 children)

I predominantly date women between the ages of 28-32 at this time in my life.

I've seen this and put up a major red flag in my mind. Women near Wall are more prone to getting baby rabies. Why would someone aware of RP even do such a thing and then I saw :

Oh and the twist. I got the sip at 28, 8 years ago and I've had 4 sterile checks since.

Fucking savage.

[–]MakeEmSayAyy 10 points11 points  (2 children)

I dont know why anyone promotes or fucks with women in that age range. They are FAR more likely to pull some shit like this and they have the entire legal system at their disposal.

[–]2Bait4Me 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The more I look, the more I see that the red pill is the truth.

[–]1Ronin11A 14 points15 points  (1 child)

1 admitted lying about being pregnant to see my reaction. 1 recieved my text explaining I was sterile and i've never been contacted again. 1 remained adamant I was the father, and 2 days ago I was cleared of parental responsibility through DNA test. (The child was not mine.)

Dude, stop sticking your dick in crazy.

[–]stawek 20 points21 points  (6 children)

A little change in law would be in order:

a woman has only one chance to claim the father. If the person she claimed is then cleared by DNA test she can never go after a different man again. She can, however, claim multiple men at the same time, if she isn't sure herself. With a twist: each man will be fully informed about the claims made with other men.

[–]yummyluckycharms 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Why would the matriarchy ever accept such a law? It exists to protect women, and your proposed law wouldn't be advantageous to them.

[–]psycho-logical 5 points6 points  (2 children)

This is pretty brilliant. Prevents fraud. There are situations where multiple possible fathers is not cheating (non exclusive dating, open relationships etc...). However, the woman shouldn't basically be able to try and stick the "best" man with the baby and if that fails move down the list.

[–]stawek 7 points8 points  (1 child)

This is obviously a joke.
A really sensible approach would be a mandatory DNA check on each and every baby, immediately after birth. mandatory. So that every woman knows with 100% certainty that lying about it will not work.

[–]AdrianWerner 28 points29 points  (36 children)

Yeah. Get vasectomy guys. If you want children in the future just freeze your sperm and in worst case scenario you can always extract fresh sperm directly from testicles. THis way if you ever get a child it will be on your terms and with person you choose to have it with.

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

and never, ever never ever never ever ever ever sign a fucking birth certificate without a DNA test.

if you are scared, say you want to make sure the hospital gave you the right baby or something stupid like that. but never sign a lifelong deal without doing a basic check first

[–]random13571357[S] 28 points29 points  (10 children)

Vasectomy reversal rates are increasingly getting better.

Within 4 years - 98% effective.

Sliding scale

Within 25 years - 85% effective.

[–]Copenhagen23 19 points20 points  (8 children)

Too bad it is $5k-$10k to reverse the procedure. Your post made me look into a vasectomy. I always thought reversal success was much lower.

[–]_LuckyDucky_ 58 points59 points  (0 children)

After 0 kids, you'd have the cash to afford a reversal.

[–]Appleseed12333 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Pro Tip: if $5k-$10k will bankrupt you, don't have any children.

[–]lukeyj_gtfc 8 points9 points  (4 children)

You got a reference for this? I'm seriously considering this...

[–]Grimsterr 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you are wanting a kid, and, more importantly, can afford to raise a kid, 10K ain't shit, it's a drop in the bucket of what it's gonna cost you to raise the kid, if you can't afford the 10K you certainly can't afford the kid.

[–]ProbablyAHippo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It should be noted for anyone reading this that there is also the chance that your body starts to generate antibodies for sperm, and even if you have a good reversal done after that point, you may not be able to have kids. I don't know the timeframe on that, but I believe it was 8-12 years where it becomes a potential issue.

Source: Had vasectomy, urologist told me this

[–]Eidolon3436 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Guys listen to this brother. When I got my vasectomy I asked my urologist if I could get a referral to the local academic hospital and put some sperm in cryo. Doc said sure if you want but any fertility medicine specialist is going to want to aspirate fresh swimmers from your scrotum via a biopsy needle and local anesthetic. Basically..you dont have to get it reversed...just be prepared to pay for the sperm retrieval procedure and IVF (or IUI too I guess). So much peace of mind now...

[–]forcevacum 10 points11 points  (21 children)

If you do this cover your tracks so no one knows you froze the sperm, it's beyond being paranoid but women have been to take vials of sperm from their dead soldier husbands to have fatherless children in the past.

[–]czmtzc 38 points38 points [recovered]

You don't store your sperm in your refrigerator, it is kept at a sperm bank cooled by liquid nitrogen.

It isn't like some random can just grab your sperm and use it.

Technically, a widow of a dead soldier would have the property rights to the sperm left behind.

[–]Mithra9009 7 points8 points  (7 children)

I think there was one case some years ago where a husband refuse to impregnate his wife because he didn't want children so the wife, knowing of his sperm deposits literally just walked into the sperm bank, requested his sperm and impregnated herself with it. It was something ridiculous like this.

[–]phx-au 20 points21 points  (4 children)

UK. Guy ended up on the hook for child support, despite the fact that she admitted forged his signature on the jizz-release papers.

Being the father is crazy strict liability. In the US a female teacher who rapes a student can successfully sue for child support as soon as the victim turns 18.

[–]prtzlsmakingmethrsty 9 points9 points [recovered]

In the US a female teacher who rapes a student can successfully sue for child support as soon as the victim turns 18.

Even worse, he's responsible for back-paying the child support, PLUS interest, to his rapist from when he was an under-aged victim!


[–]forcevacum 3 points4 points  (11 children)

Technically, a widow of a dead soldier would have the property rights to the sperm left behind.

That's what i'm referring to. If she doesnt know it exists she cant get it.

[–]czmtzc 35 points35 points [recovered]

Welll, we may be different, but if I was dead, I wouldn't care if my widow used my sperm.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points  (5 children)

In the feminist dream world even a dead man must pay child support

[–]stawek 6 points7 points  (0 children)


She wasn't a good wife, so in your will you assign most of your wealth to charities. She then gets pregnant with your baby which just happens to nullify your will. Now the baby will get most of it and she just happens to be in charge of it.

[–]nezamestnany 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Why does that matter after they're dead?

When I'm dead I'm dead, I don't give two shits what's done with stuff I had

[–]forcevacum 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Because I personally believe that its better that a child doesn't happen than a child without a proper father is brought into the world. I can see what you are saying, it's just my stance on it.

[–]aanarchist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

you snipped your snip there buddy.

[–][deleted] 36 points37 points  (5 children)

Hate to sound like some hater, but you've gotta hide your lifestyle.

Unfortunately you check too many boxes women like . Single, homeowner, well paying job? High value target.

Congrats. You're like a bank vault in the middle of the ghetto.

Best solution to this- start hiding your lifestyle.

Invent a wife or LTR , it won't matter one bit if she's into you. Use that as an "excuse" to see her at hotels and places Not Your Home.

It also acts as plausible deniability , so you can tell her you can't hang out "because wife". If you have to drop a plate because of drama , claim your LTR / wife is getting jealous and will drag you into court if you get caught.

It'll cut down on the fake pregnancy claims in this way- because the only thing women fear in this matriarchy is another one of their kind.If you're already "claimed" she won't start shit.

You won't get as much tail by raw numbers as some girls won't pursue a dude they have to fight for, but this tactic will cut down on your visits to the CS office and self- eliminate the worst of the schemers.

[–]hb8only 8 points9 points  (1 child)

he is getting girls BECAUSE his life style. hiding it would be contra productive

[–]zeroyon04 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Next time someone does that to you, go on Maury with her and rub it in like this.

[–]runikepisteme 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am generally against Slut Shaming but when it comes to Women have a hard time identifying the father of their child to collect child support . Yeah that is where I draw the line .

[–]hidano 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I stupidly banged a hoe without a condom a few years ago. She claimed she was on birth control, and I pulled out, still dumb irregardless. She got sprung on me after that one date, so I decided to completely cut ties.

A month later she texts saying she is late and thinks she is pregnant. All I responded to her was 'ok let me know'. 4-5 hours later she says nevermind, I just started my period, want to hang out?

Never spoke to that crazy ever again. Saw her on a dating site recently with two kids, who look like they are from two different men.

Valuable lesson learned.

[–]1favours_of_the_moon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She wasn't lying "just to see your reaction."

[–]UCISee 13 points14 points  (1 child)

I've never once seen a post 100% upvoted.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm 37 and I only date women 21 to 29....

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This enrages me beyond reason. The most insane part in all of this is, the society will always side with the women in these cases. Even after it is proven that they lied, people will find some way to see you as the asshole.

[–]CrashXXL 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The ol' "keep a nigga" baby.

[–]Swedishlean 2 points3 points  (1 child)

225 and single digit body fat? Let's see a pic

[–]Project_Thor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Welcome to a well-done Humblebrag.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (12 children)

1 admitted lying about being pregnant to see my reaction.

Hard next

1 recieved my text explaining I was sterile and i've never been contacted again.

Hard next

1 remained adamant I was the father, and 2 days ago I was cleared of parental responsibility through DNA test. (The child was not mine.)

Hard next

Looks like you need some new plates

[–]random13571357[S] 15 points16 points  (11 children)

In the last 2 years I've had sex with about 20-30 different women.

Numbers/biological clock = eventual paternity claim.

[–]RageLionRising 8 points9 points  (8 children)

First, I have to say, I'm impressed with those numbers. Good job. With that said, please be careful, dude. With those types of numbers you're risking a false sexual assault claim, too. It can come years down the road even. Take a look at Toby Turner of Youtube fame and the Tumblr post. I would ask all readers to please take hard precautions when you start hitting those numbers. Save texts, save e-mails, especially get pictures and video, etc., etc.

[–]random13571357[S] 12 points13 points  (5 children)

Yea I fucked a girl and in no uncertain terms told her she can't sleep here, and I made her leave and 20 minutes later text me to tell me how disgusted she was with me using her like that, and I thought you weren't like that and all this crap. Its on my radar, I don't delete text messages.

[–]RageLionRising 5 points6 points  (4 children)

Please start getting picture and video, too, to document. At the very least get a picture of her and you smiling together afterwards. Have a nice text convo the next day, etc., etc.

[–]Beegsi_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Legend. You should play along and act beta only to flip the script but who knows theses tricks can cry rape and abuse if you push them.

[–]Tamazin_ 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Can't you like sue them in some way to teach them a lesson (and put it on the book that they're liers incase some other guy gets in the same trouble but hasn't snipped and unsure ect.)?

[–]AtlasAtlasAtlas 2 points3 points  (1 child)

see I wanna get one for protection but then I might want to have kids in the future.

[–]blackhawks93 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Are frozen sperm the same quality as fresh sperm? I'd like a vacemtomy but idk if i want frozen sperm to turn into my future kids.

Sorry English is not my first language.

[–]JackGetsIt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm curious as well. Why don't you research it a do a post on it. If you need help with the English editing send me a draft of the post and I will clean it up.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I see a bunch of superficial and material crap showing how you think you are at the top.

Then I see proof that you date crazy low value women.

This is not the real world I live in.

[–]RadioactiveTentacles 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well if you're not really interested in commitment, or anything beyond sex for that matter, what's the point of expending time and effort to find one of the few and far between high value women? No matter how high the value, if you don't want commitment or marriage, then what's the point?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Question - does the vasectomy take away a chance to have a child forever with no way around it? Can you still extract the sperm from your balls and go for in vitro impregnation? If no, did you save a sample of sperm for the possibility that you will want progeny one day?

load more comments (110 replies)