MetaIn the wake of the U.C. Berkeley riots, let us remember something important: only focus on yourself. (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by [deleted]

If you're not in the know, U.C. Berkeley had to shut down a Milo Yiannapolous talk because protestors were beginning to become violent and it soon turned into a riot; riot police used tear gas and non-lethal bullets. BBC News primer.

Even President Trump addressed the issue.

In light of this event and the extreme differences in opinion between various groups of people that have been occurring before and since Trump's presidency, I wanted to remind everyone of an important, but often forgotten creed: only focus on yourself.

It can be tempting to argue with someone who you don't see as being rational or who is not looking at a situation through clear and unbiased eyes. However, all this does is drain you and takes energy away from doing things that would benefit your life.

There are certain people in the world that no matter what you say, do, or think, they will never accept an opinion other than their own. These people are not worth your time. Who you put into your life and what you expend your energy on is your choice.

Lift, read, work on that side-business, do anything but be dragged down into the miasma of these groups of people. If they don't want to listen then don't start talking.

Of course, this does not mean that one should ignore other viewpoints. Just discuss differing opinions with people who respect you and your ideas. Talk with individuals who can hold a rational conversation. Anyone else is not worthy of you or your time.

This is not a call to lean one way or the other in a political sense. However, if you think President Trump will be/is the greatest American leader in a while (or the worst) than that is your ideal. Do not be dissuaded or drained by people who would riot or commit other heinous acts against you because of differing opinions.

You are above them. The only thing that matters is yourself and your happiness. Do not let them take it from you.

[–]HungryLikeTheWolf99 81 points82 points  (2 children)

In local political campaigns, people talk about categorizing the electorate into three groups: the Saints, the Sinners, and the Saveables.

The Saints will vote for you, pretty much no matter what.

The Sinners will never vote for you, pretty much no matter what.

The Saveables can be caused to vote for you, or caused to vote for your opponent.

Now, like all metaphors, this one breaks down eventually, and we might also complain that these days, the number of Savables is at an all-time low - everybody believes what they believe and fuck you for having an even mildly divergent opinion. But, I do think that if you'd like to be part of changing people's opinions (which I don't think is wrong), you carefully consider whether you're talking to a Saint, a Sinner, or a Savable, and never, ever waste time or energy on someone who isn't clearly a Savable.

[–]Senior ContributorDemonspawn 7 points8 points  (1 child)

never, ever waste time or energy on someone who isn't clearly a Savable.

As an example, a long time ago I realize it was useless to discuss the MRM with a married man who has children: The "opportunity cost" of him changing his beliefs was likely his marriage and access to his kids.

Changing beliefs has a cost, usually emotional but a cost nonetheless. If you can understand what one's costs is for changing their beliefs, you can understand if they are Savable.

[–]Docbear64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Excellent point , this is why so many Beta men can't appreciate or refuse to appreciate TRP concepts or won't follow through after they hear them . " Workout , Make Money , don't be a social pariah " . Sounds great but it requires a certain amount of introspection that will be painful thoughts for many to harbor " I could be more attractive , I am not currently achieving all that I can financially, my social skills could use some polish" .

It is all a glass half full versus half empty perspective The line between appreciating " I can be better" and "I'm not good enough" is slim and yet the repercussions of each perspective can be drastically different. In addition to the fact that those two thoughts feel vastly different from each other as well.

[–][deleted] 249 points250 points  (37 children)

No white knighting, but the protesters were hitting and pepper-spraying female Trump supporters who were just standing around talking to each other. Makes my blood boil.

I'm not too interested in US politics, but I know whose side I am on this time. The same people who want to get rid of free speech and free thought are the same ones who say men defending themselves from rape charges is traumatic to the victims.

[–]Senior ContributorSkorchZang 173 points174 points  (14 children)

White knighting is a great built-in survival instinct. Males protect their females, or the lot of them die out.

Our enemy has many different minions, blue hair harpies and nu-males shouting "you're a fucking white male!" are just a couple of them. The enemy always uses the same basic method to take us down: abusing any available built-in automatic instincts that used to help us survive, and turning them against us.

You can think of hundreds of examples of this strategem in action. Here're just a couple:

  • Tons of sugar in everything. Human body's instinct to crave it like an addict was actually good when it was scarce, sweet things were rare. Now it's one of many slow poisons in your system.

  • TV shows with sports teams that the viewer cheers for. Natural tribal instinct, abused to sell you sugar, obesity, and destructive political ideologies, while depleting you of the natural craving for that tribal unity which you'd need to resist the enemy effectively.

  • Men loving women, wanting the best for them - turned around becomes "you're the oppressor, hands off, set her free, SHE will decide what she wants to do. And I will tell her what she wants from the TV screen."

  • Never hit a woman unless absolutely necessary (good) becomes "stop ALL violence against women and girls", you are the default aggressor, no trial no jury, no evidence necessary. Meanwhile violence against "racist" white males is promoted at every turn as noble.

  • You want to be a kind man, wish everyone well and live peacefully without stepping on anyone's throats or tearing out their guts (natural human desire). Turned against you: "if you don't let these invading barbarian armies we want to put into your country and every other country, you're unkind and racist scum".

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 27 points28 points  (2 children)

I think you found your next post, sir. Taking your natural inclinations, then using them against you. Or natural boundaries being uplifted without the time to adapt to the plethora of choice.

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Taking your natural inclinations, then using them against you.

Pretty much every quick and profitable money-making method is grounded in capitalizing on emotional reflex. Emotion is fertile ground for an impulsion which lasts just long enough for you to take money out of your wallet.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Channeling the energy of your nature on a controlled path then setting up a tollbooth. Bluepill Tariffs.

[–]pwrxas 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Great points.

If more people held these principles I'd be less confused. Why confused? I'm the resident evil heterosexual because I have a preference for females - but evil from the perspective of each LGBQT that, by definition, has their own, brashly stated preferences. This cascades into my built-in privilege and so on and so on.

People need to get wise to whats clearly politics of division. Be nice! You're being suckered into hating since you're the group of focus for today. It's going to suck when there is a new group and you're left with nothing but how much you've discredited yourself. Anyway.

[–]GuitarHero07 45 points46 points  (5 children)

In a sane world, the mayor of Berkeley would be removed from office for gross negligence. I'm sure we've all seen many of the videos and the most alarming thing about them is the lack of any police presence.

The mayor is a big time Trump hater and he basically ordered the local cops to stand down while people were assaulted, businesses were looted and things were set on fire. He would rather let his town burn than to let a non-approved voice be heard.

I guarantee you if a bunch of Trump supporters started protesting in large numbers, they would have brought the hammer down hard. Yet in this case, not even a single arrest was made! Gotta love Khalifornistan...

[–]grewapair 23 points24 points  (4 children)

If I had organized that talk, I would have hired a biker gang as security. "No cops, do your worst!" They would have had a field day.

[–]Philletto 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Would have had cops to protect the rioters from the bikers.

[–]grewapair 6 points7 points  (1 child)

The cops were ordered away by the mayor. The mayor wanted the speaker gone so the mayor wanted no police presence so as not to intimidate the rioters.

[–]reddit_sucks3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There needs to be people organized next time the antifa come around to protect innocent bystanders if the cops wont do it.

[–]MelodyMyst 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You might want to give this more consideration.


[–]AlulaEngida -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why you angry at this(the bitch could be a white supremacist) yet not a the time his group attack others? It's very telling that you be on a side of group that calls for genocide all in some free speech, yet you think BLM is a "threat"

[–]RedditAdminsSuck_88 84 points85 points  (44 children)

Rule 38.

I live in downtown Seattle and these protests are still going on. I've had to cross them many times walking home from work. I also work in an environment where the anti-Trump sentiment is very high. It's not worth engaging with these people.

I went to a Trump rally back in May in Northern Washington. There were no protesters when I got there or when we were ushered into the venue. But when the event was over and we left, there were thousands of protestors outside blocking the parking lot so we couldn't leave. As I walked into the parking lot to get to my car I was confronted by a Mexican dude wrapped in a Mexican Flag. He was being belligerent. I could have engaged with him, but I noticed he had a lot of friends/family with him also wrapped in Mexican Flags. If I engaged, could have very well been involved in a nasty fight where I was outnumbered. Instead I asked a police officer to escort me to my car. Did that make me less of a man? Am I a pussy? I'd rather be called a pussy instead of get myself involved with something that could have a bad end result.

Part of holding frame is not stooping to the level of these people. It's hard, but risk-reward. The reward is never worth the risk.

[–]Cesare_MA 63 points64 points  (15 children)

My physics teacher pointed out something really funny the other day. He was talking about how there were so many protests going on on our campus, where around 90% of the people voted Hillary. He said if these protestors wanted to make a difference, wouldn't they go somewhere where everyone else doesn't already agree with them and then protest?

[–]RedditAdminsSuck_88 60 points61 points  (9 children)

Probably because those types of people have guns and concealed carry permits.

[–]HungryLikeTheWolf99 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Oh, you mean the absolute least likely people to commit violent crimes?

There's been some discussion in the concealed carry subreddit about how to stay safe when protests are popping up everywhere. The consensus has been - stay away from any protesting activities at all costs.

TL;DR - people carrying concealed are like bears. They're more afraid of you than you are of them.

Edit: I guess your comment is ambiguous. Are you talking about regular old women's march type protesters, or violent mobs?

[–]adam_varg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah anyone with brains will try to evade any possible confrontation as best as he can while he is carrying.

That being said if seeing someone being beaten on the ground by mob while carrying i woudlnt turn my back.

[–]Cesare_MA 0 points1 point  (6 children)

And they'd be willing to give up the rest of their lives to kill one or two protestors from a group of thousands?

[–]1DubbleFUPAwitCheez 32 points33 points  (2 children)

You act like they would just get on a roof and take pot shots at a bunch of people standing around holding signs.

The point is if they got violent it could escalate to fatal much easier.

[–]17496634303659 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. Those that have concealed carry licenses usually know the gun laws MUCH better than those that have no interest in firearms. They know that if they were to ever pull out their sidearm, it had better be a life or death situation, or they can kiss their license goodbye, and even possibly end up in jail.

They don't want to hurt anyone, and don't want to give anyone an excuse to harass them to the point where they may have to draw their firearm.

[–]dwd3xedwsz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is if they got violent it could escalate to fatal much easier.

Keep groups of people who intensely dislike each other away from one another. Got it.

[–]Tailback 6 points7 points  (2 children)

You need to read up on Oregon and Washington's concealed carry and self defense laws before making such a statement.

[–]Cesare_MA 5 points6 points  (1 child)

You got me there. I don't know shit about gun laws.

[–]Tailback 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No worries, just saying that under certain circumstances lethal force is completely legal depending on the state. In Oregon or Washington if someone had run in and shot the fucker beating the guy in the head with a shovel, it would be determined to be a justified shooting and no charges would be filed. In California....yeah, good luck.

[–]dankvibez 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's all virtue signaling. Going out to the country in some public space not used by many wouldn't have as much coverage on the media anyways.

These people just wish to show their peers that they care, its a pissing contest. Whoever shows they dislike Trump and care about minorities most wins. They do this for their own status typically. They aren't really 100% conscious of it though.

[–]flashbang123 9 points10 points  (1 child)

He said if these protestors wanted to make a difference, wouldn't they go somewhere where everyone else doesn't already agree with them and then protest?

Because people feel in safe in their echo chamber.

[–]Cesare_MA 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's the point he was trying to make.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's means they would need to come to places like where I live since I'm in Trump country.

It would be in their best interests just to stay in their little safe spaces. Those deer buster's people have on their trucks work pretty good on liberals too

[–]Fall7Stand8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean leave their safe space? Not likely.

[–]NotExactlyChad points points [recovered]

I'd rather be called a pussy than have to defend myself in court over shooting someone in the face because a gang of scumbag tried to jump me.

[–]Tailback 11 points12 points  (1 child)

You need to educate yourself on gun laws by state. In CommieFornia they can just beat a guys brains in with poles and shovels with no police interference.

Recently in liberal Seattle, Washington; A AntiFa black clad anarchist was shot by a Asian-American leftist CCW holder that mistook the anarchist for a white supremacist after the black clad doofus attacked the Asian....twice. Because multiple videos showed the Asian leftist had been attacked...TWICE there were NO CHARGES FILED by Seattle police.

[–]Appleseed12333 -1 points0 points  (19 children)

That's why I ask where are all the gun owners during this riot? The police clearly gave no shit about the damage being done.

[–]Disciple_of_Libertas 20 points21 points  (1 child)

Commiefornia makes it difficult to own a gun.

[–]1FunAndFreedom 20 points21 points  (6 children)

Gun owners are as a whole very level headed, it's part of the culture. As a gun owner I subscribe to the belief that a weapon is only to be drawn if your intention is to use lethal force. These rioters are trash, but escalating things to a lethal level is not a correct response to property damage. Even if people are getting physical it is preferable to leave the situation if possible without using a gun. Obviously it's different if your life is in jeopardy but still, avoiding the situation is the infinitely better outcome.

[–]Appleseed12333 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The idea is if there are alot of gun owners present then the videos of women getting maced and men being beat down by gangs would not happen nearly as much as it did.

[–]Philletto 4 points5 points  (1 child)

What is the point of a gun then? By this liberal reasoning, you would prefer being dead than mistakenly injure someone threatening you.

Anti gun lobby has already won, you're just carrying a symbol.

[–]NotExactlyChad points points [recovered]

Yep, it could easily be argued in a court of law that by remaining in a hostile environment such as this, that you didn't exhaust all options to protect yourself before using lethal force.

Carrying a gun doesn't give anyone the right to go around putting themselves in dangerous situations.

[–]bonerland11 5 points6 points  (1 child)

It's called a "Stand Your Ground" law, you know the one that the left is trying to get rid of.

[–]Asiatic_Static 2 points3 points  (6 children)

It's not like that in CA. May-issue CCW and they overwhelmingly decided that they may not issue.

[–]1kulrajiskulraj 1 point2 points  (5 children)

I heard the Sacramento sheriff is giving em out like candy cause he's a Republican. Thinking about changing my address at the dmv to my cousins address who lives in Sacramento, so I can get one. I live in the bay, what do you think the feasibility of this is?

[–]Asiatic_Static 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude I have no idea. All I know are the laws and stats I've read. I live in Virginia, you can buy a gun and holster, take a 10 question test online for 20 bucks and 2 weeks later you have your gat card.

[–]PwnMonster 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I'm not in California but I don't think you need to change your address to have a permit issued. You probably only have to visit that sheriff's office.

[–]1kulrajiskulraj 1 point2 points  (1 child)

No you have to be a resident of the county that issues you the permit. I live in one of the bay area counties, incredibly hard to near impossible to get a permit. But Sacramento county is easy as balls.

[–]PwnMonster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, that's unfortunate. For an out of state Oregon permit I know you could go to the county of your choosing that issued them.

[–]getrekt_420blazeit 0 points1 point  (1 child)


What is this?

[–]Appleseed12333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, I'm not saying that it's the best thing to do here. But with the police willingly looking the other way and letting people destroy property all round the city, with no arrests being made, eventually people will need to start protecting their own shit using guns. If police don't want to do their job, and I owned one of the buildings, I know where I'll be with my gun.

[–]danishih 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There are very, very few situations where responding to provocation is the correct move.

[–]-ATLAS-_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your only focus as a dude should be results, "am I less of a man" is exactly the devious question that's insidiously postured around. Man is focus and creating his version of reality (his dream) into actual reality. Having police escorted you achieved results. "Am I a real man" is a shit test from your own self comparing yourself to...others I society. There's no society, there is you, a real man because of results of your actions creating your vision. Which is literally the definition of a success.

[–]dankvibez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Speaking of rule 38, I have had a lot of success talking to Bernie supporters and red-pilling them on issues like race. Many of them want the United States to be more like a Scandinavian country. I've used this to explain to them that the only way to get most of the things that they have is to become a homogeneous population. Severe immigration restrictions must be passed in order to get the majority of Americans to support all of those public programs. I don't think any country has existed and done all that well with the amount of genetic diversity the United States has.

[–]rubenbrasil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, a strong man picks his battles wisely.

Survival of the fittest. The insecure guys trying to prove how manly they are by not asking the cop and engaging them would have died or been severely wounded in the caveman days

[–]TryDoingSomethingNew 13 points14 points  (3 children)

"There are certain people in the world that no matter what you say, do, or think, they will never accept an opinion other than their own. These people are not worth your time. Who you put into your life and what you expend your energy on is your choice."

Very, very true words and obviously from someone who has real-world experience. I can verify it's true.

People who "think" (read: only with emotions and virtue-signaling) like the "progressives" are in a cult-like state of being. You cannot be rational and sane with those who are not. It's like trying to mix water and oil.

Time to consider how things will get worse, and prepare for it.

This is a sign of more things to come - and as some are saying, if this continues there's the possibility of a short form of civil war here in the USA.

I'd say you better start thinking of what's going to happen, and don't hang around people who are into attempting to destroy those who they label "fascist" or "racist" - words which mean nothing any more.

Better get ready for a wild 2017!

[–]waldo888 3 points4 points  (2 children)

The scary thing is who is funding the other team? I wonder if we are all being played to justify actual militarization.....Who is pulling the strings? its obvious that divisions are being strongly encouraged....WHY?

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are many players. There are many strategies. There are only a few motives.

I suggest googling a few things to start your research. George Soros Cultural Marxism Zionism Globalism

[–]Tailback 14 points15 points  (2 children)

What's the status of the person that was knocked out, and then beaten on the head with a fucking shovel? Complete media silence so far that I've been able to tell.

[–]1DubbleFUPAwitCheez 11 points12 points  (1 child)

My primary political view is that if you advocate for the side that is making violence inevitable, there is no virtue for you, you are wrong. The weak are always the first to call for bloodshed.

[–]NeoreactionSafe 49 points50 points  (11 children)


My hope is that the insanity of these protests increases for a time until there is so universal a revulsion about them that the entire SJW mentality is broken.


It's clearly an ending for them... they just haven't realized there is nowhere for their ideals to go forward.

The Red Pill is the better future.


Wake up everyone... on all sides... (on our side don't become an easy target)


[–]WillMatte points points [recovered]

This guy gets it. The only way for society to defeat evil ideologies is for them to get so extreme that the common man wakes up.

It took the Holocaust to break eugenics and scientific racism in the west. People need to be shocked into waking up.

[–]prime_zero 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The current liberal/sjw/left/etc ideology is imploding under it's own weight. They are figuratively eating their own, burning their own bridges and have lost touch with reality. This small vocal minority is waking up the silent majority, and their party will come to a screeching halt.

[–]night-addict 11 points12 points  (1 child)

This is my hope as well. The concern, however, is the possibility of a new ideology that is somehow more insidious than the previous.

[–]Endorsed Contributorex_addict_bro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What did you do to James Skepp?

In case he's in your basement, are you feeding him properly?

[–]onleavethrowaway 6 points7 points  (5 children)

This comment needs to be higher for two reasons. One: The Red Pill isn't a political mindset and it is not supposed to be about conservatives vs. liberals. Two: America is getting played like a fiddle by Russia right now. I know Red Pill isn't just comprised of Americans but, as people around the world, we need to be ready for unity. Russian propaganda is designed to create dissonance and a lot of people are falling for it hook, line, and sinker.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (2 children)

As a European i dont understand most of the hate russia is getting, you speak of russian propaganda but spout your own instead.

[–]onleavethrowaway 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I don't mean to be political against Russia. The Red Pill is about looking past all kinds of shrouds and veils and finding the true intentions of people. America is just as, if not more, guilty than Russia of propaganda. That being said, both countries do have state sponsored propaganda.

[–]destraht 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It only superficially appears that Russia is controlling the narrative because the liberals lost their minds some time ago and now the chips are being called in and so any sane and informed person can see how abhorrent their mentality has become. Russians went through a terrible century where they were taken over by extreme ideology that has much in common with the current liberals and so it is very easy for them to spot (and in fact is much easier for me to as well since I lived in Ukraine for years). In fact I'd go so far as to say the the current hyper-liberal mentality is from the same rhyming tree as the USSR. Russian elites don't want or need long round of extreme Marxist structures since there are other much less troublesome ways of extracting wealth. They've been there and done that. If it is so immoral for a group of Russians to have a preference about who is elected in another country then where was the outrage when Victoria Nuland was caught doing much more than this in Ukraine? Where is the outrage at Sith Rich's murder? If you don't know either of these names then wipe off the white board and start over.

[–]wanderer779 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Our leadership has sold us out so many times I think a lot of people might switch allegiance to Russia if it came down to it.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Did Russia take my kids from me and turn me into a slave? You enscript me into war and I'll work for anyone other than what I have now. You can all burn.

[–]revolucion_de_reding 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Whilst to a certain point I agree and think that its important to recognise some simply can't be won over I would point out that quite often when discussing ideas with other people either IRL or online often the real audience isn't the person that you're debating but spectators. Hence whilst you may not be able to win over your opponent you might be able to win over neutral observers and one should bear that in mind and still be prepared to debate those that have made up their mind.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. You should never argue with someone unless you're in a crowd.

[–]thisornothing 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm completely anti-Trump, but I agree with you entirely. I think he's incompetent and bad for business, but that's my own opinion, and I don't gain anything particularly through throwing hissy fits about it.

What really bothers me is the Facebook style political posts, from both sides of the spectrum. The left and the right are all behaving like spoiled little children, and it's just pointless to try and get involved in that bum fight.

Focus on your own shit, ignore the inarticulate masses shouting about their petty little lives.

Fuck the alt-right neckbeards, and fuck the libtard cucks. I've got my own shit to deal with, and I've only myself to blame if it doesn't work out.

[–]snackmuay 5 points6 points  (1 child)

You know. I was just thinking and pondering about this for like a whole week. How much of a waste of time and energy it is to argue and pay attention to this type of shit. I'm better of focusing and improving myself and not get sucked into this crazy mess. I felt like i was the only one thinking like this.thank you for the much needed post man.

[–]FuckTheLibsAndRepubs points points [recovered]

Fuck everyone else. Trust no one but yourself.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Actions speak louder than words. While being able to rationally argue is important, the energy we put into perfecting our political arguments would be better spent on acting in our self-interest. Accept that other people believe they are acting in their own self-interest, even if you think they aren't. Let them behave accordingly, crashing and burning as a result. It only serves to your advantage because it makes the playing field less competitive.

[–]ispeaknot 2 points3 points  (3 children)

The problem is that if you ignore these people, they will try to control your life. They are going to try and control you whether or not you pay attention to their antics or not. Ignoring them does not prevent this.

Their political insanity is a religion to them, and you are the infidel, to be subdued.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

control you

How would they? If you don't associate with anyone like that in your life then there is no way that they have power over you.

[–]ispeaknot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

tell that to any college kid suffering from a kangaroo "rape" court

pretending that these people or their totalitarian agenda can't affect you is ignoring basic facts of life

[–]holydemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're in the product you're using, the media you're consuming, the laws you're living under, the society you're living in.

The only way you can dissociate from them is leaving civilization. After all, all civilizations are built with the idea of order, fairness and justice as their foundation. You might leave US to another country, only to realise every country will have its own version of irrational social justice.

[–]twovines points points [recovered]

Believe very little of what you read on this sort of thing one way or the other.

Start here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crisis_of_Democracy

Never doubt for a second the government will make such demonstrations violent. It's awful difficult to move in with the swat team against peaceful protesters and the rich want to shutdown mass political organization as fast as they can.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

This. Divide and conquer is a thing. It's super easy to get control while everyone is pointing the finger and fighting. That's why the rich donate to both political parties. Keep the fire burning, nobody will notice the few lining their pockets.

[–]waldo888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even turning men against women...

[–]MC_Boom_Finger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you want a society in which men do not have to read shitty advice from forums to behave in a even slight facsimile of a man then step the fuck up and apply the basics of what you preach to everything around you. A disinterested man is not a man at all. Men control the environment around them and shape it to suit their needs, not the other way around.

[–]holydemon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alpha leads, Beta follows and Omega quits

Shutting out the mass is basically what Omega has always been doing. It's not rationalism, it's just escapism. OP is basically telling you all to admit defeat to the alphas who can lead the irrational mass, to give up, to run away to your safe personal haven, and to pray that the aforementioned alphas don't screw you over when they get to you.

Don't give up on your hard-earned alpha mentality and revert to your old Omega self.

[–]Stythe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, don't waste your energy. I tried to explain this to a friend of mine who was debating with an old coworker. He tried to explain to her that her SJW streak is only going to cause people to dislike her (and he's right, people are cutter her off) but she stubbornly stood by it and argued him. He didnt realize she doesn't even care if she's right,, she just wants validation through the attention the debate itself gives her.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This. Do you. Get Money. /thread

[–]1favours_of_the_moon 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Violently assaulting people (including women) is LIBERAL now.

[–]Hillarysdilddo_2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Violently assaulting people (including women) is LIBERAL now.

It's always been liberal. 150+ million murders/body count for the leftists.

They're lying, deceiving, and conspiring little rats that wait for the right moment to send you to the gulag.

[–]plutosheen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is essentially mgtow isn't it?

[–]tolerantman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But smashing antifa's head is pretty good for yourself...

[–]sithlordomega 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those anarchists are crazy little bitches