Rant/VentingSwedish feminists systematically having sex with underage refugees (self.TheRedPill)

submitted by 1ObserverBG

Source article here:


Swedish Left-wing women about sex with young refugees: "We All Do It"

The trial against the so-called "Arboga-woman" has drawn attention to how middle-aged women in the asylum industry are having sex with refugee children. "We all do it", says the testimony of an asylum woman on the left-wing site "Blankspot".

Previously, the issue has mostly been discussed on sites like Flashback, where sexual relations between what users call "Dye witches" and refugee children have received extensive attention. But now it is the well-known Communist Martin Schibby's website Blankspot, who has published a text in which an anonymous leftist-woman writes about how she takes home so-called "unaccompanied refugee children" from the Migration Board to her residence.

According to the woman's text, sexual relations between women and so-called refugee children are extensive. In her text about one of her sex nights with a "unaccompanied refugee child" she writes:

"Enough with the sofa, he can join me in bed. I text a friend: "help - I have to take him (have sex) in my bed!"

Answer: "We all do it, calm down. This is how it is, give him closeness. That's what you can do." she writes in her text.

Swedish social service workers tend to be older women that are outspoken advocates of socialism, feminism, multiculturalism, ect. It is now being alleged that many of these women actually get involved in social services in order to have sex with young immigrant men. Some Swedish media outlets are even accusing these women of “exploiting teenagers” for sex. These women are being called”Batikhäxor,” which is sometimes translated into English as “Dye Witch.”




The ongoing double-murder trial of Johanna Moller has brought the scandal to the forefront. Moller is accused of having an Afghan refugee murder her husband and father. During the trial, it has been alleged that she routinely plied underage refugees with drugs and alcohol and had sex with them.

The communist website Black Spot published an explosive anonymous column from a female social worker stating that it is common to have sex with young male refugees. The anonymous columnist says that the males are traumatized and the sex is therapeutic for them.

Swedish commentator Ann Heberlein says that she personally knows of numerous cases of female social workers having sex with young refugee men. Heberlein says she even knows examples of married women who decided they would rather have sex with young refugees than continue their marriage. Many women sign up to be a foster home for so-called “unaccompanied minors” for the purpose of having sex with them. Most of these “minors” are actually in their teens and early twenties. A large majority of the unaccompanied “minors” are male. (Sweden classifies lone male refugees as old as 25 as “unaccompanied minors.”)

In a related story, a Swedish woman has been exposed as performing lap dances for “child refugees” and having intimate relationships with them at an asylum centre in Åmål.

Meanwhile, another woman slept with under aged refugee in her foster home, and was charged with rape.






For more info on the issue of female aid workers and other women having sex with the refugees check this compilation post


These are the comments made by a swede with nickname “Jack Burton” that commented at Zerohedge two years before the current refugee scandal.

Begin Citation:

“And blaming women is not popular. It will not get you a date. But in Europe, women have taken over society in nearly every sense. Men are worse feminists than the women. It is a proven fact the the people most active in Migrant welcoming organizations, feeding stations, mangers of temp. housing, and demonstrating for migrants rights. Most of them are middle age women without any husbands. Watch videos from Europe carefully, you will see hundreds of migrant young men, and it is always the white middle aged woman who is handing them bread, or serving the soup. In the Calais migrant camp it is a few Middle Age French women who keep the migrants fed. They come every day to do what they can for thousands of young single Islamic men.”

“These women all have college degrees in feminism and social welfare theory. They want migrants as that employs women in the social services. Liberal and leftists women whose jobs are in government and social welfare.”

“I already posted about the Swedish woman who befriended a group of young male migrants on a Swedish train. They drank together and sang songs and she got to know these new Swedes. Then she was gang rapped by them. So what does she do? She remains reluctant to file charges, do to the fact that “They are refugees and they might have a different culture, and it is hard for them.”

“Jesus, that is all you need to know about Women in Europe. And notice who is always out front to help migrants and to welcome them. Yes, usually middle age to 60 year old single women. They have nothing, no family, so they adopt migrants as their cause, expecting migrants to love them in return.”

“I told you it was this bad, but no! It really is worse. In many small towns, the migrants prowl the streets while locals stay home. Letting children, young girls out of the house is now impossible. And guess what? Swedish feminists are fighting hard for Migrants rights, demanding borders stay open and more taxes be put on people. Women is Sweden have most of the political power, they have spoken. “Open the borders” “Cancel Swede’s rights to accomodate islamic culture” “rape is the fault of cultural differences”

I said this before, and got my ass ripped open for it. But here it goes. “If MEN do not take back political power in Europe, away from the women, and institute a defense of Swedish culture, then it is all over”.

“The stupidity of a raped Swedish woman to not want to get the migrants in trouble because she feels sorry for them. You know where that comes from? Brainwashing leftist tachers in Swedish schools.”

“The locals are told that these newcomers will boost the economy and improve life by bring their diverse culture to Swedes. Anyone daring to say a word about it is attack by the feminists who call them nazis. This migration is very much a migration of young single black and arab men, 80-90% are 15-35 Male. The major social supporters in Sweden, those who greet migrants, protest for open borders, work in refugee centers, hand out food, and generally work to welcome the migrants are ” Women , single , aged 40-65. Middle aged women. Now if you knew personally who was out thee fighting for more migration, you would know them as loser feminists spinsters. It is actually a joke in Sweden when you see a middle aged woman handing out gifts and foods to 25 year old Black Migrants.”

[–]Mudpielol 178 points179 points  (101 children)

Here's an interesting theory by Jordan B Peterson:

Jordan Peterson Lecture

What he theorizes is, men test ideas, and women test men. And the more egalitarianism gets traction, pushing out and demonizing western masculinity, the more a subconscious need for a dominant male rises, which in this case would be the refugees.

Now, as he says, we never had women in political power to the extent we do today. It may all go to shit. We don't know, but from the look of things it may very well do go to shit.

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

It’s the only logical explanation for how they behave. It’s the only way to understand why they can cheer on hordes of Muslim “refugees” swarming into Europe to rape and pillage. It’s the only way to comprehend why they can whip themselves up into a frenzy over masculine men meeting up for a beer and smearing them as leading “pro-rape rallies.” Everything feminists do, from holding up “Refugees Welcome” signs at airports to passing affirmative consent laws, is geared around encouraging men to assault them.

Here are the reasons why feminists want to be sexually assaulted, and why they’re working around the clock to aid rapists:

  1. Feminism is an r-selected ideology, and rape is an r-selected sexual strategy.

Leftism and conservatism are merely expressions of two competing reproductive strategies: r-selection and K-selection. To review quickly, K-selection breeds children to compete in a world of limited resources through a two-parent upbringing, defined by high sexual dimorphism, monogamy, late sexual maturation, and loyalty to the in-group (i.e. wolves). R-selection breeds children for a world of abundant resources through a single-mother upbringing, defined by low sexual dimorphism, promiscuity, early sexual maturation, and disloyalty to the tribe (i.e. rabbits).

The conflict between leftism (of which feminism is a subset) and conservatism is the conflict between r and K. K-selected individuals want a world that encourages competition and meritocracy, while r-selected individuals want a world of free resources: free food, free money, free shelter and free sex. In a K-selected world, men and girls have to compete to earn the right to mate with one another; in an r-selected world, men and girls have sex with no thought as to the consequences.

By its very definition, rape is an act of entitlement: forcing yourself on someone who doesn’t want to have sex with you, whom you haven’t earned the right to sleep with. Much in the same way leftists feel entitled to take other peoples’ money away through taxation and welfare, rapists feel entitled to stick their penises in girls’ vaginas. In fact, you could say that rape is an inherently leftist form of sex, which would explain why so many male feminists, such as Jian Ghomeshi and Hugo Schwyzer, enjoy assaulting and abusing girls.

Feminists, being leftists, are r-strategists themselves. The purpose of feminism is to eliminate restrictions on female sexuality: allow girls to sleep around without getting pregnant, let them legally kill their unborn babies when they do get knocked up, and have it all funded by the taxpayer. From an r-strategist’s perspective, rape is a good thing, because it allows a female to have children without having to do anything, aside from breathe.

It’s well-known that a great many girls have rape fantasies, and a significant number of rape victims claim to have orgasmed during their assaults. Both these points serve as evidence that a portion of the female population—the r-selected, leftist portion—not only wants to be raped, but is physiologically adapted for it.

Once you accept the premise that feminists subconsciously desire to have their vaginal walls torn up by psychopathic men, their behavior suddenly makes sense. For example, feminists are unwilling to condemn the Muslim “refugees” who have been assaulting girls in Germany and other European countries (and indeed, have accused those who talk about the story of “racism” and/or “Islamophobia”) because they want those refugees to keep raping.

The Muslim “refugees” streaming into Europe from the Middle East are the consummate r-selected cowards. Instead of fighting for their families back home, they’re fleeing to safe countries where they can live off government benefits. Instead of being grateful that Europeans are willing to take them in, they throw temper tantrums because their Internet isn’t fast enough, their food isn’t tasty enough, or they don’t have enough to do, showing that they are parasites looking for someone to leech off of.

Some right-wing personalities have tried to explain the left’s embrace of Muslim “rapefugees” with such nebulous concepts as “pathological altruism,” but the reality is much bleaker. In the darkest recesses of their minds, feminists want swarthy refugees to punch them in the face, tear their clothes off, and spit roast them like plump, juicy swine. Don’t expect them to suddenly realize the truth, either.

  1. Feminists encourage girls to get raped, then deny all responsibility for their actions.

In the past few years, even the slightest suggestion that girls have a responsibility for their own safety is met with a chorus of “MISOGYNIST!” “DON’T BLAME THE VICTIM!” The oft-repeated feminist chant, “Don’t teach women not to get raped, teach men to not rape,” is an explicit call for girls to place themselves into situations where they’re likely to get sexually assaulted, then dodge all blame.

While some feminists are no doubt doing this out of naivete, the subconscious motivator for many of them is their r-selected psychology. Personal responsibility is a K-strategist concept; in the rabbit warren, things just happen. By discouraging girls from protecting themselves, feminists are implicitly encouraging them to get violated, then pinning the blame on an undefinable “rape culture.”

  1. Feminists talk about the West having a “rape culture” because they want a rape culture.

This isn’t just because of hysteria and slander: r-selected leftists are more threatened by masculine men than by cowardly Muslim rapists.

One of the most laughable claims feminists make about game/red pill/PUA culture is that it encourages men to feel “entitled” to sex and female companionship. Even skimming a manosphere blog will show that this is the opposite of the truth. “Game” and “red pill” philosophy teaches men that they have to earn girls by improving themselves: lifting, dressing better, having interesting hobbies, and being entertaining conversationalists.

The reason why there’s always been an overlap between the seemingly hedonistic manosphere and the more traditionalist alternative right is because both groups have the same view of sexual relationships: men and women need to earn the right to sleep with and marry each other. The end destinations may be different, but the road is the same.

Feminists oppose this because leftists oppose competition in general. Feminist obscurantism in regards to sexual relationships (e.g. their claims that the “friendzone” doesn’t exist or claiming that men just need to “treat women like human beings” if they want to get laid) is about stripping men of their ability to compete for a mate. Similarly, pushing “fat acceptance,” tattoos and piercings, and encouraging girls to be “bossy” and sarcastic is about crippling females’ ability to compete for men.

To make matters worse, feminists have been trying to train men to rape girls for years. Their constant claim that the West has a “rape culture” is just wishful thinking: in actuality, rape has been on the decline for decades. Because of this, feminists have tried to legislate masculinity away through “affirmative consent” and “yes means yes” laws, which force men to explicitly beg for permission at every step of a sexual encounter, branding them “rapists” if they don’t comply.

Affirmative consent laws and “rape culture” claims are a two-pronged attack on masculinity, designed to advantage sneaky males and hurt masculine men, and there’s no sneakier male than a rapist. Unfortunately, despite all the rape hoaxes the mainstream media conjures up, the “rape culture” that feminists screech about has yet to materialize. The UVA rape story, for example, turned out to be a lurid, masturbatory fantasy passed off as “news.”

From here, all the pieces fall into place. We see clearly why the European Union is debating banning one man from their borders and libeling him as a “rape advocate,” while letting millions of actual Muslim rapists flood their countries. We see why leftists are driven to protest masculine men but not sneaky “refugee” cowards who abandon their families in search of government freebies and “easy” white women.

Every feminist, deep down, wants nothing more than a rapist’s baby in her belly. The armada of horny, restless, greedy Muslims storming into Europe is a bounty for the r-selected feminist. Leftists will wave “Refugees Welcome” signs no matter how many girls are forcibly DP’ed by angry Arab invaders, because Europe’s skyrocketing rape rates are a feature, not a bug.

[–]Mudpielol 18 points19 points  (8 children)

I don't know about all the points you make, we don't have many of those where I live yet. The orthodox Church is very powerful here (Romania) , and they will not allow the rise of feminism simply because they would lose power. Now, I'm not a fan of the church either, but if I had to choose, I'd choose the church. Of course, things can change, but it will take at least 50 years if not more.

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

I know the situation, I visit the area monthly. I observed the constant attacks on the church, both in Poland and Romania. If the communists could not destroy it, leftist NGOs (know they) will have a hard time too, which is why they try to pervert the idea of the church instead and attack everything that is "traditional". The reply was more for the theory of Peterson which obviously applies to Western Europe and North America. I don't have time to watch a 2 hours video but I assume what he says is basically this:

What if imported rape culture is a feature, not a bug? I think there's a coherent evolutionary reason for what we're seeing.

Through human evolutionary history, women always pass their genes down. Always. It's the men who struggle and have their genes lost. Most men historically never reproduced.

If the neighboring tribe comes in and takes over your tribe, what do women lose? Genetically, not much. At worst they'll be raped and have their children murdered. But they'll be left alive and impregnated again. They pass their genes on. The men have much more to lose, since they'll just all be murdered, and they'll vanish from the human lineage without a trace.

That kind of evo-psych explains why women aren't as racist as men, and why women are attracted to bad-boy types. Evolved tribalism makes a lot more sense for men, since men need to cooperate and fight together to have a hope of passing their genes down.

It may not be a pure coincidence that Western politics has veered sharply left and pro-immigration once women's emancipation became prominent. We're simply following the innermost desires of women (more men competing to fertilize them) rather than men (cooperate so that every man has a good chance of fertilizing a woman). Ultimately, women don't care if the Muslims take over and put them in burkas. They still get to pass their genes down, and the Muslims winning just proves they're better protectors and better men than whites.

Feminism and the mass import of bad boys from the third world under Frau Merkel are one and the same.

[–]Hjalmbere 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Merkel doesn't give a fuck. She's childless and way past menopause.

[–]rogacrat 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Everything you said is true and it just reminds me that I have so much contempt for weak, feminist ass kissing liberal men. They really deserve to be humiliated and destroyed.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

feminist ass kissing liberal men. They really deserve to be humiliated and destroyed.

They will be, but we'll be destroyed with them if we're not careful.

[–]Canarlottle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of these men you speak of have almost no fault. The process of emasculation they underwent began in their early childhood due to various circumstances of the "prolific" feminized society. It might have been single motherhood or a pussy, beta father, but they are merely victims of the urge of acceptance in this society.

The vast majority of parents today encourage this trend of conforming to society standards. Go to college, get a job, get a wife, unload your semen in her carousel-alpha-cock-enlarged cunt so she can bear your children and have power over your money and liberty, subjugating you to the provider status, which surprise, surprise, is enforced by law.

This is the normal nowadays. The illusion has been engulfed so deep in their brain that they would reject and counter-attack any idea that goes against the matrix. Only a traumatic experience (which I think will come soon) would be able to break through the fog, or to be exposed constantly to material such as TRP, but this goes against their spectrum of thought. Yes, you despise them and I believe I do too. But maybe in time this feeling will be replaced by the only feeling that characterizes the contrast between the way we each see the world: pity.

[–]Mudpielol 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He touches those points in some of his lectures. I would recommend you watch it when you have some time, he also touches on the importance of men having a mission, to improve themselves and maybe the world around them too. There's some bits about sexual strategy as well. And he emphasizes that the direction in which western culture is heading, with excessive PC and feminism is not going to end well.

[–]Hjalmbere 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Most eastern Europeans, both women and men, see western Europe as a bad example that they have no intention of emulating. Their self-preservation instincts are still intact. Their leaders have traditional family values and often have children, hence they have a vested interest in the future. The leaders of Germany, France, UK and Sweden on the other hand are childless.

[–]AnonymousAndLovinIt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

I'm surprised this wasn't mentioned in the original post. The notion that an entitled middle aged feminist would be so selfless as to be harmed and do nothing about it while gaining nothing in return for the sake of someone she destroy is beyond unbelievable.

[–]saladon points points [recovered]

Amazing analysis. You need to write a book!

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

There are plenty of books on and around the subject:

The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival

The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics

The Bell Curve

The Fourth Turning

The Devil's Pleasure Palace

The Death of the West

Democracy The God That Failed

Revolt Against The Modern World

The Culture Of Critique

. . .

You can find some here: mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg!o0Uk3KTJ

.. although unless you want to get involved in politics, this video pretty much covers the basics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The Decline of the West" by Oswald Spengler is an especially good one.

[–]NuclearTruthBomb 8 points9 points  (0 children)

To those who find this offensive: Why is it that women are in constant fear of rape and rape culture in the West, the safest place on the planet for women, who give maximum punishment to rapists, yet then defend countries and their people that actually don't give a flying fuck about women? If they don't want to be raped, they certainly facilitate their chances to be raped but a foreign bastard at every turn.

[–]Shaman6624 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Very informative and some good ideas. But I do wonder:

On the one hand you claim women want to be raped. On the other hand you say rape is for "sneaky males" and in other things you said it was clear you don't condone rape.

Why do you not condone rape. If a woman wants to be raped what's so bad about it.

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

Why do you not condone rape.

Not all women are feminists.

[–]Demsatanworshiper points points [recovered]

That's the defining point. Only low value women and those who exploit them for gain are feminists in today's day and age typically. Women who are smart, able, and educated don't feel the need to identify as feminist. These women are also able to gain valuable mates in men.

I've met very few feminists under thirty who were attractive. I think one at the most.

Also, today's feminists aren't genuine feminists. You meet the old guard of feminists or watch their interviews or read their works. They are simply women who don't want their gender to be a factor in them getting a job, for the most part. With some simple ties to being homosexual and not wanting to be an outcast in society because of it. The identity of feminism changed in the mid 90s to the batshit suicidal sexual schizophrenic shit we see today.

So it's today's Modern Feminists who have a penchant for hungering to be raped by men as they have spent much of their lives either ignored by men or unable to happily deal with their sexuality. For my personal experience, in the BDSM scene. You meet a ton of feminists into rape-play and consensual nonconsent plus kidnapping play and what. A big one lately has been forcible impregnation and being surprised with raw-dogging.

Had a little Peruvian number I tried to cut off early by stating my hunger to take her raw-dog was incredibly hungry and fierce and out of my respect for her I just wanted to be friends. She has a freakout and wants to know if we can "negotiate" the issue. The next day she confesses to having tried to manipulate me to take her by surprise with unprotected sex. And she's a big time feiminist who is poly with her fiancee and has many other lovers, blah blah blah.

[–]welshmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I've met very few feminists under thirty who were attractive. I think one at the most."

To add to this, many of the younger ones do/will grow out of it. But there is a very serious case do indoctrination in our academic facilities now. It's hard to avoid, and easy to fall into it.

[–]Casanova-Quinn 2 points3 points  (2 children)

It’s time to stop beating around the bush: feminists want to be raped.

I thinks that's too extreme. I would say "feminists want to be dominated by men". And by dominated I don't mean raped, I mean submissive to men in a general sense. They want manly men who will take charge, call them on their bullshit, fuck them rough, and get rid of them if they don't act appropriately.

[–]Eydtkuhnen points points [recovered]

Could you just tell me what the r and K stands for? I want to write it down in one of my notebooks.

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

In r K Selection Theory in Evolutionary Ecology, if you provide a population with free resources, those who will come to dominate the population will exhibit five basic traits, called an r-selected Reproductive Strategy. These traits are all designed to best exploitt the free resource availability. In nature, the r-selected strategy is best seen in the rabbit, which lives in fields of grass it will never fully consume. The five traits are, competition and risk avoidance, promiscuity, low-investment single parenting, earlier age of sexualization of young, and no loyalty to in-group. These traits are ultimately designed to maximize the numbers of offspring produced. Each of these offspring, though of lesser fitness, will be able to survive and reproduce freely themselves, due to the free resource availability.

In r K Theory, there is also a strategy exactly opposite to the rabbit's, which emerges under conditions of resource scarcity. It is called the K-selected Reproductive Strategy. There, where resources are scarce, competition for resources is everywhere, and some individuals will die due to failure in competition, and the resultant resource denial that this produces. This produces the K-strategy, which is best seen in the wolf. This strategy also has five psychological traits - competitiveness/aggressiveness/protectiveness, mate monopolization/monogamy, high-investment two-parent child-rearing, later age of sexualization of young, and high loyalty to in-group. This psychology is designed to form highly fit and competitive groups that succeed in group competition, all while capturing and monopolizing the fittest mate possible, as a means of making their offspring genetically fitter than those of competitors. Here, the goal is not to simply consume as much as possible yourself and produce as many baby-making machines as you can, with little regard to their fitness. Here, the goal is to help your group succeed in its competition for the scarce resources, and then produce offspring of as high a fitness as possible, so they may carry your genes forward by succeeding in competition themselves.

TLDR: http://anonymousconservative.com/r_K_Selection_rabbit_people.jpg


. . .

In terms of TRP it comes down to be what makes the difference between what some see as the Classical Alpha (provider) who is K-selected VS the Chad (cc) who is r-selected.

[–]welshmin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The difference between Chad and Classic Alpha in terms of R vs K selection makes a TONNE of sense. Thanks!

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

TLDR: http://anonymousconservative.com/r_K_Selection_rabbit_people.jpg


. . .

In terms of TRP it comes down to be what makes the difference between what some see as the Classical Alpha (provider) who is K-selected VS the Chad (cc) who is r-selected.

[–]welshmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This needs to be its own post, well-fucking-done. As you said, all the pieces are falling into place now. This combined with the original picture paints a pretty solid picture. A disturbing one too.

[–]scamper_22 3 points4 points  (3 children)

It's an interesting theory and it is in keeping with the red pill idea of women testing men for fitness.

I don't claim 100% knowledge here, but let me just pose something a little simpler. It is a lot more basic than that. It is not a test. It is simply that 'girls just wanna have fun' as the old song goes.

If you were a 40 something year old man and could have sex with a teenage girl. Generally without social stigma or legal consequences... you'd probably want to. Is what these women want any different? I don't think so. Men in similar positions have done similar things to young girls, be it as teachers, religious institutions, foreign aid...

And like all people, MOST generally do whatever they want... unless we have limits; generally imposed by 'the law'... aka 'the man'.

Now what we can say is that Western society doesn't like to impose it's law on women. That double standard isn't unique, but that is separate from what 'deviant and predatory women' do. In the same way as deviant and predatory men are separate from the law that generally assumes men CAN Be deviant and predatory.

And that has generally been my experience on much lower items. My sister-in-law has joked about how her husband doesn't tell her to do tasks while she is on mat leave so she can stay home and watch tv. Is that her having some devious scheme to test her husband for fitness? To me, it sounds like she's just a lazy person who will get away with doing what she wants (watching tv) without an authority figure telling her what to do.

As a child, were you out to 'test' your parents to find out if they were 'fit' to be your parents. Or did you just wanna do whatever you want to do. Watch TV instead of clean your room. Stay out late with friends instead of coming home... I think for most of us, it was more just we want to do what we want to do. The 'testing' part comes from the parents view in wondering why the child is not listening to them. But from the child's view, it's pretty simple in most cases. They want to do what what they want.

[–]Mudpielol 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I did plenty of stupid things as a kid and even later. But, looking back, there were consequences for my actions, and that's one lesson I learned. That's a lesson everyone should learn, it seems to me that today there is too much emphasis on rights, and not so much of the responsibility which comes with said rights. The way I see it, if you tolerate the behavior you dislike, it won't stop until you do something about it.

[–]scamper_22 2 points3 points  (1 child)


My point is not whether or not authority is needed. It absolutely is.

It is rather in attributing some kind of intention women, or children. Are women testing the man to see if he is fit? Some nefarious scheming mind of giant shit tests.

I just don't see it and it seems more likely to me they simply want to do what they want to do... Without morals or a code of life, there is no guide of what to do except authority.

It came comes across as shit tests to the authority figure because they do think they should be obeyed as any parent would. But I don't think the child/woman is testing for fitness. They just wanna do what they wanna do.

A child for example expects their parents to be parents regardless of being 'nice'. They want their parents to handle the shit.

Authority is needed because what children often want to do is very short sighted or doesn't think of how it impacts people...

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 25 points26 points  (33 children)

I'm just not buying this at all. Well, im danish so id consider us very similar to sweden, Denmark is a very politcal correct country just like sweden is. But i don't find it true that women here target them specifically, I really don't know alot of women/girls who date immigrants or even those with middle eastern / african heritage, its honestly very rare. And when i do see it, its usually the more ugly girls from my experience or girls with no confidence that would just go with anything basically.

[–]Dravous 30 points31 points  (7 children)

I really don't know alot of women/girls who date immigrants or even those with middle eastern / african heritage

they aren't "dating" them, there taking them back to their houses for sex. all you'll see on the day to day is them being friendly and advocating more...whatever, to the migrants. that's why this info was sent from a website without naming anyone.

[–]Hjalmbere 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"they" belong to a vocal but small fraction of the female population consisting of women who are too ugly and lazy to compete with other women for the affection of native males. And that is to say a lot about both their laziness and their ugliness since online dating has increased the SMV of all women.

Same phenomenon as male sex tourists who go to Thailand, except these women are getting paid to take young male lovers.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 1 point2 points  (4 children)

As such, it would just be the sake of sending a signal and not about targetting someone being alpha, i think thats entirely wrong. I expect most of these women (whatever the number of women is, i think its a really insiginificant amount) to be women struggling to get swedish men to bang them.

[–]Throwawaysteve123456 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Bro, you probably know more than me, but I've spent a decent amount of time in both countries, and they are MUCH more extreme feminist/SJW/PC than danes are in my opinion. Then again, it could have just been the people I met.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Well its good with an opinion from someone who is looking at it with objective eyes. My idea is that Denmark are not far away from Sweden when it comes to that. Sweden is just an extreme case of it, because immigration has gone WILDLY out of control, Denmark are getting there as well. In Denmark theres just a huge group of people opposed to all these people flooding into the country but theres also a ridiculous bunch of PC SJWs and groups here defending it and going far in the name of political correctness. Like we have one of the best welfare systems you can argue (we should since taxes are high af) and theyre literally comming into the country mooching off the system when we have poor people who are living on the street and elder care not doing too well either. And since majority of them are on welfare they really arent contributing to society in any way and they live in ghettos and seperate themselves from danes, so i don't see the benefit of bringing them all up here. Im all for helping them in their countries tho. There are even cases of people breaking the law to help the immigrants then the post it on social media for all their beta feminist friends and then they literally just circlejerk and think this is the right way of dealing with. Its honestly pathetic. This might not be super relevant in terms of the OP but my point is that there are a lot of beta PC SJWs here going far to justify something you really can't justify, then they get approval for this justification and then they keep going in this fairy-tale spiral for no deeper purpose. But from my experience there are not alot of danish women dating immigrants, in a way its almost like segregation it seems like, its alot about "us" and "them" and many dont even speak danish after several years of living here so they arent really well integrated. Thats also why its hard for me to believe the OP as a broader tendency, i think we are talking about a very small group, simply because they don't speak the language and i dont think the regular women here are attracted to that type of person. We had 2 female workers here in Denmark on an asylum centre as well who slept with 3-4 asylum seekers so thats like 1 incidence of this and defintely NOT a broader tendency. You can already tell what kind of woman would want to work on an asylum center, typical feminist "the world is great" and in this case nasty women a regular dane or human being wouldn't bother with for one minute. I think the idea of them targetting them because of "alpha traits" is absurdly far off for many reasons.

[–]OlanValesco 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Gosh, I remember watching New Year's fireworks over Vollsmose one year and I was like, there goes 2 weeks' welfare in 15 minutes.

Also, part of the reason that you don't see that many danske piger dating immigrants is because the immigrant population in Denmark is less than 10%. I guess if you include immigrants and their descendants, then it's 12.3%. So if you're looking at just descendants (which, in my opinion, is more the demographic Danish girls get with because they speak the language), that's only about 4% of the population. In Sweden, the immigrant+descendant population is 27%.

Those numbers don't account for country of origin though. If we want to look at statistics relevant to the OP, we see that Denmark is 4.8% Muslim and Sweden is 5-6% Muslim (depending on source). This represents a larger raw number of Muslims in Sweden since its population is 1.75 times Denmark's, but percentage-wise the figures don't differ much.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol :P they make alot of money by being criminals tho.

[–]Mudpielol 4 points5 points  (6 children)

Well, as I said, it's a theory. We'll see if it's right or not at some point. I just find this refugee business similar to the barbarians and the roman empire. And well, you know what happened with the roman empire.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I don't know actually, lol. I elaborated my point about this in my response to the other guy.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Stefan Molyneux talks extensively about the fall of Rome, and the parallels with today (which are many). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh7rdCYCQ_U he also has several specifically about Sweden.

The simple fact is that the West has become a Matriarchy, and Matriarchies are unstable and ripe for taking over by Patriarchies, which is what the muslim immigrants see. It is why they have no interest at all in assimilating and adopting Western values. Why would they, when they can see that they will be running the whole show in a very few decades?

The start of the fall of the West was giving the vote to women. It all comes from that. From that point it is inevitable that you will have a welfare state (because women demand it - remember even in Sweden there was no welfare state since its founding, it only came about some 15 years after women were given the vote). It is inevitable that government spending and government interference in everyday life will expand. Inevitable that anti-male laws become commonplace and the Overton Window move to the Left. And in the end, inevitable that it will fall to cultures that do not place feminine values about masculine values.

It is also, of course, why we have know for decades that average testosterone levels are falling in Western men, yet this was never considered something serious enough to do anything about.

[–]Mudpielol 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Short version, Roman empire faced barbarians and internal issues, they allowed barbarians into their ranks, they changed what made the great in the first place. They became decadent and permissive, weak.

One of the many factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire was the rise of a new religion, Christianity. The Christian religion, which was monotheistic ran counter to the traditional Roman religion, which was polytheistic (many gods). At different times, the Romans persecuted the Christians because of their beliefs, which were popular among the poor.

There were political and military difficulties, as well. It didn't help matters that political amateurs were in control of Rome in the years leading up to its fall. Army generals dominated the emperorship, and corruption was rampant. Over time, the military was transformed into a mercenary army with no real loyalty to Rome. As money grew tight, the government hired the cheaper and less reliable Germanic soldiers to fight in Roman armies. By the end, these armies were defending Rome against their fellow Germanic tribesmen. Under these circumstances, the sack of Rome came as no surprise.


Looks familiar, doesn't it?

I would compare that to what's happening now in the west, replacing masculine values with feminist values by coercion. Now, I would say that women were in a bad place 100 years ago, but now I think they have plenty of options to follow if so they choose.

[–]bluedrygrass 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The theory about Christianity is completely off. Christianity is by it's own nature opposite to socialist ideologies. The two things hate(d) each other for most of history. In Russia, almost all the churches got burned down and sacked, priest killed on the spot or sent to gulags when the communist rose to power. The same thing happened in all the other communist/socialist countries.

The ideology of Christianity has always been of helping people bettering themself, not just giving them free shit. It's why Christian countries sent priests and volunteers to Africa instead of bringing them here.

Of course, with time the Church too has been corrupted and feminized. The current pope has actually released heretic statements, said things that completely collides with the old teachings, is very "open", pro immigration, etc. etc.

He's called "el papa" sarcastically by various european countries because of his south american socialist countries ideology.

[–]Mudpielol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was making the point that they replaced their traditions with the new rage that was going around at the time. Then, one of the things was Christianity, now it's excessive sjw PC feminist bullshit.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 9 points10 points  (3 children)

I want to believe what youre saying, but... I have my doubts that Denmark is as spiritually dead as Sweden.

Didnt Denmark accept less than a third of refugees than Sweden?

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 6 points7 points  (1 child)

What i want you to understand is that Denmark, Norway and Sweden have a very similar culture and are very similar in a broader sense and have alot of the same values. All these countries are very feminine. Sweden actually takes in 6 times as many refugees as Denmark i believe, because i think they have alot who are very open about doing it and because these people getting into the country will then also advocate for more immigrants into the country and then it will spiral out of control. I think danes are slightly more opposed to immigration than swedes are, but not by a large margin, and i think alot of that boils down to the fact - like i pointed out before - that they already have a very significant number of people with other ethnic origin than swedish - so they're skewing it a bit by that because they're not "entirely swedish". I'd assume that ur regular typical swede would be as opposed to immigration as the regular typical dane. Besides that it has been easier to get into Sweden than it has been to get into Denmark from a political standpoint. So right now what i'd argue seperates is that it's already gotten way out of hand for Sweden because they didn't stop it in time, Denmark will get to the same state as Sweden are in but at a slower pace (i already think we're in a terrible state tbh but it's obviously objectively not as bad as the one sweden are in). Heres a video from New Year in Malmö almost as if you're in baghdad.. You wouldnt assume thats a group of people who had just escaped from a war in which "bombs landed next to their feet" as they all like to claim.

[–]tigerbloodstyle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweden is ostracizing anyone who doesn't subscribe to the axioms. I don't think this is true of our neighbors.

[–]bluedrygrass 3 points4 points  (9 children)

Every time. Every single time i see one of you, Swedens or Danish or Norwegians, talk about those subjects, it's always, ALWAYS, to minimize and deny that the probem sussist.

Always. I've never seen a sweden write "yes, our contry is fucked" "yes, those thigns are wrong". Never. You're too weak to take position against those things since you've been completely brainwashed by birth, and you're also been brainwashed to please others, so when you guys see a discussion on a forum talking about the problems in your country, all you can say is, "it's not that bad", "it's not true".

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 2 points3 points  (8 children)

Really is that what you made out of my post? Please don't mix the subjects together here! I don't think danish and swedish women are generally attracted to immigrants, thats just from experience, i rarely see women here going out with them and when it DOES happen its usually ugly girls and thats talking from experience. What i will say is that our country is fucked up in the way we have too many beta PC SJWs not willing to call things as they see them, we have a huge problem with immigrants and dumb people are too naive to realize its a huge problem for our welfare state and for our country and that their values doesnt bond with western values.

[–]1SeemedGood 2 points3 points  (7 children)

Love your country and agree with your assessment, but your real problem is:

(y)our welfare state

It's the socialism and the big-government welfare mentality that it breeds which is really killing Sweden.

When you don't have a welfare state the only immigrants who want to come are those that want to work hard, respect the culture, and blend in with it - and those types of immigrants only make a country stronger.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 2 points3 points  (6 children)

Totally! Thats also partly why im against all this mass-immigration, its slowly but surely killing our welfare state AND our culture, we're fucking arguing whether we can even serve pig-meat publicly and celebrate christmas here because of this BS! Its easier for these immigrants to be granted welfare than it is for some danes, and we still have a reasonable amount of people living on the street (even though we shouldnt with this welfare system), rather provide those people living on the street more money and provide them with help and a go-to home or a residence. And provide more money for elder care. Instead money are being dished out to illegal immigrants who doesnt benefit or contribute to society in any way (actually the opposite because they make up the vast majority in criminal statistics, they mooch, they dont bond, they are not well integrated, they dont speak the language etc).

[–]1SeemedGood 1 point2 points  (5 children)

its slowly but surely killing our welfare state

This would be a good thing. Your welfare state needs to be killed because it's your welfare state that's killing Sweden. And mass immigration can also be a good thing when you don't have a a welfare state.

Look at what mass immigration of Irish, Italians, and (in fact) Swedes did for the US. It was a huge boon to the country, but only because there was no welfare state so all the Italians, Irish, and Swedes who came were the ones who wanted to work hard, make their own way, and blend into the American culture. If there had been a welfare state, those immigration waves would have been a disaster because the people that came would have come in order to leech off the welfare.

Swedes don't need a welfare state. The culture itself seems friendly and generous to an outsider who has spent time there. Why do you need government interference in caring for the poor who deserve charity? Swedes could and would do that voluntarily.

After spending some time in Sweden, it's so beautiful and I loved the culture so much that I actually considered learning the language (which doesn't seem that hard for a native English speaker who has some familiarity with German), moving there and living there at least part-time - soft immigrating. But your government is so big and greedy and so unsupportive of core individual freedoms that anyone who is not an SJW minded socialist and does not want to feed off of welfare would have to be crazy to move there.

If you rid yourself of the socialism and the welfare state your immigration problem will take care of itself by becoming an immigration opportunity for immigrants that will work hard, contribute, learn Swedish, and join the culture.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 1 point2 points  (4 children)

That will never happen. Its a scandinavian model that everyone here loves, nothing will change regarding to it.. People lose their shit if we are talking about a small tax decrease of 0.5% lol. What i hope will happen is a changed view on immigration...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The migrant crisis is one big shit test, and Europe failed.

What happens when you fail a shit test? She winds up fucking other men.

[–]1PantsonFire1234 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The current situation with women in power, women in enablement and women connected to the world wide web through their smart phones puts is in the hardest position men have ever faced.

I've actually come to believe that despite TRP's obvious truths and effects. That this is just one of many symptoms born out of an impossible situation with our current women. We think we can fix our problem one way or another. Saying that the problem resides in us. But the problem always persists. We call this AWALT.

Thing is that not all women in history had access to Instagram, Tinder, Mobile phone internet and every man that's connected to these things. Neither did they have complete autonomous freedom to deal and make choices in whatever way they feel like. Or did they have the power to hack their own body to avoid getting pregnant.

We tell ourselves that we should just be more Alpha. But it's not us, society needs to be more Alpha. They need their phones taken, their voice in society muted, the pills thrown in the trash, the freedom off choice abolished- and then and only then, maybe, we will have peace.

For as long as you let women choose what they desire they will choose that which doesn't benefit men and therefor society. Even if you are Maxed-Out-SMV-AlphaLord9000, you are still living in a society where every bitch you meet will choose for herself. And if she meets Maxed-Out-SMV-AlphaLordOneMillion or SMV-OnBenefits-DangerTyrone666 you are fucked son.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 134 points135 points  (9 children)

"Post-Wall Hags Bang Desperate Men"

In other news, "'Water Is Still Wet' Claim Scientists"

[–][deleted] 41 points42 points  (7 children)

"Post-Wall Hags Bang Desperate Men"

Post wall hags desperate, men still bang them

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 31 points32 points  (6 children)

Yeah, refugees from the Dirt World. It's the chick equivalent of dudes who bang fatties.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (5 children)

this is where they still think fat is sexy? Reubenesque?

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Women are great at rationalizing.

I once read a pretty good article about female sex tourism. It was hilarious how 45-55 year old landwhales were telling themselves that the 25 year old athletic black dudes were totes into fat voluptous white women. And the money they took wasn't really compensation for damages, but more a helping hand that didn't really have anything to do with them being prostitutes.

[–]Sumsar01 17 points18 points  (1 child)

If your fat your a better meatshield for the drone strikes. That's wife material.

[–]1z1z2x2x3c3c4v4v 4 points5 points  (1 child)

They are coming from areas where people starve to death...so yes, they may just find plump women unique and adorable...

[–]el_Technico 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no, they are attracted to fitter and younger women than men in the west are use to because their women are generally not fat.

[–]H42 points points [recovered]

Male Swedes had their balls chopped off long ago, by the feminists.

However, Swede women want to fuck men with balls, the migrants.

The answer is obvious, grow a pair.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev 95 points96 points  (11 children)

If you click the link, you may find that you would NOT be interested in banging the women involved.

[–]H42 points points [recovered]

Its not about banging them, it is about re-assuming control of the country.

[–]SiulaGrande 19 points20 points  (4 children)

these women are in their 50s. they offer nothing of value to the country lol go to the link, theyre fucking ugly grandmas. im so good off that shit hahahaha no 50+ pussy for me. if anything this is just a mark against the immigrants, making them look like 3rd world goat fuckers. i honestly dont understand how they get hard for that

[–]H42 points points [recovered]

i honestly dont understand how they get hard for that

Because even a 50+ granny looks better than a goat.

[–]Dravous 6 points7 points  (1 child)

well you just called them goat fuckers. if they can get hard for that, surely they can get hard for some 50 year old spinster.

[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Confirmed. Not even a double bag or a maybe.

[–]Sara_Solo points points [recovered]

Are teenage girls interested in banging the fat old guys that molest them? This is about takng advantage of someone, not attractiveness.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Just autoclick in NMZ and you can afk forever.

[–]HappyScribe 36 points37 points  (9 children)

Not just Swedes, British men are also letting this happen at a French camp:

"It was claimed that female volunteers were more likely to have sex with male migrants than any other combination."


Now, these guys are not alpha. They're poor, they stink, they can't feed themselves. They're as skinny as fuck and they're of an ethic origin which some people seem to think makes them unattractive. Yet they're getting laid. What can we learn from this?

[–]G_Petronius points points [recovered]

"Alpha" doesn't mean "good, desirable, admirable", it means a male whose genetics are a good bet because he's healthy, muscular, masculine and aggressive. Traits that these migrants, as poor and stinky as they are, have in abundance compared to the flabby nu males that these leftists are surrounded with. Hence they fuck them.

[–]HappyScribe 37 points38 points  (1 child)

I think it's a combination: first the women have their mothering instincts activated with by these men. Then there's the social acclaim/novelty of having sex with one. Then there's the migrant's aggression and lack of fear in escalating.

What my take away is:

  • Get a girl to do things for me, make me food etc.

  • Be different (if you've gone anywhere in the world you'll know how much pussy you can get with a foreign accent). Give her something to talk about with her friends which makes her the center of attention.

  • Be unapologetically sexual.

[–]d0lphinsex 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is my theory as well (am Swede).

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's terribly wrong in this sense. Because many of these immigrants arent integrated, they dont speak the language and they arent well educated (at least those on the bottom of society) so these traits are not prevalent and you don't get to see how theyre alpha. Thats why this is only done by a feminist left-wing group trying to prove a point and trying to make it political, rather than a broad tendency that doesnt fit into a specific political demographic.

Let me ask you this: If swedish women were to travel to somalia do you think theyd be staggered by hotness and just bang left and right because all they saw infront of them was "hot alpha males" the answer is obviously no.

There is nothing particularly alpha about the segment we're talking about here, but sweden have become a VERY feminine society and they are overly tolerant only for the worse. Thats why sweden is a huge shithole atm and probably wont change anytime soon because people are beta cucks scared to stand up against the system and the pathetic PC SJWs.

[–]bluedrygrass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. Most migrants are skinny or fat, usually a good 3-4 inches shorter than the average, stinks, and are really beta in attitude. But medias attributes them alpha traits, and as we know, females needs to be told what to think.

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

Male Swedes had their balls chopped off long ago, by the feminists.

Swedish military lion gets the snip after women troops protest

Yeah.. Sweden is gone. Swedish males would rather turn into "women" and get fucked by migrants.

[–]Throwawaysteve123456 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Go check out a bar in sweeden, it's like nothing you'll ever see. The average girl is easy a 9, the men are pretty much as good looking, and NEVER fucking approach. It's so easy being forward there.

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman 17 points18 points  (0 children)

“These women all have college degrees in feminism and social welfare theory. They want migrants as that employs women in the social services. Liberal and leftists women whose jobs are in government and social welfare.”

While women using these guys as sex dispensers makes for a better story, I'd dare to say that this is the actual reason for the employees of the migration industry.

Let's look at the whole thing neutrally: I dare to say that for most open border cheerleaders, using the migrants as a sex buffet isn't a particularly noble endeavor, to put it mildly (even though I am betting dollars to donuts that with inverted genders, they would have gone ballistic long ago).

However, merely housing, clothing, feeding and supervising them on the other hand is (a) a simple necessity and (b) difficult criticize (unlike the sexual abuse). Yet this is also what ultimately pays their bills, and this will always encourage them to ask for more more more migration just to make sure that their source of income never dries up - even when their country around them is going to shit.

[–]Nobodyknowsthetruth 28 points29 points  (10 children)

I work in a sector riddled with socialist women aged mid 30s to 40s.

I've never met a sleazier bunch.

They disrespect the men who support them and hunt and exploit underprivileged and vulnerable cock.

Of course men can't speak out or we'd be summarily rounded on, lied about and fired.

Welcome to female empowerment folks. Aint it a gem.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (1 child)

and exploit underprivileged and vulnerable cock.

Lmao what did you mean by this part? Can you expand?

[–]Nobodyknowsthetruth 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I work for a homeless charity. Homeless covers people stopping in hostels and other forms of temporary accommodation btw.

[–]Throwawaysteve123456 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I work in a sector riddled with socialist women aged mid 30s to 40s. I've never met a sleazier bunch. They disrespect the men who support them and hunt and exploit underprivileged and vulnerable cock. Of course men can't speak out or we'd be summarily rounded on, lied about and fired. Welcome to female empowerment folks. Aint it a gem.

I swear we have the same job haha.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How do you resist the urge to run as far away from those fucked up cunts as quickly as possible?

[–]fedja 2 points3 points  (4 children)

What does socialism have to do with any of this? Are you sure you're not a bit confused?

[–]Nobodyknowsthetruth 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm not confused you low functioning idiot. Socialists pretend to care about exploitation of the vulnerable and here are these socialist women exploiting vulnerable men to get their jollies.

Sorry I had to spell it out for you.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Crazy cat ladies have become crazy migrant ladies.

[–]Omnibrad 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know people have hope that there's an answer to this sort of stuff. There isn't.

They're fucking refugee "children" which is sad not only because they aren't children, but also because if they actually were children then it's just rampant, unashamed pedophilia.

[–]jwquiroz 10 points11 points  (3 children)

When you see the pictures of these sweedish feminists you will feel sorry for the refugees

[–]bluedrygrass 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I don't. For them, even the ugliest, fattest white female is a goddess. That's another problem. In a normal society, uggos like that wouldn't have reproduced because whote males have higher standards.

[–]lichita_lisita 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo pienso que ellos no creen que esas mujeres son unas diosas; lo que creen es que son sus "únicas salvadoras" porque yo vivo en un país tercermundista y no por eso veo guapo a un hombre sueco blanco, gordo, mal formado y barbón. Lo que si creo es que esas mujeres se aprovechan de los migrantes. Lo que ellas están haciendo no es digno, carecen de moral y respeto a la raza humana. Y lo mismo pasa cuando un hombre cuarentón quiere salir con una chica de 18 años e incluso menor; no debería ser pero pasa....

[–]lichita_lisita 0 points1 point  (0 children)

En efecto se ven mujeres sin gracia-, por lo general eso pasa con las mujeres que se creen feministas; los refugiados ya vieron una forma de supervivencia y lo toman como un escalón más para pertenecer a una sociedad que los rechaza y los seguirá rechazando. Mi pregunta Jwquiroz tú que harías en esas circunstancias.

[–]H42 points points [recovered]

Slut-shaming these women would be a good place to start. Constantly and publicly.

[–]blackedoutfast 42 points43 points  (2 children)

no they're​ feminists who get off on victimhood, they would just see that as a sign that they're doing the right thing if "muh evil patriarchy" are slut shaming. i wouldn't be surprised if they started spraypainting SLUT on their houses for sympathy points like all the fake racist shit here.

what you need to do is to really encourage this stereotype of pro-migrant women all being old, ugly, desperate spinsters who have to import dick from 3rd world shitskin countries because not even cucky beta swedes want to fuck them. meme them into being the female equivalent of creepy fedora-wearing neckbeards.

all women are sluts at heart, when you slut-shame it just encourages more women to identify with the women you're calling sluts. but every woman's biggest fear is being unattractive. if you can succesfully convince swedish women that being pro-migrant automatically equals low SMV, they'll probably go full ethnonationalism.

[–]veganishell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, slut - shaming is the way to go. They just can't deal with this social pressure.

Shaving their head would be a good start.

[–]owlsden 2 points3 points  (10 children)

Nah, sluts are great. U mad bro?

If you're worried about these dried up swedish hags, feel free to go off white knighting on behalf of maidenly virtue. While you're dying on that hill, I'll be over here smashing sluts. Younger, hotter ones though.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Arguably not good for society as a whole.. one that will be preserved..., good for the individual sure.

[–]DeathToTheZog 11 points12 points  (7 children)

Until your Nation implodes from all the uprising Muslims. You aren't understanding the big picture here.

[–]bluedrygrass 2 points3 points  (5 children)

By the way he talks, he's one of them, so he's definitely defending his interest.

[–]owlsden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand perfectly well what's happening here.

People in this thread are projecting their personal insecurities--their inability to get hot women or a good job--on to some perceived horde of Muslim invaders, and its patently ridiculous.

Go ahead and explain how Syrian refugees are taking away all the desirable women and jobs. How is this perceived crisis effecting you personally?

More likely you're just sitting on your ass looking for excuses why you can't improve yourself and take what you want in life. That would be too hard.

If you want to have a serious discussion on geopolitics or immigration policy, then great. That's not what's happening in this thread.

[–]Archimedean 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I am a danish man with blonde hair and blue eyes and I have come to the realization that in order to save scandinavia from doom then we need to destroy our democracies. It is our democratic socialism that is funding this invasion. It is our democratic socialism that makes it nigh on impossible to afford a big family (banks wont give loans to couples with more than 1 child often). It is democratic socialism that has enabled the extremely anti-social behavior of our women. I am happily married but I meet many danish men who are in their 40s with no children and no family.

The whole country is dying and I want to stop this terminal illness.

[–]iLLprincipLeS points points [recovered]

Europe is currently witnessing female nature being expressed freely on a societal level without a civilized, masculine balancing factor. The truth of the matter is, women have no in-group loyalties. Whoever the powerful are in that moment, women drift their way with their asses bent over, knees quivering, and legs dripping with tingle juice. They want to be conquered, but they don’t care by who. Whether it’s daddy government, her father, a boyfriend, Chad Thundercock, violent criminals, or a horde of rapefugees doesn’t matter.

In times of war, women are constants. Men and boys are killed off, but women are simply transferred and assimilated into the new tribe to be the sperm receptacles of the victors.

Observing the weakness of many European men, women want a different set of male suitors. They call this initiative “diversity” or “multiculturalism.” In plain terms, women want to import men they perceive to be powerful and masculine to replace the weaklings they are stuck with. Women LOVE playing multiple men against each other to battle for her vaginal affections. It’s basically the plot of a every rom-com and romance novel.

Thanks to the 1984 police state, politicians and social media titans like Angela Merkel and Mark Zuckerburg, that new tribe so happens to be the biggest group in history to never reform itself to Western society: Muslims (over 2 billion of them). They give absolutely zero fucks about Western Civilization and their inhabitants. They never back down. These people are not just willing to die and be imprisoned to defend their beliefs, but kill: “There is no law, but that of Allah.”

Most modern Western man doesn’t stand a chance. Rape and sexual assault has skyrocketed since immigrants have been allowed to settle into Europe, yet women and feminists were silent on the subject. Why? Because they would rather live under the threat of rape by invaders than settle with skinny beta manginas protesting at slut walks and minoring in gender studies.

[–]pitchfork228 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Great piece of writing man!

[–]pantsoffire 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Holy shit. I've definitely noticed it's nearly always bloody older white women who are rabidly demanding more refugees are let in. Europe, Aus and elsewhere. It all adds up. Even explaining that their near useless degrees will actually be useful in getting employment... That's pretty calculating. Greater Income and Greater Young Cock selection.

[–]smilingbanana points points [recovered]

Aaaaand that's why I am not wrong when I say women MUST be held on their backs, knees, and in the kitchen, where they belong.

They need to be fed with dick, taken care off, not be given any power, and on first sign of bad behaviour schooled, on second discarded.

I really wish it to be different. But it's not.

[–]turok281 5 points6 points  (0 children)

hhhhh:( This is such an unpopular opinion nowadays unfortunately.

[–]DaveFoSrs 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Lol. This is why people think the red pill is sexist. Literally you are one with Muslim extremist philosophy regarding the role of the woman. Kept fucking or in the kitchen? How about working and contributing?

[–]Jolly-rancher359 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bro wtf is this? I don't come to this subreddit for some crazy alt-right conspiracy theory. I just come to improve myself, can we stick to that without pushing our agendas.

[–]eumbd points points [recovered]

Not trying to put politics into this but please remember that only 2.5% of the so called refugees are the actual refugees. The rest is simply economic migrants.

[–]thehalf_percent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't believe this is a red pill thread, seems pretty political. Maybe repost to T_D

[–]letjustbagemntagem 11 points12 points  (5 children)

I know to a lot it may read "Swedish women love Arabs and ethnic men" but believe me as someone familiar with that society, they do not. If you look ethnically Arab or Middle Eastern, you are fucked when it comes to getting hot girls there. I know from first hand experience having seen some good looking Arab guys (no homo) get rejected for average looking white and average looking black guys.

While Swedish women love black guys (especially African American men), are open to going for just about any other minority group if the guy has a decent SMV (even Asians and Indians), they absolutely hate Arab guys.

Most younger attractive Swedish women avoid Arab, Persian, and Middle Eastern guys like the plague, even the handsome higher SMV ones have a very difficult time landing the hot blondes they are obsessed with.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 14 points15 points  (3 children)

While Swedish women love black guys

Burn coal and pay the toll, stupid bitch.

RIP Sweden.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Whenever women nurse men in war environments, they fuck them. Where do you think baby boomers came from? This is not news, just basic biology/human mating patterns.

[–]WernerSeger 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Listen, I'm swedish, right wing as fuck and has always opposed massimmigration. Now with that said, as always on right wing corners on the internet, especially American ones, there exists source criticism when it comes to Sweden. The most minor thing, gets twisted into something systematical and completely different. Sure, some psycho woman who conspired to kill her parents fucked a refugee and someone else gives some interview about it. Of course there will be instances of these things happening if you take in 10 000s of people, yet remember these people are on the lowest level on the socioeconomic scale - which is a factor behind refugees coming rapes.

[–]Voidslan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Swedish pedophiles systematically taking sexual advantage of underage immigrant refugees."

[–]Sumsar01 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Europeans have always been tolerant and then a bit more tolerant and then a bit more. Until they are not anymore.

The thing is that if this doesnt stop before that this Will probably end in a huge bloodbath.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The YouTuber Gad Saad keeps saying (paraphrasing):

The problem will resolve itself one of two ways. The first way is by using speech, diplomacy, and negotiation. The second way is via bloodbath.

All the "Islamophobia" and "hate speech" on the internet is a desperate plea that we use option one by any means necessary. If the left down-right refuses to oblige us in option one.. then... well... Again, the problem will resolve itself.

[–]1OneRedYear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

always is a long time. lol. Wait, no they always weren't. Also it's one thing to be tolerant and another to be foolish.

[–]Blazingtatsumaki 1 point2 points  (2 children)

degrees in feminism and social welfare theory.

you actually have those courses in college?

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A degree in womens studies is essentially a degree in feminism

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

these women brutally reject short and bald man...

[–]andhakanoon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The stupidity of a raped Swedish woman to not want to get the migrants in trouble because she feels sorry for them.

Lel Swedish WOMEN??? I read about a Norwegian MAN who was raped by a Somali and was "sad" that the Somali got deported because "he'd most certainly die now."

[–]MRPFuckMe1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you just cite infowars? The same organization that claimed Obama was turning the frogs gay? Jesus. And what do you mean "systematically"? So there's an organization that intentionally carries out underage refugee sex with intention and protocol?

Probably more likely that these Swedish feminists are lonely and horny and are being opportunistic.

[–]LordASCII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the heck is this site? From the about page:

"This is a blog chronicling the Genocide of the European peoples, the greatest crime in all of history. Perhaps the survivors of a future age - the small, remnant European populations that still remain, in whatever holdouts and fastnesses they have found - will find it of historical interest. I hope it will help them understand how they came to be in the predicament they are in. And I hope it will hearten them to know that some people foresaw it and tried to prevent it."

On the right hand side there is a picture of people in clan uniforms. One of the articles is titled "Jews scheming to have their definition of antisemitism adopted by EU parliament".

Grain of salt the size of Manhattan.

[–]ljubebanjeglav 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't wait till war breaks again in my country so I can emigrate and fuck overweight Swedish women (I'm from the Balkans).

All jokes aside, this should simply be unacceptable. If you're a teacher or a substitute parent or whatever authority to a minor you shouldn't be allowed by criminal law to have sexual relations. You have an ethical duty. If you break it bye, bye- you can't have a job in education at any level or be in any kind of authority position towards a minor. Then if your love is strong enough or whatever you can marry afterwards and show the strenght of your love and bear all the consequences.

[–]DeathToTheZog 1 point2 points  (5 children)

I hope Sweden stands up before it's too late. I've always admired the Swedes.

[–]IkWhatUDidLastSummer 8 points9 points  (1 child)

It's already Swedistan :/ RIP

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 5 points6 points  (2 children)

The general sentiment on the webz is that Sweden is patient zero in the globalist virus and they are already gone.

But, there is a Swedish podcast I listen to and last week they were discussing thing and three of the four Swedes were adamant that its not over yet and people are waking up left and right.

Im pessimistic, but dear God I hope they are right. I just dont see it.

At least we still have Norway I guess....

[–]1SeemedGood 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sweden is patient zero in the globalist [collectivist/socialist] virus

Clearly you've never been to Sweden. It's not particularly "globalist," the culture is actually far more locally oriented than much of Europe and somewhat "soft nationalist." There's certainly a lot of Swedish pride.

The real culprit is the socialism and the collectivist attitude that underpins it. Nothing kills a nation faster than collectivism and socialism.

[–]DeathToTheZog 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's gonna take bloodshed. Without an honest to God uprising, they are truly done for.

I don't see it happening. I hate what Feminism has done to Sweden.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If you do not laugh at this shit, you will cry. This is the first world equivalent of older, single women bringing in cats or feeding pidgeons.

[–]cherryCanSuckMyDick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except this is dealing with real human beings who are desperate as fuck.

What do you think the odds are of a false rape accusation from one of these hags if one of the migrant men rejects her outright?

[–]Yozki 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Could we start using that term (Dye Witch) for SJW / feminists? You know, they all have that look to them.

[–]prodigy2throw 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Wtf are these propaganda websites?? You're way too deep into the internet dude

[–]wanderer779 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's funny how you can be on the internet and be pretty sure everything is going to hell. Then you go outside and your main problem is boredom. So then you get back on the internet.

[–]DeathToTheZog 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Really? Have you not seen the mass uprising in Sweden? Muslims are openly rioting in the streets.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The country of Sweden has turned into a cunt-tree. I'm surprised they let it get this far.

[–]nickjaa 0 points1 point  (1 child)

None of these sources are credible.

[–]randarrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, these over the hill people are sexually exploiting disadvantaged teens and young adults from third world countries? Imagine if the roles were reversed, if over the hill men were importing teenaged girls from Cambodia.... what a shit storm that would be.

[–]bluedrygrass 0 points1 point  (0 children)

feminists want to be raped.

For two reasons:

1: No white male wants to fuck them

2: They're mentally broken, they have daddy issues and whatnot and they prefer a stronger, abusive form of relationship to a normal one; they need to be raped, because normal sex doesn't cut it for them; exactly like normal hair colour, no piercings, no tattoos is too bland for them.

Often its both of those reasons, plus more like the virtue signaling that comes with fucking "poor innocent refugees"

[–]SrslyTaken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is literally a collective psychosis.

[–]rossiFan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In all fairness, some of these refugees claim to be in their teens, but are clearly late twenties.

[–]Doom_and-Gloom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So are most child refugees from the Middle East and Africa coming into Europe actually full-grown, fighting age men or are they actual children being sexually abused by evil, middle-aged feminists? Because the two are mutually exclusive. I'm not asking much here, all I'm asking is for you alt-right nitwits to be consistent with your bullshit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Filthy, degenerate pedophiles.

[–]sickofallofyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're so nasty they have to bring in refugees to fuck them.

[–]1564001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not find anything from a reputable news source reporting or even referring to a trend of Swedish social workers sexually victimizing underage immigrants. If I Google "Arboga-woman" I get the story of the woman in Arboga who killed her mother and father and is "connected with" the drowning of her husband.

The numerous links you have here are all to blogs and white power sites and Alex Jones.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost feel sorry for those Men pretending to be kids so they have to fuck an old swedish woman.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Underage... Hah!

And I'm not suprised.

[–]tolerantman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was their plan from the very beginning.

Importing savages with low standards to taste their disgusting holes...

[–]1SeemedGood 0 points1 point  (5 children)

How is this "news" or at all shocking?

Around here we realize that:

  1. Women are attracted to young and fit men, and
  2. Women are attracted to men that have higher SMV than they do.

And as the philosophy espouses the observation of behavior and the use of a praxeological methodology to understand it, we should also realize that:

Women are attracted to genetic difference.


What would you expect a whole bunch of middle-aged women from a homogeneous culture to do with an influx of young fit men from a different gene pool? And you can also be sure that the "liberal" women are just acting on the same fantasies held by the conservative women. Liberal or conservative, they're all women and thus have the same innate behaviors listed above.

If this surprises you, or you find it unusual you haven't been paying attention to either the sidebar or the posts in this sub, and I have another news flash for you:

Surprise of the year: Children like candy!

[–]bluedrygrass 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Women are attracted to genetic difference

You mean lower genetic difference? Islamic countries have the highest inbreeding rates of the world. It's not something medias would tell you since it's more useful to keep the narrative rednecks hold that primate.

[–]1SeemedGood 0 points1 point  (2 children)

No. I mean genetic difference. There's no such thing as "lower" genetic difference - either it's different or it's not.

So, assuming English is not your native language, I'll guess you meant to say less genetic variance. And if that's what you're asserting then you'd probably want to stop, as making that assertion only serves to highlight a poor education, a lack of travel experience, and a general level of ignorance.

Islamic countries run the gamut from low levels of genetic diversity to very high levels of genetic diversity - just like Christian countries.

I was raised in the heart of "redneck" country & culture on Scrapple, grits, pulled pork BBQ, and Bluegrass so the mainstream media can't tell me anything about my culture I don't already know - particularly lies. But, I have also traveled all over the world and know better than to let "alternative" media lie to me as well in a pathetic attempt to sell the same collectivist and socialist poison that the MSM peddles in a different flavor.

[–]pseudoRndNbr 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No. I mean genetic difference. There's no such thing as "lower" genetic difference - either it's different or it's not.

This is utter bullshit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_distance

[–]TehJimmyy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They just want equality. Lmao

load more comments (1 reply)